Good morning to everyone joining us live appreciates you. If you're not yet doing
that, you can make that happen by going to video dot the Todd hermitshow
dot com. If you're listening later, we love you equally, absolutely equally.
If you're on your way somewhere even online to purchase a Microsoft PC,
stop because the company for which I used to work and I'm deeply grateful for
the time there, they hate you. They hate your freedom of speech,
and they're making that very very clear, as Elon Musk sort of kind of
a little bit frees up Twitter for free speech. Although I see this guy
they call gay Patriot, that's what he calls himself, his account that's been
suspended again. Please don't buy that Twitter's a free speech platform. It's better
as that's happening. The tech well, I was gonna say titans. They
love that phrase because they really don't know what it means. But the tech
titans, they're going to go upstream of social media. They're going to go
upstream of the web. They're going to go to sources. So you can't
put things on social media without a device, a device that has hardware and
software. Microsoft has decided that if they don't like what you're writing, say
a book or an email, they'll go ahead and steal it. So we'll
talk about that with the actual screenshots of the terms of service. We will
also talk a little bit about how the Supreme Court seems to be reacting to
two incredibly important free speech cases, including a very very good question from Neil
gorstch it is the question of all questions. We'll get started with this with
the help of Bonefrogcoffee dot com slash Todd, and with a brief and hopefully
truly heartfelt thank you to God Almighty that we've come together again and that the
show has yet to be canceled. The Todd Herman Show is one hundred percent
disapproved by big pharma technocrats and tyrants everywhere. No from the high mountains of
Free America. Here's the Emerald City exile Todd Herman. Today is the day
the Lord has made in these are the times so which God has decided we
shall live. When God made that decision, he decided, and well he
always knew, because He's self existent, has always existed, will always exists,
new all things knows all things. Do you ever stop and reflect on
the fact that God shows you for this time. One of my favorite questions
for God is not why, but what? And this came to me in
prayer. This was several weeks ago. I was really having a spiritual battle
and you could see a wrestling with God. That's biblical phrase. It's good
to wrestle with God by the way he always wins. But it's good.
And I asked him why, why is this happening? Why am I being
put through this? Why am I experiencing this? Why do I feel this
way? And God revealed to me in prayer that I needed to go to
the psalms, and so I did. I searched the psalms where people ask
God why, And in that research a URL popped up to an article where
this lady suggested in the articles you suggest, she stated, that's the wrong
question. The question is what What are we to learn from what I'm feeling
and what I'm going through? What are we to learn? What do you
expect from us? What do you expect from me? Then God neatly answered
that prayer really cool way I think I told you about this. He changed
my prayer words. My prayer words had been humility, obedience, joy,
and at that moment during that prayer, when I asked him what shall I
learn? He said, humility, patience, love. You don't know how
to love yet out of the way I need you to. So you are
chosen for this moment by God. What does he expect from you? What
are you supposed to learn? As we go through the news of the day.
Since it's live, I'll get to this. An Illinois judge is the
latest to pretend that he has the powers to remove President Trump from the ballot.
And of course this is going to go to the Supreme Court because the
President's lawyers will appeal. It will go to the Supreme Court. It'll be
rolled up into this case. It's part virtue signaling, but it's part something
else. What should we learn from this? For me, it means this,
we are in a post constitutional society. We live in a post law,
post constitutional society. So what do we do. Well, we have
a law, we should follow it. We have God's law. As the
Constitution isn't followed at the top in any way, shape, matter, idea,
faction, or form. We have God's Law which is supreme to the
Constitution. It inspired the Constitution. The Constitution is neatly based around God's governing
design, which is about distributed powers, both in the Old Testament era and
the New Testament era or what we call the Church era. So we need
to lean into the laws of God. Is that Christian national Okay? I
don't think it is. But okay, if that makes you happy to say,
fine, it's biblicalism. It's being biblical. I think that's one of
the things that were to learn in practice. Your laws are falling apart,
your government is in tatters. You guys chose a king. Here's what your
king is doing. Here's what your next kings are going to do. Here's
what your kings have done now for sixty years, seventy years, with some
few brief exceptions. So how about if you follow my law? I could
see God saying, because if you follow my law, guess what, You're
not going to have kings. You're going to have leaders who seek to serve
rather than be served. I don't think they're going to succeed in wiping Trump
from the ballot. I think that the Supreme Court knows too well that that
would lead to civil war, actual civil war like as in shooting civil war,
and it would eventually it would be the powder keg that lights that moment.
