WEBVTT

1
00:00:01.760 --> 00:00:05.360
Okay, all right, well,
good evening, everybody. Welcome Elon,

2
00:00:05.519 --> 00:00:08.679
thanks for being here, Thank you
for having me. We feel very prov

3
00:00:08.800 --> 00:00:10.960
we're excited to have you. Right, So I'm going to start with some

4
00:00:11.039 --> 00:00:13.400
questions and then we're going to open
it up. Let me get straight into

5
00:00:13.439 --> 00:00:18.320
it. So Bill Gates said,
there is no one in our time who

6
00:00:18.320 --> 00:00:21.960
has done more to push the bounds
of science innovation than you. What's kind

7
00:00:21.960 --> 00:00:24.920
of going to say, Well,
that's a nice thing to have anyone say

8
00:00:24.960 --> 00:00:28.359
about you. Nice coming from Bill
Gates. But oddly enough, when it

9
00:00:28.399 --> 00:00:33.079
comes to AI, actually for around
a decade you've almost been doing the opposite

10
00:00:33.119 --> 00:00:36.240
and saying, hang on, you
need to think about what we're doing and

11
00:00:36.280 --> 00:00:38.679
what we're pushing here, and what
do we do to make this safe?

12
00:00:38.719 --> 00:00:42.320
And actually maybe we shouldn't be pushing
as faster or as hard as we are.

13
00:00:42.920 --> 00:00:44.840
I mean, you've been doing it
for a decade, Like what was

14
00:00:44.880 --> 00:00:47.799
it that caused you to think about
it that way? And you know,

15
00:00:47.799 --> 00:00:50.799
why do we need to be worried? Yeah? I've been somewhat of a

16
00:00:50.799 --> 00:00:54.960
Cassandra for quite a while where people
would I would tell you, like we

17
00:00:55.000 --> 00:00:57.159
should really be con learned about aid, like, what are you talking about?

18
00:00:57.200 --> 00:01:00.960
Like, I've never really had any
experience with AI, but since I

19
00:01:00.039 --> 00:01:04.439
was immersed in technology, I have
been immersed in technology for a long time,

20
00:01:04.719 --> 00:01:11.760
I could see it coming. So
but I think this year was that

21
00:01:11.760 --> 00:01:14.760
there have been a number of breakthroughs. I mean, you know, the

22
00:01:14.760 --> 00:01:19.280
point of which someone can see a
dynamically created video of themselves, you know,

23
00:01:19.319 --> 00:01:23.120
like it sort you can make a
video of you saying anything in real

24
00:01:23.159 --> 00:01:27.840
time or me, And so there's
sort of the deep bake videos which are

25
00:01:27.840 --> 00:01:34.560
really incredibly good, in fact,
sometimes more convincing than real ones and a

26
00:01:34.560 --> 00:01:42.519
bit deep real and and then and
then obviously things like chat GPT we were

27
00:01:42.599 --> 00:01:46.519
quite remarkable. Now I saw GPT
one, GPT two, GPT three,

28
00:01:46.599 --> 00:01:49.079
GPT four that you know, the
whole sort of lead up to that,

29
00:01:49.200 --> 00:01:53.280
So it was easy for me to
kind of see where it's going. If

30
00:01:53.319 --> 00:01:56.519
you just sort of extrapolate the points
on a curve and as seeing that train

31
00:01:56.560 --> 00:02:00.560
will continue, then we will have
profound, artificially intelligence and obviously at a

32
00:02:00.640 --> 00:02:07.879
level that far exceeds human intelligence.
So I'm glad to see at this point

33
00:02:07.919 --> 00:02:14.680
that people are taking safety seriously and
I'd like I say thank you for holding

34
00:02:14.719 --> 00:02:17.000
this AI safety conference. I think
actually will go down in history as being

35
00:02:17.120 --> 00:02:25.120
very important. I think it's really
quite profound, and I do think overall

36
00:02:25.159 --> 00:02:32.120
that the potential is there for artificial
intelligence AI too have most likely a positive

37
00:02:32.120 --> 00:02:39.080
effect and to create a future of
abundance where there is no scarcity of goods

38
00:02:39.080 --> 00:02:46.159
and services. But it is somewhat
of the magic genie problem where if you

39
00:02:46.199 --> 00:02:51.400
have a magic genie that can grant
all the wishes, usually those stories don't

40
00:02:51.479 --> 00:02:57.080
end well. Who care for what
you wish for? Including wishes? Yeah,

41
00:02:57.960 --> 00:03:02.039
so you talked a little bit about
the summit and thank you for being

42
00:03:02.039 --> 00:03:06.000
engaged in it, which has been
great and people enjoyed having you there.

43
00:03:06.639 --> 00:03:09.280
Puspending in this dialogue now, one
of the things that we achieved today in

44
00:03:09.800 --> 00:03:16.680
the meetings between the companies and the
leaders was an agreement that externally, ideally,

45
00:03:16.759 --> 00:03:22.919
governments should be doing safety testing of
models before they're released. I think

46
00:03:22.919 --> 00:03:24.159
this is something that you've spoken about
a little bit. It was something we

47
00:03:24.199 --> 00:03:29.479
worked really hard on because you know, my job in government is to say,

48
00:03:29.479 --> 00:03:30.719
hang on, there is a potential
risk here, not a not a

49
00:03:30.759 --> 00:03:36.120
definite risk, but a potential risk
of something that could be bad. My

50
00:03:36.199 --> 00:03:39.560
job is to protect the country and
we can only do that if we develop

51
00:03:39.639 --> 00:03:43.639
the capability we need in our safety
Institute and then go in and make sure

52
00:03:43.639 --> 00:03:46.639
we can test the models before they
are released. Delight of that that happened

53
00:03:46.639 --> 00:03:50.639
today. But you know, what's
your view on what we should be doing,

54
00:03:50.800 --> 00:03:53.319
right you've talked about the potential risk? Right again, we don't know,

55
00:03:53.479 --> 00:03:55.159
but you know, what are the
types of things governments like our should

56
00:03:55.199 --> 00:04:00.560
be doing to manage and mitigate against
those risks. Well, generally think that

57
00:04:00.879 --> 00:04:04.639
it is good for government to play
a role when the public safety is at

58
00:04:04.719 --> 00:04:09.599
risk. So you know, really, for the vast majority of software,

59
00:04:10.280 --> 00:04:13.719
the public safety is not at risk. I mean, if if the app

60
00:04:13.759 --> 00:04:17.319
crashes on your phone, your laptop, it's not a massive catastrophe. But

61
00:04:17.519 --> 00:04:24.319
when you're talking about digital superintelligence,
I think, which does pose a risk

62
00:04:24.399 --> 00:04:28.279
to the public, then there is
a role for government to play to safeguard

63
00:04:28.319 --> 00:04:30.959
the interest of the public. And
this is of course true in many fields,

64
00:04:31.680 --> 00:04:35.920
you know, aviation, cars,
you know, I deal with regulators

65
00:04:36.199 --> 00:04:44.160
throughout the world because of stalling being
communications, rockets being aerospace, and cars

66
00:04:44.279 --> 00:04:46.759
you know, being tracked vehicle transport. So I'm very familiar with dealing with

67
00:04:46.759 --> 00:04:50.160
with regulators, and I actually agree
with the vast majority of regulations. There's

68
00:04:50.160 --> 00:04:53.920
a few that I disagree with from
time to time, but zero point one

69
00:04:53.959 --> 00:04:59.360
percent, probably less than one percent
of regulations I disagree with. So there

70
00:04:59.399 --> 00:05:03.920
is some concern and from people in
Silicon Valley who who've never dealt with regulators

71
00:05:03.920 --> 00:05:09.040
before, and they think that this
is gonna just crush innovation and slow them

72
00:05:09.079 --> 00:05:15.800
down and be annoying. But and
and it will be annoying. It's true,

73
00:05:15.879 --> 00:05:19.879
they're not wrong about that. But
but I think there's we've learnt over

74
00:05:19.920 --> 00:05:26.480
the years that having a referee is
a good thing. And if you look

75
00:05:26.519 --> 00:05:30.959
at any sports game, there's always
a referee, and and nobody's suggesting I

76
00:05:30.959 --> 00:05:33.639
think to have a sports game with
that one. And I think that's the

77
00:05:34.120 --> 00:05:39.399
right way to think about this,
is for for governed to be a referee,

78
00:05:39.439 --> 00:05:46.560
to make sure the sportsmanlike conduct and
that the public safety is you know,

79
00:05:47.360 --> 00:05:50.720
it is addressed that we care about
the public safety. Because I think

80
00:05:50.759 --> 00:05:55.319
there might be at times too much
optimism about technology. And I speak I

81
00:05:55.319 --> 00:06:00.319
say that as a technologist. I
mean, so I ought to know and

82
00:06:00.079 --> 00:06:04.519
and like said, on balance,
I think that that the AI will be

83
00:06:04.839 --> 00:06:10.000
a forcible good most likely, but
the probability of it going bad it is

84
00:06:10.040 --> 00:06:14.079
not zero. Said, so we
just need to mitigate the downside potential.

