Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Night Show.
As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Tuesday, the second of April. You're
of our Lord, two thousand and twenty four. Well, we have some
updates. Really on April Fools, We've had one right who follows the vaccines
actually put up in April Fool's joke about it went viral, talking about what
the FDA could have and should have done, but of course I'll never do.
People believed it, and on April Fool's Day we had Biden saying that
he had been fooled. He didn't know anything about that transgender day of Visibility,
he said, So that raises a lot of questions. We're going to
talk about all of those, as well as a new information about the squatters.
Those squatters, those wonderful squatters who rushed the border, rushed the National
Guard. They've now been released on their own recognizance by a judge. Because
that's what this is really about. We'll be right back to stay with us.
Well, Rebecca Barnett talks about her April Fools tweet that went viral and
she had already been essentrally Shadow band on Twitter. But this went viral nevertheless,
and it was about the government doing the right thing about the vaccines breaking.
The Australian government has recalled an mRNA, Pfizer and Moderno vaccines and promised
compensation to all Australians for human rights abuses incurred by illegal lockdowns and vaccine mandates.
Now, she assumed that everybody would think that that was an absurd April
Fool's joke, because of course the Australian government, the American government would never
do anything like that, They would never apologize for lockdowns, they would never
do anything to compensate victims of their poison and their policies. And yet being
in Australia, that's where the day began. And so she's got a head
start on April Fools, and so a lot of people believe this. She
said. On Easter Monday, I opened my laptop to prepare for a zoom
call and I checked x defiant to fill a few minutes and noticed the date
was April fools. She said, So I thought of myself, what's the
most outlinedish thing I can type? And that's what she did. Well,
The Australian government has recalled all of these mRNA shops from both Viizer and Moderna
going to cop and say people for what it did to them. She says,
as if the government would ever do such a thing, whatever, do
the right thing, if it would ever admit error without being absolutely forced.
So she said, I hip post and I got myself a coffee and jumped
onto a zoom call. When I reopened X about an hour later, she
said, first thing I noticed was a slew of comments calling out the date
of April fools. But there were a handful of commenters who took it literally,
some who were quite offended, thinking my ab at the government was aimed
at the vaccine injured. Nothing could be further from the truth. But context
collapses on the Internet. So I clarified Number one, it's the first of
April and Australia. Number two, to the point of this was to bring
attention to what the government should do, but they protect pharma, not people.
And number three, the government is the joke. But you should have
known as a writer that Snopes has gotten onto Babylon b. Snopes and all
of these fact checkers have come after bablin Bee. They've been attacked by the
Daily Beasts they've been attacked by the ADL and all the rest. As a
matter of fact, those people attack me for talking about bablin b joke years
and years ago when Elizabeth Horn was running for president and you know, everybody
was making fun of folk hanness in her made up Indian ancestry that she used
to get a job. But she had her DNA test and it showed I
forget exactly what the numbers were, but it was something like she was several
times less Native American DNA in her blood than the average white person in America.
Not the average white band and that's Scottish, that group from the seventies.
But no, she had essentially less than most white people in American terms
of Indian DNA. And so what the bad one B did was they took
that and added a little bit of a twist to it. They said,
Hillary Clinton has has a test and it turns out that she's only a zero
point five percent alien lizard DNA or something like that. And I did that,
and I put that up as a title to a video that I put
out. I got attacked Daily Beast. I think it was one of those
rags attacked me as a wild eyed conspiracy theorist. It's like, well,
I think you're the wild eyed conspiracy theorist can't take a joke, And so
she realized that they can't take a joke. They don't have a sense of
humor, these people who are the self appointed truth garters. I also hadn't
expected the post to get so many views, as my account has been suppressed
since last June? Is that all? And she points out speech not reach.
I just call it shadow banning. But yeah, they leave you on.
You've got speech, but nobody can see you. And that nice.
If I shout murder by vaccine in the forest and nobody hears me, do
I have free speech? And this is very much like the visuals. And
one of the first things I reported on when I went den for wards was
how for the longest time, both the RNC and the DNC would allow free
speech at their presidential conventions. Right, but it was in a cage that
was many many blocks away from the entrance. But hey, you know,
if you want to, we'll even give you a microphone. How about that?
You know, just like Twitter will give you an account, the RNC
and the DNC would give you a microphone. They'd give you a soapbox to
stand on, and you could go stand in a cage many blocks away from
where anybody was and you could just say whatever you wanted to. Isn't that
great? That's free speech? Or like in the Bundy Ranch where they now
the middle of nowhere, middle of nowhere, we could see anything for miles
and miles. They put up a little area, says, a free speech
area. At the Bundy Ranch protest, somebody put up a sign said free
speech is not an area. Well, uh, that's what it is on
the social media. But anyways, she said. Our return mid afternoon refreshed
my browser. The post had been shared over a thousand times, had been
viewed over one hundred and fifty thousand times. Said most people got the point
and commented about how good it would be to have a government that put people
before pharmaceutical companies and profits. I agreed, and I linked to a COVID
vaccine injury class action where people can donate to force the issue with government.
Not that anybody should have to do this, but here we are in reality,
and so she says, I guess the reality is that we really can't
do satire on the internet. Well, the problem is that again, the
talitarian dictators and the people who are beginning to act like them on social media
don't have a sense of humor. They're famous for being humorless. Jefferd cy
maor Stalin or these guys laugh. You ever see these guys laugh on the
laugh But this is not satire. Unfortunately, the USDA has approved mRNA vaccines
for swine for commercial use. That should be satire, but it's not.
So this is something that is produced by merk and they got their license approval
for using the vaccine from the USDA back in twenty twenty two. Now they've
approved it for commercial use. You know, this is the USDA, but
of course the FDA. And again, how did they split this? The
FDA is Food and Drugs Administration, right, but when it comes to meet,
the USDA gets to have that they've worked out this treaty between the two
little bureaucratic empires, I guess, but you know, maybe we ought to
just combine them and reduce some of the overhead because it's food and drugs,
right, and so I think they can also just just combine it and they
could rename the FDA the FA Food as Drugs. That's what they're doing here,
they've got a swine flu vaccine. They're sticking in the swine Actually I
like that acronym as well, fad, because that kind of describes how they
react to all these pharmaceutical schemes. Whatever fad you've got, will rubber stamp
it, no problem at all. As we talk about what happened in twenty
twenty, one of the key things that people really don't point out is the
number of people that died in twenty twenty from the hospital death protocol pushed by
the Trump administration Fauci burks and rubber stamped by Donald Trump, the ventilators of
remdesevir, denying treatment to people do not resuscitate, all the rest of this
stuff, right, and then you know, rewarding the hospitals paying them unbelievable
amounts of money as a bribe. And then when Biden came in, he
said, all right, now you're going to vaccinate yourself. You're going to
vaccinate yourself and vaccinate your employees, or we're going to cut off that gravy
train. Not only we're going to cut off those bonuses that you've been feeding
off for the last year. We're going to cut off all Medicare and Medicaid,
which is the bulk of their business. And so in Prague you have
a hospital that gets a couple of patients mixed up. Now we've seen this
type of thing in America. There have been cases. There was one in
Florida a couple of years ago. That's not the only one where somebody is
there to have a limb amputated and they get the wrong patient. This has
happened more than once. In this particular case, the hospital in Prague did
an abortion on the wrong pregnant woman and so they described this. She went
in for a routine checkup. Instead, what they did is they gave her
an abortion. They described it. Hospital spokeswoman described it as an adverse event.
Yeah, yeah, that's kind of like the people had their lives aborted
with the vaccines. The poison based on aboorded babies, isn't it? And
this caught my eye. This is a nurse. Actually this is sent to
me by Harry Hewn. She says, my name is Lindsey. I'm an
RN. Here's my updated stat sheet and story of my vaccine injury. I
survived the bio weapon. I am a RN mandated to get injected, and
I am confirmed, documented and diagnosed as vaccine injured by three different health providers.
And she goes over a long list of ailments that she now has.
But she says, now I am I have a quality of life is like
that of a cancer or ACHFPT. She said, my career as a nurse
is gone. I can't stand up longer than twenty minutes some days, and
I can't do activities of daily living such as bathing, chores, cooking,
laundry, etc. I'm now childless and i enable unable to have a baby.
I've seen this over and over again, so have you. People who
were coerced into taking this because they were going to be fired lose their career.
As a matter of fact, I remember interviewing three police officers who had
that situation. One of the guys, the most severe, cannot work anymore.
The others are blackbald, but did it to save their job and then
they wound up as dependent invalids. But the US has recorded over one million
excess deaths of people over the age of sixty five. Well, that's one
way to handle the looming social security indebtedness entitlements of the baby boomers. Isn't
it. You can just kill them. That helps a lot, doesn't it.
They dealt with a social security problem. The CDC reveals that over one
million excess deaths have been recorded amongst people aged sixty five and over since the
FDA gave its emergency use authorization. I remember Trump brags about how he fought
them to do it faster and faster and faster than even they wanted to do,
but he would not push them on ACQ or ivermectin. He brags about
pushing them on the vaccine, but he's silent about why he didn't push them
on ACQ or ivermectin. He's silent about why he wouldn't give that out for
free, as he gave out the PCR tests for free. Well, we
know why they gave out the PCR tests. They wanted to create a pretend
pandemic. And so the media is now even talking about soaring cancer rates among
the vaccinated. This is coming from Sleigh News. I talked about this last
week. But when I talked about it last week, I pointed out that
they look at their statistics and they talk about how it's increased, but they
stop it at twenty nineteen I'd like to see what happened since then, because
even though there's been a huge increase and that some people are talking about it
a great deal, even about abdominal cancer, which was Kate Middleton, Princess
Kate or whatever has they talk about that, but they leave it up to
twenty nineteen. Why do they stop there? Did they not have data for
the last five years? Or could it be that even though it has grown
rapidly up to twenty nineteen, perhaps it has exploded exponentially in the last five
years and they don't want to talk about it. You think that's what I
suspect that it has gone up tremendously, These so called excess deaths from cancer.
Now we're not talking about the million excess deaths of people over sixty five
that they targeted with this bioweapon with a shot, But these so called excess
deaths two hundred, ninety eighty twenty twenty three have all but been ignored in
a milia that tralacts the political will to investigate pandemic policies and their aftermath.
Well, that's all partisan stuff. It is. The amazing thing to me
is that this was a bipartisan operation Republicans is heavily into it, if not
more so than the Democrats even and I say more so because Trump had the
administrators put the stuff out. But the Democrats are saying more more. But
they all did it, and they all had a hand in it, and
they all funded it, and they all told us to put on masks and
stay locked down and all the rest of this stuff. And yet that's what
the reality is. The reality is that we can see how the politicians are
united in all of this, and yet their parties are divided and blaming the
other party for what happened. And you see it in their media as well,
their media, their voters blamed the other guy for what happened. Where
there's Democrats or Republicans, it was all Biden or it was all Trump or
whatever. But they are all united. They're not divided at all. We're
divided. Amazing. Really, we cannot shrink from asking what is causing this
increase in cancer? Well, we did with autism, didn't we. And
when people came up with some plausible answers, they were purged, canceled their
hints. In the medical literature, potential ways of repeated vaccinations might undermine mechanisms
of immunity and perhaps even facilitate cancer growth. We knew this two months into
it. Doctor Ryan Cole pathologists said, I'm seeing a massive drop and killer
T cells with people who've been vaccinated. That's going to result and amongst many
other diseases, an epidemic and cancers coming back, growing faster, and all
the rest of this. The shift in messaging from the media comes after over
three years of reports from corporate outlets that the injections are safe and effective.
Of course, yeah, we need to explore the role of lockdowns, of
top down treatment protocols, and particularly to prime of life workers, vaccines were
often mandated as a condition of employment. Well, we can't though, because
we can't talk about Trump's lockdown stuff. We can't talk about his proud creation
and release of the bioweapon. We can't talk about the fact that he withheld
instead of facilitated the release of HCQ and i REMC and other things. While
they are he and Peter Navara may he rot in jail, pushed out these
ventilators to people, pushed out rubber stamped remdzevir and all the rest of these
things, and paid the hospitals to literally kill people. Can't talk about that.
That would be that'd be bad. So a new AI tool is going
to be used to predict vaccine hesitancy. As I said before, one of
the key things about artificial intelligence, I think is going to be its use
as a surveillance tool, as a minder, as the worst form of Big
Brother predictive crime. Anticipatory intelligence. Isn't that interesting. They've talked since the
late nineties, when they began geospatial intelligence. They've talked about anticipatory intelligence.
Just happens to share the acronym of artificial intelligence, doesn't it. They're both
AI, and that's what AI is going to Its primary use is going to
be anticipate anticipatory intelligence, to anticipate and predict what you're going to do and
then for the government to act on it pre crime. Like Minority Report.
Despite COVID nineteen vaccine mandates, many chose to forego vaccination, raising questions about
the psychology underlying how judgment affects these choices. Now, that's according to the
University of Cincinnati Research who's developed this AI tool. There's got to be something
strange about you if you refuse to take an experimental genetic code injection. What's
your problem. You must have some kind of a psychological disorder. And in
the past they've even getten given that a name odd, You're odd odd.
You have oppositional defiant disorder. Yeah, I got that, real strong.
I got I've had that all my life. I guess, uh, oppositional
defiant disorder, and I'm proud of it. I'm not gonna do whatever you
say unless you give me a reason. It's uh. But yeah, now
informed consent, We're not going to. We're going to. If you want
informed consent you have oppositional defiant disorder, you just do what you're told.
You bow down and kiss my feet. Using AI to target the vaccine has
that COVID nineteen is unlikely to be the last pandemic we will see in the
next decades, they said, So we have to have a new form of
AI for prediction and public health that provides valuable tools that could help prepare hospitals
for predicting vaccination rates and consequential infection rates. Maybe you ought to go back
and revisit that model from the Imperial College of London and fix that before you
start sticking your artificial intelligence on us. But we know that's what they're going
to do, and we know that they're not done with this. This worked,
All of this stuff remains in place again because the Republicans and the Democrats
were both a part of this. They have left all of this medical martial
law precedent in place. And just like cement overshoes of stuff dried on us
a long time ago, it's going to be hard to chip it off,
but we better start trying. The underlying premise is the vaccine hesdancy must be
accounted for in terms of the aberran psychology of the subjects, the people,
and not with reference to the efficacy and the safety of the vaccines in question.
