WEBVTT

1
00:00:01.040 --> 00:00:04.440
Hey, this is Christoph hacking your
leadership on this discussion on employee engagement.

2
00:00:04.519 --> 00:00:06.839
I want to talk about it a
little bit of a follow up on the

3
00:00:06.839 --> 00:00:10.599
engagement discussion we had two weeks ago. We talked about feedback and how and

4
00:00:10.640 --> 00:00:17.039
how giving feedback is a very important
part of making sure employees feel engaged and

5
00:00:17.079 --> 00:00:21.839
remain engaged in their work. We
had some listener feedback on that episode and

6
00:00:21.920 --> 00:00:27.320
on the importance of receiving feedback as
a leader in terms of employee engagement and

7
00:00:27.320 --> 00:00:31.879
how we had some listeners reach out
and say that they that their leader is

8
00:00:31.920 --> 00:00:36.159
actually very good at giving feedback,
and they do it well and it's received

9
00:00:36.200 --> 00:00:40.840
well by them, and things are
great from that standpoint. But the leader

10
00:00:40.920 --> 00:00:46.479
isn't necessarily great at receiving feedback,
not in that they don't want people to

11
00:00:46.479 --> 00:00:48.719
give it to them or that people
are scared to give it to them,

12
00:00:49.039 --> 00:00:52.280
but that they talk about it from
a standpoint of, oh, that's fantastic,

13
00:00:52.359 --> 00:00:54.520
you know, thank you for the
feedback. I love that, and

14
00:00:54.759 --> 00:00:58.280
they're very easy to give feedback to. But then nothing ever changes. And

15
00:00:58.799 --> 00:01:02.439
I thought that's a very interesting one
because I have known leaders that do that

16
00:01:03.560 --> 00:01:07.040
and it can be a tougher nut
to crack a little bit, because when

17
00:01:07.079 --> 00:01:11.439
a leader is just not good at
receiving feedback at all, at least you

18
00:01:11.480 --> 00:01:15.519
can call it out for what it
is. Right. If a leader seems

19
00:01:15.519 --> 00:01:19.000
like they're great at receiving feedback,
but then it just seems like it's falling

20
00:01:19.000 --> 00:01:22.040
on deaf ears, that can be
a problem. And so when it comes

21
00:01:22.040 --> 00:01:25.799
to making sure that your employees are
engaged, if you, as a leader

22
00:01:25.920 --> 00:01:30.280
are receiving feedback from them and you're
not making changes, that's a problem.

23
00:01:30.560 --> 00:01:34.760
It's important because feedback is bi directional. It always needs to be not every

24
00:01:34.799 --> 00:01:40.599
single session of feedback, but in
a relationship, feedback is bi directional because

25
00:01:40.799 --> 00:01:44.079
the relationship has to have some reciprocity
to it. There has to be kind

26
00:01:44.120 --> 00:01:49.040
of like this symbiosis that occurs between
a leader and an employee, and that

27
00:01:49.079 --> 00:01:53.000
will not happen if feedback isn't bi
directional. I love the feedback we got

28
00:01:53.000 --> 00:01:56.319
from listeners saying that, and I
think it's a really great call out.

29
00:01:56.480 --> 00:02:00.359
Yeah, absolutely is imperative if you're
trying to build trust with the team and

30
00:02:00.480 --> 00:02:04.359
build a culture where you know,
we talk a lot about psychological safety and

31
00:02:04.400 --> 00:02:07.520
the ability to have feedback and dialogue
and debate and conversation. You have to

32
00:02:07.599 --> 00:02:12.719
have a space where people know that
when they do share their thoughts and their

33
00:02:12.759 --> 00:02:15.319
opinions and or their feedback, that
there is you know, number one is

34
00:02:15.360 --> 00:02:22.039
welcome. Number two, it's appreciated, even if it's not agreed upon,

35
00:02:22.120 --> 00:02:24.560
but it's appreciated. And then number
three that there are actions that will be

36
00:02:24.639 --> 00:02:29.960
taken as a result of it when
they can be. And again I say

37
00:02:29.960 --> 00:02:34.039
when they can be, because not
all feedback can be addressed. You're going

38
00:02:34.120 --> 00:02:38.159
to have those situations where somebody is
giving feedback on something that really only just

39
00:02:38.240 --> 00:02:42.960
pertains to them or a need that
they need or that they have or that

40
00:02:43.000 --> 00:02:46.360
they want, and that can be
really difficult if that it's a change to

41
00:02:46.439 --> 00:02:50.280
a system or a process or something
that's happening where a lot of people are

