All right, welcome back, and joining us now is James Ruguski. You
can find him on substack at James Roguski. That's r. O. G
Uski James Roguski dot substack dot com. And I wanted to get him on.
As I said earlier in the program, nobody has Who was the first
person to really to alert everybody to what was going on with the who the
so called Pandemic Treaty and then the second document that they're using to kind of
muddy the water, which appears to be the more dangerous document, the International
Health Regulations. So I wanted to get an update from James about what is
going on with this as well as people pushing back with it, because they
keep doing the same things. It's very similar what they do with these different
tactics, and so here we got another yet another so called document, global
document that they're going to claim gives them some kind of illegal to control us.
So joining us now is James Guski. Thank you for joining us,
James, good to have you back on. Oh, David, thanks for
having me. You know, I think you were the very first person to
give you an opportunity to have a you know, a platform to share this
with its probably about two years ago now, yeah, and you know,
I actually want to start off by talking about the image behind you with all
the trees, because I think I think I can give an analogy to what
is really going on. So let me see if I can paint a mental
picture be able to see the forest for the trees. Well, you know
exactly. That's the other that's the other one. If you could imagine walking
down the little lane there in like sort of a wooded area with your dog,
and your dog breaks off fleash and sees the squirrel and goes and chases
the squirrel up one of those trees, and you noticed that the squirrel went
up to the top and was going across the tree tops and was way on
the other side the woods, and your dog is still barking up the tree
that he's all, Okay, this is what we're dealing with right now.
Okay. A slightly different analogy. If you can imagine being in a contract
to negotiations and you're you're looking for a job and you put your demands down.
You know, somebody wants to hire you, and you want a certain
wage, and you want vacation and you want healthcare, you want benefits,
and and you know, you throw in there a couple of things like,
well, I want to use the company Maserati and the company yacht, and
you know, I want to have you know, twenty personal assistants and all
these many other things. Negotiations often start out with some crazy demands that you
know, if nobody's paying attention, and you sign off on it and it's
given, Wow, that was great. I never expected to get those crazy,
crazy things. But then you know, at the end, when it's
push comes to shove and you've got to make it. You know, this
decision and signed the contract, you go, okay, I'll do without the
Maserati, but I want all these other basic things. This is what's going
on. I don't know if people watched the TV show from a decade or
so ago. I didn't really watch it, but I know about it.
It's called pumped, right, everybody's getting pumped. Oh look over here,
Look over here, there's a squirreld. Look at these look at these horrible,
horrible things. But what's really going on in the background nobody's paying attention
to. So you know, there's a lot of decoys being pushed around,
a lot of things that a lot of things that were in the documents when
we first talked two years ago. There are a lot of things that were
in the documents A year ago, four months, four weeks ago, I
published a leaked version of the negotiating text of the amendments. I thought I
found the holy grail. I was actually looking for a new version of the
other document, the quote unquote treaty, and one of the local Geneva Civil
Society organization's nonprofit whatever, you know, one of the insiders who has a
seat at the table, made the mistake of publishing something that they weren't really
supposed to publish. I was, you know, blasted by the heavens to
stumble upon it. I republished it, and they quickly took theirs doubt because
somebody must have said, hey, you let it out, what are you
doing? And David, I might as well have dropped it into a black
hole. People still want to look at the old documents. They're still barking
up the wrong tree, chasing the old squirrel who's long gone. And last
week I published, I should say I republished because of all places, Politico
was the first one to leak it. A leaked version of the other document,
the Amendment, and we can talk about both of these things. I'd
like to get into just a little bit of a detail about the secrecy behind
them. When I published the secret version, or I should say again republished
the secret version of the new proposed treaty, it was almost a year to
the day that I published an article about someone that most people probably don't even
know, Ambassador Pamela Hamamoto. She went to the same school in Hawaii as
Obama, so make of that what you wish. But she was nominated over
a year ago in October twenty twenty two, I think it was to be
the lead negotiator for this pandemic treaty, and over a year ago. The
Chinese delegate stood up in their April meeting in twenty twenty three and said,
we want, meaning China, we want these negotiations to be secret in the
sense that we don't want to publish the terms that each nation wants to put
into the agreement. And who stood up to second the motion other than Ambassador
Pamela Pamela Hamamoto from the United States saying, yeah, yeah, let's keep
this all under wraps and keep it secret. The documents that leaked out that
I republished. Have the edits of this nation said that they want to change
this, and that nation said that they want to change the other thing.
