1
00:00:15,480 --> 00:00:20,960
What is krack alakin fellow thermonuclear a
effort. I am a dance valley coming

2
00:00:21,000 --> 00:00:25,399
at you with my certified fantabulous co
host grant Us. We are on to

3
00:00:25,920 --> 00:00:30,199
the Eastern Conference mailbag that we promised
you before we get started. My usual

4
00:00:30,280 --> 00:00:33,920
reminders slash. Please, the best
way to support this podcast is to one

5
00:00:34,000 --> 00:00:37,439
subscribe to it across every platform,
your podcast player and YouTube. If you

6
00:00:37,439 --> 00:00:40,759
haven't already, like comment on YouTube, tell the algorithm, love us back,

7
00:00:40,840 --> 00:00:43,520
and to recommend us to people.
If you've done all those things,

8
00:00:43,520 --> 00:00:47,079
shout us out on Twitter, retweet
our promos. If you do recommend us

9
00:00:47,079 --> 00:00:48,759
to someone and they take you up
on us, let us know. We

10
00:00:48,880 --> 00:00:52,240
like hearing that compliments are always good
to hear. Join our discord. That

11
00:00:52,320 --> 00:00:55,640
is the other way that you can
best help continue to grow the community.

12
00:00:55,960 --> 00:00:59,359
The link of that is in the
podcast and YouTube descriptions as well, and

13
00:00:59,399 --> 00:01:03,519
follow our social handles at Hardwood Knocks
on TikTok and Twitter, and YouTube at

14
00:01:03,560 --> 00:01:08,040
Hardwood Underscore Knocks on Instagram. We
do post native content just to those social

15
00:01:08,120 --> 00:01:14,439
channels, so quick clips as well
from from these longer podcasts with the housekeeping

16
00:01:14,480 --> 00:01:17,200
noise out of the way and under
a minute. We asked the question everyone's

17
00:01:17,200 --> 00:01:19,920
actually dying to know the answer to
Grant, how the heck are you doing?

18
00:01:21,519 --> 00:01:23,840
Like you two? Watson Abbe reacting
to a Kyrie Riving tip dunk.

19
00:01:23,920 --> 00:01:26,680
I am delighted to be here.
Have you seen that? Did you see

20
00:01:26,680 --> 00:01:33,040
his reaction to it? Yeah?
That was incredible. It was just it's

21
00:01:33,079 --> 00:01:38,799
like you don't always get like genuine
unfettered emotion in life, and so when

22
00:01:38,840 --> 00:01:41,959
you see it, like and Watson
Abbe is kind of like a darling right

23
00:01:41,959 --> 00:01:45,359
now. Everybody like his approval rating
is like one hundred and fifty percent,

24
00:01:46,239 --> 00:01:49,400
and to see him just like hands
on head, just like giddy. After

25
00:01:49,760 --> 00:01:52,959
Kyrie's tip dunk against I can't even
remember who it was against the other day.

26
00:01:53,319 --> 00:01:56,280
It was that's great. That's that's
like my favorite thing is just seeing

27
00:01:56,319 --> 00:02:00,200
somebody over the moon about like a
silly play. Look the vibes coming out

28
00:02:00,200 --> 00:02:05,719
of the nets right now, or
just uncomfortably sanguine and it's making me.

29
00:02:05,799 --> 00:02:08,800
It's unsettling me. It isn't.
We'll talk about them, but we are

30
00:02:08,840 --> 00:02:13,439
going to get to some Eastern Conference
mailbag questions, as you said, as

31
00:02:13,479 --> 00:02:16,560
promised, we will always deliver,
and I have the Atlanta Hawks first.

32
00:02:16,560 --> 00:02:20,039
If we're ready to go, let's
dive in, right, Yeah, let's

33
00:02:20,039 --> 00:02:22,639
cannabi. I'm gonna belly flop in
I think belly flop. I'm gonna jack

34
00:02:22,680 --> 00:02:29,120
knives. Jack Knife's is underrated entry
technique. So this is from crabtree.

35
00:02:29,560 --> 00:02:35,319
What is the hawks two to three
years ceiling? And so I guess like

36
00:02:35,719 --> 00:02:38,039
this is a ceiling I always think
of as you know, if everything breaks

37
00:02:38,120 --> 00:02:43,639
right or almost everything breaks right,
Like how good is this team? To

38
00:02:43,719 --> 00:02:46,800
me? It's conference finalist, which
is kind of like it feels like I'm

39
00:02:46,800 --> 00:02:52,000
punting because they actually have been a
conference finalist essentially with this core, So

40
00:02:52,039 --> 00:02:54,639
it's not the highest bar, but
like to get beyond that to me,

41
00:02:55,000 --> 00:02:59,680
or even to get there, because
I think now in hindsight most people would

42
00:02:59,719 --> 00:03:05,520
agree at that run to the twenty
one conference finals was you know, it

43
00:03:05,680 --> 00:03:08,439
seems hard to it's hard to believe
that happened. The path wasn't that difficult

44
00:03:08,479 --> 00:03:12,039
and just you know, a lot
broke right, So that's kind of what

45
00:03:12,039 --> 00:03:15,479
we're dealing with. But just to
flash forward to now, this version of

46
00:03:15,520 --> 00:03:20,120
the Hawks is one in five over
the last two weeks they can't score still

47
00:03:20,159 --> 00:03:23,879
their twenty second in offense. Their
defense has been better than their offense this

48
00:03:23,960 --> 00:03:25,919
year, which is like, I
guess that's glass half full, but it's

49
00:03:25,919 --> 00:03:31,039
also just what's going on. There's
just not enough shooting, so their full

50
00:03:31,039 --> 00:03:35,759
season numbers are roughly where they are, even though the record is really rough

51
00:03:36,319 --> 00:03:38,120
over the last two weeks, last
you know, ten days or so.

52
00:03:39,680 --> 00:03:43,879
I just think if you look at
the short term of this team, it's

53
00:03:43,960 --> 00:03:47,599
kind of locked in because basically everybody's
under contract next year other than Bogdanovich has

54
00:03:47,599 --> 00:03:52,319
an eighteen million dollar player option,
which I assume he'll opt out because these

55
00:03:52,439 --> 00:03:54,439
can do, you know, at
least as well over a multi year deal.

56
00:03:54,639 --> 00:03:59,000
The Holiday brothers are going to be
free agents. What's it going to

57
00:03:59,080 --> 00:04:00,719
cost to get off John Collins?
Like, should it cost anything? We've

58
00:04:00,759 --> 00:04:04,439
talked about this a lot. Just
I'm trying to think of ways for him.

59
00:04:04,479 --> 00:04:11,599
Did you see that report just Trump
take on John Collins. That's that's

60
00:04:11,639 --> 00:04:14,680
never gonna not be wild to me. Even though he's shooting like twenty percent

61
00:04:14,759 --> 00:04:16,879
from three and it's rough, it's
bad, it looks bad right now,

62
00:04:16,920 --> 00:04:20,040
but I just can't get over you. Know his age twenty three or twenty

63
00:04:20,040 --> 00:04:25,680
two season, whichever it was,
twenty percent from three. He played great

64
00:04:25,720 --> 00:04:29,720
defense in that twenty one Conference finals
round, like he was a valuable playoff

65
00:04:29,759 --> 00:04:34,680
contributor. But so zooming back out, You could talk me into if everything

66
00:04:34,680 --> 00:04:39,680
broke right, like Collins figures it
out, young starts making shots. Uh,

67
00:04:40,079 --> 00:04:43,279
you know, DeAndre Hunter is not
a massive disappointment. They bring back

68
00:04:43,319 --> 00:04:46,800
Ogdanovich the next two three years,
you could talk me into them being better

69
00:04:46,800 --> 00:04:50,279
than almost anyone in the East,
than other than Boston, just because Boston's

70
00:04:50,319 --> 00:04:53,800
locked in. It has a ton
of talent. Like maybe the things go

71
00:04:53,879 --> 00:04:57,279
bad with the Bucks, you know, Middleton doesn't re sign, Holiday gets

72
00:04:57,279 --> 00:05:01,720
older, something falls apart there,
Brooke Lens combustible obviously Philly. You know,

73
00:05:01,759 --> 00:05:04,439
maybe Inbeat asked for a trade because
we're dealing with a three year window,

74
00:05:04,519 --> 00:05:06,639
so there's a lot on the table. I can't get past Boston.

75
00:05:06,839 --> 00:05:10,000
I just they're just not going to
be better than them, I don't think.

76
00:05:11,040 --> 00:05:13,439
So. Yeah, that's about as
high as I can go. And

77
00:05:13,480 --> 00:05:15,560
the downside, I would add before
I you know ask your thoughts are,

78
00:05:15,759 --> 00:05:20,240
like the downside is this team is
rebuilding within like the next eighteen months,

79
00:05:20,240 --> 00:05:25,000
and like that includes Trey Young being
traded, that includes Collins being gone,

80
00:05:25,040 --> 00:05:28,759
that includes trying to get picks back
that you gave up for de Jontay Murray.

81
00:05:28,839 --> 00:05:32,839
So the downside is, I don't
know how how steep that gets,

82
00:05:32,879 --> 00:05:36,439
but you know, to me,
it's more plausible we're talking about the Hawks

83
00:05:36,439 --> 00:05:41,639
starting over in a three year window
than we're talking about them as like making

84
00:05:41,639 --> 00:05:46,319
the finals. I would agree with
you on the overarching tentament here, which

85
00:05:46,360 --> 00:05:49,480
is that it's more likely they're starting
over in the next three years than not.

86
00:05:49,639 --> 00:05:53,399
And even if it's that's a recalibration
around Trey Young, Like I'm not

87
00:05:53,439 --> 00:05:56,639
even saying it's new, you know, trade Trey, but it could be

88
00:05:56,639 --> 00:05:59,000
because at that point in the next
three years, you're talking about his third

89
00:05:59,000 --> 00:06:01,680
contract, like we're near in the
end of his second. I don't know

90
00:06:01,720 --> 00:06:06,600
what the pathway to this team to
getting better is. Like they should not

91
00:06:06,680 --> 00:06:11,199
have made the Kevin Hurder trade.
That's pretty clear they've knew John Collins's trade

92
00:06:11,279 --> 00:06:13,759
value, And I just I honestly
don't know when you look at them,

93
00:06:13,800 --> 00:06:16,639
what is their biggest need. It
feels like they have biggest needs, and

94
00:06:16,720 --> 00:06:19,240
that's like a major problem when you're
not a team that seems like it wants

95
00:06:19,240 --> 00:06:24,240
to spend, has a bunch of
assets, or even is particularly flexible moving

96
00:06:24,240 --> 00:06:28,160
forward. And so, like I've
tried to think of in an ideal world,

97
00:06:28,360 --> 00:06:30,680
I tried to look at it this
way, what would be the one

98
00:06:30,839 --> 00:06:35,480
player, non superstar that you could
target that would significantly drum up their current

99
00:06:35,560 --> 00:06:40,360
ceiling. And I've been unable to
identify that player, I think, and

100
00:06:40,399 --> 00:06:42,160
I don't this is a cliche,
but I was like, if it was

101
00:06:42,240 --> 00:06:45,720
Oganna Noby, maybe, like,
does he provide just enough shooting and shot

102
00:06:45,759 --> 00:06:48,639
creation to go along with the defense
where you're alleviating the burden on even DeAndre

103
00:06:48,759 --> 00:06:51,560
Hunter where de Jean d. Murray
has helped there. But I just I

104
00:06:51,680 --> 00:06:55,519
like, and that's even still depending
on what you would need Bogdanovitch to stay

105
00:06:55,959 --> 00:07:00,439
in that situation, they feel like
they are two or three players away being

106
00:07:00,480 --> 00:07:02,199
a routine contender in the East.
And there's also the thing that I can't

107
00:07:02,279 --> 00:07:05,360
escape here is yes, maybe Nate
McMillan isn't the ideal coach here. The

108
00:07:05,360 --> 00:07:08,839
shop profile is outmoded. I think
a lot of that has to do with

109
00:07:08,839 --> 00:07:11,279
their personnel. Frankly, when you
look at where Trey and de Jean day

110
00:07:11,319 --> 00:07:15,319
Murray like to operate, but also
okay, improve the coaching. Is there

111
00:07:15,399 --> 00:07:19,519
something here with Trey Young and like
behind the scenes locker room issues, I

112
00:07:19,519 --> 00:07:24,480
don't want to overblow it, and
like the Hawks have come out pretty forcefully

113
00:07:24,759 --> 00:07:28,560
and said, you know, the
Sham's reporting is like what do they call

114
00:07:28,600 --> 00:07:30,720
it bs basically, which is like, I trust Sham's is reporting on it.

