Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Night Show.
As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Thursday, the second of May. You're
of our Lord, twenty twenty four. Well, today we are going to
go back and take a look at more of the campus wars which continue to
go on, because it's very important for us to see what this is about.
It's not about what it's about actually, the thing that they put up
there at the front, it's not about that at all. It's going to
change a lot of things, and perhaps it may be used for good.
It appears to be a lot of pushback that is coming forward with it.
We're also going to take a look at some of the vaccine stuff that is
really starting to explode in other countries. Not here here, we're too busy
cheering for Trump or Biden to care about the many millions of people that they
killed, But in other countries it's now being exposed. And we're going to
have some updates on some of the confessions of Mastrozeneca. Very interesting. We'll
be right back well as usual. Babylin b has some of the best commentary
on this stuff. Headline History repeats itself as communists run out of food at
Columbia University. They are communists. That's the key thing people need to understand.
This is a Marxists that have been trained there for many, many years.
Interesting that nobody really cared until it became anti Semitism. They could be
anti Americanism, but they didn't care until it became anti Semitism. But they
are after all Commis, and they are now declaring what their true purpose is
in many of these cases. Here, the communies at Columbia University, says
Bablin b lasted only about twelve hours before running out of food and pleading for
humanitarian aid, setting a new record for the collapse of a communist food supply.
Okay, time out on the end Offada revolution. We're out of pizza
rolls, said one organizer. I'm going to go see if the people we
just assaulted will send us some door dash another man, why didn't we take
over the food court. I'm so happy. I haven't hungry. I haven't
had chipolti in almost eight hours now. Still, I bet the people of
Gaza are inspired by our sacrifice. Yes, here's the true story that they're
parting Here at UCLA, they put out a request that was intercepted by a
Fox News reporter. They put out requests for vegan and gluten free food.
These are spoiled, pampered brats. They also said they wanted do not send
any bananas or nuts because they've gone bananas and they're full of nuts. They
have more nuts there than they can handle, So don't send any more nuts
to these nuts. The request list was obtained by Fox News's Old Malugan,
if I'm pronouncing his name correctly. It includes a variety of other supplies,
including gas masks, seals, and skater helmets. And of course they love
the N ninety five mask that has the mask of shame, like the cone
of shame that you give animals, the mask of shame. This outward humiliation
and obeisance to the medical martial law. That's become a very effective disguise for
people if they want to rob banks or take over college campuses or something like
that. So supposedly they're worried about the nuts and bananas, there are worried
about other nuts and bananas that people might have allergies to. I'm somewhat allergic
to Marxist college students. I think those kinds of nuts. The guards also
require those who enter the encampment to wear the mask, the N ninety five
masks. And isn't that interesting because you know they've set up checkpoints, So
this is not about speech, is it? When you've got checkpoints, when
you're taking over buildings, when you're busting into them, beating people up and
throwing people around, and now they've had massive fights, they've got chaz like
entrances, And this is not about free speech. But here's the interesting thing.
It's being treated by the Republican and Democrat supporters of Israel as if it
was free speech, so they can take down our free speech. Isn't that
interesting? I find that to be very interesting. It is not about free
speech at all. What these people are doing is not peacefully assembling, as
the First Amendment says, to air their grievances. No, it's something completely
different. So why are they making it about speech? Why are they criminalizing
any criticism of Israel the political entity? Even? Why are they doing that?
You and I both know why? Because they want to. They're looking
for an excuse to censorsus in every way they can, every way that they
can. For nearly a week, the propile standing activists have excluded members of
the public and the press by force. It's not a free speech issue.
And now you've got Mike Johnson out there. You know they're coming up though.
We got an anti anti Semitism, anti anti Semitism Act or whatever they
want to go on. The protesters don't believe in free speech, just like
the Satanic Temple doesn't believe in Satan. They're using these things, you know,
they're using this. What does the Temple of Satan set up these phony
things that I was talking about yesterday. Why they do that, Well,
because they want to suppress free exercise of religion of other people. They're goading
you into banning that so they can say, oh, well, you banned
our religious exercise of something that they have declared publicly that they don't believe,
so now we can ban the free exercise of what you really do believe.
So that's the purpose of the Satanic Temple, the purpose of these protesters who
have never believed in free speech, what they've been doing on campus for years,
urging anybody that comes that they don't agree with, no debates, you're
racist or this or that. And so their purpose is perhaps the purpose of
Soros, who has been pushing all this censorship and stuff as well. Perhaps
a purpose is really to shut down free speech, just like the purpose of
the Satanic Temple is to shut down on the free exercise of religion. It's
never about what it's about, is it not. With these people, there's
always a hidden agenda, and it doesn't take too long for that hidden agenda
to rise to the top. So the chaos is actually benefiting both Natan Yahoo
and Mike Johnson because it is distracting people from what they're doing. You look
at Mike Johnson again, I said, virtue signaling going to Colombia, and
so they can attack him and he can look strong even though he's incredibly weak
and bought out. He goes there like he's got a backbone, which he
doesn't. And so this is about their political agendas. Nobody's paying attention to
what NETANYAHUO is doing now. It's all about these Marxist revolutionaries. It's exactly
the opposite of what they say they want to accomplish. They have taken away
attention from the cause they say they oppose by their action. But the net
result of this will be attacking our basic liberties and the Bill ryans, CBS
is ignoring the major national security threat of bringing in Palestinians from Gaza, writes
The New American. And they're right, except that it's not Biden. Their
headline says, CBS says ignoring. CBS says the New American is ignoring major
national security threat Biden envisions importing Gaza Palestinians. Biden didn't write that legislation,
he didn't pass that legislation. Mike Johnson did. But they're not going to
criticize him because he's a conservative Republican. Supposedly, all you have to do
is get yourself a label. See Trump is not a globalist, in spite
of what he did in twenty twenty, which was marching in lockstep and leading
everybody being at the front. He was a pied piper for the globalist agenda.
But he is an anti globalist. We know that. We've been told
that over and over again by both the establishment press and the controlled conservative press.
He's anti globalist, so he couldn't betrayed us in twenty twenty. Mike
Johnson is a Christian Conservative. He couldn't be betraying us like this, except
he is. He's a trader. He's a trader. He sold out.
I never expected Trump to do anything but sell us out. I expected better
of Mike Johnson. So listen, if it had been Pelosi doing this,
do you think that they would have blamed her. Of course they would.
Why aren't they blaming Mike Johnson for this? Oh, Pelosi did this,
Biden did this. They never say Trump or Mike Johnson did it. Right,
But they're right that it is a threat. They said, left unexplained
is why the Islamic Arab nations won't take them in. Well, I think
we know, don't we Why is it a Saudi Arabia doesn't one of the
Palestinians or the United Arab Emirates doesn't want them, or any of them.
So you know they don't want to bring them in. And here's how the
thing is going to work. What CBS does say is that there are several
thousand They don't say how many, just say several thousand Palestinians that have not
been deported, and they're going to use chain immigration to bring people in from
Palestine. Are you related to somebody? Oh you say you are? Okay?
Well I don't have any way of checking that. So I'll just take
your word for it. So you're related to these people and Palestine, well,
then come on in. You're all fine, right, we've seen that
happening across the border before. That's nothing new. It's just going to now
be used to bring in people from Palestine. And then if you even if
you don't have somebody who claims to be your relative here in the United States,
you can claim that you're fleeing Hamas, which is a declared terrorist organization
declared by the United States. And so if you say that you're fleeing Hamas,
even if you are Hamas, you get a free ticket to come in.
And it's going to be, you know, even harder than it was
with MS thirteen. You know, the MS thirteen gang, they had a
habit of having their face tattooed with MS thirteen and all of their gang symbols.
But you know, the Ice didn't care, The federal government didn't care.
They let him come in anyway. I've told the story many times about
the father who was disrought. He came from Venezuela. He knew about MS
thirteen. He said, I'm sorry, not Venezuela. Let's see, I
forget now it was Evenzuel and old Salvador. Where they're from. I think
it's anyway, he was from the same country, told the story many times,
but now forgotten that detail getting old here. I guess the anyway what
he said was his daughter from the same country. I'm thinking it was ill
Salvador. But he said, we fled there, and they went all the
way up to Long Island, New York to try to get away from them,
except that there were so many of them there, and they got into
an argument with her, and of course a border patrol ice Homeland Security they
knew these kids were here illegally, but you know, we got Dhaka.
So you have Obama's head of Homeland Security says, we're not going to enforce
the law. I know that's the law, but we're not going to enforce
it. And then Trump said, well, I'd like to get rid of
that. I'd like to enforce the law. But let me ask the Supreme
Court if I can enforce the law. Let me ask them if I can
overturn an executive order from the previous president who said he wasn't going to enforce
the law. Is that allowed? The Supreme Court says, of course not,
and he goes, oh good, okay, well I can't do anything
about it because the Supreme Court said I can't do anything about it. So
they're there. They know that they are illegal immigrants, and they know that
they're MS thirteen because it's tattooed all over their face, but they won't do
anything about it. So what do you think about the Hamas people? You
think we're gonna do they tattoo the fact that they're Hamas on their face.
No, no, they don't do that, but it wouldn't matter if they
did, because our government wants to destroy this country. You understand this is
not incompetence, it's malice. Politicians like Biden and Johnson hate America except for
what they can get out of it. And in that regard, they're just
like the people they're bringing in the drug gangs in Central America hate America.
They want what they can get. The people are coming in for the welfare
magnet, for the Cloward and Pivot and stuff. They hate America. They
want the free stuff. And they don't care about this, and they're going
to go back. They're not going to bother to learn the language or get
a citizenship, most of them and they're going to take what they can and
go back, and they're just like Biden and Johnson, in it for what
they can get out of it. It's a greed and power trip for Biden
and Johnson, and it's a greed and power trip for these people as well,
bringing in more people just like them. Frankly, and so the Johnson
House, let's just put that in there, because you know, you have
a conservative media does not like to talk about the Johnson House. If it
says House approves. If it was Pelosi, it'd be Pelosi approves, it's
you a speaker, it'd be Pelosi does this, But they won't say it's
Johnson, just like it wasn't Trump, it was the pandemic, It was
the COVID that did all that stuff to us. No, it was Trump,
it was Trump, it was Fauci, No, it was Trump.
So Johnson approves the Anti Semitism Awareness Act, Well, what we need is
a Marxist Awareness Act, because that's what these people are about. That's really
the issue here. And evidently Johnson and the Republicans are not aware that they
are Marxists and that that's the real issue. Maybe somebody needs to make them
aware maybe we need to have in response a First Amendment Awareness Act. Do
you guys realize what you sor to as a condition of your office? Do
you realize that if you violate your oath to the Constitution, you have no
authority. I don't care if the Supreme Court says it's okay, not okay
with me? So zero had you asked some questions about this, How and
by what measure will federal authorities crack down on speech those named anti semitic?
And as I said at the very beginning, this is not about speech.
You know they're used, They're using these Marxist riots as an excuse to crack
down on speech. The lockdowns, folks, were not about a pandemic.
They were not about a fire. They were not about a sickness. They're
about them exercising their new tools of control. The climate stuff is not about
CO two, it's not about climate change, it's not about any of that
stuff. It's about them having a pretext to exercise to solitarian control. And
that's what this is about. And so the questions now become will criticism of
the government of Israel be deemed anti semitic? What if we criticize a foreign
political entity. Is that racism. Will highlighting alleged war crimes or human rights
abuses by the IDF be considered anti Semitic. Will involvement in the BDS movement,
that's to disinvest from anybody that has any disinvest from supporting financially supporting Israel,
will involvement in the BDS movement be deemed anti Jewish. Will slogans such
as from the River to the Sea Palestine b free will that be illegal according
to federal law. Look, we don't have anybody left anymore that supports free
speech, do we. Nobody supports free speech. And by that I mean
when you support free speech, you support the right of people to say things
that you disagree with. We don't have anybody like that. The people on
the left, if you disagree with them, they want to shout you down
and cancel you. People on the right, if they disagree with what you
have to say, they want to shout you down and cancel you. I
mean, just look at what Mark Levin was saying. We need to make
sure these people never have a job anyway, right, boy, talk about
taking canceling to the next level. Why are conservatives talking about that isn't it
a bad thing to be canceled off of the digital public square? Yes?
Is that a bad thing to be kicked out of your bank because they don't
like your politics and religion? Yes? Is it a bad thing to be
marked so that you're not able to get a job. Yes. Why are
they criticizing what Mark Evin said? Oh, they're high fiving him on that
stuff. He is a shameless racist tyrant. He applauded everything the deep state
wanted to do. He was opposed to Trump when Trump was saying the right
stuff as a candidate in twenty sixteen, when he became president, he became
a shameless apologist for him. He was telling Trump brag about the fact that
you did the vaccines. Biden is trying to take credit for them. We
need to give Trump a ticker tape parade, like we need to give him
a striped suit and a life sentence, multiple life sentences for the millions of
lives that he destroyed. And you too, Mark Levin, that's what needs
to be known. That's you know, those are actual crimes, not because
of what they said, but because of what they did. And these are
the people who get away with these crimes are murder, literal mass murder.
They want to shut down your free speech. I wonder why they don't want
anybody to talk about that, do they? Oh? I tell you can
smell these people a mile away as soon as they come after speech. It's
like, Okay, what's his game here? What is he trying to pull
on us? How is he trying to make us poor slaves to the globalists?
Will criticizing the three plus billion dollars an annual foreign aid to Israel,
Well, that'd be considered to be anti Jewish. And what are the many
Jewish protesters who are engaged in speech condemning the nation state of Israel. Show
the picture of their travis of this article here, zero edge ultra orthodox Jewish
protesters. Yeah, they don't. They don't like the political government of Israel.
And actually they're not Zionists either. They said, if there's a picture
of them, they said, yes, God has promised Israel to the Jews
and he will do it miraculously, not politically like this. And they don't
support the policies of people like Nett you know who as well. But nobody
wants to debate, nobody wants to tolerate allowing somebody to say anything that they
disagree with, and they don't want to debate. Instead, they want to
force people, Force people off of campus, force people out of their job,
force people off of social media, force force force everywhere they go,
the hand of force, destroy liberty everywhere. That's always a solution from these
people. Doesn't matter if it's Mike Johnson or the Palestinian Marxist on campus,
it's always the same thing, or Mark Levin. You know, we're going
to punish these people because you don't like what they have to say, and
we're going to silence them and shut them up forever. Well, that's not
the way of liberty. That's not what made this country great. That is
the path to tyranny and slavery. Folks, if you can't checkchallenge, and
criticize the government, especially a foreign government, are you kidding me? And
what does that say about the outsized control they have over our government if you're
not allowed to criticize them, amazing. Free speech is defending the beach that
you disagree with. Already, active participation and causes that are boycotting Israel is
now illegal in a number of US states. As a matter of factor,
you can go back and look at what de Santis did so I could get
big Jewish owners. I guess you know the widow of the big casino owner,
Sheldon Adelson, she's still got a lot of money. She used to
be the biggest contributor to the Republican Party. She's in Israel now, So
I guess that's maybe that's why he went there to sign the bill. So
she had noticed. But nevertheless, you know, he signed a bill saying
that any anti Semitic speech is a hate crime and it's going to be treated
as a felony. Well, why isn't the violence that these people doing isn't
that enough to treat that as a felony? Do you do the hate speech
stuff simply because you want to get rid of free speech? And as we
see at USF amazing, Like I said, yesterday, had school where I
met Karen University of Tampa fifty years ago. Somebody dumped a baby in the
trash can there, and then the next day I look at this in the
school that I went to graduated from USF they got protesters and fighting with the
police there. And the question I had was, since DeSantis already put in
a bill saying that any criticism of Jewish people or Israel is anti Semitic and
it's a hate speech felony. Are they going to charge these USF protesters with
a felony? Is it going to be if they get into a fight with
a police, if they get into a fight with students on campus and try
to keep people off, if they bust into buildings and destroy public property,
those are not as important. You know. The worst crime is what they
say. Are we going to accept that for America? I'm sorry, that's
not acceptable. Those other things are real crimes. When you talk about a
hate crime, you're really talking about judging somebody's motive and you're trying and you're
talking about a thought crime. But it's also to be able to censor anyone
and everyone. And these conservatives who are out there trying to shut people down
for anti semitism are no better than the left, who when you say,
well tell me something about why you're here, racist, racist, get out
of here. You know that's that's exactly that. They're exactly the same.
