1
00:00:15,880 --> 00:00:20,920
Welcome, Welcome, Welcome to the
Transfigured Life. We have a special guest

2
00:00:20,960 --> 00:00:25,519
here in the building. I'm always
here rocking with Father Jonathan. And as

3
00:00:26,120 --> 00:00:31,280
you guys can see, here we
have the comedian, the apologist, the

4
00:00:31,320 --> 00:00:36,159
gifted one here, Jay Dyer.
Give it up for Jay Dyer. How

5
00:00:36,240 --> 00:00:39,119
you doing, Jay, I'm doing
great, man, Thanks for having here,

6
00:00:39,280 --> 00:00:41,920
Glad to be here, so honored
our talk to you guys. Appreciate

7
00:00:41,920 --> 00:00:44,880
it. Yeah, our pleasure and
our honor. Thank you very much.

8
00:00:46,000 --> 00:00:48,520
Jay. We're gonna kind of get
right into it, and I want to

9
00:00:48,520 --> 00:00:55,640
begin by by by asking you a
question. Undoubtedly, if you've been watching

10
00:00:55,679 --> 00:00:58,520
YouTube for a while, and I
think you have, and if you've been

11
00:00:58,520 --> 00:01:02,759
watching Orthodox Apologize and I think you
have, can't fail to notice that there's

12
00:01:02,799 --> 00:01:07,640
been an abundance of podcasts and videos
out there now by Protestants and especially Reform

13
00:01:07,719 --> 00:01:14,000
Protestants, Evangelicals, Baptists that are
attacking the Orthodox faith in church. You

14
00:01:14,040 --> 00:01:18,400
know, I recently heard some Presbyterian
church out west even deny that we the

15
00:01:18,519 --> 00:01:22,599
Orthodox have Apostolic succession. And so
I'm sure you've heard some of these,

16
00:01:23,000 --> 00:01:26,920
But what do you make of what
do you think of that? We're seeing

17
00:01:26,000 --> 00:01:30,120
more and more of them now.
I think one reason that we're seeing that

18
00:01:30,280 --> 00:01:34,120
is just everybody's got a podcast now. My wife and I were joking about

19
00:01:34,159 --> 00:01:38,319
this, like every like every people's
grandmothers are gonna start having a podcasts soon.

20
00:01:38,239 --> 00:01:42,879
Literally everybody has a podcast, and
I think every pastor now has a

21
00:01:42,920 --> 00:01:46,760
podcast, So that's part of it. But also think that there's a realization

22
00:01:47,560 --> 00:01:52,040
that there's a lot of problems in
the religious world, especially if you come

23
00:01:52,120 --> 00:01:55,519
from a Protestant or a Roman Catholic
background. I mean, that's not to

24
00:01:55,519 --> 00:01:59,439
say there's no problems in the Orthodox
world, but every group kind of has

25
00:01:59,480 --> 00:02:01,040
its own un nique problems, and
so I think that a lot of people

26
00:02:01,079 --> 00:02:06,760
are sensing that questions are being asked
that are very difficult. A lot of

27
00:02:06,799 --> 00:02:10,360
times Protestant pastors might not have the
answers to these kinds of questions, and

28
00:02:10,400 --> 00:02:15,039
so they're going online, they're seeking
out answers, and they're feeling the need

29
00:02:15,159 --> 00:02:20,800
to have to address why people are
converting. A lot of people are converting

30
00:02:21,599 --> 00:02:24,199
out of Protestantism, some terrom Catholicism, but I think actually in the last

31
00:02:24,199 --> 00:02:28,479
three or four years more to Orthodoxy. So I think there's a need to

32
00:02:28,520 --> 00:02:31,719
try to explain this, to say, hey, don't leave. You know,

33
00:02:31,759 --> 00:02:36,400
they've got problems too, and Protestantism
can be defended. I don't think

34
00:02:36,439 --> 00:02:38,560
ultimately that it can, but I
think that's the reason, is that a

35
00:02:38,560 --> 00:02:45,319
lot of people are looking for more
than what they're getting at Protestant churches.

36
00:02:45,360 --> 00:02:49,800
So they're seeing a lot of you
know, rainbow flags going up at Protestant

37
00:02:49,879 --> 00:02:53,000
churches, and that's making a lot
of people, you know, to satisfy

38
00:02:53,240 --> 00:02:55,159
this is not what you know historic
Christianity is. So there's on the one

39
00:02:55,159 --> 00:03:01,960
hand of search for authentic historic Christianity, there's a search for wanting to be

40
00:03:02,120 --> 00:03:06,680
you know, consistent with what the
Bible actually teaches in terms of morals and

41
00:03:06,719 --> 00:03:09,080
that kind of stuff. People are
craving that they don't want this, uh,

42
00:03:09,680 --> 00:03:15,159
water down stuff. And even even
in the conservative Protestant world, I

43
00:03:15,199 --> 00:03:21,520
think there's a lot of unanswered questions
when it comes to the challenges that Orthodoxy

44
00:03:21,520 --> 00:03:24,719
and Catholicism are presenting, but more
so Orthodoxy because I think a lot of

45
00:03:24,719 --> 00:03:30,000
people are seeing you know, really
systematic level problems in the in the Roman

46
00:03:30,039 --> 00:03:35,919
Catholic world that perhaps Orthodoxy might have
the answer to that's good, Luther.

47
00:03:36,120 --> 00:03:39,159
Both you and Jay came out of
that million if you and I know you

48
00:03:39,240 --> 00:03:43,879
probably have have different issues that you
could point to. But Jay, what

49
00:03:43,919 --> 00:03:46,840
do you think are the man?
What do you think are the two or

50
00:03:46,879 --> 00:03:51,680
three biggest issues that are bringing people
over? Yeah, you got a lot

51
00:03:51,719 --> 00:03:57,159
of a lot of people coming out
of the you know, the Protestant world.

52
00:03:57,199 --> 00:04:00,599
So what do you think is that
that reason? Probably the biggest let

53
00:04:00,639 --> 00:04:06,319
me say the biggest two issues in
the Protestant world would be and I don't

54
00:04:06,319 --> 00:04:11,120
know if they're in any specific order, just the ones that come to mind

55
00:04:11,120 --> 00:04:15,840
that I hear the most are questions
like, well, you know solo scriptura,

56
00:04:15,960 --> 00:04:18,759
which is really the essence of classical
Protestantism. And it really doesn't matter

57
00:04:18,800 --> 00:04:23,319
what form you want to give to
solo scriptura. I know that there's different

58
00:04:24,120 --> 00:04:29,319
versions of a different apologists that give
different levels of it. Different Protestant apologists

59
00:04:29,319 --> 00:04:33,920
will recognize some kind of place for
tradition, perhaps maybe even all the way

60
00:04:34,000 --> 00:04:40,639
up to High Church Anglicans can concede
maybe the most reverence for traditions supposedly,

61
00:04:41,000 --> 00:04:46,519
but I think there's still a recognition
that there's big heaping questions of a historicity

62
00:04:46,759 --> 00:04:51,439
or the Protestant position is not historical, especially when we come to the formation

63
00:04:51,480 --> 00:04:54,879
of the Canon, when it comes
to how the Bible came to be,

64
00:04:55,519 --> 00:05:00,240
when it comes to the actual practis
of the Church in the first six seventh

65
00:05:00,240 --> 00:05:04,519
century, is the way that it
operated with liturgy oral, you know,

66
00:05:04,600 --> 00:05:10,600
teaching profession of the faith in the
liturgy and not so much people having to

67
00:05:10,600 --> 00:05:13,160
go and read the Bible on their
own to figure it all out. When

68
00:05:13,160 --> 00:05:15,800
people start to realize that when they
see what's in the ecumenical councils and the

69
00:05:15,879 --> 00:05:23,199
canons and even the earliest councils,
you know, prior to Icia and Caira

70
00:05:23,319 --> 00:05:26,800
Gangra, you know, you see
these so called Catholic and I say that

71
00:05:26,920 --> 00:05:30,680
is in the sense of orthodox Catholic
elements. People are seeing that and realizing

72
00:05:30,720 --> 00:05:32,120
that, you know this, this, this isn't Protestantism. So I think

73
00:05:32,160 --> 00:05:41,199
that's probably the biggest And then number
two might be questions that they have about

74
00:05:42,079 --> 00:05:46,199
the morals changing in the in the
world of Protestantism. And again that that

75
00:05:46,240 --> 00:05:49,720
doesn't necessarily go for the conservative Protestant
evangelical groups. But I think in the

76
00:05:49,720 --> 00:05:54,399
Protestant world, like the I mean, I don't know the numbers per se,

77
00:05:54,439 --> 00:05:58,680
but most you know, all the
mainline Protestant nominations in the US they

78
00:05:58,959 --> 00:06:02,639
pretty much liberal in the nineteen twenties
and thirties. And by that I mean

79
00:06:02,680 --> 00:06:09,319
not just you know, caving into
higher critical textual scholarship, but also morals.

80
00:06:09,319 --> 00:06:13,839
They began to cave on moral questions
and issues. And so I think

81
00:06:13,879 --> 00:06:15,959
that those are probably the two biggest
ones, you know, the history of

82
00:06:15,959 --> 00:06:18,920
the church, the Bible, social
scriptura. And then I think there's other

83
00:06:18,959 --> 00:06:24,439
issues too, like this debate world. You know, this pops up on

84
00:06:24,920 --> 00:06:28,439
YouTube and the internet. Yeah,
there's a lot, there's a lot of

85
00:06:28,759 --> 00:06:33,560
you know, great chats and discussions
and debates going on. That's that's probably

86
00:06:33,600 --> 00:06:39,160
a big factor as well. Well, I agree, yeah, yeah,

87
00:06:39,199 --> 00:06:42,680
there's definitely definitely a bigger debate will
happen out there. I see that.

88
00:06:44,000 --> 00:06:46,759
Well, yeah, real quick,
I noticed. I didn't even know this

89
00:06:46,839 --> 00:06:49,160
until a few days ago. Uh. And obviously I'm not I'm not a

90
00:06:49,279 --> 00:06:54,319
huge fan of TikTok because it's you
know, obviously it's a Chinese sort of

91
00:06:54,519 --> 00:06:58,560
surveillance app. But I am on
there just to put out clips and stuff,

92
00:06:58,800 --> 00:07:01,560
And I didn't realize that I could
go live on there until fairly recently,

93
00:07:01,560 --> 00:07:04,639
because you you got to hit a
certain tier of subscribers or something.

94
00:07:04,680 --> 00:07:10,439
But I went live on TikTok and
turns out there's this giant world over there

95
00:07:11,040 --> 00:07:14,399
that's different from you know, YouTube
and these other places. There's there's just

96
00:07:15,240 --> 00:07:20,600
masses of Protestants over there. Calvinists
are arguing and going crazy, Muslims are

97
00:07:20,600 --> 00:07:27,439
going crazy on TikTok. So I've
kind of stepped into that whole other mess

98
00:07:27,920 --> 00:07:31,040
of getting on TikTok. And but
that's a whole nother, you know field

99
00:07:31,160 --> 00:07:35,000
for potential, you know, new
audiences, and TikTok tends to be a

100
00:07:35,079 --> 00:07:40,480
lot of twenty five are really young
people over there as well. Yeah,

101
00:07:40,560 --> 00:07:43,439
kids are always dancing on TikTok and
stuff like now. But now there's a

102
00:07:43,480 --> 00:07:46,800
whole debate world because they have live
streams, so you can live stream for

103
00:07:46,920 --> 00:07:48,959
you know, long long form on
on TikTok. Now, so there's always

104
00:07:48,959 --> 00:07:56,439
people debating over there. Oh my
gosh, well fascinating. Well let's let's

105
00:07:56,480 --> 00:08:01,079
dive into some Calvinism. I know
that you you yourself used to be a

106
00:08:01,120 --> 00:08:07,079
Calvinist I was a Calvinist as well. You know what led you specifically out

107
00:08:07,120 --> 00:08:11,560
of that? Jay, What are
some of the issues that you start to

108
00:08:11,560 --> 00:08:16,759
see with it? What was your
progression out of that. I'm curious that

109
00:08:16,839 --> 00:08:20,360
Father Johathan, did you have a
background Protestant? Did you convert or were

110
00:08:20,360 --> 00:08:24,759
you raised ord Rocks? Well?
I was theoretically I'm a cradle but when

111
00:08:24,800 --> 00:08:28,879
I was a when I was in
high school, around tenth grade, I

112
00:08:28,920 --> 00:08:33,000
started going to a Presbyterian church and
attending their Bible studies and their youth pastors.

113
00:08:33,759 --> 00:08:37,159
I have to give them a lot
of credit. They they taught me

114
00:08:37,240 --> 00:08:41,360
Bible, you know, they really
did, and that that has literally stayed

115
00:08:41,360 --> 00:08:43,519
with me for fifty years. A
lot of what I learned there, but

116
00:08:43,559 --> 00:08:48,000
they didn't teach a lot of theology. It was here's what the Bible says,

117
00:08:48,039 --> 00:08:50,879
and you know, we kind of
read it and read it and read

118
00:08:50,919 --> 00:08:54,600
it and kind of memorized it.
So I didn't learn a lot of theology.

