Welcome? Yeah? Yeah? Yeah? Stop it? Yeah? Stop it?
Welcome? Welcome to this Monday, April 8, Eclipse Day. Today
I' m seeing that I overshadowed my face on this side, put myself
in the lusa. There as I have to put a good time for distoria
in history, I change the light or welcome way to this day, as
I told you. Welcome, Dr Amel Hello, good night, a lot
of prepping for today. So, thank you for these many things, welcome,
Efra bab Hello. Girls, how are you on this Monday of retrograde
mercury Eclipse on the Rhine Everyone, Right now, we' re going to
talk about it. Thanks to those who are already connected from Facebook, to
all those who are connected from YouTube, thanks to those who are members of
this channel, to those who are subscribers of this channel, those who are
passing through. Thank you all and thank you for the likes you give us,
for the comments you leave us. Thank you Spreaker, Spotify, iTunes,
Amazon Music, Thank you for listening to us and I ask you,
please share us and search us on these platforms on anyone share so that this
program and this project you believe, because the truth is that we do it
very eagerly. We' re having so much fun. Yeah, that'
s very professional. So this here the variety hears right now. Let'
s talk about the Eclipse, but first let' s put nothing else on
the subject. We' re all going to talk about the debate. We
' re not going to get into politics, because we' re not a
policy program, we' re not a political analyst' s table. For
that he is third grade and Sir Gómez Leyva was there and there were forums,
I don' t know where, and those of forty and the good
ones, a lot of political aalists there and know very much and know all
the reality of the country. But as ordinary ordinary citizens, we all have
to be interested in who will govern us, because we are all concerned,
we are all concerned, we are all concerned about health, about education,
about taxes, about work, about safety, about everything. So, of
course it has to be an issue that we all care about and I don
' t know what you think. First point, because some say no,
because it won the debate and the one that didn' t win and so
on and no, because it could only reveal a debate where you can get
nervous, where the clock didn' t work, where they put a back
that distracted the attention a lot, because it was changing where there was nobody
who knew who was in the middle of Claudia Schanebown and s Stoogil Galves,
because nobody knew who this in the middle Domsikini, in Schinis. Well,
well, that' s not who Depri was interrupting like he wasn' t,
that' s gonna define our vote. You can or how you see
it, you think you can, that could define people' s vote.
Who wants to think of me. I don' t think this debate is
going to define people' s vote. I believe that what could and is
actually happening because, in addition, in the analyses that many people have begun
to share since yesterday, because what we see, of course, is a
tendency to favour the debates that support an idea already prior to each of us.
I honestly believe that what happens is that it reinforces, merely reinforces previous
positions. I do not know what will happen in a forthcoming debate, but
at this moment it seems to me that it did not merely reinforce those who
favor Claudio Shembo that position, To those who are favoring those chilies favor that
position And those who do not have much idea of what to do, because
they are a little encouraged by myness, which I say with all respect to
the lord and to his right to be within this contest, because it is
a pity, because we know historically what happens so that for that they put
them, put them, to divide the vote, puts them in discord,
exactly that I do not even fulfill I thought this afternoon a function of catalyst.
Not even catalyze adana. It does nothing, absolutely Ephraim, because I
am very mustache there nothing more hindering this very sad. I think I want
to take the debate. As I say so and it' s costing me
so much work because I, I mean, it was all a meme.
I don' t think what he' s saying is completely shared. We
were more polarized than ever. The debate is not going to define anything,
because no one said anything, that is the reality. No one said anything
new from my perspective and in the afternoon I told her a friend. I
think she won from Nis Merker and told me a friend didn' t,
but it was me starting out because of exactly why everything was terrible. The
truth is, yes, I think we should do something like a country to
remove this character that was in the middle of it just by nasting the cake
to the most there was temporary, because good and no way. Unfortunately,
we have and have said so many times, we pay a lot of taxes
to keep parasitic parties sold to the highest bidder, such as the Green Party
Citizens' Movement. Then there are thousands and thousands and billions of pesos spent
on political parties that are parasites, nothing more than families. That' s
what I really do. That is why this character is there, not that
they are sold to the convenience of being like fi That is, on the
one hand, but on the other hand, the debate itself, when we
are at a decisive moment. It is the first time in Mexico' s
history that a woman will govern us, because the contest is between two women,
Sochil gallvez that and Claudia Shinoun. I' m not talking about favoritism
or anything. I have my way of thinking and everyone will have theirs.
But being as important an event as they are going to, we will be
ruled by a woman for the first time without there being a revolution and hand,
because that' s simply how the board was played and women were left
to rule. There was a bad sound in the beginning and a hole in
it. Like I told you, the back of the studio was movable.
Then it was distracting because it was full of colors. If you look at
us, I' ll put them like this, we' re in remote
boxes. So, if I teach you this as much as possible, you
' re not going to read it. No. Then if I had put
them in. If I got like this and I showed them this, they
' d see my entire April 8 week schedule. It' s not the
difference and here they put us away then all the cardboards they brought, everyone
who was, they didn' t even see Claudia Shane Ban the other poor.
