Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Tuesday, the ninth of April. You're
of our Lord twenty twenty four. Well, today we're going to take a
quick look at some of the reactions to this eclipse thing, especially some of
the Trump fans, and we've got all kinds of crazy prophecies, crazy reporters
who go crazy in the dark, and others. But we're going to also
take a look. There's an excellent article about what is really fundamentally changing about
gold. We've noticed that instead of gold being adversely tied to interest rates as
they go down, gold goes up. That type of thing that's been broken,
and it's been broken for a while, and it indicates that there's a
real shift that is happening. So we're going to take a look at that
as well as the climate stuff. You now have with this Hawaiian lawsuit going
in, you have former generals and admirals talking about how this is going to
affect national security, natural security as well. It'll affect our ability to move,
but of course that's not anything that anybody cares about. This might be
something however, that would get them get their attention, so we'll pay attention
to that. Also joining us today is going to be Joel Scalzen in the
in the third hour. He is going to be talking to us about how
he perceives what's happening with the various wars around the world. Always good to
have his expert advice. And we talk about the eclipse. And I didn't
talk about it on Friday, I didn't talk about it yesterday. I didn't
talk about it. You know, all last week. Everybody else's going crazy
about this stuff, and it certainly was an opportunity for the clickbait masters to
get involved. I even saw several several sites that were Christian that said,
well, uh, what what does this tell us about the future, about
prophecy and the rest of stuff? And you click on it and says absolutely
nothing. Right. They even't clickbaited on that as a joke. But everybody
was doing it. Everybody was doing it. And it's just in sandy to
see all these false prophets and clickbait masters out there, and they really don't
care. They know they're going to be caught in a lie. And uh,
but just like Alex Jones, and Steve Pachinnick. They don't care.
They go ahead with it anyway, because that doesn't really matter. People will
move on. They got a short attention span. And so this is the
way that CNN reporter covered this at the eclipse. This is I think indicative
of just just the insanity of it. Here's the CNN reporter live at one
spot where they had a total blackout, their shoes in the dark six four
three two. There we go. Okay, you do appreciate the darkness that
we are experiencing. And by the way, our temperature is dropped. We're
down to seventy two degrees. Whoa, I can even see a blue spot
right there. Come on, we've got four of this. The crowd is
brilliant. Yeah for a second, I'll take it. Howard Dean moment here,
Remember howur Dean really you kind of tanked his campaign? He was he
won some primary somewhere and it's like, we're ak of this. So yeah,
you know, I started screaming just like her sounded just like and is
that interesting? When the sun got blacked out, she noticed the temperature dropped.
It's almost as but if the sun is warming up the planet instead,
if you're suv. What's going on with that? Are they going to have
to rethink things that CNN about the climate alarmism? Absolutely amazing. And then
I had a listener send this to me. He said, I think I'm
gonna throw up. This is the Trump crowd take on it. The most
important moment. Oh, yes, the most important moment in human history.
The most important moment in human history. Nothing more important than this? Is
it the solar eclipse? No, the most important moment in human history is
taking place in twenty twenty four. All the people are looking up to the
sun. God. Yes, and you see the silhouette there, Lord or
favorite idol, our son God, Donald Trump. Yeah, that's that right
there, he will say of America. I added that at the end because
I wanted to throw up as well. It continues to go on with this
Zarathustra. Yeah, this, this is this is something that that Richard Strauss
did based on, uh, the the nihilism of the guy who said we
have killed God. God is dead, right niche and his his idea of
the superman. Yeah, this is all and so well, let's not call
him a fascist, Nazi or anything. Let's just use the all the music
that was always there to worship the uber mintsk you know, the fascist,
the superman, the kind of the core idea, the atheism, the idolatry,
the secular humanity. There was a basis for Nazi Germany. There's it
right there. Yeah, what a joke this has all become. And then
someone else sent me this, and this is I think puts it in perspective.
It's a quote from Solberg says an eclipse is a cosmic reminder that the
university is not a random collection of matter and events that happen by chance.
The cosmos is so finely tuned that we can know precisely where every heavenly body
will be two hundred years from now down to the minute. These events remind
us that the universe is not an accident, and neither are we. God
made both, and He is in control. As a matter of fact,
when we when we look at the planets, and we look at the unique
things about the Earth. Even have scientists who look at this say, well,
it's almost as if everything was precisely tuned for the existence of life right
here, because if we just had this slight variation in terms of our orbit,
if we're a little bit closer, further away from the Sun just a
little bit, or if the atmosphere was slightly different, or if this was
slightly different, looks like it is fine tune, because if anything changed at
all, we wouldn't have life here. It'd be a dead planet like the
rest. I know, by the way, when you find water, that
is not evidence of life. Water is a necessary condition for the kind of
material life that we see, but it's not sufficient. And so when they
look at this, they say, well, it almost looks like it's set
up for man, that it is centered on man, that it's centered on
the Earth. But that's not the case. Oh why is it not the
case? What do you know that we don't know? Well, they don't
tell us, do they. There's a lot of excitement about the solar clips
that is happening, and some are even suggesting it might be a sign from
heaven that judgment is coming. I said one person, Well, if you
want to sign from heaven that judgment is coming, just open up your Bible
and read it. You could even read the Trump Bibles, even in that
one. But people don't want to. They're looking everywhere else and to everyone
else except to the Bible. To want to see where the judgment is coming.
One woman allegedly went on a shooting spree because she was directed by God
to do so. Now we keep having these people. You know, had
son of Sam years and years ago who said he was being told by God
to kill these people up in New York. What was his name, Berkovich
or something like that, but and his dog was speaking to him or something,
you know, David Burka, Victure or something like that. Anyway,
Yeah, he thought God was talking to him. Well, God's not going
to tell you to shoot people. You would know that if you read the
Bible, you'd know that. If you are, in fact hearing that voice,
there's something else going on, either with you or somebody else's playing with
you. But it's not God. He doesn't tell you things that are going
to contradict his basic principles. And he's also going to tell you to do
stupid, suicidal things, things that are going to injure you. He's not
going to tell you to go follow a narcissistic billionaire politician and put your entire
life at risk. He's not going to tell you do that either. That's
the Grandma that we talked about yesterday and I feel sorry for her. She
listened to the voices of demons, you know, Steve Mannon, Alex Jones,
Donald Trump. Yeah, those are the voices of demons talking to you,
perhaps through these people, or maybe the voice of the CIA. It's
hard to distinguish the CIA from actual demons. But yeah, God's not going
to tell you to do suicidal things that are going to destroy your life to
benefit and to follow some kind of narcissistic billionaire. But this person, this
woman, went on a shooting spree on the highway. Taylon Nichelle Celestine charged
with attempted murder, aggravated battery with a deadly weapon, and improper discharge of
a weapon because you're not supposed to discharge the weapons and to passing cars.
That's one of the first things you learned if you take a gun class.
That's a definite no no. Florida Highway patrol arrested this twenty two year old
in Georgia charged her with attempted murder. They didn't arrest her in Georgia that
she is from Georgia. They arrested her in Florida, where she was doing
the shooting. She says she was directed by God to shoot people in their
vehicles. Driver one vehicle that was hit was hit by the broken glass,
grazed on the arm by a bullet. Still he was able to move over
to the shoulder of the innertce she continued driving. She allegedly shot at another
vehicle and shot the driver in the neck. The driver was transported to a
nearby hospital to be treated for injuries. I don't say what is or her
condition is, but she was taken to the jail, where she was booked
on several charges, including attempted murder. God is not going to tell you
to a tempt murder on people. So was that a hate crime? No,
God told her to do it, right, It was an act of
God, she said. I love how people always say natural disasters an act
of God. Well, that's the way they like to see God. In
Scotland where they put this expansive hate crime law hate speech making that a crime.
Well, the Scottish police are saying they can't cope with a deluge of
bogus hate crime reports under this new law. And of course the guy who
is pushing all this stuff Pakistani who is now the Prime Minister or whatever,
is Grand Poobah of Scotland whatever that is. This guy actually hates Scottish people.
He's made comments about how it's so depressing to always be the only white
person in the room. Well, maybe you should go somewhere else then if
you aren't that racist and you're that hateful that it bothers you so much to
see people of a different skin color. But some of them have different hair
color too, what's his problem? But it's a Scottish National Party had hard
left self loathing lefties who vote for somebody like this who loathes them as well.
They have common cause they hate themselves and he hates them as well,
So let's vote for him. We have that in common with each other.
And there were more the very first day of the when he had JK.
Rolling throw down the gauntlet and start talking about trainees versus women. She says,
okay, go ahead and arrest me. I defy you to do it,
and they backed down. As a matter of fact, there were more
charges of hate speech about this Prime Minister, whatever his title is. Then
there were charges against our accusations, I should say against Rolling, and then
David Threadgold, who was chairman of the Scottish Police Federation police union claimed that
officers remained confused about who should be charged because of inadequate training. Well here's
a clue. If the person's really famous, you'll let them go, you
know, like JK rolling. But if they're not, you nail them to
the wall. That's what's going to really happen. We know around eight thousand
hate crime reports from me the first week of legislation coming into force, with
mister Threadgold warning that it was being exploed to fuel personal and political vendettas well.
Yeah, that's what this is. It's full on Marxism. It's a
big struggle session. They always have hated speech, and they always will hate
speech, and they hate people that are different from them as well. Officers
have been brought back to do overtime shifts, he said, and it is
simply unsustainable. We can't go through all of these. Well maybe you just
deepsicks it if you see that it is something pertaining to speech, because in
a free country, and they like to say democracy, speech is not a
crime. Claims also emerged on Monday that the police had dismissed to complain about
a relative of an SNP politician. You see, that's how you determine this
famous person relative of a politician, a politician himself. This person allegedly posted
an anti Semitic image online. They let the complaint about this relative of a
politician who posted something anti semitic online go because he or she was not Jewish.
Well, that's an interesting take on this, because you remember Matt Hancock
when he came after Andrew Bridgin. Andrew Bridgen made the statement he said,
these vaccines and these measures have killed more people than the Holocaust, or it's
been like a holocauster. I don't remember what. I don't even think he
said. It was more. We just mentioned the Holocaust as an example of
mass murder, and Matt Hancock, who was not Jewish, accused him of
anti Semitism. And Andrew Bridgin is suing him now because Andrew Bridgin has been
about the only politician in the UK. We don't really have one here in
the who has stood up to this. Well, we do have Ron Johnson,
the Senator, we do have Thomas Massey who has but neither of them
to the extent that Andrew Bridgen has. And Andrew Bridgin bore a lot of
punishment for that he was called anti semitic. They kicked him out of the
con Servative Party simply because he was talking about what a massive atrocity this was.
And yet you know, Matt Hancock is okay calling somebody else anti semitic
because he's talking about the vaccine, playing the race card a big red herring.
Don't pay attention to the vaccine. This guy is anti Semitic and he
gets away with it. Democrats, by the way, having the free speech
rules pushed against them now because they have they're getting these college protesters coming after
them because of their support of what is happening with Israel and Gaza, and
so they have as they're giving their little speeches in colleges where they would normally
be welcome. Now these Jacobins are having the mob come after them like robsphere.
I always said this is going to happen. Jarathan Turley wrote a column
on the Hill. He says, after years of supporting the censoring and blacklisting
of others, these politicians like Jeremy Raskin are now being targeted by the very
anti free speech movement that they once fostered. The mob has come for them,
just like the French Revolution. Hillary Clinton last week became the latest Democrat
targeted by protesters in a visit to her alma mata, Wesley College, and
so Biden told social media companies a couple of years ago, you are killing
people by allowing free speech. He wanted to shame the executives into censoring the
people that he didn't like. And then we have Jamie Raskin, also leading
figure in Congress, opposing efforts to curtail massive censorship programs that were being coordinated
by the Biden administration. We now have the receipts, the emails, and
other things showing that this is being directed. We always knew this. We've
known this for six years and actually longer than that. We knew it before
twenty eighteen when it was done openly against info Wars. But we knew that
even before then that the government was directing it. And so Raskin opposed the
investigation of federal censorship even when they had the documents there. He continues to
push social media companies to increase the censorship and silencing of Americans, says Jonathan
Turley. Last December, he sent a letter on behalf of other Democrats on
the powerful House Oversight Committee demanding even more censorship, not only on election fraud,
on COVID or on climate change, but also on abortion. You know,
I've thought about it when somebody sent me the clip, hadn't seen it
for a few years of you know seven, Well, actually it wasn't the
seven dirty words, but it was a club and you ain't in it,
the George Carlin thing. And of course he had a very famous battle with
the FCC and others over seven dirty words that you're not allowed to say,
and they were all sexual and content and I thought, well, that's interesting.
If you're coming up with a list of words, it doesn't have to
be limits, not limited to seven anymore. And it certainly isn't about sexual
stuff. As a matter of fact, they want you to talk about sexual
stuff. They want your kid in elementary school or kindergarten to talk about sexual
stuff. Come on, say the words. I love it when you say
the words. Don't tell your parents though. Here's some pictures I want to
show you too. That's what's going on in the schools. It's amazing to
see how things have changed. But it wasn't that that made me think about
the seven dirty words, thinking what are the words that you are not allowed
to say today? You know, things like Pfizer, Moderna, mRNA IVERMICT
and eight c Q pro life medical martial law. A little phrases like that,
these are the things that will get you removed from social media, get
you canceled and removed, just like he was removed from radio stations and other
things. We're saying the seven dirty words. They've the tactics haven't changed.
It's just the words that have changed, isn't it. We're troubled by the
rabid spread, I'm sorry, rapid, not rabid, rapid spread of abortion
misinformation, said Jeremy Raskin. So you're not allowed to show pictures either of
what abortion really is. Don't show the murdered babies. Don't show the dismembered
children ripped apart, and the mother and then collected the parts, collected and
put out on a table so they can make sure they got all of the
parts of the baby out that they ripped apart while it was alive. Don't
show that. Don't say that either. You get kicked to the outer corners
of the Internet like me. Now, abortion misinformation, disinformation. I don't
want to see this on your company's social media platform, said Jeremy Raskin and
the threat this development poses to safe abortion access in the United States. They
don't care about safe abortions. They're putting They're letting people get pills without a
doctor's examination to abort their babies chemically, which presents a real health issue for
the mothers. They don't care. If they can kill the mother, so
much the better. When journalists and even other members testified in favor of free
speech, democrats attacked them as Putin lovers an insurrectionist. But last week the
left turned on Raskin. He was giving a lecture titled Democracy, Autocracy,
and the Threat to Reason in the twenty first Century. What hypocrisy for somebody
who is a censor to talk about reason the threat to reason in the twenty
first century. Protesters accused Raskin of being complicit in genocide, and University of
Maryland President Darryl Pines had to end the event early, and then Jonathan Turley
says Pines then pulled a Raskin himself. While mildly criticizing the students for their
lack of civility, he defended their disruption of Raskin's remarks as if a Heckler's
veto were free speech. Now Turtley is exactly right about this. A heckler's
veto is not free speech. They're just shouting down free speech. This is
not a debate, This is not an exchange and ideas. Somebody is heckling
you. They just want to get you off the stage. They don't want
you to speak. It's another way of canceling and censoring people. So a
heckler is veto, it's not free speech. He's absolutely right. So the
University of Maryland president said, what you saw play out was actually democracy and
free speech and academic freedom. Nothing of the sort. Nothing of the sort.
You know, there are rules for debate, and the universities used to
encourage and exchange and invadeer ideas. Now they encourage censorship and canceling and veto
of speech. He said, from our perspective as a university, these are
difficult conversations that we should be having. It wasn't a conversation, it was
a shoutdown, and he certainly deserved it. So he says, the mob
finally came for him after years of encouraging and demanding the censorship of others.