119
00:08:54,639 --> 00:08:56,080
So I have to say I don't
really come from that kind of a

120
00:08:56,080 --> 00:09:03,440
background that experience. My experiences well, that that background and not all Calvinists,

121
00:09:03,519 --> 00:09:07,240
right, We're not saying this all
calvin but it's it's definitely like a

122
00:09:07,279 --> 00:09:11,039
debate world for real. When it
came to that realm, it's like you

123
00:09:11,080 --> 00:09:15,000
weren't Calvinists enough at times, you
know, yeah, right, yeah,

124
00:09:15,080 --> 00:09:18,000
yeah yeah. Like, uh so
I got into that when I was about

125
00:09:18,080 --> 00:09:22,320
nineteen. I got into reading the
scriptures from an evangelical Bible study I was

126
00:09:22,360 --> 00:09:26,320
invited to when I was eighteen,
and then uh kind of eventually wandered my

127
00:09:26,360 --> 00:09:30,039
way into reform Baptist stuff, like
you said, because I went to a

128
00:09:30,080 --> 00:09:33,039
Reform Baptist Bible College for a while
and there everybody, you know, all

129
00:09:33,080 --> 00:09:35,320
the young guys. We all we
did was just kind of you know,

130
00:09:35,360 --> 00:09:39,720
talk about church history and biblical theology
all the time, and so we would

131
00:09:39,720 --> 00:09:41,759
get into these debates about well,
you know what about you know, the

132
00:09:41,840 --> 00:09:46,799
church fathers, they taught this and
that. And I remember there was a

133
00:09:46,840 --> 00:09:52,240
really formative situation where I ended up
stuck at Bible College throughout the whole winter

134
00:09:52,360 --> 00:09:56,600
break. And so now everybody else
left and I was stuck there for the

135
00:09:56,600 --> 00:09:58,320
whole you know, three or four
weeks or whatever it was, and I

136
00:09:58,320 --> 00:10:01,639
didn't have anything else to do.
So I decided I was going to read

137
00:10:01,639 --> 00:10:05,039
the City of God. So I
read from the beginning all the way up

138
00:10:05,080 --> 00:10:09,399
until about page nine hundred, and
I wrote down these I wrote down all

139
00:10:09,440 --> 00:10:11,679
these questions because there's nothing else to
do. It's just me and in Louisville,

140
00:10:11,720 --> 00:10:15,679
sitting there by myself, and I
didn't know anybody. So I just

141
00:10:15,720 --> 00:10:16,919
read that the whole time, and
I wrote down all these questions. And

142
00:10:16,960 --> 00:10:22,120
I took him to a couple of
the professors. The a couple of him

143
00:10:22,120 --> 00:10:26,799
are still pretty still teaching Baptist Bible
college stuff, and I said, he,

144
00:10:26,919 --> 00:10:30,120
here's all these questions. I said, I don't understand how we could

145
00:10:30,159 --> 00:10:33,519
believe that. You know, we
like Augustine, if you know, he's

146
00:10:33,519 --> 00:10:39,399
got all these things that we think
are just you know, Catholic crazy accretions.

147
00:10:39,080 --> 00:10:43,360
And I didn't get very good answers, so I'll just leave it at

148
00:10:43,360 --> 00:10:46,480
that. But eventually they said,
well, you might need to leave this

149
00:10:46,480 --> 00:10:52,559
this Bible college. This might not
be for you. So I didn't.

150
00:10:52,559 --> 00:10:56,360
I wasn't ready for any changes at
that time, but at that time I

151
00:10:56,399 --> 00:11:00,360
was more so thinking, I'm I
think i'll believe in an infant baptism.

152
00:11:00,440 --> 00:11:03,240
I think I believe in patal baptism. And I was reading a bunch of

153
00:11:03,919 --> 00:11:09,879
reform stuff from Bonson and Rush Juney
and Van Till and all those people.

154
00:11:09,039 --> 00:11:13,159
And so I found a PCA church
at that time that I liked, which

155
00:11:13,200 --> 00:11:18,120
is a Conservative Presbyterians, and met
one of the elders there, got to

156
00:11:18,159 --> 00:11:20,720
be kind of friendly with him,
and he introduced me to a lot of

157
00:11:20,759 --> 00:11:26,360
stuff that ironically would later point me
in the direction out of Protestantism. And

158
00:11:26,399 --> 00:11:31,000
so in some of the circles of
Presbyterians, there was a movement back then

159
00:11:31,120 --> 00:11:35,279
that's now kind of attached to Doug
Wilson's stuff, which is kind of people

160
00:11:35,320 --> 00:11:37,720
looking into high church, you know, liturgy and that kind of stuff in

161
00:11:37,759 --> 00:11:41,120
the in the Protestant Reformed world.
So I was kind of introduced to these

162
00:11:41,159 --> 00:11:43,960
questions at that time, but I
still wasn't ready. I remember, I'll

163
00:11:43,960 --> 00:11:46,679
try to make this short. I
don't want to ramble a whole time.

164
00:11:46,679 --> 00:11:50,120
But I met with some Catholic priests
just out of curiosity, because I wanted

165
00:11:50,159 --> 00:11:52,240
to know, like, well,
what do you guys teach about, you

166
00:11:52,240 --> 00:11:56,000
know, Augustine and Grace and all
this stuff. And I remember having you

167
00:11:56,039 --> 00:11:58,799
know, one on ones with several
Catholic priests and they said, well,

168
00:11:58,840 --> 00:12:01,799
here's the Catholic Catechism, and I
remember getting that and I remember reading through

169
00:12:01,840 --> 00:12:03,559
about half of it. I was
like, no, I don't believe a

170
00:12:03,559 --> 00:12:07,120
lot of this stuff. This stuff's
crazy. So I wasn't ready for,

171
00:12:07,960 --> 00:12:11,639
you know, marrying stuff, and
I thought all that was out there and

172
00:12:11,000 --> 00:12:16,720
wild. So but I did have
a gradual movement towards reading more and more

173
00:12:16,799 --> 00:12:20,360
Church Fathers, and so for me
at that time, it was really just

174
00:12:20,399 --> 00:12:24,200
I didn't know about Orthodoxy yet.
This was like, this is about two

175
00:12:24,200 --> 00:12:28,039
thousand and one, and so I
bought the Church Fathers the Chaft Set,

176
00:12:28,559 --> 00:12:30,320
and I was like, well,
I guess I'm gonna have to start reading

177
00:12:30,360 --> 00:12:33,480
this. So I started reading Jerome, and I started reading Ambrose, and

178
00:12:33,519 --> 00:12:37,559
I started reading Cyprian, Saint Cyprian, and I started noticing, well,

179
00:12:37,559 --> 00:12:39,919
these are they don't teach anything like
what we teach. So I was out

180
00:12:39,919 --> 00:12:45,960
of crossroads and all I knew about
at that time. And in two thousand

181
00:12:46,039 --> 00:12:50,480
and three ish, the only things
on the Internet that you could ever find

182
00:12:50,600 --> 00:12:54,840
were Roman Callic stuff and like Calvinist
Protestants everything that that was the debate at

183
00:12:54,840 --> 00:12:58,000
that time, right, all the
blogs, all the stuff. All the

184
00:12:58,039 --> 00:13:03,279
forums, you know, you would
just see people debating on blogs and websites

185
00:13:03,279 --> 00:13:05,360
and forums back and forth. So
I just thought that's that was the extent

186
00:13:05,440 --> 00:13:09,759
of the debate. I didn't even
know about Orthodoxy except for I'd heard there

187
00:13:09,840 --> 00:13:13,080
was a book by you know,
Callistos where about Orthodox Church, but I

188
00:13:13,080 --> 00:13:16,639
didn't have it, so I just
didn't think anything about it. Plus I

189
00:13:16,639 --> 00:13:22,840
didn't live anywhere near an Orthodox church. So that was probably the hardest decision

190
00:13:22,960 --> 00:13:26,320
for me actually in my life at
that time, because I was really I

191
00:13:26,320 --> 00:13:30,559
mean I was a huge student of
Bronson vanil Rush Juney. I did a

192
00:13:30,600 --> 00:13:33,320
semester at Bronson's there should we think
of Bronson Seminary, So I was learning

193
00:13:33,360 --> 00:13:39,039
apologetics from doctor Bonnson. Like Paula
Johnathan said, you know, we were

194
00:13:39,120 --> 00:13:43,480
just like I mean, it was
just Bible NonStop. I mean we were

195
00:13:43,600 --> 00:13:46,120
like tell Muitic Jews with the Bible. I mean like we were just studying

196
00:13:46,120 --> 00:13:54,159
a NonStop. I mean we would
have morning Bible before church. Church was

197
00:13:54,200 --> 00:13:58,960
like two hours of lectures from Bible. We would have Sunday night Bible study,

198
00:13:58,080 --> 00:14:03,200
and then we would have Winday and
Friday meetings to read you know,

199
00:14:03,320 --> 00:14:09,200
reform theologians, because if you don't, I don't know if you guys know,

200
00:14:09,240 --> 00:14:11,799
But like in the Bonds and Rush
Janny stuff like, they were theonomists.

201
00:14:13,399 --> 00:14:16,720
So they have this very high view
of Biblical law and so there's a

202
00:14:16,720 --> 00:14:22,440
lot of you know, emphasis on
what relevance you know, the Torah has

203
00:14:22,519 --> 00:14:26,279
for today. Now they're not messianic
news or anything like that, but they

204
00:14:26,320 --> 00:14:28,600
just have this view that a lot
of those laws are applicable to today.

205
00:14:31,399 --> 00:14:33,720
So, you know, there was
it was really difficult to move away from

206
00:14:33,720 --> 00:14:37,000
that because I was so wedded to
it. But one of the things that

207
00:14:37,080 --> 00:14:41,000
really stuck with me was when I
read Russiani's book called Foundations of Social Order

208
00:14:41,799 --> 00:14:46,080
and there was a chapter on the
Ecumenical councils, and so russianny ironically had

209
00:14:46,080 --> 00:14:50,240
this high view of the ecumenical councils. And I was starting to read The

210
00:14:50,320 --> 00:14:54,639
Church Fathers at that time, and
I had read Cyril and I'd read Ephesus,

211
00:14:54,080 --> 00:14:58,120
so I knew kind of what it
was all about. And then russianis

212
00:14:58,679 --> 00:15:03,559
take and found of Social Order was
actually that he thought, I'm not joking,

213
00:15:03,559 --> 00:15:07,600
He's he thinks that Cyril's position isn't
a story as this position, it's

214
00:15:07,600 --> 00:15:11,639
a Russian You got it completely backwards. And that really shook me at the

215
00:15:11,639 --> 00:15:13,559
time, and I just I didn't
know what to do. I took that

216
00:15:13,639 --> 00:15:16,399
to my reform pastor and said,
hey, this is this is totally backwards.

217
00:15:16,440 --> 00:15:20,279
I mean, how could he mess
up that? You know that big

218
00:15:20,320 --> 00:15:22,679
and well we're all fallible, Yeah, we're all fallible, but I mean

219
00:15:22,679 --> 00:15:26,519
that's a pretty big mistake if we're
going to be saying why we're not why

220
00:15:26,559 --> 00:15:31,320
we're reformed. So then I decided
it was going to be an issue of

221
00:15:31,519 --> 00:15:37,840
not so much this church father versus
that church father. What's the root of

222
00:15:37,879 --> 00:15:41,480
Protestantism. Well, it's it's ultimately, if you're a classical Protestant, it's

223
00:15:41,879 --> 00:15:45,559
Bible alone, it's soul scripture.
That's the ultimate primary authority. So I

224
00:15:45,639 --> 00:15:48,320
figured out I'm gonna have to answer
this question of how did the cannon come

225
00:15:48,360 --> 00:15:54,000
to be? And I listened to
tons and tons of Roman Catholic and reform

226
00:15:54,080 --> 00:15:56,960
debates. I went back in the
fourth and at that time it was all

227
00:15:58,000 --> 00:16:02,279
you know, James White debating athletics, and it was Jerry Madoti's debating bonds

228
00:16:02,320 --> 00:16:04,039
and all, you know, reform
a Catholic debates was about the extent of

229
00:16:04,039 --> 00:16:07,240
all you could find. And I
went through all those, and then I

230
00:16:07,360 --> 00:16:11,440
said, the best way to do
this would be to read a bunch of

231
00:16:11,440 --> 00:16:15,559
the Protestant evangelical scholars on the history
of the formation of the Canon. And

232
00:16:15,600 --> 00:16:18,200
so I read F. F.
Bruce's book, and I read Lee McDonald's

233
00:16:18,240 --> 00:16:22,559
book their Evangelical Scholars, and here
they are admitting, oh, yeah,

234
00:16:22,559 --> 00:16:25,200
of course tradition plays a key role
in the Bible. Coming to me,

235
00:16:25,279 --> 00:16:27,679
and I'm like, what so again? And you and you know, you

236
00:16:27,759 --> 00:16:32,840
take these questions to your Protestant pastors
and well, you know, I don't

237
00:16:32,840 --> 00:16:34,440
know. I never read that.
Yeah, I haven't looked at that,

238
00:16:36,200 --> 00:16:38,159
but I'm sure we can find somebody
that knows. And then they'll refer you

239
00:16:38,279 --> 00:16:42,399
to, you know, some professor
at Reformed Theological Seminary or Westminster or whatever.

