Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Night Show.
As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Tuesday, the thirteenth of February of Our
Lord twenty twenty four. Well, today we're going to take a look at
what is happening with climate They're really going to make a change. We're going
to be joined in the third hour by Senator Frank Nicely. He's going to
talk about how the natural asset companies that were unexpectedly shut down, how that
agenda is still moving forward, and how it's moving forward at the state level.
Just as we have states making subtle changes to enable CBDC through u SEC,
through the Uniform Commercial Code, there is the same type of mechanism that
is happening with conservation easements and other things at the state level here in Tennessee
and in other states you'll see the same thing as well. We're going to
began, however, with an update to the news. We'll be right back.
You know, for the longest time we've talked about pesticides and the effect
on our health, and their effect on the economy and their effect on the
food supply. Glyphaseit has lost well bear which owns it. It's created by
Monsanto. They bought Monsanto. There's been several glyphicit trials now that resulted in
multi billion dollar judgments, but of course they believe they can appeal their way
out of it. Bear knowingly bought Monsanto knowing that this was an issue,
and of course now we have glyphaset has pervaded everything in the food supply.
And I was just talking the other day about a study that showed that it
may actually be responsible for trends generational obesity, skipping the first and second generation,
hitting the third generation with massive obesity. They observe that in rats,
and so it may and not just be our sedentary lifestyle and our junk food
and the quantity of food that we consume, lack of exercise, but it
may also have to do with a glyphist that is in the food, and
that multiple factors are perhaps to the reason why we're seeing such an explosion in
obesity. All these things there, but there's also other pesticides that are similar
to glyphysid. Dicambra is another one of these, And understand that both the
cambra and glyphysid poison the land, poison the land for anything other than the
seeds that are sown that are sold, not sewn, but sold by these
corporations. This has already been a big factor in India, and Pierre Emidiar
made a great deal of money off of this very thing in India, where
the farmers would go in and they would buy these pesticides and they were great
at keeping weeds and other things out. Kills everything, kills everything except their
genetically modified seeds. Now, apart from the health issues, you know what
glyphisit does to us when it pervades the food supply, and the same thing
with these other pesticides. Apart from those health issues which are being adjudicated in
the courts now, there's also the typical globalist move to enslave people, to
make them renters. Because what they did was essentially by poisoning the land for
everything except their seeds. You are now at their mercy. And every year
you cannot create your own seeds, you must buy those seeds from Monsento or
nothing will grow on your land. Or Bear now Bear BASF Military Industrial Complex
Company and Syngenta. These are three dekamba based weed killers. We have a
tendency to want to say dekembra but it is Dekemba. I'll try to keep
that under control because people always write me the mispronounced things, and I appreciate
that I need to need to fix it when I mispronounced the words. But
no, this is also kind of a sister idea. Again, you have
to buy their seeds because it poisons it for everything else. And it's a
big problem for dekemba because it drifts, It drifts in the air, it
seeps elsewhere, and so it destroys neighboring lands. This is one of the
reasons why for Glycasset and for Decamba, you had these big companies years ago
spent millions and millions of dollars to try to defeat local regulations that prohibited their
use, you see. And so the response they spent in one jurisdiction,
there was a local election where they were going to outlawn in that community because
it was drifting. These pesticides are drifting and destroying the land of people who
are trying to grow non gmo stuff and trying to grow organic stuff, and
the pesticide was getting into their land and destroying that. And so they spent
over eight million dollars on TV ads in this one small community saturated it.
The problem is when people know the truth, no amount of advertising lives will
make any dent on it. You see, you can pay Travis kelce twenty
million dollars to push the next Peiser injection. But if you've watched a family
member die or had friends who have died, if you've watched and paid attention
to what's been going on these last three or four years, Travis kelcey in
a football uniform pushing peiser poison isn't going to have effect on you. And
of course, in these communities where they had seen what happened with this stuff,
they knew what the issue was and there was no amount of advertising was
going to stop it. So this happened in jurisdiction. After jurisdiction, these
big companies are spending millions of dollars. Again, small community eight million dollars.
They did not want a trend to begin. Well, it was a
trend, and so how did they stop it. They went to Washington and
they pushed the thing that many of us call the Dark Act. We said,
we're not going to have a patchwork quilt of these things being prohibited.
We're going to have the EPA approve it, Well, that still doesn't change
anything. The communities could still criminalize that. But it's always you see that
the influence is purchased in Washington. Washington is too far gone. It is
a tool of the multinational global corporations. Washington is run by cabal that wants
global government or governance, i should say, and headquartered preferably out of the
United States, you know their area. But they're not for America. They're
not for the Constitution, they're not for individual liberty. They don't want us
to own anything. And this whole thing is a scheme to turn all farmers
into essentially sharecroppers for these big chemical companies. And so this trial now has
yet again, this has happened before, yet again banned it. This is
not the first time it's been banned by court for being dangerous three weed killers.
And the court also says that the EPA broke the law. So it
says these corporations product is poisonous and the EPA broke the law. How did
they break the law the same way the Trump administration broke the law with the
vaccines, And it was a Trump administration that reinstated these just before the end
of the election. I wonder how much they paid him under the table Trump,
because it already had a court that had shut this stuff down, he
reauthorized it. He pushed the EPA really hard, just like he did the
FDA, and bragged about how he pushed the FDA to do this without any
testing. He pushed them to do it without any testing and without any notification
as required by the rules. But the rules don't matter, The law doesn't
matter, constitution doesn't matter. All that matters is do these people like me?
Do these people pay me? That's the Trump calculation, is a calculation
of the Democrats as well, just trying to get people to understand He's not
your savior. He's no different from Biden. He's no different from Hillary.
He's no different from Bill Clinton or Jeffrey Epstein, if you will. These
guys all hang out together. They're in it for themselves. And Nicki Haley
is coming after Trump, and rightfully so, for his stupidity for attacking and
again it's not about issues, it's about personal attacks for both of them.
And she claims that he doesn't respect the military. Of course he doesn't,
does she She wants to send the military out to die everywhere. He calls
them stupid, he says they're losers, and so forth, when they get
injured, when they get captured. But she wants to send them to every
war. So which one's worse? So get back to this. The US
Court this week banned three weed killers widely used by American agriculture, finding that
the EPA broke the law and allowing them to be on the market, as
they did with the vaccines as well, and so many now they've just said,
well, we not even care about looking at any of these new vaccines.
It's now set and established a precedent. It's established a president three takamba
based weed killers, which have been blamed for millions of acres of crop damage
and harm to endangered species and natural areas across the Midwest and the South.
This is the second time a federal court has banned these weed killers since they
were introduced for the twenty seventeen owing season. They were reintroduced, okay,
But as a matter of fact, when I did that, that's part of
that contest. For the anniversary of Einrand's book Atla Shrugged, I began by
talking about this very thing, and that was back in two thousand and nine.
So the corporation has got together. They took over the control of the
food, and you know, everything was centralized, and it all went wrong,
and it was you know, start at twenty thirty was the time date
that I had on it, and I showed this desolate desert where nothing would
grow this type of stuff. This has been known for a very long time.
The reason I did that was because of glife going back to the nineteen
eighties other things like that. But now this is a newer version here.
In twenty twenty, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its own ban,
but months later, the Trump administration reapproved the weed killing products just one week
before the presidential election, at a press conference in the swing state of Georgia.
I had nothing to do with the presidential election. I'm sure that was
all just a coincidence. But a federal judge in Arizona ruled on Monday yesterday
that the EPA made a crucial error in reapproving to CAMBA, finding the agency
did not post it for public notice and for comment, as required by law.
I don't like this system, but they don't even follow this system,
you know, required by law. We have regulation without representation, as well
as taxation without representation. The laws are supposed to be made by your elected
representatives. Instead you have these bureaucracies at publish rules, they put them up
for comment. They're not accountable to any of these comments. You know,
at least politicians, if they get a massive amount of response on something,
they'll pay attention to it. And I know that's true. I've seen that
happen at the state level. I mentioned that before. In North Carolina we
had a completely Democrat government, both houses and the governor, and they were
allied with the big teachers unions and they wanted to come for homeschooling, and
the few homeschoolers that were there at the time organized letter writing campaigns just hammered
them with it, and they backed off. They backed off. I mean
that truly was amazed they and it's the number of responses that they get.
But the bureaucracy doesn't have to back off because they don't have to face reelection.
They don't care what you say about the rules. They'll do what they
want. And they've been captured by corporations and so they didn't even bother to
go through this rule thing. Why bother I'm going to do what I want
to anyway, right, just a formality. But the judge said, you
skipped that, and you also skipped the testing. This is rushed through.
Yeah, that's how you got the warp speed vaccine. You skipped the testings.
Trump so again, you know, do the vaccines, no tests,
do this, No tests, no notification, no rules on the pesticides.
He just needs to know who's going to pay him. The judge wrote that
the EPA did not allow many people who were deeply affected by the weed killer,
including specialty farmers, conservation groups, and more, to comment. Well,
again, that was like the lockdown. We've never had a lockdown of
healthy people before. We've never had a lockdown where non essential businesses, in
other words, the businesses that are not big box retailers on Wall Street,
those non essential businesses, they were shut down. They didn't get a chance
to weigh in on any of this stuff. You had a bureaucracy under Trump
administration to shut them down. There was no comment period. And oh,
by the way, if you made comments, so you got in trouble,
you got purged. And if you refuse to comply with this, they would
shut you down. Permanently. So all of this stuff seems to be the
same procedure. Let's rush this through, no testing, no comments. I
don't really care what you say. You're non essential, just like the lockdown.
So this lawsuit was filed by farmer and conservation groups. They said time
and time again, the CAAMBA cannot be used without causing massive and unprecedented harmed
to farms, as well as endangering plants and pollinators in other words bees.
But see this is also about the global agenda to turn everybody into renters.
Because for all practical purposes, once you poison your land with this stuff,
it's owned by bear monsanne to you can't do anything with it except grow their
seeds, and you're at their mercy. When they raised the price of the
seeds. As a matter of fact, it got so bad that with glyphasset
they had, they would go out and they would look at stuff that was
going on other people's property, and they if the seeds went on to another
person's property, they would come after them for you know, just like the
Digital Millennium Copyright Act, or you can't fix your tractor, they would come
after them. If these farmers tried to get off of it in some areas,
or if it went on to another farm, they would sue them for
intellectual property theft for these genetically modified seeds. It is the same type of
scheme we see happening everywhere everywhere. The kamba was introduced to American agriculture in
nineteen sixty seven, but was never widely used during warm months because it was
well known that the chemical can volatize and move long distances when temperatures climb.
Volatization is when dicamba particles turn from a liquid to a gas an hours or
days after the irbicide has applied, in effect turning into clouds of weed killer
and causing landscape level damage. So that's the process. It isn't that they're
out there spraying it and the wind is blowing it when it's hot. It
turns into a gas, then moves out and drops down on neighboring property.
That's the dacamba drift needs some kind of Brazilian music to go along with it,
right. Dicamba is also prone to drifting on wind far from where it
is applied, and it can move into drainage ditches bodies of water as runoff
during raining events. What do you think it does in your body. Oh,
they don't care about that. They don't care about life is that either.
So they encouraged Monsanto encourage farmers to buy their newly created decamba tolerant crops
the seed stuff I was talking about, just like life as it. Farmers
buying these specialized seeds could spray to camba on fields while the crops were growing,
killing the weeds but not the precious commodities. And again the Renter model
poisoned the land for everything but their stuff. De Camber resistant crops have been
planted on as many as sixty five million acres estimates the EPA, which is
an area larger than the state of Oregon that they have now poisoned poisoned.
In February twenty twenty, a federal jury in Missouri awarded the state's largest peach
farmer two hundred and sixty five million dollars were damage to his farm, though
that total was later reduced by a federal judge. So that's February twenty twenty.
In June of twenty twenty, Bear, who now owns Monsanta This Bear
announced a four hundred million dollar settlement with soybean growers that had been damaged by
non target drift, and so the Trump administration runs it, says that's February,
then June, the Trump administration runs it through just a week before the
election to reapprove it. You think they knew, of course they knew.
You think the EPA knew. Of course they knew. Months later, they
authorized it just a couple of months later without comment for a globalist, corporatist
scheme. For years, Bear and Basf have blamed other factors than their weed
killers for the damage that we all see, you know, not just poisoning,
but killing bees, other things like that. Discovery documents, however,
turned up in this litigation show that the companies knew that their decambo weed killers
would probably lead to off target crop damage. They think, we don't know,
but we do, right. We know that they know. We know
that they're lying. We know that they know exactly what they're doing. Other
documents filed in the lawsuit show the EPA was in a rush to approve the
CAAMBA in October twenty twenty to get it done by the election. Anybody look
to see if any of these companies made any donation to Trump or to Trump
packs or anything like that scientists complained that they did not have enough time to
do a proper analysis. One year later, the EPA issued a report that
found de camba was still spreading for where it was applied to adjacent areas.
It was doubtful that de camba, used on tens of millions of acres of
cotton and soybean crops in the US could legally be kept on the market.
But again we see the same mo We see the Trump warp speed hustle for
this, just like you did for the plandemic, the global plandemic, the
poison poison land for everybody, everything, like their seeds. You know.
As a matter of fact, this memere okay, So after this injection you
may feel a bit ill. That's mainly because it's poison. Yeah, mainly
because it's poison. Bar de Canva based herbicide they're inherited when it acquired Monsanto
in twenty eighteen. And of course they knew all this when they bought it,
just like they knew all about glyphyst The news comes a particularly bad time
for Bear because they just had the Monsanto trials happening there. Sinjenta is also
facing nationwide litigation over its paraquat, herbicide, which thousands of plaintiffs claim causes
Parkinson's disease. And of course, if the term paraquat sounds familiar, is
because they were doing massive spraying of marijuana fields with US too in Central and
South America. Paraquat, you know, give people Parkinson's disease. Meanwhile,
perhaps perhaps Bear was grateful to Trump, and maybe sent Genta was grateful to
Trump. But as I said yesterday, maybe he's wondering if Taylor Swift is
going to be grateful to him or the copyright changes that he made. I
haven't looked at those changes, the Music Modernization Act. I seriously doubt anything
coming out of Washington is going to benefit singers. But I don't know that
he's necessarily doing this so he can shame her into endorsing him. I don't
think she cares. I think he's doing this for his bass. I think
his bass can't stand Taylor Swift, and so he picks a fight with her.
This is the way the whole thing works. If he can pick a
fight with her, it helps him. They hate Taylor Swift, So if
Taylor Swift hates Trump up, that makes him look better. They hate the
Democrats. So if the Democrats use law fair against Trump and indict him for
this stuff, they love him. Well, if these people hate him that
much, he's got to be really good if they're going to go to all
this trouble, got all this lawfair for this stuff, and of course they
want Trump as the opponent as well. But and then he, you know,
does the same thing with the judges that he's doing right now, Taylor
Swift. He mocks them. He hopes that they take the bait and come
after him. That's the basis of his popularity. It's not based on what
he did. He's now talking about doing conservative things, which he never did.
He did the opposite of what he's talking about. Now, now we've
got candidate Trump, We're about to get Trump, you know, four point
zero. I guess you get candidate Trump the first time, then President Trump
is Trump two point zero. Then we get candidate Trump three point zero.
Then we'll get president Trump four point zero if he wins as a former president
Trump making a play for Taylor Swift, writes bry Bart, No, exactly
the opposite. He's he's pushing her, goating her, baiting her as a
ploy to build up his base. I don't like Taylor Swift, you know
that, of you wretch. I'm sick of seeing Taylor Swift, and I'm
sick of seeing Trump and every every article as well. Maybe you're getting sick
of the two of them as well. Trump even said that he was a
fan a Swiss boyfriend Travis Kelsey, even though he said he may be a
liberal and probably cannot stand me. Well, they're would be getting along together.
Look, Travis Kelcey made twenty million dollars for pushing this Pfiser crap.
