Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Night Show.
As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Wednesday, the twenty fourth of July.
Here of our Lord, twenty twenty four. Well, today we're going to
take a look at what the mainstream media is not really looking at. Everybody
is so focused on la Law Harris. You know, she may not even
be the final nominee. All of this stuff is just shifting sands. So
we're going to take a different tack today and we're going to take a look.
At the beginning, we'll look quickly at what just happened with the Secret
Service Director, but then we're going to take a look at viruses. As
people are looking at the COVID virus asking for a proof, they started to
realize, wait a minute, maybe there's not any proof for viruses. So
we'll give you the case against viruses existing. I think it is a pretty
interesting case. And also take a look at the escalating push by the technocracy
to put us all on universal welfare, so we're dependent on what they give
us. We'll be right back. Well, you know, it was amazing
the hearings on Monday when the Secret Service Director, former Secret Service director went
to Congress. It was people just ripping her apart, swearing at her and
the rest of the stuff. Of course, a lot of that was for
effect, right, It's the type of thing Nancy Mace doing that. It's
like Megan Kelly doing it. Even had a listener had written me before that
happened, talking about how course the language has become because they have to do
it for effect. So this is what it's deliberate. It's a deliberate effect.
But apart from that, the bigger issues were the fact that she was
stonewalling everybody, and the outcome of that was that there was a bipartisan call
for her to resign, which she did yesterday during the show. So I've
not played a lot of these things. It's not really necessary. We all
know what the issues are there. I just want to say, when it
comes to the assassination, it's not necessary for us to really know what happened,
and we never will quite frankly, they can look at nine eleven.
I don't think we'll ever know what happened with nine to eleven, definitively what
brought the buildings down. We do know what did not happen, and we
do know how it was used, and that's what we need to focus on.
So two things you need to know. Number One, we were lied
to so that number two, they they could create homeland security, they could
create the Patriot Act, they could create the Germ Games and the Model State
Health Emergency Powers Act to pull off what they did in twenty twenty after they'd
practiced it for two decades, that's what you need to know. You don't
need to know if it was bombs planted, or if they had, you
know, remote control planes, or if there was a directed energy weapon.
You don't need to know any of that stuff. What you need to know
is that they lied to you, that people like Rudy Giuliani destroyed the evidence
to prevent an investigation and things like that. If you knew that about nine
to eleven, Rudy, you might not have fallen into that trap for January
the sixth and stop the steal stuff. But yeah, what you need to
know is that they lied, and you need to know just enough of it
common sense and we already do. I mean, when you look at the
wealth of questions that were brought up, why did nobody cover that roof?
And then the lies that she came up with the ridiculous lines, Well it
was too sloped. No, no, it wasn't. And so good news
for her. She's already got another job with a law firm. Do a
cheetle and how there Ron Johnson. This was in the house where she faced
the grilling, and Senator Johnson is talking about couple of issues. He said,
you know, the Secret Service didn't even attend a security briefing for the
local swat and sniper teams. Isn't that interesting that we now have in a
small town like that, Butler, Pennsylvania, we have swat and sniper teams?
Are we militrys here? Yet? That's the other thing about it?
Right, As I said at one point in time, why is it that
we have to have an army of people to guard the presidency or the presidential
candidates for the same reason that we got so much money in Washington? It
is an abomination. What is being done? I don't know. There was
a trudge is all about La La Harris. Right, he puts this up.
Harris roasts Trump and the crowd goes wild. While it was her own
campaign staff, she raised over two hundred million dollars. I don't know of
two hundred and thirty, two hundred and eighty trying to remember what I looked
at. The people had stopped and donating, so then they just fled into
that. So we'll see what happens. It is so incredibly early. As
a matter of fact, if you go back and look at what the headlines
were three months ago, they were telling you that Biden was unstoppable three and
a half months ago, right, same people now they're telling you that Lala
Harris is unstoppable. The point of all of this election stuff is to prepare
you for a civil war. They want you fighting mad if your candidate didn't
win, believing that it was stolen. And by the way, whoever wins
it will be stolen. That's what these elections are. At the top level,
here's a prediction the election will be stolen. Let's just make sure we
don't have a civil war over it. Want folks, they do it every
time. It's just going back to JFK Chicago and the voting machines and thought
they got ways to do it. It's a lot more sophisticated and it's a
lot easier now to steal the elections, especially when Trump put in the vote
by mail stuff. But getting back to you know, so what do you
need to know about lo La Harris? First of all, all of these
poles, and it's amazing to see these poles anywhere from oh, look at
this, she starts out eleven points below Trump to another pole that shows her
two points ahead. I didn't put it in the thing here, but you
know, the the beginning of guys and dolls. The guys standing on the
corner. I got the horse right here. His name is Paul Revere.
And then the three of them called fugue for ten horns and a fugue.
They are singing about how each of them's got a favorite horse and they're all
different. Right, No, no, no, my horse is the one's
going to win. You can get a poll to say anything you want,
and they usually use the polls to push you in the direction that they want.
It's called a push pull, very well known tactic. So it's way
too soon to even tell she's going to be the nominee. And so again,
three and a half months ago, Biden was he was a shoe in.
According to these people, there's no way Trump's gonna win. Like it's
kind of all these convictions and newly found convictions. Uh so, that's a
lot of smoking mirrors to keep you distracted and to a large extent, getting
micro focused on the details of this shooting. And I call it the shooting
because you know, it could be an assassination attempt. It could be a
false flying who knows, I don't, I don't care. I don't have
an opinion on that. Just understand that the purpose of that is to get
you more invested in this election. It could be a loan shooter and a
DEI compromise and incompetent and sloppy Secret Service. That's a simple explanation. It
could be Biden and a plot to have the Secret Service stand down multiple shooters.
I really don't care about that stuff. Or it could be even Trump,
you know, having somebody somewhere else shoot into the crowd while he pretends
that his ear was hit. You know, I who knows what it was.
And you've got people putting all of these conspiracy theories out there, so
pick one. But the bottom line is that this is happening, and it
didn't happen to Jefferson, it didn't happen to Adams. They were able to
walk down the street arguing with each other over policy. Because they disagreed,
President and vice president from different parties, they were able to walk down the
street in disagreement and nobody came up and attack them. Why. Because the
federal government wasn't seeking to run everybody's lives. The federal government wasn't seeking to
micromanage everything. As I said before, in the nineties, most of the
people in Switzerland didn't know who the president was. They didn't care, didn't
have any impact on their lives. Oh but we know every detail about these
people, or at least think we do. Right, We know all about
their backgrounds and all the rest of stuff, and we want them to do
even more micromanagement. We want even more power in Washington. Well, just
briefly, as you look at, the Secret Service didn't attend the security briefing
for the swat and sniper teams that are local law enforcement, and communications were
siloed. They were not in frequent radio contact directly with a Secret Service.
Local law enforcement notified command about crooks prior to the shooting, received confirmation Secret
Service was aware of the notification, and then number four following the shooting,
Secret Service was seen on the roof of the American Glass Research Building with local
law enforcement. Photos of the shooter were sent to the BATF, which is
I think interesting for facial recognition. I don't know who got the DNA information
was that. The FBI talked about that yesterday, collecting blood samples for everybody,
got a DNA base for everybody facial recognition. Is they've got such a
comprehensive database of facial recognition at the BATF. Isn't that something that Senator Johnson
should be interested in? Why? Why? And Secret Service was initially not
going to send snipers to the rally according to the local law enforcement people.
He said, there are so many unanswered questions, and of course the director
refused to answer any question, stone walling everybody. And maybe that's because first
time she tried to answer a questions she came up with a blatant, ridiculous,
absurd lie. We didn't have anybody on it because it's too much of
a slope, you know, that was ridiculous, As New Americans says,
perhaps her job was apparently too steep a slope on which to stand safely.
After she resigned, the GOP oversight Chief Comer of Kentucky said that more heads
might roll, well, well, we do in a criminal investigation criminal negligence.
Chetle only became director after she was a gal pal of First Lady doctor
Joe Biden. As a New York Post reported, she was well liked by
the future First Lady and her most senior aides, including cop advisor Anthony Bernall.
She had served on Jill's security detail, and Anthony Bernall pushed for her
the cop advisor to Joe, I guess she runs the show. But again,
when you look at one of the questions that somebody asked, so how
many So at the same time that Trump was at this rally tens of thousands
of people and Joe Biden is addressing a couple hundred people. She's at a
venue I think it was maybe a casino or something that was somewhere where they
had security there already. So there's local security, and it's in a building,
and she got two or three times a number of Secret Service agents that
Trump did. When you're talking about an outdoor event with ten twenty thousand people
out there, Well, I guess that's because Joe Biden is Jill is a
friend of Cheetle. Maybe that's not the answer that she gave. She just
said, well, you'll have to investigate that. I don't really know anything.
So I heard of the time that she was being considered for director,
that Anthony had pushed her forward as an option, said an anonymous source to
The New York Post. Washington Posts explained Secret Service insiders opposed the appointment quote.
According to a half dozen written complaints that Secret Service agents sent to the
Post around that time and in the two years since. The complaints had said
that Cheatle had never worked a senior post on her Presidential Protection detail. Later
in her tenure, she was excessively focused on hiring and promoting more women agents.
As we've all talked about. She wanted thirty by thirty and that particular
case, thirty percent of the agency be female by twenty thirty, regardless of
merit. Right that would mean passing over combat hardened special operators from armed services
such as Marine raiders and Navy seals. In addition, six of the former
agents, all of whom have served in presidential protection details, told in The
New York Post that they found Cheatle's public statements about security for butler Pennsylvania campaign
event embarrassing. They said they're particularly outraged by the comment she made after the
shooting saying that police were responsible for securing the outer perimeter of the event in
the AGR building, and then to say what she did about the slope,
which was particularly stupid and particularly clear that it was a lie. So she
had been adamant that she was not going to resign as a matter of fact,
that bablin Bee had a headline saying she reassures a nation that she is
just incompetent and not trying to kill Trump. But Trump said, well,
she never gave me proper protection. And I think it's interesting that in this
environment where we are electing somebody who, as Joe Biden says, all these
people think it's the job of the presidency to not just rule us, not
just to rule all Americas and insert themselves into every minute detail of our lives,
but it's also to rule the world. Like Joe Biden said, I'm
running the world. Well, if you're running the world and if you've got
people buying favors from you for hundreds of millions of dollars a day, you
know she got over Laalas pulled in over two hundred and something million. Trump
got a pledge just from one guy, Elon Musk, for one hundred and
eighty million, And that's just part of it. I wonder how many billions
will be poured into Washington for all these corrupt politicians to buy favors from them.
This is why we have such a corrupt government, because there's no restriction
on what people can spend. You know, they'll send somebody like the next
Desuza who writes a check straight ahead, writes a check twenty five hundred dollars.
Oh no, you've got to do it through a political action committee.
And if you do it through a political action committee, oh, you can
give whatever you want. You can give hundreds of millions of dollars. If
you give more than twenty five hundred dollars directly to somebody without playing that game,
oh well then you're going to go to jail. Like Danesh to Susie
say I corrupt the system is, and the metric for the corruption is how
much money they are giving the politicians. So when you look at the fact
that she never gave me proper protection, Trump is a billionaire, why didn't
he pay for it himself? I mean, if you want it done right,
you've got to do it yourself, right? Is he foolishly relying on
the deep state? Yeah? Yeah, the deep state has been trying to
kick him out of office, a deep state that maybe trying to kill him,
and he's going to let them provide security form. I think it was
probably better for RFK Junior to provide his own security than to now he's got
it from Secret Service and he's does he trust them? These are the people
who failed to protect his uncle and his father. And there's a lot more
power money involved today in Washington than there was then. Many requests were made
by on site Secret Service for more people, always a turned down or a
no response, said Trump, I have the biggest crowds in history. They
should be treated accordingly. But even in his own life, he's not willing
to do for himself what he can get the government to do for him,
and neither of the conservatives who support him anymore either. Now, one last
thing I'll point out here, and I think it was interesting, not only
from the standpoint, just like I think it's interesting that you know, they
didn't meet with the local sniper teams and stuff, the local sniper teams well,
or the swat teams. The military the local soldiers. We'll talk about
a standing army. That's what the swat teams are. You know, we
didn't even have swat teams until the nineties. Really were Darryl Gates and lay
started doing it. What did he do during the Rodney King rites with the
swat teams and the armored cars that he had. Oh, they protected themselves
in city Hall. They didn't do anything to protect the public. They didn't
do anything to stop the rioting. And again you go back to the early
eighties when Terry Gilliam did the film Brazil, that over the top raid that
we show frequently. Yeah, that was really over the top. Not anymore.
And so this is an interesting story because what it reveals to us about
the surveillance that is happening in this country. Just like I said before,
send facial recognition stuff to the ATF. They've got facial recognition database. You
realize that, well, here's mobile data. This is something that was discovered
by the Heritage Foundation, you know, the people behind the Project twenty twenty
five. They also have what they call an oversight project. And so who
visited Thomas Crook's home before he attempted to assassinate President Trump and they were able
The Heritage Foundation of conservative think tank was able to get a hold of mobile
ad data and analyze it, and they were able to get the geospatial intelligence
to show, Okay, here's a person. These are people who are close
to him, right, we're talking about how pervasive geospatial intelligence has become.
These are people who were in the proximity of Thomas Crook. Where else did
they go? And they were able to find an individual who actually nine devices
linked to ad IDs that were located at Crook's home and work within the last
year. And out of those nine, you know, they tracked devices that
regularly visited his home and his place of work, and they followed them and
they were able to do this a publicly available data. I find that fascinating
and disgusting. At the same time, someone who regularly visited Crook's home and
work also visited a building in Washington, DC located in Gallery Place. This
is in the same vicinity as an FBI office. So the question is is
this person is he being run by some FBI people? As we've seen these
types of things done over and over again. We found a device linked to
his work that traveled to Butler, Pennsylvania on July fourth and July eighth,
and this devicenopped all activity on July twelfth, the day before the shooting,
for the protection of whistleblowers and for our investigation. Heritage Foundation said we will
not be sharing further information with the Congressional Task Force due to the connective tissue
between that entity and the FBI, The Secrets Service, and other entities said
the Oversight project well told how that you found the data. Anybody can go
there and find it, of course, but isn't that strange. I think
it's strange that they won't share any more information when they told where they got
it from. And I think it is strange that that kind of public information
is available to people. Imagine what the government has in terms of being able
to track people. And then we also see that there was an office and
you probably have seen the video as well, but it came out in some
questioning in the congressional hearings House hearings. You've seen the pictures of the office
that the people walked out of right before the shooter crawled onto the roof.
Maybe that's a coincidence, who knows, and it directly looked down upon just
a few feet away from that roof directly look down. So they weren't on
the roof, they were up in a building behind that. They said they
got reports that there was somebody walking around, and so the two guys that
were in that room left left it unsupervised. And again a question after question.
But the real question that we have is why so much power in Washington?
Why is there so much of a militarized police state surveillance already, That's
what you should be asking yourself. Well, we're going to take a quick
break and when we come back, we're going to take a look at viruses,
viruses. Did did they ever isolate the tars virus or the COVID nineteen
virus? Did they ever isolate any virus? We're going to talk about that
when we come back. Stay with us making sense comment again, you're listening
to the David Knight Show. Well, welcome back, and thank you Conservative,
thank you, thank you for that arcan think, Thank you for the
tip. I appreciate that he's a commander of common sense bringing you all the
information you missed the same one, David Knight, thank you. I appreciate
that well. And by the way, while we're talking about that the contributions
we have got part of the mystery solved with cash app according to them,
and of course we got finally we're able to get a hold of real live
person. And perhaps there was some hallucinating going on with the artificial intelligence help.