240
00:16:42,440 --> 00:16:48,279
And I just never really got good
answers, and so I decided I

241
00:16:48,279 --> 00:16:49,840
would have to be Roman Catholic.
So that led me to the Roman Catholic

242
00:16:49,879 --> 00:16:53,080
world. Still didn't know about Orthodoxy
when when I bought the church, fathers

243
00:16:53,120 --> 00:16:56,480
said, I just assumed that the
Western Church fathers had it all right,

244
00:16:57,080 --> 00:17:00,519
right, So I just started reading
Jerome, and I started reading you know,

245
00:17:00,559 --> 00:17:04,759
Ambrose and Cyprian and in Augustine,
and I just thought, well,

246
00:17:04,839 --> 00:17:08,880
Chris system and you know, he
might be all right, and the Capadocians

247
00:17:08,920 --> 00:17:11,759
maybe they're cool, but there's no
pressing need for me to read them.

248
00:17:12,000 --> 00:17:14,960
We all believe in the Trinity,
right, I mean they were defending the

249
00:17:15,000 --> 00:17:17,400
Trinity. Why do we need to
We don't need to rehash that debate.

250
00:17:18,000 --> 00:17:21,079
Yeah, So long story short,
Yeah, I went. I went in

251
00:17:21,119 --> 00:17:25,119
that direction. I left the Reformed
Church. I started attending a local Catholic

252
00:17:25,240 --> 00:17:29,720
church in two thousand and three,
went through what they call Catechumen r CIA,

253
00:17:30,759 --> 00:17:33,720
and UH spent about ten ten years
in the Roman Catholic world, got

254
00:17:33,759 --> 00:17:37,880
really serious about attending the traditional Latin
Mass. Did that for many, many

255
00:17:37,960 --> 00:17:41,920
years, drove for two hours for
probably five or six years to do that

256
00:17:44,279 --> 00:17:47,079
in Memphis or Nashville because the only
place it would have the Latin Mass that

257
00:17:47,119 --> 00:17:49,279
I could go to. UH.
And then and then I got to this

258
00:17:49,319 --> 00:17:52,079
point where it was like I was
so immersed in church history. I got

259
00:17:52,119 --> 00:17:56,319
really into Tomism and all that,
and it was like, well, what

260
00:17:56,359 --> 00:17:59,960
am I going to do with pre
post Vatican two. Long story short,

261
00:18:00,079 --> 00:18:03,279
that got me looking at the Orthodox
question. I encountered Orthodox blogs in two

262
00:18:03,279 --> 00:18:07,720
thousand and six for the first time. I wasn't ready to convert, but

263
00:18:07,759 --> 00:18:11,480
I would hash it out, I'd
argue with all these different people that were

264
00:18:11,519 --> 00:18:15,720
online in the Orthodox world at that
time. Yeah, and so that that

265
00:18:15,799 --> 00:18:18,759
kind of led me just to start
reading Eastern Fathers. And that took me

266
00:18:18,759 --> 00:18:22,759
another ten years. I wasn't ready
to, you know, because I mean

267
00:18:22,799 --> 00:18:26,319
I obviously think, well, maybe
you're just unstable and you're just converting to

268
00:18:26,319 --> 00:18:27,799
one thing in the next. I
would actually take long periods of time,

269
00:18:27,839 --> 00:18:30,759
right, I was runing CALLICU for
about ten years, and it took me

270
00:18:30,839 --> 00:18:34,599
another ten years before I decided that
I would go into Orthodoxy. I mean

271
00:18:34,640 --> 00:18:37,519
I held off for a really long
time. I say, I had the

272
00:18:37,559 --> 00:18:42,880
longest catechumen. It like I intentionally
I was a ten year catekid because I

273
00:18:42,920 --> 00:18:45,279
held off a long time. So
anyway, I'm sorry, I don't wanna

274
00:18:45,359 --> 00:18:48,519
keep talking about myself. It's just
kind of rambling and weird. But long

275
00:18:48,559 --> 00:18:52,880
story short, yeah, I just
I felt like, ultimately for me,

276
00:18:52,160 --> 00:18:56,400
at the end of the day.
The main issue of what led me out

277
00:18:56,440 --> 00:19:02,359
of Protestantism was looking into the cannon. It's historical formation, that reliance on

278
00:19:02,559 --> 00:19:06,680
church tradition for not just cannons city, but even things like absolutely authorship.

279
00:19:06,720 --> 00:19:10,359
That's those are things that we don't
I'm the gospels, they don't name them

280
00:19:10,559 --> 00:19:12,400
their author in a case of like
Matthew, right, I mean, and

281
00:19:12,440 --> 00:19:15,680
even if it says Matthew, well, there's other gospels that are false gospels

282
00:19:15,839 --> 00:19:18,000
you know that we don't accept.
Why don't we accept them? So you

283
00:19:18,039 --> 00:19:21,240
can't take it just because of the
name. Oh, this was the Gospel

284
00:19:21,240 --> 00:19:23,039
of Thomas, Right, Well that's
the not we don't want that one.

285
00:19:23,079 --> 00:19:29,240
Well how do we what are we
a judge between? Right? So yeah,

286
00:19:29,359 --> 00:19:30,039
more I got into the church history, more, I got into the

287
00:19:30,079 --> 00:19:33,799
church fathers. More I realized that, well, it just can't be Protestantism.

288
00:19:33,319 --> 00:19:37,319
And I was also, you know, still really into Bible the whole

289
00:19:37,359 --> 00:19:41,440
time, so I would always be
encountering passages that didn't fit with the system

290
00:19:41,480 --> 00:19:45,359
that I had. So if you've
got this soul of fitte a justiccation by

291
00:19:45,359 --> 00:19:48,839
faith alone, you know, Calvinist, you know Tulip system, you've got

292
00:19:48,880 --> 00:19:52,920
all these problem texts that you're gonna
have to deal with, and over time,

293
00:19:53,200 --> 00:19:56,119
more and more of those problem texts
just really started mounting up, and

294
00:19:56,119 --> 00:20:00,759
I didn't find the answers really sufficient. But the biggest things actually for in

295
00:20:00,880 --> 00:20:06,640
terms of specifically Calvinism and what I
would say, it's just really ultimately the

296
00:20:06,759 --> 00:20:11,119
errors of a lot of Latin theology
period, would be the questions of absolute

297
00:20:11,119 --> 00:20:17,400
divine simplicity and the energies and the
issues of Christology. Because once I realized

298
00:20:17,400 --> 00:20:22,880
that Calvinist Christology, even though they
don't intend it to be a lot of

299
00:20:22,880 --> 00:20:26,400
times, it actually is a Nestorian
Christology. So you can you can take

300
00:20:26,440 --> 00:20:30,400
it in two directions. You can
go in Nestorian and you can say that

301
00:20:30,519 --> 00:20:34,759
the subject who was punished on the
cross by the Father is a human subject,

302
00:20:34,880 --> 00:20:38,880
Jesus of Nazareth, which would be
an Astorian option. Or you could

303
00:20:38,920 --> 00:20:42,240
say that the son was damned by
the Father, which it would be an

304
00:20:42,279 --> 00:20:45,079
area In option, because that would
mean the Trinity is no longer you know

305
00:20:47,160 --> 00:20:49,440
one. So so all those are
the only two options. If you believe

306
00:20:49,519 --> 00:20:55,400
the classical Protestant doctrine of the Sun
being punished as the you know, the

307
00:20:55,400 --> 00:21:00,799
payment for the sins of penal substitutionary
atonement, right exactly. You mentioned what

308
00:21:02,240 --> 00:21:06,720
must be a beautiful a doctrine.
You mentioned what must be a beautiful teaching

309
00:21:06,880 --> 00:21:10,039
and it must be a beautiful thing
because it's named after a flower, tulip.

310
00:21:10,079 --> 00:21:12,319
I think you mentioned that a moment
ago, and Luther and I were

311
00:21:12,400 --> 00:21:15,799
kind of anxious to talk to you
about that, but you said something and

312
00:21:15,960 --> 00:21:18,680
I really want to follow up with
you on that, and and and that

313
00:21:18,839 --> 00:21:25,440
is we were talking about the the
the the incredible explosion and growth of videos

314
00:21:25,519 --> 00:21:30,240
against Orthodoxy. But at the same
time, they're a lot of Protestants,

315
00:21:30,400 --> 00:21:34,000
and certainly a lot of Calvinists,
they're encountering the Fathers, in some cases

316
00:21:34,039 --> 00:21:37,680
for the first time, and they're
having to grapple and deal with things.

317
00:21:37,680 --> 00:21:41,559
And they're there, and I've spoken
with some of them privately, and it's

318
00:21:41,680 --> 00:21:45,440
they don't want me to quote them, but I mean, what they're saying

319
00:21:45,519 --> 00:21:51,119
privately about what they're what they're wrestling
over is profound. Do you see a

320
00:21:51,359 --> 00:21:56,920
change in Protestantism in general because of
this? And I think the encounter maybe

321
00:21:56,960 --> 00:22:02,839
goes back only maybe twenty years when
when when when this started to get very

322
00:22:02,880 --> 00:22:06,160
serious. Do you see that?
I see it, But I mean I'm

323
00:22:06,200 --> 00:22:08,640
wondering what you see in your encounters
and talking with people. I'm starting to

324
00:22:08,680 --> 00:22:14,839
hear them talk about real presence.
I'm talking they're starting to see to pity

325
00:22:15,799 --> 00:22:18,039
baptism and things like that, and
it's like, oh my god, this

326
00:22:18,119 --> 00:22:23,359
is what you guys abhorred thirty years
ago, and now you're you're actually saying

327
00:22:23,359 --> 00:22:26,599
there must be something too a Jayder, What do you think? What do

328
00:22:26,599 --> 00:22:29,359
you say? Absolutely? Yeah?
I mean, like I said, so,

329
00:22:30,200 --> 00:22:36,240
you know, twenty years ago,
maybe twenty two or three, the

330
00:22:36,400 --> 00:22:38,960
Presbyterians, the PCA, and some
of the OPC people had what they called

331
00:22:40,000 --> 00:22:45,160
the Auburn Avenue Conference, and that
was a lot of these guys at that

332
00:22:45,279 --> 00:22:48,440
time dealing with grappling with the things
that you're talking about. And so a

333
00:22:48,440 --> 00:22:52,000
lot of them were reading Schmaman,
Fello Schmaman's books. They were reading books

334
00:22:52,000 --> 00:22:57,079
that dealt with liturgical theology. Peter
Lightheart, James Jordan, That's the people

335
00:22:57,079 --> 00:23:00,519
I'm talking about, and they're realizing
that, hey, there's actually a lot

336
00:23:00,559 --> 00:23:04,519
of liturgy in the Bible. There's
actually a lot of symbolism that could point

337
00:23:04,599 --> 00:23:08,359
us in the direction of typology that
maybe it's relevant for the New Testament Church.

338
00:23:10,359 --> 00:23:12,880
Maybe vestiments aren't a bad idea,
Maybe it's not wrong to have incense,

339
00:23:14,039 --> 00:23:18,799
right, So you know, and
this is ironic because, like you're

340
00:23:18,839 --> 00:23:21,720
saying, thirty forty years ago,
the Reform, the Calvinists, you know,

341
00:23:21,839 --> 00:23:25,359
they had this strong position which they
call the regulat principle of worship,

342
00:23:26,119 --> 00:23:30,960
which is the idea that laid down
in like the Westminster Confession, that you

343
00:23:30,000 --> 00:23:36,720
can only worship God in the way
that he has explicitly mentioned. But of

344
00:23:36,759 --> 00:23:40,519
course the difficulty there, and I've
been making this point quite a lot with

345
00:23:40,599 --> 00:23:42,359
the Protestants in the last few years, is that, well, isn't it

346
00:23:42,440 --> 00:23:47,160
odd that the New Testament then doesn't
give us a pattern of worship? Now

347
00:23:47,160 --> 00:23:52,519
we have Paul of Saint Paul complaining
about abuses, but how do we know

348
00:23:52,599 --> 00:23:56,000
the layout of what we're supposed to
do? If you're going to make the

349
00:23:56,079 --> 00:24:00,720
argument, as many Calvinists do,
that Nadab and Abihu were put to death

350
00:24:00,839 --> 00:24:03,720
because they offered strange fire, they
did what they weren't supposed to do in

351
00:24:03,759 --> 00:24:08,319
Lett, because because they didn't go
according to the explicit commands. Where are

352
00:24:08,319 --> 00:24:12,319
the explicit commands of how you do
the worship service? And it's intentionally,

353
00:24:12,319 --> 00:24:17,720
i think, providentially not there because
there's a reliance on the fact that the

354
00:24:17,759 --> 00:24:23,359
Apostles and that here's the weird part. Every Protestant scholar and even Anglican liturgists

355
00:24:23,359 --> 00:24:30,559
that I've read, they admit that
the Apostles had some sort of liturgy that

356
00:24:30,640 --> 00:24:33,799
they established in the sea, the
seas, the apostlote seas and churches they

357
00:24:33,839 --> 00:24:38,039
set up that was some kind of
blending of the temple in the synagogue service.