115
00:07:30,759 --> 00:07:33,759
Whether it was there was actually substance, there are things we didn't know

116
00:07:34,000 --> 00:07:39,079
already. That's a different story.
But like there's there's been enough smoke here

117
00:07:39,279 --> 00:07:41,240
for there to be fire for a
while. And the fact that the report

118
00:07:41,240 --> 00:07:44,279
I don't even think this was from
SHAMS came out that players in the locker

119
00:07:44,360 --> 00:07:47,240
room would have sided with McMillan over
Trey in this scenario. If that's even

120
00:07:47,279 --> 00:07:51,519
a like there's an iota of truth
to that, that's a real problem.

121
00:07:51,560 --> 00:07:57,279
And the other thing is just which
might set them back because we've seen they've

122
00:07:57,319 --> 00:08:01,639
had other changes aside from Travis Slank
stepping down, we know that Landry Fields

123
00:08:01,639 --> 00:08:05,079
reportedly he's more motivated than ever.
Trade Collins, why did you let Schlank

124
00:08:05,240 --> 00:08:09,360
go through the off season like he
was the one that makes the Murray trade

125
00:08:09,360 --> 00:08:11,160
extends, DeAndre Hunter goes through your
draft, goes through the free agency for

126
00:08:11,199 --> 00:08:16,800
trades Kevin Hurder unless Landry Fields was
the final saying on that like what like

127
00:08:16,920 --> 00:08:20,240
now he's gone the middle of the
season and you're sort of changing regimes.

128
00:08:20,720 --> 00:08:22,519
I just I don't understand the logic
here, and so I don't need to

129
00:08:22,519 --> 00:08:24,600
be all doing glue with the Hawks. They have a lot of talent.

130
00:08:26,480 --> 00:08:28,639
I'm with you in the sense though, and maybe you have better ideas on

131
00:08:28,639 --> 00:08:31,279
how to fix them or what they
need. I'm with you in the sense

132
00:08:31,279 --> 00:08:35,039
though, that over the next three
years they're ceiling. It's conference finalists,

133
00:08:35,080 --> 00:08:39,000
which is that's fine, but it's
more likely not that they don't make it.

134
00:08:39,039 --> 00:08:41,799
That's always more likely. It's more
likely that we're talking about a full

135
00:08:41,840 --> 00:08:46,039
on tear down over the next three
years than them being a conference finalist.

136
00:08:46,080 --> 00:08:50,720
Again. Yeah, and I think
so part of the problem is, you

137
00:08:50,759 --> 00:08:54,519
know, what the Hucks need is
the guy, the version of DeAndre Hunter

138
00:08:54,600 --> 00:08:58,120
that they thought was worth ninety million. That's like one thing. And then

139
00:08:58,200 --> 00:09:03,240
I think, you know, optimized
you and Capella hasn't been playing but a

140
00:09:03,360 --> 00:09:07,279
kong Wu in the middle, as
as just like a defensive you know,

141
00:09:07,720 --> 00:09:13,159
game record. I think that solves
a few things. Young not shooting thirty

142
00:09:13,200 --> 00:09:16,279
one percent from three. I feel
like I've mentioned that almost like every time

143
00:09:16,279 --> 00:09:18,919
we talk about the Hawks, like
how much different does the season look if

144
00:09:18,919 --> 00:09:22,159
he's at thirty eight percent? But
to me, you mentioned it, and

145
00:09:22,440 --> 00:09:26,039
you don't want to overblow stuff like
this, but I just have and and

146
00:09:28,000 --> 00:09:31,000
no good point has ever started with
I just have this feeling. But I

147
00:09:31,039 --> 00:09:35,440
just have this feeling that the Tray
Young stuff is real and and some of

148
00:09:35,480 --> 00:09:41,080
that is the reporting and some of
that is just the idea that I really

149
00:09:41,120 --> 00:09:45,159
don't I can I could totally understand
why he wouldn't be someone that guys like

150
00:09:45,360 --> 00:09:48,440
playing with both it's some of it's
the heliocentrism, but he's a great passer,

151
00:09:48,639 --> 00:09:50,919
so there's like, well that offsets, you know, the fact that

152
00:09:50,960 --> 00:09:54,799
he's always got the ball. But
then there's also just like what makes Trey

153
00:09:54,840 --> 00:09:58,879
Young great outside of the rain shooting, the great passing, the flow,

154
00:10:00,000 --> 00:10:03,000
the craft, all that stuff,
A lot of it's just the chip on

155
00:10:03,039 --> 00:10:07,440
the should like he's really like defiant, like super confident, like loves to

156
00:10:07,559 --> 00:10:11,799
kind of rile things up type of
player, and that just might not be

157
00:10:11,879 --> 00:10:13,720
the kind of guy that is a
great teammate, Like I don't know.

158
00:10:13,840 --> 00:10:18,279
I wouldn't say that if there weren't
reports about the team. You know,

159
00:10:18,320 --> 00:10:22,480
if it's me or him, we're
going with McMillan. And that's just that

160
00:10:22,840 --> 00:10:26,519
just factors into it. So it's
almost as much as anything, I have

161
00:10:28,120 --> 00:10:31,120
some skepticism about the Hawks, you
know, mid and long term ceiling and

162
00:10:31,200 --> 00:10:37,559
future, just because I totally it
would never It would the farthest thing from

163
00:10:37,600 --> 00:10:41,120
being shocked if it turns out that
Young is just a tough guy to be

164
00:10:41,200 --> 00:10:45,639
around and play with, and everybody
else on that team, Collins, you

165
00:10:45,679 --> 00:10:50,720
know, there's been it's been debunked
and then bunked and rebunked over and over

166
00:10:50,840 --> 00:10:54,440
that Collins and Young haven't seen ey'd
eye. So it just feels like that's

167
00:10:54,440 --> 00:10:58,080
a factor that can't be ignored when
you're talking about, well, which direction

168
00:10:58,159 --> 00:11:01,639
is the arrow going for this team? A. J. Griffin was a

169
00:11:01,720 --> 00:11:05,720
nice find. Can I very quickly? Can I play with within the next

170
00:11:05,840 --> 00:11:09,320
year? I want to play Round
of keeper trade with you for Atlanta.

171
00:11:09,519 --> 00:11:13,120
I'm just gonna go through some of
their players, and I don't even want

172
00:11:13,120 --> 00:11:15,960
an explanation. I just wanted to
keep her. Trade on these guys.

173
00:11:16,600 --> 00:11:20,480
Tray Young before let's say, before
the twenty twenty four trade deadline is what

174
00:11:20,519 --> 00:11:26,279
we'll use. Tray Young trade,
Welcome, Dejante Murray, keep Bogdan mcdonovitch

175
00:11:26,399 --> 00:11:30,320
going to be a free agent this
year. Yeah, i'd keep him.

176
00:11:31,120 --> 00:11:37,159
DeAndre Honor, trade John Collins keep
damn it. No, they're gonna trade

177
00:11:37,200 --> 00:11:43,320
him, but I would keep them. Clint Capella trade keep and aj Griffin.

178
00:11:43,559 --> 00:11:48,200
Oh keep. We traded half of
the rotation. Basically you're starting over.

179
00:11:48,480 --> 00:11:52,120
Yeah, yeah, you did say
keep Dejanta Murray, though, yeah,

180
00:11:52,159 --> 00:11:54,840
I think I can. I don't
like a scenario where he's your best

181
00:11:54,840 --> 00:11:58,879
player. I just think he makes
I still think the logic of pairing him

182
00:12:00,039 --> 00:12:03,799
if Young works on paper, and
I think if you had if he's a

183
00:12:03,840 --> 00:12:07,200
guy that is a secondary you know, even he works fine as a primary

184
00:12:07,200 --> 00:12:09,480
creator if there's just enough shooting around
him. I mean, it was an

185
00:12:09,480 --> 00:12:13,879
All Star in San Antonio with with
you know, middling shooting. I don't

186
00:12:13,879 --> 00:12:16,440
think it's that hard. He's almost
easier to integrate than someone like Young.

187
00:12:18,000 --> 00:12:22,320
But just that's as much personality as
anything. I don't know. And that's

188
00:12:22,360 --> 00:12:26,840
assuming you don't have to max Hunter
Max Murray outs that would like it all

189
00:12:26,840 --> 00:12:28,159
depends on what you're gonna have to
pay him on his next deal. That

190
00:12:28,279 --> 00:12:31,120
gets into and I don't want to
spend more time to talk, but that

191
00:12:31,120 --> 00:12:33,639
gets into an overarkling discussion. Like
when he reaches free agency. I think

192
00:12:33,679 --> 00:12:35,759
that free agency's gonna look maybe not
vastly different, but I think it's gonna

193
00:12:35,759 --> 00:12:39,639
be a little bit more competitive.
Where we've seen a lot of players just

194
00:12:39,679 --> 00:12:43,000
signed contracts with their team and move
later. I think there might be more

195
00:12:43,000 --> 00:12:46,039
player movement on the horizon, so
you might need to max him to keep

196
00:12:46,120 --> 00:12:48,519
him. That's a scary thought.
I don't feel great about that. Let's

197
00:12:48,559 --> 00:12:52,879
move on to the Boston Celtics,
who are my team. Shout out Grant

198
00:12:52,000 --> 00:12:56,279
by the way for labeling these so
that we didn't get last time. I

199
00:12:56,320 --> 00:12:58,519
figured out before we went live,
but I did research on like four or

200
00:12:58,559 --> 00:13:03,600
five because I fucked up the order. There was no at least not that

201
00:13:03,639 --> 00:13:05,799
I know of. Maybe we'll find
out now there was no mess ups at

202
00:13:05,799 --> 00:13:09,600
this time thanks to him the two
guests Bastard. How good is the Celtics

203
00:13:09,639 --> 00:13:13,000
offense and is it as dependent on
three point shooting as it seems were the

204
00:13:13,039 --> 00:13:16,879
first twenty games due to unsustainably high
three point percentages? Or are the last

205
00:13:16,879 --> 00:13:22,480
ten or so due to unsustainably low
ones? And so some background on this.

206
00:13:22,559 --> 00:13:24,000
So the Celtics starts the season twenty
one and five. This is how

207
00:13:24,039 --> 00:13:28,919
I broke it down for them.
They were first in offense one twenty one

208
00:13:28,960 --> 00:13:33,320
point seven offensive rating. Their effected
field goal percentage of fifty nine point six

209
00:13:33,559 --> 00:13:37,720
was first by a country mile.
Basically, Denver was second at fifty eight.

210
00:13:37,840 --> 00:13:41,960
Over their last twelve games, they're
twenty sixth in offense at one twelve

211
00:13:41,000 --> 00:13:46,120
offensive rating. Their affective field goal
percentage has dropped by more than seven points

212
00:13:46,159 --> 00:13:48,600
to fifty one point six. That
is twenty seven, So there are the

213
00:13:48,600 --> 00:13:52,799
bottom five of both offensive rating and
effected field goal percentage. They're shooting from

214
00:13:52,879 --> 00:13:58,320
three during the twenty one and five
stretch forty point eight percent across the board,

215
00:13:58,320 --> 00:14:01,600
both in the corner and above the
break that led the league by a

216
00:14:01,679 --> 00:14:05,399
comfortable not really. Denver shot the
three ball well during that stretch, but

217
00:14:05,440 --> 00:14:07,679
forty point eight percent that ranked first
in the league. Over their last twelve

218
00:14:07,720 --> 00:14:13,519
games, they are thirtieth at thirty
point five percent on threes, including under

219
00:14:13,639 --> 00:14:18,679
thirty percent from above the break.
To break this down one final time,

220
00:14:18,919 --> 00:14:22,039
during their twenty one and five stretch, they shot forty three point six percent

221
00:14:22,519 --> 00:14:28,120
on wide open threes. During this
stretch, they were shooting thirty one point

222
00:14:28,120 --> 00:14:31,159
three percent on wide open threes.
This is with wide open threes accounting for

223
00:14:31,240 --> 00:14:37,440
basically the same share of their total
shot attempts, and so that hasn't changed

224
00:14:37,440 --> 00:14:43,080
at all. That leads me to
believe that we're just simply experiencing peaks and

225
00:14:43,200 --> 00:14:46,159
valleys right now, and there will
be a middle ground. And when you

226
00:14:46,200 --> 00:14:52,080
look at this stretch, their highest
volume three point shooters are and this is

227
00:14:52,120 --> 00:14:54,559
an order of their attempts per game, Jayon Brown thirty one point eight percent,

228
00:14:54,840 --> 00:14:58,879
Jason Tatum thirty point nine percent,
Marcus Smart thirty point five percent,

229
00:15:00,159 --> 00:15:03,200
Al Horford thirty nine point six percent
due to God, Malcolm Brogden twenty eight

230
00:15:03,240 --> 00:15:09,639
point nine percent, Derek White twenty
two point two percent, Sam Houser twenty

231
00:15:09,639 --> 00:15:13,799
eight point nine percent. And so
you're looking at their seven, their top

232
00:15:13,879 --> 00:15:18,200
seven in terms of volume three point
shooters, all being demonstratively below the league

233
00:15:18,240 --> 00:15:22,360
average, not just not just what
they were shooting before their league average.