So, you know, the secret is out, and there's a very good
reason why they don't want anyone to know what each nation is saying. Because
despite what everyone is saying, you know in the alternative media about the old
squirrel that ran up the tree and is long gone, with the documents from
well over each year ago, the nations are having a really difficult time.
So the last meeting that was supposed to be for the amendments was in December.
When they set up their original schedule, they were going to be done
the first week of December. They were going to hand over their package of
amendments to the International Health Regulations Review Committee, and it was supposed to be
submitted before January twenty seventh of this year, twenty twenty four. Well,
in October I reported that their co chair said, we're not going to make
our deadline. They know that they were not able to reach agreement. You
know, get in FT one hundred and ninety four delegates from nations around the
world over to your house for a pizza party. And see how long it
takes to figure out what they want on their pizza. Now, let me
ask you that you saw some of the edits and it said some of you
know, this is what one nation wants, this is what another one wants.
What are the points of disagreement that they can't come to consensus on.
We'll talk about the two separate documents, because there's two separate things going on
in there, and in the amendments, they were supposed to be done by
December, supposed to be public four months in advance of the May meeting.
And so what ended up popping up in there that is not in the original
documents is they want to strengthen the ability of nations to quarantine foreign travelers who
are traveling internationally. Now, we could go way down rabbit hole, but
just imagine the irony and the hypocrisy of having an open southern border and you're
negotiating, you're negotiating to This is often confused. So I'm going to take
my time and try to be very precise. This is not the who saying
that the nations have to do this, that or the other. This is
a gentleman's agreement amongst one hundred and ninety six nations in the IHR, where
they are essentially saying, well, we know that we can't force our people
to do jabs or you know, drugs, or quarantine or all those sort
of things, but we have all of the right in the world to do
it to all of the members of the other one hundred and ninety five nations.
We can use foreigners who want to come into the country. If you're
familiar with the story with Novak Djoy convict, the tennis player, yeah,
you know his name is Novak, but he's living up to it because he
wouldn't get the vaccine and so he wasn't allowed in to play. I think
it was the US Open and other countries. I think Australia wouldn't let him
in, not just because he wasn't jabbed, because he wasn't a citizen.
His rights are not protected by our Bill of rights. And so there's a
lot of talk going around right now. People are trying to get states to
pass resolutions or laws saying, oh, the who doesn't have jurisdiction in Louisiana,
right, there's a Senate bill one. Well, no shit, Sherlock,
right, of course, the who doesn't have jurisdiction in any state in
the Union. That isn't the issue. There's no state law that is going
to protect you when if you're from Louisiana, you go on a Caribbean cruise
and you want to disembark in the Bahamas, and the Bahamas say, well,
you know, we're going to institute our quarantine on your ship because you
know, somebody didn't pass a rapid antigen test and there might be some scary
disease on mm hmmmm. Everyone is barking up the tree on the left and
they're sneaking in stuff that nobody's paying any attention to. And there's a certain
symmetry to that to what happened with us between the federal government and the states
in twenty twenty. And you go back and you look at after the anthrax
attack a week after nine to eleven, which is two months after their Dark
Winter simulation. But then they put out two months later, after the anthrax
attack, they put out some model state health legislation and they said, here's
what if we declare there's a pandemic, here's what we would like for you
to put into law so that you can implement this at the state level.
And so after all this stuff runs, you know, we hear from people
trying to make excuses for Trump or trying to make excuses for Fauci, or
Fauci making excuses for himself. I didn't order anybody to do anything. I
don't have that power. I made recommendations. And of course we've got Fiat
currency to back up our Fiat orders and flood them with cash, declare an
emergency, flood them with cash, and let the rest of this stuff happened.