85
00:06:14.319 --> 00:06:17.000
And then how you talk about referee
and that's what we're demonstrate. Yeah,

86
00:06:17.120 --> 00:06:19.560
well there we go. I mean, you know, and we talked about

87
00:06:19.560 --> 00:06:23.800
this and Demos and I discussed this
a long time ago, like literally facing

88
00:06:23.920 --> 00:06:29.959
right and actually Demister his credit and
the credit of people in the industry,

89
00:06:30.000 --> 00:06:31.800
did say that to us. I
think you say, it's not right that

90
00:06:32.000 --> 00:06:34.959
Demis and his colleagues are marking their
own homework, right, there needs to

91
00:06:34.959 --> 00:06:40.160
be someone independent, and that's why
we've developed the Safety Institute here. I

92
00:06:40.199 --> 00:06:43.560
mean, do you think governments can
develop the expertise. One of the things

93
00:06:43.560 --> 00:06:46.480
we need to do is say,
hang on, you know, Demis and

94
00:06:46.600 --> 00:06:48.399
Sam all the others have got a
lot of very smart people doing this.

95
00:06:48.879 --> 00:06:54.079
Governments need to quickly tool up capability
wise, personnel wise, which is what

96
00:06:54.079 --> 00:06:56.560
we're doing. I mean, do
you think it is possible for governments to

97
00:06:56.600 --> 00:07:00.079
do that fast enough, given how
quickly the technology is developing, or what

98
00:07:00.079 --> 00:07:01.120
do we need to do to make
sure we do do it quick enough.

99
00:07:02.360 --> 00:07:05.439
No, I think it's good.
It's a great point you're making. The

100
00:07:05.800 --> 00:07:12.199
pace of AI is faster than any
technology I've seen in history by far,

101
00:07:13.240 --> 00:07:17.839
and it seems to be growing in
capability by at least fivefold, perhaps tenfold

102
00:07:17.879 --> 00:07:26.240
per year. It'll certainly grow by
an automatitude next year. Yeah, so

103
00:07:26.240 --> 00:07:30.639
so, and government isn't used to
moving at that speed. But I think

104
00:07:30.720 --> 00:07:35.439
even if there are not firm regulations, even if there's not even if there

105
00:07:35.480 --> 00:07:40.839
isn't an enforcement capability, so we're
having insight and being able to highlight concerns

106
00:07:40.839 --> 00:07:46.040
to the public will be very powerful. So even if that's all that's accomplished,

107
00:07:46.079 --> 00:07:48.360
I think that will be very very
good. Okay, yeah, well

108
00:07:48.439 --> 00:07:51.000
hopefully we can do better than that, hopefully. Yeah. Yeah, No,

109
00:07:51.079 --> 00:07:55.800
but that's how fast we were talking
before. It was striking. You're

110
00:07:55.800 --> 00:08:00.600
someone who spent their life in technology. They're living More's law. And what

111
00:08:00.680 --> 00:08:03.560
it was interesting over the last couple
of days talking to everyone who's doing the

112
00:08:03.560 --> 00:08:07.399
development of this, and I think
you concur with this is is just the

113
00:08:07.439 --> 00:08:13.519
pace of advancement here is unlike anything
all of you have seen in your careers

114
00:08:13.519 --> 00:08:16.439
and technology. Is that fair because
you've got these kind of compounding effects from

115
00:08:16.480 --> 00:08:24.279
the hardware and the data and the
personnel. Yeah, I mean the two

116
00:08:26.240 --> 00:08:30.120
currently the two leading centers for a
development are the San Fransco Bay area and

117
00:08:30.439 --> 00:08:33.559
the sort of London area, And
there are many other places where it's being

118
00:08:33.559 --> 00:08:37.200
done, but those are two leading
areas. So I think if you know,

119
00:08:37.519 --> 00:08:43.840
if the United States and the UK
and China are sort of aligned on

120
00:08:45.279 --> 00:08:48.360
safety, that's all going to be
a good thing. That's really that's where

121
00:08:48.600 --> 00:08:52.159
that's where the leadership is generally.
You actually you mentioned China there. So

122
00:08:52.240 --> 00:08:56.600
I took a decision to invite China
to summit over the last three days,

123
00:08:56.799 --> 00:09:00.559
and it was not an easy decision. A lot of people criticizes me for,

124
00:09:01.039 --> 00:09:03.000
you know, my view as if
you're going to try serious conversation,

125
00:09:03.080 --> 00:09:05.559
you need to. But what would
your thoughts? You do business all around

126
00:09:05.559 --> 00:09:09.960
the world. You just talked about
it there. Should we be engaging with

127
00:09:09.000 --> 00:09:11.559
them? Can we trust them?
Is that the right thing to have done?

128
00:09:13.399 --> 00:09:16.960
If we don't, if China is
not on board with AI safety,

129
00:09:16.240 --> 00:09:22.399
it's somewhat of a moot situation.
The single biggest objection that I get to

130
00:09:22.679 --> 00:09:26.799
any kind of AI regulation or sort
of safety controls are well, China is

131
00:09:26.840 --> 00:09:30.639
not going to do it, and
therefore they will just jump into the lead

132
00:09:30.759 --> 00:09:37.679
and exceed us all But actually China
is willing to participate in AI safety and

133
00:09:37.720 --> 00:09:41.480
thank you for inviting them, and
they you know, I think we should

134
00:09:43.440 --> 00:09:48.919
thank China for attending. When I
was when I was in China earlier this

135
00:09:48.000 --> 00:09:52.639
year, my main subject of discussion
with this the leadership in China was a

136
00:09:52.919 --> 00:09:58.240
safety and saying that this this is
really something that they they should care about,

137
00:09:58.480 --> 00:10:01.639
and they took it seriously and and
and you are too, which is

138
00:10:01.799 --> 00:10:05.840
which is great. And having them
here I think was essential. Really if

139
00:10:05.879 --> 00:10:11.279
the if they're if they're not participants, it's it's pointless. Yeah, that's

140
00:10:11.399 --> 00:10:13.960
and I think we were pleased.
I think they were engaged yesterday in the

141
00:10:13.000 --> 00:10:18.399
discussions and actually ended up signing the
same communicy that everyone else did, which

142
00:10:18.440 --> 00:10:20.120
is a good stop, right.
And I said, if we need everyone

143
00:10:20.159 --> 00:10:24.320
to approach us in a similar way, if we're going to have a realistic

144
00:10:24.399 --> 00:10:26.799
chance of resolving it. I was
going to tell you you talked about innovation

145
00:10:26.879 --> 00:10:31.240
earlier and regulation being annoying. There
was a good debate today we had about

146
00:10:31.279 --> 00:10:37.200
open source, and I think you've
kind of been a proponent of algorithmic transparency

147
00:10:37.279 --> 00:10:41.240
and making some of the ex algorithms
public and you actually we were talking about

148
00:10:41.600 --> 00:10:46.120
every hint and on the way in. You know, he's particularly been very

149
00:10:46.159 --> 00:10:50.879
concerned about open source models being used
by bad actors. You've got a group

150
00:10:50.919 --> 00:10:54.360
of people who say they are critical
to innovation happening in that distributed way.

151
00:10:54.559 --> 00:10:56.960
Look, it's it's a trick.
There's probably no perfect answer, and there

152
00:10:58.000 --> 00:11:01.720
is a tricky balance your thoughts on
how we should approach this open source question

153
00:11:03.000 --> 00:11:07.919
or where should we be targeting whatever
regulatory or monitoring that we're going to do

154
00:11:09.639 --> 00:11:16.240
well. The open source algorithms and
data tend to lag the closed source by

155
00:11:16.360 --> 00:11:22.320
six to twelve months. So that
but given the rate of improvement that there's

156
00:11:22.320 --> 00:11:26.879
actually therefore quite a big difference between
the closed source and the and the open

157
00:11:26.840 --> 00:11:31.559
If things are improving by a factor
of let's say five or more than being

158
00:11:31.559 --> 00:11:35.919
a year behind is you're five times
worse. So it's a pretty big difference.

159
00:11:35.720 --> 00:11:41.399
And that might be actually an okay
situation, but it certainly we'll get

160
00:11:41.440 --> 00:11:46.679
to the point where you've got open
source AI that can do that, that

161
00:11:46.759 --> 00:11:52.559
will start to approach human level intelligence, will PHAPS succeeded. I don't know

162
00:11:52.639 --> 00:11:54.639
quite what to do about it.
I think it's somewhat inevitable. There will

163
00:11:54.679 --> 00:11:58.759
be some amount of open source,
and I guess I would have a slight

164
00:11:58.799 --> 00:12:03.240
bias towards open source because at least
you can see what's going on. It

165
00:12:03.320 --> 00:12:05.559
wears closed source. You don't know
what's going on. Now, it should

166
00:12:05.600 --> 00:12:09.799
be said with AI that even if
it's an open source, do you actually

167
00:12:09.840 --> 00:12:13.840
know what's going on? Because if
you've got a gigantic data file and you

168
00:12:13.879 --> 00:12:22.720
know sort of billions of data points
or weights and parameters, you can't just

169
00:12:22.759 --> 00:12:26.039
read it and see what it's going
to do. It's a gigantic file of

170
00:12:26.159 --> 00:12:30.559
inscrutable numbers. You can test it
when you when you run it, you

171
00:12:30.600 --> 00:12:33.279
can test it. You can run
a bunch of tests to see what it's

172
00:12:33.279 --> 00:12:39.159
going to do. But it's probabilistic
as opposed to deterministic. It's not it's

173
00:12:39.159 --> 00:12:45.200
not like traditional programming, where you've
got it you've got very discrete logic and

174
00:12:45.720 --> 00:12:48.200
the outcome is very predictable, and
you can read each line and see what

175
00:12:48.279 --> 00:12:54.360
each line is going to do.
A neural net is just a whole bunch

176
00:12:54.360 --> 00:12:58.519
of probabilities. I mean, it
sort of ends up being a giant Comma

177
00:12:58.600 --> 00:13:01.759
separated value file. It's like our
digital guide is a CSP file. Really

