Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Night Show.
As a clock strikes thirteen, it's Wednesday, the third of January. You're
of our Lord, twenty twenty four. Well, today we're going to take
a quick look at the news, but we're going to get into developments in
the election. It's going to be a long year for me. I've already
got people who have been longtime listeners and supporters upset with me for criticizing Trump,
and I have to wonder what were they hearing for the last three years.
But we're also going to take a look at who is behind CBDC,
the different banks and crypto organizations that are pushing this very hard, and what
it means for us. And we'll be joined in the third hour by Ryan
Christian of the Last American Vagabond. He has been on this fluoride think for
a very long time and it is finally coming to trial this month, and
so we're going to get an update on that, as well as some other
things he's been tracking. We'll be right back. Well, the Epstein list
was supposed to be released yesterday. We were told it didn't happen, and
so bablin Bee has a story about that the Epstein list hangs itself moments before
its release. A shocking turn of events, Epstein list was found hanging in
a secure document storage facility this morning. This is such a tragedy for many
of us who desperately wanted to know who was on that list, said security
expert Hillary Clinton. Now will sadly never know. My thoughts and prayers are
with the family of this Epstein list. May it rest in peace. Well,
it is kind of interesting. We saw with the Christmas break that Tucker
is now talking about the Epstein murder in prison. You know, it's kind
of like Building seven. He said, you can't do anything about Building seven.
Can't talk about that or you'll get fired. Well you've been fired now,
Tucker. Why don't you talk about it. Tell us what you think,
point out what's going on. People are listening and they're wondering what you
think about this, unless maybe you're not fired, maybe you're still working for
the CIA. But Representative Birchett here in Tennessee says he expects the Epstein client
list cover up to continue. He says, what I want is the client
list. You know you've got these skeevy old dudes that everybody says, well,
they've gone and had sex on this island. What's the big deal.
Well, no they haven't. They've done an act of violence against a child,
and they need to be burned on that. He said, that's the
list that we need. And he said, I hope they get burned,
every one of them. You know, the Bible's pretty clear on what God
thinks of people who mess with a child. I think the American public needs
to stand up and do something right finally, and man that both sides of
the isle we need to wash our hands of this deal. He says,
I don't care which side of the isle you're on. If you are on
the Epstein list, you should pay the consequences. Really, we don't care
if it's Republican or Democrat. We don't care even if it is Trump.
Trump. There he is a Trump and Millenia, Jeffrey and Giselaine. And
here they are. Looks like Millennia is enjoying herself there as we go back
and forth, the four of them a foursome right there. Burchett said.
He also accused of Senator Dick Durbin of perpetuating the cover up to protect his
friend Bill Clinton. Well, you know again it's Clinton. There's people like
RFK Jr. Who on the plane, and of course Trump Trump who had
him just on the plane, but he was also at Trump's parties. And
Kevin Spacey, who Tucker interviewed in character to try to bring back his career.
I guess Kevin Spacey not only his connections to Jeffrey Epstein, but his
connections to Davos, the King of Davos. He was, you know,
he was entertaining all of them on an annual basis, deeply tied to all
of those people, very much like another actor Malcolm McDowell, who has played
in this X rated Caligula, who is in Clockwork Orange and all the rest
of this stuff. It's just it's interesting, isn't it. It's kind of
like, I don't know if these guys are good actors or not. Maybe
they're just like John Wayne who always played the same character everywhere he went because
he's playing himself. Maybe Malcolm McDowell and Kevin Spacey are playing themselves, and
maybe Trump and the GOP is playing you as well. They don't want to
talk about his involvement as a matter of fact, the only people want to
talk about it is a left press, And I thought it was very interesting
to see that Newsweek headlines Trump Donald Trump flights on Jeffrey Epstein's Alita express what
we know and they talk about it, and of course they say, well,
we suspect he's there, but we don't have any evidence of it yet.
And then they say the same thing at the very end of the article
is one little paragraph saying, oh, we don't know anything about Bill Clinton
either, Right, that's their only mention. But the most the entire article
from Newsweek is focused on Trump and Epstein, Whereas when you look at all
the Magabird press, you know, Breitbart, Info, Wars, WND conservative
press, you will see it's all about Clinton. They don't mention Trump.
Isn't that interesting? I really do hope that we have something like what Andy
Birchett is saying, we need to burn these people regardless of their political affiliations,
and yet the press is not doing that. We have a press that
is so incredibly partisan that even on something like this, even on pedophilia,
they tow the line. I got to say, you know, going back
years and years and when we look at Dennis Hastard, longest serving GOP Speaker
of the House, a wrestling coach, pedophile in high school, the GOP
reached out to him and had him run for Congress. I mean, what
you know, I'm not saying that you can't run for Congress as a wrestling
coach, right, but I suspect that his primary qualification was that he was
blackmailable, and so they collessed around him, colles around him, and then
they made him speaker for a very long time. And they had their page
scandals of Republican congressman who was accused of doing pages miners in congress or sex.
And you had Dennis Hastert go on with Rush Limbaugh and they just blew
it away as partisan criticism. And there was two scandals that were like that,
and Dennis Astert would go on with Rush Limbaugh and they would explain it
away, this is just partisan stuff. No, you're excusing this conduct as
partisan. And I don't know. I didn't listen to Rush much of the
time. After Dennis Hastert was charged, after it was found out that he
was being blackmailed by this guy, he was charged for taking his money out
and trying to avoid detection, taking the money out structured withdrawals. That's not
a crime, should not be a crime. It is against their law,
but it is not a crime. Should never be a crime. There's no
excuse for a law like that. But that's what they used to put him
in jail. And the judge even when he put him in jail, he
even referenced the pedophilia. You need to get rid of that statute of limitations,
and we need to come after. And the reason they don't come after,
the reason they don't get rid of the statute of limitations is because of
people like Dennis Aster and Donald Trump and Bill Clinton and RFK Jr. And
the rest of them. So, yeah, it is a truly amazing to
show how partisanship and the worship of men in power can blind you to the
most heinous acts, isn't it. Trump's son, Eric says Newsweek is also
listed on a flight in nineteen ninety five. He would have been eleven at
the time. He says, so again, that's he's a minor. But
so perhaps that wasn't about any of that, but they bring that up in
Newsweek. They have every little detail about Trump's life, just like the conservative
press will have every little detail about Bill Clinton being there. Trump and Epstein
were associates for years in the eighties and nineties. In a two thousand and
two interview with New York Magazine, Trump said, I've known Jeff for fifteen
years. Terrific guy, lots of fun to be with. It's even said
that he likes beautiful women as much as I do. Many of them are
on the younger side, no doubt, he said, Well, you know,
he was also friends. Trump was with alex Acosta, the guy who
prosecuted Jeffrey Epstein, the guy who worked out a sweetheart deal with Jeffrey Epstein's
two lawyers, Alan Dershowitz, who's now a big Trump supporter and defender,
And with Ken Starr, who's now deceased. But ken Starr went on to
he had essentially covered up for Bill Clinton. Isn't that interesting? You know
the degrees of separation. You got Ken Starr who's brought in as a special
prosecutor for Bill Clinton. He ignores all the financial irregularities, he ignores all
the credible allegations violence and rape against women. He focuses on Clinton committing perjury
about a consensual affair with Monica Lewinsky. That's the basis of it. Ignores
all the rest of the stuff, all the crime, corruption, sexual assault,
and rape was ignored by ken Starr. And then the next time he
shows up in a big public forum is to defend Jeffrey Epstein. And kin
Starr, who was touted as this big Christian, goes on to Baylor,
which is supposed to be a Christian school, and as president of Baylor,
he covers up for the football players rape or ledged rape or whatever. I
don't know how that case turned out. And then they kicked him out and
so Alan Derschwitz Alex Acosta was brought back to be the labor secretary and Trump's
first pick for labor secretary. But I'm sure there's no connection at all between
Trump and Epstein. Right, all of you Trump supporters out there, you're
telling me, oh, you just hate Trump. You're right. I do
hate Trump. I hate what he has done. I really do. There
have never been any suggestions that Trump had sex with other women who were trafficked
by Epstein. Clinton also has denied knowing about Epstein's offenses or visiting the island
with no flight logs existing suggesting otherwise. Says Newsweek as we're about to see
this stuff released a little preliminary leak talking about I forget how many times it
was, was it seventy five, one hundred and fifty times? Whatever it
was that Bill Clinton is listed in the flight logs. And so after Epstein
was taken into custody in New York twenty nineteen, Trump changed his tune.
Well, I was not a fan of his. I can tell you that.
Well, he was a fan of Alex Secosta, he was a fan
of Dershwitz, and he was a fan of Jeffrey Epstein for decades. So
as we look at the corruption in Hollywood and people like Kevin Spacey. Now
that Mickey Mouse is in the public domain, the early Mickey Mouse, the
Steamboat Willie Mickey Mouse. On twelve one am of the New Year, one
minute past midnight, you had a trailer come out of a Mickey Mouse horror
film. This is where Hollywood is sex, violence, depravity. Isn't it
amazing? You know Winnie the Pooh when it went into the public domain,
why they do? They did a horror film, a real schlocky horror film,
which is probably what this is as well. Winnie the Pooh blood and
honey. Well, now they've got a Mickey Mouse horror film because we have
these characters that used to be portrayed as wholesome. And of course Disney is
probably kicking themselves or not thinking of making a Mickey Mouse and Winny the Pooh
horror film themselves, because that's where they are. Yeah, maybe they could
have turned it into some kind of a sex depravity thing with Disney. After
all, these are animals identifies humans, right, the original trends species.
I guess Mickey's mouse Trap is the name of this new piece of filth.
They use clips from the nineteen twenty eight animated classic steamboat Willie shown interspersed with
newly shot footage that tells the story of a mask of a mouse mask wearing
killer who stalks college age kids at an arcade. Well, at least they
point out that people who wear masks are insane. Right, That's that's one
thing that we can learn from the last few years, isn't it. I
thought it was interesting that George Soros, the guy who has been opposing law
enforcement and district attorneys and spending millions of dollars to put in district attorneys that
are going to turn criminals loose to create chaos on our streets. He was
swatted. He was swatted. George Soros was swatted. In other words,
somebody makes kind of a prank, call a false accusation, and he gets
a swat team. Well, I thought that was perhaps interesting. Well he
now uses resources to stop these swat teams out there, because they really have
gotten out of hen. I've got a report here about a family and I'll
get to this in a moment after we take the break, and we'll come
back with politics. But it's about a family who went to January the sixth,
and you will not believe what they did to them. They didn't do
anything but the swatting that happened against them, And again it was just as
illegitimate as somebody calling up and making a false claim about somebody, except that
this false claim is coming from the Biden administration in the Department of Justice,
and it's horrific what they did to them. It is a practice that needs
to be ended. Except that what we're going to see is as this police
state, the surveillance state increases. Here's a good example of it. This
is from just the news. Censorship concerns rise over state and local governments registering
their domain names with SISA, and we have to be concerned about this again,
the corruption from the federal government. We have got to get people at
the state and the local level who are going to stand for the constitution and
individual liberty because the fish is riding from the head down and Washington is far
too gone. This is again white people say, well, you don't like
Trump and you don't like by, Well, who do you like. I
don't like any of them. Frankly, I don't trust any of them,
and neither should you. You should never trust any person in politics. As
a journalist, I'm not interested in endorsing anybody because that is an element of
trust and when you do that, you get burned, and rightfully so,
you need to be skeptical. You need to take a look at what they
do and look at SISSA. It has now come under height and scrutiny in
recent years for targeting disinformation through its Disinformation Governance Board. It works with big
tech to shut down on popular information about COVID, or about wars, or
about any narrative that they've got going on. And if you remember, CISSA
was an integral part of Trump of Alex's CIA source, Steve Pachinnik, who
was using that to kick off all this January the sixth stuff. Two days
after the election, he talked about a sting. He said CISSA was working
with Trump to put blockchain, watermarks and all the ballots and all these places.
They knew who had cheated, and they had already sent out twenty thousand
National Guard and two days after election he said, we've already had tons of
people arrested. All that was a lie, every bit of it was a
lie, but incorporated CISSA in there. Now, SISSA was supposed to guard
us against cyber attack. But who guards the guardians? That's always been the
question, you know, James Madison put it. He says, well,
because men are not angels, we need to have government. But because government
is going to be run by men, you know, how do you protect
against that? That's the age old question of who guards the guardians. Once
you put these people in power, they will use these tools that you gave
them to protect us against us. They will become instruments of tyranny, not
just in foreign wars, but against domestic wars, against tactics such as terrorism
or cyber attacks. I think It's interesting, you know that there was this
Japanese plane crash that happened, and when you look at this, I don't
typically cover you know, earthquakes and fires, and you know the if it
bleeds, it leads on most of the media stuff. I'm not interested in
that type of thing typically. But there's a backstory to this. And here's
what it looks like. You said that explosion off in the distance, and
then you see a plane going that is on fire. It completely incinerated this
commercial jet that had three hundred and seventy nine people on board, and yet
nobody died on that. But the plane. The reason that there was that
fiery crash was because there was a Japanese Coast Guard plane that was at the
end of the runway and it was getting ready to do some relief work or
something about the earthquake that had happened, but they were parking the wrong place
or something, and that was not picked up, and as that plane landed,
it struck that and so the big jetliner, which then was completely incinerated.
Everybody was able to get off, all the crew, all the passengers
were able to get off, but everybody on board the Japanese Coast Guard plane
died. The reason I bring that up is because we're talking about cybersecurity,
and if you recall a few months ago, we had a situation which was
the first time since nine eleven that all planes were grounded in the United States
and it was about twelve hours. They said it was not a cyber attack.
It was. I'm absolutely certain it was because there is a system and
it's relevant to this plane crash here. The no TAM system is what we
call it, and what it does is it sends out messages to planes if
there is some obstruction on the airport, or somebody is in the wrong place
or something, or if there's been some incident to give a heads up.
Now that might not have come into play with this. They might have just
been mispositioned and the air traffic controllers didn't understand it. But you do have
the no TAM system to prevent something like that from happening. If somebody is
all on the runway or something that you put that out as a warning that
system was shut down. I think that system was shut down as a cyber
attack. And the reason I think that system was shut down as a cyber
attack is because after about twelve hours of planes being grounded, it came back
online and within an hour you had the no TAM system taken down in Canada
as well. But without the not tam system, they stopped all the flights
because they didn't want to have something like that Japanese plane fire there. And
that's the issue behind so much of these cyber attacks. They will attack an
ancillary thing, just like with the Colonial pipeline. They didn't take the pipe
down pipeline down itself. What they did was they took down the financial and
accounting system so they couldn't track who they were selling it to. That type
of thing, couldn't do accounting, So by taking down the accounting system,
they stopped the flow and the biggest pipeline on the East Coast, the Colonial
pipeline. This is the way cybersecurity works. It would be nice if we
had some protection against that, except that SISA is focused internally increasingly in the
same way that the NSA and the CIA are increasingly focused internally, the same
way that the FBI is not focused on criminals but on citizens. That's what
our government has become. Finally, as we see started with a Babylon be
Sorrylin with a Babylon be story in the news, the president of Harvard,
Claudine Gay, gives a tearful resignation speech entitled the Gettysburg Address. Supposedly fired
for her plagiarism, she came back and accused them of being racist. She's
being fired because she's black. Now she's being fired for racism, She's being
fired for her perceived anti Semitism. The backers of Harvard, largely Jewish,
did not like the line that she took about the Israel amas Or, and
so they pulled back as Donor is dead. And interestingly enough, they all
discovered that she was a plagiariss and they had another round of plagiarism, and
so as Babylon Besas. At publishing time, Harvard confirmed that they were already
interviewing other communist black women to replace Gay, except that they didn't replace her
with the communist black woman. They replaced her with a Jewish guy. We'll
be right back. Whether you're feeling like the poos, where is or Bluegrass
APS Radio has you covered? Check out a wide variety of channels on our
app at apsradio dot com. So, unlike most revolutions, whether people rise
against the real economic oppression. In our case, here in Boston, we
are fighting for purely an abstract principle. It is, however, not nearly
so abstract as a young gentleman supposes. The issue involved here is one of
monopoly. Today, the British government will monopolize the sale of tea in our
country. Tomorrow it will be something else, liberty. It's your move.