It's going to be, as you point out, it's going to be
a very subtle way that they get exactly what they want, whether they do
it with the international stuff. One of things that concerns me is you're pointing
out the hypocrisy of the absurdity of having a wide open southern border, and
it's got a lot of different issues with that, but one of the problems
is a lot of people who oppose that are coming after it from the disease
standpoint and saying, oh, we've got all these people coming in with measles
and all the rest of the stuff. We've got to lock that down and
we have to have stricter controls, and that kind of thing can backfire,
just like you know, well, we've got all these people coming in that
are illegal aliens, so all of you need to get an ID, all
of you need to get some kind of a vaccine ID or permit or something
like that, because we've got people coming in from the border, so they
can use things like that to push their agenda. And we've got to be
careful that we don't become suckers for that, and that we take a look
at what the longer term agenda is. I think, what do you think
I'm going to have to charge you rent for taking up presidence inside my head?
Take the words outside, take the words right out of my mouth.
That's exactly the point. What happened with the decoy. With the original documents
were language that was convoluted because it came primarily from Bangladesh in India India.
I can still remember I was sitting right where I'm sitting right now when I
read the document for the first time, and India had proposed a change to
Article three. They proposed crossing out language that was in you know, is
currently in the International Health Regulations. They would cross out the words that said
the regulations have to be implemented with full respect for the dignity, human rights,
and fundamental freedoms of people. They would cross that out. Well,
I remember my jaw hanging open, going oh, well, that's crazy,
and I pushed my jaw back up and it came right back down, and
I'm like, Okay, this is insane. There's no way in Oh wait
a minute, that's a decoy. That's them saying, oh, look over
here, and so you've got to dig in deeper. It's like, well,
what are we not looking at? And so I've spoken to people in
India and at some point they said, oh, that was just a misunderstanding.
We've retracted that. Okay. Now, Bangladesh and the African nations.
The reason for these negotiations they called for them on December first, twenty twenty
one. It's not the who said we want to take over the world.
It's the relatively poor nations. We're dealing with something that, you know,
you have to erase the blackboard of your mind and forget everything you've talked about
and everything you know, because that's going to get in the way. You've
got to let yourself be stupid for a moment. And here's what is actually
going on in the end of twenty twenty one, after twenty twenty and COVID
and then a year of everybody getting jabbed like that was going to stay the
world the relatively poorer nations. Think about you know, South Africa and Botswana
they identified Omicron and they handed over the genetic sequences, just like you know,
China the WHIV one was handed over. You know, think about that
genetic sequence and how many hundreds of billions of dollars that data file was worth.
It's the new gold rush. They turned that into you know, Pfizer,
Maderna, Astrozanica, everybody else billions of dollars. So when South Africa
and Botswana handed over Omicrons, you know sequence, believe about you know,
vaccines or rather viruses and terrain theory, whatever you want, it is undeniable
that there was a digital file that was said to be this new variant.
Well, they were not happy because they were greeted with travel restrictions, hurt
their economy, and then they washed Pfizer and Maderna turned that into a couple
of more billion dollars by putting it into the booster. So what they're actually
negotiating it says in the treaty principles that sovereignty includes sovereign control over biological resources.
In the amendments, they said, you're not getting any more sequences unless
we share in the benefits. They want to create what they call a pathogen
Access benefit sharing system. Will give you our biological weapons data. You could
go turn it into drugs and jabs, but you're going to have to share
the profits with us. So this this is, you know, the treaty
is a corrupt business still. I've dubbed it the new OPEK. I'm sure
you're familiar. You know, the oil producing and exporting countries. The new
OPEK is the Organization of Pandemic Emergency Corporations. What they what they want with
the treaty is thirty billion dollars a year coming from nations in the global North.
Because they're the ones with the money, or they're the ones who know
how to print money or digitally create money. They want to put that into
a fund that would be governed by either the WHO or most likely the Conference
of the Parties, which should be reminiscent of, you know, the Framework
Convention for climate change. You sign on to a framework empty convention, and
then you have a bunch of unelected bureaucrats have a party once a year,
get together and decide the fate of the world. And since you signed on
to a blank agreement, whatever they decide, you know, somehow finds its
way into your local laws. They want to distribute up to thirty billion dollars
a year to go looking for pathogens. You know, they refer to them
as pathogens with pandemic potential. Whenever I hear that, I hear pathogens with
pandemic profiteering potential. So then they set up they want to set up a
WHO coordinated laboratory network so that you know, you have a Wuhan Institute of
Virology on every street corner. Bring in your pathogens that you find in your
septic system or your you know, sewage treatment wastewater. The CDC is monitoring
wastewater around the country. Just go look it up, you know, wastewater
surveillance CDC all around the world. They're doing that there. They're taking blackwater
out of the bathrooms and airplanes when international flights come in looking for pathogens.