178
00:13:05.440 --> 00:13:09.799
okay, but that's kind of what
it is. Yeah, Now, that

179
00:13:11.240 --> 00:13:13.080
point you've just made is one that
we have been talking about a lot,

180
00:13:13.200 --> 00:13:18.639
because again conversations with the people are
developing their technology make the point that you've

181
00:13:18.679 --> 00:13:24.639
just made. It is not like
normal software where there's predictability about inputs improving

182
00:13:24.840 --> 00:13:28.200
leading to this particular output improving,
and as the models iterate and improve,

183
00:13:28.720 --> 00:13:31.240
we don't quite know what's going to
come out the other end. I think

184
00:13:31.240 --> 00:13:35.840
Demis would agree with that, which
is why I think there is this bias

185
00:13:35.840 --> 00:13:37.200
for Look, we need to get
in there while the training runs are being

186
00:13:37.240 --> 00:13:41.919
done, before the models are released, to understand what is this new iteration

187
00:13:41.840 --> 00:13:46.879
broad about in terms of capability,
which it sounds like you would would agree

188
00:13:46.919 --> 00:13:48.840
with. I was going to shift
Goz a little bit on. You know,

189
00:13:48.879 --> 00:13:52.519
you've talked a lot about human consciousness
human agency, which actually might strike

190
00:13:52.559 --> 00:13:58.559
people as as strange given that you
are known for being such a brilliant innovator

191
00:13:58.559 --> 00:14:01.639
and technologist, but it's it's quite
heartfelt when I hear you talk about it

192
00:14:01.679 --> 00:14:07.320
and the importance of maintaining that agency
in technology and preserving human consciousness. Now

193
00:14:07.480 --> 00:14:09.519
it kind of links to the thing
I was going to ask, is when

194
00:14:09.559 --> 00:14:13.720
I do interviews or talk to people
out and about in this job about AI,

195
00:14:13.799 --> 00:14:16.639
the thing that comes up most actually
is it probably not so much the

196
00:14:16.679 --> 00:14:20.600
stuff we've been talking about, but
jobs. It's what is AI mean for

197
00:14:20.720 --> 00:14:22.960
my job? Is it going to
mean that I don't have a job or

198
00:14:24.120 --> 00:14:26.080
my kids are not going to have
a job. Now, you know,

199
00:14:26.679 --> 00:14:31.120
my answer as a policymaker, as
a leader is actually, AI is already

200
00:14:31.120 --> 00:14:35.519
creating jobs, and you can see
that in the companies that are starting.

201
00:14:35.039 --> 00:14:39.240
Also, the way it's being used
is a little bit more as a co

202
00:14:39.399 --> 00:14:43.840
pilot necessarily, versus replacing the person. There's still human agency, but it's

203
00:14:43.879 --> 00:14:46.919
helping you do your job better,
which is a good thing. And as

204
00:14:46.960 --> 00:14:52.120
we've seen with technological revolutions in the
past, clearly there's change in the labor

205
00:14:52.159 --> 00:14:56.320
market the amount of jobs. I
was quoting an MIT study today that they

206
00:14:56.360 --> 00:14:58.399
did a couple of years ago is
something like sixty percent of the jobs at

207
00:14:58.399 --> 00:15:01.919
that moment exists forty years ago,
so hard to predict. And my job

208
00:15:01.960 --> 00:15:05.440
is to create an incredible education system, whether it's at school, whether it's

209
00:15:05.480 --> 00:15:09.759
retraining people at any point in their
career, because ultimately, if we've got

210
00:15:09.759 --> 00:15:13.320
a skill population, they'll be able
to keep up with the pace of change

211
00:15:13.320 --> 00:15:16.360
and have a good life. But
you know that it's still a concern.

212
00:15:16.600 --> 00:15:22.399
And what would your kind of observation
be on AI and the impact on labor

213
00:15:22.440 --> 00:15:26.159
markets and people's jobs and how they
should feel about that as they think about

214
00:15:26.200 --> 00:15:31.600
this. Well, I think we
are seeing the most disruptive force in history

215
00:15:31.600 --> 00:15:35.879
here. You know, we have
for the first time, we will have

216
00:15:35.879 --> 00:15:41.919
for the first time something that is
smarter than the smartest human and that I

217
00:15:41.960 --> 00:15:46.039
mean, it's hard to say exactly
what that moment is, but there will

218
00:15:46.080 --> 00:15:50.960
come a point where no job is
needed. You can have a job if

219
00:15:50.000 --> 00:15:54.919
you want to have a job for
sort of personal satisfaction, but the AI

220
00:15:56.039 --> 00:16:00.320
will be able to do everything.
So I don't know if that makes people

221
00:16:00.320 --> 00:16:06.679
comfortable uncomfortable, it's it's you know, That's why that's why I say,

222
00:16:06.720 --> 00:16:10.759
if you, if you, if
you wish for a magic genie that gives

223
00:16:10.759 --> 00:16:11.960
you any wishes you want, and
there's no limit. You don't have those

224
00:16:11.960 --> 00:16:15.759
three limits three wish limits, not
since you just have many as many wishes

225
00:16:15.799 --> 00:16:22.320
as you want. So it's both
good and bad. One of the challenges

226
00:16:22.320 --> 00:16:26.919
in the future will be how do
we find meaning in life if if you

227
00:16:27.039 --> 00:16:32.080
have a magic genie that can do
everything you want. I do think we's

228
00:16:32.200 --> 00:16:33.600
it's hard. You know, when
there's when when there's new technology, it

229
00:16:33.639 --> 00:16:38.080
tends to have usually follow an S
curve. In this case, we're going

230
00:16:38.120 --> 00:16:41.120
to be on the exponential portion of
the S curve for a long time,

231
00:16:44.200 --> 00:16:47.720
and we have to like so we
able to ask for anything. And it

232
00:16:47.759 --> 00:16:51.639
won't be we won't have universal basic
income. We'll have universal high income.

233
00:16:52.559 --> 00:16:55.720
So in some in some sense it
will be somewhat of a leveler or an

234
00:16:55.759 --> 00:17:02.600
equalizer, because really I think everyone
will have access to this magic Jenny anyway,

235
00:17:02.600 --> 00:17:03.880
able to ask any question. It
will certainly be good for education,

236
00:17:04.039 --> 00:17:07.400
you could it'll be the best tutor
you could add them the most patient tutor,

237
00:17:08.200 --> 00:17:15.799
UH said there all day. And
there will be no shortage of goods

238
00:17:15.799 --> 00:17:21.759
and services, will be an age
of abundance. I think if i'd recommend

239
00:17:21.839 --> 00:17:27.400
people read in Banks, the Banks
culture books are probably the best in visioning.

240
00:17:27.400 --> 00:17:30.880
In fact, not probably, they're
definitely by far the best envisioning of

241
00:17:30.920 --> 00:17:36.039
an a future. There's nothing even
close. So I'd recommend, really recommend

242
00:17:36.160 --> 00:17:41.440
Banks. I'm a very big fan. All these books are good. There's

243
00:17:41.480 --> 00:17:47.960
not Jay which one all of them. So so that's that'll give you a

244
00:17:47.960 --> 00:17:56.319
sense of what is a I guess
a fairly utopian or pro topin future with

245
00:17:56.319 --> 00:18:02.240
with Ai, which is good for
as you said, it's a universal high

246
00:18:02.240 --> 00:18:03.440
income, which is a nice phrase, and that's it's good from a kind

247
00:18:03.440 --> 00:18:08.759
of materialistic sense of abundance. Actually, that then leads to the question that

248
00:18:08.799 --> 00:18:11.200
you pose, right, I'm someone
who believes, you know, work gives

249
00:18:11.200 --> 00:18:14.920
you meaning. I write a lot
about that. As you know, I

250
00:18:14.960 --> 00:18:17.400
think work is a good thing.
It, you know, gives people purpose

251
00:18:17.400 --> 00:18:19.720
in their lives. And if you
then remove a large chunk of that,

252
00:18:21.200 --> 00:18:22.240
you know, what does that mean? And where do you get that?

253
00:18:22.759 --> 00:18:26.200
You know, where do you get
that drive, that motivation, that purpose?

254
00:18:26.240 --> 00:18:27.319
I mean you're talking about it.
You work a lot of hours,

255
00:18:29.319 --> 00:18:32.519
you know, as I was mentioning, when we were talking earlier. I

256
00:18:32.519 --> 00:18:37.160
have to somewhat engage in liberate suspension
of disbelief because I'm putting so much blood,

257
00:18:37.160 --> 00:18:40.599
sweat and tears into a work project
and burning the you know, three

258
00:18:40.640 --> 00:18:45.000
am oil. Then I'm like,
wait, why am I doing this?

259
00:18:45.200 --> 00:18:48.920
I can just wait for the AI
to do it. I'm just lashing myself

260
00:18:48.960 --> 00:18:56.359
for no reason. Must be a
gutton for punishment or something. So we

261
00:18:56.440 --> 00:18:59.359
called called called demos and tell them
to hurry up and then you can have

262
00:18:59.400 --> 00:19:03.160
a holiday. It's the plan.
Yeah, No, it's a Look,

263
00:19:03.160 --> 00:19:04.920
it's a tricky. It's a tricky
thing because I think you know, part

264
00:19:04.960 --> 00:19:10.200
of our job is to make sure
that we can navigate to that very I

265
00:19:10.240 --> 00:19:15.279
think largely positive place that you're described
people through it between now and then,

266
00:19:15.359 --> 00:19:18.160
because these things bring a lot aboutter
change in in the labor market as we've

267
00:19:18.200 --> 00:19:22.240
seen. Yeah, I think it's
probably is generally a good thing because you

268
00:19:22.279 --> 00:19:26.359
know, there are a lot of
jobs that are uncomfortable or dangerous or which

269
00:19:26.400 --> 00:19:30.359
sort of tedious, and the computer
will have no problem doing that. We're

270
00:19:30.400 --> 00:19:34.079
happy to do that all day long. So you know, it's it's fun

271
00:19:34.119 --> 00:19:37.880
to cook food, but it's not
that fun to wash the dishes, but

272
00:19:37.920 --> 00:19:41.359
the computer is perfectly happy to watch
the dishes. I guess there is.

