WEBVTT

1
00:00:03.759 --> 00:00:08.679
Hi, You're listening to The Sociology
Show, a podcast about absolutely anything to

2
00:00:08.720 --> 00:00:14.039
do with the wonderful world of sociology. Whether you're a teacher, a lecturer,

3
00:00:14.199 --> 00:00:18.039
a student, or just taking a
passing interest. This podcast will look

4
00:00:18.039 --> 00:00:22.800
at a range of issues from social
class, ethnicity, gender, sexuality,

5
00:00:22.879 --> 00:00:27.960
religion, crime, education, and
anything else that sociology has to offer.

6
00:00:29.839 --> 00:00:33.039
My name is Matthew Wilkin. In
each episode, I will speak to someone

7
00:00:33.079 --> 00:00:37.119
working in the field of sociology and
let them explain all about their own interests,

8
00:00:37.280 --> 00:00:42.000
their research, and their experiences.
So put your ear phones in,

9
00:00:42.320 --> 00:00:49.880
turn the volume up, and let's
be sociology geeks together. Ah, Hello,

10
00:00:49.960 --> 00:00:53.600
and welcome to the Sociology Show.
My guest for this episode is Professor

11
00:00:53.679 --> 00:00:58.000
Lee Elliott Major, talking about his
new book, Equity and Education, leveling

12
00:00:58.039 --> 00:01:00.439
the playing field of learning. Before
we get stuck into that, just a

13
00:01:00.439 --> 00:01:04.400
couple of messages for you. The
first one is for students listening. So

14
00:01:04.439 --> 00:01:10.840
The Sociology Show podcast now offers online
tutoring for both A level and GCSE sociology.

15
00:01:11.359 --> 00:01:14.680
One thing that we always do with
our tutors is we only use tutors

16
00:01:14.719 --> 00:01:19.000
who are examiners, and we also
have some lead examiners or chief examiners as

17
00:01:19.040 --> 00:01:22.439
well, So if you would like
some online tutoring from people that know the

18
00:01:22.480 --> 00:01:26.280
exams inside out and can answer all
your questions and give you really, really

19
00:01:26.319 --> 00:01:30.760
top advice, then do get in
touch. You can email at the Sociology

20
00:01:30.760 --> 00:01:34.599
Show podcast at gmail dot com.
Also a message for teachers listening as well.

21
00:01:34.640 --> 00:01:40.319
The Sociology Show podcast offers conferences and
these conferences can either be face to

22
00:01:40.319 --> 00:01:44.000
face or they can be online.
These are for students and they can be

23
00:01:44.319 --> 00:01:47.239
the length of a lesson or if
you want someone to come in to talk

24
00:01:47.239 --> 00:01:49.359
to you for longer, they can
be two hours, three hours, half

25
00:01:49.359 --> 00:01:52.400
a day, whatever you do like. So, if you are struggling with

26
00:01:52.439 --> 00:01:56.719
any of the content, or you
just want some clarification on the exam structures,

27
00:01:56.799 --> 00:02:00.359
how to approach the exams, whatever
it may be, then we do

28
00:02:00.519 --> 00:02:05.319
have members of staff available, really
experienced sociology teachers who can come in and

29
00:02:05.359 --> 00:02:08.159
talk to your students as well.
So again if you're interested in booking a

30
00:02:08.199 --> 00:02:14.280
short conference, then do get in
touch again. That email is the Sociology

31
00:02:14.280 --> 00:02:17.280
Show podcast at gmail dot com.
Thank you very much for listening to the

32
00:02:17.319 --> 00:02:23.199
messages without further ado, let's go
over to the interview with Professor Lee Elliott

33
00:02:23.280 --> 00:02:29.719
Major. Enjoy Hello and welcome to
the Sociology Show podcast. Would you like

34
00:02:29.759 --> 00:02:31.159
to start by telling us a little
bit about who you are and what you

35
00:02:31.199 --> 00:02:37.560
do. Please, So I am
Lee Elliott Major. I am the country's

36
00:02:37.680 --> 00:02:42.560
first professor of social mobility. Believe
it or not, we actually don't know

37
00:02:42.639 --> 00:02:46.960
of another professor in this film in
the world at the moment, so very

38
00:02:46.960 --> 00:02:53.000
proud to be that. At the
University of Exeter. I was formerly chief

39
00:02:53.000 --> 00:02:54.719
executive I think called the Sutton Trust, which is what a sort of big

40
00:02:54.800 --> 00:03:04.319
education foundation which is dedicated to improving
life prospects through education, dedicated to improving

41
00:03:04.319 --> 00:03:08.080
social mobility. So I'm unusual in
the sense I'm a professor practice. There's

42
00:03:08.080 --> 00:03:15.120
someone who's had another role in their
career, and my job in a nutshell

43
00:03:15.400 --> 00:03:21.800
is about doing research, but also
working with schools, universities and indeed governments

44
00:03:21.840 --> 00:03:29.439
and increasing actually employers to improve prospects
for children from underresourced backgrounds. Will come

45
00:03:29.520 --> 00:03:32.159
back to that point on language,
because I used to use the term disadvantaged

46
00:03:32.159 --> 00:03:37.919
pupil for most of my career,
but we have reassessed that in our latest

47
00:03:37.919 --> 00:03:39.759
book, and we might get back
to that, Matthew on that, but

48
00:03:40.439 --> 00:03:45.960
that's in a nutshell. So I
increasingly present across the company, indeed in

49
00:03:46.240 --> 00:03:49.800
other countries as well these days.
You know, these issues of inequality and

50
00:03:49.960 --> 00:03:57.199
education, social class, influence on
life prospects, social mobility are things that

51
00:03:57.560 --> 00:04:00.000
most countries now are interested in.
You know, is quite interesting for me,

52
00:04:00.159 --> 00:04:04.680
So so increasing a global topic.
Thank you, thank you, And

53
00:04:04.680 --> 00:04:10.520
I'm always always interested in why that
particular area. I read that you were

54
00:04:10.520 --> 00:04:13.719
the first of your family to go
to university. I just be interested to

55
00:04:13.759 --> 00:04:17.040
know about your own background and in
terms of where you are now. So

56
00:04:17.160 --> 00:04:21.240
again, I'm very unusual as a
professor in that I do come from basically

57
00:04:21.439 --> 00:04:27.519
a working class background. I'm from
West London. I'm a place called Felton,

58
00:04:27.560 --> 00:04:31.839
which is famous for its Young Offenders
institution, and that's where I grew

59
00:04:31.959 --> 00:04:35.759
up. My mum and dad,
as you say, didn't go to university.

60
00:04:35.759 --> 00:04:38.800
So I was first and families to
go university. I lived on my

61
00:04:38.839 --> 00:04:42.319
own from fifteen. It's quite a
story actually when I look back on it.

62
00:04:42.480 --> 00:04:46.279
I was on social security. I
was quite academic at school, so

63
00:04:46.360 --> 00:04:50.040
I was one of these kids again, we'll get back into this. That

64
00:04:50.199 --> 00:04:54.959
was sort of plucked, you know, because I was very bright academically,

65
00:04:55.040 --> 00:04:58.040
even though I was from a more
work class background. I was sort of

66
00:04:58.079 --> 00:05:02.399
helped by teachers to go back to
school and they were really instrumental, as

67
00:05:02.399 --> 00:05:05.959
well as some family members who helped
me and some friends. I lived with

68
00:05:06.000 --> 00:05:11.480
my best friend's family for a time. They took me in. So one

69
00:05:11.480 --> 00:05:14.639
of the things about my life I
always say is that you know, we're

70
00:05:14.680 --> 00:05:18.439
all products of many people, and
I really dislike the narratives that you know,

71
00:05:18.480 --> 00:05:23.160
it's all about me and how brilliant
I am. Actually, most lives

72
00:05:23.199 --> 00:05:26.920
are a product of many people.
It's just that some people forget those people

73
00:05:26.920 --> 00:05:30.120
that help them when they were younger. Right. So I used my story

74
00:05:30.120 --> 00:05:35.399
when I give lectures now. So
the Daily Mail did a news piece on

75
00:05:35.839 --> 00:05:40.160
my life and it was from bin
man to professor. And it's true I

76
00:05:40.360 --> 00:05:43.399
was a bin man, but I
was a bin man during the summer.

