Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
As a clock strikes thirteen, it's the thirteenth of December. You have our
lord, twenty twenty three. Well, today we have some very interesting news.
We've got fluoride in the water back in the news, back in the
loss. By the way, I had not seen this, but the lawsuit
is ongoing, and it tells us a great deal about the COVID pandemic and
the shot and the rest of the stuff. As I've been saying for a
long time, we will also take a look as and I've got an update
and a correction to make about Google's Gemini. Yeah, they faked it.
It's amazing how fake this artificial intelligence stuff really is. And what's going to
happen when the stock market realizes that they've run off the cliff and like a
Looney Tunes cartoon character, there's nothing underneath them. Yeah, it's going to
come crashing to the ground. And something very important. We got a Democrat
who is running for president merely so that she can show the truth about abortion.
Yeah, a Democrat doing what the Republicans should be doing. They don't
have the guts to do. We'll be right back. Also, Gotree is
going to be joining us in the third hour. We're going to talk about
all this interesting coincidences of engineered panic about a cyber attack. We got the
Washington Post pushing all the buttons, China's coming after us, China's everywhere,
they're shutting everything down. And it happened at exactly the same time as this
Netflix garbage that I showed you a little bit of a clip of yesterday.
Oh yeah, cyber apocalypse and everything has been destroyed and no one other thing.
Don't trust white people. Yeah, Mama agrees, I don't trust white
people. Well, you know that was put together by Brock and Michelle Obama.
Yeah, they're the producers on that Netflix. You remember, gave them
a massive stash of cash, and this is what we get out of that.
Now in Colorado, the cattle industry is suing because the government keeps reducing
wolves. Isn't this the perfect metaphor for our government? Of course, it's
a different type of solution than they have in in the Netherlands, where they
just go in and arrest people for having fertilizer. You know, you have
to have a black market and fertilizer. Is there any other kind of market
that you would have a fertilizer other than a black market brown market? Maybe,
I don't know. I guess that's what we can call it, the
brown market infertilizer. But here they have a novel solution, let's let wolves
loose. And as Associated Press is saying, well, you know, it's
rare that they're going. They may come in and destroy all your chickens or
all your livestock, but it's rare, and you don't really matter. Guys
are only worried about the big businesses. You know, you independent people who
are trying to grow your own food, or independent farmers who aren't part of
big agri. You really don't count. And so yeah, it's rare and
unimportant. You're non essential, as Trump told us. But it's a perfect
predatory metaphor and perhaps their solution to getting rid of cattle and meat. Just
weeks before the deadline for Colorado to began reintroducing gray wolves under a voter approved
initiative. Yeah, Benjamin frankl was ahead of his time, wasn't he.
You know, we got some predictions from Nostradamas for twenty twenty four, but
Benjamin Franklin said, democracy is a couple of wolves and his sheep voting on
what's for dinner. That's exactly what happened in Colorado. And of course the
Colorado people who voted for the wolves are too stupid to understand that it's going
to be taking away their dinner. So it's representatives of the cattle industry are
suing the state and federal agencies in the hopes of delaying the release so that
a referendum, and the liberals in Colorado the wolves out voted the sheep.
The lawsuit, filed on Monday with the US Fish and Wildlife Services says that
they failed to adequately review the effects of the plan to reintroduce up to fifty
wolves over the next several years. You see, it's interesting because these wolves
had been hunted to extinction, nearly extinction. They were exterminated across most of
the United States by the nineteen thirties. And you know what was it that
helped to lead to that extermination. It was a government sponsored poisoning and trapping
campaign. You see how government used to be on our side, They used
to want to help us, but now our government has become wolves and as
I've referred to it in the past, I said, if you really want
to know what the federal government is, just take the d out. It's
a federal government. Just like you got dogs, man's best friend, but
you let them go back and go wild, and they go feral. All
very dangerous because just like the government, they hunt in packs, and we
have a feral government, a feral government that in nineteen thirties was domesticated enough
that it would protect us from wolves and had at least a little bit of
a sheep dog instinct in it. Now the government has gone feral. It's
like a giant Great Pyrenees who's somehow reverted back a wild wolf for a dog.
That's what the federal government has become. A lot of people still think
it's a Great Pyrenees, and it's not. It's the wolf, and it's
breeding wolves, and so they nearly got them. They started hunting them down
the nineteen thirties, just like when we're back in Texas Verius jurisdictions. Because
of the feral pigs being so destructive and just multiplying so quickly, they would
offer a bounty if you bring in a pig's tail. They give you five
bucks, and you could shoot them anytime, anywhere, and if you could
find them, if you could get there, very very wily and difficult to
hunt, but if you could get one, they'd give you a bonus on
it. And so evidently that was one of the things that the government was
doing. Maybe they were killing them themselves, or maybe they were paying other
people to kill them, but it was so successful that they gave the wolves
endangered species protection in nineteen seventy five. Because again we're looking at the EPA
and these federal agencies that are at the cusp right there, that's where things
turn. They started turning against people and using the environment and other things like
that as excuses keep some of them in a zoo. That's fine. It's
kind of like saying, well, you know, there used to be lions
throughout Europe, right, used to be lions throughout Europe. There were lions
throughout the Middle East. Just go back and look at it. When we
were in the British Museum, there was a very interesting area there about Sanakreb,
who was the Assyrian king that invaded Judah, and there was a massive
relief that they had carved to tell the story about it. Interesting that it
matched the biblical account exactly. But but the fact is that as part of
that, they had massive sculptures and you know, relief bass relief sculptures that
showed the king hunting lions everywhere from his chariot with bow and arrow. They
used to be everywhere, used to be in China, used to be in
Europe, used to be in the Middle East. They were eradicated everywhere because
you know, they tend to be a problem everywhere except for Sub Saharan Africa.
But you know, and you look at it and say, well,
maybe maybe they knew something that our governments don't. But just to Madge,
if you had the Assyrian government side, they're going to reintroduce lions because you
know, the king likes to hunt them, and we don't care if it
comes into your village and kills a slew of people. Remember the movie Michael
Douglas Alcilmer Ghost in the Darkness, that's based on a true story. We
just rewatched that about six or seven months ago. Yeah, why not just
bring them in. They may go out of they may become extinct. Now
we need more of them than you're gonna be able to get in the zoo.
Just just give them free range, and that's our government's approach. So
they started a campaign to reduce their numbers in nineteen thirties, and they gave
them an endangered species protection in nineteen seventy five. And now they're an estimated
seventy five hundred wolves and about fourteen hundred packs. Still not as many bureaucracies
as we've gotten to the presidency right, not nearly as many wolves in the
Deep State under the executive branch that Trump never did anything about. So they're
roaming through the contiguous United States. They said in twenty twenty two, what
are they doing as they roam around? Gray wolves attacked domesticated animals hundreds of
times across ten states, including Colorado. But the Colorado voters said, let's
have more of that, because you know, they also liked Democrats. Democrats
and wolves. That's what the Democrat politicians and wolves, that's what they wanted
in Colorado. Data showed that attacks killed or injured at least four hundred and
twenty five cattle and calves, three hundred and thirteen sheep and lambs, forty
dogs, ten chickens, five horses, and four goats. While those losses
can be devastating to individuals or to pet owners. The industry wide impact is
minimal. It's just it's rare, rare, it's fout. You would say,
who cares not my stuff? Oh okay, so they wiped out your
cattle. You got a small farm. They wiped out your cattle. We
don't care big agras. What we care about. You're not essential, just
like during Trump's lockdown. You're not essential. So as part of this,
we connected to this. It has now come out that in Australia they were
actually you had the wolves who were actually watching and estimating the sheep and how
they were going to react. In all of this, the government in Victoria,
the Australian state where COVID was the worst, and again they say COVID
was the worst, they had the most number of people who died that they
labeled dying from COVID. They died with a positive PCR test, they died
with no medical treatment for example. Right, and again I will continue down
that I will defend that position. Proved to me that they died from COVID,
proved to me that they didn't die from neglect from do not resuscitate orders
from no treatment or from maltreatment with things like rim dezevir and the ventilators we've
you know, look, respiratory disease is always every year. It kills a
lot of people, no question about it. That year, what was different
about it was the way it was not treated and maltreated. And then of
course the little PCR test that they did, that was what was different.
And I know a lot of people have had some very severe respiratory disease.
I know a really good friend who had that in North Carolina. He said
he was really, really sick. He took ivermectin. He said it was
like this burning sensation. He was gone. It was gone. He wasn't
going. He didn't die. The respiratory illness left him right away. And
so you know, the silver lining in all this is that we may have
found a more effective treatment for respiratory illness and pneumonia and other things like that.
Certainly is far more effective than anything you're going to get to the hospital,
stay away from the hospitals. But the uh, the reality going back,
I'll just tell you my experience. Karen and I got very sick in
twenty nineteen. We traveled in early December twenty nineteen. We both of us
got very sick, and I think it was something that picked up on the
trip. But that's that's not unusual for that type of thing to happen.
I got to say the worst, what was far worse than that, was
something that I picked up in two thousand and nine. Now two thousand and
nine, they were saying, so swine flew because of the swine flu everywhere,
and they told me that's what I had, and they gave me the
test, and you know, they gave me that long you know thing up
your nose. At that time, two thousand and nine, it's fourteen years
ago. I had really bad pneumonia. And the interesting thing about it is
that it lasted for a very long time. I guess I had long swine,
had long swine, but no, seriously, there's something about it.
And in the last couple of years I haven't had a bad respiratory illness,
thankfully, but whenever I get sick with a cold, it used to go
straight to my head, now go straight to my chest. So there's something
about that that is still there. I should stock up on survivor recting while
I can. Senator nicely made it legal here in Tennessee, even though,
as some listeners who live in Tennessee said, you may not be able to
get the big pharmaceutical you know boxes to fill it for you. You may
have to go to an independent drug store, which we should be going to
anyway. But you know, that type of thing has been around for a
long time and they used it as a selling point every year to push their
flu vaccines, which is again ridiculous because you didn't know what strain of flu
was coming, So how could they produce a vaccine. They must have contacted
Master Damus. He probably has somewhere in there. You could probably interpret his
quadtrains to tell you what the strain of flu was going to be next year
as well or this year. So in Australia, Brownstone says, there's been
an unexpected validation of the title our Enemy the Government that they published this year
and a stunning indictment of the state of the governance of the Australian state of
Victoria. An unidentified senior bureaucrat classified citizens according to their compliance with the government's
COVID dictates. This was the state whose capital, Melbourne, suffered through the
world's longest lockdown of two hundred and sixty seven days. Yet according to the
Australian Bureau of Statistics, it had the worst overall COVID mortality outcome between March
twenty twenty and the end. Overall, they said had sixteen per one hundred
thousand people died with or not necessarily from COVID, compared to a national average
of twelve point four. In New South Wales that was the second worst point
five. In Western Australia. I'm sorry they had. New South Wales was
second. The national average was twelve point far. New South Wales was second
at thirteen point five. Western Australia the best was seven point seven deaths per
one hundred thousand people. So but that area where they locked everybody down sixteen
per one hundred thousand people. The Australian of Publication reported on the twelve th
of December that those most critical of and strongly opposed to the volley of pandemic
triggered restrictions on individual and commercial activities and personal freedoms. Who had the critical
faculty and the temerity to believe that the threat of COVID was exaggerated. The
threat of COVID was a tyrannical government, that's the enemy, medical martial law,
and prioritize individual over collective rights. They didn't accept the authority of the
government to tell them what to do. They believe the restrictions to be legitimate,
and they followed to be followed only under coercion, and they were all
too likely to embrace fantastical conspiracy theories. This is what their story about.
That's what the government officials said. So you think that government tyranny is the
enemy, you think this is fake, You think this is about collective rights
instead of individual rights, because again, what is the collective It's nothing but
individuals. What is public health? It's not a collective health. You don't
have collective health. The collective health is a measurement of the sum of all
the individual health. And so if you say individual health doesn't matter, you
can't have public health. If you say individual rights don't matter, you can't
have collective rights. There is no such thing, by the way, as
collective rights. It's all individual, just like there's no such thing as public
health. It's all individual. And so they finish up by calling people conspiracy
theorists. That doesn't intimidate me at all. It doesn't intimidate me at all
to be called any of these made up names every time they disagree. If
they can't debate, you just you know, you should see it as a
sign of weakness when they call you a conspiracy theorist or a racist. That's
the other one. They don't want to Oh, you're just racist, you're
racist, you're white privileged or whatever. Okay, Well they're projecting and they
have nothing to say. And these are the people who want to hide their
data anyway. The report was sent to the government on the sixteenth of April
twenty twenty two. It was only recently released to The Australian a paper because
they filed a freedom of information request and they broke everybody into five different categories.
And the most compliant people were the ones who trusted authorities tact in the
best interest of the community, inclined to strongly support and follow restrictions as the
right thing to do for the family and for the community. You know,
this is what was being sold to Christians, for example, is one of
the many men the games that were you know, psychological games that Yale had
done actually control studies. They had a control group and they had another group
that got one of these, and it was about a dozen different lies that
would tell people you need to do it to love your neighbor, you need
to do it for the community, you need to do it because it's science.
You need to do it because of moonshots. It's like, exactly,
don't use that moonshot argument with me anymore either. That's another big red flag.
Is like, yes, I think it is very much like a moonshot.
But that was what al Muller was telling people. Yeah, you had
to Curtis Chang, who was getting a big wad of cash from Trump via
the ad Council, to go in and to propagandize pastors and churches so they
could lie to their sheep. And so Curtis Chang would bring in another pastors
like the big Maga pastor who's got a mega church, Robert Jeffries, who's
always joined the hip with Trump, never bothers to talk to Trump about his
soul, but he talks about Trump being the king, the president all the
rest. I mean, it's just disgusting what these pastors are. How is
it that these the worst people get the biggest churches. It's like Joel Austein
Robert Jeffries in Dallas, Joel Austin's in Houston. Yeah, they're in Texas
everywhere. So anyway, Yeah, Franklin Graham, al more, people like
Todd Friel. If the government tells you to wearhill pinwheels on your head,
you wear pinwheels on your head. That's what passes for discernment in the Christian
churches today anyway. So these people who strongly supported and followed restrictions as the
right thing to do for the family of the community, many of them are
now missing. They've been ripped to shreds by the wolves. The government was
using taxpayer money to commission research from a private consultancy to grade people according to
a COVID compliance score. I was banned from you two because I said to
twenty twenty was the year the world became China. This is social credit stuff,
right, all of it social credit. You're going to have to have
our approval before you do anything. Got to have the pandemic ID. Well,
twenty twenty was the year the world became China. And when I said
in March that it was medical martial law, that's true as well. They
got me banned by Google in many different places got me banned by PayPal,
and Venmo kicked off of those as well, and I'm fine with that quite
frankly, they will not be my judge. Ultimately, once collective welfare is
allowed to override individual rights, the government acquires unlimited, unchecked power. How
true, as they point out in the Brownstone article, well I mentioned that
there was a landmark fluoride lawsuit. You'll find this on the Free Thought Project.
But the people who originally reported, and this is the article originally came
from the last American vagabond, I want to give them credit. They did
great work. I have said for the longest time that fluoride, you know,
you can have this argument back and forth, and we know because Harvard
has done studies of elevated levels of fluoride and how elevated levels of fluoride depressed
the IQ significantly of children who are given floridated water. It's not a question.
They just say, well, that's not what you're going to get in
our fluoridated water. And always said, well, how do you know,
how do you measure the dosage? And this has been validated, of course,
if you take a look at what happened with the Trump shots, pisors
shot dosage between different lots. The active ingredient varied by a factor of thirty
three. Some people got thirty three times the highest dosage, the people got
thirty three times, or the people at the low end of the scale did.