They might want to they might want to check your your chicken coop, or
your pig stye, or your you know, dog or cats stool sample when
you go to veterinarian's office. Because you typically find pathogens in excrement, they
might need to go to the local bat cave and get some guano to bring
into the lab so that they can find a sequence that could be turned into
money, make some products. And then in the amendments. Currently people maybe
are aware that the Director General can declare what's called a public Health Emergency of
International Concern e H, E I C or fake. You can't put your
stuff up. He can declara fake. That's in the International Health Regulations from
two thousand and five. Well, what they're adding with his latest leaked version
of the amendments is an early action alert, which has fewer requirements than the
zero requirements to declare fake, just if he wants to, so I call
that a pre fake, and then he can also declare a post fake,
which is called a pandemic emergency. So if you can go looking for pathogens,
tweak them a little bit in the lab, turn them into drugs and
jabs, and then find some compliant local officials who will attempt to coerce and
overstep their authority and do some kind of you know fear mongering and say,
oh we found this pathogen. Oh, one bird died in the flock of
the million, and we cranked up the PCR test to one hundred, and
you know they had bird flu. We got to kill all your birds,
or we got to jab all your people, or we got to you know,
put you in quarantine or whatever it might be. If you keep falling
for the hypnosis psychological operation from the World Hypnosis Organization the WHO, they're going
to keep doing it because it's really really profitable. And the treaty is essentially
a trade deal. It is constitutional. Now this hurts people's heads, I
know. Article one, Section three. I'm sorry. Article one, Section
eight, Clause three, it's the commerce clause. The federal government was given
the enumerated authority by the original States to regulate international commerce with foreign nations.
So if we want to give billions of dollars to the WHO to redistribute to
oligarchs in the Third World who are going to be building laboratories and testing equipment
and mRNA manufacturing facilities so that they can get in on the deal to scare
people and make products, to jab the black and brown people that the big
farmer missed the first time around. Is that how you would prevent the next
pandemic? Or is that how you would set up, you know, a
racketeering organization, you know, a crime syndicate to profiteer from the next scary
thing. Well, do you recall I'm sure you probably do event too OH
one. Yeah, okay, the same group that did event to OH one
in October of twenty nineteen. In October of twenty twenty two, same group
put on catastrophic contagion and what they were simulating in their tabletop exercise was an
outbreak of an enterovirus that hits children in, of all places, eastern Venezuela.
I don't know if you've reported on it, but you might want to
pay attention to east east eastern Venezuela, which is the country of Guyana.
That Venezuela has been rumbling that they claim to have annexed two thirds of Guyana.
I wonder why could it be that in the riving off the coast,
there's you know, all kinds of well. Well, interestingly enough, the
planned or i should say, the simulated outbreak scheduled for twenty twenty five is
in eastern Venezuela. Catastrophic contagion. So I noticed, and this is back
in October of twenty twenty two, that they neglected to reserve the domain name
catastrophiccontagion dot com. So I'm the proud owner of catastrophiccontagent dot com. If
anybody wants to know what they're planning for twenty twenty five, go check it
out. And so I think it's amazing, you know that they're still doing
these germ games because they got away with it, you know, the first
one two months before nine to eleven, and they've done one every year and
they're still doing it after this COVID routine still during their annual germ games,
and as usual suspects is usually JOHNS Hopkins and you know people from the CIA,
people from DARPA, BARDA, all these different people there, they're all
there still doing the same germ game. And so you know, they know
where and when and what is going to happen. And so the idea is
they want to have the who be in charge of the global distribution and Logistics
Network. Tedros gave a talk at the World Government Summit and proudly said that
they have a twenty thousand square meter distribution hub in Dubai. That's about four
football fields. So if you're the godfather of pandemic prevention, preparedness and response
and you had you know, four football fields in each of your six regions
that you had to fill up with pandemic related products, who do you think
is going to get those contracts? Day? Right? You think you think
they're going out to bid? Or do you think your cronies who are sitting
around the table trying to get a piece of the pie? Why do you
think all of the small nations want this agreement to go through? It's because
they want a piece of a multi billion dollar pie. Now, I want
to ask you a rhetorical question. It's a trick question and I don't want
to mess with your head. I'll give you the right answer, in my
opinion, right, the right answer is none of the above. Would you
rather have the WHO set up a search and exploration mission with billions of dollars
looking for pathogens with pandemic potential to bring into the WHO coordinated laboratory network so
they can run it through the pathage access and benefit sharing system. So whoever
found the pathogen get some of the profits when they ease the regulatory restrictions and
all these drugs and jabs get put into play real quick, and then they
could distribute all of the products and have their leader be the one who could
declare a pre fake, a fake or a post fake or option B.