77
00:05:43.480 --> 00:05:46.879
It was a job my mum got
me. It was nepotism. She worked

78
00:05:46.879 --> 00:05:48.879
for the local council. It was
a summer job while I was doing a

79
00:05:48.879 --> 00:05:53.759
PhD. Right, So there's always
a different side of these headline stories.

80
00:05:54.519 --> 00:05:59.279
But it's an important story for me
because when we discuss it with students and

81
00:05:59.319 --> 00:06:05.480
in d T and undergraduates, it's
a nice example to explore what we actually

82
00:06:05.600 --> 00:06:10.079
mean by social justice or social business. That I would argue that we need

83
00:06:10.120 --> 00:06:15.759
good beIN men right as well as
professors. So let's not implicitly suggest that

84
00:06:15.839 --> 00:06:23.360
these jobs are somehow inferior to other
jobs. And let's not also implicitly suggest

85
00:06:23.399 --> 00:06:28.000
that being working class is inferior to
being middle class. So I use my

86
00:06:28.079 --> 00:06:31.199
own story really to explore what I
call the sort of deficit mindset which I

87
00:06:31.199 --> 00:06:36.319
think still dominates a lot of education. And the book Equity Education, a

88
00:06:36.360 --> 00:06:41.680
lot of what we talk about is
trying to challenge those very dominant sort of

89
00:06:41.680 --> 00:06:47.519
deficit approaches that dog the education systems
this day. It's really interesting you think

90
00:06:47.560 --> 00:06:50.639
that because I was reflecting on myself
like you, as the first in the

91
00:06:50.639 --> 00:06:54.959
family to go to university, and
the expression caught up in here is you

92
00:06:55.000 --> 00:06:59.360
know that the boy that done good? As if had I not gone through

93
00:06:59.360 --> 00:07:01.040
that route and education, had I
been a bin man, or had I

94
00:07:01.079 --> 00:07:04.040
worked in a call center, that's
not doing good. I find that really

95
00:07:04.040 --> 00:07:09.360
interesting that doing good seems to be
progressing further rather than staying in a working

96
00:07:09.399 --> 00:07:14.600
class profession. Yeah. Absolutely,
And you know, I would argue that

97
00:07:14.759 --> 00:07:21.839
my job is about enabling young people
to find out what they can do with

98
00:07:21.839 --> 00:07:26.560
their lives. You know, irrespect
your background shouldn't determine what you do whatever.

99
00:07:26.600 --> 00:07:30.160
That is right and that you know, for some people, they don't

100
00:07:30.199 --> 00:07:33.199
want to move to the big cities
and get a high playing job that is

101
00:07:33.360 --> 00:07:39.439
very stressful. They want a decent
life, They want to contribute to society,

102
00:07:40.519 --> 00:07:44.600
and they want to stay in their
local community or regions. So I

103
00:07:44.600 --> 00:07:47.839
think these debates are really interesting.
And the problem with that sort of rags

104
00:07:47.839 --> 00:07:53.000
to riches story is it makes us
all feel like we're failures. Right,

105
00:07:53.040 --> 00:07:57.120
so you say, yeah, the
system works because these people kind of implicitly

106
00:07:57.240 --> 00:08:01.160
the assumption has worked really hard or
were really talented, did and made it

107
00:08:01.160 --> 00:08:05.079
to the top however we defined it, and the rest of you are losers,

108
00:08:05.199 --> 00:08:09.319
you know. So I think we've
really got to challenge some of those

109
00:08:09.360 --> 00:08:13.800
dominant narratives we see in the press. And I was very nervous when you're

110
00:08:13.920 --> 00:08:18.000
Daily mail, Honestly, you don't
know quite what the headline's going to be.

111
00:08:20.000 --> 00:08:22.720
To be honest, it was a
very generous story about me, but

112
00:08:22.800 --> 00:08:26.639
it did play to those assumptions definitely. Yeah. Do you think it is

113
00:08:26.759 --> 00:08:30.879
more of an issue in Britain?
People always say Britain is one of the

114
00:08:30.920 --> 00:08:33.279
most classes societies, if not the
most classes. I'm just thinking, for

115
00:08:33.320 --> 00:08:37.480
example, I work with a fellow
sociology teachers who's German, and he says,

116
00:08:37.519 --> 00:08:41.240
you know, in Germany, if
you have a vocational job, if

117
00:08:41.320 --> 00:08:45.720
you have a more manual job,
it's got a much more higher status than

118
00:08:45.759 --> 00:08:48.919
we tend to regard in the UK. We still seem to be quite obsessed

119
00:08:48.960 --> 00:08:52.200
with, you know, the academic
versus vocational roots and the snobbery that comes

120
00:08:52.200 --> 00:08:58.559
with that. I do think we
are obsessive about class divides, and we

121
00:08:58.639 --> 00:09:01.960
certainly invented the class, you know, if you look back at the history

122
00:09:03.000 --> 00:09:09.440
of Britain. But I also think
class does exist and persist in other countries.

123
00:09:09.480 --> 00:09:13.080
I just think it's more subtle.
I don't think they necessarily call it

124
00:09:13.120 --> 00:09:16.320
class. So in Germany, you
know, if you're from a certain part

125
00:09:16.360 --> 00:09:20.200
of Germany with a certain accent,
or you have a particular education, and

126
00:09:20.200 --> 00:09:22.480
you're absolutely right, they are properly
better on things like apprenticeships than us,

127
00:09:22.519 --> 00:09:28.240
but they still have some sort of
class system. Every country I've looked at.

128
00:09:28.840 --> 00:09:33.919
I think there are some what I
call status markers in the workplace,

129
00:09:33.559 --> 00:09:39.120
your accent, where you come from, your education, and those are not

130
00:09:39.600 --> 00:09:45.240
directly really about talent. They're just
about your class, okay, and it

131
00:09:45.440 --> 00:09:48.120
just means and there's been some lovely
work done on this by socialogists, there

132
00:09:48.200 --> 00:09:54.399
is this sort of class ceiling that
we observe in the UK. I'm convinced,

133
00:09:54.399 --> 00:09:56.159
and this will be probably the next
book, by the way, is

134
00:09:56.200 --> 00:10:01.679
that there is a class ceiling across
the world world and in many ways the

135
00:10:01.720 --> 00:10:07.279
British and American cultures have influenced the
rest of the world. And you know,

136
00:10:07.519 --> 00:10:13.120
because we have a very globalized business
system in this world, and I

137
00:10:13.159 --> 00:10:18.159
think some of the assumptions about how
we define talent have been explotted across the

138
00:10:18.200 --> 00:10:22.240
world. So it's a really interesting
topic. Maybe that's for another time,

139
00:10:22.320 --> 00:10:26.000
but you know, to what extent
is class global I think is a really

140
00:10:26.000 --> 00:10:31.159
interesting question. Yeah, it's interesting. I've taught a few international schools and

141
00:10:31.159 --> 00:10:35.639
there's still this obsession. We're going
to England for university you know, it's

142
00:10:35.679 --> 00:10:39.399
still got that high prestige and status, even students from Singapore applying for UK

143
00:10:39.559 --> 00:10:45.000
universities when they've got fantastic education in
their own country. Yeah. And you

144
00:10:45.039 --> 00:10:50.320
know, speaking English is a real
asset across the world. Speaking English with

145
00:10:50.639 --> 00:10:56.360
an accent at an English accent or
an American accent is seen as better,

146
00:10:56.440 --> 00:11:00.919
for example, in India, than
having an English language but an Indian accent.