I didn' t do anything, but neither the Shabon nor Galvez saw
anything. There was, I mean, the discussion wasn' t even raising
I' m going to make, or was there, there were certain proposals
I' m going to make in education, I' m going to make,
but in general there were no proposals. No, and I think the
public is missing a second debate. But that' s how I think it
was played as a very trivial part. It' s not trivia as you
say. Fran is going to analyze and I' m going to tell you
one thing that has me a little worried and sorry because I don' t
have postures. All homos, Jorge, I' m going to vote sorry
for you yamstery for ju forever whatever, don' t mean, don'
t get mad, but here everyone will see for what suits them, because
that' s how the human being is and not moderating that way we are.
So I always check what' s up with each of them' s
LGBT agendas and what' s you asking for, Claudia, no forgiveness and
forgiveness, sorry, Claudia, but they received them with great tear. It
' s correct because let' s say it, it mentions exactly. When
she mentions it, we are the government that has protected the most. When
last week Mrs Clemente, who was super, super, super four, made
tea go look and said the four tele betrayal to the community back. They
filled us up, they turned us down. So it looks like he wasn
' t even aware of what' s going on, and not just the
trans community There' s no medication for people with h since he was at
four that there was no containment on the monkey fever issue two years ago.
I mean, if Claudio doesn' t remember that, I do, I
would like it to be so very peaceful, because I too do have a
position that I don' t want to share, because I just don'
t want this to go back to a misinterpreted question like that we' re
talking about ourselves, why we don' t defend anyone and they' ve
put us where they rightly defended or I don' t know who when it
' s not the case. But I, like, see it as a
social phenomenon, a little unmarked from any personal position I might have, and
that I tell you, I prefer to reserve myself, because that' s
my decision. But the montage, let' s say, and the whole
development of this deba leaves me quite disappointed. Everywhere. I believe that Sochi
and Galvez, because he lacked a great deal of aplomb, a great deal
of eloquence can be seen that the betrayal of nerves. I am not talking
about specific ideas, but about this question of management. Let' s say
the debate as such. And well, Claudia Schingon, who simply and simply
stood in her unmovable position of not responding to what was prefected. Well almost
all questions you citizenship. The citizenry sent and simply did not answer and rather
dedicated itself to pondering their awards and recognitions and so on. So that is
very disappointing, but I wanted to contribute from my field of work, because
a reflection that did immediately come to my mind and is good. In nineteen
hundred and twenty- nine, one thousand nine hundred and thirty, Freud publishes
a very important text called The Unease in Culture, which today remains one of
the texts, although we already know that Fraiud was in neurologistic and later,
since the creator of psychoanalysis or the father psychoanalysis. This text of the malaise
in culture is the foundation of the discipline of sociology and in it it speaks
of how the culture, that is, the evolution, the development of societies
to be increasingly sophisticated and more organized, is inhibiting, say, the impulses
or impulses of the human being and forces us to repress them very much.
And then you cannot walk through life living from what you feel and what you
want, but you have to adjust to what culture demands and in this case,
not only in the debate, in the debate, yes, but also
in everything that is happening around. I see that this malaise in culture has
been lost a lot and then, far from being in a world of ideas,
in a world of genuine real proposals based on the common good, which
seems to win over and over again, because that is not it. You
' ve lost a lot of exenios myself already, but at least when they
were the rough one and I think it was with Fox, he didn'
t tell me the rough one, the beast told me, at least they
were fun because they said this, but wow, I' m not going
to say Fox was ay what a brilliant man. Not because it wasn'
t, but it was dreamy. He was sympathetic. Then the other,
when Fernández was also there, goes away and I am not saying that they
are impolute, sinning nothing in or immaculate, only, of course, that
they had a much more entertaining rhetoric. One of the most interesting things can
read to Dr Sagal, who is a doctor of philosophy and was once master
of mine. Well, notice that Dr Sagarza was absolutely right, because I
' m not saying I insist that the previous characters were brilliant, but they
did have better rhetoric. Why he won and why many presidents win and I
' m sorry, I' m sorry don' t get angry. But
it' s true because López Obrador' s speech is the one that helps
him get there. And it turns out that it helps him so much that
even if it doesn' t match the facts, they continue to support him
because the rhetoric serves him and there was no such thing here. There was
no rhetoric with either of the three, nor with Sochil Galves, but neither
with Claudia Shamboun and, by the way, the other person nor mention it.
I insist, because it' s a real saying. We should not
even vote for whoever you want, Shane Bown or Claudia or Sochill Galves,
but ignore the other person, because that person is about to spoil the election.
That' s why they put her there and she' s living for
free. You know it' s not going to be anything, but that
' s how I think it takes, above all, fluency eloquence, a
much better line design. I' m sorry. I' m also very
sorry, but everyone who hates Mr Córdoba is going to like him very much.
But the previous debates were considerably better organized, I insist, from the
sound, from the stage, from the taking of the candidates, a cropped
image, they looked very much like the moderators, because they were the ones
who were far away and they were the ones who stood out. But go
for the rest if it is a failure and I feel it infinite. But
a big part of the failure of this debate is undoubtedly the organisation of Efrain
line and told them a situation with all peace and without having to be really
biased, because I insist I still do not have a position and that is
my reality? I still don' t have a position, but when they
ask Souchill about the LGBT Sutchic issue, they always said good from day one.
