Attention. You're listening to the Todd Huff radio show, America's home for conservative
not bitter Talk radio. Be advised. The content of this program has been
documented to prevents and even cure liberalism, and listening may cause you to lean
to the right. Here's your conservative but not bitter host, Todd Huff.
All right, my friends, you have tuned in to America's home for conservative
not bitter talk. I am your host, Todd Huff. Actually spent some
time yesterday responding. It piles up on me from time to time, the
amount of work. I know some of you think I just work when I'm
on this program, but that is nothing can be further from the truth.
On that I caught up on some messages that people had sent me. I
like to respond. Be patient with me. If I haven't gotten to you,
you can email Todd at totipshow dot com. You can text three one
seven two zero twenty eight thirty. Do my best to get back with you.
Thoughts, feedback, questions, whatever. Just always be sure to include
the appropriate amount of adoration and praise, which admittedly is much more than you
might think at first glance. So a couple things I want to get into
today. Of course it's a Monday. You know my thoughts on Monday.
It's like catch up extraordinaire because we have a full, you know, a
couple of days where we haven't been together. You've been well, you might
have spent time listening to archives of the show, show you shows you might
have missed, or reading issues of our email newsletter or column, which,
by the way, I'm happy to tell you that yesterday we've we've sent indicated
that column at the first first individual, the first group to carry it stream
dot org if you want to check it out there, but you can always
get it for free at Toddhefshow dot com just sign up for the email newsletter.
But we've not been together the past couple of days, and I know
that's hard. I know that that is tough. That's the probably the toughest
part of the weekend, which is why we do this bonus content just to
get you, just to get you through to Monday. And then when Monday
hits, we hit the ground running because it is sometimes overwhelming the amount of
stuff that we got to get caught up with. So couple things I want
to hit on today, and for those of you, you know, my
position on Trump and his being the nominee and all of that. But there
are some things I want to talk about here that I'm not necessarily happy with
Trump about. I understand where he's coming from, but I want to we'll
actually get to that today and I but I do want to start. I
do want to start. Boy, there's a lot I want to get to.
Did you see Barstool Sports Dave Portnoy. I know some of you aren't
sportspeople. Dave Portnoy does this pizza review. It's massively popular. He's a
funny guy. He started Barstool Sports I think twenty years ago. I think
it started off as a publication. Now they've got four hundred and some employees
I think two hundred and fifty million dollar enterprise that he's built, and done
so in an extraordinary way. In fact, he's the one if you remember
during COVID. During COVID, he came out and said, if this would
have happened when I was when he was building Barstool Sports, COVID to shut
down, the lockdown all that stuff, he said, I couldn't have survived.
And as someone who's you know, my self here, as we've had
this program for a bit, but we're an expansion. We're still in expansion
mode. I mean, I can say we felt that many of you felt
that as well. Small business owners of lots of employees felt the COVID stuff
as well. But Dave Portnoy has been out there. He's got you know,
he's got a lot of opinions that I think would align with what we
talk about on this program. Not one hundred percent, of course, but
and a lot I think that you would agree with as well. I've got
a piece in the stack of stuff. It's actually him calling a Washington Post
reporter who was writing what he's calling a hit piece about him. He records
the call and time permitting we might get to that today. It's about a
nine minute We won't listen to the full nine minutes, but the first minute
or two I just it's it's worth listening to. And if we don't get
to it, I at least want to mention that off the top of the
program. We've got Kamala Harris. I get emails, Yes, I get
you know why I get these emails because I've got friends who think it's funny
to put me on email list. So I get is Biden Harris campaign email,
and this is what it said. It's from Kamala Wink Wink, Kamala
Harris writing me an email, Kevin McCarthy. This is the email, Kevin
McCarthy, Marjorie Taylor Green and Maga. Republicans just launched into a excuse me,
just launched a beyond ridiculous impeachment inquiry into President Biden. It's not beyond
ridiculous. In fact, it's a one hundred percent justifiable and dare I say,
dare I say even required for those who care about law, justice,
order, and removing corruption from well ideally all parts of government in this particular
case, from potentially the executive branch with President bribery. And then she says
this in the email in bold letters, So she really wants to make this
point, really wants to hammer this home. It's clear. She says,
they're going to throw everything they have at Joe because they know they can't run
against our record. And she says, if you're waiting for a moment to
show your support for him, trust me when I say this, this is
it. This is it. So she's out there claiming Republicans launched this impeachment
inquiry into president bribery because they don't want to. I can't even say it
with a straight face. They the Republicans, she thinks, she claims,
or she wants you to think or me to think or better. Yet,
the people who legitimately signed up for these stupid emails, she wants them to
think that Republicans are afraid of running against the Biden Harris record. On what
pray tell Kamala, what is it that's so intimidating to Republicans about your record?
