Using free speech to free minds. You are listening to the David Knight Show.
As the clock strikes thirteen, It's Thursday, the eighteenth of April.
Hee're of our lord, twenty twenty four. Well, today we're going to
talk about the reauthorization of fizers. But of course it is more than a
reauthorization. It is a massive expansion. They're pushing for it to take place
by tomorrow and then they're going to ship this that's in the Senate. Of
course, the House has already proved it. So we're gonna take a look
at that. We're also going to take a look at the back and forth
about what was really happening in twenty twenty. Was it really just about the
lab? Is that what it truly is? Because that's what I keep seeing
featured from Ran Paul, and I got to say, if he's not going
to talk about the hospital death protocols, if he's not going to talk about
the JAB, then talking about the Wuhan Lab is merely a distraction. Folks.
We know that the excess deaths and cancers and everything began not in twenty
twenty, but in twenty twenty one and escalating thereafter. We'll be right back.
As a matter of fact, yesterday I was going through the news.
I'll always look at Breitbart and the thing that was getting the most number of
comments, and it was a lot of comments. It's been a long time
since I've seen this many comments on Breitbart, fourteen thousand comments in defense of
Trump because this silly trial that is going on, and again, he deserves
to be in jail for the rest of his life. I've made that clear,
because he's a mass murderer. And this is what we're talking about here.
The mother of the COVID hospital protocol victim, he drove there and left
in a body bag. What people are concerned about is that Trump can't go
to his son's high school graduation. Oh oh, what a shame. Well,
my daughter had her high school graduation canceled because of his lockdown. But
we've got a lot of people, as I said when I covered this initially,
and it made me angry because I just see this traction getting more and
the story getting more and more traction, more and more sympathy for him,
but no sympathy for the people whose children died suddenly from a heart attack from
his shot that he pushed you know, there's only two people that I know
of that call it the Trump shot, me and Donald Trump. Isn't that
interesting? The left doesn't want to call it the Trump shot because they don't
they like it, and they don't want to give him credit for anything that
they like. The right knows that it is poison and they don't want to
associate it with the guy who actually did it. He's right about that.
He was responsible for it. He's the one who ran the whole thing.
He's the one who funded it. Give him the credit that he demands that
he gives himself. All the time, they keep saying, stop talking about
it. Yeah, people are going to you're identifying yourself with mass murder,
and he is, and he doesn't care. So there are two people that
call it the Trump shot or Donald trum. To me, we agree on
something, don't we? How about that? Yeah? I agree on a
key issue with him. Who's responsible for this mass murder? The mother of
a COVID hospital protocol victim says he drove there and then left in a body
bag. Yeah, the real pandemic, folks, was the hospital protocol for
murder that he paid for, that he rewarded and just conservatives on a just
freak out about how much money he gave to the hospitals. First of all,
how in the world do you embrace that as a conservative? They point
the finger at somebody, say they got COVID. They may not be sick.
They don't have a PCR test, they said. They you point a
finger at him, thirteen thousand dollars, you put him on one of his
ventilators, thirty nine thousand dollars, right, And then they give once you
point a finger at him, so they got COVID, you get thirteen thousand
dollars plus a twenty percent bonus on all all the charges that you have there,
So you can get the thirty nine thousand dollars for putting them on a
ventilator, and until you kill him in a few days, which is what
they did with this guy, this guy in rem deservir course as well,
after you kill him or you know, before you kill him, you can
get a twenty percent bonus on everything. Why are conservatives okay with that?
Why are conservatives okay with him handing tens of billions of dollars worth of subsidies
over to these big pharmaceutical companies that have no liability. Why is that okay,
Well, here's the sad story of one man. Because tens of millions
of people dying is a statistic, one person is a tragedy. And this
is a bigger tragedy than missing a high school graduation. For all the people
on Breitbart, for all the MAGA club out there. And December twenty twenty,
life was going well for forty year old William Judah. He was vice
president of a family owned janitorial company, father of a five year old stepfather,
two other children, and a saw fotball coach. His mother said she
was supposed to see him right after Christmas twenty twenty, but the plans were
canceled when he tested positive for COVID nineteen and then he began experiencing symptoms such
as loss of smell and taste. She said, I would have dropped everything
and run up there, but he said, no, there's nothing you can
do in the coming days is symptoms worsened, so he told her he's going
to drive himself to the Prattville, Alabama Baptist Hospital. He was going to
the hospital to get some antibiotics. By January eighth, he was dead.
So from the twentieth to the eighth, maybe about two and a half weeks.
His mother said, the COVID hospital protocols which include the administration of rimdzevir
over five days, yeah, HCQ and zinc no, ivermecton no. As
a matter of fact, she got sick, she and her husband, her
husband's seventy seven years old. They took ivermectin and they got fine. One
of my best friends got very severe flu. Nobody else in his family got
it, but he got it very very severe. It's going in pneumonia.
He took ivermed and stopped it. But what they did was they took people.
You know, flu kills a lot of people every year. I'm not
saying this wasn't a different flu. I'm just saying it was a hospital protocol.
And there's things like rem dezevir and the ventilators and the denial of care,
of appropriate care, and the denial of something that we discovered that works
very well against these respiratory diseases you had neuminology. Is that a pneumatologists.
I think it is respiratory doctors. I have said I looked at that putting
people who have pneumonias, put them on a ventilator. We've never done that
before. What's that about, you know? And to intubate them that type
of thing. Of course, that's going to kill them anyway. She told
him that in her region of Florida, monoclonal anti bodies were being administered for
patients. He told her the nurses at his hospital told him they were administering
quote what they gave President Trump. There you go. Did they really give
that to Trump? Did he really take it? Or was he pushing rim
dezeviet for Fauci. The hospital isolated him, prohibited his family from visiting.
We see this over and over again. Those are the key things. You're
not allowed to know what they're doing. This was deliberate murder, paid for
by the Trump administration. You would be furious if this was done by Hillary
Clinton. You'd be furious if it was done by Biden or by Obama.
But it's okay when it's done by Trump, isn't it. I had spoken
to and they were also giving him toward all for pain. It was in
a lot of pain. They said that he kept pulling the mask off,
so they had the oxygen on too hard. Now think about this. They
put this guy in there. They're denying him any effective treatment. They're giving
him rimdzoviet, which kills your liver. And had done this over and over
again. They knew this very well. Fauci had tried to push this for
his pals at Gilead Pharmaceutical. This was his third time, and they were
about to run out of their copyright, their patent that they had on it.
He had offered it up for AIDS. Everybody said, no, it
doesn't do anything, but it does destroy the liver, so we're not going
to prove it, you know, no effectiveness and certainly not safe. Then
he tried it again with ebola, same story, doesn't do anything. Then
he tried again for this and there was a WHO study that was done in
China that went up saying it doesn't do anything, but it does kill the
liver, and that got taken down that same day, and within a week
Fauci put up his non peer reviewed study and pronounced it the standard of care.
And he changed the standard of approval because always in the past of the
therapeutic which is what rim does of areas, you have to show that it
is effective. And his stuff showed the same thing that China did. That
didn't make any different whether you took grim da zevir or not. But he
said that the people recovered got better thirty percent faster. So that's the standard
of care, right, and they went with it. Now. Isn't it
interesting that Ran Paul, who has hung out on the Wuhan lab, doesn't
want to talk about the jabs as a matter of fact. One of his
criticisms of fact, doctor Fauci, you're going to make people vaccine hesitant.
Don't do that, right. Ram Paul is a doctor. He should be
He should understand what's going on. He should be honest with people. He
should understand what's going on with these flu shots and the rest of the stuff
and the COVID. But he never criticized the JAB. He is a better
friend to the pharmaceutical companies in that regard than even Fauci, because Fauci is
pushing a dangerous, untested JAB that even Paul off It, one of the
biggest cheerleaders for vaccines, always said, well, if we push this thing
out too fast, this may cause vaccine hesitancy. So Paul Offit and Ram
Paul on the same side worrying about creating vaccine hesity, which they have created
vaccine hesitancy and by trying to defend the vaccine industry. But both Rand Paul
and Vauci on the side of Gilead Pharmaceutical and Rim Dezevier. Ram Paul had
his wife by shares of rimdzevir before Fauci proved it. So you know,
there you go. He doesn't want to talk about Rim deserveret he doesn't want
to talk about the JAB, he doesn't want to talk about you know,
President Trump's lockdowns, none of that. Let's go to the lab. I
want to attack Fauci because conservatives don't like Fauci. That's why ram Paul is
doing this. He doesn't have any principles anymore, folks. He's sold out,
just like Mike Johnson. These guys have sold out. They've sold us
out. He's got no principles. So he's going to talk about the Wuhan
Lab seriously, and he gets featured everywhere, right, everybody's featuring him all
day yesterday, the top of zero Edge. This is what got me upset.
So let's talk about this tragedy. Here. Hospital isolated and prohibited his
family from visiting him. He's trying to get the mask off so he can
breathe. So they ramp up the oxygen, keep putting the masks back on
him. Now, what's the difference between what was done to this forty year
old man and George Washington? For example, we talk about George Washington's death.
He was quite a bit older than forty, but he wasn't all that
old. And he's out riding his horse around his plantation and he gets a
cold and it starts to get worse. Than have the doctor coming, what's
a doctor do. He gives him mercury. He puts leeches on him and
removes most of the blood in his body. And we look at this and
goes, well, you know, he died with a cold, but he
died from the leeches and the mercury. This guy died from the mass,
the room deseevere, the ventilators, all that stuff they did to him,
not from any COVID or anything the hospital protocols. And we're going to look
back at this stuff, folks, because it's not going away. It's not
going away, and the people who push back against it, like me from
the very beginning, will be vindicated. The truth will be vindicated. People
will regard Fauci and ran Paul and Donald Trump and the rest of these murderers
for their political expediency. They will be regarded even worse than this doctor who
killed George Washington. He did it out of ignorance. They did it out
of calculated machiavellian politics and the love of money. According to his mother,
a nurse told her son the oxygen was on too hard because he was trying
to pull the mask off of his face. She was literally blaming him,
said the mother. By January the sixth, he indicated that he wasn't getting
any better and he might need to be moved. He's communicating with his family
by text again because the family is prohibited from actually seeing him or having anything
that It's a medical kidnapping we've seen over and over again. Some one of
the reasons why I talked to Marty Gottisfel so much. You know, this
pattern of medical kidnapping that you saw with the children's hospital associated with Harvard University,
this type of kidnapping by the hospital that's been done over and over again,
and that's what was done on a massive scale. So I have the
medical kidnapping, we have the hospital protocol of murder. By this point,
he was diagnosed with pneumonia, but she learned that her son was not receiving
appropriate treatment for pneumonia. Instead, they were giving him rim dezevir. I
said, are you they're giving you an antibiotic? He said no, they're
watching me for blood clots. Are they giving you a blood thinner? He
said no. They said there's something that might be wrong with my liver.