But you go with the bread and where I dance my posture. This
and that is the issue of going out to defend things from what you believe
and from your reality, not like Claudia, who is clearly carrying a scrit
of what she had to say with semi- coma those situations are hopeless.
That' s one and two. This thing about being progressive because doing what
the lord did in the end, this one that you' re trying to
speak and sign language, is an insult. Sir, if you don'
t know how to do it, don' t do it, don'
t make a fool of yourself, because it looks like I looked for another
word, but I didn' t find it and it looks like something stupid
class not very silly. He looks so dumb. Are they ridiculous? Are
they ridiculous? Look at one of the things that happens with politics in Mexico
and one of the things that I think that' s what you meant mel
and this part of a critical thought of knowing how to question, are arguments
like those that are writing to me. Says Marian Lupita. Even you feel
sorry to say that you are a pianist, because no, because I am
not a pianist I have never played in any game, nor have I ever
been favored in my life, because my lies because you do not know it
says Carlos Adago, just yesterday Ephraim. But during the debate there were several
people who are carriers of ve i AchE. They precisely said that these medicines
have never been lacking. There are others who have said yes. Says Marifer
Santos. I have my vote defined. I already have a choice. I
' m aware that it' s not the best option, but the truth
is everything that' s been happening to me in our country I don'
t like. And Melda says tell me if I' m wrong. The
first debate in Mexico was when Colocio and Ceballos were there and that was very
good. And that was a good one That' s what I mean.
That' s what I' m talking about with a good debate. Says
those who don' t, says Tony Lopez, that everyone has already decided.
No. If we' d all decided, I' d vote for
the whole list. And unfortunately, Mexico has a high percentage of abstentionism.
Unfortunately, unfortunately, the clock was tampered with. I don' t know
Marlen Lugo whether the watch was manipulated in favor of Sochill or not or I
don' t repeat that we couldn' t say in favor of Sochi because
already those who said they were in favor of Hoche no longer control the line.
He didn' t miss them. He failed them for whatever reason you
want, and the three of them complained. Sara allelí, but that'
s the lack of critical thinking to think they' re being manipulated. The
three of you didn' t miss the watch. My younger brother is going
to vote for it, and that made me so angry that we have to
commit. Sar is our country. I don' t want my country to
go on like this. Elizabeth says that that money could well be used for
exact service everything that goes in political parties, parasites that we should be a
maximum bipartisan, three, but so many who keep the fox here and lived
long. Then she erased our laughter. It says exactly and gentleman, we
are not good at arguing. We' re missing a lot of exact work.
You have to learn to argue, and in peace you say to Sayuri,
in peace, Lupita, if you want to have fun, go to
a clown show, because that' s what we had yesterday. Or a
Zururi clown show. What I want is rhetorical eloquence. Speech arguments, that
' s what I want. I' m Yuri, I' m a
clown show, I saw it yesterday. That was it. That was yesterday
' s debate. Says Marianne. There' s please, if Claudia had
played funny, you' d be done. No. Not really. It
wasn' t about being funny. It just seems like this part doesn'
t understand the difference between eloquence, a good rhetoric to make the clown that
' s a difficult part, which is what I think is the strong topic
to talk unclear And besides, I' m already curious to you, because
there are many people, some critics, who have political critics, who have
a lot of support, experience and ability to make this kind of criticism.
But yes, I noticed that some said, for example, that the format,
because it was very rigid, had not allowed these candidates to explain themselves
in their comments or in their questions or in their answers and so on,
and notice that I am a little bit at odds there, because just that
lack of eloquence, which is seen in a climate of a narrow design,
of a murate imagine yourself if there are not those points or that order or
that structure that, perhaps it would seem rigid, but that otherwise it would
have been, as I say, a batiburrillo, I mean, it would
have been a worse mess even because there did not seem to be a guideline.
And this is supposed to be very prepared. She weighs a lot that
looks like Claudia Shaiman and Shiman were very prepared. So, I was very
prepared to say what I wanted and not answer the questions. But, well,
that was part of his preparation. But imagine an open, free format,
because it wouldn' t have left us. I think so, but
exactly Ephraim. To close this topic. To close this issue, look at
people who come to power to get a little bit of stuff, there'
s always going to be in a personal capacity with all peace, people from
the LGB community are going to say that they' re the President' s
bitch and things like that we' ve always had and don' t represent
us all. And there is an important section of the population demanding medicines,
because what they said here in a message is a reality. There' s
no neas pyrins, so leave the BGP meds. No, no, no,
no, no, no, no, no, no, no,
no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no,
no, no, no, no, no, no, no,
no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no,
no, no, no, no, no, no, no,
no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no,
no, no, no, no, no, no, no,
no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no,
no, no, no, no, no, no, no,
no, no, no. Well, that' s the point, and
that was the debate, and that was a very important issue. And you
know that if I know that you listen to us here, in other countries,
in the United States, in Central America, in South America, in
another in Spain, eight is important from all countries. Hey, they'
re asking us for bisa for Peru. We already asked the Peruvians to step
in, we already fought, well, I didn' t, but the
government and corporal fought with Ecuador. We' re not going to discuss that
because we' re not in politics and we' re going to scratch.
But, well, we' ve already been asked for a visa for Canada.
