WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:04.280
Who's ever the chairperson of the SEC. Whatever the regulations are will follow.

2
00:00:05.960 --> 00:00:10.640
When we started, it was when
Clayton was the chairperson of the SEC right

3
00:00:10.800 --> 00:00:14.480
and he was a Trump appointee and
essentially he was the one who came out

4
00:00:14.519 --> 00:00:20.120
with the special Purpose Broker Dealer release. So you know, whatever the regulators

5
00:00:20.120 --> 00:00:23.679
say, our whole position has been
will follow it. That's why it has

6
00:00:23.760 --> 00:00:30.679
taken us arguably a long time,
because regulations weren't clear, and you know,

7
00:00:30.760 --> 00:00:35.640
you have to work with the powers
that you know, the actual regulators

8
00:00:35.840 --> 00:00:39.320
in order to make sure you obtain
the licenses if your belief is that's the

9
00:00:39.320 --> 00:00:49.439
way to do a compliant This content
is brought to you by Uphold, which

10
00:00:49.479 --> 00:00:53.560
is a great crypto platform that I've
been using since twenty eighteen. Uphold has

11
00:00:53.640 --> 00:00:57.320
all the top cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin and
all the all coins. In fact,

12
00:00:57.359 --> 00:01:00.240
they have two hundred and sixty plus
cryptocurrencies on their platform. You can also

13
00:01:00.359 --> 00:01:06.359
trade precious metals, stable coins,
and thirty seven fiat currencies. In addition,

14
00:01:06.400 --> 00:01:11.000
they are available in over one hundred
and fifty countries and this platform is

15
00:01:11.000 --> 00:01:15.000
fully reserved. They do audits so
you can trust that your funds are safe

16
00:01:15.120 --> 00:01:18.719
no commingling, no lending out your
funds. If you'd like to learn more

17
00:01:18.760 --> 00:01:23.560
about Uphold, please visit the link
in the description. Welcome to the Thinking

18
00:01:23.560 --> 00:01:27.239
Crypto podcast. You're home for cryptocurrency
news and interviews. With me today is

19
00:01:27.280 --> 00:01:32.640
Aaron Kaplan, who's the co CEO
and co founder of Prometheum. Eron.

20
00:01:32.719 --> 00:01:36.400
It's great to have you on.
Hey, Tony, thank you for having

21
00:01:36.439 --> 00:01:41.159
me so erin big news around Prometheum. There is a big launch taking place.

22
00:01:41.640 --> 00:01:44.879
I have a lot of questions for
you about your services and much more.

23
00:01:45.040 --> 00:01:48.159
But before we get to Prometheum,
tell us about yourself. Where you're

24
00:01:48.200 --> 00:01:53.400
from and what's your professional background.
So I am from New York, I

25
00:01:53.439 --> 00:01:57.799
grew up in Westchester. My backgrounds
in financial services, and I am a

26
00:01:59.640 --> 00:02:06.439
class trained as a securities attorney,
which was obviously very interesting and useful in

27
00:02:06.480 --> 00:02:09.680
doing what we're doing. And since
essentially, I believe twenty thirteen, i'd

28
00:02:09.680 --> 00:02:16.159
focused my securities practice the application of
distributed ALLGRIC technology to the securities industry and

29
00:02:16.199 --> 00:02:21.639
really the related regulatory issues now.
At the time when we first started,

30
00:02:21.719 --> 00:02:28.280
and people weren't necessarily considering the sort
of the crossover between what at the time

31
00:02:28.520 --> 00:02:32.599
was bitcoin then became virtual currency,
and then became sort of smart contract enabled

32
00:02:32.680 --> 00:02:38.039
network tokens, then just expanded from
there, and they weren't considering the implications

33
00:02:38.039 --> 00:02:45.879
from sort of a regulatory standpoint.
But essentially, since we got into the

34
00:02:45.919 --> 00:02:50.159
space, since reading the Biitcoy white
paper, you know, and really believing

35
00:02:50.159 --> 00:02:57.800
in the technology, we had focused
on sort of the best way or a

36
00:02:57.840 --> 00:03:01.919
proper way to allow for participation,
meaning trading clear and set on the custody

37
00:03:01.960 --> 00:03:07.280
of the general public in the space. And we initially wrote a no action

38
00:03:07.400 --> 00:03:14.479
letter to the SEC in April twenty
fourteen asking them to allow us to transact

39
00:03:14.520 --> 00:03:19.199
bitcoin as a security through an ATS
and a brokerage account. And the whole

40
00:03:19.240 --> 00:03:23.039
idea there was that the federal securities
laws provided an excellent framework to allow for

41
00:03:23.240 --> 00:03:28.120
participation in the space that would allow
the general public to be properly protected.

42
00:03:29.120 --> 00:03:32.599
So from there that's where we started, and we went down a deep rabbit

43
00:03:32.599 --> 00:03:38.159
hole. And what was your first
encounter with bitcoin? I'm almost curious about

44
00:03:38.199 --> 00:03:44.360
folks history and story about when they
first encountered bitcoin and what was the aha

45
00:03:44.400 --> 00:03:50.599
moment for them, you know,
when reading about reading the white paper and

46
00:03:50.639 --> 00:03:53.280
going into it and listen, I'm
a security attorney, I'm not an engineer.

47
00:03:53.840 --> 00:03:59.000
You know, anybody who doesn't have
a deep engineering background or even had,

48
00:03:59.080 --> 00:04:02.039
you know, as major you could
only go so far, but you

49
00:04:02.080 --> 00:04:10.639
could understand that there was a lot
of potential to innovate how data and value

50
00:04:11.000 --> 00:04:16.120
was transacting on a blockchain as the
basis for that. But essentially so after

51
00:04:16.199 --> 00:04:20.199
reading that, it was sort of
aha moment, like, oh, this

52
00:04:20.279 --> 00:04:27.120
is going to change how securities operate. Because the thought was is like securities,

53
00:04:27.199 --> 00:04:30.040
if you look at the history of
security securities are initial paper securities,

54
00:04:30.079 --> 00:04:36.439
make certificates, they transfer like eventually
they they transitioned to electronic sort of trading,

55
00:04:36.480 --> 00:04:43.040
which is basically a electronic representation of
a physical certificate, but it's still

56
00:04:43.079 --> 00:04:46.079
based on the physical certificates. But
the next generation beyond that is to be

57
00:04:46.120 --> 00:04:50.920
pure digital, meaning having the asset
issued on chain and transferred on chain and

58
00:04:51.519 --> 00:04:56.839
overall in the security space, the
idea is sort of like the Holy Grail

59
00:04:57.199 --> 00:05:00.439
is a tady settlement. It t
zero. It just eliminates a lot of

60
00:05:00.439 --> 00:05:05.759
counterparty risks. So the thought process
was by integrating the benefits of distributed architectures

61
00:05:05.800 --> 00:05:11.160
into market infrastructure, what would you
what you could achieve is really the holy

62
00:05:11.160 --> 00:05:15.560
Grail of markets, meaning you know, insanitaneous settlement and basically the ability to

63
00:05:16.079 --> 00:05:20.000
trade clear settling custody on a blockchain
was the goal when we started the company,

64
00:05:20.319 --> 00:05:24.000
and as I mentioned before, we
wrote our first no action letter to

65
00:05:24.040 --> 00:05:29.399
the SEC in twenty fourteen. You
know, it was a little bit progressive

66
00:05:29.439 --> 00:05:33.759
in its thought and nothing became of
it. But since then, you know,

67
00:05:35.120 --> 00:05:41.720
we I focused my practice in the
space, and as the different technologies

68
00:05:41.759 --> 00:05:45.839
developed, as you had a smart
contract enabled network tokens come out, you

69
00:05:45.839 --> 00:05:48.759
know, and initially with the ico
boom and the like, there was a

70
00:05:48.839 --> 00:05:54.920
conflation between the what I saw as
an opportunity between the technologies attendant to virtual

71
00:05:54.959 --> 00:06:00.480
currencies and sort of how markets worked. So while I'm not the biggest bitcoin

72
00:06:00.560 --> 00:06:06.279
person, I do believe in a
lot of the smart contract based network tokens

73
00:06:06.319 --> 00:06:13.000
and their viability as a means of
processing data, and think that the conflation

74
00:06:13.120 --> 00:06:16.680
between those technologies and markets is really
the future of where everything's going. Now.

75
00:06:17.120 --> 00:06:21.879
Giving your securities background, and we
see the talks of tokenization and putting

76
00:06:23.160 --> 00:06:27.759
stocks, bonds of real estate on
the blockchain and the ability to do that

77
00:06:27.879 --> 00:06:33.480
is because of smart contract technology.
What is your outlook for the future is

78
00:06:33.560 --> 00:06:39.240
of the future of securities. You
know, you have a timeline for when

79
00:06:39.279 --> 00:06:42.279
we see all these things token as
you have like Larry Finger at black Rock

80
00:06:42.360 --> 00:06:45.800
talking about it saying it's a future
of finance, and is Prometheum trying to

81
00:06:45.839 --> 00:06:53.879
position itself to be able to meet
the market needs there. So prometheum is

82
00:06:53.920 --> 00:06:59.959
sort of interesting because it allows for
potential disruption into different parts of the market.