It's been devastating to everyone that calls themselves an American. I guess,
unless they're on the welfare system, the welfare state, unless they're a rat
echo leftist that's being catered to, or somebody who's getting some government funding for
something, some sort of a research project or whatever. But for the normal
people in this country, this has been devastating. What do you mean they
don't want to run against your record? But anyway, so that's what's going
on in in the Biden administration. And I wanted to read that first because
this is going to blow your socks off. This blew my socks off.
This is a ABC News Washington Post poll. ABC News Washington Post poll.
You ready for this headline? I was astonished when I saw this. Now,
anytime I see something like this, I pause because I think, why
are they doing this? Is this? Is this legitimately the truth? Are
they? Do they have another angle? They are they trying to scare Biden
voters into getting off their duffs and donating to this things like the stupid email
I just read to you from Kamala. But here's the headline, trump edges.
First of all, the wording of this is peculiar to me. If
I said Trump edges out Biden in a head to head matchup in a poll,
what would that? Oz? Let me ask you, how many points
is edging out somebody in a poll? What do you think that that would
be a couple points, two or three points. Here's the headline, trump
edges out Biden fifty one to forty two. Now, if there's a Bernie
Sanders fan tuned in today, a Democratic Socialist in the audience who's obviously needing
some help with Matt, that is nine points. That is much greater than
Oz's expectation of a two to three point poll, which suggests and it seems
it seems to conform to that sort of reality. That's that would be edging
out. This is blowing out. Trump edges out, Biden edges out fifty
one to forty two, and head to head matchup according to this poll.
Not only that, Biden is nineteen points underwater in his approval ratings. So
what is I don't have that, it's it's in this article. Let's see
overall, his approval rating is thirty seven thirty seven. I remember years ago
when I listened to the late Great Rush Limball when President George W. Bush
was in office. I remember the media, after incessantly attacking him for a
long long time, they drove his polling numbers down to I forget what it
was. It wasn't too much less than this. It might have been thirty
six percent. I would have to go back and search the archive and see
if I could find that. But Rash used to play the the montage Wolf
Blitzer CNN would come on every time, every top of the hour, every
bottom of the hour, every chance he would get and say breaking news,
polling shows that George W. Bush is at the lowest approval rating of any
president, says Duda dut it up thirty whatever percent it was I think it
was thirty six. It might have been a little less. This just in
next segment would begin this just in George W. Bush's polling numbers are at
critically low levels, at levels we've never seen in modern presidencies at this particular
point in time of their in their administration. Breaking news at the top of
the hour. This went on every time, just hammering it into the minds
of the American electorate. Bush sucks. Bush sucks. I mean, that's
basically what they were doing. Nobody likes Bush. But this poll shows Biden's
approval is at thirty seven percent. I don't know if I seriously doubt what
you're still even on. I don't even know. I think he is,
but I don't know thirty seven percent. I wonder if he's over there doing
the same thing. Of course we know he's not, but I wonder if
he's doing the same thing. But his disapproval rating Biden's disapproval is at fifty
six percent. So when you say he's under water nineteen percent, that means
he's got a fifty six percent negative view of his job performance and a thirty
percent positive view of his job performance. So you take the thirty seven and
you subtract the fifty six. Now I know again Bernie Sanders fans tuned in
here. That's like, how what's going on that creates a negative number.