Isn't it amazing how alike the left and the right are. I hate these
parties. I hate these Democrats and Republicans where they passion. Every day I
look at them and I hate them more because they hate America, they hate
our liberty. They want to kill us in wars and revolutions and civil wars.
They're disease, disease of the mind and the soul. These political parties.
The founders hated political parties. Maybe they knew something. They hated partisanship.
Boy, do I hate it. The bill would require the Department of
Education do you use the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance Working definition of anti Semitism when
enforcing anti discrimination laws. And as one of the people pushing back against it
said, oh, okay, so there's no definition of anti Semitism in this
anti anti Semitism law. And it's just kind of like what they say is
what those people say, we're going to reference an external group. What they
say reminds me very much of what the FBI would labeling people as terrorists and
as extremists and all that. Like me, okay, because I was attacked
by the Anti Defamation League, or I was attacked by the Southern Poverty Law
Center, there's an FBI. I said, well, we'll just let them
decide who the terrorists are. So the Congress is going to let this International
Holocaust Remembrance Alliance decide who's anti Semitic and what is anti Semitic. The group
defines anti semitism as quote, a certain perception of Jews, which may be
expressed as hatred toward Jews. Well, let's understand that these same people have
been selling us this race beating agenda. Love to talk about unconscious bias.
Well, you may not actually hate Jews, but what you're saying is harmful
to Jews, so therefore you are unconsciously biased against them. That's what we've
seen with the black and white stuff and all the rest of the things.
Unconscious bias. I know, you don't don't really have any animosity to anybody,
but you're a hateful racist anyway. You have unconscious by simply because you're
white. And they say rhetorical and physical manifestations of anti semitism rhetorical are directed
towards Jewish and non Jewish individuals. The organization provides a number of examples for
what qualifies as anti Semitism, including calling for the harming of Jews in the
name of a radical ideology or extremist view of religion, and of course they
will tell us what is radical, and they will tell us what is extreme.
We have seen people at PDA meetings, in school board meetings being labeled
as extremists because they oppose the sexual grooming of children, they oppose pornography being
shoved in the faces of young kids and put in the libraries of the schools.
You are an extremist. Now they are the extremists, but they're the
ones wielding the labels. So so any extremist view of religion or accusing Jewish
individuals as inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust. So even a theoretical discussion writes this
zero head j article or interpretation could be considered to be illegal, as it
already is in some European countries. Matt Walsh said. The legislation itself never
says what the definition of anti Semitism is. All it says is that the
definition is whatever this other group says. What they say, you know,
it grants the force of law to whatever that organization happens to decree on the
subject. And of course it's not even fixed to whatever they say it is
at this point in time. What if they change their definition of this.
By the way, this is what they're about to do with the who's international
health regulations. Well, pandemic is whatever the WHO says it is. Anti
semitism is whatever this Jewish organization says it is. So if they say it's
anti semitism, you're gone. If they say it's a pandemic, you're locked
down. You've got to have your passports, all the rest of this stuff.
This is you know, our government for the longest time, Congress has
kicked the can to the other side, to the bureaucracy so that they don't
have to write the laws. So we've got laws, we got regulation without
representation, Congress is useless at this point, folks. And so because they
have kicked this over to the bureaucracy forever now and now they're going to another
step. Now they are going to kick it to outside organizations. So we're
not going to have even the present with an executive order lock us down declaring
a pandemic. No, we'll let a foreign organization do it. We're not
going to have the Congress attack free speech in the name of anti symatism.
They're not even going to give us a definition. They'll go to some outside
organization for that. It's just amazing. It's going to reminds me of what
Trump did with the gun control stuff. There's bad enough that Congress would pass
gun control legislation in defiance of the Second Amendment, but then they Trump did
it by executive order. Biden and La La Harris love that. It just
keeps getting worse. Washington is gone, folks. So Margie Tellergreen says anti
semitism is wrong, but I will not be voting for the anti Semitism Awareness.
It's not even about awareness. I should call it the Anti Semitism Punishment
Act or whatever. This it's again doesn't even have to be anti semitism,
because it's something's being defined by this outside group may not be actual anti semitism.
And I've said that for the longest time as well. You know,
when you point the finger at everybody and say you're racist, racist, racist,
what do you do You give a real pass to the racist people out
there. Well, they call everybody racist, You call everybody racist. Nobody's
racist, really, that's what happens. So the people are actually racist,
get off of the free pass. So she said this could convict Christians of
anti semitism for believing the gospel. It says Jesus was handed over to Herod
to be crucified by the Jews. Well, that's not the good news.
The good news is what he gives us. But still, when you look
at what the Bible says, it doesn't simply say that he was pilot had
responsibility for it. The jew Jewish leaders had responsibility for it. The Jewish
people who said, you know, crucifying had responsibility for it. But Jesus
said, I lay my life down, no one takes it from me.
He voluntarily did that. And here's the good news. And you know what
else, we were responsible for his crucifixion. He wouldn't have needed to lay
down his life if it wasn't for our sins. I ask people and all
these other religions, what do you do with your son? Well, I
just hope for the best. I do lots of good work because and I
hope that it outweighs that. Well, you can't ever get right with God
after you have rebelled against him. The punishment for that is death. And
the animal sacrifices were a picture of the ultimate sacrifice. It would have to
be paid for us to get back in God's good graces. So who killed
Jesus. I did, you did? He died for your sins. He
died for my sins. So all this stuff about, but again you have
people who will use that. You know, people attacked Mel Gibson for his
this movie said, oh it's anyway, they don't understand the gospel. Currently,
and historically, pro israel Hawks who advocate for sending billions in American taxpayer
dollars to Israel each year tend to accuse any and all opponents of such policies
of being anti submitic. Some independent journalists say they have struggled to find blatant
examples of people being targeted in anti Submitic attacks on campuses. Yeah, anybody
opposes them on anything, they call you racist or anti Semitic. Quite frankly,
I don't care, you know, load it up, call me whatever
you want. I don't really care. I know what's going on, I
know what's true, and it's going to You can call me an anti vaxer,
conspiracy theorist, whatever you want to call me. I mean, I
will admit to those I'm not racist or any Semitic, but I am anti
VAXX and I have lots of not just even conspiracy theories. I've got a
lot of conspiracy facts, so I don't really care about those labels. None
of us should. So Matt Walsh again, he says, the vast majority
of Republicans just voted for a bill to criminalize criticism of the Israeli government.
And think about this, folks. If they can criminalize criticism of the Israeli
government, think they'll do it with the American government. In a sense.
They have right already in many different ways. If the bill passes, you
will be guilty of hate speech if you apply double standards quote unquote to the
government of Israel, or if you accuse it of genocide. And so I
don't know if they're gonna be fired by Big Shapiro for saying that New York
City Mayor Eric Adams surprised me. He actually got upset when he saw them
waving the flag of another country. He said, it's despicable that schools would
allow another country to fly, would allow another country's flag to fly in America,
that they would take down the American flag, they would fly their Palestinian
flag. Well, you know, I kind of felt that way about Congress,
you know, when all these Democrats were waving the Ukrainian flag the Democrats
and Johnson wasn't waving it, but he knew it was going to happen.
I mean, don't tell me that all the Democrats are getting a Ukrainian flag
and Johnson doesn't know it. They're walking in, they're handing them flags,
or they're walking in their flags and stuff that he doesn't know it. Is
he really that stupid night. It's not that stupid. That's one thing he's
not. He is very cunning. He's not that stupid. He knows that
they had those flags, and he let that go on for quite some time
before you had Chip Roy and others get up there and say that's a violation
of the rules. Stop that. And then of course that video there was
done by Thomas Massey and he had the chief law enforcement what they call him,
Sergeant of arms. I think he wanted to find Massy, not find
the people waving the flags, which is every bit as much a violation protocol
as filming the people waving the flags. They can do whatever they want.
If you report their crimes, you committed a crime for reporting them. So
yeah, Eric Adams said it was despicable that US schools would allow another country's
flag to fly on their campuses while defending the New York Police Department after hundreds
of officers in riot gear broke up pro Palestinian protests on Columbia University's campus and
they took down the flag as well. So to me, that was kind
of surprising. I didn't expect to see Eric Adams defending the American flag.
So Adams became heated after police showed a number of videos and included protests at
Columbia as well as a protest at City College in New York, where demonstrators
took down an American flag. He said. Another significant part of the video
was at the end, said Adams, that's our flag, folks. You
don't take over our buildings and put another flag up. That maybe find other
people, but it's not to me. I guess it was okay though for
him when they were removing statues and stuff, and quite frankly, it bothers
me more to see statues of people who contributed to society who were not perfect.
Nobody is perfect, but if they moved us in a major direction towards
liberty, had some major accomplishments, and we honor them. That's what these
people are tearing down because they want to tear down our society. They want
to take us back into the Stone ages. They want to level everything so
they can reconstruct their socialist revolution. And we've now got these leaders of this
movement saying that on campus, we have to destroy everything so we can have
our Marxist revolution. They're actually saying that. Got a recording of it.
I'm going to play for you here in a minute. But you know when
they remove these statues, you know, the flag is a political enemy,
enemy entity, should say, and it is now a political enemy Fordians slipped
there. Yeah, that's right. Trump is accepted the invitation to speak at
the Libertarian Party. That should be interesting. What is reception is going to
be. I don't know what they're going to do. I know what would
have happened when I was there. Of course, Libertarian Party has. I
haven't changed, but the Libertarian Party has. But the way it was identified,
most of these articles identified as the Libertarian Party, and then I saw
one of them. It is from raw story. Their headline was Trump agrees
to speak to anti government groups. Like what is that liberty? Yeah,
that's what they call Libertarian Party, an anti government group. And I thought
about it for a second. I thought, okay, I'll take that.
I'll accept that label. I'm anti vax I'm anti government, I'm a conspiracy
theorist. I don't really care. Those are accurate labels actually, quite frankly
of me, so it bothers me more to see these statues taken down.
You think you're perfect, you think you don't think there's anything in your life
that is wrong. Have you accomplished anything? These people that have statues put
up, for the most of them made some significant contributions to our society into
our understanding. Okay, Jefferson had slaves, but do you understand the other
things that he did, And do you understand that most of the people,
not most of the people, but most of the wealthy people, the people
who were in government at the time, had slaves. But that doesn't that
blindness in their life does not take away from their warnings and their understandings about
power and how it needs to not be centralized. And those are the takeaways
that and the things like the Bill of Rights that we now despise. Quite
frankly, I'm more than happy slavery's gone, and I would like to keep
the Bill of Rights but these people want to talk about an institution that's gone
so that they can destroy the Bill of Rights. And the way they do
that, it's by taking down the statues to the people who wrote the Bill
of Rights and other things like that. Yeah, they were not perfect,
but it bothers me a lot more to see that happen than it does to
see a flag taken down, because the flag also represents what our government is
today. And yes, I am anti government. I despise what both parties
are doing today, says Eric Adams. And my uncle died defending this country.
These men and women put their lives on the line. It's despicable that
schools allow another country's flag to fly in our country. Well, you know,
and a lot of the people that they tore down these statues of a
lot of them died because of what they did as well, and they also
left a legacy. He said, we're not surrendering our way of life to
anyone. What a joke. This is the guy who is destroying private cars,
and he's allowing the crime basically to go unanswered. And he's bringing in
all the migrants and giving them, putting them to the head of the line
and giving them, the illegal immigrants, giving them more than he does the
American citizens. Are you kidding me? We're not going to surrender our way
of life to anyone. He's been one of the key guys pushing the Sea
forty agenda. That's surrendering my ability to even eat meat and have milk or
travel. That's surrendering that to the globalists, and he's a part of that.
It's so strange to see Eric Adams defending the American flag. And it's
equally strange for me to see the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
where you've got a fraternity that is defending the American flag. That is the
last place on Earth that I would have expected, except for New York,
that I would have expected the American flag to be defended because we used to
live not too far from unc Chapel Hill. Very surprising to me, but
it's a bunch of guys in a fraternity. As the Marxists were coming for
the flag, they stood there defending it. It went viral. They put
up a GoFundMe thing. Interestingly enough, Bill Ackman, who has been in
fights with Harvard over this Gaza Palestine stuff and everything, and he wanted to
do a kind of McCarthy blacklisting, just like Mark Levin of people that he
disagreed with. He doesn't support free speech, but he supports making sure that
these people who have you know, signed their name or whatever, wants them
kicked out of school, wants them to never have a job working for anybody
ever in their life. Very McCarthyism, right, blacklisting people for life.
And you know, he has an interesting history. I haven't talked about it
before, but Bill Ackman, hedge fund manager. He made a fortune shortening
the stock market as the lockdowns were about to come early March, and then
he goes on TV and makes this emotional plea with President Trump to shut the
country down after he's already put in his orders to profit from the plunging stock
market. Great guy, great guy. I don't really respect people like him.
He endorsed Bloomberg, the Democrat, technocrat, the climate terrorist, eco
terrorists, whatever you want to call him. That's what Bloomberg is. He's
an eco terrorist, I guess, maybe the best one. But he was
a big supporter of Michael Bloomberg. And he wants McCarthyism against people. But
he disagrees with Look, I disagree with those people as well, but I
don't like to see this blacklisting, this cancel culture that's been put out there
because it's directed at free speech. So when you look at what Thomas Massey
said about this anti semitism, ability says, do you agree with all these
examples of semitism? And he lists what was put in there. You might
be an anti Semitist or you might be anti semitic if you are, you
know, it's kind of like a you might be a redneck if you fox
Worthy remember that, Well, you might be anti semitic if you do any
of these things. There's a long list he puts us up. He says,
should people in America be prosecuted for saying these things in all contexts?