You're listening to the David Knight Show. Well, let's take a look at
politics here. Let's take a look at the election. We have David Axelrod.
If you remember who David Axelrod was, he was a White House had
high level advisor to Obama. He was also high level official, maybe the
campaign manager. I can't remember his exact title, but he worked on the
Obama campaign. He is a very savvy political operative and he's now saying the
same thing that James Carvill, who was the savvy political operative of Bill Clinton.
Both of them, both of them have been talking about how the the
over the top legal moves that are being made against Trump. Everybody sees it.
Everybody knows it. You know, the Democrats know it, Republicans know
it, and it's galvanizing the Republicans and both David Axelrod and James Carvill are
saying this is you know, we're helping Trump, And of course everybody knows
that. You don't think that. The district attorneys know that. You don't
think the Department of Justice and the Biden administration knows that, knows why are
they doing that? Why are they helping Trump? David Axelrod is panicking over
the Democrats tossing Trump off the ballot. He says, you're making him stronger.
Here's what he had to say, all of this is strengthening him in
the Republican primary. We've run this experiment. You know, he's only gained
since he started getting indicted. You know, what you thought might be kryptonite
for him has turned out to be battery packs, and this is a big
one for him. Presumably the Supreme Court will deal with it fairly quickly,
and I expect that they will leave him on the ballot. And yes,
brion I, I have very very strong reservations about all of this. I
do think it would rip the country apart if he were actually prevented from running,
because tens of millions of people want to vote for him. I think
if you're going to beat Donald Trump. You're going to probably have to do
it at the polls. Yeah, you should do it with debates, which
they don't want to have. So are they going to make this about personalities?
And it's very much like what James Carvill said about the pending impeachment or
hearings about Joe Biden and his corruption. James Carvill said, how do we
get so lucky here? That's going to make us go Skyheim popular? You
know, to paraphrase it. He knows exactly it's going to get the It's
going to do the same thing for Biden. This is done for Trump.
And you notice that both of these things are continuing to rip the nation apart,
polarizing it behind two men. There's no principles really involved here. Uh,
this is the reality that we're looking at. Of course, you know
the corruption that's happening with Biden, that is a principle that needs to be
Uh, it needs to be looked at, but it should have been looked
at for a long time. And Uh, again it's going to have the
effect of polarizing. As he said, it ripped the country apart. But
you know that's what they want. That's why I said, why are they
doing this. They all know Thisical advisors know it, everybody knows it.
On both sides. I think that they want to have a civil war and
Trump is going to be were They're going to do the Tiger War over and
maybe over Biden as well. Stop and think about this. Look at how
you have. The press is already saying, oh, well, we're gonna
Republicans are take back the Senate. They're building up expectations for Republican voters.
If that doesn't happen, We've already had the red wave that didn't happen.
Why did that not happen? Personally, I think it was because of Trump
and his connection and Trump and his endorsements, you know, endorsing people like
doctor Oz who is beaten even by Fetterman, endorsing other celebrity candidates who have
absolutely no principles, empty suits, but they were loyal to him and they
looked good. And so when you look at this as we're coming up to
this, they really are sending this up to tear the country apart. And
I said this after the twenty twenty elections. I said, if you want
to talk about election corruption, I've been talking about voting machines at that point
in time. I've been talking about it since twenty fourteen, smart manic and
it's our origin in Venezuela, created by friends of Hugo Chavez to make sure
that he won that election. And they had a long history of accusations of
rigging elections throughout Mexico, Central America, Brazil, the Philippines. Over and
over again, these accusations have been made, but it's not limited to one
company. This is something that is going to make all elections vulnerable. And
then Trump added the vote by mail to everybody, the mail out election where
they mailed out ballots, in many cases multiple ballots mailed out to people.
They're not talking about getting rid of that. Trump's not talking about getting rid
of it. He's saying, We're going to do a better job of it.
I'm going to out cheat the other side with us vote by mail stuff.
So everybody looks at this, and I said from the very beginning as
well, I said, well, if you want to talk about corruption,
talk about ballot access. That's where it all begins, is with ballid access.
And now everybody's upset about the fact that Trump doesn't have ballid access,
and they should be. But why is it only when it happens to Trump?
Why is canceling and censorship only an issue when it happens to Trump,
as he ignored it in twenty eighteen, so he gets kicked off of Twitter.
Nobody cares unless it is Trump, because we don't care about the principles
and we don't care about other people. Look, you need to have an
open ballot if you're going to have democratic elections. And if you don't have
open ballots, and if you don't allow all the candidates that are on the
ballot, even after they jump through extra hoops that the Republicans and Democrats don't
have to jump through, if you don't allow them to debate, you don't
have a democracy, a mockery of a democracy. Take a look at RFK
Jr. For example. I don't support RFK Junior, but just take a
look at the issues involved here. He is been cut out. Biden is
not going to debate him, just like Trump is not going to debate his
opponent. So he said I'm going to run as an independent. He's not
going to get on the ballot in very many states. As a matter of
fact, when he had James Carvell on over the Christmas breaks and he's talking
to Bill Maher. James carvill is saying you better wake up, and he
is a little bit stronger language about this. He said, look, we've
got all these people on the Democrat side who are running. You know,
you've got Joe Manchin and a congressman who may be running as a no labels
candidate, and you've got an even mentioned you know, some minor candidates.
He didn't mention RFK Junior, who is a much bigger threat than Cornell West.
And but you know, his problem is that he is not going to
be on the ballot. And of course when you look at the Democrat Party
of Florida, they even kept other Democrats off the ballot. The Democrat Party
did, They're only going to have Biden on the ballot. That's how you
start rigging these elections. You rig them from the debates, from the ballot
access to the debates. Then you rig them with polls. You push people
say you elevate somebody like Trump, for example, it's not, Yeah,
he's won everything. We haven't even had the first primary yet, but he's
won everything, according to all the polls and according to all the press that's
out there, so you manipulate people with the polls, and then you manipulate
them in terms of all the different things that can be done in terms of
ballot custody, ballot reporting, and all the rest of this stuff. And
then you also have the vote by mail and the computer stuff. Be Getting
back to David Axelrod, he said Trump wanted to set up a construct which
says that they're coming after him because he's running for president and they're trying to
prevent him from being president. He says, well, we've run this experiment.
He's only gained popularity since he started getting indicted. What you thought might
be kryptonite for him turned out to be battery packs. And this is a
big one for him, being kicked off of ballots and being kicked off just
by you know, a secretary of state in one place, well or another
place by judge. So as this is all happening, and there's the two
issues in Maine. In Colorado, vaiveik Ramaswami is doubling down, saying I'm
going to withdraw my name from these ballots because he is angling at this point,
you understand, for vice president, that's what he's really focused on and
also angling for vice president is South Dakota Governor Christinoum, who says, I'm
heading to Iowa. I'm going to do whatever i can to help Trump get
across the finish line. Again. She's making an open move to be a
vice presidential candidate vice president along with Trump to get on the ticket. She
says that she and Trump really work well together. Oh that nice. Yeah,
she's not even trying to hide it. You know. That's again this
whole thing, that House of Cards stuff, Game of Throne stuff. I
just really hate this political maneuvering. You see a little bit with Fetterman.
You know, Fetterman is starting to get to work again, talk again now,
and he did an interview and he was saying, well, I was
very scared about this. You know, I thought I might lose my career.
Your career. Politics is a career for you. How despicable, how
anti American that these people think of themselves as careerists. And that's true of
all the politicians, Republican and Democrat for the most part. You know,
they don't have a life outside of this stuff. And this is the gravy
train that they're on. And they are social climbers. You know, the
first time we had somebody that really fit that description in America is Abraham Lincoln.
All the rest of the people said, well, you know, you'll
stand for election. Other people will nominate me. These people push themselves self
promoters, careerists. Truly is despicable. That's why we have the kind of
government that we have. So she said, on potentially serving as the twenty
twenty four running mate, Christy Nomes says, we will talk about that when
it's time to make a decision. Well, you know Trump has She works
really well with Trump. They get along great, but he doesn't get along
good with a lot of other people. As a matter of fact, is
a Christmas message He told Biden and a lot of other people to rot in
hell. Merry Christmas. Is such a nice guy, isn't he. We
should all be supporting him, don't you think all the Christians should be supporting
him. As a matter of fact, you look at this headline, Trump
rats worn. We're running out of time to stop his return to the White
House. I guess that's me opposed him. That's why I got fired.
I'm glad that I got fired. Actually, I'm proud of the fact that
I stood up for people who were the lader were victimized as I predicted that
they would be victimized. But you know, I said yesterday, there's all
these people are going to be It's going to be a difficult year for me
because I'm going to double down on Trump. I'm going to double down on
this guy because I don't want to see him return to office. How in
the world could anybody who has any conservative principles or any Christian support this guy
after what you have seen him do in office, after he shut down the
churches, after he put out the JAB and prepared all of that and paid
for it all. As David Stockmann pointed out, you know, he spent
trillions of dollars on these corrupt welfare programs, Stimulus check and the PPP and
all the rest of this. He's got a book coming out three weeks called
Trump's War on Capitalism. That was one aspect of it, but it was
much broader than that. It was a war on our individual liberties. It
was a war on our very lives. The Trump shot the Trump poison.
But like I said, it's going to be a difficult year for me.
So I saw yesterday a comment that was by a listener, somebody who has
been a supporter in the past. It says, David, with a humble
heart and love of Christ, for your sincerely hope the Lord touches you and
sends his spirit of repentance, forgive Trump and gets set free from your root
of bitterness. Well, first of all, Trump's not asking for forgiveness.
He's proud of what he's done. Does that give you a clue? Do
you have the discernment to understand this is a man who is proud of his
crimes against humanity and that he will easily repeat them, of course in a
rhyming way, not exactly in the same way. But if he is capable
of shutting down churches, why are you not pushing against him? Why are
you telling me that I'm the problem? Frankly, I don't care if you
listen. I don't care if you support this. I went against Alex over
this January the sixth stuff and over this Trump shot stuff. He was my
sole means of support, except I don't get my support from any person.
God can provide for me. If you were to see somebody on a roof
sniping at people, would you call me bitter. If I warned people about
it, what would you do? Are you going to call evil good?
What do you think the Bible says about that? Christian? Can you discern
good from evil? Can you discern a killer? Trump has killed far more
people than any sniper has ever done, and he is capable of doing it
again. He killed the constitution, he killed our economy, He paid and
bribed governors to do all of this stuff. Don't excuse any of that stuff.
Don't remain silent. If you do, it's on you. I'm very
comfortable with where I am, and I don't really care if anybody watches or
supports this program. I answer to God, not to you, pal so
called Christian. You don't have the discernment to understand what's going on with this
guy. Let me give you an example of this. This is sent to
me this morning by Mary ellen Moore, and it's an article that just came
out another January, the sixth story. This is what I was trying to
warn people about. This is what Alex was setting up as a trap.
I said, this is a grift. Stay away from it. It's a
trap. You're being enticed into this, You're being lied into this. Alex
is out there saying we're going to keep Biden out by any means necessary,
and so when I warn people about that. Look, I'm not bitter because
I got fired by Alex. It's been a real blessing. I'm very happy
to be here and to not be in Texas. The climate suits me that
everything about this is much better. And I'm grateful to supporters, and I'm
grateful to God for making this happen. But look, whatever happened, I
didn't know any of that was going to happen. I didn't even know the
show was going to continue. I hadn't planned on the show continuing. But
I'm not going to sit there and remain silent while he's telling people that the
Trump shot is sugar juice, while he's supporting Trump, telling everybody that Trump
is playing forty chess with the lockdowns and all the rest of the stuff,
and while he's selling a fear campaign, and then at the end of the
year ripping off people as he sends them into danger on January sixth. I'm
not bitter. I'm not bitter, but I'm not going to stop complaining about
and warning people about Trump and about Alex because they are still influencing people.
They're like a sniper who continues to take shots at people, and they're destroying
people's lives. As Mary Elan Moore points out, Liz Colin is the one
who did this story, responsible for a film, The Fall of Minneapolis,
about the George Floyd stuff that happened there. She lost her job with one
of the networks there. She's married to Bob Kroll, who is or was
the head of the police union. Because she talked about the corruption of the
George Floyd name. But now she's talking about this particular family. Here's the
headline from Liz Colin Minnesota mom slam's two tiered justice system. Ahead of the
family's j sixth trial. Her husband and her sons are facing jail sentences and
here's what happened. All three of her sons and her husband are prefering for
February the twelfth trial dates. The family makes up one third of the January
sixth defendants from Minnesota. These are all her husband and three sons are all
charged in face prison time. She said, I think this is something people
really need to understand. People want to sweep it under the rug, but
it is still going on. To hear that it's still going on. People
are still going to jail for Trump. People are still dying from Trump's sugar
water, Alex. While these people point you to Ray Epps, they're the
ones responsible for this stuff. Westbury said she and her family stayed for former
Trump's former President Trump's entire speech from the Ellipse on January sixth, describing the
massive crowds is unlike anything you'd ever seen, she said, So when we
get to the Capitol, there's no barriers. There was nothing set up that
would have made us think that we could not be there. When we got
there, my husband and my sons went ahead and my son Jonah was recording
and just the whole day because it's very exciting. We'd never been to Washington,
d C. So courted and put it on his snapchat. When we
did go into the Capitol, the doors were open. Entrapment, entrapment.
But never forget that, even though Biden is totally culpable for all this,
the entrapment as well as the enticement. The entrapment happened under Trump. The
enticement came from Trump to save America. It came from Alex Jones, and
there were no subsequent pardons either. Trump had a couple of weeks to pardon
people, he decided not to do it. Why not. As a matter
of fact, Roger Stone, if you remember, was so angry with Trump
that he went off on camera in front of some filmmakers that were doing a
documentary film on Roger and I won't repeat in the language, but he swore
up one side and down the other that he would oppose Trump for everything.
And now look at what Roger is doing. One of his biggest fans out
there, because that's the path to fame, fortune and followers, is to
get on the Trump bandwagon. So the doors were open. We were just
like tourists, he says. She said it was actually one of his classmates,
a high school classmate. They called the FBI and said, oh,
I see somebody that was in the Capitol, a former classmate of mine.
So that's how this all got started, she said. She said two of
her sons helped her husband to a bench inside the Capitol after he was pepper
sprayed. We see from some of the videos now that that was initiated by
the police. They initiated the force. She said, Isaac and Aaron went
in to help Roslin Boilin, a Trump supporter who died that day. We
didn't know who it was at first. Aaron said to my son Isaac,
we've got to go help because they were doing CPR and we could see that.
They went to the front of the tunnel, the infamous tunnel, and
they tried to get to Roseanne to help, but they were unable to the
police were spraying this very toxic yellow gas. From what I'm told, it
sucks the oxygen out of the air. So they realized they could not get
to Roseanne. So Aaron told Isaac, let's pick up shields, and they
were holding shields on the ground so that she wouldn't get sprayed. They're the
ones who have felony charges for doing that, she said. Isaac and Aaron
are facing up to twenty years in prison. Her husband Bob and son Jonah
face up to two years in prison. Jonah Westbury was twenty five years old
in twenty twenty one. He is fighting a slew of charges, including entering
and remaining in a restricted building and grounds, disorderly disruptive conduct and a restricted
building in grounds, disorderly and disruptive conduct, and a capitol building in grounds
and parading and demonstrating or picketing in a capitol building. Let me just say
this. You know, when you look at what's going on with Info Wars,
and you look at the martyrdom of supposedly martyrdom of Owen Schwarer, he
went to jail for sixty days, less than sixty days. It let him
out early because he was demonstrating or picketing in a capitol building. He disrupted
a hearing that was there. Now I understand that they gave him a suspended
sentence and then they came after him again, and probably it was all because
of the January six stuff. Think about how light he got off, and
think about his role in enticing people into January sixth. He's not a victim.