That's Michael Rectinvoll, author of Google Archipelago, The Digital Gulog, and
The Simulation of Freedom. He said, it's implied that if people are vaccine,
the fault is endemic to them rather than to the vaccine itself. But
see this is the characterist any critical thinking. You've got a problem. If
you're thinking critically, you had too much to think. From this premise,
the research seeks to justify vaccination as normal by linking anomalous mental and psychological characteristics
with vaccine hesitancy. Yeah, there you go. Absolutely you are odd.
We'll be right back. APS Radio delivers multiple channels of music right to your
mobile device. Get the APS Radio app today and listen wherever you go.
You're listening to the David Knight Show. Well, welcome back. Let's talk
a little bit about a new phenomenon here that we've got. Not only do
we have Biden with his April fools. I really really didn't put out that
order, or at least he doesn't remember it. I don't know which is
a scarier. But we now have a new phenomenon as well, and I
would call them Christian nationalist atheists. Richard Dawkins, one of the preeminent atheists,
is now talking about his preference for Christian culture. We're going to get
to that in a moment. But take a look at this. This has
went out by libs of TikTok as part of the trans Day of Visibility.
You had a transgender who has now been arrested and charged in Portland for burning
down this one hundred and seventeen year old church. Yeah, you had Cameron
David Storer was charged with two counts of first degree arson. One count of
second degree arson and two counts of second degree burglary. So haws that for
visibility torture. Church, well, I guess that works out, and it
really is. You know, they didn't charge him with a hate crime.
Interestingly enough when that happened, but Biden saying I didn't do that, even
though his executive order was all over the internet for two days. He finally,
I guess woke up and so I didn't do that. I have no
idea how that happened. And as zero Hedge points out, Democrats have spent
the better part of the last six months trying to give us the idea that
even though he seems goofy and doddering and senile and public all behind the scenes,
he is a well oiled galaxy brain as they put it, behind the
scenes. But evidently, as they said, he can't keep up with his
Marxist handlers. They understand this is Marxism, and we should all understand this
is Marxism. That's what LGBT is. It is a mal technique that is
being done. Case in point, when asked about proclaiming Easter Sunday the trans
day of his ability, he flat out denied it. I didn't do that,
So everyone asked about the proclamation with real clear politics. When asked about
Speaker Johnson's claim that he had, Biden replied, well, he's thoroughly uninformed.
Wow. So the question is who's running the show? One person,
Ian Miller. So it's hard to figure out which possibility is funnier here That
he had no idea what's being said under his name in proclamations and in public
posts, or that he's already forgotten what happened literally yesterday. Sir Hej says,
well, is that funnier or scarier that he's in that kind of situation?
But in reality, he's very much like Vauchi and Trump and the Maga
culta altogether. They don't remember what was done under Trump's name. They all
forget about that, right the emergency executive for I didn't do that. I
didn't do any he didn't do any of that stuff. It's very much like
this proclamation. They put this stuff out using their presumed authority. Perhaps what
happened with Trump, maybe he really didn't do that executive emergency order. Maybe
Klaus Schwab signed his name and turned in his homework. You think I Joseph
Biden, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority
invested in me by the Constitution. Do you know that the Constitution gives an
authority to worship transgenders and the law of the United States do hereby proclaim March
the thirty first, twenty twenty four as Transgender Day of Visibility. It also
came with a long commentary about this. I am proud that my administration has
stood for justice from the start, working to ensure that the LGBTQ community can
live openly in safety, with dignity and respect. It should add, while
parents and other people who live in the real world have to cowtow in a
obedience to them. Right, But this proclamation is filled as with I and
my administration all the rest of the stuff. So who's writing this stuff or
does he not know? Does he not remember? Biden also comes out and
tells trans Americans that's kind of an interesting Maybe that's what the next name for
the newcomers is going to be, right, We'll call them trans Americans.
These are people who are not American, but they identify as American. And
not only that, but they transed the border, didn't They it's perfectly fits
the trans Americans. I think squatter is a better term. Though trans Americans
made in the image of God. Well, all of us are made in
the image of God. Some of us are marred and mutilated physically and or
spiritually. But he says, you are worthy of respect, and they are,
but not everything they do is worthy of respect. You know, the
guy Richard Richard Lemine, okay, I call him Dick divine that they have
given him a title of admiral. He's like deputy director of HHS or something,
and then you know, given him all kinds of awards as if he
were a woman calling himself Rachel. Look, you know, he is somebody
who's creating God's image. But the image that he projects at this point in
time, it's not something that we should embrace. Parish the thought, but
it's not something we should accept. Let's just put it that way, and
we need to it's not a loving thing to race that and to promote that.
So he says, Christians recognize the need to suppress anger, forgive and
even love, says the author here of this bright part article. And they
talk about you know, we understand that we turn the other cheek and so
forth. Well, I don't think that's really what's being applied here. I
think a better approach is what Jude said. He said, be merciful to
those who doubt, save other people by snatching them from the fire with great
caution, hating the sins that contaminate their lives. You see, should we
just let people burn? Should we sho we just you know you're on your
way to hell, just have a nice trip. Is that love? That's
why I read that essay yesterday about from Matt Trojuela. He says, so
you know, we have this false idea of love that is not loving,
that is taking the easy way out by saying I love myself more than I
love you because I don't want to have anything. I don't want to I
don't want to get criticized, I don't want to get canceled, I don't
want the hate mail. I've just let you go your own way. That's
that's the reality. So it's not loving your neighbor to let them burn,
and just because you don't want to make them angry or make other people angry,
that's a cowardly thing, frankly. And so you've got Laala Harris who
celebrated says Our Chavez Day because on their proclamation that was put in Spanish,
they didn't talk about Sunday, March the thirty first. They didn't talk about
it being Transgender Visibility Day for some reason. Why do you think that is?
You know, the the problem that the the Democrats have in terms of
the Hispanic community is they're actually much more conservative than Americans are in general,
and they know that, and so they didn't put anything about the transgender Day
in there. Instead they made it about Sesar Chavez Day. One person on
the internet responded, it's Easter today, ma'am, just in case you didn't
know, But you had Donald Trump Junior say, well, it's anything but
Easter. They'll talk about anything but Easter. Easter's nothing, folks, it's
nothing. They didn't want to talk about Jesus. And I said, you
know, they don't even want to use the term resurrection Sunday. Why because
they don't want to talk about Jesus. That's the reality, and that's the
reality of Donald Trump Junior as well as the Democrats. You know, Jesus
is the reason for the season, but Jesus is the reason for the resurrection
as well. They don't want to talk about that, and that includes the
Republicans are out there pushing this stuff. Oh, you guys are worshiping your
Marxist leaders and you're worshiping the LGBT. And yet before all this stuff happened,
before this proclamation for Transgender Visibility Day happened, you had the Washington Times
and the person who wrote this article, Tim Constantine. The title of this
article is the Crucifixion of Donald Trump. Now, let me say to you
that worshiping and making a setting up on a pedestal and worshiping transgenders on the
same day that everybody else is talking about the resurrection of Christ, to worship
the transgenders on Sunday, is that worse than worshiping Trump and putting him up
on a pedestal. And that's exactly what this guy does. There is idolatry,
false religion on both sides of this stuff. And what he does.
Listen to the way that he equivocates Christ with Trump and his time on Earth.
Christ spent his public days doing good works, and so did Trump as
well. He says, Christ drew big crowds wherever he went, so does
Trump as well. But fear and the hunger for perpetual power led some to
eliminate him. Oh well, you know that fear and hunger for perpetual power.
That's something that Trump shares with the people who arrested and crucified christ Is,
isn't it. Uh? Oh yeah, He says. Donald Trump spent
four years of his life as president of the United States. After he recounts
what he thinks are good works of Jesus, he says, Donald Trump and
his good works during that time is four years. He enacted policies that built
a solid economy. He secured America's southern did he really how did it open
up so quickly? And he appointed three well qualified justices to the Supreme Court.
He brought Arabs and Jews together in the Middle East. He paid them,
He paid them to sign an agreement. He paid them with our money.
He didn't close the border except for the pandemic aspect of it. And
when it comes to his building a solid economy, as David Stockman pointed out
and Trump's War against Capitalism. I interviewed him before that that book was released
in January. I interviewed him back in December, I think, but he
said he'd already laid the seeds for disaster, and his tax policies and other
things that he had done even before he went up to the four trillion dollars,
got people used to universal basic income, crushed and stomped and ground into
the dirt. All the small mom and pops on Main Street. He threw
cash at the Wall Street big box retailers. Just disgusting, Not to mention
the fact that he killed seventeen million people worldwide with his shots. Destroyed lives,
destroyed livelihoods, created trillions and debt, and then the Constitution shredded into
confetti. But hey, let's equate Donald Trump with Jesus on Easter. That's
what the conservatives do. The liberals worship the trainees, the conservatives worship the
Trumps. Pilot knew better. Letitia James and Judge Arthur Ingeron know better.
Fanny Willis knows better, Jack Smith knows better. Yet, like Pilot,
their desire to maintain a grasp on political power is greater than their respect for
the law. Perhaps the biggest remaining question is, regardless of how the courtroom
crucifixion goes, whether mister Trump will experience his own political resurrection this November.
We need to put a stake through the heart of this Trump vampire cult.
Folks blasphemy, pure bs Bolshevik. How dare me criticize the Trump worshipers?
Right? And MSNBC says, how dare these critician Christians criticize Biden for worshiping
the trainees? See panel on Morning Joe on Monday, offended by Republican reactions
to a White House transgender proclamation overlapping with Easter. Did they not know that
Joe Biden had nothing to do with that? They said? Republicans are seizing
upon trans issues as like their go to wedge issue this time around. How's
that for projection? The trainees are the wedge. The trainees are the wedge.
They're the wedge for censorship, They're the wedge for tyranny. Oh,
we've got to have hate speech laws, you know, all the rest of
this stuff. They're using the trainees for that. They're not doing this because
they want the votes of the trainees. The trainees couldn't get people elected dogcatcher
because there's too few of them. They want to use the trainees to delite
reality. We're way beyond modernism and postmodernism. I mean, we're into total
la la land. Two plus two equals five, and so he says,
here's why I think the Republicans so heinously sees on the transissue, said Deutsch,
Obviously the numbers are not there. The amount of trans athletes competing is
with men men with women is zero point zero zero zero one percent. This
is an issue that oh, wait, boys can be girls, girls can
be boys. That's simplistic. I know the world doesn't make any sense to
you anymore. Get it says, you see what's happening. Well, I
think we do see what is happening. I think we understand. This is
Orwell plus Huxley hedonism described in Brave New World. That's what the trainings are
about. You think the two plus two egles four, You think that gender
is biological. Well, I'm going to tell you that two plus two ekles
five and gender is not biological. And you're going to do what I say,
and we're going to just step back and enjoy the detachment from reality and
the hedonism. That's what this is really about. It's about Orwell and Huxley.
So listen, Tolano said. Jesus said, love your neighbor, So
Eastern transgender holidays are not in conflict. Well, what do you mean by
love? I mean, you know, it's we know and the Greek there's
four different words for love, right, There is eros, which is sexual.
Is that what she means love your neighbor? Maybe, since we're talking
about Alissa Milano, that's maybe what she means. There's also a familiar a
love of a family. That is there a brotherly love fileo like Philadelphia,
right. The love of the family is to our gay and then there is
an unconditional love agape. And that's how we are to love people. It's
not conditional what they do, but we love them away from a future eternity.
That is love to speak the truth to these people, but they don't
like the truth. As a matter of fact, the DC Cardinal Wilton greg
slammed Joe Biden. He called him a cafeteria Catholic. I like that term.
That's good. You've got a lot of cafeteria people out there. We
got people who are cafeteria Christians, Catholics, Evangelicals, whatever, And we
have cafeteria people in terms of politics, right, I'll just forget about this
thing over there or whatever. Yeah, it's just you pick what you want
and and so, uh, we even have cafeteria atheists now who pick what
they like out of Christianity. As I mentioned before, that's that's Richard Dawkins.
He's really kind of a cafeteria atheist. He likes the culture, he
likes the music. He likes, you know, some of the rituals,
even song and things like that. He likes the foundation of Western civilization,
things like innocent and boving guilty and due process and free speech in the free
exercise religion. He likes those kinds of things. But and he calls himself
a cultural Christian. He didn't call himself a cafeteria atheist, but he calls
himself a cultural Christian. Isn't that interesting? The problem is is that he
loves the lows and the fishes, but he doesn't love Jesus. That's a
problem for Richard Dawkins. You know, It's something that we see happening in
a lot of different ways. I think of Ben Shapiro, he's kind of
a cafeteria Jew. Yeah, he likes the land that he says, you
know, Moses took the people to the Promised Land, but he doesn't want
to believe that the Red Sea parted. He doesn't want to believe that the
River Jordan parted either. He rejects the miracles and essentially calls Moses a liar.
But he'll take the land. I like that land. I'll keep that
land. But that Bible miracle stuff, that's just nonsense. You know.
We'll look at it as a bunch of do this and do that. We
got some good moral rules and some good ethical rules, but you know,
these people are liars and lunatics who gave us these great moral and ethical rules
that were the basis of Western civilization. And so that's really kind of where
Richard Dawkins is as well, kind of like Ben Shapiro. They do want
the blessings of God, but they don't want God. And so Richard Dawkins,
he wrote the God Delusion. I remember talking to my sons about this.
You know, we use the example. I said, well, there's
a Dawkins delusion as well. You know, I hear that Dawkins has written
a book, but I've never seen the Dawkins and so I can't say there
really is a Dawkins at all because I've never met him. And that's essentially
what what atheists like Dawkins were doing. There's this book written by God,
but I've never met God, so I think that's delusional. Well, I
think there's a Dawkins delusion because I've never met him. But now the guy
has become a Christian nationalist. Now this is not a weaponized term in the
UK yet, so we'll see what happens with it. And we'll also we'll
have to call Rob Reiner and get his learned opinion as to whether or not
Richard Dawkins should be canceled. And he had to be very careful about what
he said because in the context of these remarks, he was also talking about
how afraid he was of Islam. Well, but I don't mean all the
Muslims out there. You got to be very very careful because you don't want
to get somebody trying to, you know, somebody slashing your throat like they
did Solomon Rushdi when he criticized Islam. Just to kind of prove the point
of what he was saying about Islam, he says, I do think this
is Richard Dawkins talking. Now. I do think that we are a culturally
Christian country, and I call myself a cultural Christian. I'm not a believer,
but there is a distinction between being a believing Christian and being a cultural
Christian. Yes, isn't that true. I've noticed that many times. I've
come across many many cultural Christians and churches and other places like that, and
a lot of people call themselves evangelical. They never read the Bible, they
never pray, they don't have really any oward faith. They act and look
and you know, seem exactly like everybody who says that they're not a Christian,
a cultural Christian. He says, I love hymns and Christmas carols.