234
00:15:22,440 --> 00:15:28,159
When you look at those names Tatum, Brown, Brogden, Sam Houser,

235
00:15:28,279 --> 00:15:31,879
for sure, there's going to be
some progression to a mean. Now,

236
00:15:31,200 --> 00:15:35,679
do I think that Boston's offense was
too reliant on threes? I don't,

237
00:15:35,720 --> 00:15:39,799
because their three point at temph three
was never astronomically high. It's always hovered

238
00:15:39,840 --> 00:15:45,120
around like ten twelve for the season, and even now you know, as

239
00:15:45,159 --> 00:15:50,519
the as their bricklaying, it is
currently at their third so like, yes,

240
00:15:50,559 --> 00:15:54,480
it's up there in three point a
tenth three. Could you pull back

241
00:15:54,519 --> 00:15:56,320
from that? It seems like they've
got away from driving and dribble penetration a

242
00:15:56,360 --> 00:16:00,240
little bit. They were doing Jason
Tatum specifically a good job of getting more

243
00:16:00,279 --> 00:16:03,600
to the foul line. Yes,
you can get back to some of that.

244
00:16:03,679 --> 00:16:07,039
I don't think. Did they have
one of the five best offenses in

245
00:16:07,120 --> 00:16:11,799
NBA history? I thought on paper
that was probably always fluky, and a

246
00:16:11,799 --> 00:16:14,480
lot of it did have to do
with the three point shooting. I'm not

247
00:16:14,600 --> 00:16:19,360
worried about their offense long term.
I think there's enough varying layers here to

248
00:16:19,399 --> 00:16:23,120
where they'll figure it out. And
also they've had to reintegrate Robert Williams the

249
00:16:23,159 --> 00:16:27,320
third during this stretch, and that
changes the geometry of your floor, and

250
00:16:27,320 --> 00:16:32,200
that's something that they're gonna have to
get used to. What do I think,

251
00:16:32,360 --> 00:16:34,440
Like, you know, we see
the extremes bottom five offense versus the

252
00:16:34,480 --> 00:16:38,720
best offense in the league, I
probably think they should still be settled into

253
00:16:38,960 --> 00:16:41,679
not even just for the year because
we know the first twenty six games will

254
00:16:41,679 --> 00:16:45,440
skeewe that, but they should be
a top ten to twelve offense like that.

255
00:16:45,639 --> 00:16:51,039
Twelve feels like almost their floor just
because of the level of individual shop

256
00:16:51,080 --> 00:16:53,279
makers and creators that they have.
And so no, I'm not worried.

257
00:16:53,320 --> 00:16:56,919
If you're if their path to winning
the title was, oh they're they're,

258
00:16:56,960 --> 00:17:00,000
you know, one of the five
best defense and five best offenses, I

259
00:17:00,000 --> 00:17:03,359
think it's fair to question whether they
fall under that umbrella. But I don't

260
00:17:03,440 --> 00:17:07,319
view anything here as sinister that they
need to make some type of move at

261
00:17:07,319 --> 00:17:10,799
the trade deadline. They have a
nice little tidy trade exception to be good

262
00:17:10,799 --> 00:17:14,519
if they could do something with it
or willing to pay the luxury TAXI,

263
00:17:15,160 --> 00:17:18,240
you know, penalties for using it. That being said, this is still

264
00:17:18,680 --> 00:17:22,480
they are probably Honestly, look,
they're probably the safest bet to come out

265
00:17:22,480 --> 00:17:23,599
of the East when you look at
what's happening in Milwaukee. Will get to

266
00:17:23,680 --> 00:17:26,079
them, Brooklyn, you just will
get to them too. But I mean,

267
00:17:26,319 --> 00:17:30,680
why are you gonna trust Brooklyn.
Philly's tearing it up right now,

268
00:17:30,839 --> 00:17:33,640
like what is Miami going through.
They've gotten a little bit better, So

269
00:17:33,079 --> 00:17:37,799
I would say Boston's probably the safest
bet in the East. And that hasn't

270
00:17:37,200 --> 00:17:38,960
I didn't pick them to come out
of the East. I picked the Bucks

271
00:17:40,000 --> 00:17:44,000
and I'll stick to it. But
that this hasn't moved me in the direction

272
00:17:44,039 --> 00:17:47,680
of panic. I don't know about
you. No, I agree with pretty

273
00:17:47,759 --> 00:17:49,839
much everything you said. I think
if the short answer to the question of

274
00:17:51,079 --> 00:17:53,160
how good is the Celtics offense is
it's good enough. You know, it

275
00:17:53,200 --> 00:17:56,480
doesn't have to be great, like
it's good enough now. And I think

276
00:17:56,519 --> 00:18:00,799
specifically with a team like this,
there aren't a lot of teams that I

277
00:18:00,880 --> 00:18:03,960
give this kind of leeway to.
But you know, they were in the

278
00:18:03,960 --> 00:18:08,799
finals, They've made deep playoff runs. They you know, they look totally

279
00:18:08,839 --> 00:18:11,960
likely to do that. Again,
I kind of am more interested in the

280
00:18:12,039 --> 00:18:17,200
highs and like the stretches where they're
playing really great than I am concerned by

281
00:18:17,240 --> 00:18:19,920
the lows, which you know,
there's just been a ton of variants.

282
00:18:19,960 --> 00:18:23,599
We're all we're trafficking in small samples, you know, cutting the season up

283
00:18:23,599 --> 00:18:27,599
into ten and fifteen game increments.
Even so, it's like, I just

284
00:18:27,720 --> 00:18:32,279
valued now, the shooting to start
the season was totally unsustainable. It was

285
00:18:32,319 --> 00:18:36,279
just everybody was shooting forty whatever percent
on good four percent of wide open threes.

286
00:18:36,319 --> 00:18:38,480
It's just like next level stuff.
Yeah, it's just that wasn't ever

287
00:18:38,480 --> 00:18:44,400
gonna last. But I think it's
pretty compelling that they did. They did

288
00:18:44,480 --> 00:18:48,799
sustain that for you know, what
would have been a long chunk of the

289
00:18:48,920 --> 00:18:51,759
playoff run. And that's all it
really takes, like if you have the

290
00:18:51,759 --> 00:18:53,920
capacity, if you have the shooters, and I think Boston does have enough,

291
00:18:55,039 --> 00:19:00,000
like genuinely good shooters to say they
could run that hot against playoff competition

292
00:19:00,599 --> 00:19:03,559
over a couple series or even more
than that. For sure, I guess

293
00:19:03,559 --> 00:19:07,240
it's as likely that they could run
cold like they have for other stretches this

294
00:19:07,279 --> 00:19:11,160
season. But I just like the
highs. The highs matter more with a

295
00:19:11,200 --> 00:19:14,400
good contender like this, I would
say the only really quickly, sorry to

296
00:19:14,400 --> 00:19:17,680
interrupt you, because I rambled for
five minutes, was who was the actual

297
00:19:17,720 --> 00:19:21,680
outlier throughout that entire stretch was Derek
White. And I guess if you want

298
00:19:21,720 --> 00:19:25,559
to go Marcus Smart to talk,
but when you see Marcus Smart run hot

299
00:19:25,559 --> 00:19:29,039
for an entire season basically from three, yeah, No, it's just the

300
00:19:29,720 --> 00:19:33,200
overarching thing is when you're talking about
a team that's as good as the Celtics,

301
00:19:33,480 --> 00:19:37,240
I think just when they show that
they can hit a really high level,

302
00:19:37,680 --> 00:19:40,960
it just matters more than when they
slump, because I think even internally

303
00:19:40,960 --> 00:19:44,200
it's kind of like, well,
we're bulletproof and then you let your guard

304
00:19:44,240 --> 00:19:47,640
down a little bit, and then
that contributes some along with variants and just

305
00:19:47,759 --> 00:19:51,240
randomness and regression of the mean.
But that's a factor two for teams that

306
00:19:51,279 --> 00:19:55,279
are this good. I think,
speaking of teams that are this good,

307
00:19:56,200 --> 00:20:00,720
the Brooklynness that's so good the brook
the Nets have won a trillion games in

308
00:20:00,759 --> 00:20:04,559
a row. They're the best offense
in all the land. They're grade at

309
00:20:04,599 --> 00:20:11,000
everything. And so this question is
from not Grant Hughes at all. Come

310
00:20:11,000 --> 00:20:14,680
on, get at us Brooklyn Nets
fans for a question here. This is

311
00:20:14,720 --> 00:20:18,440
why I've sent out four solicitations in
total to our two to our discord,

312
00:20:19,480 --> 00:20:22,759
one from Hardwoo Knox Twitter, one
from MBA Mats Twitter. Where are you

313
00:20:22,799 --> 00:20:26,720
at? Nets fans? And Clippers
fans kind of let us down this time.

314
00:20:26,799 --> 00:20:30,079
Maybe maybe they just don't care about
anything until the playoffs, but for

315
00:20:30,160 --> 00:20:34,240
sure as hell don't, that's for
sure. Yeah. So we talk all

316
00:20:34,279 --> 00:20:37,359
the time about how we started the
season, talking about how like, well

317
00:20:37,400 --> 00:20:41,400
it's it already was a tire fire, it seemed like, and the combustion

318
00:20:41,440 --> 00:20:44,720
potential was off the charts, the
most high variance team in the league.

319
00:20:45,319 --> 00:20:48,720
Take that off the table for the
Nets. Take Kyrie's gonna say or do

320
00:20:48,839 --> 00:20:53,480
something crazy. Uh, they're gonna
try to get Jock bonfired for some reason,

321
00:20:53,559 --> 00:20:57,480
like take all the like on the
trade, like take all that off

322
00:20:57,480 --> 00:21:03,799
the table, take all the like. No way this is happening again to

323
00:21:03,839 --> 00:21:07,920
this team. So why shouldn't we
believe the Nets can make the finals if

324
00:21:07,920 --> 00:21:11,799
we just pretend? And this is
kind of like this is purely a thought

325
00:21:11,839 --> 00:21:15,440
exercise, because I don't think it's
safe to pretend this that none of that

326
00:21:15,440 --> 00:21:18,319
stuff is going to creep in and
kind of derail what's been one of the

327
00:21:18,359 --> 00:21:22,559
best runs of any team this season, even though the schedule and hasn't been

328
00:21:22,559 --> 00:21:26,559
all that tough. But whatever,
Like a winning streak like this is still

329
00:21:26,559 --> 00:21:30,680
a winning streak like this. So
to me, there's just there's only a

330
00:21:30,759 --> 00:21:33,839
couple of areas you really look at, and almost all of them can be

331
00:21:33,240 --> 00:21:38,359
just over there, papered over,
overcome by incredible shot making, which this

332
00:21:38,400 --> 00:21:41,720
team just has, you know,
up and down the roster, particularly Durant

333
00:21:41,799 --> 00:21:47,799
Irving, you know, Curry,
Harris, t J. Warren looks really

334
00:21:47,839 --> 00:21:52,119
good to me in limited stints.
They're a little small. Nick Lackson has

335
00:21:52,119 --> 00:21:56,279
been awesome, but there only other
real center that they play is Darron Sharp

336
00:21:56,319 --> 00:21:59,839
and and like, I get it, you want to use Ben Simmons there

337
00:21:59,839 --> 00:22:03,039
if you can. Kadie can play
some center. They're a little small,

338
00:22:03,079 --> 00:22:04,359
Like this is a problem for everybody, but like, what do you do

339
00:22:04,440 --> 00:22:10,680
with MB in a playoff series?
That's just that's really difficult for this team

340
00:22:10,799 --> 00:22:12,839
even you, honest I think probably
poses a similar problem where there's just aren't

341
00:22:12,920 --> 00:22:18,920
enough like bulky deterrence inside. Not
the length is there because durance long and

342
00:22:18,920 --> 00:22:21,920
they can play a lot of forwards
and wings that can have some reach,

343
00:22:22,000 --> 00:22:26,599
But that's an issue. It's tied
to the defense. I think rebounding has

344
00:22:26,599 --> 00:22:30,880
been a problem for this team for
most of the year. So through November

345
00:22:30,759 --> 00:22:34,400
they were twenty first and offensive rebound
rate fourteenth and defense or though they were

346
00:22:34,440 --> 00:22:40,400
dead last and both through November.
Since December, during this run started twenty

347
00:22:40,480 --> 00:22:44,599
first and fourteenth and offensive and defensive
rebound rate respectively. That's improved a little.

