President Luis Sabinadera walked through the Vatican yesterday. He was accompanied by his wife,
his daughters, etcetera. It has been the news that the local media
have wanted to highlight, but, unfortunately, to the bad luck of the
President, his visit passed to no plane yesterday through the mouth of the Communist
Pope Benedict X Francis I, alias, also known as the hypocrite. What
the Pope said, the pope that perhaps many people of this knowing is a
phony to a large extent. You just have to go to his history inside
Argentina and the years before he became a cardinal and already being a cardinal of
the city of Buenos Aires, Bergoglio' s history over there, and many
people bought him goodism with that phrase. Who am I to judge the rich
a good hypocrite and thus make it clear means of Italian as running from the
siera that the sayings have been published by Pope Francis last week, exactly the
twenty, with a meeting with part of the leadership of the Church. For
half Italians, according to the Confidencial de España, say that Pope Francis has
assured that there is already a lot of faggotry in the seminars. And the
Church knows it well, they know it everywhere, here, here, there
and there, and let there be what is above the seminaries of the Catholic
Church throughout the world, in the haystack. And it is a problem that
they have decades trying to face, because somehow that and another many issues are
the stone in the shoes or in the shoe of the Church, the Pope
referred to that there was already a lot of faggotry to defend the position of
not admitting homosexuals in the seminaries at the closed meeting in the Assembly of the
Italian Episcopal Conference. According to reports, yesterday Monday several Italian media reported that
Pope Francis would have used the word derogatory in Italian froshiagine faggotry during the meeting
with the Italian bishops on 20 May and had been published a couple of days
ago on the Dagospia website, which publishes alleged exclusive information. But on Monday
some Italian media, such as Corriere de la Cera and República, confirmed the
term. With some bishops present. They were talking about whether to admit openly
homosexual candidates in the seminars and to what extent? And Francis, while reiterating
as always the need to welcome everyone, was very rigid in this regard,
reiterating his refusal to admit them, as the Church has already reiterated on several
occasions. According to the Diario de la República, which cites several anonymous sources
that agree in its version, the Pope jokingly said we had already cha faggot
in the seminaries leashes de la serra, explains that, according to the present
consulted, rather than shame, the phrase was received with some incredulous laughter and
that it was evident that the Pope was not aware of the offensive that turned
out that word in Italian. The Pope reiterated the position of the Church with
an instruction of the clergy decaterium that in two thousand five, like Benedict,
we say this confirmed in two thousand sixteen with Francis, established that the Church,
with deep respect for the people in question, cannot admit in the seminary
and in the sacred orders to those who participate in the practice of homosexuality have
deep- rooted homosexual tendencies or support the so- called Gactoy culture according to
a totally church. In November, at the Assembly of Assisi, Italian bishops
approved a text regulating admission to seminars. It is called the ratioformatiy priestis,
which has not yet been published because it is expected the green light of the
Holy See, and in which was included an amendment that maintained the distinction between
simple homosexual orientation and the so- called deeply rooted tendencies that is, that
a homosexual can always be admitted as guarantees as a heterosexual, of knowing how
to maintain the discipline of celibacy. However, one more slutty thing I compare
so that his building, the Pope would have, according to these reconstructions,
rejected the possibility and homosexuals should not be admitted into seminaries without nuances. Finally
the Confidencial of Spain says what and those fantasies ok with that stuff in there
with the good jack Look, you know that the Pope still has a subject,
the guy as he calls what says fucking freedom, President of Millay thousand
who lives the fucking freedom. Aha good concert, God of Rock, Yes,
tremendous Milak, you know that before I came over Costoy was very a
very Christian people know that inside the family, always from the fields that I
do not contribute, we created the homosexual history of my parish. Oh,
my God, ever since that time it was always like a family member was
booked or worked to be the father, to be looked at. We are
going to leave the most open of my church, but it included and shepherds
duck birds, professed birds and certainly that I no longer see how that boom
of the young people wanting to go to a seminary, and that daddy went
to the Monaguillo seminary. The cock down already I swear to you by the
amount of monkey that I went down long before. They were very much what
we wanted. Or so the Church is more open to accept anything she wants.