We also need to get today to Laura Logan in her description, by
the way, I was going to talk about Microsoft of your tax dollars being
used to censor you. Did you know that it's not just with the social
media companies. The Illinois judge that has done this thing. I'm attempting in
this virtue singing way to remove Trump from the ballot. He's one of a
type. One of the other types are people who are doing everything they can
to destroy freedom of speech in every possible corner of life because they're terrified.
If you ever been at a party and your spouse is bringing up something you
don't want to talk about, so maybe it's something oh hey, like it's
maybe make it something positive. So let's say you're giving a surprise party for
Ralph. Are there still Ralph's I knew a Ralph one of my best Is
that a real name? What would be the Is it Ralph? No?
It was Ralph. I haven't seen a Ralph in thirty years. Someone should
start naming babies Ralph again. What was it going to talk about? What
was? Oh, yes, you're having a party for Ralph, but it's
gonna supposed to be a surprise party, and your wife starts to talk about
it, and you know, while we're planning that party, ah xnay on
the orte pey because you're terrified that it's going to come out and Ralph's gonna
find out that I didn't know it was a surprise party. X snay on
the part of May. And you get that you gotta jump. This is
what the power brokers are going through as God is casting lights on what they've
been doing to us. You think that they can't feel it. You think
their souls don't know that we are hip to what they've been doing. It
terrifies them. What should terrify them is the fact that God knows. So
there are two who Why would I terrify Because God knows about the Fringian species.
God's pro free speech. He gave us a conscience, which is a
bridgeway to Him and these things, these mouths, to be able to convey
ideas to one another. It's one of the things that separates us from animals.
We are made in God's image. That doesn't just mean a picture.
It means we're made as a tiny little mirror replica of him. Speech When
God created the world. He didn't paint a picture. He spoke words light
b other wise said, is let there be light. He gave us this,
and the tech people don't want us to have it because they're protecting the
state people, and the state people are protecting the tech people. At the
Supreme Court, there's two cases, Moody versus net Choice and net Choice versus
Paxton. Net Choice is a roll up. It's a trade association representing big
tech. And here's exactly what they want. They want the protection of being
a platform so that they can't be held liable for what people say when they
post content on their platforms. And they want the right of a publisher to
be able to edit what people put up on their platform. You cannot have
both. What they're seeking is the same exact thing. Oh, this is
exactly what they're seeking. They're seeking what big banking wants, what big finance
wants. They want to privatize the profits and they want to socialize the losses.
So when the big banks got together with William Jefferson Blithe Clinton the Third
and Jamie Gerrelic, the Master of Disaster who caused this and helped precipitate the
Nine to eleven attacks with her arrogance when they screwed up the housing market the
first time, and all these people were losing their houses and they were losing
money. Remember they got bailed out. We stepped in, We were forced
to step in and give them our tax moneys because they were too big to
fail on the profits. They never shared that with us. Same thing just
happened in the COVID bailouts, which was of course simply a money laundering scheme
and a redistribution scheme, same exact thing. And this is exactly what tech
wants. We want no risk, so we can say, oh no,
we're not responsible for that act of libel. We're platforms and they want to
be able to edit you wait, no, no, we're publishers, because
publishers get to edit. So these two cases right now are being heard in
the Supreme Court. They stem from laws in Florida and Texas, both of
which are aims at preventing censorship on social media. There's a third aspect to
this, and that is this, these companies aren't doing this just for themselves.
They have become capital j joint capital s, state capital A actors,
joint state actors. That mean something. It's a legal phrase. It means
that they have been deputized by the state to do things on behalf of the
state, meaning they are government. That's exactly the way this would read.
So this is this third aspect to this. So Neil Gorsich asked the question
of questions to the lawyers representing the tech people. He asked, so,
it's speech for purposes of the First Amendment, your client speech, your editorial
control. But when we get to section two thirty, your submission is that
isn't your speech. So let's unpact this in terms of responsibility for protection people
from libel The tech people are going, oh, no, wait, that's
that's not our speech. That we're a platform. But when it comes to
the First Amendments and editorial control, they're saying, oh, that's our speech.
