Attention. You're listening to the Todd Huf Radio show, America's home fork,
conservative not bitter Talk radio. Be advised. The content of this program has
been documented to prevent and even cure liberalism, and listening may cause you to
lean to the right. Here's your conservative but not bitter host, Todd Huff.
Welcome, my friends. You have tuned in very wisely, I might
add to the Todd Huff Show. It's a pleasure to be here, America's
home fork, conservative not bitter talk. Glenn, I appreciate has always the
introduction there email should you want to be part of today's conversation Todd at Todd
Huff Show dot com, or feel free to hit us up on the texting
uh well, the hot line the Huff hot line. I guess you can
text, or you can even leave your messages there. I welcome you to
do that either way. Three one seven, two one zero twenty eight thirty
If you text, message and data rates may may apply not from us,
but from your carrier. So anyway, it's good to be here. Thank
you for for joining us. You know, I've got a couple of things
today that I want to get to that have been in the stack of stuff
from previous days one in particular to maybe two in particular. So we'll get
to that in due course. I think it's relevant, and I, you
know, we try to talk about we try to talk about what I think
is most important at at the moment where we are right now, and sometimes
there are things that are important, but something else is a little bit more
timely, or something else might be more in the news narrative. And if
a couple of those more urgent or I don't know, relevant or interesting topics
pop up, then some of these things that I think are probably more important
to understand and to be aware of. But they sometimes can get well,
they can they can slide by without notice. And again when you move full
speed ahead here each week, as we do, and as the narrative does,
it can get tricky. So there's some things I want to go back
and make sure that we hit on, and we'll do that in due course.
But where I want to start today is with the hearings yesterday before the
House Ways and Means Committee with a couple of I R. S. Whistleblowers,
Gary Shapley, Joseph Ziggler. Mister Ziggler was the one who was anonymous
in the days and weeks leading up to this, to this initial hearing for
obvious reasons. I mean, just just ask yourself that why would why would
someone want to remain anonymous a whistle blur. Well, there's a lot of
reasons. It takes a lot of courage to come out and to stand in
the limelight before the US House of Representatives, members of Congress House Weighs and
Means Committee specifically, and to make some of these want to make this,
to give this testimony, to make some of the allegations, to raise some
of the concerns, because, my friends, we are dealing with some evil,
absolutely atrocious and evil people in our government. Now this may come as
a news flash if I've got a Bernie Sanders listener tuning in to Day or
a Hillary supporter, But there can be evil people anywhere. There can be
evil people that are running businesses. There can be evil people who are I
don't know, running school districts. There can be evil people who are running
churches that happens. There can be evil people who are in our government.
And it's remarkable to me and I comment on this from time to time,
but I haven't said this in a while. It's remarkable to me that there
are people in this country who see such a tremendous amount of well, they're
so hesitant to believe anything that comes from the business community, which is fine.
I'm not even saying that they should. They're so skeptical of people in
business. They think that they are straight from the pits of hell sort of
thing. But they see nothing wrong with people in government. I don't understand
that line of thinking. Now I'm going to tell you, I understand why
they make these conclusions. They've something. I mean, it doesn't make sense,
but they have come to trust our government for reasons that cannot be articulated
candidly, because there is no reason to trust our government in the sense of
when it comes to the approach where the government just says, well, trust
us, just trust me, I'll take care of this for you. Just
trust me. Give me, the government would say. A politician would say,
give me more of your hard earned money, give me more of your
liberty. They don't say it like this, but this is what they're asking
for. Give me more authority, more power, more control, and an
exchange for that, I'll make sure that your city is not wiped off the
face of planet Earth because of climate change, and they are responsible for stirring
people into a frenzy over these things. And so there are bad people everywhere
everywhere. And the truth be told. The truth be told from a very
basic and well from the position of absolute truth. We all, we all
are, have our own evil and wickedness that we've had. That's why,
that's why the God of the Bible sent his son Jesus. I won't get
preachy on you this morning today whenever you're listening to this, but I'll say
this, evil exists anywhere, and evil can't exist. I don't know why.
