Talk to us now and go to the TNT Radio Interactive Live chair room at
TNT radio dot live, Lighting the fuse for freedom Today's News Talk Radio TNT
TNT. You're with Jeremy Now on Today's News Talk Radio TNTNT jeem Warfare at
TNT radio dot Live. It's my email address. Thank you to everybody around
the world who sends me mails. I really do appreciate it. I particularly
appreciate those emails from people who actually tell me where they are the most fascinating
locations from you know, of people who listen to my show. It really
is amazing. I love the fact that internet radio exists, that I can
broadcast to people in the Maldives, to people in the US, Canada,
Australians. He didn't Russia, even Latin America, Brazil. I don't know,
alex Can I say Latin America. I never know what's politically correct anymore.
I used to say. I used to say Latin America. I think
I can still say that. These days. Everybody gets offended by everything.
You can't say black American. You have to say African American, which is
also patently absurd because most black Americans don't come from Africa, but and also
Elon Musk would therefore be called African American. And that's why it gets so
silly. Shurely Siron, she's also African American. It's so silly, these
these ridiculous labels. Nevertheless, jump into the live chat on TNT's website.
Yeah, hi, Rebecca, Rebecca says she's loving TNT. I think that's
my housekeeping, Alex shall we shall we get to my guest. Let's do
that. My name is Germ. This is Jim Warfare the Battle of Ideas
says it happened around the clock up there. Today's news talk radio TNT Jay
Daya. I love chatting Jim, my friend. How are you, very
man? How are you? I can't complain. I actually can complain because
I made the grave error of watching Bobby. I was heavily I was heavily
deceived by that trailer. So what I'm saying is, I don't know if
if you felt the same, But the trailer of Bobby made it look like
a really funny movie that didn't take itself too seriously. That's kind of where
it all started for me. Yeah, it did look like, you know,
a standard kind of comedy. It looked like it was going to be
sort of a fantasy kind of you know, like the Lego movie, which
was, you know, not not too bad, and I didn't expect it
to be just full on, next level metal level propaganda, but sure enough
it was. It was one of the most feminist slash gnostic films I've ever
seen, So yeah, I felt the same way I had to review it.
I don't really care that much about it. I wasn't super excited.
It's like I thought it was a kid's movie, and then I thought it
was a comedy, and then it's like, no, it's something else,
and uh yeah, I mean I'm ready to dig into it. I got
my all my notes here, But yeah, I thought it was I thought
it was pretty sad the level to which we have to have all this.
Uh, probably get a shove down our throat before we we chat about it.
I just quickly want to play your short clip, Alex, have you
got that clabretty good for it? Hello, I'm not Johnny Cash. I'm
a barty girl in a barty world. Life is last da It's fantastic.
You can brush my hair untrusted me everywhere. Oh, come on the barby
Let us go party because I'm in a Barby world if you want to be
my lover. So Jay, that obviously is not Johnny Cash, that's AI.
But I just wanted to play it because it was so funny. It
was funnier than the whole movie. I didn't realize it was a I was
trying to figure out how did Johnny Cash sing that song? But we could
chat about AI on a different day. But isn't isn't that scary? How
good AI is becoming? Yeah? Yeah, yeah, Well it's odd because
AI was the plot of the Mission Impossible movie. Did you watch that?
Yeah? What did you mean the latest one? Yeah? No, no,
no, no, I haven't seen it. Is it worth watching?
Oh? Yeah? I mean for the programming and for the propaganda is Yeah,
that's pretty wild too. I mean it's all about chat GPT basically coming
alive. It's just it's kind of like Sky Now basically it terminates a revival
more or less. But it also has the same nastic theme as Barbie.
But so you want to get into Barbie or what? Yeah? So,
okay, so let me just start by saying I went and watched it with
my wife and I didn't Okay, as we already explained, I didn't expect
it to be what it was. Everybody pitched up, there were people wearing
pink and all the usual stuff. There's this big moment in the middle of
the movie where half the cinema stands up and does it gives a standing ovation.
I don't know if this was just local or if it's happened everywhere else.
And at some point I was feeling like this was absolute cringe worthy stuff.
And my wife leans over and she says, you know what, I
don't think like this. This is this is complete garbage. And I've never
had that experience in a movie. You said people were standing up and clapping.
Yeah, there was that big feminist monologue if you remember in the middle
about women having to Yeah, that whole thing, and they were clapping and
going crazy. Did it happen in you as well? No, I didn't
watch it at the theater. I watched it at home, so uh.
I watched it on as. I watched it an illegal Russian streaming site,
so I didn't give him any money. Okay, for those who haven't watched
it, would you mind just quickly giving me the synopsis? For those that
haven't, I mean, I'll might spoil it, but basically, you have
a you have an ideal world where it's the pretend world, the imaginal world,
the ideal world where you have the figure of Barbie that lives, and
she lives in a kind of a perfection. It's kind of it's it's an
Eden basically, and you know, it has the look and the feel of
you know, a kid's imaginations that so it's it's a weird mix some of
that I like in terms of cinematography and all that. But Barbie learns,
she starts to learn about the idea of death and decay and corruption, and
this introduces this into her ideal world. And so she's trying to figure out
why it is she knows about death, why does she know about these things?