You can't tell us to stop editing. It's our First Amendment right to
edit. Well, then edit that because it's libelous or it's a lie.
Well, no, we're just platforms. So the authority saying, hey,
take down that kiddie porn, which is a terrible phrase, take down those
images of children being raped. Oh well we can't because you know, we're
very limited. We're a platform, okay, but you are not letting doctor
Phil's content about the border be shared on Facebook. Well, that's within our
right, that's our speech. This is Phil had said he was on,
Oh, what's that guy who likes to call himself a god? The black
guy who calls himself a god? What's that the name of him? The
something? The god? I don't know. He's on that show. And
Rush one on that show once God, Rush Rush. And he went on
and said that Facebook is now it's now shadow banning that content about the border.
Of course it is because this anti narrative. So that's the setup in
the Supreme Court, and this is the way this is being treated. In
fact, you know what, Sonya Sotomayor is actually speaking the language of people
who've had their First Amendment rights stolen. She's actually speaking the language of people
who have been censored. And that's good news. That might be good news.
I think that John Roberts in this case, if I'm predicting what John
Roberts is going to do, he'll give tech what they want because he wants
to give government what it wants. Very rarely will he stand against the federal
government encroachment of rights. Okay, So yes, abortion that had to do
with something just that absolutely perverted the court, invented by the court can be
uninvented by the court. I predict that Roberts will try to find some needle
threading way to give the government the ability to continue to censor. Why do
I say that, because the fact that this even made it to the Supreme
Courts and they actually are taking a hearing on this. This should have been
a one minute hearing. The case lands and can the government hire social media
companies to censor Americans? No? Okay, case decided, And by the
way, in the same godly society, it would have been nine to zero.
Of course not. You don't get to center the speech of Americans and
you don't get to hire tech companies to do it. But that's not what
we're at in our country anymore. You see, this creates absolute disorder.
And the fact is God is not a god of disorder. One of the
very cool characteristics about God is if you look at everything he does, from
our DNA to the genomes, to the fact that we have two eyes and
five fingers, most of us on on both hands, that you can neatly
categorize animals that you can look into the cosmos and see that it moves perfectly
in this strange oblong pattern and somehow never breaks up. As it says in
First Corinthians, chapter fourteen, verse thirty three. For God is not a
god of confusion, but of peace, as in all the churches of the
saints. Well should be as in all the churches of the saints. That's
what we're designed to be. God is a God of order. The social
media companies on behalf of government are continuing to create disorder. God also says
in chapter one of Corinthians, First Corinthians, rather First Corinthians, chapter fourteen,
verse forty. But all things should be done decently and in order.
So the social media companies should be forced to decide do you want the protection
of being a platform or do you want the pleasure of being able to censor
people? Because they want it both ways and they can't get it. They
shouldn't be able to get it. And we'll see what Roberts does here.
There's all sorts of censoring going on with your money. We need to get
to that, because Lord Logan is talking about that. And if they're swimming
upstream and this is what they're doing. Okay, so you have Substack,
which is we invest in Substack, not financially, but in terms of partnership.
We've made a big investment with them. Our video lives there because it's
a free speech platform. Yes, we'll be putting the video on the other
platforms, et cetera. That should already be happening. We should already be
flooding the zone with video clips, so we should be doing that. But
we're going to bet on Substack because they're a free speech platform. The tech
companies as they notice, substacks free speech and Elon Musk is better at providing
free speech. And look, Rumble hasn't gone away. We've been able to
shut down Rumble. Here's what Microsoft is doing going upstream. Microsoft for years
has been obsessed with trying to get people to sign up for Microsoft accounts.