Would you rather have? The United States Defense Department pledged five billion dollars over
the next five years in the December twenty twenty two National Defense Authorization Act to
do pretty much the same thing, And in twenty twenty three they doled out
about three hundred and forty million dollars to thirty seven countries around the nation to
start building, you know, the biolabs in there were twelve career Oh imagine
that twelve Caribbean countries were first on the list. Maybe that's connected to catastrophic
contagion, and you know others in Africa, South America and so forth.
You would you prefer to have the who in charge of the research, development,
distribution, and proliferation of biological weapons or do you think that we should
keep that as part of the United States Defense Department? Yeah, exactly,
Yeah, it's yeah, you're right. No, the above it is very
dangerous and you know, let me let me before we run out of time.
We talk about these treaties, and this is one of the reasons why
it's been so concerning to me. You know, we go back and we
look at the Paris Climate Court, for example, on the climate side,
when they put this thing together, all these different nations get together at their
their conference, you know, the cop whatever the number was, and John
Kerry comes back and says, yeah, Obama and I self ratified that.
You know, well, that's not what the constitution says. So all the
people who think that, well we've got to have something ratified here, that's
not the way they're going to use it. They have these agreements, they
say, well, we've agreed to this. Whether or not, whether or
not they have followed any legal procedure, they will still use it. That's
the key thing. And so regardless of you know, once there's an agreement,
and that's I guess the key thing is, well, not these countries
can come to an agreement. But once they do come to an agreement,
then what the United States government will do is say, well, that's it.
We're part of that treaty. And nobody in the Senate ever, no
Republican, not Mitch McConnell, not rampaulton. Nobody ever came back and said,
you know, we never had a vote on the Paris Climate A court
that was supposedly ratified by John Carey, Biden Secretary of State. But that's
not how this works. Nobody ever called their bluff, and they're not going
to call the bluff on anything that's coming out of this World Health Organization negotiation
either, are they. I completely agree with you, but it's actually even
worse than that you could amgine. So let me let me try to explain.
I know we got maybe ten minutes when we first met, when you
first had me on two years ago. What I was talking about then,
what had happened, what I had uncovered was after the Nations on December one,
twenty twenty one, said that they wanted the WHO to oversee negotiations for
equitable access to pandemic related products. We don't want to give you our pathogens
anymore. That's a sovereign resource. You guys aren't paying us for all the
money you're making. After the Nations said that, and they said that they
wanted to have, you know, manufacturing be distributed all around the world.
The Biden administration a month and a half later, in January of twenty twenty
two, submitted amendments to the International Health Regulations putting stricter requirements on nations.