I don't know what was happening with it, but first it told us
that we had too many contribution two and we'd had ten that month. The
eleventh one was blocked, So that's really strange. I never had that kind
of limitation before. So I started Google searching. I couldn't find any limitation
on the number of transactions as you had. But I knew that they had
just changed the way that they were the processor that they had for it,
and they had changed their fees, and I had to I had to accept
a contribution. I never had to do that before, had to create a
pen number in order to accept the contribution. So though, well, I
guess they've changed a bunch of stuff here, they came back and they said
the person was trying to send the money that was on their side and it
wasn't on our side, so it wasn't blocked because of that. So I
had another I had somebody who has sent me frequent contributions on cash app sent
me a dollar yesterday so we could confirm that was I didn't tell me,
they just did it. And it's like, well, okay, that's working.
So cash app does seem to be working. It is still strange though,
what was going on with the banking requirements. When we finally got the
person on the phone, he said, well, maybe you were a victim
of a phishing attack. No, I wasn't. I know what a phishing
attack is. I would never click on an email, oh this is hi,
this is so, and so please give us your password. It wasn't
that at all. It didn't come from an email even it came from within
the app that they were asking for the password to my bank account. And
I still think that's very strange and I still haven't resolved that yet. So
anyway, but it appears to be working. I don't know. Let's talk
about viruses and virology, you know, I mentioned this last week. There's
an op ed piece that somebody put in and they were talking about abstractions that
people have in order to in science, in order to try to understand something
that they can't really observe, and they can't isolate. And he contrasted physicists
with virologists, and he said, the physicists admit that they don't know.
You know, they've got all these problems in terms of astrophysics, you know,
creating concepts of dark matter and things like that, and then when you
go to the sub atomic level quantum mechanics and replacing not only Newtonian physics but
also Einstein's physics, and so you know, they're looking at them and say,
wow, we really don't know. This is really surprising us. And
if you think you understand quantum physics, you don't understand quantum physics that type
of thing. Right, So they make money and get grants by telling people
they don't know what's going on. The virologists make money by telling people absolutely
know everything. They're totally certain. And as he pointed out, they haven't
really done any real science or any new theories or anything since the late seventeen
hundreds, whereas physics is constantly changing, and of course it's going to be
the nature of it because they can't really it's not like you know, when
you're looking at physical things that are that are large, like Newtonian physics,
where you're looking at the static levels on a bridge or something, or you're
looking at the kinetics of collisions or stuff like that. You know, that
was I really enjoyed that stuff when I was in school. You had,
you know, things like you're going to have a roller coaster and you know
you're going to drop it and it's going to do one hundred and eighty degree
loop. You know, what height do you have to drop it? Assuming
not going to it's just going to be the momentum that it gets from a
gravitational fall. What height do you have to drop it in order to make
sure that you have sufficiens and tripetal force at the top of the curve,
that nobody falls out of their seat without wearing a seatbelt, you know.
And you can do that kind of stuff with Newtonian physics very interesting. My
favorite one was that you're in a Volkswagen part at a stoplight and we're going
to assume a a an elastic collision of the lords is not going to be
any defamation. You know, you're not going to be smashed, no energy
is going to be absorbed in the impact, and you got your foot on
the brake and your coefficient of friction is this and bareling down on you is
a dump truck going this speed, weighing this amount of money. Calculate what
instantaneous acceleration is on the people inside of the Volkswagen that type of thing,
assuming that there's not going to be any energy absorbed by collapse, you know,
all this kind of stuff. So that was a lot of fun,
and you can do that kind of stuff, and you can. That's the
basis for people building real stuff. And again, even with that, there's
certain assumptions, right, and what is your coefficient of friction? How much
energy is going to be absorbed in a real life collision. He makes some
simplifying assumptions so that you can do it well. They do the same thing
with virology. They make simplifying assumptions and sometimes they're just completely made up.
They have no basis for this life. Site News had an interesting article a
headline in case you want to look at it. This goes back to last
Wednesday, a week ago. Scientists challenge fundamental precepts of virology. Do viruses
even exist? They said June twentieth an interview with Tucker Cross and they had
a Scottish TV presenter Neil Oliver, who said he was not persuaded that there
was such a thing as COVID nineteen virus circulating the population between twenty nineteen,
twenty twenty twenty, or nevertheless today, either explaining that in his judgment,
based on hospital bed and death statistics, there was no pandemic, but rather
a pandemic of propaganda, a pandemic of lies, a pandemic of false PCR
testing. That is exactly right. And if you listen to the show,
you know that I've been saying this for four years. I said this when
it was happening in the beginning of twenty twenty. You talked about Carrie Mollis
and all the rest of this stuff, and the fact that there was no
science in any of this except for behavioral science. Yet, you know,
there's may be surprise to learn that many scientists have asserted proof that he is
correct, that no virus even exists, SARS COVID two even exists. Further,
they argue with compelling confidence and detailed demonstrations and with logic, that there
actually is no proof that viruses exist at all, and that virology itself is
a pseudoscience. And a forty minute video titled official evidence that virology is a
pseudoscience. Canadian researcher Christine Massey explains how she and others have issued freedom of
information request to hundreds of scientific institutions and forty different countries quote asking for any
records of anyone in the world ever finding this alleged stars cove tw virus in
bodily fluid or tissue or excrement of any people anywhere on Earth, by anyone
ever. And this is very key, because you know they're going around looking
for bird flu and milk and cows. They're looking for it and sewers and
all the rest of the stuff. They're not done with this game. They're
going to play this bluffing game again. And we all know that whether or
not viruses exist or not, that this PCR thing is a lie. It
is absolutely a lie. The guy who invented it said, you can't use
this, said mocking Fauci says. Fauci thinks that you can look into a
microscope and see a virus. You can't see that, and you can't infer
that there's using a PCR test. You can't use that to infer that AIDS
is caused by HIV. A virus he and many other scientists at that point
in time. And Okay, conservative thinker left of Tip said, seek is
pronounced sick, not seek. I just mispronounced it. Don't forget these people
are six. I think he's making a joke there. I think it is
seek. I'm not sure sure anyway, Um, Christine Massey and the Foyer
requests forty different countries, hundreds of requests, she said, To date,
we have responses from two hundred and sixteen different institutions and forty different countries,
and so far no one has been able to provide us with even one record.
Further, they can't cite any record. So they've all admitted that they
don't have a sample of the alleged virus, and they don't know of anyone
else who ever did obtain a sample of this alleged virus in order to sequence
and characterize a particle and study it with controlled experiments, which is the foundation
of the scientific method, she said. And if nobody has a sample of
the alleged virus, and nobody can have conducted any science. See, this
is the genius, the diabolical and evil genius of Fauci. The fact that
he would abuse the PCR tests to make people think that science was actually being
done, that they could actually observe and measure a virus or you know,
whether it is COVID or whether it is HIV, and they can't. You
say, that's the fundamental lie. The PCR is a fundamental lie, because
the PCR is the lie that says that they are doing science. They're not
doing science. They have an isolated anything and you can't use says carry said
Cary Molse. He's dead now. He died just before, conveniently about a
month or two before this all kicked off. But he said, you can't
use it for that. So what is the purpose of science? Science?
You have theories and then you tell people how this works, and then they're
supposed to be able to reproduce and observe this. And if they can't reproduce
it. We'll see this all the time. So he would like, well,
we've got fusion at room temperature. Oh yeah, what did you do?
M Sorry, I can't reproduce it. I don't know what you're talking
about, you know, I don't know what. Yeah, but you see
this all the time. We constantly get news breaks talking about how somebody's come
up with room temperature fusion and then other people try to reproduce what they did
and they can't do it. So that's science. If you have a group
of experts, or even if you've got something that is peer reviewed, that
doesn't make it science. You have to actually review the phenomenon that they said
that they saw. So who is Christine Massey. She's a former cancer biostatician
statisician holding a Master's of Science degree. Providing full documentation of her research,
including a list of organizations she contacted, which includes World Health Organization, the
CDC, the Research Council of Canada, the Public Health of England, and
hundreds more, she said. Mount Sinai Hospital in Canada replied and she said
they told her quote, we are not aware the isolation of a virus in
the manner that you have described as possible for any virus. It is not
within the scope of current scientific processes. And she says, well, this
is not a limitation of technology. We have proteins and other smaller particles that
are purified and we can observe them. You know, it isn't that the
virus is so tiny that they can't do it. We have smaller particles than
viruses. We have proteins, and so why can't you isolate a virus that
isn't because it's small. As a matter of fact, they go on in
this to talk about electronic geometries, and you know, it's been about forty
years since I worked for Texas Instruments, and I didn't work in the manufacturing
facilities there, but I knew what they were working on and what the state
of the art was at that point in time, And forty years ago they
were trying to get down into the nanometer size particles, and actually they've now
gotten there as of a few years ago. And so they cannot only observe
stuff that is smaller than a virus. They can manufacture and manipulate stuff that
is smaller than a virus, and then you have biological things such as proteins
that they can isolate and observe. So they said, smaller parla crules are
purified. She said, these letters indicate that such purification isolation never happens,
never happens in virology. So why is it that the people who are making
circuits can work with stuff smaller than that, but they can't work with it
and they never bother to them. They never question it, so because if
they did purify particles, they would not be able to show that they actually
fit the definition of a virus. Like other experts in the past. Several
decades, Massey says that she and fellow researchers came to realize this anomaly was
not limited to COVID nineteen, but to all virology. She thus surmised,
this field of study is quote not scientific. They never have a valid independent
variable. Instead they go in the exact opposite direction. She said, this
is blatant pseudoscience. He said, the virus is just a concept. It's
an intellectual placeholder, like dark matter or something. Okay, so we see
some things out there and they're not moving in the way that we think they
ought to move, and so we can try to explain it by imagining that
there's some matter that we can't see that is dark and it's having some kind
of gravitational effect on the stuff that's out there. But they don't know if
there's any dark matter, just an idea. As a result, Christine Massinger's
colleagues made similar freedom of information requests for other alleged viruses. She said,
we asked for any record of any alleged virus that supposedly infects human beings being
purified from a sick person, and they admitted they didn't have any whatsoever.
Such inquiries included institutions such as the CDC. He specifically requesting the same information
regarding quote, any alleged virus that is supposedly covered by a so called vaccine
on their vaccination schedule, either for children or for adults. They were unable
to provide any records. Now She's not the only one doing this. Similar
research is being done by doctor Mark Bailey, a medical doctor New Zealand.
He wrote a twenty nine thousand word thesis Farewell to Virology. He's also been
made into a three part video series for explaining his arguments to a broader audience.
The first video describes Bailey as quote a microbiology, medical industry and health
researcher who worked in medical practice, including clinical trials, for two decades.
He says virology invented the fictional theoretical virus model, but has consistently failed to
fulfill its own requirements to prove their existence. It's claimed that virus is caused
disease after transmitting between hosts such as humans, and yet outside of cartoons,
computer models, and Hollywood movies, the scientific evidence for these claims is missing.
Like I said, physicists admit the things they don't know to get grants.
The virologists pretend to know to get grants. Perhaps virology's greatest failure has
been the inability to obtain any viral particles directly from tissues or fluids of organisms
like humans said to have viral disease. And yet we're told all the time,
oh, look, we got it here, and we got it there.
It's the PCR, the lie of the PCR. In order to obfuscate
the state of affairs, virologists have resorted to creating their own pseudo scientific methods.
Maybe that's what the piece stands for, pseudoscientific COVID research PCR as polymerae.
I forget what it was, but yeah, that would be a better
description of its scientific COVID research. So he says A. Virologists have never
isolated this extracellular vesicle particle alone and apart from thousands of other particles found in
human tissue fluids, and their petri dish and their test tube experiments to genetically
characterize it and prove that it is a virus particle. Virologists must isolate a
particle that they believe through photographic imagery to be a virus in order to in
fact prove it is a virus and not just cellular debris garbage. Again,
the diabolical genius of Fauci is to seize upon the PCR and to create an
illusion that he can magnify cellular debris and garbage by one point one trillion times
or more now more now uh, and say that somebody is sick the reason
that they're even when they're not sick. Right, Oh, you got you
got the cooties and you may not have any symptoms, but hey, my
PCR test says that you do. Well, it's not a test, and
it's not science. What it does is it gives a veneer of science,
a false facade of science, to a pseudoscience of orology, because they're just
magnifying cellular debris to a ridiculous absurd level. No one published scientific No,
not one published scientific paper exists which legitimately finds a virus. Viruses such as
SARS cove two are nothing more than phantom constructs, existing only in imaginations and
computer simulations, and we'll talk about what they have to say. Here you
have people, why Peter McCollough, who pushes back on this very thing,
and they answer him back as well. In this paradigm, cases of invented
diseases like COVID nineteen are nothing more than the detection of selected, tiny,
common genetic sequences and proteins that are purported or pretended to be viral. The
existence of an actual virus is not required in this fallacy loop of circular reasoning.
Thus, entire fictional pandemics can be built upon fictional digital creations, then
falsely sustained through meaningless in vitro test tube molecular reactions, and magnified not just
by the PCR test, but magnified by the media and the government and the
authorities. Another physician, doctor Thomas Cowan, MD, says, fact which
every virologist agrees to is that there's not on unpublished scientific paper where any particle
that you could call a virus is found in any biological fluid or sick human
or animal anywhere. And everyone agrees, All the urologists agree. They say,
that's not how you find a virus, But again they use the PCR
to pretend that they can observe it, to pretend that they can measure it.
In a document where Cowen is a primary author, is titled Settling the
Virus Debate. The point is made that similar described particles called exosomes have been
successfully isolated through purification and have not been shown though to be replication competent,
infectious, or disease causing. Hence they cannot be said to be viruses,
And particles exceedingly smaller than alleged viruses are regularly isolated, experimented on, manufactured,
and even constructed as nanotechnology. Density gradient centrifuge. Centrifuge is the scientifically
required standard technique for the demonstration of the existence of a virus. Yet even
though this method is described in microbiology manuals as the virus isolation technique, it
has actually never applied an experiment meant to demonstrate the existence of any pathogenic virus.
Said additionally, they explain how virologists describe viruses as being thirty to one
hundred and fifty nanometers in diameter, And we talked about this kind of stuff,
the absurdity of the superstition of thinking that a N ninety five mask let
alone, some kind of cloth handkerchief that you put over your face. I
mean, come on, this is we're back to people playing you know,
cowboy robbers, you know, with a going to rob the stage stagecoach and
put that mask on. You know that that's going to protect you. Seriously,
they demand that you wear that to go into a store or something.
And so they're supposed to be thirty to one hundred and fifty nanometers in diameter,
Yet molecular scientists are chemists find and isolate molecules smaller than one nanometer.
Again, viruses are supposedly thirty two one hundred and fifty nanometers, and yet
people are constantly working with nano one nanometer, that's what nanotechnology is. And
some of these things that are smaller than a nanometer that's one billionth of a
meter by the way, every single day they work with this, every single
day they do all sorts of things with them. IBM unveiled in twenty twenty
one the world's first two nanometer chip technology with two nanometer nano sheets, which
are easily able to manufacture, to find, to isolate, to even attach
to other nanostrips that are only twelve to forty four nanometers wide and only seventy
five nanometers all this much smaller than what they claim the viruses. Well,
we haven't isolated any of it yet, why not take it over to Texas
instruments or somebody, or send it, you know, if they don't have
the technology, send it to South Korea. They can clearly manufacture things of
this size, smaller than the size of a virus. They can find and
isolate them in order to attach the smaller two nanometer nano sheets onto them.