147
00:11:00.960 --> 00:11:05.399
There was a real status hierarchy in
these different places. Accents are really

148
00:11:05.440 --> 00:11:07.600
interesting. By the way. We
do talk about this a bit in the

149
00:11:07.600 --> 00:11:11.960
book. My accent has changed a
lot. You know, I come from

150
00:11:11.960 --> 00:11:18.720
Western I was basically talked a bit
like that when I was younger, and

151
00:11:18.759 --> 00:11:22.120
I always remark on this when I
give lectures. The fact is my accent

152
00:11:22.159 --> 00:11:24.440
has changed, and I'm not sure
if I did that consciously, but you

153
00:11:24.519 --> 00:11:28.639
see this with a lot of people
like me who are what I would call

154
00:11:28.720 --> 00:11:33.240
awkward climbers. We've we've kind of
lost the place we came from. We

155
00:11:33.320 --> 00:11:37.720
don't quite know where. We still
feel a slightly imposter syndrome when I give

156
00:11:37.799 --> 00:11:41.879
lectures. I got an obe from
Buckingham Palace. You know, I still

157
00:11:41.919 --> 00:11:43.960
felt someone was going to grab me
on the back of the shoulder, say

158
00:11:45.039 --> 00:11:50.879
Lee, right, go back to
where you came from. Honestly genuinely felt

159
00:11:50.039 --> 00:11:56.080
that, as well as pride in
being recognized for my work. And I

160
00:11:56.120 --> 00:12:01.000
think this is something that a lot
of people relate to in my generation.

161
00:12:01.159 --> 00:12:05.279
And I think I was, in
many ways the first wave of social mobility,

162
00:12:05.440 --> 00:12:09.080
that sort of model of you know, picking these kids from disadvantages around

163
00:12:09.120 --> 00:12:13.399
the resource backgrounds, giving them a
chance to get into a leading university.

164
00:12:15.120 --> 00:12:18.440
And I think a lot of my
generation are reflecting on that now and saying,

165
00:12:18.480 --> 00:12:20.399
yeah, it was okay for us
as individuals, but the system has

166
00:12:20.399 --> 00:12:26.440
stayed the same. So how do
we change the cultures of schools, universities,

167
00:12:26.440 --> 00:12:31.360
and employers to make them more inclusive
rather than you know, making me

168
00:12:31.519 --> 00:12:35.240
and others become sort of middle class
clients. Right. So I think that's

169
00:12:35.360 --> 00:12:39.960
going to be a big discussion over
the next decade. How do we make

170
00:12:39.360 --> 00:12:45.000
places more inclusive. It's interesting that
you say that you know that the system

171
00:12:45.120 --> 00:12:48.879
or the ideas are still the same. I mean a level sociology students listening

172
00:12:48.879 --> 00:12:50.919
that will have studied the likes of
Paul Willis in the nineteen seventies, and

173
00:12:52.039 --> 00:12:56.919
how are Becker's labeling theory right up
to Diane raise miseducation study. It sounds

174
00:12:56.919 --> 00:13:00.879
like nothing's changed. You know,
some of those studies go that fifty plus

175
00:13:00.960 --> 00:13:03.159
years, are we still talking about
the same issues and the same problems.

176
00:13:05.639 --> 00:13:09.559
I do think some of these issues
are very persistent. So if you look

177
00:13:09.600 --> 00:13:15.879
at some of those earlier studies,
I think they apply equally today. Diane

178
00:13:15.960 --> 00:13:18.639
raised great work calls, but you
know, there's some really interesting stuff in

179
00:13:18.919 --> 00:13:26.279
America. Annette Lore's work on concerted
cultivation when she looked quite a small study

180
00:13:26.360 --> 00:13:31.799
actually looked at middle class and working
class families in America, and what she

181
00:13:31.000 --> 00:13:35.159
found was that the families from middle
class background, on average get you gotta

182
00:13:35.159 --> 00:13:37.480
be careful to generalize, and this
had a sort of what I would call

183
00:13:37.519 --> 00:13:43.360
this sort of sharp elbow behavior.
She called it concerted cultivation, basically getting

184
00:13:43.399 --> 00:13:48.799
your kids to advocate for themselves in
the classroom, you know, getting questions

185
00:13:48.799 --> 00:13:52.720
from the teacher, getting getting feedback, advocate for yourself, and you know,

186
00:13:52.840 --> 00:13:56.720
doing all sorts of activities at home, doing all those extra activities that

187
00:13:56.840 --> 00:14:01.240
middle class parents do with their children. Whereas working class families did what she

188
00:14:01.360 --> 00:14:07.039
called natural growth parenting, right,
and that is much more it's less structured.

189
00:14:07.080 --> 00:14:09.759
It just I call it the hands
off approach. The point about this,

190
00:14:09.840 --> 00:14:13.799
Matthew, is that not that one
approach is better than the other,

191
00:14:13.960 --> 00:14:16.639
because again they both have their rub
advantages and disadvantages. You know, concerned

192
00:14:16.759 --> 00:14:22.080
cultivation, middle class shop elbows is
a very stressful environment sometimes and can actually

193
00:14:22.559 --> 00:14:26.240
actually lead to young people having anxiety
and not having much free time. Right.

194
00:14:26.720 --> 00:14:31.240
But the point is this, and
those studies from early on show this

195
00:14:31.320 --> 00:14:35.600
as well, that the academic system, the schooling system, and certainly the

196
00:14:35.720 --> 00:14:43.720
university system is much more throne or
much more sort of use to that middle

197
00:14:43.759 --> 00:14:46.679
class culture. Right. So it
is a middle class culture essentially, So

198
00:14:46.720 --> 00:14:52.279
if you're from a middle class family, you're much more likely to prosper in

199
00:14:52.360 --> 00:14:56.600
school than if you're from a work
class family. The question that comes from

200
00:14:56.600 --> 00:15:00.440
that, I think, is do
we need to make explicit the unwritten rules

201
00:15:00.440 --> 00:15:03.679
of the game that often operate in
the classroom or the workplace, or do

202
00:15:03.720 --> 00:15:07.000
we actually want to challenge those rules? Right to what extent are these rules

203
00:15:07.639 --> 00:15:11.679
you know? Needed? Is a
really interesting debate, but this goes back

204
00:15:11.720 --> 00:15:16.279
a long way. You know,
if I look at Bernstein's stuff on the

205
00:15:16.440 --> 00:15:20.399
language. Here, he talked about
the restricted code versus the elaborated code that

206
00:15:20.399 --> 00:15:24.720
was in the nineteen fifties, and
his point was that again again on average,

207
00:15:24.720 --> 00:15:28.559
middle class children tended to speak in
an elaborated code that's sense to be

208
00:15:28.600 --> 00:15:33.919
more extended senses with bigger words,
whereas working classes tend to speaking that more

209
00:15:33.919 --> 00:15:39.039
restricted code, smaller word or sentences. Now, the point is here again

210
00:15:39.480 --> 00:15:41.759
that you need a bit of both. Actually, in good writing is a

211
00:15:41.759 --> 00:15:46.840
bit of elaborating umbership, but when
we're when teaching mode and certainly in professor,

212
00:15:46.960 --> 00:15:52.600
you tend to talk more in that
elaborated code. This was talked about

213
00:15:52.639 --> 00:15:56.960
the nineteen fifties. I still think
that applies today. So I think we

214
00:15:56.000 --> 00:15:58.919
still have this sort of debates,
and maybe we're a bit more open about

215
00:16:00.080 --> 00:16:03.919
class, and we can talk about
how maybe class has changed in some respects.

216
00:16:03.480 --> 00:16:10.559
But my view is there are still
the persistent class divides that are persisted

217
00:16:10.600 --> 00:16:15.240
for quite a time in this country. Some people would argue some more on

218
00:16:15.279 --> 00:16:19.279
the conspiratorial arm of the social mobility
world will say that this is all intentional,

219
00:16:19.320 --> 00:16:23.759
This is how the social elites replicate
themselves from one generation to another.

220
00:16:23.879 --> 00:16:29.200
Right, they created a system that
only they can win. And when you

221
00:16:29.360 --> 00:16:34.000
look at the absence rates now from
pupils, many of whom will come from

222
00:16:34.039 --> 00:16:37.320
those low income or work class backgrounds. In a way, I think what

223
00:16:37.399 --> 00:16:42.440
we're seeing post pandemic is almost a
rejection of the school model. You know,

224
00:16:42.879 --> 00:16:47.240
what's the point in us coming to
school if there's no jobs locally in

225
00:16:47.279 --> 00:16:52.960
our part of the country. It's
a very narrow academic curriculum that can be

226
00:16:52.000 --> 00:16:57.120
gained by the middle classes through extra
private tutoring. There's not much in it

227
00:16:57.159 --> 00:17:00.399
for us. And now, mum
and dad didn't do well school, and

228
00:17:00.399 --> 00:17:03.839
our grandparents didn't do well at school, right, so I can sort of

229
00:17:04.599 --> 00:17:08.319
see why some children aren't going to
school. I think we need a debate

230
00:17:08.359 --> 00:17:14.319
about the curriculum that we offer.
It's not just about knocking on people's doors.