273
00:19:42.599 --> 00:19:48.240
You know, we still have sports
like where where humans compete and like the

274
00:19:48.279 --> 00:19:52.720
Olympics, and obviously a machine can
can go faster than any human, but

275
00:19:52.759 --> 00:20:00.200
we still have we still humans race
against each other and and have a you

276
00:20:00.200 --> 00:20:03.519
know, these sports competitions against each
other where even though the machines are better,

277
00:20:03.519 --> 00:20:06.640
which I guess computnitity, who can
be the best human at something?

278
00:20:07.279 --> 00:20:11.640
And people do find performing in that. So I guess that's perhaps a good

279
00:20:11.680 --> 00:20:14.799
example of how even when machines are
faster than are stronger than us, we

280
00:20:14.839 --> 00:20:18.480
still find a way we saw enjoy
computing against other humans, so at leaste,

281
00:20:18.480 --> 00:20:21.640
who was the best human? Yeah, that's a good it's a good

282
00:20:21.640 --> 00:20:25.480
analogy. And we've been talking a
lot about managing the risks. Just before

283
00:20:25.519 --> 00:20:29.000
we move on and finish on AI
is just talk a little bit about the

284
00:20:29.039 --> 00:20:33.880
opportunities. You know, you're engaged
in lots of different companies. You're an

285
00:20:33.880 --> 00:20:38.359
obvious line which is doing which is
doing some exciting stuff. You touched on

286
00:20:38.359 --> 00:20:41.920
the thing that I'm probably most excited
about, which is an education. Yeah,

287
00:20:42.119 --> 00:20:47.200
and I think many people will have
seen sal CON's video from earlier this

288
00:20:47.279 --> 00:20:48.799
year. Is Ted talk about as
you talked about, it's like a personal

289
00:20:48.799 --> 00:20:52.599
tutor. Yeah, an amazing personal
tutor, an amazing personal tutor. And

290
00:20:52.599 --> 00:20:57.359
we know the difference in learning having
that personal tutor is incredible compared to class

291
00:20:57.400 --> 00:21:00.799
from learning. So if you can
have every child, I'll have a personal

292
00:21:00.839 --> 00:21:03.559
tutor specifically for them that then just
evolves with them over time. Yeah,

293
00:21:03.599 --> 00:21:07.119
it could be extraordinary. And so
that you know, for me, I

294
00:21:07.119 --> 00:21:08.759
look at it, I think,
gosh, that is within reach at this

295
00:21:08.880 --> 00:21:12.599
point. And that's one of the
benefits I'm most excited about. When you

296
00:21:12.640 --> 00:21:15.880
look at the landscape of things that
you see as possible, what is it

297
00:21:15.960 --> 00:21:22.680
that you know you are particularly excited
about. I think certainly AI AI tutors

298
00:21:22.720 --> 00:21:27.279
are going to be amazing, perhaps
already are. I think there's also perhaps

299
00:21:27.400 --> 00:21:32.480
companionship, which may seem odd because
how can the computer really be your friend?

300
00:21:32.480 --> 00:21:36.279
But if you if you have an
AI that has memory, you know,

301
00:21:36.359 --> 00:21:40.000
and remembers all of your interactions and
has read everything, you've got to

302
00:21:40.000 --> 00:21:41.799
actually like give it permission to read
everything you've ever done, so it really

303
00:21:41.799 --> 00:21:47.559
will know you better than anyone,
perhaps even yourself, and and and where

304
00:21:47.559 --> 00:21:49.799
you can talk to it every day
and those conversations spoiled upon each other,

305
00:21:51.119 --> 00:21:56.319
you will actually have a great friend
as long as that friend can stay your

306
00:21:56.359 --> 00:22:00.400
friend and not get turned off or
something. Don't turn off my friends.

307
00:22:03.759 --> 00:22:07.720
But I think that will actually be
a real thing. And I have a

308
00:22:08.119 --> 00:22:12.640
one of my sons is sort of
has some learning disabilities and has trouble making

309
00:22:12.680 --> 00:22:17.160
friends actually, and I was like, well, you know he AI friend

310
00:22:17.200 --> 00:22:21.319
would actually be a great fri enid
Okay, you know's that was a surprising

311
00:22:21.359 --> 00:22:25.599
answer. That's actually it's worth worth
reflecting on that. That's really interesting.

312
00:22:25.640 --> 00:22:30.000
I mean we're already seeing it actually
as we deliver you know, psychotherapy anyway,

313
00:22:30.400 --> 00:22:33.359
now doing far more by digitally and
by telephone to people, and it's

314
00:22:33.400 --> 00:22:36.799
making a huge difference. And you
can see a world and which actually,

315
00:22:37.160 --> 00:22:41.319
you know, AI can provide that
social benefit to people. Just a quick

316
00:22:41.400 --> 00:22:45.799
question on on X and then we
should open it up to everybody. You

317
00:22:45.880 --> 00:22:51.640
made a change when in one of
the made many changes, but one of

318
00:22:51.680 --> 00:22:56.279
the one of the changes, We've
got a real thing about it. You

319
00:22:56.359 --> 00:23:00.920
really do, really do one of
the changes which you know kind of you

320
00:23:00.960 --> 00:23:03.200
know, it goes into the space
that you know, we have to operate

321
00:23:03.240 --> 00:23:07.720
in. And this, this balance
between free speech and moderation is you know,

322
00:23:07.759 --> 00:23:11.240
we grapple with as politicians. You
were grappling with your own version of

323
00:23:11.240 --> 00:23:15.839
that, and you you moved away
from a kind of manual human way of

324
00:23:15.920 --> 00:23:19.960
doing it, the moderation to the
community notes and yeah, and I think

325
00:23:21.000 --> 00:23:22.440
that's you know, it was an
interesting change, right, It's not what

326
00:23:22.480 --> 00:23:26.680
everyone else has done. It would
be good, you know, what's what

327
00:23:26.720 --> 00:23:29.200
was the reasoning behind that? And
why do you think that is a better

328
00:23:29.240 --> 00:23:33.519
way to do that? Yeah?
Part of the problem is if you if

329
00:23:33.519 --> 00:23:37.279
you empower people as sensors, then
well there's going to be some amount of

330
00:23:37.279 --> 00:23:42.400
bias they have, and then whoever
appoints the sensors is effectively in control of

331
00:23:42.480 --> 00:23:47.720
information. So then the idea behind
community notice, well, how do we

332
00:23:47.920 --> 00:23:52.599
have a consensus driven I mean,
so it's not really censoring it, but

333
00:23:52.680 --> 00:23:56.799
consensus driven approach to truth? How
do we how do we how do we

334
00:23:56.839 --> 00:24:02.640
make things the least amount untrue?
Like you say, like what you can't

335
00:24:03.319 --> 00:24:07.920
perhaps get to pure truth, but
you can aspire to be more truthful So

336
00:24:08.079 --> 00:24:12.559
the thing about community notes is it
doesn't actually delete anything. It simply adds

337
00:24:12.599 --> 00:24:15.519
context. And that context could be
this thing is untrue for the following reasons.

338
00:24:18.400 --> 00:24:22.960
And but but importantly with community notes, everything is open source actually,

339
00:24:23.039 --> 00:24:27.759
so you can see the software,
every line of the software. You can

340
00:24:27.799 --> 00:24:32.160
see all of the data that went
into a community note, and and you

341
00:24:32.200 --> 00:24:36.000
can independently create that community note.
So if you've got if you see a

342
00:24:36.039 --> 00:24:38.559
manipulations of data, you can actually
highlight that and say well this, this,

343
00:24:40.079 --> 00:24:42.440
this, the appears to be some
gaming of the system, and you

344
00:24:42.440 --> 00:24:48.599
can suggest improvement. So it's it's
it's maximum transparency, which is i think

345
00:24:48.759 --> 00:24:52.279
combined with the kind of wisdom of
the crowds and transparency to get to a

346
00:24:52.279 --> 00:24:56.119
better answer is you. And really
one of the key elements of community notes

347
00:24:56.200 --> 00:24:59.960
is that in order for a note
to be shown, people who have historic

348
00:25:00.279 --> 00:25:04.720
disagreed must agree. And there is
a bit of AI usage here, so

349
00:25:04.759 --> 00:25:12.319
there's will populate a parameter space around
each contributor to community notes, and then

350
00:25:12.720 --> 00:25:18.400
the parameter space so everyone's got basically
these these vectors associated with them, which

351
00:25:18.519 --> 00:25:22.400
so it's it's not as simple as
as right or left it's saying it's it's

352
00:25:22.400 --> 00:25:26.480
more, it's several hundred vectors.
That that because things are more complicated than

353
00:25:26.519 --> 00:25:33.079
something right right or left and and
and then will we'll do sort of inverse

354
00:25:33.119 --> 00:25:37.839
correlation, say like, okay,
these these people generally disagree, but they

355
00:25:37.880 --> 00:25:41.119
agree about this note. Okay,
so then that so then that that that

356
00:25:41.160 --> 00:25:45.519
gives the note credibility. Yeah,
that's that's the that's the core of it.