As a matter of fact, see this also goes back to the beginning of
orology. People could see in a microscope bacteria, but then they saw these
diseases that were happening, and they couldn't observe any bacteria that might cause it.
So they came up with the idea of virus too small to observe,
not too small to observe anymore. Rawle just can't find a thirty two one
hundred and fifty animeter virus and a large sample of spit them. Despite COVID
nineteen government propaganda suggesting that those infected carry the virus in such significant levels that
it can cause a person to become dangerously ill from up to six feet away
and can also be filtered out with an N ninety five mask. Again,
the mask is the most comprehensive test of IQ or the most comprehensive test of
compliance that we've ever had. The whole thing was a large Milgrim experiment.
Somebody in authority tells you to do this, somebody authority tells you to do
it to other people. You make those people put the mask on, even
if it's going to harm them, even if they've got a respiratory issue.
It makes it difficult for them to breathe, but it doesn't keep them from
getting a tiny particle like that. No way that it could stop that.
We talked about that over and over again. I mean, just all the
pictures of people inhaling some smoke and then you see a picture of them with
a mask and they're blowing it through the mask, They're blowing it around the
mask and all the rest of this stuff, and logically it doesn't make any
sense either. As I said, for longest time, going back two thousand
and two, they made it a criminal fence in New South Wales to sell
these masks, to tell people who's going to protect them from a disease and
at the time. They were also saying and even physicians weren't wearing them because
after twenty minutes, your mask is saturated with spittle, and if there is
anything in there, it's going to get smaller spit particles, and they're going
to stay airborn longer and travel farther, all of that stuff. So they
had a significant fine on that. In two thousand and two in New South
Wales, then i'mina view that viruses do exist defended by other help freedom physicians.
They said, the proverbial baby has been thrown out with the bath water.
And so there's a bit of a debate coming from Michael Palmer and Sukharate
Bahdi, and they push back on this. They said, Okay, just
because they allied to us about COVID doesn't mean they're alling to us about all
viruses. So they put out a paper or do viruses exist? They acknowledge
that the public has ample reason to mistrust the scientific community. Yeah, but
they say, don't take it too far. Don't throw the baby out with
the bathwater. So they make some fundamental statements that were soon countered by Massy
and an email that she's sent them. Also in a forty three minute video
analysis by a Cowan. First, they propose viruses often have a very characteristic
shape that is not likely to be confused with any particles produced by living cells
or debris left behind. In response, Cowen points out that they implicitly admit
that these viruses have never been isolated using the common definition of isolation. Then,
he says that their statement on this matter is clearly false is demonstrated by
many papers which directly refute it, including one which says that there's no way
to distinguish such alleged viruses from particles by visual only. Secondly, they PMB
Palmer and Bachti went on to say there's many biochemical methods for characterizing viral particles.
Cowen says that is simply circular reasoning. He says, how can you
know that they're actually dealing with viral particles if they've never isolated or properly identified
them. How can they know they're establishing genetic information that is characteristic of the
virus rather than a host cell culture if they have never isolated, that is,
they have never separated the virus from the host cell culture. He said,
no particle has ever been sequenced, characterized, or studied with valid controlled
experiments and shown to fit the definition of a virus. Again, when they
look at the exosomes, they say, well, but they haven't been shown
to a cause disease or transmit it. So he's third. They said that
not all viruses can easily be grown in cell cultures. He says, well,
that's an amazing thing to say, he said. In other words,
they tell us that the way that you isolate or find or prove the existence
of a virus is that you grow it in a cell culture. And he
said, and then you see the cytopathic effects of these very specialized cells,
So that is how you identify that a virus is present. And then they
turn around and say, well, some viruses you can't grow in a cell
culture. Didn't you just tell me that the definition of how we know that
there is a virus is that it causes a cytopathic effect in the cell culture.
And now you tell me that not all viruses can be grown in a
cell culture. Do you know it was a virus? How do you know
it was a virus in the first place, because that was what you just
told me was how I would know. And so they do this over and
over again. This is circular reason, tam Massey added, when an argument
relies on an abstract concept as if it were an established, concrete fact.
When a hypothetical scenario or situation is referred to and treated as if it was
a real thing, Continually referring to particles as viruses doesn't make them so it
is an evidence that they are, and it is misleading. Given the absence
of valid logical evidence. No amount of analysis of made up computer genome that
has never been shown to have a physical counterpart told tell us anything about an
alleged virus. Hence we come back to the PCR to give them an alleged
foundation of scientific observation. That is the evil genius of Anthony Fauci. He
realized that he's coming from the field of virology. He realized they had no
hard evidence for anything, and so he abused the PCR tests to pretend that
they did. I literally have hundreds of Freedom of information responses from over two
hundred institutions in forty countries and zero cases has any institution been able to cite
a study describing actual isolation and purification of an alleged virus, And so it
goes back and forth. I wanted to get to the statements of doctor Peter
McCullum. Oh, by the way, one more thing before I skip over
this. When Palmer and Bachte were pushing back on this and said, don't
throw the baby out with the bathwater. Yeah, we realized that there's not
really anything out there that has been isolated for COVID nineteen. Maybe that's a
special case, but don't say there's no such thing as viruses. And so
they went back to a nineteen eighty five study in which they claimed that the
virus was directly isolated with a new use of notobiotic, that is, a
germ free pigs. Colin provides an extensive analysis of the study, claiming that
it first presumed the presence of a virus without demonstrating it, that the experiment
had no control group, and merely further presumed the effects of diarrhea in pigs
was caused by a virus without sufficient scientific verification, and the question only one
study. It was done forty years ago. He said, they're having to
use a study, having to go back to nineteen eighty five to find a
study where they actually isolate the virus directly without using a cell culture, and
yet there is no evidence that there is a virus in this to begin with,
there's no evidence of any isolation of a new virus, new or otherwise.
They never have a pure form of this virus, so they could never
possibly study it. Calan said when P and B said, well, this
is all based on the fact that solely on the rigid demand that isolation be
accomplished without the use of cell cultures, well, Cohen says, this isn't
a rigid demand, it's just common sense. If you don't agree with that,
give us a definition of what isolation means. You know, if you're
going to isolate it, that means that it's there by itself, and you've
never done that with anything. Show us which part of the cell culture that
the isolation was performed in, and I can guarantee you that they will not
answer that question. They have no solid, solid scientific evidence. They have
an uncontrolled, irrational study from nineteen eighty four that doesn't even begin doesn't even
attempt to actually isolate anything, which is the whole point of their paper,
which is to show us that they have isolated a virus that they exist.
And so then we get to doctor Peter McCollough, who argues for viruses,
and he says in his podcast he's uncomfortable with the challenge to the consensus that
viruses exist. He said, all these viruses have been cultured and they have
been isolated. And so doctor Mark Bailey says, well, I have great
respect for doctor McCollough. I support his fantastic work of warning people not to
go along with the nonsense and not to take these toxic shots. But when
Peter says things like isolation, he does does he understand what he means because
he's not talking about physical isolation here. We know that they're not doing that,
and we know that they tried, particularly around the nineteen seventies, they
were really trying hard to purify particles and guess why they didn't. And then
enter Fauci. So they tried the nineteen seventies to isolate this stuff. Fauci
comes in and then mid nineteen eighties, you know, he starts, he
becomes the head of the AID, and then after that, you know,
after they've tried and failed in the seventies to isolate any viruses, then he
comes up with a PCR. That's how we do it. That's how we
convince people that it's science. We use it to say that we found a
virus when they didn't isolate HIV. Found a virus and it's what causes AIDS,
and we're going to create a vaccine for it. So again Bailey says,
when Peter McCollough talks about isolation, we have to remind everybody that this
is the virologist definition of isolation, which in fact doesn't really have a definition.
Some of the textbooks of virology don't even give a specific meaning for the
word isolation, so they pretty much use it however they want. What he
says is that the standard culturing he's just talking about sell breakdown experiments where a
biological sample is added to traditionally something like a monkey kidney cells which have a
propensity to break down because they have chromosomal abnormalities, and claiming that that is
an isolation technique to watch this breakdown. McCaulay continued in his podcast to point
out that Sino Farm, the company that makes the Chinese COVID vaccine. He
said, they actually culture virus in large quantities, then they kill the virus
and they give it as a vaccine. In other words, what he's saying,
is their COVID vaccine is not an mRNA thing. Now they're culturing the
disease, killing it and putting it out there. In response, Bailey referenced
to his paper explaining in February twenty twenty the Chinese study, which described how
their scientists took a lung sample from one forty one year old man with pneumonia
and then just looked for every single RNA sequence they could find in that fluid.
Then they created a silico model, that is a computer model, and
then compared it to others in the genetic database, and on that basis they
declared that there was a novel coronavirus, when there's nowhere in that paper that
shows anything that replicates, that shows anything that is infectious, and there's certainly
no evidence of these genetic sequences that they've published came from inside any particle that
they claim to have identified. By the way, does the Chinese vaccine work?
If the Chinese vaccine work, why did they pursue for such a long
period of time the lockdowns for zero COVID The people who are howling in Shanghai
in other places because they were isolated in the lockdown. If you've got a
working vaccine. If you understand all this stuff, Oh you isolated, you
killed it, you're going to give it to people. None of that work.
Please explain that. Then. Now see what was happening in Shanghai.
They had to give these upity an affluent to people, a lesson as to
who's really in control. So this is the kind of studoscience we're talking about.
When they're making declarations of isolation, they've done nothing of the sort.
And we can only encourage Peter to read the work that all of us have
done. Electron micross microscopy. I guess that is how you pronounced it,
way that I can do it. Imaged particles have never been shown to be
replication competent or disease causing in nature, and thus cannot be said to be
viruses. McCullough continued in his podcast, he proposed the COVID nineteen virus is
scientifically visible on an electron microscope, so when we watch it, he said,
the virus invades a human cell and then it multiplies inside the cell,
and the cell bursts and the viral particles mushroom out. Yet, after making
similar arguments on his substite page, In November of twenty twenty two. Doctor
Sam Bailey provided a refutation just four days later, claiming that the methods section
of the study that mccullull was citing reveals that the authors simply asserted that they
started with viral strains and some obtained specimens, and after adding them to monkey
kidney cells and observing their breakdown four to five days later, they declared various
particles to be viryons. For the more, he said, there was no
control experiment. Of course, they have fallen for one of virology's oldest tricks,
what we call the point and declare scam. Wow, sounds very much
like the PCR stuff. Sounds very much like, oh, just do a
clinical diagnosis and we'll send you. We'll give you twenty percent bonus on everything
you do. These people point and declare, point and declare pandemic. None
of these imaged particles have ever been shown to be replication competent or disease causing
in nature. None of them have been characterized to see what, if any
genetic material they contain. There are no particles that have ever been shown to
be replication competent and pathogenic, and so it's not just there's several people are
starting to do this now. And we look at doctor Michael Yayden, somebody
who like and I will say, you know, Peter mccallay has, you
know, put his career on the line to oppose these vaccines, and I'm
glad that he did. But you know, there's a lot of stuff that
I disagreed with him about in terms of politics and other issues. And doctor
Michael Yayden has also said, you know, I don't think that there's viruses
either. Doctor Michael Yayden was a vice president at Pfizer, the first whistleblower,
and he has been right about everything. He preceded everybody else. Lots
of papers asserting the same unproven thing, said Yayden. Simply do not bolster
an unproven claim. That's nothing but group think. Mccaulaugh I said on his
podcast, he said, for those who are kind of denying the presence of
the virus, I think we're approaching three hundred thousand peer reviewed papers on the
topic. I mean, this is a mountain of evidence to dismiss out of
hand. Well, I would just say you you got a look at the
scientific method. Consensus is not science. As a matter of fact Francis Bacon
called consensus. He called it academia. Yeah, they had a lot of
people with titles, They had a lot of people at universities that were very
well respected, even worshiped, that would say these things. But that doesn't
make it true. Francis Bacon said, show me reproduce it, let me
see it. Yeah, let's set up an experiment here and so Life site
News, which is where you find this article, asked doctor Michael Yadan for
a comment. He said, my initial concerns mainly with the attempt to pretend
that a lot of papers asserting the same unproven thing bolsters the unproven claim.
It doesn't. Back in the day when people thought the Earth was stationary,
in that the Sun orbited the Earth, had there been peer reviewed papers,
all the reviewers would pass papers on Earth centric numbers. Don't make it correct,
merely that once groupthink sets in, almost everyone will interpret evidence in that
light, and this continues until unequivocal evidence emerges to counter the errors of thinking.
Same thing as the climate science you want to grant. You repeat the
lies of climate science, no matter how many times they are disproven, shown
to be lies, shown to be false, predictions, no matter how many
times their models are discredited, they keep going because it works because of the
group think. So again, Michael Jayden And see the other part of the
problem that I have with McCullough is he's now joined on the bandwagon of pushing
this fear of gain of function right that they did it to us once there
was real virus is really core to how he makes his living now. And
he doesn't need to sell that in order to make loby. It's simply enough
to know that some of these products like I remcted and help people to get
over the respiratory illness. But he's going to buy into this because he wants
to go on the alarmist shows and tell you they're going to they're going to
make some kind of bird flu that's going to kill people. And he's no
better than Robert Redfield when he does that, Robert Redfield, who's like,
well, it's inevitable. This thing is going to naturally evolve. Birdflud is
going to naturally evolve to humans, and it's going to kill twenty five to
fifty percent of us who get it. And he doesn't know any of that.
He's just making this step up stuff up Robert Redfield, who is the
CDC director for Trump. That's an absolute line. We know why Redfield is
doing it. It's because he's getting big checks cut for him from testing companies,
from vaccine companies and other things like that. So he's pushing this fear.
He may have some other irons in the fire. Who knows, you
know. Peter mccallaugh says that they're going to create that they created this thing
and release it to everybody, and they're going to do it again. He's
simply pushing fear for money. In my opinion, he needs to honestly look
at this stuff. Michael Jayden earned a PhD in respiratory pharmacology. He spent
over thirty years working for the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world. He rose
to the most senior research position at Pfizer, becoming vice president and chief scientist
for Allergy and Respiratory. He resigned in twenty eleven and founded his own biotech
company, which was later sold to Novartists in twenty seventeen. And doctor Michael
Jayden doesn't believe that there's viruses out there. It's like, show me,
show me the evidence that there are virus is out there and it is simply
fraud for the stakeholders. Doctor Kevin Corbett, out of the UK British Researcher
said even many of his fellow medical freedom advocates have backed away from these challenges
to virology because they don't understand it, because they're frightened of the arguments.
Because of their investments in the industry. They're intertwined within the biotech industry,
whether they like it or not, and there's a lot that is at stake
here. That's why Klaus Schwab calls them stakeholders, and they don't want to
lose that. He went on to side a peer reviewed nineteen ninety three paper
and the highly credentialed Nature Biotechnology Journal, which he said indicated quote, there
is no proven HIV isolate what krrit mallis other scientists at the time we're saying,
and thus it's testing mechanism was fraudulent for demonstrating an HIV infection. The
PCR test was fraudulent, which is what Kerry Molse is saying. Said.
You can't prove that that's what's causing aids. He said, you can't prove
that that isn't just debris there. So Michael Yayden in twenty twenty two said
that he had conversations with people like this, and he said it distressed him
for quite some time, and then he eventually realized that he could no longer
maintain his understanding of respiratory viruses. This is a guy that's his whole field
as respiratory disease. He said. It collapsed the possibility that respiratory viruses as
described exist at all. They don't, said Michael Yaden. Those scientists who
are open to the argument have seen the logic in the paper, he said.