And she starts to have, you know, her toast gets burnt,
her milk ghost sour. So we have corruption introduced into this ideal world.
And so she has to go on this quest to find her child that owns
her, her other self, her mirror self in this world or whatever.
And it turns out that it's this single mom that's got a rebellious daughter.
And anyway, Barbie has to go on this quest to find her, and
then if she heals that girl and fixes whatever's wrong with her, then things
will be fixed in her ideal world, and we'll have a new perfection will
return and all this stuff. And it turns out that after after that,
it shifts into being a story about the roles of men and women and how
the traditional roles are kind of a box or a prison. Will Ferrell plays
the CEO of the Mattel Corporation in this world, and in this world it's
ruled by the patriarchy, and so Ken, who kind of as a beta
orbiter, tags along with Barbie. He comes to this world and he realizes
that hey, guys rule this world, and so he takes the patriarchy back
to Barbie World and he sets up what he calls kingdom, And so there's
a revolution in the ideal world, which is previously run by an all female
Supreme Court, and then we get basically what's portrayed as a tyranny in the
Barbie world. And then Barbie and her cohorts have to stage a revolution and
they divide and conquer and Outsmarten the men the kins, and they restore the
matriarchy in the ideal world. So in the ideal world, it goes back
to no men writing things. Men are just kind of the servants to the
women. And Eden and Perfection return and then Barbie decides that she doesn't need
Ken anymore. Barbie's happy being Barbie. She says, you know you bu
I'll be me, and then she decides to come to the human world.
It's kind of a Pinocchio scenario there. I think the point is that her
job, since she's fixed that world, is to come to this world and
restore and fix the matriarch in this world. Because the movie began with a
sequence spoofing two thousand and one with a with an ancient primeval matriarchy, and
then that matriarchy falls and you get a patriarch in this world, and so
her job becoming incarnate at the end of the film, in my view spoiler
is too I'm happy to spoil this movie. Her job is to come to
this world and solve it and fix it and make it a matriarchy. Now,
I don't know much about the original intention of Bobby. I might have
it wrong, but I think the woman's name is Ruth Handler. She invented
the doll for her daughter. What in the nineteen fifties or something. I
don't think she intended it to be some sort of feminist icon, should he
Oh, have I got a drunk? I don't think so. I mean,
you know, feminism wasn't really popping off in the fifties. But I
did hear that she was a originally some kind of cartoon. She was like
a prostitute in a little cartoon zine. So I don't know if Ruth got
that idea from that. I mean, I know she says that she saw
her daughter playing with toys with toys and got the idea for the for the
doll. But I also heard that there was a previous instantiation of Barbie as
a cartoon who was a kind of a whore. So I don't know which
one is where it really originates. But no, I don't think it was
intended to be back in her day anything revolutionary. I mean, third way
feminism doesn't kick off until the nineteen sixties, and it kicks off through the
through Abbey Rockefeller and her her mamily, her family's funding of Third way feminism
in the nineteen sixties. But I mean, if you think about it,
then what might have been an innocent Girl's Doll has now become some kind of
weird matriarchal icon. I will not endorse the purchase the purchasing of that doll
from now on. Yeah, I'm my wife. Actually, she put a
chapter in her one of her books about the way that toys are social engineering.
And I remember when I did some talks. I came to the UK
into a lecture back in twenty seventeen, I think, and my talk was
about the way that the Pentagon consulted on some of the toys from the nineteen
eighties, including transformers and g I Joe, you know, stuff I grew
up with. Well, the Pentagon was actually consulting on that because they were
very interested in the way that toys affect children. They did a bunch of
studies on this. And so toys are social engineering, so I mean from
that perspective, not saying every toy is, but but they definitely they know
that you can prepare you know, a boy for war, for military recruitment,
that kind of stuff. That's what the goal of the eighties, you
know, Gi Joe and that kind of stuff was about that. But nowadays
that's why toys are so malicious in terms of promoting this new you know,
skittles agendas because they want to push the non binary stuff and all that through
toys, because toys are social engineerings. So they're doing the same thing with
Barbie. And that's why in the film, you know, they talk about,
oh, there's all kinds of Barbies. There's lawyer Barbie, there's judge
Barbie, there's whatever black Barbie up. I enjoyed your video analysis of it,
and I can't remember if you made a mention of this comment that I've
seen floating around the internet. But do you think it's possible that the entire
movie was a satire? Well, I mean it could be a satire and
still have a revolutionary method message. I mean a lot of a lot of
films can be satire and still have you know, nastic chromatic and I mean
the Lego movie was very similar. If you remember in the Lego movie,
Uh, they needed to rebel against this sort of ARCon figure or this this
demi urge figure. That guess what it was Will Ferrell again, So yeah,
say you had the same I mean, Lego movie wasn't feminist, but
it was. It was. It was a gnostic message where the created world
is a prison. It's rolled over by Will Ferrell as an archon or as
a demi urge, and the same the same thing here. So I mean
there's elements of satire to it, but the idea that it's not feminist is
ludicrous. I mean, she ends up at the end without a man.