Then this one, we have to get along well, we have to
get along well. Hey, next one. The next thing that happened,
well, it' s already our eclipse. Today was the eclipse. I
had two medical appointments in the morning, so I was. I said I
want to get out. Or tell me altogether that he did go out at
twelve o' clock this day, because no more in Mexico, no more
shadows were seen in Mexico City or not. I mean, he saw this.
There wasn' t a moment that did as if I was starting a
sunset, I didn' t embrain such a thing, I did go out
and I already got some glasses and the whole thing. A momentous perspective what
horror we were hearing Bravos, but he never saw so much, in fact,
he told me already I saw you no longer leaving, Mr Hey,
but he was. Yes, he was emotionally intense, as I told him,
Pesadona, they did. You guys felt it. Those who are listening
to us felt that there was. I' m going to confess. My
two dates were with the dermatologist and the dentist. The first date was with
the dentist at ten in the morning and it was very mild. It wasn
' t anything that was anxiety or anything. I was really sleeping that I
was falling asleep, that is when I no longer crossed the building to go
with the dermatologist and kept sleeping. I kept falling asleep, that' s
sometimes like I got weird tired. I always want to look for the logical
explanation. I was gonna tell you, because you went to the Shower.
But that was Saturday. Don' t imagine I' d have ended up
on Sunday. No, no, no, the sower left at eight o
' clock at night. They don' t believe, I mean, either,
or two o' clock in the afternoon. He was leaving at eight
o' clock at night. I didn' t stay there until dawn either.
Nothing. I slept very well. I slept very well. I rested
very well. And I don' t think he' s looking. I
believe that subject to whatever Ephraim tells us. From this other way, let
us say to understand the phenomenon and its influence in our lives, which we
have already said here many times is indisputable. That' s how it is.
We are certainly part of a system, of a system that has some
form of life. Not then do I mean this solar system, which has
an operation, has an order, has an influence, the moon, the
force of gravity and so on. That is, of course, that we
are immersed in a lot of forces and energies that do influence us so much.
It is so well known also that in these countries, for example,
where they have prolonged winter nights, very long, specific periods from night to
night only, not for weeks and so on, as happens in Alaska and
elsewhere. Obviously, that has an undoubted effect on the mood of people,
because it has to do with both biological and chemical processes of the organism and
those emotional. Just being faced with darkness all the time. Or I'
m just a man, I was there at the dentist, I wasn'
t stuck in a building, I mean nothing, but suddenly he started hitting
a dream. But perhaps, I thought that, on the one hand,
there might be a real influence of the unseen. I mean, that'
s why I got more that got dark or didn' t get dark,
but something was going on. And also maybe, one effect of suggestion is
that this was would differ I, to see, says Paula Bucaro, we
were a couple that, gave us glasses and made pin I felt a special
energy can be the emotion of seeing something so supernatural. In fact, it
' s not supernatural. It is quite natural that people give explanations in addition,
but so must exist something that affects us, without suggestion that the animals
themselves react. I live, as you know, on a hill. Then
I was at the doctor' s at ten, the other appointment was at
eleven. I came to my house, like about twelve and ten or so
that the eclipse was still going on, because the hospital is very close.
They could hear me live where there were farms and gidal. You heard cocks,
you sang cocks, you heard birds, like I am good at sunrise
I mean, then yes, it is a real astronomical matter that, of
course, has to affect you in some way, because dogs keep the animals
and keep them and I think a little bit of everything, but it ingests
without denying the real phenomenon at all with its effects on us. No yes,
yes, I believe Ephraim, because notice that at the weekend, I
began to corroborate that it was completely. And then four very professional astrologers told
me we' re going to play the chiron. That is the chiron,
is this pain that we all have in the soul, with which we connect
with humanity. It' s a pain that' s never gonna go away,
but we can connect with each other. Then we had to feel it
so we could break it, take it off and finish it. So,
right now, it was an eclipse of lights and shadows, because we had
to feel our pain in order to release it and help others, human beings,
we have to start being more empathetic. Then, speaking astrologically, it
was an eclipse to feel our pain, embrace and love and love others.
So, is it nice? Astrologically, it' s not very pretty.
The truth, I mean, look at it, and I started checking with
anthropologist friends. For no culture of eclips are decreed. Hey, all cultures
talk about the team then ending something. In all of them I looked it
up and looked it up and I said to myself or none because I was
discussing it in the past program, in the comments, in no culture talking
about history and anthropology and I challenge it. Now I' m a challenge
they like to be told. A culture in which eclipses mean the beginning of
something is the end. He always hears, but that I did you know
that like you told us there was something to do about leaving things behind.
I said let' s leave behind bad habits and disorder and I started doing
my diet and I' m going to start my fast and my drinking omen.
You did something to me like that, almost as New Year' s
purposes. Almost new purpose. I think I don' t know how much
I say here, because you' ve been known here for years with all
this work you' ve done for so long, but I don' t
know how much people know about the disciplined that you' re really. I
am very surprised, because I also saw everything Ephraim said. But at the
time of the hour I am dragged by the gust from day to Monday,
after the weekend the activity of the work and goes up the discharge and suddenly
I pass the same medical appointment. Not mine, but where I accompanied someone,
then we get hungry half a day down the street. And I ended
up eating everything Ephraim said I didn' t go drinking wine, drinking anise.