Well, that's something would have been remdesevir and they knew it as well.
A lot of nurses were calling it run death is near, you know,
the stuff that Rampaul profited off of. The Next day, they put him
on a ventilator and he passed. But when she tried to find out more
information from the hospital staff initially told her that they had taken him all fluids,
is all they said. And then she said that he coded twice and
they were able to bring him back in other words, flat lined or whatever.
But the third time they were busy with other patients and just couldn't bring
him back. His mother said they were just too busy. I guess I
got some other people they can make money from him. Right. When finally
released the dish certificate that he died from COVID nineteen and pneumonia and from renal
failure. Now he died from remdesev and he died from the ventilator, and
he died from their death protocols that the Trump administration paid them obscene amounts of
money to administer. William was unvaccinated because in January twenty twenty one, COVID
vaccines would not even be administered for his age group. She said, I'd
had COVID twice. My husband's seventy seventy had it twice. If anything,
we'd be the ones to die. But we didn't go to the hospital and
we didn't take remdesevir. We took ivermectin and we're fine. Now again,
all the people out there, I hear that Trump people, well he talked
about Ryer mc. Yeah, he made a laughing stock out of it.
What Trump did with ivermxin and ivermectin and HCQ was his damaging in many ways,
as the FDA tweeting out it's horse medicine, y'all stopped taking it.
If Trump really wanted to do anything, they could at the very least have
said we're not going to allow people to be punished. You're not state governors
if you here's what he would have done. He doesn't have any ability to
directly order them. So what would he have done. You could have done.
He could have said, well, you know, we're giving you all
this money for this emergency. I'm going to take that away if you prohibit
ivermectin or ACQ. Because Trump has already admitted that he knows that strategy.
Everybody knows that. Anybody that's been watching politics for more than a day knows
what's going on with that. That's how the federal government gets around all the
Tenth Amendment prohibitions for direct orders. They bribe and they blackmail. Do this,
and I'll give you money. Here's money. Get your hooked on it.
Keep doing what I want you to do, or I'll take it away.
You put the boys in the girl's bathroom, or I'll take your money
away. That type of thing. The governors know they can do that as
well. The scientists did that in Florida. If you force masks and vaccines
on people, I'm going to take away your state funds. Trump said,
I'm going to if you mandate these colleges at mandate vaccines. He just said,
at these colleges, at mandate vaccines, I'm gonna take away their money.
Well, he didn't take away the money from the hospitals that were doing
this kind of stuff, and he didn't take away money from the states that
were punishing doctors and pharmacists for giving people ivermectin. So a matter of fact,
he could have gone the other direction. He could have mass produced ivermectin
in HCQ. But he didn't do that either, did he. Yeah.
He was getting the rim deserver and the ventilators and the things that would kill
people out to them, and the tests, the COVID tests, many of
them coming already preloaded as positive as we've already shown. So it was a
standard of care. Poor Trump, he can't go to his son's graduation.
Yeah, well his father can't go to his children's graduation either, because Trump
killed him. Yeah. He's going to get away with a murder, isn't
he. And people are going to vote for him again, aren't they.
The mother said the pain of losing her son drove her into action, so
she joined online support groups that became activists for other victims of the hospital death
protocols and the vaccines. She said, with the COVID grief groups who were
communicating, it was like they knew what I was talking about. They didn't
argue with me and say, oh, it's just part of it. They
would say, yeah, that happened to my husband too, or to my
daughter too, or to my son too. That's how we came up with
those twenty five commonalities. She said. They've got a list of those that
was developed by the former FEDS group Freedom Foundation. I've interviewed a person from
that group several times and they have produced a list of twenty five commonalities.
This isn't going away. People understand what's happened, and this massive censorship and
disinformation campaign run by the government run under the Trump administration, continuing under the
Biden administration that will be defeated with the truth. Twenty five commonalities are just
an eye opener and encouraged me to go out and educate other people. She
said, I can't tell you how many local mothers who have lost sons have
contacted me, or even when their son was in the hospital, they would
contact me and say, what was that drug that they gave your son.
Ah, that's the one they gave my son to former FEDS is also involved
in a class action lawsuit against Gilead. You see, that's the real stuff.
That's the real stuff. These people are former FEDS. Ram Paul is
now a current FED, and I'm fed up with him. He's out there
focusing on wu Han. These people are focusing on Gilead that he invested in.
What a trader. FDA says, no safety signals that link the white
blood class that you've seen of the autopsies where they pull these long, stringy,
rubbery white things, and balmers say, we've never seen anything like this.
I got to pull this stuff out so I can do the embalming.
More than seventy percent of two hundred and sixty nine embalmer's surveyed found these fibrous
white blood clots that didn't appear ever before, didn't appear during COVID, they
appeared after the Trump genetic code injections. Doctor is sorry. Air Force Major
Thomas Haviland conducted a twenty twenty three survey of two hundred and sixty nine embalmers
across four major countries and three different continents. He also conducted a similar survey
in late twenty twenty two. They revealed sixty six percent of embalmers began finding
the unusual clots in mid twenty twenty one. Oh, when they really put
the pressure on everybody, you know, just like we saw from One America
the insurance company saying, oh, we had like a this like a once
and two hundred year event. You know, the number of excess deaths that
we had in third and fourth quarter. I wonder why that happened. It
suggests a temporal link to the rollout of the Trump shots. The white stringy
rubbery Klotz, also a Thai neurologist, discovered the same thing. He worked
for the Red Cross and their science center there. He is a proponent of
the vaccines, but he suggested that these clots might be connected to sudden death.
And then he got fact checked along with the other The Air Force Major
AFP fact checked him. He got intimidated by the media, and so the
tie Red Cross doctor cave on it. But the other guy didn't, you
see, So the tie doctor said he would avoid publicly discussing the white Klotz
so that I've already shared all the information publicly that I found useful, and
I still support the Trump shots, and I'm not part of any anti vaccine
group. Don't hit me with that label. I don't want to be called
anti vaxer. Well I do. I'm proud of it. I'm proud of
it. I was anti vaxxer before the Trump shots, and I'm really anti
vax now. Significantly increase significant increases in cancer mortality, say the Japanese researchers.
I mentioned this yesterday, I didn't give you the actual numbers of it,
and the fact that they correlated it, especially with the third job,
the third job of the Trump shot, and so they said increases in mortality
from all causes in Japan indicated a two point one percent mortality increase in twenty
twenty one, not in twenty twenty, and a nine point six percent increase
in twenty twenty two. Researchers found no significant excess mortality in twenty twenty.
How about that, But then they see mortality for some cancers increasing as much
as nine point seven percent. British doctor After dal Gleich, renowned on coologists
and professor at St. George's University of London, has warned about the potential
risks of RNA base vaccine since early in the pandemic in twenty twenty two,
he sent an urgent letter to the British Medical Journal their equivalent of the Journal
of the AMA here JAMMA, about leukemia, non Hodgkin lymphoma, and other
cancers that he said were associated with the mRNA shot. He said there were
melanoma patients that he had who were stable for years and then suddenly going into
rapid relapse, typically within three to twelve months after vaccination. I shouted,
I screamed, the canary and the coal mine, but I was told it
was pure anecdotal, nothing to see. Shut up, and by the way,
you'll upset cancer patients. Well, dal Gleiche said, it's an adage.
Now, the subsequent booster doses would become increasingly less effective until they disturbed
the immune system so much that the disease you're trying to prevent was actually fueled
by it. So this was early research on mRNA. As a matter of
fact, I remember reporting in the spring of twenty twenty one what doctor Ryan
Cole, pathologist was saying in terms of I'm look at these people have been
vaccinated and have a significant reduction in killer tea cells, which is your body's
main defense against cancer, which is present in all of us to some degree
or the other. He said, at that time, it's going to result
and a lot more cancer, and a lot more rapidly advancing cancer because these
jabs are killing the killer tea cells. So you can imagine after you get
three of them, it's really taken down the number of your killer tea cells.
Dog Lee study he has been contacted by doctors from all over the place
telling him we're seeing the same thing. But see they come back and they
say, well, there's no studies proving that, so it's simply anecdotal.
Well, if you don't run a study, you're not going to find out,
right, that's what the government will do, have done that for the
longest time for anything that's a natural ingredient or something. Oh, we're not
going to run any studies. And so since we don't have any studies that
prove this, it is only anecdotal what you're saying, and so no studies,
Well, no changes. These spike proteins and ntoparticles induce microclots, he
said, And from my training, I remember specifically that prostate and pancreatic cancers
are really associated with increased clotting. One of the major causes or mortality.
Impatience with cancer is cancer associated from bosis blood clots. By the way,
I'll talk about this just as we end here. But I had a lot
of people have indicated to me some things that I could take, because I
said, I was only prescribed a Peizer drug which has a horrific safety profile
not afiicient, just from the people who use it. And and of course
they charge way more than anybody else charges. It's relatively new drugs, so
the medical community pretends they don't know of any issues yet. But I've found
an alternative, and I'll tell you about it coming up here, because because
I have aphib I'm also at risk for increased clotting, so it's something natural.
I'll mention it here in a moment. But why cancer screening doesn't save
lives as a matter of fact, that we're seeing several of these articles and
they're talking about specifically cancer screening for prostate cancer and other things like that.
They said they did a very large study and they found that there was no
difference the people that they caught it early and the people that they didn't,
said because and the reason for that was basically what their protocol is for tree
reading it. If they discover it early, their protocol might kill you.
They found no difference between people who didn't do any PSA screening versus people who
did it and then went to them for treatment. Probably the sweet spot would
be to get the test and then if you find out that you've got to
do, to stay away from medical community and it's something on your own.
They didn't evaluate anybody along those lines, but they did say that they found
no improvement in the survival rate of people who didn't have advanced notice and people
who did, because the people had advanced notice got all kinds of invasive treatment.
Now I mentioned earlier that the big increase in cancer came after three shots.