And you know, mister Pfizer wouldn't have made twenty million dollars if mister Trump,
the father of the vaccine, had put this stuff out. He's the
Pfiser father. He's the father of the Pfizer vaccine. So mister Pfiser ought
to be very happy about Trump, don't you think. No, of course
not. They will be on opposite sides of all this stuff. Thank you
very much. I appreciate that, Karen be on Rock Fan, thank you
for the tip. I appreciate that. Oh, by the way, you
know, speaking of the of Travis Kelsey, look at this, you know
this is everybody has seen this by now, the guy that's the head coach.
The look of this guy. Everybody's saying Andy Reid. I thought,
who is Andy Reid? Is he the offensive line coaches? No, No,
he's the head coach. He comes out, pushes them. Other players
have to pull him off, and so I don't know, you know,
after after young of the coach, I don't know that Travis Kelsey is going
to have be amenable to Trump either if you do that. Uh, the
man that Maga praised too. You know our Pfizer father who worked in DC.
You know I would be Trump's name anyway, and angered, Travis Kelsey
slammed into Andy Reid with enough force to knock him over. These other guys
didn't catch him. Maybe this is a warning to Taylor Swift, don't get
on this guy's bad side. She's a lot smaller than that than that coach.
That coach has got a good bit of mass on him if you notice
that. But she doesn't. She might not want to double cross him.
They had it was all over social media. Lip Readers said, well,
this is what he was saying, and a lot of jokes, one of
them, if we lose, she's gonna dump me, And then write a
song about me. That's my favorite one that I saw with all these different
ones. Most likely that will eventually happen. And as Valentine's Day is approaching,
I thought this was interesting on Reason magazine, pull this picture up,
Travis and show this. Why are teens rest? It's not social media?
Per se? Has Reason magazine show that picture? Yeah, I look at
that picture and that got my attention because that guy on the left was me
when I was a teenager. They're with my sacks. I had a lot
of things that I was doing, you know, I was, I was
in a band, I was socially active with a lot of different people in
that sphere I was. I didn't participate in sports. We did a lot
of water skiing and other things like that, and you know, with friends.
But today the teens are like the guy on the right hand side,
doing nothing but looking at the phone. That's their entire life, you know,
the black mirror, as they say, that's the real issue. Social
media is just one aspect of that, and it really is the isolation.
And so this is a very long article. I'm not going to go into
from Reason. Maybe the problem for the teens is not the screens, but
what the screens are replacing, and they look at it from one aspect or
the other. They talk a little bit about the damage that was done by
the plandemic lockdown and things like that and how and reason. We'll say,
well, but you know, the screens were kind of a lifeline for some
of those teens who are locked down with the plandemic. It really doesn't matter.
They look at adolescent depression, isolation, and even when you look at
things like teen pregnancy rates out of Wodlock pregnancy that has declined significantly, driving
fatalities of decline significantly because the kids are isolated and they're setting in their homes
and you know, those are things that happen when kids are out and about,
but you know, those are both signs really of increasing isolation. And
it's not just there. So one study found that the social media does have
an effect. They said that one study found that adolescents who spent more than
three hours a day on social media faced double risk of experiencing poor mental health.
They said when Facebook was rolled out. In another study across college campuses
in two thousand and four to two thousand and six, they found a nine
percent increase over baseline depression and a twelve percent increase in anxiety after Facebook was
put out. But of course that's all just the beginning of all of this,
and it all really is this program to isolate us that was just a
major, major push during the plandemic to have everybody isolated as they seek to
have us. But the Washington Post jumps in on this because tomorrow is Valentine's
Day, and so the Washington Post talks about the anti Valentine Day movement.
They're actually making a virtue of isolation and of not having a relationship because you
could get hurt in this. You know, don't try to connect with anybody
in a relationship because you could get hurt. Maybe the Washing Post for tomorrow,
maybe they'll change their subtitle to Romance dies in Darkness or in Isolation,
And it is really about isolation and anti social behavior that they're celebrating. They're
saying, this is part of people's identity. They said Valentine's Day has more
potential to hurt, harm, terrorize, terrorise the students. Can you imagine
that start of February's triggering for anybody who isn't feeling it again more this,
you know, woke Marxist nonsense. They said. There is a lot of
T shirts that are being sold. They are anti Valentine's Day. One of
them is there's love in the air, try not to breathe design and it
shows somebody wearing a combat gas mask because you know, that's what this is
about. Mask up, mask up, keep yourself away from dangerous human beings.
I mean that that that T shirt there is essentially a distillation of all
this fear that is being pushed to this generation of teenagers for the last several
years and done to them for years by everything. Another one fries before guys,
fries before guys. You say, mener evil. So you should be
a lesbian, you should join LGBT. Uh. That's one way to uh
enforce depopulation, isn't it declining birth rates? A lot of it is social.
A lot of it is chemical and environmental that is happening, but there
is a social component to it as well. Again, it's all these different
things, just like we're talking about olbesity epidemic. It's all these different things
all at once. They don't try just one thing, you know, these
these evil satanic plots, they don't just try one thing. They've got a
confluence of events that hit us in multiple fronts. Valentine's Day, they said,
to the distaste of many and to the delight of some, underscores away.
Our culture intertwines love with money when we talk about how people profit.
But wait a minute, weren't they just celebrating this anti Valentine's Day merchandise?
Yeah, this is after all the Washington Post marketing is pivoted to hosting Gallantine's
Day again. More lesbian is a more isolation of people from each other.
You too, can sit with your other single friends and drink wine until you're
all weepy. No, I know, Oh you could go to You could
watch a Taylor Swift concert too, same type of thing. I mean,
Taylor Swift stuff is really kind of like Gallentine's Day, isn't it. It's
all women. It's amazing. And you know when I played that video,
I didn't talk about that. Yesterday. I played that video of the Silent
Disco where they took over this ancient cathedral, Canterbury Cathedral. It was all
women in that picture. It was all women, wasn't I didn't see any
men. You know, it's all women dancing around in the dark. Waving
glow sticks and having you know, the headphones on, glowing headphones. Can
of most guys are gonna look at that and go, yeah, I know,
that's what I was just about to say. I can't imagine any guy
wanting to do that. So it's a cathedral full of women dancing with each
other. So yeah, the dating trauma, you know they they have.
The next thing they go to is just how traumatizing. This is, terrorizing
and traumatizing it is. And they talk about Maryland teens going through what they
call Connection Counseling. This is an organization and Maryland there because you're washing posts
is out of DC and so these are kids who have been so traumatized by
their dating experiences that they're going to see a psychologist to finish them off.
I mean, this is it's psych Collegists are just gonna take it down the
mix. It's absolutely amazing. Don't get hurt, isolate yourself from all human
contact, and as I said, to do that is a good thing.
And they call that an act of self preservation and of self love. I
found pictures of the author of this article, and I understand why she's had
a rough Valentine's thing. When I started reading this, I looked at this.
I thought, wait a minute, is this Taylor Lorenz. No,
it's somebody, it's somebody else. Uh, yeah it is. It is
truly amazing self love. In the last days, people will become what lovers
of self right, and it be promoted as a virtue by the mainstream media.
Finally, they say, she says, finishes it up says it's all
about choosing yourself. Bravo teens, That's why she finishes it. Well,
my question about all this stuff is what would Chuck Norris do. Chuck Norris
on WND has a column and he wrote about Valentine's Day Chuck Norris, so
we better pay attention, he says, A long journey to find my true
Valentine. And so, as an antidote to the Washington Post, let's listen
to a Chuck Norris on. Let's listen to Chuck Norris on this. You
know, do I have I'm looking at Yeah, I do have that.
Okay, I got that in the boxer, he said. In a week
when the world celebrates love, I was thinking, is love a battlefield a
blessing? Or is it both of these things? He said? I recently
read a poll, says Chuck Norris. They reported eighty six percent of Americans
believe true love really exists. Sixty seven percent said they themselves had experienced it.
Most of the rest indicated that they had not found it yet but were
hopeful that they would. About two thirds one third have given up. Not
surprisingly, the older respondents were more likely to say that they had experienced true
love. He said. Between the ages of thirty and forty four, sixty
five percent said they experienced true love. It goes up a little bit between
forty five to sixty four, goes up to sixty nine percent from sixty five
percent, but then it jumps up to seventy five percent for those above the
age of sixty five. He says, So what the poll seems to say
is stay alive long enough, and you really will experience true love. Or
it could say that maybe the younger generations not even trying if they're listening to
the Washington Post and the bad advice that there's being pushed on them by the
established media and schools. He said, like so many of you, I
had lots of trials and errors in the earlier parts of my life, he
said, but at the ripe age of fifty eight. I met my true
love in Valentine when I was filming Walker, Texas Ranger. One of my
best friends, Larry Morales, came to Dallas for a visit. He said,
I was living a single life. Even though I had had a successful
TV series, I was miserable. I had devoted my life to fame and
fortune, and I'd learned a hard lesson in those years. If your whole
life is spent trying to make money, and you neglect the important people in
your life, you'll create a deep void in your heart and soul, not
to mention your relationships. And I fell into this trap, says Chuck Norris.
Yeah, and of course the teens are isolating, not even for fame
or fortune, just you know, because of phone, because they're told don't
get hurt. But he said, his friend Larry realized that he had everything,
but he had nothing. So his friend Larry brought in a lady that
he wanted to introduce to him. He said, I was at a restaurant
with about twelve friends and he had a date. Larry came in with this
young lady. He began introducing her to everybody, but he says, I
was engrossed in conversation with my date. I didn't even notice until Larry called
my name and said he wanted me to meet Jenna. I looked up at
her, and all I could see was an angel staring into my eyes.
And I stuttered and I said, oh, er, hi, nice to
meet you, he says. When I finally turned back to my date,
all I could see were daggers in her eyes. She immediately left, and
so they talked quite a bit, and so the next day she invited him
to a fashion show where she was going to be modeling wedding gowns. One
particular gown had a long train, and as Gina was walking, it hooked
on a potted plant and she dragged it down the runway. She was quite
embarrassed. Kidding Lee, I said, well, I was thinking about buying
that potted plant. It doesn't have any use for her wedding dross, right,
And I saw that, and that really really resonated with me, because
the first time I saw Karen was months before I transferred to the University of
Tampa. She was with the marching band there. She was a towirler.
As a matter of fact, she had had a scholarship that she turned down
and can this full scholarship for twirling that she turned down because she wanted to
go to Florida and so she was very good at it. But I was
there with a date and we were watching the game and I was kind of
laughing at the band because the band was so tiny, very small school,
and they had a very small marching band. We marched about one hundred and
fifty people, and we had a very good marching band in high school.
These guys sounded pretty good, had a big sound, but there's a few
people. And one of the reasons for that, I used to the used
to self deprecatingly build themselves as the biggest little band in the South because even
though they had a few players, most of them were playing professionally. They
had really good people. No deadwood in that marching band. So we were
looking at and I was kind of laughing about how small the band was,
and then I saw this major wrette trip on a flag and fall, and
so we were laughing about that as well. That was Karen, and within
a few months I was dating her and I was in that band. So
that's how life turns things around, you know. Never laugh too hard at
something or you may wind up getting put into it by God. So anyway,
that was the beginning of their relationship as well. But he had some
interesting things to say. He said, they got married, and they've been
married now for twenty six years. Our fiftieth anniversary of our first date is
coming up on Saint Patrick's Day. We've been married for forty four years.
He said. Love is a battlefield, but it's also one of the biggest
blessings in this life. And the blessings far outweigh the battles if you are
doing it right. So Chuck Norris has some advice for you. Better listen.
If you're dating, you must not leave your brains at the door.
Don't merely consider the other person's outer traits, but discover what makes the person
tick on the inside. Don't compromise, compromise your morals or your principles when
searching for a soulmate. Make sure your core values and your beliefs align with
the other persons. You know. They said, we watched Shenandoah the other
day, and Jimmy Stewart's character has got some great advice for his future son
in law. And here's this scene. Yes, do you like her?
There's no easy job, Sam, take care of a woman, Oh,
sir. They expect things they never asked for. And when they don't get
them to ask you why, sometimes they don't add and they just go ahead
and funny, ship, are not doing something you didn't know you were supposed
to do on the what? For instance? It Well, that's a very
difficult question to answer, Sam, You're never quite sure. It's just that
it's sort of you might say, relative relative to what's it to how they're
feeling at the moment, and how's that? You never know? I don't
believe I really understand what you're trying to tell me, Sir. I know,
I know. I never understood it myself. I never understood it.
It's just one of those things, Sam, it's ron you just don't ever
see it. I suppose suppose Jenny started to cry one day. You don't
know what she's crying about, so you asked her, why do you follow
me? Sam? Yes, you asked her, and she won't tell you.
And that's when you ask her what it was you did that caused her
to cry. She still won't tell you, and that's when you start to
get angry. But don't get angry, Sam. She won't tell you why
she's crying because she doesn't know. Women are like that sound, and that's
exasperating, it's but don't let it make you angry. None. When she
gets like that, just walk up and hug her a little bit, because
that's all they really want when they're like that sound, a little loving.
You understand me, don't you, No, sir, you don't. Well,
yeah, that's a lot of truth right there in that little two minute
clip there. Back to Chuck Norris from Jimmy Stewart, he says, Socrates
once said, by all means, Mary, if you get a good wife,
you'll become happy. If you get a bad one, you'll become a
philosopher. I guess his wife was not a good one. Chuck Norris said
the same thing as true for husbands, right, ladies. Speaking of humor,
he said, Entry number nine and my one hundred and one Official Chuck
Norris Facts Book reads on Valentine's Day, Chuck Norris gives his wife the still
beating heart of one of his enemies, and being romantic, Chuck believes that
every day should be Valentine's Day. Well, he said, GENA and I
decided early on, through think and then that we were going to stay together
no matter what. See, that's why you have marriage. Marriage is that
commitment. And I see that so much in this generation view separate bank accounts
and all the rest of this stuff to me. You know that type of
stuff like prenuptial agreements and separate bank accounts that kind of backs off from this
commitment. You need to commit or not. You need to make up your
mind. We dedicated ourselves to fight for love in us and in others,
and to discover all the fruits that God intended to bless us with in our
marriage and our long term love journey. Chuck Norris says, pray together,
ask for divine help for you, for your family, for your country,
for your world, he said. Doctor James Dobson once said, a great
marriage is a union of two good forgivers. So be patient, be kind,
don't go to bed angry without resolving. I had somebody asked me last
week, you know what does it mean? He says, don't let the
sun go down on your wrath. Well, it was in that context.
Don't let this stuff fester. Don't go to bed angry with this stuff.
Finally, he says William Penn found at Pennsylvania One said she is but half
a wife who is not a friend. Yeah, going back to Jimmy Stewart,
do you like her? If you like like her, the love will
come and it will grow over the many years. We'll be right back.
H h See if you like the Eagles, dog doesn't Hallway, the cars
and Heuey Lewis and the news, they say the hotter Lewis and you'll love
the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio, download our app or listen now at
apsradio dot com. Well, I want to thank Eric and James on Rockfan.
Thank you both of you for the tip. I would ask all of
you if you would like the stream, if you are following in, if
you do like it, that helps us with visibility. That's very important.
Of course. You know, if you want to send a tip, that's
great too somewhere. If you want to support us on subscribe star, that
has been a big base of our support for the longest time, and especially
after we got shut down on PayPal, But we do have other ways.
If you'd like to support the program, you can find those at Ddavidnightshow dot
com. It will show you not only where you can find all the different
live streams, the video archives that we have, as well as where you
can listen to the podcast. And the podcast audio is not live at the
moment. We're looking at a way to perhaps make that the case, but
of course you can with Rumble. And you know that reminds me, I
forgot to put up what Noel sent us about how to do that travels.
We need to put that up on the website, the instructions of how to
listen to the audio live on Rumble, even shutting down your phone if you
want to do it that way. So we really do appreciate the support.