231
00:17:14.319 --> 00:17:18.119
So yeah, in an nutshell,
these things have been persistent for many

232
00:17:18.160 --> 00:17:22.279
decades. Thank you. I was
just looking at my phone. Actually I

233
00:17:22.359 --> 00:17:25.920
wasn't being rude. The reason being
I asked some of my department if they

234
00:17:25.960 --> 00:17:27.599
wanted me to fire any questions at
you and what you were just talking about.

235
00:17:27.640 --> 00:17:32.440
One of my colleagues, James,
who's a fellow sociology teacher. If

236
00:17:32.480 --> 00:17:34.279
I could just pose you this one, he says, does he think the

237
00:17:34.319 --> 00:17:40.119
working classes actually value the education that
is provided to them? Where is it

238
00:17:40.160 --> 00:17:42.920
on their list of priorities? Do
they have different learning needs? And it's

239
00:17:42.960 --> 00:17:48.480
the current system geared up for these. So one thing I'd say to you,

240
00:17:48.680 --> 00:17:52.880
we summarize the literature and aspirations,
right, have you, is that

241
00:17:52.519 --> 00:17:56.759
all parents want the best of their
children. They're again I've seen a lot

242
00:17:56.799 --> 00:18:02.720
of rhetoric from politicians around you know, working class parents don't have high aspirations

243
00:18:02.720 --> 00:18:04.240
for their children. I would challenge
that. I think a lot of this

244
00:18:04.319 --> 00:18:11.359
is about knowing the reality of what
realizing those aspirations. How do you go

245
00:18:11.480 --> 00:18:15.880
about doing that for you children?
So I'm not convinced that there are low

246
00:18:15.960 --> 00:18:23.599
aspirations among parents. I do think, however, that the education system as

247
00:18:23.599 --> 00:18:30.119
it's currently organized does not fulfill all
the needs of all our children. Why

248
00:18:30.160 --> 00:18:34.559
do I say that, Well,
if you look at the annual results of

249
00:18:36.039 --> 00:18:41.680
GCSS, for example, around twenty
five percent of young people do not get

250
00:18:41.680 --> 00:18:45.559
a grade four in their English and
maths GCSS. Right, I believe the

251
00:18:45.599 --> 00:18:49.559
system should be good enough that every
child, whatever they go on to do,

252
00:18:49.599 --> 00:18:53.440
whether it's academic or vocation or whatever, should be able to get what

253
00:18:53.480 --> 00:18:59.839
I would call functional literacy and numacy
at school. But I don't believe that

254
00:18:59.880 --> 00:19:06.000
the current system is catering for all
the talents among our children. So I

255
00:19:06.079 --> 00:19:12.160
would explore, for example, a
curriculum that adds more vocational ATMs in their

256
00:19:12.440 --> 00:19:18.880
serious vocational options. I think creative
skills, I alwayso think social emotional skills

257
00:19:19.279 --> 00:19:22.759
to add to that. And I
know that you know, teachers are so

258
00:19:22.799 --> 00:19:27.119
busy with this is but I do
think we need a discussion about how we

259
00:19:27.319 --> 00:19:32.839
judge and measure essentially talent in school. So at the moment, it's a

260
00:19:33.000 --> 00:19:38.799
very narrow conceptualization of ability. It's
academic summarizing of you know, which is

261
00:19:38.839 --> 00:19:42.039
you know things I was very good
at, right, you know, memorizing

262
00:19:42.119 --> 00:19:48.359
facts, analyzing. I think actually
that there are many children who have different

263
00:19:48.400 --> 00:19:53.200
talents that we do not basically nurture
in our school. So in the book

264
00:19:53.279 --> 00:20:02.079
we do talk about celebrating a broader
mix, if you like, of attributes

265
00:20:02.319 --> 00:20:08.119
in the classroom. The Sociology Show
podcast relies on the kind contributions of sponsorship

266
00:20:08.160 --> 00:20:11.680
and donations. If you enjoy the
show, then you can help with the

267
00:20:11.720 --> 00:20:15.920
hosting costs by donating as little as
five pounds on the go fundme page.

268
00:20:17.319 --> 00:20:22.599
Simply visit UK dot GoFundMe dot com
and search for the Sociology Show. If

269
00:20:22.599 --> 00:20:26.079
you can donate, then you will
be sent a Sociology Show pen as a

270
00:20:26.079 --> 00:20:32.400
small thank you for your continued support
of the show. And you also mentioned

271
00:20:32.400 --> 00:20:37.400
about celebrating working class figures and popular
culture as well, Danie, do you

272
00:20:37.400 --> 00:20:41.759
want to say a little bit more
about that? So yeah, I don't

273
00:20:41.799 --> 00:20:47.200
think there's enough celebration of working class
achievements in the curriculum. So we cite

274
00:20:47.559 --> 00:20:52.920
just a few names. You know
Mary Anning, who was an amazing fossil

275
00:20:52.000 --> 00:20:56.880
hunter from Lime Readi's right on the
South coast, who came from a really

276
00:20:56.920 --> 00:20:59.799
poor background but was an amazing She
was also a woman, by the way,

277
00:21:00.039 --> 00:21:03.400
in an era of Victorian era that
didn't celebrate perhaps women as much as

278
00:21:03.440 --> 00:21:10.960
they should done. We talk about
Storms as a sort of more recent example,

279
00:21:11.680 --> 00:21:17.319
and that's interesting because of course he
has Black history as well comes into

280
00:21:17.319 --> 00:21:19.400
that as well. It's not just
working class. We're really keen when we

281
00:21:19.440 --> 00:21:22.799
talk about work class, by the
way, to think of it in an

282
00:21:22.839 --> 00:21:26.720
intersectional way, right, So this
is not just white working class important as

283
00:21:26.720 --> 00:21:32.200
that is, right, this is
about people from a mix of other characteristics.

284
00:21:32.200 --> 00:21:36.720
And that's important because what we know
from the studies is that those young

285
00:21:36.839 --> 00:21:41.759
children who have a number of characters
can suffer multiple disadvantage. Right, So

286
00:21:41.960 --> 00:21:45.319
if you happen to be female,
black, and working class, that can

287
00:21:45.400 --> 00:21:51.759
be really difficult for you in the
classroom. So yeah, I think we

288
00:21:51.759 --> 00:21:56.119
should do far more. There's so
many people in our history, right who

289
00:21:56.160 --> 00:22:00.319
have done really well, and often
they're in the curriculum, but I think

290
00:22:00.359 --> 00:22:04.240
we need to explain where they came
from. Michael Faraday is another example.

291
00:22:04.400 --> 00:22:11.319
You know, I did physics right
a level an amazing character and he came

292
00:22:11.359 --> 00:22:15.240
from a very you know, humble
background. Changed the world in terms of

293
00:22:15.240 --> 00:22:18.839
what we know about electricity. Right. Without Michael Faraday, we probably wouldn't

294
00:22:18.839 --> 00:22:25.240
have the electricity that runs all the
electronic devices we have today. So I

295
00:22:25.240 --> 00:22:29.119
think this is more about It might
be in the curricular curriculum, but I

296
00:22:29.160 --> 00:22:33.519
think that it would be really good
for pupils. If you come from a

297
00:22:33.559 --> 00:22:38.279
background, under resource background, it's
really good to know that there are other

298
00:22:38.359 --> 00:22:44.920
people, right that did contribute to
society, saying that you've got to be

299
00:22:44.920 --> 00:22:48.599
careful you don't fall back into that
deficit mode. I not everyone could be

300
00:22:48.640 --> 00:22:52.079
Michael Faraday or Mary Anna, right, so you've got to get the balance

301
00:22:52.160 --> 00:22:56.640
right. But I don't think there's
enough in the curriculum. And Michael goes

302
00:22:56.079 --> 00:23:00.720
when he introduced that concept of cultural
capital. So if you're inspected by a

303
00:23:00.799 --> 00:23:07.119
school now, you know, in
the Offsted framework there is this paragraph on

304
00:23:07.200 --> 00:23:14.039
cultural capital, but it tends to
be a middle class notion of cultural capital.