Well, Alberta, Canada is now recommending boosters every three months. Every
three months, that's four year. I want to get it rid of some
people, I guess. And this is a place where Danielle Smith, who
came out and pushed back against the law of this public so called public health
stuff, that's where she's premier. Now you know there is this disconnect to
some degree between the politicians and the public health of things, but she could
pull this in and if your public health people are doing something that you want,
you don't want, you can do something about it. You know,
they're putting out these recommendations. They're not mandating it, but this is what
they're recommending, an mRNA booster every quarter, every three months, every year
for the rest of your life. One person says, well, beginning with
six month old babies. They can be pushing it on kids. One person
says, well, that works out to about three hundred and twenty doses of
this or the average lifespan. Well, if you're constantly getting this stuff,
you're not going to have an average lifespan. You'll have the lifespan I guess
of the new normal. Just trust the expert. That's right. And you
know when you look at this, Uh, is she excused by saying that
she didn't mandate this? Is that an excuse? Well, I'm not mandating
it. I'm just recommending it, because that's the excuse always here for Donald
Trump. Well, he didn't mandate it, he just recommended it. Told
everybody how wonderful it was. Well in Africa. In Africa, they have
been the brunt of a lot of these experiments from the drug companies, and
now a lot of African nations are recalling a Johnson and Johnson children's drug,
a cough syrup that is there Benelin pediatric, a children's cough syrup that's made
by Johnson and Johnson, And of course it is not so uh. You
know Johnson and Johnson. You know they're talking baby powder. You know that
that became known that this was causing respiratory disease and mothers and children they kept
doing it. Didn't care. Opioids, same thing, jabs, same thing.
Trump got them set them up in the business to rush up and to
do a vaccine. Of course they had one of the worst vaccines. I
can just imagine behind the scenes. Look, I know you got all these
problems with baby powder and opioids and things. Let's get you into something for
which you have no liability. So three Africa nations have followed, Nigeria,
Kenya and South Africa and withdrawing the batch of the cough syrups that's now six
of them. Unacceptable high levels of diethylene glycol, they said, which is
found to cause acute oral toxicity and lab animals. Well, it's not the
same thing as a polyethylene glycol, which is the peg and the encapsulated stuff
but still, you know that causes a lot of people to have anaphylectic shock.
Diethylene glycol has been reported to cause abdominal pain and inability to pass urine
and a cute kidney injury which can be fatal. Yeah, we keep seeing
all that stuff, don't we all the time? And so I said I
would mention the medication that is good for clots as well as some other things.
It turns out that it goes back to some Chinese medicine and they noticed
that they were grinding up these particular earthworms and it was having a beneficial effect.
And so so Western scientists went there and tried to isolate what it was
that was different about these earthworms, and they came up with an next track
that they called nato Canas. I don't know. If I dropped dead of
a blood clot or something, you'll know it doesn't work, not to the
extent that it's supposed to. But anyway, I was told by a friend
and by several listeners. Here's one listener I appreciated. Elane says, I
know you've been trying to find natural remedies for your blood pressure. Nato kanades
would be something you may be interested in looking into I think it'd be great
for you. So that's n A T T O K I N E S
E. And in comments on Rock Fin here and H says thank you for
being brave to speak the truth to women I know aged fifty and sixty approximately
in my area are finding sudden on set breast cancer. One is taking chemo,
the others taking radiation. I'm so sorry to see that. There's so
many things but you know, that are causing cancer. And we've seen an
increase in cancer, but it is really shot through the roof and progressing much
more rapidly due to this. Whatever the bad situation was in our food environment,
they can still make it worse. Nancy Chambers on Rockfin. Today would
have been my husband's eighty second birthday, but thanks to Trump's vax protocol,
he is dead. I'm so sorry. Seven days later vexed without consent.
I am so sorry. Well to bridge, the next thing we're going to
talk about is politics, and I wanted to bridge into that. I wanted
to show you a Saturday Night Live clip from back in the mid eighties.
This is Phil Hartman at Saturday Night Live playing Ronald Reagan, and he does
an amazing job. And I'll tell you why I'm playing this clip later.
And finally, mister President, about the Iran Nicaraguan connection, some may wonder
which was worse. You're knowing or you're not knowing. Well, all I
can say is I didn't know, and well we're trying to find out what
happened because none of us know. Thank you, mister President. Well,
I hope I've answered your questions as best I could given the very little that
I know. Goodbye, and God bless you. Thank you, mister President,
Thank you very much. Okay, get back in here. All right,
let's get down the business. When I saw this, I thought,
do this one here reminds me more Mike Johnson than he does of Ronald Reagan.
When you're looking, you'll spearhead our new operation to fund the contrast.
The C five days with the tow missiles and grenade launchers will leave for South
Africa at eight hundred hours. I want you to supervise the loading too.
Reagan, Yes, sir, well, I'm afraid you're going to have to
resign, but first you'll make a public statement supporting me, which I wrote
myself. It's over there on the words processor. Just key in and press
file. The code name is Oh all right, I'll do it for you
now. Any questions Casper give mister President, you're going so fast. There's
still a lot about the Ironnic operation. I just don't understand, and you
don't need to understand. I am the christ only I need to understand.
Is that? All right? Car Luci, you're new. Here's how we
do things. The red countries are the countries we sell arms too. The
green countries are the countries where we wash our money. Nothing much has change,
has it. It's you're eleven thirty photo opportunity, the little girl who
sold the most girl Scout cookies. Damn okay, let's get it over with
everybody else. Come on, move, move. This is the part of
the job I hate. Well, oh little girl, what's your well less?
You're that good as sales lady. Maybe I could use you up on
Capitol Hill. Well, it was nice meeting. Come on, Lisa,
come on bye bye. All the people coming in taking pictures by dork.
Yeah, it is a masterful performance by Phil Hartman. And I thought,
like I said, First of all, he looks he does a great job
of Ronald Reagan, but his physical appearance. He looks more like Mike Johnson
and perhaps acts like Mike Johnson as well, But just did an amazing job.
And I cut it short. It's very long. There's another spot in
there where Dana Carvey comes in, if you want to see the rest of
it, comes in and does Jimmy Stewart. Just an amazing impersonation to Jimmy
Stewart by Danna Carvey with that as well. But I looked at that and
I thought, you know, why haven't I seen Phil Hartman after that?
I just didn't really see too much of him, and so I looked it
up. He died at fairly young age. I think it was forty nine
or something, and it was about ten years after that skit, and it
was his wife. They'd been married for eleven years. I had to seem
to have a very good relationship. According to everybody that knew them, that
had dinner earlier that night. Didn't seem to be a problem. And he
falls asleep and his wife gets a gun and shoots them right between the eyes
while he's asleep, shot him in the chest, shot him in I think
the stomach or something like that killed him. And then she gets in the
car and she drives to her friend's house and she said, I just killed
Phil. Come on, you're kidding. You know. It was very calm
about it, really strange, and I'm reading that. I'm like, again,
this is SSRIs, I know. And sure enough, so off sol
off. But he takes her back to the house and you know, she
insisted that she killed him and something's wrong. Goes back and he sees,
yeah, he's been shot. He calls the police. She goes into the
bathroom, walks herself in and shoots herself. Murder suicide pills SSRIs. But
we're supposed to blame the gun, right, The gun's the problem. Got
to get rid of the guns, keep the drugs, get rid of the
guns. Right. Everything for the pharmaceutical companies. I mean, you know,
you look at the fact that you've got the Democrats coming after gun companies,
suing them directly for even manufacturing guns, even though there is a law
that says that they can't do it, even though there's a constitutional amendment that
says that they can't do that kind of stuff, They're still doing it.
But they don't touch the pharmaceutical companies. I mean, the SSRI stuff is
not even a vaccine where they were given specific community by Fauci. They come
straight for it. And so when you look at that later on, her
brother sued Pfizer to clear her name, and of course that type of thing
could have happened just because she was having because maybe she stopped taking it.
Right, That's the key thing about the SSRI stuff if you're on it and
it's starting to cause other problems, because it does have other problems. So
sometimes you know, people be having physical symptoms, like their body is on
fire or something, and then they'll stop taking it, and that's when you
have these kinds of incidents when they stop taking it. We don't know.
We've just seen ssristories dot net and they've got what was that nine thousand different
anecdotes like that, like Phil Hartman's wife who killed him. Yeah, the
vaccine companies just keep going on and on, and so do the calculating machiavellian
politicians. And that's what we're going to talk about when we come back.
What is being pushed by the real life version of that, the character that
Phil Hartman was playing there. We got him now as Speaker of the House,
third in line to the presidency, we'll be right back. Tell Alexa
to add the APS Radio skill and have access to the best channels anywhere,
from country to blues, classic hits to news. APS Radio curates incredibly diverse
playlists for you to enjoy. Get details at APS radio dot com. You're
listening to the David Knight Show well on Rumble Junk Silver. Thank you very
much for the tip. He says taking a long walk every day is good
for clots. Adfiser will never tell you that. Thank you. I appreciate
that tip as well. That is something that I definitely need to do.
I'm walking less and less. It's getting arthritis in one knee, so between
that and the workload, I'm not doing nearly enough walking. I know what
I need to do, it's a question of doing it. But I appreciate
the advice and the concern. Let's talk about politics here. The founder of
Tea Party Nation several different groups, but this is Tea Party Nation, Judson
Phillips says fifteen years later, the Tea Party movement was an abject failure.
That's his term, abject failure. And I said this at the time about
the Tea Party movement. I said, here's the problem with the Tea Party
movement. Yeah, taxed enough already, I get it. Taxes are way
too high. What do we do about it? Do we just cut taxes
and keep spending and let the deficit grow, or do we cut programs?
Programs? Which programs do we cut? What does a tea Party stand for?
Well? Nothing? Really, They didn't really have a program, and
everybody goes, oh, I'm all about tea party. You know, Glenn
Beck really rode that horse a lot. Oh tea Party this and tea Party.
That's like, what's what's the purpose? Where is it going? It
doesn't have any goal. You know, if you're not aiming for something,
you're never going to hit it. If you're not aiming for what you want
to do to reduce taxes, either cut taxes or cut spending on other things
or something like that or both. If you don't aim for that, you're
never going to hit it. Of course, but he said that it has
been an abject failure. He said when the Tea Party movement started, it
was triggered by Obama's seven hundred and eighty seven billion dollar stimulus package. Seven
hundred and eighty seven billion. Those are the good old days were they Yeah,
that's called a stimulus package. Today that is a rounding air. He
says. The deficit was ten billion dollars when Trump took over in January of
two thousand and nine. Today it is thirty four trillion. Wow, So
let's just knock off some zeros there. From ten billion to thirty four trillion,
that's the same as going from ten dollars to thirty four thousand. We
can understand that, right, you know the ilions. When you get into
the millions, we're oh, I can't get my head around that. But
just the same is going from ten dollars deficit on your personal account. Let's
say you got a credit card, right, Well, I got a ten
dollar ballance on my credit card when I first got this thing. But here
we are, after after I let Obama use a credit card, and Trump
use a credit card, and Biden use a credit card, they run up
a bill of thirty four thousand dollars on my card. I only had ten
dollars on there before these guys got started. The way you ought to think
about it, it's going up by trillion dollars every hundred days, and that
rate is accelerating, he said, And he said Republican lawmakers didn't do anything.