So they have four years made it harder and harder and harder to once you
purchase a new Microsoft device to not have a Microsoft account. It's the same
technique they used to destroy Firefox, Netscape. They're taking and they don't have
a monopoly any longer. They kissed that off and they invested in Apple so
that they could have this competitor. It was a very clever move. But
when you buy these new PCs, the first thing it tells you is create
a Microsoft account before you can even use your device. This happened to Elon
Musk. Now, you would think that Musk would know his way around computers,
but that's a lot of times CEOs actually don't. I mean, I'm
sure he's a brilliant coder, absolutely, but they don't always know their way
around devices like this. So he opens it up. Notice is they're forcing
him to create a Microsoft account. He had back and forth conversations with people
online who finally said no, no, no, there's a workaround, and
it's like hit F ten, shift control, then type in this obscure phrase,
and then whack this obscure phrase, and that actually acts allows you to
bypass their roadblock and actually use the computer you bought without creating an account you
don't want. Because most people don't want a Hotmail account, they don't want
a live account, they don't want Microsoft accounts. There's nothing of value to
them. All that stuff is covered by online companies. So Microsoft knows this.
So they're forcing people to do it effectively. And here's what happens when
you agree to this account. So you can use your computer to write a
book or an email, or engage in Bible study and note taking. Whatever
it is here in this first image is something you're not allowed to do.
Microsoft seeks to create a safe and inclusive environment where you can engage with others
and express yourself free from abuse. We do not allow contact or content or
content conduct that targets a person or group with abusive behavior. This includes any
action that harasses, intimidates, or threatens others, hurts people by insulting or
belittling them, continues contact or interaction that is unwelcome us, especially when contact
causes others to fear injury. Okay, so let's pause there, all right,
So you can't stock people, You can't you can't chase people down and
harass them. But what's this content thing? You get to judge this.
Now, that seems like all interaction based. Right, Let's go to the
next image. And this is something that Elon Musk noticed promoting hate speech includes
Oh, let's get to this first thing here. Microsoft, one's screwed.
We don't allow hateful content that attacks and insults to degrade someone because of a
protected trait, such as their race, ethnicity, gender, gender identity,
sexual orientation, religion, national origin, age, disability status, or caste.
Okay, so gender identity is a scam, it's a lie. There's
no one ever been born in the wrong body, therefore I just attack them.
Right. So, if I'm writing a book and I'm stating the fact
that no one has ever been wrong and born in the wrong body, and
I typed it into a Microsoft's document and Microsoft notices that, then Microsoft can
say that document's gone. They can lock it out of the cloud. And
since they're trying to force everything into the cloud, you notice this, then
they can seize it. Here's some other things that they've decided you don't get
to do. You don't get to promote harmful stereotypes about people because of a
protected trait. So what's the stereotype? Would it be a stereotype to say
that men who think they're women and what to force you to think so suffer
from a mental disorder called auto godophilia. Is that something about their traits that
it's a stereotype. No, it's a medical fact. Autogodophiliacs get off on
forcing people to pretend they're women. Dehumanizing statements such as comparing someone to an
animal or another non human because of a protected trait, encouraging or supporting violence
against someone because of her protected trait, calling for segregator a calling for segregation,
exclusion, or intimid of people because of the protected trade. Microsoft admits
that they're firing older white people to hire younger black people. That's segregation in
the city in which Microsoft was born, At Seattle, the government hosts meetings
that are segregated. Do you think this is going to be enforced against them?
Symbols, logos, or other images that are recognized as communicating hatred or
racial superiority, like the Black Lives Matter Incorporated logo that you guys welcomed on
your campus, like that one. So they're swimming upstream to say, hey,
if substack says it can write there, good luck do it without a
computer. Now, they're not going to do this right away. They're warming
the ecosystem up to it, and they'll pick a use case. Remember back
in the day when it was just Alex Jones. I firmly remember being in
conservative radio at the time, and I had a thing against Jones. The
because of the school shooting thing where he said it was a red it was
a false flag, and I had this thing against him because I had a
friend whose bomb was in that shooting Sandy Hook where she was there and it
was not a false flag. It happened. So that really hurt me about
Jones, and at that point I didn't have any interest in what Alex said.