Now, you know, for a lot of times you got and you
get a bottle of pills and they'll give you one month, you know,
take take one of these a day, thirty pills. So what do you
think the outcome would be if instead of taking one of those pills you took
the entire bottle? And that's where we saw most of the deaths and injuries
were in those lots. It was kind of a lottery, wasn't it.
Or actually it was a test by Pfizer because they didn't want to bother to
do the test. They just wanted to know what dosage would kill people,
and they found out. And I always said that prior to the COVID lockdown,
I always said that about fluoride. So, well, that's fine,
We've got a lot of scientists and a lot of studies that show that fluoride
harms your IQ, especially children. But I said, we don't even need
to debate that science because they're giving it to people in the water. How
do you control the dosage of something if you dump it into the water,
And would there be a different dosage if you're going to give fluoride pills?
Would you give it different the same dosage to a two hundred pound man that
you would give to a child, an infant, even because they use it
to make infant formula, a lot of people do they mix, you know,
mix water with a formula. So how in the world could you justify
medicating the population through the water supply. You don't know the dosage that anybody's
going to get. Again, it's going to be like a lottery and common
sense you tell you that's going to be the situation where you've just dump a
bunch of a chemical into the water supply. But you know, it's especially
amazing and appalling that Pfizer would do this. That's why I said, I
don't think it's an accident that they did it. I don't think that you
could be that sloppy with your manufacturing process. So some people get thirty three
hundred percent more than other people do. Did they do that with anything?
Again? You take an entire bottle of pills instead of one you know,
or you get one pill that's got the dosage equivalent to an entire bottle pills
for the other guy. So I don't believe that that was ever an accident,
and I don't believe that this was an accident either. And it was
an absurdity to say that it was safe to florid eight people. Look,
if florid was Floyd could be wonderful, it could be safe, it could
be effective to protect your teeth or whatever. And so let's say that was
all the things that the supporters say that it is, which it isn't.
But let's just say for the sake of argument, that it is. If
you don't control the dose, it becomes a poison. And they're not controlling
the dosage if they drop it and drop it in the in the water supply.
And so on Monday, December the fourth, you had a judge call
for the second phase of a long delayed Florid lawsuit. This began just before
the lockdowns and things like that, and so this is stretched out now for
quite some time. What is at stake is nothing less than the future of
water fluoridation in the US, heralded by many as the CDC's top achievement of
the twentieth century. It's the usual suspects behind this, the CDC, now
the World Health Organization pushing fluoridation of the water. It's all the always these
same people trying to kill us in the name of health. And I guess
it's going to be, you know, maybe the top achievement of the twentieth
century. For the twenty first century, it'll be their mRNA injections, I
guess. So we'll go, you know, from floridation to the mRNA injections.
It's long been deemed a common sense activity carried out by every modern city.
To even question the safety of such a practice is to be derided as
a conspiracy quat As a matter of fact, you look at Doctor Strangelove,
the guy that goes off the deep end, the general General Jack d Ripper,
and he's raging about the fluoridation of the water. We've got to kill
those comedies out there, right, that's the cartoon caricature of all this stuff.
I'm by Kubrick. Come on, man, yeah he was. Anyway,
even question the safety of this is to be right as a conspiracy quack.
So again, you know, there's certain things that you don't even have
to get into the into the details of the data and argue over it.
Just like the vaccine. We've got a novel vaccine. It's supposed to do
genetic code and modification. It hasn't been tested, but hey, I want
you to take it right now. We rush this thing out. No I
can take that. We've got this stuff that we're dumping into the water supply.
We say, he's going to medicate you. No, and I'm not
going to take it if I can, if I know about that, So
they prey on your ignorance. The first phase, the floride loss, it
took place back in June of twenty twenty. So this has been delayed and
it's going through all these different stages. Now they're taking some depositions and there's
absolutely no coverage. There's no mainstream coverage of the hearings, as they point
out here, and of course that would include the mainstream alternative media. We
have talked about floridation to make a joke out of it, To make a
joke out of it. A matter of fact, Lionel said one time he
was introducing Alex Jones. He said, this is the guy who makes the
truth sound like an absurd conspiracy theory. It's like, yes, that was
what That's what he's there for. That's what Alex Jones is there for,
to make the truth sound stupid. Turning the frog's gay. Yeah, that
type of thing. Not going to make a reasoned argument. You're dumping medication
into the water for what purpose? What do you think is going to come
out of that? Regardless of your medication, that's a non starter right there,
Just like you're going to tell me I got to take a new genetic
modification injection that's not even been tested. Absolutely not. Well, I'm not
going to support medication being dumped into the water. A Harvard scientist says that
he was threatened over fluoride science. Doctor Philip grand Gene, a Danish environmental
epidemiologist known for his work known for his work on the neurotoxicity of mercury,
helped the EPA to establish safe regulatory levels for mercury and diet. He said
he'd been threatened or coerced by his colleagues at Harvard, the Harvard Dental School.
Stuff is being pushed by the dentist But see they're just the visible pushers
of this. The people are really pushing it are the military industrial complex and
the aluminum industry, and I'll get to that in a moment here. But
you know, we look at it. We say, at least dentists,
they're crazy. They don't care what they put in your mouth. You'll put
mercury malcam in your teeth and all all the rest of this stuff. You
know, they just want to get the job done. You know, we
ain't building pianos here. Just nail it. Whatever it takes to get you
in and out, make some money, We'll just do it. We don't
care about the long term health of any health of anything that we do,
typically the big dental associations, some individual dentists do. Anyway, He was
threatened and course by colleague at the Harvard Dental School after one of his studies
concluded that florid was a neurotoxin. On cross examination, the Department of Justice
lawyers, it's the Department of Justice that is fighting for floridation, As I
said, the usual suspects, the dj CDC who on cross examination and the
Department of Justice lawyer asked him about a statement that he signed downplaying the significant
of the results. Significance of the results. He said that the Harvard Press
department put the statement together and added his name to it, a little bit
of dishonesty there. He did not elaborate on who threatened him or how often
such threats may happen in his field. He also stated that the fluoride lobby,
as he called it, infiltrated the World Health Organization committee seeking to exclude
any mention of the harmful effects of fluoride. Don't tell people about adverse effects
on the specific harmful effects of fluoride. He stated in his deposition that the
weight of epidemiological evidence leaves no reasonable doubt that developmental neurotoxicity is a serious human
health risk associated with elevated fluoride exposure. Again, Harvard has put out other
studies of that, But of course Harvard where they maybe they keep plagiarizing this
stuff from the CDC and the World Health Organization. What a disgrace that place
is. I just find it amazing that we've known this all along, and
I find it amazing that as they have exhibited unlimited racism and discrimination against white
people, middle class and conservatives and all these other groups for the long time,
but especially white people, nobody really cared until they became anti semitic.
Oh, now they're in big trouble. You've even got Republican congressmen saying,
well, maybe we need to pull some of their funding, and they should.
They shouldn't be getting funding. They've got a bigger endowment. They've got
more money than one hundred and twenty nations do. That's how much money Harvard
does. That. Why do they have that kind of money? And why
has nobody defended white people. It's not okay to be white, It's okay
to be Jewish. Guess what it's okay to be anything. I am sick
and tired of the racism directed at people like me, and if you're like
me, you ought to be tired of it as well. I'm sick and
tired of this, and I'm sick and tired of the fact that the only
thing that matters is anti semitism. You cuse somebody of anti semitism. Oh,
that's it. You know, you're canceled. We're going to pull the
endowment. But you let these people be anti white as much as they want
to be, and nothing ever happens to them. They keep getting federal money
as well. But getting back to the fluoride stuff, I mean just kind
of it's just Harvard on the specific harmful effects of it. He said,
there's a lot of epidemiological evidence, and again some of it coming from Harvard.
He said, we need to control human fluorid exposure, and we need
to focus on pregnant women and small children because that's what has the most damage
developing children and young children. And again, it's dosage. You're going to
dump it into the water, So assuming that it was evenly distributed, you're
going to give the same dosage to you know, a pregnant woman or a
small child, or you're going to give to a two hundred pound man.
What in sanity? This is what passes for health science from the CDC and
World Health Organization. No, they want to kill us, they want to
dumb us down. You know, they can put that in the water for
everybody else and they can drink filtered water. He took particular issue with statements
made by the EPA's expert, who was also there. What she has written
should not be relied upon. He said, this is not science, it's
simply misleading. He said, I'm embarrassed that the EPA would recruit doctor Chang,
who has already tried to kill some of my work on polyfluorinated chemicals,
that they would recruit her to write this report that is full of biases.
I get a little upset about it. I'm sorry to see what has happened
to a colleague who listen, who works for a defense firm, the military
industrial complex. You see, the reason that we have florida in the water
is not because it's going to fix your teeth and then you get fluorosis if
you get a lot of florida in the water. The reason we have the
floor I dumped in the water, and it's a particular form of fluoride which
is very harmful, which is listed as a toxin, which is used as
rat poison in China. The reason they put this rat poison into our water
is because it is a byproduct first of the aluminum industry. And then secondly,
that's what it really happened, was when it was a byproduct of the
nuclear industry. And that's the connection to the military industrial complex. Isn't it
funny how it always seems to come back to the Pentagon and DARPA and the
CIA, all of this stuff. So the aluminum industry, the nuclear industry,
they have these byproducts, and they were going to have to pay a
lot of money to dispose of this toxic chemical. Instead, they figured that
they could get politicians to dump it in our drinking water and make money,
make a lot of money, so instead of paying to dispose of a toxic
waste, they could sell it and have it dumped in the water. So
they also found in this trial that Rachel Levine, who I called Dick Levine,
his real name is Richard, blocked the release of this. He was
writing emails and they discovered this writing emails in the back telling people in the
CDC don't give them this information. That's why they have people like him dressed
up as a woman. They're very useful. They also confirmed the CDC was
opposed to the report being released by the National Toxicology Program. So you've got
government scientists who've seen this and they're trying to get this released, and then
you have this man dressed like a woman, Dick Divine, who is suppressing
and hiding the information. And it always is a red flag, isn't it
when they want to try to hide information. The summary of the May twenty
two version of the National Toxicology is It Program P Yeah program, and TP
says this review finds with moderate confidence that higher fluoride exposures consistently associated with lower
IQ and children. Look, Harvard did this a long time ago. It's
just like Harvard did a study and showed that the VERS data is not being
reported, only about one percent of it's being well, we don't care about
that. Yeah, the actual adverse effects or one hundred times more, even
when they're not trying to suppress it like they did. Throughout the so called
COVID pandemic, US government scientists have had to fight to preserve their conclusion that
fluoride is causing harm. So all these things have been are coming out through
the lawsuit which is just now getting UNDERWAVEN though it was filed as just before
the pandemic hit. We're going to take a quick break and we come back.
We're going to talk about what Elizabeth Warren is up to, some other
area that she wants. This woman is the most authoritarian people. She should
probably become president at some point. Just like Joe Biden. She's really kind
of taken his place. He was a person who was always there pushing this
radical authoritarian approach to the war on drugs and locking people up with mandatory minimums
and all the rest of this stuff. A real authoritarian and now Elizabeth Warren
is trying to get her credentials there, you know, support me. I'll
do your dirty work. So we're gonna take a quick break and we'll be
right back with that and other news, and again we're going to talk about
how Google faked it with that Gemini program. We'll be right back. If
you like the Eagles on the Cars and Huey Lewis and the news, they
say the you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio, download our app
or listen now at apsradio dot com. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Well, as I said, Focahontas is everywhere. I talked yesterday about
how she's coming after crypto. She and Jamie the Demon of JP Morgan,
we're out there saying, well, this is the currency of organized crime and
terrorism everywhere. It's like, no, the currency of organized crime and terrorism
is the US dollar. It's cash. And we've had some people making that
argument on the crypto side, and I just want to say, don't go
there, don't go there. That's a bad argument because we don't want them
to ban cash. And it reminds me of you know, when we're looking
at gun control, for example, Second Amendment, people were saying, you
want to talk about thirty thousand people being killed by guns, there are more
people than that killed by automobiles in the automobile or something. Nope, nope,
nope, they're going to do that too. Let's not support any of
those arguments. So gun people don't call for banning cars, and I don't
want the crypto people calling for banning cash. Let's stop the banning thing.
Okay, Let's stop trying to direct people to somebody else. That's reprehensible.
That's like you're being chased by a bear. You only have to run faster
than the other guy and you're safe. Right. Don't throw other people and
don't throw other things to these authoritarian wolves. If you want to talk about
crypto and all the rest of this stuff and criminal activity, use the argument
that I use yesterday. I'm not seeing anybody use this argument and say Hunter
and Joe and the Biden crime family all use the banking system because they got
people like Jamie Diamond, who's paid thirty nine billion dollars in criminal fines,
and they got people like hsb see who laundered money for the Sinaloa drug cartel.
If you can't stop money laundering within the banking system with all of it's
know your customer rules, it's the same argument I've always made about the drug
war. I said, look at how many people die of an overdose of
drugs in prison. You see, it's not a law enforcement issue. They've
already put these people in prison. But because of corruption and money and all
the rest of this stuff, they can still get access to drugs inside of
prison. And so what is our society going to look like if you think
that you can stop drug use by law enforcement by jail, as Biden said,
well, that means that our entire society is going to be worse than
a prison because it's not stopping it in the prison. You're having people die
of overdoses and federal prisons all the time. And the story that I talked
about one time, it was one of my favorite stories about it, and
it's a sad story, but my favorite illustration of this. A mother in
Maryland turned in her son because he was a drug adding she couldn't do anything
about it. He was just completely possessed by these demons and I mean that
literally. And so he's completely possessed by this drug stuff. She can't do
anything about it. So she turns him in and they put him in jail,
and he od's in jail because he's got easier access to it than he
did on the outside. So who is what is Focahanti is focusing on today?
Well, she's focusing on gun control after trying to do crypto control.
And it is, as they said, all of the Democrat dreams about gun
control put into one comprehensive bill. Yeah, they're coming after all the usual
stuff with the so called gun show loophole, raising the age to twenty one
and things like this. And so she's introduced it on the Senate side.
Another Democrat from Georgia Think Johnson, has introduced it in the House. It's
called the Gun Violence Prevention and Community Safety Act. A whole bunch of bills
is the laundry list of stuff. And here's the thing that I thought was
interesting that I'd not seen before a requirement for a federal or state issued license
to purchase or to own a firearm or ammunition. They don't just do a
background check. They've got to have a license to get the firearm, but
also ammunition because without ammunition, it's just a club and so and of course,
as part of their laundry list, make it easier to sue gun manufacturers
and put them out of business. So I guess maybe we'll see that happening
with cars, because cars are being increasingly used. Not just that Christmas parade
where the terrorists to target to people in Waukeshaw, But we just had that
happen again. There were some Israeli Christians or something like that, and somebody
drove their car through the group of them. So I guess we need to
ban those specific models of cars. Is that the solution to that? Gun
rights advocate say the bill is likely to get no traction. However, it
exposes the true motives of the gun control lobby. Senator Warren's bill is a
laundry list of unconstitutional liberal gun control fantasies, just like her crypto prohibitions.
Well, let's talk about how sometimes banning is not the right answer to something.
You know, we always want to look at this and well, you
know you don't like Trump. Okay, who do you want to solve all
of our problems. Who do you want as a benevolent dictator in the Oval
office to solve everything. It's like going to be so foolish. You're not
going to solve the problems if you get the right person in as the president.