305
00:23:14.079 --> 00:23:15.079
You know. It's things like I
mean, I'm in a characture here,

306
00:23:15.119 --> 00:23:18.839
but it's like going to the museum, going to the theater really important.

307
00:23:18.880 --> 00:23:23.440
All children know about those opportunities.
But it's also important that we talk

308
00:23:23.480 --> 00:23:30.799
about I know, football, that
we talk about other rich cultures in this

309
00:23:30.960 --> 00:23:36.279
country that have more of a working
class tradition. And again, you know,

310
00:23:36.400 --> 00:23:40.359
I think we tend to fall into
deficit mindset. Even the term social

311
00:23:40.400 --> 00:23:45.599
mobility itself implies, isn't it sort
of moving from the way politicians of it

312
00:23:45.640 --> 00:23:49.960
are interpreted, is moving from the
sum there bottom to the top. It

313
00:23:51.640 --> 00:23:56.279
implies that there is a place that
isn't as good as another place, right,

314
00:23:56.160 --> 00:23:59.799
So yeah, I think we could
do well. The other thing about

315
00:23:59.799 --> 00:24:06.160
this, Matthew, is, of
course teachers come from middle class backgrounds mostly

316
00:24:06.319 --> 00:24:11.119
like professors do, right, And
by definition, you know you are middle

317
00:24:11.160 --> 00:24:14.440
class if you're a teach, that
is, in believe it or not,

318
00:24:14.519 --> 00:24:18.400
because teachers are of course totally underpaid
compared to the other professional groups, right,

319
00:24:18.400 --> 00:24:25.319
But you are classified as one of
the professionals. And the problem with

320
00:24:25.400 --> 00:24:29.839
that is that we all fall into
unconscious biases. Right. So the studies

321
00:24:30.319 --> 00:24:33.960
are quite humbling on this in that
they show, and when I do sessions

322
00:24:33.960 --> 00:24:40.920
with teachers, it's always a really
interesting exercise that teacher judgments tend to judge

323
00:24:41.519 --> 00:24:48.160
children from more work class or low
income backgrounds more lowly than the actual test

324
00:24:48.240 --> 00:24:52.359
results would suggest, and vice aversa
for middle class children. Right. So,

325
00:24:53.240 --> 00:24:56.920
now, I think we all suffer
from these biases. And if you're

326
00:24:56.960 --> 00:25:00.480
middle class, you're going to probably
tend to rel relate to those middle class

327
00:25:00.480 --> 00:25:03.799
pupils in the classroom a bit more. So you're probably just going to be

328
00:25:03.839 --> 00:25:07.519
a bit more warm, You're going
to probably give them a bit more eye

329
00:25:07.559 --> 00:25:10.119
contact. It comes back to actually
work. By the way, what you

330
00:25:10.160 --> 00:25:12.839
were talking about earlier. Some of
the lately people are talked about labeling theories

331
00:25:14.119 --> 00:25:18.200
in this or you know, self
fulfilling prophecies, you know in the classroom

332
00:25:18.279 --> 00:25:25.119
where you kind of make some assumptions
about that child and then they kind of

333
00:25:25.160 --> 00:25:27.079
play up to those assumptions and before
you know it, you're in a cycle,

334
00:25:27.799 --> 00:25:32.559
which means that that that pupil will
not excel as well as they might

335
00:25:32.640 --> 00:25:37.000
do. So so, yeah,
really important to understand that that the biases

336
00:25:37.079 --> 00:25:41.960
and barriers in the classroom. Yeah, I was just looking This is another

337
00:25:41.039 --> 00:25:45.000
question by James. I suppose it's
more of a statement and you've kind of

338
00:25:45.039 --> 00:25:47.599
answered it, but I just read
it anyway. James says, if the

339
00:25:47.640 --> 00:25:51.920
curriculum value system and teaches a white
middle class on the whole, why wouldn't

340
00:25:51.920 --> 00:25:56.119
there be biased against working class groups
and some ethnic groups as well. I

341
00:25:56.119 --> 00:25:59.720
think you've kind of answered answered that
one in that respect. Can I fire

342
00:25:59.720 --> 00:26:03.440
another one? An't you? That's
all right? So Leslie another fellow sociology

343
00:26:03.480 --> 00:26:07.359
teacher, and this is something that's
always got me thinking, Actually, why

344
00:26:07.440 --> 00:26:11.559
is classism the least discussed of the
isms, You know, We often talk

345
00:26:11.599 --> 00:26:18.680
about racism, homophobia, sexism,
and see them as you know, very

346
00:26:18.720 --> 00:26:21.920
bad things, you know, in
terms of how they're judged. But classism

347
00:26:21.960 --> 00:26:26.839
doesn't seem to quite fall into that
sort of severity, if that makes sense.

348
00:26:27.160 --> 00:26:33.160
Yeah, it's almost become a taboo
subject in many of these debates.

349
00:26:33.200 --> 00:26:37.799
And that is a real pity because
I think that, like diversity efforts in

350
00:26:38.119 --> 00:26:45.599
the workplace are flawed unless they consider
class as well as ethnicity and gender and

351
00:26:45.640 --> 00:26:49.319
are the characteristics souse. If you're
missing out that characteristic, you're going to

352
00:26:49.319 --> 00:26:53.279
miss out a lot of young people, right. And it's also, as

353
00:26:53.319 --> 00:26:56.799
we were talking earlier, it's intersectional, so you know, you're missing a

354
00:26:56.920 --> 00:27:02.960
huge bit of what we are as
people. And so yeah, I really

355
00:27:02.960 --> 00:27:06.559
worry about that. And a lot
of my work is in a sense promoting

356
00:27:06.599 --> 00:27:10.759
this idea that we need to talk
about class alongside these other characteristics. I'm

357
00:27:10.839 --> 00:27:15.000
really keen to say that that's not
instead of right, this compliments those other

358
00:27:15.519 --> 00:27:18.640
issues, and there's a real complementarity
here. You know, some of the

359
00:27:18.680 --> 00:27:23.440
things we talk about in the book, you know, could apply to pupils

360
00:27:23.440 --> 00:27:29.880
who struggled with biases because of other
characteristics, Right, The other thing I

361
00:27:29.920 --> 00:27:33.119
would say about this as well,
that we've emphasize in the books. Really

362
00:27:33.160 --> 00:27:38.240
important to say on this is that
education can't solve all societies ills, right,

363
00:27:38.359 --> 00:27:42.759
So you know, I talk about
bias in the classroom, and I'm

364
00:27:42.759 --> 00:27:47.200
working with teachers to think through the
practical implications of that. It's been really

365
00:27:47.240 --> 00:27:51.440
interesting actually talking to some geography and
history teachers last week about this, and

366
00:27:51.440 --> 00:27:55.359
we were talking about how you give
feedback in the classroom. Our children respond

367
00:27:55.400 --> 00:28:00.640
to behavior processes in schools, how
do you differentiate in the classroom that There's

368
00:28:00.680 --> 00:28:04.559
so many questions about clash in practice
that sort of emanate from these discussions,

369
00:28:06.079 --> 00:28:08.759
but it's really important to also emphasize
that schools can do so much. So,

370
00:28:08.839 --> 00:28:12.519
you know, in the book,
we talk about the flawed assumptions of

371
00:28:12.559 --> 00:28:17.599
modern capitalism, because what we have, in a sense, whatever party you

372
00:28:17.640 --> 00:28:21.279
look at in the UK, is
this assumption that we can have quite wide

373
00:28:21.319 --> 00:28:26.960
inequalities in life, both material and
cultural, as long as schools are there