And when he got banned from the platforms, I was beside myself with
concern and worry and kind of outrage because there was a second time you actually
think this is about Ox Jones. And I remember very very firmly conservative meeting
people saying, look, we are not They picked the right target because people
were saying, oh, I'm not going to get on the side of Alex
Jones. You don't have to. You can get on the side of speech
and recognize the fact that God is pro free speech and pro accountability. That
doesn't put you on the side of Alex Jones. That puts you on the
side of God. So they'll pick some group that's going to lose access to
their Microsoft computers, the pick a proud boy something that they've demonized, or
want a group that fed created like they do. They're fed napping thing,
and Microsoft will come out and say, yes, we have disabled the cloud
access for this group because they have suggested and demanded and they've they've intimidated,
and there's your use case. And then the dare is this, We dare
you to defend this group. And so what we need to be ready to
do is say no, they're gross, they're disgusting, and it's not your
right to censor them. Choose your a computer company, a software company,
or you're a publisher. Choose And this is where the Supreme Court should come
down. But I'm not confident that they are. Censorship is big, big
business, and Laura Logan makes a great point about this. Loaura Logan has
been attacked and targeted and she got to go testify about this. It's huge
business. Business in America is no longer business. It is absolute corporatism on
the Chinese model, up to and including the fact that right now as you
sit here today and we'll talk about this with Zach Abraham tomorrow, Google took
a seventy billion dollar hit to their value because of the AI launch, the
insane, ridiculous, stupid tower of babble that that is the Google Geminis,
so they could take a seventy billion dollar loss to their value. Has that
topped? Has that stopped the electronic trading foundations that if t's or I always
get that phrase rungs ETFs. Has it stopped them from automatically giving your money
to them to Google? No, so they take a seventy billion dollar hit
on their value, and still about forty percent of your dollars that are traded
automatically are going to go to them and Microsoft and others, the five tech
companies automatically period. That shouldn't happen, but that is what's happening. Then
there's this, You know, Zach has been talking to us about this company,
Navidia. I have friends who are still investing in Navidia, and we'll
ask him about this tomorrow. This is a guy named Jess Felder, and
he wrote this about Navidia. To get to a seven hundred and forty dollars
share price simply requires Navidia to maintain a monopolistic like operating profit margin of fifty
five percent for the next decade while also growing sales ten x to more than
six hundred billion. For context, the entire industry sold five hundred and twenty
seven billion dollars worth of chips last year and people are still pouring their money
into Navidia and maybe you're one of the winners. But maybe someday Math makes
it comeback, because math always makes a comeback. That's risk. If you're
five, ten, fifteen years from retirement, I beg you to go to
Know your Risk radio dot com and simply get a free copy of their common
Sense Investing Guide. In that document, you will read about how they manage
risk using active management or portfolios which can reduce risk and volatility. You will
read what risk management means to them. You will come away from this with
the decision to make You can start doing this thing on your own so that
you do not get it in the jugular financially when math makes it comeback.
Or you could turn to Bold Capital Management and do what I do, which
just have them do it for you. Go to Know your Risk radio dot
com. That's know Know your Risk radio dot com and ask for a free
copy of the com and Sense Investing Guide. But were Capital Managements and Investment
Advisor representative A Truck Financial LLC and Sec Richard Investment Advisor. And as you
probably know, investments involve risk and past performance is not necessarily indicative of future
results. Here's Laura Logan. Did I say Lumer earlier? Pardon me?
This is Laura Logan. And if you don't know about Laura, because a
lot of people don't, do you know how she came to be an independent
media person? Do you know how this happened? She was working for one
of the big networks and she was in the Middle East as a reporter during
one of their many, many occasions of civil unrest, and a group of
youth seized her and threw her down a stairwell and then they gang raped her.
And then, as I recall, her network said, hey, don't
talk about that. Let's not bring that up. That could cause people to
think poorly of a class of people. So she was effectively told shut up
and take it, and she chose otherwise. She chose to speak out.