357
00:25:45.559 --> 00:25:49.359
And it's working quite well. I
get to see a note actually be

358
00:25:49.720 --> 00:25:53.079
be present for more than a few
hours that that is incorrect. So the

359
00:25:53.079 --> 00:25:56.119
batting average is extremely good. And
when I ask PEP, people say,

360
00:25:56.119 --> 00:26:00.720
oh, they're worried about community notes
sort of being dis like, send me

361
00:26:00.759 --> 00:26:04.799
one and then they can't. So
so I think it's I think it's quite

362
00:26:04.799 --> 00:26:10.640
good. I mean, the general
aspiration is with the X platform is to

363
00:26:10.680 --> 00:26:14.839
inform and entertain the public and to
be as accurate as possible and as truthful

364
00:26:14.880 --> 00:26:18.279
as possible, even if someone doesn't
like the truth. You know, people

365
00:26:18.279 --> 00:26:26.400
don't always like the truth, not
always, but that's that's that's the aspiration.

366
00:26:26.599 --> 00:26:29.880
And I think if we are if
we stay true to the truth,

367
00:26:30.039 --> 00:26:33.400
then I think we'll find that people
use the system to learn what is going

368
00:26:33.440 --> 00:26:41.759
on and to learn. I think
actually truth pays, so I think it'll

369
00:26:41.759 --> 00:26:45.480
be what I mean, assuming you
don't want to engage your self delusion,

370
00:26:45.599 --> 00:26:52.240
then I think it's it's the smart
move. So excellent, very helpful.

371
00:26:52.279 --> 00:26:55.839
Right, let's open it up to
all our guests here, and we've got

372
00:26:55.839 --> 00:26:57.319
some microphones that they'll come. Put
your hands up, they'll come and find

373
00:26:57.359 --> 00:27:03.519
you. We got yes, go
for it. Thank you, good evening.

374
00:27:03.720 --> 00:27:07.119
Alice Bentink from Entrepreneur. First,
thank you for a fascinating conversation.

375
00:27:07.160 --> 00:27:11.279
I suppose a question for each of
you, Prime Minister. The UK has

376
00:27:11.440 --> 00:27:15.640
some of the best universities in the
world, we have the talent. What

377
00:27:15.680 --> 00:27:19.839
will it takes the UK to be
a real breeding ground for unicorn companies?

378
00:27:21.680 --> 00:27:26.839
And elon being a founder in the
UK is still a non obvious career choice

379
00:27:26.880 --> 00:27:30.319
for the most exceptional technical talent.
What are the cultural elements that we need

380
00:27:30.319 --> 00:27:33.960
to put into place to change this? Thank you both. Well you want

381
00:27:33.960 --> 00:27:37.319
to go first, go for it? Sure? Well, you're right that

382
00:27:37.400 --> 00:27:44.880
there are cultural elements where you know, the culture should celebrate creating new companies

383
00:27:45.559 --> 00:27:53.720
and there should be a bias towards
supporting small, small companies because they're the

384
00:27:53.759 --> 00:28:00.119
ones that need nurturing. The larger
companies really don't need nurturing. So you

385
00:28:00.160 --> 00:28:02.319
know, just you can think of
it's sort of like a garden. If

386
00:28:02.319 --> 00:28:04.200
it's a little sprout that needs needs
nurturing, if it's a mighty oak,

387
00:28:04.240 --> 00:28:10.519
it doesn't need quite as much.
So I think that that is a mindset

388
00:28:10.599 --> 00:28:17.599
change that is important. But but
I should mention that London is you know,

389
00:28:18.000 --> 00:28:21.559
London and San Francisco or the Bay
Area are really the two census for

390
00:28:21.960 --> 00:28:25.960
AI. So that so London is
actually doing very well on that front.

391
00:28:26.240 --> 00:28:30.720
That the two I said, the
two leading locations on Earth. You know,

392
00:28:30.640 --> 00:28:33.680
San Francisco's probably head of London,
but London is really very strong.

393
00:28:33.960 --> 00:28:41.200
But London Area, greater London home
counties, I guess, keep keep going.

394
00:28:42.400 --> 00:28:48.160
So I'm just saying objectively this is
the case. And but you do

395
00:28:48.240 --> 00:28:52.240
need that. You need you need
the infrastructure, need, you need landlords

396
00:28:52.240 --> 00:28:56.640
who are willing to rant to new
companies, who you need law firms and

397
00:28:56.680 --> 00:29:00.160
accounts that are willing to support new
companies. And it's generally it is a

398
00:29:00.200 --> 00:29:03.759
mindset change, and I think some
of that is happening. But I think

399
00:29:04.119 --> 00:29:07.640
really it's just culturally people need to
decide this is this is a good thing.

400
00:29:08.359 --> 00:29:11.400
Yeah yeah, actually, well thanks
for what you said about the UK.

401
00:29:11.480 --> 00:29:14.960
It's something that we work hard on. Lots of people in the room

402
00:29:15.720 --> 00:29:19.519
are part of what makes this a
fabulous place for companies, including Alice.

403
00:29:19.599 --> 00:29:25.000
So that's what i'd say is my
job is to get all the you know,

404
00:29:25.000 --> 00:29:26.880
the nuts and bolts right, make
sure that all of you are starting

405
00:29:26.880 --> 00:29:30.519
companies can raise a capital that you
need everything from you know, your seed

406
00:29:30.559 --> 00:29:36.640
funding with our incredible you know eis
tax release all the way through to you

407
00:29:36.680 --> 00:29:38.880
know, your late stage rounds.
And we need reform of our pension funds

408
00:29:38.880 --> 00:29:44.680
and the Chancellor's got a bunch of
incredible reforms to unlock capital from all the

409
00:29:44.720 --> 00:29:47.519
people who have it and deploy it
into growth equity. Right, that is

410
00:29:47.519 --> 00:29:49.079
a work in progress. We're not
there yet, but I think we're we're

411
00:29:49.079 --> 00:29:52.599
making We're making good progress. We
need talent, we need people, you

412
00:29:52.599 --> 00:29:56.240
know, so that means an education
system that prioritizes the things that matter.

413
00:29:56.319 --> 00:30:00.559
And you've seen my reforms. I
go on about more matt, more maths,

414
00:30:00.599 --> 00:30:03.079
more maths, but I think that
it's important, but also attracting the

415
00:30:03.079 --> 00:30:07.880
best and the brightest here. If
you look at our fastest growing companies in

416
00:30:07.240 --> 00:30:11.319
this country, and I think it's
probably the same in the US, over

417
00:30:11.400 --> 00:30:15.039
half of them have a non British
founder, right, And so that tells

418
00:30:15.039 --> 00:30:18.920
you we've got to be a place
that is open to the world's best and

419
00:30:18.960 --> 00:30:22.119
brightest entrepreneurial talent. So the visa
regime that we've put in place, I

420
00:30:22.119 --> 00:30:25.839
think, does that makes it easy
for those people to come here. And

421
00:30:25.880 --> 00:30:29.039
then actually it's the thing that we've
spent the beginning of the session talking about

422
00:30:29.039 --> 00:30:33.200
the regulation, right, making sure
that we've got a regulatory system that's pro

423
00:30:33.240 --> 00:30:37.519
innovation. That Yeah, of course
we always need guardrails on the things that

424
00:30:37.680 --> 00:30:41.039
will worry us, but we've got
to create a space for people to innovate

425
00:30:41.079 --> 00:30:44.000
and do different things. Now,
those are all my jobs. The thing

426
00:30:44.039 --> 00:30:45.920
that is tougher is the thing that
Elon talked about, which is culture.

427
00:30:47.480 --> 00:30:52.119
Right, It's how do you transpose
that culture from places like Silicon Valley across

428
00:30:52.160 --> 00:30:57.039
the world where people are unafraid to
give up the security of a regular paycheck

429
00:30:57.200 --> 00:31:02.000
to go and start something, be
comfortable with failure, You talk about that

430
00:31:02.039 --> 00:31:03.480
a lot. I think you talk
about it more and when you're playing games,

431
00:31:03.559 --> 00:31:07.559
right, but that you've got to
be comfortable failing and knowing that that's

432
00:31:07.640 --> 00:31:11.559
just part of the process. And
that is as a tricky cultural thing to

433
00:31:11.599 --> 00:31:15.319
do overnight, but it's an important
part of I think creating that kind of

434
00:31:15.440 --> 00:31:18.839
environment. Yeah, if you don't
succeed with your first startup, it shouldn't

435
00:31:18.839 --> 00:31:22.640
be a sort of a catastrophic career
ending exactly, thing it should be you

436
00:31:22.680 --> 00:31:25.599
know, well good I think generally
should like should be like, well,

437
00:31:25.720 --> 00:31:26.759
you know, you gave it a
good shot, you know, and and

438
00:31:26.960 --> 00:31:33.119
and now try again and exactly.
It's so one thing I'm going to mention

439
00:31:33.240 --> 00:31:34.759
is like, obviously creating a company
is sort of a high risk, high

440
00:31:34.759 --> 00:31:41.839
reward situation. But I don't know
quite what the how it works in the

441
00:31:41.960 --> 00:31:48.039
UK, I think probably better than
continental Europe, but the stock options are

442
00:31:48.480 --> 00:31:52.279
very difficult in most parts of Europe. I'm not sure how does you give

443
00:31:52.319 --> 00:31:56.079
it. But if somebody's basically going
to risk the sort of life savings and

444
00:31:56.279 --> 00:32:00.640
with and the vast majority of startups
fail, So I mean you hear about

445
00:32:00.640 --> 00:32:07.000
the startups that succeed, but most
companies are most startups consist of you know,

446
00:32:07.119 --> 00:32:13.359
a massive amount of work followed by
failure. That's actually most most companies.