He skirted this stuff, and Alex has skirted everything about this stuff.
Isaac Westbury is eighteen years old disorderly conduct in a capitol building and an act
of physical violence in the Capitol ground buildin because he was holding a shield.
Aaron James is a US Navy veteran who served three tours in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Faces the same charges as Isaac. He says, the reason that I
went she said, I felt like I had to go. It was a
compulsion within me. Was it for President Trump? Well, I suppose it
was because you had people like Alex saying, by any means, we're going
to make sure that Joe Biden does not become president. So what happened to
them before these indictments? Two no knock raids were carried out by the FBI.
It first happened in April of twenty twenty one. I was talking earlier
about Soros getting swatted. Well, this is an illegitimate swatting of these people
who committed no violent crime. They come in combat So again, Joe Biggs
seventeen years no violence. Believe me. They went through and they highlighted him
for the J six committee. You know there's Joe Biggs, but you know,
darken everything out, but a highlight on him on the video. If
he had done anything violent, you know, they would have highlighted that.
She said they came in with a swat team. They came in combat style.
They had AR fifteen's. Everybody has to get out, they said.
They dragged us, dragged the men to the front of the house. They
put Jonah in shackles and leg irons and ankle irons. They dragged him out
and put him in the back of a vehicle and brought him down for processing.
He was in a holding cell for hours and hours and hours with leg
irons on. He was inside of a cage with leg irons. You say,
when we talk about and I mentioned nineteen eighty four Terry Gillian kind of
black satire about nineteen eighty four that he called Brazil, and it begins with
this type of thing. Except even then, in nineteen eighty four, what
Terry Gilliam put in Brazil was so over the top. I'll never forget seeing
it for the first time. And yet we are beyond his exaggerated satire of
a police state, the beginning of Brazil, movie about it to solitarian society.
Can't hold a candle to this. They came in, she said,
with fifty to sixty agents and a swat team, and they had drones that
went through my chicken coop and into the house. I don't know what they
were looking for, but they dragged Aaron and Bob and Isaac down to be
processed. They didn't allow them to even get shoes on. They didn't allow
them to get really anything. They were in their stocking feet, barefoot.
They brought them down to be processed, put them in leg irons. She
said. The raids traumatized her neighbors, who would always refer to as the
Christmas Cookie Lady. They called me the Christmas Cookie Lady because I made Christmas
cookies for everybody every year, and they were wondering what is going on at
the Christmas Cookie Lady's house? She said, there was no reason for it.
They took all of our firearms, all of my electronics. I haven't
been charged as of yet, but everything in my house, the phones,
the cell phones, the old cell phones, computers, everything, they took
everything. They had us get rid of all of our firearms, our crossbows,
even had us get rid of replica guns, cap guns, cap guns.
She said, my family did nothing wrong. If they take a deal,
what are they pleading to Are they agreeing that they're guilty of? What
of whatever the government says that they're guilty of. So they're standing up for
what's right, what's good, what's holy, what's true. After rioting in
Minneapolis, the US Attorney's Office charged seventeen people with federal riot and arson,
just four people who are responsible for destroying the Minneapolis Police Department's third Precinct building
faced charges and the longest sentence of those has been four years. In that
case, they comparing contrasts to what happened in Minnesota over the George Floyd.
Is that again, going back to the mother, we have people who are
nonviolent at the capitol and they're being charged and they're being put in prison for
twenty years, eighteen years. It is a tiered justice system. It's not
justice, not justice at all. And it makes me think where has our
country gone? And there's a fundraiser for this family to help them with their
legal expenses. And so I want to go back to this and say,
forgive Trump, you forgive Trump. This is still going on. Every week
we get more reports of people who have been sacrificed for his ego and his
finances, and he's still doing it, and he's on the cusp of becoming
president again. I will oppose that, And don't you push back on me
on this stuff. Just go somewhere else, Go listen to Alex because I've
been banned and canceled for speaking the truth so much that I don't have any
patience for you or anybody else. Narrowgate ministries, go somewhere else. If
you can't handle the truth about Trump, because I'm going to let on.
I don't care what the consequences are here. If you don't warn somebody when
you see something happening, my conscience is clear. I tried to warn people
away from January sixth. I said this kind of stuff was going to happen.
Why don't you get angry about what is being done to innocent people?
Why do you push back on me against the person who did it to them,
the criminals who did it to them, who enticed them, who entrapped
them, who robbed them of their money. Why don't you talk about that.
You want to pray for Trump, Pray for Trump. You know you're
told to pray for Trump. You're told to pray for those in power.
Pray that Trump becomes a Christian. Instead, Trump has surrounded himself with false
prophets, false Christians, like the so called pastor and self anointed prophet Julie
Green. My children, the time has come a time that you have been
waiting for a reinstatement, a shift of power, a new government in control
and overthrow and a take over in this nation from the hands of the wicked
to the hands of the righteous. There's not anybody righteous, especially her.
The time is drawing near, a coup is about to be disrupted and annihilated,
and everyone a part of it, exposed and removed. So my children,
hold on. Twenty twenty four will start out with a bang. So
brace for a mighty impact coming to shake you loose from the chains that bind
you. It will look worse, but remember my words. This means your
enemy's days are running out. Yeah, so there they go. This is
the woman who said, have so many false prophets who call themselves Christians.
How many times do you have to lie to somebody about what's going to happen
before you become a false? It just once? And we've had these people
who over and over again have said, no, Trump was the winner.
Trump is going to be reinstalled, He's going to not leave office. Oh
he's now, He's going to come back in March or in April or something
like that. Continuing this, Julie Green has been that way from the very
beginning and continues that way. She is held up by other false Christians like
Michael Flynn who goes to Christian buildings. They call him churches and holds his
Reawakened tours and has people there, the sheep there reciting a prayer from Elizabeth
Claire prophet, this cult leader from the nineteen eighties, plagiarizing it word for
word. I've played that a couple of times, plagiarizing it word for word.
And then he has Julie green On, and he has Eric Trump and
Julie green On together, or Donald Trump Junior and Julie On together. Folks,
this is a false Christianity, it is. These are false prophets,
their liars, their deceivers, their thieves, their criminals. Why would anybody
not be bitter about this? Let me tell you what the appropriate way to
do this is. Narrowgate narraw ministries. You ought to get the equivalent of
some cords and beat these son of a guns out of the public square like
Jesus did. You ought to get angry about this kind of stuff. Infant
son of a January the sixth defendant placed on the Quiet Sky's Suspected terrorist list.
So yeah, you told me who is the rat and all of this
stuff. There's no excuse for Biden. But Biden and Trump have been a
tag team on both January sixth, and on the Vaccines their tag team.
An eight week old infant has placed on a secretive terrorist watch list known as
Quiet Skies last week. According to AJ Fisher. The only suspected but not
so reasonable explanation for this designation is that Fisher is a January the sixth defendant
and the infant's father. Most alarmingly, it was not even Fisher who booked
the ticket for his child. Fisher's finance fiance booked the ticket for herself and
the infant, but neither was anywhere close to d C on January sixth.
They booked separately weeks apart from Fisher because he is still waiting court approval for
travel due to his ongoing case with the Department of Justice. So now anytime
Fisher's fiancee or their infant son travels, their boarding passes are stamped SSSS dedicate
that they are suspected domestic terrorists. The infant son see Trump set them up.
Trump set them up, and Alex set them up for this unbelievable.
Nancy Mace, who is congresswoman from South Carolina, she went on to Fox
News and said, we're losing the fight on abortion. Every single day.
No, they have not tried to fight abortion and failed. They have failed
to even try to fight abortion. Nancy Mace says, Oh, I'm pro
life, but we're losing this fight. And if you want to be serious
about reducing the number of abortions in this country, we have to have a
conversation on how women can have greater access to birth control and abortions at other
times right now, if you want to be serious about this, I have
covered the the pro life progressive Democrat who is running for Congress simply because as
a federal candidate, they cannot censor her pictures to show what abortion is.
In Washington, d C. She and other activists discovered a great number of
aborted baby's bodies and they took pictures of them, and she is using her
candidacy for Congress to show those pictures because the networks cannot refuse to show that
that is the truth of abortion that Nancy Mace and these other Republicans don't want
to go near, don't want to go near it. And you know,
as somebody who is running for Congress, Nancy Mace is uniquely positioned to be
able to show the truth. If I were to, if I had the
money to buy those they wouldn't run those ads only if you're running for Congress.
And that's why this progressive leftist who is pro life is running these these
commercials. But no so called pro life Republicans will do that, never have
done that. This is not an opposition to abortion. They have never opposed
it because they have never shown it for the crime that it truly is.
We're gonna take a quick break and we come back. We'll talk about Nikki
Haley and Joe Biden. So we'll be right back. Stay with us analyzing
the globalists next move and now the deevid nutshell. Whether you're feeling like the
booze or bluegrass, APS Radio has you covered. Check out a wide variety
of channels on our app at APS radio dot com. Well, Nicki Haley,
and this is a good article. I appreciate this. This is from
US natural Born Citizen dot com. And they're under her game. And she's
not unique. We've had so many presidential candidates again, so why would we
be surprised that people running for presidency don't care about the constitution. That was
one of Trump's defenses in this Colorado case. Well, you know, he
didn't swear note to the Constitution, and he didn't. You know, the
office of the president is not a you know, not anything that's on the
Constitution or whatever. It's like, Well, actually he's telling the truth.
You know. The Constitution is a dead letter to these people. Time to
wake up. That's what his lawyers say, just like Alex's lawyers said,
he's an actor. He's an entertainer. That's right. And Trump is not
subject to the Constitution. That's right. His lawyers told you the truth.
Trump won't tell you the truth that they will not subject to the Constitution either,
because she is not born on American soil, to American president, to
American citizens. As per the Immigration Nationality Act of nineteen fifty two, It
clearly states one has to be a resident on file for a five year waiting
period before obtaining a naturalization status. She was born before that period of time
was completed with her parents, who moved to America from India. Therefore,
she was born to parents who were not citizens at the time. Prior to
the Fourteenth Amendment. This was the rule of law the Supreme Court in English
versus Trustees of eighteen thirty and in Elk versus Wilkins of eighteen eighty four ruled
that a child born on US soil of a father who owes allegiance to sovereignty
other than the United States is not a US citizen at birth, and that
the citizen should of such a child is that of its father and not of
its place of birth. Nikki Haley would have been classified as a foreigner under
these court decisions of eighteen thirty and eighteen eighty five. And then when you
look at the fourteenth Amendment, I believe came between those two came back after
the Civil War. I don't have the date of the fourteenth Amendment here,
but I believe it came between those two Supreme Court decisions. And what did
it say, Well, it made it very clear that you have to be
subject to the jurisdiction and citizens of the United States in order to be made
a citizen. Why did that come up in the fourteenth Amendment Because the Fourteenth
Amendment. The purpose of the fourteenth Amendment was to say that freed slaves had
full rights of citizenship. They had been born in the United States to parents
who were subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, and so that's why
it uses that phrase there. But they made a distinction about someone who was
a let's say, an ambassador who is here legally, not even an illegal
alien, but an ambassador who is here legally. And if they have children,
those children are not American citizens. They have just you know, that
is not what the majority opinion is right now, but that is what the
law states. And so when we look at this, it's not just NICKI
Haley, it's also Marco Rubiot ted Cruz Obama if he was if his father
was really Obama, but if his father was that that communist organizer, you
know, was it dreams for my real father, Joel Gilbert had if his
father was really the communist organizer, then he would be a natural he would
an American citizen. But again looking at some housekeeping issues here. Another listener
was questioned about it was upset about the fact that in California there was a
statement. She sent me a statement. I would say, what are they
doing to Republicans here? Well, it wasn't a Republican party that was trying
to keep people off the ballot. In California, they had the three America
three parties, the American Independent Party, the Democrat Party, and the Libertarian
Party allow people who have no party preference to vote in their primaries. But
that's a decision that's made by the parties because the parties have so much control
over all of this. But the Green Party, the Peace and Freedom Party,
and the Republican presidential primaries are only open to voters who are registered with
that party. And so again, you know, when we look at this,
we need to understand what the games are being played with the ballot and
how much power the parties have in terms of connecting that crossover voting is whether
trying other Republicans don't want Democrats voting in their primary, so they don't allow
that. But of course you could say the crossover voting is happening with the
district attorneys and the Department of Justice that are making heroes out of Trump.
And then Biden. What is Biden doing? Well, again, he has
Joe Biden picked up these dogs. And we see this happen all the time
from presidential candidates. They never had a dog, but then they they get
elected president and they get a dog because it somehow humanizes them, I guess
for them to have a dog. And so he adopted you know, let's
go let's be really politically correct. Instead of getting a puppy or something,
I'll get a dog that has been abandoned by the people because they've got biting
issues or something like that. And rather than having somebody train it, he
just lets it run loose because it's all just about a photo op. And
now his second dog is also accused of biting many people. I guess when
he goes to the vet. Here, you go to the vet and they
give you the they put your last name there behind the dog, and so
you know, we take a scout to the vet, he's Scout Knight.
Well this is Commander. That's the name they gave this dog. And I
guess when he goes to the vet, he is Commander biting because he's biting
everybody. And that's an appropriate identification for both the dog and his owner.
But then you know, when you look at Joe Biden, he's been on
vacation quite a bit, so maybe he doesn't accompany the dog to the vet.
You think, I'm sure he doesn't. Thirty percent of twenty twenty three
was Joe Biden on vacation. He says that he's working as he's sitting there
under the umbrella, but I don't think so. And then twenty twenty three,
he says his favorite memory of twenty twenty three is the economy's improvement.
This is a guy who can't remember what his favorite food is. Remember he
and I just recently had his wife remind him that he likes ice cream,
and so Biden says on New Year's Eve that his favorite memory of twenty twenty
three was the improvement of the US economy. I don't think we can trust
his memory. This guy is truly our first AI president. Isn't he the
artificial incumbent? Yeah, that's exactly what this guy is. We'll be right,
but looking for better information. Apsradionews dot com features articles and commentary,
along with audio from all the top news from around the world. Apsradionews dot
com Making sense common again. You're listening to the David Knight Show, and
the only thing that got me out of that space was a comedian friend of
mine, the late great Norm McDonald. That's right, shout out the Norm.
And what Norm did, which I'll never forget, is he knew that
I was the biggest Jim Carrey fan in the world. Now, I'm not
going to go all into it. But Jim Carrey is talented in a way
that you can't practice rehearse. What a god given talent. I was fascinated
with him, and Norm knew that, and he called me up and he
goes Dave. He said, I'm doing a movie with Jim Carrey. Do
you want to meet him. It was the first time I could remember since
my father died being excited. In the movie was called Man on the Moon.
I didn't know any of this. And in this movie Jim Carrey was
playing another comedian and I admired the late great Andy Kaufman. Yes, and
Jim Carrey was so immersed in that role that from the moment he woke up
to the time he went to bed at night, he would live his life.
It's Andy Kaufman. I didn't know that. When they said cut,
this was still Andy Kaufman, so much so that everybody on the crew called
him Andy. I didn't know any of that. I just went there to
meet him, and when he walked into the room he was supposed to meet,
I screamed Jim Carrey, and everyone said, no, call him Candy,
and I had to understand. And then he came up when he was
acting weird. I didn't know he was acting like Andy Kaufman, just like,
Hey, how you doing it? And I was like, hello,
Andy. Now, in hindsight, how un lucky are mine? And I
got to see one of the greatest artists of my time immersed in one of
his most challenging processes ever. Very lucky to have seen that. But as
it was happening, I was very disappointed because I wanted to meet Jim Carrey
and I had to pretend it was Andy Kaufman all afternoon, and he was
clearly Jim Carrey. I can look at him and I could see he was
Jim Carrey. Anyway, I say all that to say, that's how trans
people make me feel. And yeah, that's a sorry about some of the
profanity. I forgot to beep out of that, but that's It's quite a
punch line that he had there, and very true. As a matter of
fact, This Zero Hedge article says activists are now furious at Dave Chappelle because
he explains transgenderism. You're not any Kaufman. You're not a woman either.