42
00:02:50.280 --> 00:02:53.280
impacted by that and it may not
be you know, something that can be

43
00:02:53.360 --> 00:02:57.400
kind of done for everyone or in
that environment, like we have to be

44
00:02:58.000 --> 00:03:00.000
real sometimes and some of the things
that we ask for, but I think

45
00:03:00.039 --> 00:03:02.879
from a leadership standpoint, the most
important part of that is, like do

46
00:03:02.919 --> 00:03:07.400
you do you create the space that
allows for that dialogue to happen, because

47
00:03:07.400 --> 00:03:13.520
I think sometimes when it comes to
feedback or adjustment, we tend to either

48
00:03:13.520 --> 00:03:16.879
bucket it into like here's what that
leader needs to go do differently to make

49
00:03:17.039 --> 00:03:22.680
you know, the employee feel you
know, more heard, more empowered,

50
00:03:22.800 --> 00:03:23.960
those types of things, and then
sometimes the feedback is like I want to

51
00:03:24.039 --> 00:03:28.879
change this thing and and like that
thing will not be changed. And sometimes

52
00:03:29.120 --> 00:03:30.680
we have to as a leader to
say like the answer is no, and

53
00:03:30.719 --> 00:03:36.159
here's the reason why it's no.
But but that is okay, so long

54
00:03:36.199 --> 00:03:39.960
as it's clear, and so long
is that it's not like a beating around

55
00:03:39.960 --> 00:03:44.439
the bush or or you know,
trying to push kick kick to kick the

56
00:03:44.479 --> 00:03:46.400
can down the road or whatever.
But like you're addressing it in the moment.

57
00:03:46.680 --> 00:03:51.599
But it is important again more that
that you allow the space to have

58
00:03:51.680 --> 00:03:55.759
the conversations and that people feel comfortable
coming to you to provide feedback, and

59
00:03:55.759 --> 00:03:59.840
that you do something with it,
even if the thing that you do with

60
00:03:59.879 --> 00:04:01.120
it simply say like, well,
no, that's not going to happen,

61
00:04:01.199 --> 00:04:04.400
right right. I think I think
there are three different types here, and

62
00:04:04.639 --> 00:04:09.960
the easy ones are the are the
very clear ones. It doesn't necessarily mean

63
00:04:10.039 --> 00:04:13.919
leaders are good at it. I'm
saying the what should be gimmes here are

64
00:04:13.960 --> 00:04:18.040
the ones where you're giving feedback as
a leader and you instantly agree with it.

65
00:04:18.160 --> 00:04:21.000
Like what the person is saying,
you're thinking to yourself, and this

66
00:04:21.040 --> 00:04:25.560
is feedback on you as a person, you as a leader, your leadership

67
00:04:25.600 --> 00:04:28.839
style, the way that you interact
with people, the way that you that

68
00:04:28.879 --> 00:04:32.079
you lead a team. Not feedback
on you know what a what a company

69
00:04:32.120 --> 00:04:34.959
policy is, or what you know
something you have no control over. But

70
00:04:35.120 --> 00:04:40.759
something about feedback directed directly at you
as a leader. If you hear it

71
00:04:40.839 --> 00:04:43.839
and you agree with it, that
should be a gimme. And as long

72
00:04:43.879 --> 00:04:46.480
as you can check your ego at
the door and say that, then making

73
00:04:46.519 --> 00:04:50.000
those changes, but asking for grace
along the way. If it's something you've

74
00:04:50.000 --> 00:04:54.360
been doing one way for a long
time and someone's giving you feedback that needs

75
00:04:54.399 --> 00:04:58.199
to change, being able to say, you know what, I agree with

76
00:04:58.240 --> 00:05:01.920
you. This is going to happen
overnight. So I would like to ask

77
00:05:02.000 --> 00:05:06.000
for your partnership in you know,
pulling me aside. If you see it

78
00:05:06.040 --> 00:05:09.600
happen, know that I'm going to
make an effort to do this as best

79
00:05:09.720 --> 00:05:12.759
I can. But I want your
help, So please, if you see

80
00:05:12.759 --> 00:05:15.600
it out of me again, don't
think that I thought you were wrong,

81
00:05:15.680 --> 00:05:17.279
or that I don't think it needs
to change. Know that I wanted to

82
00:05:17.360 --> 00:05:20.519
change and I would love your help
in making that happen. And you will

83
00:05:20.560 --> 00:05:25.199
see steps, you will see change, but it's not going to be overnight.