That's what keeps this program going. Let's talk a little bit about what is
happening in terms of the constant surveillance state to surveil us, to control us,
to immobilize us. And when you look at what is happening in London,
the anti ul e Z campaigners and that's the ul EZ. These are
the ultra low emission zones. In other words, what it means essentially is
that nothing but an EV is going to be able to travel there, and
if you have something other than an EV, it's going to cost you a
little bit more than fifteen dollars day to move your car. Well, people
are not happy about that. This is something that was imposed by Sadik Khan
against the will of the London Council. He just overrode them and put it
in hisself and himself and he's got cameras all over London. And of course
London has broken into all these different boroughs, districts, very much like New
York, you know, really all these different small towns that grew together,
but they still have some local government governance there. One of them, one
borough of Sutton, has just had a major protest against these and they had
about four hundred protesters in this one borough called Sutton and they basically blocked every
one of these cameras in that area. Four hundred protesters took part in the
borough wide demonstration, organizers say involved obstructing more than eighty cameras on a Sunday
afternoon. A bus driver of the campaign group Action against Unfair Ules Ultra Low
Emission Zones says the demonstration meant that no ULES camera was functioning in the South
London borough as At least twenty other cameras have already been damaged or removed.
These people have been coming after these cameras and taking them down. London Mayor
Khan's expansion of the scheme last year saw about ninety percent of the boroughs fall
under the ULES rules overnight, and the decision was fiercely opposed by the council
and a petition was set up to delay the expansion until public transportation in Sutton,
for example, had improved significantly and they got thousands of signatures. Pasidiq
Khan doesn't care. This guy is a foreigner that's been brought in to rule
these people to push this globalism. They want to ban privately because they don't
have sufficient public transportation. Banning private vehicles and then not having any sufficient public
transportation, that's a way to just mobilize these people into the fifteen minute city
plan. See how it all works. Well, there's nothing I can do
about that. Oh well, if you can afford to pay for the more
expensive evs, well that'll be fine until the power grid drops to its knees,
because they are wrecking that as well. Over emissions, and that's already
begun in the United States. You got the EPA already is now starting to
play this emission game to shut down power plants. So if you buy the
UV the EV, are you going to be able to drive it? No,
this is the this is the scheme. Sadiq Khan was one of the
founders of this C fortys thing. And of course they're upfront about what they
want to do. They want you to have no meat, no dairy.
They want you to have maybe one trip under one thousand miles on a plane
every three years. They want you to be able to buy three articles of
clothing a year. I mean it is draconian. It is taking us back
to the dark ages. And these people are all about it. And so
city Con was a co founder, a co founder with Bloomberg in New York
City, And so what is happening in New York Do they have these ul
easy cameras there yet? No, but they've got speed cameras up. If
you're going to measure speed or any of these other things. Once you set
up all these cameras to start monitoring the way people drive or if they drive,
or what they drive, it's a trivial thing to change it from speed
to emissions. And so in New York City what they call super speeders people
not that they're going really fast, and I can't. I've driven in New
York, which was the last time I was in New York to drive was
back in twenty twelve when I was there to cover the UN Arms Trade treaty
that they were trying to ram through, and parking and traffic was so bad.
I was there with my sons and we were doing interviews for National Association
Gun Rights and of people who are there from industry, people who are there,
were politicians and things like that, and so we were there shooting footage
and all that kind of stuff. It was so difficult to do. We
just had Karen circling the van, you know, while we were there at
the UN What a mess. I can't imagine anybody speeding there. They did
have signs saying don't honk the horns, three hundred dollars fine, and everybody's
constantly honking horns and see anybody getting fine. But how in the world could
you speed there? Well, speeding is going ten miles per hour or more
over the speed limit, so I guess, you know, if they got
a speed limit of maybe you know, fifteen or twenty miles per hour,
and if you're going thirty one miles per hour. You know the camera's going
to snap you right there and you get hit. Maybe there's a spot,
a little spot where you can speed up to thirty miles an hour before you
have to stop and wait for two or three minutes. Again. Super speeders
in New York are people who have tracked who have racked up over one hundred
infractions for going ten miles per hour or more above the speed limit. And
so they got all these different speeding tickets. You know, it's like you
would think about a super speeder, you think somebody's going super fast. No,
it's the quantity of tickets that these people are getting. Now, what
I find interesting about this is that one individual alone has three hundred and seventy
three tickets and they never took his license. Now, when I was going
up, if you got you know, every time you've got a speeding ticket,
you got points, your insurance goes up. But if you go over,
you know, if you had like three tickets or speeding tickets or something
like that, you would lose your license. This guy's got three hundred and
seventy three tickets and he's still driving because they're making a lot of money.
Isn't it about safety or anything else. This is about making money, and
it's about surveillance, and it's about control. So they said the city was
equipped with thirteen hundred New York City had thirteen hundred automated traffic enforcement cameras spread
throughout its burrows by twenty twenty, but only four drivers reached the super speeder
threshold of having more than one hundred tickets. But they said by twenty twenty
three as a number of these cameras doubled. So now they've got twenty six
hundred cameras, twenty six hundred just to measure the speed of cars. When
are they going to change this to again? Ultra low emission zones and things
like that, you know, you have to have they can look at and
of course what they're doing writing these speeding tickets. They have automated license plate
readers. So if they automated license plate reader looks at your license plate,
looks it up, that's a diesel car or that's a gasoline car, that's
not an ev okay, find them right there. All the mechanism is already
there, you see. They just have to flip the little switch to start
dinging you for something else. So they said the count. By twenty twenty
three, they double the number of cameras, and then they got twenty six
hundred cameras. And now they instead of four drivers who have racked up more
than one hundred tickets, they have one hundred and eighty six drivers who have
more than one hundred tickets. And the one the top driver, the guy
I would congratulate is the guy who's got three hundred and seventy three tickets.
Cities are increasingly turning to automated enforcement. Yes, because it's going to go
from speed to CO two surveillance control lockdown. It's not to be like an
acronym scl I did that for the genetic code injections of Trump. I used
to call them gcis. But yeah, we could call this SCLS Surveillance control
and lockdown if you will. This is all began because of something they call
vision zero. Isn't an interesting you see you have zero emissions by city con
in London. Then his sister tyrannical City in New York, they have vision
zero. Vision zero is not about emissions, but it's about safety, safety,
and we don't want to have any pedestrians injured or any automobile accidents,
and so we're going to that's our vision zero thing. In order to do
that, we're going to put speed bumps in, We're going to put cameras
in. We're basically going to eliminate cars because that's the only way you're going
to get to zero. Whenever you got freedom, it gets a little bit
messy. And you know, just like we're talking about with dating, right
zero, heart's broken. Everybody, stay by yourself, don't connect with anybody
else's right to talk to anybody else. You know, if you try to
talk to somebody else, he gives you a cold shoulder. Now, oh
his heart's broken, Well, get over it. Get over it. The
Blausio they've got the twenty six hundred cameras operating twenty four to seven and so
these super speeders now represent a majority of speeding violations. They have outstanding fines
that average over eleven thousand dollars each. Wow. See this is for money.
It's not for safety, right, it's for money. It's for them
to make money finding you, and it's for the bigger guys up another level
to make money by controlling you and renting everything to you and renting you transportation
by the right, if you can afford it, right, That's what these
self driving taxis are all about. And again, all of these ride sharing
programs, as Travis Kalalnik said, at the very beginning of it, the
guy that started Uber, he said, Yeah, what makes our rides expensive
is that other dude in the car. We're going to get rid of him.
We're going to have self driving cars. But of course there's not really
going to be any cheaper. They will still charge you by the ride,
and they will make a lot more money out of this. So what I
found interesting was that there's no pushback in New York City against these cameras like
there is in London. Now, of course London they've gone to a complete
lockdown. You're not going to use your car at all. So they've accelerated
this a lot faster than New York has. But that is the goal for
both of these places. Again, the two cities that were the foundation of
this see forty stuff forty cities that's now one hundred major cities are more around
the world. New York is advancing traffic law enforcement with proposals to hike fines
and lower speed limits. Yes, let's give everybody a ticket. If you
even move this thing right, you're going to get a ticket. We're going
to lower the speed limits, raise the fines. We're going to make it
impossible for you to drive, and we're going to make it unaffordable for you
to drive. So you're driving is either going to be useless because you're going
to be going so slow and have to be so worried about getting a ticket,
or they will make it unaffordable. Useless or unaffordable. Which would you
like? Despite challenges, New York's method of connecting tickets to license plates and
its extensive camera network could inspire other cities. Oh yes, it will.
And this is why I keep saying things are going to be better or worse
for you depending on your local government. Let me hammer that in. You
think Trump is going to do anything about this, of course not. You
think Congress is going to do anything about this, of course not. This
is a bad local government coming at people, and we've had situations. I
think in Texas they outlawed red light cameras. You had some bad jurisdictions where
they put those things in and you know, they created accents, people slamming
on their brakes because they didn't want to get a ticket causing you're in collisions
and things like that. But you know, you can have local governments can
get bad with this, but you can shut down the state level. And
if the state level allows that, then it's up to you to get some
people in your jurisdiction. They're not going to be putting in speed cameras and
bed light cameras and emission cameras and license plate readers and all the rest of
this stuff. You've got to fight this stuff at the local level. And
the Liberals have always known this. They said, think globally, that's their
global agenda, but act locally. That was a motto. It's been the
motto for sixty years. All my life, I've been hearing this, and
so we need to understand what the global agenda is that they're thinking about.
It's not hard to do, but we're going to stop it locally. That's
where the rubber meets the road, and that's where you going to block them.
As long as I said, we're going to be talking to Senator Nicey
in the next hour about that. And so as we're talking about these self
driving taxis, they're despised and hated wherever they are and so in San Francisco,
where they've already had situations where people have immobilized these things. In San
Francisco and Austin, they've blocked traffic many times. They've all gone to the
same intersection and blocked traffic there. They block emergency vehicles other things like that.
People hate them. So you've had situations where they put traffic cones on
them. They're not destroying the cars, they're putting traffic cone on it,
and it freaks out, It doesn't doesn't move. Made me think a little
side story here of when Karen and I lived in Texas when we first got
married from eighty to eighty three, and there was if you ever saw Stir
Crazy with Richard Pryor and Gene Wilder, there was a rodeo there, the
Huntington Rodeo. If I remember quickly, I think that's the name of the
city. It's a tough penitentiary for hardened criminal. They do their executions there.
People there said when they electrocute somebody, lights get dim But so they
said, at the time nineteen eighty we went to we like to go to
rodeos, and we went to a rodeo up there and it was kind of
interesting. They had a whole bunch of inmates that were in a caged in
area of the grand stands, all wearing white. They didn't wear the striped
suits if I remember correctly, though I think the people that if But it
was a prison rodeo, and so the prisoners would actually participate in the rodeo.
But you had to be, you know, found to have good conduct
in order to participate. And I think when we saw it, I think
they dressed them up in striped suits like the you know, the stereotypical thing.
But one of these events, they did different kinds of events than you
would have at the other rodeos. Peter would not like this at all.
What they did was they would get some wild horses out there that have not
been ridden, and they had a group. They put him in a group
of four guys and so they had to saddle this wild, unbroken horse,
and one of them had to ride it across the arena there to score points.
And what they did to a man was one of them jumped up and
grabbed the horse around the neck and bit his ear. And when they bit
his ear, the horse would just freeze as long as he's biting his ear.
The horses. I'm not I don't know what's going on. I'm not
moving at all, totally still, and the other guys would race to put
the saddle on, and more often than not they wouldn't get it cinched up
properly. So once the guy got on it start riding, the saddle would
come off and he would go underneath the horse. So some horses and animals
sudden and men were also injured this thing. But it was it was crazy.
It was a free for all. Whenever I think about these self driving
cars and they put the cone on it, it makes me think of that
rodeo. It's just the way. I don't know, it's a story.
I just just springs to mind the horse that freezes there. I guess these
prisoners never thought of putting a traffic cone on the horse's head. Maybe it
doesn't work. Okay, So Google has the way most self driving cars,
and there in San Francisco, I remember cruise As already said all right,
we're done. We had a car that, you know, woman was hit
by another car. It didn't recognize that she was on the ground, and
it ran over her as well and drug her for quite a distance and that
was kind of the final traffic cone I guess in their saga of a cruise
cars in San Francisco. But Google was still at it, and so last
week they had people were celebrating China's lunar New Year, setting off fireworks.
One person jumped onto the hood of an empty Way Moe vehicle, which you
know, these things are are still circulating around even though they've got nobody in
them. How efficient. And so one person jumped on the hood the way
Movee hicle broke its windshield. Another person then jumped on the hood thirty seconds
later. Some of the people in the crowd clapped and approval. Other people
were filming it. That's how they know all the details. They said.
That was when it went wild. They just got people on skateboards breaking the
glass, others graffiting the car. They said, there are two groups of
people, those who encourage it and those who are just shocked and filming it.
You know, half of the people now anymore just you know, don't
react to anything except to film it. Waymo said that someone threw fireworks inside,
which set the vehicle on fire, and then being electric fire at the
electric car. It just took it the rest of the way. It was
a Jaguar Eyepace equipped to with twenty nine cameras and other sensors, but I
guess those were all burned beyond recognition. But it reflects a growing public hostility
to all of this stuff. And that's the key thing as we look at
the hostility that is rising against the global agenda, the farmers and the EU.
As Katherine Austin Fitz said Why interviewed her last she said, when they
looked at twenty twenty three, an unexpected trend as they went back and looked
at all the articles over the last year was pushback. People pushing back against
this agenda. And most people don't really understand how dangerous and they don't really
this agenda is, and they don't really understand the full implications of it,
but they're still angry about it. But the farmers, I think, know
what's going on in the EU. The EU Commission now has bent the knee
kind of to these protesting farmers. They said they're dropping key passages in this
proposal for a new twenty forty goal aimed at cutting greenhouse gas pollution. These
people nitrogen, seriously, you want to stop nitrogen and it's not even nitrogen.
In the past they've complained about nitrogen fertilizer running off into water, creating
algae and other things like. That's not what this is. It's about nitrogen
gas. It's about what is it about eighty percent of the atmosphere seventy or
eighty percent of the atmosphere is nitrogen, and they're worried about a little bit
of nitrogen, a little bit more nitrogen going out there. It's absolutely ludicrous.
It's just like CO two CO two, including man made CO two,
zero point four percent of the atmosphere. That's going to make a big change.
No, it's not. They are gas lighting you. Well, I
tell you what if that movie hadn't come up with that term gas lighting?
This all stuff about nitrogen gas and CO two gas. That is the perfect
analogy for this stuff. When are they going to come for the oxygen?
That's what I want to know. The previously mandated thirty percent cut to agriclate
cultural production between by twenty twenty four is now gone. They said. The
revised draft also has excluded a mandate for citizens to make lifestyle changes such as
eating less meat, and a push to end fossil fuel subsidies reports political well
maybe and maybe not. This thing has not been passed, and some of
these European bureaucrats are not fully on board of this either. Farmers protests have
broken out in many countries across Europe in recent weeks. Some of the largest
demonstrations have been in Germany, prompted by a cut two diesel subsidies. The
EU's planned to be presented today Tuesday, will recommend a ninety percent cut in
total EU emissions by twenty twenty four, twenty forty by nineteen ninety levels.
This is still crazy. When you're going to cut ninety percent of emissions,
they're still going to be coming after your food and your mobility in your farm
and all the rest of this stuff. By the way, well, I'm
going to get to these at the end. I've got some comments here,
people talking about Valentine's Day things. But the updated version of the plan,
which is still subject to change, framed agriculture in a more positive light.