All it takes is one person to point out reality and break the collectively enabled
delusion and that's what I think he did a great job of doing, they
say on this article is a zero Hedge article. The trans movement exists in
this kind of bubble, a place where objective truth is no longer welcome,
and cognitive dissonance is encouraged for the sake of comfort. Much like any oppressive
environment, the more people self censor to avoid rocking the boat, the harder
it is for individuals to speak their minds. This is how concent is manufactured,
by creating the illusion of consensus. And so, you know, we
certain things you're not allowed to say. Certain people will, you know,
punish you for that. You don't want to oppose the agenda of the pharmaceutical
companies, of the military industrial complex, or the World Economic Forum. You
don't want to oppose the agenda of the LGBT, or they will punish you
for that. You don't want to in Republican circles say anything about Trump.
Chappelle is back with another Netflix special. It's called The Dreamer, And as
one person says, hey, you know, lighten up. This is a
comedy. Everybody gets mocked and that's why it's funny. No one is too
special to be made fun of. Well, that's what real comedy is about,
right. Ricky Jervis, who also released a special of the Christmas period,
was attacked again for not towing the woke line. The only thing more
popular on Netflix right now than Dave Chappelle. And he posted this and he
said, hey, we should get together and host the Oscars together. I
think that's going to happen anytime soon. But take a look at what is
happening even in churches. The Methodist Church in the UK says that we should
have more inclusive language, which means that the Methodist Church is saying we've got
to get rid of husband, wife, brother, sister, because those are
hurtful things. Hurtful things. Replace them by what you might ask, Well,
you replace that with a parent or partner, or child or career,
but not mother and father. And of course, you know, we've had
liberal elements within the Catholic Church that we've got to get rid of our fathers
to sexists and all the rest of this stuff. And so what about you
know, we want to honor these people, They say, using a person's
chosen pronouns is helpful as it honors their identity. Well, what about honoring
God? What about honoring the reality of his creation and how he created us.
No, that's not anything we want to do. In California, you've
got schools or forcing kids to watch movies about transgenderism, and they use these
things as commercials for puberty blockers. California school district that has more than nineteen
thousand students, Get your kids out of schools because this isn't something that just
happens in California. It's everywhere. It's everywhere. So they've got a lesson
planned. It centers around a twelve year old girl. They give this to
fifth graders who are at that age, right eleven to twelve. So a
twelve year old girl unsure of her gender identity, the film promotes the use
of puberty blockers to give her more time to decide. This school district has
also pledged forty million. They pledged in twenty twenty one forty million dollars to
develop and implement an ethnic studies curriculum. They spent over ninety thousand dollars on
a quote liberated ethnic Studies curriculum un quote, which was coming from an organization
that pushes critical race theory. They also spend fifty seven thousand dollars at an
organization called Woke Kindergarten. They're teaching critical race theory in kindergarten that is aimed
to quote disrupt whiteness. They're teaching hardcore racism to kids in kindergarten. What
do you think our society is going to be like? They're going to get
their race war. They're working real hard on it, and they're using our
money, and they're using your children if you're putting them in school. Another
twenty three thousand dollars with the questsol Education Services, an organization that teaches anti
racist math. Well, math doesn't have race in it unless you put it
in now, math is completely free of race. We look at what is
happening in Ohio. Governor Dwined there a Republican, and again over the holidays
he vetoed a bill that was set up to protect kids from being mutilated chemically,
surgically and so. Jack Windsor is a journalist out of Ohio and in
this interview where they talked to him about this, this is he was interviewed
by a Tennessee Star. He talks about the deep ties between the wine and
the medical industrial complex and by that he means both the hospitals as well as
big pharma. He works for the Ohio Press Network as a journalist, and
he said, you know, this goes back the guy who was interviewing him
at the Tennessee Star said, you know, you were probably the most disliked
journalists there during the lockdowns and stuff like that that this Republican governor was doing
the wine. He said, yeah, I guess if they would handed out
of those kinds of awards for the press, I would win that award hands
down. The guy said, you had ask him questions that he couldn't answer
about the COVID lockdowns and all the phony elements of the COVID report that they
had in Ohio. He says, yeah, we were just talking about the
data. Right, If the mass don't work, why aren't they working?
He said, That's just what we were talking about. We were talking about
any conspiracies or anything like that. We're just asking, you know, what's
the matter with the mask and why isn't that stuff working? He says,
Are we looking at the long term impact of these COVID policies? You know,
these are the kind of questions, frankly, that need to be asked
of Vivek Ramaswamy, because as we look at Governor Dwine and we look at
what he did during not just you know what he's doing now by vetoing this
legislation to protect children from so called doctors that want to mutilate them, we
go back and look at you know is it is a continuum going back to
the so called pandemic and it was Vivic Ramaswamy who was on the Wine's team.
That's damning enough to oppose Ramaswami right there. So anyway, he said
at one point he was out of answers because there's no correlation between what he
was doing and what was really going on with a virus. So instead of
saying, you know what, we may have gotten this wrong, they just
kicked people out who ask those hard questions. So we see that everywhere.
Have you heard Trump say that he got the vaccine wrong? No, No,
he doubles down on it. You know, he push him on it,
and he pushes back and tells you that he saved two hundred million people
or something, some nonsense that he just makes up. They will not admit
even to doing wrong, which tells you that they're not going to stop doing
wrong. He says, it would have this bill that was vetoed by Dwine
would have outlawed puberty blockers, cross sex hormones, and what we call gender
mutilation surgeries. It would have made it illegal for males to compete in girls'
sports and also invade their privacy in places like locker rooms. He said,
many people on the Republican side of the aisle, and I would even dare
say. One of Dwine's former advisors contacted me a day before Dwine vetoed the
bill and said, what's going on? This is a layup? He said,
why is this taking him so long to make a decision about this?
Well, we'd been investigating, and I unpacked some of the information that we
had gathered and I said, look, he's going to veto this, and
here's why I think he's going to do it. Do you remember Christinom.
Christinom who is traveling to Iowa because she's a great fit for Trump, and
she really is, you know, have neither of them have any principles?
Right? Trump is saying any protection against abortion is too harsh, and on
and on, pushed gun control by executive orders at that president, all these
other things Christinome. When a bill was presented to her, she vetoed it
as well. That bill was about sports men and women's sports, and she
vetoed that. So she's a good fit for him. So and he says.
Jack Windsor, the journalist from Ohio, says, his former advisor said,
in her opinion, said, look, he's just old the wine.
He's out of touch. He really just doesn't understand this is an issue.
He thinks this is really not an issue. And Jack Winsor said, no,
I don't buy that. He came out. He said that his reasoning
was that he'd had parents who told him that if it wasn't for these treatments,
their child would be dead. Yeah. Right, He says. He's
owned by the big drug companies and they're driving this kind of activism. He's
beholden to the medical industrial complex, just as he was during the lockdowns,
just as he was during the Here you take the jab and I'll enter you
in a lottery to possibly win a million dollars. Where did de wine get
that money? Well, Trump pages helicoptered in tons billions of dollars, tens
of billions of dollars to all these governors, to do exactly that type of
thing. But Dwine took the lead on that. That's another thing that Ramaswamy
needs to answer for. He was on his team. What did you say
about that? What did he have to do with that? So anyway,
Daily Caller did some research and found that DeWine received forty thousand dollars from children's
hospitals who support sex change procedures. Now, why don't the Republicans impeach him?
As I said before, you know, we should impeach Biden for crimes
of corruption like that. But you know, in this environment and in this
time, it's going to be perceived it's just tit for tat. It'll be
dismissed by the Democrats. They don't care about the corruption. I mean,
they don't care about the corruption from New Jersey Senator Menindez. He's been up
multiple times about corruption and now you know they're coming after him again. Lindsey
Graham, by the way, testified as a character witness for Menendez and his
pre vious corruption trial, because you know, you always want to have Lindsay
Graham as a character witness. No, they're on the same team when it
comes to the military industrial complex. Well, you know the Wine is on
the same team as the medical industrial complex and their medical martial law. So
he's paid off by them. Gave him forty thousand dollars. Look, it
doesn't matter whether they gave him forty million dollars or forty thousand dollars or forty
dollars. He's on their payroll. He took a bribe. It's just that
simple. Of course, the Democrats are not going to indict him for that
because they're all about the trans agenda, and the Republicans won't do it because
he's part of their party. He says. This is a five billion dollar
industry nationwide. He says, I've talked with representatives of the Senate President.
They seem to think they've got the votes to override the wines of Vetail.
They seem to be one hundred percent willing enabled to consider this and to provide
enough votes for a veto override. So he said, the final nail in
the coffin for me to know that Dwine was going to veto this bill was
the night before Lieutenant Governor of Ohio John Houston or Husted, I don't know
how I pronounce his name, said on Twitter. He said not verbatim,
but essentially he said, Hey, I believe this should be law. I
hope that goes into law. He said, so you could see him unhitching
his wagon from de Wine. This lieutenant governor in Ohio has got a problem.
He didn't unhitch, says journalist Jack Windsor. He didn't unhitch his wagon
from DeWine during COVID. Neither did Ramaswami. Dwine was really lucky and so
was the Lieutenant governor that the primary was far enough after the midst of how
they handled COVID that he didn't lose. If they would have had the primary
in the middle of that c is the Wine would have lost. But then
there's this who was it that gave him the money for what he did with
COVID that both the Wine and the Lieutenant governor doubled down on. Well,
it was Trump who is now saying now distancing himself from the guy that he
gave the money to to be a COVID dictator. Trump says, I'm finished
with this stiff, meaning the Wine, that Trump is hypocrite in chief.
Trump is somebody who not only funded DeWine's medical martial law on the million dollar
lotteries to take the jab and all the rest of this stuff. But he
is also a pioneer in all this transgender stuff, pushing men to get into
women's beauty contests. When he had Miss Universe, he was open to it,
he was bragging about it, he was supporting it. But see,
this is all for Trump. This is just a popularity contest, he says.
You know, whenever I do an event with the Wine, he gets
loudly booed every time I introduce him at the rally. So I'm done with
this stuff because this is nothing other than Trump's own perceived self interest. That's
what it's always about. So he's the person who pushed the transgenders into beauty
contests and one and all that stuff. But you know, this bill is
vetoed by to Wine. Now Trump has done with this guy because it prohibits
biological males from competing in women's sports. Doesn' say anything about beauty contests though,
and again, the person who wound up owning Miss Universe today had a
whole bunch of men in that beauty contest. And it's not just the beauty
contests and the sports other sports. USA boxing is now going to allow transgenders
to fight women beginning this year. Trump should be proud. He should be
proud. This is what he was talking about a long time ago. World
Boxing Council President Mauricio sulimaner I guess is way he pronounce his name call the
Telegraph that he's not happy with the ruling that his organization has sought to create
a unique division strictly for transgender athletes. This is a different This is the
World Boxing Council, whereas the US Boxing organization that's the name of US Boxing,
they're going to allow it. But the World Boxing Council guy said in
boxing, a man fighting a woman must never be accepted, regardless of gender
change. There should be no gray area around this, and we want to
go into it with transparency and correct decisions. Woman to man or man to
woman. Transgender change will never be allowed to fight a different gender by birth.
You don't change your gender and change your mind what you think you are,
but there is no changing your gender. So you know, maybe we
could still have professional wrestling opened up to women. I don't know. That's
where Donald Trump hangs out, because he really is the master of professional wrestling.
Whether we're talking about the actual theatrical stuff or the professional wrestling of politics
will be right back. Whether you're feeling like the booze or bluegrass. APS
Radio has you covered. Check out a wide variety of channels on our app
at APS radio dot com. You're listening to the David Knight Show. Well,
we were talking about the Methodist Church in the UK. Maybe it's in
the US as well, where they were changing the terms that they're going to
refer to people. Don't call them husband and wife, don't call them mother
and father. These are offensive things. We should run away from them.
Calvin Robinson had a substack talking about this, the Methodist Church branding husband and
wife as offensive. You know, it was years ago James Dobson, who
did had Focus on the Family said about the Methodist Church. He said,
you know when I was when they started embracing all this LGBT stuff, He
said, when I was going up, he said, the difference between the
Baptists and the Methodists was that the Baptist didn't think that you could lose your
salvation and the Methodist did. But now he said, you know, it's
they've completely gone off track. You know the reality is the Methodists have lost
the plot altogether, not just understanding what it takes to be saved. They've
lost the entire plot because they've lost the Bible. They no longer care.
What they do is they bring the zeitgeist of society into their church. So
as the Calvin Robinson said, he said, you know you ban these terms
because they said it conveys an assumption that is not the reality for many people.
Well, it determines reality. What is the objective truth? Especially for
somebody who claims to be a Christian? He said, living in grace is
not a reality for many people, So should we avoid using the word grace?
He says, difficult to get one's head around the idea that ministers should
stop using particular words in case a minority of people find them be offensive.
The question has to be asked, so what so what if they find it
offensive? Does not know that these people not know that the Gospel, which
is good news, is an offense to most people. There are many people
who find the Bible offenses. So should we throw it out altogether? Of
course not. But so is the idea of no longer using regular English terms
like husband and wife, which have clear and unoffensive meanings. There's nothing inclusive
about excluding the traditional use of the English language, or for that matter,
reject being the institutions that were created by God, the family first institution.
Where is all this coming from, he says, Well, the manipulation of
our language is coming not from Christianity, but from Marxism, critical race theory
and critical theories. Our contemporary take on Marxism, the neo Marxism is an
amended, extended, and adapted form of Marxism for the twenty first century.
He says, Marxism forces the overwriting or the replacing of what is appropriate or
acceptable. They do this with everything. It's just like tearing down statues,
historical statues. Everything must be erased and altered, he says. Liberals would
say that disordered lifestyles are equal to ordered lifestyles, but Marxists would go a
step further. They say that disorder must replace order, because that's how they
come to power. Let me justthethically put in here. You know, as
we look at the press and how they focus on whenever they can find somebody
who is, you know, identifies as a Christian or as a pastor,
or as a priest or whatever, and they're involved in some kind of a
sexual crime or violence or angersome. And here's an example of this. You
got a pastor in North Carolina. His wife was working at McDonald's and she
called him up. She said she was being disrespected by the cook. And
so this guy goes to McDonald's. He grabs a guy by the throat and
he tries to push him into the deep friar. And the only reason I'm
covering this and the police came and arrested him. They got the camera footage,
surveillance footage showing exactly what happened. The only reason I'm covering it is
because of this this great headline from Zero Hetch talking about it. They call
it baptism by friar. I thought that was hilarious. But anyway, it
is a shame that, you know, we have whenever something like that happens,
they will hold us to those standards. They won't hold themselves to those
standards. When we look at what happened in Iowa with the Satanic display there,
John Harris says the Founding Fathers are now meeting the pluralist Satanists. In
December of twenty twenty three, fault lines emerged within the ranks of both conservatives
and evangelicals after a Navy pilot destroyed a Baphomet statue depicting Satan in the Iowa
state Capitol. Now, I've talked about this and I've said, you know,
the bottom line is is that these Satanists are not exercising religious liberty because
they don't have a religion. What they're doing is they're anti free speech,
they're anti free exercise of religion. They're anti God, they're anti Christ.
They don't believe any of this stuff, and they want to urge all of
it. It is kind of a Marxist issue here, very much like that,
trying to purge things. They don't have a religion that they believe.
They are anti religion, Antichrist, all the rest of this stuff. But
I also said, you know, I agree with this guy essentially knocking it
down. I'm fine with that. But what is interesting is the fact that
you've got people like John Dunwell, who's a Christian Missionary Alliance pastor and a
representative in the state of Iowa elected representative, one of the first to publicly
use the logic of religious neutrality to support the statue's presence. I don't think
they were called to be silent. I don't think we're called to be neutral.
He said he didn't want the state evaluating and making determinations about religions.
Well, neither do I. But this is not a religion, and nobody
is questioning the Satanist's religion. Nobody's asking, well, what do you really
believe? You know, you really believe that they are openly saying they don't
believe any of this stuff. They're openly saying that they're doing this in order
to shut down any free exercise of religion. That's what they're doing. So
it's not like you're setting up some kind of an inquisition as they did to
soldiers in the military. Do you really have a religious objection to this vaccine?