Deplatforming is the rage on our college campuses. And that's the key thing.
You know, when you look at what is happening with DEI and censorship and
all the rest of this stuff, you think about what a cesspool the universities
are. There was an article a couple of days ago on zero Hedge talking
about the degrees that were most likely to result in unemployment. A lot of
the usual stuff that you would expect. Uh. The one that was like
number four or five, however, was aerospace engineering. You know, a
rocket scientist. It's kind of no respect for that. I guess we Actually
that's nothing new. It's just there's so few jobs in that. When we
had the video stores, we had a guy who had just graduated and he
had a degree in aerospace engineering from ENCI State, and he couldn't find a
job, and so we'd introduce him as our resident rock scientists to beat one.
But he eventually got a job, but I don't know if it was
as a rocket scientist or if he repurposed that into something else. One of
the guys that I worked with in engineering and a physics degree. Physics is
also there, but those are the only two that really practical. The rest
of stuff was like sociology and this kind of art history things like that.
You know, how are you going to get a job with that? But
yeah, for physics it can sometimes be hard to get a job as well,
unless you go all the way to a PhD and start teaching in the
university. But we should start thinking about how the universities are not just a
massive waste of taxpayer money, a massive waste of individuals who get into massive
debt. Of course it's going to be forgiven now by Biden. Actually saw
somebody I'm just diverging here, but somebody else tried to shame Christians who are
saying Biden shouldn't be getting rid of this student debt, and they so well.
I thought Christians were all about forgiveness. Somebody correctly point out, this
is not forgiveness. This is theft. It would be forgiveness if the person
that you owed the money to let you go, but he's just giving away
stuff, stealing it from other taxpayers. But beyond all of that, beyond
the waste of time, the waste of money of the college degree, frequently
is it's this Marxist seminary that is destroying our society, with the DEI and
the struggle sessions and the censorship and all the rest of this, and that's
what they're so focused on. That is their passion. Now, that was
always there. Fifty years ago when I was in college, it was there,
but it was a very very tiny minority. Yes, student government had
been taken over in this commuting campus on the university far. They had about
twenty five thousand students there at the time, but it was mostly a commuting
school and people didn't really get involved in student government or student activities. But
you still have to pay a student activity fee. And the people who took
over the student government were the Black Student Union and the Gay Coalition, and
they were Marxists, and there were thieves, and they embezzled thousands of dollars
for their personal use. But they got away with it because you know,
they're special people like the Scottish politician who can say whatever he wants or his
relatives who can say whatever he wants. They got away with that theft,
a personal theft. I mean anyway, Yeah, these schools need to be
shut down. They need to be shut down or pay their own way,
let them pay what it really costs. They have. One of the reasons
that tuition, of course is skyrocketed because it was heavily subsidized by the government,
and so as they would subsidize it, they would jack it up even
more. The same thing happens with our medical fees hospitals. Because there's a
lot of insurance coverage. They just jack it up, so you wind up
paying as much or more than you would if you were a cash patient.
I've seen this even before they rolled out Obamacare. The LA Times is talking
about it. We experienced that because we were self insured, actually through one
of the Christian ministry sharing things. But it was when you go in and
you tell them all, I don't have insurance. Oh well, we don't
need to do this test and this test and that test, and you can
negotiate the prices down. And then you had the Christian organization with Samaritan ministries
and you could share that with people. Now that we are on what is
it Medicare Medicare, Yeah, we go in and they want to do everything
to us. It's like, no, no, no, I don't need
that. I gotta tell them back off. I'm doing exploratory tests and all
the rest of this stuff. I know what you do to people of those
tests sometimes, but they just want to do everything because they got a blank
check from the government. You know, if you're part of that program anyway.
Last week, Walter Isaacson, former CEO of CNN and of the Aspen
Institute, you know, liberal elites out there in Aspen, was accused of
assaulting a Tulane student protester during an event held off campus. Isaacson is now
seventy two. He teaches at Tulane. He was attending the university sponsored event
and had had enough when McDonald became the eighth protester to stop the event.
He stood up and he shoved McDonald into the hall. McDonald, the student,
insisted that he and his fellow protesters are merely peacefully interrupting the event.
Help, I'm been repressed straight out of Mighty fivon you know, the event
to stop others from speaking. He displayed slight scratch marks and is quoted as
expressing a fear of learning to get to this after the incident, and they
have demanded that he, this former CNN CEO, be fired. All this
stuff, Turlie says, Yet these students have been taught for years at speech
is violence and it's harmful. Well, I guess if speech is violence.
Then this guy initiated the violence. So Isaacson was just responding to that violence.
Right when that happened. I had this sent to me by a listener.
This is he said. There could be something very dangerous going on here
in Missouri. Perhaps this is an attempted gun grab. Perhaps they have homeschools
in the site center. Andrew Koenig and other Missouri legislature legislators who are pushing
school choice in Missouri need to answer for this and put it on the record.
And he says, so, compare the current law to this proposed new
law. And he asked, so are they trying to criminalize gun possession for
homeschool parents in their own home. Previously they had defined, you know,
for the as used in a couple of different sections in the law, they
would define a homeschool as a school incorporated or unincorporated. And again that's not
a good definition, but that was the previous one. But now they're saying
for all the purposes of state law, for all purposes of state law.
So it's not just something has to do with education, but this is for
any purpose in state law. And then the drafting manual says this limitation will
ensure that the definition is not misconstrued as applying to the entire code. And
he referenced this in Arkansas, while the definition is not intended to apply.
In other words, it was something that was very specific to homeschooling. But
now it's saying for all of state law. Let's pull that back up again
here, and then when it talks about criminal gun law in the state of
Missouri, back to the Missouri statute again, if you carry a firearm in
any school, in any school, okay, Well, if you've defined a
homeschool to be something that is incorporated or unincorporated, and you say that it
is essentially for purposes of state law, a homeschool is a school, whether
incorporated or unincorporated, that has as its primary purpose a provision of private or
religious based instruction. Well, if you're going to define it that way and
then say that for all of state law, well that would also put it
under the state laws that would govern carrying guns. So that's an interesting issue.
If you're in Missouri, you need to take a look at that and
see what is happening with it. Meanwhile, the ATF has undermined as this
is put in the headline is put in bright bar. Under mind the left
hysteria over the so called gun show loophole, the ATF and the National Firearms
Commerce and Trafficking Assessment Report have essentially said that when you look at the numbers
of gun trafficking for intra state traffic, so they have things that happened within
the state, things that happened from between one state to another, and then
things that are international that cross the border and to let's say, for example,
Mexico, like the gun Walker program under Bush and the Fast and Furious
program under Obama, those were false flag attacks. Even the New York Times
admitted that it blew up in their face because under the Fast and Furious under
Obama, you had a law enforcement officer get shot. But the purpose of
that was to make a case to have complete registration serial numbers for guns and
even in some cases extreme cases, they had pushed for ammunition so they could
track everything that we had. And the justification for it was going to be,
well, this stuff is going across the border into Mexico, so we
need to stop this international trafficking of guns. And that was not just Obama,
that was also Bush, George W. Bush, but that blew up
in their faces following decades of hysteria from the left resulting in gun control push
after gun control push. Based on the so called gun show loophole, one
would think such shows to play a dominant role in interstate and interstate trafficking and
even international trafficking. However, the new report the NFCTA, which is again
the National Firearms Commerce and Trafficking Assessment, shows only three point two percent of
atf intrastate trafficking within the state involving trafficking and firearms at gun shows, flea
markets, or auctions, only four point three percent of interstate trafficking from gun
shows, flea markets, or auctions, and only four point five percent in
international trafficking. So again, just like the climate stuff, this is a
phony problem. That doesn't that they're just using as an excuse to run through
the mcguffin they want. We'll be right back. Elvis, the Beetle and
the Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find them on the Oldies channel at apsradio dot
com. You're listening to the David Knight Show. I want to say on
rock Fan, thank you very much to Michelle Obaman, thank you for the
tip I appreciate that, and let's talk about money, specifically about gold.
The goal prize is up nearly nineteen percent in this rally, but you haven't
seen anything yet, says Robert Minor, who was a director of investment strategy
at a UK investment company called Aberdeen. He writes in an interview. He
says, rather a golds rally to record highs above twenty three hundred and fifty
dollars an ounce is just getting started, and it's only a matter of time
before retail investors jump into gold backed exchange traded funds to kick off the next
major leg higher. Now he's somebody his investment company, Aberdeen, actually has
a gold ETF and they have seen it go past three billion dollars for the
first time because a lot of people are starting to get into the gold ETF.
Again. I've talked about the paper gold many times with Tony Ardeman and
how that is not real. We'll talk a little bit more about that,
but it is the first thing that a lot of people will look at because
it makes the transaction a little bit easier, and you know, you can
just you can buy it in smaller increments a tenth of announce or something like
that, and you can do it through a broker, although it's not difficult
to do it through Tony Ardaman. You just calm up and place the water
again. You can go to Wisewelf dot Gold through Davidknight. Dot Gold dealt
with Tony for a very long time and he can lock that price in for
you and get it. But Mentor said, since April of twenty twenty two,
ETF investors have sold about seven hundred and fifty tons of gold, creating
a massive supply in the marketplace that was met with two years of historic demand
from central banks. So what he's saying is typically the ETFs are brought by
retail customers and they're looking at this and they were selling it off massively.
And it's also institutional people. It's not just consumers in the United States.
A lot of them will buy the paper gold sell the paper gold, but
it's very very heavily institutions and they will sell it off in reaction to interest
rates and things like that. The institutions will and so there's been very very
heavy selling. As they pointed out, seven hundred and fifty tons the two
years, but that was bought. The demand was strong enough from the central
banks to keep the price of gold firm, to keep it from declining as
it always has in the past. And that's kind of interesting. And so
he says, if you were a prudent central bank fund manager in some of
these countries, you would diversify away from the dollar to reduce your risk.
It's just plain and simple, he said. He expects Western investors or waiting
for an actual rate cut from the Federal Reserve to move. That's why he
thinks, even though it's a record high, that it's going to go even
further. He said, with credit card debt at record highs insurance premiums rising
across the board, and government debt growing out of control, the US economy
can't afford to keep interest rates in restrictive territory much longer. He doesn't even
mention the election, and of course that's the big driving force. That's why
Tony and Gerald Celenti were saying last year, Oh yeah, they're definitely going
to lower the interest rates. I want to get that sugar high in there.
Same thing that Biden has done in terms of selling off the strategic petroleum
reserves in order to temporarily bump down the price of gas at the pump,
and people will look at that and it's like, oh, okay, I
was kind of concerned about that, but it's all okay now, you know,
just like Trump does the lockdowns and the masks and social distancing, and
then Biden comes along and does the mandates and stuff like that, and then
they back off and everybody's like, well, well, good, that's all
over with now I don't have to worry about it. No, they left
all of that usurped power in place. That concrete that you're standing in that
they put you in is getting hard, and they're going to shove you off
the pier with a pandemic treaty from the World Health Organization. The next time,
it'll be one of these deals where well this is coming from the World
Health Organization, the World Health Organization. So we just made recommendation, you
know, like Trump did in twenty twenty. We don't have the power to
force anybody. They just obey us. And so a lot of you know,
I didn't do it, Did he do it? No, he didn't
do it either. I don't know who did this stuff. It just happened.
I guess I don't know. Nobody did the lockdown. We got some
guy out there wrote this this documentary thing, not not ever talking about Trump,
but saying, you know, it wasn't so much Fauci as it was
Deborah Burks. Look, it was all those people, but she wasn't running.
She's two or three levels down. But let's not talk about the guy
who is really at the top, who gave the authority to Fauci, who
gave the authority of whatever she had to Deborah Burks, to the CDC,
to the NIH all these other people. Let's not talk about him. Everything
that happens while Biden is present is his fault, and quite frankly, it
is. And it was, you know, the all to the presidents who
were in charge all the time. Like I talked about yesterday, Hooverville.
Well, one guy said, there were a lot of progresses of both parties
who were saying the government can fix the Great Depression and everything wasn't just Herbert
Hoover who was doing it. But he got all the blame, and rightfully
so, because he was a president, and the buck stops with the president
unless you were Donald Trump. And if you were Donald Trump, nothing ever
happens. Now. They used to talk about Ronald Reagan as being the teflon
president. I think we got to start talking about Donald Trump. Since the
MAGA people like to couch him in such religious terms all the time, maybe
we should talk about his immaculate perception. This guy is perceived to be completely
immaculate with all of the stuff that happened in twenty twenty. Don't ever blame
him. It wasn't his fault. It was Biden who came after twenty twenty.
Anyway, getting back to the money, if you were the chair of
the Fed, you would have to know the impact, the magnitude of the
rate increases that you've done in a very short time, the magnitude of the
impact that's going to have on the economy. Of course, we've never seen
interest rates go so quickly, straight up, kicking off a banking crisis that
is now being multiplied by the commercial real estate issues. So this shock to
the system is put in by the Federal Reserve raising these interest rates seventy five
bases points three quarters of an interest rate at a pop, boom boom boom.
At the same time you've got this massive trillion dollars every one hundred days
commercial real estate bust that goes back to Trump's lockdown. This kind of monetary
policy usually breaks something in the economy on a structural level, and you have
to play catch up very quickly. You certainly wouldn't risk much higher unemployment just
to bring housing inflation down a few tenths of a point, for example,
he says. But since holding support at two thousand in early February, gold
prices have rallied nearly nineteen percent, with prices hitting a new intra day high
at twenty three hundred and seventy two dollars an ounce on Monday. Minter said
there is still significant value in the gold market even after this rally. He
said, regardless of the timing or regardless of the magnitude, the next Fed
fund's move is going to be a cut and historically that has led to fifty
seven percent increase in goal prices in two thousand two hundred and thirty five percent
increase in goal prices in two thousand and six, and a sixty nine percent
goal price increase in twenty and eighteen. He said, even with prices up
eighteen percent, we ain't seen nothing yet. Actually said, we haven't seen
anything yet, But anyway, the market has finally awakened, says A Peter
Grosskopf, on the goal miners who are rallying on on higher metal prices.
He so the main driver for goal prices will be debt concerns. He's more
focused on debt than an interest rates. See all those things look at bad.
There's just too much debt in the world, says gross comp Governments have
built up these deficits and debt levels to the point where they actually do matter.
But the size, the sheer size of the US fiscal deficit and whether
or not they have control over that is startling, rather starting to trouble investors.
You have two choices to get out of this debt predicament. One of
them is to deflate and to face a financial crisis, which I don't think
anybody expects is going to happen. The other one is going to be to
inflate. Because if you create inflation, there's a little bit of a lag
time there, and you can also create government statistics to hide it. People
are going to feel it. And then you have people like the commentators on
CNN, Well, you know, if you don't count food prices, inflation
is not all that bad. Actually, we all have to eat. You
should ask yourself why they want to exclude food prices. Gold holes is on
even in an environment of rising rates and in a world where deficits and debts
are just too big, he said. And so part of what is happening
is that China is beefing up their central bank reserves. That's one of the
things that is boosting it to high levels, says Reiters. And the there's
an interesting analysis from a writer on RT who is drawing from a lot of
different sources. Actually, a great wealth transfer is underway. How the West
lost control of the gold market, and it is really what has happened.