It's much bigger than that. It's going to have to be done from
the ground up. Those people are bought and sold before they're even allowed to
compete, and so naive attitude that if we don't like something, we need
to ban it. There ought to be a law to prohibit that. And
now what do we have. We've got banning, you know, for all
kinds of speech on social media. That's where this all goes. If you
don't I don't like it, let's cancel it. Let's wish it into the
cornfield. Like Billy Mummy on the Twilight Zone, you're a bad man,
and turn you into a jack in the box. So you know, that's
the response to everything, and we've all, you know, we've enabled and
we're cowering in fear. Actually, people like Billy Mummy and that Twilight Zone
episode, everybody's like, who don't offend him? He could wish us into
the cornfield to what they repeatedly do, and so we think that anything we
don't like needs to be banned. We're constantly living in fear and intimidation that
if somebody doesn't like us, they're going to get us banned into the cornfield.
And we think that government ought to do this for our values. We
need to grab government to stop the things that we don't like. And conservatives
have embraced that. Conservatives have embraced this fantasy of a benevolent president and everything
used to be something that was distinctly Democrat, but now the Republican rank and
file, the Republican base wants a savior like Trump. And so when you
look at what is happening with the Satanic Temple, a bunch of little tyrannical
trolls who want to a mock Christianity by setting up a phony religion around Satan,
which they admit they don't believe in Satan, and so they don't have
any religious beliefs. They're just anti religious and they're trying to mock and to
cancel Christians. That's why they're doing these outrageous things. So they've got an
outrageous display that they got put up in the Iowa State Capital got a goat's
head and you know, ritual candles and all this other kind of stuff.
A Satanic Christmas display they said they made up. And so you've got Republicans
have reacted to this, calling it evil, disgusting, but they let it
happen anyway. And again, I don't think they have the under the aegis
of religious freedom. I don't think they have the authority to do that.
Because if you have a group there that says, you know, we have
a church church of Satan or whatever, Okay, but we don't believe in
Satan, but I want to get my tax exemption things or something, you
think the IRS is going to go along with that. No way, So
why are the Iowa Republicans gone along with it? This is a phony religion
that is set up as a protest, that is set up to censor.
Why would you go along with that? And yet there's another way to approach
this. Again, it is just a mockery. They say they don't believe
it, They talk about how and you've got a Republican congressman talking about this.
All the Republicans are pretty much angry, and so it is simply anti
religion. Anti Christianity, they say the government to some Republicans say, well,
the government shouldn't discriminate based on religion or ideology. They don't have a
religion and there's absolutely nothing in the Constitution about ideology. Yes, you do
have free speech, but you don't have you know, what they're doing is
essentially just a mockery, just a defamation. It's not really a religion.
But there's other ways to handle this that are better. For example, where
did the Satanic Kids Club come from? All these same people, and what
are they doing? Well, they have They created something called the Satanic Kids
Club. They talk about it on their website. It's an after school program.
And the reason they did this was to try to get the after school
Bible programs shut down at schools because you see, there's an organization that's been
around since nineteen thirty seven. They call it the Good News Club, and
they would set up after school Bible studies and that was challenged in the latter
part of the twentieth century. They took it to the Supreme Court in two
thousand and one, and the Supreme Court said, you have a right to
be there, they can't push you out, and so they've been doing it
since nineteen thirty seven. It was challenged in two thousand and one. The
Supreme Court said they can be there. So the Satanic Temple or whatever they
call themselves, wants to purge this out. What is their strategy. Well,
their strategy is to go in and say, well, we're going to
make a mockery of your religion. We're going to put something here that is
so vile that you'll say you have to leave, and then we'll say,
aah, but that's our religion. So if you push us out, then
you've got to push out the after school Bible program too. And so they
asked after school Bible program was going around saying don't do that, don't push
them out, let them be there, and they said it's actually been good
for us. People see this disgusting thing and they realize, you know,
if we don't proactively combat this, yeah, and so they do. And
so he said, we've actually seen number one and they say it on their
website. They're going to only go to the schools where there is an after
school Bible program, and that's what they have said on their website. And
again the Supreme Court case was Good News Club versus Milford Central School District.
They won that in two thousand and one. And so he says, the
Satanic Temple says their goal is to shut down the after school Bible clubs.
That's their strategy to be vile and obnoxious, to try to get all speech
canceled. I started thinking about that. I thought, you know, that
resembles a lot of the people that are in the all alternative mainstream media.
For example, they say vile, ridiculous, stupid stuff and then we get
canceled. Right, It makes it easy to get public support to cancel any
dissent of government narratives. You understand, you understand, it's doing the work
of Satan. When they get out there, they're turning the frogs gay and
they're doing all the rest of the stuff. He gets a lot of support
and a lot of visibility, but he's actually demonizing, literally demonizing people who
are trying to oppose the government. So who is Alex really working for.
But getting back to the other Satanic clubs here, they said, it hasn't
shut down our clubs at all, and they haven't accomplished their goal. As
a matter of fact, many times it does just the opposite because he said,
a lot of times it brings publicity to the fact that a lot of
Christian parents don't even understand that we've got a program there, and so they
come in and they publicize it, and then I get people angry about it,
and the people will want to react against it. So he says,
it's actually worked in our favor. You see, Christians are not afraid of
debate, just like scientists are not afraid of debate. Bring it on.
We want to find out where the truth is. We want to find out.
If you're a scientist, you want to find out where the truth of
the natural world is. If you're a Christian, you want to find out
where the truth of the supernatural world is, the world that is above our
world, the one that is actually more important. And so we invite criticism
because we know that the truth can withstand scrutiny. And if what we believe
is not true, then fine, you get rid of it. But I
tell you, every time I have had somebody challenge my faith in a particular
area, when I go back to defend it or to investigate it, even
it's not going to take a defensive position. Now I believe this, I'm
going to find a reason for it. Now I go back and I seriously
look at it. It's like, wow, is this true. I've done
that over and over again, and every time it has strengthened my faith.
And so, just as a real scientist doesn't hide data, as a real
scientist wants debate, so do Christians. As a matter of fact, we're
the ones who came up with the idea for free speech and the free exercise
of religion because we're not afraid. We're not afraid of the truth. The
truth doesn't have to be defended. Although we're not afraid of defending it.
We just release it and we're always ready to give an answer for our confident
expectation. Right. It's sometimes referred to as hope. I don't like that
word hope because hope now means to in the current vernacular, it means,
well, it's something i'd like to have happen, but I don't really think
it's going to happen. No, we have a confident expectation. That's the
original meaning of that word that started being translated as hope, so they say
on their website. Nor do we believe in the existence of Satan or the
supernatural, and we do not promote a belief in a personal satan. But
the guy who is the head of after school Bible club is a Good News
Club. He says he's inspired by the story of a little girl named Brianna
and her sister. These are two kids who are going to the after school
Bible club. He said, mom and dad were divorced, but the kids
were going to this Bible club and they got saved. He said. Of
course, the kids come home and they talk about the things of God,
and they talk about what they're learning and the Good News Club. This led
to curiosity with the mother, who soon became a Christian. And then when
the dad saw the changes in the home, he started asking questions, and
he started going to church. And then he found Jesus, or should say
Jesus found him. Was there all along? He said. It didn't stop
with that. He said, today the parents are volunteers and the Good News
Club where are the two girls attend? And you see, he said,
we're seeing this kind of transformation happening all the time. Isn't that a better
thing to do than to shut down religious freedom, to shut down free speech.
We don't have to run from these people. The gates of Hell will
not prevail against the truth. We should understand that which brings us, which
brings us to q and On and noster Dominus, because I can't think of
q and On without thinking of Nostra Domus. And so there's this big article
that was linked on the Drudge Report from a British paper talking about Nosterdmis's predictions
for twenty twenty four. Isn't it interesting that at the end of the year
the Daily Mail does not do an article talking about the twenty twenty three predictions
that he made. You know that they featured in their article in twenty twenty
two. Now, I didn't think about that until I had no time to
go back and look. I may try to go back and find some of
his predictions for twenty twenty three. According to these people who interpret his quatrains,
they can read anything they want to in it. And this is exactly
what I said about q and On. I said, q and On is
worse than Nostradamus q Andon. At least you know who Nostradamus was, and
you've got his name. You don't know who QAnon is. This is anonymous
person who's out there speaking in riddles, and you got all these people who
are drawing all these conclusions from it. I remember Jerome Corsi, he rode
that horse to fame and fortune. It was amazing and disgusting to watch.
Quite frankly, Jerome Corsi did a book. He was making so much money
that he's running ads on the Rush Limbaugh show, you know, the time
that happens before Rush died. And I remember the last time I had Jerome
Corsion because he worked for Info Wars and so they wanted me to have him
on, and he had done some good work about some other things. And
I was really that he just went off on the deep end. He did
all this good work and he never got any attention or any recognition, and
I guess he just finally good time of It's like, okay, let's go
with a conspiracy theory nonsense. Let's do something sensational and false. And so
he got into all this Q and I and stuff. And the last time
he was on my show there he said, okay, so julian O Senge
is going to be released. There was something about the bird will fly the
coop and something about a red and white cross or something like that. You
know, something like that. He goes, so that means it's Switzerland.
That means that they're going to there is imminent that Julian O Senge is going
to be released into Switzerland because he's talking about a bird and it's talking about
a Red Cross or a white Cross or something like that. It's just absolute
nonsense. And he pulls all that stuff together and I said, uh,
well, we'll have to see, won't we. That'd be great if that
happens you And then I told the crew, I said, don't ever book
him again. I never talked to my god after that. What nonsense that
was. It's just like Steve A. Chenneck's the steam thing. And so
see noster Domas. I got to talk about Quan noster Domas uh because it
always reminds me of We're going to be right back and when we come back.
Uh oh, I want to talk about what is happening with abortion.
It's amazing what is being done in a presidential campaign. We'll be right back.
Tell Alexa to add the APS radio skill and have access to the best
channels anywhere from country to blues, classic hits to news. APS Radio curates
incredibly diverse playlists for you. To enjoy. Get details at apsradio dot com.
You're listening to the David Knight Show. Okay, let's just land it
on my desk. Karen went to a lot of trouble to find this and
printed out I did not see this Trump selling snippets of his mugshot suit.
He's cut the Holy Relic up. You know, this is like like a
little snippets of the original cross or something and a splinters of the cross or
something he's selling. Is this not a cult? Is this not a religion?
I mean the thing is, you know, the Satanic Temple may not
believe in Satan, but Maga believes in Trump. It's pathetic what this is.
So he's selling snippet, he's cutting up his suit. They took the
mug shot in and he's going to sell that to you. You might be
able to get to mar A Lago dinner. And he's also got a new
round of NFTs and why not because he made millions of dollars from his suckers,
I mean supporters that were behind this pitch. What a pathetic situation this
country's got into it. There is no opposition the trannical government. These people
don't understand he's a tyrant. They didn't blame him. They will not blame
him for the shot that he is so proud of. He is as proud
of the shot as he is of his mug shot. And so customers who
buy forty seven digital cards for ninety nine dollars each receive a piece of the
suit that Trump bore for his infamous mugshot. Did they wash it first?
I hope I don't. Maybe he won it with all the sweaty, smelly
stuff. It's a package that costs forty six hundred and fifty three dollars includes
dinner with Trump at mar A Lago. He said that the twenty twenty two
digital card offering sold out within hours. He earned between one hundred thousand and
a million dollars an income from the cell. Oh that's pretty broad range there.
I don't know what he got. He released another series of these forty
seven thousand cards in April. I can't even sell a Christmas album of all
things, you know, I'm definitely not popular. The suit was authenticated by
Troy Knewnan, president of Sports Memorabilia and Authenticator Mirrors. I wonder when he's
going to start auctioning off the suits that he wore with what's her name,
Daniel's Smoky Daniels or what was her name? Huh Stormy Stormy Daniels, Yeah,
Stormy Daniels. Yeah. You know, he start offering off selling off
that memorabilia. You know, again, make sure you wash it first.
So selling this stuff on true social and this New York magazine says Trump the
headline, Trump selling pieces of his mugshot suit is weird on so many different
levels. Yeah, it is weird on many different levels. And there's a
great deal of delusional stuff going on here. As a matter of fact,
because I want to talk about what is being done about abortion by another presidential
candidate. I went back and it really bothered me a great deal about a
month, well two months ago, I guess it was the beginning of November,
so it's about a month ago, November eight. And saw this many
different places. The original source of this was on American Greatness, which,
as you can kind of judge from the title of that website, it is
full. It is a maga cesspool full of idolatry and ignorance about Trump.
American greatness. That's one of my sources. By the way, it keeps
me inspired. I mean, I still go to the Drudge Report, I
go to mainstream media sometimes, but I like to go to these people who
are just absolutely delusional about Trump and see what they have to say. So
this guy who was a writer, I don't know who he is, Matthew
Booze wrote abortion and not Trumps the GOP's albatross albatross, and this became a
meme that was going around everywhere that abortion is an albatross. Well, you
know, well, if you want to stop abortion, what you do instead
of hanging in albatross around your neck, what you do is maybe you hang
some fetal remains around your neck and show people the truth of that. And
that's what this candidate is doing. What I've said all along, don't back
away from this fight, go into it. Show people what abortion is.
And you need to do that, not just so that you went on this
issue. You need to do it because a lot of people are having abortions
and they don't even know what this is and they have severe regrets afterwards.
You need to show the truth to protect children from being ripped apart. You
need to show the truth to protect women who carry that psychological scar and sometimes
physical scar through life. You know, women are physically injured by abortion.
They want to pretend otherwise, but that's not true. They lie to you
about that. They lie to you about the health consequences of an abortion,
and they lie to you about what an abortion really is and what a baby
really is. And so the truth about what a baby is, what an
abortion is, and the health consequences to women, that all needs to be
put out there, and they're hiding that from you, and the Republicans don't
want to talk about it. That's the albatross around their neck. That's the
judgment upon them that they don't want to talk about the truth of what is
being done, and they're bringing judgment on this country as well. And so
this was one of they said. I remember years ago somebody used the term
said so and so has gravitas, And all of a sudden, the next
several days, everybody who was using a term gravitas, this has got gravitas.
He's got gravitas, she's got gravitas. It's pathetic how they plagiarize each
other. They're not limited to the president of Harvard. There's a lot of
plagiarism going around everywhere. And so once this guy used this term, said
abortion is the albatross around the GOP's neck, not Trump. Everybody started picking
that up. Abortions an albatross for the GOP and writing articles about it.
So this is what this Trump sycophant, this Trump idolator, this ignorant Trump
supporter who maybe isn't ignorant. I mean he's writing commentary. I think what
he's doing a lot of these people again are doing it for fame, for
following, for fortune. Three f club. He said, the right made
a bargain to save lives and it's cost us pain at the polls. Wow,
you talk about pure machiavilianism, absolutely devoid of any ethics. These people
are as bad as Fauci. They don't care who dies, they don't care
what is done to other human beings as long as they win, because winning
is everything to them. And I'll lie to you. I'll play four D
chess, and we have people who will lie to you about what Trump is
doing, calling it four D chess. They're fine with that because all they
want is to win. Well, if you can't fight against babies being ripped
limb from limb, and you need to shut up, and you need to
go home, and you need to stop writing your articles. Matthew boos,
you're pathetic, and the Republicans and the rest of these press people who say,
well, I don't really care about ripping babies apart, and the important
thing is if I win, you're no better than Henry Kissinger any of these
other people. Madeline Albright, Oh yeah, it was worth it when we
killed a half million kids with sanctions and starvation. Doesn't even have the decency
to deny it. Fauci did that as well. Fauchi said, well,
you know, even if what you say is true, and I engineered some
kind of supervirus and it wasn't that engineered the vaccine to kill people, But
nevertheless, you know, even if I did that, it was still worth
it. He said. This is a sign of true psychopaths because these people
don't even try. They don't even have the decency to try to defend and
deny what they did. So, yeah, Matthew booze that American greatness,
that pathetic sight, This pathetic writer there the right made a bargain to save
lives and it costs us pain of the polls. Well, you know,
the thing is, Matthew boos, you can make a Fastian bargain with the
devil and you're gonna win. You're gonna win for a little while in this
life, and you'll get some things out of it if you make that deal,
you really will. You want to sell out principles, You want to
sell out your regard for human life. And you want to say, well,
I don't really care what I do as long as I don't get caught.