Well, explain this to me, and then trying to trick them and
trap them up seat you're taking this other stuff over here, and they used
a test for No, it's not any of that kind of stuff. These
people are openly telling you they don't believe what they say their religion is,
and they're openly telling you that they're against you having free speech, you having
free exercise. And then you had a Presbyterian pastor Scott Clark, who said
Christians should not engage in iconoclasm, in other words, tearing down icons any
reason that since the Iowa State Capital is a secular building, their religious displays
of any kind should be present there, including Nativity scenes. He doesn't understand
at all. He doesn't. This is a guy who is a pastor.
He doesn't understand either Christianity and he doesn't understand the principles of establishment versus exercises.
As I've always said, So there is no neutral position. Right when
you come to preferred pronouns, and you come to drag queens, and you
come to mutilation by chemicals and surgery, is there a neutral position in that?
No, there isn't. So the Satanic Temple essentially exploits America's tradition of
religious toleration in order to destroy that religious toleration. So why do we play
that game with them? So that's my first take on it. Jenna Ellis,
who represented Trump and then tearfully repented of all that. Jenna Ellis is
now weighed in on this. She says, we don't I want to create
a theocracy that doesn't allow religious freedom. But they point out in this substanc
in seventeen eighty seven, when the federal Constitution was ratified. Nine state constitutions
included Christian religious test requirements for officeholders, including adherence to doctrines such as the
Trinity and the inspiration of Scripture. The four remaining states were governed by explicitly
Christian royal charters or constitutions. New York, one of the states that did
not have a religious test, said in their constitution of seventeen seventy seven that
quote, free exercise of worship and liberty of conscience shall not be so construed
as to excuse acts of licentiousness. Not only did all thirteen states recognize God,
but they exclusively preferred Christianity in seventeen eighty six of Virginia Statute for Religious
Freedom that Jefferson was so proud of. That's what he wanted on his tombstone,
not the Decoration of Independence, but the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom.
That statute's immediate impact was to foster a greater peace between competing Christian denominations by
ending compelled worship. And see, that's what establishment is, and that's the
difference between the establishment of religion and the free exercise of religion, and that
is government compulsion, they would compel people to go to a particular church,
or compel people to pay for a church. None of that is involved.
And that was always the case. As a matter of fact, into the
eighteen forty something you had Massachusetts still had a state church. Of course,
that's long after the Constitution was ratified and eighty seven, and after the Bill
of Rights in seventeen eighty nine, they still had an established state church.
I don't agree with that, But the First Amendment doesn't even prohibit a state
established church. First Amendment prohibits the Congress from a stateablishing that because all the
states had established those. But again, the issue here is compelling people versus
allowing them to freely exercise in the public square what they believe. And that
is what came in the middle of the twentieth century with a Supreme Court,
and that is what the Satanists are busy trying to do. But as we
see in school district, after school district, and here's another article about their
after school satan club and a Kansas school, let me just say this isn't
the school itself a club, a Satanist club. What they teach the kid,
they give them pornography, they teach them they're the wrong body, They
teach them to hate people because of the color of their skin. Isn't that
a school of Satan? And isn't the Iowa State Capitol Building largely a monument
to Satan when we look at the policies. But the bottom line is that
God can use even this, as I've pointed out before, when they put
the Satan clubs in, what it does, is it They're putting these after
school Satan clubs in because they want to get rid of the after school Bible
clubs. And yet when they go in and they do this, people look
at it and then they say, this is this is pretty crazy. They
find out about the after school Bible programs that they didn't know about before.
You say, God can use any of this stuff to further what he wants
to do. You know, as we began by saying that the United Methodist
Church wants to get rid of even the term husband and wife and mother and
father. You have a movement, and a lot of it I think is
just kind of a style type of thing, you know, TikTok type of
thing, the trad wife movement. But there was an article on the Epic
Times about a twenty two year old who quits her job and becomes a traditional
wife. At first, she's talking about how she just loves the nineteen forties
on it, so this is very much of a style thing. But it
is a bit deeper than that because as she gets into it and talks about
how, you know, they met through mutual friends and everything, and she
said, I'm doing this because my purpose is and glorify God, and I
don't see that very much in modern society. Well, I don't see it
at all either, And that really is the issue. You know, we
look at this how we're going to live our lives. What is the purpose
of our lives? Is the purpose of our life to honor God. It's
a purpose of my life to try to get as big an audiences. No,
I don't care. I've got an audience of one. I've got an
audience of one, and that's what I do this for. And because it
bothers me again to see people sniping and killing and tricking and imprisoning people.
I don't like that kind of corruption. We'll be right back in a world
of deceit. Telling the truth is a revolutionary act. You're listening to The
David Knight Show looking for better information. Apsradionews dot com features articles and commentary
along with audio from all the top news from around the world. Apsradionews dot
com. Let's talk about money before our guest comes on from the Last American
vagamond. We're going to talk about fluoride. But US national it has now
topped thirty four trillion in the first time in history. It's just grown by
leaps and bounds since twenty twenty when Trump began the PPP stuff. But think
about that thirty four trillion dollars. That's more than one hundred thousand dollars per
man, woman and child in the United States. I guess maybe we need
to bring in more illegal aliens to help pay this off. Well, no,
the problem is that two thirds of the illegal aliens who come in are
on welfare. That's why I've said it's the magnet that nobody wants to do
anything about, right, It's the magnet of welfare. We got in California,
Gavin Newsom first state to offer full insurance to illegal aliens. And so
again it's all Cloud and Piven. That's you know, opening up the floodgates.
So we can bankrupt this state. But you know they can do it
even without the illegal aliens with all of their trillions of dollars of handouts that
they're warned at the very beginning were going to be gamed and it was going
to be corrupt, that there was no controls on that. I've talked about
that in the past. Just four decades ago, the national debt hovered around
nine hundred and seven billion, zero point nine zero point nine trillion. Now
it's thirty four trillion, growing by you know, six or seven trillion a
year under Trump and Biden. And so that was happening forty years ago.
I remember the left raging at Ronald Reagan look at this exploding deficit. But
it's the same kind of stuff that you see Speaker Johnson doing. Now.
You know, it was always you vote for mine and I'll vote for years,
and so you got Johnson who's saying, well, let's let's spend some
money on the US border protecting it, and I'll open up the floodgates for
you to send money to Ukraine. It's that type of thing, that type
of thing that exploded the deficit forty years ago. But again it's now thirty
four times bigger. Even more worrisome is that the spike in interest rates of
the past year and a half has made the cost of servicing the debt more
expensive because, of course, as interest rates rise and the deficit is exploding,
and the interest rates have gone up further and faster than we've ever seen
in the past, not at a higher rate now than they got in the
nineteen eighties, but going up at a faster rate. Interest payments in the
national debt are projected to be the fastest growing part of the federal budget over
the next three decades. For example, payments are expected to triple from nearly
four hundred and seventy five billion dollars in fiscal year twenty twenty two to a
stunning one point four trillion dollars by twenty thirty two, one and a half
trillion dollars just on interest. Who gets that federal reserve? Why why are
we paying them this? And of course they're going to be passing that on
to people who bought their Federal Reserve bonds and other things like that. The
whole system, the interest payments are projected to surge to five point four trillion
by twenty fifty three. By twenty fifty three, five point four trillion dollars
just on interest on the debt, and that depends on what they're going to
do with the interest rates could be worse. That's more than the US spends
on Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and all other mandatory and discretionary spending
programs. Let me just say this, under the constitution, there's not really
any there's no mandates in the constitution for them to spend a cent. They
have some responsibility for defense, which they won't do. They won't even defend
our borders. But all the rest of these programs that are entitlement programs that
they say they have no discretion whatsoever about, those are unconstitutional, all of
them. So what do you do about this? How do you get out
of this system? Well, again, gold gets you out of that system.
It really does. And so that's one of the key reasons to to
try to get out of gold. And a lot of people are starting to
realize this. First it was Costco, Now it's Walmart. You know.
Costco said we sold one hundred million dollars and gold, and now Walmart is
selling gold and silver. As one person on Twitter, Crypto Rich said,
are you awake yet? This is a financial change, a spike today in
the price of gold, and it's attracting every last buyer, including Walmart and
Costco buyers. You know, they're all under the fear of missing out.
You know, gold is taken off and we got a as Tony Arduben the
Wise wolf Gold always says, you know, when you look at when the
price of gold spikes up, everybody wants to rush in and buy it.
You should rush in and buy it when it drops even or just buy it
all. You know gradually over a period of time. Is he set up
wolf Pack to do that? Because what you want to do is you want
to get out of this system, this bankrupt system, and you want to
get out of the web, the net that they are designing for everybody with
CBDC. So yeah, fear of missing out, but it's always a good
time to get out of this fake system. And understand that the spikes again,
as Tony's always pointed out, the spikes are just variations in this fiat
currency. You know, you look at what gold buys in terms of and
there's been a lot of people have done various things. I remember the one
that we talked about a suit. You know, one hundred years ago,
somebody buys a suit and they travel to Europe and they were able to do
all that with gold. And how much gold did it take for a custom
suit? And how much does that cost today in terms of fiat currency?
And you know it stays the goal stays about the same, but the fiat
currency way more, way more costco and Walmart's gold rush comes as goal prices
have swored fourteen percent since early October to a record new high of two thousand
and eighty eight this week. Gold's strength has been underpinned by traders aggressive pricing
of Federal Reserve rate cuts. As one person says, who's the portfolio manager
of Tiberius Group, He says, gold is the answer from many things at
the moment, whether it's inflation or whether it's carrying on, or whether it's
rate cuts with uncertainty or very costly wars. But it doesn't even mention what
I think is the biggest reason that is CBDC Free Thought Project does the cbdc's
roll out. You've got different groups of crypto companies that are very connected to
the globalist elite, and they're all competing with each other and making alliances with
each other, some of them making alliances with Bill Gates and some of them
making alliances with the World Economic Forum. But they're all trying to position their
product to be the blockchain infrastructure for CBDC. That's what they're all trying to
do. And so he starts off by talking about interests. Elba, the
actor who has done an elaborate promotional video for an organization called Stellar, saying
that this is going to help marginalize people. Who've you heard this argument before.
We've heard it from Bill Gates when he's pushing the ID number for everybody
in India the ODDHAR system. Well, everybody needs to have an ID.
These people are marginalized. They're out of the system, and we've got to
get them in the system. Now. They want many of them would like
to have more money, but they want to be out of the system.
They are like, oh, how can I get an ID? Right?
And so they sell this as saying, well, this is going to open
up borderless opportunities. Well, borderless because it's going to be a global CBDC.
That's what they're really pushing for. Unlimited Hangout went through and looked at
the relationships between these people. And it's kind of interesting because there's three of
them. There's this one from Stellar, and then there's also Ethereum, and
then there's also Ripple that are all positioning themselves and they look at the relationship
with these men. They're all tied one way or the other to the World
Economic Form or to Bill Gates. You know. They have these different you
know, power coalitions that are forming to try to set up some kind of
a global currency. What I thought was interesting was that they were all founded
about the same time. Ripple came in and twenty twelve they called it open
Coin. Then in twenty fourteen, Stellar was a spinoff of Ripple that was
in twenty and fourteen, and then in twenty fourteen you also had Ethereum created
by the Italic bouterin if I'm pronouncing his name correctly anyway. So you have
these these three competitors, one of them created in twenty fourteen. Two of
them are twenty twelve, two of them in twenty fourteen. And I find
that very interesting because it was in twenty and fifteen, I believe the first
time I remember seeing it was that they began to be very specific about the
UN twenty thirty Agenda. It was twenty fifteen, about a year or two
after these currencies started coming out, because it is such a fundamental part of
all of that. Prior to that, they had talked about Agenda twenty one,
the UN Agenda twenty one, sometime in the twenty first century, we're
going to pack everybody into these massive, mega smart cities. And then they
got into a very certain date, and it was about that time started saying
you will own nothing, we will control everything. So it is Ethereum,
and even in Ethereum, Budarin, who was one of the co founders of
that, is saying, well, you know, there's some really dystopian things
that CBDC can be used for. But you're starting to see all the big
corporations, whether it is MasterCard or whether it's Stripe, all joining together on
one of these three players. Peter Thiel is connected with Stellar, and so
as open AI's Sam Altman, so they're pushing together on that side of it.
In terms of Ethereum and Booterin. In a September twenty twenty three interview,
he said, these digital currencies can provide convenience, but they end up
being even less private and they basically break down all of the existing barriers against
both corporations and government. At the same time, it said in twenty twenty
two, the crypto itself has a lot of dystopian potential if implemented wrong,
and so that's where we are. You know, they have points out in
this article going back even looking at connections to the CIA, connections to the
NSSA. Bitcoin Secure hash algorithm two fifty six was actually developed by a mathematician
who is now the chief mathematician at the NSSA. So a lot of people
have said, well, Bitcoin was developed by the NSA. They point out
that this algorithm had been made public before Bitcoin came out. But nevertheless,
you've had the CIA bragging about how blockchain technology is quote a powerful but underutilized
forensic tool for governments to identify illicit activity and bring criminals to justice. That's
CIA Deputy Director Michael Morrell. You see, it is, as he said,
it's a boon for surveillance. That's one of the things that I have
a problem with with cryptocurrency. It's one of the reasons why I prefer goal
because I'm not interested in the investment aspect of it or the whereas gold relative
to the continually fluctuating price or you know, of value of the fiat currency.
My concern is really about the surveillance aspect of it, and that's what
is open to people with blockchain. Yes, there are some, you know,
there's Monaro, and there's the pirate coin. I can't remember the exact
name of it, something about pirate coin, but and I've interviewed him before,
one of the people involved with that. But it is that connection to
surveillance that I think is the big issue. So we're about to join our
guests here. Let's just say one more thing as we do. This is
from an article called the End of Money as we know It, which is
kind of a paraphrase of the end of the world as we know it,
you know, when everybody's talking about prepping for a total disaster. He says,
the central banks prepare the way for digital currencies, which are the closest
thing to surveillance disguised as money. Reserves of value are more needed than ever
before. Gold is likely to be a good decorrelated asset that protects against the
debasement of sovereign bonds and of domestic currencies, as well as surveillance, and
so that's why I'm proud to have Tony as a sponsor. As a support
of this program, David Knight dot Gold is what he's set up to take
you to wise wolf Gold and you can you know, unlike Costco and Walmart,
he will lock in the price for you. They'll tell you I'm sorry,
I'm just out of it right now. He'll get you a good price.
He'll lock in the price for whatever you want, large or small,
and you can purchase that on a regular basis with Wolfpack. So we're going
to take a quick break before we do. By the way, let me
just read out some of the names of people who have supported us in December.
These are December checks that we got. Really do appreciate this. As
I said before, it's going to be a difficult year, I think,
because there's a lot of people, even people listen to this program. As
I was talking about earlier, you just don't under stand my opposition to Trump
for whatever reason. But that's only going to escalate. So I really do
appreciate the support that we got. Let me read through the list real quickly
here, because we don't have any other way to get back to the people
who have supported us through cards and via mail. Fred and Jackie Faye super
Faye, thank you, Tom and Rachel L, Lloyd P. Philip and
Kelly M, Jennifer L, Stephanie K, John R, Ronald C.
John W. Jack, H, Mary Ellen, M, Ti S,
Jeremy and Amanda, David and Anne, Marie N, Bob S, Minor,
Mike Gonzalo, M M A G. Just the initials and Joshua S.
David and Wie W, Robin R. Richard R, Heidi W.
Tom and Nancy KA Charlie S. Thank you very much. And again that's
Aps and Linda E. And Ron and Deborah H. Thank you very much.
Amos Pool also mentioned st a sentate book as well as that and W.