As I point out, and as Tony has pointed out many times, what
is strange about all this is that with these massive increases and it rates,
that gold is basically holding its own and with everything else that they were doing,
even with really really high interest rates, it held its own, which
is not what typically happens. And it doesn't typically happen that way because Western
institutions would trade and as based on the interest rates. And so what this
article from Martia saying is that it's part of the denillarization that the control is
slipping away from the West. In terms of these financial issues, he says,
for thousands of years, gold was the ultimate source of store value,
synonymous with the very concept of money. Trade was often settled either in gold
itself or in banknotes that were backed by gold and directly exchangeable for it.
Currencies backed by nothing but government decree, called fiat currencies, tend to eventually
fail. However, nineteen seventy one, gold found itself cast out of this
ancient role when the US unilaterally suspended dollar convertibility into gold, as enshrined in
the Breton Woods Agreement that established a framework for the post war economy shortly thereafter,
and enact that medieval alchemists only dream of gold was created out of thin
air in the form of futures contracts, meaning that bullion could be bought and
sold without any metal changing hands or even existing. Now he's talking about the
paper gold, and that's something else that Tony and I have frequently talked about,
the fact that we don't know if the Shanghai Gold Exchange has the gold
to back up this paper stuff or not, most likely not. That's what
a lot of people are saying. There are two important features how the gold
market has subsequently functioned. First, gold has essentially been reduced to trading like
any other cyclical financial asset. Second, the price of gold has largely been
determined by Western institutional investors. But both of these long standing trends are now
breaking down. The importance of this development is hard to overstate, but let's
begin with a very quick examination of how gold went from being the ultimate source
of value to just another ticker moving in predictable patterns and the constellation of financial
instruments. The collapse of Bretton Woods in the late sixties and early seventies,
culminating in the gold Wind to being shut in nineteen seventy one was a messy
period of transition, uncertainty, and instability. The dollar devalued and a fixed
rate system was negotiated and soon thereafter abandoned. But what was clear was that
the US is steering the world away from golden toward a dollar standard. He
talks about the recent memoirs of a guy who was president of the Dutch Central
Bank, and he was chairman of the Bank of International Settlements. This is
the central bank of central banks, and he was there as a chairman of
the Bank of International settlements from nineteen sixty one, nineteen sixty seven or other
to nineteen eighty one, so he was there for fourteen years, and he
recalled in his memoirs he said gold disappeared as the anchor of monetary stability.
The road through endless vicissitudes to a new dollar hegemony was paved with many conferences
with faithful, shrewd and sometimes misleading stories, with idealistic visions of the future,
and impressive professional speech professorial speeches. The ultimate political reality was that the
Americans supported or fought any change, depending on whether they saw the dollar's position
strengthened or threatened. In other words, America had the power, and it
shoved this through and their own interest against the interest of everybody else. After
breaking the thirty five dollars pronounced Pagan nineteen seventy one, gold rocketed all the
way up to eight hundred and fifty dollars by nineteen eighty. So the US
government had a very strong interest in managing the perception of the dollar through managing
gold. Most importantly, it didn't want to see gold recreate a pseudo reserve
currency by strengthening substantially fed Chairman Paul Voker at the time said gold is my
enemy, and indeed it traditionally has been the enemy of central banks. It
forced them to tighten rates when they didn't want to, and impose on them
a certain discipline. So the paper gold market that began in the nineteen eighties,
you had countless gold derivatives that emerged, he says. It's actually started
in nineteen seventy four, the launch of gold futures trading, but it exploded
in the next decade. And what happened is that bullion banks began selling paper
claims on gold for which there was no actual gold attached. You see,
whenever they start this derivative stuff, it doesn't matter whether the asset is real
or not. It could be gold, it could be bitcoined, it could
be something as real as real estate. And look at what they did to
the real estate market using these real estate derivatives, and they securitized mortgage groups.
They completely wrecked it. But they always created this. When they started
this bitcoin etf it's like, well, why would anybody do that? I
mean, you know, certainly, it's it can be difficult, it can
be slow to go through these different cryptocurrency exchanges, but the potential for abuse,
for fraud, for manipulation. That's brought in whenever you bring in an
ETF. You know, because we watched this with paper gold ETFs, paper
silver ETFs, so when they bring it in with bitcoin, that's a real
warning flag. Buyers are not actually required to pay upfront, but they could
simply leave a cash margin. That's one of the reasons why people would moved
to this. And the author says this is reminiscent of the old communist joke,
says that we pretend to work and you pretend to pay us. In
this case, the investor pretended to pay for the gold and the seller pretends
to own it, and none of them do. This is about as close
as you can get to pure speculation. And that's the problem with all these
derivatives. It's speculation. It really is a casino where these people are rigging
the game. Thus was born the fractional reserve paper gold scheme that persists to
this day, and indeed there is now vastly more paper gold than there is
physical, some two hundred to three hundred trillion dollars of paper gold assets out
there compared to eleven trillion of what they think is actual gold according to an
estimate by Forbes magazine. So think about that, it's actually eleven trillion they
have inflavad this you total up all of the gold ETFs and everything, that
would mean that they've got to have two or three hundred trillion dollars worth of
gold out there. It's not there. It's a fantasy football league. Really.
Others put the discrepancy even higher, but nobody really knows. Yeah,
Forbes is going to be conservative, They're going to come in on the conservative
side, But the point is nobody knows. Again, Tony Ardaman and I
have talked about this several times. This is an excellent article on ARTEA.
The creation of a derivative market satisfied demand for gold that would otherwise go to
the physical market. It's a way for the institutions and central banks to try
to control the price of the actual price of the actual gold by creating a
fantasy gold market out there. And I used to to get involved in that
until gold started making some moves a few years ago, and then it's the
paper gold is not tracking it, and so I started looking at why is
that? And that's when I realized sometigation do your own research. Yeah,
that's why they tell you don't do your own research or anything. You do
your own research, you find out that, yeah, it's a fantasy market.
Here, only a limited amount of gold exists that can be mined.
An unlimited amount of gold derivatives, though, can be unwritten. Underwritten should
say when monetary expansion drives demand for gold, there are two ways this demand
can be dealt with gett Either let the price of gold rise as more dollars
chase the same amount of gold, or you can permit more paper claims to
be created on the same amount of gold, which allows the rise of gold
to be managed. The rise of the paper market has clearly played an important
role in defanging gold in its role as exerting a hard limit on expansionary policy,
and of course the same thing is going to be true of bitcoins.
One of the reasons why they're setting up the Bitcoin ETF I think. I
think it is a way to subvert a bitcoin, which they see is their
key competitor, to a central bank digital currency. It allows them to manipulate
that in the same way they did with the real estate market. Institutional investors
have primarily traded gold based on movements in US interest rates, meaning interest rates
suggested for inflation. Gold is bought when real rates fall, and vice versa.
The logic is when interest rates rise, money managers can earn more by
switching to bonds or to cash, thus increasing the opportunity costs for holding non
interest bearing assets like gold. This correlation has been particularly strong over the last
fifteen years or so, and many analysts date it back even further than that.
So let's go a step further and pose the following question. If Western
institutional money has been driving the price, who has been on the other side
of the trade When the actual gold does change hands. Western institutions are essentially
controlled the price of gold and bought from the East in bull markets and sold
to the East in bear market. This makes sense because the Western side of
the trade essentially consisted of investors who, in any asset class, tend to
chase the price higher. The East, meanwhile, was characterized more by consumer
demand, so gold flowed from east to west in bull markets and from West
to East and bear markets. But it was the Western institutional investors who were
in the driver's seat in this kind of trade, and this was the well
established state of affairs up until twenty twenty two, when the Ukraine proxy war
began and the US took the bowld step of freezing three hundred million dollars in
Russian central bank assets. What happened then was that the correlation between the US
real rates and gold broke down and it has not been restored. The first
sign of impending shift was that in the first few months after the FED embarked
on a sharp rate hike cycle in March of twenty twenty two, gold did
drop, but proved to be more resilient to the rising rates than the correlation
models would have suggested. But the real breakdown and correlation began around September of
that year, because remember March, that's right after the Russian invasion and the
sanctions and that type of thing, so already it was starting to have an
effect. But really by September when goal prices actually started climbing, even as
real rates remained flat. In fact, from late October twenty twenty two through
June twenty twenty three, the goal price rose seventeen percent. Meanwhile, over
twenty twenty three, US real rates rose despite quite a bit of volatility,
which, according to the old correlation should have meant a decline in goal prices,
as higher yields elsewhere would make non yielding gold less attractive. Our goal
rose fifteen percent that year. This is why when Tony says, you know,
they keep playing these games with interest rates and raising interest rates early,
are arbitrarily raising them at a very rapid rate. And but it's not affecting
gold. That's the key thing. How strong it's been in the face of
this competition from strong interest rates. Another notable aspect is that the Western institutional
investors have been net sellers of gold, as evidence by declining inventory held by
Western exchange traded funds. So they're still doing the same thing as interest rates
go up. Markay, let's sell our gold and get into these bonds or
whatever that are paying a higher interest rate. But in twenty twenty three,
gold ETFs posted net outflows for the year despite the rising gold price. So
far this year through February, the ETF outflow figure amounted to five point seven
billion, four point seven billion of which came from North America. All this
is happening while gold prices have surged to all time highs. So what he's
saying is traditionally in the past as interest rates go up, the institutions would
sell the stuff off, the ETFs would sell it off, they would get
into things that we're going to pay them the higher interest rates, and that
has continued to happen through this in the US in North America, and yet
it hasn't affected gold as it always has in the past. So this is
the thing that's fundamentally changed, and it's predicated off of using the dollar as
a weapon. So coming into focus is a picture of Western institutional investors responding
like Pavlov's dogs to rising interest rates and ditching gold in favor of higher yielding
assets like bonds, stocks, money market funds. Normally, like clockwork,
this would have driven the price down, but it didn't. And the two
main reasons are the voracious appetite for physical gold coming from central banks and the
extremely strong private sector demand for physical gold from China. This is the central
banks, even though you got the institutions and the ETF funds and anything selling
this gold, central banks around the world just snapping it up. So it
doesn't cause that the demand is so great. They're just they're they're taking it,
so it's not going down. As a matter of fact, it's going
the other way. Estimates that the People's Bank of China bought a record seven
hundred and thirty five tons of gold and twenty twenty three, about two thirds
of which were purchased covertly. But again, nobody knows about that, just
like they don't know about the about the paper gold that is just made up.
But you can look at it and say there's absolutely no way that it
is twenty thirty times more than the known gold assets. There are instances in
history where events overtake those who are living through them, and when change is
so profound that most observers lack the mental categories to perceive it. In nineteen
thirty six, Carl Jung said, the hurricane has broken loose in Germany.
While we still believe that it's fine weather, the hurricane that is bearing down
one of the western world is a debasement of the dollar, owing to the
weaponization of the financial system and the spiraling US debt crisis. These are apocabal
developments that will have combined to break the familiar financial world beyond repair. The
flow of gold from West to East is both a real transfer of wealth,
but it is also symbolic of how profoundly. The West has been underestimating the
significance of what is happening, and so as we see just this last week
there Hedge points out China's gold buying frenzy at Central Bank is sparking chaos and
the ETFs. The ETFs price had gained over forty percent in the past four
section sessions before falling ten percent after trading resumed on Monday for the second time
in a week trading and an ETF that owns gold companies was halted in China
overnight. And so the question is where does this take us Well, besides
people speculating on what the future of value of gold is, I keep coming
back to the Central bank digital currency issue. That is a fundamental necessity for
the kind of digital slavery surveillance police state that they want to impose on us,
and that is still also marching in place. In Australia. One tost
popular tourist island there, Hamilton Island, has told made the controversial move that
they will not support any cash use on that island. They've gone cashless and
it has created a big backlash in Australia, many people threatening to boycott the
popular tourist destination. Well, we're going to take a quick break and when
we come back, we're going to talk a little bit more about what is
happening with money and politics, but this time we're going to talk about what
is going on with Trump? Are they going to start to it looked like
everything was solved with this demand for one hundred and seventy five million dollars,
he got it reduced, But now it's looking like they are going to make
a move to actually confiscate his property. And what are the implications of that
for the election? I think that people see the kind of corruption that's actually
happening here. We'll be right back. Tell Alexa to add the APS radio
skill and have access to the best channels anywhere from country to blues, classic
hits to news. APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy.
Get details at apsradio dot com. You're listening to the David Knight Show and
you can walk five hunds out steps but not us sing that you say,
I have more hounds and a few activates and all about cops bent at your
door off? Yeah, well what about that curw curfew activating and what about
all the people who showed up on January sixth. As I pointed out yesterday,
RFK Junior had said at the end of the week last week he said
he was talking about Julian Massange and at Snowden, how they had not received
justice, how he was going to pardon them, and he also mentioned how
the people who were there on January the sixth have been quote stripped of their
constitutional liberties. And then his radical left supporter has got a hold of him.
Four hours later, his campaign press secretary said, that doesn't reflect mister
Kennedy's views. That was the work of a marketing firm that we hired.
They have now been fired by the campaign because they inserted this stuff about the
January of the sixth people. And then as the SRFK Junior and his staff
wet their finger and stuck it in the air again, they realized, well,
maybe we went a little bit too far on that. I mean,
the guy is just flip flopping back and forth, like I don't know Trump
or Biden. These people have no principles whatsoever. They'll tell you whatever they
want to get elected. And so now he's taken another position with this.
He came back out and he said, quote, I am concerned about the
possibility the political objectives motivated the vigor of the prosecution of the January the sixth
defendants and their long sentences and their harsh treatment. If elected, I will
appoint a special prosecutor to investigate whether powers were abused for a political advantage and
to write any wrongs that are found. Well, great, we'll see if
he would do that if he got elected. But anyway, He also gingerly
questioned the notion that January the sixth represented insurrection. Look, we all know
that this is political. We all know that it was heavily politicized Department of
Justice. It is as absolute tyranny, aus and abomination to see this type
of stuff happening. But of course Trump could have prevented all of this before
he left. He had another two weeks before he got out of office.
He could have pardoned the people. If you don't believe me, believe Roger
Stone, who at the time was so angry that he was spitting cuss words
on the phone as he's being filmed by documentary people about what he was going
to do. Trump and the family if they didn't because they were just letting
everybody hang out to dry, so he could have prevented all of this suffering.
Trump could have and several suicides. You know, it kind of reminds
me when you see this stuff happening, Jim Jones and his kool Aid cult.
Right, well, you got Alex Jones and his kool aid cult telling
literally telling people in twenty twenty, oh yeah, it's just sugar water.
You can take that. I've told many people this and they don't believe me.
What what? No, really, no, really, I've played the
clip over and over again. But yeah, that's just basically sugar Why do
you can do that? You know, it's forty chess. He's got a
different vaccine than Bill Gates and the World Health Organization does. It's all fine,
and yet this guy, you know, just take inject the sugar water.
It's fine, said Alex Jones. We all knew it was poison.
And now even after they come out and say that the jab is poison,
they tell you to support the guy who created the poison. The guy who's
telling is still telling you to inject the poison. Donald Trump. It's absolutely
amazing to me continue to tell people to take it. This is not just
Alex. This is all of the big conservative media. This is Breitbart,
this World, Met Daily, this Daily Caller, It's like everybody, everybody
who's on the conservative side of this stuff. As a matter of fact,
I got to say, you know, yesterday I talked to the constitutional sheriffs
and peace officers, and I like the work that Sheriff Mac does and I've
always supported him talking to sheriffs about the constitutional duty. And so there's a
convention coming up, and they called me to talk about that, and they
were very kind to offer to have me come out there, but and I
said, no, I can't do that. I could this show on a
daily basis, but be happy to, you know, tell people about the
convention. And so they start, not Sheriff Mac, but the person who's
putting it together, started telling me about it. And it's got Steve Bannon,
it's got General Flynn, and you get the idea. I mean,
it's turning into a reawaken America think and I'm just not going to do that.