Well like Christmas carols, don't we, well, most of us do,
I guess sort of feel at home in the Christian ethos. I feel that
we are a Christian country. He noted that the number of Christians is declining
in the UK, which he said he's very happy with. Oh there you
go. He wants he not only wants a Christian country without God, but
he or was a Christian country without Christians. How does that work? Is
this guy supposed to be a scientist or a philosopher or a think or whatever.
How do you get a Christian country without Christians in it? But he
said he would limit the loss of cathedrals and other cultural aspects of living in
a Christian country. Well, that's okay. They can just turn the cathedrals
into discothequts and restaurants and things like that. Museums. That's what That's what
the Communists did when they took over countries. They turned the cathedrals into museums.
Right. I think it would matter, certainly if we substituted any other
religion. He said, that would be truly dreadful. When he was pressed
on whether he saw the decline in church attendance and the increasing number of Islamic
mosques being built across Europe as a problem, he said, yes, I
do. He said he would have to choose his words very carefully, and
as by Bart points out, maybe he's thinking about what happened to Soloman Rushdi
his throat slit. But Dawkins said, if I had to choose between Christianity
and Islam, I would choose Christianity every single time. It seems to be
a fundamentally decent religion that I think Islam is not. He said, there
is an active hostility in the Koran to women that's promoted. I think promoted
by the holy books of Islam. I'm not talking about individual Muslims, who
are quite different, but the doctrines of Islam, the Hadis, the Koran,
are fundamentally hostile to women, hostile to gaze. And I find that
I like to live in a culturally Christian country, although I do not believe
a single word of the Christian faith. Well, again, to paraphrase what
he's I think that Dawkins seems to be a fundamentally decent person, but I
don't believe a word of what he says about God. I don't even know
if he exists. I don't even know if Dawkins exists, but we'll just
assume for the sake of argument that he does. And a British writer writing
for Unheard dot com says, we need more cultural Christians like Richard Dawkins.
Really we just don't want the real thing, right. We don't want people
who, you know, cultural Christians, But we don't want people who will
lay down their lives for a principal, do we People who really believe it?
People who will stand up to COVID dictates and mandates to shut down church.
We don't want those kind of people. They're kind of crazy extreme.
They've got oppositional defiant disorder. They won't even take the vaccines. What's the
matter with those people? We need some cultural Christians, he says. Dawkins,
now eighty three, has once again stated that he regards himself as a
cultural Christian. This is not a new position for Dawkins. Even the heyday
of the New Atheists, he alluded several times to his love of choral evensong
and country church yards and Gothic architecture, what you might call the form of
English Christianity, rather than the substance. Ts Eliot rebuked people like this in
his Courses from the Rock. Ts Eliott said, do you need to be
told that even such modest attainments as you can boast in the way of polite
society will hardly survive the faith to which they owe their significance. He says,
the great cathedrals, the Christmas carols, and enduring liturgical poetry of the
Catholic Mass, of the Book of Common Prayer were not and could not have
been created by half believers who found Christianity to be merely soothing and comforting.
He said, all that said, I have a soft spot for cultural Christians,
and you know, quite frankly, they seem to be more bold in
some ways than people who are professing Christians. You know, they'll come out
and tackle these issues, whereas a lot of people who profess to be Christians
will just remain silent and try to avoid any conflict. He said, those
who can't quite bring themselves to believe in full yet still find consolation and moral
guidance in the faith are to be commended for their openness and encouraged to think
about what it might mean if beauty and truth and joy are real things in
the universe rather than merely illusions created by a collision of atoms. Yeah,
what if truth and beauty and joy were so real that one day you'll be
able to essentially touch them? You know, that's what we hear from some
people have near death experiences. Not that all those near death experiences are anything
that we base our faith upon. But when people look at this again,
you come back to what C. S. Lewis said, Well, you
like the society that's there. Do you think Christianity has given culture and society
a lot of gifts? And yet you think the man and the people who
wrote about the man are liars and lunatics. You think that's the case.
How does that fit? How is that consistent? Maybe he's Lord and not
a liar lunatic. Well we have not just the atheist. Oh one more
thing here, Yeah, atheists for Christianity. This is on the Washington Examiner
in terms of Christian nationalism here in America. So Dawkins was not asked if
he believes US is a Christian nation, but if he did, he would
actually be in the minority here in America. According to Pew and a pull
from them, only thirty three percent of adults consider the US to be a
Christian nation, although forty five percent said it should be. But this is
more interesting, I think in terms of you know, doublethink, sixty four
percent say the US is not a Christian nation, but a solid majority sixty
percent believe that the founders intended the US to be a Christian nation. So
sixty four percent said it's not, but sixty percent said it was intended to
be a Christian nation by the founders. So this person says, I would
like to ask those who believe our country was founded as a Christian nation,
but who now believe that it is not a Christian nation. When exactly that
transformation took place? What year exactly did the US stop being a Christian nation?
And maybe what they mean by that is that people have walked away from
it, or maybe they believe that the principles no longer apply. But it's
not just a guy who sold atheism who now says he likes the Christian culture
and who is speaking out against some of this insanity. We now have an
author who made billions of dollars. I guess I don't know how she made.
JK. Rowlings selling witchcraft to kids. You know, now she's these
people are looking at what was the fruit of Christianity and they see that going
away, and they now have a problem with it because JK. Rowlings is
now talking about free speech. This is a Christian idea. You don't see
this in other countries, do you. You don't see this in other religions,
you don't see this in other political systems, and it's disappearing in the
West as well. So I guess you know her issue that she has is
and we've seen this for a long time. I said, there's this going
back to about two thousand. In fourteen fifteen, when the trainees first started
to come on the scene. I said, there's an inherent conflict here between
the l's and the t's and the LGBTs. There's going to be a civil
war here. They're fighting each other over this, and that was evident from
the very beginning of it. And so it's good for her that she's going
to take a stand. I don't know that she's necessarily there in terms of
standing for free speech in general, or if she's just standing up for feminism
and for women, which is, you know, somebody needs to stand up
for women because the other people are not. She is a prominent critic of
the Trands people and other individuals, and so she put out a very long
tweet talking about eleven individuals who are many of them rapists and other criminals who
then pretended to be women so they could get into a women's prison. Very
long chain of talking about men pretending that they're women. On April the first,
which was the day that this new Scottish censorship law went into effect.
How appropriate on April Fool's Day. And then at the very end of it,
she says, April Fools only kidding. Obviously, the people mentioned in
the above tweets are not women at all, but they are men, every
last one of them, because she referred to them with female pronouns and everything
as she was talking about them. Very sarcastic and certainly deserving to be mocked
in terms of what is happening. She lives in Edinburgh, and so she
says, well, I'm abroad right now, but I'm ready to be arrested
for violating this Scottish law censoring what we can say about trainees. As people
point out, there's absolutely no protections in there for hate speech directed for women,
but there is for the t and I disagree with all hate speech rules,
but freedom of speech and belief are at an end in Scotland if the
accurate description of biological sects is deemed to be criminal, she said, I'm
currently out of the country, but if what I've written here qualifies as an
offense into the terms of the new Act, I look forward being arrested when
I returned to the birthplace of the Scottish Enlightenment. There was once upon a
time Scottish people were very bold in terms ustanding what they perceived as the truth.
You look at John Knox confronting the Queen and others over their beliefs.
And make no doubt about it. This LGBT stuff is a religion. It
is an anti religion used to attack Christianity, especially in the same way that
you know these small attacks by the so called Church of Satan. They're doing
that. Miss Rollings comments came after the Scottish National Party's Minister for Community Safety
and those who miss gender others online calling a trans woman he for example,
said could be investigated by police. Rolling who warned of the effect on free
speech, was reported to the north Umbria Police last month for calling Trends TV
broadcaster India Willoughby a man evidently he is. Police later said the complaint did
not meet the criminal threshold. They are going to be very reluctant to prosecute
her because of her high profile and it's good that she has the boldness to
speak out. Believe me, they will come after the individual Christian who speaks
out, but they're not going to come after her. I seriously doubt it.
And if they do, even Rishi Sunak, the Prime Minister who calls
himself a conservative, has said that she doesn't need to be arrested for this
stuff. So we'll see what happens, it'll be an interesting Finally somebody's going
to push back against this stuff. In her social media post, the author
listed ten high profile trans people and denied their claims to be women. They
included double rapist is the Bryson thirty one, who was initially jailed for eight
years at a women's prison before later being moved to a male prison following a
widespread backlash. Bryson, who is known as Adam Graham at the time of
the offenses, transitioned in twenty twenty after being charged for several years. Now.
She said Scottish women have been pressured by their government and members of the
police force to deny the evidence of their eyes and ears, to repudiate biological
facts, to embrace a neo religious concept of gender. It absolutely is a
religion. Look the climate stuff, the greenies, that's a religion as well.
These people have a religious adherence to it. It is a foundation for
a complete worldview. That's what our religion is. And it comes along with
this is right, that's wrong, and I'm going to make sure that you
do what is right or wrong. I'm going to impose this religion on you.
That type of thing, you know, We've got a lot of different
religions out there, and not all of them are formally recognized as religions.
But it is a neo religious concept of gender that is unproven and untestable.
She said. The redefinition of women to include every man who declares himself one
has already had serious consequences for women's rights, girls' rights and safety in Scotland,
with the strongest impact felt as ever by the most vulnerable, including female
prisoners and rape survivors. We're going to take a quick break. We will
be right back. Sometimes your day needs a little smoothing. Check out the
Jazz channel at apsradio dot com and the PS radio app and leave the stress
behind. You're listening to the David Night Show. Well, welcome back.
Let's talk a little bit about squatters we have. As I mentioned at the
beginning of the program, the El Paso Judge has now ordered the release of
the squatters. They call them illegal aliens, or they call them newcomers or
whatever. I think squatter is the best term we could have. Who are
filmed overrunning the National Guard on the southern border. That was an amazing visual
that is happening there. But of course you know they're just they're going to
remove the razor wire and push their way in as squatters. And now we've
got a judge who's going to reward that behavior. This happened, that happened
two weeks ago. They're now going to be released on their own recognizance.
What does that mean when you don't even know who these people are into America
and I guess on the way in they get a nice basket of goodies,
not just an easter basket, me free phones, cards, loaded up with
money and all the rest of this stuff. Hey, we've got some housing
set up for you in various other places in the country. And if we
don't have any public housing, you can just take somebody else's house over.
We've now got this, as we've seen in the lawless areas overseen by Sorost
District attorneys that he helped a light just as they allow people to steal and
go free. What they do. They organized themselves into criminal bands and they
started doing a very organized theft, even causing the massive Wall Street big box
retailers to shut down out of fear of losses. It got to such an
extent where did that all happen? And it happened because you had judges who
would not uphold the law. Just like this cop that was shot in New
York they had the funeral for he had twenty one prior arrest and they just
would arrest him and turn him out, arrest him and turn him out over
and over again. Finally he wound up killing a cop. What are they
going to do now They're going to release him again? Who knows? And
so this is what happened. And now there are reports that the squatters are
organizing criminal bands, just like these people have in California and other places with
the Sours District attorneys. They've organized, They've got organized looting of stores,
organized shoplifting on an industrial scale. Now there's a word that these squatters organizing
themselves into bands of criminals who were invading neighborhoods, invading homes and other things
like that. If it hasn't happened, it will happen, because that's what
happens when you reward criminal behavior. And everything about the border is a reward
system. You know you have And I had a lot of people who have
written me that were upset about comments about open border that guests made on Friday
and I just have to say that. You know, when it comes to
borders and a lot of other things, I have big differences with the Libertarian
Party and I have some agreements with them as well. And so you know,
we have these discussions, we have people on. We we talk to
them about different issues frequently when I have a guest on, I want to
get their take on things. I don't necessarily want to have a debate with
them, So I understand how that goes. But you know, when you
look at libertarians, they have some real blind spots when it comes to immigration.
They have blind spots now when it and that's always been there, That's
always been there they have. And I remember when I got an a libertarian
party right, they would have operation Politically Homeless. They would go around to
colleges and they would say they would use a Nolan chart to get people to
try to think in more than just a one dimensional line where everything is left,
right or center. They said, well, let's think about this as
a two dimensional space, and this two dimensional space we can put leftist right,
we can have center, we can have authoritarian, we can have libertarian.
And what he did was Nolan, David Nolan, one of the founders
of the Libertarian Party came up with thin. It was five or ten questions
about individual liberty and five or ten questions about economic liberty. And you would
answer these questions and then they would plot it out on a scale and you
could see whether you were left center right, or whether you were totalitarian or
libertarian. And of course they took the plot and they rotated it by forty
five degrees, so it looks like a diamond rather than a rectangle like you
typically see with a plot. And down the bottom where you didn't believe in
any freedom, well, that was the authoritarian area, and then if you
believed in all the freedoms, that would put you up in the libertarian area.
Well, when I took that, I never got one hundred percent on
it because I disagreed with the open border position of the Libertarians. Always.
I said, you can't have an open border if you've got a welfare state.
And that was before we created the welfare magnet for squatters. It is
far far worse with the cloud and pivot strategy that's been put in, far
far war person it was when I was taking that thing that test forty years
ago. But they have a real blind spot about that, which is really
kind of strange since the libertarians don't like a welfare state and they can't connect
the dots and they don't really understand what is happening with us. This is
kind of the same thing they do with censorship because they love corporations so much,
and they operate under the fundamental illusion that we have a free market.
We don't. We don't have a free market. We have crony capitalism.
We have a kind of fascism, fascistic merger with the government and the corporations.
And as I said many times, libertarians think the corporations can do no
wrong because they've got to compete for your product. Well that's not really the
way that it works anymore, and we can see that, and they're utter
contempt for their customers. Were you got Coca Cola talking about how we've got
to get rid of white people, whatever, Nascar, you know, or
just any of these any of these corporations that are bought into the ESG stuff,
They openly have contempt for their customers. So obviously there's not a market
situation that is happening here. Or Bud Light with their Dylan mulvaney or michaelm
whatever mulvaney, I guess it was. Anyway, they have open contempt for
their customers and they actively program against them, counter program one hundred and eighty
degrees away from them, So the marketplace is not in effect there. But
they think the corporations are great because they have to obey the free market.