That's something socialist should be very familiar with, are negative numbers because their ideas
and viewpoints and the way that they run an economy creates lots of negative negative
numbers. So thirty seven minus fifty six is where that negative nineteen percent comes
in. But this is I mean, this is a thrashing. I don't
know if you were to apply this, if you were to somehow extrapolate this
and get into the data and apply this nationwide to However, the breakdown is,
you know, between typical turnout Democrat Republican in certain states, Trump would
win massively in the electoral college. If this remains to be the case in
twenty twenty four. Remember if Trump won in twenty sixteen having not won the
popular vote, he won in twenty sixteen having not won the popular vote,
If he's up nine points in the head to head matchup against Biden, that
is a massive thrashing of Biden. This is why, of course, the
left is worried. The Democrat Party is worried. This is why some people
ask me or they're getting Gavin Newsom ready to run. I mean, look,
that's a candidate that they would love to have on the radar. But
the truth is, and as crazy as it is to have to say these
words, the truth is from the Democrat kingmaker's position, from the people who
really run that party, from the big money, from some of them big
names, some of them not so big names. The people who are making
the decision, the people who are the super delegate types, the ones who
say all people who are are equal, but some of us, they would
say, some of these radical leftis running the Democrat Party would believe that they
are more equal than the rest of the Democrats. Those folks who have the
levers of power in Washington, DC or elsewhere, they still believe their best
bet is Joe Biden. And I don't I don't disagree in some way,
it's just crazy because he's not that. That's not an endorsement of Biden at
all. That's just recognizing that they have a cast of characters, a cast
of clowns, of people who are eligible or who have you know, kind
of been in those circles of discussions of people who might be the next nominee
and so forth. The only person that I think are two people, a
couple of people that they could go after, which I've told you before,
they've been longing for this, drooling over this, if they could get someone
like Oprah or Michelle Obama. But after that, I mean, what are
they gonna do? Pick mayor Pete? They're gonna pick Pokahonas, which,
by the way, I can say that because genealogy has proven beyond a shadow
of a doubt that I am the thirteenth great grandson of Pocahonas. It's a
true story, by the way, actually really cool family history. Everybody's history
is great, but ours has pocahona literally Pocahonas Palhattan is in there as well
her father. Anyway, I am the self appointed spokesperson of the family.
We don't care if someone calls Elizabeth Warren Pocahontas, because she's the one pretending
to be Native Americans so that she can get some sort of bonus points,
whether it be in colleges or whether it just be in the political sphere that
she operates in the day. But who else are they gonna pick? Mayor
Pete pokahonas the nutty professor Bernie Sanders. Who do they have, I mean,
really and truthfully, Oprah and Michelle Obama. That's who they really want.
It also tells you a lot about how they think about their candidates.
They want people that they think people like. They don't want to have to
get into the issues. They just want someone who can, you know,
play the role give stuff away like Oprah. You get a gift, and
you get a gift and all this kind of stuff. It's actually a very
good spokesperson for the way the Democrat Party views politics today. Vote for me
and you get this and you get that. Definitely how the Bidens appeared to
have done things. Give us money and we'll give you this and that and
anything else that you want. Allegedly president bribery. Anyway, the Trump's up
nine points here if this poll is correct. This is I mean, sirens,
alarm bells, whistles have to be going off within the Democrat Party.
This is a massive, massive thrashing and Trump hasn't even really started going after
Biden yet. Anyway, timeouts in order when we get back. I'm actually
gonna talk about something that you know, I'm not well. I just want
to get to it after the break. It's it's something that Trump put on
truth Social here recently that I want to get to. I think that it's
relevant. I think there are points that we need to consider, and certainly
I have my disagreements with it, but we'll get to that in due course.
My friends, sit tight, I need a drink back here in just
a minute. Welcome back, my friends. Okay, Now, in the
interest of fairness here and I have made it well known consistently on this program,
and it's something I didn't think I would do. I did not think
when I first started this program that I would be one to endorse a candidate
during the primary. But while I knew this country was on a road to
crazy land, I did not expect it to go as radically left as it
has in recent years. I did not I knew, huh. I guess
the level in the depth of corruption and evil in our government again today,
it would take a lot for me to be surprised. I think, although
I'm certain that I would be surprised in some instances. I'm comparing it back
in time. I just if you go back five, eight, ten years,
I think I knew that it was bad, but it's much much worse.
And so when I saw that, and when I've seen the fight in
Trump and his consistency coming down on the right side of the issue, even
if he's not a principled conservative, if he still ends up there and he's
got the fight and he's able to take it to these leftists and these radicals
and these deranged lunatics, then that's what we need. I mean, this
is for the survival of the republic, my friends. It truly is for
the survival of this constitutional republic. But that does not mean and this is
where I don't know. Sometimes I feel like I'm in the minority here.
I'm sure some of you agree with me on this, but just because I
said that thing, it does not mean that I agree unilaterally with everything that
Donald Trump is said and done. That's just not the way that my brain
operates. I can support somebody for candidate without having to have one hundred percent
agreement. But there are important things that come up from time to time,
and this is one of them. So Trump, this this is in response
of Trump being interviewed on What's the Show O was with Kristen Walker Meet the
Press. Meet the Press was it last weekend. I know we played played
some of it. We did not play the part in question. But he
was getting on Governor Ron De Santis for the six week ban on abortion.