I'm not going to align myself with these people who are pushing a mass
murderer who overthrew the Constitution with medical martial law. I'm not going to push
somebody like that this is a constitutional issue. They should understand this. They
were actually on the side of a lot of law enforcement officers said I'm not
going to obey that unconstitutional order. And I've talked about that many times.
Well, where did that unconstitutional order come from? It came from Trump.
And you're going to have these people like Michael Flynn and Steve Bannon who are
out there lying to people, deceiving people to this day and coming up with
their phony version of the Christian religion and trying to portray that to the world
as if that's real Christianity when they're leading prayers to ascended masters that they have
plagiarizes from Elizabeth Claire prophet. That's what Flynn has done. Flynn was pushing
the transgender issue back in twenty fourteen with Chris Beck. At that point in
time, I hadn't even really heard that. I heard of it, and
I said, oh, let's not focus on that. That's in the weeds
and it's a sensational clickbait thing. It was forming right then, and you
had Flynn pushing it with that Navy seal Chris Beck, you know, honoring
it, pushing it there in the Pentagon I'll have nothing to do with these
people, and you should not have anything to do with them either. They're
liars, they're deceivers. They overthrew the constitution, they're still overthrowing the constitution,
and they committed mass murder in the process. And then on the other
side you got Letitia James and heard thugs at the Department of Justice and the
thugs at the FBI just as bad in a different way. I mean,
they've done a lot of this other stuff, and they're now using this as
open political persecution. This is actually going to It is so clear that this
is baseless political persecution of Trump that it is actually helping him. And that
gets me angry too. I don't like to see legal due process suspended,
and I don't like to see it done in this kind of political calculation either.
So you got this situation where he had he was successful in getting an
appeals court to drop it from the four hundred and fifty four million dollar fine
plus like another ten percent or something. It was going to be over five
hundred million dollars he had to come up with. He was successful at getting
that dropped, and they had gone around they said it's impossible for us to
meet this. We've got We've talked to thirty different insurance companies, bond insurance
companies for this, and we can't get this done. They dropped it.
They won on that issue. And then the story was was that this guy
who does subprime car loans and is now a Trump supporter, a billionaire in
his own right, but he had an insurance company and so Donald Trump had
the one hundred and seventy This is the story that we heard two weeks ago
after this stuff came out. He said, you know, Trump, I've
got one hundred and seventy five million, but he's going to give it to
this guy and then this guy is going to use that to put up the
bond. And I thought, why didn't Trump just do it? Well,
it turns out that there was something about saving some money on interest or something
like that, which would be really significant when you're talking about that amount of
money, and so he ran it through this other company. Now you have
and then I reported that as the New York officials looked at it, they
are so focused on getting Trump. It's very much like you know when you
have to go through and you got to collect the signatures to get on the
ballot and they say, well, we're not going to throw these out,
you know, and all that type of stuff. So they look at it
and they say, well, your paperwork's not complete, and I said,
well, it certainly sounds like an excuse, but it could be true.
If you look at Trump's lawyer, Lena Habba, I mean, she is
a piece of work that doesn't seem to know what is happening here. So
that well, maybe she did mess up the paperwork there. But a New
York court has rejected the paperwork, says that it wants to see more information
on its financial backing, and so the company filed new paperwork in April fourth.
She forgot to give them a financial statement. So this could be the
fault of Trump's lawyer, or it could be this is just rabid political person.
It'll be taken by Trump's supporters, of course, as political persecution,
regardless of what it truly is. Writing on X one, a one time
federal prosecutor wrote that this insurance company that belongs to the billionaire who does subprime
loans, it's called Knight Specialty no relation, might not be able to post
the bond for Trump and will be liable for the full amount because it had
given a guarantee to the court. See this is where it starts getting really
crooked. Looks like there's a real possibility that this Don Hankey owned Knight Specialty
Insurance. That Don Hanky is the name of the subprime auto loan billionaire.
So this Don Hanky owned Knight Specialty Insurance does not itself have liquidity and did
not get from Trump collateral sufficient to provide legally cognizable assurance that it can pay
one hundred and seventy five million dollars on demand and the event of a judgment
affirming appeal. Thus, New York Attorney General James looks to be soon greenlit
to execute on her four hundred and fifty million dollar judgment against Trump, as
if Trump had posted no bond I can. This is clearly political persecution,
and it may be mixed in with legal malpractice on the part of his lawyer.
But somebody is lying. Maybe both sides are lying about this stuff.
The Trumpian part of it, she said, is that even though or perhaps
because it may be part of a Trump scam, Night now two may be
on the hook for one hundred and seventy five million dollars as it won't automatically
get out from underneath its own preferred surety of profit security. So what they're
saying is that they may ignore this bond even though they put the money up,
and they may confiscate that money and Trump's property. That's why I'm saying,
Yeah, this looks like political persecution in terms of this. There may
be other issues that are there, but clearly that is the way this is
going to come across. So again, the bond was rejected by the court's
filing system shortly after it was posted due to missing paperwork, and part of
the missing paperwork was not having a current financial statement. How in the world
does that happen. We'll be right back. Sometimes your day needs a little
smoothing. Check out the Jazz channel at apsradio dot com and the APS Radio
app and leave the stress behind. The common maid they created common Core and
dumb down our children. They created common Past to track and control us,
their Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing, and the communist future.
They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of
us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what
we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their
most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything
about us, while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that
around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links
you'll find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank you
for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your
prayers. The Davidnightshow dot Com. A rockfan we have Thomas Falco. Thank
you for the tip, he says David. Yesterday, he spoke of insurance
companies surveying properties by drone. I have been with Nationwide Insurance since building my
home in two thousand and four. I received notice from them stating that I
need a new roof. I called my insurance agent, who explained that Nationwide
now uses drones for property inspections. I asked Carl to quote me a rate
with another carrier. He did, and I saved about ten percent. That's
amazing, isn't it? I mean, is they will stop at nothing,
just like the surveillance in the cars snitching on people. Oh well, you
know we're going to double your insurance. Why is that I haven't had any
tickets, I haven't had any accidents. Well, we have this stuff in
your car, you know, on Star, and it's measuring how fast you
break and how fast you accelerate and how fast you take turns and things like
So we don't like the way you drive, so we're we're going to go
up or we're going to cancel your insurance. That type of thing. It's
never enough for these people, is it. You know, the same thing
happens with these insurance companies that happens with the ultra rich billionaires. It's never
enough. They always want a little bit more. And that has always been
the case, going back to John d Rockefell. It's the case with all
these billionaires that are out there now. I don't see Elon Musk or Donald
Trump as a savior because they are a part of all of that. We
were just talking about the money aspect of this, why US public debt is
unsustainable and why it is destroying the middle class. And this is on zero
Hedge is by a Daniel lacoll. He said, recently saw a tweet from
someone he doesn't name them, talented, he said, financial analyst and investor.
He said, well, this whole debt is unsustainable narrative that's been around
for forty years plus. What's astonishing to me is how the people who push
this narrative never asked themselves why has it been sustainable for so long? Yeah,
you keep saying everything is going to crash, and yet look at this,
everything is still fine. And now we're running up the debt trillion dollars
every one hundred days. What's the problem with that? Yeah, that's no
problem. This is one of the reasons why I think a lot of these
people who know better, should know better, are buying into this modern monetary
theory. Oh, the deficit doesn't matter at all. Okay, then fine,
let's let's get rid of the income tax. Then well, why are
you doing the income tax now if you really don't believe that the public debt
matters, because the income tax doesn't come close close to paying it. It's
even it's not one hundred percent of why they take in. It's always it's
less than fifty percent, I believe, of what their total revenue mixes.
So why bother with that? If the debt doesn't matter, just let the
debt go a little bit faster. I mean, look, at how it's
exploded, So just stop taxing us. No, they're not going to do
that. And when you look at where this stuff all began, this multi
trillion dollar increase in the deficit every single year, that all began, of
course with Trump and his lockdowns, with the Cares Act, with the ppp
Act, and with the stimulus checks which are universal basic income training began with
all that. So this person says, well, actually, he said,
you look at the situation in Argentina. Look at the massive inflation that they're
having there because of the public debt and all the rest of that. He
said, And yet Argentina is still there, isn't it. But it is
a problem. What does it look like? He said. There's widespread idea
that fiscal imbalances of a world reserve currency issuer would end in an Argentina style
bankruptcy. However, the manifestation of unsustainability didn't even appear as drastic in Argentina
itself. Hey, Argentina is still there. But he says, excessive public
debt is unsustainable when it becomes a burden on productive growth and when it leads
the economy to constantly rising taxes and weaker productivity growth and weaker real wage growth.
In other words, we're all getting poorer, and we can tell this.
We can see it with the inflation, the loss and purchasing power that
is what is not being sustained. Yeah, America is still here and unfortunately
sows the federal government, but our purchasing power is not here, he says.
Many diabetic and obese people continue to eat too much unhealthy food, thinking
nothing has happened. So far, so far, so good. Like the
guy who falls off to the skyscraper. He gets to the twentieth floor,
So far, so good, not a problem yet, doesn't mean the eating
habits are sustainable, doesn't mean he isn't going to hit the ground. Those
who ignore the accumulation of public debt tend to do so under the idea that
nothing has happened yet. This is a reckless way of looking at the economy
as sort of, well, we haven't died yet, so let's accelerate mentality.
An ever weaker private sector, weak real wages, declining productivity growth,
the currencies, diminishing purchasing power. All these indicate the unsustainability of debt levels.
It becomes increasingly difficult for families and small businesses to make ends meat and
to pay for essential goods and services. And you know, you go back
in look at what does this look like in Argentina. Well, it looks
like people who started businesses having to close them because they can't afford to keep
it going. It looks like massive unemployment. It looks like a younger generation
that has absolutely no opportunities. It looks like despair. That's what it looks
like. And you know, Trump kicked this up to a whole new level,
and Biden has kept it there and increased it marginally himself. When the
fiscal position is unsustainable, the only way for the state to force the acceptance
of his debt is through coercion and through repression. Hence, folks, the
army of eighty seven thousand i RS agents, it's on his way. The
state basically conducts a process of slow default on the economy through rising taxes and
weakening the purchasing power of the currency, which leads to weaker growth and erosion
of the middle class. The captive hostages of the government. Fiat currency course
as a currency issu where the state never acknowledges its imbalances. It always blames
inflation and weak growth on the private sector, the exporters, other nations and
markets. And so when you look at the pandemic, when you look at
the lockdown, it has tremendous consequences that we're still feeling. Just like the
Trump created injections, they're still killing people. We're in the stage now where
what was surprising about it was how many people died right off the bat,
more than all the previous records combined. And it rapidly got to that level,
and then they basically stopped letting people talk about it without getting purged.
And yet, just like the increase in people of all ages getting cancer and
the rapidity with which the cancer progresses and all the rest of this stuff,
or the continuing sudden deaths from my carditis and para carditis and other things like
that, the blood clots and all of this, it's continuing and the same
thing is happening with it financially as well. But I want to go back
to the mandates, and this is one of the things that really should stick
in people's craw And as soon as you start talking about twenty twenty, the
conservativesill immediately jump to Biden's mandates and the only ones that he really mandated,
if you want to use the logic of the Trump apologists, the only ones
that he really mandated were the military. The rest of them be incentivized.
He said, well, you do business with the government, and if you
want to continue to do business with the government, you will do what we
tell you. Otherwise you're free to go. So if you're a hospital and
you've gotten used to this gravy train that Trump puts you on in twenty twenty,
we're going to take you off that gravy train, and we're going to
kill all your Medicare money as well, unless you vaccinate all your medical personnel.
But when it came to the military, he actually issued that order.
But as Jason Barker pointed out, Jason Barker was fighting this when he was
in the military, and he knew that Trump had already put in the order.
And I've shown you the order, the executive order that Trump is going
to do exactly the same thing at exactly the same time that Biden did it.
They were both going to mandate it as soon as it was rubber stamped
by the FDA, skipping all of their established procedures to validate a vaccine just
going to at some point in times say all right, we've waited long enough,
we're just going to say it's good. And that's what they did.
And I said in December of twenty twenty, I said that will happen in
September of twenty twenty one. And it did. And I knew that because
that was going to be when everybody's going to go back to school. I
knew that would be a part of the mix. And so all of this
stuff was the there. Now I want you to see this. This is
a military guy who is This is a video that is now just resurfaced and
the military goes in. There's a guy who is in jail. His name
is Lance Castle. He was dubbed to be an insider, a threat.
He was given sixty days pre trial confinement that caused him to miss the birth
of his firstborn child, and then sent to a court martial to stand trial
on five charges. Now they're getting ready to go into his cell here and
look at this. They've got like five or six different guys all lined up
ready to go in to attack him. Now, are you choosing to be
non compliant? Here? They go five guys six if you got the guy,
they opened up the doory. Here comes at number six. They pin
him to the ground. Yeah, this is the kind of treatment he got.
He was dubbed an insider threat, given sixty days in court. And
this is coming from Mark Charles Boshaw, a medical professional who was the first
man convicted in a special court martial in May of twenty twenty two for violating
orders to comply with COVID nineteen mitigation measures. Bashaw is a father of three.
He was also found guilty of failing to wear a mask indoors. He
continues to expose a truth about the military COVID mandates that ruined thousands of people's
lives, injured hundreds of soldiers and sailors and marines. And I tell you,
when you look at this, it's just infuriating to see the treatment the
people who had legitimate concerns about having this constitutional concerns, religious liberty concerns,
whatever the concerns are, that they would be forced to have this vaccine.
You know, this is this is an article that was on Gateway Pundit.
Gateway Pundit will tell you all about this trial and all the rest of the
stuff, because this is where they want to hang out. So you don't
look at Trump's involvement in this. And yet Trump had already done the executive
order for the military to do precisely this. He was prepared to do it
and would have done it. There are a couple of clowns. It is
professional wrestling to try to decide between the two of them. You need to
stop looking to the presidency to solve your problems. You need to start looking
at other ways to protect yourself and your family, because neither Trump or Biden
are going to do it. You know, as Bannon was saying talking to
the Chinese people about how they were going to yeah, we got this vote
by mail thing, and we're going to claim that we want one way or
the other. And when Trump gets back in, Trump is going to be
off the chain, said Bannon. He is going to not have to care
about what anybody thinks. He's not going to be up for another election.
He will be off the chain. That's my concern that both Trump and Biden,
both of them, either of them will be off the chain. The
second term of a president is always the worst. They're off the chain,
and that's what we're going to win. That's what we're gonna get regardless of
which one of these clowns wins. So we're gonna take a quick break.
By the way, when he finally did get his procedure there, Lance Castle
was found not guilty of all five charges that they brought against him and imprisoned
him for two months. We're going to be right back. Stay with us.
Tell Alexa to add the APS radio skill and have access to the best
channels anywhere from country to blues, classic hits to news. APS Radio curates
incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy. Get details at APS radio dot com.
New World Order in Music one, two, three, four five,
also unvaccinated us, still in life, A little bit of Fiza in my
a little bit of biotech. It does not how a little Johnson Johnson do
sixty A little as to Sandy cuss so you don't get sick. It's used
on number five and you can walk five hand steps, but not as sing
that have more hontis and a few agniphates and all vot copsvent at your door.