Democrats don't think that government can do anything wrong, but they think corporations can
do nothing right, and libertarians are just the opposite. They think corporations can
do nothing wrong and government can do nothing right. And what both of them
miss is the fact that corporations and government have merged in a fascist kind of
way, and they both become more evil than you could imagine either of them
being individually because they're working together. And so we would see that all the
time in terms of the way they would respond to corporate censorship, absolutely clueless
about the fact that the government was strong arming them, coercing them, or
rewarding them to do censorship on its behalf, that the censorship was really coming
from the government. And you had Cato Institute, you had John Stossel,
but you also had conservative The Heritage Foundation, the biggest conservative think tank,
would push back against all that stuff. Oh, no, corporations should be
able to shut you down. John stossel I really don't like being censored by
them. But hey, corporations can do whatever they want. They've got rights
and so forth. No, they don't. They've got government granted privileges and
they're working for the government, and they can't acknowledge that. And so there's
big blind spots. In The big blind spot that the libertaries have is that
they think that what's happening at the border is like Ellis Island, nothing at
all like Ellis Island. The Ellis Island experience when we saw people coming from
potato famine in Ireland, or massive wave of Italian immigration that happened in the
early twentieth century, and some of it even in the aftermath of the Italian
Civil War, which happened at exactly the same time as the American Civil War,
and for the same reasons, because it wasn't about slavery. It was
about a fourth turning. It was about the industrial revolution and the consolidation of
the nation state. But you had people coming to this country who had nothing
but the clothes on their back. Why well, because they loved the ideals
of America because they wanted to be American, because they wanted to have the
freedom to change their station in life. And there was no welfare, there
was no safety net, there was nothing. They laid everything on the line,
they burned the bridges. They had nothing. They brought nothing with them
except a love of freedom and a love for America. That's very different from
what's happening now. The people who are coming now are not coming for freedom,
They're coming for free stuff. They are transported in many cases, this
is the reality that the Libertarians don't seem to understand. They're transported by NGOs
who have been given our taxpayer money to bring them here. They have war
gained this as to where they inject them into Central or South America to get
around the immigration prohibitions in certain states, so they can then make that trip
all the way up into the United States and they give them cash cards and
the rest of this stuff, and then the American government facilitates this. This
is again like crony capitalism, where you have the operation of these NGOs and
these corporations and these globalists working with our national government to subvert and to undermine
our government. That's what's really happening. We can forget the simplified extract abstractions
about open borders and immigrations and immigration that we should be able to go anywhere
we want. Look, I don't like the idea of passports. I don't
like the idea of borders either, but I don't like the idea of welfare.
And you've got to you know, that's the world that we live in
until you get rid of welfare. We just want to always tell libertarians for
forty years, unless you get rid of welfare, you cannot have open borders.
And now we have it on steroids. So the presiding Magistrate, Judge
Umberto Acosta, made his ruling on Sunday during an online teleconference bond hearing,
where he accused the El Paso District Attorney's office of not being ready to proceed
with the tension hearing for each defendant and the district attorney asked for continuation.
This is typically just a formality. You know, you are representing yourself and
you ask for a continuance, they typically don't give it to you, right,
But if an attorney askedport, especially a district attorney, a judge is
typically going to accommodate that it's very unusual for them not to and he's not
doing it because he's got an agenda. He's looking at this as an excuse.
It is a ruling of the court that all the rioting participation cases will
be released on their own recognizance. A request for continuance was rejected by him.
And as Information points out, v Dare is being hounded to the ends
of the earth by the government for running a legal and lawful anti immigration website,
while illegal aliens caught on film storming our border overrunning the National Guard are
being ordered to be released into our country. This is that's what it looks
like. And Chris Menahan at Information Liberation puts this definition from Wikipedia in the
purpose of a system is what it does. You know. They even have
an acronym for it, you know, like constaffel. There's no such thing
as a free launch type of thing. The purpose of a system is what
it does. Posi wid I guess they pronounce it. This is a heuristic
that says that there is quote no point in claiming that the purpose of a
system is to do what it constantly fails to do. Right. We can
say that about the education, the school system, the education system. Is
the purpose of the schools to actually educate kids, Well, no, because
it consistently fails to do that. The purpose is to indoctrinate them, to
groom them sexually, to do a bunch of other than to get them to,
you know, follow the crowd and listen to people in authority, be
moved by peer pressure. That's that's the purpose of the educational system is not
to educate people in reading, writing, and arithmetic. No, it's not
about then, it's invoked to counter the notion that the purpose of a system
can be read from the intentions of those who design, operate, and promote
it. It is what it is. And again this is something that the
libertarians ought to understand because a lot of them embrace EGN Wren's objectivism, which
says A equals a. It is what it is, and yet they refuse
to look at the reality of what is happening at the border. I don't
embrace objectivism. I don't embrace that system of atheism. But certainly we can
say that the purpose of a system is what it does, and we should
be able to realistically look at the border and understand what that is really about.
And so how do we handle squatters, whether they are at the border
or whether they are at our home. Well, I gave you an example
last week. Let me show you another example of how to handle a squatter.
Stay off this property. You're not cutting on this property. Oh,
your band is gonna be toad. You can go around. This is private
Property's gonna get out of my god damn way. This is private property.
This is private property. The cops were here last night. You know this
is private property. Days. I'm going to get my band. You're not
gonna see you go around. You can go around. You're not you're not.
You broke this fence. Did you cut this fence? Broke? It
wasn't broken. Gut here. I'm not blocking you. I'm stopping you from
trespassing on this property. Yeah, you trespassed. Your band is gonna be
toad. Can't you don't let me throw what I'm gonna hit you? You
cut a hole in this fence. You're not my husband? A Yeah,
get everybody. Let's come back with everybody. Force our way in. He's
recording as well. Now he pulls out his gun. She's got a stick
and he's got a gun. Let me grow well, he said so that's
what need to be done at the border here. Yeah, that's uh,
that's why he handles squatters, whether they're at the border or they're at your
house. You know, possession. He's got possession of the property. They
left. They can't come back, they can't force their way back in.
They have no right to attack him. Uh so uh. But the bottom
line is all legal arguments aside the gun has a list and all of this.
There's other ways to do it though, And as I pointed out last
week, the one guy who was he did it legally. He looked at
it and he just sat there and he waited until they left one day,
and then he took possession of the property, just like this guy. And
it was his mother's property. He realized that his mother didn't have any rights
as the owner. But if he got a lease signed lease from her saying
that he was renting the property, well now it was renter versus renter.
See, our government puts renters over the people who own the property. And
that's going to change when we're all renters, believe me. But which is
their goal. But so he made himself a renter and he took possession,
and he says I have a valid lease here, so go call the police
if you think you can do something about it. But eventually it's going to
push, is going to come to shove with that type of thing. In
most cases, in this particular case, it just decided they would go somewhere
else. Well, the Biden administration, maybe he doesn't know about this either.
He didn't know about his trans day of his ability, he says.
Maybe he doesn't know that they just gave three hundred and twenty million dollars to
Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt and Tunisia to build border walls. Imagine that he
literally gives them money to build their border walls, three hundred and twenty million
dollars. But of course we paid over eighty billion dollars, well sixty billion
dollars they say, for Ukrainian border security. It's way more than that.
It's actually more than one hundred a billion that we have paid for that.
Canada, meanwhile, is also getting the great replacement treatment. Canada has had
the most rapid population growth in sixty six years, and it's all foreigners coming
in, all foreigners, not a birth rate. The birth rates are collapsing.
The highest annual growth rate reported since nineteen fifty seven. Canada's real time
population clock shows the country's population is now broken forty one million, just months
after breaking the forty million threshold. And so they said in twenty twenty three,
the vast majority ninety seven point six percent of Canada's population growth came from
international migration, both permanent and temporary, and the remaining portion two and a
half percent came from a natural increase, said Statistics Canada and Michigan, again
we talk about in fact, these people are squatters, right the headline,
the headline from mainstream media is that Michigan is offering five hundred dollars in rent
aid a month to house illegal newcomers newcomers. No, they're not newcomers.
They're squatters, and good luck getting them out. Amy Hovey, executive director
of Michigan State Housing Development Authority, said the program aligns with the goal to
increase affordable housing across the state for everyone, including those who are seeking to
build a new life here. Oh well, you see, they've they've got
an American dream which is better than yours. Of course, I don't imagine
they're going to help people who are really refugees, like the German Christian homeschooling
family who had been here for a decade, and then Biden tried to throw
them out. They wanted to take away their children in Germany because they went
to homeschool, so they came to America and then you had the Biden administration
after they've been here for a decade and they were supporting themselves as well.
By the way, have to throw them out, have to send them back.
We'll be right back. If you like the Eagles on the cars and
Heuey Lewis and the news, they say ther you'll love the Classic Hits channel
at APS Radio, download our app or listen now at apsradio dot com,
Liberty It's your Move, and now the David Night Show. Well, I
want to thank some of the people who have left tips on rock Fan.
Wayne Wonder, thank you very much, Michelle Obaman, thank you. And
James all on rock Fan, thank you very much. I appreciate that.
And I want to respond a little bit here to some emails that I got.
This is from This is from Harry Hown and it is a quote going
back to June the fourth, twenty twenty, when Trump was present. And
this is a this is Trump is being quoted in this tweet by USAID.
This is the CIA agency that Obama's mama worked for. Of course, you
know, his grandparents were some of the founders of the CIA, LSS and
things like that. But USAID is a CIA front group that would go into
various countries. And they quoted They put this out as a tweet from USAID,
and they quoted Trump who said, as the coronavirus has shown there are
no borders. USAID echoes real Donald Trump's words and is proud to be partnering
with GAVY by committing one point one six billion to protect people through vac scenes
because vaccines work, so USAID and Trump partnering with Bill Gates, a global
vaccine organization. Gaby back in June of twenty twenty, did we forget that
somehow? Well, there's your reminder, your daily reminder. Democrats strategist Megala
thinks that third party candidates are cockroaches. This is sent to me by Mark.
Thank you Mark. Yeah, he says this Gateway punt An article shouldn't
surprise you. Democrats strategist Paul Begala thinks that third party candidates are cockroaches.
He said the Quiet part out Loud I actually called him cockroaches. Well,
we know that we know that the UNI Party does not like any competition.
And you know it's not just that they they hate Trumpet is a game of
thrones. These people all hate each other. We just have to make sure
that we don't become their pawns and their forty chess game. This is from
Baby Bear, who says, so, what is a treaty? I mentioned
this briefly yesterday, but this listener sent this to me and says, I
just checked a few of my dictionaries. I've got a Webster eighteen twenty eight
dictionary, a Random House College Dictionary from nineteen eighty four, and Baron's Law
Dictionary nineteen ninety six. He says, all include the definition from Webster's as
to what a treaty is. They all basically agreed on it, but you
know, the language is malleable, isn't it, And so he said,
they all say essentially the same thing, but Webster's the quote. Specifically,
a treaty is an agreement, a league, or a contract between two or
more nations or sovereigns, formally signed by commissioners, properly authorized, solemnly ratified,
by the several sovereigns or by the supreme power of each state. Treaties
are of various kinds, as treaties for regulating commercial intercourse, treaties of alliance,
offensive and defensive, treaties for hiring troops, treaties of peace, et
cetera. And then he says this, so what is it about these this's
WHO treaty here, The WHO and the World Economic Forum are not nations.
They're not sovereigns. So you know, how do we get these things?
And when you look at the UN, it's not a nation either. But
when they come up with these things like the Paris Climate Accord, these are
things that we understand are really put together by these NGOs or these you know,
non governmental agencies. They put them together under the pretense that it's all
the nations acting together. But what it is, it's something that is drawn
up by the World Economic Form or by the UN, or by the World
Health Organization, and they're the ones who are masterminding the Paris Climate Accord or
the Pandemic Treaty and the rest of this stuff. He says, Wikipedia,
though it's interesting, Wikipedia has changed the definition from what Webster's had You known
eighteen hundreds, or the dictionaries from the nineteen eighties, or the Legal Dictionary
from the nineteen nineties. Here's the new malleable definition from Wikipedia. A treaty
is a formal, legally binding written contract between actors and international law. Doesn't
say sovereign nations, does it. It is usually made by in between sovereign
states, but it can include international organizations, individuals, business entities, and
other legal persons. This is how they change the language, and this is
important because it shows us that they're going to drop the pretense of this being
an organization that's just bringing together the nations so that they can act together collectively,
going to drop that pretense and they're going to go direct with it.
I think that's the key thing here. They really are prepping for global governance
by stakeholders, and that's one of the reasons why the Wikipedia thing has changed
it. Well, it can be with individuals, it could be with here
it is organizations, individuals, business entities, right corporations. The people that
are constantly described as stakeholders by the UN, by the World Economic Forum and
so forth. You see, we don't have a stake We're not going to
own anything we'll rent everything from the stakeholders. They will own everything, and
they will be the ones who are making these treaties that they say are going
to be binding against us, and they will be binding. And the only
way we're going to eventually break these changes by violence, I'm afraid because they're
not going to follow any rule of law. They're prepping for global governance,
folks, that is already here. We already have global governance by stakeholders,
the idea that the stakeholders are corporations as well as countries, that the two
of them are essentially equal, and we see them moving in that direction with
some of these trade treaties in NAFTA, for example, where even though that
was supposed to be between different sovereign nations, they would have arbitration there and
it was always going to be it was corporations that were bringing actions against the
countries that were signatories in this NAFTA accord. Already moving towards an equality,
already moving towards global governance by corporations and states. Darren from Alberta, thank
you, We said, I'm sending you zero point zero zero zero three one
three bitcoin. How that works out right now? I hope it finds you
well. Thank you. I appreciate that we do have a bitcoin the thing
where people can make contributions, and people do do that. They do that
on cash app also has a way that you can send bitcoin as well.
A couple of people have done that and I still got it there, so
it's gone up. I'm going to just kind of ride this thing up to
wherever it goes, I guess. He says. Also, whenever you mention
it, I hit the like button too, So please folks hit the like
button. Thank you for the reminder, Darren, and thank you for the
contribution. And the like button really does make a difference. It helps to
give us visibility. It's one of the biggest struggles that we've got is visibility
right now. This is from Charlie who is in Thailand, and he sent
me a comment that he's been putting on some of these Trump cheerleading sites and
discussions. Why aren't you selling helping Donald Trump sell his Bible? If he
happens to be selected to be the next occupant of the White House, you
can be sure that cbdc's five G et cetera will be a part of his
time in office. After all, he destroyed the economy, facilitated a bio
weapon which to date has killed about seventeen million people globally. Your people continue
to amaze me, he he says. By the way, Benedict Donald cares
as little about you as he does about the January sixth people in the DC
goulog and he says, this is getting me blocked from the comment sections of
a lot of different places. He says, Greg Hunter has blocked in as
well, so yeah, that will work that way. Finally, this is
from Will, who had an experience with the Census. He said, I
recently had the privilege of receiving a Census form of the mail. I chose
to ignore it. However, about two weeks later I received another request.