But I think if I thought about it from that special point of view
that you were saying about love and so on, because the truth is,
I had a really good time. I had a lovely time with a person
I love a lot of good and just yeah, see if I do a
little bit talking about topics maybe not very easy, but I think so with
the intention of breaking up with everything that was left of those not easy issues
already, to finish leaving them behind. Then I think that' s always
good. No greetings to those who listen to us from Ecuador. Thank you.
Now I do very well, I had a defensive ballast and I said,
because I celebrate every year, they like the new year, the year
eight, every new year I celebrate and I leave my defending teacher, I
always told her it is a time to start, to renew. It is
always perfect to renew yourself, to renew every moment that is something new.
And I think that' s the one that has an impulse for me.
He took me out of my house because I had to be alone here in
my house, touching my pains, because I am very intense with these things.
And an impulse pulled me out of the street. I ended up at
the monument of the Revolution. Andra filmed some glasses surrounded by people and I
said you' ve never been alone because and I share them, I love
that loneliness. This family thing hits me a lot and I said look at
people in front of me today. So much, the world is fine yesterday.
That' s good, good. We' re going to move on
to the other topic we' re going to see because this topic and I
was going to bring up this topic and we were going to talk about the
Marks folklore that we played on Friday that everyone said if there' s anyone.
Indeed, no one knew who he was, and no one would have
to know who the Marquis Fulmn is. But it' s this man who
raped a woman in a parking lot in February. And then, in the
month of February, this man is, ma' am hitting this person'
s rearview mirror and he' s not telling the lady I' m going
to get the papers out of the second. You' re gonna talk to
him about insurance and he says I don' t think so and boom hits
him. He takes her out of the truck, hits her, throws her
on the floor, ends up kicking her, and then he' s stopped.
He' s stopped and he' s smiling. Smile. Smile because
he' s smiling that he' s been arrested because he' s supposed
to have a lot of money. He says he makes a lot of money.
It' s a great ip on the heir of I don' t
know what. That' s all so lame. And this was Thursday when
they stopped and I suppose he would be free Friday. I think I even
saw a video right now, but I don' t know if it'
s true. But according to me, until now, Monday, March 8,
at seven in forty- eight has not gone as far as I know.
But the problem here is violence. Why there are these types of rapists.
We had news from Brad Pittefrayin, from ord to notice that Angelina declared
for a newspaper that we already knew that in the two thousand sixteen, Brad
had bled her that they came from a trip from France to Los Angeles and
everyone knew that she had taken violent violence and so on, because Angelina said
that that was not the first time and that, in fact, before adopting
the last girl, she had already presented some types of violence and they know
what I thought the note was. I believe Angeli did not know that he
was violent and gave them to him in peace, because in this culture that
we have been opening our eyes over the last few years, especially the pandemic,
came to open our eyes big, big, big. I think we
' ve already realized that the man was a violent guy that the fact that
you hold your strong hand are raping exactly the one that hits your hand so
they' re raping you not then what she meant. It had to do
with the issue of not knowing that she was being raped and that since before
she adopted the last child she was already violent. I' m going,
look, see, right now, keep talking badly if you want to while
I bring them in, because I pulled out today morning the violent meter,
Right now, I' m remembering here I' ve got it, and
yes, it' s very good, Right now, yes, exactly right.
I' m gonna show them to you, look, I used to
have a lot of these is just like good. I think it had a
shape like a cardboard rule and you give it to women especially. But also
clear that it can be to men, to anyone who feels in danger of
being raped to recognize those signs, as Ephraim rightly says, that sometimes people
normalize, that is, they get used to or believe that they are acceptable
and they are not, because, moreover, this is always climbing. Then
he starts with one thing and he' s going up, up to his
life. And that' s why it' s always better, because stopping
it before it becomes an exact real tragedy. Here' s one you already
have, now, I got it, but finish it, then I said.
It is a real sadness that one wonders over and over again, over
and over again where the hell this comes from. I mean, how is
it possible that there are people so hostile and so violent can be on the
loose street? How can that happen? And well, the answer is that,
unfortunately, in matters of mental health, the diagnosis is insufficient. In
other words, there are many people who are very disturbed and very disorganized in
their mental structure, which is loose. Totally true, totally true to see
Let' s go there, come on, come on, because there it
is It' s from women. This is also published by the National Institute,
the national polytechnic FOTBO. And I don' t know the islands there
aren' t those of my college. But, well, there goes the
violometer. Start zero, then nothing. But one hurtful jokes, those jokes,
that jokes that, well, it' s a joke. But they
hurt you not and it can start from neither love, you don' t
think it' s not after, that' s not another. This is
more scaled up. Not a irritating joke, it would be a joke to
you to joke a hurtful joke. It' d be like I' m
blowing a water balloon in your face. You' re humiliating yourself. You
know what I mean, you' ve just made up, and I'
m blowing a water balloon in your face, and I' m messing with
you. Blackmail, blackmail. If you don' t do this, I
' ll go. If you don' t do this, I' m
gonna get mad, lie and cheat? Lying and cheating. Obviously, that
is obvious. He' s going up to that he' s got it
on the screen Sorry. Ephraim continues to ignore and this is here. I
think that' s when I start the violence very sharp, ignore the law
of ice, punish you and stop talking about the jealousy that is growing,
blaming the other one of me, as I will tell you, because of
you, the children do not study, because of you the rops is dirty
not disqualifying. Here' s what you said disqualifying here is whether or not
you have how he knows how to see everything. I mean, yeah,
it' s okay for you to say, but the truth is, whatever
you say doesn' t count to ridicule and offend Hey, you look so
fat in that dress, your sister' s better or the cousin looks better
or not. This violent no more, no, it' s not only
in pairs, eh, it can also be from parents, to children,
from amir, from friends, it can be from another authority, from the
boss, the teacher, but it can be accurate your friends who ridicule you.