Yeah, let's talk a little bit about the what is happening in terms
of trumps changing position on abortion. You know, I actually he got it
right at this point in time. But who knows what is going to be
next week. You know, these people, just just like RFK JR.
On January six, people his form he's against them. Well, let's try
to negotiate something in the middle, just like r. Who knows what Trump
is going to do? Bablin B. Trump says his position on abortion is
whichever one will get him elected. Trump definitely maneuvered himself into a position to
simultaneously woo voters who will never support him and to alienate portions of his most
loyal base. My stance can't be any clearer, he said. I am
in complete and total agreement with each voter, whatever their individual view may be.
If you believe abortion is murdered, so do I. If you think
there are cases in which it is acceptable, so do I. If you
think there's nothing wrong with it, neither do I. As everyone can see,
I feel very strongly about this issue. Strong convictions, the strongest,
so strong, I'm becoming all things to all people, so that by all
means I may get elected. Maga and by publishing times as bablin B all
disappointed, Trump supporters had announced that they would all still vote for Trump,
Yes, he will. He will do this, and in this particular case,
he stumbled into the right position momentarily. But who knows what it'll be
next week. This may or may not last through the election. And then
if he gets elected, what will his position be. Who knows. Trump
says abortion should be decided by the states. That's absolutely right, and that's
a new position for him. He says, by the will of the people.
Now, actually it's because the Constitution says so. And the Supreme Court
finally acknowledged that that the Supreme Court has no authority to determine when life begins.
That is not something that is a purview of the federal government. That
belongs at the states. Trump said, my view, this is him actually
talking. Now, this is not the Babel and b but it might as
well be. My view is the states will determine by legislation or vote or
perhaps both, and whatever they decide must be the law of the land.
We keep you every time we talk about abortion. We got to use that
catchphrase, don't we law the land? Give me a break in this case,
the law of the state, he said. Many states will be different,
many will have a different number of weeks or some will have more conservative
than others, and that's what they will be. At the end of the
day. This is all about the will of the people. It's all about
me getting elected at the end of the day. In other words, you
must follow your heart. The heart is desperately wicked. Who can know it?
This is Disney theology. Follow your heart. Follow your heart straight to
hell, because that's where it's going to lead you. It is desperately it's
deceitful. You can't know what your own heart is doing. Anyway. Last
week, Trump told reporters in the Michigan campaign stopped that he would make a
statement in the coming week after he was asked about Florida's controversial six week abortion
band. You know, too harsh, too harsh, too sanctimonious. Right,
That's what he's always been saying. But as Reason pointed out, he's
embracing a federalist approach to abortion. Now, actually it's a constitutional approach because
it's a Tenth Amendment approach. It's not federalism. It's not a new policy.
It's what's in the Constitution. In the Tenth Amendment, it says the
powers that have been expressly delegated to the federal government are theirs. But if
it hasn't been expressly delegated to the federal government, those powers are retained by
the states and by the people. There is nothing that gives anyone in the
federal government, not the executive branch, not the legislative branch, not the
judicial branch, the authority to make this kind of decision, just as they
don't have the authority to make a decision about what the definition of marriages,
or what the definition of a woman is, or anything else that is not
the purview of the federal government. And so Reason magazine that talks about you
know, certainly there's a political basis for doing this. By ruling out the
federal abortion restrictions, Trump has provoked criticism from pro life activists who favor a
national band, But those activists will never support Biden anyway. That's why Trump
is able to do this, and that's why the babylin b said, but
the people are still going to vote for him. They'll never support Biden,
who not only views the twenty twenty two reversal of Roe v. Waight as
a grave injustice, but he favors legislation that would re establish a federal right
to abortion during a Meet the presid interview last September, Trump, who once
described himself as pro choice. That's right. This guy was a New York
Democrat. He was pro abortion, pro gunk control, pro Jeffrey Epstein and
all the rest of this stuff, pro trainees and beauty contests. He was
a Hillary Clinton Democrat until he decided that he could snooker the magakrowt and he
did. You know, he got a bunch of people who never paid attention
to politics before, but they watched The Apprentice and they wanted him for president.
Lindsey Graham Johnson and Lindsey Graham has led a lot of this pack to
say that we want to put this back to the federal level again. Why
well, because they want that wedge issue. They've always wanted that wedge issue.
They never wanted to end abortion, they wanted to keep it, and
so he wants it back as a federal issue, and to put it at
fifteen weeks, which is worse than France, for example, Where does he
come up with that magic number. Why does Lindsey Graham get to decide this.
Lindsey Graham doesn't even play the game. So it's just he says it's
a fourteenth Amendment. No, it's not. This is a guy who he
doesn't know or care anything about the Constitution. He's never met a war that
he doesn't want. He's fine with killing babies too, and kill people at
any age with his wars. Many of Graham's fellow Republicans were dismayed by his
attempt to renationalize the abortion issue. Senator Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia said,
I don't think there's an appetite for a national platform here. I'm not
sure what Graham is thinking, but I don't think there will be a rally
around that concept. Look, the reality is that even for the people who
are pro life, they need to understand the practical aspects of this. As
I've pointed out my opinion, what will happen is if you've got Republicans who
come in and set a limit and say it's going to be fifteen weeks.
Now, we got a lot of states where it's much lower than that,
So that's going to actually kill more people. The people out there who say,
well, we're pro life, we want to stop it and save as
many lives as we want, will then keep it low in the states that
are going to fight abortion, because if you raise it, then what is
going to happen is you're going to have more people killed in these states where
they are currently stopping it. And then when the Democrats get in, they'll
remove the restrictions altogether, and you'll be able to kill babies all the way
up to and beyond birth. And the Republicans will go along with it.
If the Publicans come in with a fifteen week limit or a twelve week limit,
or a twenty five week limit, or whatever arbitrary number they decide,
however they want to split the baby, that's what they're doing. A lot
of the Democrat states won't go along with it. They'll say, no,
we're going to do all thirty six weeks, so they'll ignore it, they'll
nullify it, and of course there is no federal authority to make that happen,
so they will be able to nullify, just like they nullify the unconstitutional
prohibition about marijuana and other drugs. And then yet when they get in and
they say, well, we're not going to cap it at fifteen weeks,
we're going to take it all thirty six weeks, all the Republican states will
go along with that. You know that's going to happen. They will refuse
to comply with a reduction, and then the Republicans will comply once it is
taken up to the top level. Now, Mike Pence, mister constitution himself.
Remember, I'm not going to weigh in on this. And he was
right about that about January sixth. There's no I have no authority on the
Constitution to get involved in this January the sixth dispute. He was right.
But now he's coming in and saying, well, we've got to This is
a slap in the face for Trump to say that he's going to leave this
at the States. How is that a slap in the face. Pence is
nothing but a demagogue who is wrong on most issues, including war, including
abortion, pretty much every other issue as well. And beyond this, what
Pence represents and a lot of these people represent, is the fact that Conservatives
have now joined the Democrats to believe that every problem should be solved by government,
and by government at the federal level. Everything needs to be a federal
case. And that's what he really represents, and that is what is so
dangerous, the fact that now everybody wants all power in Washington, and they
don't want to have you know, it's massive power in Washington. As a
matter of fact, it was also a Reason article talking about how the presidency
became culture warrior in chief. The modern presidency is a divider. It can't
be anything else. It's become far too powerful. We put all power in
one basket, so everybody fights over that basket. And this is just an
other example. Let's put the abortion pro life issue. Let's put that in
that basket. Biden said, we've got to end this on civil war.
Unity is a path forward. Well, again we hear that kind of rhetoric
from all of them, as they point out, we will have a civil
war as long as we keep concentrating all power into the presidency. That's the
real issue. And that's why when you look at this, if you feel
really strongly about this, you want to fight me about who's going to be
president. Well, the problem is that you think too much, too highly
of the federal government. The problem is that you don't want to have any
control over your life at the local level. You'd rather entertain this fantasy that
some billionaire savior is going to save you from the boogeyman in Washington when they're
all the boogeymen. So we're not going to have a glide path to national
unity. As I was talking about the fund for example, when you look
at how much money is going in, that's a real metric of corruption.
One hundred million dollars for George Bush and he's accused of buying the election by
Gore, who had seventy million dollars in two thousand and yet where are we
now, you know, when when Biden ran, not Biden, Obama ran,
he got over seven hundred million, He got more than ten times what
Gore had gone. It's a measure of corruption because as why is that money?
Why are people spending that kind of money, Because they're expecting something back
from that. If they're spending a billion dollars and the presidency, they're expecting
one hundred billion back in special favors. And that's not all coming from one
person, but you understand it's going to be one hundred billionaire, it's going
to be trillions of dollars coming back. Because politicians are such a good return
on invest they always know that, they always know they can buy a politicians
favors and subsidies with a small amount of money. And so when we look
at the billions of dollars that are now flowing into politics with each and every
election, that's why we have these deficits of trillions of dollars, because people
know they can get anything given to them with this fiat currency, just print
the money out of thin air. So you got a New Jersey Senate candidate,
a greenee Green Party. She'd deleted a post after she blamed the climate
crisis for the earthquake around New York. Everything, everything they had as always
happens, these sheer cliffs that they have in California where they have houses that
are sliding off, and they have part of the Big sur Highway collapsed.
Yet again, this has happens on a regular basis, and they have to
close the highway. It's right up to the edge of the sheer clift and
it's constantly eroding. They all came out, so, oh, it's climate
change. She says this about an earthquake. She's running for state Senate in
New Jersey. By the way, that was one of the things that always
bothered me that the Libertarian Party never focused on state offices. They were always
focused again on the presidency to retain ballid access. It was all about ballid
access and retention of balid access. So it'd always be about the presidency or
the governorship, but they wouldn't get people in at the grassroots level. It's
a fatal mistake. And this is why it is a fatal mistake for us
to focus all of our thoughts and activities on this presidential race. This a
mistake for us to focus everything on politics in general. I mean, we
need to be making preparations for individual lives, prepping and other things like that.
But if we're going to get into politics, the first thing you do
is at the local level. Soros knows that Elon Musk knows that we ought
to listen to them. They really know what they're doing. She said,
I experienced my first earthquake in New Jersey. We never get earthquakes, so
climate crisis is real. She said. People came back and said she skipped
science class. Another person said, she's probably thinks that Guam is going to
flip over to you. Remember that Hank Johnson back in twenty ten, the
congressman who said after they sent eight thousand marines to Guam, because you're gonna
put so many marines on there. You're going to flip the island over.
Yeah, we really do have people that's stupid. In Congress, they make
sure of that. So it's not that far off of what these alarmists are
saying today when you look at this. So we're talking about islands. Again
mentioned at the beginning of the program. Hawaii has a lawsuit against all the
oil companies. They're using the same strategy that Democrats have been trying to use
and have used against gun manufacturers to say that if somebody's killed with your gun,
we need to sue you out of existence. It's like, well,
they use that just like somebody running people down deliberately with a car abuse people.
You don't need to ban forward SUVs because somebody is to kill people in
a parade, and so that type of logic they still use that against even
though there's specific prohibitions against using that for against gun manufacturers, the Democrats still
do it. And in Hawaii they have a lawsuit which has been green lit
by the Hawaiian Supreme Court to go ahead and proceed, and of course if
it does proceed, it'll probably eventually go to the Supreme Court because you know,
the people in Hawaii are democrat enough that they're going to approve this.
They're suing the oil companies. They want to put the oil companies out of
business, and so Hawaii wants to get a massive judgment, shake them down,
steal their money, put them out of business. And so you now
have even the people in the military are talking about how dangerous this is.
But before we get to the Hawaiian thing, these climate alarmists have been telling
us that a lot of these islands are going to just disappear anyway. Amount
of land that is equivalent to the size of the Isle of Wight has now
been added to the shorelines of thirteen thousand islands around the world in just the
last twenty years. We had people like Algore telling us they're all going to
disappear. Three hundred and sixty nine square kilometer increase recently discovered by a group
of Chinese scientists analyzing both surface and satellite records. Overall, land was lost
during the nineteen nineties, but the scientists found that the study period of three
decades to twenty twenty, there was a net increase of one hundred and fifty
seven square kilometers. Study observed considerable nature variation in terms of both erosion and
other aspects of it. But scientists said their data suggested that sea level rise
has not been a widespread cause of erosion for island shorelines. Well we knew
that, didn't we And yet Hawaii maybe they're thinking that they're going to go
under water. They're probably going to water financially since they're run by Democrats,
but they want energy companies to pay climate damages to them. I wonder what
damages those would be. And you have a former general and a former admiral,
people who used to be one of them, well both of them actually
used to be at one point in time, chair of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff said in a legal brief. They said that oil and gas products are
critical to the national security, economy, stability, and military preparedness. Of
course they are retired. The current idiots there at the Pentagon are telling us
that our number one security issue is climate change. That's the number one thing
for the military to address. So I guess you know, they're not worried
about the massive use of fuel by rockets and planes. They're not worried about
the bombs that are dropped. They're not even worried about thermonuclear war, not
that kind of climate change. They're not worried at all about that. No,
they're worried about your suv. Yeah, if anybody can change the climate,
it's these guys with their thousands of nuclear warheads. So this is something
that looks like it's going to take it to the Supreme Court. And maybe
these briefs and these former chairmen of the Joint Cheese Staff, maybe that'll help
to bring some sanity of this process, because what happens to our lives clearly
doesn't matter to these people. The only thing that matters to them is what
they define as national security. They want to have that oil to fly their
planes and run their ships and all the rest of this stuff, and they
don't want that cut off. So you know, they probably still won't do
anything to keep them from cutting off off our cars. They'll just make sure
they get what they need for their stuff. Because the EPA emissions standard,
as a Christian lord says, defy reality. Well that's putting it mildly,
isn't it. Let's just call it pure Bolshevik. Let's not pretend. And
they go through this article. This is one of the things that really annoys
me about people who oppose the EPADE. They don't oppose the EPA. They
don't oppose these draconian statues except to say, well, there's other things that
are generating the imaginary climate change. No, you need to say that there's
absolutely no evidence of any of this, because there is no evidence for any
of it. As a matter of fact. A new paper that's been put
out by a twenty twenty two Nobel Physics laureate doctor John Klausser, said,
I assert there is no connection whatsoever between climate change and CO two. It's
all a crock of crap, in my opinion. Good finally say it,
say it out loud. Don't play this game. Well, you know there's
other things that can emit more CO two. And how many tons of carbon
does this person generate and that person generate? And are they being hypocritical about
this because we all know how important your carbon usage is. Don't play that
game. That's even worse than calling yourself a red state. Another one of
my pet peeves, don't play their games. They come up with these fantasies
and then you try to operate within that. That's a loss. He said.
There is no discernible connection. It's non discernible. Now I've talked about
this. The total amount of CO two zero point zero four percent of the
atmosphere, and then a small amount of that is done by humans, a
very small percent. Another small percentage of so called human production of CO two
as automobiles and things like that, that turns out to two point five ten
thousands of a. In other words, it's non discernible. It has absolutely
no effect. And I'm glad that there's somebody who is a scientist who isn't
going to play those games. The conservative so called conservative reporters who work for
the Epic Times and other places, they need to stop playing those games.
We got some comments on Rumble in Max says Trump set at the Clintons.
Uh set the Clintons in the front row of his wedding to show them off.
That's right, Yeah, he paid them to be there. He said
he's impressed with power, money. He hates the common folk. I really
do agree. On Rumble Bow the Kid part two, Greta Thunberg needs to
set sail again to save the planet. Please got a area. And also
on Rumble Rebel Son one says the climate changed four times last year. Yeah,
it's the hippie dippy weather man explaining that to us. You know,
he used to be got really cold and it got really nice, and then
it got really really hot and it got really nice again. And now it
looks like he's going to repeat all this stuff all over again. Uh.