Again, I ignored it and tossed it in the trash. Two weeks after
that, I received another which I also ignored and discarded. Finally, I
received a note from the census folks stating that if I did not respond by
a certain date within a week, as I recall, I would be subjected
to a fine of five thousand dollars or worse. Finally, I did respond,
and I was angered and annoyed at how intrusive. The questions were,
here's some of the examples. He said, how many rooms are in your
house? How much property tax do you pay? How much is your mortgage
payment? What is your income? What gender are you? And he said,
and they gave you five choices? Is that all? Can't you imagine?
You can only imagine five different genders? Wasn't running with these people?
They need some additional time and a DEI reprogramming instructions here, what ethnicity are
you? Do you rent out any of your home? Are you on Social
Security? If so, how much do you receive? And numerous other questions.
He said, It would seem to me that the government already has all
this information via the IRS, via license bureaus, many other public records.
So what is the game here? Yeah, well, you know, it
may be a perjury trap. It just may be the pretense that we're not
sharing information when we actually know that they really are. Interestingly enough, you
talk about all the information the government has. When I interviewed William benny years
ago, and they were trying to push the false Russia Gates stuff with Trump,
and William Bennie says, they've got all of this stuff. They've got
all the records are out there in Bluffdale, Utah and other places like that.
They've got all they've they're capturing everything that everybody's done, and so they
pretend that they don't know. Yeah, I think a lot of this stuff
is really just kind of a trying to get people in a perjury trap,
like the FBI does when it brings you in for questioning. That's just trying
to entrap you. We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right
back and talk about climate. We had some interesting things that have now turned
up on RFK Junior and his ideas about a smart grid. Whether you're feeling
like the Booze or Blue rapp APS Radio as you covered check out a wide
variety of channels on our app at APS radio dot com. You're listening to
the David Knight Show. Well, let's talk about RFK Junior and his ideas
for a smart grid that have not really aged very well in the last thirteen
years. But before we do, a couple of comments here on rock fan
ghost bo says, I bet this infestation of squatters will make everybody think twice
about posting their plans to take a cruise on Facebook. This season. Yeah,
I'd probably be smart not to brag about the fact you're going to be
gone for a couple of weeks. Always has been a good idea not to
publicize that. Unrumble Johnny Freedom says, my brother got COVID last week for
the third time twice since he got the jabs. I'm still at zero and
with zero jabs. Yeah, as I said before, I really do think
that the you know, we have seasons, and I remember when the swine
flu thing was, you know, they're talking, well, we get swine
flu, and they put out that rushed vaccine and things like that. But
I did get sick with the worst case of flu i'd had that year.
Now, nobody else in the family got sick. I've had one of my
best friend's longest friends got had a positive COVID test and got very, very
sick. He was able to get iver and that's what really got him over
his pneumonia. But again, nobody in his family got sick. And so
I'm reluctant to say that there has been a gain of function change in something
that was released. Okay, I think we have years where there are very
bad viruses that go around and some people are susceptible of them, and some
people aren't. And I don't think anything really changed with that. I think
what changed was the way that people used it in the government. And I
think what really changed was the fact that you had this trump shot bio weapon
that was put out there. That's still the key thing, I believe.
Let's take a look at RFK Junior. He supported building a national smart grid
to remotely shut off personal appliances back in twenty eleven, thirteen years ago.
This is a video that has now resurfaced and posted out there by the New
York Post. He argued that a two hundred and fifty billion dollar grid would
eliminate peak demand periods and insisted that consumers would not care about their devices being
rendered inoperable for fifteen minutes at a time. Here he is talking about it.
It will probably cost about two hundred and fifty billion dollars to build a
smart grid that reaches most of America and that you know that can do the
things that we need to do, like I can send signals through the line,
allow the utilities to send a signal through the line to turn off the
hot water boilers and a million homes for fifteen minutes in order to avoid the
peak demand that is the most expensive part of our electrical system. If you
eliminated peak, you save enough natural gas in our country to power the entire
US passenger car fleet, the entire US passenger car fleet, especially if we
don't have cars. Right. This guy was, and I believe still is,
a radical environmentalist, a radically stupid environmentalist who doesn't value free speech.
He doesn't value freedom, he doesn't value markets or anything else. He's going
to impose things on us that he knows better. He's an old style democrat
in that regard. I've got some ideas how I'm going to fix society,
I'm going to impose them on you. And those kind of people are really
dangerous. As the quote from C. S. Lewis, I can't remember
exactly, but you know, there's no kind of tyranny better than people think
that they're doing it for your own good. So he's radically stupid as an
environmentalist. He is not for free speech. I played the clips that are
more recent than that, I believe, where he said we need to lock
up the Koch brothers because he didn't like their position on environmentalism. He wasn't
just talking about silencing them, but you need to put them in jail.
He is also not anti vaccine, and he's also not anti CIA. He's
got family who, yes, was it his daughter or whatever working for now
part of his campaign. One of the things SILENTI said, Jerald Slente.
So he's positioned himself to be anti war until he changed his mind on all
of that, and then he put in the CIA person and he got rid
of Dennis Cassinich and all the rest of stuff. You need to understand who
this guy is. Typical politician. They present one image. They're exactly the
opposite, just like Trump is exactly the opposite of being an anti globalist.
You know, he is against his competitors and they're against him. But he
did everything the globalist wanted. So he said, if you've got enough natural
gas. We got enough natural gas in our country. He said, the
time to power the entire US passenger fleet if we eliminate the peaks. And
we can do that by telling people when they can even use their electrical appliances.
You see when you look at this mania that they have, that everything's
got to be electrical. And then we will tell you when and it will
manage that electrical grid. It'll become a control grid. And that's always been
the purpose, always been the purpose of this stuff. And there's also this
this ignorance of these people. I say, stupid. It is stupid.
You go around and you ask these people what is your favorite source of power?
Why? Like electricity? Electricity is clean. That's not a source of
power. That is a product of power. How are you going to generate
that electricity? Are you going to use fuel, are you going to use
hydroelectric? Are you going to use solar? Wind? And how do those
things stack up with each other? Electricity is the output, folks, And
they can't get that through their heads. They think, oh, this is
great, I got electric things and they don't smoke. I want more of
those things. That's my favorite source of power. They got a consumer mindset.
They don't even understand how this stuff is produced. But he says,
it can go into your car and we can borrow that stored electricity in your
car that's in your battery. And as I've said before, this is the
future that these people foresee for electric vehicles. They don't want you to have
private transportation whatsoever, including electric cars. No, those expensive electric vehicles that
you buy, those are going to be extra batteries for them connected to the
power grid. They'll tell you you can't drive your car, we don't have
enough power. But we're going to need that power that you put into your
into your car, so we're going to use it. We're going to cycle
through the battery. Every time you cycle through these batteries that you know that
that uses up its useful life. And so we're going to be using up
your batteries, cycling them on and off and draining, you know, filling
them up, draining them out, filling them up, draining them out in
order to power the grid. So they're going to use them as grid batteries,
but you're not going to use them as cars. We need, he
said, to create a marketplace that does what a market is supposed to do,
which is to reward efficiency, to reward good behavior, to punish bad
behavior. Well, again, that's not what he's talking about. He's saying
that you're not talking about having a marketplace. He's talking about government edicts,
and they're going to decide what is good in terms of energy usage. You're
going to decide what is good in terms of speech and they will decide what
is bad with both of those things, and they will prohibit the bad stuff.
No, in a free market is the people who decide good and bad,
not the government. And the people do a much better job than even
the smartest people if you put them in the government. I I've pointed this
out many times. If you have a the collective intelligence of people operating in
a really free marketplace who can make decisions about what to purchase and what to
use, their collective intelligence is really kind of like a large neural network,
which is always going to be smarter than a CPU, a central processor unit.
That decentralization is the key, the fact that you've got all these people
evaluating all this information. You' see, even the smartest person or the fastest
CPU is limited by the amount of data that it's got coming in. And
that's why this essentially, if you want to think about as a neural network,
quiet is so much more superior. They have more information, so they
can make better decisions than even the smartest and most honest central planner. But
you know, he looks at free markets and at free speech and he thinks
he knows better. Typical Typical. We need to have a smart, Grady
said, so when you plug in more than six Preus cars, you don't
black out the neighborhood. Is this like a vision of hell? Here we
got that six Prius cars are going to take it, and we're all driving
prices as well. Not that there's anything wrong with it, if that's your
decision. I just don't want to have a gun put in my head saying
I've got to drive a particular type of car. I must drive this.
I can't drive that. That's what's wrong. That's what's not a free market.
Despite Kennedy's utopian language, energy experts who spoke to The New York Post
warned a national grid could be susceptible to both cyber attacks and bad actors,
and vulnerable to US government overreach into people's privacy. You think, of course,
of course, the last thing that people that run these grids want to
do is to have one big grid, said the CEO of the American Energy
Institute. Well, that depends. That's what the politicians want. They want
everything centralized and for under their control, and they don't care if it works
or not. The important thing is that they control it. You know,
they don't care if there's some ten pot dictator with a starving economy and everything
is in rags. If they're the top dog, that's all that matters to
them. They're perfectly fine with austerity as long as they're in control. Control
is what they're looking for, and they'll burn our society down in order to
get it. Biden has spent billions and as a matter of fact, seven
and a half billion to set up a charging network for eves, but only
seven stations have been built in four different states so so far. That's about
a billion dollars a little over a billion dollars per charge are installed. This
is the efficiency of the government. And again they don't care that it is
unworkable for them. That's fine. You know, the purpose of Biden all
the rest of these people is not a transition to clean energy. The purpose
of their purpose is to cripple and destroy our society, everything about it.
Now, as we look at renewable mandates, and again back in two thousand
and nine, I was with an organization. Colorado was the first date that
was putting in renewable energy mandates. We're going to mandate that x percentage of
power generated in Colorado comes from wind and solar and so we were saying,
well, that's not a good idea. It's also should not you know,
we challenged on a legal basis. This is an article from What's Up with
that dot com? Hahai is energy transition where they replaced coal clean coal with
solar has now in a period of just a couple of years, caused there
already highest energy rates to go up by a third a third, went from
a thirty cents a kilo one hour up to forty one since a killo one
hour. And what's interesting about this is that we see this approach being taken
in a lot of different states. Here in Tennessee, the Tennessee Valley Authority
wants to put in wind and solar, and they want to put in these
big battery energy storage sites b e SS, massive lithium batteries, a massive
fire waiting to happen. They want to position them in various places so they
can store energy from solar and wind because they can't produce it on a steady
state basis like a fuel based system. And it's not the only one.
This guy who had is that over fifty years I think it's fifty seven years
working as a power engineer said, yeah, I'm glad that they did this
in Hawaii, because Hawaii is a perfect test case. It's an island,
it's isolated from all these other grids, and so they have to produce all
their energy right there, and it's like a little closed system. And he
said. What they have done in Hawaii, he says, is what they
want to do here where I live in South Carolina, he said, and
that's what they want to do here in Tennessee as well. So my state
of South Carolina and neighboring states are planning similar renewable plus energy storage. So
thank you Hawaii Electric for providing this outstanding example of applied renewables. Your experiences
are very helpful, he says. In twenty twenty, I wrote how this
would be a glimpse in the future the Green New Deal. He said,
Well, here we are. The last coal plant in Hawaii was shut down.
They installed much generation capacity in renewables and added the largest or at least
one of the largest battery storage systems in the world. How has it worked
out well? He said, Here's my update from the June twenty twenty blog.
At that time, he said, amongst US states, Hawaii has some
of the most ambitious mandates for shifting from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources to
generate electricity. Drop the fossil drop that that's a weaponized term fuel. It's
fuel. To achieve these mandates, the state aims to rely heavily on battery
energy storage systems to provide backup. On Hawaiian island of Oahu, a large
and sophisticated battery energy storage system recently came online, marking a key point in
the state's efforts to move towards a future of one hundred percent renewable energy.
It was a massive Tesla megapack of lithium batteries. The system can meet seventeen
percent of a Wahoo's electricity demand for three hours. Isn't that great? This
massive grift from Elon Musk, And it can only produce less than a fifth
of the electrics well, one six let's just call that one sixth of the
electricity for three hours as a percentage of the electricity system that it serves.
This project is larger than any other battery storage project in the world. And
so he said, And here we are four years later. They've gone from
the highest retail electricity price in the US at thirty cents per kill one hour
to forty one since for kill a one hour, so he said, digging
a little bit deeper, the plans for the future are for fifty two percent
renewable by twenty twenty one, one hundred percent renewable by twenty twenty four,
twenty forty five. Rather, so imagine how expensive that's going to be when
they go one hundred percent. He finishes up, and he says, many
of my knowledgeable friends have suggested that if the US were to apply one hundred
percent renewables, it would be a very good idea to first apply this to
one electric supply system rather than force green energy on all of the states at
the same time. Right, we have fifty different states. We should have
different approaches, and that goes for a lot of different things, but especially
for this well, he says, we have a completed experiment, why has
passed the test, being the first experiment of applying the Green New Deal,
and we can see just how it has failed miserably. And yet we have
South Carolina, Tennessee and others wanting to reconstruct that. In Virginia, residents
in Virginia Beach are already complaining about an offshore wind project causing cracks in their
walls from the vibration of these nine hundred foot towers being installed. So can
you imagine if they're that close enough that the vibrations of the installation are causing
cracks in their wall. Can you imagine what is going to happen when they
actually start these things up. It's very well documented. They even have a
name for it. They call it wind turbine syndrome. The health effects that
it produces and animals and whales and human beings and all the rest of this
stuff. And it's also a big eyesore. You have people paid a lot
of money to get beachfront property there in Virginia. Be Now they're going to
look out and see these gigantic turbines. But it's going to be not just
the visual impact of It's going to be the actual physical impact of that that
is going to be a big issue for them. And then there's other issues.
Besides the wind turbine syndrome. You also have the blackout syndrome and the
empty wallet syndrome. Sixteen billion pounds of Scottish wind and energy is being blown
away, the inefficient transmission of wind power from Scotland to England is projected to
waste over sixteen billion pounds this decade due to regulatory and planning failures, resulting
in higher electricity bills for consumers. Now this is not just the fact that
the stuff is so much more expensive. Oh well, you know wind and
sun, that's going to be free, right, No, no, but
it's even worse than that, because what they're doing is they're putting this up
in the sea close to Scotland and then they wind up not having a way
to transmit the power back into other places. They've got a bottleneck in terms
of transmission lines. You know, they put out the massive wind farms in
Texas, they had the state of Texas spend I don't know how much,
how many billions of dollars to run infrastructure to pull that power back in.