See, the issue is is that nobody in America should be prosecuted for saying
anything if they are, we don't have a free country, we don't have
the Bill rights, we don't have the First Amendment if you can be prosecuted
for saying anything. And so the example out of the bill says, well,
it could include but it is not limited to and it's got a very
long list here. But of course it could be anything it includes, but
it's not limited to oh that's nice. So we still don't know what the
boundaries of this are. It's a completely open ended thing. It canna be
things like stereotypical allegations or a myth about a world Jewish conspiracy. I say
this all the time. You know, George Soros. You can't criticize George
Soros. Why because he's Jewish. But he hates the Jewish people, right,
he's Jewish. So if you criticize George Soros because he's Jewish, you
call him a globalist, which he is. But since he's Jewish, he
gets a pass on that because we've got this stereotype out there about it a
global Jewish conspiracy. Well, the problem is is that that also includes people
like Gates, who's not Jewish. It includes people like the Rockefellers, which
not Jewish. It includes Klaus Schwab who's not Jewish. Yeah, there's a
lot of Jews in it, but there's a lot of non Jews in it
as well. Why don't we look at what people actually do. I'm not
going to be intimidated by these kinds of labels, and you shouldn't be either.
We need to push back and resist in the same way that you got
even a fraternity at unc Chapel Hill resisting people taking the American flag? Can
we resist them taking our first Amendment? If you accuse Jewish citizens of being
more loyal to Israel or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, then then
to the interests of their own nations. What if I accuse Congress of being
more loyal to other countries than they are to America waiving their flag, sending
the money to these other places and not giving us opinion. Instead is allocating
three and a half billion dollars for Biden to bring in people from Palestine.
Do you think that these paid politicians are more loyal to Ukraine and to Israel
than they are to America. They just proved it a couple of Saturdays ago.
They proved it. Go look at the bill and tell me that they're
not more loyal to foreign governments than they are to us. And again it
includes people like Mike Johnson who are not Jewish, but they are more loyal
to them than they are to America. And so it finishes up by saying
anti Semitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law, for example,
denial of a Holocaust, or a distribution of anti Semitic materials in some
countries, or if it's like Andrew Bridgen talking about how many people have been
killed by this job and he says it's he said, and he was quoting
a scientist who said that. He says a scientist, it's going to be
like that, it's like a Holocaust. Oh, you can't say that that's
anti semitic. It's like, no, it's not. That's not even denying
the Holocaust. But oh, it's got to be separate. And I know,
look, we know that Stalin and mal killed more Peo people then died
in the Holocaust. That's a fact. But you know, you can't don't
talk about that at all. And so you're going to take somebody who is
trying to tell us the truth about this mass murder. And that's what the
Conservative Party in the UK used to silence and to cancel him. You said
something about the Holocaust. I'm done with this stuff, folks, I really
am. I am sick to death of people like Johnson, these shills that
are up there. So anyway, the wh when you look at it,
and there's a lot of this back and forth from these people about Jesus and
his crucifixion and that type of stuff. Look, there's no telling where these
people are going to use it. There's a lot of different ways that they're
going to persecute us. I think it's even bigger when you look at the
tip of the spear is really not the anti Semitism charges. The tip of
the spear is the LGBT stuff. But again, going back to USF,
please use tear gas on protesters there. At USF where I graduated from and
fifty years ago, we had radical Marxists that were there at the time.
They weren't an engineering they you know, hung out in other places. But
so at UCLA again, folks, this is not free speech. Let me
show you why they're doing at UCLAD. Look at it. Somebody is being
beaten. Somebody is being beaten with thick and punches in the middle of the
lung. Is that is that free speech? Is that free speech? Why
isn't that the bigger concern at the bottom of that brawl right there? Yeah,
hand to hand melee with sticks and look at that. Look at that.
Somebody is being dragged and beaten in the front of that ply that that
plywood wall. Wasn't it Einstein who said the Third World War be fought with
sticks and stones? And maybe he's talking about the campuses, I don't know.
Just incredible, like where are the police? Where is security? Where
are these people? Yeah, but this is la. Where was authority here?
Where Darryl Gates gave us the militarized police where they're m rappers and all
the rest of this stuff. He gave us the swat teams, He gave
us a no knock raide, never covered without any sign of enforcement, law
enforcement security whatsoever. This has gone now on for over an hour and a
half, and it is absolutely appalling in my estimation that we have not seen
any response. I've just never seen it. Yeah, yeah, And it
goes on and on. You know. That's all we saw Darryl Gates when
he was still there's not there anymore now. He was there in the nineties,
thirty years ago. But he was the one who gave us swat teams
and no knock grades and militarized police and all the rest of this stuff.
And then when you had the Rodney King riots, what do you do they
use all that stuff to protect themselves. It circled the bugs around the police
stations and let everybody else offend for themselves. So, which is what they're
doing right now at UCLA campus. What does that tell you? Well,
we saw thirty years ago, we see it now. When they get their
societal breakdown, folks, you're on your own. There's not going to be
anybody on the other end of the line coming to help you. And so
again, you know, think about what you're going to do to prepare.
What are you going to do to prepare for food? Do you want to
be dependent on them for food? Oh, so they're going to put you
in a FEMA camp. Tell you've got to be vaccinated all the rest of
this stuff. Right, So, you don't want to be dependent on them
for food, you don't want to use their financial system, you don't want
to be dependent on them to protect yourself. And so again you need to
take a look at Civil defensemanual dot com. He's got a great chapters on
so many different things, but especially about building community because you don't want to
be by yourself either. Massive numbers of people can overwhelm you in any of
these situations, but it's about how to feed yourself how to get together in
a community to defend the community that type of thing. And you also want
to make sure that you are outside of their financial system. Tony Rdman set
up David Knight dot Gold and so you go there and you can gradually start
to accumulate gold or silver. You can get quantity discounts. That's part of
that buyer group that he's got. The wolf pack that's there. You go
from fifty dollars on up and actually he's got a kid's version that goes down
to thirty five each month. Or you can buy gold and silver at any
big or small individual purchases. It doesn't have to be a part of that.
He just set that up for people who want to do it on a
regular basis, make it a part of their budget and get quantity discounts as
part of a buyer's group. But he will buy or sell this stuff for
people, and he doesn't run out of it like they do at Costco.
You know, he'll if you place an order, he'll get it for you
at that price. He places his order, gets a hold on it.
It may take a little bit of time for it to show up, but
he'll get it for you at that price, So go to David Knight dot
Gold. I really do appreciate Tony's that support this program. We're going to
take a quick break and we're going to come back. I got one or
two more things to talk about, but I also want to talk about with
this the campus wars, and actually the war is on free speech. But
I want to talk about the new regulations another week, another couple of regulations
of things that are going to be banned for you. As Biden is making
houses more expensive, he's making everything unaffordable. He's got more regulations for houses,
more regulations for power generation, more regulations for appliances. There was an
interesting back and forth. They're the White House reporter ask his pres secretary,
you know when does this all end? Well, it isn't until we until
we ended. If you like the Eagles, doesn't way the cars and Heuey
Lewis in the news they say the Horrors You'll love the Classic Hits channel at
a p S radio, download our app or listen now at a p S
radio dot com. Analyzing the Globalists next move and now the David Nutshell.
I want to thank Michelle Obama, thank you very much. On rock Fan,
thank you for the tip. I appreciate that. Well. I thought
I got more to say about this. Again, they make it about free
speech, but here's a Jewish student wearing a Star of David necklace deny entry
to his own university because he's Jewish. I'm a UCLA student, he says,
I deserve to go here. We pay tuition. This is our school,
and they're not letting me walk in in. By the way, we'll
have the people who are there. The protesters don't go to that school,
but they're keeping students who do go to that school out. But let me
ask you, why do you think this would be any different? All of
my life, I've watched these schools like UCLA and Harvard and Columbia anything.
I've watched them keep people out because they're not the right skin color, or
because they're not the right gender, whichever gender they want to imagine. Right,
they have the people running these institutions, and now you've got these these
donors like Acmen or Ackerman or whatever that that don't that they've gave money all
that time, and they were just fine with it until the mob turned against
them. Right, That's what always happens. It's just like Robospear. You
generate this Marxist mob, and eventually the mob comes for you, and so
that's what's happening with us. Why is that a surprise, because for decades
they have been telling somebody you can't come here because you're this or you're that.
So why wouldn't they now at this point say you can't come in because
you're Jewish. They've been saying that to white people, to males for a
long time at these universities. And so you look at what is happening.
It's not just, of course, this one at Columbia. Here are the
Palestinian protesters and you can see some of these people obviously are not students there.
They're pretty old. I think maybe they're professors teaching this stuff. But
here's the fight that's going on here. Big mob coming in. They're busting
into these buildings, and there's two guys there that are locking arms and say
no, we're going to stand here protecting us. And so these people wearing
masks are shoving them around. By the way, that guy wearing the glasses
there, that's a grandson of Doug Wilson. He says, I'm very proud
of him for standing there, and so here's the mob, big mob against
two people shoving them. Then I got it, I got it on.
He says, this is assault. This is one hundred percent assault. Give
those out anyway, what is what is your name? Walk out? Walk?
Yeah? What's your name? They got caps on, they got the
N ninety five Fauci masks on. They won't give their names. Right,
I'm not signed out? Yeah? Free speech? Right? Is this free
speech? Well? You know, Mike Johnson looks at this and he says,
you know what we need. We need a regulation coming out of Congress
that shuts down free speech. I says response to all this stuff, it's
pathetic, pathetic U c l A. The brawls and everything else that are
happening. There's pathetic that they would make this about that's not about free speech
at all. There's nothing at the university is about free speech. That's the
thing that bothers me so much about Mike Johnson and these other people. Well,
here's what this is about. We had one of them explain it to
everybody that this is really about a Marxist revolution. There's only one way.
So much yay, the crowd likes that, so we can have a socialist
reconstruction for the United States of amer Yep, that's it. Let's understand what
this is about. It's not about free speech, it's not about debate.
This is about violence. It's about mob violence. And as he said,
there's only one solution in FATA revolution. We must have a revolution so we
can have a socialist reconstruction of the USA. You see, we have these
these youthful idiots at the bottom who have been radicalized by our indoctrination systems.
And then at the top we got the people like class Swap saying the same
thing. Quite frankly, you know, Class Swap and his ilk are Marxists.
They've got common Pass and they've got you know, the Commons project.
And because they're communist, they're communists and they want universal basic can come where
you don't own anything. Because folks, they're communists. How many different ways
do they have to tell us they're not woke, they're not climate you know,
they're communists, and so they want this at the top, they want
to destroy everything, and see points out we have to have a revolution so
we can have a socialist reconstruction, destroy everything and then reconstruct it in their
communist utopia. Which is dystopian hell. That's what this stuff is about from
all of these people, and absolutely no question about it. Let's talk a
little bit about climate. Here we have it's talking about the moves yesterday by
the Biden administration and now you've got black Rock. Larry Fink has made his
move and he is telling people at the World Economic Form Investment Tip what we
need to do is get into some other alternative form of energy because our AI
centers are really hungry. And he doesn't say it, but so are there
surveillance centers. And that's ultimately what AI is going to be about, is
surveillance. So you look at these massive data centers that the NSA is running,
and you look at the artificial intelligence. The amount of energy that these
things are using is astronomical. Now he talks about that and he says,
you know, it's going to explode. So and we're not going to be
able to have the energy artificial intelligence and for surveillance that we need if it's
wind and solar, So we've got to go to something else. Well,
Biden administration, on the one hand, it's starting saying, well, let's
go to neutral and nuclear because we're going to we're still going to shut down
all the coal plants. They're just too cheap and plentiful. So we can't
have anything that's cheap and plentiful. Everything must be expensive because this is about
a transfer of wealth to the few. So they've got to give us the
most expensive ones. And we've got to make sure that these people at the
top when they burn and everything down, that when America is reconstructed, they're
going to be on the ground floor and everybody's going to be paying them.
And so they've been shutting down coal plants, and now the other hand of
the Bide administration is saying, well, we're going to put restrictions on Russian
uranium, which is only twenty five percent, but it is also twenty five
percent, and we take away twenty five percent of your supply. If you're
a retailer trying to operate on a small margin, if they take away twenty
five percent of your business, you're out of business. And so there's a
lot of coal natural gas plants that whether they're taking down, will they start
up nuclear power plants that they took down before. We'll have to wait and
see. But the bottom line is it's going to be them. Who is
going to make the money? Now, the Daily Skeptic asked, why is
a WHO so asking doctors to lie in order to promote climate alarmism. Well,
because they're both mcguffins, and because the goals are the same, and
because they lie about everything. The WHO has published a new toolkit empowering health
professionals to tackle climate change, say, there's absolutely no reason why you shouldn't
converge these mcguffins, because again, they want in the In the end,
they want the same thing. They want depopulation, and then they want control
of the people who are left. In fact, it requires healthcare professionals to
use their authority to issue science and to lie to their patients and politicians.
The climate war is, after all political, and so the Daily Skeptics said,
yeah, that's right. And by the way, so is medicine.
Now, medicine is also political. So why shouldn't they If they've got they're
both political and they've got the same goal, why shouldn't they merge? Since
the climate scare story merged in the nineteen eighties, well that's when they made
it about global warming. But before that, through the seventies, it was
all about the ice age, but they still wanted the same thing, may
just change with the fashions the era of global boiling. As you and Secretary
gutarists put this, this also happens to be the era in which unprecedented social
development has occurred. So surprisingly for a toolkit that is aimed at people such
as doctors, who have proven capacity to understand scientific literature if they care,
which they don't. Typically they read the marketing press releases from big pharmaceutical and
they they pass that on to you. The toolkit offers little evidence in support
of these claims. Well, the doctors have been prepared for this because they
were willing to accept little or no evidence about a pandemic. They're willing to
accept little or no evidence about the safety and efficacy of the vaccine. They
didn't even care to vet the lies that were there, that lies that would
not pass just critical thought, let alone, show me your data in a
scientific investigation. So this toolkit says that changing weather patterns quote unquote, and
extreme weather events can reduce crop yields, potentially leading to food insecurity and malnutrition.
That's the plan, isn't it? Food insecurity and malnutrition, poverty,
slavery to these people, as data clearly shows though, since nineteen ninety there
have been radical reductions and mortality caused by malaria, malnutrition, diarrheal disease,
natural disasters, exposure to temperature extremes. You see, one of the best
things that you can do for people not just the quality of their life,
but life expectancies, to make sure they've got cheap abundant energy and you know,
things like that. Hygiene follow from that. We don't improve our health
with vaccines. We improve our health, interestingly enough, with cheap abundant energy,
which is why they're trying to take it away from us. How does
the data compare with the who's claim that the frequency and intensity of these events
is surpassing the capacity of both natural and human systems to respond effectively. Well,
they show the charts in this Daily Skeptic article. Here they say diarreal
disease mortality has fallen by two thirds in the period between nineteen ninety and twenty
seventeen. Malaria deaths have been cut in half. Yeah, you know,
you've got air conditioning you can avoid if you're as everybody does now, they
avoid the outdoors, they stay indoors with the air conditioning, you don't get
bit by the mosquitoes or whatever. But anyway, similar paradox can be shown
by comparing the who's statements on food security with other UN agencies data. There
is no evidence of climate change adversely affecting agricultural production and vulnerable economies, but
they want to do that anyway. They want to shut down farms, and
now they're trying to use bird flu to shut down our food supply as well.