There was in London. This one was actually caught on video. A another
one of these e bikes exploded. And here's the video that was caught of
this e bike bursting into flames and a London train station. It had been
bought only four months before in an online marketplace. There you go, look
at that. People saw it start to smoke and they for the hilse.
Nobody was hurt. Fortunately, it blew up in a place where there's a
brick wall, concrete floor that steal train next to it, and it's still
going there. Yeah, it's really nice. According to London Firebrigade, the
e bike and the eastcooter fires are the fastest growing fire trend in London.
Yeah yeah, Well it's footage shows the stationary bike starting to smoke and then
burst into flames, scattering pieces all over the place. Comes after a series
of these and of course in New York City, they've had a lot of
these fires. A New York Fire Department says e bikes are responsible for two
hundred and sixty seven fires in the city and twenty twenty three, killing eighteen
people, causing one hundred and fifty injuries. Fatality has increased two hundred percent
threefold compared to the previous year. Yeah, that's what it looks like right
there. Well, I want to remind everybody if you will please like the
stream that helps us with visibility, which we really do need, and just
want to remind people again we talked to before about gold and the issues that
are there. Go to David Knight Dot Gold. That'll take you to Tony
Arduban. You can put in orders with Tony for any amount of gold,
small or large. He can get that reserved for you and if you want
to set up he's got a buyer's group that is set up so you can
accumulate it on a regular basis and get a group by discount with that as
well. That is wolf Pack, and so he's got all that set up
down even to a kid's version of Woolpack. Go to David Knight Die Gold.
That'll take you to Tony Arbin's wise wolf goal. Let him know that
you're coming from US. And I just got one more article here to talk
about before we take a break. Do we have Joel scouts And okay,
we're still getting a Joel here. No roads for you. A major US
city is going to slap drivers with a massive toll in order to cut traffic.
Now, this is the congestion tolling that is coming into New York City.
First time it's coming in the United States. They've been using this in
London and other places in Europe to charge you every time you come into the
city. And you know, toll roads are a real pet peeve for me.
Quite frankly, I really hated him. In Texas. We had him
introduced to North Carolina by Tom Tillis. Going back to two thousand and eight,
everybody voted for you know, not everybody, but you know Barack Obama
one in North Carolina. And yet two years later there was enough votary Moorse
that they put Republicans in everywhere at the top of the state government all the
way down to the State House. And so they had everything changed except for
Congress because that is all dependent on the Jerry Mandarin. And once they had
control of the State House, that's when Tom Tillis just came out of nowhere,
you know, kind of like Speaker Johnson coming out of nowhere. It's
like, who's this guy. I had a really good guy, Skip Stam,
who I knew, who had been the leader of the minority, and
they just skipped right over Skip and they put in Tom Tillis, and he
started pushing for toll roads. And they've got more and more toll roads in
North Carolina and then in Texas they just multiply. And I've seen this happen
in the northeast where Caaren is from. Once you start putting in these toll
roads, they start multiplying like a cancer, and they start getting more and
more malignant in terms of the amount of money that they charge. And that's
what's happening in New York City. And of course here in Tennessee, we've
got a Governor Bill Lee who has decided that he wants to put the first
toll roads in Tennessee. Tennessee one of fourteen states that doesn't have any toll
roads. And so it is a real sticking point to see this type of
thing. And we know what this is about. One person said this is
going to kill Broadway and said, if you're going to charge me another fifteen
dollars to come in and see a play, it's already really expensive and difficult
for people to get into the city, and the city is dying because of
all the lockdown stuff. So now what they're going to do is they're going
to charge people another fifteen dollars to come in to the area and get this.
If you are using a taxi, it'll be another dollar twenty five added
on. If you're using an uber, they'll double that. It'll be two
dollars and fifty cents. And yet with all this happening in New York,
they love government and they love taxes, don't they. It's got sixty percent
approval. Now, those polls could be rigged, but because there already are
six lawsuits that have been filed to stop this. So we're going to stop
at this point, and we're going to take a quick break and we're going
to come back with Joel Scousen. Haven't had Joel on for a while,
just talking about the other It's been a while since Joel's been on. I
really wanted to talk to him get his take on what is happening with all
the many conflicts around the world. That is certainly his area of expertise,
but there's other things that he is expert on as well, in terms of
getting a secure home, preparing your home for worst case scenario. So we're
going to talk to Joel about all that stuff. We're going to take a
quick break and we will be right back. APS Radio delivers multiple channels of
music right to your mobile device. Get the APS Radio app today and listen
wherever you go. Liberty it's your move. And now the David Knight Show.
All right, welcome back and joining us now is Joel Skousen. He
has World Affairs Brief dot com and that is an ongoing letter by subscription that
keeps you abreast as to what's going on with world affairs. He also has
Joel Scousen dot com. You can find his excellent books. And we'll talk
a little bit about these coming up. A strategic relocation where do you want
to Where are the safest places in the country in case we have a nuclear
war, many other issues that could happened, civil war, anything like that.
And how do you fortify your house to protect yourself against home invasions or
against a war, that type of thing. So we'll talk about those books
coming up. I think he has those at Joel Scousen dot com. Is
that what our Joel at Joel see that's correct at Joel scoutsing dot com.
Okay. And even though you can get them on Amazon, I prefer people
buy from me. Oh, you don't want to beat the beast, So
that's right, absolutely, absolutely, And I want to talk a little bit
about the Constitution Party. You got some news about the Constitution Party. Tell
us about that. Well, the Constitution by the national chairman first of all,
asked me to be the keynote speaker at their convention in Salt Lake City
this year in April twenty sixth and twenty seven. And then about a week
later he gave me call and said, you know, we're having trouble finding
anybody credible running for president with the Constitution Party. We'd like you to run,
oh excellently. You know. I was kind of shocked because I am
pessimistic about being able to earn things around in this country because of the moral
decline and the control over the media and how much how many millions it takes
to get on the ballot. But I felt very strongly that because they're going
to steal the election from Donald Trump again this year, that it's a good
time to wake Republicans up to the fact that their party is controlled at the
top, just like the Democrats are controlled all throughout the party, and that
even though we you know, elect conservatives, they become more and more mainstream.
And you have people like Mike Johnson who was supposed to be a real
tough conservative and he's capitulated just like McCarthy in terms of these these spending bills.
And I think it's time for the Republicans to wake up that they're never
going to get into results. And my specialty, of course, is I'm
probably the foremost expert in the nation on conspiracy, both specifics of what's gone
on and the big picture, which very few conservatives have. Even those that
understand the JFK conspiracy or the nine to eleven attack by the deep state,
they still don't understand the major globalist conspiracy to use war to get us into
a military as the global government, and how they have recently began, rather
than cover for Russia and China, they started to attack and go after Russia
which they always do before an actual war. But conservatives unfortunately have bought into
the fact Alex Jones in particular, that he's in solidarity with Russia. He
thinks that because all through the war on Terror, the globalist deep state,
you know, created phony enemies or AQ in Afghanistan, nothing to do with
nine eleven who went after them, and the Libertiis and conservatives basically think,
well, anybody the globalists must be against must be a good guy. And
that's a very very crucial air. They don't understand that they've been building Russian
China as enemies. But before this war comes, they've got to reverse positions
and start to attack them so that they're on the right side when the actual
war strikes. And they're not obviously guilty, that's right. Yeah, the
ruthless murderer and assassin. And he doesn't support any civil liberties or the rule
of law. And it's amazing he's not a Christian. He's not a Christian.
He's not anti woke. He is in terms of saving the Russians from
the woke stuff, but he's still trying to infiltrate Hollywood and all the other
things with woke ideas and corrupt Western society. Yeah, let's vote about the
process, because again, you know, I'm hoping that there's going to be
somebody on the ballot here in Tennessee that I can vote for, because I'm
not voting for these guys for his second term. And there's a guy in
Texas who changed his name to literally anybody else, and I don't think it's
just so he could get on the Texas ballot as a presidency because people were
so fed up with this. But again, he's not going to be able
to even get on the ballot. It's literally anybody body else. It's so
difficult to get on the ballot. I worked for many years with the Libertarian
Party in North Carolina trying to get on the ballot, and I know how
difficult that is. The Libertarian Party just basically that's all their focus is just
getting on the ballot. They don't really care about principles or anything on that
anymore. That just to get on the ballot, and you know, and
have this ballot slot that they offer people. I don't know if that's going
to happen with RFK Junior, but talk to us about the ballot status of
the Constitution Party, because when all this stuff started happening in twenty twenty,
I said, well, folks, look Trump instituted this vote by mail stuff,
and he and many other people were talking, and I was talking about
how it's going to be a new level of corruption. Steve Bannon even said,
well, here's how this is going to work. You know, we're
going to use this to our advantage and we're going to say we want whether
we want or not, that type of thing. But it's you know,
they added that new wrinkle of corruption that was there. But I told everybody,
I said, okay, so so before we get all been out of
shape about the voting machines and their problem, or about the mail ballots,
and that's a problem. All these things are real problems, and we've had
elections that have been crooked and sold in all my life. But I said,
it all begins with ballot access, and then the next step is debate
access. So what is the situation right now with the Constitution Party with ballot
access. Well, the Constitution Party does have permanent ballot access in about twelve
states because they have had significant successes. And that's the gold standard. If
you can get a big enough showing in when you put a candidate, then
you don't have to go get signatures again the next year. And that's what
the Libertarians have been trying to do to get permanent ballot access. But the
two parties keep making it difficult to keep changing the rules in terms of ballot
certification, and they are very stingy about certifying any signatures, you know,
unlike voting ballots, where the Democrats want to accept any ballot at all,
whether or not it's valid or not. So the two major parties when they're
trying to let a third party in, so it is very difficult. Now
they've just now qualified in North Carolina and they're probably going to get access in
Texas and some others, So I suspect upwards of about twenty states we'll be
on there. Now. That's not even half of what you need to win.
But you see, frankly, from my geopolitical analysis, you know,
we're coming up against the World War here toward the end of this decade,
and so we're really running out of time to change the country by electoral means.
And as one person in North Carolina said to me in my interview last
night with the party, he said, well, if they're going to steal
the election for Donald Trump. As you say, why won't they steal it
from you? And I said, well, they would obviously, because you
know, Donald Trump is clueless about conspiracy. That's why he can't tell who's
deep state and who is in deep state. But I can. And they
would be very, very worried to have a conspiracy factual expert as well as
theorists on the ballot. But I said, that's really what we need to
send a message to the deep state, is that if you vote for Donald
Trump, it's a wasted vote because they're going to steal the election. But
if you vote for Joel scous And, you're going to send a big warning
flag to the deep state. Americans are starting to wake up to conspiracy.
They're starting to wake up the fact that there are facts in conspiracy as well
as theory. And the reason we still have theory is because they hide most
of the things in these illegal actions and assassinations and false flag operations under the
cover of national security. So we're never going to find out completely. But
we know enough about the facts to prove the existence of these major conspiracies.
And I basically I'm going to use this platform to expand my voice. As
you know, my World Afairs Brief is under a paywall. It's modest,
only forty eight dollars a year, but still people are used to getting things
free on the Internet and reluctant to pay anything. So I'm going to be
out public speaking and getting on social media's and I'm going to really tell the
truth. I'm going to have a series of short videos five and six minute
videos on each issue that are going to get spread around social media and we're
going to see what kind of impact it's going to make. Excellent, Well,
we'll do what we can to spread that information around as well. So
what we're talking about the different conspiracies they let's talk about the one that everybody
talks about, the JFK assassination and what Trump's comments were on this and about
the JFK assassination files. Give us your take on that. Well, you
know, when when Judge Napolotano asked Trump or confronted him about the fact that
you know, he promised to release the JFK files that they squirreled away for
fifty years and after the fifty years passed, they wouldn't let him out,
And he said well, the Intelligence Committee, you know, came to me
and told me what's really in the files? And if you knew what they
knew, you wouldn't release it either. Well, I know, what is
it? So judgment Napoletana said, well, what's in the files? He
said, Well, sometime we can talk in private, I may tell you
and things. But yeah, you know, I can tell you that Trump
doesn't have a clue about being able to decipher what he's being lied to by
the intelligence community. Now we don't know exactly whether or not they're telling him
the truth that, yeah, the government killed Kennedy, so we couldn't reveal
that, and he bought that if he did buy that when they told him
the truth, and he's guilty of basically covering up for the deep state out
of fear, probably not because he's you know, a deep stated but out
of fear of what they might do to him or anybody knowing how powerful they
are. But I don't suspect that they've really told the truth. They probably
told some half truth to them that was sufficient enough to get him to back
down from doing that. I'll tell you a couple of things that I would
do as president. I would release them MLK Martin Luther King files, and
I know what's in those because Deputy Director Gray told me after Martin Luther King
died and Hoover died, I said, what's in those files? He said,
well, Joe, there's fifteen file cabinets that the FBI has. Thirteen
of those are pornographic videotapes and surveillance and wiretaps that we have of his relationships
with prostitutes, and two file cabinets are full of his relationship with the Communist
Party. Wow. Wow. So you see, Martin Luther King has a
very very dark history in there, and that's why those files are never going
to be released. And of course, in the JFK assassination, you know,
the CIA hired a couple of mafia hitmen to one demand the grassy and
the other to take over the firing position in book depository. We know that
Osweald didn't shoot the weapon because he was down having a coke come in Pane
four when the shooting started. He was the patsy, of course, that
was set up. Interesting enough, Robert F. Kennedy Junior is pretty savvy
about the government's role in the assassination of his uncle and his father, especially
his father, because you know, there were Sierra and Sirhan was using his
mind controlled using a revolver that had six twenty two shells in it. There
are nine bullets, all thirty eight caliber, found in the woodwork of the
kitchen. So and he was shot twice in the back, which killed him
by one of the bodyguards that was standing behind him. RFK has said that
publicly, and he's right. He's actually says the autopsy physician, you know,
pulled out the bullets from the back and said this is what killed him.
One in the spine of rf case. And Saran was in his front
of course. So these are conspiracy facts, David, These are not theories.
And you know, we're we're dealing with a criminal government, and Americans
have to wake up to the fact that all of these issues that we argue
about on party platforms, about whether it's abortion or whether it's about judicial reform
or criminal reform, none of that means anything as long as you've got a
deep state that controls most of the judges in about three fourths of Congress through
blackmail and other things. Yeah, it's just a charade we're living through.
Unless we can get past this. So you've got to have someone who really
knows conspiracy in the White House to be able to tell, really bos what
the real deep state is. I absolutely agree with you. I had I
had interviewed in the past doctor Pepper. Unfortunate name, because when you start
talking about things that people are reluctant to believe you say. But I interviewed
doctor Pepper, who investigated the Martin Luther King assassination as well as the RFK
RFK Senior assassination, and kind of had, you know, have a retrial
of it, present the evidence to a jury and everything. So the stuff
that you were just talking about there that RFK Junior has affirmed is absolutely true.
There he had an interesting statement about Martin Luther King Junior. He said,
I agree with my dad's surveillance of Martin Luther King Junior. Do you
have any more information about why he said he agreed with it? Is it
because of the two files there that were Communist involvement, well, the fifteen
and of course they were pulling up files about his his prostitution, you know,
talk about a minister of the Gospel, Yeah, being almost every night
with prostitutes and his wife knew about this of course. In fact, the
very hotel that he came out and was shot out of the morning was an
orgy going on between several prostitutes with him self and his staff, and that's
part of what RFK had surveillance on. And you know why did they kill
JFK For two reasons. One he was going to shut down CIA covert operations.