It's been completely ignored by so called scientists, especially in the field of
HIV, especially in the field now of COVID nineteen, COVID nineteen, especially
in the field of bird flu all these different things, right, but especially
ignored in the field of HIV, simply because the industry won't accept it.
In the industry is what dictates this, not the science. The science.
This is being led by the industries, said Corbett. By the money impacts
to this thesis incredible, would mean collapse of half for the medical pharmaceutical system
and a collapse of the childhood vaccination schedules. That's why it's important to talk
about this, and let me just close before we take a break. Here,
Listeria poisoned food kills two people in the United States. Now this is
bacteria. We've seen this before. This can happen around milk products and stuff.
It happened to ice cream factory with a Bluebell and Texas. It's just
not missing some cleaning and stuff like that. You start to get this bacteria
gruns, you can see it. And they had people get sick and people
who died with that. You had criminal charges brought against the ice cream company.
They fix that big fine criminal charges. And so this is what bacteria
which can be isolated, which can be observed, and you got at least
two people have died. Over two dozen have been hospitalized in the US amid
an outbreak of listeria food poisoning or listerosis listeriosis. So two people, one
in Illinois when a New Jersey died from the disease, said the CDC.
And so when you look at this, the question and twenty eight people very
sick hospitalized from listeriosis. So why is the CDC so fascinated and so focused
on bird flu? Well, you know we might have twenty five to fifty
prisons, people dying. We got to look for it everywhere. We've got
to look for it in dairy workers. It's bird flu. We got to
look for it in milk and all this other kind of stuff. We've got
to kill millions of chickens and everything. Why the fascination of bird flu?
Nobody's dyed. We've had two people die in the US, twenty eight others
have been hospitalized. This listeriosis has been reported in twelve states, and yet
the no payny attention that there's no press coverage of that is there. It's
just bird flu. At the same time, in Canada, they've had two
people die of a listeriosis outbreak. Authorities there have linked the illnesses with milk,
no with plant based milk substitutes. You see these people who are trying
to scare you to death about raw milk, the people who are trying to
scare you to death about bird flu. They don't care when people are actually
dying. They're selling you a narrative. They're not protecting your health. They're
not protecting your food. The FDA is there to protect the drug companies,
not the food supply, and they're not even there when they want to scare
you to death about raw milk. These two people who died in Canada died
from listeria that they got from plant based milk, silk and the great value
brands. I'd be Walmart's stuff. This is soy milk, I think,
so it's a plant based milk. But they want to shut down all the
raw milk factories. The incubation period for listeriosis ranges from a few days to
twelve weeks after eating contaminated food. The disease is especially dangerous to high risk
groups, such as pregnant women and people with weakened immune systems such as cancer
patients, elderly people in infants. They can't point to anybody being harmed by
raw milk, but there's soy milk substitutes. Because they're done in a factory,
they're able to do that. They want to shut down local farms.
But the problems that we have with listeria that are much bigger than bird flu,
which is not affected anybody, But those are coming out of the industrialization
process, because that is a very dirty process. Rock Finn Psalm one four.
Thank you for the tip. Hi, David. I'm off work today,
so I'm out here hoeing around in the garden, glad to get to
listen live and thought i'd buy you a coffee. Thank you very much.
I appreciate that thanks to the great work. Jesus is proud of you.
I hope so on. Rock Finn, a Syrian girl, thank you for
the tip. Great expose on the virus scam. David. I hope you
keep hammering on this. People need to wake up. I am because I
was skeptical about this as well. You know, just like doctor Michael Yating.
You can imagine, here's a guy his entire field is based on this
stuff that turned his world upside down, but he had the integrity. He
had the integrity to continue on with it and to tell people the truth regardless
of the consequences. I really I do like Michael Yayden. I haven't reached
out to him yet to try to interview him, but I hope to interview
him someday. We'll have to do that. I really would like to interview
him. Rock Fann, Diana Phillip, thank you for the tip. I
love that you're covering the virus topic. David. Thank you. Well,
something needs to be done, because folks, this is such a mountain of
lies, and it's beyond the PCR. But I think the key thing is
is that we understand the cynical, evil way that Fauci used the PCR to
give a scientific facade to something that was completely made up and had absolutely no
science to it. But he said, hey, we got a way to
measure it. Come on, it's real science. No it's not. We're
gonna take a quick break and we'll be right back. You know, a
world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. You're listening to
the David Knight Show. I got an update from Scott Sharam. Do you
remember Scott his daughter Grace, And he's got a website, Our Amazing Grace,
And they lost their daughter. Grace had down syndrome. They put a
do not resustate order on her, essentially killed her. And he fought not
just for the malpractice but because they actually murdered her. And he actually got
the judge to say, yeah, we will consider whether or not she was
murdered. We're not just going to make this a malpractice case. And so
he's working very hard on this. He put out an update. He said,
we just had a hearing. Purpose was twofold number one to rule on
a temporary gag. He said, we disagreed with this temporary measure because we
believe it was an abuse and was also being used as a potential tactic to
prevent the eventual trial from being public. That's the key reason why he's doing
this. He wants people to understand that this medical protocol that was imposed upon
us because of power greedy politicians and money hungry hospitals and the bureaucrats in between
all of them, that this thing was actually a the basis of people dying
in twenty twenty. We believe that this situation violates our First Amendment rights,
and our attorneys call the stunt a hostage taking tactic to obtain undeserved relief,
and so they had the hearing there, he said, Interestingly, one of
the defense attorneys attempted to dismiss his client in a last minute motion. We
haven't even taken the doctor's deposition at this point, and the judge denied that
request. I see these games as a complete waste of time and money and
an effort to wear us down. And he says, this is why your
prayers are most important, and so they don't understand that we have God as
our source of strength, and so do pray for Scott's Sham and his family.
They're not doing this because they're bitter and they want revenge. They want
to stop the murder. I've talked to him several times, We've interviewed him
several times on the show. That is their motivation is to stop the killing.
And we know that God wants that stopped. And so we can ask
with confidence and pray for them that this evil would be exposed, that God
would use their work and their time and their effort to expose this, he
said, regarding the gag order. During and after hearing the arguments, that
judge talked openly about the idea of releasing the transcrit but not the video.
He didn't issue a decision, but instead he required both sides to write a
two page brief that would answer the question of whether separating out the video depositions
from a release of the deposition transcripts was a violation of the First Amendment.
The briefs are due at noon on this Wednesday. My impression is that the
judge wants to follow the law, he said. Finally, the judge scheduled
a follow up hearing for next Monday to rule on the gag order to set
a new scheduling order, assuming that the parties can agree. Regarding the trial
date, he said, we can't wait a year, and no later than
May or June. Of course, a public trial be the most important opportunity
to wake people up as to what is happening in hospitals today. He said,
a reminder that this antichrist legal system is not where justice is found.
Assuming that we win, writing a check for Grace's death is not justice.
Medical malpractice is the number one cause of death in America. Doctors and nurses
have immunity from liability by following standards of care that FACCI put out the remdesivir,
which nurses now call run death is near yeah, declaring that the standard
of care. He did that unilaterally. It had multiple studies. He tried
to sell that poison as a remedy for AIDS. He tried to sell that
poison as a remedy for ebola. And then when people tested it, and
he had China did a test on it, and they put it up on
the World Health Organization's website, they got it down and that was taken down
that same day unless that showed that a it didn't do anything and b it
was very dangerous and killed a lot of people. A week later, Facci
put up his own study that had not been reviewed, and he said,
and he violated what the standard is for having a therapeutic. Therapeutic is supposed
to make something better, right, supposed to cure it at least some.
But it didn't have any of that. Nobody there was no difference. And
the cure rate between the control group and the group that got run death is
near. But in spite of that, he declared it to be the standard
of care. He said, Yeah, it doesn't make people better necessarily,
but if they survived, I say that they got better thirty five percent faster.
How do you even quantize that? Come on, come on, it's
ridiculous. He just at that point he had so much power he could do
anything that he wanted to by FIAT. Just amazing. So, yeah,
the standard of care run death is near. It is the standard of care
is designed to hasten our deaths, which is murder. He said. You
would expect any law designed to protect the public would result in minimum loss of
license to practice. The medical industrial complex in bed with our legislators and legal
system does not allow for that consequences and consequence. In Wisconsin, the medical
malpractice statutory limit is seven hundred and fifty thousand dollars. No matter what they
do, no matter whether they kill your loved one. Most you can get
a seven hundred fifty thousand dollars assuming a victory. The payment doesn't even come
from the doctor. The statutes further require that he or she has to have
medical malpractice insurance. So the guilty parties literally have no consequences for their actions
and you're not allowed to know, you see. That was one of the
things we go back to. When Trump was running in the twenty sixteen election,
as I said many times, he had a great paper about what needed
to be done to the healthcare system. It's not going to be perfect,
but it had a lot of very badly needed reforms, and it was put
out there because the two issues of the time where the border is going to
build the wall and Obamacare, you know, and all that kind of stuff.
So one of the things that they had there was transparency so that you
would know what the record was for physicians and for hospitals. Well. As
soon as Trump got elected that guy went down the memory hole. They deleted
that page immediately. And so they don't want you to know about people who
are constantly having malpractice things. They keep that hidden so that you, as
a customer, don't know about their record and you can't find out. You're
not allowed to know how much they charge versus what some other people charge for
the same thing. You're not allowed to know whether or not they are good
at what they do versus other people. Not allowed to know any of that
stuff. Even if you had the money to, you know, because of
tax rebates or because of medical savings accounts or whatever things like that. Even
if you had, even if they gave you a voucher, you wouldn't know
how to spend it because you wouldn't have any ideas. So which doctors and
hospitals are good and which ones are bad. They keep that hidden. This
reality goes against God's law, the fact that there's no consequences for their actions,
which is one of the many reasons our country is getting what it deserves.
He said, well, I absolutely agree about that. Anyway. Pray
for Scott Shara and his family. You can find them at Ouramazinggrace dot com.
Daisy Luthor. I'll just finish up briefly with us and we'll take a
quick break. Daisy Luthor, the Organic Prepper. So as the more we
learn about the made up rules and forced during the COVID pandemic, the more
outrageous the entire thing becomes. Fauci had the utter audacity of set in Congress
and admit that they had no data, so they just creatively improvise things like
social distancing measures. They fold a lot of people once, so shame on
them. But it looks like they're going to try to fool us again with
a bird fluid. If we fall on it, then shame on us.
If we don't take some lessons from this, writes Daisy Luthor, the Organic
Prepper, then we don't deserve to call ourselves preppers. It looks like we're
about to be tested on what we have learned. Boy, that is absolutely
true. We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back,
we're going to be joined by doctor Jane Ruby. So stay with us.
We'll be right back U defending the American Dream. You're listening to the
David Knight Show, all right? Joining us now is doctor Jane Ruby.
I've had a lot of people who've contacted me and said, you guys are
on the same page. You need to get her on and talk. And
I'm always happy to get people who, you know, when we're looking either
at politics or at the pandemic. Because the pandemic was politics, I was
happy to have them on. And doctor Jane Ruby has a lot of medical
experience as well as political experience. She is a licensed nurse practitioner. She
actually ran clinical sites for quite some time and then took a sabbatical and went
to Washington and worked there, so she knows both the politics and the medical
stuff. So it's great to have her and thank you for joining us.
It's good to talk to you you too, David. I have to say
you are definitely one of my go to people every day. Thank you.
It's not just the echo chamber. You bring such a great, you know,
new perspective of this. So I'm really thrilled to be with you today.
And yeah, well, thank you appreciate it. Tell people what you
think about the last four years? Is that broad enough? I mean,
you know, I'm looking at this and yesterday I said, I saw this
article, Well, what would you have done in Germany? In the nineteen
thirties, I said, you don't even have to think about that. What
did you do in America or in the UK or Canada in the last four
years? You know, what have you done in the twenty twenties, because
that's really the point of testing, you know, to see if you really
get this and what did you do. Do you go along with it even
if you understood it, or did they completely fool you or did they get
you to comply with it even though you knew what was wrong? You know,
take a look at that. So what do you think about these these
last four years and what we just saw at the Republican Convention where they just
kind of seemed to ignore what happened in twenty twenty except for the election of
course. Yeah, yeah, absolutely. I mean there was a huge,
huge elephant in that auditorium at the RNC, and I just can't believe the
American people. Well I shouldn't even preface it by saying I can't believe because
after what I saw in twenty twenty and the caving to all of this,
the masks, these shots, the whole bit by so many Americans really stunned
me at the time, and it shouldn't surprise me anymore that they're allowing themselves
to be you know, memory hold, and they're just so many people are
just going forward. And here's the thing, David, when I say to
people, you know, this is crazy, I point out things about Trump.
He's hiring all the wrong people. Again. You know, we saw
it in DC in the first term. You know, people say to me,
well, what are you going to do, doctor Jane, you know,
go vote for Biden. They're missing the whole point. They're missing the
whole point because you don't have elections. And actually there's a third choice between
Trump Biden. And the third choice is how about holding Trump accountable? How
about making him a better candidate? Right, I'm sure you agree with that.
Oh, nobody wants to criticize it. You criticize, you say what
happens. I mean, even the guy in the Virginia who was head of
the Freedom Caucus simply for endorsing Dysantis, so he was excommunicated from the Republican
Party. Right, so much for you know, freedom of thought and freedom
of speech. But to get back to your original question, I mean you
actually touched on I was fascinated again by your first segment. You touched on
two of my favorite topics. If you don't mind, I'll go into those
sure a little bit, maybe from a you know, additional angles. You
know the PCR test many people have forgotten. First of all, let me
take a broader stand. There is no validated test on the planet to diagnose
any flu or differentiate one flu from another. So people go yes, But
and I say, wholl whoa, whoa. Bring yourself back to the beginning.
Let me repeat what I just said and try to grasp what I just
said. When I try to educate people to validate an instrument, if I
hold up my pen and I say this is going to make your eggs tomorrow
morning, David, I have to test it for validity. Does it make
eggs? Right? I know I'm being a little silly, but he get
the point across. Yeah, But the second part of validity studies is reliability.
Okay, let's say this pen magically gets up tomorrow morning and makes David
Knight's eggs. But does it do it every morning or the majority of mornings?
That's your reliability. No, there's none of that testing on this.
In addition to the inventor carry mollis as we all know by now, who
said it's not diagnostic, and you did a great job of explaining why you
can get down to those molecular levels and you're really not seeing anything, which
is what he was trying to say. But the CDC itself in a sleight
of hand kind of. In twenty twenty one, July recalled the PCR and
people just, you know, people call me to this day. You know,
hey, I got sick over the weekend and I got a COVID test
and was positive. What, Oh my god, David, my head wants
to explode. Yeah, I know, I know it's right. It's just
like it's as ridiculous as a mask once you understand what it's about exactly.
I tried to tell people early on, the only time I did work in
a hospital, I did take care of patients independently. I have assisted in
surgeries. My specialty was cardiology. I assisted in bypass graphs. The only
time we wore a mask or two times in a hospital. If you're in
the o R, so in case you have a reflexive sneeze, you don't
spit into somebody's open gud or if they were on medications to suppress their immune
of capabilities because they got an organ transplant. Those are the only two times
we ever wore a mask because we knew that it had no other purpose.