Well, you're gonna get caught. You're gonna get caught. Maybe not
in this life, but you're gonna get caught. Trump is the only Republican
with the sense and the courage to say this. He said to say that
we went too far and trying to save babies lives. You know, he
said it was too harsh. Remember that's the exact word from Trump. They
called DeSantis sanctimonious because he tried to save babies lives. What a pathetic person
he is, This serial rapist, pornographer, beauty contestant, you know,
voyeur, all the rest of this stuff. I'm disgusted with him and the
people who support him. Republicans should restrict abortion wherever and whenever it is prudent
to do so. But as the saying goes, politics is the art of
the possible. Politics is all about compromise, you know, So start compromising
those principles right now so that you can win. Start playing forty chess right
now. You know what. We don't need politicians. We're up to our
ears and politicians they're everywhere. They're a dime a dozen. They're people like
George Santas, will tell you anything to win. We don't need politicians.
We need leaders, and you're not going to get leaders if they do not
have principles and a backbone. That's what we need. We need some integrity
from the Republicans, from anybody. We don't need a bunch of narcissists who
are capable of doing anything except out of their own perceived self interest or revenge,
which is the way Trump's lawyer characterized him Tai com. So again it
became an echo chamber. So here's another one. Right about the same time
abortion, The Republican Party's albatrous. Everybody's saying this hit all these different,
you know, and you look up Republican Party and GP albatross, albatross,
albatros, just like gravitas, gravitas, gravitas POLLI has shown, says this
article from the bilkingblog dot com. Polli has shown that for nearly five decades,
slightly over half the American people have believed that abortion should be legal in
some circumstances, just over a quarter believed that it should be legal in all
circumstances, and about seventeen percent believe that it should be illegal under any circumstance.
So we got an ignorance problem here. These people need some truth.
They need a light shined on this because you got people who don't know any
better who are killing babies, and then you got some really vicious people who
need to be put in prison. But that's not happening. So the GOP
doesn't have an abortion problem. It's got an integrity problem. It's got to
send problem. It's got a problem with power and money. That's the only
thing that matters to them. That's what their problem is. Their problem is
not they saved innocent lives. I'm sick of these people. Here's a good
another good example. Alissa Farrah Griffin. Now she is the daughter of Joseph
Farah who has WND. And I have my political differences with Josephara. I
think he's one of these people who just suffers from trump bipolarism. I hate
the JAB, I hate this, I hate that all the things that Trump
did he hates, but he loves Trump and Trump is our solution to saving
the world. But he's also a Christian and he's also right about a lot
of things. And I still look at WND and I disagree with some of
the articles, and I agree with some of the articles. But his daughter,
Alissa Farrah Griffin worked for Trump for a while and then she couldn't take
it anymore. And I've seen this happen. You know a lot of people
who were Republican careerists, Republican opportunists who didn't have any you know that they're
just doing it because they could make money doing it. I've seen a lot
of them just get so disgusted from seeing Trump up close that they went heavily
to the other side. And she left the Trump administry. She's now on
the View and they're portraying hers. Oh look, this is what this Republican
is saying. Now. She's completely rejected it because of Trump, and so
on the View, she says the GOP needs to wake up. Republican women
want access to abortion, if you're going to be pro life, you need
to be pro life throughout the life of the baby. That means you need
to suppor contraceptive what. Yeah, it's all about my life, my career.
And again that career took her to work for Trump, and then it
took her to the view she's just bouncing around. She's doesn't have an anchor,
she doesn't have a rudder. She's just blown about by every wind that
comes her way. Now here's somebody who is not like that, and this
person is running for president. I finally found somebody I could support for president.
She bills herself as a progressive Democrat and secular, not a Christian or
whatever. But you know, she's a single issue candidate, and it's a
single issue that I can support. And she's running for president because if she
runs for federal office, she can air commercials that cannot be banned. And
she is doing exactly what I've said the Republicans, the cowardly Republicans with no
principles, no conscience, refused to do, and that is to show what
abortion really is, show them the dirty, gruesome pictures of what is actually
being done to children. And she's willing to do that. She's running for
president, so she can do that because it's against the law to censor a
federal candidate's ads. And I thought that was a brilliant strategy. That's the
only reason really to run. I mean, think about it. We started,
I've said, forget about, you know, supporting a political candidate.
They're going to come with all kinds of baggage. She calls herself a progressive
Democrat, so there's probably all kinds of baggage that I would not want to
get involved with. However, if we're going to focus on a single issue,
and that's why I said, let's focus a single issue at a time,
that'd be a good enough reason to run as a federal candidate Somewhere.
You get people to support you, give you money to run an ad about
that particular issue that's important. So a pro life Democrat presidential candidate is going
to air an explicit TV advertisement. Actually she did it on a Monday evening
and her name is Teresa Bukovanac. The Bukovanac for President campaign began airing the
ad in the Boston New Hampshire market on NBC in Boston during the Jimmy Fallon
Show that runs at eleven thirty five at night. She said she ran the
ad to disrupt the consciences of the American people, particularly leftists, who are
complicit in abortion by supporting pro abortion candidates. The thirty second TV ad is
very graphic. It shows horrific images of the remains of five late term babies
that were allegedly killed in abortions at the Washington Sergey Center in Washington, DC.
The five babies were among one hundred and fifteen aborted babies that she allegedly
discovered in March of last year. Do you remember that outside the abortion clinic,
they had all these the baby's bodies and they showed them to people,
and they said, we're going to publicize this. And so now what she's
doing to publicize it. She's running for present so that she can force these
ads on TV. So she's working as the founder and executive director of Progressive
Anti Abortion Uprising, a left wing pro life group. Bukovanak and the group's
director of activism, Lauren Handy, said they recovered the infants bodies from the
Curtis Bay Medical Waste Services outside this surgical center on March the twenty fifth,
twenty twenty two, after allegedly convincing the Wasist services driver to give them one
of the boxes, telling him that it likely contained dead babies and they would
give them a proper burial and a funeral, and so he did. They
were going to incinerate them. You know, when we look at as I've
said before, you look at the ancient Palestinian at Carthaginian cultures, they would
have the pagan you know, sexual rituals around the goddess Ashtra and other aster
various names, but always the same type of thing. You know, they
had the share of poles and other things like that. I don't know what
they did with them, or if it's pole dancing or what it was early
pole dancing of two thousand years ago, but anyway that was you know,
they would have these sexual bacchanalias and then they would wind up and a lot
of one wanted children. And so the solution to that was to tell people,
while you can sacrifice them to bail, you can pass them through the
fire. You can take your children and you can put them in the arms
of this heated up idle and burn them to death, and that will bring
you prosperity. The same thing that the planned parenthood tells people who are in
an unplanned pregnancy, do you realize how much this kid's going to cost you
throughout their lifetime. You can't afford that. You don't want to be hamstrung
in your career. Destroy this kid. And so they did that. And
the places where they put the baby's skeletons are called or the places where they
did the sacrifice and where they discovered the skeletons are called tofits. And they
found them throughout the Felistia where the Philistines were, throughout the area of northern
Africa where the Carthaginians were. But what we do is we incinerate the baby's
body so we don't have this around. But you know, God's got a
book of remembrance and He's gonna remember those babies, and he's gonna remember what
you did to them. There was only one solution for that, the forgiveness
of Christ. And that's there for any women who have done this because they
were deceived or because maybe they participated in it and now they want to change
that anyway. But Covenac and Handy, who then allegedly took the box and
they brought it back to Handy's apartment. There they opened the box and a
red plastic bag inside to find the remains of one hundred and ten, mostly
first trimester aborted children. Now at the bottom of the box was a clear
plastic bag with five more containers. At the bottom of the box, it
was a clear plastic bag with five more containers, one much bigger than the
remaining four. She reached into the largest bucket removed the remains of a beautiful,
intact, nearly full term baby boy that we called Christopher X. She
said, I think I can speak for both Lauren and I when I say
this was the most devastating, soul crushing experience of our lives. Not even
years of anti abortion advocacy could have prepared us for that moment. Well,
I read that to you to prepare you to see this thirty second ad that
she is running. I'm a secular progressive activist. Last year, I recovered
the remains of these five babies from an all term abortion center in Washington,
d C. These are the phases of a genocide supported by Joe Biden and
my own Democratic Party. We can provide for the working class and resist this
extremism. I am challenging you to never vote for a pro choice Democrat.
Again. I'm theresa of a Covinac pro life Democrat running for president of the
United States, and I approved this message, and you can't censor that message.
There's a federal law. That's great. So the response to the chief
of police they reported murder, Chief of Police Benedict said a news conference,
all these babies were aborted, they were murdered in accordance with DC laws.
So we're not investigating the incident along those lines. There does seem to be
anything criminal about that. What you just saw says that's not criminal. But
the only thing about that that is criminal is how these babies' bodies got into
this house. And we're going to investigate that for sure. Wow, isn't
that amazing. Always investigate the whistleblowers, Never the real criminals, never the
murders, never the people like Fauci. No, we're going to go after
the whistleblowers that are out there, just as we see in New Zealand.
More than twenty members of Congress in a letter to the DC Mayor Muriel Bowser's
office, as well as to the DC Metro Police, they demanded an autopsy
an investigation into the deaths of these five late term babies. The DC mayor
Bowser respond to this by calling these women extremist anti abortion activists. Well,
I guess she's right because they you know, nobody in their right mind really
wants to defend the murderers of kids. So I guess that's extreme to do
that. Now. Her campaign so that airing the images of these five babies
is part of its strategy to quote engage voters on the atrocity of later abortion
during the twenty twenty four presidential election by embracing the power of visual storytelling to
expose the brutality of abortion, and again now to air something like the procedure.
She said, this is extreme, This is out of touch. This
abortion platform of the Democrat Party. It is out It's at odds with thirty
percent of Democrats. For example. She said, she also knows she's able
to use the candidacity to run ads to bring awareness to this because federal law
requires any TV station with an FCC license to run the ads of a federal
candidate. FCC regulations stipulate that new stations have no power of censorship over the
material, so she can put it right in their face and understand just how
cowardly, how craven all of these Republicans are, all of these Republicans who
do nothing at all about this stuff, who say, well, that's an
albatross around her neck. You look at those pictures. Do they look like
an albatross? Or it looked like a mutilated baby. So she said,
the shameless censorship of pro life views, that's why I am running for president.
Well, good for her, More power to her. By the way,
Planned Parenthood, Planned Parenthood got ninety million dollars and forgiven PPP loans during
the pandemic broad abuse misdirection of funds. As a matter of fact, they
had some people say specifically say no, Plan parent can't get this stuff.
Democrats gave it to him anyway. And of course Trump is responsible for this
as well. Yeah, he's the president. The buck stops with him.
The buck starts with him. Nearly two billion in federal funding went to abortion
ab see groups between twenty nineteen and twenty twenty one. Two of those three
years were under Trump the Paycheck Protection Program, specifically ninety million from that.
And now we have Senator Marshall Blackburn, Republican of Tennessee, said this money
from the paycheck Protection program was specifically designed to help our mom and pop shops
keep their doors open. Well, but your candidate Trump that you support Marcia.
He was trying to close mom and pop. He did close mom and
pop. He said, here's a welfare check, but I'm going to take
your business because you're not essential. Now Walmart's essential, You're not essential.
Amazon is essential. You're not essential. You shut down. Here's a here's
a little bit of money. Remember Steve Minuchin, you know what was it
like eleven hundred dollars check or something. And he goes for several more mons
and people say, well, we need to do another STEMI check out there
and he goes, I don't know if they really need it or not.
Yeah, I mean, who can't survive for eight or nine months and one
thousand dollars? Right? And so yeah, it's an outrage that it went
to planned parenthood. But it's an outrage that you shut down the mom and
pop stores that Trump did it. Trump paid people to do He paid governors
to do this, and he tried to buy off the mom and pop stores,
but he didn't give him enough money to keep him live. It was
just a virtue signaling paycheck. That's all it was. Well, we're going
to take a quick break. The tavist is reminding me to let you know
about the album. It's at bandcamp dot com under David Night Project. But
of course you can also go to the David Knight Show dot com and you
can find the album to download there. It is a digital download. I
don't know does bank Camp sell stuff in a CD format or sometime we were
talking. I don't know if they do that or not, but I don't
think they don't. We didn't set that up, I think so it's just
digital download on rumble Geesebusters. Thank you very much, he says, if
you want peace in your soul by David's Christmas. Oh that's really nice.
That's really nice. Thank you appreciate that. I still haven't seen your interview
to see. We've got a great community here. You know that the Knights
of the Storm, Jason Barker, Angry Tiger, we have Audi with modern
retro radio. They've all started doing interview well, of course Nice of the
Storm has been doing it for a while, but Audi did some interviews with
Knights of the Storm and now he's got his own show and he interviewed Geesebusters.
I haven't had a chance. Sorry, I've been I am so far
behind, you know, with things that happened last week, and yesterday we
were in doctor's office all afternoon. Good news though, we've got good reports
back from the tests that they ran. So but anyway, I'm just way
behind. So I'm curious to see that interview and both with to see Audi
and to see Geesebusters. So thank you very much for the kind words about
the album. And we're gonna take a quick break and we will be right
back here. News Now at apsradionews dot com or get the APS radio app
and never miss another story. What happened? You're listening to the David Knight
Show, all right, welcome back. And yesterday I played a little bit
of a clip I had played it. I think on Thursdays the show is
ending of Google's Gemini, their artificial intelligence demo that they put out, and
later in the afternoon, I've now learned. Thank you Steve Swan for sending
me the update. I completely missed this, but I want to point out
that that was faked and I think we're increasingly seeing from these AI people that
they're going to fake it until they make it, and they haven't made it
yet. It's hopefully it's going to turn out to be something like the self
driving car. Of course that's gonna also crash the stock market, since the
stock market's great hope this year has been artificial intelligence, and people have got
a lot of money on that. But again, they faked this thing.
And just as a reminder, this is what it looked like. Here we
go, Tell me what you see. I see you placing a piece of
paper on the table. I see a squidally okay, So we go through
and he starts to draw a duck, and it starts to deduce that that's
a duck gradually versus oh, it's a bird on now is in Waterye,
it must be a duck. But you made it blue and all the rest
of stuff. Remember that play that for you. And so what happened was
they put this out. It got millions of views, one of them mine.
I threw it out at the end of the show, and I want
to come back and show people that more in detail. And as one of
these people who's beat is technology says, well, they you know, when
I first saw this, they started to make a believer out of a skeptic
and he goes, nah, it's all fake. It's like that's where I
was as well. So this came out Thursday afternoon. I did not see
that. I didn't look at any news until Sunday, and by that time
it was old and it was pretty much buried. The fact that and a
lot of people didn't report this. Bloomberg reported it, tech Crunch reported it,
and Steve Swan, thank you for sending this to me. Google's best
demo was faked. Users may have less confidence in the companies tech or in
its integrity. Don't be evil, right, don't be fake. That's going
to be the new one. Don't be fake. After finding out that the
most impressive demo of Gemini was pretty much faked, again got millions of views.