They didn't do anything when they were granted the opportunity to hold the majority
in the US House of Representatives and in the US Senate, and at the
beginning of the Trump administration, we had Republican control of both houses and the
presidency, and they did nothing about the budget, They did nothing about the
border, any of these existential issues. Nothing. He said, we brought
the Republican Party back to life. They had nothing after John McCain was wiped
out in two thousand and eight. We got them a majority in the House
in twenty ten, and they did nothing with it. As a matter of
fact, you go back and look, I've mentioned many times North Carolina had
got a Republican legislature for the first time since reconstruction in twenty ten. Obama
had carried North Carolina in two thousand and eight, and then every statewide office
as well as both houses went Republican two years later. People did not like
what he was doing for many of the same and what he was doing then
tiny compared to what is going on under Trump and Biden. All the crises
that we have, whether it's a fiscal crisis of deficits, and taxes,
or whether it's the open border, or whether it's medical stuff. I mean
you look at everybody was concerned about death panels with Obamacare. Yeah, you
should have been concerned about it. If the government controls your healthcare, they're
going to tell you if or when or what kind of health care you can
have. Well, what do we get under Trump? You see, if
it had been done under Hillary Clinton, everybody would have said, we told
you this was what was going to happen when you went to Obamacare. That
was just the gradual steps, you know, like Bauci said, we'd do
it from the inside, we'd do it with disruption, and we'd do it
iteratively, and everybody would have understood, this is an ext sideration of Obamacare,
except it was done by Trump and we didn't see that right. Well,
I saw you guys, and you guys saw it as well. The
general public did not see it, right, And so twenty ten people are
already pushing back against it. But going back to what he said. But
again, you know, gave them a majority in the House in twenty ten,
they did nothing. We got the most liberal Republican nominee in the history
of the party in twenty twelve Mitt Romney, who could have just as easily
fit in as a Democrat because he had already in twenty twelve they decided they
were going to push through Obamacare, and he had already done Obamacare with Ted
Kennedy as governor of Massachusetts, so he really did fit in as a Democrat.
Either way, you're going to get it. Just like in the nineteen
ninety two election, you were going to get NAFTA if you got George H.
W. Bush or Bill Clinton, both of them were for NAFTA.
You had Ross pro who was against it, but they took care of him.
But you know, they do that. They when they've got an agenda,
they get somebody in there who's going to push it. You know,
regardless of whether the Republican or Democrat wins, that central thing they need to
move along, whether it's NAFTA, whether it's Obamacare, they're going to make
sure that the two puppets both agree on that. Then in twenty fourteen we
got Republicans control of the Senate. What did they do. They made sure
their lobbyists got their projects funded, and they funded a few other things,
but they didn't cut spending, absolutely not in regards of twenty twenty four election,
he says the US has passed the point of no return, adding that
the former President Trump wins the election, his presidency would simply be buying more
time before there is a complete economic meltdown. Well, I didn't even know
that he's going to buy any more time. He may actually accelerate it as
he did in his first term. Because see, you've got to have principles.
That's the Yeah, it's not enough keeping him back to the to the
musical gypsy because I did a lot of stuff, and Karen did a lot
of stuff musicals. The strippers are teaching her you got to have a gimmick.
Well they got gimmicks. They got gimmicks all over the place to win
applause. Right, But you've got to have principles if you're going to change
anything, and so you've got to have a goal. You got to have
principles. You know, the globalists have all these goals, sustainable development goals
and all these other things. Not only that, not only do they have
things that they want to accomplish, but they've got a specific date by which
they want this stuff accomplished. If you don't have a date on your goal.
You got to wish not a goal, and they're very specific about that.
We're still struggling around to try to find a goal. And so you
got to have principles. And then you got to have principles even when you're
not running for office. Right after you win, you still got you can't
just throw those things away, which is what they always do, and you
got to hold these people to these principles. This is what makes it's so
amazing to me to see what Mike Johnson is doing in an election year.
In an election year, it is a race to the bottom. You know,
people are looking at Biden and they can't stand what he's doing, and
his people don't like what he's doing, and Republicans are You've got Republicans in
terms of We're going to do nothing about the border, and I'm going to
increase surveillance of Americans to levels that we've never seen before. I'm going to
package all these bills together and send them over at the last minute and tell
everybody, now, you've got to pass it because we're at the deadline.
You got all this stuff that's happening in an election year. They usually wait
until the year after the election, did all this really bad stuff to us,
you know, try to drag us into wars and bankruptcy and all the
rest of this stuff. They're doing it now. Can you imagine what it's
going to be like next year? Anyway, if you look at the history
of the Republicans, he said, when did they ever cut spending? The
answer is they didn't. If you look at Trump, his attitude towards debt
is that of a businessman, not of someone who is looking at the government.
He thinks that debt is good because if he gets overwhelmed with debt,
he can just declare bankruptcy, you know, which is not over and over
again six casinos, just declare bankruptcy, and I'm out of it. You
know, wash my hands, he says. But guess what. We can't
bankrupt the national debt of the United States. We can't declare bankruptcy. The
constitution prohibits that. Trump didn't veto any spending bills because they spent too much
in his first term. And past performance is the best basis of future work.
I'm sorry, he said, I'm just not optimistic here. He doesn't
even talk about the fact that Trump set us on the path to a six
trillion dollars a year spending fact that you know, it went vertical under him
with all this stuff universal basic income and lockdown the stimulus checks and all the
rest of this. You know, it's interesting. The Simpsons talked about this
in season eleven back in nineteen ninety nine. It was an episode Bart to
the Future, and so you've got an adult Bart Simpson. But Lisa has
become president of the United States. As you know, we've inherited quite a
budget crunch from President Trump. How bad is it? Secretary Van Houghton,
We're broke. Yeah, we're broke. So there's that, and then there's
the spy state, a massive betrayal an election year, and besides the fact
that we're broke and adding another trillion dollars every ninety to one hundred days,
you have a massive new spending for wars abroad offered by Speaker Johnson. As
well as this major betrayal of surveillance, the House reauthorizing the Section seven O
two of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Acts. They have completely subverted and turned upside
down inside out one hundred and eighty degrees whatever you want to say, the
FISA Act, which is supposed to stop the spy. This has now become
a vehicle to give them legal cover to spy. The only person who's really
been consistent on this, amazingly is a Democrat, Ron Wyden, who I
disagree with him on everything, but he's always been there in terms of domestic
surveillance for some reason. You know, he was the one who asked the
question of James Clapper, are you spying on American people? Well, well,
Senator, not intentionally, yeah, right, This is pretty intentional,
and it's pretty hidden. And when people are questioning these congressmen on this committee,
they just come back and say, well, this is classified. I
can't tell you anything, and you're not entitled to know anything about that anyway.
Is no wonder that these people have kicked their responsibility over to the bureaucracy,
where we have taxation without representation, we have regulation without representation, and
all the rest of this stuff, because they don't want to represent us anyway.
And so Ron Wyden said in a post, he said, this bill
represents one of the most dramatic and terrifying expansions of government surveillance authority and history.
Other people are saying it's like another Patriot Act in terms of its extent.
Again, he's good on this, but only on this. But you
know, we just take these things issue by issue, really do. It's
all you can do. So. Elizabeth Goydon, co Director of Liberty and
National Security Programs, had a very long list of a very long Twitter thread,
and as part of that, she said, buried in this section seven
or two reauthorization bill passed by the House last Friday is the biggest expansion of
domestic surveillance since a Patriot Act. Widen calls his power terrifying, and he's
right, She says, under current law, the government can compel electronic communications
service providers that have direct access to communications to assist the NSSAY in conducting section
seven oh two surveillance. In the past, I mean things like Verizon and
Google would have to turn over the communications of any Section seven oh two surveillance
targets, and the targets have to be foreigners who are overseas. See,
that's the key thing. They thought they had this sewed up right with a
fiz that you can't spy on Americans without a search warrant, and you can't
even spy on foreigners who are in America. Without a search warrant, and
you can't spy on Americans abroad without a search warrant. You can only spy
on foreigners abroad under this FIZE Act. And they started saying, yeah,
but what about what about if you've got that foreigner abroad and he has communications
with an American, or he's got communications with another foreigner who has communications with
another foreigner who eventually has communications with an American. You see, this is
like the six degrees of separation of Kevin Bacon, and they can go two
or three different hops. When I talk to William Benny, he was talking
about how you know, we just go like three hops and you pretty much
get everybody. So the targets have to be foreigners overseas, but the community
communications can and do include communications with Americans. The House has now vastly expanded
the universe of entities that can be compelled to assist the NSSA. So it's
no longer just the phone company Verizon or Google that have to turn this information
over any company. This is what's been changed with Speaker Johnson that he's pushing
so hard, and of course bipartisan. You had eighty six Republicans join in
on this the committee that is up. Like I said before, when I
talked about this, there was a split in the Republican Party between people who
are in the House Judiciary Committee who were concerned about search warrants and abuses about
that, or the Republicans who are on the committee that was tied to the
intelligence community. Let's just say the CIA as people like that. They want
it. The people who are about the rule of law don't want it.
Right because we have this organization that has taken over and the real government in
America, there's really this coalition between the intelligence community and the military intellig military
industrial complex. We call it the ick Mick or the mickic or something like
that. It's really the spies, the spies and the Pentagon or the Pentagram.
I guess we should call it the U the spy pentagram axis that's controlling
our government. That's probably a better way. Because they love to do the
eyeball things. We call it the I pentagram. How about that the eye
pentagram even ties into the back of the dollar bill. They always love to
put this single eye there. Not they they call their their coalition of spy
agencies English speaking spy agencies. They call it the Five Eyes five countries,
US, UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. Five eyes,
their eyes, the eye of Horus or something. Right, that's what these
guys always go back to. Creepy, the cultic, that's what they are.
So I guess we call it the I spy pentagram. Any company or
individual that provides any service whatsoever may be forced to assist an NSA surveillance as
long as they have access to equipment on which communications are transmitted to store.
So that means any router, any server, any cell tower, et cetera.