So anyway to the PCR, and it's the gift that keeps giving because,
like you said it, without the PCR, you don't have cases. You
can't gin up h five on one, you can't gin up COVID two point
three or whatever it's going to be. And so that's my little spiel on
the PCR. And you know, let me just add to you know,
Fauci, you know, coming from that field, he knew that they had
a problem in terms of show me this or show me that during the real
sign and it was a perfect answer for that, you know, using it
to push HIV, which is where the big fight was between him and most.
But it gave this veneer that you could actually observe and do real science
with it. And that's the fundamental lie that he was able to exploit from
AIDS to COVID that he built his career, and he built all of these
deceptions on the PCR test. Truly is amazing. Yes, yes he did,
and a lot of innocent animals and millions of innocent people died, especially
in third world countries, but all over, including in the United States.
And just to wrap up on the RNC, that was the absurdity was that
there was no touching on the COVID nineteen shots as biological weapons, which has
been proven over and over again by countless analysts and scientists, the role of
the DoD You know, in my quest, I put out a tweet a
while ago, David, and I said, think about this, why don't
you ask Trump when they gin up H five N one and they throw it
in your face and you create your new panel, what are you going to
do differently? Because if he says nothing, you know you got your deep
steak guy. He's just picking all the wrong people. I know. We'll
get into that in a minute, but I want to touch on my second
favorite topic that you covered if I could earlier, and that was McCullough.
I've been on to Peter McCullough for over two years. And here's my dubious
distinction is no one they can come after me, David. They can call
me names, they can call me fake, they can disparage my credentials,
but they've never proven me wrong. And I called him out two two and
a half years ago because I was in a private telegram chat C nineteen expert
group that he created himself, and in that chat David one day, to
my astounding, he posted a communication to us with some data on nova vacs.
When nova vacs first came out, right, it's also a biological weapon.
It gets to the mRNA in your body, but through a different mechanism,
different story. And I questioned in front of everyone, well, why
are you promoting it's not a vaccine and it's another weapon, and boom.
I was blocked from that group shortly after that. You have to understand,
we were doing each other's podcasts, We were friendly, we were colleagues,
so it really was a huge red flag for me. There are three problems
I have with him. First of all, he's taken. If you look
at Chuck Grassley's Sunshine Act, the website is OpenPayments dot CMS dot gov,
the government's repository for money. Every time I took a physician out in my
pharmaceutical role, I was in the industry for twenty years, as you probably
know, we had to file some paperwork with the CMS and we had to
you know, if I took out doctor Jim Smith, and it was a
two hundred dollars bill. I had to file that, so they keep those
accumulated. He has taken since twenty fifteen five point five million dollars and it's
not that's in addition to research grants now by comparison, and the late doctor
Zelenko just as a comparator in that same five year period took about six hundred
dollars from pharma over over seven or eight years. That's like a sandwich a
year, right, So that's number one big farm, and you know they
expect something for that money. As you know David, So what has he
done. He's pushed a very dangerous ant, supposed anti viral called pak Slavit
pack. Slavid is two anti virals, normatrel vir and written avir. Written
vir has a black box warning and has had it for years by the FDA.
It's highest warning level for a drug before they pull it right, and
so it's very dangerous. And you have Albert Borla coming on promoting off label
saying, yeah, if it doesn't work the first time, take another round
of it. Where are your studies for that's taking it? Keep filling that
scrap you'll be fine. Wow. And that's against the law. By the
way, that's off promotion by a commercial agent of a company. In contrast
to how I knew there was a problem in twenty twenty. I'm a prescriber
as a nurse practitioner, so I understood the lie right away when they said,
well, I got sick myself, and I said to my doctor in
March of twenty twenty, okay, just phone in the hydroxychloroquin. You know,
we weren't aware of ivermectin at the time and its effectiveness. And he
said to me, I can't do that. I'll lose my license. What
there's no law that prohibits a prescriber from prescribing off label. The illegality comes
in, of course, when a company, whether you're on the medical side
or the commercial side, promoting something other than that for which the drug was
approved. They can't. Companies can't do that, right, So he pushes
Packsloviy. He's got a protocol David for COVID right like you said in your
first segment. He loves that narrative, that vaccine, virus and narrative,
so he promotes and then the Nato Kaines story. It's a asociated with fibrint.
There aren't there no proof. And by the way, David, like
you mentioned in the first segment, when he throws those studies at you,
I want to tell the general public, please don't be intimidated by that,
because half of what he throws at you, if you really read beyond the
title, is like you said, a facsimile of a segment or a sequence.
It has nothing to do. And where's your instrument? I said to
him, where's the instrument? Remember good science, you measure before, then
you give your onion powder, then you measure it after. Right, where's
your instrument that you're using, Peter to measure your pre and post spike proteins.
And I'll land my plane here. If they've never proven that this virus
exists, and I'm all about that, I have not seen it proven to
me in its whole and pure form from an ill individual. Then how do
you believe in the spike protein? How do you believe in a portion of
something for which the whole has never been demonstrated? Oh? Yeah, yeah,
it absolutely is amazing. And when I looked at the way they were
describing the mr anda at the very beginning, and it's like Oh, okay,
so it's going to go in here and it's going to start replicating itself,
and where's the off switch? It sounds awful lot like cancer, you
know, and what is this thing that is making in your body? But
that was their whole narrative, you know, that's the way Moderna described it.
It's like, yeah, we're gonna we can do this really fast,
President Trump, because we'll turn people's bodies into manufacturing facilities. And it's like,
okay, let's stop right there. That's enough for me. And here's
the most egregious thing. His latest stunt, promoting another RNA synthetic lab in
Silico created god knows what it is to go in after the next the previous
one, and people are saying, in it, what is that? What
is that? That is the other mRNA that he's promoting. It's called si
RNA and it stands for sit down, everybody, small interfering. Isn't that
convenient? And it's so genius that the first one was not genius and it
was able this this one, though, David is able to go target what
the first one did and then reverse the damage. That's a fairy tale.
There's no science behind that. And where are the double blind will seeble controlled
trials before and after for this si r NA. He is so in the
thick of Farmer's grip, it's not even funny. Well, I had a
big problem with him and anybody who is promoting this Lablak theory, you know,
or deliberately leaking it out, scaring people the gain of function stuff,
because as far as I'm concerned, that is a red herring to keep people
away from looking at the effects of the vaccine. What do you think about
that? I think it's one hundred percent true. There are actually two biological
weapons. One is used intermittently and that was what was created, I believe
from the paperwork and the documentation by at Fort Ditrich by the DoD and they
use it to drop I don't know when an aerosol way or something to show
pockets of illness. Then they create these cases and everything, but the major
biological weapon, if you look at the work of Catherine Watt, Sasha A.
Lotapove, and by the way, doctor Mike Eden is a mentor of
mine as well. He's the head of their investigative group called Team Enigma.
This. Pfizer even admitted it in the motion to dismiss argument in theacks Brook
Jackson whistleblower case. Hey, we weren't making a pharmaceutical product. We were
making a military prototype. So there's no labliederal your DoD, which is a
reco operation, just laundering and laundering and laundering money is actually produced these shots
and the material. And here's a scary part, David, we have more
than just h fight on one. You had Albert Burl a year and a
half ago, I tried to warn the public admitting in a Davos interview that
the fall of twenty twenty three would have seasonal flu shots made entirely of this
mRNA poison, and god knows what else it's in in injection form botox,
ladies fillers, childhood schedule. They don't even hide it. It's in the
childhood schedule multiple multiple times. So this is a very frightening time for people
not to be paying attention. It surely is, you know. And when
you look at it, everything is going into everything is going into drugs to
control people. All the stuff about ozmpic and everything, and wegavy and you
know, well you can't control our hunger. So let's come up with an
injection what's in that. You know, it's absolutely amazing to see how trusting
people are. They trust the government, they trust the press, they trust
the science, which is what you're supposed to do, right, Just trust
the science, yell, and let me bring it back to President Trump and
JD. Vance really quickly. The guy is entrudged in numerous companies, by
the way, with his buddy Vivic. Vivic and his brother Shankar Ramaswami's Mammy
Ramaswami provided them with all these opportunities and you have they're all in together and
they're making millions right now in companies that are going to generate more mRNA.
Where are we going? Oh yeah, oh, it's really it really concerns
me when you look at Peter Teel and Peter Tiel and Elon Musk are really
excellent at manipulating the conservatives. You know, you had Teal come out and
say, yeah, I don't like those people at Davos, and yet he's
a permanent fixture at Builderberg. You know, he like Scarp and these other
people like that, they're always there. And when you look at what they
want to do in terms of technocracy, I think one of the key things
is people just don't understand what the technocracy is. They want to try to
pigeonhole people into some categories political categories that they already know about. Oh well,
their conservative or their socialist, or their Marxist or this or that are
a populist. But the technocracy thing is a completely different deal. And what
confuses them, I think is that it's got you know, it's got a
little bit of this, and it's got a little bit of that, but
it's got its own thing. And you know, these people seek to rule
the world through their technological prowess and their inventions and that type of thing.
And it is a very dangerous, i would say, satanic move to think
that they're going to become like God, They're going to live forever, They're
going to transfer themselves in machines. I mean, that's where they ultimately go.
Peter til is right there with Singularity. It is absolutely amazing to see
JD. Vance is now this acolyte of this guy who really you know,
put him in, put him into politics, put him into venture capital and
all this other kind of stuff. And Peter Till is a guy who created
the Singularity Foundation. It's just amazing unbelievable. It is amazing that people,
even though we've tried to make the connections for them, that the American people,
it is. Trump was truly right in twenty fifteen or twenty sixteen when
he said I could step out in Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and they'd still
love me and they defend me. And you know what, He's been proven
right over and over and over again. They just can't get off the sikaphant
to look. And I've said, what is he going to do differently if
you won't address the issue now of the way warp Speed went by the way.
I don't know if people know this state of what warp Speed is in
full operation. It is offices and resources and budgets and it's humming along.
Where do you think it's going. Yeah, all the scary you know,
all this stuff that they put it in place, and it is just it
continues if you don't root it out. It's like this weed and it's putting
down deeper and deeper roots and it's going to just sprout up in a big
way. And that's the way all of these bureaucratic programs are. Once you
put something in you know, going back to Reagan when he got in,
he's the Department of Education was created during the election year of nineteen eighty.
Well, I'm going to get rid of that. He didn't get rid of
it, and by the time he left it was gigantic, And so we're
going to see that with these guys. They just headed off to each other
in kind of a professional wrestling tag team match, isn't it. Well,
when you think about it, I mean, we currently have I have military
intelligence friends that are on our side that have said to me for a year
now, Jane, there are people inside the West Wing, the Executive Office
Building, which is on the White House grounds, and in the White House
that literally have offices that are that are from the CCP, that are the
domestic enemies are just as dangerous the Peter Teels in my estimation. And one
of the thought I had about Elon Musk, I don't know if you've thought
about this, but the fact that starlink is so available in Sheep and everybody
wants it in their house, and I'm thinking to myself, Kay, Starlink
Neurallink, maybe if you put this thing in your house, it's saying maybe
it does something with your wife why would you want to take the Yeah,
it's funny. When I when I saw that and saw the links and everything,
it made me think. I haven't talked about it, but it is
like a predicative program. What was it, Carl Travis? Was that the
Kingsman or something who are at one point they flipped the switch on the satellite
thing, and you know, everybody flips out and goes nuts and starts killing
each other, you know. And of course they begin all of this stuff
when they're in the church, so that the hero has to fight off and
kill these people in you know, they just instantly the flip, the switches
flipped and they start attacking him. Yeah, it's funny how they come up
with this crazy stuff. And I tell people all the time that the big
mistake that we make is that we I guess we'd say if we were George
W. Bush would say, we misunderestimate the technology these people have and how
evil they are. You know, they are morally capable of anything, and
they're pretty close to technologically capable of anything. And so that's the that's really
what we're up against. I think, Yeah, I totally agree with you.
It's difficult to strike a balance between thinking, look, they had the
military had the Internet years before we even knew it existed. So it's kind
of a fear factor of oh my gosh, what do they have now that
we don't even know about. But I want to balance that with maybe they
have less than we think they do, and maybe it's they confabulate it with
the fear factor we've seen so much. But it just concerns me and going
into this election, I don't believe. I've said many times in my social
media we don't have elections anymore. And here's one of the key of features.
You know, Trump got taken out by three things, right technically,
internet connected voting machines, two weeks of early voting, in those two thousand
meal drop boxes. He never said a word about them, right in this
in this election cycle, the three things that took them out, and those
three things are still in place in most counties. We have twenty thousand drop
boxes in Palm Beach County alone, sitting in front of DMVs and other public
vialism. I'm looking at these things, going why is this still here?
Oh? Yeah, all the stuff is still there, and what do you
think I mean? I'm looking at this and the passions are being escalated on
both sides now, especially after there was you know, the shooting of the
Trump rally. I don't know what to call it, but after there was
a shooting of the Trump rally, everybody is like, Okay, that's it,
and they are just ready to have a war if they lose. And
that's why I said, I've been describing Trump as as kind of the Mason
Dixon line for a new civil war. Both sides want to fight over him
if he doesn't win. Yeah, I'm concerned about what do you think about
that? I mean, you know, they could easily manipulate us into a
civil war just by manipulating the election, which is a very concerning thing because
we know how they manipulate the election, and a civil war, you know,
massive civil unrest gives them exactly the excuse they need for a more blatant,
I say, more blatant martial law in lockdown. Hey, they're not
going to get us to do it for a virus again. They know we're
not going to go for it, even people that are not completely aware,
but so they have to go about it in a different way. We have
no excuse, or we have no other option. You're rioting in the streets.
We have to protect people. You know, again it's always under protecting
people. But you know, David, I got to bring up that ear
bandage. Can I just say a word about it? Yeah? Yeah,
I've got my doubts as well. What do you think about the air bandage?
First of all, if your ear got grazed, and there's two stories
it got grazed, there was so much blood that it was all over.
But if it got grazed, what do you need that giant patch for.
You need the patch because there's nothing wrong with your ear exactly. But you
got people out there in the audience. They're wearing the patch and on it
it says fight fight Fight. They wrote that, put a piece of paper
on their ear says fight fight Fight. I look at it. There was
somebody who did a testa and these guys were, you know, all about
Trump, and you know, they were not trying to debunk Trump at all.
But what they had was a head that had this gel like material that
was like human flesh. They would use it for ballistics and stuff like that,
and the skeleton that you could see inside the head, and they put
a red Maga cap on it. And so uh so they've got this and
they're you know, they get a little bit closer range so they can actually
make this shot and they get a shot in the ear and it put and
they come back and go wow. I was surprised because they had a very
very fast camera that was on it, so you could see this bullet in
slow motion going through it and it opened up a big hole. And the
surprised that the days that it did. And it's like, yeah, and
I'm looking at these pictures and I see red, but I don't see any
hole or anything torn or anything missing as the bullet hitting is ear it really,
you know, Like I said, I don't know what to call this
thing. And we've got a lot of different theories out there about a lot
of different things, but I got my doubts about all of it. I'm
just concerned about how it's going to be used, and how it's being used
is to really again ramp up everybody around Trump for and against and things like
that, you know, And it's a so's this whole election when we talk
about election corruption. I used to be involved in third party politics, and
so I know about the ballot When everybody was talking about and said, well,
look, you know he put the vote by mail stuff in, and
you know, we we knew about the vulnerabilities with machines and the internet,
have done something about it. We didn't. And then we add this new
thing about that. But I said, all the election corruption begins with the
ballot. And now look at what is happening with a ballot. All these
people who voted in the primaries, and of course they did anything they could
to shut down the primaries. Now they're just going to overturn all that and
they're going to do their own thing in a couple of weeks, just hand
select candidates, because it is a selection. It's not an election, not
at all. And I mean, if anybody thinks there are real elections since
what you witnessed in twenty twenty, you just aren't paying attention. And I
knew something was very wrong. I'd been very devoted to Trump as a candidate
as a president in the prior and I knew something was wrong. On five
o'clock on January sixth, and I'll tell you why he came out. I
call it the Isis speech. You know, you know, when you get
they got caught by Isis. They threw an American in like a jumpsuit,
and the person would stand there and say, I'm Jim Smith and I hate
America, and I'm you know they were under duress. He just looked.