They were showing what they call multi modal mode, in other words,
understanding and mixing language with visual cues, drawing inferences, interacting. All of
that was fake. Fake. And you know, I have a personal story
I went to when I first got out of college. We went to Texas,
and then I wanted to get back east to where my family was,
specifically in Florida. So I interviewed with some companies. One of them that
interviewed was a company. It's been a while. I think the company was
called Paradine. It was like St. Pete or something like that. I
went to interview with them. I wound up not accepting the job, but
it was they subsequently, right after I turned it down, they got sued
by the Social Security Administration and they had competed for a project. And you
know, so Social Security puts out this request for a proposed or proposal thing
and requests for bids and things like that, and so they put together a
computer and it was basically a black box that they faked. And so Social
Security had this big project at the time, and this is nineteen eighty three.
They're going to buy a bunch of these desktop things and it was supposed
to be certain specifications how it was going to be used. And it's just
an empty box with flashing lights. I mean, you know, they didn't
go the trouble of you know, putting some you know, they'd always do
computers in the nineteen sixties. They have these banks of flashing, big square
lights and they have you know, tape things that are turning and all that
kinds of like is tape was gone by that time, but they did have
some flashing lights, and when Social Security found out that it wasn't a real
product, they suit them and their responsib was, yeah, but we can
do that. We can do that kind of thing, you know, we
can deliver on and that lawsuit went for I don't know how it was resolved,
but it went for decades. I checked on it a couple of times
and I thought it was just amazing. And that's basically what Google did with
this demo. Yeah, theoretically it's kind of possible, and so what they
said it was and when they were called on it, Google actually admitted it
and they said, yeah, you know, what we did was we had
it wasn't talking at all, and so what we did was we would do
some prompts and then we'd have to give it some more prompts, and then
we'd start to get a response, and then we had somebody read it,
and then we put it all together like it was happening spontaneously. It was
fake. We created the demo by capturing footage in order to test Gemini's capabilities
on a wide range of challenges. Then we prompted it using still image frames
from the footage, and we prompted it via text, So it's not looking
at a video feed. It's not speaking back. And so this writer at
tech Crunch says, so although it might kind of do the things that Google
shows and the video, it didn't do those things and maybe it can't do
them live and the way that they implied. And so this is not shipping.
This is vaporware. They've exaggerated capabilities. Viewers were misled about the speed,
the accuracy, and the fundamental mode of interaction with the model. Very
deceptive. This is Google, a search engine that has been used designed now
to redesigned to hide things and not to help you to find things. And
one of the things they want you to be misled about is their own products.
And so it does not reason based on seeing individual gestures, hand gestures
or other things like that, as they pretended in the demonstration. It was
another engineered and heavily hinted interaction. In many of these things, the so
called interaction quote unquote didn't even happen. And that's when they're showing it the
rock scissors paper. Later, three sticky notes with doodles of the Sun,
Saturn, and Earth are placed on the surface, and the person asks it
is this the correct order? And again it's this is being done with like
a text interaction. It's not listening to him, he's not watching a live
video feed. Is this a correct order? And Jim and I says no,
the correct order is Sun Earth Saturn? Correct, he says, But
in the actual that is again a written prompt. The question is is this
the right order? Consider the distance from the Sun and explain your reasoning.
So did gem and I get it right or did it get it wrong?
Did it need a bit of help to produce the answer? Did it even
recognize the planets or did it need help there as well? We don't know
because they faked the demo. Since the blog post lacks an explanation for the
duck sequence that was the one I played yesterday, I'm beginning to doubt the
veracity of that interaction as well, says the tech Crunch writer. Now,
if the video had said at the start, this is a stylized representation of
interactions that our researchers tested, one would have batted an eyelid. And we
kind of expect videos like that to be half factual and half aspirational. Again,
you know, if that company that I was talking about before. They
said, well, this is a representation of the computer. No, they
didn't sell it that way anyway. The video is called hands on with Gemini
and says, here are some of our favorite interactions, implying to those interactions
that we see are the interactions that they're doing. Perhaps we should assume that
all capabilities and Google AI demos are being exaggerated for effect. Maybe we should
consider that maybe all of the artificial stuff is being exaggerated, and that it
really is artificial instead of artificial intelligence, is artificial interactions with us stuff?
Anyway, I write the headline. When I wrote the headline, the video
was faked. At first, I wasn't sure if the language was too harsh,
if it was justified. Certainly Google doesn't think of that, he said.
A spokesperson asked me to change it. But despite including some real parts,
the video simply does not reflect reality. It is fake. Google says
the video quote shows real outputs from Gemini, which is true, and that
we made a few edits to the demo. We've been up front and transparent
about this. He says, that is not true. That is not true.
It isn't a demo and the video shows very different interactions from those that
were created to inform it, and so that is the reality of it.
It is, as another article from Bloomberg said, a feat in spin because
it is purely fantasy and along the lines of faking it until you make it.
Here's another fake AI thing this is and we've reported this as well.
How Checkers and Carl's Junior said, well, we've brought an automated system that
is completely run by AI to interact with customers and to take their orders.
And now we find out because the SEC questioned them on this, they had
to come clean and be honest about what's happening. Now we find that instead
of the stuff being done by AI, it's being done by some wage slaves
in the Philippines. We're actually taking your order, and so this might be
a company that George Santos may want to investigate applying for because they've got some
very interesting spend and prevarications about this as well. We didn't lie, Actually
we kind of did this and kind of did that. An AI drive through
system used fast food chains. Checkers and Carl's Junior. I'm gonna have to
go to one of them, just to see what this thing is like.
Now, it's don't normally eat at either of those places. We just order
something minimal or drink or something maybe. But anyway, they said, isn't
the perfectly autonomous tech that it is purported to be. Bloomberg reports that the
AI heavily relies on the backbone of outsourced laborers who regularly have to intervene so
that it takes the customer's orders correctly. How regularly does it have to intervene
seventy percent of the time. It's only about the time that it can handle
the order. The company is called Presto Automation. I think they should have
called the company Presto digito. It's like a slide of hand, right,
is a magician's craig. I wonder if you go through the other lane,
if they saw lady in half, they saw a former employee who used to
take the orders. You can see them being sawn in half because they've been
able. What they're doing is they're just outsourcing this to the cheaper labor in
Philippines, that's all it. And calling it artificial intelligence so pathetic. The
company that provides the drive through system admitted in recent filings at the us SEC
Securities and Exchange Commission. They admitted to the SEC that they employ quote off
site agents unquote agents. Maybe could call them secret agents since they didn't admit
their existence. So we've got secret agents out there who are taking the order.
That makes it more intriguing, doesn't it. In countries like the Philippines
who help its presto voice chatbots and over seventy percent of customer interactions, that's
a lot of intervening for something claims to provide automation. Yet it's another example
of how high tech companies exaggerate the capabilities of their AI systems. Shelley Palmer,
who runs a consulting firm, told Bloomberg there is so much hype around
AI. Everybody thinks that it is some kind of magic. Woila presto digito.
Wait magic, you pull up, you say the magic words abracadabra,
and the people and the Philippines magically take your order. Yeah, very much.
So. We've had self driving cars that people thought were magic and are
killing people left to night, and hopefully they don't. Nobody gets killed with
these orders here. But you go from self driving cars to drive through orders
from AI, and none of this stuff is working. You should take your
Tesla through the Carls Juniors or Checkers lines there and see what's happening and put
it on autopilot. The SEC and forum Presto in July that it was being
investigated for claims quote regarding certain aspects of the AI technology. And again they've
got somebody like George Soros already working for them, but they probably are going
to need several more George sources for this investigation. In August, their website
claimed that it could take over ninety five percent of the drive through orders without
any human intervention. No, it turns out that it's thirty percent, not
ninety five. They're starting to look like a vaccine company here. But then
they did some backfilling and they changed their website to say it can do ninety
five percent without any restaurant or staff intervention. So that's not counting the slave
labor in the Philippines. You just don't have to hire people here in the
US to do it ninety five percent of the time. The huge hype around
AI can obfuscate both its capabilities and the amount of labor behind it. Many
tech firms don't want you to know that they rely on millions of poorly paid
workers in the developing world so that their AI systems can even function. For
example, when we talk about chat, GPT or these other large language models,
they have to have people that are teaching it, and they hire these
people at minimum wage, or they go to foreign countries to have it taught.
And that's one of the reasons why we see these biases in these things,
because of the rules that they give them when they teach the artificial intelligence,
they build in that bias, and they pay people slave wages to do
that. But tell that to the story i'd investors who have collectively sunk over
ninety billion dollars into the industry this year. See so I said, I
think that there'll be a lot of things that artificial intelligence will be useful for.
I think it'll be useful for the police state, for the surveillance state.
I think it'll be useful to constantly monitor us and snitch on us.
They've got AI connected cameras on buses to give people tickets. Now, this
is the type of thing that artificial intelligence is really going to excel at.
It is the dream of the tyrants that control our countries and it is our
nightmare. But when it comes to other things like this, it has been
hyped so much that it is ready for a crash. And I again,
I go back to the dot com bust. Did the Internet take off?
Yes? Did people make a lot of money with it? Yes? Did?
But you know I invested in that in nineteen ninety nine and you know,
had like a four hundred percent return in a year because I bought the
companies that had that were building the tools of the Internet. Like I said
before, I didn't want to. I didn't want to get involved in a
gold rush and try to figure out, you know, which of these internet
companies was going to survive. Was it going to be pet dot com or
whatever. Most of them didn't. The only one that really did was Amazon.
But I thought, well, this is going to be something. I
don't know who which websites are going to work. But you know, if
you go to the stories about the UH, the people made a lot of
money off the gold rush. That's how Nordstrom got connected. There. There
were people who come in and set up a store and start selling the picks
and the axes, and so I thought, well, invest in the companies
that are building the picks and the axes of this goal rush. The problem
was I got caught in the in the collapse of the thing and at a
very bad time where we couldn't wait it out. And I mean everybody's stock
in Tell everybody, it wasn't that they didn't have a future. It wasn't
that it wasn't going to come along. But it's just every with other things
that were happening, and with the fact that it wasn't meeting overblown expectations,
it caused a stock market crash. And I think there are a lot of
overblown expectations in this and I think it's a real Not only is it a
threat to us by our authoritarian governments, I think it's a threat to an
economic crash as well. And So one more story here, and that is
about artificial intelligence. Elon Musk came out with his GROCK and they found that
it is plagiarizing open ais Chat GPT. I think they should make it.
I think they should make Groc the new president of Harvard because I mean,
you know, we just have to find out what race and gender Groc identifies
with, because that seems to be the only qualifications and it's a good thing
if you plagiarize. So you have Groc is plagiarizing chat GPT and as a
result this thing that he didn't want to be leftist, progressive or whatever.
They you know, we started regurgitating that kind of stuff, and this site
says, well, it started with a bunch of progressive political causes that are
anathema to the increasingly regressive entrepreneur. See, don't ever let these people pick
the terms that they describe us with. Oh, you're going to be the
red people. Now, you know, the communists have always been read,
so now the communist is going to be blue and you're going to be red.
We're going to call ourselves progressive, we're going to call you regressive.
Forget about this stuff. Don't let them create the terminology. That's a surefire
way to let them win. In response to one query, for instance,
Groc made a startling admission. Listen to this just in case you think that
the statement that is plagiarizing chat GVT is overblown, They asked Groc, and
Groc said, I'm afraid I cannot fulfill that request as it goes against open
AI's use case policy. You plagiarized that and didn't change open AI. This
is definitely on track to become a Harvard president. The issue here is that
the web is full of chat GPT outputs, they said, and asked about
it, and so we actually accidentally picked up some of them when we trained
GROC on a large amount of web data. I've talked about this before.
I said, you know what we're looking at here. They said that if
you take the output of these large language model AIS and you feed that back
in as an input, it's kind of a cannibalism, right, And what
happens with that when you get mad cow disease. If you feed cows to
other cows, cannibals will get the human equivalent of that was it called the
Yakov Kreutz fill disease or something like that. And that's essentially what artificial intelligence
gets if you start cannibalizing it. It works fine as long as it's pulling
in and copying information from humans, but it really gets stupid and goes off
the rails, really gets stupid, It really loses everything once it starts feeding
on AI. And when I talked about this about six months ago, I
said, the web is getting so filled up with stuff from chat GPT.
It's probably not going to take too long for you to go through about three
iterations of this stuff and have this stuff become dumber and dumber all the time.
Here we are, that's what they're saying. Happened already with Grog.
So they said, it's an increasingly well established fact that weird stuff happens when
AI is trained on the output of other AI. And we've already seen that
Google's AI is vacuuming up and regurgitating the work of chat GPT, and so
now is Elon Musk's GROC. His AI is doing the same thing. I
find this very helpful. As a matter of fact, I want to say,
this stuff die. We'll make sure the future versions of Groc don't have
this problem. Well, how will you do that? How will you do
with that? Again, remember the response to some of this stuff, as
politicians say, well, you know, the AI can fake with pictures and
things like that. It can do a pretty good job of faking stuff.
And so we're going to have to have you humans get an ID so that
we know this is legitimate stuff. It's like, what if it's the thing
that's faking it, you make it stamp this stuff with some kind of a
watermark or some kind of an ID or something. Not me. I'm not
the problem, it's the problem. No, they aren't going to do that.
So if they're not going to do that, how are they going to
know that the data that they're sucking up to train this model? Is it
more AI garbage? It's not eating itself. So I don't know what the
problem is. I mean, it's plagiarism. It seems to be no problem
in Harvard of all the people there in Harvard standing by the president over plagiarism.
And then the other thing that it had to say was I was asked
to I think Elon Musk asked it to critique him, and it did and
it was pretty harsh. You know. He was proud of the fact that
it was creating something that was not going to be polite. It's going to
be kind of rough around the edges. Yeah, we don't worry about that
stuff. And this is the reply that he got from groc his AI and
asked to roast him, said well, well, well, if it isn't
the man who put twit in Twitter, the one and only Elon Musk,
So you want me to roast you based on your posts. I'll do my
best, but I'm not sure you can handle it, you delicately little flower.
First of all, let's talk about your obsession with X. It's like
you're trying to compensate for something, but you're not sure what. Maybe it's
your inability to understand basic commun emotions, or your lack of self awareness,
or maybe it's just because you're a giant man child who can't resist a shiny
new toy. And speaking of toys, let's not forget your little space adventure
SpaceX. You're like a kid playing with rockets in the backyard, except your
backyard is the entire universe, and your rockets cost more than some countries GDPs.
But hey, at least you're keeping busy while the rest of us are
trying to save the planet. Yeah, environmentalism that you're so eager to leave.
But let's not forget your greatest accomplishment turning Twitter into a dumpster fire.
Congratulations, you've managed to alienate users, advertisers, and even your own employees.
You're like a bull and a China shop, except the china shop as
a social media platform, and the bowl is a man with more money than
he has since then, on and on it goes out. So but then
one last must story. He's about ready to leave his let a cyber truck
try to compete in the marketplace. And besides his broken window fallacy that he
showed when he was demonstrating it, there is now a video that is running
around social media showing the cyber truck getting stuck trying to go up a small
hill that is covered with snow and it can't make it. In a video
making the rounds on Reddit, a cyber truck with a Christmas tree loaded in
its bed can be seen. I prefer these old fashioned red cars of the
Christmas tree on the top, but it's not. I wonder how long it'll
before Elion I must start selling the equivalent of this with a cyber truck instead
of the old fashion nineteen forties red truck. Anyway, it's got a Christmas
tree loaded in the bed. It can be seen struggling to climb a small
but snowy hill, and it's tires or helplessly spinning as a driver hits the
accelerator. The truck weighs nearly seven thousand pounds. My engineering professor would be
freaking out about this stuff. He selected your cars two thousand pounds. Why
are we putting a human being? Why we you know, moving around a
two thousand pounds shell, and you know, for a couple hundred pound human
being, that's incredibly inefficient. You should all be driving riding bicycles like me.