358
00:24:38,079 --> 00:24:42,759
This is pretty pretty unanimous in you
know, history of liturgy books that

359
00:24:42,799 --> 00:24:45,839
you'll read, even from Protestants.
So to me, that was kind of

360
00:24:45,880 --> 00:24:49,200
another big, you know thing when
I read that many years ago that I

361
00:24:49,240 --> 00:24:52,279
didn't realize when I was Protestant,
that liturgy has a key role in the

362
00:24:52,319 --> 00:24:56,319
formation of the Biblical canon. And
when I learned that, that was pretty

363
00:24:56,400 --> 00:25:03,680
much I think and see McDonald or
Bruster says that you can't divorce the daily

364
00:25:03,759 --> 00:25:08,359
electionaries, the daily readings from the
cannon and how the cannon of scripture was

365
00:25:08,359 --> 00:25:12,799
was decided upon in terms of the
many centuries actually plus even the fact that

366
00:25:12,839 --> 00:25:17,000
it's centuries and there, you know, the Orthodox view, if we accept

367
00:25:17,000 --> 00:25:21,680
the you know Trolo and I see
it too, that's really where they affirm

368
00:25:22,319 --> 00:25:27,200
the cannons of Carthage, that lists
are loose cannon. You could say that

369
00:25:27,279 --> 00:25:33,359
to me is if you're a Protestants, I will wouldn't If we're Protestants in

370
00:25:33,400 --> 00:25:36,519
the in the first century, the
first thing we would do is decide the

371
00:25:36,599 --> 00:25:42,200
cannon. The possibles would have said, hey, we got to have Jerusalem

372
00:25:42,240 --> 00:25:47,160
Council too, right acts fifteen,
let's have Jerusalem too right away here?

373
00:25:47,200 --> 00:25:49,000
And I don't know one hundred eighty
or ninety eight. I guess they'd all

374
00:25:49,039 --> 00:25:52,279
be dead. But I don't know, right Apple, why didn't Why wouldn't

375
00:25:52,319 --> 00:25:55,839
happen in the you know, John's
day? Why wouldn't John. Let's get

376
00:25:55,880 --> 00:25:57,759
together. We got to decide this
Bible first. I mean, we're Bible

377
00:25:57,799 --> 00:26:02,960
alone right anyway? So I'm rambling, But again, yeah, I think

378
00:26:02,960 --> 00:26:11,440
you're right father, that so many
Protestants are beginning to see that there's not

379
00:26:11,559 --> 00:26:17,160
just an issue of throwing this or
that Bible verse. There's a bigger issue

380
00:26:17,279 --> 00:26:19,640
at work here, which is,
how does this Bible come to be,

381
00:26:21,359 --> 00:26:26,880
and the very people that make these
decisions about putting these books into the Bible,

382
00:26:26,599 --> 00:26:32,759
none of them believe Protestant stuff.
And then the option usually for Protestants

383
00:26:32,799 --> 00:26:34,319
at that point. I tried this
too. When I first encountered this was

384
00:26:34,359 --> 00:26:40,640
well, I'm gonna try to find
Protestant issue quotes in the Church Fathers.

385
00:26:41,640 --> 00:26:44,559
Well, you know, one of
the other things that people say about the

386
00:26:44,880 --> 00:26:48,000
IM not gonna go into this,
but just regarding the Cannon is that the

387
00:26:48,039 --> 00:26:52,880
Cannon was formed very early. Excuse
me, the lectionary was formed very early.

388
00:26:52,440 --> 00:26:56,359
And one of the reasons why Revelation
was debated for the longest time because

389
00:26:56,599 --> 00:27:00,640
one of the arguments was people at
point and say, it's not electionary,

390
00:27:00,759 --> 00:27:03,319
right, you know, it's not
already one of the books that we're reading.

391
00:27:03,359 --> 00:27:07,519
So anyway, but we got we
got so much more we want to

392
00:27:07,519 --> 00:27:10,759
go into. Here. One point
on that which a lot of people don't

393
00:27:10,759 --> 00:27:12,440
know about. I think it's in
the in the Lee McDonald book. If

394
00:27:12,440 --> 00:27:15,200
you read the Lee McDonald book,
he said, there's a whole chapter and

395
00:27:15,200 --> 00:27:22,640
they're on how Saint Athanasius went to
Rome and Rome was doubting. Uh,

396
00:27:22,160 --> 00:27:30,079
the Catholic Epistles and Revelation, and
Athanasius said, it's our tradition that this

397
00:27:30,160 --> 00:27:33,599
is this is a valid book,
you should include it. So it's actually

398
00:27:33,640 --> 00:27:37,839
the Pope of Rome was convinced to
keep the Catholic Epistles in the Roman Canon

399
00:27:37,400 --> 00:27:41,960
by Saint Athanasius. And if when
you start to realize that, you know,

400
00:27:42,000 --> 00:27:45,920
in the Protestant mindset is kind of
like social scripture, the Bible just

401
00:27:45,000 --> 00:27:48,559
sort of like falls out of heaven
as this like complete thing, and then

402
00:27:48,559 --> 00:27:52,440
you realize, no, actually,
the history is God using people through divine

403
00:27:52,480 --> 00:27:57,480
providence, like Athanasius to say,
and I'm not saying that, I'm not

404
00:27:57,480 --> 00:28:02,119
saying it's true because Rome said.
I'm just saying that it is important that

405
00:28:02,240 --> 00:28:06,799
Rome included the Apocalypse in the Cannon. But it wasn't just the pope saying

406
00:28:06,920 --> 00:28:10,279
I had decree the apocalypse is like, no, it's autonaceous had to go

407
00:28:10,279 --> 00:28:17,400
convince them. It's interesting that earlier
you mentioned like as you were thinking through

408
00:28:17,440 --> 00:28:21,599
that calvinistic system of yours, like
you're really you're seeing scriptures like that weren't

409
00:28:21,640 --> 00:28:26,079
really, you know, compatible with
your your calvinistic beliefs. And I actually

410
00:28:26,160 --> 00:28:30,519
had a similar kind of experience at
my previous church when I, you know,

411
00:28:30,519 --> 00:28:33,640
I was asked to preach. We're
preaching through the Sermon on the Mount,

412
00:28:33,880 --> 00:28:38,000
and I was just like, man
like, justification seems like a process,

413
00:28:38,119 --> 00:28:41,799
and you know, like as you
walk through the Sermon on the Mount,

414
00:28:41,880 --> 00:28:45,200
like texts I was struggling with was
like judge not unless you be judging

415
00:28:45,240 --> 00:28:48,519
the measure that you judge, you'll
be judging. Or also the you know,

416
00:28:48,680 --> 00:28:52,319
texts about forgiveness like forgive so that
your heavenly Father would forgive you.

417
00:28:52,359 --> 00:28:55,720
And I'm just like, man like, how do I preach this text?

418
00:28:55,799 --> 00:28:57,920
And I was like struggling because I
was on stage. I was like,

419
00:28:59,000 --> 00:29:02,960
yeah, this is what scholars you
know say like RC spoil this that in

420
00:29:03,000 --> 00:29:06,319
the third and and here you know, so like I had this, I

421
00:29:06,400 --> 00:29:08,079
was I was almost like arrested to
the text in a way where I was

422
00:29:08,200 --> 00:29:11,400
like I had to give two views
because I didn't know what to do because

423
00:29:11,400 --> 00:29:15,240
I was like, clearly the text
is saying something different than what Calvinism teach.

424
00:29:15,359 --> 00:29:18,519
What would you say for you were
kind of those things that you looked

425
00:29:18,519 --> 00:29:22,680
at and you were just saying this, this does not work there were so

426
00:29:22,759 --> 00:29:27,440
many. I mean, I remember
thinking, you know, like the parable

427
00:29:27,440 --> 00:29:32,799
of the of the sower. You
know, in Calvinism, if you're regenerated,

428
00:29:32,920 --> 00:29:37,400
you're regenerated, right, that doesn't
go away because only the elect are

429
00:29:37,440 --> 00:29:41,200
regenerated. But in the parable of
the sower, it's very clearly the analogies

430
00:29:41,680 --> 00:29:47,519
is that one of the seeds sprouts
up two new life and withers the ways

431
00:29:47,559 --> 00:29:49,799
and dies. And I could never
make sense of that, and of course

432
00:29:49,839 --> 00:29:56,039
you have to say things like,
well it didn't really spring up today is

433
00:29:56,119 --> 00:30:00,359
the analogy doesn't work anymore if it
didn't really spring up to new life.

434
00:30:00,400 --> 00:30:03,759
And you know, there's there's so
many other passages like that, where you

435
00:30:03,759 --> 00:30:07,039
know in Hebrews, you know,
you have the passage about tasting of the

436
00:30:07,039 --> 00:30:11,160
heavenly gift, and you know they've
been washed, they've tasted of the life

437
00:30:11,160 --> 00:30:15,279
to come. How do you taste
of the life to come? If?

438
00:30:15,559 --> 00:30:19,160
I mean, that could only be
a regeneration and you can't be unregenerated if

439
00:30:19,160 --> 00:30:25,640
you're regenerated. So you know,
so many of those passages were difficult passages

440
00:30:25,720 --> 00:30:27,960
too that related to baptism. I
noticed that, you know, every time

441
00:30:27,960 --> 00:30:34,720
we would talk about the right of
baptism. It was distinct from all those

442
00:30:34,720 --> 00:30:40,160
things in the New Testament about baptism. And it's like, well, you

443
00:30:40,200 --> 00:30:45,759
know, how come Paul isn't distinguishing
visible invisible church, visible baptism from invisible

444
00:30:45,759 --> 00:30:51,079
baptism. Right, It's always spoken
of as this unitive act, even to

445
00:30:51,160 --> 00:30:53,039
the point of you know, TIEDUS
three five, the washing of the labor

446
00:30:53,079 --> 00:31:00,200
of regeneration. And it's like,
this seems to be an the grace and

447
00:31:00,319 --> 00:31:04,240
the sacrament, the physical elements are
united here. And so the more I

448
00:31:04,279 --> 00:31:07,720
noticed this union, and the more
I noticed that, well, now wait

449
00:31:07,759 --> 00:31:11,920
a minute. So we're doing the
same thing with ecclesiology, where we're saying

450
00:31:11,920 --> 00:31:18,119
that the church is invisible, it's
a spiritual thing, and then there's this

451
00:31:18,240 --> 00:31:21,640
visible church. It's kind of a
big mess, right, and the true

452
00:31:21,680 --> 00:31:23,599
elector amongst the you know, all
these different groups. And it's like what

453
00:31:23,720 --> 00:31:26,680
Paul is always saying, one Lord, one faith, one body, one

454
00:31:26,680 --> 00:31:30,359
baptism. It's always joined. Great
and those were you know, when I

455
00:31:30,400 --> 00:31:36,160
would think about those pastors another here's
an overlooked one too that really stuck with

456
00:31:36,200 --> 00:31:38,920
me. When I was a Calvinist, I remember, you know, I

457
00:31:38,960 --> 00:31:41,960
was really into Covenant theology. If
you're reformed, you know you love Covenant

458
00:31:42,000 --> 00:31:47,480
theology, you really want to you
want to stress Covenant theology when you're discussing

459
00:31:47,480 --> 00:31:49,160
with a dispensationalist or a Baptists.
You want to say, hey, you

460
00:31:49,200 --> 00:31:53,160
know, we've got these Covenant blessings
just like or even better than the Old

461
00:31:53,200 --> 00:31:56,839
Testament that people had. You know, we can we have people included in

462
00:31:56,880 --> 00:32:01,079
the Covenant more so, right because
if you in the Old Testament, you

463
00:32:01,119 --> 00:32:05,240
know it was the males that were
circumcised to be included in the Covenant.