374
00:28:26.359 --> 00:28:30.759
to equalize opportunity. Right. So
it's down to you, teachers essentially to

375
00:28:30.880 --> 00:28:33.920
make it all happen, you know, And that's implicit in a lot of

376
00:28:33.960 --> 00:28:40.119
the political debates we have. The
evidence points to a very different conclusion,

377
00:28:40.160 --> 00:28:44.160
and that is that a lot of
children's outcomes are shaped by the home learning

378
00:28:44.240 --> 00:28:48.759
environment, what happens outside the school
gates. And I think in the book

379
00:28:48.799 --> 00:28:51.839
we talk a lot about what can
schools contribute to that? So, for

380
00:28:51.880 --> 00:28:56.160
example, many schools now provide free
school breakfast, for example, So you're

381
00:28:56.200 --> 00:29:00.799
kind of getting into that social welfare
stpaa's effectively right as a school And it

382
00:29:02.200 --> 00:29:04.599
saddens me in some ways because I
think teachers are so stretched. But then

383
00:29:04.799 --> 00:29:07.799
you know, when I visit schools, I say, Lee, there is

384
00:29:07.839 --> 00:29:10.640
no one else picking up these pieces. So if no one else is going

385
00:29:10.680 --> 00:29:14.519
to do it as teachers, we're
going to try. But I think the

386
00:29:14.599 --> 00:29:17.839
problem with it is that all the
evidence suggests that schools can't do it on

387
00:29:17.880 --> 00:29:21.319
their own. So you know,
if we're going to have a serious debate

388
00:29:21.400 --> 00:29:26.359
about equity or social ability or social
justice, you have to think about how

389
00:29:26.440 --> 00:29:30.720
you address inequalities outside of schools as
well as inside them. Right, So

390
00:29:30.880 --> 00:29:34.160
while I'm challenging teachers to reflect on
their biases, you've just got to put

391
00:29:34.160 --> 00:29:38.519
that into context, right, which
is teachers can be transformative, but they

392
00:29:38.599 --> 00:29:42.240
can't hold the whole of it on
their own, right, So you've just

393
00:29:42.319 --> 00:29:45.920
got to make sure you understand that. Yeah, I was going to say

394
00:29:45.920 --> 00:29:49.279
a lot of the inequalities start before
the child's even started school at the age

395
00:29:49.279 --> 00:29:52.839
of five, haven't they. We
need more Marcus Rashford's in the world.

396
00:29:52.839 --> 00:29:56.119
That would be a good start.
This was really interesting. You know,

397
00:29:56.480 --> 00:29:59.599
I do this kind of quiz question
when I give lectures, which is,

398
00:30:00.799 --> 00:30:04.359
you know how many universities have produced
English Prime minister since the war? Right?

399
00:30:04.599 --> 00:30:08.519
The answers won't everyone is Oxford and
nothing on Oxford. I'm a fellow

400
00:30:08.519 --> 00:30:11.880
at one of the colleges then,
or but I think it is amazing that

401
00:30:11.960 --> 00:30:15.680
only one universe, not even Cambridge, has produced, let alone someone like

402
00:30:15.720 --> 00:30:19.279
Exeter. Right, and there are
primises. By the way, didn't go

403
00:30:19.319 --> 00:30:22.960
to university, and Gordon Brown was
Scottish. I'm not including him, So

404
00:30:22.079 --> 00:30:26.559
just any very good questions on that. And by the way, Keir Starmer,

405
00:30:26.720 --> 00:30:30.720
if he does become a crient,
I think did a postgraduate degree ox

406
00:30:30.839 --> 00:30:33.880
I've checked that so And by the
way, I've had to update that slide

407
00:30:33.960 --> 00:30:40.599
several times the last year, recurring
sort of slide. But I mentioned that

408
00:30:40.720 --> 00:30:45.519
because I think it's really important that
we do have diversity at the top because

409
00:30:45.559 --> 00:30:49.440
what's happened recently in you know,
we got this inquiry into the what happened

410
00:30:49.640 --> 00:30:53.359
in the government sort of management of
the COVID, you know, that really

411
00:30:53.359 --> 00:30:57.480
interesting inquiry, and I think a
lot of things coming out of that are

412
00:30:57.920 --> 00:31:02.440
when Marcus Rashed was saying, actually, we need to we need to offer

413
00:31:02.519 --> 00:31:07.680
all children, you know, free
meals during the summer holidays, and stending

414
00:31:07.720 --> 00:31:11.720
that at the cabinet because they were
all from such a small slice of society,

415
00:31:11.960 --> 00:31:18.920
didn't quite understand the issues facing those
children, right. So, so

416
00:31:18.000 --> 00:31:23.839
the problem with low social mobility is
that you get a dysfunctional I would argue,

417
00:31:23.920 --> 00:31:33.000
and certainly disengaged elite that the governors
the country, and then you'd get

418
00:31:33.039 --> 00:31:37.359
those issues where you get a bit
of a disconnect between those and the people

419
00:31:37.359 --> 00:31:41.200
they're meant to serve. Yeah,
definitely understandable that. And I was just

420
00:31:41.279 --> 00:31:45.400
thinking as well as you were saying
that as you sort of move up through

421
00:31:45.599 --> 00:31:48.559
through education, you know, I
teach a level myself, I wonder if

422
00:31:48.559 --> 00:31:53.200
the if the gap is even more
noticeable at that stage. If I think

423
00:31:53.200 --> 00:31:56.839
of the college that I'm teaching in
at the moment. You know, the

424
00:31:56.880 --> 00:32:00.799
A level students come from some very
very sort of affluent areas. I live

425
00:32:00.839 --> 00:32:04.480
and hope some very affluent areas,
and those students that do come from the

426
00:32:04.480 --> 00:32:07.599
working class backgrounds, I think perhaps
even film more fish out of water.

427
00:32:08.240 --> 00:32:12.400
And one of the questions that I've
had from another sociology teacher, Sophie,

428
00:32:12.640 --> 00:32:17.319
she says, what is the best
way to poverty proof at A level?

429
00:32:17.359 --> 00:32:21.400
What could be done in our classrooms? And I know the second half of

430
00:32:21.440 --> 00:32:24.119
your book focuses very much on what
we the teachers could do, so I

431
00:32:24.200 --> 00:32:28.920
was interested in your thoughts on that. Well. By the way, we

432
00:32:29.000 --> 00:32:35.200
have similar issues in universities. So
versus are trying to recruit talent from all

433
00:32:35.240 --> 00:32:38.359
backgrounds, but it's really difficult,
particularly at universites where you have very high

434
00:32:38.519 --> 00:32:44.559
A level grades for entry. So
in fact, I'm doing a lecture tomorrow

435
00:32:44.599 --> 00:32:46.880
on this at my own institution,
my own university, to try and reflect

436
00:32:46.960 --> 00:32:52.039
on how we can up our game
as a university on this. I do

437
00:32:52.079 --> 00:32:58.559
think as teachers we need to be
aware of those young people in the class

438
00:32:59.079 --> 00:33:01.640
that so for A level, You're
absolutely right if you look at the statistics

439
00:33:01.640 --> 00:33:06.839
around a levels, you've already lost
many children, for example, on free

440
00:33:06.880 --> 00:33:10.880
school mills right there. The attrition
is quite horrifying actually when you look at

441
00:33:10.880 --> 00:33:15.799
the statistics and that then shapes you
know, the population that they go on

442
00:33:15.920 --> 00:33:21.599
to university. So I think there's
a number of things teachers can do.

443
00:33:21.680 --> 00:33:23.319
I mean, the thing that you've
got to be so careful of with all

444
00:33:23.359 --> 00:33:31.400
this is not to label or stereotype
the pupils in your class while giving them

445
00:33:31.440 --> 00:33:36.160
support in a non patronizing way.
Right You're known this, Matthew is.