Again, some are resistant to believe this, but evil can exist in
our government. One may smile and smile and be a villain. One may
be up there regurgitating all the talking points that sounds so lovely and wonderful to
the ears that are tickling to hear what they want to hear. And yet
they go behind those doors and they are absolutely in some cases inexplicably. Well
it's explainable, but if someone's naive, it's inexplicable to them why these actions
and decisions are being taken and made and so forth. So anyway, so
these whistleblowers come out in direct opposition to the people I just described. And
so these whistleblowers again two agents at the IRS, of which, by the
way, I'm not a fan of the IRS. I would like to see
I would like to see the IRS abolished. I would I just the idea.
I don't want to get into this in detail. About the idea that
you have to tell the government how much money you made is preposterous to me.
It really is. What business is it of THEIRS. They didn't create
it, They didn't have anything to do with it, unless, of course,
you're allegedly Hunter Biden or President Bribery allegedly, which is what part of
this hearing was about. They had nothing to do with it. Why should
you have to report it? On what universe? Why do we accept some
of these things? It's none of their business. We had to literally create
an amendment to the US Constitution in order to pass what has become our current
tax code. We are allowing our government, our federal government, to target
individual citizens. Originally it was states. States were responsible for raising revenue and
then sending it in proportionally to the federal government. Now it's the opposite.
Now the federal government taxes everybody and they give the government or the states money
back to run the state. It's completely opposite. And we wonder why we
feel like we're powerless. This is one of the reasons, one of the
many reasons why, and it's one of the many reasons why these folks that
are standing up against the machine should be applauded. So, these two high
rust whistle blowers come out, they testify to a lot of things. I
don't have sound bites today. I just want to talk about this, and
I want to get to a couple of other things that I said that we've
skipped over here this week, not intentionally, just because of the sake of
time. These are some of the things we heard yesterday and their testimony.
By the way, I'm referencing in part here an article from the what is
this the Federalist dot Com, which I'll put on the stack of stuff six
ridiculous narratives Democrats tried. Wait a minute, pause that there's two of them.
This is actually from the watch an examiner, and I confuse them because
this one has six six takeaways from the irs whistleblower hearing. So these will
both be on the stack of stuff page on the website if you want to
read them for yourself, and I would actually encourage you to do that if
you can make time to do that. Because some of the things that were
testified by these two IRS agents, again Gary Shapley Joseph Ziggler, they testify
that A or number one, whichever you prefer here, they were blocked they
or their colleagues. When I say they, I don't mean that that is
their individual pronoun. I mean they collectively or on behalf of what they saw
happening elsewhere within the IRS. This was what they experienced. They were blocked
from accessing all of the contents that were on Hunter Biden's laptop. So these
agents, these agents were involved in investigating Hunter Biden for things that we've since
seen him plead guilty to that amounted to a slap on the metaphorical wrist.
They were involved in this, and so in order to investigate, they were
allowed to look apparently ostensibly at some of the contents of his laptop, but
not all, not all of the contents. Does that sound like an investigation
for you? Can you imagine when the IRS went into excuse me, the
FBI went into raid Mara Lago. If someone said you can look in that
room but not this room, would you accept that? But this is that
they weren't allowed. They weren't allowed to see the full contents. And why
I mean, even if they were saying, look, we don't want your
eyes to witness some of the app absolutely terrifying naked pictures of Hunter Biden or
as drug pictures, even if that was the intention, which I'm not defending,
I'm just saying, let's just say that's the best case in here.
Hey, look, man, your eyes cannot unsee that. There's no there
is no solution on planet Earth that can clean what you're about to see from
your eyes. If that was the intention, which clearly it's not, I'm
not saying that it is. But what are the reason would they have for
saying you can't or you shouldn't be looking at all the contents of the laptop.
But why would you do that when you're if you're intent, it's for
someone to have free reign in their investigation, right, I mean, let
them see it on their own. Tell them buckle up, you know,
buckle up, be ready to see some absolutely sodom and get more alike imagery
on this laptop. But you're gonna have to go through it and find what's
relevant to the investigation and apply it or ignore it as you see fit.
They were not allowed to do that Number two or letter B. They were
stopped, They were prevented from actually interviewing Hunter Biden. Seems relevant, right,
if you're investigating Hunter Biden for tax tax law violation, which again i'm
not saying I'm defending in the US task code, but this is the existing
tax code. There's potential that he broke some tax law. It seems logical
that you should be able, It seems necessary that you, if you're an
investigator, should be able to question Hunter Biden. They were prevented, they
said, they testified yesterday under oath that they were stopped from actually doing that
number three or let us see if you prefer. They were also prevented.