464
00:32:05,640 --> 00:32:07,960
Now it's anybody, men, women, gentiles, everybody can be included in

465
00:32:07,960 --> 00:32:12,960
the Covenant. But then I realized, well, I'm making an argument against

466
00:32:12,960 --> 00:32:17,640
a Baptist or against a dispensationalist.
That's historical. And then I started thinking,

467
00:32:17,799 --> 00:32:23,240
you know, the history of the
Covenant and the Old Testament is one

468
00:32:23,359 --> 00:32:28,720
people, right, And yeah,
you in the Old Testament. Certainly other

469
00:32:29,039 --> 00:32:31,240
people outside the nation of Israel could
be joined to the Nation of Israel as

470
00:32:31,240 --> 00:32:37,559
possible. But the point is that
there's one group or church called the people

471
00:32:37,599 --> 00:32:39,880
of Israel, the Ecclesia. And
then in the New Testament, if I'm

472
00:32:39,880 --> 00:32:43,680
going to make that historical argument.
I can't just restrict it to the New

473
00:32:43,720 --> 00:32:46,119
Testament. There seems to be one
historical group as well in the New Testament,

474
00:32:47,039 --> 00:32:52,000
and so the church has to also
be just as one, and even

475
00:32:52,000 --> 00:32:55,839
more so one because it's post Pentecost
than the Old Testament Church. And so

476
00:32:55,880 --> 00:33:01,240
I realized that I couldn't argue that
the Church which existed amongst thirty thousand different

477
00:33:01,240 --> 00:33:07,000
groups, right, it has to
be a single visible and all the analogies

478
00:33:07,039 --> 00:33:10,759
that not just Paul, but Jesus
uses right, the tree, one tree,

479
00:33:12,799 --> 00:33:16,119
the sheep fold, right, it's
all these united things that are also

480
00:33:16,240 --> 00:33:21,440
united in history. Doesn't mean that
the Church doesn't have periods of schisms and

481
00:33:21,440 --> 00:33:24,599
stuff like that, But I'm just
saying that there's also a historical continuity to

482
00:33:24,640 --> 00:33:30,359
the historicity of God's people being a
single people. J Jay. When we

483
00:33:30,440 --> 00:33:34,799
talk in orthodoxy about what's central to
our to our faith, what's central to

484
00:33:34,799 --> 00:33:38,279
our church, we talk about across
the death the resurrection. Is it fair

485
00:33:38,319 --> 00:33:44,200
to say that when you were a
Calvinist that rather than that? Is it

486
00:33:44,240 --> 00:33:52,319
fair to say that Tulip was the
foundational center of Calvinist theology rather than across

487
00:33:52,359 --> 00:33:57,599
the death the resurrection is is that
it's another angle. That's a great critique,

488
00:33:57,759 --> 00:34:01,000
you know, because you would if
you read the pistoles, you know,

489
00:34:01,119 --> 00:34:07,240
Paul. Paul's always stressing those things. The gospel is death row resurrection.

490
00:34:07,920 --> 00:34:10,000
The gospel is that, And then
if you're a Calvinist, you're thinking,

491
00:34:10,000 --> 00:34:14,119
well, that's not really the gospel. The gospel is Romans nine and

492
00:34:14,159 --> 00:34:16,440
the Divine decree, right, I
mean, the gospel is this sort of

493
00:34:16,480 --> 00:34:22,360
process of you knowing the divine minds
decree of who the elect are, and

494
00:34:22,360 --> 00:34:25,440
then understanding that there's total pravity,
that you don't have the ability to move

495
00:34:25,519 --> 00:34:31,239
yourself towards God, that you have
to have irresistible grace and monarchism, which

496
00:34:31,280 --> 00:34:36,280
is the divine energy has to act
in you to cause you effectually to believe.

497
00:34:37,320 --> 00:34:40,320
So there's a loss of synergism and
all that in the process of salvation,

498
00:34:40,360 --> 00:34:45,800
and there's no notion of losing that
faith falling away because the elect are

499
00:34:46,280 --> 00:34:50,679
that's who Christ died for limited atonement, right, irresistible grace, and then

500
00:34:50,679 --> 00:34:54,639
perseverance, meaning that only the elect
ultimately persevere. So yeah, that's that's

501
00:34:54,639 --> 00:35:00,239
an interesting angle as well, that
you know, it's kind of like when

502
00:35:00,239 --> 00:35:02,920
you're when you're if you're an evangelical
Baptist not Reformed. You know, you

503
00:35:02,960 --> 00:35:06,239
think when somebody says, what's the
gospel, and you think, oh,

504
00:35:06,239 --> 00:35:08,159
it's Romans Road. You know,
you go to Romans three and you didn't

505
00:35:08,199 --> 00:35:10,559
understand that you're a sinner, and
then you go over here you can't do

506
00:35:10,639 --> 00:35:13,960
good, and then you go here
to Romans five that you know, just

507
00:35:14,039 --> 00:35:20,679
five by it. So it's like
this, that's the pathway that supposedly lowest

508
00:35:20,679 --> 00:35:23,400
common when I'm in their scales the
gospel down, but that's not what Paul

509
00:35:23,519 --> 00:35:28,400
says. How come Paul's always saying
resurrection, resurrection, ascension, ascension,

510
00:35:28,960 --> 00:35:30,280
and I just, yeah, you're
absolutely right. Like at a certain point

511
00:35:30,280 --> 00:35:37,480
you realize, you know, those
weren't really significant and reform theology or Pentecost,

512
00:35:37,559 --> 00:35:42,320
I mean, even the action of
Pentecost. It's like I realized eventually

513
00:35:42,400 --> 00:35:45,719
that well, Pentecost is the empowering
of the church, and Jesus says,

514
00:35:45,719 --> 00:35:49,519
I'm not going to leave you and
forsake you, and I'll guide you into

515
00:35:49,519 --> 00:35:52,000
all truth. And yet here we
are, as Protestants and reform we're saying

516
00:35:52,440 --> 00:35:55,320
we'll ride away that. You know, the church pretty much failed historically,

517
00:35:57,039 --> 00:36:00,159
right, But where was this promise
of pentecost and guidance and so forth.

518
00:36:00,199 --> 00:36:02,760
Oh, well, that's only for
the elect. But wait a minute.

519
00:36:02,920 --> 00:36:08,719
When Paul writes to the Ephesians when
he's talking about predestination, he's not writing

520
00:36:08,760 --> 00:36:13,960
to the elect, to the invisible
church. He's writing to the invisible community

521
00:36:14,039 --> 00:36:17,159
at Ephesis. And that was always
a problem for me in terms of exegesis

522
00:36:17,239 --> 00:36:21,880
of Ephesians, because I have a
you know, million reform commentaries and I'm

523
00:36:21,920 --> 00:36:24,639
over here reading Charles Hodge and you
know how to see exegy, you know

524
00:36:24,920 --> 00:36:29,559
Ephesians. Oh, this is Paul
writing to the regenerated officis, to the

525
00:36:29,599 --> 00:36:32,679
elect. No, it's written to
the invisible church. And that's a problem.

526
00:36:32,840 --> 00:36:37,519
That means that the Protestant, the
Calvinist auction predestination is not what's in

527
00:36:37,559 --> 00:36:40,320
Paul's mind there. So, long
story short, the essence of what you're

528
00:36:40,360 --> 00:36:47,440
asking is that the the Tulip approach
is the wrong order of theology, the

529
00:36:47,480 --> 00:36:52,960
wrong order of theology. It's reading
theology from trying to do it from the

530
00:36:52,039 --> 00:36:55,400
vanished point of the divine mind to
divine decree but that's not how we do

531
00:36:55,480 --> 00:37:01,519
it. Theology is read first and
foremost trying to and christology wise. Then

532
00:37:01,639 --> 00:37:07,000
that leads you to how you would
understand steriology and ecclesiology basic. So if

533
00:37:07,000 --> 00:37:14,480
you try to start with the divine
decree, start with steriology right, justification

534
00:37:14,559 --> 00:37:16,480
by faith alone, that's the gospel, he gets all messed up, and

535
00:37:16,519 --> 00:37:22,599
then you get people. Then down
the road your trinitarian christological stuff's all messed

536
00:37:22,639 --> 00:37:28,360
up because you have to squeeze Jesus
being damned into the priest oppositions that you

537
00:37:28,400 --> 00:37:31,480
have of justification by faith alone,
and both of you coming from a Calvinist

538
00:37:31,559 --> 00:37:36,760
background, it would seem to me
there's another big thing missing out of this

539
00:37:36,840 --> 00:37:42,880
is that you can take the center
and you can forgive the sinner all you

540
00:37:42,920 --> 00:37:45,320
want, forgive, forget, forgive, forget, forgive. That center is

541
00:37:45,320 --> 00:37:49,840
still going to die. You haven't
in the Calvinist it seems to me,

542
00:37:49,880 --> 00:37:52,000
and I could be wrong. In
the Calvinist way of looking at things,

543
00:37:52,039 --> 00:38:00,079
you still haven't dealt with death,
and Christ destroyed death, so that the

544
00:37:59,760 --> 00:38:04,840
sin they're still forgiven. Who's still
having to deal with the sin in him,

545
00:38:04,840 --> 00:38:07,840
the sinful nature and so forth,
could live. And it seems like

546
00:38:07,920 --> 00:38:12,760
that that's missing, that the idea
that Christ destroyed death. Yeah, the

547
00:38:12,920 --> 00:38:20,440
ultimate that's missing from Calvinist theology.
It's a crucial point because in Calvinist theology,

548
00:38:20,559 --> 00:38:25,559
death is kind of like a necessary
it's it's a necessary element under the

549
00:38:25,599 --> 00:38:30,480
divine decree. Right, So it's
not the enemy of God. It's sort

550
00:38:30,519 --> 00:38:35,480
of just the tool of God.
And certainly, certainly God's providence covers evil

551
00:38:35,519 --> 00:38:38,119
and death, but it doesn't mean
that he positively wills or decrees it.

552
00:38:38,159 --> 00:38:42,719
In fact, Scripture says God does
not will death. And you know in

553
00:38:42,760 --> 00:38:45,360
Californid's got these different wills. So
he's got one will where it's like he

554
00:38:45,400 --> 00:38:49,639
doesn't really want it, but then
he's got a secret will where he's like

555
00:38:49,719 --> 00:38:57,800
doing it. It's crazy. Yeah, So this is this is a huge

556
00:38:57,840 --> 00:39:00,840
gap. You're absolutely right, and
it ties into the notion that you can

557
00:39:00,880 --> 00:39:06,599
be saved and justified and righteous and
have no no actual holiness. Right,

558
00:39:06,639 --> 00:39:10,360
that's the that's a weird thing that
actually encountered that in a lot of the

559
00:39:12,400 --> 00:39:17,199
Roman Catholic critiques of Protestantism when I
was looking at Roman Catholicism, because they

560
00:39:17,239 --> 00:39:20,920
made a great point. I think
it was. It was I think it

561
00:39:20,920 --> 00:39:25,360
was on Eck. There's a there's
an old book that is ex debate with

562
00:39:25,440 --> 00:39:29,840
Luther. It's actually a really good
book. I'm not I'm not advocating Roman

563
00:39:29,880 --> 00:39:32,280
Catholicism. I'm just saying that Eck
has some really good arguments in that debate

564
00:39:32,320 --> 00:39:37,440
with Luther, and he's and and
some of the topics brought up are things

565
00:39:37,559 --> 00:39:42,519
like, well, how can God
call somebody righteous if in fact they're completely

566
00:39:42,559 --> 00:39:45,559
wicked? As you say, Luther, right, your your filthy rags.

567
00:39:45,639 --> 00:39:50,159
Luther was even more radical and depravity
than Calvin was because Luther wrote Bondage of

568
00:39:50,159 --> 00:39:52,400
the Will, which is basically arguing
that you can you can't do anything good

569
00:39:52,400 --> 00:39:59,079
at all. He's more radical just
on that point than Calvin is. Well,

570
00:39:59,679 --> 00:40:02,840
He's says that you're a you're a
you're an ass that's either written by

571
00:40:02,920 --> 00:40:07,039
God or the devil, but the
devil. Yeah, And that's in that

572
00:40:07,079 --> 00:40:10,000
Bondage of the Will book. And
I had a payse where I read I

573
00:40:10,039 --> 00:40:14,159
read the private six Luther books.
I was really enamored with Luther for maybe

574
00:40:14,199 --> 00:40:15,679
a year or two. I wasn't
Lutheran, but I just thought he was

575
00:40:15,719 --> 00:40:21,559
an interesting, you know, bombastic
figure. But uh, you know,

576
00:40:21,639 --> 00:40:23,159
acc was making these points that,
well, doesn't that make God a liar?

577
00:40:23,400 --> 00:40:28,760
How can God call you righteous when
in fact you're evil and God can't

578
00:40:28,800 --> 00:40:31,840
lie, So how's that possible?
Oh well, he's just seeing the righteousness

579
00:40:31,840 --> 00:40:35,920
of Christ's covering you. But it's
not actually the reckness of Christ. It's

580
00:40:35,920 --> 00:40:38,960
actually just a legal status. Great. And then there's a great point that

581
00:40:39,760 --> 00:40:45,079
I think it's brought up in the
Alistair McGrath Eustecia day Book, which is

582
00:40:45,119 --> 00:40:51,360
that nobody before nominalism in the Middle
Ages and the Reformed, the rise of

583
00:40:51,360 --> 00:40:58,960
the Reformed tradition, they didn't think
of a division between what you called something

584
00:40:59,199 --> 00:41:04,440
and it's actual a mentaphysical status.
That's an actual post Enlightenment, postal Reformation

585
00:41:04,519 --> 00:41:08,800
division. In other words, it's
impossible to have that view, that nominalist

586
00:41:08,880 --> 00:41:14,559
view prior to medieval nominalism debates.
So, in other words, nobody in

587
00:41:14,599 --> 00:41:19,119
the ancient medieval world, including Paul, thought that you could have a purely

588
00:41:19,239 --> 00:41:23,679
legal status of righteousness divorced from the
actual ontological status if you're being righteous.

589
00:41:24,039 --> 00:41:28,320
And that's a little bit of a
philosophical angle on it. But if that

590
00:41:28,440 --> 00:41:30,559
is the case, and I think
that it is, that's also really devastating

591
00:41:30,599 --> 00:41:37,440
to the idea that you can be
just before God in a purely nominal legal

592
00:41:37,559 --> 00:41:40,679
sense and not in an actual sense. There wasn't a division in the world.