Jack. Thank you all of you for the support. We couldn't do
this program without your support. We're going to take a quick break and when
we come back, we're going to talk to Ryan Christian with the Last American
Vagabond. We've got a lot of things we want to talk about. We're
going to talk about floridation. We're going to talk about an article that he's
got there about the pathology of the m RNA trump shots as discovered by recently
passed away pathologists who came out of retirement to look at the mr mRNA pathology,
and also about Pfizer and digital IDs and Gaza, because this is about
controlling people. We'll be right back here news now at Apsradionews dot com or
get the APS radio apps and never miss another story. You're listening to the
David Knight Show, all right. Joining us now is Ryan Christian of the
Last American Vagabond dot com. And I wanted to get Ryan on. I
talked about a landmark fluoride lawsuit. I saw this reprinted on Free Thought Project,
but of course it goes back quite a while. The Last American Vagabond
has been covering this fluoride trial going back to November of last year, but
November of twenty twenty two, and then again in the summer because this is
something that has drug on for years in legal limbo and it's now about to
come back up in January. So I wanted to get Ryan on to talk
about that and some other issues. Thank you for joining us. Ryan,
Hey, my pleasure. David. It's an honor to be on with you.
It's a lot of our audience Overlaps and Beans something that people have been
asking for for a long time. So it's my pleasure to join. Well,
thank you, thank you, it's great to have you on and especially
I thought it was very important, and I had not noticed this lawsuit until
you've picked it up and you've been on it. As you pointed out,
the mainstream media and even conservative media is not really talking about what's going on
this floorid lawsuit. Bring us up to date and as to some of the
aspects of this, and we can talk a little bit about what we anticipate
is going to happen as it resumes really in this month, but give people
kind of a back ground of what's been happening with us. Yeah, First
of all, the credit really goes to Derek Brose, writer for The Last
American Bagbaugh, who also runs The Conscious Resistance, who he's been doing this
work on this specific topic even before the as we've termed it, the fluoride
trial began. So a lot of great credit goes to Derek Brose for keeping
up on this when so many others are. You know, it's such an
important topic and so many others, including independent media, aren't really talking about
this and it's such an important shift in the understanding, and so for people
to understand, there's been a debate about fluoride in your water for a long
time, and a quick small background on that. It really breaks down to
being a byproduct that was I mean, think of it this way. It's
a byproduct that these companies would otherwise have to pay to dispose of, but
ultimately now pay to put into our water under the argument that it somehow benefits
our teeth, which I mean, I make the joke all the time where
it's like, our government barely wants to take care of us in serious ways,
but we're going to pretend we're going to pay money to keep our teeth
white. It just doesn't make any sense. And even then you could talk
about floridos the dental fluorosis of the teeth, which is what actually happens when
people have too much fluoride. But so really this has been put in our
water under you could argue that they think it's good for you or not.
The point is that the information over a very long period of time, and
it's been it goes back a long time period study after period study finds that
it is damaging. Now there's a whole level when you get into the different
science and different opinions of how damaging. But let's be clear, it is
not healthy for you, and it has a lot of dangerous effects. It
is neurotoxic. And I'll get into the studies that are showing this. The
most important point they're pushing in the trial right now is that it is actually
hurting your children. It is reducing the IQ of your children, and it
is in fact neurotoxic and it has a lot of delitarious effects. Now the
point of the trial, now, this came in regard to the nation National
Toxicology Program basically trying to push investigate this study, this toxicology report, where
they're trying to basically get this study to be seen and acknowledged by the US
government. Now at the moment, they been dragging their feet on this for
I think over four years since this report has been completed. Now, this
is the important part, and this is largely because of the fluoride action network.
I mean almost entirely. They've been really driving this entire thing. And
the report has been finished, the report has been stated to be finished,
and every single time it comes to a sort of a point of culmination,
they argue something's needed. We need another report, we need another evaluation this
time. And this is you know, there's a lot we could get into
in between all of that, right, And what it came down to in
the last year Derek's been covering this is they essentially said, look, we
have the report that's done, It has all the information included. You guys
have checked off on it. Just because you want another group that's not included
to reevaluate this does not change the fact that the report has been completed and
it shows exactly what you guys are trying to refuse to show. And all
that ultimately happened was interestingly enough, of all people, Rachel Levine put her
basically stepped in and said, no, we're going to pause this and this
is publicly discussed until further notice. And that was after all these differ delays.
Now Judge Chen, who is the one who's been involved in this entire
process, basically agreed with this. You can sense frustration through these processes and
this entire time it's been done via zoom because of COVID nineteen. Are the
illusion they're in. And now what's happened today or rather over the last so
many months weeks is they ultimately Judge Chen came back and said, Okay,
we're going to have the final push for this. It's going to be in
person. So one thing, we're trying to fly out or we're going to
be flying out Derek to cover this in person, trying to raise some funds
for that, and he's going to be going either way. And what we're
expecting is the actual culmination here where I don't see how they can get away
with another dragging of their feet. This is going to be the moment we're
hoping where they essentially go, Okay, the report is public, here's what
it shows, and then it really is a game of who chooses to acknowledge
it, which we already know how that works. Oh yeah, but it's
there and the evidence is astoundingly clear. Well, you know, it's interesting,
and you talk about this in your articles as well as CDC says,
so this is our crowning achievement, you know, the twentieth century until I
guess they get their MR and A vaccines. But really what we're talking about
here above and beyond the debate over medical issues, is we're talking about coarse
consumption or course treatment, right, and so in that way, it ties
to what we've just been through with the medical martial law in the last couple
of years, very tightly to that. We see the CDC is going to
decide whether going to put in your body one way or the other, put
it in the water supply or put it in and course you through you know,
the vaccine programs. You're not going to go anywhere, do anything,
or have a job unless you get this. So they're all about this forced
medication and to me, that ought to be the showstopper right there. You
know, even we got a lot of data that's gone over a lot of
years. Harvard even did a study talking about the correlation between lower IQ and
children and fluoridation in the water. So you know, we can have these
arguments, and we should have these arguments about this, but to me,
it kind of feels like, for the longest time, it feels like,
you know, the debate that we had over just the MRI vaccine. You
know, it's like, well, this is something is new, it's not
been tested, but regardless, you don't have any right to coerce me into
this. And that's really what is that the basis of all this fluorite stuff.
It's big corporations working with CDC for their financial benefit, and they're forcing
you to consume this stuff. That's that's the worst thing. Not only are
they ripping us off, but they're poisoning us and one way after the other,
aren't they. Yeah, that's such an important point, and I exactly
where I'm coming from in this is that obviously we should be engaging with the
fact that these things are dangerous and they're killing people and in the sense of
the COVID nineteen injections, and that's an important primary part of this. But
obviously the central conversation should be around whether or not it's dangerous. Do they
have the right to just coerce you into doing this or I mean, I
agree with the word coerce in this, however, but people would argue that
essentially it's not being coerced, that's being put but ultimately the same conversation,
right that you are. You ultimately don't have a choice here unless you want
to. And this is the choice game they play with the COVID nineteen injections.
Well you can go buy bottled water. Well, not everybody has the
option to do that, and ultimately it's not healthy anyway. So I think
it's an early example of how they were trying to and to your point,
go back and state for this long period of time that that's our crowning achievement,
trying to create the illusion, the understanding, the impression that this was
a success. And that's why that's the precedent for X, Y and Z
coming next. And there's been conversations about lithium in the water. I mean,
I often point to this a study that's been done more than once in
fact, where at high levels, ANDIH was one of them discussing that should
there be a need for some kind of in this case, it was a
bioethics like an mRNA conversation, a need for something like that to be done
compulsory like we saw with COVID nineteen. They'd argue time and again that it
should be done secretly because well, they don't understand and that wasn't peer reviewed
science, that was before COVID nineteen. So I think that plays a factor.
But the whole point is the mindset of what they think they're allowed to
do, whether or not really it's counterdeow constitutional rights, and they know that
that's right. And as we look at this to bring this up to date
and to look forward into the future. We now see these people because hey,
we know that you don't like to get the shots, and so we're
not going to stick a needle in your arm. Instead, we got these
other forms of delivery, including aerosol mRNA, So there's a lot of talk
about that. Let's talk about putting it into our food, mRNA shots and
things like that. So again, if we let this principle stand that they
can put stuff in without our knowledge, without our consent, they're going to
find a way to do that with many other products, and probably already are
you know, it's certainly food additives and other things like that that are happening,
and the way they've contaminated so many things. But again, wherever we
see this, we need to oppose this openly. What they're trying to do
in a hidden way without our consent, and it's going to come across a
whole spectrum of things. Let me also point out too, something else that
I think correlates with the vaccine stuff, and that is the dosage. Right,
how do you control the dosage for something that you jump into the water.
Well, I think the answer is that you don't you know, they
can come up with a concentration of it, but that's not necessarily going to
the concentration that you get out of it. And then when you dump it
into the water, you're giving the same dosage of this to a baby that
you're giving to a two hundred pound man. Okay, So how do they
justify something like that? And when you look at the mRNA aspect of it,
when you had the mRNA shots going out, we now know from looking
at these different lots that different lots varied by factor of thirty three from the
lowest to the highest dosage. The highest dosage was thirty three times which you
would get at the lowest dosage. To me, that looks very much like
what they're doing in terms of dumping this stuff in the water. And if
you don't control for dosage, any medication, even something that's beneficial, turns
into a poison. Yes, we all said exactly, And I think this
overlaps with the first point you made in regard to the m RNA where it's
going. But you know, the first obvious point there is such an important
thing to think about, is that they in any number of these conversations,
you can see that kind of disregard for the dose conversation actually, and I
wanted to point out that in regard to a lot, I think that's a
really important conversation that we that still needs more investigation. But one of the
arguments that I want people to remember is I think it was Ryan Cole made
the argument that it's not necessarily that that proves that was a deliberate act,
which I'm completely considering that it is, but that he argues that it's part
of it is that they are the m RNA essentially, or rather the lipid
nanoparticles broke down and in ultimately that then changed or altered the dose comparatively in
one case anyway, and argue that in some cases that might have actually saved
people's lives. But you know, the m r and itself is dangerous by
protein and so on. But to your other point, and I just want
to include that because I think it's fascinating kind of where look, just so
it's clear, I one percent think there was deliberate mouthfisence and then deliberate actual
criminal action to hurt people. I really believe that. But it's interestant to
think about the fact that overlapped with that there was just simple mistakes by people
that don't care about your safety in you know, in conclusion, in combination.
But to your other let me say, before we look at that,
you know, when we look at that, and I made this point,
when we looked at it, it's like a factor of thirty three. It's
like thirty three hundred percent more dosage. Said, how in the world does
this happen in pharmaceutical world? Right? Yeah, they're so careful about the
dosages and the quantities that they put out there. And they have to be
because, as I said before, it turns into a poison. How could
you have a manufacturer that's kind of again, maybe it's something about the lipid
nanoparticles breaking down. I don't know, but it seems to me that is
so extreme. I can't imagine how that could be done in a pharmaceutical environment
without deliberate malfeasance with that or whatever you want to call it, maliciousness,
you know, but it seems to be that it have to be a deliberate
process. But go ahead to the other point, Well, and I agree
completely. I think that really it matters obviously whether it's delibered or not.
But in the larger sense, it kind of doesn't. It just shows you
that either way, obviously, it still leans in the point that we should
have a choice here, either there making so many mistakes that are killing people
or they're choosing to It kind of amounts to the same point. But on
the other side of it, the m R and a part of it.
To overlap that with what you were saying, it's exactly one of my biggest
fears around all of this is either the step that's already taken that we're unaware
of or that we haven't acknowledged, or that is about to happen, which
is in regard to the self spreading and really the same one step before that,
the self amplifying vaccines, which I think that's what this already is.
They've already argued this. One of Pfizer's earliest documents said self amplifying in regard
to their Pfizer BNT two one B two. I think that series and then
that went away, and all that really needs is that essentially continues to produce
the spike protein in a simplified way, and that's what we know is happening
already. As I think doctor Peter mccolaugh in an unchallenged peer if you'd study
that still stands on Elisa her the sustained synthesis of the spike protein, that's
what we're seeing. It's undeniable, and we'll get into Arnt burkhartt same point,
finding spike protein and all over the body and the same kind of things.
But my point is that the self spreading, which I again question whether
that might have already been used. The omicron overlap, that seems to be
kind of a similar point and where it started in Botswana or where they claim
it was South Africa and diplomats that we can't verify that came from Botswana,
you know, diplomatic community. It seems like something was executed there. My
point, though, is that self spreading, whether happening or next step is
it keeps me up at night. We're talking about something that's already been designed.
They've talked about this going back as far as I don't know if you're
familiar with it, but it's called insect Allies. It was a CDC program
that scientists around the world signed documents saying, you know, we know what
you're doing. This is dual use technology. It's a weapon, and they
made it. But they just kind of walked it back. Now we're talking
about the same concept with with pathogens or whatever you want to understand it as,
where it's something that can be released that literally spreads from person to person
and they proudly say and it inoculates these people and there's no need for informed
consent, like that's a proud statement coming from the people discussing this. That
really concerns me. And to your point, there's no dosage there. You
can get back, you know, inoculated whatever you want to call it,
over and over and over if you're around the same people with the same thing
happening. I don't know how they make sense of that. And you know,
there's also, you know, besides the aerosol delivery that they're talking about
and putting it in food they're talking about, there's also the issue of shedding.
I was just talking to a friend this last weekend back in Austin,
and he never took the vaccine, but he's he's got very sick with COVID
and it's taken out his hearing in one ear as he's so congested with He
went to the dog, didn't get into his chest into pneumonia, but he
went to the doctor and they were doing some blood tests and they were trying
to draw the blood out and he said it literally took them like twenty minutes
to get a sufficient amount of blood to come out. He said, the
blood just wasn't flowing. The technicians said, have you had a problem like
this before? He us, no, it's his blood was super, super
thick. And so the question is, you know, is this something that
is spreading even to unvaccinated people. They don't want there. They have nothing
but contempt for our consent, that's the key thing. And they don't follow
any procedures or testing, you know, they don't. They don't even pretend
to do testing to see if this stuff is safe or not. We've had
that discussion through this MR and A stuff all along. And that's really began
though with fluoride many many years ago. As you point out, it was
an industrial waste product that they would have had to pay a lot of money
to get rid of. It's used as rat poison in China. And yet
if they told everybody that this is going to be something's going to help your
teeth, they could get paid to dump it into our water. That's the
most amazing thing, isn't it? It is? It is. And one
more point before we go, if we go back to Florida, just that
the overlap there you made is so important that it's This is why I'm convinced
this was not by accident. That every single choice made, whether we're talking
about the choice to make people wear cloth masks, where a payovid study in
twenty fifteen proved that increase your risk of illness, every choice that was made
deliberately seemed to well, I think deliberately seemed to increase all the problems.
But if the overlap of both mechanisms here or redligious aspects of it, the
m r and A itself, as you pointed out, is at least now
being discussed, as I think it was an overlap of MIT and Harvard of
the both the aerosolization of it and as well as the fact that it can
be deployed, you know, via particle like so they can release all the
nanoparticles and it can inoculate you in the same way. They say, So,
that's one side of it, and let's not forget the technology. They
argue is that m RNA is the instruction to create the spike protein But then,
as you point out, the spike protein itself, however, that comes
along in and of itself, is cytotoxic. That Salk Institute proved that with
a pyravieed study, and the point was that itself, and this was the
main point. They said, the spike protein is capable of shedding, or
rather they did in that stity they didn't say shedding, but rather just the
in and of itself can cause disease, which means that gives you symptoms,
which means it can then be spread. So whatever you want to call that,
how is that not a self spreading concept? I mean that's what we're
you know, you get the spike protein is delivered, then it spreads to
somebody else. But the real problem is that we also know as doctor Warren,
Luigi Warren, who was one of the primary people in regard to this
technology itself, the discovery of m RNA, said that yes, of course
it can shed. Rather the spike protein itself, he said, of course
it can shed, but he argued at the time that it was not likely
to get you sick because the amount was so small. But we've then later
come to find out that it was sustained synthesis. So it's all there if
you really just look at the information. So you're definitely spreading spike protein.
And to your question, I really don't know whether it's a risk. I
would imagine it clearly is to the average person. But you know, it's
about keep being healthy and fighting things off like anything, you know, But
ultimately I think that's a deliberate action. Oh yeah, yeah, I said.