348
00:22:44,680 --> 00:22:48,359
That's still probably not good enough.
I'm wondering if the sorry Ben Simmons

349
00:22:48,400 --> 00:22:52,079
clacks ten minutes now working, I
wonder if that's helped there. I haven't

350
00:22:52,079 --> 00:22:55,119
looked at the rebounding percentages of those
lineups, but I'm wondering if that maybe

351
00:22:55,160 --> 00:22:56,880
has helped them stabilize a little bit. It does, and they're a little

352
00:22:56,920 --> 00:23:00,880
like the Celtics, where you know, the off can be good enough,

353
00:23:00,920 --> 00:23:04,559
everything else can just be good enough, and then Durant is unstoppable and Irving

354
00:23:04,680 --> 00:23:08,319
can get you thirty on seventeen shots, and like that's just the recipe for

355
00:23:08,359 --> 00:23:15,759
winning. So size defense, I
guess you could question their shot profile.

356
00:23:15,799 --> 00:23:18,480
They're really reliant on just making mid
rangers. So their first and effective field

357
00:23:18,480 --> 00:23:22,960
goal percentage this year, but they're
twenty ninth in location based effective field goal

358
00:23:22,960 --> 00:23:26,839
percentage. But that's the Kyrie kd
effect, right. How big a concern

359
00:23:26,920 --> 00:23:29,759
is that if you just know that
the guys that take the most shots are

360
00:23:29,799 --> 00:23:33,599
really good at shots that you know
theoretically you should not take. It's a

361
00:23:33,640 --> 00:23:36,680
little bit like we talk about the
suns, you know, the last couple

362
00:23:36,720 --> 00:23:38,079
of years. Oh, they're mid
range. Well it's like if Devin Booker

363
00:23:38,079 --> 00:23:41,240
and Chris Paul are taking all your
mid rangers, they're just gonna make a

364
00:23:41,240 --> 00:23:47,240
disproportionate amount. So I guess the
other big one is like, how good

365
00:23:47,400 --> 00:23:51,279
how useful is Simmons going to be
in a playoff series? Yeah? I

366
00:23:51,279 --> 00:23:53,039
mean, like he's still I think
I read the other day he hasn't taken

367
00:23:53,039 --> 00:23:56,240
a free throw. Since he hasn't
made a free throw since November twenty five,

368
00:23:56,839 --> 00:24:00,799
that's problematic. Can he be on
the floor at the end of games?

369
00:24:00,039 --> 00:24:03,839
I don't know. And he's so
valuable to their defense that if you

370
00:24:03,920 --> 00:24:08,000
can't play him, then suddenly it's
Claxton and like Royce O'Neil's playing the only

371
00:24:08,000 --> 00:24:12,160
other guy you'd really trust Durant.
Maybe. So there's a few things,

372
00:24:12,440 --> 00:24:15,559
but I just come back to like, if you're telling me that this isn't

373
00:24:15,599 --> 00:24:21,279
going to blow up for non basketball
reasons, then we just have to We

374
00:24:21,319 --> 00:24:26,000
just have to view the nets as
as as dangerous as like literally anybody else.

375
00:24:26,720 --> 00:24:29,799
I don't have any other concerns other
than what does Ben Simmons look like

376
00:24:29,799 --> 00:24:32,960
in the playoffs? And then what's
the Kyrie Irvan Wildcar factor? I honestly

377
00:24:32,960 --> 00:24:34,400
don't have anything to add to you. I will say that I think people

378
00:24:34,440 --> 00:24:38,279
might be underrating how valuable Nick Claxton
is. It's probably already the single most

379
00:24:38,279 --> 00:24:44,240
switchable actual center in the league.
Opponents are shooting this year. His rim

380
00:24:44,240 --> 00:24:47,640
protection has never been better. Boast
is that bolt? Is that like zero

381
00:24:48,200 --> 00:24:51,880
like level stop gap? Or someone's
coming over as helper, or someone's breaking

382
00:24:51,920 --> 00:24:53,519
up place from behind they're shooting,
And I was looking this up. I'm

383
00:24:53,559 --> 00:24:56,119
getting used to a second screen.
That's why you see me staring off here

384
00:24:56,680 --> 00:25:02,000
rather than shaking my laptop my first
laptop here. Fifty point nine percent against

385
00:25:02,079 --> 00:25:04,160
the classon at the rim. There
have been thirty eight players who can test

386
00:25:04,200 --> 00:25:07,680
at least one hundred fifty shots at
the rim. Only Draymond and Jane McDaniels

387
00:25:07,839 --> 00:25:11,319
have better limiting percentages there. And
his offense has been spectacular. I'm not

388
00:25:11,359 --> 00:25:15,200
even talking about like rolling finishing at
the basket. He's shooting like eighty percent

389
00:25:15,240 --> 00:25:18,960
at the rim. Led the league
in field goal percentage last time I checked.

390
00:25:18,039 --> 00:25:22,319
But he's hitting like fifty percent of
his hook shots. He's putting a

391
00:25:22,359 --> 00:25:25,200
ball on the floor. I posted
actually a clip of him because I was

392
00:25:25,240 --> 00:25:29,079
watching him, and so I posted
some clips of like his more complicated usage.

393
00:25:29,200 --> 00:25:33,519
People on Twitter comment think they're like
some of these drives drives. They

394
00:25:33,519 --> 00:25:36,440
thought it was Kevin Durant. That's
a huge swing piece. This is a

395
00:25:36,519 --> 00:25:38,119
player they almost traded for protected first
round pick. That's the only thing I

396
00:25:38,160 --> 00:25:41,839
have to add is that the only
thing that's preventing the Nets from winning a

397
00:25:41,880 --> 00:25:45,279
title, my eyes, my own
skepticism which leads me to this is from

398
00:25:45,319 --> 00:25:52,039
not Dan for Valley at all.
Ken Kevin Durant win the MVP Award?

399
00:25:53,160 --> 00:25:57,000
Is it? And I guess it's
Is it fair to hold what happened against

400
00:25:57,079 --> 00:26:02,599
him in the discussion and why's the
answer. That's just gonna say that that's

401
00:26:02,599 --> 00:26:06,240
the question, because I don't know
how you get over Well, the MVP

402
00:26:06,440 --> 00:26:10,000
is just such a cluster anyway,
because like what's value? You know,

403
00:26:10,039 --> 00:26:15,160
what's valuable? Is it on the
court stuff only? Is it offense only?

404
00:26:15,279 --> 00:26:17,960
Do we care about catch all metric? You know, because Durant just

405
00:26:18,039 --> 00:26:21,279
excels in so many of those areas. But how do you get past?

406
00:26:22,200 --> 00:26:26,640
I'll say this, I don't think
voters are gonna get past the fact that

407
00:26:26,680 --> 00:26:30,880
he really tried more than once to
just blow the team up. And I

408
00:26:30,920 --> 00:26:36,039
guess it's a credit to how great
he is that he just came back and

409
00:26:36,519 --> 00:26:38,680
is playing at an MVP level.
Like, I don't think that's really debatable.

410
00:26:40,119 --> 00:26:41,680
But I just don't know how you
get past how anyone's going to get

411
00:26:41,680 --> 00:26:47,480
past the other stuff. Here's my
thing. And I saw I can't remember

412
00:26:47,480 --> 00:26:49,559
which podcast I was listening to.
They were commending Durant's leadership, leading this

413
00:26:49,599 --> 00:26:53,480
team through the Kyrie Irving stuff,
leading this team through his own trade demand,

414
00:26:55,160 --> 00:26:57,359
but Steve Nash firing, no,
you absolutely can hold it. He

415
00:26:57,440 --> 00:27:00,400
might be the most valuable player in
the NBA. But the nets were in

416
00:27:00,519 --> 00:27:03,640
lurch. Does the roster look any
different or is it any better if he

417
00:27:03,680 --> 00:27:07,359
doesn't make his trade demand. You
were the one that wanted the coach fired,

418
00:27:07,799 --> 00:27:12,400
and so like, you didn't lead
this team through anything that you didn't

419
00:27:12,440 --> 00:27:15,680
create. Like, and I'm not
going to give you bonus points for navigating

420
00:27:15,680 --> 00:27:18,759
the Kyrie stuff because first of all, you did it quite poorly if we're

421
00:27:18,759 --> 00:27:22,640
being honest, And two, like, I don't want to hear another fucking

422
00:27:22,680 --> 00:27:26,039
thing about his love of basketball.
That is awesome. Kevin Durant is an

423
00:27:26,079 --> 00:27:32,160
underdog when you look at his life
trajectory, everyone like if there are people

424
00:27:32,160 --> 00:27:34,680
in like not this league isn't filled
with Andrew Bynum's who are only playing because

425
00:27:34,680 --> 00:27:37,680
like they make a lot of money
and that was their best you know,

426
00:27:37,960 --> 00:27:41,599
occupational option. I don't even know
how to phrase that. Ever, these

427
00:27:41,640 --> 00:27:44,720
players love the game. That's why
they're here, That's why they're at the

428
00:27:44,759 --> 00:27:45,839
level. That's why most of them
invest time in their craft. It's that

429
00:27:45,920 --> 00:27:48,839
it's the money. You might be
the famous celebrities accommodation of everything. Kevin

430
00:27:48,920 --> 00:27:52,839
Durant is not like on some it's
not so higher power because you think Kevin

431
00:27:52,920 --> 00:27:56,559
Durant loves the game less than Steph
Curry, Like, I just you think

432
00:27:56,640 --> 00:28:00,599
Kevin Durant loves the game less than
Lebron James for them, and that's why

433
00:28:00,680 --> 00:28:03,720
Lebron's Lakers have fallen apart. Doesn't
love the game enough. Maybe if the

434
00:28:03,759 --> 00:28:06,279
station his career, he doesn't.
I don't want to fucking hear it,

435
00:28:06,400 --> 00:28:10,160
Like, if he's so love of
the game that he wanted to be traded

436
00:28:10,200 --> 00:28:12,880
from Brooklyn, have his coach in
general manager fired. No, I'm just

437
00:28:14,519 --> 00:28:17,759
that is and I think, and
I'm part of this, and I wanted

438
00:28:18,079 --> 00:28:21,319
and I'll try, and I'll be
remedying something in my next MVP ladder.

439
00:28:21,640 --> 00:28:25,119
I have artific I don't know if
it's artificially. I've held him back in

440
00:28:25,160 --> 00:28:27,519
the MVP discussion because of this where
it's like he should probably be one two

441
00:28:27,640 --> 00:28:30,559
or three at worst based on the
body of work from him, the minutes

442
00:28:30,599 --> 00:28:33,559
that he played, especially at the
start of the year. I just think

443
00:28:33,839 --> 00:28:37,480
that if we're going to talk about
teams, like if wins and losses are

444
00:28:37,519 --> 00:28:41,920
a players stat, because the player
has to come from this really good team,

445
00:28:41,039 --> 00:28:44,319
you know what, a player has
to prove to me that he's not

446
00:28:44,359 --> 00:28:51,559
trying to submarine that team. Well, it's like if if a pilot of

447
00:28:51,599 --> 00:28:56,480
a commercial airliner like sees a couple
of clouds and so I don't like those

448
00:28:56,519 --> 00:29:02,000
clouds. I'm gonna fly into the
middle of this Category five hurricane and then

449
00:29:02,200 --> 00:29:06,000
somehow like makes it out, like
everyone thinks we're all dead on this plane

450
00:29:06,000 --> 00:29:08,279
and he makes it out. Do
you applaud the pilot? Like is that

451
00:29:08,519 --> 00:29:11,839
are we is? Like doesn't the
first thing matter as much as the second

452
00:29:11,839 --> 00:29:17,480
thing? Like you, it's just's
just the self created problem that you managed

453
00:29:17,519 --> 00:29:19,960
to navigate, just like, don't
start the problem, like I don't matter,

454
00:29:21,359 --> 00:29:22,880
I don't mean it's It's also like
I don't remember the show that this

455
00:29:22,920 --> 00:29:26,279
came from now, Like I was
watching a show away back when, and

456
00:29:26,519 --> 00:29:32,359
like someone set a fire in their
school chemistry room. They put it out

457
00:29:32,640 --> 00:29:36,440
and then they got an award for
putting out the fire, and I don't

458
00:29:36,480 --> 00:29:38,839
remember what show it was, Like
That's that's what Kevin Durant did, is

459
00:29:38,880 --> 00:29:42,160
he helped if it wasn't him who
set it on fire, he handed like

460
00:29:42,200 --> 00:29:45,480
the matches over to other people to
do it for him, and then he

461
00:29:45,599 --> 00:29:49,640
put it out and just he's been
terrific. He can be your MVP.