And you know, the problem that they have and they still have, is
there's very strict you know, four nations shall do this, and shall do
that, and shall do the other thing. All of the comments or suggested
edits from the United States and the EU are like, well, you guys
have to do what we want you to do. But you know, the
shall, right, It's a shell game. When you see the word shall
in the document, it means you must unless there is a qualifier. And
so for all of the requirements on big pharma, it's like, you shall
consider making your contracts, you know, transparent. You shall you know,
share intellectual property if you kind of want to, right, you got to
look at the qualifiers. But what happened in twenty twenty two is the Biden
administration was planning ahead. Got to give them a little credit. They were
planning ahead, saying, well, any amendments in the future, rather than
going into effect in twenty four months, they wanted to shorten it down to
six And if you look at the calendar, if the Assembly ends on June
first, six months from June first is still in the Biden administration. If
it was you know, twenty four months or whatever, that would go into
whoever's going to be the next president. And they were trying to speed this
process up so that they could ram through something in the future. Well,
the poor nations looked at that and they said, no, not doing it,
not going to have it, mostly about the requirements. And then what
happened is in violation of our Article fifty five, which it should be called
the anti Nancy Pelosi rule, because they say that any amendments have to have
four months advanced notice. So the deadline, you know, you can't just
real, you know, roll the bill in one thousand pages, you know,
Obamacare, and Nancy famously said, oh, just vote for it,
you can read it later. Yeah, you got forty eight hours to decide
what you want with us. Then, so, in the middle of the
twenty twenty two Assembly, the United States, the United Kingdom, European Union,
handful of other countries illegitimately submitted new amendments to be considered. Four days
later, the World Health Organization published a document that said they had adopted these
amendments. Well, little problem. They didn't bother to vote. They just
said they were adopted. Now, I know we have election integrity issues in
the United States, they at least pretend you have a Yeah, right,
we're at that point now. Yeah. It says in the document that it's
certified by their Legal Council, and then down on the bottom it said it
happened in their eighth plenary session. Well, you could go watch the eighth
session and they never even talked about it. So eighteen months to the day
after that, in November eighth, twenty twenty three, we did get a
dozen members of the European Parliament to write a letter to Ted drus and say,
you know, we see these amendments and you know we got a deadline
to reject them. But there's no proof that you ever voted. These are
all known and void. Rob Russ who's the member of European Parliament, and
Philippe Crusoe, who's a lawyer in Switzerland, you know, talking to him
all the time. They flew to the United States and presented this to Senator
Ron Johnson at his last meeting that he had about a month or so,
and it was a collective eh whatever, really and so you know, the
issue here is it's a boys club, meaning the members of each nation,
the delegates, they decide what the rules are amongst themselves. It's not the
who saying you have to do this. And so if all of the nations
agree to have stricter quarantine requirements on foreign travelers who are coming in legitimately,
and they say, well, we'll abuse your people and you abuse ours.
That way, we can still be within our constitution, but we get planet
lockdown whenever we want it, because people are going to be afraid to travel.
They don't want to sit in quarantine and get forced jem. So this
game is far more sophisticated. Everybody wants a simple answer. It's very similar
to what you're talking about. Is very similar to what they already do with
their intelligence agencies, the Five Eyes for example, you know, the five
English speaking countries, the US, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand.
They will say, well, you know, we can't legitimately spy on
our own people, but you can, and then you can give us that
information. And so it's the same thing as that they you know, they
like you point out it's like a club, a cartel, a mafia,
you know, they come up with these little workarounds that are just semantics really
yep. And so there's a lot of panic and fear mongering, and there's
I heard a little bit of into before we started this interview, and if
if what is going on in the world is analogous to a thousand piece jigsaw
puzzle, and maybe the Treaty and the amendments and who or like one or
two pieces in that puzzle. People are rightfully talking about central bank, digital
currency and digital ID and geoengineering and the Pact for the Future and the Sustainable
Development Goals and all these many, many, many things. But then they're
saying all of that is in the treaty, and it's like, well,
you know, the treaty is a piece of the puzzle, and it is
connected to all of those things. But you do yourself a disservice by quoting,
you know, horrible things about some other aspect of what these demons are
doing. And when people go to look in the treaty, you're not going
to find anything in the treaty that is an attack on national sovereignty. It's
a lovely red herring. It's not an attack on national sovereignty. It's actually
strengthening national sovereignty so that nations can abuse individuals. Yeah, very similar to
what we saw again between the FEDS and the states. It actually strengthened.