They were not allowed from asking thinking about this one, by the way,
why this one? Why we remember again, well, let me finish this
statement and let me set the stage, and we'll take a break and we'll
pick it up next segment. But they were prevented from asking witnesses about any
of Hunter Biden's messages on that laptop. So there's evidence on the laptop.
They've read the messages. Some of the messages mention or reference President bribery.
And they're not a lot, remember the big guy. That sort of stuff.
They're not allowed to ask. They were prevented from asking those other witnesses
about those messages. What did that mean? How in the world, my
friends, how in the world is should there's no scenario in which this should
be allowed? And may I remind you, and I know I don't have
to do this because you know, but remember at the time that we first
learned about Hunter's laptop, which was in the days or weeks leading up to
the twenty twenty election the end of October I believe of twenty twenty. I
think it was I don't know, two or three weeks something like that before
the election. And remember there were fifty one so called intelligence professionals, members
of the intelligence community. They got together and they said, whoa, whoa,
America cannot let you just absorb the contents of the Hunter Biden laptop because
this has all the hallmarks of a Russian disinformation campaign. You can't be fooled.
This is what they do. They're trying to use this, this scenario,
these circumstances to corrupt the name, the image, the likeness of the
Biden family, name, their brand. We can't have that. Fifty one
of us are going to sign this saying don't fall prey to that. That's
Russian disinformation. Of course, we know now that they had already determined at
that time that the laptop was legit. So those fifty one people signed a
lie that I would maintain every single one of them new they lied to you,
They lied to me, They lied to the American people for the purpose
of helping President Joe Biden and hurting President Donald J. Trump by extension,
they were involved in election interference. You might say, the very thing that
they were telling us they were trying to do, to make sure no one
else did they themselves were doing. I remember at the time I told you
that this one little old podcaster, radio show host I apparently understood more about
intelligence than the fifty one so called experts did, because it was who he
from the beginning, and the rest of you knew this as well. So
this was the scene the scenario. Putting this in context as they we were
coming through that era, this is what the government had already done. This
is what individuals who had governmental power or authority or influence or whatever. These
were the steps they had already taken. And this was after two impeachments,
this was after spying on Trump's campaign, This was after so much already that
we should already know. So in addition to all of that, all of
that, the laptop comes out, they try to dismiss it, deny it,
hide it. They try to prevent these whistleblowers or these investigators at the
time from actually looking at it, asking anybody really anything about it whatsoever.
Protecting the current president of the United States not legitimate functions, my friends,
you want to talk about interfering with our democracy, of course, as a
constitutional republic. But nonetheless, if you want to talk about that, may
I show you exhibits a right here, this story timeouts in order, my
friends, we're gonna come back and talk about a few more things about the
hearing yesterday, what it means, what's going on, some of the other
things that popped up on the radar, or that we're disgusted in more detail.
We'll do that in due course, and don't want to get to some
other things as well. Today, my friends, sit tight. You're listening
to conservative, not bitter talk. Every host toff back in a minute.
Welcome back to my friends. So we're talking here about the testimony before the
House Ways and Means Committee yesterday by Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziggler. Actually I
said it should actually the Tuesday or excuse me, Wednesday, so that we
mentioned some of the things they testified to. And I want to talk briefly
about this attorney who's involved. This attorney is named David wi Sees, the
US attorney in Delaware, and there seems to be a lot and I want
I want to spend a little bit of time just talking about this, and
I don't want to We're not gonna go into this beyond this segment because I
there's other things I want to get to, as I shared earlier. But
David Weiss the Biden administration when they came in, they knew he was looking
into this situation with with Hunter and taxes and all this stuff. Laptop and
for the appearance, I'm gonna stress that the appearance. You've heard me talk
about this many times on the program before. I would say politicians in general,
but in particular the left, everything that we see everything. The optics
are what's most important to these politicians and to the left, and so they
want you and me to see fairness and objectivity and this. Hey man,
we're gonna let this guy, this David Weiss, run with this as he
sees fit. If there's something there, then he can. We're gonna tell
him, hey man, you got prosecutorial authority here. You can get into
this, and you can do whatever you think. We're so confident anyway,
we're not going to interfere. Why would we interfere. We're the people who
are on the side of democracy working, after all. So that's the optics.