And so he's gotten, you know, some some pushback, and he's upset
some people about this, and I say, understandably. So now so he
goes to truth Social, his social media platform, and he posts this,
I'm gonna read this. It's not super long, but it's several sentences.
So here we go. I'm gonna this is These are his words, not
mine. I want to be clear that I'm reading this. So here he
goes pro lifers, He writes, this was Saturday, Saturday, late Saturday
night at looks like eleven fifteen pm. Pro Lifers had absolutely zero status on
the subject of abortion until I came along, writes Trump. For fifty two
years, everyone quote talked end quote. I put it in quotations. Why
said that? But got nothing? He says, I got it done,
all capital letters with an exclamation point. There would be no talk of a
six week ban or anything else without me, writes Trump. Roe V.
Wade allowed the killing of a baby at any time, including the fifth,
sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth month, and even after birth. Again
Trump's writing this day, he says, therefore are the radicals all caps,
not us? And now because of our Supreme Court victory, the power has
shifted, and for the first time those finding for the pro life movement have
been given tremendous power on this issue. Before our victory, Trump rites,
they had nothing, and they will have nothing again if we don't win elections.
All caps, like Ronald Reagan, he says, I believe in the
three exceptions for rape, incest, and the life of the mother. Again,
Trump's words, not mine. You have to follow your heart. That's
in all caps. But without the exceptions, it will be very hard to
win elections. The six Week Band, Trump writes on abortion, among other
things, like his fight against Social Security and medicare killed the des sanctus,
as he says it campaign. That's it. So I want to talk about
this because I don't we don't see I I on this issue. Now,
there's going to be many of you that agree with this, or some of
you. I don't know the percentages. But so Trump's saying here, Look,
look, don't get mad at me for not wanting to oppose. Trump
would say the six week ban on abortion. I'm the one that got us
to this point, because Trump saying, look before, I stacked the Supreme
Court with conservatives, people who actually interpreted the Constitution, people who actually cared
about the legal rationale for the Row decision, which was absolute sophistry and complete
nonsense. They made it up out of whole cloth. There was no legal
justification for the Row decision. It was terrible law. It wasn't following the
constitution. Nine old white men in roads told women what they could do with
their bodies. They tell us that the left, or excuse me, the
left tells us, the media tells us, the Democrat Party tells us that
it's conservatives that want to tell women what to do with their body. But
it was the nine leftist judges in the Supreme Court in nineteen seventy three who
ruled on the Roe v. Wade case that told women what they could do
with their bodies and win. That's what happened. They made it up out
of whole cloth. It wasn't past, it wasn't created in law. It
was just created by fiat by these activist Supreme Court justices. And so Trump
says, I got a group of people on there, that we're focused on
interpreting the law, and we're even willing to make corrections for past decisions the
court made, changing precedent when it's really really bad precedent. And Trump said,
I did that. So now now you're wanting Trump's I'm just painting Trump's
position. I'm not saying it's right or wrong. I'm gonna paint the other
side in a minute two as fairly as I know how. Trump said,
Hey, don't be getting on me for not being on board with the sixth
week ban. There wouldn't be any discussion of this because without me, Trump
saying, there would still be a Roe v. Wade and my friends,
that's undeniable, right. I mean, the court actually did it. But
who put those justices there that actually saw this through. It was Donald Trump.
So he's not wrong there. But what he's saying is, look,
this six week ban is a much more controversial part of the decision or part
of the argument, than the overall decision to overrule the Roe versus Wade case.
And so we have to win elections, Trump says. And so I'm
the one who's been reasonable here. Trump says, I'm like Ronald Reagan,
I believe that there should be only certain exceptions for abortion. That those exceptions,
he says, should be the life of the mother, if the baby
was conceived from rape, or if the baby was conceived from incest. He
says, Look, you have to follow your heart, you have to do
what you think is right. But if you don't consider yourself open to considering
or discussing or compromising on these exceptions, it's gonna be hard for the Republican
Party to win elections. I'm just summarizing. Don't be putting these words in
my mouth. I'm telling you what he's saying here. Then he says,
that's what the six week ban on abortion does the campaigns. It kills them
like it killed, as he puts it, the sanctuses. Although I thought
it was the sanctimonious is what he called him. But anyway, so he
said it killed the Santus's campaign because these things. The American electorate is not
ready for this to be part of a platform or something that we're pushing.