She tells ken, I don't need you. You need to grow up and
be yourself. I'm gonna go be me, You be you. I mean,
yeah, she says, I don't. She's like, I don't need
a man. So that's the whole point. And to make it worse,
as my wife points it out, the very lost wood in the movie is
gynecologist. Yeah. I think the point of that was that, you know,
they make the joke throughout the movie because their dolls they don't have they
don't have parts, right, they don't have biological genitalia indicating their you know,
their gender or whatever. So at the end, now that she's gonna
be you know, in this sort of it's like a reverse incarnation. You
know, in Christianity, you have the idea that the second person that God
had became a man, and he became man to restore and save the human
race. Put it back to its hedenic state. Now you get a reverse
incarnation with a woman. And I've been talking about you know, there's a
lot of movies that do this. You think about fifth Element, you know,
Mila Djovivic basically becomes the incarnation of the Ether or the fifth element.
She's a goddess savior. There's a lot of films that have this goddess savior
narrative, Lucy with Garla Johansson, on and on and on, and this
is just kind of the latest instantiation of that in my view, because in
the movie, Barbie is the ideal, she's the archetype of a woman.
But she evolves, and they keep making that point that now she's evolved beyond
the older notions of being a housewife and having children. So why is she
going to the guy? Because her parts are her own. Now she will
determine the purpose of her parts, right, not a man. It's not
there for the you know, for reproduction. It's there for her to determine
at her will and at her liberty. So that's part of the purpose I
think of her coming, you know, Pinocchio style, to become a real
girl at the end to this world is so that she can now determine her
own destiny. She's not bound by biology. All right, Jay, hang
on one moment, are quickly, I have to go to an ad break.
My name is Germ changing to jayde This is TNT Radio, CNT Radios,
Katie Hopkins. He said, I'm going to adjourn this, and he'd
received letters from locals about the impact it would have on that which had obviously
been well written and obviously had worked on points of the law, which is
brilliant. He said, I'm minded to invite these local peoples to have their
say in open court, and I am minded to review what's gone on with
Carmarthen show cancel and there appeal against this, and I'm minded to have a
bit more of a reflection on this, meaning I need some time to read
this damn thing. But also evidently I learned judges are not that impressed when
sure order stuff happens for short notice stuff, because basically they see what the
person's trying to do, which is kind of trick people. But the win
because as we know here, we take a win when we get what the
police thought they'd be able to start moving people. The hotel owners thought they
could run this through rough shot because the protesters wouldn't be organized. Say protesters,
they're not protesting, they're making a damn stand. They're positively making a
stand. They're not protesting, they're standing up for themselves. That's quite different,
isn't it standing up for Welsh people in Wales? There's not protesting anything,
Katie Hopkins on T and T Radio. When the forgotten poor are suffering
and in need of healing, they wait for a ship unlike any other Mercy
Ships the largest floating civilian hospital in the world, with volunteer medical staff and
crew who donate their time to save lives. Heroes of Mercy like these.
Every human being has the right to be treated as human, to have a
place at the table of the human race. If you could just see the
look in that patient's eyes, or the smiles that you get when lives have
been changed, that it would make it all worth it. You bring hope
and healing to one person, but that person belongs to a family, and
that family belongs to a community. Together, these heroes of Mercy and friends
like you bring hope and healing to those who desperately needed. To learn more
about heroes of mercy, go to Mercy Ships dot Org, Today Internet Internet
Online, t NT Radio dot Live, Today's News Talk Radio t NT Jay.
In your analysis of the Bobby Movie, you speak about gnostic themes and
symbols. What do you what do you mean by that? Yeah, I
think Hollywood is really bound up in pretty much always representing and repackaging this structure
of a story when it comes to narratives for villains, heroes escaping, you
know, metaphysicalations. So you know, you could go back to movies like
Metropolis, you could go back to movies like two thousand and one by Kubrick.
We really find this repeated because there's only so many storylines that you can
do. When it comes to liberation narratives and Nazissism is a early Christian heresy.
It's the idea that the physical world that we inhabit is created by an
evil God as a kind of a prison, and so there's an escape that
occurs, a liberation that occurs through some sort of knowledge, secret nosis,
and hence gnostissism. So the idea is that the way that you escape that
and there's not one gnostissism, there's a lot of different gnostic sex In the
first three centuries of Christianity. You get versions that are more ascetic, where
you escape through bodily rigor and fasting and sort of becoming a yogi, or
you get versions of it where you overcome through intentional transgression, so you you
intentionally try to do evil, live in a really carnal way. So there's
a lot of different types of gnosticism. So it's not but the basic foundation
is the idea that the physical created world is evil and so we got to
escape it, usually through some kind of knowledge or perhaps ritual or whatever.