83
00:07:00.639 --> 00:07:06.199
So on the virtual currency side,
the idea there is just basically what

84
00:07:06.240 --> 00:07:12.120
people call virtual currency and everything besides
for bitcoin, arguably we view as an

85
00:07:12.160 --> 00:07:16.959
investment contract that is a digital asset
security and basically you're able to treat and

86
00:07:17.040 --> 00:07:21.959
trade it, treat and trade clear
selling custody of that asset by providing the

87
00:07:23.040 --> 00:07:26.319
benefits of the feral security as law
as such that investors are protected. So

88
00:07:26.319 --> 00:07:29.360
that's one side of the market.
But what you're referring to on the other

89
00:07:29.399 --> 00:07:31.639
side, which I think is like
a big driver of future growth, is

90
00:07:31.680 --> 00:07:38.160
this tokenization idea. So when you
think about tokenization, now there's fringe cases,

91
00:07:38.160 --> 00:07:42.279
so it says not one hundred percent, but tokenization is arguably security is

92
00:07:42.279 --> 00:07:46.000
out of blockchain. And when you
see people like Larry Fakett, you see

93
00:07:46.000 --> 00:07:50.040
people, you know, the big
banks talking about how tokenization, meaning security

94
00:07:50.079 --> 00:07:54.319
is out of blockchain, is essentially
a billion dollar market. I know that's

95
00:07:54.360 --> 00:07:57.360
not a word, but you know
they say crazy numbers. You know you're

96
00:07:57.360 --> 00:08:03.839
talking. They're talking about trillions of
dollars, right, And that is I

97
00:08:03.839 --> 00:08:07.680
think which will drive what will drive
a lot of the future growth, the

98
00:08:07.720 --> 00:08:13.560
institutional adoption, the institutional participation,
because it really provides a mechanism by which

99
00:08:13.519 --> 00:08:18.800
institutions could arguably generate compliant revenues in
the space. If they can issue a

100
00:08:18.839 --> 00:08:24.319
security on chain, they know it's
regulated, there's no regulatory compliance issues,

101
00:08:24.639 --> 00:08:28.920
and basically now they can sort of
transition their business away from traditional means of

102
00:08:30.160 --> 00:08:33.320
sort of creation of securities, trading, clear sellment, custody to on chain

103
00:08:33.360 --> 00:08:37.200
activity and now that they can generate
revenue from it, there's significant more and

104
00:08:37.240 --> 00:08:41.960
more significantly more interest. But if
you take it a step further, like

105
00:08:43.120 --> 00:08:46.000
in people talk about tokenization, but
in order for tokenization to be empowered,

106
00:08:46.240 --> 00:08:50.840
tokenization is the creation of the asset, but you need to be able to

107
00:08:50.840 --> 00:08:54.039
do things with those assets thereafter.
Yeah, I mean, if you can't

108
00:08:54.080 --> 00:08:58.440
do anything, it's a liquid there's
no public market trading, there's really no

109
00:08:58.519 --> 00:09:03.360
activity there, right, So what
Promethium does is basically everything after the asset

110
00:09:03.480 --> 00:09:09.279
is issued. We then provide a
public market infrastructure, meaning an ATS for

111
00:09:09.360 --> 00:09:13.679
digital ASEID securities that can publicly trade
digital assets digital asset securities, I should

112
00:09:13.679 --> 00:09:16.559
say, which means that there's depth
of market, there's liquidity, it's real

113
00:09:16.639 --> 00:09:20.960
trading, right. But in order
for that to occur, like you can't

114
00:09:20.960 --> 00:09:24.639
have public market trading unless you could
also do what occurs after the trade is

115
00:09:24.679 --> 00:09:28.840
made, meaning clearance, settlement,
and custody, and we've through our special

116
00:09:28.840 --> 00:09:33.279
purpose broker dealer are have the licenses
and the authority to do those activities.

117
00:09:33.919 --> 00:09:41.519
So basically, in that sense,
we can provide a sort of a infrastructure

118
00:09:41.519 --> 00:09:46.240
that will allow tokenization to take flight
actually meet its potential because the asset could

119
00:09:46.240 --> 00:09:48.559
be created and then it can actually
be publicly traded, cleared, settling,

120
00:09:48.600 --> 00:09:52.480
custody, meaning everything else that has
to occur to really allow tokenization as a

121
00:09:52.480 --> 00:09:58.120
whole to move forward, which we're
very excited for. And you guys have

122
00:09:58.240 --> 00:10:03.720
a FINRA appro to clear and settle
digital asset security trades along with custody.

123
00:10:03.039 --> 00:10:07.519
And then the big news, which
folks you're going to hear about, is

124
00:10:07.799 --> 00:10:11.519
the Ethereum custody launch. Tell us
about the FINRA approvals and the Ethereum custody

125
00:10:11.600 --> 00:10:20.399
launch. So I believe it was
in December Prometheum Capital, which is our

126
00:10:20.399 --> 00:10:24.120
special purpose broker dealer, received the
approval to clear and settle digital acid securities.

127
00:10:24.559 --> 00:10:28.519
So when you think about markets,
you have a trading venue and you

128
00:10:28.559 --> 00:10:31.919
have a custodial venue, and what
occurs in between, and this is a

129
00:10:31.000 --> 00:10:37.159
very simplistic explanation, is the clearance
at settlement. So we had the ability.

130
00:10:37.279 --> 00:10:39.759
I think we received the license for
our ATS with Prometheum ATS and twenty

131
00:10:39.799 --> 00:10:45.159
twenty one, and we received our
special purpose broker dealer in May twenty twenty

132
00:10:45.159 --> 00:10:48.240
three, I believe. But in
order to do that piece in between clear

133
00:10:48.279 --> 00:10:54.960
and settle and really have the ecosystem
as a whole makes sense, you really

134
00:10:54.960 --> 00:10:58.080
had to have that final approval.
And once we receive that, now basically

135
00:10:58.120 --> 00:11:05.919
we have the approval to have an
end to end blockchain enabled ecosystem for digital

136
00:11:05.919 --> 00:11:11.080
asset securities now and really overall that's
the last approval pro medium needed before we

137
00:11:11.159 --> 00:11:16.159
could launch this whole ecosystem and really
service the entire life cycle of the trade.

138
00:11:16.240 --> 00:11:20.440
Now, one thing that's it's a
little bit nuanced, but it's important

139
00:11:20.480 --> 00:11:24.360
understand, is that our license are
for digital asset securities. A digital asset

140
00:11:24.399 --> 00:11:30.240
security is both what a lot of
people would consider virtual currency ex. Bitcoin,

141
00:11:30.799 --> 00:11:35.240
which we basically consider investment contracts,
which is a qualification type of security,

142
00:11:35.320 --> 00:11:39.519
but it also includes any sort of
thirty three Act security, which includes

143
00:11:39.559 --> 00:11:45.519
equity, debt option, destructured products. And that's that tokenization side. So

144
00:11:45.559 --> 00:11:50.519
you could service both sides there.
You could service both the virtual currency which

145
00:11:50.559 --> 00:11:54.799
we view as investment contract digital a
SID securities, but also of any sort

146
00:11:54.840 --> 00:11:58.679
of security issued and transferred on a
blockchain, which is basically the entire tokenization

147
00:11:58.840 --> 00:12:01.720
universe. So, uh, it's
really expansive and I think that that is

148
00:12:03.639 --> 00:12:07.000
why I think we have the potential
to disrupt a lot of sort of different

149
00:12:07.039 --> 00:12:09.679
parts of the market. Now,
you mentioned and Aaron, we're going to

150
00:12:09.679 --> 00:12:13.200
talk a bit about this. You
know, you mentioned digital asset securities.

151
00:12:13.200 --> 00:12:15.960
A lot of people in the crypto
industry disagree with you on that, right,

152
00:12:16.000 --> 00:12:20.720
but your Etheroereum custody launch. Are
you treating etherorem as a security?

153
00:12:20.720 --> 00:12:26.679
Are you viewing as a security or
commodities is similar to bitcoin? So you

154
00:12:26.759 --> 00:12:31.120
know, it's an important question,
and honestly we're super excited to roll out

155
00:12:31.200 --> 00:12:37.720
our Theorem custody launch because it's a
pivotal moment not only for Prometheum, but

156
00:12:37.759 --> 00:12:41.480
I think for the broader industry.
So as I mentioned the expansive nature of

157
00:12:41.519 --> 00:12:48.120
our Digital Aid Securities license, and
that basically means we can handle investment contracts

158
00:12:48.120 --> 00:12:54.159
which are digital acid securities, and
we can offer services that are internal to

159
00:12:54.399 --> 00:12:58.600
assets that our internal compliance seems confidences
security and basically we are confident in this

160
00:12:58.720 --> 00:13:05.159
case and for purposely for these purposes
we started with Ethereum now but looking at

161
00:13:05.200 --> 00:13:09.679
the bigger picture, like Promethium,
in some senses, doing something that's never

162
00:13:09.120 --> 00:13:13.519
been done before, and by doing
with e the most popular token besides for

163
00:13:13.600 --> 00:13:18.759
bitcoin, which is obviously bitcoin is
a security, as the SEC and other

164
00:13:20.120 --> 00:13:24.120
regulated entities have said. But basically
what we do is we hope to establish

165
00:13:24.200 --> 00:13:28.679
that the existing federal securities laws are
applicable to most digital assets and investors can

166
00:13:28.759 --> 00:13:33.200
safely engage with them under existing regulatory
frameworks and sort of this is significant for

167
00:13:33.279 --> 00:13:35.600
the I'm sorry, go ahead.
There's a lot of like, no,

168
00:13:35.759 --> 00:13:41.320
no, you mentioned bitcoin as a
security, but I thought even answer is

169
00:13:41.360 --> 00:13:43.360
not a security. Oh okay,
Bitcoin's the only one that's not a security.

170
00:13:43.440 --> 00:13:46.840
But like the and then it's like
the question of what happens with everything

171
00:13:46.919 --> 00:13:52.840
else? Right, But the origination
and the inception of bitcoin is followed a

172
00:13:52.879 --> 00:14:01.399
different model than almost every other asset
thereafter, So I think that's a distinguishing

173
00:14:01.480 --> 00:14:11.039
point. And while in theory you
could technically and from a operational standpoint handle

174
00:14:11.080 --> 00:14:16.240
bitcoin, whatever the regulators say,
we try to follow. So everything else

175
00:14:16.320 --> 00:14:20.120
besides for that is potentially open business. So Aaron, I mean, I

176
00:14:20.200 --> 00:14:24.879
mean, I think it in a
sense because you have this license, regardless

177
00:14:24.919 --> 00:14:28.960
of if something's at security or not, you have the ability to custody securities.

178
00:14:28.039 --> 00:14:31.600
So right now, you could list
a lot of cryptocurrencies if you want,

179
00:14:31.759 --> 00:14:35.080
right because you have to license.
Am I Is that correct? Am

180
00:14:35.080 --> 00:14:39.720
I off base? There? Yeah? No, We view the majority of

181
00:14:39.799 --> 00:14:43.799
the highest volume of traded assets as
digital asset. Security is when it comes

182
00:14:43.840 --> 00:14:46.480
to virtual currency, and honestly,
we intend to make them available as quickly

183
00:14:46.480 --> 00:14:50.879
as possible, because you want to
be able to support the largest and most

184
00:14:50.879 --> 00:14:54.320
liquid tokens. And we start off
with number two. And while our initial

185
00:14:54.360 --> 00:14:58.320
focus is on this investment contract digital
assets what some people would say crypto,

186
00:14:58.360 --> 00:15:01.559
the next thing, the next step
which we really think will drive future growth,

187
00:15:01.720 --> 00:15:05.559
is the tokenization side. And as
I mentioned before, that basically means

188
00:15:07.039 --> 00:15:11.080
securities issued and transfer out of the
blockchain. And you know, while as

189
00:15:11.120 --> 00:15:16.240
you mentioned before with Larry Fink,
there's a lot of discussion about tokenization being

190
00:15:16.279 --> 00:15:20.080
the next big thing in finance,
you know, at quadrillion dollar market,

191
00:15:20.399 --> 00:15:24.559
that's actually a real term. But
essentially in order for that market to be

192
00:15:24.600 --> 00:15:28.240
empowered, you need that infrastructure,
and that's the infrastructure we've created. So

193
00:15:28.360 --> 00:15:33.679
basically we believe that we can empower
that that discussion that mister Fike had mentioned,

194
00:15:35.159 --> 00:15:37.759
what are your thoughts on You know, you mentioned, like you did,

195
00:15:37.879 --> 00:15:39.039
number two, which is e theorem, And as you go down that

196
00:15:39.159 --> 00:15:43.840
list, you have for example,
XRP and you had that ruling in the

197
00:15:43.039 --> 00:15:48.320
case. We know the case between
the sec and Ripple is not fully concluded.