447
00:32:13.720 --> 00:32:16.119
And so it's a high risk kigh
reward and so the higher reward part

448
00:32:16.279 --> 00:32:20.519
does need to be there for it
to make sense. I think that was

449
00:32:20.559 --> 00:32:23.759
a very soft pitch for a tax
policy that I need chance that. But

450
00:32:23.960 --> 00:32:28.119
actually I can tell you so like
AI agree, and we have so we

451
00:32:28.200 --> 00:32:31.599
have, I think relative to certainly
European countries, but certainly the US,

452
00:32:31.799 --> 00:32:37.039
definitely California a much lower rate of
capital gains tax right. So for those

453
00:32:37.079 --> 00:32:39.599
people who are risking and growing something
like, we think the reward should be

454
00:32:39.640 --> 00:32:44.680
there at the end. So it's
twenty percent capital gains tax right. And

455
00:32:44.839 --> 00:32:47.359
on stock options, I don't know
if we've got anyone from Index Ventures in

456
00:32:47.920 --> 00:32:52.440
the room. So Index one of
our bleeding VC funds here. They do

457
00:32:52.559 --> 00:33:00.160
a regular report looking at most countries'
tax treatment of stock options. And you

458
00:33:00.160 --> 00:33:02.960
know, when I was a Chancellor
of Treasury Sexuary equivalent, you know,

459
00:33:04.000 --> 00:33:06.960
we were I think down at we
were pretty good, but we were fourth

460
00:33:07.039 --> 00:33:08.839
or fifth. Then I said we
need to for exactly the reason that you

461
00:33:08.920 --> 00:33:12.839
mentioned was like this has got to
be the best place for renovative We need

462
00:33:12.880 --> 00:33:15.039
to move that up. And I
think in the last iteration of that report

463
00:33:15.079 --> 00:33:19.640
we had because of the changes that
Jeremy and I have made, we have

464
00:33:19.720 --> 00:33:22.799
moved up to I think second from
memory. Hopefully that actually give you and

465
00:33:22.839 --> 00:33:27.680
everyone else some comfort that we recognize. That's important because when people work hard

466
00:33:27.680 --> 00:33:30.960
and risk things, yeah, they
should be able to enjoy the rewards high

467
00:33:30.000 --> 00:33:32.480
reward. Yeah. And I think
we have a we very much have a

468
00:33:32.519 --> 00:33:36.680
tax system that supports that. And
those are the values that you know,

469
00:33:36.720 --> 00:33:38.119
I believe in, and I think
most of us in this room probably do

470
00:33:38.240 --> 00:33:42.680
as well. Right, next,
next question, I've got seven front of

471
00:33:42.720 --> 00:33:47.720
me, and then I'll come over
here. Gone gone, So thanks very

472
00:33:47.799 --> 00:33:53.240
much. We've talked about some really
big ideas, global changing ideas. I'm

473
00:33:53.279 --> 00:33:58.400
really interested, particularly in the Contexte
creation of science and technology, superhubs and

474
00:33:58.400 --> 00:34:02.759
so on. How does that app
onto the everyday lives of people living in

475
00:34:02.839 --> 00:34:07.160
say Austin, Texas, to choose
around you and more in my case Nottingham,

476
00:34:07.240 --> 00:34:10.000
East Midlands. Uh, what what
is? How do you see that

477
00:34:10.079 --> 00:34:17.920
evolving for people? You know every
day sort of every day effective AI for

478
00:34:19.079 --> 00:34:23.000
context, Elon so SEB. SEB
runs our equivalent of CDs, right or

479
00:34:23.000 --> 00:34:25.920
Walgreens, so you know when actually
I visited, right, So he's got

480
00:34:25.960 --> 00:34:30.159
millions of people coming in the shops
every day, and it's making sure how

481
00:34:30.199 --> 00:34:32.159
do we make this relevant? I
think is your question, how is this

482
00:34:32.239 --> 00:34:36.159
relevant to that person? You know? Maybe actually let me go I'll go

483
00:34:36.239 --> 00:34:40.039
first on that because I think it's
a fair a fair point. I was

484
00:34:40.079 --> 00:34:43.800
just going over with the team a
couple of things that we're doing because I

485
00:34:43.800 --> 00:34:45.480
was saying, like, how are
we doing AI right now that it's making

486
00:34:45.519 --> 00:34:50.239
a difference to people's lives. And
we have this thing called gov dot UK,

487
00:34:50.480 --> 00:34:53.119
which is which actually when we when
it happened several years ago, was

488
00:34:53.159 --> 00:34:58.840
a pioneering thing. All the government
information brought together on one website, gov

489
00:34:58.880 --> 00:35:01.519
dot uk, so you need to
get a driving license, passport, any

490
00:35:01.559 --> 00:35:06.800
interaction with government. It was centralized
in a very easy, relatively easy to

491
00:35:06.880 --> 00:35:13.800
use way, better than most.
So we're about so we're about to deploy

492
00:35:14.199 --> 00:35:16.360
AI across that PI form. So
that is something that I think, you

493
00:35:16.400 --> 00:35:21.320
know, several million people a day
use right, so a large chunk of

494
00:35:21.320 --> 00:35:24.400
the population is interacting with gov dot
UK every single day to do all these

495
00:35:24.559 --> 00:35:28.440
day to day tasks. Right,
every one of your customers is doing all

496
00:35:28.440 --> 00:35:31.960
those things, and so we're about
to deploy AI into that to make that

497
00:35:32.079 --> 00:35:36.800
whole process so much easier. Because
you know, some people will be like,

498
00:35:36.800 --> 00:35:39.760
look, well I'm currently here and
I've lost my passport and my flights

499
00:35:39.760 --> 00:35:44.000
in five hours. You know at
the moment that would require you know how

500
00:35:44.039 --> 00:35:45.840
many steps to figure out what you
do? You know, well, actually,

501
00:35:45.880 --> 00:35:49.360
when we deploy the AI, it
should be that you could just literally

502
00:35:49.599 --> 00:35:52.039
say that and boom boom boom,
bom boom. This is what we're going

503
00:35:52.079 --> 00:35:54.599
to do walking through it, and
that's going to benefit millions of millions of

504
00:35:54.639 --> 00:35:58.840
people every single day, right,
Because that's a very practical way in my

505
00:35:59.119 --> 00:36:01.679
seat, that I can start using
this technology to help people in their day

506
00:36:01.679 --> 00:36:07.039
to day lives, not just healthcare
discoveries and everything else that we're also doing.

507
00:36:07.079 --> 00:36:09.880
But I thought that's quite a powerful
demonstration of literally your day to day

508
00:36:10.000 --> 00:36:15.079
customer seeing actually their just day to
day life get a little bit easier because

509
00:36:15.119 --> 00:36:16.760
of something that you know, Elon
Demis and others in this room have helped

510
00:36:16.800 --> 00:36:21.800
create. Yeah, exactly, The
most immediate thing is just being able to

511
00:36:21.840 --> 00:36:27.360
ask, like having a very smart
friend that you can ask anything, you

512
00:36:27.400 --> 00:36:30.920
know, ask how to make something, how to solve any problem, and

513
00:36:30.960 --> 00:36:37.920
it'll tell you so. And obviously
companies are going to adopt this, so

514
00:36:37.800 --> 00:36:40.920
I think maybe you'll have much better
customer service. I guess essentially that'll probably

515
00:36:40.920 --> 00:36:47.960
be the first thing you notice.
And then if we talked about education,

516
00:36:50.679 --> 00:36:55.079
so having a tutor, so if
you're trying to understand a subject, like

517
00:36:55.159 --> 00:37:01.440
having a phenomenal tutor on any subject, is that that's really pretty much there

518
00:37:01.480 --> 00:37:05.679
already almost. I mean we need
to obviously, I need to stop hallucinating

519
00:37:05.840 --> 00:37:09.199
before you know it can't give you. I mean that we still have a

520
00:37:09.239 --> 00:37:13.320
little bit of the problem where it
can give you an answer that's competently wrong

521
00:37:14.280 --> 00:37:19.079
with great grammar and you know,
in bullet points and everything in citations,

522
00:37:19.079 --> 00:37:22.800
it was not real. So that's
be okay. We need to make sure

523
00:37:22.800 --> 00:37:28.800
it's it's not it's not it's not
giving you competently wrong tunor answers. But

524
00:37:28.800 --> 00:37:34.800
but that's going to happen pretty quickly
where it is actually correct. So yeah,

525
00:37:34.800 --> 00:37:37.639
I'm gonna say for any for any
parent who was homeschooling during COVID and

526
00:37:37.800 --> 00:37:42.280
realizing what their kids needed to be
helped with. That will come as an

527
00:37:42.360 --> 00:37:45.159
enormous relief. I think, yeah, very very good. Right have we

528
00:37:45.239 --> 00:37:47.880
got let's go questions over here?
Who have we got? We only microphones

529
00:37:49.000 --> 00:37:53.360
or brand you they're perfect? Hi, Brent Herman. So you know you've

530
00:37:53.360 --> 00:37:58.880
spoken eloquently about abundance in the Age
of abundance, So it feels obviously with

531
00:37:59.000 --> 00:38:05.440
AI it's everything else were everywhere all
at once. But with robots, and

532
00:38:05.800 --> 00:38:07.039
to get the age of abundance,
we'll need a lot of robots. I

533
00:38:07.119 --> 00:38:12.079
know you're working on robots as well. Are there sort of constraints that we

534
00:38:12.119 --> 00:38:15.559
should think of our politician should be
thinking of that we might get one country

535
00:38:15.639 --> 00:38:19.320
might get heavily behind in robots.
They can do all these things and end

536
00:38:19.360 --> 00:38:23.559
to the age of bunds and therefore
be it a strategic disadvantage. Well,

537
00:38:25.719 --> 00:38:30.239
really, anything that can be actuated
by a computer is effectively a robot.