And so you'll see in a lot of Hollywood movies the figure like Will Ferrell
here, the plays the controller. He's the sort of corporate elite, controlling
guy, and he's he's the leader of the patriarchy in the film, in
this world, and so he's always trying to keep Barbie down, try to
keep her in her place. He wants to put her back in her box,
which is supposed to be symbolic for you know, her in her traditional
place. You know, keep you in the box, keep you, keep
you down, and so you know she has to The whole plot is her
overcoming Will Ferrell's control. So I mean, not every tyrant control narrative is
gnostic. But a lot of times when you have these different worlds narratives,
you usually have a patriarchal, controlling figure who represents the creator God, so
I think. And that's again it's just a very parallel to the Lego movie
because in the Lego movie, that's exactly what Will Ferrell's doing. He's trying
to stop the kid from breaking the rules of how he plays with the Lego
toys, right, because he says, you have to follow the instructions.
You can't build the Lego ships and toys or whatever in your own way,
and you can't mix up the different characters and put them into different scenarios.
You can't have Batman playing with Legos, you see. So it's violating the
rules. And the whole plot is that in order to say of the called
the spark of revolution or something like that, that they have to get this
spark of knowledge of nosis, this revolutionary piece which is lost. That's all
straight from the gnosticism. So in the same way, you'll find that pattern
all throughout, you know, I mean with the matrix, right, the
matrix is a the architect is this controlling figure who tries to trap people inside
the matrix, and the neo helps people, you know, fight against the
architects. So you know, over and no over know where you see gnosticism
presented in movies. In the Bobby movie, did you see some very overt
symbolism, Yeah, I mean it's a little more obvious in this because it's
a kids movie, so they weren't heavy per se on symbols. There's a
lot of I mean, the structure itself is, as I said, a
gnostic storyline and then structure. But I mean when it comes to just straight
up symbolism, it was kind of it was kind of low ball, low
tiers, so I actually I wouldn't say it was high on symbolism. It
was pretty straightforward in what it was presenting. I mean there's something like the
symbolism of the two thousand and one sequence for example. I mean that's a
symbolic sequence about human evolution, So human evolution is presented as we were actually
a matriarchy and we fell away from that. Do you really think it's a
children's movie? I mean, I think they wanted to appeal to audiences across
the board, so they wanted it to be you know, kids and parents.
So but no, I mean it had quite a few innuendos, had
quite a few you know, adult level of jokes. So I think it
was trying to be trying to be opaganda and be funny all at once,
and I think it failed. I mean, there was maybe one funny scene,
but for the most part, now it wasn't very good. And then
alongside the nastic themes the obvious feminism. But yes, what's interesting, and
tell me if you agree with me, But a lot of movies that I've
seen have got very obvious feminist themes. Somehow in this movie, they took
it a level up. And I don't know, I don't know how they
did that, but they did. Yeah, they took it a level up.
Because usually, you know, we're told things like, you know,
women just have a right to be independent. But this is more of like
a metaphysical feminism or it's like a one of the Gnostic gospels is the pistis
Sophia, and it's the idea that salvation ultimately has had through the feminine principle
or through the goddess. And you know, whether that's an actual entity or
just symbolic figure or whatever. And however you read gnostissism. It's it's the
same idea that it's the masculine figure of the logos or the foul logo centrism
as it's called, that imprisons us, that keep us, keeps us in
these structures of rules and laws. It's as boundaries, and the feminine principle
is overflowing. It's there's no laws, it's it's raw and nature, no
rules. It's revolutionary. And so if you go back to, for example,
the French Revolution, some of the early feminists were radical egalitarians. They
believe that there was an absolute equality between men and women. That eventually becomes
the idea that, you know, we're all self determining with no limitations at
all. So you see, we couldn't have where we are with, you
know, the gender revolution without first having feminism. So you get feminism,
and then you get the skills revolution, and then now you get the biological
revolution. So they all go together because they're all they're all rebelling against.
Yeah, exactly, that's the next phase. Yeah, exactly. After the
binary and non binary and gender revolutions, you get the transhumanist revolution. Right,
So there's phases to the revolution. But the first of all these was
feminism. Feminism was kind of the original, you know, into the modern
world with people like Mary Wallstonecraft and other French revolutionary era figures. Then you
get the suffrage movement, which was which was the next phase of that revolution.
And so the idea here is that you know, again, there's no
there's no structures, there's no logic, there's no there's no rules in biology
and morals and religion and society. Everything can be overturned and evolved. So
it all goes together with you know, the evolutionary philosophy and narratives. So
the whole movie is just about the supremacy of the matriarchy. And yes,
exactly at the end when when the Ken Revolution fails and the Kens then say,
well, you know, we learned our lesson, can we at least
have one man on the Supreme Court? And they say, no, you're
not ready for that. You haven't involved yet to be able to handle that
responsibility. But that's also an observation that I made that it's not only the
matriarchal superior superiority that they're pushing in the movie. It's that men are inferior,
are absolutely useless. I mean there's that scene in which they enter the
real world and a guy comes up to her and slaps her on the butt.