198
00:15:48.360 --> 00:15:52.279
That's still I think there's a trial
in April, but the judge rule

199
00:15:52.320 --> 00:15:56.639
that XRP intrinsically is not a security
depends on the scenario of how it's offered

200
00:15:56.720 --> 00:16:02.480
up. Would Prometheum be looking to
XRP as an asset that you would support,

201
00:16:04.279 --> 00:16:11.840
It would depend how the measure played
out in court. Obviously there's a

202
00:16:11.919 --> 00:16:15.639
lot going on in the courts and
that will play out in time. But

203
00:16:17.759 --> 00:16:22.360
the way we viewed it is that
what you're trying to do is just provide

204
00:16:22.840 --> 00:16:29.440
an established an ecosystem, under established
regulatory framework to allow the public to participate

205
00:16:29.480 --> 00:16:33.519
in the space. And what we
saw on the events historically, particularly you

206
00:16:33.559 --> 00:16:37.480
know we're moving away from twenty twenty
two, but essentially you need to have

207
00:16:37.600 --> 00:16:42.559
frameworks, You need to have oversight, need to have the ongoing reporting requirements,

208
00:16:42.720 --> 00:16:47.399
and you need to make sure that
you know when people participate in the

209
00:16:47.440 --> 00:16:51.440
space, they are able to do
so, and that they're going to make

210
00:16:51.519 --> 00:16:56.799
or lose money based on their own
investment decisions and not because of the mouthfeasance

211
00:16:56.840 --> 00:17:02.360
of the underlying platform. So I
feel like it provides just a mechanism by

212
00:17:02.399 --> 00:17:07.359
which that could occur. And it's
not easy to get regulated under the securities

213
00:17:07.440 --> 00:17:12.079
laws. It's a much harder approach. It's like it's much more difficult because

214
00:17:12.519 --> 00:17:18.839
in one sense you're innovating by combining
the two in some capacity. But beyond

215
00:17:18.960 --> 00:17:22.240
that, you know, you have
to go through the process. You have

216
00:17:22.279 --> 00:17:26.319
to go through the regulatory process.
And while it's taken us a long time,

217
00:17:26.720 --> 00:17:33.640
you know, we started twenty seventeen, I think that by putting in

218
00:17:33.720 --> 00:17:38.960
the effort, it'll actually allow for
the innovation and markets people have been discussing

219
00:17:40.039 --> 00:17:45.480
for discussing about for a long time. Now, are you servicing just primarily

220
00:17:45.559 --> 00:17:49.559
institutions or are you looking to have
a retail product? And apologize if I

221
00:17:49.680 --> 00:17:53.799
missed that and do my research,
but what's your plans as far as servicing

222
00:17:53.839 --> 00:18:00.000
different types of clients? So our
licenses allow for both institutional and retail.

223
00:18:00.839 --> 00:18:07.680
The idea is to create a public
market trading and custodial infrastructure for digital securities,

224
00:18:07.480 --> 00:18:11.240
because if you think about it,
if it's not a public market,

225
00:18:12.759 --> 00:18:18.640
it's basically just matching illiquid shares,
stocks, tokens, whatever you want to

226
00:18:18.640 --> 00:18:22.960
say between a buyer e seller,
and usually what happens in our space when

227
00:18:22.000 --> 00:18:26.920
that occurs in you know, any
sort of licensed digital asset security ats right

228
00:18:26.960 --> 00:18:30.440
now, they do trading at one
place and they do clearance and settlement in

229
00:18:30.440 --> 00:18:34.319
another, and basically they do it
offline. It's almost like an OTC trade.

230
00:18:34.839 --> 00:18:38.640
And while that is definitely a step
forward from what had occurred previously in

231
00:18:38.720 --> 00:18:44.000
that you know, there was no
digital asset securities ATS is. The goal

232
00:18:44.079 --> 00:18:48.039
for us is real trading, depth
of market, actual liquidity, and what

233
00:18:48.160 --> 00:18:55.640
that requires is both institutional and retail
participation. And what's on your roadmap for

234
00:18:55.680 --> 00:19:00.079
twenty twenty four obviously huge launch right
with the etherorem custody launch. Anything that

235
00:19:00.160 --> 00:19:04.920
you can tell us that maybe down
the line later this year. Yes,

236
00:19:06.039 --> 00:19:11.200
first it's a custody eth will be
the first asset that we are custodying.

237
00:19:11.720 --> 00:19:15.799
And then after is obviously the adding
addigital assets because you want to be able

238
00:19:15.799 --> 00:19:18.839
to support the most liquid and you
know, the largest volume tokens. But

239
00:19:18.960 --> 00:19:25.599
beyond that, the next step is
trading, first institutional and then retail because

240
00:19:25.640 --> 00:19:30.440
you want to create this end to
end blockchain enabled infrastructure for trading, clear

241
00:19:30.480 --> 00:19:34.039
and settlement and custody of digital asset
securities. And when you think about it,

242
00:19:36.200 --> 00:19:41.640
it really is it has the potential
to change a lot because you're going

243
00:19:41.720 --> 00:19:45.519
to have the potential to change the
thoughts or how certain processes are done with

244
00:19:45.599 --> 00:19:51.440
virtual currency, but you also have
it or digitalt you know, investment contract,

245
00:19:51.440 --> 00:19:56.079
digital asset securities. But on the
other side you have traditional markets.

246
00:19:56.119 --> 00:20:00.039
And basically the goal of traditional markets
I said before the holy is is the

247
00:20:00.079 --> 00:20:06.480
Teddy settlement, and uh, you
know that's what we've built in some capacity

248
00:20:07.039 --> 00:20:14.400
is basically a blockchain enabled infrastructure that
integrates the benefits of digital asset architecture into

249
00:20:14.480 --> 00:20:17.480
markets to basically create a better Apple
cart. So you have the potential to

250
00:20:17.559 --> 00:20:21.279
disrupt both the virtual currency side and
the traditional market side, which is pretty

251
00:20:21.319 --> 00:20:26.200
cool. M And are you just
servicing the US market or are you also

252
00:20:26.519 --> 00:20:34.279
servicing countries outside the US? American
born and bread so basically would eventually to

253
00:20:34.400 --> 00:20:40.240
go global. I mean, so
it's it's it's an interesting question if you

254
00:20:40.240 --> 00:20:45.400
can think about, like I'm trained
in American securities laws, right, our

255
00:20:45.680 --> 00:20:49.079
bread and butter is American securities laws. So the first step, which was

256
00:20:49.079 --> 00:20:52.559
a very high bar, is America. And we've seen a lot of companies

257
00:20:52.640 --> 00:20:56.039
basically say, oh, it can't
be dout of America. Let's go to

258
00:20:56.119 --> 00:20:59.000
Singapore, Let's go outside the United
States, let's go to the EU,

259
00:20:59.799 --> 00:21:03.319
right, but American capital markets or
the leading capital markets of the world.

260
00:21:04.039 --> 00:21:07.599
And I think that's why, beyond
that being our expertise, that's the area

261
00:21:07.680 --> 00:21:11.519
we know, and that's the area
we wanted to focus on now once we're

262
00:21:11.519 --> 00:21:15.359
able to get everything going here.
Obviously, the goal, which has a

263
00:21:15.400 --> 00:21:18.160
lot of possibility to sort of compared
to how traditional market's done, is the

264
00:21:18.279 --> 00:21:25.920
internationalization of markets. So in theory, if you had different sort of entities

265
00:21:26.119 --> 00:21:30.720
or partners licensed under the different securities
laws, in arguably common law based countries

266
00:21:32.920 --> 00:21:36.359
and which includes a lot of countries
you know, Becau's the UK, because

267
00:21:36.440 --> 00:21:41.839
Singapore, it includes Australia. You
know it potentially could include places like Japan.

268
00:21:41.160 --> 00:21:45.400
Like what you could have is really
an internationalized system. We're able to

269
00:21:45.440 --> 00:21:49.920
connect the buyers and sellers of digital
assets under the securities laws, have all

270
00:21:49.960 --> 00:21:55.079
the amlksc et cetera. And you
know that is that would be awesome.

271
00:21:56.519 --> 00:22:03.799
And tell us about your custody platform
are is it you're proprietary custodial service or

272
00:22:03.920 --> 00:22:07.400
are you using like an anchorage or
a bit go or I don't know,

273
00:22:07.759 --> 00:22:14.160
a bny melon or something like that. No, we basically some the Special

274
00:22:14.200 --> 00:22:17.519
Purpose Broker Dealer release came out in
Christmas twenty twenty. It was called the

275
00:22:17.559 --> 00:22:19.200
Christmas Release, and as soon as
that came out, we just put our

276
00:22:19.240 --> 00:22:23.359
heads down. Essentially, we were
like, Okay, you need to build

277
00:22:25.160 --> 00:22:29.759
custom almost everything in order to get
approved for this license. I mean you

278
00:22:29.839 --> 00:22:32.720
have to build your own technology,
you have to build your own operations,

279
00:22:32.759 --> 00:22:34.400
your own compliance procedures, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. And

280
00:22:34.480 --> 00:22:38.440
the reason for that is it's never
been done before. So I don't think

281
00:22:38.440 --> 00:22:45.279
you could take a white labeled product
and potentially get a lot SPBD license with

282
00:22:45.359 --> 00:22:48.000
that. You have to basically build
your technology within the four corners of the

283
00:22:48.039 --> 00:22:56.240
regulation to make sure that essentially you
are complying with how everything's meant to be,

284
00:22:56.480 --> 00:23:03.720
meaning the rules attended to did asset
securities under the SPBD release create specific

285
00:23:03.799 --> 00:23:07.680
parameters that you have to meet in
every level in order to obtain that license.