So that sweep sent an enormous range of US businesses that provide Wi Fi
to their customers, barbershops, laundromats, fitness centers, hardware stores in his
offices, fast food places. One of my longest friends, this is twenty
years ago when Wi fi was a fairly new thing, and so he goes
to the fast food place. They got to sign up, says free WiFi,
and person in front of him places is order how many hamburgers and prize
he wants and all this other kind of stuff, and he goes, oh,
and I'd like some of that free whiffy, and the clerk who's there
doesn't know what he's talking about. I like to say that free whiffy,
But my friend is looking at the sign, he knows what he's talking about,
free Wi Fi. And they go back and forth for a while.
He's dying trying to keep from laughing out loud. But yeah, if you
provide free whiffy, they want a sniffy of whatever you're from. Anybody out
there. It also includes commercial landlords or offices of journalists and lawyers, and
nonprofits and financial advisors and healthcare providers and on and on and on. In
other words, everybody, everybody. It's just like East Germany, except it's
a lot worse. As a matter of fact, one person contacted the ranking
Democrat member and said, this is looking like the Stazi. He got really
offended about that. He said, well, I've seen all this stuff,
and I've seen stuff that is classified and you can't see it. No,
no, no, And there's nothing like the Stasi in here. Yeah,
it's a lot worse, a lot worse than the Stazi because it's algorithmic and
because it is automated, and they have the power of computers and they have
the ability to data mine it's going to get more and more automated, and
more and more data mining as they bring in artificial intelligence to help them.
It's much much worse than the Stazi, where you had half of the people
spying on the other half of the people all the time. The amendment even
extends to service providers who come into our homes, house cleaners, plumbers,
people performing repairs, it service providers. Anybody who has access to laptops and
routers inside of our homes could be forced to serve as surrogate spies, or
you could be forced to serve as a spy on them. You see,
none of these people or businesses would be allowed to tell anybody about the assistance
that they were compelled to provide. They like, you would be put under
a gag order and you would face heavy penalties if you fail to comply with
it. And that's not even the worst part. Unlike Google and Verizon,
most of these businesses and individuals like the ability to isolate and to turn over
a target's communication, So you'll have to give everything, perhaps even equipment itself,
so they can just narrow it down to one. But you just could
turn over everything and Essay has a cart block to look at everything. This
is why you know, when Speaker Johnson said he's a war speaker, people
just need to shut up because it's a really difficult job. Look, we
are in we are an unprecedented times. Okay, we're in dangerous times.
This has been articulated here around the world and here at home. We need
steady leadership, We need steady hands at the wheel. Look, I regard
myself as a as a wartime speaker. I mean, in a literal sense,
we are I knew that when I took the gabble. I didn't anticipate
that this would be an easy path. Former Speaker Nuke gingridg posted a couple
of days ago on his social media that this is the hardest challenge it's face
to speaker, probably in the history of the country and the moment we're in
right now. He said, arguably maybe comparable to the Civil War, but
maybe worse. Well, you know new it's a bit of a goal.
That's as well himself. But he did say something I thought was very wise.
He said, you look at what's happening. You got eighty percent of
the people who want this and twenty percent of the people who want that.
Where do you want to be? What do you want to be? Mike
Johnson? We're an election year here, What do you want to do?
You want to be with the eighty percent of the twenty percent? Well,
he got twenty billion dollars in one quarter, so I guess we know where
he wants to be. He wants to be with the money side. And
he was told coming in, you're going to be a wartime speaker. I
said, when I played that clip yesterday, I said, so, when
did we have that vote about war? You know that's your responsibility, speaker.
You should know that we don't go to war without declaration, and you
were the guys who were supposed to do that. When did we have that?
I missed it? And I said, well, maybe he's talking about
war with us, A literal war with us. He said, literally at
war. The NSA having wholesale access to domestic communications on non precedented scale would
then be on the honor system. You know, they're going to get your
entire device and all your records anything, because you can't separate the stuff out,
and they'll be able to pull out and retain whatever they want. House
leaders deny the administration has any intent to use this provision so broadly. Listen
to their excuse. Supposedly, there is a single type of service provider that
the government wants to rope in. But I didn't want anybody to know what
that type of service provider was, so they hid the real goal by writing
in the amendment as broadly and as vaguely as possible. So we want this
particular type of service provider, but let's just put everything in there, so
they don't know what we really want. Well, we know what you really
want. You really want everything. Oh, don't worry. That's the only
one that we want to do. We're on an honor system. Of course,
these people don't even know the meaning of honor. So the administration is
not actually going to use all that power. It just persuaded the House to
give it. And of course it is being pushed by Biden. Speaker Johnson
is rubber stamping everything the Biden administration wants. Tell me again, because I
was just talking about that. Brendan Smith was saying, you know, I
used to think that there was no difference between Republicans and Democrats, but now
with Trump, I know there's a big difference. Tell me again, how
about that difference there, and when you got Trump doing everything that all the
other globalist presents are doing at exactly the same time, what is the difference?
You know, we didn't see a difference politically from one country to the
other. I don't see a difference within our own country. You know,
we got this supposedly hard right Christian conservative congressman who was that way before.
He evidently had discussions with people saying we're going to have wars. Let's let
you be the wartime speaker. We'll get lots of money to you, and
immediately comes out and say, yeah, I pose all that money for Ukraine,
but now I'm all for it. How much do you want to increase
the IRS? I'm all for that too. He's not even going to go
with the McCarthy reductions, you know, we're not. We're back to growing
it. Make it seven times bigger than it was going to be instead of
just five times bigger. We're going back to what Pelosi you wanted, what
Biden wants. Give them everything they want. Because you want to go to
war with the American people, Well you go to war with him by using
the NSA. You got war with him by using the IRS. You go
to war with them by using the FBI. As we talked about in that
interview yesterday, they're going to get a new headquarters center. It's going to
be twice the size of the Jagger Hoover building that they've got now. But
of course they'll keep the Jaggar Hoover building as well, So, in other
words, are going to be three times bigger. And that's not just yeah,
that's just their headquarters. How many other people are they going to be
adding in all these other different places. So explode the size of the surveillance
police state. We explode the size that people around there constantly and trapping Americans
based on their political positions. We explode the size of the tax collectors.
And our Republican conservative leader Speaker is all for it. He's right, there
no difference between him and Biden at all. So he says, I can
overstate how mind blowingly irresponsible this is. I don't think any administration should be
trusted with an orwelliam power like this one, even if this had administration doesn't
plan to make full use of it, go ahead and fill in the rest
of this right we all know, and she said there are certain powers a
government should never have in a democracy, and these are the powers these people
are breaking legs to get. You. Come with us on this or you're
out again. The guy Jim Hines, the ranking Democrat, She said,
here's the thoughtful and conscience's reply he made to somebody who was concerned about this.
You know, yes, I know exactly what's in there. Some of
it is classified. None of it is stazzy like you can sell your nonsense
somewhere else. He said, this is the arrogance of politicians in an election
year. We're well into the election year. This is their arrogance in an
election year. They know that they're not accountable. They know that these federal
elections mean absolutely nothing, folks. The federal level is gone, It's been
gone for a long time. It is bankrupt, it is non re responsive,
it is arrogant, it is at war with us. And both the
Democrats and Republicans fit that bill at the federal level. They both do.
There's a handful that are good on one issue or the other. Yeah,
But the only guy I agree with on everything, and he always sticks out
by himself is Thomas Massey. I gotta say that. You know, he's
a so far, he's been one hundred percent. In my book, everything
that I've seen him do I agree with, and everything that he does usually
is a courageous stand by himself move. I think he's better than Ron Paul.
Frankly, the White House will tell Senators they have no choice other than
the past the House bill, because this is going to expire tomorrow. April
the nineteenth. What a famous day. April the nineteenth. Yeah, the
day of the British came for the guns that conquered in Lexington. The day
the Nazis burned down the resistance at the Warsaw Ghetto because these people took the
guns from the Nazis and held down some Panzer division for quite a while.
They just burned them down in Warsaw. And the day that the atf an
FBI burned down all those men, women and children at the Branch Davidian Compound
over guns again just burned them alive. This April nineteenth deadline only exists on
paper. A notational deadline is no reason to create a surveillance state. The
Senate must take the time to get this right. It's not just our civil
liberties that are at stake, it is our democracy. Well, it is
our Republic. It is our constitution. That's Elizabeth Goyon, and she's absolutely
right about that. But it tells you who the real government is, isn't
it. Can we not see that the real government is the I pentagram?
And can we not see who serves the eye pentagram, the single eye pentagram?
And we need to need a logo for that. I guess can't sell
it as a T shirt. Nobody want to have the kind of a cultic
thing wearing it around. It's like, so what culture you had? But
you know, just take the pentagon pentagon from an aerial viewpoint, you stick
that single eye in it, and you got it right there. But nobody's
gonna want to wear that T shirt. Maybe we could give one to Speaker
Johnson. You would probably wear it. The removal of Speaker Johnson heats up.
Yeah, we know what his war is now. It's the war against
the Constitution. It's a war against Americans. Thomas Massey, as I pointed
out yesterday, joining Marjorie Taylor Green and but so far it's just the two
of them opposed to that. Well, a couple others have said something about
it, but they're not signing on to this thing. To remove him.
As a matter of fact, you've got one Republican from North Dakota, Kelly
Armstrong, who told the Hell that in terms of talking about these efforts to
throw Johnson out, he says, I don't know who at this point would
want the job. Well, you better find out, because that's a person
that you really want in the job. The person you want in the Speaker
of the House is not the person who is seeking it, not the person
who wants twenty billion dollars a quarter, like Speaker Johnson. It's the person
who doesn't want it. That's the way it used to be done. That's
why you would have nominating committees, because it was considered to be very very
bad form for somebody to put themselves forward. Look at the self serving politicians
we have now, and look at the kind of government we have now.
And sot Joel Scouzon on the other day, I thought it was funny.