They talked about food sovereignty, and as I've talked about this and the food,
the farmer protests and things like that, I said, you remember these
verious European countries have always heavily subsidized food and farming because they wanted to make
sure that they were not dependent on other nations to feed their own people,
and so they wanted to have what they called food sovereignty. Part of that
was heavily subsidizing French farmers, Dutch farmers, and all the rest is because
they wanted to know that the farmers in their country could grow enough to feed
their population without relying on someone else. As a matter of fact, the
Netherlands are so fertile that they are the second largest food exporterer that small country,
second only to the United States. So again we're going to talk coming
up with Senator Nicely there is you know, as they shut down the natural
asset companies quickly and unexpectedly, he's going to talk about what happened with that
At the that was a plot to essentially bring carbon credits in through the New
York Stock Exchange. They would be given public lands. Why would they turn
title over to, say, the Smoky Mountain National Park? Why would they
turn that over to some private corporation. What are they going to do to
make it better? No, right, it's nothing, really, It's just
so they can tap into that. But it also then gives them this financial
construct to which they add no value whatsoever, but they get paid. This
financial construct will then be used for them to control things. And so Senator
Nicely is talking about it is how they're using conservation easements, which a lot
of farmers thought was going to make sure that the deal was that they were
going to get some tax credits, that this is going to remain as farming
land, and they were going to do certain conservation things. But now this
has turned to climate and to environmentalism. That's what the bills are now before
the Tennessee legislature and before probably the legislature in your state as well. Going
back to the Netherlands, our farmers deserve to be listened to, said one
person in the parliament. I know that they're worried about the future of agriculture
and their future as farmers. So again, let's listen to them, let's
assuage their fears while we stick the knife in their back and cut everything by
ninety percent. EPP environmental spokesperson said the twenty forty target for a ninety percent
cut over nineteen ninety levels. We should focus on positive opportunities for farm unless
on these new instruments that rather see the farmers as an enemy of climate policy.
You see, let's put them to sleep. Let's tell them that we're
going to this is going to be a positive opportunity for them. And these
instruments that we got and we're talking about, you know, just like natural
asset companies or doing these conservation easements or things like that, they will subtly
in the background and quietly change this stuff to target you, to make you
the enemy of their climate policy. One EU official tot politico really is hard
to escape the fact that is, the agricultural sector could and should contribute to
climate goals. It's hard to escape reality. Well, their reality is based
on these phony models. Their reality is not reality. It's not sanity either,
and we need to oppose this. We cannot accept and start arguing about
carbon We can't start arguing with them about levels of emission and their hypocrisy about
all this stuff that is not That is the path to losing this stuff.
We have to confront them on the absurdity of CO two being tied to global
warming to begin with. And so this official says, despite all the semantics,
right, this is all just semantics to assuage their anger. Despite the
semantics, there's an unequivocal impact assessment taking a very compelling case for ambitious headline
target and for all sub targets for all sectors. So this is just a
headfake. And of course when we talk about the diesel prices there are already
primed to a rise really sharply this year coming to a head. Global stocks
of diesel have been declining. Why well, because of sanctions and other things
like that, and lack of manufacturing capacity. And when we look at how
things have been transferred, how our economy has been and our manufacturing has been
transferred to China, here's a good example. Why are solar panels forty four
percent cheaper in China than in the US. Well, it's protectionism, and
it's the China price of slave labor, currency manipulation and things like that.
However, you'll see this that he talks about four different stages of production of
these solar cells, and what is happening in terms of China establishing dominance or
even a one hundred percent monopoly on these stages of production, and the way
that they're able to do it, of course is because of energy. Because
of energy, the last steel planets reported a couple of weeks ago. The
last steel plant in the UK was in Wales shut down. Why just because
for the same reason that the German factories are shutting down. It's a highly
energy intensive process to get these really high heats that they need for a steel
processing and metallurgy and all the resa stuff, and so that takes a lot
of energy. And European countries like the UK and Germany cannot compete with China
on that because China's got cheap energy. Why do they have cheap energy because
of the Paris Climate Accord and the governments saying that they have to obey and
comply with this, And so what that does is that shuts down our cheap
available power and it lets the Chinese and Indian companies build more and dirtier power
plants than way dirtier than anything in Europe or the US, and we shut
down our cleaner power plants so they can build cheap and dirty and they wind
up getting very cheap energy. And then surprise, surprise, we can't afford
to compete with them in any kind of manufacturing, not just in steel.
Oh steel, that's so yesterday. Well, no, it's not. But
also in solar and so they said every process of this is worth taking a
closer look. This is zero hedge, and the US trails significantly in every
stage of production. Four stages. The first one polysilicon. Polysilicon is a
very high purity silicon. It's ninety seven percent of the world's solar panels.
That's the fundamental building block, and that is the most energy and capital intensive
piece because the high temperatures and the expensive equipment used in refining. So there,
like I said, just like steel, we have polysilicon raw material.
Up until two thousand and five, polysilicon manufacturing was dominated by companies from the
US, Europe, and Japan. But with China's huge expansion and investment,
by twenty twenty three, roughly ninety one percent of polysilicon for solar panels was
produced in China. If you take something that's extremely energy intensive and you give
them an advantage in the price of energy, you artificially advantage them by something
like the Paris Climate Accord. This is what happens. And again Mitch McConnell
could have stood against. This was twenty fifteen during Obama, Remember Kerry and
Obama said we self ratified it. That's not a thing. Everybody said that
at the time, but not a single senator, as I said over and
over again, not Rampaul, not Mike Lee, and certainly not Mitch McConnell,
pushed back against that and called for a vote. They could have shut
it down. No, this is not this is not a treaty that we're
going to go along with. And then when Trump got in, there was
a fight in his administration the beginning of it. He decided that he would
not get out of it. He said, all right, well I'll declare
that we're out of it after the election. And so he left it there
for four years. And then the day after the election or whatever, he
says, well, we're out of it. And then two months later Biden
puts us back into it. Nobody wants to shut it down. They're playing
games with it. He left it there for four years to help establish You
know, Meanwhile, for those four years while Trump leaves it there, things
are being shut down everywhere under the idea that we have to comply with this
Paris agreement. So that's the first process. The polysilicon thing very heavily energy
intensive, and so now ninety one percent of that is being done in China
because of the energy advantage. Then you get to the ingots and the wafers,
and so what they do the next part of the process is also very
energy intensive, very high temperatures. Whether it is they take that polysilicon and
they make it into long rods or ingots, and then they cut them into
wafers. You've seen the wafers on the solar panels, and ninety seven percent
of the world's solar ingots and wafers are made in China. The US makes
none. None. So if you want to go to zero missions, you
know, once you get these solar panels, this is what they're going the
little bit of rationing of energy that they're going to let us have because you
can't do manufacturing with solar panels on the grid if you're going to shut down
the so called fossil fuels and they're not fossil fuels, that's all you know,
the peak oil lies that were put out there by CIA and the oil
companies to tell you those fossil fuels, there's only so much oil on the
ground, all that kind of stuff. So again Trump left that Paris thing
in there, and now we got zero ingots and wafers being manufactured in the
US, ninety seven percent of them made in China, just like ninety one
percent of the polysilicon has made there, and the bulk of China's solar manufacturing
is and provinces where electricity costs are nearly thirty percent below the global industrial average.
If you control energy, you control the economy. If you control the
economy, you control the country, and you can take the country down.
Folks, this is war against us. What would you say if if an
enemy came in and said, well, we're not going to allow you to
manufacture anything anymore. That's what our own government is doing to us. Our
own government is our greatest enemy. Our own government is marching in lockstep with
a global agenda, and that includes Trump. He let the Paris Climate Treaty
stand, and all the Republicans let it stand. The Democrats are open about
saying all they want it. The Republicans pretend they don't want it, but
they let it stand. The next part of it, sand and other materials
I called a quartz. Sand is used to make special containers called crucibles for
melting the silicon. Most of the world's sand used, and inget production comes
from where right here, Appalachian mountains around North Carolina and Tennessee. So we
have the raw materials for this, but we ship it straight to China so
they can manufacture and add the value to it. There we become a third
world country. This is reverse colonialism. What are we missing? We're missing
the permission to have cheap energy. We have a government that is shutting all
that down. Then you manufacture the cells. This is where the silicon becomes
a device that can convert sunlight into electricity. China controls eighty percent of the
solar cell market, largely because of cost advantages and energy The US currently has
no solar cell manufacturers, So again, this is to make us dependent upon
China and these and how do you go? How are you gonna bootstrap yourself
out of this? When we shut down all of our power plants, you're
going to hook up a whole bunch of solar cells to superheat. Stuff ain't
gonna happen. Finally, you get to the solar panels themselves, which is
essentially an assembly process. It's the least capital intensive and it is the least
energy intensive. But China still has eighty three percent of that market and the
US has less than two percent, And so the same thing is true in
your same kind of de industrialization. They are rapidly adding solar panels. They
added the number of solar panels that they have in Europe jump by forty percent
from twenty twenty two to twenty twenty three. But of course they're all being
made in China. And then you have the tariffs. Trump has been talking
about sixty percent tariffs, but Biden has kept all of Trump's tariffs and he's
increased them as well. So they're both talking about raising the tariffs. But
as a serioheddronical points out, it's not going to level the playing field by
increasing the tariffs. It's not going to level the playing field for labor costs.
They've already got slave labor. It's not going to let the playing field
for electricity costs either, will it? Because of Paris. I'll always have
Paris. We did because of Paris. They've got the electricity cost advantage,
and electricity that is huote just like it is enslave wages. And so what
that means is that we're still not going to be able to compete. It
means that we are still going to be buying this stuff from China, and
they will mandate that we have to buy it from China. And when you
look at adding these tariffs that Trump is talking about, he's not talking about
cutting the income taxes, and the Goop's not interested in cutting the income taxes
or the irs agents that Biden is adding. They're going to keep all of
that stuff. I've talked many times about how and when I was talking to
Tony last week, we're talking about the fact that look, you know,
having a free trade zone, you know, eliminating all internal taxation as Thomas
Jefferson did, and just having the government that was very very small, very
very small at the time it fit inside the Constitution on like this gargantuan monster
we've got Now. By doing all of that, they eliminated internal taxation.
They had taxation at the border. They're not going to do that with these
tariffs. They keep raising the terrace, and they keep raising the income taxes
as well. They've got both external and internal taxes now they're not going to
get rid of. It's the same type of thing we used to see with
the arguments about having a national sales tax, and people say, well,
okay, but you know what's going to happen. They're going to add a
national sales tax and they're not going to get rid of the income tax.
Well, they're going to add these sixty percent terrace and they're going to get
rid of any of the income tax stuff. No, they're going to come
after us so with an army of IRS agents that's seven times bigger than it
is now, and the GOP is not doing anything about it. They said
we're going to do something about it, but they didn't. US can easily
catch up on technohl, but it's going to lose out on every other step
of the process. And both Biden and Trump are willing to do this.
Trump proposes sixty percent tariffs on China today. Biden has taken Trump's terrace and
retained most of them and even expanded on them. If the US puts sixty
percent terrace on China, the final costs will rise at least sixty percent.
It rise more than that, and we will need much more electricity as well,
but we're not going to be allowed to get it, so electricity costs
will jump too. There's going to be huge inflationary pressures. We have to
end this climate gas lighting. We really do have to end this, and
it's no better. When you look at the windmills. The true costs of
hiding net zero are impossible to hide. A forty eight percent surge and costs
of these windmill powers, windmill power plans and shows that it's not economical.
It's not going to work at all. So with all this happening, even
as we had the natural asset companies shut down temporarily, I think they're going
to come back. You've got Moodies rolling out a new scoring system for ESG.
ESG. Environmental societal governance has been pushed by black Rock and State Street
and Vanguard, these massive holding companies that have about thirty trillion dollars of assets
that they control. And again, you know, just like they want to
do with the natural assets, you know, Vanguard and Blackrock and all they
control these companies by getting a controlling interest in them enough that they can blackmail
these people to do what they want. That's going to be the same mechanism
that they will ultimately do with the natural asset companies. The same mechanisms are
going to do with the conservation easements in the States and all the rest of
the stuff, and so as you've got attorneys general and many states are pushing
back against this ESG thing and saying it's fundamentally fraudulent. You've got pension funds
and you've got individual investors who are buying into this because they think these companies
are in business to make money, but they're not. They're not. They're
in business to push the government's social agenda or the government's environmental agenda, and
they don't care if it causes them to lose money. And so that's fraud.
Well, now that they started pushing on that side, the new way
that they're going to come back to respond to that to push the ESG is
to have Moody's, which does a lot of reading of companies. Moodies Investor
Services is now going to start assigning a value, a scoring system for whether
or not these companies are complying with the Paris Climate Courts. It always comes
back to Paris, always comes back to that this treaty that is not a
treaty, but everybody pretends that they've got to obey this treaty. Officially launched
last year, the new NZAS is what they call it, provide an assessment
of the strength of a companies carbon emissions reduction profile relative to the global net
zero pathway that is consistent with the Paris Agreement. Always that That's why Trump's
betrayal on this as well as all of the GOP was so important. Market
participants confront considerable challenges and comparing decarbonization plans. All this is about standardized ratings
of Paris Climate Accord compliance. And if you want to speak out against this,
we now have in Canada a member of parliament there has rolled out a
bill to criminalize anybody speaking against well, not speaking against climate change, but
anybody promoting fossil fuels. And it's kind of interesting because, you know,
as we had Michael Mann who came up with that fraudulent to hockey stick thing,
and again we know it was fraudulent because the emails of climate Gait were
being passed back and forth between Michael Mann and people in the UK's East Anglian
Climate Center. They were passing emails back and forth saying, our models don't
work. How do we hide the decline? Oh, Michael Mann's got a
great idea, let's do this. And so as mark Stein was poking fun
at him, he said, well, that's defamation. He won a case
against mark Stein and it is a tremendous loss for free speech and free press.
Mark Stein, the jury said, has to pay him a million dollars.
Interestingly enough, this Canadian bill would find people up to a million dollars
oh and two years in prison for promoting fossil fuels, for saying that they're
good, for saying that they work, for even talking about them. I
mean, think about how insane this is. Think about how stalines this is
even truthful. Statements that compare relative emissions of natural gas and coal would be
banned, in criminalized for the longest time. I remember back in nineteen seventy
one had the first Earth Day. I was in high school, and I
remember all these people look at how we have all the emissions in America,
and I said, yes, because we make everything in America. Nobody is
talking about all the emissions coming out of China, now, are they,
Because everything's now being made in China, just like I was talking about the
soldiara, Oh, nobody is going to complain about China and India. They
get a free pass and nobody even talks about it. So this is a
rep out of Northern Ontario where the Fossil Fuels Advertising Act. If you're in
Canada's Bill C three seventy two prohibit the promotion of fossil fuels except in accordance
with the provisions of the Act, and promotion is defined as a representation about
a product or service, including any communication or information about the product or service
and its price and it's distribution. Don't talk about it, it doesn't exist.
Complete censorship, zip the lips, any of it that is likely to
influence or shape attitudes, beliefs, behaviors about the product or service. Look,
all ads are designed to do exactly that. All ads are designed to
shape your attitude, your beliefs, your behavior is about the product or the
service. Right, that's what an advertisement means. Advert know, you go
back to the Latin roots of that means to turn too. You're trying to
turn people to your product. So no advertising of any fossil fuel products whatsoever.
And again they're not fossil fuels. That's a lie from the CIA and
big oil to promote scarcity. And then to justify this in this bill,
they say, you know all those Canadian wildfires, Oh, that's because of
fossil fuels. No, it's not, and it's not because of climate change
either. We've seen the Lake Cabin fires in Quebec. That's most of that
is based on arson, the Barrington fire and Nova Scotia. The cause of
arson, it wasn't global boil. And we just had a case come to
that goes back to twenty twenty one, the El Dorado fire that was out
in California that was based on a gender reveal that went wrong. They had
some something that had combustible stuff and that's set off a fire. You just
had husband and wife. They were part of that gender reveal. They just
pled guilty to involuntary manslaughter because people died from that fire. It got really
big. It had twenty three thousand acres that got burned there. But anyway,
so this is where these people are on climate change, and it just
continues to go because we don't have anybody, anybody in national politics who's going
to even take up this mantle and talk about it. Isn't that odd an
election year. The silence, the deafening silence about this thing that is going
to be used to destroy everything in our society's going to take us back to
the dark ages and we don't have a single politician who is going to take
up that and talk about it. We'll be right back. Elvis the Beatle
and the Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find them on the Oldies channel at APS
radio dot com. Using free speech to free minds, It's the David Knight
Show. He feels a little chill. Can I bring him this blanket?