They care more about optics than they care about actual truth. That is
one hundred percent accurate, by the way, They care more about how something
looks than what something really is. And that goes to the core that that
should ignite fury in the core of principled people, because the optics will take
care of themselves. I'm not saying you can't. You don't have to focus
on communicating and making sure that you're concise and accurate and so forth in communication.
But I am saying that what's more important than what something looks is what
something actually is. You've heard the old saying that character is who you are
when no one is looking. Character is who you are in the dark.
And so people who are interested in manipulating others care only about how it looks.
And so the Biden administration says, hey, you know, we're gonna
let this guy keep running his course. He can investigate whatever he's got prosecutorial
authority. But then you begin to listen to some of these things that were
testified to or even some of the things that we've heard reporting David Weiss in
some cases that's again the US attorney in Delaware, which that's important to note,
which I mean, if the bidens have the bidens have been in Joe
Biden has been in government for twenty percent of this nation's history. I've shared
that. But beyond that that, they've got national obviously influence, international influence,
as we've seen from the laptop, but on top of that, on
top of that, they have a lot of influence in the state of Delaware.
And so when you begin to look at some of this, and you
look at some of the things that conflicting statements that appear to be coming from
this attorney David Weisse, here's one shapily when he testified earlier this week,
so that there were conflict of interests involving two Biden appointed US attorneys being given
the final say over whether the president's son should face felony charges. When this
attorney, David Wise, had been told or had told Congress even that he
had been given authority. David Wise also said that he wanted to bring certain
charges, it was told that it was outside of his jurisdiction. So what
I'm saying here is that there's something going on, and I think we all
know what this is. I don't know specifically the details of what it looks
like, but in general, here's what it looks like. And here is
what I think we've got to come to grips with. Here's what I think
we have to understand. In order to fight the tyranny and the race to
grow the government and shrink liberty in this country, we have to come to
grips with the fact that the optics of politicians are to make it sound like
and look like, oh, I'm on your side, We're here for the
people. We're trying to protect your democracy. We're going to keep the you
know, this attorney on the case, We're not going to replace him just
because we came in. We don't want this to have the appearance that we're
interfering in the investigation into the president's son, Hunter Biden. But make no
mistake about it, when the cameras are off, when the reporters are gone,
when the chips are down, there are calls that are made that everyone
knows. There is no doubt, there is no doubt what is an acceptable
conclusion to this case. The conclusion does not involve anything that would jeopardize Biden
his presidency, anything that would have negative influence or negative that would have a
negative impact I should say on his campaign, on how he has acted as
vice president potentially as president. There will be nothing. There shouldn't be there.
This is the press. There should be by the way, if if,
if the evidence leads there. But from the perspective of what happens behind
closed doors, there is there is pressure. There is probably intimidation, whether
overtly stated or simply simply by knowing who these folks are and what they desire,
and you begin to look at the things that David Weiss has said literally
conflicting, it's it's sometimes it contradicts itself. One minute telling us that he
has the discretion to prosecute whatever he thinks, the next him telling us that
he's been told that it's outside of his jurisdiction. The next being told that
he's going to, you know, pursue misdemeanors over felonies, felonies that are
clearly, clearly warranted according to the testimony of these irs agents. So this
is our government today. We know what, folks. The wine House,
as I've said earlier this week, has become a frat house. We've got
cocaine in there, We've got topless transactivists running around. It's a modern,
modern day Sodom and Gomorrah. I mean it is. It is disgusting and
evil and wicked. And they don't want that stuff coming out. They don't
want that stuff coming out at all. That's why they don't have security cameras
so allegedly supposedly in the White House that could have identified who brought the cocaine
in. They threw away the evidence, as was reported by I think Tom
Cotton centat of Tom Cotton. They didn't keep the evidence to maintain the DNA
or any DNA that might have been on the evidence and as it pertains to
the cocaine. I mean, on and on this thing goes. But somehow,
somehow, this is the same government that wants to tell you that wants
to work with Facebook and Twitter and these other social media nazis to not allow
free speech. They're gonna protect the speech of individuals. They're gonna make sure
I should say, they're not gonna protect the speech. They're gonna make sure
that you don't say that I don't say something that contradicts the government narrative.