Now. I want to pause. I'm there's several things I think he said
that are correct there, but I also think that there's some key points that
we need to discuss. So I want to do that on the other side
of the time out, to talk about the alternative perspective, the pro life
position, or better yet, even the abortion abolitionists position, the rational,
the thinking, the logic that gets us to a different position while still also
understanding, I think, being aware of being cognizant of the realities and the
political world. So timeouts in order. I'm want to do that on the
other side of the break. But I wanted to alert you to this because
I'm out here telling you that I think Trump's the nominee. I still do.
I'm not one hundred percent on board with this. We're heading in the
right direction, but again, we have to look at things in their totality,
so I want to talk about them in their totality. The other part
of it's on the other side of the break. So sit tight, my
friends. You're listening here to conservative not better talking. I'm your host.
Hoof back in just a minute. Welcome back, my friend. I was
on hones during the break here and I want to kind of share some alternative
things. I don't agree one hundred percent with Trump. I agree with some
of his assessments. Again, this is all by the way, you can
go to the What toddepshow dot com Just go to the stack of stuff page
and you'll find the link to this if you want to read it. I
don't disagree with his assessment as far as the political assessment, which is,
look, the reality is six week bands might make it hard to win elections.
Now, I'm not saying that that's enough to compromise on these issues,
but I'm also and as I pointed out before, has he pointed out the
reason that Roe was overturned was because of what he did and because of what
those justices did, and that can't be lost. But the nuance and the
subtlety gets lost in this stuff. And I know, look, I am
someone who and this is where really what I want to say about abortion,
the the problem with having exceptions, the problem with that, and I get
it. These are horrific situations to put somebody in. Someone gets pregnant from
being raped, someone gets pregnant from being part of an incestuous situation. I
don't want to say relationship, but something from incest, a child that's conceived
from incest, or this notion of the life of the mother, which,
by the way, that one that is not the way in fact, I
don't think that that's logically well obviously, let me let me say, let
me rephrase that I'm saying, to save the life of the mothers is a
noble thing. I'm not. What I'm saying is that's not the choice.
What they want to put in your mind is that a killing the unborn child
is necessary to save the mother, when in reality, maybe you have to
go in and have an emergency C section and the child will not survive,
but you don't have to kill the child to save the mother. I know
that there's a topic pregnancies and that sort of thing. It's a it's a
different sort of situation. But people who are in the world of talking about
abortion will say that that's really not that. That's really more of a you
know, a way to frame it that helps, because no one wants to
say that you have to die, that you have to pick the child over
the mother. That's These are incredibly complicated and difficult circumstances now, But I
don't think that that's the proper way to frame it. I think you can
say, hey, let's save the mother, and let's try to save both
of them. But let's save the mother and then you know, if the
child can't survive in the process of saving the mother, that's not the same
as actively trying to kill kill the child anyway. But these these the main
problems excuse me, these exceptions is that it undermines the main reason that abortion
is is evil. And I look, I always I usually say this,
if you've had an abortion of someone else that you know it's had an abortion,
this is not about that. This is not about I mean, this
isn't about heaping guilt or anything like that. I actually want you to find
healing. I do. And there's groups, there's groups at churches, there's
groups that help people cope with this because the reality, that's the reality,
that's the reality that I look at. In fact, I've talked to some
women. I'll let me rephrase that. I've talked to a woman who has
had abortions and she's knows people in her group that would say that the emotional
components, the guilt and so forth, even though they might have gotten pregnant
through ways that you weren't even their fault. They might have been you know,
any number of things. But the point is is that who are the
people looking out for the women who have to deal with that for the rest
of their lives, because again, because the life is a human life,
and so when you start making exceptions for an innocent life as to when you
can take it, it automatically becomes problematic. And you can disagree with me
on that as far as you think that there should be exceptions, but the
point still stands firm because if you make if you make exceptions, then now
the only thing separating our exceptions from the radical left are the level of exceptions.
And maybe you can make a logical argument as to why it's this or
that, why it needs to be six weeks or not six weeks, or
anything else, but the bottom line is if you start making exceptions, then
it undermines the truth, the reality, the scientific reality, the biblical reality.