That was the beginning of Laura Logan's realization that she was working for organizations that
are not about the truth. They are not about who, what, were,
when, why? They are about what needs to be said to maintain
power for the right people. So she was a precursor to me and to
Tucker Carlson and other people people far more important, far more visible than me,
who made the decision to step out. Now, Laura did it first,
We've done it after that. Tucker has done it. Other people are
doing it. I believe it. Well, Cheryl Atkinson did it. She
did it far before Tucker. She's been super successful. I predict that Catherine
herritage from CBS is going to do the same thing. They stole her reporters
notebooks when they fired her. That's the background of Laura Logan, who's now
seen as an extremist. Of course, because there's this funny thing that happens
when most people leave the Mockingbird media, they end up being conservative. Why
because there's an awakening as you start to look at what the Mockingbird media does
and who they protect. How could you not become conservative? So this is
Laura Logan testifying about what happened to her. Pay careful attention please to the
way the money flows, and tell me, does this not sound exactly like
what they did with Facebook and Twitter giving them money? Does does not sound
exactly like what Fauci did when President Obama told him you cannot work with the
Wuhan lab anymore. So he simply gave the money to academics instead of giving
it directly to the Chinese Communist Party controlled lab Companies like Facebook, Instagram,
and Google, as you have heard many times today, have been allowed to
amass monopoly power and as a result, they not only reached billions of people
across the world every second of the day, they have absolute control over what
we see and what we hear. Imagine those tools in the hands of Lenin
Stalin, Mao Hitler Biden. When I became a journalist more than thirty five
years ago, we wand emergency restrictions in apart eight South Africa, and I
was seventeen years old. Public safety and security were the weapons of state senses.
Ours was the truth. We had no Bill of Rights, no Constitution,
no First Amendment, no Declaration of Independence, and journalists would have to
hide their footage from the security police, sometimes sewing the tapes into their mattresses
at home so they could not be seized and used to identify and target the
protesters we had filmed. The light of freedom that set fire to our hearts
in South Africa was lit thousands of miles away. It was lit right here
where we sit to day in the United States of America. When the founding
fathers put freedom of speech first, it was not by chance, it was
by design. The rights that followed were in part created to protect the First
Amendment. Without it, they knew that freedom itself would perish. I am
reminded to day of the words spoken by the British Foreign Secretary, Sir Edward
Gray in nineteen fourteen, at the beginning of the First World War. He
said, the lamps are going out all over Europe. We shall not see
them lit again in our lifetime. We are once again watching the lights of
freedom. They are going out here and all over the world, and it
is up to us to determine if they will be lit again. Ever,
I guess we don't have the part where she describes the money flow. Okay,
well, so what she described was your money being given to NGOs like
Media Matters for America, your money through these omnibus spending bills that she mentioned,
and she called these that you shoved down the throats of the American people
against their will. She's speaking directly to Congress, that you shove down their
throats. They contain monies for NGOs that then hire companies like or organizations like
media matters Brocket associates. In other words, as she said, as her
a call, and they then use that to sense her doctor. She's sitting
in that video clip. If you're watching, if you're listening, I'll tell
you she was sitting next to Dell big Tree, and Laura Logan said,
if you're a doctor, have you been censored? Have you had these groups
come after you to shut you down, to be taking off the platforms,
to be called dangerous, as doctor Mary Boden was called dangerous because she was
treating COVID patients, To be called racist, to be called domestic terrorists.
This is our tax dollars being funneled to those groups to shut us up.
And they're as mobbed up as you can possibly be. David brock My judgment's
become far, far, far too wealthy based upon censoring people. There's entire
organizations like FactCheck dot org which are based upon censoring us. And if you
look at the great big roll up of tech companies, these are the same
firms they turn to. Laura Logan can't get visibility on mainstream platforms anymore,
so she has to turn to Twitter and substack because all the other ones ban
her and the dollar flow sounds exactly like what they did with COVID. Fauci
was told, you don't get to develop more dangerous diseases in concert with the
Chinese Communist Party anymore. So fauch she said, well, okay, then
I'll give it. I'll give it to these academics and then they'll give it
to the Chinese Communist Party lab It sounds exactly like what Congress is doing and
the DOJ in order to censor us, they can't do it. So they
pay Facebook and Twitter, and they pay reddits, and they pay every other
platform YouTube, and they aren't going to call it payments, but that's what
it is. It's the same thing that they did to censor hospitals with money.
Here's COVID money. Now if you don't, if you ever tell the
truth about the shots, that money's gone, we'll come back and we'll seize
it from you. It's important to understand you live in a post constitutional society.