They're gonna be able to make sure, even though they can't monitor what's directly
under their noses, they're going to be to tell us, they say,
what the sea levels are going to be in a hundred years, or what
they're going to be able to somehow by just passing a piece of legislation getting
women equal pay for equal work, just going to suddenly poof be solved,
as though these things are measurable in some way like that. I mean,
it's silly what they tell us they can do, because none of these things
can they come close to doing. Reducing the sea levels, changing the global
temperature, making sure that this society is absolutely fair, that there's no person
that's been mistreated. Meanwhile, they don't pay any attention to the child trafficking
problem. They want to ignore that, they want to mock that, they
want to belittle that. These clowns are not interested in your interests or my
They're interested in their power. They're interested in maintaining what they've got. They're
interested in taking more and more and more, leading this nation away from the
Constitution, away from liberty, away from your ability, my ability to even
provide for our families. We relying more and more on these folks. They
get more and more control, and poof, suddenly they begin to get us
in a direction that they want, which is globalism, which is socialism,
which is communism, which is wokeism. They hate the idea that our rights
come from God. They hate that. They truly hate that with an absolute
passion. These people are evil. You don't have to agree with everything that
we say on this program, but if you're diametrically opposed to the concepts of
constitutional conservatism, at some point one must ask why. And my friends,
I'm telling you it's a condition of the heart, just rejecting, reject the
good that comes with that worldview. So timeouts in order along in the segment,
switching gears. When we get back, you're listening here to conservative not
better talking on your host. Huff back in there we go. Gotta pull
the right thing up here back in just a minute. Welcome back, my
friends. We will continue to keep our eye on developments and some of these
well, the stories, the testimony and everything else that's happening in relation to
the Hunter Biden's story. But what I want to do corruption in general,
this administration, and again the Hunter Biden story is not about hookers and illicit
drugs. The Hunter Biden story, make no mistake, is about evidence,
and there is actual evidence that shows that there is potential collusion if you will
pay to play, if you prefer between Vice president bribery and business quote unquote
business associates of Hunter Biden, Lots of money exchanged hands. We're still learning
about this, and that is the real scandal. Who is who is actually
influencing decisions that are being made in this country, Who is getting personally wealthy,
who is getting personally wealthy by peddling their position of authority around the world.
These things should never be allowed to happen. That's what this Hunter Biden
situation is about Now, I want to pause that. Look at the clock
here. I was really long last segment two. So let me frame up
what I want to talk about in the remainder of the show. And that
is something I found earlier this week an article that talks about GOP senators Republican
senators who are not very happy, if you will, with what they are
calling or what the article calls radical radical conservative populism. Now I get messages
on occasion, and it's from people that don't listen to the show because they
don't know what they're talking about. Message is saying, when am I going
to I don't attack, I don't attack anybody. This is not personal to
me. But when am I going to go after? I guess the Republican
Party. I think, I think that I'm much more inclined. I mean,
I'm very incredibly disappointed in the Republican Party as a whole. I've made
that very well known, especially here in my state of Indiana. The Republican
Party is not that conservative, my friends. It just isn't. I mean,
it just it truly isn't. And our governor Eric Ulcum is not conservative,
so help us if he runs for Senate, which I'm not going to
be surprised if that happens. In fact, I think it will happen.
I mentioned Senator Todd Young, who is not quoted in this, Well,
he might have been quoted. If he was quoted, it was it was
anonymous. He's not a conservative guy. He's not a guy that's interested in
peeling back the size and scope of government. And it is. It is
dangerous. It is dangerous, and I just it's crazy to me. It's
crazy to me when I get messages saying I don't and there's not many.
There's a couple, but I just as I'm talking about this and framing this
up, I want to make sure that we identify that there is an element
of the Republican Party that is at odds with conservatives, at odds with the
Constitution, at odds with the concept of limited government. And that is more
upsetting to me than a radical leftist being in odds with it, because I
at least know who they are. They're not being a hypocrite, they're not
pretending to be on my side. They're diametrically opposed to the Constitution and to
liberty each and every day. Meanwhile, I've gotta parish through the double speak
of senators like Lisa Murkowski, or like Todd Young and Mitt Romney, who,
by the way, I saw a thing on Twitter yesterday where Mitt Romney.