Well, they haven't done that in the UK. Instead, what they do
is when they have too much power, they pay the wind farm companies to
make their wind the wind mills go idle. They pay them to shut them
off. Okay, Now that is called curtailment, and that curtailment is going
to cost more than seven hundred million dollars in twenty twenty three, where they
further one sorry pounds seven hundred million pounds. Will they further one hundred and
forty million pounds spent in January and February this year alone. And yet even
though they've got excess capacity, more than they can send to other places,
and they're paying them to shut the windmills down, they are still building them.
And why wouldn't you if you're a corporation and you've got a government that's
that stupid because of its central planning, that they're going to pay you to
build these windmills, and then they're going to pay you when they got too
many of them, they're going to pay you to make them idle. Why
wouldn't you build more? That's a pretty good model. That kind of stuff
is how Elon Musk got to be the world's richest man, you know,
playing on all of this green stuff and this ESG stuff. Now, with
this purchase of Twitter, here's all of a sudden become the conservative workingman hero,
almost up there with Donald Trump, higher than Donald Trump in the esteem
of some people. Costs are expected to shoot up as offshore wind farms continue
to grow, while construction remains mired mired in what and government approval process,
just like what we're talking about with a bridge, and what takes so long
to build these bridges. Well, they got to do all these environmental studies
and everything. These people are rewarding and subsidizing these companies to put windmills out
in the sea. They don't have enough infrastructure to bring it back. And
it isn't for any other reason other than the fact that they've got themselves tied
up with their own red tape, their own government tying them up with red
tape. It doesn't get any dumber than any of this stuff. One last
thing, and we've got our guest coming on. Our guest, today's got
Tree. We're going to talk about technology today. In the UK again you
have motorists have been given twelve million pounds worth of fines for driving through a
neighborhood that has designated itself as clean air. You can drive through neighboring areas.
This is very much like the Paris Climate Accord. Right, we got
global problems, they say global warming, and so we got to have everybody
shut down their coal plants except for China and India. They can build as
many as they want, they don't have to have any pollution control on them
whatsoever. And the environment will say winter, this doesn't make any sense.
If this is a global issue, how can you allow the two biggest countries
to have as much in as dirty a power generation as they want. Well,
here you have neighborhoods right next to each other. You can drive through
this one, but if you drive through that one, we're going to give
you a fine unless you've got a zero emission electric vehicle. And so the
people there are protesting stop the lt NS put democracy in safety first. This
is a cynical green washing scheme. Oh, it absolutely is. Will residents
within the boro are allowed to move freely amongst the streets. They're given a
pass, just like the Chinese and Indians are alongside black cab drivers. Care
that black cab. That's not talking about the skin color of the cab driver.
This is the black cab is like we've got yellow cabs. Yellow taxis
here. Caterers and businesses, visitors out of borrow drivers will be fined,
they said. Further, the council spent twenty thousand pounds on road markings and
signage, where they further ten thousand pounds used for promotion letters and leaflets to
threaten people. When it was first introduced, they call it a traffic calming
scheme. That is typically when you put speed bumps in, but in this
particular case, they're actually putting up barriers to keep people from being able to
drive. That's the extreme case of traffic calming along certain route and hope that
in the hope that it will make the roads more pedestrian friendly and deuce air
pollution. And yet and another neighboring town here they have one point two million
dollar cycle lanes bicycle lanes. So at one point, I keep saying dollars,
but it's pounds, and it has destroyed the businesses there. First of
all, they took forever to build, just as we're going to see with
the bridge collapsing. Took forever to build. And now it's such a bottleneck
because the first they did the road calming, putting obstacles on the road so
that cars can't even drive through, or putting speed bumps in, or they
do the road diet, which means that they cut off areas of it to
put bicycle lanes in. And the people there are saying the same thing.
I said, when I went to Tampa and saw all the bicycle lanes everywhere,
there's nobody using them. I don't think it's a good idea because you
don't see cyclists using it at all. I saw two people cycling up the
road earlier, but one person was using the pavement and the other one was
using the main road, in other words, the pavement of the sidewalk.
That's what we saw when we went to Tampa. It's absolutely insane, and
we've got to get control of local government. It's local government than this one
area put in the massive fines and shut down the road. It's another one
that is doing the road calming and the road diets and all the rest of
this stuff. That is where the rubber meets the road, and that is
where these people are going to shut down the driving and shut down the road.
And we need to try to get identify some people who value freedom and
short circuit it. If we understand what the global agenda is, we can
then fight it and stop it locally. We'll be right back. Whether you're
feeling like the booze or bluegrass, aps radio has you covered. Check out
a wide variety of channels on our app at apsradio dot com. The common
Man. They created common Core and dumbed down our children. They created common
Past to track and control us. They're Commons project to make sure the commoners
own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man as simple,
unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image
of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they
want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
They desire to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us.
It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
Please share the information and links you'll find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank
you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially,
please keep us in your prayers. The Davidnightshow dot com. All right,
welcome back and joining us now is a guest we've had on many times.
Always enjoy talking to goat Tree. He works in the cybersecurity area and
he is I should call him a white hat guy that is protecting against the
black hat guys. In other words, a business will hire him to try
to find vulnerable these and warn them before the bad guys do it. So
joining us now is goa Tree. Good to have you on Goatree. Thanks
for joining me. Good morning, David. What's on your mind today?
Oh man? Everything? You know, You've got a great show rolling today
and uh, you know, I was listening and I was thinking, you
don't Failure's good. It's really good because a lot of this that you were
talking about is failed, and I hope it continues to fail even though they're
promoting gets like it's on the horizon. Yeah, oh yeah, absolutely,
yeah. I'm happy to see these self driving cars fail. But you know
what, they don't care. There's there's several articles out from mainstream media in
the last couple of days saying, well, whether it works or not,
we're gonna we're gonna equip the semi trailers to be self driving. It's like,
you've already seen it doesn't work. You've already seen how bad it is
in San Francisco and other places like that, and you've had to stop these
experiments. So now what you're going to do is you're going to fail up.
I mean, this is this is ridiculous. They keep taking it up
to bigger and bigger things to fail. Well, I mean, but they're
promoted as a success. I mean, you know, what are the things
I've really got to chuckle about and everybody's panicked about. Well if you should
be panicked about it. But you know, Elon Musk just did that brain
chip yeah yeah, thing and he's promoting it as a success. And well,
one thing, it validates what we've been saying for years about it to
plug people into the grid. He he put this chip into a man that
was paralyzed from the neck down and do the premise that it's going to give
you miss voter skills back and do all this. The other thing that it's
got came out of it so far is the guy has stripped up to the
next just like we've been predicting all along. Yeah, and the only result
Elon's got from it was posted on X I'm Elon's bot. Yeah, he
still can't move his arms, he still can't move his legs, but he's
fired up to the net now. Yeah, yeah, he can play video
games of his mind. Isn't that a great accomplishment? That's a pretty radical
game accessory, topping up your skull and put a chip on your brain so
that you can play a game. I mean, that's that's amazing. Well,
now, I think the most successful part of that is, you know
how we've been talking about how are they going to hook you up to the
net, and then that's going to lead into your facts, But uh,
how is he able to transmit outside of his skull? I mean that was
that was one of the sticking points. And the only thing I could think
of is the guy's got like this antenna, like these cartoon marshans, you
know, were reading thanks to the Internet. Don't have that old TV show
My Favorite Martial where he thinks about a couple vent and it's come out of
his head. I don't know, but you know, at the same time,
as they move forward in this and of course here's the vision coming from
the Rand Corporation, they said that there's going to be an Internet of brains
by twenty fifty. This sounds like the Matrix. I mean, these people
are trying to make science fiction come true. And it's kind of interesting,
you know, to see writers like Annie Jacobson. She's now out again talking
about nuclear war, but I've talked about her books on Operation paper Clip and
on DARPA and other things like that. She gets access to these people on
the Pentagon and talks about you know, what is coming up, but it
truly is amazing. She said, they'd like to get these these science fiction
writers and movie producers into the Pentagon and talk to them because then that gives
them a vision for what they want to implement. And she said when she
went there with gay Anne Hurd, who was the former wife of James Cameron,
they were married and co producers of the Terminator series and then they got
divorced and he just as far as I'm concerned, he made a bunch of
junk underwater movies and everything. But you know, with gaile An Herd there,
everybody was like, oh, I love the Terminatory. I mean,
they identify with the villains. And she said, that's kind of the scary
part of this. She said, first of all, they're all kind of
you know when they go home there they got a family, and they got
a dog, and they got a TV and they're kind of like us.
But she said, the bad thing about it is these people identify with the
villains and they're looking at these science fiction writers, give me some ideas of
some things that I can do. Well here we got the Rand corporation talking
about an Internet of brains. Looks like they've been camping out on the matrix
M And here's fil here's not the fail Okay, now you think that this
Google as they're presenting the founding fathers as African Americans, I mean, it's
not AI. And to me, it's just flat out with fraudulent. It's
a failure. If I it's a programmed it has nothing to do with AI.
They're trying to influence people under the guise of AI. Now that's the
public accesstem to their AI. I don't know what's in the back room,
but to me, I mean if I had a staff of programmers that did
that to my AI, everybody, but you know that it's perfect because it
was a picture of what they were doing with texts, you know, and
yet when you do it with a picture, everybody gets it instantly. And
now they're talking about the fact that they can do voice cloning so quickly that
they can they only need fifteen seconds of your voice in order to clone it.
Okay, Well, I guess maybe if Google is doing this, everybody's
gonna sound like Samuel L. Jackson, right, Hey, they all sound
like me. They'll get luck. You know, I don't know. Yeah,
they're gonna they're gonna be misappropriating voices all over the place. This is
such such dangerous technology, then only the government can have it. All right,
This is Samuel sam Altman, right, who is always this This guy
is dangerous, but he he's going to give that technology to the government to
clone our voices. But you and I can't have that. It's just too
dangerous for us to have that kind of technology. Hey, you know,
one skin, I think so maybe it's time some most start. Colleague.
Failure is a good thing, because have you seen this technology? I haven't.
I mean hear about it, yeah, I mean, but I haven't
seen anything. And it's great cover for these politicians. You know, that
wasn't me. That was a I mm hmm. That's right. I was
saying that when they were doing all of this stuff. All these clips of
me saying that's all AI. He's already using that as an excuse as an
alibi. It's like, no, I think that was you. So you
know, it's it's like everybody's talking about failure. I used to I used
to be totally anti failure, but now I'm embracing it's like theyre is a
good thing of what these people are doing. Yeah, well, you sound
like me. We start out in technology and it's like this stuff is great,
and then we start seeing how it's being monopolized by the government and by
the military Industrial Complex and DARP and all the rest of stuff, and we
start rooting for failure. You know, I've got a great story for you,
and that goes back to your days at TI. You remember back in
the eighties, even in the seventies, man, if you had a calculator,
handheld calculator, you were top of the goop food chain. That's right,
that's right. And one of the first things I did with I was
working in radio at the time, and the first thing I did. You
know, I was a techie, but you know, back then tech didn't
pay anything. You were looked at like like the village idiots. So I
was working in the radio station and my first thing check I bought a TI
handheld calculator bout the size of a credit card, and you know, I
went that thing out. Man, I'm the biggest, biggest nerd in the
room and it was instant respect. Ooh ah, that in your digital watch,
right, A four days, I just only calculator. So my mother
had passed earlier, well, it was last year, and I was cleaning
her house out and I found that calculator because I gave it to her after
you know, there was bigger and better things, you know, more zeros
and the more commons you could calculate, the bigger peek you were. So
I gave her my old one and I found that and it has to be
every bit of forty five years old. I turned it on. It was
working, you know, los per Own David got it right first. You
know, what they're doing with technology, it's just sitting up for film.
It's not doing anything like we used to be able to do where yeah,
you had longevity to it. Yeah, yeah, And it was a big
it was a big leap. You know. When I got into engineering,
they had just approved for use for the students. They could they could use
calculators instead of using a slide rule and having you know, carry around with
you a slide rule and a book with tables and extrapolate between. And so
you know, it was like, oh, this is great, and it
really was, you know, and and it was very useful and helpful.
Uh. And so they had t I programmables, and they had HP programmables.
I think hps put themselves out of business now, but I got the
HP. It had RPN in it. You remember that a reverse polish notation.
Basically it was a stack and and so you do the operatives in a
different order and everything. But it was it was a lot of fun and
you had a great, great time with that stuff. And remember going into
classes and they have this giant couple of them that have giant slide rules on
the wall that were maybe about five or six feet long, so the professor
people had to do it. It's like, well, I'm sure, I'm
glad I didn't start there was a year or two earlier. You know.
It was a great timing to miss out on that stuff. But yeah,
they used to. It used to be a technology, was something that was
very useful and directed to you. I remember. The other thing that was
happening right about that time was the revolution in personal computers, and and you
were involved in that as well. But you know, the thing is they
had centralized computers and it was such an asshole to use them, and then
you had computers that would sit there and wait for you you instead of you
setting there and waiting for the computer. But now it's completely the other way
around. They're using technology in every regard to surveil and to control us,
not to serve us. That's right, you know, as you said that,
I was employee number thirty at Compact back in the day. Wow,
And you know what we built back then is now what we call smartphones.
But I remember one day this is a great story because this is where they're
going wrong with technology. This is before Compact went out, you know,
really hit the market, and we were trying to build the ultimate machine.
And we did a lot of things. We smoked things we weren't supposed to
smoke back then, but it helped us in the lab. So we got
the bright idea, let's shock tests the prototypes. Well, we grabbed about
four of the prototypes and left to the roof and we were throwing them off
the roof, shot testing them. Roger Rod Canyon, the CEO, drove
up. I swear I've never seen a man have a nervous breakdown in the
middle of the parking lot. But those computers that we do off through.
Four of the five survived. Uh. Can you imagine any kind of electrical
device off the roof nowadays and expecting to survive. That's right. That could
have been a marketing thing right there. So it's a uh, that's your
h it's not a it's not a bug, it's a feature. You know,
we can we can drop these things off the roof. Percentage of them
survived, well, well, the vice President's walked in and we were bowling
with them. I mean we had always that we taking music, like bowling
balls to see if they survived. But you do nobody does that anymore.