Bill Gates wants to use AI to genetically modify beef cows so he can
save the planet. He wants to make it I guess, so that they
can't farty, just blow up. I guess, float away. They turn
into big balloons, And there you go. We got col flu. The
cow flew away. He couldn't fart, so he just blew up like a
big balloon and flew away like the Wizard of Oz. Microsoft founder Bill Gates
recently discussed how AI could fight climate change on his podcast. His podcast is
called Unconfused Me with Bill Gates. Well, I wouldn't want to be confused
with Bill Gates either. If I were Bill Gates. It was just the
type of unhinged conversation it would expect from the same man who touts synthetic beef
depopulation and preventing cows from burping and farting, says Technocracy News. So when
he was discussing in this interview with a data scientist Hannah Ritchie, he says,
I was very stunned how the AIS went from basically not being able to
read or write at all to doing that in a very fascile way, he
said. When asked if he thought AI could play a role in taking action
on the climate, he said, oh, absolutely, yeah, because it'll
be there to measure and to watch and to record and to resnitch on everything
that we do. It's going to have a big role in that, because
that's what this is all about. Absolutely, he said. He cited the
examples of genetically modifying beef cattle with AI so they can produce less methane.
You know, this is I'm saying multiple articles every day about using artificial intelligence
with genetic modification. You know, we talk about genetics, robotics, artificial
intelligence, nanotechnology. The acronym is grain, and they're starting to converge,
aren't they in a lot of different ways. I Mean, we see robotics
and artificial intelligence. That's how you get these robots that are able to look
at the table and you're given instructions and it pulls the stuff out. So
robotics and artificial intelligence, we've seen that being merged. Now there's all this
stuff about artificial intelligence and genetics, and that really concerns me because I've used
chat GPT really concerns me. So anyway, he says, so we can
genetically modify the beef cattle so they produce less methane, or by using AI
to somehow produce meat without the cow. Well, here's an idea, Bill,
Why don't you let us eat without the gates. Why don't you let
us eat without constantly hectoring us about what we are eating? You know,
really tired of his advice. As a matter of fact, a lot of
people are tired of his foods. Remember, he invested in impossible foods.
He invested in upside foods, which really ought to be called upside down foods.
He invested in beyond meat, which I think ought to be called beyond
food. Anyway, he and his ilk are nothing more than ring race of
greed. You know, they're not looking at some ring of power. Although
that's essentially what it is. But they're just they are so in love with
money that it's kind of turned them into these horrific ring race And he's not
even aware of it. I think he doesn't even realize just how despicable his
actions are. Perhaps he has sadden the past, all rich countries should move
to one hundred percent synthetic beef. Why so he can get richer. Yeah,
that's why. But he is optimistic that fake meat products will be a
very good alternative for consumers. Last November, Beyond Meat cut nearly twenty percent
of its non production workforce following plummeting sales as customers a skewed the and that
interesting looks like chew, doesn't it. But it sounds sounds kind of like
a sneeze as chew his food. It's very appropriate to use that word.
His highly process and unhealthy concoction. Once heavily hyped. It's stock that is,
Beyond Meat has fallen more than sixty percent, and an opinion piece in
The New York Times recently referred to lab grown meat as quote the revolution that
died on its way to dinner. Well better that than the people die after
they eat his dinner, because what's typically going to have it such products going
off for much in the way of environmental benefits and maybe even be causing more
harm than good. So Gates is going after a cow burps. He is
investing in an Australian startup that's focused on preventing cows from burping methane emission.
They're being polied about it. I don't know the cows burp that much.
Basically, they're farting air by feeding them a dietary supplement with a synthetic version
of an ingredient in red seaweed that prohibits methane formation. So it's not even
giving them red seaweed, but it's a synthetic version of red seaweed. Isn't
that great? Yeah, really nutritious stuff. Gates Investment Fund said, although
cows are a significant greenhouse gas source and it no, it doesn't matter.
It really doesn't. The methane, the CO two doesn't matter. We shouldn't
be concerned about that at all. We can talk about it, point out
how hypocritical these people are. They wring their hands in despair about greenhouse gas
and CO two. And then you got people like Taylor Swift that goes around
the world equivalent to seven times in one year with her private jet. Even
they're absolute hypocrites, and we can talk about the only reason to talk about
CO two and methane is to number one debunk the lie and number two to
point out their hypocrisy. But we shouldn't say, well, this is a
better solution over here. We should never get into that. We should never
assume go with their assumptions that CO two and methane need to be taken down.
They don't need to be taken down. That's why God gave us plans.
It's a closed loop system that adjusts anyway. Livestock agriculture remains one of
the cheapest protein sources globally, says Bill Gates. That's why he wants to
get rid of it, because if you've got cheap protein sources, you don't
need his expensive sources that are going to make him rich. If carbon really
is as bad as he claims, shouldn't he be concerned about the large carbon
footprint involved in developing and maintaining and disposing of AI technology. Yeah, yeah,
they never And that's the biggest hypocrisy. It's not even the private jets
and all the global meetings of these people go to. It's artificial intelligence data
centers, it's NSA data centers, it's constant biometric surveillance of everything that we
do, facial recognition everywhere. That uses a lot of energy, and they
don't care about that. And we also know because you know, when Larry
Fink talks about money, he tells you the truth, or at least he
tells his friends at the world he can form the truth. And so you
know, we know that they don't have They're not going to be able to
get enough power out of solar and wind, and it's not going to be
steady state power, and so it's going to have to be something else,
and it's going to require tons of it, a lot more than they've got
right now. It's going to explode. As he point out, the emissions
from the IT technology industry as a whole are expected to account for fourteen percent
of global emissions by twenty forty. I think that's very low. As who
was talking about, you know, the explosion many many times more than it
is right now. So placing all the blame on the planet's woes on cows
and glossing over the negative impact of AI on the environment. The planet doesn't
have any woes. The woes are being imposed by the globalists. We don't
have a problem with global warming, we don't have a problem with CO two,
we don't have a problem with methane. And anyway, the artificial intelligence
does show their hypocrisy, so he says, but it all makes sense when
you look at their big investments and meat alternatives and into open AI. But
I don't really care about the AI's effect on the environment except for its hypocrisy.
But not a day goes by now that you don't see something about genetically
modifying food, and that you don't see all of these scare tactics about bird
flu and what it's going to do to cows and all the rest of this
stuff. And it is now at the point where the media is taken to
this is the new thing today. The media has taken to scolding the US
Department of Agriculture, which has been over the top stupid about this stuff and
aggressive and trying to expand its empire. It wasn't enough that the FDA went
out and tested milk oh we found some viral particles that don't worry, nobody
got sick. The cows weren't sick, people that consumed it weren't sick.
And you know, we boil it and it breaks it up or kills it
or whatever. You know, whether these things are alive or dead, or
if they even exist, as we talked about yesterday. So the FDA said,
we tested it, but it's not a problem. So then after that,
the USDA goes out and starts looking at ground beef. You know,
I kind of think it's interesting that they would look at ground beef instead of
its steaks. Right. Why do I say that, Well, because when
you ground when you grind up the beef and everything, what you're doing,
you're you know, you're shredding it and all this kind of stuff and processing
it, and it's getting exposed a lot more to the atmosphere. And you
can find anything in anything if you ramp the PCR test up enough, so
it makes it even better. If you test ground beef which has been errated,
right, all the different parts internal and everything. You know, it's
been exposed to the air, and you can find anything in ground beef,
especially ramping it up with a PCR tests like that rather than looking at a
stake. But that even that and all the talk about how they're going to
start following cattle and tagging them and banning them from going across state lines if
they haven't been vaccinated and haven't been tested and all the rest of the stuff.
We understand that game because we've been the cattle. We've been there,
We've had as Eric Peters, we've had the ear tag that they tried to
put on us, and we know exactly what that game is. And so
we know what the agenda of the US Department of Agriculture is. And yet
here's the new thing. We've got reporters now, various outlets are starting to
criticize the US Department of Agriculture for not doing enough. Where have we seen
this before? Well, we saw that as well during twenty twenty. You
had all of these organizations holding Trump and scolding FAUCI for not doing enough,
giving them cover to be more aggressive because we all know, don't we buy
now, don't we understand that it's a partnership between the media and government,
And so it's like, go ahead, criticize me, go ahead, go
ahead do it, and then that I'll respond to that criticism by doing more.
If I just do it on my own it looks a little bit suspicious,
right, but you criticize me, and that's what's going on right now.
They're not letting up on this bird flu thing to come after our food,
and everybody understands it. Like I showed at the beginning of the week
that one article that was put up on zero Hedge, people just ranked on
zero Hedge and on Epic times for putting that piece of propaganda and clickbait up.
And it was just five hundred comments, not a single one in agreement
with any of that stuff, every single one of them mocking, satirized them,
condemning them for this foolishness and seeing through it. But again, we'll
see what happens. Published on April twenty ninth, the study on the CDC's
website. Yeah, they are so concerned about safety and purity of food,
aren't they. As a matter of fact, this is a good place for
me to play. The several people have talked about what Walmart is doing.
Now they've gone from corn processed and canned in Arkansas to corn coming out of
Thailand that has a lot of really bad stuff in it and double the calories.
Here's the breakdown from one lady so here's an older can of corn from
my pantry, and we're going to compare the two with this newer can of
corn. Okay, number one, it says that it has picked and grown
on the same day. It has this green little Grape for You label here.
Over here, it says that it's from Arkansas, has forty five calories.
What else is oh, and it's gluten free. Okay, let's compare
that to the second can. By the way, the biggest difference to the
second can is a product of Thailand. Looking at the nutritional information, we
went from forty five calories to ninety calories. There's more sodium, there's more
carbs. Apparently it's no longer picked and packaged on the same day like this
one, and it's no longer gluten free. And also lost that great for
you tag. Let me tell you why. On this new can of corn
from Walmart, there's a health warning. Let's read it for camp in your
corn. It exposed you to chemicals including lead, which are known in the
state of California to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. I
guess that's reason enough to lose the Grape for You symbol that was on this
can, So go into your pantry check out your can corn. Yeah,
she's at the very beginning of that, by the way, and she just
misspoke because she corrected it later. I think. Decide it's got the sticker
it says and grown on the same day. It's like what picked and canned
on the same day. But not in Thailand. I guess maybe they lay
it out on some lead for a couple of days when they put it in
the can. Who knows. Yeah, they're so concerned about our food safety
and food purity, aren't they. Where's the FDA in all this? Right?
Do they care that Walmart is now selling corn with lead in it?
N they don't care. That's Walmart. You know. They were the kind
of people that were essential during the lockdown. The mom and pop businesses on
Main Street were non essential, but Walmart was essential. And I said,
one of the reasons that really grated with me was because we had been through
that about thirty years earlier, twenty five thirty years earlier, we had our
stores and power was knocked out with a hurricane for several days. The only
time that we shut the chain down if we had a snow storm or anything
else, like that. I would go around pick people up, take them
to work, but nobody had power. When power came back in one area,
we opened up Wall Street, Wall Street. It was Wall Street Walmart,
big Wall Street store right across the street. The cops came around to
shut us down, and so Walmart's open. Oh yeah, Walmart can stay
open. You guys are going to shut down? Yeah, so yeah,
I've seen that whole thing before as well. April twenty ninth, the study
on the CDC's website. The abstract says, an infected cattle experienced non specific
illness. Well, maybe, since this is supposed to be scientific, maybe
you could be specific about it if you're going to try to take stuff from
us, But of course, you know, whether they're taking away your speech
or they're taking away your food, they're not going to be specific about it.
They also had reduced feed and take and rumination, and an abrupt drop
in milk production. Have you got any numbers with that? An abrupt drop?
Was it one percent, five percent, hundred percent? Tell us about
that. Although the US FDA has indicated the commercial milk supply remains safe,
the detection of influenza virus and unpasteurized bovine milk is a concern. A continued
surveillance of bird flu is needed to prevent cross specie and mammal to mammal transmission.
No, it's not where we are right now, folks. Is We're
in another one of these bat soup pangling moments here. Oh we have zoonotic
specie transmission and evolution and all the rest of this stuff. It's absolute total
nonsense. And again, you know Reiters is telling us, then this is
by the gold standard, the PCR test. We've seen all of this before,
and yet they are shamelessly lying to us, aren't they. They think
we don't know, but we know, and we know that they know we
know, and they're still going to lie to us. I'm a bit disappointed
and the lack of transparency and urgency, said an epidemiologist who is interviewed by
Salon. This is why I said, this is the new thing where they
come out and they criticize these agencies for not being authoritarian enough. The bureaucracy
needs to do more, It needs to ban more, it needs to do
this faster. I'm a bit disappointed in the lack of transparency and urgency,
particularly with the USDA, so particularly with the ones who are the most aggressive.
See that's what they were saying. With Fauci. I'm particularly concerned Fauci
hasn't done more. They go to the person who is going to be the
lead in all of this, or the agency that's going to be the lead
in all of this, and I criticize them for moving too slow, because
they're itching to go faster, and it just doesn't seem that there's an appetite
to get ahead in this. Salon then went on to report the notion that
it is now perhaps calling this bird flu, and they said, well,
is this really kind of should we start calling it cow flu now? And
the expert that they got said, well, we have to make it very
clear that this is not a new virus. He has been around since two
thousand and two. It's been around since SARS. It's not new. It's
not like COVID nineteen in the October of twenty nineteen. It has existed for
over twenty years. Well again, at least they haven't recycled that part of
it yet. The New York Institute of Technology told Salon calling this the cowflu
is misleading if it is only circulating around with cows, then it can be
called the cowflu. He said, Well, then I guess that means that
bird flu is really only for birds, right. Oh, no, it
could jump. It could jump, It could jump to pangolins, even though
we don't have them here. Why not? So they said, it's also
important to emphasize that it's not a definitive conclusion that the cats from the CDC
report. Yeah, they said, two cats that they fed raw milk to
died. Be very afraid of raw milk. They said, no, they
said, he even this is the epidemiologist. He said, well, the
cats could have died from something else, you know, in raw milk.
They could have even died from eating infected birds. We don't know. This
is not a virus, however, that we want to play around with.
It really confirmed that raw milk is something we don't want people to consume.
See, this one is rolling out for the benefit of big Agro, like
the other one rolled out for the benefit a big pharma. Yes, they
really don't want people to consume raw milk. So I can imagine another one
of these conferences like they had the Milk and Institute in October twenty nineteen when
they asked Fauci, how do we get everybody take an untested vaccine worldwide?
We do it from the inside with disruption, and we do it iteratively.