No, that' s violence, publicly humiliating. There are many teachers
who do that or many parents who do that. Intimidating, threatening or terrible
controlling, prohibiting intimidation and threat is usually in secret and that is where there
is a great deal of fear of denouncing, controlling and prohibiting. I mean,
you can' t get out of it at such an hour, you
can' t go see such little friends. No, and then they start
banning you. Friendships, money, places, appearances, activities, cell phone,
e- mails, all that starts to control you. They have access
to everything else. This is growing and we' re getting red. Destroy
personal items. I break your clothes, I break your computer, I break
your notebooks, your books, I shake your hands when you don' t
want to, when you like one. That' s aggressive caresses, too.
Oh, well, no truth, turning around playing is like the jokes
of the beginning. I wouldn' t put the jokes around here, because
it' s a hit, right, but good to pinch scratch, let
' s go up, push, jerk, slap, kick, that'
s where this fofo marques comes to slap, kick, and it' s
already going up in the most serious part of violence, lock up a lot
of isolation. That happened to this actress what' s called the auro vinitat
and I just told her that she ended up being locked up not threatening and
many women like you say embrain, because they don' t realize threatening with
objects or weapons. We are already in the most serious part that you need
professional help, threatening to die, forcing a sexual relationship, sexual abuse,
rape, maiming and, finally, reaching death. That is the violent meter
and fofo, since this man was twenty- six years old yesterday, he
had reached the number twenty- one. We are talking about thirty, that
is, it had already reached a limit of very serious violence. So one
of the things they' re telling you about is attempted femicide. That'
s what aggravated his situation, but he' s not the only one,
because we have brad Pit. Like you said, he didn' t realize
it was violent Ephraim and Angelina, too, what' s going on.
I think we are culturally at a time of many changes because, I mean,
before it was just hold on. The one who can' t stand
the jokes is then, that is, I remember there I' m going
to find people telling aunts of mine. Oh you' re very silly France
and me as well as not aunts, I mean, my mom is the
youngest and she' s eighty years old, that is, obviously, when
you took off and my aunts assumed supersumistically that the husband was right, because
yes yes, I can say it and I don' t mean and we
' re and I think what Angelina is going on with her is that she
' s saying God, yes she was violent and here they were telling us
in a couple of exact poisons yes, but what you' re talking about,
like you said Ephraim. But when it' s these jaloneos, which
is what one of the children had described, I don' t know what
and I don' t want to be like what I' m going to
say, but let' s stop using the toxic word and tell them because
there' s nothing in the toxic brain. Toxic is a substance and others
say it as it is, because here we are always told to be very
correct and I tell you that I, in health things, can be very
correct. We' re always insane people and it hurts more. It hurts
so much to say what an unhealthy couple they' re not. Let'
s say it like this, let' s stop using the toxic prefix,
because it really analyzes it if I say it with all peace and with much
and we' re going to even joke, not exactly, it' s
already cool to be toxic or I' m already toxic. Yes, it
' s a silly thing that you say on your part, who I didn
' t make fun of, I don' t even totally agree with,
I totally agree exactly. Look Bonny gives us his testimony. He lived this
and well, yes, it' s good that you managed to get out
of that relationship, because that' s the hard part And we have for
example I put Gustavo Adolfo Infante, who is a rapist and could be in
public humiliation, which is what he has done with many people. What I
want to have happened, for example, with me, was to humble in
public what he has done with Jorge Carvajal, is to intimidate, threaten,
try to control what others say. In short, then, yes, yes,
yes, it is a violent one, but why we are or why
women or why people can feel with this right to violence the other, because
what it gives them is fear. I think it' s fear, but
I don' t know what you think. I think yes, there is
an indisputable feeling of inferiority in other aspects of your personality, very often in
the intellectual, very often in the moral quality. And so, then,
the only weapon that remains, for it is physics or truth, physical violence
or verbal violence to defend itself from a very great feeling of inferiority. It
is then sought to demonstrate superiority through the violence that can be exercised by physical
force. But, for example, it is also a sadness that today and
I think that was also the case with this Mr Fofo, that I do
not know what I mean by that, by the way, I do not
know whether it is his real name or not. We have another way of
getting to know him more than I think, but I mean, you have
money, your family has economic power, and maybe certain relationships, it'
s really pathetic. What sadness, because that is something that has undoubtedly happened
throughout history, but that would seem to be very important today, as in
the foreground, this question because I will be a person and I don'
t say it because I don' t even know how it is. If
I study and have no idea, but in general let' s say a
person who doesn' t know, as my dad said neither the or the
round, has no culture, has no image of respect, earned on the
basis of work, based on honesty, based on qualities that would be important,
but simply say I have money, I call what I want, I
mean, it' s a real and a real shame that on that people
are basing their value today. Then I find it sad. And yes,
it seems to me of people who don' t have much within themselves,
that is, they don' t have an emotional armament that gives them the
ability, for example, to deal with people through the word, which would
be the most civilized thing we have. This is like pretty animalic. I
wouldn' t say I don' t know about Ephraim and also understand that
the person who is the victim of violence doesn' t have to be prepared
to answer the violence, because that' s another one, I mean suddenly
ay, but it' s also because he didn' t say anything,
there are both of us toxic. No, I don' t have to
have the guns to get your violence. That is, yes, it is
simple because sometimes we are young, we have no experience, we do not
know how to answer and we have to understand that because to blame the victim
again, to be raped, to victimize the victim and to justify the victim.