84
00:05:25.279 --> 00:05:27.839
Necessarily. If I've been doing it
one way for a certain length of

85
00:05:27.839 --> 00:05:30.000
time, ask for that grace and
you will likely get it and you will

86
00:05:30.000 --> 00:05:32.519
build a relationship with a person.
But again that's one of the gimmis.

87
00:05:32.839 --> 00:05:36.240
Another one of the gimmis is when
you know something can't change. Right.

88
00:05:36.399 --> 00:05:40.439
If a person is saying, you
know, I don't want to have a

89
00:05:40.439 --> 00:05:42.399
schedule. I want to be able
to show up to work when I want

90
00:05:42.399 --> 00:05:44.720
to show up to work, well, clearly that's not gonna that's not going

91
00:05:44.800 --> 00:05:48.199
to happen, and that should be
also a gimme. Where this becomes difficult

92
00:05:48.199 --> 00:05:54.399
for leaders, I think is when
you don't know what the answer is and

93
00:05:54.439 --> 00:05:58.399
you want to validate a person for
giving the feedback. And again this is

94
00:05:58.439 --> 00:06:01.920
this is from listener responses said,
Hey, my leader is great at receiving

95
00:06:01.959 --> 00:06:06.600
feedback. It's just nothing changes I've
been in situations personally where I've received feedback

96
00:06:06.959 --> 00:06:11.600
and I didn't know how to take
it, meaning I didn't know whether that

97
00:06:11.639 --> 00:06:14.199
person was right or wrong. Clearly
it was their perception, so it was

98
00:06:14.319 --> 00:06:16.399
right to them, and I wanted
to process it. I wanted to think

99
00:06:16.439 --> 00:06:20.839
about that, and then it just
kind of goes by the wayside because I

100
00:06:20.879 --> 00:06:25.720
didn't really have a clear bucket to
put it in either Oh, I agree,

101
00:06:25.759 --> 00:06:29.160
we need to change this, or
this is not possible. It's the

102
00:06:29.560 --> 00:06:32.920
let's think this through and what this
feedback means. If it falls into this

103
00:06:33.000 --> 00:06:35.920
category, you need to think it
through and see what it means, and

104
00:06:35.920 --> 00:06:39.959
if it means, following up with
the person and asking more questions about it,

105
00:06:40.199 --> 00:06:42.160
telling them, hey, you know
what, I've been thinking a lot

106
00:06:42.199 --> 00:06:46.680
about our last conversation. I'd like
to know more because I'm having any difficulty

107
00:06:46.680 --> 00:06:49.279
with it from this perspective or that
perspective. You know, I've never received

108
00:06:49.279 --> 00:06:54.079
this feedback before. You're the first
person, but I believe you, So

109
00:06:54.199 --> 00:06:57.560
let's talk more about this. This
is the follow up or action that needs

110
00:06:57.600 --> 00:07:00.000
to happen. It's not necessarily that
they give you feedback and you need to

111
00:07:00.079 --> 00:07:04.279
change it. If you disagree with
the feedback, then don't change it without

112
00:07:04.279 --> 00:07:09.639
talking to them first. Talk it
through with them. That's where the failure

113
00:07:09.639 --> 00:07:13.600
of leadership that I think happens is
you end up disagreeing with the feedback,

114
00:07:13.879 --> 00:07:15.839
not in the moment, but later
on and you let it go by the

115
00:07:15.839 --> 00:07:18.720
wayside. I want to talk about
some advice for leaders here on what they

116
00:07:18.720 --> 00:07:21.279
can do in these situations, but
first I want to give word for one

117
00:07:21.319 --> 00:07:26.439
oversponsors. All Right, if you're
a leader and you're receiving feedback from people

118
00:07:26.720 --> 00:07:30.680
and you it's not a clear cut
style of feedback where you inherently one hundred

119
00:07:30.680 --> 00:07:34.839
percent agree or disagree that it can
be done at all, but it's something

120
00:07:34.879 --> 00:07:40.240
you have to think about. There's
no such thing as receiving feedback like that

121
00:07:40.240 --> 00:07:43.720
that is a one and done.
It will require follow up conversations, and

122
00:07:43.759 --> 00:07:46.040
if you're the one receiving the feedback, you need to be the one to

123
00:07:46.079 --> 00:07:49.759
follow up with the conversation. And
this works the opposite way too. If

124
00:07:49.800 --> 00:07:54.839
your leader is giving you feedback that
you have to think about and then you

125
00:07:54.839 --> 00:07:57.920
inherently disagree with, you need to
follow up with them too and ask them