That doesn't happen in reality. Well, I mean if you go to
Egypt, that does. I mean, wife got her butt slips when she
went to Egypt. So it depends on where you come. But yeah,
I mean the idea that in I mean, I think the idea is that,
oh, women are oppressed in any society where you have men, uh
in a patriarchal role, that necessitates the oppression of women. Because the whole
point of the movie, like you said, is that we were afraid of
women running things, and it's because of our insecurities as men that we don't
want women running running things because we feel like we have to show off.
Right. If you remember, Ken is always doing what he's doing to show
out for Barbie, and Ken eventually has to learn the hard way that oh,
no, uh, you see, poor you know, poor Ken,
You're you're so unsophisticated, your rule by your your bodily desires. You know.
When when ken revolution happens, he basically makes the Barbie into his servant
and she just brings them beer and looks cute, right, So the idea
is that that's oppressive to women when when men rule, it's because insecurities and
because we are tyrants and all this nonsense. And the reality is that,
you know, both men and women are fallen, and we both have our
vices and our virtues, but there's nothing inherently wrong about you know, just
just think about the fact that if the corporate structure is inherently tyrannical, which
is what we're supposed to think, then why is it that we just need
women in the corporate structure. I mean, now the women are going to
be the tyrants. Oh no, you see, we won't be tyrants because
women are loving and peaceful. Now that's just not true. I mean women
are full of envy. Women envy each other, They gossip about each other,
they backbite. I mean, both sexes have their own vices, So
just having one sex above the other sex is not inherently necessarily going to make
the world or life more virtuous or more peaceful or whatever. So it's just
silly. And they also really drive home the point that men are just corrupt
and are unable to govern in any kind of normal, reasonable fashion. I
mean, it goes even further than that. I mean they go into the
point of that, you know that actually, if women ran things, you
would have this sort of pseudo utopia, would have an almost utopia, right,
because women in the ideal world, when when they ran things before Barbie
has her fall and they introduce corruption and decay into the Barbie world, it's
it's it's it's eaten. It's perfect. Right, you have an all female
Supreme Court. Men know their role. Men kind of just attend to the
women and they do what women want. But the iron, of course,
is that women don't like men that do whatever women want. I mean,
that's just women don't like beta males. Women like alpha males. And so
the iron is that when when Ken becomes just a little alpha, right,
the movie has to present this as a tyranny, and I mean it's explicit
and it's not my interpretation. He's explicit because when Ken comes to this world
and he sees that it's a patriarchal tyranny, he starts checking out books on
men's rights stuff. He's basically, you know, over there reading men's rights
books. He's got a whole stack of them. Then he checks out the
library and then when he gets back to ken world. You know, he
starts lifting weights, he dresses like a pimp, and he starts, he
starts basically setting up this uh you know, ridiculous like what the caricature of
masculinity, right, which is more like just a teenage dude basically horses and
cowboys exactly. And the funny part about that too, if you remember what's
that Barbie and her crew of women, they get together and they basically they
engage in a big black pink ops set of black ops. Is a pink
Ops revolution to divide and conquer, and so they have to because of course
they outsmart the men. Men are men aren't smart enough to figure out you
know, black ops and running civilization and all that. So, I mean
it's totally contrary to all history, right, I mean, men build civilization,
right, I mean they you know, think that they engineer. It's
not women that are out there building you know, supercomputers and building you know,
giant engineering feats. It's men that do these jobs. And everybody knows
that, but we're being told that, No, no, it's it's the
other way around, you see, as totally inversion, just total fiction,
totally made up. But that's part of the philosophy of the revolution is that
it has to constantly invert things, has to constantly lie about reality in order
to overthrow reality because the that's the philosophy of revolution, is that it has
to constantly go against norms, structures, rules, law and order. But
the irony, though, is that I'm trying to wrap that around some of
these narratives in the movie. Uh, this utopia from where Bobby and can
come is plastic and it doesn't it's not real. So in a way,
it doesn't matter if if Bobby or Bobby's govern it because it's not real.
Well it's it's not real, but it's the ideal, you see, So
it's it's even though it's an imaginary world, it's real because we are as
children, you know, if you look at like PJ and child psychology and
this kind of stuff, we we're programmed as children through what we see as
the ideal world. Right, so if we're told as children that it's ideal
for women to be like Barbie. Now women have these unrealistic standards supposedly that
that are possible that they have to try to meet, and that's oppress it.
And the idea is that men have given us that in the in the
movie, the ideas that you know, men men have determined that Barbie is
the impossible ideal. And this makes women feel bad because if they're fat,
if they're unattractive, that's the fault of the patriarchy oppressing them to make them
like the ideal. So it's not really about what's real and what's false.