I mean, here there will be people like us, who are very
prepared, like they squealed prepared and out of elementary school and sometimes even being
very prepared, like mexir, not prepared for elementary school. We don'
t know how to answer. And I' m going to tell you one
thing. It ever happened to me like a boyfriend who told me you didn
' t dress like Rosa because it' s women' s. No,
and then I stopped wearing pink. It happened I went to therapy. Many
years went by and some other boyfriend wanted to tell me not to dress in
pink and I told him sonles chavo, the rose does not go to enough
one. But I had to have the gun myself to learn to answer.
And that' s what we have to understand. No Angelina didn' t
have to have it, because maybe the weed doesn' t believe the women
who mind, because we' re in a moment of pendulum. We come
from very violent men and now we have to believe women completely so that at
some point we are in the middle. But for that because we still have
to have you here. No, we don' t have to, we
have to have the openness to talk about these uncomfortable issues and point out,
point out, point out. How Gustavo Adolfo is told that they are violent,
notice, that you know that I think we are all forgotten, that
we are individuals, individuals and we are each different. There are as many
differences between human beings as people inhabit the earth, that is, there are
all the differences in the world, so we forget that as you say,
not everyone has to know how to react to violence, not everyone has to
wait for it. And some will know how to defend themselves, but maybe.
Others are much more vulnerable, because they bring a different childhood, because
they bring a different trauma, because they bring a lifestyle. Or they had
mom, they didn' t have mom and they had violent, they had
good dad or. Anyway, there are so many ways you could have spent
a childhood. What' s more, you may have had a wonderful childhood,
but perceived it as traumatic. Of course it' s the per-
point way you live. That' s right, then it' s not
that you believe him or not that people, if they feel attacked, are
being attacked point and we just need to clear things up. What you can
' t. And I think this violence of these men over women or over
other men. Now we' re talking about specific men, because they'
re the news that jumped. But the violence of these men. I think
it' s this despair of losing control, of an exacerbated narcissism where they
have to stand out because I' m not the smartest, I' m
not the tallest, I' m not the most handsome, I' m
not the best writer, I' m not the not so I' m
not. Then I have to climb, step on, hurt. And well,
Brit brad Pit is a man' s chrome. But it is that
Angelina I lie was free, she Angina Yoli had her own children. It
was enough, it was wow, so I do women. She' s
gorgeous. Besides, I didn' t think so, it doesn' t
tell you that it all started because she was offered a campaign alone and he
was very upset. And he in the part, as it was assumed,
also had addiction problems. No and remember that, yes, substances destroy that
too may have paid well, please, because to increase this problem. And
indeed, when a person feels that he has no other means, he will
be subject to what he has left. No, and in that case,
yes, the physical superiority he often has. That' s why they'
ve heard many times about these phrases that people, because yes, I won
' t know anything, but I' m going to pull you down and
I mean, yes, and that makes you a better person or that shows
you, because nothing, not just that you have a force, that you
' re going to use it in the worst way. And that' s
it. But this is what some people claim. Well, I won'
t know anything, I won' t have it, but I' ll
come and wind you up, of course, influential father, and I'
ll throw it ahead of you. And besides, as the broken soul that
we were this past Wednesday, it wasn' t that of Erik Smith,
a thirteen- year- old boy. Why did you kill, because I
can, because I can, not so look says angels May. I had
a boyfriend who used to call me fondly and tell me that if I left
him, I was going to find myself begging, because he was the best
thing that ever happened to me. According to him, when I left him,
I realized the abuse. That' s, that' s what happens,
you' ve been manipulated so much. Of course, you' ve
been so downgraded. Ephraim, notice that here I am going to answer it
with my coach, I am smooth because I give you toy about to finish
the race, but I am ready charver yes and I am not Coachefrain,
well, my Mentora? Now, your mentor, your supervision? History OK,
there was no conception here that if it would be violent, it would
not be violent. But the narrative is inherited and we have an obligation to
change the narrative completely, that is, not because it didn' t hit.
I' m gonna hit my son, which is what I do.
We always regularly educate So and the simplest thing is to follow the narrative.