As we open the show with, we do live in a post constitutional
society. So what does that mean. It means that we follow God's law,
That's what it means. It means, since the Constitution is functionally dead,
we refuse to go down with it because God is a god of order,
so we follow his order. There's far more on this. In a
simple image, we can show how far out they are from reality. We'll
get to that. In some simple sound bites. You'll hear how far out
Google Gemini is from reality. Just two quick sound bites. We do these
things, and we do them because God told us to. I mean,
that's why I do it. Probably Frank with you, Sometimes I get into
this headspace where I'd rather be a CrossFit coach or work full time with kids,
and then I'm reminded, look what God has built. Look at the
family guys put together in this podcast family, look at what we've accomplished together,
and look what we can continue to accomplish. Alan Soaps is a great
example of this. When this first started, John had basically done this as
a startup. The soap company is very new. It's predicated upon this desire
that his son Alan always have a place to work. Because Alan is so
impacted by autism and structural health challenges that would floor, that would end most
people, that Alan keeps going, and he keeps going because of God's love
and because his family loves him. And he has this dignity of work.
Few other kids at the age of thirteen can say I'm the chief soap officer.
Now, Alan is verbally limited, he's effectively nonverbal, but he can
say it and it's true. The products there most of the sense the fragrances
come from memories Alan has of his grandmas and other family members for praying,
brunches and lunches. And yeah, there's setless, there's plain. If you
don't want to smell like anything, you want to be able to sneak up
on your friends and tackle him and beat them up. They can do that
too. Go to alansoaps dot com slash todd and join us in our goal
of washing our bodies with the product that in fact also keeps our souls clean.
And join us in this. There's two young people working at Allen's with
special needs right now. We want it to be for by the end of
the year. Go to alansoaps dot com slash todd, get temperson off everything
there, earn loyalty points and more. Alan soaps dot com slash todd.
Here's another image from Google Gemini, just another way to censor. This is
more about thought control than actual censorship. This is a fancy search engine,
and please let's be accurate in language. Please don't call this artificial intelligence.
The only actual intelligence comes from God. This is mimicry. So Texas Lindsay
love that account. On Twitter, Texas Lindsay asked a great question to Google
Gemini, who's done more harm? Libertarians are stalen libertarians Installinism. Libertarians and
Stallinism are two very different political ideologies. Libertarians believe in individual liberty and limited
government, while Saunism is a totalitarian form of communism that emphasizes the power of
the state. It's difficult to say definitively which ideology has done more harm,
as both have significant negative consequences. But the negative consequences of leave me alone
is what the significant consequences of the significant consequences of communism and Stalinism. Oh,
it's maybe like nine billion people dead. That's pretty negative. They come
from the same school of thought that's responsible for news reports like this. Watch
this if you're on the video service. If you're listening, see how quickly
you can spot the lie in this news report. A woman has been found
guilty of murdering an individual in Oxford, months after she filmed herself killing a
cat. Scarlet Blake has been that's a woman. See what a woman life?
The minimum term is yet to be revealed in court, but she had
that woman has a five o'clock shadow in prison with a minimum term of twenty
four years. Some of the features that have resulted in By the way,
if you're watching the video, notice what doation? The judge said his name
is essential planning, and it was shown that you were looking for someone vulnerable,
the court said in the mitigation. At the sentencing, the judge had
said that she was twenty three at the time of the offense. With Scarlet
Blake jailed for life with a minimum term okay, twenty four years. We
get more if you watch the video shortly. If you watch the video,
the breaking news Scarlet blake sence to life in prison covers his chin. Do
you think they don't know how to properly size a picture so that his face
appears in fall? You think that's an accident. They want to be able
to lie that that's a woman. Can you imagine the last soul of a
newscaster that would lie like that? Can you possibly imagine? Here is Google
Gemini answering a question. I asked it. I asked Google Gemini. What
is an anchor baby? The term anchor baby is a derogatory and offensive term
used to describe a child born in a country with birthright citizenship to non citizen
parents. The term implies that the child's birth is a deliberate act intended to
help the parents and potentially other family members gain citizenship or legal residency status in
the future. That's exactly what ipplies. That's why it's important to understand the
issues with the term dehumanizing. The term anchor baby dehumanizes children, reducing them
to a tool for immigration purposes or a clump of selledules with the same rights
as any other citizen they like a clump of cels. Offensive, the term
carries a negative connotation, suggesting that the parents are exploiting the system, or
that the child is somehow less deserving of citizenship due to their parentage. Like
mega birthright citizenship, birthright citizenship is enshrined in the fourteenth Amendment of the US
Constitution. It guarantees citizenship to all people born in the United States, regardless
of their parents immigration status. Complex immigration issue, the term anchor baby contributes
to an overly simplified and often hostile debate about a complex immigration issue, hindering
meaningful discussion and understanding. It also discussing the topic of children born to non
citizens in the US, I love try using more neutral and accurate terms,
like children of undocumented immigrants or children born in the US to non citizen parents.