It's about how we're programmed through supposedly what we think of as the ideal.
You see, and the film is saying that it's it's been unfair for men
to create these things like Barbie. I'm some about in the story. I
know that the woman is the real creator of Barbie. But if you notice
in the movie the woman the real creator of Barbie. The woman shows up
and she talks about how you know, they have put her in this uh,
you know, basement room, and they're not really listening to what she
said about Barbie. And Will Farell, the patriarch is the bumbling buffoon demiurge
patriarch is controlling things and he's a tyrant. So that's the whole point is
that is to rebel against the ideals that men have said up, the false
ideals. It's just quick, didn't to go to my loss to d break.
Be back with you shortly. My name is Jim chatting to Jade.
This is TNT Radio. Give me a minute with TNT Radio is Steve Mahlsburg.
You've heard me talk about how pathetic Republicans are getting their message across.
They can't combat the phony narratives of the media and the left. But listen
to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu push back at ABC's George Stephanopolis, who has
been ripping him for Israel's recent judicial reform. Imagine that in the United States,
the Supreme Court could tell the executive the president, Okay, we are
nullifying any one of your decisions just based on something that we we think is
on You would not accept it. We don't accept it. That was last
week. Here he is on CNN in February before the kindesset pass the reform.
Britain doesn't have a constitution like us, and the court cannot rule down,
strike down any decision of the British Parliament. Here's a country that has
exactly this provision. It's called Canada. This Canada not a democracy. Is
Britain not a democracy? Is New Zealand not a democracy because they all have
either have this provisions of such a provision or have no ability of the court
to strike. That was with Jake Tapper on CNN. A lesson for Republicans
here in fighting misinformation and fake news biomission courtesy of Benjamin Netan Yahoo. Thanks
for giving me a minute. I'm Steve Malsburg for TNT Radio. Melissa from
Michigan. I work an extra part time job serving lunch at my child school,
but I so can't afford to put food on our table. Daniel from
California. Choosing whether to pay the rent or pay to fix the car to
get to work doesn't leave us with much at all. Now we can't even
pay for meals. Hunger is a story. We can end end it at
Feeding America dot org. Brought to you by Feeding America and the AD Council.
Jerem Warfare is Jeremy now on today's news talk radio tnt J. I
count remember who made the quote. Might have been a US president. I
just caun't remember, but something about behind every great man there is a great
woman or a woman, or something to that effect. I think you know
more or less what I'm referring to h do you think that society ready is
patriarchal in terms of its governance oftentimes typically Yeah, just for kind of obvious
reasons that you know, in the history of the world, women have tended
to be the caregivers, the raising the children and turning to the household.
And I think there's a reason for that. It's not just made up roles.
It's actually part of our biology. It's part of kind of what we
just naturally tend to. Men are geared towards going out into the world,
bringing home the bacon. Women are geared towards their very biology, you know,
having children, and so modern world is revolutionary and that it's intent on
going against these things. It's it's it's all about rebelling against that. So
I think it's just a it's it's it's obvious, it's self evident in nature
that that's how we are made. Yeah, I think I was being a
bit more jovial in the sense that, you know, we don't just you
know, bulldoze our wives. You know, we we we asked them and
they'll they'll give us their opinion. Yeah, it's a reciprocal Yeah, it's
a reciprocal relationship and ship. It's a it's not a type tyranny, and
it's the idea that the idea is that all forms of hierarchy are inherently oppressive
and are destructive. But the problem is that the same people want women in
power. Well, now wait a minute, so it's not actually having authority
or hierarchical structures the end that are the problem, because you just want the
power. So if you if women are in power, how are we not
going to be oppressed? Well, the ideas, oh, because women are
better you see. So it's all premised on you know bs basically. Another
observation in the Bobby movie that I noticed was how they always made Ken in
a subservient position to Bobby. For example, when they were driving in the
car, he said at the back at the end where they were talking,
he was physically lower than her on his knees, you know, like an
absolute weakling, you know. And then at once, at at one point
in the movie he said to it, I exist because of you. Yeah,
I mean, that's what I'm saying. That's why I said he's beta.
I mean the whole time, he's a beta orbiter. He does whatever
she wants. He's he defines himself according to her, he shows out trying
to win her favor, and the whole thing is him simping for her.
And the irony, of course, is that she doesn't like him and doesn't
find him attractive. And so I mean that part of the movie I think
is accurate because nobody, I mean I thought that that women, uh you
know, do women like Alpha's are not right? I mean, if Ken
is unattractive, then the movie is admitting that that women don't like Beta's.
But then in the in the end, ultimately Ken doesn't come out of that.
He's just simply told at the end that she says, it's no longer
Ken and Barbie or Barbie and Ken. She's like, how about I'm Barbie
and your Ken, and you be you and I'll be me. You see,
So it's we're independent and they both come to some degree of self realization,
right, I mean, eventually Barbie becomes kind of sheet. There's they
make it a point to show her coming to self consciousness and self realization,
like she realizes that, oh, I'm I'm my own independent thing. I
don't I'm not defined by another person or a role. I'm whatever I wanted.