My experience with the church was positive. I didn' t see anything
out of the ordinary, except that the father of my parish had moved a
woman near secondary where he says in the glass and that the Pope said offensive.
That one ended up using it. That depends and that I gave myself
a smoke, another priest from a good field. But they' re things
like that, they' re small, coughing boxes of beer among a group
of I' ve served is nonsense and you have to go out or mambo.
If the Pope said that word with the s with human, so it
is offensive, as the word in Italian again is called the expression is to
drink froshia Jine, then Chiajing if he put his hand, as well as
the Italian tigers or cold ones put it there that same. But God doesn
' t offer himself to jiny they' re already offensive. But if he
put the hand on, yeah, sure, there' s a problem.
Yes, but, obviously, I think regardless of what it is, I
think you' ve seen a pope who' s been trying to build an
image of him that he' s going according to the times we' re
living, and so on. And I see many people who are not Catholic,
who are not Christian, who want the Church to adopt, practice,
adopt, etcetera, issues that are very fashionable now. I don' t
see the need. No. I do not see the need, because each
institution is based on values, principles, etc. And if many of the
things that are celebrated today are defended they are contrary to this. I do
not see the need for a free society that those who refuse them want to
be forced to do so. I don' t agree, because there'
s a pressure bomb. A few days ago the Pope of an interview with
CBS and all the questions of the journalists revolved around that intention that I liked
the Pope' s honesty in that interview, which was very frank in many
questions that, for example, that of ordering women priests. But why do
you want to order women doing to you? If there you have the Anglican
Church, which is going to disappear all these things, which has adopted the
Axican Church. What he has done is to separate and separate many faithful wherever
this has grown proportionally. Then the Church that deals with their issues and other
religions, such as progressiveism, LGBT people, etc, that they defend their
subject and that anyone who wants to submit to progressive dogma and LGBT dogma that
does so and practices it freely everyone in their place. But I don'
t see it all since I impose it and defend the same. That the
Church is opposed to abortion is a matter of principle, whether that is,
that every bet. Homosexuality is a matter of principle also religious and based on
what his sacred book poses, Because, that is, that is the essence
of the Church. At that time it should not be changed, because you
understand that yes the abortion that did cry out my love, then you create
your religion and believe what it does, exactly what many pastors have done that
have said I do not agree with the churches that stigmatize point out give space
to those who lead it a life with which they do not feel at ease
and do not allow you to approach to find the message of God. Churches
have been founded that are more open, much more tolerant. That is what
must be done in an open society. And the fact that I didn'
t agree with you that they agree and that we agree that we don'
t agree is already the need to impose it on every place. In other
words, you need that the fact that everyone says the same thing and is
not yes or is the essence, the essence of the Church, the Bible
says so. We don' t have to change anymore. I think I
' ll change. I believe that progress has a rather intense task, because
the extent to which today' s progressism pushes Islamism in the West as something
of truth that is permissible in our form of coexistence and in Western culture,
that they are not admissible, that they also exist with that, that they
go to where the clergy, Shiites and pressure them with these want clearly I
invite them for real, that is, I am willing to that. Finally,
in the case of the Church, I do not see the need for
scandalization. What it does make very clear is that the Pope is a hypocrite,
that Bergoglio is a hypocrite, as he has always been, that he
was going to ask him deeply that he knows more than I, after Monja
and other ranks more up mother, how he is. No. No,
it' s not that nun is the concept that embraces them all after there
' s a sheath inside Sister I don' t know what sheath. Sister
single therapy tortera Sorcurtía. No, no, no, no, no,
no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no,
no, no, no, no, no, no, no,
no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no,
no, no, no, no, no, no, no,
no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no,
no, no, no, no, no, no, no,
no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no,
no, no, no, no, no, no, no,
no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no,
no, no, no, no, no, no, no,
no, no, no, no, no. It is. That'
s devotion. You don' t charge. They don' t collect their
devotion. We' re coming.