He had that black coat on. He was in front of the Rose Garden
and he said, look, we know it was stolen, but you got
to go home now. And I'm thinking, got to go home now.
Our country was just stolen and a coup. Why would we go home.
I'm not saying violence, I'm saying whatever, but have a different solution.
And if you've thought you if you believed you won, David, if you
believed you one from the people, we the people in the United States the
presidency, would you have ever walked out of that building. I'm sorry,
I'm sorry, and I'll tell you. The other thing that made me suspicious
about this event with the ear shooting is, look, he's been attacked before
and you've seen him taken off stage. They immediately surround that. He didn't
come back on After that one time where they took him off at the back
of the stage, he didn't come back and yeah, raw rah no,
they whisked him away and that was the end of it. This one so
strange. You're gonna raise your arm Reagan style and expose your trunk in your
underarm where they can get into your heart with a shot. I don't think
so they knew he wasn't in danger, David, So I just wanted to
mention that too. Yeah. Yeah, it was kind of funny watching Bill
maher is saying, you know, wow, look at that. He said,
luckiest guy in the world. And he was serious about he wasn't really
being cynical about it, but he says, yeah. He gets up there
and he does this, you know, fight, fight, fight, and
he goes, that's amazing. He goes, take one, we got it.
You know. It's almost like they were And I said, yeah,
that's that is my thought exactly. It was almost like they rehearsed it.
Take one, We're done, you know. Was it was amazing? Yeah,
truly, Well your point. I absolutely agree. I'm concerned about how
it's being used and going to be used going forward. They've got them locked
up, those sickophants. Yeah, yeah, it is. It is strange,
and they cannot it's the you know, when all this stuff started back
in twenty twenty, I said, you know, the entire country has become
OCD. They've scared everybody to death. Nobody wanted to touch a you know,
the pump at the gas put the gas in their car. You know,
everybody's afraid to even do that. I said, the entire nation has
become psychotic with this OCD stuff. And we have this situation with the people
who are so focused on Trump and they cannot make these connections. You know,
they absolutely hate the vaccine, but they can't and won't connect it to
him. It's an amazing double think, isn't it. It is an incredible
double think. The excuse is that people come out actually show the pathology of
their inability to make the connections. Like, for example, when people say,
oh, he was not telling you to take the shots. When he
told you to take the shots, he was telling you to think, look
between the lines, and don't take the shots, go take ivermectin. Well
that's like four leaps. I don't even know how you get there. But
it is such as an incessant, just burning desire to cover for this man.
Even when he starts to talk about making Larry Fink, the CEO of
Blackrock, his Treasury secretary, Well you know he was going to be Hillary's
a Treasury secretary. You know, when she was so far out in front
in twenty sixteen, they said, you know, they were talking about how
they're going to fill out her cabinet, and it was going to be Larry
Fink was going to be Treasury secretary, just like for Trump. That's why
I say, there's no difference between these people. You're going to get the
same government, because the government is going to be the personnel are going to
be the policy. And you put these people in, you're going to get
the policy of black Rock and Larry Fink. Whether it's Trump upfront or whether
it's Hillary. It just makes it easier for them to control people. I've
told these people that when we talk about the ivermectin thing, well, you
know, he tried to tell us about iverymcnen I said, well, why
didn't he manufacture it? Look at all the trouble they went to to manufacture
the ventilators and they were killing people. He could have the ivermectin was cheap
to make, and they could you know, and it's not patented anymore.
He could have, first of all, could have used his power said nobody's
going to stop you from getting a prescription filled from a doctor. Didn't do
that. But if he wants to take this proactive approach and make remedies some
of the federal government, I don't know where we find that in the constitution.
But if he wants to do that, then do it with ivermectin.
But he didn't. He didn't do it with HGQ either. Very disappointing,
very disappointing, and in terms of surrounding himself with the wrong people, we
saw this in twenty seventeen. It was such a disappointment. After his inauguration,
I wrote an article. I remember the website great Again dot gov,
where everybody was so thrilled he was in. He said, they said President
Trump wants to use all of the loyalists to come in, and a lot
of these people got appointments in the administration. And then they started contacting me
because I had a little podcast in DC, and they said, doctor Jane,
the holdovers are the Obama managers. They're still here and they're writing us
up and firing us. So I wrote an article great and then they said,
oh, we lost the database. Remember that the show on Spicer database.
I mean I wrote a second article saying, hey, loyalists you're fired,
because really, anybody who was loyal to him. When I was in
the Office of Presidential Correspondence in his in his administration, I would say,
oh, my gosh, isn't this great President Trump? We got somebody in
the way, and a lot of them were from the Bush you know era
and the Obama era, and they just looked at me. These were Republicans
and whatever, and they looked at me and they said, yeah, yeah,
that's great, and they like walked down the hall I used to I
worked in the EEO B. And I thought, why aren't they happy like
me? Yeah, because they realized that we got taxation with that representation,
regulation with that representation. That's what's happening in Washington with a bureaucracy. It's
permanently there. Yeah, you know when when you look at all this stuff
and people, you know, he's trying to warn us, He's trying to
get us the good stuff. I mean, that was that was the issues
that I had in Info Wars. Why things blew up there? You know,
I was going to tell people that Trump's got another shot, you know,
and it's the good shot, and all this other kind of stuff.
It's crazy. And then when you look at you anyway the sixth, you
know, it was December the fourteenth that already had the Electoral College votes sent
in. And at that point, you know, they could have done something,
as I've said many times in the audience, they could have done something
at the state legislatures, but they didn't. And so at that point it
really was it really was too late. But the whole thing, the whole
genesis of this is just based on such incredible lies. You know, just
a couple of days after the election, and even see Bannon talking about it
to that group of people with the Chinese billionaire Guo telling them, yeah,
on October thirty first, he said, yeah, when it happens, we're
just going to tell everybody we want. And so that's the kind of thing
that I'm concerned about, is that this election is going to be used to
push us into more open conflict because they know the season that we're in,
and most people don't. Everybody talks about millennial this and boom or that and
all the rest of the stuff. But the people came up with a term
millennial and gen Z and gen X and everything. They had a very good
theory about every eighty years, everything turns around, and we're in the center
of that, right, and we've only got about another four or five years
for this stuff to be finished. And they're looking at all the institutions being
changed, and I think that's why we're seeing so much chaos and why everything
is being thrown out there. They understand, as Fauci did when he said
in October twenty nineteen, how are we going to get everybody to take a
vaccine? He was asked at Milkin Institute, and he said, will we
do it from the inside. We do it with chaos, and we do
it ineratively. That's everything that they're doing right now. They're deliberately creating chaos
for the inside, and they're continually escalating that chaos. Yeah, you know,
you've often talked about the lockstep nature of this and that it goes across
everything. One of the most the things I've been most outspoken about, and
I've been unequivocal about it, it is the Congress. And when I say
all five hundred and thirty five, I don't care who has an affection for
Thomas Massey. I've already tussled with him, and I've chanced because he's still
in the position anybody who stays there. It's like the nurses who stayed in
the hospitals and the doctors. You are enabling this big, gigantic system to
continue to kill people. Whether you're doing it yourself physically or not, you
are enabling the system. And even though a few of them raw raw And
I've gotten into private email tussles with Senator Ron Johnson. Happy to show those
because they're actually public information. In my opinion, it was an official email,
you know, by a government official where he feigned indignation, and I
said, you're only using this for your next reelection campaign. You may talk
and have all these hearings, like you know Marjorie Trader Green and some of
these other people you know who likes to stand in her bikini, but you're
not going to do anything. You could have hauled this company, Fizer or
Journal, all these companies in You could tie them up in discovery. There's
a lot you can do, even as one, you know, senator or
Representative David I tell people, don't even look to Congress. I told Brad
Miller the Military Accountability Project friends of mine. I love my military. It's
one of the reasons I came out in this whole thing. Four years ago.
I've said, stop, you know, getting gaslighted by Congress, because
they're going to take you to a few parties on the hill. I've been
there, done that, selfies with famous people, and you're going to go
home. They're not going to do a damn thing. Sure about the military
that are still under mandates in many areas of the military, and you know
all that, but this this is a big concern. And yeah, I
always saw that with Trey Goudy. You know, it's like, okay,
so he's got all this stuff. We have ample evidence about what happened with
Ben Gaysian said, they do nothing about it. But he gets all this,
he gets grandstands with all this stuff, and then he gets a talk
show, giggut Fox News and you know, Jim Jordan another one of these,
Oh let's hold a hearing about that. And they'll never do anything.
As you point out, they could tie them up in a lot of different
ways. They could cut the money to these people, but they don't.
That's their key weapon, and they keep funding everything, including you know,
the foreign wars and all the rest of the stuff that they complain about.
All they do is show these have these hearings. The argument that you made
in terms of enabling them as one that I've actually made about schools for example.
You know, it's like, yeah, we got good teachers, and
unfortunately many times what happens is these these you know, when you have a
good teacher in school that gets people let their guard down. It's like,
well, you know, yeah, but maybe they are really an excellent teacher,
but they can't really change that institution that's there. Instead, what it
does is it builds people's confidence in something that is really going to rip their
kids apart. And so I understand which argument is there about even no excuse,
yeah, yeah, no excuse, Yeah, you stay in Congress or
enabling it every congress before them. The disillusionment has been so real, David.
You know, Reagan was a beloved it will just take him as an
example, such a beloved president. But like you say, he blowed it
up, you know, government, just like the rest of them. He
gave us in pharma immunity, he gave us, he put that burden of
compensation on the back of the American people. Despicable because he cave to the
farm you know Trump. I mean, it just goes on and on and
on. It's every president, it's every Congress. But we're living with this
Congress right now. And I just can't stand people like, you know,
just not realizing. I mean, you know, it's Trey Goudy's I used
to say, all hearings, no action, right like Texas, you got
all all had no cattle. You look rich, but you're not really doing
anything. You don't have any cattle. And this is going to go on
and on and and you know, David, I take the slings and arrows
every day. You're this, you're fake, you're that okay. And then
eventually when they see that Congress has allowed this and they've been you know,
by the way, they should be incensed that Congress exempted themselves from these shots.
Hello, and their three thousand staffers and eight hundred what is it,
eight hundred thousand Chinese Exchange students. How interesting? Well I didn't know that.
I didn't know about the Chinese Exchange students. Yep, all yeah,
there you go, wow, wow crazy. Yeah. Yeah, that's a
small gun right there. So what do you tell people? You know,
where do you you know, we don't want to leave people hopeless with all
this stuff, So what do you tell people to focus on. I tell
people, well, I'll let you tell people what you focus on. Well,
I mean, like I said, you're my go to person, and
everything I share with the public is literally a composite of people like you,
good patriots, good Americans, and people who are intelligent enough to figure this
out. And you're right. I don't want to leave people with doom and
gloom. I passion up the negative, the scary stuff, because because people
need to wake up. Yeah, they need to really stop going to Johnny's
soccer game and not giving this more thought. But here's what I tell people.
Okay, then this none of us is going to change anything at the
federal level. It's such a behemoth, it's such a dangerous monster. We
are being run by foreign and domestic enemies. There's every bit of evidence to
show this. It's all out there if you just take the time to do
it. So what does that mean? We all need to stay healthy mentally,
physically, keep our families going, because we need to survive in order
to thrive. On the other side of this, I am hopeful David Hope
is not a plan. I'm very much focused what I'm doing in my spheres.
I have military intelligence, I have political intelligence. I have all kinds
of resources that I put together every day. And what we're all doing and
talking about is, yes, I'm still going to help educate the public and
do my thing a little bit, but I'm going to focus more on the
solutions, and for me, the solutions start local. I've said to people,
it's very basic, and I don't like when people throw out meat and
say, oh, it's local. Start there. So let me give a
couple of pieces of that. Look around you now, I know it sounds
silly. Who's got an American flag on their home or apartment? In your
neighborhood? Who is of like mind? You already know in your family you
have people who hate you now because of this, and people who are of
like mind. Your neighbors, your family, get your community, get your
barriers set up, not necessarily a fence, but hey, look if stuff
goes south. Look, I'm a nurse practitioner, you're a carpenter, you're
intellect. Okay, we're going to support each other and create an infrastructure parallel
so that we can stay off of their grid as much as possible. Off
the grid is independent and you can protect yourselves. Maybe we won't see it
in our lifetime. I don't think i'll see it. I'm way too old,
but I do believe that in it'll take a generation or two and people
will look back and say, boy, they were right, they understood what
we're doing. I'm glad we followed their lead, because you need to survive
this oncoming thing that's happening in our government and our country in order to get
to the other side. So yes, you need to ask yourselves in your
family, if we couldn't get to an on grid store for twelve months,
let's go the worst possible that you could think of. What would we eat?
Where would we get the intermittental power electricity? What do we have to
protect our resources that we were smart enough? Right, So you better have
some firearms, you better have some perimeter and those kinds of things that gives
people working things to do that we'll come back to serve them. And then
just don't send any money. Please don't send money the RNC or to anybody
in Congress. Please don't. Yeah, for years, when they would send
me a fundraising thing because of my registration whatever, I would take all the
paperwork and I would wrap it up in their postage paid return envelope and send
it back to them without putting anything on it. So I didn't know what
was coming from. It's like you pay for the postage sentence that. But
yeah, I absolutely agree with that. You know, we got to do
this locally. It begins with us, and we need to have you know,
we need to have alliances with people. We need to learn that real
prepping is really about skills, It's not just about accumulating stuff. So and
that's what I want people. That's why I say, you know, when
we look at the elections, you know, it is a big distraction.
It is a big reality TV show, and I think it's there to distract
us and to move us away from the things that we could do that would
really make a difference. And that is all local, all the things that
are going to make a difference. And we still have an opportunity to do
some things individually as well as even in some areas you might have some ability
to do things at local government. Because we saw a big difference and what
was happening in twenty twenty with those lockdowns, it was a big difference from
place to place. I traveled across the country and so that really hammered home
the point to me that you know, we need to focus a little bit
more on the local area. There can be a lot of corruption anywhere that
you go. I mean, we're dealing with people, there can be corruption,
but there's also more of an opportunity to do something at the local level.
Even Elon Musk tried to explain that to people that Soros was smart because
he was leveraging his money on local district attorneys. And you know, that
is a very cynical thing that he's doing, but it is a good strategy
because all politics is local, but your life is really local. And if
you don't have this kind of a relationship with other people, and I would
also say a relationship with God, because when I look at at Hope,
I'm looking at that as a confident expectation. That's my grounding, that's that's
what I know that I can trust on and that anybody's going to take that
away from me no matter what happens life or death. And so you've got
to have a foundation, you've got to have relationships, and you've got to
start building from the ground up instead of from the top down. Everybody,
that's the thing that's so annoying to me is to see that conservatives have bought
into this idea of top down solutions from government. They want the government,
they want the president to do everything. It's just amazing savior contexts, and
I like I do want to spend a few minutes talking about you know,
the Lord and your spirituality and how important that is right now. Because for
those people David who did unfortunately make the wrong choice under dress, but it's
clearly the wrong choice and took the shots, that's not a judgment. I
tell them, you must acknowledge that you made the wrong or a very bad
choice, because otherwise you will fall forward again if you don't believe you had
the power to really choose, And then you can start to forgive yourself.