286
00:23:07.880 --> 00:23:11.680
And historically what happened in the space
is, you know, there were

287
00:23:11.720 --> 00:23:14.759
different standards. It said, oh, you know, everyone built their own

288
00:23:14.799 --> 00:23:18.920
custody solution, right, but you
get LICENSERE, you get licensere, whether

289
00:23:18.960 --> 00:23:22.200
it's the new York dfs or whether
you get license to different states or in

290
00:23:22.279 --> 00:23:27.160
different places, and it became a
question of best practices maybe, and how

291
00:23:27.279 --> 00:23:32.319
you think these standards and like different
standards for custody. And what we saw

292
00:23:32.400 --> 00:23:37.720
recently was the introduction to the potential
change to the custody rule such that investment

293
00:23:37.799 --> 00:23:41.960
advisors have to hold their assets on
the crypto assets on we have of clients

294
00:23:42.160 --> 00:23:48.599
at a qualified custodian. Now it
gets really technical, but essentially the idea

295
00:23:48.680 --> 00:23:52.960
here is to create high level standards
for all custodians to be able to meet

296
00:23:52.599 --> 00:23:57.640
in order to ensure that the public
is protected. So we had to build

297
00:23:57.680 --> 00:24:03.720
our own technology basically and do everything
from scratched in order to make sure we

298
00:24:03.839 --> 00:24:08.720
met those standards. And with the
etherorem custody you're providing, are you going

299
00:24:08.759 --> 00:24:14.279
to be able to offer staking to
your clients or not at this time?

300
00:24:15.680 --> 00:24:22.759
Oh, interesting questions. So we've
seen regulatory actions which would basically arguably show

301
00:24:22.920 --> 00:24:27.880
that staking as a service related activity
implicates the securities laws. Right, a

302
00:24:27.960 --> 00:24:34.000
lot of the different platforms have had
to change or sort of stop doing how

303
00:24:34.039 --> 00:24:41.160
they were Staking as a service.
We have a lot to do, but

304
00:24:41.400 --> 00:24:45.640
Obviously we've considered the different lines of
business under the securities laws. But as

305
00:24:45.720 --> 00:24:51.720
I mentioned for twenty twenty four,
it's custody, launch, then trading and

306
00:24:52.039 --> 00:24:55.119
we could go from there. Got
it. Yeah, I know the staking

307
00:24:55.319 --> 00:24:59.000
situation is tricky. So Aaron,
I'm going to ask you some tough questions

308
00:24:59.319 --> 00:25:04.559
because there's it seems to be a
dichotomy between what you're doing at Prometheum and

309
00:25:06.480 --> 00:25:08.839
the rest of the crypto industry.
The rest of the folks have gotten wells

310
00:25:08.960 --> 00:25:15.039
notices, We've got lawsuits. You
know, you, for example, look

311
00:25:15.079 --> 00:25:18.759
at a lot of these cryptocurrencies as
digital acid securities. Other folks do not.

312
00:25:19.279 --> 00:25:22.759
There's some of this playing out in
the courts. Congress is involved with

313
00:25:22.880 --> 00:25:30.680
certain conversations with Chair Againser, and
is regulations being worked on. What is

314
00:25:30.759 --> 00:25:36.160
your take on the dichotomy and how
this is playing out? And and look,

315
00:25:36.240 --> 00:25:37.880
it is an election year. I
know this is an act question.

316
00:25:37.960 --> 00:25:42.400
I'm asking you here. Chair Againcer
may not be around if Biden loses,

317
00:25:42.640 --> 00:25:48.319
right, So what is your take
on this entire situation? Hi? Everyone,

318
00:25:48.480 --> 00:25:52.039
part of the interruption. I'm Tony
Edward, the founder and host of

319
00:25:52.079 --> 00:25:55.559
the Thinking Crypto podcast. I have
a huge favor to ask you. If

320
00:25:55.599 --> 00:25:59.960
you haven't subscribed as yet on YouTube
or the podcast platforms, hit the subscribe

321
00:26:00.079 --> 00:26:03.559
button, hit the thumbs up button, hit the notification bell on the YouTube

322
00:26:03.559 --> 00:26:07.039
platform and on Spotify or Apple or
wherever you get your podcasts, please leave

323
00:26:07.039 --> 00:26:11.599
a five style rating and review.
It supports the podcast. It allows me

324
00:26:11.720 --> 00:26:15.160
to bring great quality content to you. Thank you for your support, and

325
00:26:15.240 --> 00:26:19.200
I'll let you get back to the
content. The whoever's in, who's ever

326
00:26:19.480 --> 00:26:25.680
the chairperson of the SEC, whatever
the regulations are, will follow. When

327
00:26:25.720 --> 00:26:30.400
we started, it was when Clayton
was the chairperson of the SEC right and

328
00:26:30.559 --> 00:26:33.079
he was a Trump appointee and essentially
he was the one who came out with

329
00:26:33.160 --> 00:26:38.799
the special purpose broker Dealer release.
So you know, whatever the regulators say,

330
00:26:38.960 --> 00:26:42.200
our whole position has been, will
follow it. That's why it has

331
00:26:42.279 --> 00:26:49.039
taken us arguably a long time,
because it regulations weren't clear, and you

332
00:26:49.119 --> 00:26:53.559
know, you have to work with
the powers that you know, the actual

333
00:26:53.640 --> 00:26:57.359
regulators in order to make sure you
obtain the license is if your belief is,

334
00:26:57.559 --> 00:27:02.839
that's the way to do it compliantly. So you know, who knows

335
00:27:02.839 --> 00:27:06.000
which way the wind blows. But
whichever way it blows, you know,

336
00:27:06.119 --> 00:27:10.559
it usually carries the plane with it. Aaron, what do you think about

337
00:27:10.720 --> 00:27:15.880
under j Clayton would Bill him and
Bill Hinman gave a speech. Jake Clayton

338
00:27:15.960 --> 00:27:21.279
endorsed it up etherorem not being a
security That seems to still be holding up

339
00:27:21.640 --> 00:27:26.319
to this day. However, Chair
Gencer has not reiterated the statements. I

340
00:27:26.400 --> 00:27:30.480
know you just said, look,
it just depends on the way regulations go.

341
00:27:30.720 --> 00:27:34.960
But what are your thoughts on Etheroreum
not being a security and Bill Hinman

342
00:27:36.039 --> 00:27:42.000
and j Clayton's statements. You know, the Hindman statements were definitely interesting and

343
00:27:45.119 --> 00:27:49.799
you can make different arguments about it. I mean, the way we see

344
00:27:49.799 --> 00:27:53.960
it is that if you're going to
follow Himan's statement, who's not a commissioner,

345
00:27:55.200 --> 00:27:59.279
you would follow the commissioner's statement before
you would follow one of his supportinates

346
00:27:59.319 --> 00:28:03.400
statements. And Chairman Gensler has said
basically he views almost you know, the

347
00:28:03.440 --> 00:28:11.160
overwhelm majority of digital assets of our
securities besides Vicoin. So we understand that

348
00:28:11.519 --> 00:28:15.519
that him and statement was out there, but I think it was almost like

349
00:28:15.559 --> 00:28:18.480
a head fake, right in some
sense, it could be a disservice to

350
00:28:18.480 --> 00:28:22.079
the industry because I believe if you
look at the emails in one of the

351
00:28:22.160 --> 00:28:26.160
cases, there's certain people in terms
of the internal emails of the SEC are

352
00:28:26.200 --> 00:28:30.279
saying, Hey, what you're saying
is outside of what we believe. So

353
00:28:33.559 --> 00:28:37.279
I think if you look at that
from that sense, it might have done

354
00:28:37.359 --> 00:28:41.240
more harm than good. Sure,
yeah, by sort of deaking people out,

355
00:28:41.279 --> 00:28:44.680
you made people zag when they should
zig, and now they've like doubled

356
00:28:44.720 --> 00:28:49.359
and tripled down on certain sort of
viewpoints and certain feces that like that weren't

357
00:28:49.400 --> 00:28:56.240
necessarily got to play out in the
long term. M So it seemed like

358
00:28:56.480 --> 00:29:00.480
Jake Clayton and Bill Hidman and screwed
up there with this caused more fusion in

359
00:29:00.559 --> 00:29:04.160
the market. And I don't know
if it was Clayton though to my understanding,

360
00:29:04.440 --> 00:29:08.839
I don't know if it was Commissioner
Clayton, to my understanding, at

361
00:29:08.920 --> 00:29:12.160
least from what the emails say in
terms of the public emails from the from

362
00:29:12.200 --> 00:29:17.319
the cases. I don't know if
it was a top I don't think it

363
00:29:17.319 --> 00:29:19.799
was a top down director. I
think it might have been a viewpoint of

364
00:29:22.079 --> 00:29:26.519
himman that was outside of the consensus
viewpoint of the regulator. The thing is,

365
00:29:26.599 --> 00:29:30.079
though, I and I've seen videos
of Chair Clayton. You know,

366
00:29:30.119 --> 00:29:33.720
at that time he was endorsing.
He's like, hey, check, I'll

367
00:29:33.759 --> 00:29:37.720
build him in speech. So I
get what you're saying. It just seems

368
00:29:37.839 --> 00:29:44.319
like the Chair stamp this his stamp
of approval, despite him not being the

369
00:29:44.799 --> 00:29:48.160
originator of this. I know there's
other talks of conflicts and things like that.

370
00:29:48.279 --> 00:29:52.960
I don't know if you're aware of
these things of Bill Hinman and look,

371
00:29:52.000 --> 00:29:56.559
and maybe I've never seen the emails
I read him. I like,

372
00:29:56.720 --> 00:30:03.759
you know, like that's not for
me to really I don't know, Like

373
00:30:03.880 --> 00:30:07.680
I understand that if there's conflicts,
there's conflicts, and that's that's interesting.

374
00:30:08.119 --> 00:30:12.000
M Yeah. Look, at the
end of the day, I'm hoping we

375
00:30:12.079 --> 00:30:17.200
can get clear regulations from Congress.
They make the laws right and we can

376
00:30:17.279 --> 00:30:21.480
put some things in order, and
the SEC, the CFTC and whoever they

377
00:30:21.640 --> 00:30:23.440
do their part and we can move
forward. But right now it's just a

378
00:30:23.480 --> 00:30:27.200
lot of ambiguity and confusion, and
hopefully we can get these things cleared up.