He's going to run for the Constitution Party. So he's talking to some other
people there and it's like would you want well, I don't know, Okay,
I'll do it. And it reminds me of when we're in the libertarian
parties. So who's going to run for the different offices there, and it's
like, I don't want to do it. Well, I did it last
time, and so did last as your turn to run, so you would
come on, you gotta you've got to do it this time. We've done
it before. You've got to do it. That's the kind of people you
really want to have in office. So I don't know who out of the
Republican Party would want this this well, you know, if you can find
somebody who really doesn't want it, who really really really doesn't want it,
not just because they don't want the brick bats and the uh you know,
the criticism and everything, but they really don't want to be empowered. That's
the person you really want to have, he says. And now we're walking
into an election cycle. Yeah, we're an election cycle, and they don't
care at all what people want. You know, Johnson is tripling down on
mortgaging America's future to pay off the Ukrainian leader Zelenski. As Breitbart puts it,
the household vote on Saturday night on a yet to be released for an
aid package. So this is so they're sending all this stuff over to the
Senate, and what he's doing is he's packaging these four bills along with Faiza
and TikTok and stuff, and he's got all these other things. He's sending
all that over to get them to pass this stuff on, sending the FISA
thing over for them to pass this on tomorrow, and then he's going to
put the four bills together. He's going to have the House passed the military
spending bills on Saturday and then send all four of them over to the Senate
to be approved as a giant package. This is always reprehensible when Pelosi did
it, and it still is reprehensible even though it's now become standard operating procedure.
Yeah, so just tell me that this guy is not owned by the
Eye and Pentagram. Johnson texted House Republicans late Wednesday morning that he would soon
release the text of three bills to fund America's national security interest in ally says
he put it. Those three bills to fund Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan
will be packaged together with a fourth bill that combines the REPO Act, the
TikTok ban, and sanctions and other method measures into a single rule. There
you go, That's exactly what the establishment wants, is what he's doing now.
Jd Vance, senator out of Ohio, says, the rumored course of
action in the House combine Ukraine and Israel Aid with other Biden boondoggles, send
it all to the Senate as a combined package, then let the House vote
on a fake border security package that has no chance. He says, is
not only betrayal, but it's stupid politics to boot. It's almost like they
want the Democrats to take the control of the Senate this next time, isn't
it newsflash for Speaker Johnson, said Marjorie Taylor Green. We've already passed,
the Senate has it and refuses to secure our border. They want five thousand
illegals per day to come in. The House passed fourteen billion dollars for Israel
Aid in November, and the Senate refuses to pass it. You, Speaker
Johnson, voted against three hundred million dollars for Ukraine before we gave you the
gavel. You're with a majority of Americans of Republicans at that time. And
of course, with all this happening, just remember at the border, we
really do have a literal invasion, and this is a literal invasion of cartels
who have the money to just drive this expensive boat just at full speed right
up onto the beach and you got about twenty guys. It's like a military
assault jumping out of this thing and just abandoning that expensive boat. Now,
who can do that? Well, the same kind of cartels that are in
a literal war with Mexico and other Central American countries, and the drug war
that has run for so long has created so much wealth and power in these
criminal operations that they're now challenging nation states throughout Central and South America, and
they will challenge this nation state as well. And there's the invasion happening right
there. This is you know, you've got massive sea of people coming across,
thousands at a time in caravans, and then you've got cartels that are
doing this repeatedly. That's not the only one that one was caught on,
but people are saying that's happening all the time. They buy these expensive boats,
use them once, and just abandon them because they've got so much money
and power. And we're being abandoned, you know, they're abandoning their boats,
But we have been abandoned by our politicians totally neglecting the southern border.
Scott Perry Jim Banks Republicans said this is insanity, and in this foreign aid
framework, there is nothing for the US, nothing for US as all for
other countries. You know, they're coming in. They're upset about the fact
that we're giving three times as much to Ukraine as we're are at Israel.
Where do we get the money to give to any of them? We're busted.
We have trillions of dollars in debt, and they are going to ground
this economy and just abandon it. Why well, because just like that boat
that you saw, these people, these parasites don't care about the host.
You know, they're like they are. These politicians are like parasites. They
will destroy the country that they're feeding on, America, and then they'll just
move on to something else, or they'll come in and they'll pick the bones.
So what does Trump say about all this stuff? He says, well,
we'll see what happens. He doesn't want to take a position on any
of this because he's a pure opportunist. He's a fence sitter. He doesn't
have any principles. He's going to show no leadership, and that includes on
the border or foreign wars. He's just gonna sit on the sidelines and watch
what happens. He doesn't want to get involved in any of this because he
has no principles. He will make no difference or he will be used.
The difference that he'll make is he'll be there as a pacifier in the mouth
of conservatives. As a matter of fact, just to show you what he
really cares about. He is now saying that if any candidates use his likeness
in their campaign, he wants a cut. He wants a cut of the
money they bring in. It's always been about the money, and it's always
been about the celebrity. He is a celebrity candidate looking to make himself wealthier.
Has always been about money and celebrity for him, and it still is.
It's not about principles whatsoever. You know, even before he ran,
he trademarked MAGA. He trademarked that in twenty twelve, and then it went
it became effective in twenty fifteen. I remember when that happened. I was
I actually talked about on there. I said, so, how in the
world is make America great again? How is that something that is so brilliant
that it could be trademarked first of all. But I've never seen a political
candidate trademarked their campaign slogan like that before. I said, it shows that
it's just all about money with him. He wants to trademarket so he can
merchandise it. And he did take legal action to support that trademark. He
that went, he got it into twenty twelve, and then as his campaign
kicked off, he made it effective because he's all about the money. And
so Forbes points out that if he's telling people that are using his likeness in
their campaign stuff, candidates who use his name, his image, his likeness
have been asked asked, it's just a request, but there's some things than
here. If you don't go along with the request. If they use his
name, his image is likeness. They've been asked to split a minimum of
five percent of all fundraising solicitations to Trump and to the Republican National Committee,
which is now co chaired by his daughter in law, and he split that
is higher than five percent. Quote will be seen favorably by the RNC and
President Trump's campaign doing some bonus points with us. Give me more than five
percent, but you better give me at least five percent, or you're going
to be the RNC is going to come after you. Trump's going to come
after you. Everybody is scared to death of Trump. I look at politicians,
even at the state level that I have had a lot of respect for
what they do at state level. Who becomes sycophants who are tweeting stuff about
Trump, who are groveling to Trump. They're scared to death of him and
of his Maga mob. People like Laura Looney, people like that. He
La, You're pathetic. I don't care what you do. I'm not just
amazing. She is a caricature, a caricature, a plastic surgery and plastic
policies. It's just amazing plastic politicians. Trump's campaign also asks candidates and committees
to avoid speaking on behalf of Trump and their messaging, mentioning his family or
questioning reader's support of Trump and more. Business relationships between vendors and Trump's fundraising
committee will be suspended if the guidelines are violated. Well, there you go.
R and C will cut you off in every way possible if you don't
follow him. Finally, when we look at Germany, we can see a
reflection of what is happening here under our speaker Johnson, and the extension of
Faiza, the biggest extension that we've seen the head of German Germany's spy agency
as advocating for spying on people's speech as well as their thoughts. You see
Heinz, the Democrat who got so upset because the constituents said, you guys
are acting like Stazi. Well, you know, the Germans know all about
the Stazi, and he's right, this isn't the Stazi. What Germany and
the US and all these people are doing right now is far far worse than
what the Stazi did. Because the Stasi was getting everybody snitching on everybody else,
and they didn't have the manpower to go through and collate all this stuff.
We do have the manpower to do all that stuff, and that makes
it a lot worse, a lot worse because the technology that's been added to
this. A German paper gave their commentary on some of the salient parts of
this guy who is His name is Haldenbang. He is head of the German
spy agency. As they point out, he likes to write in the pluraliss
ma justice tists towards the royal we, he says, yes, we are
often in the media for specific occasions in order to enable an informed political debate
even below the bands. This is part of our legal mandate as an early
warning system. As the German newspaper says well on plain language, what he
wants to do is to spread suspicion. One waits in vain for a word
of self criticism here for example, in today's journal on June twentieth, twenty
twenty three, he saw it as his task to lower the political party AfD.
He wanted to lower their poll ratings. That's what he puts on today's
journal. So he's specifically coming after a political party to take down their poll
ratings, clearly taking the side of the last generation as well. These are
the eco terrorists who call themselves a last generation. They've been involved in acts
of violence, in arson and all all kinds of things, blocking traffic,
that type of thing. The last generation people, he said, the last
generation is not extremist. Although they commit crimes, they do not engage in
extremism and he doesn't care they commit crimes. Alden Bang therefore sees no reason
at present to monitor the last generation. But the people who don't commit any
crimes a FD who are merely political opposition, he does monitor. He also
writes freedom of opinion also has limits. The most extreme limits are set by
criminal law, for example, with regard to punishable propaganda offenses or incitement to
hatred. Oh yeah, we got hate laws. But listen to this,
he says. However, even below the criminal law limits, and without prejudice
to their legality, expressions of opinion can be relevant in terms of constitutional protection
law. If the Office for the Protection of the Constitution becomes active below the
criminality limit, the newspaper said, this means nothing less than that all legal
recourse and all review of state actions are excluded. Anyone accused of crimes can
defend themselves in court, and judicial decisions are bound by law. But if
this is something below the level of criminality, then we've got something altogether different.
And this has been the case in America for a very long time.
When you look at civil asset forfeiture, well, this is not a crime,
this is a civil action. If this was a violation of a law
put in by your elected representatives, then you would have due process and you
would have protection against excessive punishment and things like that. But this is not
that you have no presumption of it, since you have no due process or
protection against the finance, because this is just a civil rule created by the
bureaucracy. This is below the level of criminality. This is the kind of
legal fiction that they've been running against us for a long time. And of
course the drug war was a justification for this. So you can get no
due process and even more severe penalties than you could if it was something that
was legal. So, as they point out in this newspaper, the government
itself in Germany said that for the year twenty twenty two, the number of
crimes that they had from left wing extremists was thirteen five hundred and forty two
for right wing extremism seven hundred and eighty eight. So, in other words,
fifty five percent of violent crimes were left wing, forty five percent right
wing. This guy doesn't care about left wing. He doesn't care about the
fifty five percent. He's only concerned about forty five percent, and he's concerned
about right wing political beliefs and political parties. And he doesn't care about crimes.
He cares about what he concerned what he thinks is extremism. He doesn't
care at all about crimes or violence, so they event a new kind of
criminal offense, the alleged disparaging of the state. This is beyond hate crime
stuff. You disparaged the state. What does that mean? Well, what
that means is actually you're criticizing the state's measures against things like COVID or things
like climate If you criticize those measures, you are disparaging the state, and
we will come after you. That is exactly what these people have done.