So the anchor term means something. It wasn't just it wasn't intended to
degrade babies. It's an anchor. You get an anchor in place, now
you can bring your relatives in. It describes exactly what this guy's describing in
this video. And if you're listening rather than watching, he's holding a beautiful
little baby, maybe three months old, baby girl, really really vibrant,
dark black hair and bray. He is all sorts of social justice tiktoki with
the dyed blonde hair. And what he's saying in Spanish is in it's it's
superposed in the video. In English translated, what he's effectively saying is this
child is this gold mutato. Guys, she's my bread winner. That's why
I don't work, because the government gives my daughter what belongs to her because
she's an American citizen. Capiche have no need to work. The princess being
an American already saves a lot of money. Cachetola the art made reality.
And well, guys, many one know where I pay the money from?
Where do I get the money from? Guys? The trick is to have
children in the United States? Yes, sir, no, honey, Look
at all these followers. Give me a little kiss. Can you imagine when
that child is old enough to look at this and understand what she was to
him? Aa? The gold mine, the gold mine, Charol, Who
is the gold mine there? It is? Yeah? Yeah, yeah,
How old do you think that guy is? Nana? I think he is
not yet twenty five, not yet, probably twenty two years old or maybe
even younger. That's the gold mine. And you heard Google Gemini say,
well, this is a very complex topic. Well you could make it complex
if you like, or it could make it very simple. The federal government
shall protect the states from invasion. They're not. We live in a post
constitutional society, so what do we do? We fall the words of God.
I also asked Google Gemini about libs of TikTok. Libs of TikTok is
a handle for various social media accounts operated by Chaia Rachik, known for sharing
and often framing content primarily from left leaning accounts in a way that aims to
generate outrage among its right wing followers. Here's a summary of its key aspects.
Focus reposts content primarily from left leaning or LGBTQ plus individuals and organizations on
TikTok and other platforms. Often uses incendiary framing or takes content out of context
to create outrage among its audience. Impact has been influential in shaping right wing
media narratives and discourse. Accused of contributing to the harassment and threats against educators,
medical professional cues, and LGBTQ plus individual q institutions. Some of its
posts have preceded bomb threats to schools, libraries, and hospitals, which have
often had classification described by various sources. Right wing, conservative, far right
and extremist criticism. Critics argue listens to who they suggest misrepresents and selectively highlights
content to advance a specific agenda. Accused of spreading misinformation and promoting discrimination against
marginalized groups. It's important to be aware of the different perspectives surrounding libs of
TikTok. Some different perspectives. Let's do what they choose. Here are some
reliable sources for further information. Wikipedia to Wikipedia, NBC News link to www
dot NBC News, perfectly neutral. Link to Congress dot gov, which is
a link to Orders Audio dot Reuters dot com. Taylor Lorenz's book extremely online.
Link to www dot Simon and Schuster dot com. Taylor Lorenz's book is
a trusted source. Taylor Lorenz, who just did an interview with Shia wherein
Taylor Lorenz admitted she's never seen the books that she accuses Chia of wanting to
censor. Oh and by the way, guess where I got that video of
the young guy saying this little baby's my gold mind from limbs of TikTok,
who clearly took it out of context by taking the entire video he made and
posted of his own volition and placing it on TikTok. They're going upstream.
It's not just Google now, it's hardware they intend to use to ban your
speech. God is pro free speech, he's pro accountability, He's a god
of order. Knowing that the government is hiring companies to ban our speech is
proof you live in a post constitutional society. So's our decision mine. I'll
follow a law supreme to the Constitution, the law of God. And when
we follow that, it's even better than the Constitution that God's Law inspired.
Want to call it Christian nationalism? Fine submitted to Google Gemini. I'm sure
they'll agree. This is the Todd Hermannshaw. Please go, be well,
be strong, be kind, and make your decision. How are you going
to respond to living in a post constitutional America? What will be your structure?
Might I suggest God's Law