To find myself as and it's the same way with Ken to a degree.
He comes to realize that he's independent and he doesn't need Barbie either.
But the reality is that we need other human beings. We can't rebel against
our roles. You see now bringing this conversation paradoxically into the real world.
You know, some people will ask you me the last few days, well,
why do UK, why are you even going to dedicate a whole conversation
to this? But there is a cultural impact, isn't they? Well yeah,
I mean millions and millions of girls are watching this movie, So this
is essentially socially engineering an entire generation of young girls. I know that.
You know, like I said about toys, I mean, in my generation,
the social engineering of the toys, which was again literally coming out of
the Pentagon. I mean I even have entire lectures talking about the guy who
was the Pentagon consultant on the toys and the cartoons. I mean, it's
just the newest phase of the revolution, right, So the revolution has to
in the culture express itself in all forms. So just like in the Cold
War with Francis Stunner Saunders and the cultural Cold War, I mean the CIA
was pushing feminism in the nineteen sixties because they saw it as an advantageous approach
against the Soviets. So they were funding Miss magazine, they were funding Gloria
Stein, and they were funding Playboy, they were funding Andy war Hall,
they were funding Jackson Pollock, on and on and on, because the arts
were seen as a key way to engage in the cultural Cold War. And
that continues today with all forms of the arts still being appendages of the Cold
War, of the of the culture war, and so the establishment, which
has taken the so called revolution to its next phase, they're just continuing to
push the new phase of the cultural cold War, which is telling girls that
not just feminism or third wave feminism, but now biological revolution. Right.
That's that's how Barbie ends. Is that you determine the purpose of your body
parts. No one can tell you what the meaning of those things is.
Someone asked a great question a few days ago, what do you think Mattel
makes of this? What do you mean? I mean, do you think
that do you think that they're making millions of dollars? Billions of dollars?
I guess what do you mean? All right? So they don't care about
the messaging as such. No, they do. That's what I'm saying.
Like, it's not just about the money. I'm saying there's a deeper level
beyond this, right, I mean, think about all of the I mean,
if this is just about money, then then the companies would listen to
you know, go WoT go broke. But they don't care. They keep
they keep charging forward with the message because the message is more important even than
the profits. That's because these corporations Fortune one d Fortune five hundred. I
mean, that is the new world order. The new world Order, isn't
you know Stalin or nineteen eighty four. It's uh, it's Barbie. Barbie
is the new world Order. It's the Fortune one hundred. That's the new
world order. So absolutely, Mattel and all these corporations are on board with
us. I mean, you know, they were putting out social engineering via
the toys in the nineteen eighties, so absolutely they're part of it. M
So, what I was thinking about the other day is the messaging of this
movie is so hard, it's so in your face. And I'm also a
believa in silver linings, I try and find a positive spin. Do you
think that there will be a count of pushback to this, to this movie
and to the cultural impact that it's going to have. I think we're already
seeing a pushback with red pill stuff, for all of its flaws. I
think we've been seeing pushback, you know, when the manosphere started to pop
up on the scene in twenty ten, twenty eleven, twelve thirteen. You
know, there's a lot of dubious figures that are part of this, uh
this idea online, but regardless of their motives, it does express pushback.
So, you know, I've been commenting on a lot of the red pill
stuff in the last several months because it's popular again, and it's part popular
because we're going into a new election coming up, and a lot of times
these these issues come up before election season, and a lot of the red
pill people then they turn into political commentators because they're just riding various waves.
But regardless, there is reaction to this because people are realizing that it's just
simply absurd and it's not true. You know, there are there are some
matriarchal civilizations, but they're few and far between, and they're not really matriarchal
in the sense that you know, movies and revolutionary philosophy presents them as matriarchal
societies. Are even the ones in the West that have existed. I mean
there's they're no different than the patriarchal societies of the West. I mean they
essentially have all the same characteristics and flaws. I mean, is the Queen
of England? Is that a matriarchal society for the last before she passed away?
I mean it was pretty much engaged in all the same subter few huge
deception degeneracy is any of the patriarchal society, so that they maybe even worse.
So, you know, we're getting girl bosses everywhere, We're getting you
know, slay queens leaning into their CEO profession. Is it? Are things
getting better? I don't think so. What do you think would happen?
Though? If let's just pretend for a second that they get they get there,
they wish that men disappear. I mean the whole thing will just fall
apart. I mean it's just complete nonsense. So in other way, I
think the game, Yeah, the elite that have been pushing this don't care
about that. That's part of their goal. I mean, if you go
back to Rockefellers, they themselves brag about promoting feminism, especially third wave feminism.