Here's the iterative process. We see this every day. They iterate it,
reiterate it every day. Every day they take a little bit further. And
so Big Agro wants to shut down raw milk once and for all, and
then Big Pharma will have its turn to feed at the troth of bureaucratic bands
and all the rest of the stuff, because they are angling to try to
vaccinate all animals. You see, since they played this herd immunity game on
us, and since they injected us with poison, people are a little bit
shy about this at this point in time. So now it's time to go
for the actual herd, to go for the actual cattle. And why not
because they can do them on an annual basis, just like they tell you
to give your dog an annual Rabi shot. I mean last year's didn't work.
Yeah, And they can do that. They can require that, or
you're not going to be able to process it because they've got the monopolis to
control the processing plants. You're not going to be able to transport your cattle.
You're not gonna be able to process your cattle. And you know they
can get many, many times more vaccines out there into the cattle than they
can into us, And that way they can still poison us by poisoning our
food. I just have to put a little bit of a label on there
warning this contains deadly mRNA vaccine particles in it that are going to do all
kinds of things to your body. But hey, no problem, we just
removed the good for you label that's on the food. They said, scientists
don't know what happens if someone consumes and fact did raw milk at the moment.
But it's a good sign that there haven't been any fatal cases linked to
raw milk, never, not with this, not with anything else. And
they said, even though there has been one human case of bird flu caught
from cows, here's where these people are lying a lot. But by the
way, five percent of Americans drink raw milk. So if this is an
issue, you'd be seeing a lot of people sick and dying, wouldn't you.
But no, And like I mentioned before, this one person that they
claim got sick had redness in their eye. One report said it was pink
eye. That was it. That was it. Do you think we could
live with this? Do you think we should destroy the food supply over somebody
who got red eye or conjunctividis. As a matter of fact, that's exactly
what dairy farmers are worried about, and they set it out loud. Barons
Publication interviewed doctor Joe Armstrong. He is a cattle production expert at the University
of Minnesota Extension and the article that was on Barons headline was dairy farmers are
still reluctant to report suspected avian flu. One expert insinuated that the regulation could
soon be changed to force farmers to slaughter their entire cattle herds if just one
cow test positive. We knew this was the goal. If they want to
have zero bird flu, well they may say, you're going to have zero
cattle. It's always this zero stuff. We're going to have zero traffic desks.
Well that means we're going to have zero cars and we're going to have
zero cases of PCR. Or we're going to lock down all of Shanghai and
keep it locked down. We've seen this, how it destroyed the Chinese economy
and everything else. But they don't care. These people, like the Chinese
communists, like Mao, They like to starve people to show them how powerful
they are. And we're run by the same people. This is Mao's America
now that we're talking about here, she Van Fleet pointed out. So doctor
Joe Armstrong, cadile expert, I was asked by Barons. Barron said,
what would keep farmers from wanting to tell the authorities that they think their cows
are sick. Cows aren't sick, folks, They're not sick. Nobody is
sick. Nobody that none of the stuff that was tested. The cows are
not sick. It's just like the other quote unquote pandemic in twenty twenty.
Nobody was sick. It was a PCR test. Armstrong says, the major
reluctance when you talk to farmers is there's still too much connection to highly pathoogenic
avian influenza. So farmers are looking at what the USDA requires of poultry flocks
when they test positive. And Barons knows, They said, you mean that
the USDA it requires farmers to kill their entire poultry flock if they get a
positive test. The bird doesn't have to be sick. It can be only
one bird who knows what the magnification is on their PCR test. But you
got one bird that gets a positive killed the entire flock, millions of birds
killed, he said. Baron says, you think the farmers worried they'll be
ordered to kill their cows, and Armstrong says, yeah, correct, because
we refuse to name it something else. Even though it is something else,
there's still too much connection. He says after that, it's just the economics
of having the USDA on your farm and trying to manage that. Imagine for
these farmers having the USDA come on their farm as like having the irs auditor
come into your house. Oh nice house, she got here, that type
of thing. You know, where'd you get that thing? Did you report
that? Or whatever? Barons In addition to mandating that positive tests be reported
to the USDA, the new Federal Order or also requires testing any lactating cattle
before their move I've talked about that before, he says. Does that go
too far? He asked this guy. Listen to what the guy says.
Because they're afraid of the government. He says, that's a step in the
right direction. What that's a step in the direction of tyranny. These people
are afraid of our tyrannical government. We've already gone too far, haven't we
a step in the right direction? He says. I kind of think it's
a wake up called industry to say that unless you want the USDA dictating what
happens, you need to come up with your own plan to control this.
This is like saying, censor yourself so that Google doesn't do it, or
Facebook or Twitter, censor yourself, or we'll do it for you. How
far away is that from just telling people kill yourself. We're all going to
do it right. Yeah, I can make it very painful for you.
I could just commit suicide. How about that? So, with all this
happening, Biden has locked in regulations targeting every appliance owned by almost every household.
Quote for too long outdated energy efficiency standards have led to higher utility bills.
Oh well, he's making higher utility bills by banning our fuel, by
shutting down our power plants, by giving us the most expensive kinds of energy
that we can find, wind and solar. Why do you think the Chinese
and the Indians are using coal because it is far and away the cheapest and
most reliable form of energy, so that will be banned by the Department of
Energy. They finalize their regulations on Tuesday for popular appliance that will push the
market toward adopting heat pump technology. This is at the same time that they're
you know, the Department of Energy is pushing banning everything that's not electric.
At the same time the EPA is shutting down power generation into the grid.
The does final energy efficiency regulations for water heaters will apply to common electrical water
heaters and significantly increase the share of those models that use heat pumps. According
to the agency, it'll significantly increase the price. The Biden administration's efforts to
push rules and regulations targeting appliances ranging from pool pump motors, and light bulbs
to furnaces and portable generators. Yeah, folks, if you want any of
this kind of stuff, you better stock up now because it's going to be
unbelievably expensive and inefficient if they can even build it, because you know,
I guess we can import it from China when they build it for us.
By the way, Jennifer Granholm, who's the Secretary of energy. What does
she know about any of this stuff? What does she know even about efficiency
or designing any of this stuff. She's a lawyer. She's not an engineer.
She's a lawyer. She's a Harvard lawyer. She wasn't an American citizen
until she was twenty one years old, and then she got naturalized. So
I guess you could get into government, you know, being there at Harvard,
you know, you really should get naturalized so that you can, you
know, be the energy secretary. But she said, almost every household has
a water heater, and for too long, outdated energy efficiency standards have led
to higher utility bills for families. She said, so you know, you
need to buy these new expensive water heaters to save money. It's just like
the cost benefit analysis of the warp speed, vaccines or anything else. But
since she's not an engineer, she doesn't do cost benefit analysis. But you
don't have to be an engineer. You just have to be an ordinary citizen
to look at this and say, I can't PLoP down all this money to
save a couple of bucks. It doesn't make any sense to do that.
So they order people to do that, and some people are calling pure Bolshevik
on this appliances. So from this administration, we've seen them go after gas
stoves, air conditioning in US with regulation, refrigerators, washing machines, dishwashers,
not water heaters. How many more home appliances will Americans eventually have to
replace them because regulation, So just to be clear, when it comes to
water heaters and it is proposed, what has been put forward, and if
it is enacted, it would not take it into effect until twenty twenty nine.
So let's not forget that. No, yeah, we'll got another four
or five years, so don't worry about it. Just kick the can down
row. We'll take everything away from you power, you know, force you
into electric appliances. You'll pay through the nose for these things and replace stuff
that is working just fine. You know you got a water heater, well
you need to throw that in the trash and buy a new, expensive one
that runs off the electric grid because we're getting ready to shut down the electric
grid in five years. This is crazy. These people do not they want
to save you money, that's the argument. Now, that's exactly the reason
why you don't want to do this. Look, whether you're talking about canned
corn or whether you're talking about appliances. These people don't care about our health,
they don't care about our wealth. This is about them and their unending
greed for money and for power, and that's all any of this stuff is
about. We need we need to push back on this. I've had enough,
I hope you've had enough. Let's move on to some other things.
We're gonna have a little bit of fun when we come back, talking about
some of the things that are happening just in news in general, some crazy
stuff as well. But we're going to take a break here, and I'd
like to get some comments from people. Travish, you can feed those back
to me. I want to play a new piece that I did here.
I didn't do any video cover for it, but I'm curious to see if
anybody recognizes this where it came from. So we're gonna play this for you,
and we'll be right back here Newsnow at APS Radio news dot com or
get the APS Radio app and never miss another story. All right, anybody
I name that tune, so let us know and don't see if anybody that.
Let's talk about some news here. I thought this was an amazing story.
Can't make this up. An emergency slide falls off the Boeing plane.
We talked about that, but it was discovered and outside the home of a
lawyer whose firm is suing Bowing. By the way, we just had a
second whistleblower die. This one not under as suspicious as circumstances. It'd been
sick with an infection type of thing. But still, you know, the
whistleblowers are dying left and right. Parts of the plane are falling off that
the lawyer is suing. Then had this emergency ramp falls down into the water
outside his lakefront property. I guess. Attorney Jake bissel Lintzk, whose firm
is currently sewing Boeing due to one of its planes losing a door plug during
a flight in January, discovered the emergency slide from Delta Airlines Fly five twenty
washed ashore on some rocks outside his oceanfront home in New York City. So
there you go. I guess, like I said before, so why they
call it Boeing Because that's the noise the parts make when they fall in the
ground. Jeffrey Tucker talked about the ruination of plane travel. He's somebody I
guess who still flies frequently, and he has a lot of issues. And
of course my wife and my daughter, whose separate trips that they took on,
both of them had issues with plane flights being delayed, canceled, things
like that, and they just did you know, one trip, and so
okay, Mark Dora, thank you for the tip. Thank you, David
for continuing to be the voice of reason. Thank you very much. I
appreciate that. So Jeffrey Tucker says, you know, the best time to
write about how horrible plane travel is is when you had one of your planes
scheduling disasters that happens with this, he says, when it doesn't happen and
your flight goes well, you just don't care about it. But he says,
when you're in the thick of it, as I am right now,
as I'm writing this, in a thirty six hour international travel time on a
nineteen hour delayed domestic flight that just took off, he says, Yeah,
when that happens to he feels like the apocalypse. It's more common now than
I can ever remember. I'm at the point of trying not to travel unless
I have to, because three of the five of my last trips these days
seem to end up this way. So he's had five recent trips and three
of them, and our family two trips and both of them. Right.
Yeah. I reached my tipping point on flying a long time ago, even
to the extent that when we went to Washington to cover a thing, I
said, I'll go, but only if I can take an extra couple of
days and drive it myself. And that's what we did. We drove it.
I don't want to fly, and that was in two thousand and sixteen.
I hate flying. I hate flying because but it used to just be
the interference of the TSA and things like that. Now it's a real safety
hazard, really is, he says, Consider the fact that you the three
young women who attempting to travel with their foofu fluffy dogs who are their best
friends. These dogs are well behave, perfectly gorgeous animals who normally manage just
fine unless there's a problem, and when the food runs out and nature calls,
it's another matter. Airports don't really provide areas for dog bathroom breaks,
so the dogs and their owners began to panic and cry, it's good things,
not Christy Nams. You just shoot shoot the dog, isn't it interesting
that the name of her book was no Going Back or something like that.
That's it was a one way ticket out of politics for her, wasn't it.
Then you have older people and their medicines and other special needs. They
could be shots or otherwise require special conditions, and they might not have enough
medication with them, and so then everything gets shut down for a day or
whatever. He said. But the most bizarre circumstance affected my flight, he
said, I'm landing. Previously, the oxygen masks suddenly fell from the ceiling,
so maintenance had to come and check that out. But of course there
is a shortage of those people, and they spend all day running from plane
to plane to try to get the little lights to change from red to green.
No one really understands how anything works, so you just fiddle with things
until the machine tells you it works. Well, welcome to the new normal
that Trump ushered in on us killing people, and you know, the normal
of deliberately dumbed down people with these schools and all the rest of the stuff.
To show you just how stupid it all is. This is coming out
of the UK and it's a luxury fashion brand in the UK called Jordan Luca.
Let's hope that it doesn't come here, because what they're selling people are
pre stained genes that look like you just peed your pants. And of course
that's what we all want, isn't it. You look at yourself in the
mirror and it is like, something's just not right. It doesn't look like
I've peed in my pants. And it reminds me of that joke of they
told about Lord Nelson. Not not true or sure, but they said,
yeah, there's the picture of the pants that you have peed in. I
don't know, maybe this is a fashion trend coming from Biden or something.
I guess it depends, but the joke was they say, well, why
the British wearing red coats and he says, moles because that way if we
get shot, we don't see the blood. It's good for a morale,
that type of thing. And then the guy comes in says Lord Nelson,
the French Navy, the bulk of it has just come around this island,
and he says, fetch me my brown pants. Maybe they're prepping us for
such a moment. You know, everybody's got to have those pants when they
break the news to us about what they're doing with the war, or with
a dollar, or with the next lockdown or whatever. Jordan Luca is a
luxury fashion brand in the UK just introduced their new pre stained genes that look
like somebody pete in them, and of course they sold out in minutes,
and they were selling them for eight hundred dollars Canadian. We will never understand
the world of fashion and clothing like this makes us really not want to understand
it. Well, you know, for the longest time, people have been
spending a lot of money to dress like they're poor. Right, what was
it even Billy Joel, he hasn't written a song for three decades or something,
got to spend a lot of money to let's see, to dress.
I can't remember the lyric now anyway, but you know he was talking about
how you had to spend a lot of money to look like you didn't have
money. And so people have been, you know, buying more and more
jeans with holes in them to look like they're rags and everything. So now
I guess we can get soiled pants to look like we are poor and homeless
at the same time. So I guess it fits. This is the new
normal. And as I was saying before, about the Biden administration making everything
more expensive, all of our appliances and everything. A new Biden energy rule
will raise the cost of a new home by thirty one thousand dollars. No
problem. You know you don't like that old inefficient homedo. Let's just raise
the price of housing by thirty one thousand dollars. It isn't like people are
having any trouble buying homes now, right. I mean you got to I
saw the debate on reason about whether or not there ought to be limits or
on the amount of houses that the big Wall Street companies can buy, because
they are the ones who can afford to buy these houses. Now, as
the interest rates stay high and the price of housing continues to go up and
up and up, what's driving the cost of houses up A lot of it
is regulations like this, just like they drive the price of cars up with
regulations, or the price of water heaters or your hvac. All this stuff
is being constantly driven up. It isn't bad enough that they print money,
you know, quote unquote, they print regulations to do that. So you
know, they tax us with their inflation, but they also tax us with
these rules and the rules are there without representation, thirty one one thousand dollars
added to the cost of housing to make it even more unaffordable than it is
with his already bad economy. And it's kind of interesting as people are you
know, Oh, we're going to be a friend to the average American because
we're going to stop these big Wall Street companies from buying up all the houses
and turning everybody into renters. It's like, well, your band isn't really
going to stop that which you You are interfering with the marketplace by artificially inflating
the price of everything, So get your rules off of us so you can
buy cheaper cars and cheaper homes. If it weren't for these rules, you
would have many suppliers who would go in and say, well, okay,
people can't afford to buy this house, I'll make a cheaper house. No,
you can't make a cheaper house because I've got these rules in here,
and that's a floor you can't go below that. Meanwhile, on the highways,
we're going to have tens of thousands of driverless trucks. Now we're not
talking about the battery trucks. They're working on that as well, and that's
also a big issue. That's an issue of practicality as well as something of
a hazard. But that's a separate issue the ev stuff. They're pushing out,
these self driving cars quote unquote self driving. They're pushing these things out
even with the diesel engines there. The key is they want to get rid
of the humans who are driving the cars, and they want to put chat
GPT in charge of driving these massive semis here. So again, this is
tens of thousands of fully autonomous tractor trailers expected to haul freight on public roads,
and upcoming years, the plans are in place to begin with twenty driverless
trucks in Texas in twenty twenty four. So nobody behind the wheel of these
eighteen wheelers. That's a great idea, isn't it. With twenty five lasers,
radar, and camera sensors, the truck can see. Are you impressed
with that? I'm not impressed with it. It can see obstacles on the
road from a quarter mile out and then switch to an unobstructed lane without any
instruction or manipulation from a human. Can it look to see if there's somebody
in that lane accurately within three or four years, Aurora and its competitors expect
to put thousands of self driving trucks on America's public freeways and put thousands of
drivers out of work. That's their goal. Everywhere you look, this is
what the goal is. The goal is to make everything unaffordable. The goal
is to put us out of worth. They're going to make our gradually,
iteratively, make our food unaffordable, our homes, our appliances, gradually replace
our jobs. And they've been talking about this for a long time. You
know, for fifteen years. I've been talking about, Hey, they want
to Their schemes are to put us out of work, and they want to
condition us with universal basic income. That was another thing that made me so
angry about Donald Trump. I knew that, Yeah, oh you're non essential.