I made a mistake that was wrong. I knew I was trying to do
something good and protect my family. But then you can then start to heal
spiritually and ask God for comfort and support and miracles of healing, and for
forgiveness, for forgiveness for not recognizing the delusion that he had sent so many
of us. That's that's what I say. Our relationship with Christ is all
about, is about a new beginning, and it's always about that new beginning
starts with not trying to just put it out away and ignore that it ever
happened, as they did at the R and C about twenty t twenty.
It's about confronting that and acknowledging as you point out mistakes so you don't make
them again. But it's also that is absolutely necessary that we come to grips
with the uncomfortable realities that we have in life, and that includes our own
uncomfortable reality. So that is absolutely important, and that is what is missing
from so many different things. People will just run from these problems and you
how to confront them. Yeah, and he's waiting, I think, for
more people to realize what this is about and to come to him. Ultimately,
he wins, and he knows what's going to happen and why we're all
here. I think. You know, one time I heard I was backstage
and I was watched doctor Zelenko go out. I was speaking after him,
and he went out on stage and after the crowd came down, he said
something really shocking. He said, we are living in the greatest time in
history. And I thought, oh my god, doctor z how could you
say that? You know, people are dying. The shots a whole bit,
and there was a pause and then he said, because we are the
enemy has revealed himself, we are about to see the light overcome the darkness.
Now. Unfortunately, about a month later he passed away from his cancer.
But which I have theories about that's another topic. But I realize we're
all here at this time, you know, in God's time, for for
this purpose. So everybody should try to find that purpose and look around you
and see who you and what you can protect to help as many people of
God's children to get to the other side. That's that's my whole feeling about
it. Yeah, it is. It is an interesting time that we're living
in. That's the old Chinese curse. You know, may you live in
interesting times. But that means that there are there are opportunities for us in
this type of situation. It is a time of testing. We always have
tests that are being given to us. So we don't know what the purpose
of it is. But really the purpose of the test is really to find
out what you know about yourself, is to teach you about yourself. And
you know, God knows everything about us. He doesn't we need to know
about ourselves and that's really what kind of comes out of these tests. So
it is, it is a very difficult time. It's an important time for
people who are going to just do their best. Anybody can be mistaken,
but we just have to do our best to tell people what is true.
If we see something that is out there, we need to warn them about
it. That's what I appreciate you doing that and telling people honestly, regardless
of how it's going to be received. You know, the truth is the
truth, and we have to tell people about that. Yeah, And I
just want to say one last thing in terms of warning, big, big,
big warning everybody. Please this m RNA. You've got Vance, you
know, invested with Ramaswami, you know, Vivid, you know, and
Teal and all the hundreds and thousands of people investing billions into m RNA.
It's not going anywhere. So get off of the pharmaceutical grid, get off
of the notion the old fashioned. It's coming at us in a lot of
different ways. And so we've got to be aware so we know what to
protect ourselves from. And that's a whole other topic. I know. The
other and of course Ramaswamy was they're in the Ohio with the Wine, one
of the worst of the governors, and he was there trying to put in
a surveillance and tracking and things like that. So that's a whole other aspect
of it that dovetails with all of this pandemic thing, is a surveillance and
tracking and that all goes back to Peter Teel and Pallanteer and all the rest
of the stuff. It's about surveillance, tracking, anticipating what people are going
to do, manipulating them, punishing them in advance because they you know,
kind of this pre crime thing. They called it anticipatory intelligence. It has
been around for a while, but they're making it real. And the people
who have made it real and made a fortune off of it are the ones
who are supporting Jade. Vance is very concerning. I'm very concerned. And
Donald Trump, don't keep him out because he's bringing them all together like he
brought them all together in twenty twenty operational warp speed, consolidating all the alphabet
agencies that created this nightmare. That's right, yeah, yeah, second term
is going to be pretty amazing. Tell people where they can find you,
doctor Ruby. Well, I have my own show and coffee chats, which
are not as being nine as they sound. They get a little deep into
information on my rumble channel it's rumble dot com forward slash Dr Jane Ruby,
and I'm pretty active over on Twitter and Telegram, just trying to get the
word out, get conversations going and things like that. So really, thank
you so much, David. It's been an honor. You are one of
my absolute favorites and go tos, and it's been great being with you.
Thank you very much as honored to have you on and great information and thanks
for sticking your neck out there, even if you're gonna get people throwing stuff
at you. So thank you for what you do. And we're gonna take
a quick break, folks, and we'll be right back analyzing the globalists.
Next move now the David nutshell. Yeah, let's talk a little bit about
what we can put our trust in. I don't want to leave people black
pilled in senecal and without hope. I saw this article and I thought it
was really a wonderful article. It's about a search and rescue team and they
were looking for a man and they'd been looking for him for about two weeks
and there was no sign of it, and so they believed that they were
just doing a body recovery. But they actually found the man alive after fourteen
days, twelve days without any food or water. Twelve days without food or
water. The person who was on the rescue team, Scott hern I'm sorry.
The person that was they were looking for Scott hearn came one day after.
A person who was on the search and rescue team, Eric Walterman.
He described himself as quote not a very religious person, but he said he
woke up and he felt compelled to pray. He felt compelled to pray that
day, a guy that doesn't normally pray for this forty eight year old man
that had been gone for fourteen days and missing food and water for twelve.
He said, I'm not a very religious person, but yesterday morning I woke
up and I said a prayer for Scott Hearne and his family, he said
in a statement that he was shared by the rescue search and rescue team.
He said, to be honest, praying isn't something I do too often.
We were working on this operation since Tuesday, and most of the team went
into the day pretty much where they thought this was going to be a recovery
mission, just recover a body. So I said a prayer, knowing that
the family would probably be getting some very sad news that day. As a
searcher recalled, he said, Saturday was going to be the teen's very last
day for looking for him, regardless of what they found or didn't find.
The area that they searched was the roughest terrain and a very dangerous part of
the Daniel Boone National Force. During the last ditch search effort that the team
found footprints in the mud they had not seen before. So we stopped a
regroup and one of the people on the team heard a very faint noise.
He said, we pause, and we shouted who is that? Thinking it
was another search team. I then heard help and we took off in that
direction. We got closer. We asked what his name was, and he
said, Scott Hern, the guy they've been looking for. I've never moved
faster uphill in my entire life, he said. Walterman hurried ahead with a
search rescue team. As soon as he reached Hern, he remembered he said,
my name is Eric, I'm with Wolf County Search and Rescue. You're
safe. We're going to get you out of here. He just looked at
me and said, thank you so much. Will you give me a hug?
He said. I got terry eyed and I gave him a big hug.
He said it was perhaps the best hug of both of our lives.
So the team has described this rescue as truly a miracle. He said.
We were persistent in our search, but he said the hope was failing.
And so you know, when you look at this, there are times in
our life where we may be moved to pray for somebody. But I think
it's important for people to understand that. And if you try it, and
I think you will be amazed at the results. I just got to say,
yeah, prayer has changed our life, has changed many people's lives that
I know. And at the same time, we see that belief in creationism
is at an all time low. And what we're not talking about is creationism.
What we're talking about is just a belief in the Bible. Is what
you're talking about here. Senative Americans who believe that God created humans in their
present form in the past ten thousand years is the lowest that it has been
since they've been looking at the appolling results from Gallop They've been doing that for
forty years. They've never gone this low. While the share of those who
do not believe God had any role in human evolution is the highest that they've
recorded in the Gallop Pole. Again, they've been doing it since nineteen eighty
two, so they've been doing it for forty two years. The largest segment
of Americans, thirty seven percent, remained creationists despite the all time recorded low.
The scientific theory of evolution has evolved, and it really has evolved.
They've changed it quite a few times, but it has evolved and is getting
larger and larger. You know, I knew of Francis Collins long before he
was at the NIH. I knew of him before he's really involved in the
Human Genome project. I knew him from a thing that he's set up called
biologos. The purpose of that was to put the Bible subordinate to whatever the
scientist's understanding of the world was at that point in time, to make it
subordinate to the idea of molecules to man evolution, which is different from the
kind of natural selection that Charles Darwin was observing. Yes, you're going to
have an amazing amount of variation as possible. You can do that with selective
breeding, or it can be done accidentally, it can be done because of
environmental effects and things like that. There's a tremendous amount of variation in the
DNA and I thought it was interesting. And I don't know which one he
got involved in first, whether it was Biologos or whether it was the Human
Genome Project, but you know, Francis Collins ran the Human Genome Project.
They had this massive effort of scientists and computing assets that went over many,
many years to try to sequence DNA, and of course they never really finished
with it. They always wound up with things, oh, well, that's
junk DNA, and it's like, no, there's no junk DNA in there.
That's part of the problem with their presupposition that there's no intelligence. And
that was the thing that I always found puzzling about Francis Collins. He was
an opponent of intelligent design. Now, how as an opponent of intelligent design
do you really approach DNA. DNA is one of the best examples of intelligent
design, and maybe that's why they come up with junk DNA, because that
is their presupposition it. But I always thought that, you know, when
you look at that, and of course the people who discovered it, they
had a presupposition that there cannot possibly be a god. So they said,
well, we think you know, it obviously is intelligent design, said Krick
and Watson, but we're going to attribute it to space aliens and call it
pan spermia. And so he goes one step further. He says, no,
there's no such thing as intelligent design. And you don't even have to
look at the or the DNA to see that. I mean when you look
at when you look at various aspects of an animal, for example, like
a giraffe, Right, it has specific designs for the giraffe that if it
didn't have those things, it would not be able to function. Right,
It's got a very long neck, its head is really high up. It's
got a huge heart that is really pumping to get that blood up that neck
to the head and everything. And yet there is in their brain there's an
ability to absorb that surge of blood when they move their head down to drink
or move their head down to ground level. And you'll find that kind of
stuff, many examples of that in every single animals. One of the things
that I really enjoyed homeschool and the kids with because that was never taught to
me in school, the uniqueness of each and every animal. You see,
what they tried to do is they dumbed it down to trying to come up
with a take it down to the skeletal level. I sessify everything by vertebrates
and nonverbrits and then say, well, this is related to that because they
look similar. Some well maybe they look similar because there's a similar designer,
but they would completely miss all of these unique features of the woodpecker or the
giraffe or the Bombitier beetle or something like that that I'd be very specially designed
that couldn't possibly evolve. You remove one aspect of it and the entire organism
fails. It's one of the things I'm looking forward to with the little kid
Travis go ahead doing that kind of stuff with it. I get it.
Choose to review that again because that was a lot of fun. But you
know, when you look at this, it's Francis Collins before he ever got
into you know, we ever got into lying to people about and again pushing
through these radical and dangerous experiments that he and Fauci were doing. Uh,
he and another guy are out there trying to rehabilitate peeople's faith and science and
religion. Now, well, I think he's kind of the poster child why
people are skeptical and have abandoned these institutions. If we look at Trump,
for example, his disassociation with abortion issues, as this article from Life Site
News, is very concerned at what they saw with the RNC, in the
same way that we see gun owners are very concerned about what happened with the
RNC, this new platform that was stripped down at the insistence of Trump.
But as I said, why would these people think that they would not discard
their organization, whether your pro life or your pro Second Amendment or the rest
of these things. Why would you think that he would not discard you.
Since he, i said the other day, discarded the Constitution like he did
his trophy wives, He'll do the same thing to you. He'll do the
same thing to the pro life movement. He's capable of doing that to babies
if they get in the way of his political ambition. The twenty twenty four
Republican platform was released with nearly all previous pro life commitments purged. The only
remaining commitment, opposition to late term abortion, was in the same sentence as
support for birth control and IVF. Reports indicate that on abortion and on the
sanctity of marriage, Trump was personally involved in drafting the changes. The convention
speeches in Milwaukee, which contained not a single mention of abortion, were confirmation
of the Dope's pivot away from the pro life movement. How could you possibly
think that somebody who did what Trump did in twenty twenty was pro life.
We look at what happened to the hospitals, when you look at what happened
with the vaccine and all the rest of this. And so when he talks
about this, as I said, the idea that he said, he'll never
be a federal issue again because we were able to get rid of roeby Wade,
and it's now in the States. And you know, that is one
of the problems that the pro life movement has with it. And I think
though that they don't understand or respect, first of all, the Constitution.
If you think that that is wrong, morally wrong, well then you have
to still change the constitution. That is the appropriate way to change it.
See there was never any authority on the Constitution for anybody to regulate abortion,
to define when life begins, to define what marriage is, and all those
things will be brought back in right now with the removal of Roby Wade.
And the left understood it immediately because they knew that they were usurping power that
they didn't have when they defined when life began, when they define what marriage
is, and so immediately say, oh, well, that puts in you
know, puts in jeopardy the idea that the Supreme Court can dictate marriage to
the states. And so these people are pro life who Christians need to understand
that. They need to understand that, first of all, they have to
change the Constitution. Secondly, they need to understand that if they do federalize
it, it's going to result an absolutely unrestricted abortion. And that's going to
happen pretty quickly if they do it, If they're in charge and they put
it in and put it in with some restrictions, then what is going to
happen is as our society is drifting, they're going to put it in as
unrestricted abortion. There's not going to be anything. And this is a bad
strategy because it is trying again to pursue a solution from the top down,
to try to get this imposed upon other people from a centralized standpoint. This
is one of the reasons why conservatives have over and over again created institutions that
have been weaponized against them. They talk about Project twenty twenty five, they
said, it's notable for how seldom Project twenty twenty five mentions abortion, despite
the involvement of a number pro life leaders. It merely states that abortion and
euthanasia are not healthcare, and it advocates that the Health and Human Services Department
must ensure that in all its programs and activities they root them in deep respect
for innocent human life from day one until natural death. But see here again,
HHS shouldn't even exist. You know, it wasn't created until nineteen fifty
three. Where did the authority for that come from? Is there any authority
in the constitution to have a federal HHS. No, Like essentially everything that
they do. The only specific pro life policy advocated by Project twenty twenty five
is a proposal that the FDA reinstate a previous ban on mailing abortion pills and
requiring that the abortion pill be overseen by doctors in person rather than by telemedicine.
Again, no authority for the FDA to exist. Well, what would
we do if we didn't have the FDA? What would you do if we
didn't have the HHS. We would regulate it at a more local level.
And at a local level, you could do something about that in the same
way that you don't have to have the FDA telling us or inspecting our food.
We can do that, and we can do it better at the local
level. Finally, and I'll end up with this here. It's very similar
to what we began with the prayer from the search and rescue team guy who
said he really wasn't a praying man, but he just woke up he felt
compelled to pray about it. You know, we can all kind of wonder,
you know, why does it work that way, but nevertheless, just
accept that it does. This is a guy who was traveling with his father
out in West Texas. His father had grown up on farms, been a
long line of farmers, but his father had left that line of work and
become a statistician. He said, we're just driving out in West Texas,
where you just see for miles and miles and miles. There's nothing in the
way, no trees, nothing, it's flat. We were driving talking.
He said, it's always great to do that with his dad because it's one
of these guys, he said, who knows a great deal about pretty much
everything, tremendously a wide array of subjects. And so he said, his
dad is pointing out some of the tracks of land that he's looking at,
and he said that farm over there, that's a dry land farm, and
then explain what a dry land farm was. He said, it's exactly the
way that it sounds. He said, it's land that is intentionally not irrigated.