Here's some legislation. Strengthen your authority because at some point in the future,
we're going to tell you there's a pandemic and we'll give you some money if
you do this stuff. But you're going to be the ones who get to
do this. You know, it's going to be your your state and local
public health officials that are going to be able to do this. We'll help
you with that. But yeah, it's it's very interesting how they have have
set this thing up. They will keep these these entities that are around now
that everybody likes so much. We you know, we've got our flags,
and we got our national anthems, and we got our official state bird or
whatever, and they'll keep these different artifacts around so people have this sense of
continuity. And yet the reality is is that it's it's control from top to
bottom, and they're all kind of kind of on this. But we won't
see like a global government that is set up over here. It'll just be
this global governance network of people who are kind of, you know, working
behind the scenes to make sure they're all on the same page. I think,
to summarize it in a sentence, the local tyrants who abused you over
the last four and a half years didn't need any amendments to the international health
regulations, and they didn't need any stinking pandemic treaty to overstep their authority and
trick you and coerce you and hypnotize you and just you know, abuse you.
So those local issues are not going to be solved by a little one
paragraph state resolution or state law that says, oh, the who doesn't have
any jurisdiction here. I want to give a shout out to Catherine Watt.
If you haven't met her, we should introduce you, Catherinot, writes Baileywicknews
dot substock dot com b A I l I Wick News, you know,
like a Bailey Wick, like inland, like the trees behind you. She's
put forth a sample state legislation to repeal all these crazy laws and actually address
you know, why is it that the laws have been corrupted to take away
liability from companies that produce our products that are harmful and all of the emergency
rules, you know, give dictatorial powers. So if you want to work
on a state by state basis, by all means, give me a phone
call three one zero six' one nine three zero five to five. It's
not easy. It's not Oh, you know, they can't touch us.
They're not the ones who abused you the first time. It's your local officials
and your local laws. In the in the amendments, they want to strengthen
international travel restriction quarantines and make the process of quarantining people and have a pre
fake to add to the faith and a post fake. But the treaty is
just a bunch of mob bosses trying to set up a cartel to go looking
for pathogens with pandemic profiteering potential so they can scare the bejeebers out of you
again and again and again. And because there's going to be so much money,
they'll financially incentivize it again. You know, that's the other part of
it. People don't realize that, And you're right, you've got to go
back and remove a lot of this legislation that was put in. A lot
of it was put in at the end of two thousand and one in response
to the anthrax thing. That's the stuff that's got to be pulled out.
I keep telling everybody. Their motto for the longest time has been think globally,
act locally. So we got to cut off those hooks that they've got
into us at the local level. You're exactly right. That's how it'll happen.
That's where the rubber meets the road, and that's really where the work
needs to be done. And we need to root that out because they'll they'll
do it again as long as they've got their hooks in us, and it'll
be financially driven with a money that is there. That's one of the things
the key things that they're working on right now with the WHO is that money
aspect. Now you've also got exit the who dot org and there is a
sort break. I'm going to charge you rent. You're inside my head.
Those are the next words out of my mouth. Exit to who dot org
is an activist toolbox. Okay. I've connected to people in dozens of countries
around the world, obviously including the United States. If you go to exit
the who dot com that's dedicated specifically to the United States. Andy Biggs Representative
Andy Biggs from Arizona well over a year ago. Put forth HR seventy nine,
which is the with WHO Withdrawal Act, very simple page and a half
stop giving him money, Tell them we're leaving and get out of here.
When a relationship has gone so bad, you know, sometimes you just need
to get divorced. Yes, and so we need to exit to who.
You know, I think we need to go first there and abolish the WHO.
But if you go to exit to who dot org, exit to who
dot com and my favorite, if you want to take action, record a
little video of your opinion about this, put it out on the internet.
I've collected several hundred videos along those lines and they can all be found on
screwth who dot com. Have a little fun with it. You know,
if you don't, if you don't speak up, you're not doing your job.
Absolutely absolutely, exit the WHO dot com for the USA information, exit
the WHO dot org for world information. Screw the Who. And also you
can find James Roguski at substack and his last name is r. O.
G U. S k I. Thank you so much, James for the
hard work that you do. You've been on this like a bulldog for a
long time. Thank you very much everyone, have a great day. Thank
you, thank you. Let me sell you the David Knight Show. You
can listen to with your ears. You can even watch it by using your
eyes. In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening
to the David Night Show right now. Yeah, good job. And you
want to know something else. You can find all the links to everywhere to
watch or listen to the show at Thedavidnightshow dot com. That's a website.