Sure? All right. It's sad when my mother has to speak the words
that condemn her own son. But I couldn't allow them to believe that I
would commit murder. They have put him away now, as I should have
years ago. He was always bad, and in the end he intended to
tell them I killed those girls and that man as if I could do anything
except just sit and stare like one of his stuffed birds. They know I
can't even move a finger, and I won't. I'll just sit here and
be quiet, just in case they do suspect me. They're probably watching me.
We'll let them let them see what kind of a person I am.
I'm not even gonna sweat that fly. I hope they are watching. They'll
see. They'll see, and they'll know, and they'll say why she wouldn't
even have a fly. Yeah, and of course that was Norman Bates.
And we've got another trainy insanity psycho killer as well. This is what happened
at Joel Austin's Lakewood Church on Sunday in Houston. And interestingly enough, mainstream
media and the Houston Police Department insist on calling this guy a woman. I
don't know how they addressed Norman there. Yeah, missus Bates did they play
along with the insanity there as well. And this one is not named Norman
Bassis. One was named Jeffrey Escalante. Our shooter is identified by a driver's
license as Janice Marino, thirty six years old, Hispanic female. But there
are some discrepancies, said the Houston Police Department's commander. Some discrepancies, you
mean between the driver's license and the body. The body. You've got a
body here. If these people can't conduct their investigation to see what gender,
sex and gender and sex are the same thing, they can't conduct an investigation
to see they're so confused and confusing everybody else. And of course the media
is having a field day with that. We do have reports she this is
a Houston Police department. We do have reports she used multiple aliases, including
Jeffrey Escalante. So she has utilized both male and female names. But through
all of our investigation to this point, talking with individuals, interviews, documents,
Houston Police Department reports, she has been identified this entire time as female.
Are they afraid to dead name this corpse? This is just beyond absurdity,
the fact that our police and the media and the government will all play
along with this. And I told Karen this. At first, I didn't
cover this because, you know, they were saying, well, it looks
like a female shooter somewhere between the age of thirty and thirty five. There
was no name or any identification, they said, and there was a we
think that when she was accompanied, she was in a trench coat with a
long rifle. They said, a companied brought in a five year old child.
A five year old child has been hit. They didn't even wouldn't say
at the time whether the child was the same child that she brought in.
So I was like, I'm not going to talk about it. But I
told Karen, I said, that's a training killer. That's a training killer
coming after church again, just like the one in Nashville. And look at
all the hoops that they jump through to keep that stuff quiet. And now
it turns out that yes, it is that same child that she brought in.
A child is seven years old, not five years old. So a
lot of this stuff changes as they go through some and it's interesting to see
what different organizations focus on because we have somebody who's absolutely as a nutbag psycho
killer like Norman Bates. But of course there was also a Palestinian sticker on
the butt of the gun, so some media has focused on that made that
the focus of their reports. Some people have focused on the criminal record of
this person who has a very, very long rap sheet. Some people have
focused on the fact that this is an immigrant, perhaps an illegal immigrant from
El Salvador. People focused on that. Of course, the New York Times
focused on the fact that the killer was carrying an AR fifteen, because all
the rest of that stuff, the insanity, the illegal aliens and the open
borders, the racism, the hatred for Jews as well as Christians, none
of that matters. It's the AR fifteen, that's the thing we need to
focus on. According to the New York Times, it's absolutely crazy. Let
me respond to some of the comments and tips here. I was going to
do that before I went to break and then I'll get back to this.
On rock Fan, David Blackburn, thank you very much for the tip,
he says, God bless David, Well, thank you. That is a
blessing. All of you appreciate your tips. On rock Fan, Nancy Chambers
says, my husband asked me to marry him the day after we met,
married five weeks later, and we were happily married for fifty eight and a
half years until the vaccine killed him. I'm so sorry, but it is
a blessing to have that you had fifty eight and a half years, and
that is a blessing, and I hope that you'll be reunited with him as
well. Rockfinn Andy said, I experimented for a little while using the term
genetic code injection the GCI when reporting if my patient took the JAB or not.
Nobody ever kicked my paperwork back. That's right, that's good, that's
good. I like that handy. On Rumble, Heather Ram twenty nine,
thank you for the tip, says thank you so much. From Ontario,
Canada, where they're trying to censor any talk at all about fossil fuels that's
coming out of Ontario. You're beagon in the darkness. Well, thank you,
And if these people get their way, that will quite literally be literally
be in the darkness, literally in the darkness, in the silence. The
sound of Silence on rock fan Jason Barker good to see, He says,
I have forty five acres mostly wooded. Can I get paid for scrubbing CO
two? Oh? No? Bill Gates wants to come out and cut trees
down because he said, you know, they're a fire hazard, and you
know when they die, they're going to release all that CO two that they've
captured. So we've got to cut them down and bury them. Not make
anything useful out of it, but cut them down and bury them. That's
where these people are headed. Be getting back to this shooting though much to
say so a seven year old child when she pulls up, they said she
opened up the door, pulled out a seven year old and out of the
back seat as well as the bag, confronted a security guard who let her
in along the west side of the building. So I'm not sure that confronted.
They don't say where that was a threat with a gun or something,
or if she just you know, let me in. I don't know what
the deal was, and I am saying she, it's not a she,
it's a guy. Then he this guy addresses a woman immediately starts firing after
entering the hallway of the church off duty officers who are working approved security jobs
for the church. And again, what's a lesson about this is how you
protect your schools as well. If you're going to have soft targets where there's
a lot of people, most of them unarmed, you do need to have
hired security. And it's even better if you've got people that are carrying that
are identified by a uniform engaged. They engaged him in a gunfight. He
and the child are brought down in a hail of bullets. The child was
shot once in the head. They don't know who shot the child because there
were two different groups of They've evidently had a lot of security there. It's
a big church. They got like thirty thousand people there and lots and lots
of money in the hallway. Multiple shots were exchanged by all three. She
they say she eventually a guy. That's a guy. The seven year old
child falls to the ground as well from gunfire. One gun shot wound to
the head, so again. This what is disturbing to me about this as
well. I'm reading to you there's many different accounts I could have read to
you from, but they went through the blow by blow here more on the
Christianpost dot com. And yet the Christianpost dot com is using the killer's preferred
pronouns. They're afraid to dead name this killer. The child remains the critical
condition of the hospital. Two weapons were discovered from the scene, a twenty
two caliber rifle which was not used, and an AR fifteen with a Palestine
sticker on it on the butt of the stock, the butt stock there.
We do believe that she does have a mental health history, said the Houston
police officers. Well, these guys our geniuses, aren't they inspector lestrides.
I mean, you know, this is a tranny who's a man dressed up
as a woman. Yeah, well you think this person's got a mental health
history? Yeah, wearing it all over there. We do believe there was
a familiaral dispute that has taken place between her ex husband and her ex husband's
family, some of whom are Jewish, so we believe that might have possibly
been where this stems from. Isn't that interesting? This person goes to a
church and sets it up, and they're going to portray it as anti Semitism.
I don't know what's going on with that, but I guess you know,
if you're going to talk about a hate crime, it's okay to hate
Christians. But if they find a Palestine sticker on the gun indicating that they
the killer hates Jews as well, then I don't know. So as you
look at this, as I said the training, insanity is everywhere, including
the fact that we're going to focus on the Palestine stickers, on the fact
that they're there to kill people in the church. You have a World at
Daily WND says it was political. You have others that say it was anti
Semitic, and of course the New York Times ignores all the immigration, all
the criminal records, all the politics of this person and focuses on the AR
fifteen. We don't understand why these things happen, Sat Joel Ostein, but
we know that God is in control. This is a guy who sells a
prosperity gospel. When bad things happen, he doesn't have an answer for that.
He's a mister smiley face. Prosperity gospel. Why do bad things happen
to good people? He has no answer for that. He says, we're
going to stay strong, We're going to continue to move forward. There are
forces of evil, but there are forces that are for us. The forces
of God are stronger than that. Well, that's true, but that's not
the whole truth. And he misses a great deal of that truth. And
so you know, when we were talking about this with my sons and with
Karen, it was very interesting. You know this again, this individual a
crazy Norman Bates type of person, a documentary history of arrest and mental illness,
an illegal alien, all the rest of stuff. But I, as
we're talking about it, my son said, I don't think that was the
most dangerous person in the church that day. Maybe the most dangerous person in
the church that day was Joel lostein Phoenix, Arizona. Hello, Hello,
Larry, You're the best, and thank you Joel for your positive messages and
your book. I'm wondering, though, why you signed tip Larry's earlier question
about how we get to heaven. The Bible clearly tells us that Jesus is
the way, the truth and the light and the only way to the fathers
through him. That's not really a message of condemnation. Truth. Yeah,
I would agree with her. I believe that. No, Well, here's
my thing there is. I can't judge somebody's heart, you know, I
don't know. Only God can look at somebody's heart. And so I don't
know. I just to me, it's not my business to say, you
know, this one is or this one isn't. I'm just saying, here's
what the Bible teaches. And I want to put my faith in, uh,
you know, in Christ. And I just I think it's wrong when
we go around saying, you know, you're not going, you're not going,
You're not going because it's not exactly my way. I'm just I'm not
going to be believe. I believe my way. I believe my way with
all my heart. But doesn't share it. Well, he is wrong,
and well, I don't know. If I look at it like that,
I would, I would present my way. But I'm just gonna let God
be the judge of that. And I don't know, I don't know.
So you make no judgment on anyone. No, but I as no,
I just you know what, I let I let somebody, Let let God
be the judge who goes to heaven and Hell, and I just again,
I present the truth and I say it every week. You know, I
believe it's a relationship with Jesus. But you know what, I'm not going
to go around telling everybody else. If they don't want to believe that,
that's going to be their choice. God's got to look at your own heart.
God's got to look at your heart. And only God knows that you
believe there's a place called heaven. Mind. God is not in the condemning
business. He's in the restoration business. His sermons are relentlessly positive, and
that's made him a target of critics who say Ostine sometimes sounds less like a
preacher and more like a motivational speaker. You have to take the hand you've
been dealed and make the most of it. You know, you've been criticized
for church light. Yeah, that's right for a cotton candy message. Do
you feel like you're cheating people by not telling them about the hell part?
I really don't, because it's a different approach. You know, it's not
hellfire and brimstone. But I say most people are beaten down enough by life
they already feel guilty enough, well, you know, it's kind of interesting.
Was and of course that's a famous clip where he's on with Larry King,
and he had many other things to say. But when the caller comes
in and quotes him what Jesus had to say, this is what it is
an offense to people with Christianity. When Jesus said I am the Way.
You didn't say I'm a way. He said I am the way. And
then he says, no one can come to the Father except through me,
and so no one the way and except through me. Those are all very
exclusive. And that's the thing that is so offensive to everybody about Christianity,
that exclusivity. But if you don't believe what Jesus says, don't call yourself
a Christian, Joel, when you are shamed of the gospel, you're shamed.
You don't want to offend anybody. Why because you're making millions of dollars
you got you bought a basketball arena, and you just retired that one hundred
million dollar debt. He is selling the spirit of the time, the spirit
of the time that says we're not going to judge anything that anybody does.
We're not going to set up any standard for anything that anybody does that is
not a loving thing. You know, back when I was in school,
people talk about the Great Awakening that was a precursor to the American Revolution,
and at center of it was a piece by Jonathan Edwards Sinners in the Hands
of an Angry God that sounds like a real condemning piece, and he talks
about the fact that at any moment our foot might slide and we might fall
into this pit of eternity? Are we righte with God? At that point?
And Jonathan Edwards didn't scare people into a Great Awakening as much as he
offered out the idea that God is offering something better for you. He is
offering and the fact that God's mercy and grace is being extended to you.
He says, you know, you could be dead already except that God has
given you more time. Are you going to thumb your nose at this mercy
of God? Because if you do, there is a massive condemnation that to
wait for you. That is not judging people. That is saying what Christ
said, and that is if you believe what Christ said. Isn't it loving
to tell people to try to avoid the worst thing that can happen. That's
why my son said whistler. I said, well, I think the most
dangerous person at that church was not the shooter, but Joelosity. Because Jesus
said, don't fear those who can destroy the body, but destroy, but
fear him who can destroy the body and cast the soul into eternal hell.
That's what you should be afraid of. The training shooters should be afraid of
God. You should be afraid of a God whose wrath has not been appeased
by Jesus's sacrifice. And that's the key thing. And when you offer that,
that's a free offer for anybody who wants to take advantage of that.
And we do all stand condemned. He says, well, I don't want
to. We're all you know, everybody's feeling like you know, there's certain
things that they need to do. And then he starts talking about well it
could be better, parents, they could be better. No, we're all
in rebellion to God, in rebellion to God. How does it get any
worse than that? And so what do we do about that? Well,
fortunately God has provided Jesus to take away our sins and to give us his
righteousness, and so we can offer our lives then to him, and the
things that we do are now acceptable that would not be acceptable. I mean,
like sacrificing an unclean animal or some kind of a weird thing on the
altar if we didn't do it. And that's what he's calling people to do.
He's calling people to do something that God never called them to do.
And as far as the obedience goes, as Jesus said, you know when
he was very merciful to people again, he gave his life for people,
but he said, if you love me, keep my commandments. He would.
He would engage people, but he would not leave them the way that
they were, and so he would give them the power to change their lives.
He would give them the power to change their relationship with God and that
God would change what they want out of life rather than being focused on prosperity
or your best life now, which is what made Joel Austein famous. We
had Super Bowl ads that twenty eight million dollars worth of Christian ads for the
Super Bowl. He Gets Us was one of these. And then Mark Wahlberg
has got a Catholic meditation app telling people to get prayed up. I don't
know. I didn't look at this Catholic prayer app. Hello, But I
don't know how did people pray before they had an iPhone? If we need
an app to pray, maybe we don't. Maybe this is just something to
kind of encourage you to do it. I don't know. But the thing
I wanted to focus on was the He gets Us ad. By the way
Wahlberg's company raised the people that's with Hallow the app, they raised fifty million
dollars. The Heat gets Us thing is getting its money from the hobby lobby
billionaire who is funding that the hellow app from Mark Wahlberg. Interestingly enough,
the CEO's name is Alex Jones, and they point out that that is not
info war is Alex Jones. They raised one hundred and five million dollars in
funding, a lot of that going for this app. I guess maybe this
Alex Jones could call it maybe stop kneel, you take out my app and
pray instead of a kneeling to pray. I don't know how how people got
along in the past without having an app, but anyway, the point of
that was to get more people to pray. He gets Us campaign though,
and said, well, we're just trying to reintroduce people to the Jesus of
the Bible. Now what they're trying to do is reinvent the Jesus of the
Bible. Maybe we could call their movement to stop the kneel and kneel to
each other, because the whole thing is a bunch of it looks like a
bunch of AI generated artwork. But they paid a fortune to a photographer to
actually take those pictures. And that's one of the issues of this. You
know, when people have this money that's been given to them because it's a
Christian organization and they want to, you know, push people in that direction,
people kind of wonder, well, what are you using the money for,
you using it wisely or you're just kind of throwing it away. Well,
appears like they were just kind of throwing it away, spending massive amounts
of money on this these these still photographs, and then it's the content of
the photographs as well. They ran two ads. One of them was called
foot washing, a modern take on the biblical story of Jesus washing the twelve
apostles feet to tell them to serve each other. That was one of the
things that people were saying, Well, you didn't quite get that right.