Although this ultimately is I mean, this can be proven scientifically, but
there's also a component of Hey, God made sacred life. Don't get mad
at me for saying that I don't want people to just take life, innocent
life without any difficulties or repercussions. That is a problem to me. I
mean, that's what government actually exists for, is to protect life, liberty,
and property right. I mean, so this is and the most vulnerable
among us. So the abortion abolitionist or the pro life individual would say,
look, Trump may be right in a lot of ways. Trump may have
helped us or in these changes, and maybe we don't have there's not the
political will for these things to get done yet. But let's not just gloss
over the fact that there are some ideological problems here, some legitimate issues that
shouldn't just be glossed over. Yes, it might not be where the American
people are. Yes, it might hurt that their chances of winning elections.
Well, let's also not look past the main reason for being pro life or
being one who wants to see the abolition of abortion, and that is because
it's the life of a human being. It's the life of a human being,
and that government should be set up to protect that life. And so
again, I just wanted to point that out because I'm not I understand where
Trump's coming from. I agree a lot with what he's saying, but I
also think that we need to continue pushing this fight because my friends, my
friends, this is still I mean that there are still innocent babies who are
being killed an abortion. So and there's nothing wrong with fighting for it.
While also understanding, and it's tough. I know it's tough because you know
what this is where we are, you know, and we've made a lot
of progress. That's the other thing I don't want to look past. We've
saved a lot of lives because of these changes, but we haven't saved all
of them yet. So anyway, quick time out. I just wanted to
talk about it because it's something that is relevant, it's something that is important.
It's something I don't agree completely with Trump on, at least his position.
I understand the logic of it. Anyway, I just wanted to share
that because sometimes I think I just want to make sure that you know that
I'm fair. I'm not. I'm not blinded to the reality here as to
some of these important issues. But I still I still think that having someone
that's going to fight and push these things in the right direction is vastly superior
to having someone who might have an answer that's one I cannot agreement with.
More that will never get it off the ground. They don't have the fight.
I don't even know if they mean it. They might just try to
be trying to fundraise. In everything else, Trump has a track record here
of success so timeouts in order a little bit along the segment. My friends,
sit tight back, you're in just a minute. Here's the headline that
you're gonna love. US employers expect to see the biggest jump in healthcare costs
in a decade next year. That's right, Bidenomics reeking more havoc on the
American economy, the American people, the taxpayer, the working class. What
is this, Biden I thought you were here to help protect the working class.
Three healthcare benefit consulting firms or forecasting costs to rise five point four to
eight point five percent and twenty twenty four. So if you're one of those
employers, zoopsie daisies here. If you're one of those employers who's concerned about
that, if you're an individual who thinks, hey, I've got to find
a different plan when it hits me, I just want to know what my
options are. I encourage you, my friends, to reach out to my
friend Eric Wilson at I sell Health. He's been helping clients throughout the US
since two thousand and four. He specializes in these individual and group health plans.
He's an expert on the Affordable Care Act. I always like to tell
you when we When I talk about this, that doesn't mean he's a fan
of it or a proponents. These are my words, not his, but
it means that he knows how to navigate these things. You can call Eric
for a no cost consultation. It's a great guy. He's been on all
sorts of media talking about healthcare. Very knowledgeable, very energetic, justinar all
around a good guy. Eric Wilson, phone number three. Excuse me eight
one five listen to that's my own text. I'm about some of my text.
Don't text me. Call Eric eight one five three seven two thirteen sixty
three eight one five three seven two one three six three, or visit I
sell health dot com. My friends, timeouts in order. I want to
get to one more thing before we wrap up for the day. After the
break, sit tight back in just a minute. Welcome back, my friends.
I want to play something for you really quickly. Here. This is
me last week, the radical Left, that didercrat party. They've all colluded
with one another. Of course, the truth is they're all the same people,
but they've colluded with one another to get people to be absolutely terrified.
That's I mean trembling in their Boots terrified of Donald J. Trump, and
they were successful the media. That is exactly right. And by the way,
as I hear that, folks, you are lucky. As I listen
to myself, I don't listen to myself. But that's exactly right. So
why do I bring that up? Because and look, I don't have much
time left. But I just find it important to point out that by sharing
that opinion, I had an individual on social media basically say that I was
lying. Folks. You can't lie. I guess you can lie and say
something is your opinion when it's not. But an opinion is not a lie.
An opinion is an opinion, right. It can be wrong and correct,
but it just goes to show and there's a lot to it. There's
a back and forth I had. I don't always do that, but I
did with this individual ray and you can see it. It's on TikTok.
Yes, it's on TikTok. By the way, anyhow, I just the
ability for people to have logical, coherent conversations without misinterpreting or misunderstanding or misapplying
things. It's crazy, but I go to go SDGC tomorrow