593
00:41:40,800 --> 00:41:45,440
And ladies and gentlemen watching this debate
sometime in the future of this recording,

594
00:41:45,559 --> 00:41:50,079
go back and listen to what Jay
just said. Listen to that again.

595
00:41:51,000 --> 00:41:53,519
That's really something. Yeah, there's
no division. And the same thing

596
00:41:53,559 --> 00:41:58,960
goes for sacraments, right the ancient
and medieval world. Now, certainly there

597
00:41:58,960 --> 00:42:04,079
were heretics that deny the real presence, but they didn't typically think of this

598
00:42:04,239 --> 00:42:10,840
radical division between uh sign and signifier. Right. The same goes for iconography,

599
00:42:10,920 --> 00:42:14,960
the image of the icon, the
image of the saint. They didn't

600
00:42:15,000 --> 00:42:19,079
think of it as this radical division
of oh, that's just a purely token

601
00:42:19,199 --> 00:42:23,280
symbol. They thought of it as
having in some sense a real, real

602
00:42:23,320 --> 00:42:29,199
metaphysical connection with the person that being
the thing. Right, So there might

603
00:42:29,199 --> 00:42:31,719
have been debates about the real presence, but nobody thought about it. As

604
00:42:32,440 --> 00:42:39,239
you know, symbols in the ancient
world were not sure dead matter. Does

605
00:42:39,280 --> 00:42:42,719
that make sense? Yeah, well, that's what they think of it today,

606
00:42:42,760 --> 00:42:45,400
that's not what they thought of it
back then. The word symbol is

607
00:42:45,519 --> 00:42:49,000
is radically altered now from what it
meant two thousand years ago. There you

608
00:42:49,000 --> 00:42:52,199
go, yeah, yeah, because
you're clashing two things together is out?

609
00:42:52,639 --> 00:42:58,840
Yeah you So so this question here, I got to ask you this so

610
00:42:58,880 --> 00:43:02,199
that Daniel, Daniel MacArthur, if
you're listening, he wanted me to ask

611
00:43:02,480 --> 00:43:07,920
Jay Die this when when the opportunity
presented sself. So you're welcome. So

612
00:43:08,000 --> 00:43:15,159
basically you touched up on this idea
of the Christology, this reformed Christology.

613
00:43:15,239 --> 00:43:17,440
Now it's been kind of you know, you know, mutulated in a way.

614
00:43:19,360 --> 00:43:22,719
Can you can you speak more into
that. I know you referenced you

615
00:43:22,760 --> 00:43:25,440
know where that kind of gets messed
up, But it's a it's an important

616
00:43:25,480 --> 00:43:30,159
point. Daniel said that was something
that was very convincing for him as well.

617
00:43:30,239 --> 00:43:32,760
Back in the day. You've you've
had videos where you've talked about this,

618
00:43:32,800 --> 00:43:37,159
But could you kind of walk through
why that Christology issue is such a

619
00:43:37,239 --> 00:43:43,280
huge point and why it's a radical
Sure, So I would say I'm not

620
00:43:43,920 --> 00:43:47,400
saying that Protestants are intentionally wanting to
be an a Storian. Sure, a

621
00:43:47,400 --> 00:43:50,679
lot of times when I make this
point, though, say I'm not in

622
00:43:50,760 --> 00:43:53,159
the Storian. I don't believe that. I'm not saying that you're intending to

623
00:43:53,199 --> 00:43:59,280
be. What I'm saying is that
the logic of the penal substitution position will

624
00:43:59,360 --> 00:44:06,119
take you there if you're consistent with
it, and it's pretty clear cut.

625
00:44:06,159 --> 00:44:12,320
I think that now some Protestants and
Evangelicals today, I mean maybe maybe Calvinists

626
00:44:12,320 --> 00:44:14,519
are up in the air today.
I'm not sure I did hear that one.

627
00:44:14,880 --> 00:44:17,960
Somebody told me that one of the
modern Calvinist systematic theologians, I don't

628
00:44:17,960 --> 00:44:22,960
remember who it was, maybe Robert
Raymond or somebody. Somebody supposedly doesn't have

629
00:44:22,039 --> 00:44:28,800
the classical Reformation view that that Jesus
was damned in our place. But for

630
00:44:28,840 --> 00:44:37,639
the classical reformers even up in two
people like Ji Packer, uh, Paul

631
00:44:37,679 --> 00:44:46,079
Washer teaches it right. Here's the
other, the Calvinist Baptist guy that everybody

632
00:44:46,119 --> 00:44:51,639
that's super famous I always good blank
on his name, John John Piper,

633
00:44:51,719 --> 00:44:54,880
John Piper Teacher hyper teaches that Christ
was damned. I'm trying to think of

634
00:44:54,880 --> 00:45:00,880
who the classical guys all that's really
cool damns himself. I like that one

635
00:45:00,920 --> 00:45:06,800
boy. Yeah, well, I
mean they're trying to be consistent because so

636
00:45:06,840 --> 00:45:13,360
you have you know, you have
in the Apostles Creed. I know that's

637
00:45:13,360 --> 00:45:16,079
not really an Orthodox church. But
in the West, when Luther or Calvin

638
00:45:16,079 --> 00:45:20,119
and these guys, when they were
commenting on Christ's descent into Hades and the

639
00:45:20,159 --> 00:45:24,280
Apostles Creed, they had to give
it a new understanding because unfortunately, even

640
00:45:24,320 --> 00:45:29,760
though the Latin Church in the West
at that time they I believe that they

641
00:45:29,800 --> 00:45:32,239
had kind of lost the significance of
Christ has sent into Hades, it was

642
00:45:32,239 --> 00:45:37,559
still it was still there in confession, and even today in the Catholic Catechism

643
00:45:37,639 --> 00:45:42,400
it's still there that they professed that
Christ has sent it into the Hades.

644
00:45:43,039 --> 00:45:45,360
But the Reformers, this is a
fascinating They gave it a new spin.

645
00:45:45,639 --> 00:45:49,519
They said, well, it's not
him actually going to someplace called Hades.

646
00:45:50,480 --> 00:45:59,519
What that means is that on the
cross he experienced the reality of the damn

647
00:45:59,559 --> 00:46:02,880
nation and of all the people that
he died for. The logic of that

648
00:46:04,000 --> 00:46:07,159
is that if it's going to be
a full transaction in a legal sense,

649
00:46:07,199 --> 00:46:12,400
if he's going to pay the debt
that I out he paid up old.

650
00:46:13,360 --> 00:46:15,119
You know, I can't remember that
Baptist him we used to sing when I

651
00:46:15,159 --> 00:46:19,039
was a kid. But so right, I mean, if the debt is,

652
00:46:19,079 --> 00:46:21,880
if it's a one to war,
you've got to pay the damnation,

653
00:46:21,960 --> 00:46:28,599
which was to me that I then
get the bank account righteousness put into my

654
00:46:28,639 --> 00:46:30,639
bank account. Right, That's how
it works in the classical Protestant idea.

655
00:46:31,119 --> 00:46:35,239
So it's not just them saying,
oh, well, God just forgives you

656
00:46:35,280 --> 00:46:38,159
and transfers the righteous of Christ to
your bank account. It's on the basis

657
00:46:38,320 --> 00:46:45,079
of and most of the classical reformers
the wrath of the Father being poured out

658
00:46:45,119 --> 00:46:50,199
on the sun. So then we
have this question in terms of Christology,

659
00:46:50,239 --> 00:46:53,400
which is that, well, we're
going to be orthodox in our christology,

660
00:46:53,559 --> 00:46:58,599
how does that actually work? Because
is it the Father damning the sun?

661
00:47:00,039 --> 00:47:04,159
And if you believe ephesis and the
Christology that you know comes out of well

662
00:47:04,199 --> 00:47:08,599
not just emphasis but calconon, then
we know that the subject is a divine

663
00:47:08,639 --> 00:47:15,199
person, the logos is the divine
person who's undergoing supposedly this event, and

664
00:47:15,239 --> 00:47:17,760
that would mean then that the divine
person of the Father is damning the divine

665
00:47:17,760 --> 00:47:22,760
person of the Logos who's incarnated.
So you kind of only have two options

666
00:47:22,800 --> 00:47:27,280
there. You can say, well, it's not the father damning the divine

667
00:47:27,400 --> 00:47:31,639
son, it's the damnation of the
human nature. Well, but it's there's

668
00:47:31,639 --> 00:47:35,480
has to be one person. Yeah, there's got to be some subject that

669
00:47:35,800 --> 00:47:38,679
is the recipient of that. It
can't just be the human nature that's damn.

670
00:47:38,760 --> 00:47:42,519
It has to be a subject.
And so is that Jesus of Nazareth

671
00:47:42,519 --> 00:47:45,159
the historical person. Well, that
would be an a story in view that

672
00:47:45,559 --> 00:47:51,559
the story is sought a dual subject
Christology, that there was a human hypostasis

673
00:47:51,639 --> 00:47:54,079
Jesus Nazareth, and then there's the
divine hypostasis of the Logos, who was

674
00:47:54,159 --> 00:47:59,519
kind of sometimes present, and then
sometimes it's the human person sometimes. So

675
00:47:59,559 --> 00:48:04,320
it's this weird dual subject Cristology.
And the whole point of that tokos the

676
00:48:04,400 --> 00:48:07,159
word the phrase is, Cyril said, this completely cuts out the whole idea

677
00:48:08,199 --> 00:48:13,920
of there being a dual subject Cristology. The only subject for all the incarnate

678
00:48:13,960 --> 00:48:15,800
action, Cyril says, is the
divine person of the Logos. That's it.

679
00:48:16,280 --> 00:48:19,960
He is a full human nature,
but he's not a human hypostasis or

680
00:48:20,039 --> 00:48:23,239
person. And so if we accept
Ephesus and that teaching. Then what happened,

681
00:48:23,239 --> 00:48:28,360
and by the way, Calcedon as
well, because a lot of people

682
00:48:28,400 --> 00:48:30,920
don't know. People think Leo is
the measure of Calcedon. That's not actually

683
00:48:30,960 --> 00:48:37,880
true. They measured the tone of
Leo against Cyril, So Calceldon is actually

684
00:48:38,159 --> 00:48:45,320
Kirillion, not primarily Pope sa Leo. Now point being, then the other

685
00:48:45,360 --> 00:48:47,880
option is I could say, well, in this transactional event, I could

686
00:48:47,920 --> 00:48:53,559
say that the divine person of the
Sun is the one that's damned. But

687
00:48:53,639 --> 00:49:00,320
this presents so many trinitarian difficulties that
it's almost just unimaginable. I mean,

688
00:49:00,639 --> 00:49:06,559
first of all, the persons of
the triads share the same will. There's

689
00:49:06,599 --> 00:49:10,880
one willing God. Great, how
could you have one will the person the

690
00:49:10,920 --> 00:49:15,199
Father of setting his will against the
son to damn the son, right,

691
00:49:15,280 --> 00:49:19,840
how could you? You would?
We would lose paracorisis the divine involved right,

692
00:49:19,920 --> 00:49:22,679
the Father and the spirit would no
longer dwell the son if you's damned,

693
00:49:22,159 --> 00:49:24,760
because he's a curu. So it's
just absurd, it would be it

694
00:49:24,800 --> 00:49:29,400
would be anti trinitarian. But that
they wouldn't have those teachings to begin with,

695
00:49:29,519 --> 00:49:34,719
because from Protestants from the Reformation on
think of how much they were simply

696
00:49:34,880 --> 00:49:37,840
inventing because everything was anti Catholic at
that point. So if the Catholics believe

697
00:49:37,880 --> 00:49:40,760
it, we don't, then what
do we believe? And then they have

698
00:49:40,840 --> 00:49:44,599
to come up with this kind of
stuff as something, because what are the

699
00:49:44,599 --> 00:49:46,679
people waiting for? You know,
well, if you read Lutheran Calvin,

700
00:49:46,800 --> 00:49:52,440
there's always this sort of verbal credence
given to things like Chalcedon and so forth.