446
00:33:36.400 --> 00:33:39.240
It's very difficult. So some of
the discussions I get into with teachers is

447
00:33:39.279 --> 00:33:46.039
how you provide support without making those
children feel like they're they're they're in need

448
00:33:46.119 --> 00:33:51.759
in some way right, that they're
being patronized. We talk in the book

449
00:33:51.839 --> 00:33:59.720
about not labeling and actually thinking in
the classroom. Disadvantage is a continuum really

450
00:34:00.200 --> 00:34:05.839
any classroom. It's not pupil premium
versus non pupil premium as we tend to

451
00:34:05.880 --> 00:34:09.159
think of in schools, right because
funding comes in for those children free school

452
00:34:09.199 --> 00:34:14.719
mills through the pupil premium. So
one thing I think you need to really

453
00:34:14.719 --> 00:34:20.840
think about is think about all good
teachers do is thinking about pupils as individuals.

454
00:34:20.880 --> 00:34:24.679
They're all basically a product of many
different factors, and so you really

455
00:34:24.719 --> 00:34:31.400
got to just be careful in stereotyping
I guess those young pupils and just not

456
00:34:31.559 --> 00:34:37.360
assuming. I mean that phrase poverty
proofing is a really interesting one, and

457
00:34:37.599 --> 00:34:40.199
I think culture proofing might be another
one. Right. So, I think

458
00:34:40.239 --> 00:34:45.920
we're not explicit enough about what's expected
at a level and indeed university, so

459
00:34:46.000 --> 00:34:51.119
there is this notion that you're more
of an independent learner right a level.

460
00:34:51.920 --> 00:34:55.840
I think that again is a bit
of a middle class bias for someone like

461
00:34:57.000 --> 00:35:00.000
me. You know, I was
used to that that was my tendency,

462
00:35:00.119 --> 00:35:05.559
right. I think many childrenm middle
class flounders have been taught that they've been

463
00:35:06.000 --> 00:35:08.119
developed from very early on, whereas
if you come from work class back you

464
00:35:08.199 --> 00:35:14.400
might just not understand that of experience
that as much. So I think as

465
00:35:14.400 --> 00:35:20.119
a teacher, you've just got to
question your own assumptions and also the fact

466
00:35:20.159 --> 00:35:23.400
that we all come from quite middle
class backgrounds, right. So, I

467
00:35:23.400 --> 00:35:28.920
think there's a lot of reflection we
could do as teachers to just to think

468
00:35:28.920 --> 00:35:31.840
about some of the biases and barriers
that are in cost of the problem.

469
00:35:31.880 --> 00:35:37.320
I think the system is none of
their training around teaching mentions these sort of

470
00:35:37.320 --> 00:35:42.599
issues. You know, I do
lectures for training teachers on disadvantage on the

471
00:35:42.719 --> 00:35:46.000
quality, but it's to be honest, it's far on fear between that those

472
00:35:46.079 --> 00:35:51.159
teachers will get that sort of grounding, you know. And I think some

473
00:35:51.239 --> 00:35:54.760
of our teachers are put into situations
where they've got very little experience of the

474
00:35:55.719 --> 00:36:00.559
spectrum of society that they're actually going
to be serving. So I certainly think

475
00:36:00.559 --> 00:36:04.719
we did should do more in training, and I think things like OFSTED inspection

476
00:36:04.960 --> 00:36:08.880
should have much more of a focus, explicit focus on what is this school

477
00:36:09.000 --> 00:36:15.119
doing for those from underresourced backgrounds?
Right, And again I really emphasize a

478
00:36:15.199 --> 00:36:21.800
language here. You know, we've
moved away from that description disadvantaged pupils because

479
00:36:21.840 --> 00:36:27.679
we feel that that immediately puts the
emphasis on the pupil, It defines them,

480
00:36:28.039 --> 00:36:31.440
whereas it's the circumstances that those pupils
have experience that might have affected their

481
00:36:31.519 --> 00:36:36.719
learning, it's not them as individuals. And we also spoke to a lot

482
00:36:36.760 --> 00:36:39.400
of A level students who said,
I don't particularly want to be labeled as

483
00:36:39.400 --> 00:36:45.880
disadvantaged, right, So I think
it's really important the language teacher uses as

484
00:36:45.920 --> 00:36:50.360
well. And just to clarify that
you use the word under resource rather than

485
00:36:50.360 --> 00:36:53.159
disadvantage, is that right? Yeah? I mean, you know it's not

486
00:36:53.920 --> 00:36:58.639
the key point here is you know, lots of studies that I and others

487
00:36:58.679 --> 00:37:01.239
are involved in, you do find, you know, one group on average

488
00:37:01.280 --> 00:37:05.760
is low income compared to enough.
So you can use those terms when it's

489
00:37:05.760 --> 00:37:08.440
well defined to look at different and
we have to do that to find out

490
00:37:08.440 --> 00:37:14.519
what the inequalities are in education.
But at classroom level and even at school

491
00:37:14.599 --> 00:37:17.280
level, I think the language we
use and the work I do with charities

492
00:37:17.280 --> 00:37:22.079
and other organizations, I think we
should use the term, you know,

493
00:37:22.199 --> 00:37:25.559
pupils from underresourced background. Now,
not everyone agrees with that, and some

494
00:37:25.599 --> 00:37:29.880
people don't like that word under resourced. By the way, I use that

495
00:37:30.039 --> 00:37:34.159
term because it fits in with some
of the board you sort of notions of

496
00:37:34.199 --> 00:37:38.480
cultural capital. You know, board
you uses that term capital because it has

497
00:37:38.519 --> 00:37:43.920
an economic parallel, right, And
in a way I would argue that that

498
00:37:44.559 --> 00:37:47.880
totally agree with that that you the
cultural divides are as important in my view

499
00:37:47.880 --> 00:37:52.559
as economic or material divides. So
when I talk about under resourced. I

500
00:37:52.599 --> 00:37:58.760
don't just mean money or you know, I mean culture. You know,

501
00:37:58.800 --> 00:38:04.639
it's just that you haven't been cultivated
in the norms of the classroom or the

502
00:38:04.679 --> 00:38:09.559
workplace. And in the book we
list actually the advantages that many children have

503
00:38:10.119 --> 00:38:15.440
and that we put onder sort of
material things like being you know, paid

504
00:38:15.639 --> 00:38:20.960
to have extra private tutoring or live
in a house near a school that is

505
00:38:21.199 --> 00:38:24.119
even demand. And then we look
at culture. You know, how you're

506
00:38:24.239 --> 00:38:29.800
helped as you know, by your
mum or dad to know how to navigate

507
00:38:29.840 --> 00:38:34.079
the education system right or t advocate
for yourself. We talk about education adviangs,

508
00:38:34.280 --> 00:38:37.599
and then we talk about health related
advantages because sadly, what we're finding

509
00:38:37.679 --> 00:38:43.679
is that many children and those basic
health entitlements are being eroded. So loads

510
00:38:43.679 --> 00:38:49.199
of studies showing that those with short
maybe some site issues in terms of their

511
00:38:49.199 --> 00:38:53.679
eyes have not been diagnosed properly and
then get sort of labeled as special education

512
00:38:53.800 --> 00:39:01.079
needs right food, clothing, dental
checkups on. It horrifies me that our

513
00:39:01.159 --> 00:39:05.519
generation, Matthew, no, I'm
cleaning you in this by the way,

514
00:39:05.599 --> 00:39:09.039
you and me, you know,
we've allowed those basic entitlements to be eroded

515
00:39:09.719 --> 00:39:15.119
in some ways, I would argue
that we have gotten backwards. And if

516
00:39:15.159 --> 00:39:17.480
you look at all the social mobility
studies that I know as have done.

517
00:39:17.639 --> 00:39:22.199
For example, you know, we
know you're more likely to be downwardly mobile

518
00:39:22.440 --> 00:39:27.639
in terms of social class compared to
your parents. That's the first time on

519
00:39:27.920 --> 00:39:30.719
average, that is, there are
some people who are upwardly mobile, but

520
00:39:30.920 --> 00:39:34.639
for the first time there are more
people that are downwardly mobile. It's hard

521
00:39:34.719 --> 00:39:37.199
to get a house. If you're
young adult, you'll know this is a

522
00:39:37.199 --> 00:39:43.800
teacher. It's really difficult for this
generation. And in my view, this

523
00:39:43.840 --> 00:39:50.440
is fundamental stuff. It's about capitalism, It's about is the society we've created,

524
00:39:51.400 --> 00:39:54.000
you know, creating a level playing
field that everyone can even lead a

525
00:39:54.079 --> 00:39:58.320
decent life in. And I'm afraid
the answer for me is no. At

526
00:39:58.320 --> 00:40:02.239
the moment that brings us, brings
me nicely onto the full title of your

527
00:40:02.239 --> 00:40:07.159
book plate because its equity and education, leveling the playing field of learning.