379
00:30:29.519 --> 00:30:33.160
Tony, let me tak it quickly
on potential for new regulation. So

380
00:30:33.000 --> 00:30:37.880
there's been a discussion for a long
time about regulatory clarity, and it's in

381
00:30:38.000 --> 00:30:41.559
the best interest of everyone. Basically, there's a path, let's just figure

382
00:30:41.559 --> 00:30:48.200
it out, let's move forward.
But I think people are waiting for a

383
00:30:48.319 --> 00:30:55.000
new president and therefore potentially new potential
chairperson to the sec or they're waiting for

384
00:30:55.119 --> 00:30:57.960
new legislation, which you know,
depending on how you view it. You

385
00:30:59.000 --> 00:31:03.240
know, I think McCann has said
he's going to was it leave Congress by

386
00:31:03.240 --> 00:31:08.039
the end of the year, and
which the market with the Market Infrastructure Bill,

387
00:31:08.119 --> 00:31:12.880
So what are we doing. We're
waiting at least a fifteen months or

388
00:31:12.960 --> 00:31:21.480
so. But I think by actually
custodying eth under the securities laws, you're

389
00:31:21.559 --> 00:31:25.599
arguably moving the conversation forward. We
don't have to wait fifteen eighteen months,

390
00:31:25.640 --> 00:31:27.279
however long it takes to get regulatory
clarity. And if your view if you

391
00:31:27.319 --> 00:31:33.079
see Congress like let's make sure at
first they fund the government before they they're

392
00:31:33.079 --> 00:31:36.160
not going to be focusing on crypto
legislation before they focus on the government,

393
00:31:36.599 --> 00:31:40.200
And in a split House had Senate, I think we're going to wait for

394
00:31:40.319 --> 00:31:44.920
regulatory clarity, if that's your viewpoint. But by what Prometheum is going to

395
00:31:45.000 --> 00:31:49.000
be doing when we custody through OBDA
capital eth I think you're moving the conversation

396
00:31:49.119 --> 00:31:53.480
forward. You're basically saying, hey, like, these assets could be handled,

397
00:31:53.519 --> 00:31:59.920
treated, and traded custodied under the
securities laws. And while the security

398
00:32:00.039 --> 00:32:07.640
laws might not be perfect for certain
elements of digital assets, they are arguably

399
00:32:07.680 --> 00:32:10.160
the best framework we've had. They've
allowed American capital markets to flourish. It

400
00:32:10.240 --> 00:32:15.680
basically allowed us, you know,
we have the most vibrant and arguably the

401
00:32:15.839 --> 00:32:17.759
best capital markets in the world.
And the reason it is is because we

402
00:32:17.839 --> 00:32:22.000
have integrity in our markets. And
what we saw in the events of twenty

403
00:32:22.039 --> 00:32:23.759
twenty two is when you don't have
integrity, you lose the faith of the

404
00:32:23.799 --> 00:32:28.400
public. You make institutions not want
to participate in the space. So if

405
00:32:28.400 --> 00:32:31.519
you're trying to achieve both those goals, basically use the best framework you have.

406
00:32:32.640 --> 00:32:37.039
Yeah, And so do you think
cryptoregulations are like maybe two years out,

407
00:32:37.079 --> 00:32:43.240
Maybe it's twenty twenty Fybri twenty twenty
six. I don't know if you'll

408
00:32:43.359 --> 00:32:49.400
see any sort of comprehensive crypto regulation, Like you can make arguments for certain

409
00:32:49.480 --> 00:32:52.720
areas about it. Maybe when it
comes to stable coins at those pose different

410
00:32:52.759 --> 00:32:58.519
systemic risks than I maybe have been
historically considered. But when you look at

411
00:32:58.680 --> 00:33:05.319
the sort of the investment side of
digital assets, meaning people who are trading,

412
00:33:05.480 --> 00:33:07.279
people who want to custody those assets, and basically the best way to

413
00:33:07.440 --> 00:33:12.440
the methodology by which people are sort
of interacting with the Web three space,

414
00:33:13.279 --> 00:33:15.519
I don't know if there's a need
to recreate the wheel. Like the securities

415
00:33:15.599 --> 00:33:20.759
laws have disclosure requirements on the investor
protection side, they have fair and early

416
00:33:20.839 --> 00:33:23.920
market requirements which are meant to prevent
manipulation on the trading side, and they

417
00:33:24.000 --> 00:33:30.200
have specific rules for clear and settlement
custom such that customer's assets are segregated from

418
00:33:30.240 --> 00:33:34.200
that the institution, not just that. They force those places to go and

419
00:33:34.319 --> 00:33:38.880
report and file reports and have ongoing
overside and examinations, so you basically ensure

420
00:33:38.920 --> 00:33:44.119
that those standards are being conforced.
So I guess my viewpoint there is that

421
00:33:44.240 --> 00:33:47.240
I don't think you need to recreate
the wheel now. And I have some

422
00:33:47.480 --> 00:33:52.279
awkward questions to ask you, and
a lot of these things have been talked

423
00:33:52.279 --> 00:33:57.960
about by various folks. I think
you testified before Congress. We had congressmen

424
00:33:58.039 --> 00:34:04.720
ask you certain questions. I have
to ask, and there's talks of Prometheum

425
00:34:04.839 --> 00:34:12.360
having deep ties to the CCP.
Do you have relationships with Wang Dong Feng

426
00:34:12.480 --> 00:34:16.119
and Long Link Capital and what ties
and you know, are they invested in

427
00:34:16.239 --> 00:34:22.599
Prometheum and what can you tell us
there the two people you mentioned, I

428
00:34:22.599 --> 00:34:27.760
have no idea who they are.
I've never met them, never spoken in

429
00:34:27.880 --> 00:34:34.239
regards to ties to the CCP.
I understand that there's concerned there. And

430
00:34:34.320 --> 00:34:37.519
the reason that there's concern is because
when you're building market infrastructure, it's a

431
00:34:37.599 --> 00:34:42.480
matter of national security. So I
totally get it, and I believe me

432
00:34:43.000 --> 00:34:45.679
markets are very important to America.
When you look at America as opposed to

433
00:34:45.719 --> 00:34:52.039
places like China, America's invest the
significant part of their liquid capital in markets,

434
00:34:52.119 --> 00:34:53.360
so they have a lot of welfare, right, So it's really a

435
00:34:53.440 --> 00:35:00.039
matter of natural security. So in
terms of like what happened historically, so

436
00:35:00.199 --> 00:35:02.440
as a young company in I think
twenty eighteen, we took an investment from

437
00:35:02.480 --> 00:35:07.440
a company to hash a Hong Kong
company called hash Key which was owned as

438
00:35:07.480 --> 00:35:14.079
a subsidiary of Wangshong Wan Xia and
G I believe, and the idea was

439
00:35:14.159 --> 00:35:16.719
we take an investment and we're going
to code develop, and we're going to

440
00:35:16.800 --> 00:35:21.079
code develop this market infrastructure. Right. Don't forget this is a different time.

441
00:35:21.159 --> 00:35:24.119
It's before sort of the decoupling between
America and China. Right, But

442
00:35:24.239 --> 00:35:28.920
you can start to see the way
the wind's blowing. Maybe a year later,

443
00:35:29.079 --> 00:35:31.480
and beyond that, we realize that
this is not a viable approach.

444
00:35:31.880 --> 00:35:38.039
So within a year eighteen months something
like that. Thereafter we basically abrogate that

445
00:35:38.119 --> 00:35:42.440
agreement. We basically have a contractual
agreement that we're done with this, you're

446
00:35:42.480 --> 00:35:45.440
no longer to do this, and
we take everything in house, and not

447
00:35:45.639 --> 00:35:50.559
just in house, but everything with
American developers, meaning people here on an

448
00:35:50.679 --> 00:35:53.400
H ONEBVS or based in America besides
our CTO who's in the island man.

449
00:35:54.039 --> 00:35:58.480
So that's just you know why,
we'll qualification and we do everything internally.

450
00:35:59.360 --> 00:36:05.480
And beyond that, we are in
a position that, you know, this

451
00:36:05.599 --> 00:36:07.159
is what we think is the best
way forward, because as you're building something

452
00:36:07.159 --> 00:36:10.719
that becomes more real, it's better
for America, it's better for the company,

453
00:36:10.760 --> 00:36:15.559
it's better for everything going forward.
And then thereafter we basically also start

454
00:36:15.639 --> 00:36:22.559
to get letters, meaning we have
a inquiry from this SITHIUS, which is

455
00:36:22.559 --> 00:36:24.559
the Committee Foreign Investment in the United
States, which is basically meant to make

456
00:36:24.639 --> 00:36:30.320
sure that foreign entities don't have power
over companies or sort of you know,

457
00:36:30.480 --> 00:36:36.559
important national security type companies. Right, we submit everything they ask. There's

458
00:36:36.639 --> 00:36:39.559
no issues there, right, not
just that we get a full on investigation

459
00:36:39.679 --> 00:36:45.039
by the SEC. Right a formal
inquiry we submit. We basically submit everything

460
00:36:45.280 --> 00:36:51.719
that they ask and that inquiry was
closed. So if you look at it,

461
00:36:52.639 --> 00:36:57.599
you can make an argument that we're
one of the most investigated companies in

462
00:36:57.679 --> 00:37:00.800
that sense to make sure we don't
have ties. And if you know,

463
00:37:00.679 --> 00:37:04.519
if you extrapolate from there, it'd
be interesting to see what other companies were

464
00:37:04.639 --> 00:37:08.519
like. So like it's like,
I understand the concern. It's definitely a

465
00:37:08.559 --> 00:37:14.039
matter of national security. We take
the exact same view. Everything we create

466
00:37:14.199 --> 00:37:15.880
is our own, all our code
is our own. We are not dependent

467
00:37:15.920 --> 00:37:22.159
at all. Essentially, Hashkang highki
Wangshong I own. I think owned as

468
00:37:22.159 --> 00:37:25.199
an equity investor a percentage of the
company, not where close to majority,

469
00:37:25.719 --> 00:37:30.280
and basically they have the same rights
as every other investor. God, I

470
00:37:30.360 --> 00:37:32.360
got it. So you guys,
like you said, went through their regulatory

471
00:37:32.440 --> 00:37:37.880
scrutiny. All these things have been
checked. I know, like you said,

472
00:37:37.920 --> 00:37:44.000
you testified for Congress on these things. So there's no need for people

473
00:37:44.000 --> 00:37:46.599
to be concerned with data and control
and so forth. Like you said,

474
00:37:46.599 --> 00:37:51.599
they're not a majority shareholder and so
forth. Listen, I firmly agree with

475
00:37:51.679 --> 00:37:55.079
that. I mean, you know, when you look at social media,

476
00:37:55.159 --> 00:37:59.840
you can make weird arguments there if
you get what I'm saying, and like,

477
00:38:00.760 --> 00:38:05.360
yeah, it's interesting. Now,
I believe you answered this question another

478
00:38:05.440 --> 00:38:08.800
podcast. But folks seem to think
that you're getting special favor from the SEC,

479
00:38:09.719 --> 00:38:15.039
that maybe you know someone at the
SEC, or your friends are Gary

480
00:38:15.079 --> 00:38:19.559
Ginster or something. Another awkward question. But what can you say about that

481
00:38:19.599 --> 00:38:25.760
in your relationship with SEC officials.
So I saw one of the rumors that

482
00:38:27.760 --> 00:38:32.159
I think Chairman Gainster's my uncle.
Maybe that was a funny one because we

483
00:38:32.239 --> 00:38:37.800
look so alike essentially, but it's
actually, like, listen, I get

484
00:38:37.880 --> 00:38:43.119
it. People have been spending a
long time trying to figure out how to

485
00:38:44.760 --> 00:38:50.880
be compliant under the securities laws,
and I think we were in a unique

486
00:38:50.880 --> 00:38:54.400
position because it was always our thesis
since we started in the first O actually

487
00:38:54.440 --> 00:39:00.519
letter of twenty fourteen basically that the
paral securities laws what we thought were the

488
00:39:00.559 --> 00:39:04.280
best framework to regulate the activities in
the space, meaning the intermediarrea is a

489
00:39:04.320 --> 00:39:07.000
trading, clearance, settlement, custody
right to ensure that investors are protected.