But primarily it is a man centered message, not a God sented message that
you're seeing from He gets us. So you got a policeman kneeling before a
black man. How many times we've seen that, right, We know where
these people are coming from. Politically, you got a protester before a woman
who is visiting a family planning clinic. You've got a white woman kneeling to
a migrant mother and washing her feet, and so that's their their commercial.
A little bit of it for you here. We're not going to play a
whole lot of it. But here's what it looks like. A still picture
that they're zooming in on. It's a police officer washing the feet of a
black guy in an alley, and that's in the school. Here's some you
know, an Indian having his feet washed by a European man family planning clinic.
There you go. So it's just a bunch of I don't know why
they think that's going to be effective at changing anybody's life. Again, what
changes your life is to understand that you have a relationship with God, that
you have eternal life, that your sins have been forgiven, that you are
now free to Your past has been removed from you, but you're free now
to obey God. That's not going to be perfect, but you're always going
to be forgiven as long as that is your goal to do this. They
don't have anything about the gods, so they say, well he gets us,
Well do they get God? I don't know. Have they even read
his message? It ended with a slogan, Jesus didn't teach hate, he
washed feet. How would our contentious world change if people, especially those with
opposing ideologies, took off their shoes and washed each other's feet. So what
we're seeing here this is simply the social gospel of the left, always about
man to man, never about man to God. What about my relationship with
God? I don't worry about it. You know He's He's going to not
judge you for anything. Well, that's not the message of the Bible.
Message of the Bible is that we stand condemned before God unless we do something
with our sin. A second, fifteen second advertisement, who is My Neighbor
shows a homeless man and a man working in a shop and asked what if
we treated them accordingly? Again, it's all about man to man stuff.
Well, Manda man stuff is great, but the Manda Man stuff is going
to They're putting the cart before the horse. You're not really going to be
able to get that done properly unless you have already taken unless you've got a
different basis for this. When I talk about doing social change and having the
guts to stand up to something even if you know that it's going to destroy
your life, maybe even take your life, that's because you've got a fulcrum
point, that is, outside of this life, you have a different perspective
on things. And I think that's true even when you're talking about social issues
like this. So they said they expected that these two ads together could have
cost them seventeen and a half million dollars before looking at the cost of hiring
actors and production and again their production costs. They had to get some special
photographer to make this stuff look like it was AI generated. The AI images
were free. One of your wrote and said, you do realize that Jesus
is the one I've known all my life would not approve of commercialized glorification super
Bowl commercials costing millions of dollars money that could be used to actually help those
in need. You want to wash somebody's feet. You want to help your
fellow man, Fine, don't waste twenty million dollars on an ad you want
to talk about. Well, look, here's somebody in front of a family
planning clinic and you know you're you're washing the feet of this pregnant woman who
was thinking about getting an abortion. We'll take that twenty million dollars. How
many how many of the four d ultrasound imaging machines could you scatter around the
country at these crisis pregnancy centers for twenty million dollars. Nothing that they say
they support. Even if they're going to be focused on the social gospel,
they're not even doing the social gospel. They're doing Super Bowl commercials. They're
building up their organization. They continued. Let us be clear in our opinion,
Jesus loves gay people and Jesus loves trans people. Yes, he loved
them enough to die for their sins, and he loved them enough to give
them the power to change their lives. And then he said, if you
love me, you will keep my commandments. And it's pretty clear these people
want to normalize what Jesus says is not normal. So they could have focused
on the pro life aspects of this as well, but of course they didn't.
And so you have a pro life organization that did talk about this.
This is the Live Action dot Org. They said. You know, even
though you've got this Super Bowl ad talking about well, we should love other
people, we should serve other people, we should do it with humility,
they said, you know, this is what the pro life movement does every
day, they said. One of the scenarios in the ad was a young
woman sitting on a bench in front of a building label Family Plan clinic while
another woman washes her feet. In the background, a group of what appears
to be pro lifers stand holding signs. The pro lifers do not appear to
be hostile or angry, and their signs are not threatening, and as they
pointed out, you know this is abortion. Activists frequently denigrate the pro life
movement by accusing them of being hate filled misogynists who want control to control women
and to force them to breed, but in reality, the abortion industry itself
has consistently failed women. The pro life movement serves women daily with love and
humility. For pregnant mothers, resources from pro life groups abound from maternity homes
that give women a safe shelter to on campus resources. And again, when
we look at all this stuff, you want to help the homeless, you
want to help people have crisis pregnancies and all the rest of the stuff.
They could have spent some of this money on that. Instead they wasted it
on this safe nothing add Just can't we just love everybody and give everybody hugs.
That is not the basis for changing our society. They really don't have
any basis for people doing that. What changes our behavior, what changes our
heart? There's Christ that changes our heart, changes what we want out of
life, changes us from being lovers of self. That takes a transformation.
That's not something you're going to jin up and it's not something you're going to
even understand. Listening to a pastor who's all about smiles and prosperity. We'll
be right back. If you like the Eagles on the cars and Huey Lewis
and the news, they say ther you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS
Radio, download our app or listen now at apsradio dot com. You're listening
to the David Knight Show. Yesterday I played for your clip over the weekend.
President Trump talking about how tough he talked to the NATO countries, He
said, well, you need to pay your fair share, and if you
don't pay your fair share two percent of your GDP, I don't think we
should come to rescue you if you're attacked by Russia. As a matter of
fact, I would encourage Russia to attack you. He said, that encourage
Russia to attack you. Well, that created a lot of pushback. You
had a lot of pearl clutching from GOP and from Democrats. You know,
for the most part his base people in America don't want entangling alliances. So
I didn't really care about what he had to say in terms of coming to
people's rescue. We don't like NATO because, as Pat Buchanan pointed out,
we got trip wires all over the globe that require us to come to the
rescue of people. But of course we don't wait for that. We start
wars preemptively. Don't we wait for somebody to attack us. We'll attack them
first. But it was all just blustering from Trump. He did nothing of
the sort I said. When I talked about it, I said, well,
you know, you look at this one way that you could understand this
is that maybe this is a fundraising drive to precede the Ukraine War, which
everybody knew was coming. Right Poutin knew it was coming. Anybody who watched
what NATO had done after the fall of Soviet Union knew it was coming.
As a matter of fact, I've played for you in the past. Arrestovich,
who was Zelenski, was elected on a campaign of stopping the war that
had been going on at that point in time for five years after the coup.
For five years after the coup, the Ukrainian government that was installed by
the CIA had shelled civilian areas in the eastern part of Ukraine, bordering the
people who wanted to remain with the Soviet Union. It's been bombing civilian towns
for five years and they wanted peace. Everybody wanted peace, and so that's
what Zelensky ran on. And then he sends this guy, Alexey Arrestovich as
the peace envoy, and he was interviewed by the local Ukrainian media and they
said, so, what are the chances of peace happening? Is none?
None. As a matter of fact, he said in twenty nineteen, it's
going to get worse. He said in twenty twenty two, Russia's going to
invade, and he said it's going to be full on wars. She said
that's horrible, and he goes, no, that's good. He could well.
He said they're going to invade and Ukraine will be devastated. He used
a more comprehensive word, not annihilated, but you know, demolished. She
said that's horrible. He goes, no, that's good. We'll get into
NATO. They knew it was coming. Both sides knew this was coming for
a long time. And so, you know, was Trump far from He
didn't get out of NATO. You know, his base thought of him as
getting out of NATO, just like his base thought of him as being anti
vaccine. His base thought of him as being pro wall and all the rest
of this stuff. Maybe he was just pushing it up, but somebody looked
at actually the what the European nations are contributing. After Trump had his tough
talk with him and told them to pay up and pay their fair share?
Are they paying their fair share? No, only a third of them are
paying their fair share. So he did and get them. He didn't do
anything. Again, this is his imaginary presidency, just like his imaginary building
of the wall that didn't happen, which is why we've got one of the
reasons why we've got the mess of the border. But again, I don't
think that the border mess is going to be solved strictly by interdiction or by
border patrols. It's necessary to have some of that stuff there, but it's
not going to be solved by that. It's the welfare magnet that's bringing people
in. It's the policies that say, come in and we'll give you everything,
including the right to vote. We'll give you unemployment checks, will give
you free medical care, we'll give you free welfare. Just come on in.
You don't have to ask permission at all. Anybody who wants to come
in can come in. That's what's creating the crisis. And unless you stop
that welfare magnet, nothing is going to do anything about it. But getting
back to this statistic is Katrina Bukoltz. So the goal of two percent of
GDP and military spending that NATO has set for itself was not reached in many
of the European countries as of mid twenty twenty three, even though some improvements
have been made especially in Eastern sup NATO members Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia are
also planning to fortify their Russian border with bunkers. Oh so they're gonna do
something about their borders, and oh, do you think that's going to be
effective? You're gonna put bunkers there. Do you remember when France did that
after World War One? They created the imagino line. We got invaded by
Germany before. So we're gonna set up these bunkers and we're gonna have guns
in them, and we're going to stop the Germans from invading us again.
We just flew over them and attacked them from behind. They could turn their
guns around. It's ridiculous. I think that you're going to stop them with
these bunker things there. Again imagine o line mentality. But it is an
imaginary defense, right, just like the imagine just like Trump imagined building the
wall, just like Trump imagined getting NATO to pony up the money for their
own defense instead of charging us for it. The concept that NATO country should
spend two percent of their GDP on defense was debuted in twenty fourteen. Well,
the definition has agreed upon during NATO's Whales Summit ten years ago is vague.
The two percent target has nevertheless been considered a hallmark of NATO's success as
well as a point of contention and of public discourse. Again, what else
happened in twenty fourteen? That was the year that we had the coup.
So as they have the coup, they're pushing for this two percent. Okay,
we're we started a coup in Ukraine. That's a precursor to a war.
We want you guys to build up your defenses. Well they did a
little bit, but not much, so let's hector them with Trump. Still
they don't do anything. Still, only a third of them are doing it.
But it's tied back to the fact that NATO wants to have a prolonged
war with Ukraine. That's why they're pushing this two percent stuff. Again,
Trump is not anti NATO. He's pushing the NATO agenda, just like he
pushes the globalist agenda for the World Health Organization, for the pandemic stuff,
for all the rest of this stuff. He's pushing the globe agenda. Meanwhile,
if you look at this bill, jd. Vance, the new senator,
says that there is an impeachment time bomb that is aimed at Trump and
the Ukraine Aid bill. That's what they care about. They don't care about
forever war. They don't care about getting us involved in a war. You
know, there's some stuff in here that if Trump, you know, in
this bill, there's some things that Trump did in his first administration that if
he were to do them again, they could say they wanted to impeach Trump
for this. That's all they care about. They don't care about war.
They don't care about our death. They don't care about the violation of the
constitution, the murder of people with the Trump poison. They did nothing.
The GOP did nothing about any of that. Instead, Oh, this could
hurt Trump, This could be a trap for Trump. Let's pay attention to
that, right, that's all they care about. It is only as Trump
and Trump only, that's the only thing that any of these people pay any
attention to. Well, Nikki Haley, it's paying attention to Trump again.
The stupid remarks that he made, as I said, criticizing her always add
hominem attacks against everybody angry about about her disloyalty to him as he perceives it.
Now, he's the king, How dare her run against me? As
a king, and she came tomorrowl ago. She said she wasn't going to
run all the rest of this stuff, And now where's your husband? Where's
your husband? He's gone, He's gone. Where did he go? He's
gone. Well, he's been deployed. As I said, this was first
of all, it's projection, because everybody was asking where's Millennia. Where's Millennia,
you know, for the last six to nine months, where's Milania.
She finally just showed up after being absent all that time. And so now
he's got to project that onto NICKI, Oh, you must have a messed
up marriage like I do. Well, maybe she does, but he's in
military deployment. And so she hit back pretty hard against Trump because it was
a very foolish, stupid line of criticism. Does he not know She hasn't
made any secret of it. She's talked about his being in the military as
a badge of honor for quite some time. So he doesn't have anybody his
organization that knows that he doesn't know anything about her. So she hit back
and said, he showed that kind of disrespect for the military. He's not
qualified to be president of the United States. I don't trust him to protect
them. Do you trust her to protect the military. She wants to send
them off to die everywhere, and wars that have not been not been proclaimed
or legitimately started. She said, this was not a slip of the tongue
for Trump. When he goes off of his teleprompter, that's him speaking from
the heart, and it's a pattern. She brought up other examples of Trump
calling military members suckers and losers. According to his former chief of staff John
Kelly, he disparaged comments that he said to have made while visiting Arlington National
Cemetery losers, people in wheelchairs, people who are prisoners. Now they're losers.
We don't want to talk about them. And twenty twenty, Haley praised
Trump's record toward the military and defended him when then candidate Joe Biden tweeted a
video citing the losers and suckers remark. But now she was on the other
foot. Now she is going to after she defended that conduct, now she
is going to call it out, she said. At the time, all
of us who worked with Trump witnessed the tremendous amount of love and respect he
has for a military. But now she's got a different story. She cannot
be trusted either. But she says, anyone who will put down members of
the military, anybody who will say that while they're deployed, which is pretty
disgusting. Do you really want that kind of person being the leader of all
those who may have to go fight in a war. He's already put out
global demicide with his poisonous shots. You want to talk about that, Nikki,
You want to talk And I call her Nuki because there's an a war
that she doesn't want to start, and she wants to She'll be fine with
a nuclear war. She doesn't want to limit the killing just to the military.
She wants to involve us as civilians as well. It's unbelievable the projection
of both of them. He projects as marital problems under her family. She
projects her desire to kill everybody under him. What a pair? Got a
great choice, can't we? She said that. Actually, Trump's press secretary
came back said she advocates for greater foreign intervention. Kill them all, and
she supports endless wars. It would leave more American heroes dead. It's a
good thing. She will never be commander in chief. Look, they all
treat all of us as non essential, as deplorable, as expendable. They
treat us all as animals. Hillary calls us deplorable. Trump called us non
They all want to send us to wars. Meanwhile, you see it as
Trump is pushing out at Romney's niece for not being loyal enough. He wants
to put in his own daughter. And then we have RFK Junior, who
ran the Super Bowl ad, is now apologizing it for it. It's a
nineteen sixties ad for JFK, but they changed JFK's picture, exchanged it for
RFK Junior. Gives you an idea just how bad the commercials were sixty four
years ago. You want a man for president who's season threw and threw,
a man who's old enough to know a long up to do well, it's
up to you. It's up to you. It's strictly up to you.
American Value twenty twenty four is responsible for the contents of this advertisement. Old
enough to know and young enough to do to do what Again, It was
a problem then, just as it's problem now. He is after he tweeted
that out, he said, well, that was a political action committee.
I didn't have anything to do with that. I'm sorry to all my angry
Kennedy's, who are Kennedy relatives who are very angry at me for using my
uncle. So he's apologizing profusely. I'm so sorry if the Super Bowl ad
caused anyone in my family pain. After he tweeted it out on X,
he says on X the ad was created and aired by the American Values super
pac without any involvement or approval from my campaign. FBC rules prohibit super packs
from consulting with me or my staff. I love you all, God bless
you. And of course those rules that prevent packs from coordinating with the candidates.
One of the reasons why the Democrats are starting this lawfair against him.
They said, well, you got a pack that has raised fifteen million dollars
to get you on the ballot everywhere, an astronomical figure if you stop and
think about it. But he just dropped seven million dollars on an ad one
thirty second ad. It's absurd that you'd have to pay fifteen million dollars to
collect signatures across the country. And of course Shivaya Durey was talking about that
and the fact he's got big donors that are going to do that for him,
But now the Democrat Party is going to sue him as well, So
you're gonna have to get some more millions in order to run this is It
is a scam. Everything about it, this election, focusing on presidential elections
is truly a scam. Majority rate Biden's mind poorly. But they say Kamala
Harris is not the answer because she's in La La Land as well. Well,
you know what the answer is that if we don't want to focus on
politics at all. As a matter of fact, Caitlin Johnstone out of Australia.