This is the purest kind of farming, where you plow the fields,
you plant the crops, and you wait for the rain. Well, it
takes a big risk because you're truly operating in the realm of faith. Dry
Land farming can also be very lucrative, he said, because it's so expensive
to irrigate. He said, a farmer really only needs to have the dry
land. It only needs a dry land to produce a good crop once every
ten years in order to get bond. And he said, well, look
at that. He said, I thought, you know, there's a real
relatable point here. At a spiritual discipline. He said, you know as
well as I do that some mornings, maybe many mornings, your time with
the Lord just feels dry, so dry that you wonder if the rain is
ever going to come again, so dry that you wonder if the time you
put into prayer and studying and memorizing is even worth it. He said,
you can choose the road of faith that eventually your feelings are going to catch
up to what you know is true, and you can continue to break up
the hard ground of your heart and to sow the seed of the Word inside
those cracked and parched places, because you know that even in this dry land,
the rain will eventually fall, and you'll be ready when it does.
You know, one of my favorite passages is Isaiah fifty five, where talks
about is a rain in the snow? And you know, when I looked
at that, I thought of about that for quite a while, and it
seems to me that, you know, sometimes we have snow and it doesn't
immediately water the ground, does it. It kind of sits there for a
very long time. Then eventually it'll seep into the ground. And I think
that is an amazing picture of what our life is like his thoughts are not
our thoughts. His ways are not our ways, are they? We'll be
right back. Ord list listening to the David Knight Show on Rock Fan.
Greg Talent, thank you very much for this tip. I appreciate that.
Thank you. Let's take a look at some news and we've had an interesting
update. You know, so many times we have seen these radical environmentalists gluing
themselves to the floor to a automobile showroom or something there, throwing paint on
very famous paintings in the museums and things like that. And the UK,
some of these protesters in a group called Just Stop Oil blocked the twenty five
motorway, very busy what we would call an interstate here, blocked that motorway
and did it several days in a row. They allegedly caused more than fifty
thousand hours of vehicle delay, affecting more than seven hundred thousand vehicles. They
left the five compromise for more than one hundred in twenty hours. They had
forty five people who climbed up onto this the gantries. It led to an
economic cost of about seven hundred and sixty five thousand pounds. The cost to
the Metropolitan Police was more than one point one million pounds. He had a
police officer who suffered a concussion and was bruised after being knocked off as motorbike
in traffic during one of these protests, and they did it for successive days
back in November of twenty twenty two. Well, they just had a trial
for them. They charged, they jailed them, and they tried them and
they have now been found guilty of and given five years imprisonment for the guy
who was a leader. For other defendants have been given four years in prison.
And so some of the people who responded to that, one supporter said,
we've got a world here that is burning and it's flooding. It's not
a deluge. It's a delusion that you're suffering from here. He said,
it's terrifying this is happening in the UK. We got to do everything we
can to push back for our right to peaceful protest. Ah. Well,
okay, So if you interfere with emergency vehicles, if you tie people up
and you steal a day from them, you know, I mean, they
were essentially imprisoning these people on the interstate a traffic jam of their own making,
and you multiply that out by the number of people. I wonder if
that was equivalent to the five years that he's going to lose out of his
life. You know, he did that for a lot of people. So
the problem is when we talk about protests, and I'm all about peaceful protests,
and I'm all about extreme support of free speech. But when you start
to physically interfere with people, when you start to do vandalism and destroy property
and other things like that, that's no longer a peaceful protest. That's no
longer a debate. That's an attack. This guy says, well, today
it's about the climate, Tomorrow could be about something else. This is terrifying,
terrifying result. Today. I've been in those delays caused by just stop
oil protesters. I've suffered those inconveniences. What gives you the right to do
that to other people? He said, Not to the same degree that I've
missed a funeral or missed a hospital appointment or anything of that level, or
you know, a pregnant woman trying to get to the hospital, and these
clowns have deliberately done this to make a point. See, the problem is
is that they're not even making a point with anybody, it's actually backfiring on
them in a number of ways. Their cause is not popular. After that,
he says, I can just say at this point, we need to
look at the bigger picture on the global scale. We need to think about
the entire specie. Turn on your social media this evening and read all about
it. Right, look at the flooding, look at the fires, Look
at the people's homes and livelihoods being destroyed. That's coming here. He said,
Well, if it is a global problem, then why isn't it already
there? Right? If it's he says this, you know global warming is
already kicking in in other places. Well, why hasn't it kicked in there?
We see that the guy that was so obnoxious on social media, who
was you know, see if you can pull up the picture of there,
Travis illegal alien, TikToker. Everybody will remember this guy's picture, you know,
talking about how you just come in and he get the money and all
the rest of stuff. Millions of Americans disgusted. Whether it's illegal alien using
TikTok to tell people to invade there. He is right there, that guy,
you remember him? Right? It turns out that he was actually worked
for Venezuela's military intelligence Oh wait, is it really an invasion? Remember the
illegal who encouraged squatting in US homes, Well, he is a maybe former
sergeant in Venezuela's military intelligence unit. I was put out by end wokeness.
Since his arrest, US intelligence officers have found that he was a sergeant in
Venezuela's military intelligence unit before he invaded the US southern border illegally entering the US
through Eagle Pass, Texas, released into the country with no prior vetting,
and of course Venezuela is not going to help us to understand who the criminals
are. They many of these countries are hostile to US and want to send
their criminals to the United States, and or Cuba did that under Castro,
released the prisons and sent them into America. But it is really kind of
a form of asymmetric warfare. And this kind of asymmetric warfare flooding the nation
with military age men. This guy an intelligence agent for the Venezuelan communists who
really hate this country. It's not just them either, It's also a war
being conducted against by the Biden people. And I say the Biden people,
because people around him that are going to be there with Laala, who again
was given the point on doing something to stop all of this. It's an
interesting article on Daily Skeptic, the war on the family home and this is
what the environmentalist, the Labor Party in the UK is doing. There a
great novelist, says David mcgrogan, who wrote this. He said, a
great novelist can in a short passage say more than a thousand scholars or nonfiction
writers can't in a lifetime. And this he talks about Dostoevsky's brothers Karamazov,
and in that there is a section about the Grand Inquisitor and this story within
a story Jesus has imagined to have returned to sixteenth century Spain, and it's
put on trial by the Inquisition. The accusation is that in rejecting the offer
from Satan, when tempted in the desert to be made ruler of the world,
Jesus condemned mankind to freedom and thereby to suffering. And it would have
been better if he would have accepted Satan's offer and taken the opportunity to simply
make everybody good, safe and content. The head of the Inquisition. The
Grand Inquisitor then paints a picture of what the appropriate relationship should be with the
people and the church. He said, all will they bring to us,
and we shall resolve it, And they will attend our decision with joy,
because it will deliver them from great anxiety and fearsome torments of free and individual
decision. And I looked at that, and I thought, Wow, isn't
that what everybody who's cheering on this political process in this election really is looking
for now? They really want somebody who is you can take all your problems
to them, and they'll resolve it all. They will attend our decision with
joy. They will deliver us from anxiety and fear of having to make the
choices ourselves and having to think for ourselves. And so he says, there
are, then, as Dostoyevsky is telling us, people in the world who
think the real problem with Jesus was that he wanted people to be free.
Just think of the good I could do, These people say to themselves,
if only I were in charge of every decision that anybody could ever conceivably make,
I would make everything perfect. The implication is that freedom is necessarily undesirable,
that people should be made to do what is good for them, and
that free choice can only either get in the way of that objective or align
with it. And they they align with it, well, then you don't
have the freedom. Now. He says all this to get into economics and
the labor Party. But I think right there, at that point we get
the essence of what is wrong with this whole political pageant that we are all
caught up in. But when he gets into the economics, so he talks
about John Manry Keynes nineteen twenties, the economist wrote the essay The End of
Las a Fair. He did not like free markets, he did not like
free choices. He's an economists. It's going to dictate what is good for
us and do it from a centralized position of power. He made his a
contempt for freedom very clear, he says, nor is it true that self
interest generally is enlightened More often individuals acting separately to promote their own ends are
too ignorant or too weak to attain even these Didn't we hear that during the
lockdown? Didn't we hear that? Didn't we see that kind of idea weaponized
against us? Even by church leaders who would our spiritual leaders. A lot
of people look up to Oh, you know, you need to do this
for your neighbor. Don't be stingy. You know, you need to take
the shot for everybody and all the rest of the stuff. That's the whole
idea behind all the public health stuff. That's the whole idea behind everything that
the government dictates to us. Kaine's wrote at a time when the Labor Party
was in its infancy. But it is this mentality, the grand inquisitorial mentality,
that's come to permeate the way the Labor Party thinks about wealth, as
we see with now that they're in power again and individual John McTurnan who said,
a lot of wealth in the UK is in the form of housing wealth,
it seems right that you should actually extract some revenue from that. See
they're preparing the way everywhere for a wealth tax, coming in a lot of
different ways. The reality is that the largest amount of wealth outside of pensions
held in the country, they're actually held in the form of housing. He
said, Now you can think what you like about housing, and housing is
definitely a social need. No, it's an individual need social need. Everything
that they see they've got such a collective mindset, such a that's the lens
in which they see everything. So even your house is a social need.
Housing, though, is a capital asset that's been accumulating, particularly accumulating the
period of quantitative easing. It was a wind fall to most homeowners, says
this guy with a labor party that's now newly empowered, the fact that the
houses that they lived in have gone up in value, some of them even
faster than their income went up. Oh, so let's take that away,
because you can't have anything, he said. I was able to figure out
that two trillion pounds in value increased to them accumulated to housing in Britain during
the pandemic when we were literally doing nothing but staying at home. Now that's
a wind fall, and wind falls should get a windfall tax. Let's confiscate
these people's homes, or at least the value in them. This guy says.
There's times when one feels as though public discourse has become too uncivil,
that it would be nice if everybody remembered that, generally speaking, even one's
political opponents are approaching the matter of public policy and good faith. But then
there's other times when one is driven to agree that the real issue we face
is that we're governed by creatures who have neither the right, nor the wisdom
nor the virtue to govern us. It's one of those occasions. It certainly
is, isn't it. Because now we see that milk is being called racist.
Maybe that's because it's white, but yeah, that's the latest attack on
it. In Singapore we have approval of sixteen different insects species for human consumption
and the goals to be met by twenty thirty. And so if you want
to really be mutual to other people, as they told in the village,
you know, be mutual to others, well you need to eat some bugs.
Singaporeans and visitors may soon be chowing down on several species of crickets,
grasshoppers, meal worms, beetles, moths, and honey bees. Talk about
bees there a second. The bugs may also be used to feed food producing
animals. You know, when we were in China, it seemed like they're
pretty much eating everything already. Anyway, we laughed about it. They had
all these signs up of things that had fish lips, fish lips and other
strange things. Eating dog thing isn't just a racist joke. It's real,
it's real. Yeah, that was real. They had all these dogs exactly
the same breed and exactly the same size and age too, running around and
they told us, you know, well that all goes away in the fall.
So my favorite was the partridge that they had and you could get that
with kangi. And I said, oh, and up partridge and some kangi.
You know, that's the the twelve Meals of China. Even when we're
trying to find something that we kind of knew what it was, we went
to Kentucky Fried Chicken. We thought KFC, and I think that stands for
Kentucky Fried Creatures. I don't know what the creature was that we were eating.
When we got it. We got a very small drumstick, smaller than
you typically see with the chicken, and it was white meat. So I
don't know what that was coming from. Anyway. They're just showing that Singapore
is a little bit more open than we thought they were going to be to
eating edible insects. Some chefs in Singapore are already putting insects on the menu,
including the House of Seafood, where they offer thirty dishes that feature insects
such as sushi topped with silkworms and salted egg crabs with superworms. And the
guy who runs a restaurant said, many of our customers, especially young people
who are under thirty eight years old, are very daring. Yeah, well,
that's called being gullible, gullible and inedible. I think Tucker loves bugs.
He had a guy on who was eating all kinds of Oh this is
great. Yeah, he was selling that whole narrative for you, not as
much as Klaus where you will own nothing and you will be happy. Before
we in the program, though, I just want to say, you know,
when we're looking at what these people, the kynesy and economics, you
know, and the debt that we have been smothered with, that is something
that you have it in the power, your own power, to do a
little bit of something about that, to prepare about that. One of the
things you can do is you can start accumulating gold and silver to some degree
as wealth insurance. A great place to do that is with Tony Rdman at
wise Wolf. He has set up David Knight dot Gold to take you to
Wisewolf and there you can sign up for wolf Pack. You can began accumulating
gold and whatever monthly budget amount you want to do from fifty bucks up.
And you also get the benefits of group discounts by being a part of Wolfpack.
But of course you can also buy gold and silver in any quantity with
Tony and he can help you with your IRA as well. And as I
point out yesday, we've got a new sponsor here, Patriot be Best,
and that is another way that you can start to prepare everything needs to.
We need to start taking control of our own food, of our own food
chain. And unless we are able to grow a lot of our own food,
and guess what, we're going to need to have bees in order to
do that. You want to have a garden, You're going to have to
have some bees, whether they come there naturally or whether you make whether you
help that along a little bit. If you go to patriotb Best dot com
you will find information about bee As a matter of fact, the good people
at Patriot be Best have done extensive research and study about the importance of our
bee populations and maintaining the natural food supply. Patriot b is a digital b
sanctuary for education, engagement, and real change. These people know bees and
Patriot be Best is laser focused on restoration and preservation of the American bee population.
You can learn about how the honeybee benefits all of us, and you
don't even have to eat them like in China. You can. It be
better if you don't actually, because they're going to provide food for you.
You can learn about how they benefit all of us. You can discover be
friendly initiatives and other helpful resources at the worker Bee subscription level. Each issue
of Buzz offers educational information, advocacy opportunities, be friendly products, be rescue
activities, and more. In addition, Queen Bee subscribers will get access to
bonus content on patriotic topics related to restoring and reinforcing American values. So join
to learn about restoring the health of the American bee population. Check them out
at Patriotbebest dot com. You can subscribe, you can see all the cool
b related products they have to offer. It is the destination for all things
about the American be Check out the links there. They've got a video why
is our American bee population under attack? And we do appreciate them as a
sponsor of the program again. Patriotb Best dot com where you'll find all that
information. Well, we're just about out of time. But as I said,
you know, the racist milk and all the rest of the things,
we clearly understand where they're headed. They've told us that they don't want us
to have any food. They've told us that they want us to eat the
bugs and own nothing, and now they're trying to make that come true.
They want to take the equity in our homes, they want to take the
food from our farms. They want to shut down the farms and take the
farms. And that's why it's very important for us to start to learn to
preparing is really about relationships and having those relationships, as we were saying earlier
with doctor Ruby, having those relationships in your community and having the skills that
you can barter with somebody else with. Those are the things focus on local.
Don't get so caught up in this election. Yeah, you're going to
hear nothing for the next few weeks. You're going to be hearing everything now
about Lala Harris and the Democrats as they come up with their selection. As
somebody pointed out, the Democrat Party that was always all about democracy has now
just flushed all the votes that people made and they're going to tell you who
you can vote for. It never has never been more obvious, is it.
Well, have a good day, Thank you for joining us. Let
me tell you the David Night Show you can listen to with your ears.
You can even watch it by using your eyes. In fact, if you
can hear me, that means you're listening to the David Night Show right now.
Yeah, good job. And you want to know something else, You
can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at
Thedavidnightshow dot com. That's a website.