We've got to keep the Wall Street companies here, however, and that's
always been the plan, always been the plan to replace workers. While the
technology makes advances. The average Americans mindset toward an eighty thousand pound truck driving
sixty five miles per hour down super highways may not be one of acceptance just
yet. According to Triple A's latest survey on the subject, most US drivers
express fear yeah, or uncertainty about fully driverless vehicles. Two thirds of them
are afraid of them, and rightfully so. It isn't as if we've seen
a perfect record from these other cars, is it. I mean, now
we've got Ford being called in for an investigation for their driverless cars. We've
seen it with Ford, creuse Way, mow Tesla, all of them.
And so we're going to fail up. We're going to continue to you know,
if we've got problems with battery fires, well, then we go from
the phones that we're catching fire to the laptops. We go from laptops to
the electric bikes, we go from that to the cars, and then we
go to the buses and now the tractor trailers. And then we have the
battery energy storage sites where have massive collections of batteries to do back up for
solar and wind that are already expensive. And each one of these things is
a ticking time bomb to start a fire, and it's the same thing with
the driverless side of this. Safety advocates have also been pointing out that almost
no federal regulation is currently on the books for autonomous cars and trucks. Isn't
that interesting? You know, the FEDS love to regulate everything. They love
to regulate our dishwashers, they regulate our hot water heater or anything. But
they don't want to regulate the autonomous cars and trucks. Why is that?
It seems to me like it'd be, you know, exactly the type of
thing that your bureaucracy would want to expand into. I mean, look at
all the new people you could hire, you could build your little empire there
regulating these autonomous cars and trucks. Why is it that they have absolutely no
interest in regulating them. Well, for the same reason they have absolutely no
interest in regulating vaccines or other pharmaceutical products of that matter, of course,
because they're captured, because they're partners, because they're just looking at how they
can make money, and hey, if it kills a bunch of us,
that's all the better. So as of now, it's to the developers to
determine if the vehicles are safe. Just like when Children Self Defense call up
the CDC and said, you know, they're pegilating these particles in the mRNA.
Do you realize that a lot of people are going to have going to
go into shock with this anaphylactic shock? Oh? Well, you know,
says the CDC and the FDA, A call Pfizer and tell them that we
don't care. And Pfizer didn't carry either when they called them. If we
put a vehicle on the road that isn't sufficiently safe that we aren't confident in
the safety of, then it kills everything else, says the CEO of Aurora.
Well, let's hope that it does. But so far it hasn't.
Like I said before, we've had way moot, We've had crews and both
of them in San Francisco. We've had a lot of these things, but
it hasn't hasn't slowed this down at all. They just keep making bigger and
bigger things that are self driving, and bigger and bigger things that have more
and more batteries that can catch fire. Just one of those batteries catch fire
and it's a chain reaction. And so we had four police officers killed in
Charlotte after they went to serve a warrant on an armed felon. Wait a
minute, he's got multiple felony convictions and he's a fugitive and he's not allowed
to have a gun. So I guess it'd be safe to serve a warrant
on him because you know, it's against the law for this guy to own
a gun, so he won't have a gun, right, except that he
did because he didn't care about that law any more than they cared about the
other laws that they were coming after him for. He was banned from buying
and possessing guns as a felon, but he didn't care. So Biden is
making a big deal out of this. He's trying to ramp this up so
he can call for gun control. So he's pretending to care about the murder
of four police officers. Isn't that interesting? He doesn't care when the police
officers are murdered by his mob marching millions, his million man migrants. That's
what he should call. The million migrant march. Is what we've got to
accept, several million that are coming in. If something like that happens,
or he got somebody, you know, some young girl is raped and killed,
he doesn't care about that, won't even mention it. But he wants
to be Johnny on the spot because he wants to come after guns. So
Biden called on Congress to impose a national red flag law, as well as
federal storage mandates for farms. Do you think that would stop this? You
know, this is a guy who's got multiple felony convictions. Would that be
a red flag? And there's already laws against him having a gun, so
we need to have national red flag laws. Do you think maybe if we
have a storage mandate for farms, Oh, that would have stopped him.
Yeah, this felon who's not allowed to have guns would have put his gun
safely into a storage thing so that he would not have shot at the police.
Right. No, he's just trying to public support for doing his gun
control by executive order. That is really what he's up to. So meet
the lifelong felon who killed four cops in North Carolina. This is from zero
Hedge. They said, you know, he's got a long rap sheet.
He was barred from owning or possessing any firearms and so then he I guess
took him out of his safe storage that he had and he ambushed a US
Marshal's Fugitive Task Force. So he's also a fugitive police officers. As they
were serving a warrant, three US Marshals three and an officer from the Charlotte
Mecklenburg Police Department were killed in a shootout, and four police officers and one
marshal were injured. So he wounded five people killed, four all law enforcement.
So I guess, you know, we need to have more gun control
laws that'll solve it. As their headge says, has the leftist corporate media
identified the fella, Well, no, because it doesn't fit the narrative.
CNN hasn't talked about it. Fox News has not talked about it either.
According to the police, US Marshalls attempted to serve him a warrant for firearm
possession. He was also wanted for two counts of felony flight to try to
get out of the Charlotte area. I guess I didn't see that coming.
I've got some comments about the music Guard Goldsmith, John Williams, you got
that right, Yeah, you got that right. And John Madison the nineteen
eighty four Olympics, you got that right. That's what it's from. Yeah,
that's the Olympic fanfare in March. The I guess the march part of
it or something like that. Well, again, I was wondering if if
anybody would recognize that. I think they. I don't watch the Olympics,
but I think they play it on a pretty regular basis. But I think
it was a nineteen eighty four Olympics. I think you're right. I think
it was. It was the ones that they had, the one they had
in La, because the people in La knew how good John Williams was,
so they get him to do their own Olympic thing and it was so good.
I think they've kept it every time since then. Regarding the pea pants,
Tommic Doogg says, pea stained pants. Now you can cultivate the homeless
look before the government actually makes you homeless. There we go. See,
that's it. It's cool to be poor and homeless, and so we take
the shame away from it. That's what I guess they're trying to do.
And Travis tells me at page six on the News is reporting that the son
of Fox News Brett Behar, had to have emergency open heart surgery for a
golf ball sized aneurysm. His son is sixteen. I wonder if he took
the jab. You know, we just had a football player who was only
retired like a couple of years, still in his late twenties. He died
suddenly with this stuff, And of course you know, they're bragging about the
fact they're forcing everybody to get the vaccine. In the NFL. Aaron Rodgers
famously pushed back against it. But yeah, we're going to talk about that
and what's going on with AstraZeneca as well. But thirteen reasons why AR fifteen's
should never be banned. This is by United Liberty dot Com. There's a
lot of confusion misinformation by the AR fifteen. Some people believe it's dangerous and
deadly weapon has no place in civilian hands. As a matter of fact,
when we look at these people on TV, they all treat it as if
you know, well, somebody's got the Air fifteen, there's absolutely no way
you can stop them. But of course we saw one shooter who did have
an AR fifteen was taken down by a guy with a revolver. And so
this whole idea to DEMONI a particular type of firearm, call it an assault
weapon because it scares them, I guess says just seeing it is like an
assault. The reality is the Air fifteen is versatile, reliable, popular with
gun enthusiasts for a variety of reasons. First of all, they said,
in spite of what the liberals seem to think it is not automatic. Secondly,
it is very commonly used. It is commonly used and widely owned.
It is useful for hunting. Unlike the narratives that you hear from Joe Biden.
I remember years ago he was trying to push smart guns when he was
vice president. That was going to be his initiative, that he was going
to own his little carve out. I remember because we played it a lot.
You know, ladies don't get an AR fifteen, get a shotgun,
you know, over and under or side by side or something like that.
And so people put up pictures of men who are shooting a shotgun that had
never shot a shotgun before, and they didn't realize they needed to put the
stock against their arms. So they're obviously you know, newbies and all this
stuff or whatever, but it knocking them flat. And then they would show
women shooting an AR fifteen because it's got very little recoil. Sports shooting is
also something people use it for. But going back to the hunting thing,
you know, Joe Biden also putting out this idea, why do you are
the deer wearing a bulletproof vests or something? What do you need that AR
fifteen for and it's like, well it's bulletproof, vest I ain't taking the
deer down anyway with any of this stuff. Useful also for self defense for
many of these same reasons. It's an educational tool, they point out,
because it is easily customized, so it's a good platform for teaching gunsmithing and
firearm modification, which the ATF really hates. Precision is very good. Again,
it's customable. That's they already had that in there for before. But
it's got a lot of safety features that you might not have on some other
rifles. It has a big economic impact for the firearms industry because so many
people buy and own them. It is a historical significance. I did not
realize that this has been in production since the nineteen sixties. I guess it
took it a while for it to catch on, but it's been around for
quite some time. And I think a lot of people think in the a
lot of leftists think the AR is for automatic rifle or something, but it's
not. It's armor light, it's range of use for civilian sports shooting,
for hunting, and all the rest of the stuff. And here's number thirteen.
It's a constitutional right, that's the one that matters. Of course,
I guess they could have been in fourteen. According to Christinome, it's great
for shooting dogs. But we won't jug about that. I mean, what
did what an idiot? I mean, does she not remember how Mitt Romney
got harangued for putting a dog talking about how he had put a dog on
the top of his station wagon or something, I forget the details over there
were moving or something like that, and everybody realized, what what did she
think when to put something like that in there? Absolutely tone deaf and stupid.
Texas detective says, turning off your phone means that you're either the victim
of a crime or you're probably in the process of committing one. Yeah,
because I guess if you don't want Big Brother watching you, just like in
nineteen eighty four. You know, if you are trying to sneak around the
corner so the Big Brother camera can't see what you're doing, you must be
doing something wrong. And that's what he said. This is a guy who,
evidently, I don't follow the crime blog stuff, but evidently the case
of Moe Wilson, who was a cyclist and she was a kill by Caitlin
Armstrong. It was just convicted and sentenced to ninety years in prison. The
detective was interviewed on CBS News. So when compiling the evidence and piecing together
the string of events to determine who the murderer was, how, when and
why it was committed, apparently one of the tip offs was the murderer lied
about her phone's battery dying the night Armstrong carried out the murder. Isn't it
interesting how all these detectives are conspiracy theorists in a sense. Right, They
have an idea as to how the crime was committed and then they looked to
see if that really was it. But they they come up with these theories
about what happened, and that's the basis of their investigation. But you're not
supposed to do that with the government either. However, this is not found
to be true and the phone had been deliberately turned off, and this was
a red flag for the detectives making the statements that in this day and age,
if someone turns off their phone or takes it off of a network,
that it most likely means that the person is a victim of a crime or
a criminal themselves. Have they never heard of people putting their phone in airplane
mode so they they don't get bothered with the radiation while they're sleeping. Seriously,
I guess we have to be asleep if we don't see the surveillance state
coming. These people are moving it in every direction right now. You're either
a victim or you are committing a crime if you don't have your phone on
it should be constantly reporting to these people. I mentioned earlier that Ford is
getting into trouble with their self driving thing they call Blue Crews. But yeah,
let's go ahead and open up the gates for these semi trailers. There
have been two fatal crashes with Blue Cruise as a driver assistance them, and
they've already had two separate fatal crashes, both of them occurring at night.
But wait a minute, don't they have radar and laser and all the rest
of this stuff. Remember when when that self driving car that was I think
it was an ubercar. They were practicing with it in Phoenix and there was
a homeless woman who was jaywalking and she you see, it's got a camera
looking forward, and it's got a camera looking at the human driver who was
not doing anything other than sitting there playing with the phone, playing a game
or something with the phone until the bump bump of running over the jaywalking homeless
person. And they put that out in their first excuseise, well you can
see this person. You couldn't see him, and they just as soon as
they came into the headlights. That was too late. And everybody said,
well, wait a minute. It doesn't navigate with visual light. It's got
light ar all these other things there. It should have seen that, seen
her coming, and it should have applied the brakes. Why didn't it do
that? And then as people continue to ask questions, it comes out that
they had had problems with the emergency braking kicking on and so they just disabled
it because it wasn't functioning right. So, yeah, the crashes at night
that killed two separate crashes that killed two different people. With the Blue Crews
Driver assist it was introduced in twenty twenty one. It's supposed to offer hands
free driving assistance on pre mapped divided highways. Unlike Tesla's Autopilot, Blue Crews
has a more restricted operational design domain. They call that odd. I think
it is odd anyway. That's the acronym incorporates an infrared driver monitoring system to
ensure drivers keep their eyes on the road, except it doesn't always work as
advertised, like most of this stuff. And then finally, here how robots
making your burgers and fries can lead to greater income inequality. Now this is
from the La Times, and this is an article that's picked up by Drudge,
so you can imagine that it's got kind of a leftist tilt to it
in some regards. But it is interesting because they understand, as I was
saying, that Gavin Newsom's minimum wage law was really about putting robots in these
fast food restaurant chains. You know, it used to be that when I
was growing up, we had kids in high school. I mentioned it that
I worked a little bit at Red Lobster, but I had other jobs.
But you know, I mentioned it when Red Lobster was going out of business.
But all the kids that I knew in high school, we all had
jobs, and we use those jobs to buy cars because that was our ticket
to ride, our ticket for freedom. And yet what do we see now.