462
00:29:51,240 --> 00:29:56,119
But let's not pretend that like his
love of the game transcend it all here

463
00:29:56,200 --> 00:30:00,079
like fuck that fuck. Let's keep
coming up with analogy. If you jump

464
00:30:00,119 --> 00:30:06,599
into the lion cage and he dragged
twelve people with you, and then look,

465
00:30:06,880 --> 00:30:10,799
Kevin Durant understands his why more than
anybody else in the league. That's

466
00:30:10,880 --> 00:30:14,440
that's why the Nets are here.
Kevin Durant understands his why. He might

467
00:30:14,519 --> 00:30:17,559
have been he was clearly right about
Steve Nash, but that also kind of

468
00:30:17,599 --> 00:30:21,240
goes on him because the Steve Nash
get hired without Kevin Durant says, well,

469
00:30:21,680 --> 00:30:23,319
yeah, let's not be naive.
He at least said, cool,

470
00:30:23,400 --> 00:30:27,680
let's do it at absolute minimum.
And I don't mean Kevin Durant is one

471
00:30:27,720 --> 00:30:32,759
of the ten greatest basketball players of
all time. He's probably been wire to

472
00:30:32,880 --> 00:30:36,680
wire the best player in the NBA
this season? Is he the most valuable

473
00:30:36,680 --> 00:30:40,119
player in the NBA this season?
Just putting out your own fires count as

474
00:30:40,200 --> 00:30:45,160
value. Who's this? Are we
ready to hop onto my team, which

475
00:30:45,240 --> 00:30:51,160
is there's Charlotte Hornets and we have
We had more than one question on the

476
00:30:51,200 --> 00:30:55,359
Charlotte Hornets. I appreciate that horns
fans usher which duo would you rather see

477
00:30:55,440 --> 00:30:59,720
with Wemby, Kayden Wemby or Lamello
and Wemby. I chose just to do

478
00:30:59,839 --> 00:31:03,079
it make it more interesting, because
I think Detroit has more young talent than

479
00:31:03,319 --> 00:31:07,319
Charlotte. I would rather see.
Oh my god, I'd rather see LaMelo

480
00:31:07,359 --> 00:31:11,160
and Wemby. Let's just get this
dude some fucking help. I think Cade

481
00:31:11,480 --> 00:31:15,240
and then having Jade and Ivy,
Killian, Hayes and Wemby and that Core

482
00:31:15,319 --> 00:31:18,240
and Detroit would be objectively better right
out of the gate. But also,

483
00:31:18,319 --> 00:31:22,279
like, I want Wemby to get
as much opportunity as possible on the ball.

484
00:31:22,319 --> 00:31:26,279
And if you have Jaden and Killian
and Kaide, but especially Kade and

485
00:31:26,400 --> 00:31:30,880
Jayden, how like does that limit
his development? Also, Jalen Duran is

486
00:31:30,920 --> 00:31:33,519
there too, like him and Isaiah
Stuart aren't guys. They're gonna clog up

487
00:31:33,559 --> 00:31:37,519
the pipeline for Wemby, but it
is part of the equation. So give

488
00:31:37,519 --> 00:31:40,559
me LaMelo and Wemby, and then
Wemby just automatically your second option, and

489
00:31:40,599 --> 00:31:45,240
let's just let let let's see him
cook on Charlotte and give some hope to

490
00:31:45,279 --> 00:31:47,920
the Hornets franchise in general, which
I think is the most hopeless team the

491
00:31:48,000 --> 00:31:49,640
league. We we name them the
most hopeless team the league. But also

492
00:31:49,799 --> 00:31:55,119
just that's it kind of I want
to see players. I don't want to

493
00:31:55,119 --> 00:31:57,160
get into the talk of well,
what's LaMelo gonna do next after he signs

494
00:31:57,160 --> 00:32:01,519
this extension. I want to just
envision him being there because I like when

495
00:32:01,960 --> 00:32:06,200
organizations, unless they just so blatantly
run them out of town, which the

496
00:32:06,200 --> 00:32:09,200
Hornets might be doing at this point, I want to see Lamello stay there.

497
00:32:09,279 --> 00:32:13,640
I want to see all these like
I want to see smaller markets have

498
00:32:13,640 --> 00:32:17,559
have their why have their core and
when LaMelo would just be so much fun

499
00:32:17,599 --> 00:32:20,759
to me. I don't know where
you landed on this. No, it's

500
00:32:20,880 --> 00:32:23,519
it's LaMelo one hundred percent. And
it's like, yeah, the Hornets need

501
00:32:23,680 --> 00:32:27,200
when ban Yama the most, but
they kind of deserve him the least.

502
00:32:27,680 --> 00:32:30,200
So the way to put it,
some part of me is is hesitant,

503
00:32:30,240 --> 00:32:36,319
but just like I think, I
think LaMelo is full stop one of the

504
00:32:36,319 --> 00:32:38,799
best passers in the league, and
there's just not a lot of places to

505
00:32:38,799 --> 00:32:42,960
put the ball for him on this
team, and just like, well,

506
00:32:43,039 --> 00:32:45,720
let's bring in the guy with the
widest catch radius of all time, like

507
00:32:46,319 --> 00:32:51,960
imagine the lobs imagine, you know. And I think too, if there's

508
00:32:52,039 --> 00:32:53,880
anything to worry about with when Bin
Yama, it's that he can do.

509
00:32:54,119 --> 00:32:59,279
He'll be able to do so much
as a rookie just based on you know,

510
00:32:59,480 --> 00:33:02,000
it's gonna be hard to tell him
not to take tough threes just or

511
00:33:02,440 --> 00:33:07,279
just really go into his bag because
I mean, he's gonna rightfully believe he

512
00:33:07,319 --> 00:33:10,000
can do that stuff. But I
think it will help a lot if there's

513
00:33:10,000 --> 00:33:15,160
someone on his team that's just a
high level thinker, distributor passer, just

514
00:33:15,519 --> 00:33:17,519
because maybe the you know, four
or five easy buckets he would get from

515
00:33:17,559 --> 00:33:22,480
LaMelo. Not that Kade is you
know, any you know is incapable of

516
00:33:22,519 --> 00:33:28,319
that kind of stuff, but LaMelo
is just a dynamic facilitator of like cool

517
00:33:28,359 --> 00:33:32,400
shit. So I think I think
having Mbiamba get easy stuff will be helpful

518
00:33:32,680 --> 00:33:38,519
and Mabe prevent him from you know, falling into the crowd pleasing trap or

519
00:33:38,519 --> 00:33:43,799
the like I'm just gonna do this
myself, I think, I think esthetically,

520
00:33:43,839 --> 00:33:45,680
and I think for his development,
probably playing with LaMelo is better.

521
00:33:46,000 --> 00:33:50,960
Charlotte also as much as their rosters
just like man, they can't carve out

522
00:33:51,119 --> 00:33:53,960
better spacing. I would think around
So let's say Mark Williams, Lamello and

523
00:33:54,799 --> 00:33:58,839
Wemby, you would have Terry Rozier
just to get up shots and volume there

524
00:33:59,240 --> 00:34:02,599
and then if hey word is healthy
for some reason next season. So where

525
00:34:02,599 --> 00:34:06,839
it's Detroit, it's like Jay and
Ivy such a question mark there than playing

526
00:34:06,920 --> 00:34:09,960
him with Duran and because Ivy so
ball dominant where Terry Rozier is not.

527
00:34:10,039 --> 00:34:15,639
And I would also although Wemby Durhan
is the more intriguing from court pairing,

528
00:34:15,679 --> 00:34:21,440
Mark Williams and Wemby could do some
awesome shit together too. Next Hornet's question

529
00:34:21,559 --> 00:34:27,400
comes from RMM, what are some
realistic deals the Hornets can do at the

530
00:34:27,440 --> 00:34:30,039
trade deadline? And I'll preface this
by saying, I don't think they need

531
00:34:30,079 --> 00:34:34,000
to do anything because they're going to
be organically bad enough to just be in

532
00:34:34,039 --> 00:34:37,599
the the Wemben Yama sweepstakes or Scoot
Henderson who had like this. I don't

533
00:34:37,599 --> 00:34:39,800
know if you saw the Scoot Henderson
dunk on Wednesday night, Tuesday night,

534
00:34:39,840 --> 00:34:45,440
Oh my god, talk about that
is like I'll take that consolation prize,

535
00:34:45,519 --> 00:34:50,960
so with Charlotte, and I'm not
looking to get players that can help me

536
00:34:51,079 --> 00:34:53,199
per se this season. I'm looking
to load assets up for the future.

537
00:34:53,559 --> 00:34:57,920
And I want draft pick flexibility because
of the way that I protected the pick

538
00:34:58,000 --> 00:35:00,920
that I don't even remember who owns
it at point because it's been it's bounced

539
00:35:00,920 --> 00:35:05,679
around the league so many times.
There it's to Denver, but it's like

540
00:35:06,000 --> 00:35:09,039
it's Lotto protected the next three years. So this year, twenty two four

541
00:35:09,039 --> 00:35:14,320
and twenty twenty five, I'm looking
at just what can I get for guys

542
00:35:14,360 --> 00:35:16,400
that I either shouldn't be investing in
or won't be here long term. Jail

543
00:35:16,480 --> 00:35:19,599
McDaniel is going to be a free
agent. I think he'd get a second

544
00:35:19,760 --> 00:35:23,840
for him, like not a great
second, but like a second Terry Rose

545
00:35:23,960 --> 00:35:29,159
year in the first of a four
year extension that's basically fully guaranteed his partial

546
00:35:29,239 --> 00:35:31,320
guarantee on the final years, like
twenty four point eight million of twenty seven.

547
00:35:31,360 --> 00:35:35,840
It's just wild. I don't understand
what like, I don't I just

548
00:35:35,880 --> 00:35:38,280
want to know what went into that
at all. I don't think you're gonna

549
00:35:38,280 --> 00:35:42,920
get net positive value for him.
But if you just want flexibility to get

550
00:35:42,960 --> 00:35:45,840
his money off the books. Maybe
in a shorter amount of time. The

551
00:35:45,920 --> 00:35:47,480
Lakers to me are off the table
with Westbrook. They're going nowhere, and

552
00:35:47,519 --> 00:35:52,719
Westbrook's been good off the bench,
But like, what about a team that

553
00:35:52,840 --> 00:35:54,920
won't would they be would teams to
be a willing to send back expiring money

554
00:35:55,039 --> 00:35:58,559
or close to it for Terry Rose
year and so two that I thought of

555
00:35:58,920 --> 00:36:00,960
Milwaukee, if you build stuff,
if you're at the Hornets and willing to

556
00:36:01,000 --> 00:36:07,920
facilitate a step ladder trade Grayson Allen, George Hill's salary, you have,

557
00:36:08,599 --> 00:36:13,039
like Jordan Wara makes a little bit
of money there as well. It's like

558
00:36:13,119 --> 00:36:15,960
you can get to bringing back or
Joe Angels if you want to give him

559
00:36:16,039 --> 00:36:19,400
up. Obviously, you can get
to bring back Tarry Rozier. And I

560
00:36:19,400 --> 00:36:22,079
think he might help out I know
you don't necessarily want him to dribble a

561
00:36:22,079 --> 00:36:23,760
ton, but he might help out
Milwaukee's half court offense. The other one

562
00:36:23,800 --> 00:36:29,360
I thought about, and I don't
know if they would do this Orlando with

563
00:36:29,400 --> 00:36:31,119
Tary Rozier, Like maybe they don't
want to go to the consolidation route like

564
00:36:31,159 --> 00:36:36,920
you have some just Jonathan Isaac and
Terrence ross Is expiring money for starters,

565
00:36:36,920 --> 00:36:39,280
and you can flesh out other types
of deals there. So I would look

566
00:36:39,280 --> 00:36:43,960
at can get off Tarry Rozier's money. Caspace doesn't mean the world in Charlotte,

567
00:36:43,960 --> 00:36:45,400
and I do think Rosier is valuable. We just talked about his facing.