It's just embarrassing. I don't all for having fun, but the guy
was promoting a hot dog Day. I don't know when it was earlier this
week. I think it was this week, promoting National hot Dog Day,
which was fine, but he had the audacity to say that hot dogs were
clearly his favorite meat. I'm not against having a hot dog, but to
say it's your favorite meat, What on earth? How do you come to
that conclusion? You never had a good steak, Mitt Romney, nice juicy
hamburger, I mean, my goodness, hot dog anyway, So I want
to talk about those on the other side of the break, talk about these
Republican senators who don't like conservatives. I mean, that's just at its core,
that's the truth. So that's important to realize too, because it is
a part of the battle that we are facing. So timeouts in order we'll
get to that. On the other side of the break. My friend sit
tight back in just a minute. So I'm gonna reference this article was written
and posted at The Hill dot com. It will be in our stack of
stuff at tatoshow dot com if you want to take a look at this.
This was posted on the seventeenth, which was Monday. I've had it in
my stack of stuff for several days. At is not gotten to it.
But basically, basically, this article points out that Republican senators I'm reading here
the first sentence of this piece. Republican senators say they're worried that conservative populism,
though always a part of the GOP, is beginning to take over the
party, becoming more radical and threatening to cause them significant political problems heading in
to the twenty twenty four election. In other words, don't have any expectations
for these guys. Don't hold them accountable to the constitution. Don't expect them
to actually go into Washington, DC to make things better, to reduce the
size of government. What are you expecting of these guys? GOP senators,
as continues, are saying they're being increasingly confronted by constituents. Oh my goodness,
how sad. Now, look, I'm not condoning anyone who's threatening these
folks or anything like that, but to confront them big whoop, come on
crime me a river, gop Senators. Oh my, this is just pathetic.
They're being confronted by constituents who buy into discredited theories such as the claim
that Democrats stole the twenty twenty presidential election or that federal agents incided the January
sixth, twenty twenty one attack on the US Capitol. I mean, have
they discredited any of this? I mean, folks, you should have questions
about a lot of things, and for them to say I went through this
earlier in the week. I was going back and looking at Jeff Duncan,
who was the lieutenant governor of as excuse me, of Georgia, his comments
on Trump's claims that the election was stolen from him, and I looked,
I looked everywhere. I remember, in fact, I said this earlier in
the week that he made comments that he said, if I just had five
minutes with every voter, I could convince them without a doubt that this election
was not stolen. And I said, go for it. Then, mister
duncan, get out there, get your PR team together, post a video,
do interviews, tell us if they're whatever degree that we have questions about
these things. It is your job. It is acumbent upon you too.
If there's especially if there's a clean explanation, a clear and concise explanation that
can put all of our concerns and doubts and distrusts at ease, then tell
us, for goodness sake. But instead they say things like this is an
American this is an attack on our democracy. That's not refuting anything. What
on earth are we talking about? And I said that Todd Young was not
quoted in here. Todd Young is quoted at the bottom of this at the
bottom of this piece. I forget I'm here. He says he fears that
snap in pete since will become the norm, and they mustn't. And I
would say I had grease Senator Young. But where were you when we had
two impeachments of Trump? I'm going to tell you. And I think I
shared this before he I invited him on this program. I was told by
his team he would be happy to come on after all the impeachment stuff was
taken care of. You know why, you know why they want to do
that, because they don't want to lead. They want to see where the
dust settles on this. And then they'll come in and talk about it.
That is not leadership. That is cowardice. That is unacceptable. And forgive
me for not caring that these folks are actually having people who are upset and
confronting them about this bunch of wimp's part of the problem. I've got to
take a break, my friend, sit tight. You're listening to conservative,
not better talking. Who's taught up? Back in a minute, my friends.
This program is brought to you in part by our friends at four patriots
dot com. Four patriots dot com is the website the number four patriots plural.
If you're looking for food that you can store on the shelves for a
long time, in case of an emergency, in case of supply chain disruptions,
in case of any number of other potential problems that might happen when these
jokers and clowns running our government are in control. If you're looking at generators
ways of keeping your family safe, your shelves stocked with food, your water
drinkable, you can go to four patriots dot com. That's the number four
patriots with ans dot com. Use discount code Huff Huff my last name,
save ten percent on your order. My friends, but i've got to go
have a great weekend. STG