But the other thing was that they wanted to martyr him because all of
his socialist programs were stalled in Congress. None of them were progressing, and
as soon as they made him a martyr, they all passed under Lynnon Johnson's
Great Society legislation. Same thing with Martin Luther King. He was bound to
be exposed not only for his Communist connections, but mostly for his gross immorality.
I mean even at the Nobel Prize ceremony, he was with prostitutes all
night. So they figured, you know, we can really boost the civil
rights movement, take aways people's right to discriminate and it is a fundamental right
to choose who you will associate on your own property, and take that away
by martyring Martin as the King. And he's much more useful as a dead
man than he was. Yes, yes, I agree, yeah, yeah.
When you talk about the civil rights movement and things like that, in
terms of the laws that they put in, it really is necessary. You
always try to do an external change on people's behavior, especially by adding a
law or something like that. And I've said for the longest time because I
lived through that. I was young when that happened. But the real social
change that I saw growing up in the South was really something that came through
and it was something that Hollywood was pushing hard. And so you know,
that's one time I saw a positive thing coming from Hollywood, because you know,
they were exposing racism for what it was. That if you change people's
hearts and minds with something like, you know, to kill a mockingbird or
something like that, if that resonates with people, that's what's necessary. You
come in and tell people you've got to do this, and you've got to
do that. It pushed back. It actually makes things worse. I saw
both aspects of that. I saw that mandated, you know, do this,
not this type of thing. I saw that making it actually worse.
And then I saw people actually having their hearts and minds changed by narratives and
other things like that, and of course that's what Hollywood is expert at.
They usually use it for evil purposes. When you talk about conspiracies, I
hope you get into. You know, the thing that I have my perspective
on all this stuff from nine to eleven to the COVID pandemic lockdowns is that
the lockdowns of twenty twenty was just the other shooter drop from nine to eleven,
because two months before nine to eleven, they had the first germ game,
Dark Winter, and then one week later they had the falsified attack of
the anthrax thing. Two months after that they put out the model legislation that
all the states used as soon as the President was going to proclaim an executive
order, and the germ game was to lock everybody down until you got an
experimental vaccine out that you required everybody to take before they got out. I
mean that was something they practiced that for twenty years. To me, that
is one of the key things that people don't understand in terms of what has
just happened to us. I think there might be more of a pushback if
they understood how long this thing was planned and practiced, rather than just saying,
oh, COVID did it to us. This is really bad and maybe
we reacted in the wrong way, but I think we've learned our lesson.
I hope we've learned our lesson. They need to understand these people practiced this
for twenty years. They planned and practiced this, and they're not through David.
That's right. This is so, this is a major conspiracy against the
life and health and demographics of the West. And as I pointed out in
last week's In Fact, this week, I'm covering it even more about how
the vaccine is the bio weapon, and it's a very selective one because it
is deadly in ways that is so difficult to track and linked directly to the
vaccine, especially when you don't do autopsies, when you're only looking for the
spike protein. The point is it creates and you know this is not modified.
This is a manipulated DNA or RNA that in fact creates other proteins that
are damaging to the body other than the spike protein. Yes, and so
that's why you have people with liver damage, that's why you have an increase
in cancer among young people that is just off the walls. In fact,
the Princess of Wales has cancer as a young, healthy person, and they
won't talk about the fact she did take the vaccine and this is one of
the major side effects the vaccine, getting cancer, as well as myocard artist's
height. And it is a vast conspiracy because after that was announced with her,
the mainstream media in the UK and the United States said, well,
you know, there's been a real uptick in cancer with really young people,
and we don't know what's causing it. And they looked and they, yeah,
realize that we don't know what's causing it, right, But what they
did was they showed some statistics that showed a mild increase going up to twenty
nineteen, but they don't have any data for the last four years right to
talk about how it really exploded after twenty nineteen. I understand there's a lot
of things that have been introduced into our food and our environment that have increased
cancer, but you know, it exploded after that vaccine. But they say,
oh, you know, it's a limited hangout. It's some truth,
but it's not the whole truth. And they're masters of that kind of propaganda.
That's why it's good that you're running I'm looking at World Affairs brief headlines
here you talk about how the MR and A technology is the bioweapon. It
absolutely is. I've been calling it from the very beginning of the GCI,
the genetic code injection, you know what is. And I'm looking at this
and one million excess deaths in the US, and that's the message that really
needs to get out. So I'm really glad that you're running well. You
know. The important thing to realize is, and this really does prove that
this is a conspiracy. Why would they put the full vaccine only in five
percent of the batches. Yes, it's because they know how deadly it is,
and they know that if they put it in all the batches, you'd
have such massive desks that no one would ever take a vaccine again. That's
right now. I'm telling people, period, don't ever take another vaccine again,
period, because you can't trust them. Yes, And I'm covering a
lot of the things about the autism case now that the Children's Health Defense is
throwing up against the CDC for actually falsifying to the courts the evidence of autism,
and they had an official witness, you know, and the DOJ actually
he recanted. He said, all right, you know, I've given this
evidence about autism not being readied the vaccine, and I'm recanting that. They
fired him as a witness and then they continue to quote his original testimony to
the court which cause them to rule against autism being related to vaccine and not
allowing people to bam a vaccine injury over it. And so now the CHD
has a good case now going before the course if they're honest. Now that's
a real big question to prove that in fact, the DJ was guilty of
manipulating the information. And it's called fraud on the court. It's a very
serious offense. Yes, very rarely does the court rule against fraud on the
court. But because they're afraid, you know, to do this, well,
that's the fact that Latipoe in Florida, the Surgeon General in Florida under
DeSantis, was taking He said, look, we know that there's all these
impurities there and that's fraudulent that they've got that out. And as because it
has these documented impurities, we need to stop administering this. They're afraid to
take it on directly. But you know, there's enough evidence right there that
it should be stopped, and yet that's not happening. Yeah. It truly
is amazing, isn't it. Yeah, it really is. It just continues
to go on and they will tell bullface lies, censoring people, as well
as using their power of the media and power of social media and the internet
to push this narrative relentlessly. And so it really is. It really is
amazing, and I know things really stacked up. Is a Tennessee one of
the twenty states that you think of the Constitution Party will be on. I
don't have my list in front of me. I think the ballot requirements are
kind of low here in Tennessee. That might be higher for a party,
but I think like for an independent you only got to get tw hundred and
fifty signatures or something, but it might be higher for an actual party.
But yeah, I hope there are some candidates for the Constitutional Party here.
I hope to see you on the ballot. I certainly would like to vote
for you. Absolutely. It has been such a limited hangout from all these
people. Even when you look at RFK Junior, he won't come to terms
fully with the vaccine. Oh I'm not anti vaccine. Well, just you
need to be any vaccine at this point in time, there's another evidence,
and they have been so ruthless as punishing anybody who speaks against it. And
look at doctor Wakefield that they came after, destroyed his life, came from
several generations of doctors. He had the personal integrity to speak out against this,
like many of these people have now against this Trump shot, and they
destroyed his life. And they do that to anybody who opposes this powerful,
powerful vaccine lobby. It truly is amazing. So I'm very glad that you're
going to r RFK has stated in his book The Real Anthony Fauci that there
is no way to manufacture, mass produce a safe vaccine. Now that's a
pretty anti vaccine statement, and of course he's trying to avoid being crucified.
Yes, I wrote these statements and things, but he really does not believe
in the safety of vaccines anymore. Now, one thing that I've warned people
about RFK. You know, even though we are hopeful that he's a person
who of course under stands a portion of the deep state, that is the
assassination portion of his father and his uncle, etc. He still is very
much a Democrat. He just came out and said that he would create a
nationwide mandate for abortion for all, free to all. And that's the Democrat
coming out, making him very dangerous. I'm glad he came out, and
of course Trump gave out his counter statement about sort of backing pro life things.
But it's a very cautious thing. It It's very clear that Trump is
worried and he knows and so do the Republicans that because of the rate of
immorality in this country, that abortion is quite popular. Yes, yes,
maturity wants abortion, and so they're reluctant to make this case against a hard
case against abortion. You see that in Trump waffling about the There's one of
the people that's caught up as an anti abortion activist in Washington, d C.
She is one of the people that was able to get some of the
baby bodies before they were being before they were incinerated. They took pictures of
it. They've arrested them, they're now facing charges and things like that.
But she ran and she is a very liberal progressive, but she's pro life,
and she's running for Congress, or at least did run. Maybe she
was in the primary and got taken out, but she was running for Congress,
and she was able as a congressional candidate to show pictures of these brutally
murdered and mutilated and dismembered bodies of these children because they can't stop you from
showing anything as a congressional candidate. Now, I don't know if that applies
to the presidential stuff, but I've said, you know, you can show
people and it is very powerful what Live Action has put together in terms of
the development of a baby. And there are some states like Tennessee where they
are mandating that that be shown to students, so they get the truth about
development of the baby, they see the humanity of the baby. That's a
positive message, but I think people need to see the negative message. They
need to see that that horrible murder. That really gets people upset when you
show that, because it does show that truth that's there. I've said,
if I was ever going to run for Congress again, that would be the
only reason I would run, so I could fundraise for those ads and put
those ads out there in people's faces so they can understand what is going on
with that. But it is a really key issue, a very key issue
for people. If we don't stand for life. At the beginning, they're
going to euthanize us all the rest of the way. At the end of
life, they're going to push a uh suicide in the middle of life.
You know, it is one of the key things that we have to stand
by and support, just from a pragmatic standpoint, not even from a standpoint
that you're going to stand before God someday, but just from a pragmatic standpoint,
if you don't want them to kill you, you better not stand by
and let them kill innocent people. Well, I completely agreed, even though
I think it's a losing proposition in terms of majority rule, this is a
fundamental right to life. And as for you know, a woman's choice,
this is a very deceptive kind of ploy talking about pro choice. I believe
strongly that a woman exercises to her choice when she has unprotected sex. And
just like a driver who exercises his right to drive with his license cannot walk
away from an accident where he's liable for destroying somebody else's property, just like
a woman exercises right to have sex, then she can't walk away from the
consequences. When you create a new life, and the creation of new life
takes place to conception, and I am very strong on abortion that you cannot
kill your own child, you cannot kill it we have. It's interesting,
it's interesting to see these people say my body, my choice. They didn't
believe that when it was the masks. They didn't believe that when it was
the vaccines, did they? And that really was our body, that really
was our choice, you know, that wasn't another body that was there.
I actually think, and I said this earlier in the program, I think
Trump stumbled on for political expediency. I think he stumbled on to the correct
constitutional position. I do think that it is a state issue. I said
for years that it was horrendous that Roe v. Wade would be imposed on
us by the Supreme Court, just like I think it's horrendous that they would
impose a definition of marriage and many other things that they've done at the Supreme
Court. That is something that I believe under the Constitution resides at the state
level. And from a pragmatic standpoint, if they nationalize this, as Lindsay
Graham and other people have talked about, I think you would have more babies
die of abortion because it would raise the limit and a lot of these pro
life states, and then when the Democrats get in, they will get rid
of any limits whatsoever, and the Republicans will go along with it. Whereas
when the Republicans, if they Republicans come in with a fifteen week limit,
I think. I think that New York and other places like that are just
going to ignore it, just like they ignore the unconstitutional Drug War prohibition of
marijuana and things like that. There's no constitutional authority for that. They didn't
pass an amendment like they did with alcohol, so they don't have any authority.
That's why Jeff Sessions set it out, because he didn't have any authority
to enforce it. So I think the Democrats will ignore any national restrictions on
abortion. I think that they will when they get in, they will push
unrestricted abortion, and I think the conservative states will go along with it.
That's my feeling from a pragmatic I think you're right now as a principle of
law, even though I agree constitutionally this is a matter of states right.
As a matter of principle of law, I don't when you really establish a
two done, workable definition of fundamental rights, which I've done in my platform
revision for the Constitutional party. It should apply not only to the federal government
but states. No one should be able to do to violate fundamental rights.
And even at any level of government it ought to be uniform. There ought
not to be. I mean, you still have plenty of room within states
to have different levels of taxation which allows the state to be attractive to one
another, etc. And different regulations and things. But when it comes to
mandating the defense of fundamental rights, which includes the right to contract, the
right of association and disassociation, the right to life and those and right of
self defense, etc. Those have to be mandated upon all levels of government.
In fact, I believe in covenant citizenship or qualified citizenship rather than citizenship
by birth. In other words, you have to at eighteen as a test
where you know the basic limitations of law. It's an open book test in
the sense that it's all available. You just have to know it and be
able to repeat the information on a test to prove that you know what the
limitations on lawmaking or are. That's the whole purpose of the contany Otherwise,
you can't be a city. You could be a resident, then you can't
own title property. You can rent in things, but you have to give
some incentive to be a citizen, and then you qualify. Now, children
are citizens under their parents under my system until eighteen, and then they've got
to qualify for their own citizenship. And then we don't have a rising generation
raised by Marxists and socialists and universities who grew up being totally ignorant of the
gun. Because you simply can't be a citizen unless you qualify. That's right,
and it isn't hard, As I say, it's an open book.
The answers are there. You just got to know them. And you've got
to sign on the dotted line that you won't violate other people, right,
you lose your citizen. Now, this would radically change a lot of going
on in our country so that you don't necessarily have to control public education,
which I don't think ought to be funded by tax money. By the way,
I agree, I agree teach with definitely got to get rid of the
i'ment of education. Yeah, that's one of those things. Rickberry's that I
got three departments. I'm going to get rid of it. He couldn't remember
one of them, and the one that he couldn't remember was the one that
Trump put him the head of Yeah, that's because of the Department of Energy.
So yeah, that's the key thing. I mean, we look at
the and I said that in twenty twenty, I said, for the first
time in my life, I'm not voting because we've been ruled for the last
nine months by bureaucrats that are unelected and unaccountable. And we have had not
only taxation without representation, but we've had regulation without representation. So what does
an election even mean when we've turned this over to the bureaucracy. But for
the longest time, it's been headed towards that strongly headed towards that Ran Paul
used to introduce on an annual basis is Rains Act, where he said,
we got to, you know, we have abdicated our authority to pass laws,
and we kick it over to the bureaucracy and they pass rules. And
then the worst aspect of it is they pretend that these rules are different from
laws in the sense that if it's a law, you have constitutional due process
protection, presumption of innocence, protection against successive fines. But hey, if
it's a rule, we don't even have to charge you with a fine.
We can just confiscate your property. We can take as much of it as
we want. You know, that's really that's another aspect of the deep state
that I think really needs to be addressed. I'm sure you're going to talk
about that as well. Yeah, yeah, Well that's all fascinating and we're
going to have you on again to find out how the campaign is going and
ballot status and other things like that. But let's talk a little bit about
what's happening with war, because we've had some very troubling developments recently. Even
more talk is still going down this path. As you point out, the
NATO in the US wants to have a war, and it's very clear when
they start talking about well let's make Ukraine a member of NATO, that is
like an instant declaration of war. What is going on in Gaza over the
weekend? They said, well, the IDF is pulling out of these areas,
but now it looks like maybe that was a regrouping to go back into
another area. What is your take on these hotspots? Well, let's talk
about Ukraine first. In the muddy spring, of course, there's a stalemate
going on. Nobody's really on the offensive. Russia has taken back from Ukraine
about one hundred and fifty square miles, but you've got to remember that Ukraine
made erosions into Russian occupied territory and excess of three or four hundred square miles,
so it's still a net loss for Russia. They haven't been able to
make much progress, but the situation is getting critical for Ukraine in the sense
of lack of ammunition, especially one hundred and fifty five millimeters artillery shells,
which are in short supply because of all the waffling the West has done as
almost as a direct result of the Republicans and conservatives buying into the lies that
Putin told Tucker Carlson, who is clueless about real history, real history of
the Soviet Union, so that he didn't have encounters for Vladimir Putin on that,
I mean incredibly. Vladimir Putin even admitted to Tucker Carlson that we the
Russian leadership, initiated the fallow of the sovi Unit. Didn't even phase him.