568
00:36:45,400 --> 00:36:49,400
This year has been for most of
it a down shooting year for him,

569
00:36:49,400 --> 00:36:52,400
but a lot of that was look
at the burden they placed upon him

570
00:36:52,440 --> 00:36:54,079
earlier in the season. I get
what you would want to keep him,

571
00:36:54,119 --> 00:36:57,039
but you're also not at the stage
where it's like, well, we like

572
00:36:57,119 --> 00:36:59,519
Terry Rozier, I there's number for
the next three years just doesn't make a

573
00:36:59,519 --> 00:37:01,440
ton of sense. So I don't
know if you have any I'll throw it

574
00:37:01,480 --> 00:37:04,719
to you after I have two more
players to talk about. But, like

575
00:37:04,800 --> 00:37:07,239
Terry Rozier, any teams bringing to
mind for you or would you just keep

576
00:37:07,280 --> 00:37:09,239
them? If you're Charlotte, I
think the Clippers or another team you might

577
00:37:09,280 --> 00:37:13,000
look at, just because the beyond, you know, John Wall has kind

578
00:37:13,039 --> 00:37:15,679
of has faded a little bit,
and then you're just kind of looking at

579
00:37:15,679 --> 00:37:17,920
Reggie Jackson. I think what the
Clippers might say is how much better is

580
00:37:17,960 --> 00:37:22,519
Terry Rozier than like a healthier,
you know, good version of Reggie Jackson.

581
00:37:22,599 --> 00:37:27,679
They're somewhat similar. But a team
like that that just Orlando is a

582
00:37:27,719 --> 00:37:30,119
great, a great option just because
to get a guard in there that could

583
00:37:30,159 --> 00:37:32,719
kind of run things would be would
and shoot, it would be would be

584
00:37:32,760 --> 00:37:37,159
final. It's it's it's really it's
a veteran team. It's a team that

585
00:37:37,920 --> 00:37:40,159
is looking to consolidate a little bit. The Clippers are the only I mean,

586
00:37:40,159 --> 00:37:43,320
I think you covered a pretty well, but the Clippers are the one

587
00:37:43,360 --> 00:37:45,159
that jumped in mind first for me. Clippers are interesting, so it's sort

588
00:37:45,159 --> 00:37:49,679
of like, would you prefer Terry
Rozier over Marcus Morris and Luke Kennard?

589
00:37:49,719 --> 00:37:52,760
Though it could be Marcus Morris or
tryor Zier straight up and the Clippers can

590
00:37:52,920 --> 00:37:54,559
get away with that, right A
distant pick to sweeten it, I mean,

591
00:37:54,559 --> 00:37:58,119
Morris, I think is someone that
you know, the Clippers just have

592
00:37:58,199 --> 00:38:00,719
such a log job. If I'm
if I'm Charlote, I might do that

593
00:38:00,719 --> 00:38:02,159
straight up, just because there's only
one more year of Morris. I'm like,

594
00:38:02,280 --> 00:38:06,239
yeah, plays that you could play
him at the four small ball five.

595
00:38:06,400 --> 00:38:08,199
Maybe he's a better alternative than PJ. Washington. Who's my next player?

596
00:38:08,760 --> 00:38:12,280
Can you get a first for PJ
Washington? I don't know which team

597
00:38:12,280 --> 00:38:16,360
would do that at this point.
Maybe Miami the I thought about the Pelicans.

598
00:38:16,400 --> 00:38:19,679
They're not giving up a first round
pick for him after the Zion injury.

599
00:38:19,719 --> 00:38:22,159
Phoenix maybe, but what can you
get. He's gonna be in restricted

600
00:38:22,199 --> 00:38:25,800
freeency. UNS think you're gonna keep
him for like twelve million a year or

601
00:38:25,800 --> 00:38:29,440
something. I would argue, we
never see these teams make these moves.

602
00:38:29,480 --> 00:38:30,960
But I would argue, it's time
to move on. And then finally,

603
00:38:31,559 --> 00:38:36,239
Gordon Hate oh PJ Washington? Any
PJ Washington teams would you keep? Trade

604
00:38:36,280 --> 00:38:37,800
him? What would you do with
him? If you could tell? If

605
00:38:37,800 --> 00:38:39,920
you told me I could keep him
for twelve a year, I'd probably just

606
00:38:39,920 --> 00:38:43,159
hold on to him. I just
don't know what the market is going to

607
00:38:43,239 --> 00:38:50,119
be in restricted free agency for him. Miami's good. I just the number

608
00:38:50,159 --> 00:38:52,840
it's really for him because he has
his uses, right, Like you know,

609
00:38:52,960 --> 00:38:54,840
you lose a little bit when you
play him at the five defensively,

610
00:38:55,199 --> 00:38:59,719
but he's like fine defensively as a
for something. Most of the time.

611
00:39:00,280 --> 00:39:04,119
He don't play five now at all. He's proven he can shoot it.

612
00:39:04,960 --> 00:39:07,639
He's young enough to where you're probably
gonna get this level or better for the

613
00:39:07,679 --> 00:39:12,840
next you know, three, four
or five years. If I could keep

614
00:39:12,920 --> 00:39:15,960
him at a salary that's like low
end starter slash like sixth seventh, eighth

615
00:39:16,039 --> 00:39:21,519
guy, which is probably twelve to
fifteen, I'm I'm fine with that,

616
00:39:21,920 --> 00:39:25,360
just I just don't know the restrictive
free agencies of If you're trading for him,

617
00:39:25,400 --> 00:39:27,920
you just have to know you have
to. It's got to be a

618
00:39:27,960 --> 00:39:30,000
wink, you know, handshake thing, and that's hard to do when any

619
00:39:30,000 --> 00:39:35,639
other team can come in with an
offer sheet. So I would probably move

620
00:39:35,679 --> 00:39:37,519
him though if i'm then because I
think he ends up costing Grand Williams is

621
00:39:37,519 --> 00:39:40,760
gonna get fetch a pretty penny.
I think Grand Williams is better than people

622
00:39:40,800 --> 00:39:45,159
watching Clear. But that's like sort
of a like market parallel for him that

623
00:39:45,400 --> 00:39:49,360
I think might drum up his number. Maybe we'll be wrong. His three

624
00:39:49,360 --> 00:39:51,559
ball has started to fall a little
bit more recently, though, so if

625
00:39:51,559 --> 00:39:54,000
he can if he hits those,
I think that'll of his markets. Kellybridge

626
00:39:54,039 --> 00:39:57,880
Junior injury unless you're using him to
take back bad money. At this point,

627
00:39:58,320 --> 00:40:00,880
he had surgery when he was kind
of putting it off all season.

628
00:40:00,920 --> 00:40:02,519
I don't like you could move in, but like, if he's actually gonna

629
00:40:02,519 --> 00:40:06,000
return this season, I don't You're
not getting a first round pick for him

630
00:40:06,000 --> 00:40:08,280
anymore if you ever were. Hayward
to me seems immovable with the final year

631
00:40:08,360 --> 00:40:13,679
left on his deal after this season
and the fact that he's been so injured.

632
00:40:13,920 --> 00:40:15,880
But I did think, like,
would you if you're the Hornets this

633
00:40:15,880 --> 00:40:20,320
time, trade you should be thinking
about what would Dallas give you to consolidate

634
00:40:20,400 --> 00:40:25,760
long term salary into Gordon Hayward.
And that's Davis Burton's Tim Hardaway junior at

635
00:40:25,760 --> 00:40:30,440
this point, maybe it's JaVale McGee
is on that list as well, And

636
00:40:30,559 --> 00:40:32,199
I don't if you're demanding a first
round pick for that, they probably say

637
00:40:32,199 --> 00:40:36,639
hell no because like they're not gonna
trade. But if you're if you want

638
00:40:36,760 --> 00:40:40,159
like Josh Green or Jaden Hardy,
is that something you consider if your Dallas

639
00:40:40,239 --> 00:40:43,039
is that too much for you?
Would you rather just play this out?

640
00:40:43,079 --> 00:40:47,079
Because you kind of divested Chris Stops's
contract into these two more like into these

641
00:40:47,079 --> 00:40:51,639
more digestible numbers, But Davis Burton's
is just such a non entity for you,

642
00:40:52,000 --> 00:40:54,079
So that might be a team that
I could see saying, oh hey,

643
00:40:54,119 --> 00:40:58,239
like if Hayward was actually playing and
then he'd had the money to get

644
00:40:58,239 --> 00:41:00,559
there, they would they would be
interesting for him just because that Duncan Robinson

645
00:41:00,639 --> 00:41:04,440
deal. But that's just that's too
low level on the deal spectrum. The

646
00:41:04,639 --> 00:41:07,760
Dallas has two. I know Tim
Hartwo Junior has been better, but his

647
00:41:07,880 --> 00:41:10,679
contract office is contract. Maybe even
if you don't want Spencer Dinwood's contract,

648
00:41:10,679 --> 00:41:15,880
though I don't necessarily know why you
would prefer Hayward over him at this point.

649
00:41:15,679 --> 00:41:20,079
Yeah, I think I would consider
it for Hardy if Hardy's the sweetener

650
00:41:20,119 --> 00:41:23,840
and going with the bad salary back. I like MAVs fans, just like

651
00:41:23,920 --> 00:41:28,480
through darts. I just part of
it's I really like Josh Green a lot,

652
00:41:29,800 --> 00:41:34,039
but the idea of like a healthy
ish or as healthy as he ever

653
00:41:34,079 --> 00:41:36,639
gets Hayward on the MAVs, it
makes a lot of sense to me.

654
00:41:36,679 --> 00:41:38,639
It's just, you know, the
MAVs have changed a little bit how they

655
00:41:38,679 --> 00:41:44,239
played. It's still Luca you know, almost all the time, but another

656
00:41:44,320 --> 00:41:47,119
guy like Hayward really does move the
ball well and he's been a good shooter.

657
00:41:47,199 --> 00:41:50,800
It's just like, are we what
are we are we chasing a version

658
00:41:50,840 --> 00:41:52,960
of Hayward that's never gonna exist again? Like that's a concern. And then

659
00:41:53,559 --> 00:41:59,119
you know, depending on how the
MAVs want a time really hunting that real

660
00:41:59,159 --> 00:42:01,719
second guy. Having Haywards thirty one
and a half million on the books next

661
00:42:01,800 --> 00:42:07,559
year is get more valuable to have, let's say the smaller contracts with Davis

662
00:42:07,599 --> 00:42:10,480
McGee and Tim Hardaway Junior to move
with. Let's say they're pick conveys to

663
00:42:10,480 --> 00:42:15,000
the Knicks their best offer, and
I think it'll pay on comparison to others

664
00:42:15,039 --> 00:42:17,880
because they don't have Josh Green and
Jane Like those aren't blue chit prospects.

665
00:42:19,519 --> 00:42:23,159
But are those salaries plus four first
and three swaps better than let's say,

666
00:42:23,159 --> 00:42:28,800
Gordon Hayward's one salary four first and
three. Like it's cleaner with Hayward,

667
00:42:29,039 --> 00:42:32,679
But teams might prefer the maaluability of
just having the smaller deals. It's just

668
00:42:32,719 --> 00:42:37,199
that Haywards also comes off the books, dobas for Tom's and Tim's Hardaway juniors

669
00:42:37,239 --> 00:42:42,719
do not. Yeah, I think
normally you'd want more pieces in the mid

670
00:42:42,800 --> 00:42:45,440
tier salary ranges because it's just easier
to do stuff with those, But the

671
00:42:45,440 --> 00:42:49,920
fact that you know, talking about
next year thirty one and a half expiring,

672
00:42:50,599 --> 00:42:53,039
that's just that's one you dump on
some team with cap space if you

673
00:42:53,119 --> 00:42:57,360
need to and throw a pick in
there, or you use it as in

674
00:42:57,559 --> 00:43:02,199
to aggregate and get like some crazy
you know star that wants out like That's

675
00:43:02,239 --> 00:43:09,719
so if you're we're getting way away
from Charlotte, I guess because Alice wants

676
00:43:09,760 --> 00:43:14,360
to package him with something to the
Wizards to get Bradley Beal and the Wizards

677
00:43:14,360 --> 00:43:19,159
say this is we don't have to
pay anybody after this year. That's appealing,

678
00:43:19,519 --> 00:43:23,199
But but we're three We're three trades
down down the pipeline at this point.