You know, for the longest time, the entry level jobs like working
at a fast food place or something like that, have gone to illegal immigrants
who come in and they're content to I guess, work at these fast food
jobs for the rest of their life. You know, something that was typically
just viewed to being an entry level thing, and now it's become something that
people do and continue to do that they don't move on to some other job.
It's not just something that high school kids are doing. And now we
see that that is moving and being replaced. Those people are being replaced the
cheap labor that these corporations wanted it. That's why they open up the border.
They want to get people coming in that even though it's very cheap compared
to what Americans are thinking, it is much more than they were making in
the country where they came from. But now those people are going to be
pushed out by robots. And this has been the progression that we've seen for
a long time, seen this coming. And so then what do those people
do when they're pushed out of this job with robots. So now you know,
high school kids are not getting any work experience or work ethic, they're
not getting cars independents. Instead, we're going to have robots. And that's
what this is about. How robots making your burgers and fries can lead to
greater income inequality and just keep people from having any upward mobility at all.
On April the first, it wasn't interesting that Newsom did this on April Fool's
Day, raising significantly, raising, you know, by thirty percent, one
third. They went from fifteen dollars an hour to twenty dollars an hour,
just for the fast food chains that are national, because he's trying to push
them and go them into making the economic decision to use robots in the kitchen.
And we see now a lot of different robots that have the manual dexterity
and the smarts to be able to do I showed you one the other day.
It was chopping up food. It was flipping pancakes in the pan,
opening bottles and things like that. And so they're at the point now where
they can start replacing some of the labor, and he wants to give them
a financial incentive to do that, because that's what he's really concerned about helping.
He's not concerned about helping the people that are at the bottom who are
working in fast food. He wants to help the Silicon Valley companies sell robots
and so on. April fools, more than half a million fast food workers
in California got a raise up to twenty dollars an hour. That same week,
the self proclaimed world's first autonomous restaurant opened its stores for business in Pasadena.
So, yeah, he's not trying to help people at the bottom.
He's trying to help the elites up at the top, the technocrats. Fast
food franchise owners are struggling to stay afloat amid rising labor costs because he's jacking
them up, leading many of them to consider automation as the only viable solution.
That's why he's pushing the big chains. He said. If this is
a chain, even if you don't own eighty stores, even if you're a
franchising and you've got three or four stores, if you're a McDonald's franchising where
they got eighty more than eighty stores worldwide, then you're going to be covered
by this. To make sure that McDonald's is going to come up with some
kind of a robot program that everybody will be forced to buy into. This
person says I studied low wage industries in la including the effects of new technology
and workers. My research shows how automation does not always lead to greater efficiency
and cost cutting for businesses, as AI boosters would like the public and policymakers
to believe. No, it actually makes more money for the people who are
selling robots this kind, and they don't sell them, They're going to rent
them, okay, because that's the key to really getting wealthy, not selling
something but leasing it so that you will never own anything. That is a
big part of the new normal for them. This kind of innovation also promises
to further income inequality. Working people deserve to have their voices heard and determining
how, where, when or whether AI and automation should be used. This
person is writing from the perspective that the unions are going to fix this for
us. I will talk about that in a moment here. I was eager
to visit Cali Express, the new roboticized Pasadena restaurant, to learn what the
future of fast food looked and tasted like. Outside, there were slogans befitting
a traveling circus, AI frying robot, Marvel, it's not a flying robot.
That's what my son wanted when he was little. They didn't watch TV
much at all, and so we asked him when he has only said what
do you want for Christmas? And he said, I want a flying robot?
So what else do you want? But if he could imagine it,
he thought he could get it. AI frying Robot Marvel the same son in
the start. We go to a restaurant, Chinese restaurant. We used to
go there all and there's a local restaurant, small local restaurant. And you
know, he was maybe about four years old or something, and he liked
to wear his Batman costume and we'd let him wear it anywhere. You know,
we didn't care. You want to go grocery shopping with Batman? Sure,
So he let him wear it to the restaurant because he wanted to.
And so he's sitting there and the waiter, who was Chinese, came over
and he goes, you're gonna fry, and he says what He goes,
You're gonna fry, and he looks at us and he says, I don't
know what he's saying. Anyway, it's so they have an Ai frying robot
Marvel. So I don't know if it's flying or frying. But anyway,
my curiosity peaked. I entered and passed by a facial recognition scanner advertising the
ominous sounding opportunity to pay with your face. That great, you can pay
with your face. So yeah, that's basically what you're doing on social media.
You know, you're paying with your face for Facebook, the dumb efforts,
as he said, the dumb facebookers is what he was calling them.
Actually right, But you pay with your face, you pay with your privacy,
You pay dearly to use those social media things. Anyway, he says,
I went through and I placed my order on a giant touchscreen, watched
a human worker spring into action behind the counter. They rushed to load up
robots with raw beef and frozen fries, and they scrambled around the kitchen retrieving
cooked items that the robots had deposited in the buckets. Then this person manually
assembled, packaged, and delivered the food to waiting customers. A second worker
cleaned up after the robots. Well there you go. Isn't that great?
Sounds like really fulfilling work, doesn't it. I mean, you know,
cooking short or cook or whatever, cooking this stuff that's not really a challenging
thing necessarily, but you know, certainly does beat just having to be the
person who keeps stacking the frozen fries into the robot area. As all this
is happening, an animatronic arm put on a show reminiscent of a Kookie science
fare project, hastily dunking a fry basket into a vat of hot oil.
The workers toiled away in the background doing the majority of the work. See,
that's the key thing that I thought was interesting about this, Just like
the walkout store just walk out stores of Amazon, right said, there's a
lot of smoke, mirror and fraud involved in a lot of this stuff.
You know, Jeff Bezos didn't have some magical technology there, kind of a
dog and pony show like what Tesla was pulling himself, Nicola Tesla, Yeah,
one hundred and twenty years ago, where there's a little remote control robot.
Yeah, just talk to it, ask it questions and it'll link back
the answers to you. He had somebody with a remote control. They had
never seen a remote control, they didn't, I didn't know what was going
on with it, but they were very impressed. And so that was kind
of you know what Jeff Bezos and Amazon All Foods were doing with their just
walk out stores. They had one thousand Indians watching people shop and totaling it
up and then pretending that it was all automated. One little Indian, ten
little Indians, a thousand little Indian shoppers there, he says, the lofty
promises of new tech can be used as a pretense for restructuring industries and infrastructure,
often at the expense of workers, consumers in the community. And again
it's because the only concern is the wealth for the very very few, he
says. Not only is this not a great deal for the workers, he
said, consumers end up paying more for less. As automation requires high levels
of standardization and fast food, what this means is smaller menus and not as
much minimal customization. Food prices will continue to skyrocket, just as they have
of the last decade, far out pacing the rate of inflation and boosting corporate
profits to unprecedented new heights. He said, my order at Cali Express,
he just ordered a burgern of fries that was the extent of their menu.
PEPSI right, that type of thing. It came out to fifteen dollars and
forty four cents, which is more than double the same order at In and
Out Burgers. Where they can make it a lot of different ways, because
you're dealing with people. As profits boom for these multinational conglomerates, local franchises
may feel pressured by the franchise company to automate, but to fully renovate a
commercial kitchen requires enormous and risky capital investment, plunging already struggling small businesses into
new debts. So who actually gains from all of this stuff The new class
of techno middlemen who are going to lease the hardware and they're going to have
subscription based software because you will own nothing. Even the people who are the
business owners who have the franchises and things like that, they won't own this
stuff. They'll be leasing it from the big guys. You know, they
have known for the longest time that's the way to make money. You know,
we had, as I've said before, we had video stores. We
opened up in nineteen eighty six. And then when they started pushing everybody pushing
for control the movie studios, we wanted to get control, and of course
the key ones to push for that control was Paramount, who summed A.
Redstone who owned Viacom. Viacom was a holding company for Paramount but they also
bought Blockbuster, okay, and so you know, Vicom owned a lot of
different things, CBS, Paramount, Blockbuster, a lot of those things,
and so they wanted to establish all the movie studios wanted to establish a situation
where they never gave up ownership of the movies. They always just rented them.
And so they wanted to have a pay per view rental thing or they
put the stuff there, and you know, and it made it very difficult
for anybody to make money off of it if they bought into that situation.
But they use the pressure and the financial clout of Paramount to push that.
Even though Blockbuster never made any money off of that Blockbuster after Paaramount took it.
It was profitable before they bought it, but after it was bought by
Viacom never made any money. I just saw the other day that now Sumner
Redstone, who was a CEO at the time, he's died and his daughter
is there. But Paramount's gone out of business now, and other movie studios
are having a lot of problems as well. You know, Warner Brothers is
having a lot of problems. So it's the but they wanted to drive everybody
out of business. They wanted to make sure that they got all of the
money, which is what they do with the movie theaters as well. But
they're putting out a business as well. You know, you look at the
movie theaters. Way they can make any money is off of selling popcorn and
concession stands because they take almost all the ticket price and they keep all that
money for themselves. And they don't own the movie. They just rent it
for a short period of time, and so they are allowed to you know,
they have a deal set up with them. They don't even own the
posters and the standees that they put in a lobby about the movies. That
all goes back to the studios. Truly is amazing. It's about total control.
And that's the way these multinational corporations, these these large Wall Street corporations,
that's the way they operate. They don't want you to own anything.
And you look at the software models of Adobe and other ones. How you
know they don't want to sell it anymore. They want you to rent it
constantly from them. It's a leasing agreement. The companies developing the technology have
raised billions of dollars to impose their solutions quote unquote onto the unwitting public.
And how do they do that, typically with the help of the government partnering
with them banning what their competitors are doing are banning what has always been out
there, you know, just like we're talking about with food with meat and
other things like that. This is what the technocracy wants. Now, up
to this point, I'm pretty much in agreement. And this is where we
go separate ways with this article, because he thinks that, fortunately, California
has a reputation for taking bold policy action. So this guy sees the California
government as having a solution to all this, and the California government as being
the ally of the little guy. Nothing could be further from the truth.
They said, they are established the state's first sectoral bargaining councils. So are
the unions going to save us or are they just another layer of parasites and
cronyism. And it's this partnership between government and the corporations is really dangerous.
Newsom's recent executive order, this guy likes this. It's an executive order mandating
AI powered overhaul of state government operations and public services is one example. Yeah,
so he's going to fix this. He's going to use AI for state
government operations and public services, which is another one of the plans of the
technocracy. It's what Bill Gates has always been pushing in India with the Oddear
system. Let me help you to impose an ID on all the citizens.
We've seen it there in India, the Odhar system, We've seen Ukraine talking
about how, yeah, when the war's over, we're going to have anything
that you do with a government, you're going to have to have. It's
going to be so convenient. You're gonna love this. We're going to have
this digital ID and an app, and so instead of having to go stand
in line at the Department of Motor Vehicles, you just use your app and
you're all done. Except they're going to be taking away your ability to drive
and everything else. They're going to be surveilling you everywhere you go. They're
going to require an ID. So this is how we get suckered into these
things. Again, this is an LA Times opinion piece, So it was
interesting until the very end, at which point absolutely goes off the rails.
We'll be right back. Whether you're feeling like the booze or bluegrass aps radio
has you covered check out a wide variety of channels on our app at apsradio
dot com. J are listening to the David Knight Show. All right,
welcome back. Let's talk a little bit about the pharma issue, and we've
had some developments from big pharmaceutical companies. Johnson and Johnson is now proposing to
pay six and a half billion dollars to resolve almost all of the ovarian cancer
lawsuits based on people who use their baby powder. And it's not just ovarian
cancer, course or respiratory issues as well. With that. The key thing
is that with this talcum powder, they knew for a very long time about
this, and they continued to advertise it anyway, and then after it became
more prevalent, they stopped the advertising, but they continued to sell it,
kind of the same type of thing they did with opioids. And of course
we know about the Sackler family and Produe Pharmaceutical and how much money they made
and how ruthless the marketing of that was everywhere, and yet they were actually
using Johnson and Johnson to manufacture it for them. That's why I said,
you know, when Trump brought them in in twenty twenty, I said,
you realize that the history of this company. Of course, you know,
most of them have got a long list of criminal lawsuits and charges against them,
just like the banks do. But you know, it was almost as
if Trump had come in with Johnson and Johnson. It's like, you know,
I know, you got these problems of the opioid stuff, and you
got problems with the baby powder stuff. How about we get you into a
business where you've got an a liability. I can set you up with vaccines.
And they did. They got them allied with another small vaccine company.
They turned over factories to them. We've seen this type of thing before as
well. I talked about it with chabonni yogurt. This guy comes in and
Chuck Schumer and Kristin Gilbrand get him a factory in New York to make yogurt.
Isn't that nice When you got friends in the federal government, they can
just give you factories at discount prices like that set you up in business.
What do they want in return? Well, in this particular case, it
was immigration base. But going back to this, the subsidiary of Johnson and
Johnson is proposing to pay nearly six and a half billion dollars to resolve nearly
all the talk ovarian cancer lawsuits brought against the company. They said it would
resolve about nine nine point seventy five percent of the pending lawsuits brought against it
and its affiliates over the allegations. It also announced in twenty twenty two that
it would stop selling its talk based baby powder in twenty twenty three, amid
the ongoing legal battles over the product. Think about that. I mean,
for decades they continued to do it, and then when they finally come out
and say in twenty twenty two, well, we'll stop selling it a year
from now, A year from now. Isn't that amazing that they continued to
do it that long? Isn't it amazing that somebody would continue to market and
sell some kind of a health product long after the harm was known? Does
that sound familiar? What's going on with all the vaccines. As a matter
of fact, we look at what is happening in Canada and the UK.
They're now as to the point where the harm has now been shown and has
come out in both Canada and the UK. However, it's about Astrazenica.
Astrazenica evidently was not as well connected politically as Pfizer Moderna. This was the
Astrazenica vaccine, was the one that came out of the UK. Astrazenica was
a company and they partnered with Oxford University to put this thing out, and
they never allowed it in the United States, not because they were concerned about
safety, of course, just they didn't have a political constituency here. But
it was pretty obviously not a safe vaccine and they just didn't have the political
clout to keep that thing going, so they shut it down in most countries
eventually, And now you've got Canada and the UK looking at people who were
harmed by this Astrazenica vaccine. They have admitted it now in court that it
harmed people and was killing people, but still they're dragging their feet on any
compensation. Canada's COVID vaccine injury program so far is only paid out six percent
of the claim so far, so that's like one out of every seventeen claims.
And they're not paying much money either. Only one hundred and thirty eight
of the twenty two hundred and thirty three claims made so far have been approved
for payout, and the amounts that they're paying people are paltry sums Trudeau,
as a matter of fact, recently tabled a twenty twenty four budget that earmarked
an extra thirty six million dollars for the program. He doesn't want to pay
people for the vaccine that he pushed people pushed on people. Isn't it amazing?
Some people who are successful in getting payouts have said that the compensation awarded
was insufficient considering the injuries. Forty two year olds Reightman from Whiteman from British
Columbia had a lawsuit against astra Zenica and the federal government of Canada and the
government of his providence and the pharmacy at which he was injected. But he's
not getting much of anything from any of them. He received the astra Zenica
shot in April of twenty twenty one. Shortly after that he became totally paralyzed.