I mean Abby. There's a whole chapter in the Rockfeller's biography on Abby
Rockfeller putting a lot of money into third wave feminism. You know, Aaron
Russo did his famous interview with Nick Rockefeller about how they created modern feminism to
get women out of the household, to have another giant half of the population
that's taxable. You know that. You can look at the Jaffee memo from
Rockefeller playing parenthood in nineteen sixty nine. Berylson Jaffee memo says that make it
harder and harder for families to have children. One of the ways you do
that is you get the women out of the household, as Nick Rockefeller said,
was done by design. That's to destroy future generations population control. So
feminism, just like all of the castration that's going on, is just part
of the say, overall agenda of wrecking, destroying, and bringing down society
so that it can be managed in the technocracy. It's in other words,
what Bobby is all about is depopulation, transhumanism, the destruction of the family.
The movie is not about that. But the movie is not about that,
but the movie is the movie is part of the culture war which has
that as its goal. M it's a funny commentary on the live chat.
It's okay, guys, we have birthing pods for fake babies under Brave World.
You can also have a butt baby two if you're a man. Oh
of course, yes? What was the other term that I saw? An
a non men or I forget now or non woman? I don't know.
I can't keep up, Jay, but I mean, you better, you
better keep up because if you don't, you're a bigot. You have to
use whatever. The latest download of politically correct terms is if you don't,
you're If you don't, you should you should die. We're coming into the
last lap now of the conversation. But where do you see this going?
I was, I was looking for silver lining, and it does seem a
little bit dark, doesn't it. The silver lining is that all of this
stuff is so unnatural, it's so against our very biology, that it's very
difficult to push all of this. But they're doing it anyway, right,
And I think a lot of people are seeing how absurd and how you know,
I mean, men are dominating women's sports men. Bruce Jenner is Woman
of the Year. I mean, it's getting absurd, and so hopefully that
will continue to wake people up to just how revolutionary and silly it is.
And you know, if we don't, there's gonna be a collapse of civilization.
And if there's a collapse, the leftist and women are going to learn
very quickly that when things collapse, all of these ideals don't match up very
well to the real world. When you have if we have a mad Max
scenario, it's not going to be a major right, So you're gonna you're
gonna be returned to a state of brutality. And in a state of brutality,
you're gonna be following whoever has the will to power. So it's going
to be very brutal. So if we all, if we want to go
back to brutality, if we don't want to listen to this is the problem
is that you can't have a world of no order and no st structure.
It falls to brutality. And when you dispense with order and structure and logos,
you get the revolutionary philosophy of chaos and the darker elements that foster revolution.
As Father Star from Rose points out, The end result of this isn't
liberty, equality and freedom. It's nihilism and nihilisms of end, death and
destruction. So that's the end result. I wonder if there's a little bit
of an own goal scored in the Barby movie, though, I mean it
was so a male but yet an own goal. They scored their own goal
in the sense that there was so anti mail, but more than half of
the movie was dedicated to male actors and the male characters. I hadn't thought
about that, but I think that, you know, screen time is not
that big of a deal because it's dedicated to really kind of parroting and satirizing
traditional roles. So what it is to be a man is lampooned as absurd.
Right. It's ken when he when he when he when he becomes quote
manly, you know, he acts like what a sixteen year old thinks.
You know. It's like I lay around and I drink beer, and you
know, she gets it for me, right, Like she she wears a
French made outfit and brings me the beer. And it's like that's not reality,
right, I mean, that's not how the world really works, right,
unless you're like, you know, a millionaire with servants or something,
and that's not most people. So you know, the masculine element was was
really only mocked throughout the film exactly. So yeah, screen time, I
don't think it matters that the whole purpose is just sort of mock what it
is to be to be masculine. And and it's no different than all the
commercials. I mean, you will you watch commercials, and all the commercials
present men as just completely idiotic beta you know, guys that just mess things
up, and then they have to listen to the woman who has all the
reasoning and sophistication. Okay, we are running out of time, and Jay,
I'll just quickly end up by saying Rachel Wilson said to me the other
day that the irony is that probably everything that made that movie happen was developed
by a man. Well, they brought on a woman to be the director,
but yeah, everything else, I'm sure it was. How can I
follow you? Just? James analysis dot com is my website with my archive.
You can subscribe to me there for ten years worth of lectures and podcasts
and part twos, and then you can follow me on all these social media's
under my name. Jay. You are an absolute legend when it comes to
analyzing Hollywood. God vessu you and your work. Thank you for joining me
in the trauntion. Thanks man, thanks for having me appreciate it an absolute
pleasure. And thank you to Alex for keeping things going for this hour.
Up next is Steve Hook. Listen. I strongly recommend go and watch well
Jay's analysis of the Bobby movie. But your man he is. Wee's website
is full full of incredible insights. I'm hoping. I'm hoping to have Jay
back. There is so much about Hollywood that I want to chat to him
about. But for now, Up next to Steve Hook. Send me an
email jem Warfare at t nt Rady dot Live. My name is Jem.
This is jem Warfare The Battle of Ideas.