679
00:43:23,400 --> 00:43:27,760
I'm happy that you have this next
team. Yeah, because I didn't

680
00:43:27,760 --> 00:43:30,760
want them. I got the Bulls. This is from Everything Blacks. The

681
00:43:30,760 --> 00:43:35,559
bull situation isn't completely unsalvageable, is
it? This year might be lost,

682
00:43:35,599 --> 00:43:37,960
but the roster seems closer to eating
a few tweaks rather than a full tear

683
00:43:38,000 --> 00:43:45,239
down. Disagree. Uh So this
is a win now roster, and you

684
00:43:45,320 --> 00:43:49,039
have to call it a win now
roster just not just because of the age

685
00:43:49,079 --> 00:43:52,719
of like the Rosan Vukovich, but
because of the pick equity that was given

686
00:43:52,800 --> 00:43:54,880
up to sort of put this roster
together to win. Now, roster that's

687
00:43:54,880 --> 00:43:59,719
not winning. They're they're okay lately, you know they they're four and three

688
00:43:59,719 --> 00:44:05,000
in there last seven. They've had
worse stretches. Unsalvageable was a strong term,

689
00:44:05,000 --> 00:44:07,039
but it applies here because if what
you're attempting to salvage is like an

690
00:44:07,039 --> 00:44:10,519
Eastern Conference contender, that's just not
here. It's more, it's not just

691
00:44:10,599 --> 00:44:15,679
tweaks, it's the principles are not
good enough, and the you know,

692
00:44:15,719 --> 00:44:20,639
the role players are you know,
secondary, they're ancillary to the real problems,

693
00:44:20,639 --> 00:44:22,920
which is you're paying a bunch of
money to players that are supposed to

694
00:44:22,920 --> 00:44:25,480
be your best guys and they're just
not They're not good enough, they don't

695
00:44:25,480 --> 00:44:30,280
fit well enough together. There's reports
that Levine and de Rozen have had friction,

696
00:44:30,079 --> 00:44:34,719
players only meeting stuff that's all driven
by your best players, Like,

697
00:44:34,800 --> 00:44:37,800
no ninth man is the one that's
saying we got to sit down in the

698
00:44:37,840 --> 00:44:40,599
locker room and hash this out because
I don't get along with the twelfth Man.

699
00:44:40,719 --> 00:44:44,519
It's not that's not how it works. So you have hope that happened.

700
00:44:44,679 --> 00:44:46,239
I really hope that that happens all
the time in the NBA, because

701
00:44:46,239 --> 00:44:52,760
that's great. So, yeah,
I like, are the tweaks that you

702
00:44:52,840 --> 00:44:57,119
get, you know, hypothetically Bonzo
Ball is magically back and he's the connector

703
00:44:57,159 --> 00:45:00,360
that's been missing and the second perimeter
defender it's been missing. Maybe I don't

704
00:45:00,400 --> 00:45:05,039
know if that's a tweak. At
this point, you need a defensive anchor.

705
00:45:05,159 --> 00:45:08,199
Vuchovich ain't that guy. You need
Pat Williams to be better. You

706
00:45:08,199 --> 00:45:12,440
need him to have a usage rate
above like fourteen percent, and you need

707
00:45:12,519 --> 00:45:15,039
him. You know, he's shooting
forty percent from deep, but he just

708
00:45:15,079 --> 00:45:19,679
doesn't it's such a like a hack
criticism, but like he just doesn't do

709
00:45:19,880 --> 00:45:22,599
enough. It's just there if you
watch him, they are long stretches on

710
00:45:22,599 --> 00:45:27,119
both ends of the over were you
just don't feel him right. So and

711
00:45:27,159 --> 00:45:30,480
it's great if you shoot forty percent
on low volume and you can defend,

712
00:45:30,760 --> 00:45:35,320
but it's just that's just that's not
fourth pick stuff, especially you know,

713
00:45:35,360 --> 00:45:37,119
a couple of years into the into
the career, even if he's missed time.

714
00:45:38,000 --> 00:45:43,719
So I don't feel like tweaks are
are are the issue? Just a

715
00:45:43,719 --> 00:45:46,920
couple of things because this is usually
more your territory. But so like,

716
00:45:47,840 --> 00:45:52,360
if if this isn't it, if
this is unsalvageable, Lavine's the guy that's

717
00:45:52,360 --> 00:45:53,760
got to go. It can't because
he's gonna bring you back the most.

718
00:45:55,239 --> 00:45:59,559
You can't do it till January fifteenth. But like, where are the teams

719
00:45:59,559 --> 00:46:02,000
that are saying, we've gotta have
Zach Lavine at that number, like just

720
00:46:02,079 --> 00:46:07,000
gotta well, we're backing up the
truck for him. It's like Miami just

721
00:46:07,039 --> 00:46:10,760
because they hunt stars. I don't
think Lowry and a pick gets you like

722
00:46:10,880 --> 00:46:14,719
anywhere close. You got to throw
in more stuff, and the Heat just

723
00:46:14,880 --> 00:46:17,800
are still a little short on assets. The Clippers again, just because you

724
00:46:17,800 --> 00:46:22,679
can throw Norman Powell and Filler and
they can move some distant like twenty eight,

725
00:46:22,719 --> 00:46:27,719
twenty nine firsts like that. I
don't know. Orlando definitely needs a

726
00:46:27,719 --> 00:46:30,719
guard that can score and they could
throw Isaac and Suggs and Bomba and give

727
00:46:30,719 --> 00:46:35,960
back that twenty three first. Let's
have these two teams deal again and maybe

728
00:46:36,000 --> 00:46:39,159
another like it's just how many we'll
get to this with the Knicks because I'm

729
00:46:39,159 --> 00:46:44,920
gonna bring up Lavine again, but
I just don't know where I don't know

730
00:46:45,000 --> 00:46:49,559
where the team is. That says
we're going to replenish your draft assets and

731
00:46:49,599 --> 00:46:52,519
give you, you know, not
terrible salary because we've gotta have zach Lavine

732
00:46:52,519 --> 00:46:57,239
and we've got to have him at
the deadline. So that's that's ultimately the

733
00:46:57,280 --> 00:47:00,519
biggest challenge. And that's like,
that's not a tweak, that's a you

734
00:47:00,559 --> 00:47:04,039
know, a fundamental how do we
fix this team question? Yeah, and

735
00:47:04,119 --> 00:47:07,960
Zach Levine has been a lot better
lately too, but his knees are super

736
00:47:07,960 --> 00:47:10,079
concerning. Like you said, he's
younger than Bradley Beale, I think by

737
00:47:10,119 --> 00:47:14,679
a year or two, but the
cot and he's cheaper, but the contract

738
00:47:14,760 --> 00:47:17,320
is still like four years out.
On that as a concern, I think

739
00:47:17,360 --> 00:47:22,079
Miami's a smart one. I kind
of thought about Brooklyn build stuff around Ben

740
00:47:22,119 --> 00:47:24,760
Simmons and all the picks that you
have in your cachet now. And if

741
00:47:24,760 --> 00:47:28,159
you don't know that Kyrie's going to
be there long term, is that something

742
00:47:28,559 --> 00:47:31,159
you look at. Toronto could use
him. I don't know what they would

743
00:47:31,159 --> 00:47:34,760
be willing to give up for him
and does he fit into the project six

744
00:47:34,880 --> 00:47:37,320
nine whatever they're trying to do,
But you would have to put you know,

745
00:47:37,360 --> 00:47:40,880
why do the Bulls want Fred van
Fleet? And that's Fred van Fleet.

746
00:47:40,960 --> 00:47:45,360
In that scenario, you're gonna have
to probably use Ogan and Obi or

747
00:47:45,400 --> 00:47:49,159
Scotty Barnes. And I wouldn't trade
Scotty Barnes for I might even trade Ojan

748
00:47:49,239 --> 00:47:52,239
and Obi for him at this point. And I think that's what's complicated to

749
00:47:52,239 --> 00:47:57,840
me is I think that Zach Lavine
is still an exceptional player, and that

750
00:47:58,079 --> 00:48:00,599
the fact that he's been better gives
the Bulls hope. And then if you

751
00:48:00,639 --> 00:48:06,039
look at the core of DeRozan,
Caruso, Lonzo and Lavine next season,

752
00:48:06,599 --> 00:48:10,639
like that's real, But how are
you building upon that now? Bohich has

753
00:48:10,639 --> 00:48:14,280
been fine this season. I just
don't know that he's the answering the long

754
00:48:14,360 --> 00:48:17,000
term. Like you don't have your
own all in trade package to go anymore.

755
00:48:17,119 --> 00:48:21,719
Like the Patrick Williams mysterity is worn
off detO with Kobe White. I

756
00:48:21,760 --> 00:48:24,440
would assume it would be super valuable
to someone as for sure, but like

757
00:48:24,840 --> 00:48:28,440
you've hamstrung yourself with the amount of
picks that you can give up, and

758
00:48:28,440 --> 00:48:30,280
so how do you It's even if
the Bulls are better than this, which

759
00:48:30,280 --> 00:48:34,480
were the healthy Lonzo and Zach Ldn
playing the way he is now, and

760
00:48:34,519 --> 00:48:37,800
if they start beating teams that they
should beat rather than just getting up against

761
00:48:37,800 --> 00:48:40,639
the good opponents, they should be
better than this. But we talk about

762
00:48:40,639 --> 00:48:44,519
what's the hawks ceiling over the next
three years. I think the Bulls ceiling

763
00:48:44,599 --> 00:48:46,760
is lower than the Hawks, in
part because they're probably even less valuable when

764
00:48:46,760 --> 00:48:51,880
you look at the trade market to
buy than Atlanta would be. Yeah,

765
00:48:52,000 --> 00:48:55,199
I agree with that, is that
itight on Chicago. That's all I got.

766
00:48:55,719 --> 00:49:00,199
So that brings us up to a
call Eveland. So we have I

767
00:49:00,199 --> 00:49:02,960
should probably loop a few of these. Let's loop this first two together.

768
00:49:04,079 --> 00:49:08,400
On Donovan Mitchell, Ippo Ougi Flirk
asked, when did you realize that Donovan

769
00:49:08,440 --> 00:49:12,679
Mitchell is the greatest Cavalier of all
time? And stupid Jerk asked, can

770
00:49:12,719 --> 00:49:16,199
we get a heat check on the
Donovan Mitchell on whether Dono Mitchell can or

771
00:49:16,199 --> 00:49:23,079
can't be the best player on a
championship contender? Take So what's interesting about

772
00:49:23,119 --> 00:49:25,960
that is I don't know where either
of us landed on whether we thought he

773
00:49:25,960 --> 00:49:29,119
could be the best player on the
contended to leading into the season. I

774
00:49:29,159 --> 00:49:32,519
do think we both thought Darius Garland
was going to be the Calv's best player

775
00:49:32,599 --> 00:49:37,639
this year and that long term it
would be Evan Mobley. I started to

776
00:49:37,679 --> 00:49:42,000
recalibrate a little bit on how obviously
Dono Mitchell has been better than Darius Garland

777
00:49:42,039 --> 00:49:45,440
at this point and he is the
best player for what. I was listening

778
00:49:45,440 --> 00:49:49,639
to Chase Down podcast and reaction to
his seventy one point game, and Justin

779
00:49:49,760 --> 00:49:52,400
rowan friend of the podcast, Excellent
what he does, said that he didn't

780
00:49:52,440 --> 00:49:55,719
really questify the Cavs is like one
of those foremost contenders. I might be

781
00:49:55,760 --> 00:50:00,519
there for them, and Donov Mitchell
is already their best player. If he

782
00:50:00,599 --> 00:50:05,000
can't be maybe he can't be the
best player on a universal contender, but

783
00:50:05,079 --> 00:50:07,519
the way that the Calves are built, he can absolutely be the best player

784
00:50:07,760 --> 00:50:10,639
on this version of a title team. He's shooting lights out on off the

785
00:50:10,679 --> 00:50:14,960
dribble threes. It'd be nice if
they played a little bit faster at points,

786
00:50:15,039 --> 00:50:17,639
not just in transition but in the
half court. But he's so good

787
00:50:17,639 --> 00:50:22,159
at playing off of others as well. And numerous people have said this,

788
00:50:22,199 --> 00:50:23,599
and I didn't watch in real time. I took the night off because it

789
00:50:23,679 --> 00:50:29,199
was my birthday and I'm vain as
fuck, but going back and watching like

790
00:50:29,280 --> 00:50:31,760
there was nothing in organic about the
seventy one points, basically like he had

791
00:50:31,800 --> 00:50:37,320
what do you have tennisis lemnosis and
they very much needed Garland wasn't playing,

792
00:50:37,360 --> 00:50:38,480
Mobile, wasn't playing, so they
needed him to have that role. But

793
00:50:38,519 --> 00:50:43,480
he's so much more adaptable than I
think people gave him credit for in Mars,

794
00:50:43,559 --> 00:50:46,679
part because Utah they had like these
tertiary guys, but they were always

795
00:50:46,679 --> 00:50:51,760
either like two middle rung or towards
the tail end of their primes. And

796
00:50:52,079 --> 00:50:57,039
Mike Conley or like I said,
Joe Angels or Boyanmardonovitch, like they're ball

797
00:50:57,079 --> 00:51:01,000
handling specialists or secondary options when they
are another I'm mary. So his adaptability

798
00:51:01,079 --> 00:51:02,920
is really shining through here, and
yes it helps it. He gives a

799
00:51:02,960 --> 00:51:07,320
damn on defense again, So I
don't know. I don't know where I

800
00:51:07,400 --> 00:51:09,320
landed on the take leading and I'll
probably say that I didn't think he could

801
00:51:09,320 --> 00:51:13,159
be the best player on a contender, but I thought he made the Calves

802
00:51:13,199 --> 00:51:15,559
a contender. I will update my
take to say I believe the Calves are

803
00:51:15,599 --> 00:51:20,000
a real threat to come out of
the East now and Loan Donovan Mitchell is

804
00:51:20,039 --> 00:51:24,480
their best player. Yeah, I
think when we talked about him shortly after

805
00:51:24,519 --> 00:51:29,880
the trade, I know that I
thought that this is a good trade.