He was subsequently diagnosed with Gion Bray syndrome. This has been a very
long known side effect of many different vaccines, going back to the nineteen seventies
when they had the swine flu and that fake pandemic of the swine flu and
the vaccine that harmed so many people. Remember we had the sixty minutes thing
by Mike Wallace, Chris Wallace's father, and the person one of the key
people that he interviewed in that had been paralyzed with gion brace and home and
was gradually getting back use of her legs, but she was never going to
be able to do anything other than walk with braces and things like that.
This has been around for a long time, but we've never seen it to
the extent that we saw it in this. So we've had all of these
typical vaccine injuries, but far far worse than we'd ever seen them before,
plus all of the new types of injuries. Whitman was given a one time
payout of two hundred and fifty thousand dollars and about ninety thousand dollars a year
in income replacement. That's going to be eaten up with inflation given the extent
of the permanent, life changing injuries. A couple one hundred thousand dollars isn't
much, he says, that's for sure. The federal government is also a
Canadian federal government is also continuing to purchase COVID shots. Isn't that amazing?
Continuing to purchase them even though nobody wants the boosters anymore? And this is
something else that we've scene over and over again. They continue to buy this
stuff and they continue to buy. We see this, We saw this in
Australia. It is also the case in other countries that they buy ten times
the case that what people are complaining about with Ursula fond of Lye and the
EU, she bought ten times the doses of vaccine as the population, just
like they did in Australia. It's like they're planning, and we reported this
when it happened. I reported it when it happened. We had I said,
think about how many of these shots they want to get people. They're
buying ten times the number of people that they've got. They're not going to
hit you just one in two times. The UK government again caught playing hardball
over the vaccine injury payouts as the victims legal bills mount. And again this
is AstraZeneca, and this is another forty something father who was young, healthy,
out a family was supporting them, working, fighting for their lives and
having life altering injuries. Jamie Scott is nothing if not a fighter. He
must be to have survived a reaction to his Trump shot so violent that hospital
doctors phoned his wife three times to tell her to get to his bedside because
he was about to die, but each time he pulled through. Actually,
this is not a trump shot. This is the Astrazenica shot. Fit and
healthy before the jab, the forty seven year old father of two has suffered
a permanent brain injury that prevents him from working or even being able to look
after his children on his own for anything more than an hour. The battle
to stay alive was one, however, it was just the beginning. He
is now struggling to do anything in his life. And so hang on a
second. Just lost my spot here. I haven't got this memorized, so
I wanted to read this next section two, and I'm having trouble finding it
here. Oh I do know, you know, maybe should play some music
here anyway. This week, AstraZeneca has confirmed a couple of things. First,
one is that they're going to pay their CEO eighteen point seven million pounds
in compensation, and the UK Telegraph obtained court documents that showed the pharmaceutical firm
was admitting for the first time in legal proceedings that its vaccine can quote in
very rare cases. Oh, they got that. That's a fauci thing.
It's rare, you know, it's rare and very rare cases. It can
cause an illness which is fatal about twenty percent of the time. So once't
you get this illness, it is not rare to die from it. When
it's symptoms of blood clots and low blood plate counts are not deadly, it
leaves the victims of devastating injuries. In these same legal documents, AstraZeneca accepts
that it has no idea why the vaccine developed in conjunction with the University of
Oxford, has no idea why the vaccine should do that. Well, see,
this is why we have tests, right, this is why they would
go through three phases of testing so that you would know if it was harmful
and so that you would know that it was actually causing this problem. But
they did it at warp speed because they skipped the testing. They said,
the causal mechanism is not known, said the company, Well, I think
we do know the cause of all this. I think this is caused by
politicians, don't you. I mean, I don't have to go with it
to get a microscope to figure out this is caused by politicians who forced this
on us. And if we know anything at all about history and documents and
what these people have been doing for the last twenty plus years, we know
exactly why they did this. There was politicians who did this, and no
doubt about it. On Rumble, Foggy Trail says, I've been posting about
vaccines for over fifteen years. Yeah, and my in laws thought I was
nuts. They still think I'm crazy, even though several of them have helped
issues from the COVID jab That's a shame. You just can't get through to
people like that. On Rumble, Michael de Silvio, my coworker vomited and
lost control of his vowels as soon as he was jabbed. Later that night
he had a stroke. It's just and it's covered up, isn't it right?
It's covered up. They wanted everybody to believe that this is unrelated,
that it was a fluke, that this wasn't happening to anybody else. This
is why when we look at freedom of speech, it's not just an abstract
thing. It is fundamental. It is the way that we we defeat this
tyranny. Is a freedom of speech and being able to talk to and communicate
with each other. That's why that is the key thing they want to shut
down, and it's why it's such a betrayal what Mike Johnson and these other
people are doing to take these riots that are happening and say, well,
they've had too much to say, We got to shut down. What people
say, you've had too much to think, You've had too much to say,
not gonna let you talk about this stuff anymore. So the legal mess
has been made more complicated in the UK because the government indemnified Astrasenica. In
other words, they got immunity. The people they jabbed didn't get immunity,
but they got legal immunity for the harm that they caused. So it indemnified
Astrosenica and other COVID vaccine makers ahead of the mass roll out, and of
course they planned that for the longest time. First thing, Fauci did give
them for the childhood vaccines in nineteen eighty six, and then in two thousand
and five as part of the PREP Act. George W. Bush, who
was there with nine to eleven and the Patriot Act and the Model State Health
Emergency Powers Act and all the rest of the stuff, he made sure that
there was even more immunity given to people for these vaccines will be rolled out
as part of a massive pandemic or something, and so he made sure that
you know, there's going to be nothing, no liability for the companies or
for the government that was a co conspirator in all of this. In the
legal case, Master Zeneca is accused of playing hardball, but it is unclear
whether behind the scenes the UK Treasury is bulking at any payout. But for
the victims, it just prolongs their agony. That's exactly right. And so
when we look at the side effects that are there. You know, as
I point out and I correct that, I was talking about rimdservir and saying
that it was a liver thing because I'd seen a lot of people have been
had liver injury, and you can find a lot about rimdsiviet injuring people's liver.
But I had a listener who said, well, no, it's the
kidneys are the main thing. Now I looked up and he's like, yeah,
they're right, that is the main thing, but also comes after your
liver as well. It's like these vaccines, so is the main thing the
blood clots? Is it? Anaphylectic shock? Is it the myocarditis and the
paracarditis. Is it the long amyloid blood clots, long white, scringy rubbery
things that accumulate, and we go on and on with all these different symptoms.
Yeah, it's all the above. And which one is the main way
to kill people? I'm not sure actually which one is the main death thing.
I mean, we've got a lot of people dying, so but that
could be from the blood clots, or it could be from the myocarditis.
It could be from a lot of different things. I think it is the
myocarditis. I think people have that and they don't realize until they go out
and exercise strenuously, just you know how fragile their heart was. And that's
why it's you know, young people are dropping dead suddenly, young athletes.
But we got another symptom now coming from the trump shots, and this is
an elevated risk of eye inflammatory disorder. And I thought this is very interesting
because you know, earlier we were talking about cow flu. They want to
call it now, right, the bird flu avian flu. Oh, well,
we've had one case and a human being where it jumped from the bird
to the cow and then jumped from the cow to the human and what did
the human get? Got a red redness in their eye, And then it
was reported by some other people as conjunctividis pink eye. Right, that's not
a big deal. Really, Now there is something that looks like pink eye,
which is more serious. Pink eye conjunctiveis is an external inflation infection of
your eye, whereas this other condition is you euvedis is an internal inflammation inside
of the eye, and that's more difficult to treat, so it's more serious.
But they have many of the same symptoms, and so it can be
difficult to distinguish if somebody has got pink eye or if they got euveitis.
One is external, the other is internal, but they look the same,
same symptoms. So I'm thinking, so this person who got one person supposedly,
and again that tells you that as widespread as they claim the bird flu
is, if only one person has shown up with it, that's probably not
what that one person has. Just thinking critically here and what else might have
caused this, because now they're saying that this euvitis, which can look like
pink eye, is another symptom of COVID vaccination. They found that seventeen percent
of nearly a half million people who had been vaccinated four hundred and seventy four
thousand who have a history of uveitis and a recurrence within one year after a
vaccination, So not only do you get it from it, but it can
come back later after you've been vaccinated again. It is an inflammation inside the
eye that occurs in the immune system is fighting an affection or something like that.
So if you get the shot, you might get the eye infection,
and then later on, if you're fighting another infection because it's damaged your immune
system, you may wind up getting this. And they found it in about
seventeen percent of the people and it can look like pink eye. So is
this person that they're claiming that caught the bird flu from a cow or drink
the bat soup from a penguin? Is this really another vaccine symptom that this
guy had. Of the four hundred and seventy four thousand individuals including in the
study, cumulative incidents of post vaccination u itis was eight point six percent at
three months, twelve point five percent at six months, seventeen percent at one
year. In other words, is going up postfactine? You know? Long
after you got the vaccine, it's going up and it was primarily of the
anterior type, which is at the front of the eye. So again it's
going to look very much like pink I. And then we have a pfizergate
with Ursula fond of Lyne, proving as this headline says that she can get
away with anything. This is our t talking about the fact that she had
all these dodgy communications with Albert Borla of Pfizer. They were texting back and
forth, and eventually she wound up signing a contract where she bought ten doses
for every European at the expense of the European Union, and she profited from
it. And she was also pushing out the QR Code to require people to
have proof of vaccination to do anything, you know, the vaccine passport,
And so people want to know what's going on with this massive amount of money.
It was four point six billion vaccines that she bought, seventy one billion
euros of public money that she gave to her friends and big pharma, and
yet somehow, first of all, she wasn't really interested in showing them the
text messages between her and Borla, and then they just somehow disappeared. We
don't really know what happened with it. But isn't this interesting? Ten doses
for every European she bought. And we saw the same thing in Australia,
ten doses for every Australian. Wow, I remember talking about that in twenty
twenty. The fact that hey, this thing is, they're not looking to
end any of this stuff anytime soon. And un rumble atomic dog says,
my sister in law was paralyzed by blood clots. I'm very sorry, can't
walk now. Oh refuses to believe that it was a jab. It's sad.
The blood clots do not run in the family. Yeah. Well,
you know, a lot of times it's difficult for people to you know,
they don't want to believe that there's anything that they did. Even if they
were fooled, they would not want to do that. Other people, on
the other hand, it was like, you know, fool me once,
Okay, now I'm onto you, and that's going to be the thing that's
going to help us. The fact that people have looked at this now this
is and I saw this come up yet again. This was just released yesterday.
A renowned scientist said all COVID vaxed people will die in three to five
years. Now. I've heard this, and I've heard other people quote.
I've heard Alex quote this as well. Even though this person is a world
renowned scientist, I don't go on credentials, and I think that they've got
very good reason to say that. There's going to be a lot of stuff
that's going to continue to increase. The cancer is going to increase, it's
going to continue to accelerate. We're going to see other issues like infertility,
even pink eye coming back, you know, an eye infection coming back and
getting more and more frequent as time goes by, over every six month period.
I think we're going to continue to see this and people are going to
just discount it and say, well, I don't know, is it the
food? Is it? This? Is it? Five G? What is
it? You know? We don't know. Well, I think I think
this poison is is just going to keep doing this. It's damaged a lot
of people's immune system. It is persistent, and a lot of people have
gotten a lot of jabs with this as well. But I don't know that
we should go this absolutist on anything, and so I don't agree with this
that everyone who's been vaccinated with the COVID shots will die within three to five
years. That's what the person said, going back to twenty twenty one,
which would mean at the mean point, you know, that would be four
years, that would be in twenty twenty five, kind of center of it.
And I, you know, I don't believe and I'm not saying that
everybody's going to die, but I think it's going to really accelerate. And
I think it's very interesting. And we've talked about this briefly in the past,
the degal thing. You know, there's really strange that person had connections
with the CIA who put that up, and you know it really it's like,
why what is this about? Who is this person? Why are they
putting this up, and why are they talking about the number of people that
are going to die by different countries And of course the US is a few
of the places they said population was going to go up, but in the
United States said it was going to be radically reduced by about two thirds.
The UK almost as bad. Who took the lead in these vaccines, Trump,
Boris Johnson, other people like that, this person with CIA. Of
course you know, working with these intelligent intelligence agencies that are part of the
English speaking five countries, maybe they knew what they were going to be pulling
off. And when you look at this, you know it was not the
you know, the pandemic. The health threat was always the shot. The
shot was the bioweapon. All this stuff about the labs and everything is at
this point a red herring. And so when you look at that, I
don't think that you can say that everybody who got vaccinated with even a single
shot is going to die. I don't think that's going to be the case.
It's never the case. It's one of the reasons why you can get
away with stuff like this, because you look at this and how people will
react to being exposed to stuff that will kill one person. The other person
may not even get sick. That's one of the reasons why it's difficult to
prove this stuff. And when it gradually rolls out over a period of time,
and when it continues to get more and more intense in terms of the
people who are harmed by it, that is something else that makes it difficult
for people to get this. But it was a Professor Cahill, doctor Delores
Cahill out of Germany, whose work includes how proteins and antibodies can be used
by medical applications, including in biomarker discovery, diagnostics, personalized medicine. And
I think she worked with the Max Planck Institute of Molecular Genetics in Berlin,
Germany from nineteen ninety six two thousand and three, has several international patents in
this field, So clearly technically she knows what she's talking about. But I
think that anybody can make a mistake, and I think if you're looking at
the medicine side of this, epidemiological side of this, not no matter what
you're talking about, it's not going to kill everybody. But again, we
need to understand what has been pulled on us. And that's the thing that
continues to gnaw at me that Biden and Trump and all of these Republican and
Democrat congress people who all had a hand in this are not being held to
account. And again we're not doing anything to stop the elevation of this from
the state and federal governments to the international level with the who. I think
the best thing that we could do is to start contacting. We talked about
this this week Jay and Jessica contact me by email and said, Hey,
we need to put this stuff out and start pushing on state representatives to withdraw
some of these powers. And I think we probably could even do that,
perhaps at the local level, because there are local public health places of public
health. The bureaucrats who have been some of them better, some of them
worse than others. But these regulations that were put out in December of two
thousand and one after the anthrax attack and nine to eleven all the rest of
this stuff, these are the things that if we destroy that, I think
we could cut off this pandemic being imposed from above, and that includes at
the global level especially. I think it had cut it off for the federal
government, had cut it off of the state government. If the state government
would cut it off those regulations and cut it off for the federal government and
certainly for the international government, have a good day. BIS and false neoze
has become all too common social media. First, unfortunately exactly, this is
greatly dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This
is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our
democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. Break free from the usual
script with The David Knight Show a fresh perspective bringing you genuine insights on current
events. But if the show is going to stay on the air, we'll
need your continued support. Sharing the show, subscribing and even just hitting the
like button all help. And if you found our show health, please consider
donating and becoming a part of a community that values the truth because independent,
listener funded news untouched by corporate globalist agendas, is extremely important to our liberties.