Like it's a piece of junk. You drop your iPhone on the floor,
it's gonna break. And you know, this is the type of steps that
the longevity of things as opposed to what we seem to be doing now,
which is totally wrong. You think about these brain chips, you get one
of these put in well, you know, while I'm on that subject,
I remember you were talking about DARTHA. I was part of the NEMAX program,
which was the big Web server, the one that looks at everything on
the web, search that looks at everything on the Internet. Well, at
the time, parallel to it was a darker bring initiative, and I had
the clinics and these type of things where well, you know, you and
I talked about now, used to slip over there, read and watch and
see what worked and what did you Well, when I'm talking about these chips
and what they're doing, already had this twenty thirteen, twenty fourteen, already
had a glimpse of what was coming. And something dawned on me with these
COVID shots our access. Do you know how they're pulling all these sinews and
this white rubbery stuff out of these people's names and stuff. It dawned on
me, this is the threading that will go from the chip to the person's
antenna, which, as it stands right now, will be the tattoos.
Wow. Wow. And that nanotech lost control or they lost control of something,
lost control and it didn't stop building a thread status and it just kept
building until it plugged these veins and honeries. This this nanotech is any these
people from these shots, it's almost going road. Yeah. Yeah. As
a matter of fact, it's kind of interesting because you look at their key
technologies genetics, robotics, artificial intelligence, and nanotech. The acronym to remember
that it's grain. But they talk a great deal now about genetics, always
talking about genetics, always talking about robotics, always talking about artificial intelligence.
But why they don't talk about is nanotech. And I think you know that
dog that's not barking right now. The fact that they're not talking about nanotech,
that's a big deal. And it's interesting that you had mentioned that,
because I think that's very significant. We had in Japan. They threw out
first one point two million doses of this genetic code injection, and then they
threw out an additional million. And what happened was, and I don't know
if these things were not properly refrigerated or what it was, but they started
noticing black particulates in it that would react to magnets, and so they just
trashed a couple like two and a quarter million doses of this stuff because they
had magnetic particulates come out of the vaccine precipitating. Yes, yeah, that
was that graphine outside, Yeah exactly. Yeah, And uh, but you
know, I don't me. I can't do it. I mean, if
someone went through one of these big, faberous things in front of me,
I'm atta school like twelve year old girl, and so you get it away.
But what one of these well, they're putting these things out of dead
people because they kill them, you know, like you said, it's like
what I mean, that's always the thing about nanotech. You know, they're
talking about, uh, what happens with nanotech self reproducing and very small?
What happens if we can't stop it and it doesn't run away? And they
said, well, just to get this great goop, And maybe you're right,
maybe that is what is happening with these uh this well you know it
has run away. But these undertakers and people that are dealing with this,
well, I think I would like to see and it would it would be
the smoking gun and Ben indoll On proving this is they send an electrical charge
to it and see if it will conduct electricity. Yeah, that's right,
you see if it if it will handle a little mindal charge to it or
even smaller. It's a minuscule amount of electricity, but something that could verify
it mm hmm. That would leave no doubt that this was this threading system
that they have planned for these brain ships. It'd be interesting to know what
the resistances across it, wouldn't it. Yeah, I would, And that's
my point. If it's conducting electricity, you've got some explaining to do.
Pazar. No, they don't have to explain anything. They're just it's rare,
it's not happening. I don't care what you see. Don't believe your
eyes. I'm the FDA, I'm Faucci, I'm Trump for whatever. I'm
going to tell you what this is about our BI and it truly is amazing.
And yeah, you know, getting back to this brain chip thing and
what Ran Corporation is now saying, you know, they'll say eventually, when
they're ready to roll something out, they'll finally admit what they're doing. You've
seen this stuff happening for a very long time. And you know, getting
back to Annie Jacobson and she was talking about some of these agencies. She
said, you know, you have this one agency and it was involved in
launching satellites, all this kind of stuff. Huge agency, and nobody knew
it existed for decades. You look at the NSA for the longest time,
people say it's no such agency, it doesn't even exist. We're not even
going to acknowledge its existence, and that type of thing. But they keep
these eight even entire agencies. One guy was bragging about it. He said,
we had We had ten thousand people that were involved in this project and
not one person leaked it. And he said, well, actually ten thousand
and one because we had Tom Clancy involved as well. Tom Clancy, you
know Tom Clancy. This is the guy who worked with Steve Pattinek and he
was working with the little guys keeping this big project with ten thousand people.
It's keeping it secret. It's like what is going on with it anyway.
But the bottom line is when they start talking about this stuff, it means
that they're right on the cusp of putting it out. And so now the
Rand Corporation is talking about an Internet of bodies. We've always talked about how
you've talked about this for a very long time, all these different medical devices
and things that they put on, and how they can use that to hook
us into the Internet of things and how we all become more things that they
can monitor. And so they talk about the Internet of bodies and they say,
well, and then you know, if we've got an Internet of bodies,
we can have an internet of brains as well. Elon Musk is actually
even talking about this go tree with a talking about how social media for him
is kind of like a hive mind. And maybe that is a key part
of what he got Twitter, because maybe it isn't just about building his public
image with conservatives as mister free speech or something, but maybe it is about
this hive mind mentality and being able to monitor what everybody is saying. Uh.
Maybe that's the key part of it. Maybe that's the hive mind that
he is trying to set up. Well, you've got the answer, you
just haven't applied it to the right application yet. Uh. But that's a
I you see the machine learning remember, Oh yeah, here's the thing.
This is what it's going to take to trap AI. And you know,
I've put my cut off date at year two thousand. After Bill Gates failed
to do by two, key Love reminded that if his first virus pandemic didn't
work out, neither did his second one. Good going, Bill, the
smartest man in the room. Let's hope that there's surveillance stuff works as good
as his search function on Windows. I'm telling you, man, that's what
I'm saying. Tell you it's good. Yeah. But if you took everything
that was said, everything said published or put on Internet and put it into
it insanely large library the power the AI AI would be giving you answers back
to to census. Okay, you just said Elon's trying to turn a Twitter
into basically an AI form here, You're right. What that bang for your
book is to fout the largest social media platform there is. You're limited,
well except if you want to pay for it. You can post more,
but you're limited to set amount of characters. It's perfectly tailor made to feed
AI. So you know, you could ask AI, what's what is the
world's favorite color? And it could access all these trillions of replies to referry
colors and come up with the one that is primarily the most favorite, and
then it would lie to you about it because it's biased. Not sure you
could do like Google and just pre program it, you know, like,
hey, well let's just program it to give out the results we want exactly.
Yeah, that's not AI. I mean I'm sorry that that there is
Uh well, I can't say it on there. I mean, you know
everybody turned around and say, did he really say that? But no,
this is Yeah. Google needs to be called out for this. Yeah yeah,
yeah, it's pure Bolshevik, you know, as Marxist. Here's the
word I was looking for rhymes with it anyhow, Yeah, that's right,
that's right. Well, you know when when you look at what they're talking
about, though, and as you're pointing out, they've got to scrape all
this information to train AI, and then they got to take the extra step
of in putting a bias into it, you know, to get it to
give you the first it's got to know what the right answer is, and
then it's got to be trained to lie to you. So they got a
task ahead of them. But when they grab all of this information, it's
now even being talked about by the Wall Street Journal saying they're calling it in
breeding, whereas in the past and other people have talked about it, they
call it kind of cannibalism. And they made the analogy to mad cow disease.
You know, you feed cows other cows and after a while they get
this brain disease, or humans cannibals, they get Yakov Kortzpell disease, which
is a human equivalent of mad cow. But they said, you know,
if the artificial intelligence has to feed on human content on the Internet, and
then the problem is is that it's pumping out so much content once it starts
feeding on its synthetic stuff. Once it starts bringing in artificial intelligence stuff instead
of human stuff to use, then it starts getting really stupid in just a
couple of generations. It's just like mad cow disease. And so they're calling
it now now that Wall Street journalists. I talked about this months ago.
Now Wall Street journal is talking about it. Instead of making the reference to
mad cow disease, they call it inbreeding, you know, kind of comparing
it to the royal family. I guess, you know, but it's it's
good to be this inbreeding thing. And but either way, they they've got
a real issue because they're pumping out so much content, they're going to be
polluting their own data source. Well one, you could never have enough in
bread silicon, you know. Yeah, that's rights, That's what it's going
to be. That and you talk about failure being good. That may be
the thing that saves us from uh it is artificial intelligence is going to be
the fact that it's in bread or it turns into gets this U cannibalism thing.
If you talp and think about it, you could you could uh make
the comparison of AI being zombies. You know, got a feed on brains.
You know, brains. I need more brains. That's what your brain
ship may evolve into. That's right. I was trying to remember these.
In ancient Egypt, they used beetles for when when a person passed away upon
your gray matter. What was some scarbs or something. Yeah, there's a
scare beetle. Yeah, I didn't know that they ate brains. Well maybe,
yeah, they're they're really beautiful. They're they're they're rainbow colored and really
beautiful, and they have a really ugly existence. And that may be what
we need digital scabs, you know, that's right. Instead of trojan horses
or viruses, we could have scab uh for the AI. Maybe that'll be
a thing. Maybe maybe you can help make that come true. Who knows.
I don't know about that, you know, with the with the wall
of crap that we're having to put up with, I mean, it's lucky
when you brought up the ship that ran over the bridge earlier, you don't
hear anymore about it only happened like two three days ago. That's old news.
It's something they've already moved in. Can you imagine old the news is
going to be when it's a decade from now and they still haven't built a
replacement. By then, people forget there was even a bridge. Their shortest
our spans are getting. They'll forget that Baltimore was there because Baltimore will dissipped.
That may not be a bad idea at the moment, right well,
except that they're all going to relocate somewhere else. You know, it's like
smashing an ant hell. You know, the problems are gonna They're going to
reconstitute themselves somewhere else and may be closer to your house. So maybe we
could rename it like Hollywood or something that they'd all refer We don't remember Baltimore,
but Hollywood, Maryland is really a nice place. Yeah. But all
this this information overload we're on, it's almost got to the point where where
people are that try to keep up with it because I always thinking about,
Okay, how am I going to do your shoe? You know, what
are we going to focus on? And there is so much out there right
now, it's it's overwhelming. If you tried to focus on it, you
don almost feel like a schizophrenic. Oh yeah, I know, tell me
about it. But you think about what that's going to do to. Yeah,
I mean how can it process the amount of information, disinformation, general
nonsense as being a hurl at it on a daily basis. Yeah, I
mean that's true. Well, you know what you look at it. I
think what is really scary too is not only is it their encroachment into our
minds and their intention to you know, take over our minds, literally connect
us to their internet. Because that's a two way street. You know,
if you're if you can project your thoughts, guess what, they can project
stuff into your thoughts as well. Right, So it's red of a two
way street there. But you know the other part of it is robotics and
the merger of robotics with artificial intelligence. I played a couple of weeks ago
a picture of this company called Figure Figure AI, and they had a very
very impressive robot. I mean this thing had smooth moves, you know,
and not this jerky kind of stuff like you said with Disney Animatronics or anything
like that. But I mean it had a great deal of dexterity. Could
pick up you know, soft uncooked eggs and things like that and not break
it. Could it had a pause, it'd have to look. You could
interact with it because it had chat GPT as a brain, but it had
incredible dexterity and it could process and learn from watching humans how to do tasks.
It could interact with people and kind of draw conclusions and stuff. There
was a little bit of a hesitation after they talked to it, but it'd
come back and it even had like this kind of you know, California surfer
dude way of speaking, you know, and even had like a well,
yeah, you know, kind of that type of deal. It even they
even programmed it with that to make it seem more human, even though you're
just looking at a faceless glass head. But you know, when you have
something like that. Now, these people are the guy who did future,
Sorry in a future, but figure Ai the CEO look now saying that we're
going to have these things everywhere. They're going to be ubiquitous. They're going
to be like yourself. I started thinking about that. What could possibly go
wrong with that? Goa tree for get out of things. Just gonna look
up your glass head and off, kid, it has the answers and this
thing is gonna follow you around. This is worse than or well orwell envisioned
A big brother. I that's gonna constantly be watching you. This thing's gonna
be mobile, and it's gonna be you know, uh, a metal and
strong. I mean, it could throttle you if it wants to, but
you know it's it's gonna be your constant companion following you around. Instead of
having your spy device in your pocket, your big brother device is the smartphone
in your pocket, You're going to have some minder, bodyguard, robot or
more like a prisoner guard who's going to be following you around everywhere. Yeah.
It goes back to the little saying, who we're alone together? Yeah,
that's right. Yeah, that's uh, it's gonna be you know again,
it's gonna be kind of a babysitter, kind of a minder, a
constant surveillance. There when they had the snowdentapes and Snowden leaks, and it
was only reported in Germany Despiegel, but they didn't show it here in the
US. So I've shown it over and over again, and it was three
slides and they said, who would have thought? In nineteen eighty four?
And they show the Super Bowl commercial and the next side is Steve Jobs holding
up a smartphone. Who would have thought? Nineteen eighty four that this would
be Big Brother, and they show him holding a smartphone, and then they
show everybody lined up in an Apple store to buy it. And they said
and that the zombies would line up to pay for it themselves. And so
I guess they're going to get people to pay for these robots themselves. The
early adopters will think they're so cool, and then they'll probably heavily subsidize these
things so that everybody can have their own prison guard. Don't you think,
well, I mean people, you know, I hate to say it.
Maybe I'm just going rogue. I don't know. They'd start to drumbeat of
this cool factor and they condition these people so you must have it. Yeah,
and by the time it actually rolls out these it's like we're that's taxpayers
in the US, We're fund they are own demise, and we're happily doing
it. It's the same thing with the great big glass coffee heads. And
I don't even know how you're going to cart that thing around, but anyhow,
well, I can walk people, they can walk, Oh good,
Yeah, I need another stalker. Yeah, they can walk out, probably
do somersaults on top of you as well. It's pound you into the ground.
It's like one of these bots of dynamics bots that are out there.
Well, yeah, some people will be going I can't wait, and they'll
probably even turn them into something. Man, I don't even think about that.
I'm about to prove out thinking about, Hey give me a big sexy
one, you know. Now we are going there. Yeah, yeah,
yeah, they'll be all kinds. I mean, you know, you got
the people who are into little fantasy stuff. The free type of people will
probably give them like little Pokemon things to follow them around. They'll they'll dress
them up in all different kinds of ways, and but it'll be yeah,
yeah, if they're if they're smart. You remember you go back to look
at the segue right when the guy was his name was it Dean Common or
something. I can't remember his name anyway, Uh, he got a whole
bunch of Silicon Valley executives together to show him the segue, and Steve Jobs
said, that's great, that's really amazing. But he said, you got
to make it look cool or people aren't going to buy it. And he
said, furthermore, you've got to control the release of this thing, because
if you don't you're going to have some you know, some some idiot have
a really bad fall on it, and that's going to kill the you know,
the marketing buzz on it. Well, it turned out that idiot was
George W. Bush and it didn't look cool, literally stupid. You know.