So it's when all Americans finally realize that it doesn't matter who the president
is. Oh, I hear you out there. You're screaming at the radio
right now, right You're saying you're crazy. It doesn't matter who the president
is. No, it doesn't. Actually, there's an evil cabal in Washington,
d C. That's been running this country since at least the JFK assassination,
if not four, and they're bent on the destruction of American liberty,
American society, American culture. They want to keep America somewhat as a power
for the military industrial base. But whether after is global governance, and that
means that they've got to keep us in line as well. Caitlin Johnstone said,
the president's brain doesn't work. It's shot. The leader of the free
world lol is rusted gray matter like Swiss cheese. Anybody could hold that office
and it's not meaningful. The fact that the US president has dementia exposes the
uncomfortable truth of the functioning of the empires, too important to be left to
the hands of voters. The globe spanning power structure, she says, that
is centralized around the United States, is not run by an official, elected
government of that nation, but by unelected empire managers who filter in and out
of each administration and maintain a steady presence in a government and government agencies and
government adjacent institutions. These empire managers, from alliances with corporate powers and working
relations with many nations assets and partners, function as an undeclared US empire,
which means there's not really any way for Americans to vote their way out of
this mess. If you've got a problem with genocide, militarism, economic injustice,
authoritarianism, or any other critical building blocks of the US centralized power structure,
you'll never be permitted to have influence over those things, not as voters.
We've got to stop hanging our hopes on the electoral system first. Every
four years we see American attention get sucked up into this empty puppet show about
which Solace Empire manager should be the temporary official figurehead at the front desk of
the permanent imperial machine. And if you want to vote, by all means,
go ahead and vote, but don't let that performative ritual distract you from
a real project to wake up our fellow humans and to be enforcing real change.
And we do that at the local level. And that's what we're going
to talk to Senator nice about when we come back real quickly. I want
to thank dj and Ohio. Thank you for the tip, says Dka.
Brings discerning words to our present times, addresses Truman's how's it going to end?
Keep looking to and exalting the Lord Jesus, the author and finisher of
our faith. Amen to that. Well, we're going to be right back
with Senator Nicely, who is going to We're going to talk about things that
are going to be happening that you can do something about. At the local
level, because the global agenda is going to be implemented at the local level,
or it's going to be stopped at the local level. If you like
the Eagles on the Cars and Huey Lewis and the news, they say the
You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio, download our app or listen
now at apsradio dot com. Joining us now is Tennessee Senator Frank Nicely,
And of course he's been on the show many times warning people about what is
happening with cbdc's trying to establish a goal depository some other things in case we
have a financial problem which seems to be building on the horizon, how do
we keep things going at the state level. And this is a problem that
is several states surfaced with. This is not something that's just Tennessee, and
it's also a solution that many states are trying. But we wanted to talk
to him today about natural asset companies and we talked about this about a month
or so ago. It was up for approval with the SEC. The Newark
Stock Exchange was part of one of the three big sponsors for this. They
pulled out at the last minute. And we'll talk a little bit about why
that happened. But I said at the time, I think this thing is
going to come back, and it looks like they were perhaps laying some foundation
for how they were going to take over private and public land, and that
is now being passed around in a lot of different states, and so you're
going to see this type of bill very much like we saw CBDC legislation via
the UCC, the Uniform Commercial Code legislation and all these different states. We're
seeing this type of legislation that may be in your state as well, even
if you're not in Tennessee. We're going to talk about some of the specifics
in Tennessee, but also how you can identify this another state. So joining
us now is Senator Frank nicely. Thank you for joining us, sir,
Hey time, David. It's all the ways pleasing. It was very surprising
to see this thing disappear abruptly. It looked like it was going to go
through. They quietly put it in back in twenty twenty one, and then
there was some pushback from some organizations and so they they delayed the SEC approval.
But it wasn't the SEC not approving it. The New York psych Exchange
pulled out. What do you know about that and what happened with that?
Well, the word on the street is that the New York shows Change is
owned by an international group. I see the three initials that came to America,
I e. G. Maybe is that because that was one of the
groups? Yeah, that all talk change. But the couple that owns that,
the guy used to be a US center and he and his wife for
big hunters, and at the last minute he realized that he was not going
to be able to hunt on any of this land, and he pulled it
and he pulled out. Now they'll probably give him some kind of special hunting
for bed and come back later. But see, this is all coming from
from the United Nations. You know, years ago we had the Agenda two
thousand and then Agenda twenty twenty, Agenda twenty thirty. Well, they want
the govers Biden talked about thirty to thirty. They want to control thirty percent
of the land in America by two thousand and thirty. They want to control
fifty percent of the land by two thousand and fifty. And so how do
you control the land? Well, I don't know how they did in Europe,
but somehow in Europe and Midland France, they got control of the land.
I don't know the mechanism they used over there, but the farmers over
there are are riding as the cloud up roads, burning buildings all across Europe.
You don't the mainstream press went print it. We've got to go to
TikTok find out a how bad it is. But then the park over there
about had it. You know, they send it all that money to Ukraine.
But they're cutting the dicel fuel and they're sticks and how much nitrogen they
can use paracher and you know they're telling me they can't have a cattle on
the land because of climate change, which is all ridiculous. I mean,
the cattle will save the world, not destroyed world. Cattle are very beneficial
to the land to top soul microorganism. To my pro Bold and the Sault,
it's all improved by cattle. The hoof action restorers the prairies on the
side note where they fenced off the prairie out rest keep the buffalo and the
cattle off it all die. Yeah, takes that they keep the prairie alive.
Yes, But the doned nations they've been trying for years to do this,
and the first time twenty something years ago, up Or, a coal
miner, told me about it. He said, Frank, they're trying to
turn Tennessee up to Kentucky and Virginia into wild lands and call the Wildlands project
wildlands or lands at the United Nations. They don't want any human footprint,
only animals, and then they'll have these corridors. You know, for a
lot of us I talk about corridors. Well, these animals could get in
this corridor and go to another wild lands, and it's all sounded crazy to
me, but I did remember it. And then years a few years later,
I had a guy the named a Henry Lamb. He was the smartest
man I ever saw on United Nations and what they're they trying to do.
I was chirmed to ad Commedian house and I didn't come in and tell us,
And he said at the time he basically told us what plan was,
but it was so new and crazy we didn't really know how to even think
about it. But I do remember him saying that the only thing worse than
you having your land taken by the government, confiscated and you condemned, the
only thing worse than that is to go into a partnership on a conservation easement.
He said, don't everation ease. But well, now we're beginning to
realize why. See they've changed and the wording and the farm bill, Uh,
regard to these counturvations. It used to be about top and erosion and
heap and production. Now it's about climate change. It's all about climate change.
Yeah, the Governor's bills. I don't know if I'd like to think
the governor does need to realize what these fields do, because I'd really i'd
feel better about him if he didn't really understand it. But let's talk about
this. There's two different bills and uh. There so there's two bills in
the Senate. There's two bills in the House here in Tennessee. Uh.
Both of them have been brought by the governor. So they're being brought forward
by the leadership in both houses. And so that's a lot of prestige and
pressure put on your fellow lawmakers there. You got something that's coming from the
governor and pushed by you know, the leader and their legislative body. And
uh, there's two bills in each in the Senate, and two bills in
the House, because one of them is about public lands and the other one
is about private lands, and you begin to talk about the private lands of
the conservation easements, and I want to get back to that, but let's
begin by talking a little bit about what these bills would do in terms of
public lands. Well, Senate Bill twenty sixty nine is relative to the management
of State fars, and that's the one that would that would turn over the
management of all our state forests over to these nacs. So they would have
control of voliver national parks or National forsh or Bureau of Land manage the land
and all the national stuff. This would facilitate turning over our state forests and
state parks over to be managed by the high bidder on Wall Street. Wendays
nacs come back, and they will, they'll be back. They get over
to the high bidder now and so they securitize this stuff in the same way
that they always come up with these new scams and you know, get these
things. Twenty body takes a look at it, like theither of the securitized
mortgages back in the early two thousands that blew up in the mid two thousands,
and so this is a way, as we talked about before when this
was up the naturalizset companies, is a way for them to essentially securitize this
property. They can make money off of global carbon taxes, but it also
gives them control over the land and by doing that they can shut this all
down as the un has been planning to do for quite some time. As
you just pointed out, right, Yeah, you did a great job exprain
it. Then other bill send it Bill twenty ninety nine is the one that
deals with the private land. I guess what we've got to do, David,
is we've just got to make use landowners. And I've seen it time
after time. I've had a family member but their the land in the contrace
agent with me tell them not to, but they believe that it's going to
be protected forever and be able to farm it for or and uh. In
reality, it doesn't stop the county from coming in and condemning your farm and
use it for a landfill or an industrial park or anything anything more. Anything
that they can condemn it for for the common good, they can condemn it
and use it. It's a lopsided contract. But now they'll give them some
tax credits, but most farmers don't make enough money to take advantage of the
tax credits. So these tax credits you can sell them, and you can
sell them to a rich millgates, you know, somebody had a lot of
money. Uh, they pay you maybe fifty cents on the dollar, maybe
twenty five cents on the dollar for these tax credits, and then they can
bounce these tax credits against profits they're they're making it another business. And that's
the way of letting the taxpayers in America fund rich people actually buying the rights
to your land. It's uh wow, it's kind of circular bit cetery.
Yeah. Yeah. And then of course we've got these other projects. You
know, going back to the Connecticut case quite some time ago, you had
land that was condemned under imminent domain for the use of a corporation. Then
we saw that being done for a foreign corporation. Even though I agree with
the all pipelines, I wasn't happy with the way they were doing it with
eminent domain. They gave the power to a trans Canada, which is a
Canadian corporation, to condemn American farmland that have been in the families many cases
for centuries now they're doing it again. Some it is a corporation and seem
to have ties to Republicans. Trump has had the CEO there many times.
And then of course they want to pump CO two across the country, condemning
farmlands as they go to put this pipeline in so they can stick it in
the ground in north and South Dakota and some of it in Iowa. And
so people are looking at you know, what is going on, and it
really is the taking over the use of the land imminent domain. But this
allows them to make a tremendous amount of money and to exert control without going
through this eminent domain process, because that gets you know, that that least
gets attention. This is kind of a subversive way. The way I see
it uh to do this with kind of a you know, an investment scheme
and still have control of this without really taking possession of it in a sense,
isn't it Yeah it is, and it's the landowner or still gets pay
taxes. Yeah, pase cattle. They may say, well, these cattle,
you know, if these bachelor it's just methane. Too much methane.
We're gonna have to cut You can't raise cattle love. That's what they're telling
them in the Netherlands, you know, they say you can't raise cattle kind
of change there. You goes back to the language and the farm build the
new farm Bill and still being for stop erosion and helpless production. It's all
it says about climate changes, the new language in the fire Belle. So
it's all sinister. It's but the globalists they move so slow and they're so
patient, and they've got this thing planned out for decades, and it's it's
hard for the average person to really grasp how sinister and slow moving this this
whole is, this whole issue is it's uh for somebody they want to you
know, it's like John Kerry, you know he said, to know they're
the American farmer needs to go extinct. Mm hmm. They want us to
eat bugs. It's all you couldn't it. They called it what they called
it carry center. So they're they're a word. You look on the ingredients
K E C E R. Stuff. I can't remember it. Well,
think of something that is like they had, uh, you know, the
Alaskan king crab at least be called spider crabs or something. So people don't
want to eat that, so they but now they're going to give us probably
real spiders and crabs. I don't know, but in crickets tell you what
you know, saying that the ecto skeleton on these crickets really hard on our
joints and basically the old people joints, so I don't need anything else been
hard on my joints. Well, well, look at this. There is
a you pointed out that this is being put forward in a lot of different
states, the change to u UCC's Uniform Commercial Code to prohibit cryptocurrency specifically and
to specifically accept a CBDC central Bank digital currency UH. That we first heard
about that. Christy Nome talked about it in UH in South Dakota and said,
I vetoed this. And then the next thing we saw was DeSantis said
he not only vetoed it, but he went the other way. He said,
we're going to prohibit CBDC UH, but we're going to accept cryptocurrency,
say that cryptocurrency will be acceptable in the Uniform Uniformmmercial Code as payment. And
so this bill, this type of bill has been sent out for the CBDC
to a lot of different states. This has as well, how do people
identify this? You know that scheme was to change the UCC code. If
somebody is looking for this, and we'll give people, we'll see the Senate
bill you told me is two zero ninety nine and two zero six nine.
Those are the Senate bills in Tennessee. But for people that are outside of
Tennessee, how did they identify this scheme? Because they're running this to a
multiple states, what would they look for in terms of a change and a
bill? How is it inserted in there for what kind of reported purpose?
Tennessee? I mean to Kansas that are brown up in Kansas and Kansas it's
it's House Bill twenty five forty one. And Texas it was House Bill thirty
one sixty five. But it was in the Texas Senate. That's good,
that's good. And they went through the bill, they talked about the sposori.
So it's killed in Texas, still working on in Kansas. Uh,
we're working on it here. We've got a U c C bill that that
seventy five pages long. The sponsor can't tell you what it does, tell
you why we need it, So I'm going to vote against it. I
mean that is, we can't take a chance on this. You know,
in order to have cipral mac digital currency, they've got to get rid of
cryptocurrencies, and right, they got to get rid of vote those guys.
So it's it's so sinister that in Washington's paralyzing nothing. We can get nothing
out of Washington now, So the whole burdens on the states to try to
put this stuff down. And luckily we've got some good states and they get
to go overnors like Christie. Oh my, I watched her all the way
through. I would love for her to be that President's Uh. She never
wavered through the Kobe Uh. He just seemed to know right off the map
of what was good for ride and didn't waiver. And after all these years
in politics, I pay attention. That's right. You gotta watch what they
do, know what they say. And so we got this UCC bill that
has done and the parallel to it is kind of this, you know,
state level NAC. Even though that has temporarily been put on hold, they're
going to go back and rebrand it and and make some minor tweaks. And
of course we know that that'll be back because that is the perfect way for
you know, the NACS once they put it on a stock exchange, the
billionaires can invest in it. Any foreign country can invest in it. So
it is a way to take away control of the land and monetize that,
monetize the carbon taxes. It's a perfect vehicle. So we know that's going
to be back now in terms of the state level stuff as it manifests itself
for both public and private lens. What type of things would people be looking
for if they're trying to find out if this bill is happening in their state,
how you know, what is what is the cover story for it?
The way they label it, Well, one of the headlines here on this
acquisition and administration of our culture real estate interest okay, okay, headline okay,
And so it'd be something like that because they do use that same type
of you know, the language. It's almost like, you know, they
get together and they do at some of these exchange councils and stuff. They
will give them some legislation and say here, put your name on it and
hand it, you know, sign it and in this legislation. And that's
how they get the UCC legislation out to twenty five different states at a time.
So I'm sure this type of thing is happening as well at the state
level to implement this natural asset company type of scheme. Right, yeah,
it's it's it's that's like I say, these globalists, they never give up.
They just keep pushing. They're patient. If they don't get it this
year, we'll get it next year. May have to wait a generation,
we'll finally get it. And the goal is, you know, the clever
role. You know, openly stated they want to reduce the population from seven
Bay and down to Hyphabea and all. They hope stutter. I mean,
when people tell you what they're trying to do, you probably I don't believe
that's right, that's right? What could they laugh about that? And we
know what they want to do. And the problem is is that they're doing
it, still doing it surreptitiously. Right. Their goals are out there in
front of everybody, but they have these things. Again, this Natural Asset
Company thing was kind of under the radar for a full two years and then
it was a group out of that you told me about, actually, the
American Stewards dot US Uh. They reported on it about two years after it
was introduced. They had an article called monetizing the air we breathe. And
that's a good way to understand this, because they're going to monetize everything,
the air that we breathe, the water we drink, the food that we
eat, everything is going to be controlled by them. We will own nothing.