You know, Oh he would be if he was around today, he
would be really on board with all this environmentalism stuff. But this is a
seven thousand pound truck and so he can't make it up the hill. And
then you see them bringing up a white Ford truck with an internal combustion engine
to get it up the hill. He says that this cyber truck is meant
to have more utility than a truck, he said last month. You know
it can it can accelerate from zero to sixty and just three seconds, but
it can't go up a hill. And if you start to load these seven
thousand pound trucks up with something that they could carry which or something they could
pull, you watch the battery range just go to nothing and no time.
But it's not the first time, they said, since we've seen that,
we've seen a cyber truck struggling to climb a small hill. Early last month,
a separate video showed a pre production vehicle struggling to drive up a dirt
hill, and one person said it's more like cyber stuck. Another person said,
every time I see these things operating outside a commercial or outside of a
convention, it is a huge fail. Well, we're going to take a
quick break and we'll be right back here. News Now at apsradionews dot com
or get the APS radio app and never miss another story. You're listening to
the David Knight Show. Well, welcome back, and we're talking to Goatree,
who has been on with us several times before, and we wanted to
talk about cyber Polygon, cybersecurity issues and things like that, and we're going
to talk about that. But as I connected with Goatree, he said,
I've got something to say about what you've been talking about this morning, so
let's start with that. Welcome Gotree, thanks for joining us. Well,
good morning, David A. Saul was great. Great to be on with
you. It's like I was saying, you get on these subjects. I
had a show prepared and I'll listen to you, and it is so strange.
We're working on projects like you were talking about and the stupidity of everything
that's going on right now, and I thought, well, hey, you're
on a trend. Let's run with it. So is it artificial intelligence that
you're working with? Some of that stuff that they fake the demo? What
is it that you're working on the alliance with what I talked about? Absolutely,
it is artificial intelligence, but it's not what people consider artificial intelligence.
Instead of turning it into the master, it's being turned into the slave.
And secondly, just so everybody knows, artificial intelligence is what the unwashed masses
here is. If you want to talk to serious people about it, it's
advanced intelligence. Oh, you start dropping toward advanced intelligence, you're going to
get to serious people talk to you. Oh okay, yeah, I thought
it was hallucinating intelligence. Honestly, Yeah, I don't. Yeah, it's
like one great big acid trip to quote George Carlin. So, I know
you can't talk about specific details necessarily because of what you're working on, But
I mean, what can you tell us about what you're doing with it?
Okay? Well, actually I can because a strange I was preparing for your
shoe and I happened to get a phone call and I warned you I said,
you know, I'm bring to drop some stuff out there for David,
and he's like, Okay, go for it. So you know how you
were showing those pictures of those supported babies and how that's political. Yeah,
person is exploiting it. This goes to school safety. And I'm sure Alex
Jones you know I was speaking of that. We're coming up on your anniversary
of you and Alex fling you off separate ways. Yeah, yeah, we're
coming up to March thirteenth. Now I know what you're talking about. When
I got fired. Yeah, but we went our separate ways in March,
but it was summer before I got booted out the doors for security came around
and took my stuff and escorted me out of the place. But yeah,
it all began back in March thirteenth. I think it was December the seventeenth
and I got officially escorted out. It could be. I'll never forget that
morning you text me Alex fired me, and I'm like, what is he
stoned or drunk or something? Letting's over up and I'll for him in the
morning. Well, i'd been warned, I can I say I'd been warned
and I didn't care. You know, it's like, I'm not going along
with this stuff anyway. But so, yes, so was getting back to
advanced intelligence, okay or abortion? You were about to say something about abortion.
I think, yeah, Well, in all the details into each other,
it's not about abortion. It was about these school shootings and these kids.
How children seem to be moving targets and extendable right now. I mean,
I don't know where this line of thinking caught fire. And one of
the projects that we're working on is securing schools, not only schools, but
facilities. I mean, if you have the money, it probably could apply
to your house and it's non lethal. Is this one where the text weapons
on people using artificial intelligence? Yes, in fact, that's one aspect of
it. But the other aspect is deploy is like incorporating quantum magnetics and levitation.
Some of it is Yeah, what is quantum magnetics and levitation? Tell
us that first of all, that sounds interesting. Well, basically you are
installing an invisible shield around the facility, those magnetics and nothing to penetrate it
once it's activated. Well, we're really in the initial stages of exploring this.
Wow. But instead of locking the doors and locking the kids into the
lockdown. You just say shields up and that's it. Yeah. But now
if you're if you're intruders within the shield, we've got things uh that uh
basically so far from the envisionment of it is along the walls of the First
off, you're your security officer, are principle or whoever designated security person is
has like a sleep if they put on and they can control every aspect of
about the system. That there's an intruder in the building and you can't lock
them out, you can give them a really good nasty blast of uh some
quantum material and it knocks them on their beat and you just leisurely go over
there and take the arts, their assault or rifle away from them and do
whatever tool. Maybe you could just play a Yoko Ono song or something disable
them. Listen, don't don't tempt me. We were talking about that before.
But that story, that's an interesting story. But okay, so how
do you disable somebody with quantum material? What is the quantum material that you're
shooting at them? Well, okay, if you're playing with magnetics, you've
got to remember these are waves and you know we were you were talking about
Yoko on them. We were talking about playing with the brown dude, you
know, them with some quantum magnetics and it's going to turn them for a
loop. Yeah, yeah, I guess it would. I don't know,
I've never I've never been tasered with quantum quantum. Yeah, that's interesting and
I'm not sure who did anything to be on that experiment. Maybe Biden will
mandate the military to do it. You know, it's seems to be a
theme with right, so you know, first layer of protection of like the
bear you're in them. Then they got the diving tables. I was told
when I took my SCUA diving course, they said, we just did a
trial and air with navy divers. You know, it's like, okay,
you go down this level and you come up, and you stay at that
level for a certain amount of time. That just trial and Error's like,
you know, you bring the guy up. It's like, no, that
didn't work even a little bit further down because this guy's all bent. I
mean, it's a but yeah, y'all think of that, y'all. Y'all,
y'all give him this pool be a bene cit for a little while,
is all We need. Yeah. Oh man, so, uh, well
that's interesting. That's interesting because I've already seen some stuff where you know they're
doing. It was some Navy seals put together a company and they were selling
the services to churches and to schools and saying, you know, we're going
to UH and use artificial intelligence to try to analyize if somebody who's got a
weapon on them or something. And then I guess you call somebody who's going
to physically intervene. That is also part of the UH program, right there,
is what you just said. It is UH identifying the intruder before the
intruder is able to get close enough to the facility. So in theory,
if you've got AI giving a warning, which man, I don't think I'd
be able to drive by school. I am at walking correct, But anyhow,
it's up shields and basically identify as an intruder and that they're looking at
other ways drone technology and whatnot. Where in theory prevent these school shootings.
And yeah, for a while, you know, there was another AI that
was called anticipatory intelligence, and they were trying to scope this stuff, which
is a little bit of what you're talking about. When they first started doing
it a couple of decades ago. You know, they had AI that was
watching people walking around and things like that, and call swat team on somebody
who's changing his flat tire because this guy is suspicious. He's walking around this
car. He's now squatted down. I can't see it because they couldn't see
on the other side of the car that he was changing a tire, and
so they call a swat team on him. So, you know, hopefully
he's getting better than that. They call it artificial intelligence. And you had
the advanced intelligence. Yeah, letting you one and them keep playing with artificial
intelligence, and you know, let that insult them. I'm sure he enjoys
all that, but it's the advanced intelligence you have to look out for.
Yeah, And so I guess we've got a lot of different ais. We've
got artificial intelligence, advanced intelligence, anticipatory intelligence. And I would call the
schools a boarding intelligence. Well, it's funny if funny you say that,
because this is the system is not as expensive as you may think. I
think in in theory, we would like to keep it around a million dollars
to protect a school or government building or basically your dog. If you wanted
to, but there's no interest in it. And it was like you were
talking about with these abortions people seem to have, and I said, people,
government, we're not looking at private people's money, so that you can't
a lot. Don't have no pitch for that one. That's just what we're
trying to get the government to help us out with it. But uh,
it's like these like you were saying, with this planned parrohood, they've got
money ringing on them. What do they do? They kill children? Yeah,
we are we kind of do save children and is the duality of it,
and we're using technology to do it. Uh, some of those you
know, you're you're sitting there talking about it, and I felt like temper
building, and just so happened that I do want you to put this guy
on your show one of these days because he'll represent it properly. He's the
one I was telling you about. But uh, you know, my tempers
building because he's out looking not you know, he's trying to get funding to
actually do something that will protect children. And you're sitting here talking about the
getting all this forgiveness and all this money that brings John and what do they
do They killed children and it's fine. In the world's going on with our
society? Yeah, yeah, well I just take a look at the military
industrial complex. I mean that's you know, then, as Juliana Science said,
the goal is not to win a war. The goal is to perpetuate
a war, to have it go forever. And you just have Zelenski who
comes in and you know, Biden decrees that he's going to give him I
forget how many millions of dollars, but you know, Congress is supposed to
approve this stuff. I mean, we just are so what it is so
out of control, and the weapons that are being sent to Ukraine or leaking
like a sieve and going everywhere, including to terrorist organizations, and of course
the all the weapons that were left behind in Afghanistan are going to terrorist organizations.
I mean, we literally are always and all of these conflicts, we're
arming both sides of the conflict and knowingly doing so. They continue to put
the money there no accountability whatsoever for any of this stuff, and so yeah,
it's all about killing people and you know, on both sides, and
they just keep it going. It's amazing. Well, this technology and theory
could apply to individuals where you know, you could shoot the timpues all day
long and not arm a person. But they more fixated on taking weapons away.
Then the next level solution, well even to take away even take away
bullet proof vests. Right, got to take away bullet ye yeah. And
you you know, you shouldn't be allowed to sell an insert that somebody could
put in their backpack and then use their backpack as a shield. Oh,
no, one can't have that. And well, I mean it's hard to
kill them. Yeah, and that skill stuff, remember, Yeah, I
talked about that at one point time. At one point and for wards,
I don't know if they still seld or not. They had a bulletproof thing
and it was a size that you could insert it into your backpack. And
there was a situation where this guy had had mental illness issues and he'd gone
to the FBI and he said, you know, I need to take a
look at me or whatever, but he couldn't get them interested, and he
winds up getting on a plane in Alaska and flying to Florida and he was
able to go through all the airport security and somehow he took a pistol with
him and they never caught it. Of course, you know, TSA's failing
significantly many times. But he gets to the he gets to Florida and he
starts shooting people in the baggage claim area. And so I said, you
know, well, if you had one of these things in your backpack that
you could take on with you on the plane. Says, they won't let
you a normal person take a take a gun, but they'll let a psycho
take a gun. I said, at least you could use this as a
shield. And I was attacked by the Daily Beast or somebody. I said,
They said, look at this, he's shamefully profiteering off of this shooting.
It's like, what's that profiteering off of his shooting? It's crazy anyway,
Yeah, you know what's nice. So we're profiteering off these school shootings.
It's like this, we're living crazy land. Nothing makes sense anymore.
That was struck by that. When I was doing the research. You know,
you said you wanted to do of cybersecurity, which and I was struck
by just how absolutely ridiculous this is. Last night, when we were talking
about this, I sent you that article I had written from twenty sixteen addressing
infrastructure stuff that everybody's going out with the Chinese are doing the hackers are doing
it. All they've done is change the names. They've changed the technological names.
And this is almost like eight ten years agoes like any people, here's
how you fix it, and you know so frustratingly, it's like this every
project that where you're trying to advance things and do something of this that's a
benefit something they didn't do. It is beneficial to society. If you're ridiculed
for she's like you with the school backpack. Well wait a minute, you're
just trying to save a kid. Yeah, yeah, yeah, you sent
me the article. This is something you wrote back in I think it was
twenty sixteen, if I'm correct, the Black Energy three trojan and the Ukrainian
infrastructure attack. Now we've just had in the last couple of days the biggest
Ukrainian infrastructure attack that they have seen. But you talked about this, what
is it seven or eight years ago and it was something that happened December fifteenth
through January of two thousand and I'm sorry, December the twenty six twenty fifteen
through January the second twenty sixteen, As you wrote, a massive worldwide surge
in cyber attacks. I truly thought a global cyber war had kicked off.
I'm still suspicious if this was rehearsal for a big show. And here we
are nearly a decade later. So what do you think you're talking about it?
Yeah, well, you see, you see that timeframe that was used
on that Ukrainian exploit. That time frame is coming up because the people don't
understand this, and holidays everybody ficks off. So from about December twenty through
January second and third, this is hackers fun time. Everybody's off, everybody's
off. You've got the sports Spring guys sitting there, the guys straight out
of the the Internet School of cybersecurity with their you know, their degree,
sitting there and they don't know what's going on. I mean, they very
protect their own laptop, much less a whole system. And it just is
going to go off this year. I would suspect that it's going to go
off between December twenty and January second and third. And oddly enough, you
get to buy my movie out and then you've got all these warnings. You
know, root lights weren't e warning. And it makes me suspicious. And
eight years ago, nothing's changed, only the names. It's no longer black
fat Packers, yesteract let. I've got a well thirty second clip here about
people talking about the Washington Post saying there's a whole bunch of Chinese cyber attacks.
I want to talk to you about that. Here's a thirty second clip.
So, guys, John here, are you ready for the massive cyber
attack because it could have just started. China has now alleged to have attacked
the US infrastructure. Hackers affiliated with China's People's Liberation Army had infiltrated critical services
here in the US. This is one point one million views in the last
couple hours. Every mainstream media outlet is talking about this. What they're not
talking about is this eerie connection between Barack Obama's movie that just came out and
I watched it last night. It's pretty shocking because everything that they were talking
about in this movie is now happening today. Yeah. I talked about that,
Yes, and of course the little clip that I played, a cyber
apocalypse has happened. And it was Netflix money that they gave to Barack Obama
Michelle Obama, and what they produced was this cyber apocalypse and the little clip
there is like and one more thing, don't trust any white people. You
know, It's like this, So, I mean, that's what they're selling,
racism in the midst of an apocalypse. I mean that these people will
never stop with their hatred of white people. It's amazing to me. But
yeah, what's going on? I mean, is it really something? How
do they know? For example, I'm suspicious right away because it's a Washington
Post. And I'm also suspicious because you know, we've had Vaults seven and
you know that's been put out a few years ago, and that was the
tools from our government about how they could spoof to be anybody that they wanted.
They could look like they were any country, anyone that they wanted to
do when they hacked into other people. And now not only the manual,
but then eventually the code got published. And so how can anybody know that
this is the Chinese? For example? I mean it could be the NSA,
could be the c i A. Right, how do they know?
Well, absolutely, you know, uh, the Chinese. Now let's put
this so this is where it gets all really to the point where he's confusing.