It's a I rode one once. Karen and I rode all around Chicago
once on these things, and we looked so incredibly stupid, but we were
having so much fun we didn't really care. But because it's a blast to
write these things, you just kind of lean and you're you're going about twelve
miles an hour in one direction. But they do look really stupid in this,
and that was what he was saying. So they're not going to make
the if they got somebody that's smart, like Steve Jobs, they're going to
make them look cool. They're going to make them look sexy or playful or
uh, intimidating or something. I think. So the rappers can have a
couple of these things following them around all the time like he did. Fortunately,
Yeah, can you have your collector's edition so that you're building up to
demand, you know, reditional one off, it's all one inexistence. Yeah,
watching for it like rare art. You know, it's yeah, yeah,
it's just stupid the things that they're trying to push off on the world.
I mean, I'm rooting for failure now. I mean, I no
longer want to build indestructible stuff. I'm rooting for failure. Yeah. I
hope the big glass head bills or whatever that we're talking about with that even
yeah, the figure bot well talking about figure talking about failure. You got
all these fast food companies. Now the new rage is for them to add
artificial intelligence. And I wonder how artificial intelligence makes the food taste? Does
it taste any better? I mean, sorry, I haven't been to a
fast food place in ten years. I could not tell you. I mean,
I don't you want driving by them, because you know it's like everybody
drives trazy getting in and out of there. Oh yeah, And that's what
they're doing. They're all they're making them all drive throughs. Right, So
even Tick fil A is setting up now, they're opening up restaurants that are
drive through only. And and now this uh, this uh, this is
an article from Wall Street Journal and they're talking about the corporation Yam that owns
Taco Bell and Pizza Hut and you know several. Yeah, and so they're
saying they're going to start setting up changing their restaurants and Kentucky Fried Chicken they're
going to set up as a drive through type of thing. So everything is
about drive through. But I thought they were also the same people that are
trying to ban private cars. How's that going to work out? I'm thinking
that you need to be the bi clean it is. It is crazy,
but yeah, that's what they're doing everywhere. And I keep looking at this,
but I think it's a good example of how these people are not really
they're just chasing fats. You know. It's like a corporate fad to add
AI to stuff, and it's not really going to help the quality of their
fast food at all. Maybe the AI could come up with something's more addictive
or something, you know, or more unhealthy, but it's not really going
to help the food. And uh, and then it comes up with it,
oh, let's just do drive throughs. When they don't realize they're not
paying attention to the fact that Biden and company are trying to stop all the
cars, including the electric cars. Another stuff really makes any sense, you
know, if you conceptualize with what these guys are saying is no, what's
going to have a job? Know, what's going to have a car?
How are you going to pay for how are you going to acquire it?
And then how are you going to pay for it? That's right, that's
right. I mean, you know they're they're making themselves obsolete failures. Good.
Maybe the maybe the global health of rebound and people become healthy because they
can't access to yuck or youm yuck is more like it's going to be the
new but yeah, it's uh. And we see in California they get twenty
dollars an hour minimum wage for all of the fast food restaurants just went into
effect with Newsom and so you know that this is going to push replacement of
the employees with robots and other things like that. And as you're just saying,
who's going to buy their food? Right already you got a lot of
these fast food chains are saying, well, we're seeing a drop off even
in the cheap fast food stuff. We're seeing a drop off because a lot
of our people can't afford it anymore. And this is only going to raise
the price up. So they're going to you know, fire people and replace
them with robots. So again, are you gonna have robots going through the
drive food to get something to eat? No, they're not going to do
that. Henry Ford said he wanted to have an automobile that his workers could
afford. They don't think like that anymore. They don't know us. The
future doesn't need us. The future doesn't want us, and these futurists don't
want to need us. Well, and then that brings us the digital currency.
Okay, you don't need a job, We'll just replinish your wallet every
month or whatever. And you know, suddenly where are we at? This
is something It kind of goes off off the grid for a moment, but
then it brings it back into to the subject. And this is the big
threes, maybe even the big four that people don't realize is well, it's
also with the facts. I mean, you can even throw this into it.
But the leaders in Washington, the leaders on state level, the local
level, the ones that are advocating abortions, they have Americans killing Americans.
I mean the next generation. You know, they're always about sustainability. Well
this is not sustainable, right, that's right, And this is sociological engineers
coming up with the stupidity, just like the past food. And then if
you do have a child that manages not get aborted, and you raise it
five years old and you put it into public school, right, they're doing
their dead level best to scramble the kids of brains with all these transvestites.
If I don't call it gender, this, this is just the stupid,
it's mentally ill this. Yeah, and if your kid does finally manage to
survive all that, the little torture and managed not to come out to be
self loathing, and you know which, you know which restrain to use,
and if it's a boy or girl, and what species it is. You
know, they have messed up our society so bad there. You even try
to kill us off with the vaccines, that's right, Yeah, try to
silize us mentally. And if they can't do that, they sterilize us physically.
They can use our food, they can use the medicine, but it
is a mass syop of sterilization to hate other people, not even you know,
just the other sex, the other gender. But they want you to
hate being around other people completely. You know that. I had an article
last week of a woman who has been wearing her mask now for four years.
She doesn't want her grandkids around her. She said, they're a little
German monsters. They get everybody so o cd with all this stuff. They
hate other people, and they don't they're completely They just want to live their
life alone and live their life again through the internet and just just hook up
that way and live vicariously that way. That's that's rare. You may she
may have a point of back. Kids, they are pretty nasty little incubators,
but yeah, as well, they have their strong points as well.
But yeah, it is interesting to see this, this program and how they
have gotten traction on it. And of course it was very key to have
everybody locked down in twenty twenty, to put everybody on get everybody a taste
of universal basic income. I think that's one of the amazing things to me
was how long this went on and how easy it was to train people to
take a handout. I mean, it's like the pacified, you know,
just like you take a wild animal and train them to, you know,
be hand fed. And they did that to people very quickly. Yeah,
they did that people very quickly. They've got the American public domesticate it,
and so servile it. You know, I honestly think you could do pretty
much anything you wanted to the general populace, and if you've got a good
enough excuse are merited, the people would go along with it. You know,
it's crazy. And then if this isn't bad enough, this is our
own government, it is orchestrat this. This is not a government for the
people by the people. They're bringing in replacements. They made such a oh
yeah, a mess of our society and what they've done to the citizenry.
They're bringing in replacements who don't have abortions and who don't go along with this
stuff, and we're going to have one massive culture collision here shortly if these
clowns in Washington are not removed. I mean, yeah, well, they
want to have different things. They don't have different cultures, different languages,
different groups of people who, as they collapse the system, are going to
start fighting each other instead of fighting them. That's the key thing. They've
got to have us fighting each other instead of fighting them. And that's what
I think is really in stored this year in the politics. You know,
they want everybody focused around the two guys who have been rolling this program out
for the last four years on us. But we got to have one of
the two of them, and it's all about their personalities. And look at
how everybody had this far away from the election, how much everybody hates the
guy and the other party from them. It truly is amazing. But that's
what they're training for. They're pushing us into an ethnic civil war as they
pull down society. That's exactly what they want. And you know, here's
something that people don't think about with this, and it's a very real scenario.
No one seems to conceptualize this is this would be the end if we've
had a civil war because we're out here killing and slaving whatever they have envisioned
each other, creating a power vacuum. I guess who's going to sleep in
there on that vacuum. See if it's going to be China, Mexico.
We don't have to worry about Canada, but maybe Russia. I think they
have their own issues at the moment. So you know, yeah, let's
said the civil war. And in the end, it's not going to turn
at people in vision, no, no, But it's attracted our politicians and
pure facts. Gottason. It's not going to turn athlete the NB that's right.
You know, well, we live in interesting times and they're going to
get even more interesting at an accelerating rate. I think as we head into
the last this this next term of whoever it is it's president, they're going
to take us right up to the end of the fourth turning and they're going
to take us to collapse. And you know, either Biden or Trump could
do it, or law La Harris, that'd be perfect for this role.
Any of them. They've already gone through the vetting. They already know these
people can perfectly managed to collapse our society. So that's what they're going to
try to do. And so that just to me, it just underscores how
we've got to get more focused on our own lives, how we got to
prepare for it. We've had already some forward looking state legislators, you know
here in Tennessee, we've got centered nicely. UH. In Utah, they've
just set up some new UH new laws that are going to allow the Utah
state government to start accumulating gold UH to protect themselves against the financial weaponization of
a centralized digital currency and other things like that, and and to you know,
the possibility of a financial collapse. And so you've got a lot of
different states. There's several of them here in the in the southeast that are
looking at this. Uh. You've got Utah, which is just uh,
you know, one guy has been very active there. Ivory is his name,
and just like nicely here, he's put in uh, several bills that
are going to make it so the state and individuals it's easier for them to
use gold and to have gold as a as a counter to what's going to
be done by the Federal Reserve. So you have people who do see what's
coming. But if we see it, we're going to make those moves ourselves
really to try to protect that. Yeah, but I mean if this goes
off the way that they're saying, you know it's going to you're going to
you know, I even say it, you're going to have to cut off
the head of the snake. Mm hm. You're going to have to have
your ruby ridges, You're going to have to have your breach Davidian incidents.
You're going to have to Oh man, I don't want to saying this stuff.
You're going to have to eradicate one lay in the I don't mean ternally,
But I mean this taught process of these politicians and these bureaucrats who have
led us to this point. They have it. They have to be punished,
they have to be removed from power, and things need to be re
established to represent the citizens. He no longer does that. And we're supposed
to be talking about text. But you can look at just right now the
news speed. Let's take let's take Easter the oyster rabbit. Yeah he did
say he did say oyster when he's meant to say Easter. Yet all hell
the great oyster rabbit. He there's all this tender gender stuff being pushed on
us, and for the life of me, I cannot make sense of it.
Why would you take something that's lessened one percent of the United States population
and offend about seventy five percent of your voters? Lit it? I mean,
I would say fifty to seventy five percent of the citizens in the US
identify as Christian. So why would you run that risk for one less than
one percent of the population to offend the majority? Well, I have an
idea, No matter, I have an idea because I think this is fundamentally
about, you know, making people say two plus two equals five. And
as I said, or the broadcast, you have the two plus two equals
five. That's what the tyrants want to do. As solzh Knitsen said,
as Orwell said, they want you to live by the lie. They want
you to lie to yourself, to double think, to say whatever they say.
You know, once they once you accept two plus two equals five,
then they'll give you something else that you have to lie to yourself about and
just linely repeat whatever they say. But it's also this this idea that it
ties in the the hedonism that you had with Orwell not Orwell but Huxley,
you know, and so it ties all of that together. But it's a
very useful construct. Yeah, when when you look at you know, the
from the transgender stuff, they've also got the furry stuff. And I think
that that dovetails into an augmented reality and people who want to just live their
life alone, living on virtual reality and living on the internet. That's what
they're pushing people through. I think that's another aspect of this transgender stuff,
is to keep people away from having physical you know, uh contact with the
real world, keep them living in a bubble, keep them in a virtual
reality where they can get on the internet. Their entire existence is on the
internet, just like Ready Player one. They can be a rabbit their entire
life. They can be an oyster rabbit or whatever, you know. And
I think that's a part of it as well. What do you think.
Well, I'm tending to agree with you on it, but this is so
obviously the death of democracy. Everybody keeps screaming about democracy. Yet you're taking
one less than one percent of the population and you're elevating their importance over the
majority. That's not democracy, that's right. And if you have a leader
in them, I mean, I'm pretty a political I think they all are
unfit for their office. But if you have a leader that is disregarding the
beliefs of the majority, that person needs to be removed from office. And
I'm not talking about religious I'm not talking about any of this stuff that they
get you lost in the weeks. I'm talking about the concept we're a democrat
reubb Well, okay, we're a republic that runs off democracy. When democracy
is not being respected, we've got a problem. Yeah, years ago,
Nuke Gingrich and he's just a politician blowing in the wind and everything. But
at least he cared what the majority said. I remember him talking about he
said, so you got and I don't even remember what the issue was.
He goes, so you got eighty percent of the people who want this,
and you've got twenty percent of the people who want that. Well, as
a guy who's a politician, I want to go with the eighty percent.
But we don't have people like that anymore. You know, as you're pointing
out, they really they keep talking democracy, democracy, even though we've got
a Republican we've got a Bill of Rights and things like that. They hold
democracy up, is this great ideal? And yeah, they don't care.
They don't care about the eighty percent. They're going to go with a zero
point zero two percent. Well, I'll say this, if this podcast thing
gig don't work out, you really ought to run for Congress. Just just
make my life total nightmare in hell? Right? I told you, well,
Karen, I said, you know, with this abortion stuff happening,
I'm tempted to run for congress uh and do the same thing that that uh,
that that progressive liberal did and say, hey, I'm running for Congress.
I can show pictures of an aboarded baby if I want to and there's
nothing you can do about it. Just make the whole thing about that.
But I said, you know, i'd have to run as a Democrat because
I want to make sure that I didn't get elected. Well, I mean,
if you did get to get elected, it'd be totally worth it because
you would restore my faith in democracy. Yeah, yeah, that would be
an interesting thing. But yeah, we'll have to see. Maybe in the
future years when things start to wind down, maybe I'll do that just to
have have the have the campaign be a single issue thing and everybody just sending
money to fund a a uh commercials. You know, somebody else can do
it. You don't have to wait for me to do it. Well,
we could. We could use your soft scary face. It's a campaign poster,
you know. There we go. That's it. Yeah, Well,
it's always great talking to you goa tree and it always is a blast,
And it's great tapping into your experience there with technology because that's where they're coming
out with, you know, the it's a technological slavery. And you and
I have both watched this this thing turn one hundred and eighty degrees around from
the point at which technology was a great thing we loved it. It was
making our lives better and now it's being turned into a system of slavery and
they're putting these chains on us right now and people can't wake up to it.
It truly is amazing. So it's always great to have you on.
Thank you so much for joining us. Goa tree, appreciate it well.
Thank you very much, David. All right, we'll talk to you later.
And folks, thanks for joining us. And don't forget Davidknight dot gold.
If you want gold is going up really fast. But if you want
to have something that's going to be effective counter to this digital slavery, go
to Davidnight dot gold. Let me tell you the Davidnight Show you can listen
to with your ears. You can even watch it by using your eyes.
In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to the
David Night Show right now. Yeah, good job. And you want to
know something else, you can find all the links to everywhere to watch or
listen to the show at Thedavidnightshow dot com. That's a website.