And just one last thing, if you think there's a difference between left and
right, Donald Trump's billionaire donor gave Letitia James thirty six thousand dollars. This
is from Newsweek, but the headline is not accurate as a matter of fact,
that it's a billionaire couple, the cats some matitis. I don't know
their last name, but they gave five hundred and fifteen thousand dollars to Trump
for its presidential campaign in twenty twenty five hundred and fifteen thousand dollars. However,
this time around, they gave thirty six thousand dollars to Letitia James and
thirty three thousand dollars to Trump. They're giving them exactly the same thing this
time around. They're supposedly on opposite ends, right, they are diametrically opposed
to each other. And yet these billionaires know how things work, who buy
influence, and they don't care about principles, they don't care about policies.
As I am, I'm buying my way. This is why we have so
much money. When you look at the amount of money that is being spent
on these federal campaigns, that is basically a metric of growing corruption because people
like this are just buying personal access and they're going to buy it from both
sides. And you know, whoever wins, they're going to get an amazing
return on their investment. You know, give them tens of thousands of dollars
and you get back tens of millions of dollars in some special project that they'll
help you with. That's what is going on. That's why we see these
campaigns skyrocketing. That's one of the reasons why I speaker Johnson got twenty billion
dollars and one quarter one quarter that rate, he's going to get eighty billion
in a year, as I said, that's more than Al Gore had in
the presidential race all together. In two thousand, he had seventy billion.
George H. W. Bush. George W. Bush had one hundred billion,
but you got Speaker Johnson collecting it at the rate of eighty billion in
just one year on Rock Finn. We're going to take a break here and
join with twenty before we do on Rock Finn. Thank you very much,
James for the tip. I appreciate that. And hairn h to Ca Baron
says, Karen Knight, your tie background picks her so lovely. Did you
get my email regarding history books? Well, I'll have to ask her.
I think I'm not sure if she got that or not, but I'll she
appreciates the comment because she does work very hard on getting the backgrounds and the
ties to match, and she will really appreciate that you noticed and liked it.
And I appreciate what she does as well, and she does many other
things behind the scenes that nobody sees. We'll be right back. Elvis the
Beatle and the Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find them on the Oldies channel at
apsradio dot com. The common Man they created common Core, dumbed down our
children. They created common Past to track and control us. They're Commons project
to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the
common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and
dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common.
That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are
isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they
hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they
want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at the Davidnightshow
dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you
can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. The Davidknightshow dot
com. Okay, and joining us now is Tony Rderman and he has wise
Wolf Gold. He's set up David Knight Nott Gold to take you there.
Let him know that you've come through us and right now gold is at the
center of everything, isn't it, Tony. It's amazing to see everybody turning
to gold. We've even got the president of El Salvador who has been very
heavily into bitcoin and pushing that. Now he's even actually embracing gold. What's
going on absolutely amazing times, David, I just read one of the funniest
headlines was Zimbabwe has a new gold back currency and they're saying implicitly, we're
not going to create more currency units than the gold reserves that we have.
Now if anybody knows anything about Zimbabwe, as that was the international joke because
they had the trillion dollar notes of fiat. So this is a complete one
eighty and a departure from really where the world's been since nineteen seventy one when
Richard Nickols Dickson took us off the gold standard. Now we have there's a
lot of reporting coming out the major buyers that really you peel down the layers,
it becomes China and a lot of these the old distributors that we're making
like one ounce gold bars for people around the world are actually turning into kilo
bars and being shipped to China. This is happening all over Europe. I'm
noticing this in my business. It's weird. The price of gold continuing to
go up, continuing to break all time highs, but the buyers for large
amounts of gold in the public sphere are actually decreasing. But the buyers in
the larger central bank buyers, those are increasing, So it's a strange time.
You're seeing like a lot of dealers like me taking in a lot of
buyers, and those those bars and all those ounces I believe probably flowing up
somewhere to central banks and larger, larger buyers and institutions. And it's really
interesting, David. It's across the board and it's driving the goal price,
and I know the financial analysts are all very confused by it because it has
nothing to do really with the markets. The Federal Reserve and Jerome and Pal's
language about raising rates or lowering rates. It isn't really moving gold. Yeah,
I think that's confusing people because it's really about its global demand and it's
unpressing and global demand by central banks and especially players like China. I kind
of referenced it quickly after. I didn't read all the different quotes, but
there were about ten different people that are involved with the Federal Reserve talking about
how, well, you know, I don't think we're going to move as
quickly to reduce interest rates, and all of them talking about how we're going
to hold them there and kind of hinting that it's going to stay at these
rates or maybe go up. They're putting all this stuff out. As you've
talked about many, many times, the interest rates are their way of attacking
gold. They're trying. So now they're talking about, well, we're going
to keep interest rates up and not lower them in that type of thing.
But that's not causing gold to go down. And you talked about this in
the past as well. Isn't interesting that, you know, they keep raising
interest rates and things like that, and it really hasn't tanked gold. And
it has and all these comments from the Federal Reserve about how we're going to
keep interest rates strong, in other words, to keep the dollar strong,
all of these comments have not affected gold whatsoever. And the price of gold
is to point out, even though it's up hitting new records all the time,
we've got all the central banks continue to accumulate it, even though it
is hitting these record levels. The Federal Reserve Bank had a net loss on
its balance sheets of nine and forty eight billion. The people that make the
money actually lost money. And I know that escapes at the irony. I
know to talk to Nancy Pelosi figure out how she does it. And one
of the reasons why their net losers and they have to. They have to
go against gold, didn't it? And the horses out of the barn.
You can't put this back. And this is why we talked about last week
on on we hit a trillion dollars in debt in this country every ninety two
hundred days. Now it's the wheels are off. You talk about Mike Johnson
and whatever his budget is. You know, pray, tell Mike what war
are you a wartime speaker of? As it's been announced it. I know
it's not been voted on by Congress, but this is how these people think.
It's unlimited. There's a printing press, we have it. We're the
world's reserve currency. You have Janet Yellen saying that there's three hundred billion that
we've seized of Russian assets around the world through the Swift system and other financial
networks that we're holding and were frozen. And that's part of the weaponization of
the dollar. And no wonder the world's moving away from the dollar. We
don't have the rules are rigged against other countries. If you'd messed with the
hegemonic dominance of the United States and our power, we're going to punish you.
Well. I think bricks is the answer to that. The bricks wants
to move away. They are moving away. It's really it's insane to watch
in real time. And I don't think that the financial networks certainly don't get
it. The majority of Americans don't get it because we've always been our lifetime,
we've been the world's reserve currency. You know, we've had the semblance
of stability in that currency unit. But I think that is rapidly disappearing.
You can see how just in look, gold was eighteen hundred dollars an ounce
in the last quarter of last year. Yeah, yeah, it's twenty four
It's close to twenty four hundred dollars an ounce. And the price for premiums
on physical gold or even higher. So I want to caution your audience is
pay attention to this. I don't think this is this has very little to
do with the actual markets. Like it's a hot market and there's things going
and stocks are up or down. This is really outside of that. In
my opinion, I think the thing we saw last week, you know,
we saw the stock market get affected by this, we saw bitcoin get affected
by we didn't see gold get affected by That's the tell the bitcoin ETFs.
Of course, there's a having coming up here in a few days. Basically
every four years, the price it cuts in half of what is rewarded for
minors. That's called a bitcoin having. There's a little price pulled back before
then. But bitcoin ETFs, there's a lot of the outflows into those ETFs
have slowed. Everything's slowed down. The markets slowed down across the board,
but gold kept climbing, it kept going and staying steady. Right now I'm
looking at it's green across the board of gold and silver. Silver's finally starting
to have its day, I think, and I know people that have been
following the silver for years. It's just so boring. It doesn't move.
I think that's a good thing. Honestly. It's kind of an inversion of
actual value. But there's I think there's going to be a deficit this year,
David talking about silver, there's going to be a deficit of close to
two hundred million ounces. Wow. And they've been running close. They've been
running deficits for years now. The actual above ground stock versus what gets put
into the actual circulation and what is demand for physical silver. We're seeing a
disparity. There a lot of things happening, and again, it's not going
to end well for those who control the dollar system, and I think that's
going to affect us. And one of the ways that I'm preparing for it
is to stay outside of that system, stay out as best as possible.
Have things that are without counterparty risk, like gold and silber. Yeah.
Absolutely, no matter what they do with interest rates. What I was saying
earlier in the program, one of the guys with one of the big tea
party organizations was saying, look, when Obama came in in two thousand and
nine, we had a ten billion dollar deficit. Now it's thirty four trillion,
and so just think of it as these guys stealing your credit card,
you know, and you had ten dollars on your credit card, and now
you get it back after Obama, Trump and Biden stole your credit card for
several years. Now they run up a thirty four thousand dollar bill on the
credit card that you only had ten dollars on when they stole it. And
that's what's going on, and that's the thing that swamps any of these manipulations
that they're doing in terms of interest rates, because there's so many other things
that they're doing as well, like the sanctions that also mitigate against the dollar
as well. It truly is amazing. And then when you look at inflation,
Biden is out there saying, you know, they're handing subsidies to companies
to try to get manufacturing here. He wants to go up significantly on tariffs
for steel coming from China. He wants to triple them. Trump wants to
do the same type of thing. But that's not really they're not getting to
the root cause of it. Why is our steel more expensive. It's not
just labor costs. Even more important than the labor costs are the energy costs.
And they've shut down the last steel plant in the UK a couple of
months ago because they can't compete with China. China gets cheap, dirty energy,
We get virtually no energy, they call it clean and we get incredibly
expensive bills, and so we can't compete with them. And it's really amazing
to see somebody like Biden, who says absolutely no respect for individual liberty,
has no understanding or comprehension of free markets. He thinks that he can fix
all this stuff that he can, you know, and make our electricity,
our energy incredibly rare and expensive, and then solve it by putting tariffs on
China. It's just crazy. It absolutely is great. And again you go
back to this is a principle of economic nationalism. We abandoned those principles decades
and decades ago, and really accelerating after World War Two, we opened up
our markets to rebuild Japan, to rebuild Germany, and you know, thinking
about the Chinese steel markets, which was fledgling in the nineteen nineties. It
was December eleventh, two thousand and one when George W. Bush gave China
most Favored trading status and entered him into the WTO. And after that we
lost fifty five thousand factories and one in three manufacturing jobs. And of course
it didn't help. They got a lot of free steel from Rudolph Giuliani giving
all the World Trade Center still to China, getting there as fast as possible
after nine to eleven. So I'm sure that helped them a lot, get
some free get some some steal back into their coffers. That's all. That
is a part of the program to de industrialize the United States. And there'll
be some political you know, back and forth, and we can put a
tariff up, which I think tariffs work. I mean, all four presidents
on Mount Rushmore agreed on tariffs. All the figures on our paper currency,
from the one dollar bill to the one hundred dollars bill all agreed on tariffs.