490
00:39:07.719 --> 00:39:13.079
And when the regulation came out,
this SPBD release came out, I believe

491
00:39:13.079 --> 00:39:16.000
in December twenty twenty, we were
like, we'll basically called hell yeah,

492
00:39:16.840 --> 00:39:22.320
because we had we were doing the
ATS for the goal was public trading through

493
00:39:22.360 --> 00:39:25.199
an ATS for digital assets right digital
asset securities. But in order for that

494
00:39:25.360 --> 00:39:29.760
actually to occur, you need to
be able to do what happens after the

495
00:39:29.800 --> 00:39:32.320
trade is made, do clearance,
settlement and custody. So when the SPBD

496
00:39:32.480 --> 00:39:35.960
release came out, we're like,
oh, this is how you do the

497
00:39:36.039 --> 00:39:38.239
rest. This is the regulation by
which you do the rest. So it

498
00:39:38.360 --> 00:39:43.119
comes out in December twenty twenty and
there's a comment period which we submitted a

499
00:39:43.159 --> 00:39:47.760
public comment, and it's adopted into
the Federal Register in April twenty twenty one,

500
00:39:47.800 --> 00:39:52.960
which is actually means it's a law
in the United States. And we

501
00:39:52.159 --> 00:39:58.559
basically were super excited about this and
we put our head down. We basically

502
00:39:58.920 --> 00:40:04.559
spent over year, you know,
putting together all the operations, the compliance

503
00:40:04.599 --> 00:40:07.320
procedures, building the technology a specifically
laid out in the four quarters of the

504
00:40:07.400 --> 00:40:13.519
regulation, basically doing everything that was
necessary to get approved. Right, the

505
00:40:13.639 --> 00:40:19.000
goal was to become the first special
purpose broken dealer. Now, during that

506
00:40:19.079 --> 00:40:22.800
time, we did not focus on
revenues. We did not focus on generating

507
00:40:23.199 --> 00:40:29.880
you know, generating cash from virtual
currency related activity because we just didn't think

508
00:40:29.920 --> 00:40:32.480
that was the best way to do
it. And other companies, I think

509
00:40:32.559 --> 00:40:38.280
were basically focused on generating revenues.
They had operational businesses, they're basically doing

510
00:40:38.320 --> 00:40:46.360
those activities, and I don't know
if as much energy or effort was focused

511
00:40:46.440 --> 00:40:51.719
on those activities under the security claws. But in light of what happened with

512
00:40:51.840 --> 00:40:54.360
FTX in twenty twenty two, what
you see is basically it's like an oh

513
00:40:54.440 --> 00:40:59.800
snap moment, like everyone needed realizes
we need in order for this industry move

514
00:40:59.840 --> 00:41:02.440
f O or there needs to be
you know, oversight, There needs to

515
00:41:02.480 --> 00:41:07.800
be proper frameworks. There needs to
be a place that allows both institutions to

516
00:41:07.800 --> 00:41:10.519
feel comfortable participating in the space from
a compliance of bringing per perspective, but

517
00:41:10.599 --> 00:41:15.159
also make sure retail investors don't get
left holding the back for sure. Yeah,

518
00:41:15.280 --> 00:41:22.000
and so when we initially started to
tell people we were doing this,

519
00:41:22.400 --> 00:41:27.760
they would laugh at us. They
would literally scoff at us. So I

520
00:41:27.840 --> 00:41:31.159
think by putting our head down and
working hard, we put together an application

521
00:41:31.320 --> 00:41:36.760
process that took us, you know, thirteen months. I think it's overall,

522
00:41:36.800 --> 00:41:40.400
the approval process between custody clears a
settlement took us something like thirty months

523
00:41:42.440 --> 00:41:47.239
now. So I understand that while
we have a different viewpoint than most other

524
00:41:47.360 --> 00:41:54.159
people and the way that they've seated
historically, the fact that we were first

525
00:41:54.239 --> 00:41:59.320
to be approved is I think more
representative of the efforts of the team and

526
00:41:59.519 --> 00:42:02.239
not any sort of special treatment.
I mean, I've never met or spoken

527
00:42:02.280 --> 00:42:07.199
the guy against there. What were
your thoughts on the Bitcoin SPOTYTF launch and

528
00:42:07.280 --> 00:42:12.599
also the context of that that Grayscale
had to win an appeal for this,

529
00:42:12.920 --> 00:42:15.639
and you know, we were talking
about bitcoin being not a security, but

530
00:42:15.800 --> 00:42:20.119
yet the SEC did not want to
prove these botytfs. But what are your

531
00:42:20.159 --> 00:42:27.800
thoughts on the launch? So the
spot ETF was a good step forward for

532
00:42:27.880 --> 00:42:34.920
the industry because it provided a mechanism
by which institutions could compliantly generate revenues in

533
00:42:34.960 --> 00:42:39.320
the space, and what we've all
want is more institutional participation. We basically

534
00:42:39.440 --> 00:42:43.719
I think everyone, maybe not everyone, but the overall majority of the industry

535
00:42:43.760 --> 00:42:49.840
thinks that institutional participation is great.
And what we saw in light of the

536
00:42:49.840 --> 00:42:52.519
events of twenty twenty two was a
lot of the institutions sort of like who

537
00:42:52.559 --> 00:42:55.719
were considering getting the space because they
saw the big, big moneys being made.

538
00:42:57.599 --> 00:43:00.239
They were like, we can't do
this. They pulled back because aplient

539
00:43:00.239 --> 00:43:02.960
to a regulatory perspective, by getting
into a new industry, you can't jeopardize

540
00:43:04.000 --> 00:43:08.639
your cash cass right, But by
issuing the Bitcoin ETF, basically it's a

541
00:43:08.679 --> 00:43:14.119
compliant mechanism by which they can participate
in the space. But the issue is

542
00:43:14.199 --> 00:43:19.079
is, well, it's a step
forward. It's it's a twentieth century securities

543
00:43:19.119 --> 00:43:22.519
wrapper around a twenty first century asset. You have a twenty century securities wrapper,

544
00:43:22.519 --> 00:43:27.760
mean the ETF which is off chain, around the underlying which is bitcoin,

545
00:43:27.760 --> 00:43:31.039
which is a twenty first century asset. Right, And we think the

546
00:43:31.159 --> 00:43:37.079
next step is actually on chain ETFs, on chain structured products, and that'll

547
00:43:37.119 --> 00:43:44.000
be much a major step forward because
basically what that will allow is significant institutional

548
00:43:44.079 --> 00:43:51.159
participation and also it'll allow for innovative
assets to be created. By issuing let's

549
00:43:51.159 --> 00:43:54.960
say a ETF which represents five tokens
on chain, you could be a smart

550
00:43:55.000 --> 00:43:59.000
contract. You can actually see what's
in that smart contract, you could prove

551
00:43:59.039 --> 00:44:01.639
the underlying like like it's the next
step after that. And the reason that's

552
00:44:01.639 --> 00:44:07.440
important is because that's really what prothum
ecosystem empowers. In order for structured products

553
00:44:07.519 --> 00:44:10.519
on chain structure products to be empowered, you need to have the ability for

554
00:44:10.599 --> 00:44:14.599
there to be a trading venue,
for there to be a custodial venue,

555
00:44:14.599 --> 00:44:16.360
and for that asset to be clear
and settled, which will actually then allow

556
00:44:16.440 --> 00:44:21.239
for public trading of that asset,
right and really empowering it, right,

557
00:44:22.000 --> 00:44:24.960
And that's what Promethium is created.
So in that essence, I think we

558
00:44:25.119 --> 00:44:29.880
can be a major player in empowering
the next generation of ets, meaning on

559
00:44:30.079 --> 00:44:36.360
chain structured products on chains ETFs ETPs. That's fascinating and that's the first time

560
00:44:36.400 --> 00:44:39.239
I've heard of that ETFs on chain, and so I have a couple of

561
00:44:39.320 --> 00:44:44.320
questions for that. Are you currently
working on that product and what's the timeline

562
00:44:44.880 --> 00:44:50.840
for the launch of that, so
you know, there's so many different things

563
00:44:51.280 --> 00:44:53.480
you can do. Like in theory
we're talking about, you know, staking

564
00:44:53.519 --> 00:44:58.840
as a service before you're talking about
about ETFs. Now we are the infrastructure

565
00:44:58.920 --> 00:45:02.840
that can allow for once that product's
created, for it to actually be used

566
00:45:02.880 --> 00:45:07.320
in a distributed architecture, actually used
as a twenty first century asset, actually

567
00:45:07.440 --> 00:45:10.039
empowered that meaning allowed to be traded, publicly, cleared, settled in custody.

568
00:45:10.679 --> 00:45:20.519
And without giving too much specifics,
obviously, we're working with different people

569
00:45:20.599 --> 00:45:25.800
out there to ensure that that next
generation of ETFs could occur, and I

570
00:45:25.880 --> 00:45:30.360
think that's where we'll see the real
innovation. I know you probably can give

571
00:45:30.480 --> 00:45:34.800
names, but is it a Wall
Street firm? Can you give us that

572
00:45:34.920 --> 00:45:45.000
much? It's you know, well, it's there's major asset issuers who are

573
00:45:45.280 --> 00:45:49.400
thinking and who are thinking about it
differently, Like I think the first step

574
00:45:49.559 --> 00:45:54.719
was this, you know the backlog
of these bitcoinytfs, right, and it's

575
00:45:54.840 --> 00:45:59.239
it's a different type of consideration because
you could say, well bit coins out

576
00:45:59.239 --> 00:46:01.559
of security, no problem. So
if you think about it now, like

577
00:46:01.679 --> 00:46:07.639
you have the virtual currency, licensed
custodians, state custodians who are custodying the

578
00:46:07.760 --> 00:46:13.599
underlying but they can't custody the security, I mean the ETF itself because it's

579
00:46:13.599 --> 00:46:16.320
a security. But once you in
theory, if you're able to do it

580
00:46:16.400 --> 00:46:22.800
on the Promethea ecosystem, you can
custody both. So because if let's look

581
00:46:22.840 --> 00:46:23.599
at it this way, Oh go
ahead, no, no, no.