From the very beginning, I said, okay, so as they're describing
this self replicating, and you know, as Trump had his little dog and
Pony show, he went around the table, how long is it going to
take you? That's too long, next person is faster, and then they
finally get to the punchline. It's like, well, we can do it
right now, because we can turn your body into a manufacturing plant. And
I said, okay, So as they're describing this sounds like cancer or something,
I said, how you turn this thing off? You know, how
do you stop this? And it turns out, as people are starting to
see, no, it doesn't turn off. It keeps going on, it
keeps replicating, it keeps amplifying, as you pointed out. And so that's
that's where we are with this but again, I think the fluoride thing is
healthy, is important from a health standpoint, and I think it's also important
that people see the bigger picture and how this has been done for many decades.
They really kind of set this precedent of coerced ingestion of their stuff for
their corporate cronies, and I think there's a lot of that that is connected.
Let me ask you this though, as we move forward to this,
yere talking about the report that was there, and there's an article that just
came out saying that in that last Wednesday, there was a let me find
the thing. Yeah, here it is report linking florid to lower IQ and
children has made public after the CDC and the HHS tried to block it.
Is that something that's a new development, because you've been talking about this for
a long time. Is that the report that I call him Dick Divine,
Rachel Levine or whatever. Is that the report that he tried to suppress?
Or is this something that we that is different from that. Yeah, I'm
not I'm not familiar with what article you're referencing. If it's new, then
it's old. I mean, Derek covered that exact point. I think maybe
six months ago, I think the same report. So basically this is in
the opening discussion. I don't think I mentioned that. The reason that we
know and verbatim what the report already shows is because it was leaked. It
already information was already released, it was already discussed, and it's already present.
Now that's what's so crazy is that you could we linked to the report
in our coverage, so it's already present, and yet the corporate media nobody's
talking about it. And so yeah, that might if it's a new article,
that's a little bit of old news. But I'm glad it's getting out
to people. You know, it's important because it's damning. I mean,
it really is. There's literally nothing in there that even gives you the indication
that there might be a benefit to it. And that's why I think they're
dragging their feet. That's the craziest part to think about. So they're aware
of what it says, they're not even disputing what it says. They're just
going like, well, let's get more evaluation from groups that have no historical
being involved in this process, you know, and yet they are okay allowing
it to continue to be in your water while tering your children. But we
know different than in vaccinations or anything else we're talking about. But it just
shows a level of deliberate harm I think, you know, like choosing to
let this happen. Oh yeah, absolutely. And you know they've played this
game with a scientist who said, well, we've got our conclusion, let
us put it out there. If you disagree with it, you can do
that, but that's not the way the game's played. The way the game
is played is to shut down anything that goes against their narrative. And that
even happens of course internally, when you've got government scientists who are talking about
the dangers of floride, they're just going to suppress that. That's where we
are right now, and that's why it's very important for people to see.
You know, Last American Vagabond, you guys have been covering this stuff and
thanks for doing that. It's just amazing to me how nobody really seems to
care about anything except the presidential election. It is ain't going to change anything.
You know, if you're going to get focused on politics, focus locally
as to what's going to happen there. But you know, it takes up
everybody's it's all about entertainment, it's about national politic, and yet none of
the people in national politics are going to put any restrictions on the CDC.
Let alone get rid of it. This predatory organization that's been poisoning us since
the middle of the twentieth century, just in the water, let alone the
vaccines that they're involved in. You've got an article at Last American Vagabond about
Arnie bert Hardt. Tell us a little bit about this guy who came out
of retirement to take a look at mRNA. Yeah, we're very, very
very proud of this work, and Taylor or Hudak deserves every ounce of credit
for the amazing work that was done here. She's a writer and interviewer for
The Last American Vagabond. It's profound and quite frankly, probably one of the
things I'm most proud of that we've ever done at The Last American Vagabond.
And it's a high level, multi camera in his lab interview, and this
was the final interview he gave before he died, and there's a lot of
discussion to be had around that. That's something that I think we're going to
dive into going forward. But it's a very strange circumstance. So he,
as you said, he came he you know, it was basically in the
process of retiring, was you know that it was as he says in the
interview, it was something somebody contacted him with this information and he kind of
felt drawn to do something about it, and and that draw him drew him
back into this. And so he was, as we now know looking back,
one of the few people that was willing that we're willing to go through
and do what they thought was right, you know. And that's one of
the things, by the way, to state right out of the gate that
is just over it's just blowing over the top. In this interview, his
integrity is impossible to miss. Ever, is what he's doing is is at
his expense, and it was doing it because he thought it was right,
you know, going to the point to where he was working with other German
pathologists and in the beginning until suddenly, whoever, whatever happened, somebody told
him no, they thought it was conspiracy theory. They all just dropped it
and ran. And so he was the light. He got pulled into it
and then ended up being the only one really driving this forward save for the
people in his inner circle. So the bottom line is that he was a
you know, very very highly respected pathologist and he went into this world and
started doing autopsies where people, as you well know, we're not doing them
like this is the lie that we were sold from the CDC. As like
I broke down in the first year, they're not doing the work they claim
they were doing in the investigation around the people they claim are dying, they're
not, you know, or rather I think more so into the second year
when the injections were given in regard to the byproducts of what was happening.
And they remember, they claimed we're investigating every one of them, until it
came out that they didn't have the resources to do that, let alone the
autopsies, let alone and interview everybody, you know, And so he started
doing this and lo and behold, it was exactly what we found. And
I think the two other examples that I've seen of autopsies that it's your body
is being overwhelmed with this process. I mean, and we can get into
the different then. To be clear, I'm in no way an expert like
he was, and even Taylor I think is far more immersed in the interworkings
of how these things all operate. But really coming down to just some of
the things I'd pulled up. The first part of it was the assumption of
what was really being caused in the process of these injections. And so people
were, like we all saw, they were saying, well, this looks
like this, therefore it was caused by COVID, and nobody was doing in
the histopathology. Nobody was really diving into it to find these things out.
And what he ultimately found is what we what we all talk about the thrombocides
thrombosis. Even doctor Bakti made this claim right in the first year. If
Armber correctly, the vi t T vaccine induced thrombocide thrombosis is thrombocidepenia. And
so as he points out in this that it's really about this is your body's
process to try to like heal the problems that are being created by by the
injection. But see the problem is that it's never stopping, so it causes
all these blood claws. He talks about lymphocytic inflammation, which is the kind
of you know, I've talked about systemic inflammation for a long time, and
I think that's what ultimately develops into and then the he argues the most alarming
problem, and this is what he argued was the vascolitis the argument about the
you know, the brain and the as well as the end of the wheel
cells and the blood vessels, and how this is all causing the blood cloths,
the breakdown of your system. I personally find the most alarming aspect of
this to be the sperm point. And he made this point before this interview
and in a public presentation, but he really made this clear in this interview
with Taylor that there, in my opinion, there's just no way that this
was an accident. I mean, you can go back as far as you
want and find other research showing the same overlap. Knowing how this process works,
that he basically shows that these are passing through your sperm. And I
mean, I think doctor Peter mccola has made that point as well. I
mean, and I don't know how we get away from something like that.
I often make the point about glyphosate in the sense that we had a chance
in time to maybe stop what they did with that. But this point,
it's the world around, it's in the area breathing, it's in the clothes
you're wearing. It's literally everywhere. And so how we stop this I think
should be another main focus in regard to the spread of these kind of things.
But we're right now battling with people's awareness of whether this is even the
case. That's the hard part, that's right. Yeah, we've got a
lot of scientists and medical people who are now looking at this. But of
course, from the very beginning, the same type of stuff we're talking about
with fluoride was the big warning sign about this. It's not been tested.
We know what these people are doing. Yeah, and they've come up with
all these he's talking about, Oh well look this is long COVID, or
now they talk about holiday heart, or this is a new variant is going
to come after your heart, or the brain fog. There was a study
I talked about yesterday. They said, well, you know, look at
this brain fog, that it must be due to COVID. They said,
as they did the study, they found that it was due to people being
in the hospital. So they said, it's not the hospital though. It's
serious illness always no matter what it points to. I had an orthopedic surgeon
who got the shot because he's being coerced into doing it, and it ended
his career. He can't do surgery anymore. And with all the horrible symptoms
that he was having, he went to doctor after doctor and they would just
say, no, I'm not going to touch this. They're afraid of this.
There's one of the reasons why Bert Haardt, who is retired, I
think he came out and he didn't have you know, you know, it
makes it easier when you don't have your career on the line, but you
know, it's still it's a bold thing to come out and opposed this and
to expose this. And perhaps he did pay the price for this, but
for doing that, but for the most part, finally, this orthopedic surgeon
that I interviewed, he found a doctor he said, well, I know
what it is, and you know what it is, but we're not going
to say that, and I'll help to try to treat you with this.
That's how afraid everybody is of identifying what this Trump shot is doing to people.
Yeah. Yeah, I also, and I believe he was also an
orthopedic surgeon. Doctor Malik I just recently interviewed similar similar point, except he
basically went to you know, he went with the truth and ultimately lost his
career for it, and now he's spreading, you know, trying to do
podcasts and just talk about this, and so I was all like promoting his
work because it's you know, anybody that's willing to sacrifice everything for the truth
as somebody that I respect, you know, It's yeah, it's really this
whole process has been so overwhelmingly obvious from day one in my opinion, you
know, the everything seemed to be clear, and the almost deliberate effort to
both create the circumstance to drive this on people. And this is where I
get into the question of what the ultimate outcome, what the ultimate driving purpose
was of all this, And I think it is ultimately to create the setting
sort of like we talked about the fluoride step into what we're doing now for
whatever is coming next. And I think that this has been a resounding failure.
Doctor Fauci has written articles in Cell dot com that make the argument that
this didn't work, and we're not even taking a step back. I mean
they're now driving aggressively into things like ferret nanoparticle, universal flu vaccines that's literally
about to come out or a pan coronavirus vaccine also using ferret nanoparticles, which
I mean The Guardian wrote an article about this, I think in two thousand
and six in regard to how these the ferret and nanoparticle injections were used to
literally control the movements of these animals and an insect. Now that may sound
ridiculous to some people, but this is The Guardian covered this, and it's
a peer reviewed science that overlaps with people that were involved with the COVID nineteen
injection, one of them being Bob Langer with the co founder of Maderna.
These things are very real and it's an alarming step that I think we're seeing.
That's why I think this conversation of what we're doing is so important.
People realize, you know, not what's coming next, but that it's already
happening, you know, right, that's right. Yeah. When we look
at nano tech, that's one of the things that is so you just don't
know what they're capable of doing. It's got like infinite possibilities, and you
know, as people look at artificial intelligence and some of these other things,
I think the most apaque of all of these is really nano tech. That
people don't really understand the capabilities that are there. But when we look at
the overall picture, and I've talked about this with Netanyahu and pushing his own
people in Israel as labrats, pushing them Defiser and of course, you know,
I've played the clips of him multiple times calling doing a teleconference with the
World Economic Forum Davos, talking about how he's constantly on the phone with Moderna
and all these other people, how they're using his people as lab rats.
It's just amazing. And yet you know, another part of it was they
were they were really leading in terms of tying a digital ID. That's a
big part of where this is all coming. And you've got an article that
came out just to let's say, December twenty seventh, just the end of
last week, Pfiser is experimenting in Gaza with a digital ID, just the
beginning of this. So tell us now what is happening. We know what
what Netanyahu did to you know, push Israel to the front of the line,
uses people as lab rats to collect data for Pfizer and then to push
the digital ID. What is happening now in Gaza with that? Well,
just to clarify the title, and this is the way my title my shows
often that there's a comment that's kind of like separate topics, but but ultimately
the Pfiser part of it is there. They're right now experimenting with a A
it is stated an experimental injection to fight what was I think a fungus of
undefined origin. And this and this goes into the very alarming scussion about what's
been done to Gaza. And I'm not even getting into the bombing aspect of
it, just the deliberate kind of destabilization, the flooding, which weirdly was
stopped to discuss they no a lot to talk about on the corporate media.
And right after that happened, we saw this flooding and yes it was raining,
but I've never seen this kind of flooding before in the area. Asked
to add their flooding underneath the ground that rose up to their waste into many
places, you know, and so that what that caused is what they worried
about, was a massive spreading of waste, and you know, it caused
the spreading of illness. So one part of it is wondering whether this was
deliberate, right and then and then asker I mean, we've talked about the
I'm sure you have discussed before, the concept of Israel's battle tested weapons that
they test on Palestinians and then sell as battle tested. So I wonder what
this kind of dynamic is. As you mentioned as Netanyah who openly stated that
this is Pfiser's or rather Pfiser called at Pfiser's lab, as he openly stated
that they were allowing them to find out how these things worked on people.
So what they're using as an injection that Pfiser of course is testing and it's
it's barely tested, it's experimental, and interestingly, this is designed to stop
in one case Candida Albacon, which was guess what the thing that was spreading
through hospitals during all of the COVID nineteen discussion. So I don't know if
there's an exact point that makes that overlap, but I found that interesting either
case, The point is that Pfeiser yet again is being allowed to experiment on
the Israeli people, or in this case, the Palestinian people, because they're
being told they can based on something that we can't even define. The digitalied
part of it was just going into the deeper part of it which I can't
easily overlap with Israel. The point you made and all of this is,
I mean, this is a universal agenda, as I think you're well aware
of, and this is going around the world, and it is already happening
now. I think what is the original drive was sort of as we all
saw the vaccine passport and the argument that that was in one that we're stepping
into a technological world, so we shouldn't do paper anymore, but rather that
it was safer and less dangerous germs in the paper, you know, And
so that didn't work. I mean, clearly people pushed back. They tried.
It worked in some cases, but it wasn't as sound as I think
they wanted. Now it's sort of coming the other way, and this is
how I see this happening. And this is where you know Israel's involved with
the CBDC aspect, and what they're creating is this justification for digital currency.
In the same discussion, right, they say paper money is dangerous and spreads
pathogens. And so what I believe is now going to happen is sort of
the inverse of what I expected, which is that the CBDC aspect is going
to be pushed on us, maybe because of some mass event that wipes out
all of their you know, paper money records and they have to dole out
digital currency. Like that's a worry that I have. But then that will
be the point at which, and this is my guess, where they say,
oh, well, we'll give you back your digital currency. We don't
worry you didn't lose anything, as long as you sign up for this digital
ID that then will allow you to have it. I mean, who wouldn't
go through that process to get what they think is theirs back, you know,
the money you stored in a bank before the EMP or whatever happens.
Now I'm not saying I think that's happening. I just think that's a possibility.
So that being said, last point is just that this is how we're
seeing this driven in everywhere around the world, coercion. As you're pointing out
the justification that is needed because these people in South America don't have rights without
it, which is a lie or you know, any number of ways that's
happening, that's right, and that's when I can't That's why I tried to
get people to understand the way the government gets what it wants. Is usually
not with direct mandates and coercion. It's usually with bribery. And you know,
they can conveniently, with some kind of a financial crisis take everything away
from you and then doll this out. That's what they did. Bill Gates
did with odhar and India went to the poor people and said, well,
we'll give you health care, we'll give you welfare, but you're gonna have
to take the number. And so I think that's going to be the way
they're going to do this. So probably even pull kind of a world coin
type of thing and say, hey, you know this this new stuff here.
We're going to give you special treatment, reduce the taxes or something,
or you know, here's some free money, but you've got to sign up
for this stuff. And so it'll be that way. It'll be done as
something that you must accept or that you made as an offer for you to
accept. But they will make your life very difficult if you don't accept it.
They will take things away and then offer this is a carit to you.
And that's the way the federal government always operates. They operate by using
their ability to create money out of thin air. They use it to bribe
states and local governments to you know, here's a bunch of money. Now,
if you don't do X, we're going to take that money away.