701
00:49:53,840 --> 00:49:58,320
Are Oddly enough, the Westminster Confession, if I recall, which is

702
00:49:58,320 --> 00:50:05,239
post Calvin, it actually does.
It gives verbal credence to Christ having two

703
00:50:05,239 --> 00:50:08,280
wills and two natures, which is
the you know, fifth and six Councils

704
00:50:08,480 --> 00:50:14,119
explicate that. But you know,
the six Council goes really deep into two

705
00:50:14,239 --> 00:50:17,920
energies, so you know, you
have to have the essence energy sanction doctrine

706
00:50:17,960 --> 00:50:22,920
and to have two wills and to
energy. And to my knowledge, there's

707
00:50:22,920 --> 00:50:25,000
no Protestant that that I have an
essence innergy sanction doctrine, unless it's just

708
00:50:25,079 --> 00:50:28,800
people modern people just kind of saying, oh, I like that idea,

709
00:50:29,599 --> 00:50:32,079
it's cool. But but Calvin,
I think, you know, and then

710
00:50:32,159 --> 00:50:35,760
I've read the entire institute's how to
read that for bonds and seminary. They

711
00:50:35,760 --> 00:50:38,320
manage with the whole thing, all
fifteen hundred pages of it. And I

712
00:50:38,320 --> 00:50:42,679
remember there are sections where Calvin's you
know, he's like, well, you

713
00:50:42,719 --> 00:50:45,519
know, we believe in two natures
and two wills, and that's consistent with

714
00:50:45,599 --> 00:50:50,360
Calcedon, and we definitely believe.
We don't believe Calson's infallible, but we

715
00:50:50,440 --> 00:50:53,159
definitely believe what it teaches. But
they don't really understand the implications of it,

716
00:50:53,159 --> 00:50:58,880
you know, it's more than just
verbal verbal credence, right, right,

717
00:50:59,000 --> 00:51:01,480
Well, Jay, what do we
do with a person comes along and

718
00:51:01,679 --> 00:51:07,559
says something like, you know,
I'm not okay, I'm not reformed or

719
00:51:07,679 --> 00:51:12,679
Calvinist anymore. I'm a Bible believing
Christian. You know, you have a

720
00:51:12,679 --> 00:51:15,960
lot of I'm a Bible believing Christian. If that's all they are, how

721
00:51:15,960 --> 00:51:22,760
do you show them that they're no
better off from ancient Apostolic Christianity. And

722
00:51:22,800 --> 00:51:25,119
you've probably encountered a lot of this, right, Yeah, yeah, I

723
00:51:25,119 --> 00:51:29,679
mean there's a lot of a lot
of difference. Yeah, right, Well,

724
00:51:30,199 --> 00:51:32,800
I find it typically the most beneficial
to go into just saying, well,

725
00:51:32,800 --> 00:51:35,840
who do you think put the Bible
together? You know, I mean,

726
00:51:36,360 --> 00:51:37,639
did it just happen on it fall
out of the sky. I mean

727
00:51:37,880 --> 00:51:43,920
there's a real historical process to that
that you can't you can't divorce the divine

728
00:51:44,079 --> 00:51:49,400
from the human in this regard.
So just as just as in Christology,

729
00:51:49,440 --> 00:51:52,559
for example, I know evangelicals might
not know about Christology, but for you

730
00:51:52,559 --> 00:51:55,880
guys, for Orthodox people, like, we know there's a synergy in Christ,

731
00:51:57,039 --> 00:52:00,440
right, there's a synergism between the
human nature and the divine nature in

732
00:52:00,519 --> 00:52:05,800
Christ. And we know there's a
synergy in terms of our participation in grace.

733
00:52:06,000 --> 00:52:08,320
Right, we are always cooperating.
Paul says, I'm a cooperator,

734
00:52:08,360 --> 00:52:13,000
co worker with Christ work. Yeah, yeah, So there's always synergy.

735
00:52:13,039 --> 00:52:15,320
It's never gone, it's never lost. And you know, one of the

736
00:52:15,360 --> 00:52:22,239
problems in Calvinism is that conversion requires
God stepping in and basically taking over.

737
00:52:22,320 --> 00:52:27,880
So it's a monarchistic view, and
if they were consistent, I think they

738
00:52:27,880 --> 00:52:30,559
would also have to be monarchists in
terms of Christology as well. So it

739
00:52:30,960 --> 00:52:35,639
seems to me that they would prefer
severus and purists, you know, the

740
00:52:35,639 --> 00:52:38,199
people that Maximus in the Church fathers
argued with they would be more like a

741
00:52:38,239 --> 00:52:45,280
Coptic my ephysite type of position if
they wanted to really be monargist. But

742
00:52:45,280 --> 00:52:49,760
but for the typically evangelical, I
would say, one thing I found really

743
00:52:49,760 --> 00:52:52,199
effective is to point out, you
know, they'll always say, well,

744
00:52:52,559 --> 00:52:54,960
we're not saved by works, bro, you can't be saved by works.

745
00:52:55,280 --> 00:52:59,000
You know, we're justified by faith
and not works. And I said,

746
00:52:59,000 --> 00:53:01,119
well, how does what is es
to describe faith? As they're like,

747
00:53:02,000 --> 00:53:05,840
it's a gift? Yeah, but
what does he say? He says,

748
00:53:05,920 --> 00:53:08,519
this is the work of God that
you believe on him. So wait a

749
00:53:08,519 --> 00:53:13,239
minute, So faith is actually a
work according to Christ, to the Gospel

750
00:53:13,320 --> 00:53:17,760
John. So it can't be the
case that no works are necessary, because

751
00:53:19,320 --> 00:53:22,360
every evangelical is gonna at least say, well, you do have to believe

752
00:53:22,519 --> 00:53:24,800
when not wait a minute, it
doesn't believe something I do. Even if

753
00:53:24,840 --> 00:53:29,840
you think that it's just a mental
notional thing, it's still something I gotta

754
00:53:29,920 --> 00:53:32,199
do with your will. Well,
but it's a gift. Yeah, but

755
00:53:32,199 --> 00:53:38,000
it's still something I gotta do,
right, so's they can't totally divorce the

756
00:53:38,079 --> 00:53:42,800
human element from it at all.
And then then I would point out,

757
00:53:43,800 --> 00:53:46,880
well, one thing that happens in
the history of this debate of justification by

758
00:53:46,880 --> 00:53:54,320
faith alone is that the people who
defend it oftentimes totally disagree amongst themselves as

759
00:53:54,400 --> 00:54:00,400
to what it actually means. So, for example, does my faith in

760
00:54:00,639 --> 00:54:06,199
the atoning, death, row resurrection
work of Christ is that if I put

761
00:54:06,239 --> 00:54:07,840
all my faith and trust in that
alone? Is that just a case by

762
00:54:07,840 --> 00:54:14,360
faith alone? Or as many of
the classical Reformed actually said and Lutherans do,

763
00:54:14,440 --> 00:54:17,199
I also have to know and believe
in justification by faith alone. To

764
00:54:17,239 --> 00:54:22,239
be justified by faith alone, you
see. So you can sort of pile

765
00:54:22,320 --> 00:54:30,159
on the difficulties there to illustrate that
what sounds perhaps as a very clear you

766
00:54:30,199 --> 00:54:32,719
know, the perspecutive scripture that sounds
is a very clear doctrine, Actually isn't

767
00:54:32,719 --> 00:54:36,199
that clear? What does it actually
mean? And I would point out one

768
00:54:36,360 --> 00:54:39,599
one other strong point, which I
learned when I was Catholic, was you

769
00:54:39,639 --> 00:54:45,880
know, if you look at Romans
four when Paul cites Genesis, and it

770
00:54:45,920 --> 00:54:52,280
doesn't matter whether you're a Protestant,
Evangelical or a calumnist, Abraham's what they

771
00:54:52,320 --> 00:54:58,079
call transition from wrath to grace.
This is the idea that before you regenerate

772
00:54:58,119 --> 00:55:00,519
your God's enemy. You're a child
of wrath. Got h Right, When

773
00:55:00,519 --> 00:55:05,199
you're regenerated, that's what they call
the transition from wrath to grace. Now

774
00:55:05,239 --> 00:55:08,800
God loves you. You're a friend
of God. You're regenerated. The transition

775
00:55:09,440 --> 00:55:15,400
from wrath to grace in Abraham's life
should be, if you're a good Protestant,

776
00:55:15,480 --> 00:55:21,159
Genesis twelve. But I remember noticing
it one day when I was looking

777
00:55:21,199 --> 00:55:25,239
at the Catholic stuff back in twenty
four. Actually, Paul cites Genesis fifteen,

778
00:55:27,320 --> 00:55:31,960
or the passage supposed to be supposedly
the ultimate passage Romans for you know,

779
00:55:32,000 --> 00:55:36,880
defending justification by faith alone. Why
is Paul citing the wrong chapter?

780
00:55:37,519 --> 00:55:44,239
Abraham has already done three chapters of
righteous works from twelve to fifteen. Paul's

781
00:55:44,320 --> 00:55:47,039
using the text in fifteen that he
was justified by faith. He was righteous

782
00:55:47,079 --> 00:55:52,280
by faith, not Genesis twelve.
And that always bugged me because he should

783
00:55:52,280 --> 00:55:58,000
have cited Genesis twelfth. Right,
if we're Protestants, but if righteousness from

784
00:55:58,039 --> 00:56:02,480
God is something that is an actual
power that we participate with and synergize with.

785
00:56:02,960 --> 00:56:06,800
Right, and Paul's point, of
course, I think we all know

786
00:56:07,159 --> 00:56:09,639
Paul's point is not that there's no
works that we do. Paul's point is

787
00:56:09,719 --> 00:56:15,239
that the works of the ceremonial law
and circumcision didn't make Abraham righteous. That's

788
00:56:15,280 --> 00:56:21,159
the point of that passage. The
mosaic law didn't make because if mosaic law

789
00:56:21,239 --> 00:56:24,360
was necessary, then how are people
before mosaic law ross. Paul's point not

790
00:56:24,480 --> 00:56:29,920
that we don't do any works at
all. Right, So, but if

791
00:56:30,000 --> 00:56:35,679
the Protestant reading, whether your Calvinists
or evangelical, of Romans four, is

792
00:56:35,760 --> 00:56:42,519
what Romans four is, Paul should
have sided Genesis twelve. Yeah, thanks,

793
00:56:43,599 --> 00:56:46,840
yeah, no, good point,
good point. Wow, Well other

794
00:56:46,920 --> 00:56:50,920
things too. I would say to
one other point. You know, when

795
00:56:51,679 --> 00:56:58,239
when God speaks, it occurs,
it's efficacious. Right, God speaks,

796
00:56:58,280 --> 00:57:00,840
the world comes to be. And
so if God speaks, you're righteous.

797
00:57:00,880 --> 00:57:05,679
God speaks a word into our hearts. New Testament says, right, it's

798
00:57:05,719 --> 00:57:08,639
efficacious. I don't mean this in
the sense of like irresistible grace, but

799
00:57:08,679 --> 00:57:15,119
I'm saying it's not possible for God
to say you are righteous, you'd be

800
00:57:15,800 --> 00:57:22,519
Luther and you not be that right
because His word is efficacious. M Yeah,

801
00:57:22,639 --> 00:57:28,880
good stuff, good stuff. Father, As as we come to close,

802
00:57:28,960 --> 00:57:32,000
bather. Now you're about to say
something. Well, I think we

803
00:57:32,119 --> 00:57:40,519
have kind of one last thing we'd
like to ask Jay, And this kind

804
00:57:40,519 --> 00:57:45,400
of wraps back to the to the
first question. So many Protestant videos coming

805
00:57:45,400 --> 00:57:49,079
out why you should leave Orthodoxy,
Why you should become a Protestant. Let's

806
00:57:49,119 --> 00:57:55,840
turn that around. Why is Eastern
Orthodoxy a better alternative for Protestants? Maybe

807
00:57:55,880 --> 00:58:00,800
two or three reasons, Jay,
What do you think right? Well,

808
00:58:00,840 --> 00:58:07,960
I would say that, you know, but between product I was raised Evangelical

809
00:58:07,000 --> 00:58:13,039
Baptists and Calvinists for many years and
then it's been about a decade and run

810
00:58:13,079 --> 00:58:16,800
with allticism. I would say that
a lot of what both Roman Catholics and

811
00:58:16,960 --> 00:58:22,239
Protestants and Evangelicals are looking for are
it's kind of in that midway of the

812
00:58:22,320 --> 00:58:27,079
Orthodox Church. So a lot of
people are looking for while I want Bible,

813
00:58:27,679 --> 00:58:30,280
but I'm but this seems to be
like just Bible alone doesn't work right,

814
00:58:30,320 --> 00:58:34,320
because it's like, ultimately, at
the end of the day, if

815
00:58:34,320 --> 00:58:37,760
you're a Protestant, you might like
your pastor you might like your community,

816
00:58:38,000 --> 00:58:40,800
but they don't really have authority.
And at the end of the day,

817
00:58:40,840 --> 00:58:45,159
it's kind of like you and your
Bible right, and that's that. I

818
00:58:45,159 --> 00:58:50,000
mean, I know that Protestants recognize
that there's an authority that elders have,

819
00:58:50,119 --> 00:58:53,239
but I'm saying that in terms of
the church, I think that whole thing

820
00:58:53,320 --> 00:59:00,639
is disastrous because there's not a body
that can actually govern. And one thing

821
00:59:00,639 --> 00:59:05,039
I noticed too, was that you
in the in Paul's epistles, for example,

822
00:59:05,039 --> 00:59:08,679
of the Corinthians, he says that
you should excommunicate the people that are

823
00:59:08,719 --> 00:59:14,239
really causing these troubles in the church. And then if you read the Councils,

824
00:59:14,239 --> 00:59:15,440
you know, all the way up
until the triumph of Orthodoxy in the

825
00:59:15,440 --> 00:59:22,199
Seventh Council and in the Sonouticon,
you have the continuation of the idea that

826
00:59:22,239 --> 00:59:25,280
the church has the authority to excommunicate. And if you're a Protestant, I

827
00:59:25,320 --> 00:59:30,239
mean, the only time I've ever
encountered a Protestant ever even thinking of excommunicating

828
00:59:30,239 --> 00:59:35,159
it was in a very small Presbyterian
Reform group. They were the only Protestants