582
00:46:25.400 --> 00:46:31.639
If you're treating ethereum as a security
and there's a structured product ETF created on

583
00:46:31.760 --> 00:46:36.280
top of that, which is also
a security, you have to be able

584
00:46:36.360 --> 00:46:39.840
to custy it at a digital asset
securities like the license ecosystem. And the

585
00:46:39.920 --> 00:46:44.199
reason that's sort of like it's nuanced, but it's important is because the way

586
00:46:44.280 --> 00:46:47.440
that the licensing has worked on the
security side is that they've bifurkated. I

587
00:46:47.480 --> 00:46:53.159
mean they split traditional securities right,
which is basically security is issued via transfer

588
00:46:53.159 --> 00:46:59.679
agent. It's not the best explanation, but the simplest versus digital asset securities

589
00:46:59.719 --> 00:47:02.639
and digital asset security under the legislator
or the under the definition of the rule

590
00:47:04.039 --> 00:47:09.199
is basically a security issued and transferred
on chain, right, So you basically

591
00:47:09.960 --> 00:47:14.760
have to have the licenses specifically for
trading, clear and settlement and custody of

592
00:47:14.880 --> 00:47:19.000
digital asset securities. You can't be
a traditional clearer firm, you can't be

593
00:47:19.039 --> 00:47:22.559
a traditional ATS to be able to
do these things. So we have those

594
00:47:22.639 --> 00:47:25.800
licenses, which I think that you
know with METAATS and prebt capital, which

595
00:47:25.800 --> 00:47:30.760
I think then really allows that empowerment
to occur. The question for you,

596
00:47:30.880 --> 00:47:37.239
and this is more in the macro
level to your point, like we're using

597
00:47:37.280 --> 00:47:40.800
a twenty eeth century wrapper for a
twenty first century asset. But is it

598
00:47:42.320 --> 00:47:46.000
a necessary I don't want to use
the word evil, but a necessary thing

599
00:47:46.199 --> 00:47:52.480
right now for the adoption of crypto
because the wallets and the ease of use

600
00:47:52.559 --> 00:47:57.400
for the next billion users is not
there yet. It's not simple, it's

601
00:47:57.679 --> 00:48:00.599
a bit intimidating, it's a bit
scary, right that we need to go

602
00:48:00.840 --> 00:48:05.039
out kind of boomerang out this way, But it's going to come back to

603
00:48:05.159 --> 00:48:10.320
on chain to be more decentralized.
I hope. I'm no, no,

604
00:48:12.119 --> 00:48:15.159
it makes a lot of sense.
So like the way that we sort of

605
00:48:15.239 --> 00:48:17.440
deal with this, because it's obviously
a problem, is that basically when you

606
00:48:17.559 --> 00:48:22.039
come to our ecosystem, right if
you want to create an account, you're

607
00:48:22.039 --> 00:48:25.480
creating a brokerage account. Now your
brokerage account represents the wallet holdings. Right

608
00:48:25.519 --> 00:48:29.280
there is actually, but it's just
basically creating a brokerage account, and the

609
00:48:29.320 --> 00:48:32.679
overall majority of American public who's you
know, investing, is familiar with brokerage

610
00:48:32.679 --> 00:48:37.639
accounts. Yeah, so it's not
like you have to boomerang around. Basically,

611
00:48:37.719 --> 00:48:42.400
you from both a regulatory standpoint and
probably from like an operational easy use

612
00:48:42.400 --> 00:48:45.800
standpoint, you have to use these
traditional mechanisms in order to make sure you

613
00:48:45.840 --> 00:48:49.719
have very email KYC you know,
everything that's done, and then basically have

614
00:48:49.760 --> 00:48:52.880
all the information, suitability, et
cetera for the customer. Right. But

615
00:48:52.320 --> 00:48:57.159
basically by doing it that way,
you eliminate that barrier. You don't say,

616
00:48:57.199 --> 00:48:59.880
oh like like oh you know,
there's so many technical requirements, let

617
00:48:59.880 --> 00:49:01.079
me get my ledge or wallet like
you know, like let me go figure

618
00:49:01.119 --> 00:49:04.480
out these things that I have no
idea what I'm doing. Right, No,

619
00:49:04.559 --> 00:49:06.280
you don't have to do that.
You come, you create a broken

620
00:49:06.320 --> 00:49:08.519
account and then you go participate in
the space like you went through traditional assets

621
00:49:08.559 --> 00:49:15.480
here. Yeah, and I'm hoping
that you know, maybe even in the

622
00:49:15.559 --> 00:49:21.480
next five years to what you're saying, we boomerang back to on chain a

623
00:49:21.559 --> 00:49:23.760
lot of these products will go back
on chain and because I feel I'm kind

624
00:49:23.800 --> 00:49:28.159
of struggling with it. But you
know where I believe in cell custody.

625
00:49:28.400 --> 00:49:31.159
You know, I'm an early adopter, and I believe in what crypto and

626
00:49:31.239 --> 00:49:37.039
bitcoint all these things offer. But
uh, it's becoming more financialized than by

627
00:49:37.159 --> 00:49:42.880
Wall Street and tratify, where it's
taking it away from the taking away some

628
00:49:42.960 --> 00:49:47.360
of the benefits. So hopefully that
could come out. It's very interesting because

629
00:49:47.360 --> 00:49:52.679
it's like there's no free launch in
life. So people want institutional participation,

630
00:49:52.920 --> 00:49:58.719
they want broader adoption. But in
order for that to occur, you have

631
00:49:58.880 --> 00:50:02.159
to have certain you know, I
don't don't got to say, not compromises,

632
00:50:02.239 --> 00:50:07.800
but certain sort of understanding of how
things are done in a more mainstream

633
00:50:07.840 --> 00:50:10.679
sense. Yeah, for sure.
And by you know, by integrating and

634
00:50:10.719 --> 00:50:15.760
conflating both those, hopefully you get
the benefits of both those worlds. Now,

635
00:50:15.800 --> 00:50:20.519
the BT, the BT, the
Big one ETSS are alive. There's

636
00:50:20.599 --> 00:50:22.760
talks of an e theorem spot etf. Lowry Fink wants it. I've seen

637
00:50:22.800 --> 00:50:27.159
him talk about it other Wall Street
firms as well. Do you think we

638
00:50:27.239 --> 00:50:34.400
see that approval this year it'll be
interesting to see how it plays out.

639
00:50:35.280 --> 00:50:40.599
Uh, it's not my area of
expertise in terms of like predicting when ETFs

640
00:50:40.639 --> 00:50:47.559
get approved, Like the creation of
ETFs and you know, origination of products

641
00:50:47.760 --> 00:50:52.639
is a bit different than the infrastructure
needed for allow of those sort of products

642
00:50:52.679 --> 00:50:55.239
that then thereafter be able to trade, clear, settle, and custody,

643
00:50:57.440 --> 00:51:04.239
and it'll just we'll see what happens
every time it. Overall, though,

644
00:51:04.320 --> 00:51:08.920
I think what's important is you're seeing
this trend twofold of larger institutional participation,

645
00:51:09.159 --> 00:51:13.599
which is what a lot of people
are waiting for. And also a focus

646
00:51:13.719 --> 00:51:21.719
on tokenization and Prometheum's ecosystem through pro
ethium ATS and Permetheum capital is really empowers

647
00:51:21.760 --> 00:51:24.880
tokenization and will allow those institutions who
are looking to participate in the space to

648
00:51:25.000 --> 00:51:29.000
be able to do some things with
the ass do something with the assets they

649
00:51:29.079 --> 00:51:31.920
create, and having liquidity, have
the public market trading, and having basically

650
00:51:31.960 --> 00:51:37.119
the ability to allow investors both retail
institution will participate in that with that asset

651
00:51:38.239 --> 00:51:45.519
really empowers have that token confunction going
forward. Let's talk stable coins. We

652
00:51:45.679 --> 00:51:49.639
have the largest stable coin in the
market is Tether in the United States,

653
00:51:49.679 --> 00:51:52.800
you have circles USD PayPal launching a
stable coin, and it seems like everybody

654
00:51:52.920 --> 00:51:55.679
in their grandma is going to launch
one, right and they can use it

655
00:51:55.719 --> 00:52:00.920
for different ways. JP Morgan has
jpm coin, but that's interbank settlements.

656
00:52:01.280 --> 00:52:07.239
Yeah, and you know there's talks
of stable coin regulations. The SEC has

657
00:52:07.280 --> 00:52:12.400
command say the way stable coins are
offered. I believe if you're getting interests

658
00:52:12.400 --> 00:52:15.960
and so forth, is this security
offering? What is your thoughts on the

659
00:52:15.000 --> 00:52:21.199
stable coin market? And then how
will promethium be supporting different stable coins.

660
00:52:23.239 --> 00:52:30.039
Stable Coins are very, very very
interesting and I'm definitely one of the innovative

661
00:52:30.079 --> 00:52:36.760
areas within the space. I think
the lessons have been learned related to algorithmic

662
00:52:36.880 --> 00:52:42.840
stable coins, but also it's not
just that the lessons have been learned.

663
00:52:42.880 --> 00:52:50.320
The potential risk and systemic risk attendant
to stable coins has been acknowledged, because

664
00:52:50.320 --> 00:52:53.280
what we saw with lunataro is like, okay, like this is separated from

665
00:52:53.320 --> 00:52:57.880
the US market, but the more
it's integrated with larger institutions, it could

666
00:52:57.920 --> 00:53:04.599
have a knock on effect. And
there's a balance between allowing the innovation to

667
00:53:04.679 --> 00:53:09.639
tend to stable coins to occur while
making sure to really limit any sort of

668
00:53:09.679 --> 00:53:15.679
systemic risk. And I think that'll
be if anywhere there's legislation, you'll probably

669
00:53:15.719 --> 00:53:19.239
see it there, and that'll be
in order to sort of play those things

670
00:53:19.280 --> 00:53:24.400
together. Are you guys playing to
support stable coins in any way? I

671
00:53:24.480 --> 00:53:30.679
mean even as just as a trading
pair or whatever it may be. So

672
00:53:30.800 --> 00:53:37.400
we use USD on the cash side, Okay, it's just in our opinion,

673
00:53:37.920 --> 00:53:42.760
it's a method by which you don't
have necessarily conversions when it comes to

674
00:53:42.880 --> 00:53:45.159
fees, by going in and out
of the cash side. And what we

675
00:53:45.360 --> 00:53:50.079
saw, like you know, maybe
it's like eighteen months ago now, is

676
00:53:50.159 --> 00:53:57.519
when there's a when a stable coin
loses its peg, it has potential major

677
00:53:57.639 --> 00:54:00.440
risks because think about it. You
have a customer on your platform. They

678
00:54:00.519 --> 00:54:04.639
think they have ten thousand dollars in
cash. Right, the stable coin goes

679
00:54:04.679 --> 00:54:07.039
to eighty two cents on the dollar, and now you have eighty two hundred

680
00:54:07.039 --> 00:54:10.639
dollars in cash, but you had
ten thousand dollars in cash. Whose fault

681
00:54:10.760 --> 00:54:14.960
is that? Is that the platform's
fault. It's the holder of the stable

682
00:54:15.000 --> 00:54:17.079
coins fault. And if you're on
a platform, that just makes you use

683
00:54:17.119 --> 00:54:22.679
stable coins. Now you're taking on
the additional risk there. Like we talk

684
00:54:22.719 --> 00:54:27.599
about we talk about wanting this next
billion customers to get into the space.