528
00:40:07.440 --> 00:40:09.840
Did you want to say a little
bit more about the book if people are

529
00:40:09.880 --> 00:40:15.119
interested in a perhaps reading it or
buying it. So I've used that metaphor

530
00:40:15.239 --> 00:40:20.559
the playing field of learning a lot
in these debates, and as I said,

531
00:40:20.599 --> 00:40:23.760
I don't believe we exist in a
world where there is a level playing

532
00:40:24.079 --> 00:40:30.800
field. The book is a summary
of a lot of the issues we've covered.

533
00:40:30.840 --> 00:40:35.840
So the first two chapters really are
a summary of sociology and education inequality,

534
00:40:36.119 --> 00:40:39.440
you know, social class and then
there's some chapters that are specifically for

535
00:40:39.599 --> 00:40:45.559
teachers, you know, giving teachers
advice to how to reflect on this,

536
00:40:45.639 --> 00:40:49.320
and there's stuff from bias in the
classroom all the way to how do you

537
00:40:49.400 --> 00:40:54.480
work with parents and communities in your
school in again non deficit sort of way.

538
00:40:55.199 --> 00:40:59.440
And then the final chapter really is
about international comparisons and we look at

539
00:40:59.440 --> 00:41:04.280
other countries is to see if anyone
else is doing this better than us and

540
00:41:04.320 --> 00:41:07.480
what we can learn from them.
And there are some things I do think

541
00:41:07.480 --> 00:41:13.199
that other countries do it better than
us, That their inspection systems for schools

542
00:41:13.199 --> 00:41:17.079
aren't as narrow as ours. They
do take equity really seriously. If you

543
00:41:17.119 --> 00:41:22.639
go to under Scandinavian countries that do
very well for social ability, they prioritize

544
00:41:22.679 --> 00:41:28.119
equity before excellence. You know,
we tend to have debates about excellence all

545
00:41:28.199 --> 00:41:30.719
the time. You know, they
think that you go for equity. I

546
00:41:30.800 --> 00:41:35.760
either children that need help most and
everyone else will do. Okay, everyone

547
00:41:35.800 --> 00:41:39.679
else will benefit. So really interesting
those international parsons. But that's the book

548
00:41:40.360 --> 00:41:44.599
in a nutshell perfect. Thank you. And if people want to find out

549
00:41:44.599 --> 00:41:46.679
a little bit more about you,
they can add you on Twitter or do

550
00:41:46.719 --> 00:41:50.599
you want to give out any other
details at all? Yes, so I'm

551
00:41:50.599 --> 00:41:52.639
still on Twitter. Let's call something
else now X. Sorry I should say,

552
00:41:52.679 --> 00:41:58.840
excell I'm on LinkedIn and Twitter.
I haven't quite got into Instagram and

553
00:41:59.360 --> 00:42:02.679
other yet, but I probably should
do. But I'm You can look me

554
00:42:02.800 --> 00:42:07.760
up on the internet very easily.
There's a ted X talk that I did

555
00:42:07.800 --> 00:42:10.199
a few years back that talks about
this on level playing field if you want

556
00:42:10.199 --> 00:42:16.400
a forty minute summary of that.
But there's lots of me and you know

557
00:42:16.719 --> 00:42:22.280
I'm involved in the media quite a
lot as a professor, so you know

558
00:42:22.320 --> 00:42:25.280
there's loads of articles in The Guardian, for example, on various things I've

559
00:42:25.320 --> 00:42:29.440
done over the years. So and
please get in touch. You know,

560
00:42:29.559 --> 00:42:32.760
I'm very happy I do do lectures
for A level students. You know,

561
00:42:32.880 --> 00:42:37.400
I do stuff at Exeter College for
example. I do stuff around the world

562
00:42:37.519 --> 00:42:42.480
actually, and it's always lovely to
speak with A level students as well as

563
00:42:43.239 --> 00:42:46.480
teachers and undergraduates. Brilliant. Thank
you so much for your time Todayly,

564
00:42:46.599 --> 00:42:51.679
I really do appreciate it. And
are we positive about the future? I

565
00:42:51.719 --> 00:42:53.639
always like to end on something a
bit positive. Do you think we are

566
00:42:54.119 --> 00:42:57.880
going to see changing, We're going
to progress? Are we getting there?

567
00:42:57.920 --> 00:43:00.320
Do you see any sort of development
as well? Do you know what?

568
00:43:00.400 --> 00:43:04.679
I am optimistic and there's a lot
of schemes I'm involved in. We've got

569
00:43:04.679 --> 00:43:10.000
a scheme at the moment using undergraduates
as tutors for year seven pupils in local

570
00:43:10.079 --> 00:43:15.360
schools. Right. I think there's
a real appetite from people to contribute and

571
00:43:15.400 --> 00:43:21.079
to concentrate on this idea of social
justice. And I look back at history.

572
00:43:21.119 --> 00:43:24.280
You know, one of my favorite
politicians is President Roosevelt Franklin D.

573
00:43:24.400 --> 00:43:29.599
Roosevelt. You know, America was
struggling in the Great Depressions about a hundred

574
00:43:29.679 --> 00:43:32.519
years ago, much bigger issues in
many ways than we are facing. And

575
00:43:32.639 --> 00:43:37.719
yet they focused on providing a free
high education to more people. To the

576
00:43:37.800 --> 00:43:40.840
New Deal where they provided work for
those out of work. You know,

577
00:43:42.400 --> 00:43:46.519
he even proposed a maximum salary.
Can imagine that basically no one would be

578
00:43:46.599 --> 00:43:51.519
able. He was hoping to earn
over about two hundred and fifty thousand thousand

579
00:43:51.559 --> 00:43:55.960
today's money that didn't get through Congress. I mentioned him because I think that

580
00:43:55.960 --> 00:44:01.239
that focus on social justice created the
the America, the Great America of that

581
00:44:01.320 --> 00:44:06.039
sort of twentieth century. I mean
there's issues now, of course, which

582
00:44:06.079 --> 00:44:08.760
we could go into, but I
think there's a real you know, I

583
00:44:08.840 --> 00:44:16.119
think if we got together as a
teachers and undergraduates and young the young generation,

584
00:44:16.280 --> 00:44:21.679
I think we can really change the
world. I honestly believe that that

585
00:44:21.800 --> 00:44:24.760
sounds like a perfect point to end
the interview. Thank you very much again

586
00:44:24.760 --> 00:44:28.880
for your time today, and good
luck with the promotion and the book as

587
00:44:28.920 --> 00:44:31.039
well. Thank you, Matthew.
That was really good. I hope I

588
00:44:31.039 --> 00:44:35.119
didn't speak too much because I get
quite excited by these no, no,

589
00:44:36.119 --> 00:44:40.480
thank you very much again. The
Sociology Show podcast relies on the kind contributions

590
00:44:40.480 --> 00:44:45.559
of sponsorship and donations. If you
enjoy the show, then you can help

591
00:44:45.599 --> 00:44:49.519
with the hosting costs by donating as
little as five pounds on the go fundme

592
00:44:49.559 --> 00:44:54.920
page. Simply visit UK dot GoFundMe
dot com and search for the Sociology Show.

593
00:44:55.519 --> 00:44:59.559
If you can donate, then you
will be sent a Sociology Show pen

594
00:45:00.000 --> 00:45:04.800
as a small thank you for your
continued support of the show. Thank you

595
00:45:04.840 --> 00:45:07.880
for taking the time to listen to
the podcast. If you would like to

596
00:45:07.880 --> 00:45:13.199
contact the show or be interviewed,
then please email the Sociology Show Podcast at

597
00:45:13.239 --> 00:45:15.400
gmail dot com.