And so they're creating these financial structures, doing it at you know,
the Wall Street level, doing it at the state level. And as you
point out, our best chance of we got lucky, I guess temporarily at
the stock market level, but they're going to come back with that, and
their best chance of stopping this stuff is when it comes in at the state
level. Well, I tell people, if if America is saved, the
state's going to have to do it. I mean, Washington's paralyzed there.
It's just no longer functions. It's black car has been. Tim Birchie twenty
speaks to the lincol Day there. When you leave, it's like leaving a
funeral. I mean, it's so sad when he talks of you know that's
right, can't do anything done, and and I don't know it's we can
do. We can do some good work state level, but we need people
call owners and here again, if if you're an old compan you want to
put your land in a a lot of a lot of young people that buy
this land and put a conservation ease and on it, especially if they've got
a profitable business on the side. There you have business where it's very profitable,
then you can buy a piece of farm land for four thousand dollars and
you get two thousand dollars worth of tax credits, and you can bounce that
off your profit. Over here, a farmer couldn't do that. He doesn't
have a profit. But if you've got a rich company over here, it's
making lots of money, you can bounce that two thousand tax credits against your
profits from another company. So he actually bought the land for two thousand dollars.
So it said, wait for taxpayers, help rich people buy more land.
Yeah, yeah, I imagine that's a lot of that is going on
with all the land that Bill Gates is buying right now, you know,
the last week. Now him put it under it, And of course I'm
sure he's right in on all this, I mean rightly now he can buy
that farmland and then get a controvations and all it and then back bout those
tax triates against his huge profits and so he's actually buying vee price yeah,
oh yeah, absolutely, and then then he can take it off limits to
farming and get people to switch over to his other thing that he got in
on the ground floor to sell us bugs in some form or the other.
It truly is amazing how these guys have laid this stuff out. And the
key thing is for people to understand that. As you point out, one
of the key things is for them to understand really what is happening with the
conservationsements that many times they don't understand what that is. Uh. They might
be doing it even to try to think that this is going to preserve the
farm forever and keep this as farmland rather than seeing it lost to development,
and so they could pass that down to future generations. David is in Texas.
They don't have zoning, but they have a lot of deed restrictions.
If you want to leave your farm to your your children and your grandchildren,
you can put a deed restriction on there. No liquor store, no,
no, so to be do what you want to do with deed restrictions.
You don't have to get tangled up with this third party that uh can sell
the management rights to your afarm to another party, can change that three or
four times, and then soon or later the high bidder continue. You can't
raise cattle mm hmm. So much knowledge, you know it is, It's
just uh all I. All I want to do is is make sure that
that these farmers, these landowners, they know what you're getting into. They
need to We need to get a good real estate attorney that understands and realize
that there is a global movement to do this. I mean, until you
realize that mister global is trying to take over the whole world, none of
this makes sense, that's right. But when you realize that that the globalists
uh control Washington. You know, they Bushes were all big globalist. I
mean, all right Loristan blah blah blah, they're all gloglist by Carthy.
Yeah, and you get come lubbist, not a globalist like Jim Burchie or
somebody, and they damon I. I mean, it's well, I've interviewed
I can't remember his name. I was trying to think of his name,
but he produces the Tuttle Twin books and he's out in Utah and he said
he's been involved in politics quite a bit. He helped to get Mike Lee
elected as Senator, but he goes, you know, he says, I
don't disagree with them on stuff. I hope to get him elected, but
he really can't get anything done in Washington because, as you point out,
it's so broken. He said, we found that we could do far more
at the state levels. He created a think tank, Libertas, and they've
gotten you know, a couple hundred bills passed through there to help enhance freedom
and to control the growth of government. And I think that really is the
right path. We need to focus on the state level, local level.
I think people could clearly see that, as I say, on a daily
basis, you could see how that worked out in twenty twenty when everybody was
locking Downal government could either make it a lot better for you or they can
make it a lot worse. So people need to pay attention to what's going
on at local level. But everybody's just totally obsessed with the presidency, where
they're going to have the least amount of influence at all. Both as a
voter and certainly in terms of follow up, it's important to make connections to
the state and the local politicians to understand what is happening there. Well,
the state has one thing going for us that the Feds can't change. They
can't make us spend made. They can pace solves, but we don't have
to enforce them, and we have done that any face. Now, there's
a lot of talk about notification. I fully believe that notication is legal.
Yes, that any action from that is that is unconstitutional can be notified.
We can't the states can't notify things that are constitutional, but the Feds do
plenty of things that aren't constitutional, and we can notify those. And all
it takes is backbone and say they can't make us spend money, they can't
make us enforce their laws, and that's that's probable, and they kind of
typically do it with bribery and blackmail. I think it was it Butt Haulsey
that introduced the bill say that we're gonna, you know, not be on
the hook to taking a lot of this money from the Department of Education or
other things like that to control what we do in schools, because that's the
key way that they always control people. Did he introduce the bill to stop
that? I believe it was him, maybe with somebody else wait towards that
idea. They they did a study down here and they they found well,
I was that we've got more problem with our state Department of Education, and
we do the FASSE first. But that's not good. How bad the feds
are. If the state is worse than that, that's that's not a good
thing at all. Tennessee gets forty percent of their money from the Feds.
And I said, yes, but the Feds get all of their money from
the states. Yeah, they all them from us, the income tax and
road tax and everything. Well, even on our gas tax, we send
them a hundred million more than we get back. Now, a lot of
the limbles, they said, all Tennessee is a receiver state. I said,
well, you know, I don't believe that. I think we're about
in the middle of the pack. I think we send them about as much
as we get back. There are states that you know, we I think
our will you forever dollar they send in on road tax, they get fied
dollars back. You know, we send a one hundred million more than we
get back we send we send the park transportation in the US park trampstation one
hundred million roughly. I mean that was just three years ago, the roughly
one hundred million more than then we get back from them. So we could
opt out of the federal road program. We can sender on speed limits,
we do on seed law. We can do a lot of different things.
And but like say, it takes leadership and backbone. And I tell people,
Washington's not helped back by lack of brains. They know they're sorry,
and they know what they're doing wrong. It's backbone what they don't have.
They got plenty of brave what they well, you know, when you're talking
about nullification, it's not even a theory. It was done extensively. If
you look at marijuana lass for example, that was nullification and Jeff Sessions as
much as and you know, regardless of what you think about marijuana, I
refer to that all the time. So people think I support the use of
marijuana. I don't. But what I'm saying is is that from a legal
standpoint, what we saw was when the states nullified it said you're not going
to enforce that here. Jeff Sessions, as desperately as he wanted to do
that, didn't do anything about it because it was a bluff. I mean,
they had to have the eighteenth Amendment to prohibit alcohol. They didn't have
any constitutional authority to prohibit anything. And when they called his bluff on it,
he didn't do anything. And that's what you're talking about, calling their
bluff, talking about non commandeering, the fact that they can't commandeer state resources
to enforce their laws, and the fact that you know, it just isn't
going to happen in the state if we get control. That's why it is
so important for people pay attention to what's going on in the state. It
is and they're the saddu has done a great job in Florida. He said
all the right things, but he just doesn't catch on there. There's something
politicians have to have. It's a it's a trait. There's no word for
an English language, or might be one in France, I don't know,
but there's the word. I can't pull the word out of there that you
got to have and and it's hard. I can't describe it. But he
says all the right things. If if someone else read his speeches, they
would love it. But somebody it's not catching off. And uh, he
would. He would have made a good president vice president. At one point
I was hoping that he could get together Trump and and would have have Trump
for four years and there satisfied. Here appears that's not going to happen.
And I don't know, I don't know who's gonna get for vice president.
I think that's a very very important decision right now. Dem Scock name pops
up just you know, even Tolsi gathered up there. Her name's popped up.
Tyler too. So if you go back and you look at people and
their ability to make speeches, you know, we would have never had a
president Jefferson in today's markets. For sure. Everybody talked about how you he's
great at writing stuff and uh, you know, he's a great thinker.
But everybody hated his speeches. They said it was all multi feminine. Yeah,
and they said Washington was not a great speaker. Yeah. First time
he was called all speak on when he's on legislation Virginia, he he panics
and ran out of the room. Must on his teeth. I don't know.
Maybe that made him self conscious. I've seen some of his false teeth.
They were they were they were primitive. Yeah, well that's the thing,
you know, it's back in that time, people knew who they were
now we only know people from a distance, we only know them through their
media image, and that is something very easy to manipulate. But you know,
talking about the threats to farms and and how how this is metastasizing,
and of course it's much further along in the Netherlands. Uh, they're they're
you know, as you talked about their banning nitrogen, banning fertilizer. I
mean, the people are smuggling and fertilizer and they're treating it like it's some
like it's ventanyl or something, you know, coming into the Netherlands. And
then you've got people like Bill Gates, who you know, there's something fishy
when they say that CO two has to be controlled to the extent that you're
going to have to cut down trees and bury them. That's the most absurd
thing I've ever seen. They were given tax credits for growing trees, their
giant sink of CO two. I don't think CO two is a problem,
you know, it's it's necessary for plants to grow. But they want to
cut down the CO two. They want to you know, use jew engineering
to take out sunlight and everything. These people are absolutely crazy. There doesn't
seem to be anything that they're not capable of trying to do. Uh,
and so what other things have we seen here? And we need to be
on the lookout for at the state level in terms of some of these things
attacking farming, attacking the building form. Well you mentioned maybe not exactly on
that, but you mentioned geoengineering. And we have a bill this year,
and of course the people are pushing the bill. They want it's just an
outlague their way with top it. I said, well, in politics,
you've got to consider what's new. So what we're going to what I'm pushing
to just say, he if you're going to spray something or our Department Environment
Tense that tendency Department Environment Conserlation, we need to know what it is and
how much you're spraying. I mean that's the first step. What is it?
Might be good, We may say, well more, we don't know,
but we need to say what is it and how much or you're praying.
And anytime you're spraying, you know, if you've got a factory out
here, if you're making tires and anything that goes into the air, they
have to report that to our Apartment conserlation. Why do these guys get to
fly over and not report it at all. There is. The old theory
was that they were For years they denied. Then they said whether it's in
the budget? Was you do? Then they said, well, it's a
darken disguise for the global warming. Now then they said, oh, they're
putting these isons in the sky to make their satellites communicate with your cell phone
better so they can track you better. It's to enhance it's to enhance our
communications with the satellites. So I don't know what it is. I mean,
I'm just telling you what, but we do know they're spreaying something.
Yeah, you don't have contrails until you're about twenty eight thousand feet of all
these things are lower than that, so we know they're spreading something. And
I think the first step, which is to drive sign it. What is
it? How much that's called? Yeah, there was something done by that
in New Hampshire as well. And again that is the beginning, you know,
to say, well, tell us what you're doing and then we'll talk
about that. I think that's very wise and I'm glad that that's coming up
in Tennessee as well. I have one thing I will talk about, you
know, up until the year I was born, nineteen forty seven, had
a state property tax, no sales tax, but a property tax. And
you paid your property tax to the county and then you sent the county or
state tax, and this county sent it on to the state. In nineteen
forty seven, they passed the sales tax. They said, if you'll let
us have a sales tax, we'll do away with the property tax. So
they rolled property tax back to zero, but they didn't do away with so
I the interviews for resolution. It's already passed in the House, and what
it would say is we'd have to pass it but several majority this year.
Then next year we'd have to have a two third majority. Then we put
it on about it with the governor and it would have to get a majority
of the people to go to the governor, and we would amend the state
constitution to outohol a state property tax. Good. So that's a big push
this year. We've got several big things going. We've got a gold and
Silver We're trying to put some of our rainy day fund instead of storing it
in stocks and bonds with State Street put it over and the gold and silver
and store tex that we can get on our own depository. Golden Sailors about
the only thing you ever buy. Hope it doesn't go up because big gold
up. Everything else you guys gone down. So like that's right, Yeah,
it keeps its value. We talk about that many times, talk about
you know, how much gold did it take for somebody to get a custom
made suit, you know, one hundred and fifty years ago or something like
that, still about about the same un't have been a store of value at
adult God, that's right. Well, those are all good examples, and
it's one of the reasons why I'd like to have you on UH and to
get people understand that there are thing Washington is dysfunctional. It's like trying to
push on a rope to get anything done. There's too much big money and
special interests have taken it over. Can't really get anything done there, but
there still is a possibility at least to get something done at the state level.
You're a very good example of that, Senator Nicely, and so I
really do appreciate the work that you do and the warnings that you give to
people, and everybody needs to be on the lookout for these types of sister
bills. To the Natural Asset Company idea things that are being pushed through at
the state level so they can take control of state lands as they wish to
do with all the federal parks and other things like that. So it's very
important that people keep their eyes open and their ears open to what's going on.
It's so it's lack the deriveties. Back in the late eighties, yes,
they started previties. I can't explain it to my grandkids what they are,
but forever tradion dollars, both the real assets says one hundred trillion ballots
started and who knows it's going to all come crashing. And by putting those
things together they hide stuff as well. You know, when you when you
got an ETF for gold or silver, do they really have the gold and
silver in those vaults in Shanghai? And when you look at these real estate
derivatives, you know, we can't separate any particular property. You just mix
them all together under essentially. And so a big part of this is,
you know, creating confusion and ambiguity about what is really there and what it's
attached to. And that's what we're seeing in these nacs as well as these
types of structures to try to surreptitiously and quietly take over control through financial instruments
of the land. Because they want all of the land under their control and
they want to essentially own everything. This is a way of taking ownership away
very very h in a very sneaky way. If someone bought thematic rights the
Great Spoke amount in National Park, what could they do that would make it
give a option or short they do? I mean, the trains are going
to do what you're going to do. Yes, right, that's right.
And so the whole thing is is the shell game, and it's a way
of getting us to pay them for something that we shouldn't have to pay them
for. You know, I've all always said this about the carbon taxes.
I said, so we're gonna pay carbon tax is gonna pay like an indulgence,
you know, uh, like some kind of religious indulgence that they we're
going to pay to sin, We're going to pay to use energy. Who
does that money go to? Well, how are they entitled to have that
money? Oh? Well, they're going to do good things with it,
Like they're gonna plant trees. Now, I guess they're gonna cut trees down
and bury them. But you know it's going to be whatever the approved activity
is, which is all stuff that doesn't make any sense. It doesn't it's
not necessary. A whole thing is the show game. Anybody thanks you cutting
trees down and burn it's a good idea. I mean, I don't know,
it's just it's they don't understand the carbon cycle. But I've always said
this, this seal too, they use out the question out there. They
will be selling all that for this cracking. So show me fracking. Depending
on what the shows you're in, like our shell here in East Tennessee.
Uh, they tell me that the best saying to the fact these are all
well with to make them produce more just seal too, so that a little
bit expensive and they start to questioning, get a little cheaper than you use
more of it. So there's always something sinister behind this stuff that you will
you found out after too late. Maybe it's just big a giant plot by
doctor Pepper to make more carbonated drinks going to take over the world and the
carbonated drinks sarta nicely is always great talking to you. Thank you so much
for warning us about this, and if people want to contact their representatives here
in Tennessee. That's Senate Bill two zero nine to nine and two zero six
nine. One of them is about the public lands and the other ones about
the private lands. Yes, go ahead. Let me to American Stewards of
Liberty. Yes, out of Texas. And they're on the front line of
all this, and the American Stewards of Liberty, and thank you. Keep
up to them and they'll probably keep you posted. Yes, I need to
contact them and get them on as well. They were the ones who started
sounding the alarm of this NAC stuff about, you know, a year and
a half ago. So that's that's good. Well, thank you very Sanagonica,
thank you very much. The David Night Show is a critical thinking super
spreader. If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Night Show,
please do your part and try not to spread it. Financial support,
or simply tell the others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread.
Father. People have to trust me, I mean, trust the science.
Wear your mask, take your vaccine, don't ask questions, use it,
free speech to free minds. It's the David Knight Show.