806
00:51:30,400 --> 00:51:32,679
But the version of the Calves that
wins the title has Evan Mobley as their

807
00:51:32,679 --> 00:51:36,920
best player. And I'm starting,
I mean, as I'm trending up on

808
00:51:37,039 --> 00:51:39,320
Mitchell as like, yeah, because
of what you said, if your other,

809
00:51:39,440 --> 00:51:45,280
if your other like secondary players are
have been All Stars and could be

810
00:51:45,400 --> 00:51:49,119
All Stars again and are young and
are going to develop like that, maybe

811
00:51:49,159 --> 00:51:51,800
that gets you away from we've got
to have a top five, top ten

812
00:51:51,840 --> 00:51:53,400
guy. If Donovan Mitchell is like
the twelfth best player in the league,

813
00:51:53,440 --> 00:51:59,960
that's maybe enough. Provided that the
Calves do figure out the small forward spot

814
00:52:00,360 --> 00:52:04,400
and just get a big wing that
can guard and make threes like that,

815
00:52:04,400 --> 00:52:07,039
that to me is still the missing
piece. But like, I don't want

816
00:52:07,039 --> 00:52:12,239
to take anything away because so much
of what we look at in well can

817
00:52:12,320 --> 00:52:15,840
this guy be the guy on a
title winner is when things slow down and

818
00:52:15,880 --> 00:52:21,760
you need buckets late in games like
that's a that's a signature skill. And

819
00:52:22,039 --> 00:52:24,400
if you're in an account for ninety
nine points in a game with your seventy

820
00:52:24,440 --> 00:52:28,559
one points and you're eleven assists,
Like, I feel like that question is

821
00:52:28,599 --> 00:52:30,760
kind of answered. If you need
a bucket, Mitchell, I think,

822
00:52:30,840 --> 00:52:35,840
is as good an option, you
know, short of the absolute Kevin Durant,

823
00:52:36,039 --> 00:52:39,199
Steph Curry's, Luca's as bad as
good as you're gonna get in that

824
00:52:39,320 --> 00:52:44,679
regard. So yeah, I think
or do we need to recalibrate as a

825
00:52:44,679 --> 00:52:46,960
fair question? But it all sort
of to me Hinges on the Calves being

826
00:52:47,039 --> 00:52:52,639
still just like one guy away there's
next question on the Cavs came from Luke

827
00:52:52,760 --> 00:52:55,960
Jay thirty seven. I saw Zach
Low say the Calves were looking for a

828
00:52:57,000 --> 00:52:59,840
short term wing option via trade who's
most gettable and who would be the best

829
00:53:00,199 --> 00:53:04,760
for them most gettables, like for
Concord mos so like something like. But

830
00:53:05,079 --> 00:53:07,760
so I said, I'm want to
do this later on with the Pacers,

831
00:53:07,800 --> 00:53:09,079
but can you will you play who
says no? With me? I came

832
00:53:09,159 --> 00:53:14,880
up with a few Cavs trades.
Okay, carous leavert for Marcus Morris.

833
00:53:16,800 --> 00:53:21,360
That's just a good trade. I'm
I don't I don't think anybody says no

834
00:53:21,440 --> 00:53:25,400
to that because they're another creator.
I think that's valuable. I don't know

835
00:53:25,519 --> 00:53:30,039
it doesn't get weird with Reggie Jackson
John Wallavert on the same team, like

836
00:53:30,079 --> 00:53:31,559
you could maybe a little bit,
but that's a weak area of weakness.

837
00:53:31,599 --> 00:53:35,440
I do think that Morris might be
a little big and slow to guard the

838
00:53:35,440 --> 00:53:37,880
threes that he would theoretically up to
guard. But maybe Mobile makes that fine,

839
00:53:37,920 --> 00:53:43,199
and Alan makes that fine. I
like that trade. I'm carous Leavert

840
00:53:43,400 --> 00:53:46,440
and Isaaca Coro and two seconds for
Gary tren Jr. And a contract that

841
00:53:46,519 --> 00:53:51,559
Toronto's looking to dump, whether it's
Chris Bouchet or more likely Ken Birch.

842
00:53:54,719 --> 00:54:01,119
I think that if anybody says no
Toronto, well that's another two. I

843
00:54:01,159 --> 00:54:05,119
don't hate either of those because I
think Trent gives you some of the shooting

844
00:54:05,159 --> 00:54:07,960
and is at least disruptive defensively when
he's at his best. A little smaller

845
00:54:07,960 --> 00:54:13,159
than I want for that. That
three for the Cavs, But like from

846
00:54:13,199 --> 00:54:15,800
Toronto's perspective, you don't know if
you're going to have any control over Trent

847
00:54:15,920 --> 00:54:20,440
because of that player option, So
I think you take back a flyer on

848
00:54:20,480 --> 00:54:22,000
a Koro and whatever else you can. I think that makes total sense for

849
00:54:22,039 --> 00:54:28,039
them too. This one is Cody
Martin has not come back from a knee

850
00:54:28,039 --> 00:54:30,039
injury yet. He's appeared in one
game this season, but he did just

851
00:54:30,119 --> 00:54:35,559
sign a contract basically at the what
was less not basically at the mid level,

852
00:54:35,639 --> 00:54:37,039
was less than the mid level exception. So he's under a team control

853
00:54:37,440 --> 00:54:40,960
for the next four years essentially if
you want him at no more than eight

854
00:54:40,960 --> 00:54:44,519
point seven million dollars. But again, he's playing one game this season.

855
00:54:44,880 --> 00:54:51,320
So Cody Martin for Dylan Windler and
Lamar Stevens and if there's a second round

856
00:54:51,320 --> 00:54:53,400
pick that needs to go in there. My gut instinct with Cleveland might say

857
00:54:53,400 --> 00:54:58,000
no because they seem to really like
Lamar Stevens. But you can sprinkle in

858
00:54:58,679 --> 00:55:00,840
other money. It's not gonna be
Dean Wade like you could get. What

859
00:55:00,840 --> 00:55:05,639
would you do even you know Isaaco
Coro for Cody Martin straight up you could

860
00:55:05,639 --> 00:55:07,960
do? Who says not? I
mean, I'd rather have Caleb. Can

861
00:55:07,960 --> 00:55:10,760
we just make can we can we
pull some Shenanigans and have it be Caleb

862
00:55:10,800 --> 00:55:14,719
Martin. He's their only option at
the four side from Jimmy Butler now that

863
00:55:14,800 --> 00:55:16,639
Yovich is injured, and I guess
they have Haywood Highsmith too, But still

864
00:55:17,480 --> 00:55:22,119
yeah, No, I have Martin's
not playing as as a factor. And

865
00:55:22,440 --> 00:55:24,719
for do they like Lamar Stevens the
Cavs or is it just like he's the

866
00:55:24,760 --> 00:55:28,639
only guy that we can throw out
there that's just gonna guard really hard.

867
00:55:29,000 --> 00:55:30,480
I think I would prefer for with
him to just get off Isaaco Coro for

868
00:55:30,559 --> 00:55:34,599
Cody Martin. I'm not gonna lie. Yeah, I think the I think

869
00:55:34,639 --> 00:55:36,960
we know what we know all we
need to know about a Coro at this

870
00:55:37,000 --> 00:55:42,320
point. I think I have a
couple more here. Okay, So would

871
00:55:42,320 --> 00:55:46,559
you do Van Fournier, Cam Reddish
and two seconds for Lavert and Dylan Windler?

872
00:55:49,559 --> 00:55:52,599
I don't think so. I think
the Cavs say no, they're Fournier

873
00:55:52,679 --> 00:55:55,360
feels like dead money and like is
it a flyer on Reddish? If this

874
00:55:55,440 --> 00:55:59,840
is now, you know, let's
take a shot on him. Is he

875
00:55:59,880 --> 00:56:02,039
a third draft guy? Now?
I don't know how much stock I could

876
00:56:02,039 --> 00:56:07,719
put in Reddish anymore? Would you
do Dylan Windler and Isaaca Coro for Gary

877
00:56:07,760 --> 00:56:14,159
Harris? Mmm? I think I
probably would. I still feel like I

878
00:56:14,199 --> 00:56:17,960
think maybe I'm just a little too
too rosie about Gary Harris. I still

879
00:56:17,960 --> 00:56:22,440
think he's denver Gary Harris. That
just backcuts really well off Yokich. But

880
00:56:22,760 --> 00:56:24,800
I think I think Orlando says no, I would trade. If Orlando would

881
00:56:24,840 --> 00:56:29,480
do it, I would do Carris
Labert for Gary Harris and if they want

882
00:56:29,519 --> 00:56:32,639
to include another money in there to
match it up. But it works financially,

883
00:56:34,760 --> 00:56:37,519
yeah, I think that does give
because again we've talked about it a

884
00:56:37,519 --> 00:56:40,639
lot. Lavert's just kind of superfluous
with Mitchell and Garland and you don't really

885
00:56:40,679 --> 00:56:45,159
need that much more superfluous with markol
Foltz and Colin Anthony and pal Bean Carol

886
00:56:45,159 --> 00:56:47,679
a little bit too though, a
little bit, But I think, don't.

887
00:56:47,719 --> 00:56:52,159
I think I think Leavert's probably a
better offensive player than Faults, But

888
00:56:52,239 --> 00:56:55,159
I mean, I mean not that
that's like maybe not this season. I

889
00:56:55,159 --> 00:56:59,440
think Faults is definitely the better game
manager, oh for sure. Yeah,

890
00:56:59,559 --> 00:57:02,599
I guess Lavert Lavert's just a six
man to me that I wish could shoot

891
00:57:02,599 --> 00:57:07,119
a little better. And here is
one that I came up with in light

892
00:57:07,159 --> 00:57:12,079
of the Devin Booker injury, Landry
Shammitt and Jay Crowder for Cais Labert.

893
00:57:13,480 --> 00:57:15,880
I'm definitely doing that if I'm the
Calvs. So I guess I guess it's

894
00:57:17,599 --> 00:57:21,480
I guess it's the sun saying no
if I have to pick one, although

895
00:57:21,480 --> 00:57:22,920
how much better your offer is gonna
get for Crowder At this point, I

896
00:57:23,360 --> 00:57:25,760
just is there are there any offers
at all? And I don't know.

897
00:57:25,880 --> 00:57:29,760
Landry Shammon's had some higher moments,
but I don't know if people want the

898
00:57:29,880 --> 00:57:31,639
you know, the longer term money
that's left on his deal. I'm like

899
00:57:31,679 --> 00:57:37,719
the shooting that Landry Shammit provides will
probably actually help Cleveland. Yeah, no,

900
00:57:37,840 --> 00:57:39,280
I think that's right. It's certainly
more than I mean, Lavert has

901
00:57:39,280 --> 00:57:43,920
shot it, okay, but I
just does anybody nobody's afraid of him,

902
00:57:43,960 --> 00:57:46,280
you know, catch and shoot?
I just I don't see that going to

903
00:57:46,280 --> 00:57:50,519
cut in here. That'll do it
for Part one of our Eastern Conference Mailbag.

904
00:57:50,519 --> 00:57:52,480
Be on the lookout for Part two. It'll come out the immediately the

905
00:57:52,559 --> 00:57:55,239
day after this. It's coming out
on the Part one's coming out on a

906
00:57:55,880 --> 00:57:59,440
Thursday. It's the next one.
I'll come out on a Friday. As

907
00:57:59,480 --> 00:58:01,880
always, please remember to rate reviews, subscribe to us wherever you consume us,

908
00:58:01,880 --> 00:58:06,360
subscribe on YouTube, tell people about
us. Join our discord links in

909
00:58:06,400 --> 00:58:09,000
the podcast and YouTube description, follow
us on all the socials at Hardwood Knox

910
00:58:09,079 --> 00:58:15,679
on TikTok, Twitter and YouTube of
course, and then Hardwood Underscore Knox on

911
00:58:15,719 --> 00:58:19,599
Instagram until next time, And as
always, we rode the apology to Jared

912
00:58:19,639 --> 00:58:21,679
Allen and also shout out to Frank
Niela Kina