It doesn't matter whether you're talking about the boys in the girls bathroom or whether
you're talking about any of these other issues. I think that is going to
be the way they're going to operate. They're going to create some kind of
a crisis. This will be their helping hand to you. It won't probably
come to you as a mandate. And that's the scary thing because this is
being pushed by the CBDC and the digital ID stuff, and everything's being pushed
by both Biden and the Trump administration was being was pushing it. Jared Kushner
when he was there, was pushing CBDC. And so for the most part,
the politicians won't even talk about this. And as you point out,
every country, every political philosophy, every political party was marching in lockstep to
this global agenda throughout twenty twenty. It truly was amazing to see, and
it is amazing, I think, Ryan, as I try to talk about
this, people just well Trump never forced anything on anybody. It's like,
okay, you know, we just we got this partisan blindness about this because
we're lined up behind you know, the left or the right, or the
Republicans or Democrats, and we can't say what is actually being done to us
and what they're going to do in the future. But I think you're right.
I think it will be presented to us as well, here's this this
nice stuff that you can We're going to help you out after the problems that
we created. That's always what they do. Well, what I often have
said over the years is it starts. That's how it starts every time,
where it's just like we saw with the COVID injection. Is you know here
this, if you take this thing or you do this action, you get
to go to the front of the line. Yeah. Right. But then
eventually when especially if nobody does it, they go okay, But now if
you don't do it, now you go to the back of the line.
Right then it becomes well, if you don't do what, you're killing grandma,
so you have to do it, right. Like, that's the escalation
we've seen. And so that's where I worry about this is I feel like
we've already passed that step where they're trying to go like, look, at
this great new thing. So I worry that it's going to be something that's
a little bit more coercive or like a rug pull kind of an action.
But you know, I think that it all very clearly shows you that the
same people that you know, A good example is something like the GMO program.
Right, how is it possible that we have somebody like Bill Gates who
has spectacularly in worldview failed, Right, the company, the countries that they
were pushing GMOs are more food and secure now than they were before they push
that agenda. So the point is we let them just try again with another
GMO product. You know, these people are connected with all of this and
then includes the CBDCs that includes you know, it's all interconnected. Now.
For those that feel like that somehow starts to develop into an image of what
you think you're supposed to dispute as conspiracy theory, it's just a reality of
the way the world works. As you well know, David, the powerful
people will often collect conspire if you will, you can use whatever word you
want to decide what they will do to gain more power to influence their position.
And you know, you could pretend that sometimes that overlaps with what's best
for the people. Quite frankly, I think that's just a coincidence when that
happens. Oh yeah, yeah, it absolutely is true, and just flying
trying to explain to people it doesn't matter what country or what party, but
it blinds people because they get into these political loyalties to really see what's going
on, and it is across the board. And that's what's so dangerous about
this is that they control and manipulate us with this phony competition between different groups
that are both pushing for the same thing. And so that's why it's very
important. I want to keep a track of what's going on with the fluoride
stuff, so I know we'll be talking again about that. That's a very
important thing. And again it shows the long term disregard for our choice as
well as a portion of consumption of this stuff that in and of itself ought
to be something that people push back against. And they need to realize that
this has been going on for decades. It's been going on through Republicans and
Democrats being in charge in Washington. It really doesn't matter from that standpoint.
So we really do have to fight this, bring up awareness of it,
and maybe we can get people start fighting this at the local level. That's
really ultimately is there where theyump and into the water. So if you can
stop this at the local level, then you're on your way to getting control
of individual health and taking it away from these public health dictators that really have
established themselves in the last couple of years. It's great talking to you again,
Ryan Christian and it is the Last American Vagabond. Dot com is where
you'll find these articles in a great interview. Take a look at that interview
with Arnie Berkhart that we were talking about. A lot to learn from that.
Thank you so much. Tryan great talking to you, My pleasure,
David. If I could just leave you with one one in general, I
think it's important, you know, maybe we could talk about this in the
future, maybe have you on my show and so on, about the idea
of you know, as far more than just where we talked about today and
akin disrupting chemicals, you know, all the different things that are just drenched.
Our world is drenched with these things and they don't care about our health.
And so we'll be covering this more and you know that way that includes
lifeless state, what's in the injections and so on. But Derek is going
to be covering the florid trial, so make sure you keep track of that
and we'll be talking soon about that in general. And it's an honor to
be on the show, David. So it is nice. Thank you and
thank you for being on top of this when everybody else is ignoring it.
And you know, we can throw into all that soup, even things like
five G. You know, the health effects of five G another example they
don't care and another example of how it comes back to surveillance. The surveillance
is not even a question, you know, but there is a lot of
evidence to show that the health effects of five G and other things. But
again, we got to have this because you know, we got to beat
the Chinese and that type of thing. It is absolutely it's absolute insanity.
All we can try to do is try to inform people about this. So
thank you so much for what you do. Ryan appreciate it. The Last
American Vagabond dot com that's where you can keep up with what's going on with
the fluoride stuff as well as many other issues. Thank you, Ryan,
appreciate it. Have a good day, all right, We're going to be
right back, folks. Stay with us. Sometimes your day needs a little
smoothing. Check out the Jazz channel at apsradio dot com and the APS Radio
app and leave the stress behind making sense. Comment again, you're listening to
the David Night Show. All right, welcome back. And this is a
comment. I didn't see this before Ryan was gone. This is from Christer
Ripperger. Thank you very much for the tip, and I wrote love you,
Ryan, so glad to see you connecting with David. No one is
reporting as thoroughly or objectively in the Middle East as Ryan and the Last American
Vagabond. No one reported on COVID with as much source material as Ryan the
Last American Vagabond and DK should conect regularly like Siliny, Yes we should and
on rock Finn Guard Goldsmith, good to see you their guard and thank you
for the tip. I mean Guard host of the show for a week and
he gives me at tip. He says, thank you David, and welcome
back. Thanks for the excellent, excellent information and for talking with Ryan,
whose work is consistently valuable and essential to the fight for truth and freedom.
It's going to be a good year with people like you. Two men doing
what you do, and with Guard doing what he's doing at Liberty Conspiracy and
MRCTV as well, thank you Guard for what you do. On Rockfinn Max
b thank you for the tip. He says, I follow both of you
guys, and this is like an all star game. Thank you. Yeah,
he's got a lot of information there. It's very important. And again,
you know, we see these patterns that are there and regard list of
how the floor ide affects your body or how the Trump shots affect your body,
we see these overriding principles that just tell us right from the bat,
right off the bat's wrong, that's wrong. Let's talk a little bit in
the time that we got left. We've got about twelve minutes or so.
This is an interesting article by David Garnowski on gab dot com and I've had
this since before Christmas, but it is pretty much timeless. It transcends the
news cycle. I think that we have to think outside the government box and
we need to think about how we are going to transcend this and how we're
going to transform our lives. And as part of this, and this article
is titled Peter Teele was right about Adams Adams. He quotes an Atlantic story
they said, quote Peter Teele is taking a break from democracy. The article
attempts to explain his recent renunciation of political donations as a result of being burned
out by lack of return politicians, provide his vision to move America towards growth,
particularly and as Teal calls it, the world of Adams. Well,
again, I think that this is a good example. You know Elon Musk,
and I agree with what Elon Musk said. He said, you know,
the place where you're going to have really the least amount of effect is
on federal elections. I think he realized that more so than Peter Teel.
I think Elon Musk is the richest man in the world because he understands how
to read politicians and how to get money from them for his projects. And
so he says, you know, George Soros realized that he could go to
the local level and he could affect elections at the local level with district attorney
and that type of thing, or even you know, at the state level
with state you know, attorney general's attorneys general. And so he said,
you know, that's a much more effective place to do it. And I've
talked to many people who have pointed out, you know, in their state,
how they've had a lot more effect working on local laws. They could
never get anything done in Washington. That's what Peter Teele has understood. But
he said. David Gonowski says the article misses the bigger point Teal makes about
the dangers of stagnation in favor of catering to the Atlantic audience's mirror induced paranoias
about Trump, fascism and strange libertarian wealth. He says, the atom bomb
is you know Teel was talking about that. The atom bomb project is touted
by Teal and his followers as one of the last greatest things that the government
did. Is it really well, is that really a great thing? I've
come to look at that, and I think when we talk about a just
war, one of the things that's happening, and there's really guy's a conflict.
And I said this from the very beginning, as I kept all of
them talking about Pearl Harbor, they said, well, maybe they're trying to
send us a message, because it certainly does raise questions like Pearl Harbor died,
How did this happen without any you know who was standing Guard when all
this stuff happened. And as I said before, you know the fact that
FDR decided that you know, they knew that the Japanese were going to do
this, but they kept the warning from going out, didn't warn anybody,
and actually kept the warning from going out, and said, still doesn't still
doesn't excuse what Japan did. They still struck first, and that's precisely what
FDR was trying to do, and perhaps that was what Netanyahu was trying to
do, because you know, a just war and everybody understands this instinctively.
You know, we have this kind of moral understanding that you know, if
somebody attacks you, you have a right to self defense, and so that's
part of a justified war. But another part of a justified war is to
try to limit it, to try to end it as soon as possible,
to try to stop the aggression, and also to protect civilian life. And
I look at it as we see this continuous bombing in this union, now
asymmetric warfare, and now the asymmetric warfare is all on the side of Israel.
And when I look at how the war ended, for years, I
bought the argument that, well, yeah, they bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki because
it was going to be a bloody fight from island to island, and they
were going to actually save lives. But as I look at it, I
start to have questions, did we eradicate massive civilian populations in order to save
lives in terms of a military conflict that is very antithetical to what Western civilization
when it was a civilization, I would say, in terms of when it
was a civilization that had ethics. It's exactly contrary to adjust war. And
this is one of the reasons why I think people are looking at what is
happening in Gaza. It appears to be just. And this is this has
been a key part of war since World War Two. We went after civilian
populations and continue to go after civilian populations. We do preemptive strikes and all
the rest of this stuff. So that is the world that we live in
now. But again, what Peter Teel is talking about was this was a
great achievement to produce an atomic bomb. His narrative is that the victory in
World War II for the ennobled America's technological frontier spirit. Like nineteen twenties cinema,
post World War two erascience fiction saw robots and flying cars just around the
corner. Then teal laments. Beginning sometime in the seventies, America's standard.
America started to grow cynical about science and technology, and we rested on our
laurels to the detriment of wages and real growth. Well, the reality of
all this is that he sees us as being lazy and pacified. But I
don't think that's the issue. I think the issue is that we began to
worship science. And I mean that very seriously, you know, and just
take a look at recently Valci I, mister science, worship me. Bow
down, do everything that I say because science I don't have to explain it
to you. This is again when we're looking at Peter Teele is somebody who
is coming from a technocracy perspective, and it's one of the reasons why he
and Elon Musk can develop things because they're very focused on I can do attitude,
and that's good, but it's not good when that replaces basic morality.
And along that line, I want to play for you something that I looked
at. I was spending some time just doing research and thinking over the break
that I had, and I went back and I found a debate between Christopher
Hitchens, who had just written God is Not Great, and with John Lennox,
a mathematician in the UK. I'm going to play you a brief excerpt
between the two of them. So Heaven has already watched almost one hundred percent
of its creation die off, often in very unpleasant, callous circumstances with folded
arms. Right. And that's billions of years of geological time. Some people
say the homosapiens has been around for one hundred thousand years, some for as
long as a quarter of a million. No one says less than one hundred
thousand. Francis Collins, the great Christian believer who did the human genome project,
says, certainly one hundred thousand. I'll take a hundred. Richard Dawkins
thinks it's more. I'll take a hundred. What does it mean if we're
divinely supervised and divinely created and what looked out for? It means that for
ninety eight or so thousand of those years humans Homo sapiens were being born,
dying, half of them in childbirth. I would think life expectancy maybe of
twenty years. Maybe thirty people dying essentially of their teeth, out of hideous
diseases, living in permanent fear. Where are the earthquakes coming from? Where
are the lightning strikes coming from? Why is all this? What are these
diseases that hit us? We don't know about microbes, have no idea.
That's to say nothing about the fights with neighboring tribes over women, over land,
over meat, over subsistence. That the torture, the violence, the
cruelty that goes on. Well, what would be the best way of intervening
to try and redeem this rather bleak picture? What about having somebody tortured to
death in an obscure part of the Middle East that ought to cure it.
Or if you're a Muslim, what about getting an illiterate, epileptic shepherd to
start babbling and saying that he's been talking to an archangel. Or what about
inventing the figure of Moses in the mountain that's never yet been found by any
geographer? Mant Seiner, I agree very much with Christopher Hitchens. It is
repudiation of many of the evils that he claims have been done in the name
of God. But I've learned to distinguish between the greatness of God and the
inexcusable evil that has been done by those professing his name. And so I
do not deduce that God is not great and that religion poisons everything. After
all, if I fail to distinguish between the genius of Einstein and the abuse
of his science to create weapons of mass destruction, I might be tempted to
say science is not great, and technology poisons everything. What is more,
as I look back at the evils of atheist regimes of the twentieth century,
I might also be tempted, ladies and gentlemen, to say atheism is not
great. It has poisoned everything. As it is, I hold that science
shows some of the greatness of God. The famous physicist James tart Maxwell,
who discovered electromagnetic theory, inscribed above the door in his laboratory in Cambridge University
the words great are the works of the Lord's studied by all who delight in
them. Yet Christopher Hitchin says, thanks to the telescope and the microscope,
religion no longer offers an explanation of anything. I find it impossible. I
find it impossible as a scientist to take such a statement seriously, as if
using a microscope and a Rembrandt painting could disprove the existence of Rembrandt himself.
The idea that God and science are mutually exclusive explanations of the universe is as
wrong as saying that internal combustion and Henry Ford are mutually exclusive explanations of the
automobile. They are complementary explanations. One explains how it works, the other
why it exists. Far from science showing God is not great, as Christopher
Hitchin suggests, the very opposite is the case. It was belief in God
that motivated the advance of science in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Galileo,
Copernicus, Kepler, Newton expected to find law in nature because they believed in
a great law giver. Now so often we hear the new atheists talk about
faith and deprecating it. But I want to tell you that scientists are all
people of faith, as Einstein saw. They believe that the universe is accessible
to the human mind, and physics cannot explain that for the simple reason that
you can't do physics without believing that the universe is intelligible. Science is important,
but it has its limitations. It cannot answer the questions of a child,
what are we here for? What is the meaning of life? Nor
can it tell us whether literature are is good or bad. Hence an atheism
that insists that science is the only way the truth diminishes human beings. This
is very obvious to many of my Russian friends. We thought we could abolish
God and retain a value for human beings, but we found we couldn't do
away with the greatness of God. Ladies and gentlemen, and you can do
a way with the nobility of human beings endowed with all the potential of hearts
and minds made in God's image. God is not only the great creator,
a judge. He's a God of grace and love. And the central claim
of Christianity is this that, as an expression of his love, God himself
became human, the word became flesh. Christ shows us as none other the
greatness of God. He made unique claims to be the truth, to be
the Son of God, and back them up by a life and teaching without
parallel. But his moral teaching was not his main message. His stated mission
was to deal with a moral chasm that separates us humans from God. By
taking our sins on himself. Ladies and gentlemen, we scientists cannot even tell
you what energy is, so don't be surprised if I cannot completely explain to
you the deepest mystery of our universe's history, the death and resurrection of Jesus.
Yet, just as we see the effect of and use energy without completely
understanding it, what I do observe is the transformation, the peace, the
hope that comes into the lives of ordinary men and women who learned to place
their faith, their confidence, their trust in Christ as Savior in God.
I see in them and experience in myself a transcendent sense of purpose that atheism
does not have, and a hope that atheism does not know. It is
here, Ladies and gentlemen, I submit to you that the great of Gold
is supremely manifest. Thank you. Yes, and we ran over a bit,
but I wanted you to hear the end of the day. Frankly,
I got the time code wrong on that it was longer than I thought,
so I apologize for running over time. But we'll talk more about the conclusions
of that at a later date. Thank you for joining us today. Let
me tell you the David Night Show. You can listen to with your ears.
You can even watch it by using your eyes. In fact, if
you can hear me, that means you're listening to the David Night Show right
now. Yeah, good job. And you want to know something else.
You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show
at the Davidnightshow dot com. That's a website.