The challenge of life after the eclipse is to change the narrative. Our obligation
if we are from here in peace, and I am going to compromise our
audience, because our audience is a smart public. The obligation of all followers
to contract peace is to change the narrative. If something has not worked,
a change in point changes yes, which yes, yes, some aspects of
temperament can be inherited, but, as we have said here too many times,
we are not anything else neither genetic, nor are we products of the
environment, or anything. We have something very important that is also taken and
brought is another of the very very very cackled phrases. We have a free
will, but it' s true is to use it and we have the
ability to reflect and, as you say, to make the narrative change and
I think that taking advantage of the commercial, because certainly this space and we
' ll say it how many times it is necessary and maybe during each program,
because that' s how it will come out. That is why it
is called with all peace, because the intention is that power together to build
a conversation in which yes very probably and hopefully there will be different views and
even in opposition to each other, but to be able to discuss them from
the respect, from the argument based on reason and not on stubbornness or on
the personal question, to feel that one wins by winning, because it is
not about that exact. I know that, that' s very important.
We' ve been talking about the debate for a while. There were many
differences of opinion. The only thing I believe, and you' re right,
is looking for, not a point. It' s impossible for all
of us to think the same. What is sought is a good argument,
a good argument, as we said and you said it perfect Friday. You
can give the eclipse a magical interpretation. You can do a ritual you want,
even if you don' t, as Jain says. You can say
this is nothing more than pure science, or I can say nothing. But
the joke is that with absolute respect and an argument and understanding these differences that
we each have. But not pointing out, not pointing out, that'
s not an argument, that' s telling me you' re a pianist,
because no, that' s not an argument, that' s not
our argument. But it does expose our ideas and respect us, learn to
respect us. I think that' s very important. Ephraim is just going
that way exactly. That' s why I tell them to learn. They
know it' s hard to learn to say this far. Look when my
eighty- year- old mom said I' m going to therapy and I
said," Holy God" and" I" because I said. Imagine
the Terapolde telling you, ma' am, you' ve watered it a
lot and you' re 80 years old. And that' s there,
because eighty years and in therapy I said wonderful, wonderful never mind. It
is late and have humility, because it is the theme, the humility to
say this. It didn' t work out for me. I have to
change the system, because it' s not working. Totally clear about this.
I think you say that very clearly. If it doesn' t work,
this isn' t the system. We have to change the narrative,
as Dr Amel said, we have to change this way of discussing, of
exposing, without attacking. Without me, I' m going to admit that
I don' t, no, I don' t. You can make
a lot of jokes and so on, but you can' t destroy it
in personnel. That' s not an argument. And well, we'
re going to try and have the violometer always present for them to have.
You also present and say this one to see Lupita, you' re violent,
No, Ephraim, Dr Amel, you' re violent. Oh forgiveness,
forgiveness And because it' s true, they' re also things that
are like learned customs. We must learn not to violate and learn to detect
violence. Yes, I have teachers and with him it is not vile that
he will tell us, but he told us to see here who has not
been violent, of course, because it is fultional. But the important thing
is to realize it and you can take a step back, correct and improve
it. And not that simple anymore. We' re not perfect, but
we can get better every time. And in this argument thing, the cute
thing is the way I' ve already talked to you here. It happens
to me even sometimes with some patients I tell them look at you. You
' re waiting for me to shut up to refute what I just told you,
because you' re not listening to understand a little, but to see
what you' re fighting back with. And that' s not a good
argument either. The good argument is when one genuinely listens and sometimes one can
say ama has a point no. That' s right, I' m
not going to hear it clearly. Totally cover it up. It' s
true and as you say, if they really listen to you, then if
you, if you answer yourself, it' s going to be a talk
that' s smart and that helps grow what that was about a debate.
Not that there are arguments that serve good in the end, but well it
was a sad moment to say goodbye guys, we are already going from history
to history. I want to tell you that I' m going to tell
you all about the Baby Shower, because I was one of the first to
get here. So I' m going to tell you that it was really,
really fun. I' ll see you there. Thank you, Dr
Amel, thank you all very much. A pleasure, as always let'
s go to history and also see you here tomorrow. Thank you, dear
Efra, thank you Chihas, thank you to all the people. I love
them so happy with Eclipse Xanding. Thanks to all the Instagram messages. I
love you, I love you, I love you more, I love you,
and I love you, and I love you, and little hearts that
always remind me, brother. I forget later. Hey I was looking for
some symbols and I was seeing that then there are some symbols that say they
' re bad And everything, and then here it' s drawn. Anyway.
Thank you so much to everyone who is on YouTube, those who are
on Facebook, thank you for sharing, help us share the program, help
us grow, discuss, talk, let me leave, I' m going
to remove this evil so that they can see what you pointed out, wait
for me, but there it is, there it is exactly Slick so that
they can discuss, so that we can grow as a community. And well,
thank you so much for accompanying the St Spager, Spotify. There are
all those on Amazon, those on Facebook and YouTube. Thank you. If
you are looking for us on these radio platforms, we will also be grateful
and help us share it. And I' ll see you tomorrow. Guys
see you later Dulimar and greetings, Duli Mari, Greetings to everyone else.
And let' s go now so if I don' t go, I
won' t get there, I won' t get there and they'
ll tell me I have, you didn' t get to Time