829
00:59:35,199 --> 00:59:37,639
I've ever heard. Maybe there's Protestant
churches other and I saw I'm not saying

830
00:59:37,639 --> 00:59:45,920
that you should become Orthodox because people
can actuallymunicate. It's an indicator of the

831
00:59:45,960 --> 00:59:50,719
fact that the ecclesiology of Protestanism is
kind of a disaster and it's kind of

832
00:59:50,840 --> 00:59:54,760
a mess, and it doesn't really
have what we call normative authority and ethics,

833
00:59:54,760 --> 01:00:00,800
which is the idea that there's somebody
that can inter and make a decision

834
01:00:00,840 --> 01:00:05,599
and buying people right, it doesn't
necessarily make them infallible. We're not,

835
01:00:05,719 --> 01:00:08,239
you know, Papists or Roman Catholics, but there is a body that has

836
01:00:08,400 --> 01:00:15,280
some nodal authority and their decisions can
be made, and ultimately the Church as

837
01:00:15,320 --> 01:00:20,280
a totality is infallible. I think
that's the Orthodox position as I understand it,

838
01:00:20,320 --> 01:00:23,039
but not necessarily an individuals. So
so the loss of that I think

839
01:00:23,880 --> 01:00:30,039
pentecost guidance of the church. I
think you'll find in the elements that are

840
01:00:30,119 --> 01:00:35,519
missing in Protestantism, and that are
missing even in Catholicism, I think genuinely

841
01:00:35,559 --> 01:00:38,440
are maintained in the Orthodox Church.
So that's one great reason is that probably

842
01:00:38,440 --> 01:00:44,000
a lot of what people are looking
for is there. You know, you

843
01:00:44,360 --> 01:00:46,280
don't want to give you a false
impression that there's no problems in the Orthodox

844
01:00:46,360 --> 01:00:52,400
Church and it's all, you know, green pastures. I think my experience

845
01:00:52,559 --> 01:00:55,599
that different bodies have different sets of
problems, and there's some overlap. There's

846
01:00:55,639 --> 01:01:00,800
going to be we have similar problems
to other groups, but there are problems

847
01:01:00,880 --> 01:01:05,559
unique to Orthodoxy. There's problems unique
to Rome, there's problems unique to Protestantism.

848
01:01:05,639 --> 01:01:10,639
But I think that if it's not
a systemic problem. For example,

849
01:01:10,679 --> 01:01:16,360
I would argue that in Catholicism,
the papacy and what has tried to bind

850
01:01:16,400 --> 01:01:22,480
people to infallibly and with dogmatic authority, that becomes a systemic level problem such

851
01:01:22,559 --> 01:01:29,400
that that system kind of can't be
rescued or it can't function. I it

852
01:01:29,400 --> 01:01:32,880
doesn't work right. And I would
say in Protestantism, because of the nature

853
01:01:32,960 --> 01:01:38,280
of the kind of chaotic ecclesiology,
it also is a systemic level problem.

854
01:01:38,360 --> 01:01:44,599
I don't think Orthodoxy has those systemic
level problems. It certainly has its problems,

855
01:01:44,639 --> 01:01:50,280
but systemic level problems, in my
argument, would be enough to cancel

856
01:01:50,360 --> 01:01:53,239
that out is not a good option
basically. So so I think that beyond

857
01:01:53,280 --> 01:01:59,079
those kind of intellectual arguments, you
know, Orthodoxy is very different. It's

858
01:01:59,079 --> 01:02:04,280
gonna push you to change, it's
going to push you to actually, you

859
01:02:04,320 --> 01:02:08,039
know, deal with your sins.
You know you're not you're not just in

860
01:02:08,079 --> 01:02:14,000
your prayer corner mentally, you know, recounting your sins with you in the

861
01:02:14,000 --> 01:02:19,880
Bible. You're going to be going
through a kind of a healing. I

862
01:02:19,960 --> 01:02:24,159
like Father Deacon Ductryonis's analogy Orthox like
rehab. Yeah, it's like I'm all

863
01:02:24,239 --> 01:02:29,360
go into rehab and we got to
keep going back and working on you know,

864
01:02:29,400 --> 01:02:32,360
because throughout the week we relapse,
right like people who have addictions relapse.

865
01:02:32,400 --> 01:02:35,000
Well, you gotta go back,
you gotta keep working at it.

866
01:02:35,039 --> 01:02:38,960
So that's very different than anything I
experienced in Protestantism and even Romantholicism and my

867
01:02:38,960 --> 01:02:43,719
experience that the you know, when
you go to confessions, it's just very

868
01:02:43,760 --> 01:02:49,679
mechanical. It's very oh, here's
my sins, Okay, here's your five

869
01:02:50,199 --> 01:02:53,400
helm Mary's. And then it's like
I might go to another priest and it's

870
01:02:53,599 --> 01:02:59,119
that he doesn't even know, right. But in Orthodox it's different because my

871
01:02:59,239 --> 01:03:00,880
case, maybe the other cases,
I don't know if everybody's case, but

872
01:03:01,239 --> 01:03:07,440
you're typically confessing to a spiritual father
who is tracking and knowing your progress,

873
01:03:07,239 --> 01:03:12,440
and so he knows the medicine that
you need. And that's why that mechanical

874
01:03:12,559 --> 01:03:16,360
system doesn't really work. I don't
think if it's just a well I'm here

875
01:03:16,400 --> 01:03:20,119
to pay my helm Mary debt and
let me go back to do it.

876
01:03:20,719 --> 01:03:23,880
No, it's like no, you
okay, So you you got this problem,

877
01:03:23,920 --> 01:03:28,840
Maybe you need to you know,
maybe you have a problem with greed.

878
01:03:29,360 --> 01:03:31,519
Maybe you need to be more magnanimous
this next week. You need to

879
01:03:31,760 --> 01:03:35,440
give some more money if you're greedy. Oh, you got a problem with

880
01:03:35,760 --> 01:03:37,960
eating too much? Maybe you need
to fasten. You See what I'm saying

881
01:03:37,079 --> 01:03:42,760
that there's a medicine is applied to
the difficulty, and that that's not anything

882
01:03:42,800 --> 01:03:49,079
I ever experienced in other groups.
So I actually think that deep down we

883
01:03:49,199 --> 01:03:52,119
all kind of want to be healed. I'll know it. And Orthodox gothing

884
01:03:52,159 --> 01:03:58,800
has that healing medicine facts facts.
Amen. Amen, No, that's that's

885
01:03:58,840 --> 01:04:00,559
facts, like it is like,
uh but I mean it's hard. It's

886
01:04:00,559 --> 01:04:02,360
hard. I mean it's tough.
I mean I'm trying to scare people,

887
01:04:02,400 --> 01:04:05,280
but like, you know, it's
it's gonna be. It's not, it's

888
01:04:05,320 --> 01:04:11,519
not. The Christian and Protestanism is
really intellectual. You can read a lot

889
01:04:11,559 --> 01:04:16,079
of books and argue a lot,
and you're not challenged to work on your

890
01:04:16,199 --> 01:04:19,400
vices. You know what I mean. That's it's just different. Yeah,

891
01:04:19,480 --> 01:04:23,639
yeah, yeah, I say I
say all the time like it you know,

892
01:04:23,760 --> 01:04:26,360
orthodox, he is almost like the
Christian Marines in a way. You

893
01:04:26,400 --> 01:04:31,039
know. There you go exactly great. But before we close, I do

894
01:04:31,079 --> 01:04:34,199
want to ask you a lighthearted question, really a real quick one here.

895
01:04:35,119 --> 01:04:39,679
So I know before, like off
air, we were talking about like how

896
01:04:39,880 --> 01:04:42,360
you know I connected. You know, we talked on Discord a little bit.

897
01:04:42,679 --> 01:04:46,480
Now I know you you've had things
on Discord, You've had open dialogue

898
01:04:46,519 --> 01:04:49,639
and things like that. There was
a time where Deacon and and I as

899
01:04:49,880 --> 01:05:00,440
father Deacon was debating Matt Slick and
you called that Slick a goblet, which

900
01:05:00,480 --> 01:05:03,440
is like hilarious of my calling.
Go ahead, Oh no, you good,

901
01:05:03,440 --> 01:05:06,960
You're good. You could you called
you called Masslick a goblin? Did

902
01:05:08,000 --> 01:05:12,639
you know that that was going to
become a music video? No. I

903
01:05:12,679 --> 01:05:15,280
think that he's a really nasty person
that I've had a lot of nasty interactions

904
01:05:15,360 --> 01:05:18,440
within the past, and so I
think people clip that and they think that,

905
01:05:18,480 --> 01:05:21,239
oh, you just like randomly wanted
to call him names. Now,

906
01:05:21,239 --> 01:05:25,920
there's a long history of of he
would come on the Discord and we would

907
01:05:26,000 --> 01:05:28,480
he would just be really, really
nasty, and we ended up having to

908
01:05:28,519 --> 01:05:32,280
just cut off all the communications with
that guy. And there was supposed to

909
01:05:32,280 --> 01:05:35,960
be that day, there was supposed
to be a debate between doctor father doctor

910
01:05:36,000 --> 01:05:42,159
and I as a guy named Darth
Dawkins and somebody else, and then they

911
01:05:42,239 --> 01:05:46,079
brought Masslick on and so it kind
of surprised everybody that it didn't end up

912
01:05:46,079 --> 01:05:50,000
being the debate that everybody thought it
would be. And so, uh,

913
01:05:50,239 --> 01:05:54,480
no, I just I just I
think he's a pretty nasty person. And

914
01:05:54,519 --> 01:06:00,719
I don't have the view that we
should always never call people for what they

915
01:06:00,760 --> 01:06:03,000
are. I mean, maybe maybe
I'm wrong about that. I can be

916
01:06:03,039 --> 01:06:06,320
corrected. But no, I didn't. I didn't have no idea. What

917
01:06:06,440 --> 01:06:11,880
was I don't even know who makes
a lot of those heard you ever heard

918
01:06:11,880 --> 01:06:14,639
this the god? No I'm saying
I don't I've heard it. I'm saying

919
01:06:14,679 --> 01:06:15,920
I don't know who, Like I
don't know who these who who made that?

920
01:06:16,039 --> 01:06:18,920
No idea? Man? Right,
So people just you know, kind

921
01:06:18,920 --> 01:06:23,719
of clip stuff and look crazy with
it. Good stuff? Man, Well,

922
01:06:24,320 --> 01:06:30,360
well thanks for addressing Calvinism, Protestant
pro Protestantism and and just really great

923
01:06:30,440 --> 01:06:44,159
questions. Thank you, Jay.
We've got a message that we want to

924
01:06:44,199 --> 01:06:45,639
get out and we want it.
We got a message about the faith in

925
01:06:45,679 --> 01:06:50,320
the church and and it We're not
hard people to get to know. This

926
01:06:50,480 --> 01:06:55,679
is not a hard faith to get
to know. We are opening, open

927
01:06:55,760 --> 01:07:00,039
and welcoming and uh we want people
to to engage with us, admit in

928
01:07:00,119 --> 01:07:03,000
many different areas at many different levels. So thank you for coming on.

929
01:07:03,079 --> 01:07:06,280
We really appreciate that absolutely, Thank
you. And yeah, I agree with

930
01:07:06,320 --> 01:07:12,800
that. Not everybody needs to hear, you know, a detailed reputation of

931
01:07:12,920 --> 01:07:15,679
tulip, but some people do,
all right, some people do need that.

932
01:07:15,800 --> 01:07:18,920
Now we had we had a good
interaction here. I'm very grateful Luther.

933
01:07:19,079 --> 01:07:23,199
Thank you Jay, Thank you ladies
and gentlemen who are watching this,

934
01:07:23,400 --> 01:07:28,960
Thank you, and subscribe so that
you can be notified of future videos coming

935
01:07:28,960 --> 01:07:34,039
out. And we're aiming to provide
quality content and really good engagement on issues

936
01:07:34,079 --> 01:07:38,239
about our faith, about our culture, and and so much more. So

937
01:07:38,480 --> 01:07:44,480
subscribe to The Transfigured Life, and
thank you again for watching. Take care

938
01:07:44,840 --> 01:07:48,559
all y'all, have a great day. Thank you so much. Thanks you.

939
01:07:48,559 --> 01:07:53,039
You are not getting a church.
You advinted your own church excuse me,

940
01:07:53,239 --> 01:07:57,559
You're you're just making an assumption at
all that the saints agree they do

941
01:07:58,960 --> 01:08:00,639
you go read them. You have
no faith. You're a collar all of

942
01:08:00,679 --> 01:08:06,320
a demon of Boomer card card,
a demon a boomer making a summer of

943
01:08:06,360 --> 01:08:12,920
bollar em a Boomer card. Excuse
because being a demon of Boomer card,

944
01:08:13,119 --> 01:08:18,319
or you're a collar demon of Boomer
card a booming a demon of Boomer card.

945
01:08:18,560 --> 01:08:25,880
Excuse me, dement of Boomer card
card, a demon a Boomers making

946
01:08:25,880 --> 01:08:32,279
an Assumptionism? Are all the councils
inspired and inherrant the acumenical ideas? So

947
01:08:32,399 --> 01:08:36,600
there are ecumenical centens are inspired and
inherrant correct