538
00:38:30.719 --> 00:38:37.920
So you can think of frankly,
Tesla cars or robots on wheels. Anything

539
00:38:37.920 --> 00:38:44.960
that's connected to the Internet is effectively
an endpoint actuator for artificial intelligence. So

540
00:38:47.800 --> 00:38:51.840
you've got Bust and Dynamics. Obviously, they've been making impressive robots for a

541
00:38:51.920 --> 00:38:54.960
while. I think there are at
this point mostly on by Hundai, So

542
00:38:55.119 --> 00:39:00.559
I guess who is probably gonna make
robots of that are humanoid and and some

543
00:39:01.760 --> 00:39:05.639
interesting shapes that I wasn't just patting, like the one that looks like a

544
00:39:06.119 --> 00:39:08.280
has wheels and looks sort of like
a kangaroo on wheels. I'm sure what

545
00:39:08.400 --> 00:39:16.960
that is, but it looks a
little demanded, frankly. But but there's

546
00:39:16.960 --> 00:39:22.119
gonna be all sorts of all sorts
of robots. You've got the company Dison

547
00:39:22.239 --> 00:39:29.320
in the UK, which I think
there's some pretty impressive things. I think

548
00:39:29.320 --> 00:39:32.480
the UK will not be behind actually
on that front. UK also has ARM,

549
00:39:32.639 --> 00:39:38.599
which is really the best one one
of the best paths, the best

550
00:39:39.840 --> 00:39:45.119
in chip design in the world.
Tees I use a lot of a lot

551
00:39:45.159 --> 00:39:51.280
of ARM technology. Almost everyone does, actually, so I think UK is

552
00:39:51.280 --> 00:39:55.599
in a strong position. Germany obviously
makes a lot of robots, natural robots

553
00:39:57.000 --> 00:40:01.400
that I mean, I think generally
countries that make robots of any kind,

554
00:40:01.880 --> 00:40:07.920
even if they seem somewhat conventional'll be
We'll be fine. I do think there

555
00:40:08.000 --> 00:40:15.679
is a there is a safety concern, especially with humanoid robots, because at

556
00:40:15.760 --> 00:40:19.519
least the car can't chase you into
this building not very easily, you know,

557
00:40:19.760 --> 00:40:22.039
or chase you over a tree,
or you know, you can sort

558
00:40:22.039 --> 00:40:28.320
of run up a flight of stairs
and get away from a tesla. I

559
00:40:28.360 --> 00:40:32.440
think it's a Stephen King movie about
that if your car gets possessed. So,

560
00:40:34.800 --> 00:40:37.800
but if you have a humanoid robot, it can it can basically chase

561
00:40:37.840 --> 00:40:44.920
you anywhere. So I think we
should have some kind of hardwired local cutoff

562
00:40:45.599 --> 00:40:50.039
that you can't update from the internet. So anything that can be software updated

563
00:40:50.079 --> 00:40:53.519
from the internet obviously can be overridden. But if you have a local sort

564
00:40:53.559 --> 00:40:57.840
of off switch where you have to
say a keyword or something, and then

565
00:40:57.920 --> 00:41:04.239
that puts the robot into a safe
state, some kind of localized safe state

566
00:41:04.320 --> 00:41:09.239
ability, an off switch, you
know, where you don't have to get

567
00:41:09.239 --> 00:41:13.719
too close to the robot. I
don't know, if we've got millions of

568
00:41:13.719 --> 00:41:15.920
these things going over the place,
you're not selling it, just you know,

569
00:41:17.320 --> 00:41:22.280
I know, I'm saying this is
something we should be quite concerned about

570
00:41:22.800 --> 00:41:28.559
because Robert Robert can follow you anywhere. Then you know what if they just

571
00:41:28.639 --> 00:41:32.119
one day get a software update,
and they're not so friendly anymore. We've

572
00:41:32.199 --> 00:41:37.599
got a James Cameron movie on our
house. It's actually that's it's funny you're

573
00:41:37.599 --> 00:41:42.719
saying that because in our session that
we had today, you know, just

574
00:41:42.960 --> 00:41:45.360
I would say who they made exactly
the same point right then, as we're

575
00:41:45.400 --> 00:41:50.440
talking about they're talking about movies actually
about mentioning James Cameron. They're talking about

576
00:41:50.480 --> 00:41:53.559
James cameeron movies, and they're saying, if you think about it's not just

577
00:41:53.679 --> 00:41:59.639
those movies, but any of these
movies, trains, subways, metro.

578
00:42:00.599 --> 00:42:04.800
They said, all these movies with
the same plot fundamentally all end with the

579
00:42:04.920 --> 00:42:08.000
person turning it off right or finding
a way to shut the thing down.

580
00:42:08.199 --> 00:42:12.960
And they were making the same point
that you were about the importance of actual

581
00:42:13.320 --> 00:42:16.199
physical off switches and so all the
technology is great, but undamentally, the

582
00:42:16.280 --> 00:42:20.719
same movie has played out fifty times, we've all watched it, and all

583
00:42:20.840 --> 00:42:23.079
fundamentally, you know, you know, the point I'm revenged right or ends

584
00:42:23.119 --> 00:42:27.480
in pretty much the same way with
someone finding a way to just do the

585
00:42:27.559 --> 00:42:30.760
wrong. Which is kind of interesting
that you've said a similar point. Right,

586
00:42:30.280 --> 00:42:34.480
it's not the it's not the obvious
place you'd go to, but be

587
00:42:34.519 --> 00:42:37.159
One of the tests for the AI
was just so like, blank is your

588
00:42:37.199 --> 00:42:47.840
favorite Dreamers camera movie? Excellent?
Right, Yes, we got over there.

589
00:42:47.920 --> 00:42:53.400
Yeah, perfect, Hi question for
you both. So I'm a founder

590
00:42:53.480 --> 00:42:58.079
of a AI and mL scale up
in the third center for AI, which

591
00:42:58.119 --> 00:43:01.039
is leads in the North of England
a bit biased. Since the launch of

592
00:43:01.360 --> 00:43:06.920
chat GBT three months after that,
we saw a real increase in phishing attacks

593
00:43:07.000 --> 00:43:13.400
using much more sophisticated language patterns.
What do we do to protect businesses consumers

594
00:43:13.480 --> 00:43:16.119
that they trust this technology better and
how do we bring them along that journey

595
00:43:16.159 --> 00:43:22.559
with us? Well, I think
we shouldn't trust it that much. Actually,

596
00:43:25.239 --> 00:43:29.199
it is actually quite quite a significant
challenge because we're getting to the point

597
00:43:29.199 --> 00:43:32.840
where even open source AI can pass
human capture tests. So you know this,

598
00:43:34.119 --> 00:43:37.679
are you a human identify all the
traffic lights in this picture? You're

599
00:43:37.719 --> 00:43:40.880
like, Okay, it's going to
have no problem doing that. In fact,

600
00:43:40.920 --> 00:43:45.599
it'll do it better than the human
and faster than human. So we're

601
00:43:45.679 --> 00:43:47.559
like, how do you you know
at the point which is better a better

602
00:43:47.639 --> 00:43:52.039
human? Better passing human tests than
humans? Then well, what tests actually

603
00:43:52.159 --> 00:43:55.119
make sense? That is a real
problem. I don't actually have a good

604
00:43:55.119 --> 00:43:59.440
solution to it. That's one of
the things we're trying to figure out on

605
00:43:59.519 --> 00:44:02.920
the XP form is how to deal
with that, because it really we really

606
00:44:02.920 --> 00:44:08.679
are at the point where even with
with open source, you know, readily

607
00:44:08.719 --> 00:44:12.159
available AI, you don't need to
be sort of leading in the field.

608
00:44:12.960 --> 00:44:16.079
You can actually be better than humans
at passing these tests. And that's sort

609
00:44:16.119 --> 00:44:20.280
of why we think, well,
perhaps we should sort of charge a dollar

610
00:44:20.400 --> 00:44:22.679
or a pound a year. It's
a very tiny amount of money, but

611
00:44:22.800 --> 00:44:25.599
it's it's still it still makes it
privatively expensive to make a million bots.