He didn't realize that he was admitting to something that no Russian leaders ever
admitted before. The followers of it wasn't spontaneous, that they couldn't control.
That's the official narrative, but they initiated it. In fact, I published
that in the World First three years ago that Eric Knicker on his deathbed in
Chile said, Moscow gave me orders to let the student riots and Leipzig go
forward. They gave orders to all of the dictators of the Soviet satellite states
to step down, and only Choucheski of Romania refused and he was killed,
he and his wife. So this is very interesting. But the point is
is that Ukraine has turned out to drone warfare, and they have been using
a twenty two private aircraft, which is a very cheap sessment of one seventy
two type aircraft. They've turned into drones, packed the fuselage with explosives up
to one hundred and two hundred pounds of it, and take off and they've
flown seven hundred miles to hit a Russian drone factory. They've hit Russian oil
refineries and are really started to be a pain in the backside to Russia in
terms of that. Now Russia's retaliated in the same way with drones. She
had drones from Iran that they're manufacturing in Russia. So this has now become
a drone war a war of attrition. And it's very interesting that I've long
talked about in my World Affairs brief how and putting it. Even admitted this,
by the way to Tucker Carlson, who didn't see. He said,
well, an installent agreed to put the Russian speaking areas of the Dome into
the borders of Ukraine and Crimea Russian speaking into the borders of Ukraine. He
says, Now, I don't know why. Of course he knows why.
You know that they did it because they were planning on faking their own demise
later on, and they wanted to have an excuse to get back into Ukraine,
and so they put Russian speaking people into the border so they could irritate
them and get them to protest and give Russian excuse to come back in to
protect the Russians. We've seen that kind of thing with a British Empire,
where they would take different people groups and you know, not draw the borders
to have you know, one people group over here in another one, but
they would mix them up so that there would be disputes. I mean,
when you look at Iran and Iraq, you know that was part of it,
Especially when you look at the Kurds who used to be the ancient Meds.
They didn't give them any land. What they did was they split them
between Iraq and Iran, so there'd be this constant conflict between the people groups.
Yeah. Yeah, the globals have done that too. And by the
way, the Russians put hundreds of thousands of Russian immigrants into the Baltic states
of Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania. And one of the interesting globalist geopolitical lawyers
working for the government said, you know, I suspect that the Baltics are
going to be next because they have all those Russian immigreets in there who are
always complaining about being discriminated again. And I think she's absolutely right. If
they ever take Ukraine, they're going after the Baltics next. And so you
know this whole excuse by Putin that we can't allow Ukraine to be part of
NATO. Let me tell you the truth. Remember, in the phony fall
of this Onion, none of the communist bureaucrats were ever removed from any of
these satellite states, including Ukraine. And that's why the people would always complain
about these bureaucrats still charging them bribes in order to get anything done in Ukraine
and Poland and otherwords, when the West let Poland and Romanian, Hungary and
Czechoslovakia into the NATO, they were letting in people who were full of spies.
So Puga really doesn't object to a country joining NATO because he's got all
kinds of spies in there that tell them exactly what NATO is doing. This
is a ruse, this is giving him an excuse. And I'm the only
one to document how the so called Western coup in twenty fourteen in Ukraine was
in fact a fake coup by the Communist president Viktor Yanikovich, because he alone
let the coup win by creating a standdown of the bearcoot. The riot police
that were torturing and surrounding the protesters, they stood down on the day that
the coup was one and the people walked out of the Maidan Square into the
Presidential Palace. That would be like a January six protests going on and there
was no capitol police showed up at the capitol. Could the protesters have issued
to stand down or no? Only Nancy Pelosi could have issued a stand down
order please. So you see, it's the conservatives that have been snookered and
fooled by all the propaganda about now It's true that the globals want this war
just as much as Russian China, and they are provoking in little ways.
They for example, signed the treaties with Russia that we won't expand NATO.
They knew they were going to expand NATO, knowing that they were full of
spies, but they did it also to provoke, so that give Russian excuse.
I mean, that's part of the reasons for rampaging through the world in
the phony war on terror, to create the image of the bully of the
world. This helps Russian China justify attacking the West someday. In fact,
the conservatives, who are very anti globalist, as I think potent, is
trying to save them from our own from our own goal. So there,
you know. Alex Jones said the other day on the show, I am
in solidarity with Russia. How stupid can you get? Alex? And I'd
been on his show. I've explained what I just explained to you here and
to Alex. Alex was telling people that the Trump shot with sugar water.
I've got the clip. Nobody, nobody would believe me for years and somebody
sent me the clip. It's like, thank you for sending me this clip.
It's just basically sugar water. You can take it, you know.
So he's said some interesting things, you know. One of the things that
stuck out to me about this is the fact that, you know, Zelenski
runs in twenty nineteen, his party's on a party on a peace thing.
Right, civil war has been going on for five years, and the guy
that was going to the peace and negotiations, Alexander Arrostovich, does this Ukrainian
interview. She asks him, so, what's the chances for peace? He
says none. She goes, oh, that's horrible. He goes, oh,
it's going to get worse in three years, in twenty twenty two,
and it's like to the day basically he said, Russi is going to invade
and he goes in the country is going to be havoced is the word that
they used in the translation. And she goes, oh, that's horrible.
He goes, no, the good news is we get to get into NATO.
And I'm like, is this whole thing like a shadow boxing thing like
you're talking about? You know, both sides have got their games running here.
They know exactly when Russia is going to I mean, he's not saying
we're going to invade in three years. He said we're going to be invaded
in precisely three years so that we can get into this NATO thing. It
seems like they got this whole thing planned out, isn't it. And you
notice how Zelensky said almost the day before the invasion, there's not going to
be any invasion. I mean he knew, and so did his military.
Why were they telling their own people that wasn't going to be an invasion so
they were totally ill prepared, or so that people didn't flee so that they
could recruit them. The point is Ukraine is corrupt, just like Russia's corrupt.
All the former Soviet states have this in integral corruption. But the Ukrainian
people do not deserve to live under a reconstituted Soviet Union, and Pudent should
not be rewarded for having fate his own demise to pool the West into all
of this. But remember the globalist play both sides. Soviets play both sides,
Chinese play both sides. You've really got to know your stuff to be
able to figure out what's going on geopolitically. Conservatives unfortunately want to see everything
in terms of black and white. Who's the good guy, who's the bad
guy, And there are no good guys on the national international stage. That's
absolutely true, that's absolutely true. Yeah, well, what do you think,
I mean the other trouble areas that we see in the Middle Eastern China.
What is next on your Well, let's talk about gozen amas Is.
You know, the Israeli military, know that the Israeli people have very little
tolerance for casualties in the military, there's weeping, wailing and gnashing of teeth.
They don't have a very good idea of the afterlife life we do in
Christianity, and so they have very little tolerance for casualties. And so they
are have been bombing the heck out of you know, civilian areas with a
little disregard for civilian casualties, even though they give warnings before you know,
hamas Is, they're telling people you can't leave, and to exacerbate the civilian
casualties. But you know Nettignah, who is a globalist. There are a
lot of sincere people in Israel, but you know Nettignah, who continues year
after year to stop, short of actually winning any war, to continue the
conflict later on, always lets Moss reconstitute itself. And as I pointed out
in the Wildfare's brief, the Israeli military withdrew from southern Israel eighty percent of
the Gods of Battalion in order to leave this wide open, unprotected, so
that when the invasion occurred, they were six to seven hours away from being
spawn So Israel is fully responsible for allowing this to happen. Now, that
isn't the same anything about Hamas is a vicious terrorist organization, always has been,
always will There never will be peace in the Middle East because of the
hatred between the that has preached to young Gosins and young Palestinians from the day
that I've been to Israel many times, and it's a very very sad situation.
But Hamas, even if eliminated, and I don't know how you really
eliminate, because in this process of the invasion, you kill that many civilians,
you create enough hatred to reconstitute Moss, even if even if you kill
all the existing fighters. So now, unfortunately Israel ended up killing an AID
group here Western Aid group with a very prominent individual of the Eight Kitchen organization,
and this is what has basically caused them to halt or pull back.
Whether or not they stay pulled back, they're not going to ever, in
my opinion, allow Goza to be semi independent again. Remember Israel created this
by removing the troops from the occupation zone before, and the fact they even
forced room many Israelis who had productive farms along the Mediterranean coast there and gave
them multitude dozens. I don't think they can do that again. It will
just simply turn into an armed camp again. The only solution I believe,
and this is a compromise solution, is to continued occupation. And I say
this because Arabs in fact live under occupation in the West Bank and in Israel
itself, and do so fairly well. There are restrictions, of course,
there are periodic searches when they come through the work and things, but they
do so in relative peace. Whereas in Hebron, where there's a small pocket
of some eight hundred Israelis living among it, they have to have an entire
Israeli brigade to defend them. That shows how is Rats are not safe living
among Palestinians, whereas Palestinians are relatively safe. So I think the only compromise
solution forget about a two state solution. If you make it an independent state,
it's going to be an armed camp and they'll go to war against it.
So occupation with jobs available to them is probably the only way you're going
to have interim peace. But it's not going to be you know, they'll
always be sniping at each other. It's just never going to be peace until
the second coming of the Lord. Yeah, well, you're absolutely right.
You're absolutely right about Netanyahu being a globalist as well. From the beginning of
this, I've been showing, you know, I talked about when it was
happening, the fact that they wanted to get the front of the line with
the Pfizer vaccines, so he literally offered his own people's lab rats. And
then he's a couple of teleconference calls that he did with the World Economic Forum
talking about how many people he had injected with the Phfiser shot and that type
of thing. He's fully on board with these globalists. He's not very popular
at home either. It's had difficulty constituting a government. But then the question
becomes as you point out, you know, the Palestinian that the Israelis are
not safe where there's a large number of Palestinians, they would like to deport
them, I think to the EU or to the US. Is that going
to happen. We've already got massive numbers of Arabs and Michigan chanting death to
the USA of this last weekend. Are they going to be able to send
their problem to us? Well? This is one of the actual hidden purposes
of the War on Terror was to create enough Mayhem in the Middle East to
create waves millions of refugees so that they could flood Europe and destroy Western culture
there and has over twenty five percent of the population now Muslim in Europe.
Yes, and it is literal hell and where the police can't even go into
Muslim areas. It's that dangerous as well as yes, they want to import.
This is part of the entire and it really is, Frankly, I'll
be frank a Satanic agenda to destroy Christian based Western civilization with conflict, and
that's what half of the motivation for this influx at the border. This invasion
is just tremendous and it's going to be destructive to America. Especially. Think
about this, when World War three comes around around the latter part of this
decade, they'll be precipitated by an EMP strike, the grid goes down,
and I'll tell you, with the thirty or forty million illegal aliens in there
that are out of work, out of jobs, out of food and things,
there's going to be a lot of pillaging. And even Americans are going
to join in, especially in big cities where you're going to have a mad
Max type scenario going on. And that's one of the reasons why I wrote
Strategic Relocation is you've got to get out of the big cities, or at
least prepare to leave, and you've got to have advanced notice. That's why
I encourage people to subscribe to my World First brief so that they will have
advance notice. But you know, if you look at the night sky satellite
view of the United States east of the Mississippi, it's just a wave of
lights, even in rural areas, its high density population everywhere, and west
of the Mississippi it's relatively dark, except in the blue cities, you know,
La Denver, Salt Lake City, Albuqueue, New Mexico. All the
major cities are in democratic control in the United States now, and I'll tell
you those cities are going to melt down, and Conservatives who are overwhelmed there
politically, are going to realize there's no jobs left, there's nothing keeping me
here, and they're going to go back to their roots, hopefully in rural
areas, where my hope is that there'll be new a remnant, so we
say, good Christian people or moral people who will be able to establish new
constitutional majorities and uphold the constitution even while the globalist get us into a military
global government. Yes, even the global government will have to pay lip service
to democracy, that is, to majorities in certain areas. That's the only
hope that I see, frankly, is the redistribution of America, the separation
of Conservatives. I don't believe we're ever going to be united again. I
think it's impossible because of the moral degradation of society. So the only solution
is apartheid, meaning that not by force, but by voluntarily separating yourself from
Babylon if you will, that you have some protection and some mutual assistance from
other people. I agree. That's what I've been stressing with people and I
think it'll be the type of thing you talk about it being a separation.
I don't think it'll be a formal separation declaring secession, because that's going to
invite attack. Neither do I think that there is going When we have global
governance completely put in, they will still leave the putative national govern it's there.
They'll just be functionaries for the global governance, but they'll have that there
for appearance's sake and to keep people happy and pacified. And so we need
to do that same thing at the lower level. We say, oh yeah,
yeah, we're all Americans, right, while we create our own society.
At the local level, all politics is locally. Elon Musk even pointed
that out with what the strategies that George Soros was taking in terms of focusing
on district attorney races and how he could subvert things very easily and have a
great deal of effect. He says, you know, you focus on the
top level, it's very difficult to have much of an effect. I think
really at the local level, that's an important thing. I think that's very
important. It is I agreed, and strategically location again, people can find
that at Joelscousen dot com. We've only got a little bit of time left.
Briefly, tell us a little bit about fortifying your home for the things
that we're concernings that are coming. The most important thing besides relocating or preparing
to relocate two rural areas, is to secure your home. You see,
when the lights go out, even people in rural cities and towns will be
without food within about three days because not very many people, you know,
like the LEDs, people store food and have a preparedness system as a church
and so and even they probably only ten percent are really prepared. But nevertheless,
people, the most important security feature you can have is not to make
your home into a fortress, which is very expensive, but to have a
secure hidden basement safe room. And that's why I encourage relocation to areas where
you can do basements. And it's very difficult, you know in Tennessee,
for example, where you have that bedrock three feet under the ground. Almost
everywhere do that, but it still can be done in certain areas with sloping
ground, but in Texas has its hard pain areas. But it's very important
to have a secure safe room because when you see mobs coming down the street
dillaging house to house. You're not going to get out your guns and shoot
starving people. That's just not the right. You want to be able to
get out of the way. Leave your doors open so they don't break the
house down, don't lead much in the cupboards or anything at all, and
they'll go on to the next house, but they can't find you and your
survival goods and your food stocks and things because they'll be in a concealed basement
space that they cannot find. And I've written this special book, the High
Security Shelter Book and the Secure Home. Both books talk about those. The
shelter books about doing an in a basement that is existing, which is your
cheapest option. That is wise advice, and again people can find that at
joelscousend dot com. Take a look at that. Joel has a lot of
wise advice about that. He's got a lot of wise advice for the government,
if they'll just if we can just get that information out of there.
Good to hear that you're running. Thank you so much for joining us,
Joel, Thank you my pleasure. David thing, let me tell you the
David Knight Show you can listen to with your ears. You can even watch
it by using your eyes. In fact, if you can hear me,
that means you're listening to the David Knight Show right now. Yeah, good
job. And you want to know something else. You can find all the
links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at Thedavidnightshow dot com.
That's a website.