685
00:54:29.199 --> 00:54:32.960
If that occurs and you have and
everyone's using stable coins and there's a depegging,

686
00:54:34.920 --> 00:54:38.000
you'll lose those billion customers or they'll
be harder to get the next billion

687
00:54:38.000 --> 00:54:42.679
customers after that. Yeah. Agree, Yeah, I mean, look,

688
00:54:42.719 --> 00:54:44.719
there'sti a lot of things that have
to be figured out for sure, And

689
00:54:44.760 --> 00:54:49.719
I agree with you there because that
would be horrendous to have the average Joe

690
00:54:49.719 --> 00:54:52.079
and Jay you come in to use
stable coins and like you said, they're

691
00:54:52.119 --> 00:54:53.920
losing money because of the PEG,
and many of them wouldn't even understand what

692
00:54:53.960 --> 00:54:58.599
the hell happen, right, So
that way they would think they were scammed.

693
00:54:59.000 --> 00:55:00.960
Yeah, it was a scam,
and then they would lose faith in

694
00:55:01.000 --> 00:55:07.079
the space. Yeah. Crypto bull
market seems to be heating up for your

695
00:55:07.199 --> 00:55:12.440
cycles playing out. You know,
we've seen that bitcoin and cryptos being correlated

696
00:55:12.519 --> 00:55:15.280
to global liquidity stock market. What
is your outlook? I don't know if

697
00:55:15.320 --> 00:55:19.559
you can get price predictions for a
bigcoin, but you know, what is

698
00:55:19.599 --> 00:55:25.840
your outlook over the next year and
a half. It's it's really nice to

699
00:55:27.000 --> 00:55:30.239
see the attention coming back to the
space. I think, you know,

700
00:55:30.440 --> 00:55:36.320
certain pundits had written off the space
after you know, the twenty twenty two

701
00:55:36.400 --> 00:55:43.880
cycle. But the reality is there's
a lot of technology which could be integrated

702
00:55:43.960 --> 00:55:52.679
into larger markets to basically from a
distributed architecture standpoint, which should really allow

703
00:55:52.920 --> 00:55:58.079
for continued growth in twenty twenty four. Now I'm specifically referring to tokenization,

704
00:55:58.719 --> 00:56:01.800
and if you believe all the major
pundits out there who say tokenization is you

705
00:56:01.880 --> 00:56:07.239
know, the biggest thing that happens
when it comes to markets, particularly securities,

706
00:56:09.039 --> 00:56:13.679
you basically will see I think a
lot of activity there, which should

707
00:56:13.920 --> 00:56:19.599
you know, create more interest in
the overall digital asset market. And again,

708
00:56:20.039 --> 00:56:22.280
I think one of the things that
people think about is, Okay,

709
00:56:22.360 --> 00:56:25.079
well, you know, these these
major institutions, whether it's Franklin Templeton with

710
00:56:25.159 --> 00:56:30.159
the Benji or SoC Gen with their
green bond, are issuing these assets.

711
00:56:30.159 --> 00:56:32.960
They're into the space, they're understanding
it, you know, they're participating in

712
00:56:32.960 --> 00:56:37.239
the space. But in order for
that really that leap of growth, that

713
00:56:37.360 --> 00:56:40.400
sort of exponential growth to occur,
you need to be able to do something

714
00:56:40.440 --> 00:56:45.239
with those assets. Once they're created, and that's the thing the ecosystem permitives

715
00:56:45.280 --> 00:56:49.079
created. We basically created an ecosystem
that allows those assets, you know,

716
00:56:49.719 --> 00:56:54.639
basically digital asset securities, which includes
tokenization and both digital asset securities that are

717
00:56:54.679 --> 00:57:00.559
investment contracts meeting what people call virtual
currency. Besides for Bitcoin to be able

718
00:57:00.599 --> 00:57:04.840
to be traded, cleared, settling, custody under the securities laws, which

719
00:57:04.880 --> 00:57:09.639
will therefore allow real public markets to
develop. So I think that we'll see

720
00:57:09.719 --> 00:57:15.079
continued you know, positivity in the
space, particular as institutions now have a

721
00:57:15.159 --> 00:57:20.119
compliant mechanism by which they can participate
in the space through ecosystems like Chromethium,

722
00:57:20.199 --> 00:57:23.480
which will then also allow those assets
that they create to be empowered thereafter by

723
00:57:23.519 --> 00:57:27.280
actually being able to publicly trade them
and clear, settle and custody them.

724
00:57:29.079 --> 00:57:31.480
Final question here and now we'll hit
the wrap up questions. What are your

725
00:57:31.519 --> 00:57:36.800
thoughts on cbdc's Central bank digital currencies. There's certainly a lot of benefits as

726
00:57:36.840 --> 00:57:43.320
we're heading more into the digital world
with tokens and assets running on the blockchain,

727
00:57:43.639 --> 00:57:47.719
but many are concerned with privacy and
that these CBDCs could be used by

728
00:57:50.119 --> 00:57:54.119
draconian ideals by certain governments and so
forth. I'm not necessarily saying that in

729
00:57:54.119 --> 00:58:00.320
the United States, but what is
your thoughts on these things. There's a

730
00:58:00.480 --> 00:58:08.360
constant struggle in the cbd C space
between the potential innovation and benefits of moving

731
00:58:08.440 --> 00:58:15.000
cash on chain and the potential or
willy in consequences. Now, like,

732
00:58:16.760 --> 00:58:22.199
the question is how do you sort
of balance the A M L K y

733
00:58:22.320 --> 00:58:27.119
C considerations with the zero knowledge proof
considerations. I don't like, it's not

734
00:58:27.199 --> 00:58:30.519
a question of doing anything bad.
It's a question like should the government be

735
00:58:30.599 --> 00:58:34.400
able to see every one of your
transactions? And no, both counter parties

736
00:58:34.440 --> 00:58:38.440
on that. It's a it's a
big consideration, and you know, and

737
00:58:38.599 --> 00:58:43.039
on the other side of that,
you say, hey, but like you

738
00:58:43.239 --> 00:58:46.599
can't be creating new ecosystems that are
used for you know, funding the various

739
00:58:46.599 --> 00:58:50.800
activities, and how do you prevent
that on the on the on the entry

740
00:58:50.880 --> 00:58:54.679
side. So it's a weird balance
there, and I think it'll play out.

741
00:58:58.639 --> 00:59:02.079
It's a little bit easier to do
a cbd C in my opinion,

742
00:59:02.159 --> 00:59:06.559
when you're you know, a country
of five million people, or when you're

743
00:59:06.599 --> 00:59:14.039
an authoritarian country and hopefully that you
know in the United States, they'll be

744
00:59:14.079 --> 00:59:19.920
able to find that balance there.
Yeah, my hope is that the the

745
00:59:20.079 --> 00:59:23.800
government here in the United States they
lean towards more a stable coin and not

746
00:59:23.960 --> 00:59:30.320
necessary a CBDC. Maybe it's adopting
USDC, I don't know. But then

747
00:59:30.360 --> 00:59:32.320
there's also systemic risk there because like
what happens with the stable court side,

748
00:59:32.360 --> 00:59:37.280
and then like is the government guaranteeing
that stable coin with the full faith and

749
00:59:37.320 --> 00:59:40.599
credit of the government. It's weird
because like the cash is like the USD

750
00:59:40.719 --> 00:59:45.239
is USD, but there's a layer
of abstraction which becomes the stable coin,

751
00:59:45.599 --> 00:59:49.400
and then there's an entity running that
layer of abstraction. But when that thing,

752
00:59:49.519 --> 00:59:52.280
when that asset goes awry, if
it's on the government to like backstop,

753
00:59:53.679 --> 00:59:57.320
I don't know, if that it
sort of loses its potency in some

754
00:59:57.480 --> 01:00:00.559
sense. Yeah, it's a lot
of these things are TBD I know,

755
01:00:00.719 --> 01:00:04.840
like Circle they have t bills as
part of the reserves. So I don't

756
01:00:04.880 --> 01:00:07.400
know at this point, it's a
lot of speculation, but I think you

757
01:00:07.480 --> 01:00:10.239
bring up some ballid points. Well, we'll have to wait and see.

758
01:00:10.320 --> 01:00:15.360
But my hope is whatever they put
together and with out there, it aligns

759
01:00:15.400 --> 01:00:20.159
with the US Constitution at least and
maintains some of our rights at least.

760
01:00:22.960 --> 01:00:24.159
All right, I got some wrap
up questions here for you. First,

761
01:00:24.239 --> 01:00:30.679
if you could create your own metaverse, what would theme be. Shinichiro Watanabe,

762
01:00:32.320 --> 01:00:37.760
he is the the guy, the
anime director who directed Cowboy Bebop,

763
01:00:37.800 --> 01:00:40.239
Samurai, Shamplu, Michigo, Hotskin, Space Dandy. It's like, it's

764
01:00:40.280 --> 01:00:45.719
like he's made a lot of He's
directing a lot of the like best anime

765
01:00:45.840 --> 01:00:49.000
that are out there, and I
think there's different styles and different motifs there.

766
01:00:49.440 --> 01:00:55.199
Samurai Champlou has a edo period Samarai
concept with a gangster rap motif,

767
01:00:55.920 --> 01:01:00.320
so it's pretty interesting there. And
Cowboy Bebop has both a space cowboy concept

768
01:01:00.440 --> 01:01:05.239
with a like experimental jazz, So
you have a lot of different concepts there,

769
01:01:05.280 --> 01:01:07.559
all that seemed to flow together,
So that's what I would choose.

770
01:01:07.440 --> 01:01:16.079
And rapid fire questions. Favorite food, pizza, favorite musician or band Mac

771
01:01:16.159 --> 01:01:24.360
Miller, favorite movie that's interesting,
King of New York, favorite book,

772
01:01:27.159 --> 01:01:30.519
how to win friends and influence people? I'm joking, no, no,

773
01:01:30.199 --> 01:01:35.199
don Quixote. And when you're not
working at Promethium, what are you doing

774
01:01:35.239 --> 01:01:42.679
for fun. As a hobby,
I like to do yoga Aaron, thank

775
01:01:42.719 --> 01:01:45.719
you for taking the time. Thank
you for going beyond our schedule time.

776
01:01:45.760 --> 01:01:49.239
I appreciate all the answers, insights
and so forth. Thank you for joining

777
01:01:49.320 --> 01:02:02.840
me. Thank you for the opportunity. Tony tsk TSK