126
00:07:57.959 --> 00:08:00.759
to go into more detail about why
that is. Did they just hear it

127
00:08:00.759 --> 00:08:03.199
from somebody or are they seeing it
same thing. If you're getting feedback from

128
00:08:03.240 --> 00:08:07.639
somebody and they just are regurgitating it
from somebody else, or it's based on

129
00:08:07.680 --> 00:08:11.560
their personal experience, talk that out
with somebody, because the worst thing you

130
00:08:11.600 --> 00:08:15.279
can do is just ignore it,
because you will give the impression that you

131
00:08:15.839 --> 00:08:20.639
that you don't follow up or take
action on feedback because their perception about what

132
00:08:20.720 --> 00:08:22.920
needs to change isn't going to change. They still think it needs to change

133
00:08:22.920 --> 00:08:26.079
out of you, and you can't
ignore it. It has to be addressed.

134
00:08:26.120 --> 00:08:31.240
You have to come to an agreement
about what needs to change and whether

135
00:08:31.319 --> 00:08:35.000
or not there needs to be changed. Otherwise you will you will develop,

136
00:08:35.720 --> 00:08:39.120
you know, a brand of a
person who is you know, seems like

137
00:08:39.120 --> 00:08:41.559
they're great at taking feedback, but
then nothing ever changes. Yeah. Absolutely

138
00:08:41.639 --> 00:08:45.440
no, I think it's that and
that's a bad place to be in honestly,

139
00:08:45.480 --> 00:08:48.360
as a leader. Is like when
people feel that you're just kind of

140
00:08:48.440 --> 00:08:52.480
like, you know, hearing them
and just kind of like placating them and

141
00:08:52.039 --> 00:08:56.200
you're not being authentic and you're just
you know, listening for the sake of

142
00:08:56.240 --> 00:08:58.000
listening. Like people can read through
some of that fakeness, and then what

143
00:08:58.080 --> 00:09:01.279
ends up happening over time is they
just stop doing it. Then you don't

144
00:09:01.320 --> 00:09:03.759
get any feedback. Then you don't
have any trust with the team, and

145
00:09:03.799 --> 00:09:07.600
they don't believe that you're going to
do anything that you are going to say

146
00:09:07.600 --> 00:09:11.440
that you're gonna go do and that
that is one of the fastest ways to

147
00:09:11.000 --> 00:09:15.159
burn trust in a relationship and with
the team. Right. Right. I've

148
00:09:15.240 --> 00:09:18.480
often said, and I absolutely believe
that the opposite of love isn't hate,

149
00:09:18.480 --> 00:09:22.120
it's apathy. So if you're if
you're getting feedback from somebody in a positive

150
00:09:22.159 --> 00:09:24.720
way and you think, oh,
okay, this is a great relationship,

151
00:09:24.879 --> 00:09:30.519
and then all of a sudden that
feedback turns to negative like meaning the yelling

152
00:09:30.559 --> 00:09:33.120
and the screaming like you never do
this, you never do this. That

153
00:09:33.200 --> 00:09:37.120
isn't a sign of a lack of
love or care. It's a sign that

154
00:09:37.159 --> 00:09:41.480
they want this feedback to be actionable. They want you to change, and

155
00:09:41.600 --> 00:09:45.320
they're frustrated that's not changing. Where
you really have a problem is when it

156
00:09:45.360 --> 00:09:48.879
just stops all together. If you're
if you are not receiving feedback from your

157
00:09:48.879 --> 00:09:52.320
people, uh, it means that
they don't believe you have the ability to

158
00:09:52.360 --> 00:09:54.200
change it. And believe me,
there's no such thing as a leader who

159
00:09:54.279 --> 00:10:01.480
doesn't need some feedback. There will
always be a feedback need did on something,

160
00:10:01.759 --> 00:10:03.440
and so you know, think about
it from a leadership perspective. If

161
00:10:03.440 --> 00:10:07.080
it's been a wall since you've received
feedback on something, it doesn't mean that

162
00:10:07.080 --> 00:10:11.320
nothing needs to change. It means
that people are not necessarily comfortable giving you

163
00:10:11.360 --> 00:10:13.919
feedback or they think it's not going
to be actionable, and so you might

164
00:10:13.960 --> 00:10:16.480
need to kind of start that ball
rolling by reaching out to them directly and

165
00:10:16.600 --> 00:10:20.159
asking for it. I appreciate you
all listening again to this discussion on employe

166
00:10:20.159 --> 00:10:24.960
engagement. Join us again next Thursday
for another one. Have a great day.