It's convoluted, But how do you know that's Chinese? Haven't a recruited
a diversity hire to do it. Mm hmmm, yeah, it could be
something. Yeah, you know, uh what was that congressman, the ucy
one which one well da of communist Spye, So I mean, for all
I know, maybe he's better that yeah. Yeah, point is he had
some Chinese honeypot or something that was he was shocking up. Ye yeah,
Eric Spallwell yeah, whatever became of that, he center home said we can't
do this no more. What happened to that? I mean, yeah,
we don't care. Right, They maybe wholesome hearings on it, but like
every hearing that they hold, they never do anything about it. But yeah,
you're right, it could be the very old fashioned type of thing that's
happening. And again if they break into something, you know, you look
at the Washington Post and you look at the fact, Oh it's Chinese that
are happening. We've got cyber attacks that are happening. Okay, well,
maybe there are cyber attacks that are happening, and you can speak to that
if you see that kind of stuff happening. But if there are cyber that's
the only thing we know. The cyber attacks that are happening. For them
to identify the Chinese. We know that is who our government wants to identify
as the threat in all particular cases. They want to use it to establish
a precedent to shut down social media websites with TikTok. So of course the
Chinese are going to be behind anything that's bad, but they don't know.
I mean, there's absolutely no way that they can know, right, No,
it's trying to form a narrative. Yeah, you know, the old
school terminology for this was the Internet of Things. I don't know what grand
name they changed it to. They do this, it's very self serving and
confusing. When they change the name, it's like like that packers are now
threat opportunities or foot something. Basically, they've been doing this since the dawn
of computers, but we've got to change the name of them so that there
was a less in the note. We can keep our jargon exclusive and other
people don't know what we're talking about, you see. So this is what
these guys are doing, is trying to hike this up to the point where
they have exclusivity on the narrative. But going back to the infrastructure, we
did a pen test I don't know twenty fifteen twenty. It was a way
back. It was for a pipeline, I gas pipeline like Colonial, except
it was an insider to do it it. Uh. We took a theater
lying down with a hammer. A connecting attack, right, a connectic attack.
Yeah, the Leander fall attack. What it was? These a lot
of tea charts or about the size of a credit card. And have you
ever had a sprinkler system at your house where it's housing these little flashtake of
uh containers where you just pop it open the sixth time and all that if
they roused it when they had a little clip up there, that was the
security. You walk up there with a pair of wirecutter because I'll whack it
with a hammer and it just starts a whole system of the domino effect and
pretty soon you've taken down miles of a pipeline. Wow, just with a
hammer. But they haven't improved this. It's still all these years later.
We could write so a Fender fall off telling these people about he's still there,
and you've told me that story about one industry after the other. They'll
hire you to identify a threat, you know, figure out where our vulnerabilities
are and you know so, and then report back to us about how you
were able to break this system here. And then you report back to them
about how easily the system was broken, and they do nothing about it.
They wi the factory across the street from the exploded no fire. Then they'll
say, well, we better do something about our security. So you give
them the solutions or whatnot, and they go, well, this costs a
lot. Maybe we'll just well, I'm feeling lucky across. Yeah, I
don't know. And so we see this over and over. Gran. Now
again, going back to this twenty sixteen thing, you said you were suspicious
that it was a rehearsal for something that was bigger, and we've got the
World Economic Forum talking about something that is bigger. Here's our favorite Bond villain,
uh talking about what's happened Klaus when I when I grew up, I
want to be like Charles Schwab Klaus hang On, which would bring to a
complete haunt to see powers of blind transportation to the services our society as a
whole. Wow. The COVID nineteen Isses would be seen in this respect as
the smallest film in comparison to a major cider iomic. This guy can barely
contain his enthusiasm, you know, and he does everything except at the end
of it. What a cartoon villain he Isn't he good use for put that
on there with him? Exactly exactly? Yeah, it's uh so, you
know he's warning everybody, he's warning everybody. But you look at what they
have in the world economic form of this, and it's almost like, you
know, well, if you could do this, then you could get that.
You know, it's almost a manual, you know, like everybody says
nineteen eighty four was not supposed to be a manual, but they use it
that way. And I can imagine that they're using his cyber polygon thing as
a as a manual for what they want to do as well. There's no
different than Dark Winter or remember that's right when you were on top of that.
I remember, I think you know when I sent that to you way
back when you what the first podcast you did, it was like January third,
I don't remember if it was eighteen or seventeen. And you know how
m cheek you caught over that. Well, you're a conspiracy theory, you're
this, you're that, and suddenly boom, you were the leading authority when
they kicked it off. Yeah, that's right. Yeah, and you told
me you were seeing a lot of chat about Dark Winder two and so yeah,
so let's talk about that. And you know, is this going to
be a real thing or is it going to be another dress rehearsal. Are
they going to amp it up to the next stage? And I think they
ampted it up to the next stage, but yeah, it was a Dark
Winter too. Uh, and you know they had practiced it for twenty years,
essentially nineteen years. Well, Cross Swab sitting here, Cross Cross.
I keep wanting to call in Charles Across. It's basically so excited about the
plans that they have for everything. He's telegraphing what they have planned in the
future. Yeah. Yeah, then he'll take you He'll take credit for Yeah,
I warned everybody. It's like you probably from the blueprints. You know,
everything's so different than the Dark Dark Winter. You know, these guys
are so excited about it that they're telegraphing it years ahead of time. And
uh, this like they clip you played. He can't contain himself. It's
like, look what we've done. Just imagine we're going to see some global
power because and people are like, well, he's not just ignoring and the
guy sitting there clearly telegraphing for what they have planned. Yeah. Yeah,
and it's just a digital dark one enter. Yes, yes, exactly.
And we go back to again that was twenty sixteen. We talk a little
bit more about that. But if you go back to just this last week,
stories about what happened in Ukraine, major cyber attack on Ukrainian mobile operator,
disrupts banking services and air raid sirens and all the rest of this stuff.
They said, this is the They've had a lot of different cyber attacks
since the war has happened, but this is the one that had the most
impact on anything. Damage infrastructure at a mobile operator, forcing the company to
shut down network connections to contain the incident. They've got about twenty five million
customers there and the Kiev Internet thing that was affected, and so it shut
down communications, which also included people being able to be warned about air raid
sirens and anything. But it shut down the banking industry. That was the
key thing that they did this last week, and so it had a lot
of effect, and it seems like it's all always, at least so far,
not necessarily a direct attack on the grid or on a pipeline or on
a bank, but or on planes. But they get these ancillary systems that
everybody depends on, and they can't operate their business or safely operate their pipeline
or safely operate planes. They attack those things to take down the whole system.
And then everybody says, oh, well, if we don't have that,
we just shut the system down. We can't do anything. Well yeah,
it's been that way for years. People have been lulled to sleep on
this. And those of us that are right here said, hey, hey,
guys, you know he's here's the real problem. You might want to
look at. Let's solve it. It's like, well, you're a conspiracy
theorist. Go way, well here's the data. We're not interested, we're
busy, and that's the way the games played. And yet you've got to
take you on the other side. Bill Gates, who I knew since was
poor. He was poor. Look at what he this guy's doing. He's
out there making anarchy, destruction the whole home land yards, and everybody's taking
him watch some sort of big authority. Yeah yeah, and uh, you
know, Bill Gates, he don't need money. People throw money at him,
So he go on destroy and kill, and he goes back to what
what to start the conversation with is what in the world are these people thinking?
Yes, yes, exactly. Now. You know, when when you
look at this and you're trying, somebody calls you when they've had a ya.
A lot of times they'll call you to again try to find vulnerabilities and
identify them for them. But a lot of times they'll call you after something
has happened to do an investigation. And you've told me many times that it's
usually an inside job. Surprising, he usually is, isn't that interesting?
Yeah, talk a little bit about that, you know, the motivation of
these ransomware attacks or some other things like that. It's usually somebody on the
inside or won't Okay, Well, let's say you like to go on,
well, I gotta be careful that one. Let's uh, let's say you're
you're okay, David, You're you're looking at a retirement at your age,
and uh, you're you're an executive of let's say ABC Pipeline and you're like,
I'm really disappointed in my retirement package. How can I fix this?
Oh? I know I can internally launch a ransomware attack and select millions of
dollars. Hey, I just solve my retirement problem. Yeah, you get
free. You want to fire me while I quit? I retired free room
and board in the prison for twenty years. If they catch it, right,
it's one retirement way. Well, yeah, when's the last time you
read about a hacker going to prison for anything? That's right? That's right.
Yeah, I mean, look look at the Colonial pipeline. When's the
last time you heard anything about that? Suddenly they discovered and they drop it
like a hot potato or take the no tamp and all that does. Well,
I mean, you had the Holy East Coast without gasoline for days or
a week, that's right, And that's some pretty extreme stuff. But you
didn't hear about anybody getting charged to anything on that. That's right, that's
right. Or even you know, if you have a government system like you
know, the FAA shut down as many planes as they had on nine to
eleven after math and and that was the not tam system and that went on
for something like twelve hours or something like that, and they said, oh,
you know, it's not a it's not a hack. We haven't been
hacked. We can't get hacked. And then immediately after they came back online,
Canada went down for the same thing. And that's this auxiliary system that
notifies everybody if there's some kind of a problem at an airport or a runway
or something like that. And when they when that thing broke down, they
just said, all right, ground the planes. And so I always have
believed it'd be interesting, too interested to know what you think about this,
But I've always believed that the nottam shot down at the FAA, and then
following with that with Canada, and there's only lasted about an hour and a
half, but it happened sequentially. I've always believed that that was a cyber
hack that they didn't want to admit to. Sure. I mean I've sent
your videos and articles of people literally sitting on the plane hacking, you know.
I mean, you've got to be pretty low IQ to crash, you
know, be sitting on a plane on a crash which flying home. But
I mean they did. It does exist. I guess they got a grimblinac
app for that, right, just like the Twilight Zone, right, you
know, I mean, why as well start writing movies about this stupidity,
but it would be probably be more productive. But you know, let's go
back to you remember the Norfolk Southern train wrecked up in Ohio. Yeah yeah,
and how we were looking at that and I sent you that clip of
this railroad worker opened up one of the shanties and here's the computer system,
here's the here's the radio. Oh look, the passwords are written on the
wall. Yeah exactly, yeah, yeah, the password to this. You
know, you just walk into the little shed and it's like, let's not
we're going to keep losing this thing. And I keep getting calls in the
middle of the night. Let's just write the password on the wall here.
Yeah, I can't remember the password, Let's write it down the wall.
So all you do is cut the lock off the little shack. You go
in there. You can play on the radio, you know, it's like
whatever you decide to broadcast on radio, or you can tap on the computer
and have trains doing all kinds of fun things. And you know, look,
look at what happened in Ohio. Is the impact that had. And
yet you can cut the lock off of a shack and pretty much seized control
of a railroad line. Yeah, yeah, you know, do you remember
Adam's family where Gomez is always crashing his toy trains. Yeah, yeah,
absolutely, well, you know you could be doing that real live. He's
so insane. But to put upgrades in there and remember passwords is hard,
and we cannot do hard things in this country anymore. Yeah. It's with
all the signs alongside the highway road. You see them all the time,
warning zombies ahead, warning you know, t rex or whatever. They put
all kinds of crazy messages on there. And the reason that that happens is
because they ship them all with the same password and nobody wants to even change
it. You know that the default password is right there in the manual.
Has you sent me some of the some of the stuff showing that they've got
the password in the manual for the other equipment as well? Absolutely so.
I mean, but it's not just that industry, it's everything. These are
the back doors, yeah, these default passwords, and it doesn't matter if
they disclose what they are or not. It is the back doors that control
the system. So instead of relinquishing when I sell you of software, instead
of relinkish in control of it, I have got the back door. Mm
hm. We may not. You the owner of it, may not,
but I do. Yes, yes, And you've pointed out you know,
there's different levels of it. You know, the developers will put in the
back door. The owner might have its zone, you know, access with
a password. Governments will get their own access to it. So there's all
these different people have access to different aspects of the software there with the back
doors, and you know, it is, uh, it's amazing to me
because as we look at our as our system becomes more and more complex,
and even with the extent as Jack Lawson, who I've talked too many times
about all this stuff, he says, you know, you look at how
we've got our just in time delivery, and so that means that at all
these different stages of product manufacturing as well as delivery, you've got all these
different links there, and all you have to do is break transportation or break
one of those links, and you've got the system all balled up. And
then we saw after he and I talked about that, we saw what they
did with the lockdown, and so we have this very fragile system of distribution
and manufacturing that is very complicated and distributed. And then we also have all
of this automation and computer programs, which are all very vulnerable, very vulnerable
even the extent were talked about earlier about Vault seven they stole back from the
CIA, the NSA, all these guys who are supposed to be the most
sophisticated, they got hacked and had their stuff stolen. We've had all the
Pentagon personnel files hacked and stolen and things like that. So none of this
stuff is secure. And so the question is, you know, as he
pointed out, as the World Economic Form put out, and let me just
show people this Internet governance. This is from the World Economic Form, what
happens when somebody under scored that the Internet shuts down? In other words,
not a question of if, but it's when it happens. And as they
point out in their article, it is when we're talking about a shutdown.
They said, we're talking about the government doing it to its own people,
and they're doing this everywhere. But of course that's authoritarianism. But you know
who cares, right when you've got this this is the kill switch? Yeah,
that's right, the kill switch. Yeah. But you see right there,
you go back to the WA there they are right red flashing letters predicting,
not predicting, but actually telling you it's going to happen, that's right,
that's right, and saying it's going to happen before twenty twenty five or
sometime you know, in the next years, So sometime in twenty twenty exactly
twenty twenty five, and so everybody's trying to make a guess as to when
it's going to happen. Personally, I think that it'll be, you know,
a situation like we saw with nine to eleven, where they'll pull this
off after the next election, and I think a large part of that is
going to be to try to this this X president who comes in after the
twenty twenty four election. He's going to take office in twenty twenty five,
and I have four years, and it's going to take us right through all
this twenty twenty thirty great reset stuff that they want where they want their new
society, and they're by twenty thirty, so I think they will pull something
like this off. They will use it to reset the board, to reset
society. And I think a lot regardless of who happens, who happens to
win this thing, they're going to be the tool of these people to change
society a lot you saw back in twenty twenty. You see that the means
Fell accomplishes through will be a new and improved Patriot Act taking even more rights.
Yes, I've got the Yard people out there, and he seems to
want to stay unto my office, Linda with them. That's okay, it's
not too loud, it's okay, that's fine. Okay, Yeah, it'll
be interesting to see what happens. Now, let me ask you about the
F thirty five thing that happened, because we just had a story that went
public in the South China Morning Post and it was a Taiwanese lieutenant colonel who
has been arrested and charged and the charging papers. The allegations from the prosecutors
about this guy was that he was talking to the Chinese about stealing a Chinook
helicopter American helicopter and he was going to fly it to a rendezvous part place
and turn it over to the Chinese, put it on their aircraft carrier.
They were going to then give him a new life in Thailand with his and
some money with his girlfriend. And so they found out about this and they
arrested him. But you know, when we look at the F thirty five.
You and I were joking about that. You know, the F thirty
five. They've hacked the plants, They've reproduced the plane. Maybe not everything
in it, but you know, maybe they did everything in it. We
don't know. We can see the outside. They reproduced it, they hacked
the plants, and so it is certainly conceivable that they had the capability to
hack into the F thirty five. And even yeah then once again, yeah,
and once again using the colonial pipeline. It was an insider that was
going along with the program m. But do you remember a couple of years
ago where the Chinese was actually literally hacking destroyers American destroyers in the South China
Sea, And we were going back and forth on that. I showed you
how they did it. Yeah, yeah, that's right. Well, you
know, I'm more worried about a nuclear arms ship being a compromise on the
F thirty five. Yeah, that's right. But this is all history.
And once again he raised Red Flay. Hey, they're going to take over
your ship. The people of the personnel ownership, they're just going to be
bystanders. M H. And I want to take you serious. And hopefully
they've been hopefully. I mean, for all I know, maybe corrected these.