612
00:44:28.599 --> 00:44:31.679
So and especially if you need a
million payment methods, then you run out

613
00:44:31.719 --> 00:44:39.400
of sort of stolen credit cards pretty
quickly. So that that's that's sort of

614
00:44:39.440 --> 00:44:42.880
where we're thinking, like we might
have to sort of just charge some very

615
00:44:42.920 --> 00:44:49.679
tiny amount of moneyo point three cents
a day effectively to deal with the the

616
00:44:49.760 --> 00:44:54.079
onsought of AI powered bonds. And
if if and that that is that is

617
00:44:54.119 --> 00:44:59.639
spilit growing problem, but it will
be I think perhaps an insurmountable problem next

618
00:44:59.719 --> 00:45:04.199
year. So and then you have
to worry about, well, manipulation of

619
00:45:05.400 --> 00:45:08.599
information is making something seem very popular
when in fact it it's not because it's

620
00:45:08.639 --> 00:45:15.039
getting boosted by all these likes and
reposts from AI powered barts. So that's

621
00:45:15.039 --> 00:45:21.039
why I sort of think somewhat inevitably
it leads to some small payment in order

622
00:45:21.119 --> 00:45:28.719
to dramatically increase the cost of a
bart. So I think I frankly,

623
00:45:28.719 --> 00:45:30.679
I think probably any social media system
it doesn't do that. Also believe you

624
00:45:30.719 --> 00:45:37.880
over on my bart. You know, I think my general answer would be,

625
00:45:37.280 --> 00:45:40.320
you know, we need to show
that we are on top of mitigating

626
00:45:40.360 --> 00:45:45.400
the risks right so people can trust
the technology. That's what actually the last

627
00:45:45.400 --> 00:45:49.159
couple of days has been about on
the Safety Summit is just showing, you

628
00:45:49.239 --> 00:45:52.719
know, we're investing in the Safety
Institute, having the people who can do

629
00:45:52.800 --> 00:45:55.719
the research on these things to figure
out how we mitigate against them, and

630
00:45:55.880 --> 00:46:00.360
we have to do it fast,
and we have to keep iterating it because

631
00:46:00.719 --> 00:46:02.559
all of us probably in this room, believe that the technology can be incredibly

632
00:46:02.639 --> 00:46:06.599
powerful, but we've got to make
sure we bring people along that journey with

633
00:46:06.719 --> 00:46:09.519
us, that we're handling the risks
that are there and as there's a job

634
00:46:09.599 --> 00:46:13.719
to do, and the last couple
of days I think we make good progress

635
00:46:13.840 --> 00:46:16.119
on it. Because we want to
focus on the positives and manage these things.

636
00:46:16.199 --> 00:46:20.599
But that requires action, and that's
what the last couple of days has

637
00:46:20.599 --> 00:46:23.960
been about your your story, you
know, analogy. There was part of

638
00:46:24.000 --> 00:46:29.639
the research that actually, you know, the team working on the task force

639
00:46:29.719 --> 00:46:32.599
here published and presented yesterday. I
don't know if you saw it was,

640
00:46:34.280 --> 00:46:39.000
which is essentially that it was a
using AI to do to create a ton

641
00:46:39.079 --> 00:46:45.920
of fake profiles on social media and
then infiltrate particular groups with particular information.

642
00:46:46.480 --> 00:46:49.360
And actually, at the moment that, as I said to your point,

643
00:46:49.519 --> 00:46:52.280
there's a cost free it's getting.
It's getting at the point where it's like,

644
00:46:52.599 --> 00:46:54.639
really, you're going to have one
hundred for a penny sort of thing.

645
00:46:54.719 --> 00:46:58.280
Ridiculous. And if you think about
some of these social networks that quite

646
00:46:58.280 --> 00:47:01.039
a neighborhood or town levels, not
that many big profiles that you need to

647
00:47:01.119 --> 00:47:06.559
quickly create. Suddenly they're everywhere and
there's some local issue that might be of

648
00:47:06.639 --> 00:47:09.400
importance, and you know, the
team have run versions of how that would

649
00:47:09.440 --> 00:47:13.920
look like, and suddenly they're interacting
with everybody and then spreading and misinformation around.

650
00:47:15.880 --> 00:47:19.480
Were literally as part of the research
that we published on this information yesterday.

651
00:47:19.679 --> 00:47:22.719
It's a it's a real challenge.
Yeah, exactly to your point.

652
00:47:22.760 --> 00:47:27.360
I mean the images. You don't
even need to steal somebody's picture because then

653
00:47:27.519 --> 00:47:30.480
that's traceable. But you can actually
just say, create a new image of

654
00:47:30.519 --> 00:47:37.639
a person realistic looking but doesn't exist, and then create a biography realistic but

655
00:47:37.719 --> 00:47:40.480
doesn't exist, and do that en
mass and practically the only way of Bill

656
00:47:40.559 --> 00:47:46.519
tells that the grammar is too good. Don't give away typho. Come on

657
00:47:49.360 --> 00:47:51.880
now, I'm getting waved at because
I think we are out of time.

658
00:47:51.920 --> 00:47:54.639
I don't we take one very brief
last question and let's make it go on?

659
00:47:54.760 --> 00:47:57.119
Yes, sir, going, you're
right in front of me, go

660
00:48:00.679 --> 00:48:05.440
elon. Question for you related to
the X platform. Are there simple things

661
00:48:05.480 --> 00:48:07.480
we can do, especially when it
comes to visual media. You alluded to

662
00:48:07.559 --> 00:48:13.239
the fact that it's fairly straightforward and
effectively free to make people like yourselves say

663
00:48:13.559 --> 00:48:15.840
and do things that you never said
or did. Can we do something like

664
00:48:15.880 --> 00:48:20.679
cryptographically signed media. I'm from Adobe, We're working on this project. Twitter

665
00:48:20.840 --> 00:48:23.719
was a member. Love to see
X come back. Okay, digitally signed

666
00:48:23.760 --> 00:48:28.039
media to indicate not only what was
created by AI, but what came from

667
00:48:28.079 --> 00:48:30.559
a camera, what was real to
imbue a sense of trust in media that

668
00:48:30.719 --> 00:48:35.039
can go viral. That sounds like
a good idea. Actually, so if

669
00:48:36.559 --> 00:48:43.079
some way of authenticating would be would
be good. So, yeah, that

670
00:48:43.159 --> 00:48:46.159
sounds like a good idea, which
we'll probably do it. Yeah, there

671
00:48:46.199 --> 00:48:52.280
you go, actually on that on
that point. So I've already and this

672
00:48:52.400 --> 00:48:55.000
is particularly pertinent for people in my
job, right, and I've already had

673
00:48:55.039 --> 00:49:00.719
a situation happened to me with adopted
image that goes everywhere negative. By the

674
00:49:00.800 --> 00:49:04.400
time everyone realizes, well that's fake
and we should stop sending it, the

675
00:49:04.519 --> 00:49:08.280
damages the damage is done. And
actually we were again reflecting today. If

676
00:49:08.320 --> 00:49:13.119
you think next year, you've got
elections in you know, I think you

677
00:49:13.159 --> 00:49:17.280
know, the US, India,
I think Indonesia probably here there you go,

678
00:49:20.000 --> 00:49:24.880
massive news. Actually you've got just
an enormous junk of the world's population

679
00:49:25.199 --> 00:49:29.679
is voting next year, right,
and you've got EU elections as well.

680
00:49:30.320 --> 00:49:32.199
You know. Actually, just these
issues are right in front of ours.

681
00:49:32.840 --> 00:49:37.400
Next year is one of big elections
across the globe, probably the first set

682
00:49:37.440 --> 00:49:40.800
of elections where this has been a
real issue. So figuring out how we

683
00:49:42.440 --> 00:49:45.840
manage that is I think kind of
mission critical for the people who want,

684
00:49:45.880 --> 00:49:47.639
you know, the integrity of our
democracy. Yeah, I mean some of

685
00:49:47.679 --> 00:49:51.480
it it's quite entertaining, Like the
pope and the puffa jacket. Have you

686
00:49:51.559 --> 00:49:54.760
seen that one? That's amazing,
But I mean I saw ritter people who

687
00:49:55.280 --> 00:49:59.159
think that's real. I'm like,
well, one of the answer is wearing

688
00:49:59.159 --> 00:50:04.000
a puffa jacket and lie, you
know, be sweating. But it actually

689
00:50:04.079 --> 00:50:08.079
looks quite quite dashing of things.
In fact, I think AI fashion is

690
00:50:08.239 --> 00:50:12.159
going to be a real thing.
So do in glue like, we live

691
00:50:12.199 --> 00:50:14.920
in the most interesting times, and
I think this is it is, you

692
00:50:15.000 --> 00:50:17.719
know, eight like eighty percent likely
to be good and twenty percent bad.

693
00:50:17.760 --> 00:50:22.840
I think if we're cognizant and careful
about the bad part, on balance,

694
00:50:22.000 --> 00:50:27.079
actually it will be the future that
we want. Well for the future that

695
00:50:27.360 --> 00:50:31.519
is preferable, and it actually will
be some somewhat of a leveler, an

696
00:50:31.559 --> 00:50:36.440
equalizer in the sense that you know, every I think everyone will have access

697
00:50:36.440 --> 00:50:39.440
to goods and services and education,
and so you know, I think probably

698
00:50:39.480 --> 00:50:44.639
it leads to more human happiness.
So I guess I'd probably leave on an

699
00:50:44.679 --> 00:50:49.199
optimistic note. Tough act. Yeah, that's well, that's that is a

700
00:50:49.239 --> 00:50:52.000
great note to end on. I
think that you know we're all onant that

701
00:50:52.159 --> 00:50:54.360
better future. I think it's there. The promise of it is certainly there.

702
00:50:54.519 --> 00:50:58.119
Lots of people in this room,
including yourselves, are working hard to

703
00:50:58.159 --> 00:51:00.760
make it happen. Our job in
government is to make sure happened safely.

704
00:51:00.920 --> 00:51:04.159
But on the basis of this conversation
in the last couple of days, I'm

705
00:51:04.159 --> 00:51:07.199
certainly leaving more confident that we can
make that happen. It's been a huge

706
00:51:07.199 --> 00:51:09.719
privilege and pleasure to have you here. Thank you very much for having me.

707
00:51:13.679 --> 00:51:14.280
I think it's