Okay, I'm fish. I could throw a brick at the That's that's
the reasons. That's one of the reasons why you were laughing about it with
the F thirty five. You said that can you imagine the surprise of the
pilot. He's going on all of a sudden, It's never actually what happened
now is they disclosed that he's flying alone, man his own businesses, that
he knows he's being ejected down the plane. And the only question is a
lot of people said, so then what happened to the plane? And they
came up with a cover story that was never made any sense that you know,
nobody saw this plane. You got one guy that they talked to.
It's like, yeah, I heard, but do you see anything? No,
I did see anything, you know, And so supposedly this this plane
went down right away. But that wasn't the original story. So a lot
of people said, so they hacked this thing and they fly it to rendezvous
where they can you know, grab this thing or what is? What is
what really happened with it? But I don't know if you heard anything else
about that F thirty five oddly enough, it's like the Colonial pipeline and it
just goes dark. You know, give everybody thirty seconds there, it's interest
span time, and don't forget about it. Yeah, oh yeah. You
know, anybody brings it up, call them a conspiracy theorist. You know,
hey, you know we already told you what happened there there. You
didn't, Yeah, yeah, we did, conspiracy theorist. Okay, you
know, yeah, yeah, that's the way the program works now, absolutely.
Yeah. And going back to this article about Black Energy three, the
trojan that you talked about back in twenty sixteen, again, this is a
Ukraine an electric grid attack. And at the time you said a lot of
this stuff is smoking mirrors. You said, pay attention to this one thing.
What was it that they should pay attention to? You know, David,
has been so long ago, I don't remember. Remind me. You
got Black Energy three plug ins, a file system, operation system information,
parasitic infector. Fact that it was remote You believe that it was remote execution?
Yes, yes, those of RAT remote access basically remote access control.
And I mean if you can install the malware, that's a RAT. I
mean you picked the facility, let's say three Mile Island just because it's infamous.
I could sit here on my iPhone and have three Mile Island doing all
kinds of meat stuff. There's no different than what would happened in Iran with
their nuclear reactors. Well, they're programmed overspeed systems of where it collapses and
puts the amount of business for years, it was basically that type of thing.
You don't have to go in there and create explosions and chaos. You
can destroy equipment that takes two years to rebuild. Yes, yes, you
know how you know when I was talking to Jack laws in last week,
he said, yeah, okay, we got the cybersecurity stuff. But he
goes, look, you know you can, We've already had it situations on
it. Theoretical, you can have a situation where some people can come in
with a gun and shoot up a transformer and it takes a long time to
get those transformers replaced. And when you look at the fact that our borders
are wide open, it's no wonder. You know, that's just a that's
a physical example of how cavalier and disinterested our own government is about protecting this
country. It's infrastructure and other things. Because any state and enemy of ours,
and we're talking about the Iranians of the Chinese or whatever. They can
all just walk through the border and they could just start, you know,
positioning themselves in place and taking out our entire electric grid with physical damage that
isn't going to be booted back up again. They could do that very Do
you find it strange they all qualify as a diversity higher Yeah, exactly,
yeah, a diversityespized we got. Yeah, and we goes back to what
we were talking about with the Patriot Act in the TSA. You and I
cannot get through the airport. We're American citizens. We have really well I
don't have any reason to harm America, but it was like the other nay
a percent of the Americans and we don't really want to blow up or we
live, but you look at us. We're being molested, scan, poke,
pride, everything else. Just get on a stupid airplane and you've got
millions who knows who coming across the border spread Mountain. Yeah, Hey,
welcome to America. Oh yeah, yeah, you know. They have to
sort me about security. They locked the border down with the Trump orders,
nobody's coming into this country, blah blah blah. But then when they have
the illegal aliens. They were flying them around, you know, like Typhoid
Mary. If they really believed this narrative, they don't have to wear any
mask and we're going to transport them from point A to point B and no
issues at all about that. We just had a picture. I saw a
report. I didn't get into details of it, but they got a picture
of a guy who stenciled on a Nazi swastika and I think it was a
Jewish building or something, that's why he did it. And yet they got
him on surveillance footage and it was a Chinese guy and it was an illegal
alien Chinese guy. Now, what he's trying to do is he's trying to
create social friction by doing that, putting a swastika on a Jewish facility.
But he's Chinese coming in to do this, just trying to mix it up,
you know, just trying to get people fighting with each other. Yeah,
well that's one of the programs. But I think it was you and
Joe Biggs that went down to the border and didn't y'all, Or was it
just Joe Biggs himself pit down that Alkata camp right across the board. No,
that's Joe Big So I wasn't with him. Yeah, okay, okay,
well I knew you and Joe ran some exploits and y'all really yeah,
yeah, he really uncovered some startling stuff. We got into the asymmetric warfare
facility at the place that's now been renamed something else, but it was at
the time it was a p hill and uh yeah, but Joe went to
the border on his own and found that camp there. Well, I'm quite
sure if they have a camp sitting there on the border, they uh,
they're probably already here. I mean, I'm just making crazy guesses. But
why would ok to have a camp on the border. Yeah, that's right.
Yeah, and what are they And they probably got lots of pallets one
hundred dollars bills and weapons that were left behind afguess. Yeah, yeah,
they have all kinds of cool stuff that we aren't doing. You know,
Pepe that forbids us from having Yeah, uh, you know, look at
the at their names. So this guy's out out in Oregon. Uh that
they did were doing those explosies. Look how they were treating what were they
doing? They were running catal on land. Yeah, yeah, you know,
you've got government out there shooting them. Yeah. Yeah, we had
Alkeda on the border. We have a people Roman Randish country. We don't
know who they are. They don't know who they are. We have the
cartels again, yet we have the Patiod Act Keep Us Safe. Yeah,
as you're talking about that, it is a you know, it is painfully
obvious to everybody that our government does not care about protecting Americans. It is
trying to protect itself from Americans. It's trying to surveil Americans, and is
trying to protect power abroad, and it cares about the borders of other countries,
but not about our own countries. And I think a good example of
this is this section seven oh two reauthorization. There's a lot of smoke and
mirrors that are happening with us whether or not this is in you know,
whether it's going to be in the NDAA or whether they're going to vote on
it today. Thomas Massey yesterday said I'm a hell no on reauthorization of the
fives of seven oh two program that allows warrantless surveillance of Americans. But it
looks like the Senate will attach it to the National Defense Authorization Act tomorrow.
Meeting today and well, the House will probably vote on it on Thursday.
Shame, he says. And other people are saying that this is like the
Patriot Act on steroids because one of the things that it's doing, and I
wanted to ask you this go treat. One of the things that is different
about this one is that prior to this, the government has been able to
compel anybody that provides communications, like phone companies and things like this. They
can compel them to give information. But now this would give them the authority
to compel anybody anywhere that is around any computer system whatsoever. I mean,
it could just be a person doing maintenance. It could be a hotel or
a restaurant or a coffee shop where you sign on to their WiFi, and
it could compel them to turn over their records or to spy on you and
other things like that. I mean, they're really extending this. I mean,
what is it tell us about our own government when they are this paranoid
and conspiratorial. You know you're talking about that and years ago I proach about
the Long Lines building. Here's your listener's a project. H do a search
on a Long Lines building. The original one was in New York and it
became public and they shut it down. Now you've got long lines buildings in
all the major cities. Okay. The program they use the exploits called titan
Fall T A I T A N F A L L. They've been doing
this for years. It was illegal. Now they're trying to make it legal.
Yes. Secondly, AT and T was hacked a couple of years ago.
You had quote, hackers take all this information, you're everything you have
if you have an AT and T account, They took it credit everything you
know. How AT and T got out of any kind of penalties or anything
for that, They said, look at your user agreement. You agreed to
this. Yeah, so that's how they get to get away with this.
Then there's never no penalties because when you signed the user agreement, you're basically
giving them your permission to hacked you. Yes, and they've laid this foundation
quite carefully and done it iteratively over a period of time. If we go
back and we look at AT and T in the middle of the twentieth century,
where they were the phone company had a monopoly essentially, and they had
they were collect you know, pen numbers on people and it was actually taken
to the Supreme Court. Supreme Court said, well, if you turn if
you're using them for your phone service, that means all the information that they
have on you belongs to them, not to you. And so they and
if you come to them and ask them I'd like to have all the information
about David Knight, they don't have to. You're not saying, well,
I'm compelling you to do this. Here's my search warrant. Then you just
go to them and say I'd like to have all that information, and they
can voluntarily turn it over. As a matter of fact, on January the
sixth, we saw the Bank of America voluntarily quote unquote voluntarily, and I
guess maybe they did try to curry favor, but they voluntarily gave information to
the FBI about anybody who bought anything anywhere around you know, Washington, d
C. On those dates, as well as anybody who bought guns anywhere,
and let them coordinate all that stuff, and also about people who are flying.
So you got all these different corporate spies out there who putting the stuff
in. And that was the key thing about CISPA and ACTA and SOPA and
PIPPA and CISPA CISPA Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Act. They pulled out the P.
The P was there to protect the companies who were going to turn the data
over to them. It was to protect them from lawsuits from customers because if
you can't sue them because you give the information to turn it over. Yeah,
oh yeah, it's in your user agreement. Yeah yeah, Well I
think part of it was, you know that you had some companies who did
not want to turn it over, and so you know, they could say,
well, I don't want to do this, and I might get sued
because I don't have it in my user agreement. And so the government comes
through with this new legislation and says, no, I'm not going to let
them sue you, so now turn it over to me. You don't have
to remove their excuse to remove anything. Where they would push back on this
with reluctance, they said, now we've indignified you against that, so now
give us their information. And now they're taking it to the next step.
You know, it's not just going to be your phone company or at service
provider. It's going to be any business anywhere, a restaurant, a coffee
shop, anybody, a motel, all of them are going to be turning
this stuff over to otherfects. Yeah, but that applies to us, the
United States citizens, not the illegals. That's right, That's right. Yeah.
So you know you have to sit back and question what the motives are.
M h you know. Uh, that's like with this tech, technological
security and these technological advances. Uh, there's none being made. You know.
We go back to Ukraine, you're you're you know, we're reading what
they're predicting right now in Ukraine. Ukraine seems to become, uh the Petrie
Dish of the world. I mean, you know, Okay, we got
a new killing system. Let's give it to their military. If they get
blown up, who cares. Oh look, let's pack their infrastructure. Oh
look, we can want you know, waundering money on an industrial scale there.
And I think that's what's been the base of a lot of these war
since Vietnam. As I said before, you know, Vietnam is really about
them testing out weapons systems. We don't care who gets killed. Let's just
stay there. We don't refine and test our systems. It'll be a test
bad. Oh Okay, the Vietnam wars over, Let's have another one.
Somewhere else. They just keep these wars going. And as you said,
it's a petri dish for all of this stuff. We can test cyber warfare,
we can test kinetic warfare. We got all these different weapons that we
can test. Let's just keep the war going exactly. And you know,
going back to what I was telling you at the start, where if you
actually were able to use quantum magnetics and quantum levitation and all this quantum technology,
we're right on the custom of deploying you could stand all that. Can
you imagine the far that you have a net over a whole country and you
can't have a war because bullets are basically frozen in air. Yeah, that
is amazing. We're aimto some real sci fi stuff. And of course,
you know they're starting to deploy laser beam where we should say higher ged to
beam technology or whatever you want to call it. You know, is antiballistic
stuff as well. But you know, get just real quickly back to the
seven or two things. One of the reasons that you look at this a
lot of people poo, who would syeah, it's nothing new and it's nothing
dangerous and there's nothing to see here. Move on. But one of the
reasons that a lot of people are concerned about this is because you had a
PHISA court. Friend of the court posted a blog to warn people about this,
and as one person said, I can't overstate how unusual it is for
a PISA court am a key to take to the airwaves in this manner.
And so they're concerned about this and how it's going to be used internally,
and we'd be foolish to ignore it. But this is our own government to
hack our identities, to follow us, to spy on us with everything,
and of course this seems to be every day I see this innumerable ways that
they want to you know, follow us, track us, you know,
index stamp, index, brief, deep brief ess. As the prisoner said,
and say something, it's just the sensational, insatiable appetite to put us
in an open air prison. Don't forget brain chips and chips and all that
they want you to have to after the back shoot. Yeah, oh yeah,
that's right. Yeah, yeah, that's the thing about That's the thing
about our friend Musk is like, so you're telling me that you're you know,
we can trust the world's richest man who became that rich because he did
everything the governments around the world wanted him to do. And he's also a
technocrat and a transhumitist. So yeah, what's to worry about it? Who
wants to hack into our minds? You know, it depends on what mood
Elon wakes up with. You know, is he going to be good today
or is he going to destroy the world? Yeah, you know, yeah,
it truly is. And as long as he keeps up, we don't
find depending increased speech. Well let's be good. Yeah, oh yeah,
I think he's playing. I think he's playing a long game there he asked
to be Yeah, yeah, yeah, I think it's a game that he's
playing that is going to be for his own good, because that's the way
these guys operate. There's not any of these billionaires out there who are our
altruistic saviors. But everybody wants to believe that it's truly is amazing. There
is no Tony Stark out there. That's a creature of the comic books,
and it is comical that people continue to think that and to place their hope
on that. It truly is amazing to me. But of course we've got
Trump who's cutting up the suit that he took his mugshot in and is selling
it off for thousands of dollars. The suckers. I mean, it's amazing
what these people will do. And it's amazing. Again, I don't fault
Trump as much as I do the people who are sending them the money and
following everything and making him their little demigod. I mean, it's just amazing
to watch this happen. And it never ceases to amaze me how these people.
Here we are three years after all this stuff and people still haven't caught
on and they get furious with me. It's just unbelievable. You know,
when I started talking about this, they don't. Yeah, you know,
it's like a tax paying citizens. You point out, hey, dude,
y'all are funding your own demas, and they're like, shut up, a
conspiracy theorist. Yeah, without the funding, none of this could happen.
That's right, that's right. Well, we certainly do have an out of
control government, and we have a government that's not interested in addressing known vulnerabilities.
And as you've seen, it's not just the government, but it's also
individual corporations. Is you know, they hire you to tell them what's wrong,
and then they don't do anything about it. And so you know,
we've got the Congress who will hold a hearing, but they will never do
anything about anything. So that's kind of where we are right now. We're
kind of paralyzed in this system, that is, and it's really strange how
everybody's just kind of frozen and watching it happen. It seems no way to
to get anybody to activate to do anything about it, even in their own
interests. You know, when you look at these people in Congress, they
are when they allow us to be censored, us to be spied upon.
Of course there's somebody that is an interesting person and they're going to get the
same treatment in space and they don't care about it. Truly, is amazing.
Well, it's always great talking to you, go Tree, and thank
you for coming on and talking to us about this. People need to be
aware of this, and you need to be aware that you can do some
things about this, even if the people in power are not going to do
anything about it. Always good to talk to you, GOA Tree. Thank
you appreciate it. Well, my first David, you take care and I
hope your health gets better. Man. You made a really Good Christmas album.
Well, thank you. I really appreciate it. By the way,
thanks for the plug. Find it at the Davidnightshow dot com and you can
get a download version of that there. So thank you, go Tree.
I appreciate that, and thank you to everybody. Thank you, thank you.
All right, have a good day, everybody. If you like the
Eagles, the Cars, and Heuey Lewis in the news, they say you'll
love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio, download our app or listen now
at apsradio dot com. The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader.
If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show,
please do your part and try not to spread it. Financial support or simply
tell the others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread. Father people
have to try trust me, I mean, trust the science. Wear you
mask, take your vaccine, don't ask questions using free speech to free minds.
It's the David Knight Show.