Free trade really is mostly a fantasy, because if every nation on Earth
had economic parity, then free trade would work. But unfortunately, what you
do is you incentivize the country, our companies, multinationals to leave their country
of origin, go somewhere else and export it and push it into that market
because they don't want to have to deal with regulations and taxes and you know,
any sort of environmental concerns. And it's like a Darwinian contest. You
throw these workers into and our leaders again, so called leaders, I don't
think they even understand what I just said. I mean, you talk about
NAFTA, a ross pros that it was going to be a giant sucking sound.
Yeah, pretty much, and that's what it did, and millions and
millions of jobs. You look at the profits of multinational corporations after and after
it's up into the right and wages for average Americans is stagnant or down.
And of course with you add inflation to that, David, a loss of
purchasing power of your dollar. We really are becoming a nation where it's it's,
you know, a ruling class of have and have nots, and the
middle class is dissipating. Oh yeah, all that all that by design though
you know again this there's always going to be countries that compete with us.
But why don't why don't we compete here? The answer is not necessarily going
after one nation at all. Like and that's the thing is, I thought
that targeted tariffs really are kind of more of an act of war than they
are any sort of economic strategy. I mean, if you're just singling out
one particular nation, Pap Buchannan. Just if we're on the subject of tariffs,
and you know, if you want to look at something that actually would
work, if you put a twenty five percent tariff across the board on all
incoming manufacturing, just across the board, anything manufacturing, twenty five percent tariff
across the board, and eliminated the corporate income tax, the Internal and Corporate
Income Tact, you would incentivize companies to move here, put their factories here,
employ employee Americans, and that would be revenue neutral, not that anybody
cares about revenue anymore. I don't even think that's study that's right, But
that's that's one way you could do it, don't I don't think that targeting
a certain country is the way to go, and of course I don't think
they think that's the way to go either. This is a lot of posturing.
Well, it's been their go to weapon against us when we look at
the China price. Has always been about piracy, slave labor, It's been
about currency manipulation. But now it's about and this is the other thing people
we want to talk about the new China price. The new China price since
the Paris Climate A Court has been their advantage in low cost energy, and
that's going to be as big as these other things, perhaps as big as
them combined. The fact that they have this big advantage and energy, and
so he's not going to do anything to address that. Instead, what he's
going to do by tripling tariffs on a particular product from a particular country.
What he's going to do is this kind of a virtue signaling, you know,
like like Newsome, increasing the minimum wage for people who work at certain
types of fast food restaurants, right, that's what they do, and we
know that that doesn't help anybody. You know, it's followed by layoffs,
reduced hours, a lot of other things like that, and inflation, and
so all this stuff is going to be followed by that as well. And
so all these traditional things are back, and they're back, and you know,
they're coming back at it big time. You know, the the embargoes
on oil and the higher energy and all the rest of this stuff, and
all these other aspects of inflation that they've built in with the low interest rates
and quantitative easing and printing of money and all that kind of stuff. But
now there's other things that are out there, and that's you know, that's
also what bothers me. I'm looking at biometric terminals that are coming out with
EU regulations. They call it pay by face, and they want to get
rid of cash. They also want to get rid of credit cards. Everything
it's about you. You will be the thing that they track. You will
be part of the Internet of things. And so I'm looking and I've been
looking at gold for a long time. It's just this thing that is outside
of their system, something that is physical, something that is decentralized that's not
under their direct control. And to me, that is as important as all
these other economic issues that are starting to come home to roost as well.
I agree with that one hundred percent. For some reason, they made me
laugh at the biometrics and using your face that there's a funny a show called
Eastbound and Down. He said, this face used to cast checks used he
was like a disgraced former baseball player, like I used to cast checks.
And I think that that's going to be part of our future. This is
and again it could be just all the controlled demolition to bring in the central
bank digital currency its. It really is an open question of these people.
That's stupid. They they have to they have to have more sophisticated simulations that
they're running doing the math, trying to add up like when does when do
we reach like a a you know, a point of no return. They
have to have they have to have that somewhere in some underground think tank saying
well when you when you hit this number, there has to be a number
in which everything falls apart and they have to do some sort of reset,
and of course they use that language is a great reset, and I think
more and more of the financial networks. You're starting to see chatter all over
the place talking about a monetary reset, and when you're talking, you mentioned
getting outside of the system. David, this has nothing to do with investment
anymore. And I talked to people all day long and I said, look,
you know there's people like Robert Kiyosaki, who I followed since my early
twenties. He's calling for his heels, sometimes saying it's three hundred thousand dollars
bitcoin, but he's also saying, look, gold could crash to twelve hundred
dollars an ounce, and could crash because so much of this is fake.
How much of the paper, how much of it's tied to nothing, and
we don't know, And so I think you're going to have to see a
lot of this just come out into the wash. And you know, look
back at the first quarter of twenty twenty, gold went to like eleven hundred
dollars an ounce, twelve hundred dollars an ounce. Silver was like twelve thirteen
dollars. You couldn't get it for that. But I am cautioning people,
I don't think this is some kind of like investment rally. I think what
you're watching is something a lot more sinister. It's something very deep. It's
it's much more deep than that. It's not about markets, it's about a
complete change of the global order, right, That's what you're looking at.
And so when people call me and say we're you know what's going to go
up? I don't know. I really don't know. I don't know what's
going to go up. I do know where the dollar's going now. It's
going to digital, and it's going to lose whatever current status it has right
now. Every day that passes, there's more news that comes out that countries
are moving away, dumping the dollar. Again, let's go back to this.
The Federal Reserve lost money. The people that make the money lost almost
a trillion dollars. I mean, this is insane. So you can't trust
that system. The mere fact that they can't go over this again and again,
the mere fact that they can't do anything to affect the price of gold
raising, lowering, hinting, it doesn't matter. It's on its own now,
it's become organic. It's outside of their control. And you have to
remember, the dollar inherently, since nineteen seventy one, is at war with
gold. They've done. They did a pretty good job by the way of
covering that up for a long time. They went after in my opinions,
my opinion, they went after the Hunt family in the early nineteen eighties to
make sure that nobody cornered the silver market. Again. That exposes them,
because it's not that hard to corner the physical silver market. I mean,
you could you have a little if you're if you're an Elon must type or
somebody even you know, a billionaire, you could corner the silver market.
It's not that hard. They exposed that, and then so they shut that
down because it made the price of silver start really going up with fifty two
dollars and fifty cents an ounce in nineteen eighty. So nobody did that.
And then gold, you know, gratered in the nineteen eighties because you had
you know, it was mourning in America, and you had Art Laugher and
the Laugher curve, and they're going to stimulate the economy through deficit spending and
all this other stuff, and so it looked like that era was over.
Well until it's not. And then you've spent too much. You know,
again, it's a trillion dollars every one hundred days. So in my opinion,
I think that entire system is coming apart. They're going to have to
reset somehow. Their war with gold it's continuing. I don't know what they're
going to do about it. But every time the goal goes up that you
see, you know this crate. I wouldn't have predicted these prices six months
ago. I didn't say that. I mean, I thought we'd be in
the two thousand, maybe twenty one hundred range. But to break into the
twenty's that's something. Twenty four hundred is something that I don't think even some
of the most bullish analysts were saying that we were going to be in here
at this stage in twenty twenty four. David, So something else is afoot?
I agree. Yeah. I also talked about Tea Party organization guy earlier.
We're talking about how it was out of control, and he's saying,
you know, when you look at Trump, he looks at it like from
standpoint of business managed so as well, if you go bankrupt, you just
declare bankruptc and you start all over again. Well, you can't do that
with the country. So but he didn't address so what happens when the country
is bankrupt. What happens when we can't service the debt, for example,
And what happens is they completely reset the financial system. You know, that's
where he stopped. He didn't talk about that. And how do they do
that? Well, they just you know, completely wipe that out. Here's
the next new thing. How do they force people in it. I've got
an article i haven't covered here where somebody's talking about, well, maybe it's
going to be through the food supply, maybe you'll be through a some kind
of bird flu pandemic. We got our because they're going to start registering all
the backyard chickens and anything else like that that people have in the UK.
Beginning in September. They're telling everybody we got this bird flu pandemic that's going
on right now. It's really serious. But you know, in three months
or six months, it should say six months was when they said it.
In six months, we're going to start registering all this stuff. It's like,
well, it's serious, why don't you do it now? Same type
of iterative gradual control that we saw throughout the COVID plandemic, they're going to
start doing that as well. And so they said, well, so what
happens when they go in and they say, well, we've got to kill
all the chickens and everything. Now everybody's starving. That's going to be a
very effective weapon to try to force people into their currency. Right, I'll
trade all this for food. And so when I look at gold, or
when I look at backyard chickens, or when I look at solar that is
off of their grid, you know, I don't like solar being used as
an input into the grid, but I like it as a system that's off
to the side that gives you independence from the grid. You know, you
look at all those things and they can be very expensive, and it's like,
well, why would I bother to have chickens and I just go buy
chickens or go buy eggs at the grocery store. The same thing with the
power. Why would I spend more money for a solar system than this other
stuff? Because you're preparing for what you think is going to come along.
And that's the real issue. That's as we're saying here, that's above and
beyond all of these financial problems that are coming home to roost, and that
is, you know what this control mechanism that I think they're going to try
to get this done by twenty twenty nine. I think it's all going to
happen in the next presidential term, regardless of which one of these clowns gets
a second term. Absolutely, wasn't it like one hundred and eighty different fires
or planes flying into food distribution point and two different planes at the maybe three.
And there's a lot of so many confidences, so many coincidences, and
you know you have you have built, you have kill gates buying up all
the farm land. Yeah. I saw a meme the other day and I
thought it was great. Uh. I think it was depicting the Revolutionary War.
Maybe it was Boston era seventeen seventies. It had somebody getting tarred and
feathered and it said that we need to make tax collectors birds. Again.
Reminded me of that thinking about the backyard chickens. Uh, you know they
will do that. I mean, and I think that all the test models
from COVID nineteen eighty four were what will peop? Will people comply? And
we found that out. All you have to do is give them a give
them a Trump figure and say he's on your side. He's playing forty chess
that'll neutralized the people that generally would stand up to it. And you were
so right this morning. You'd be so angry if this was Hillary Clinton,
you'd be so angry if this was Barack Obama. But you're not. And
that's the mind control here, and that's why I think we live in a
world where you just what you just said is is could become a reality where
they start going after anybody who's producing on their own, trying to get you
under the guise of we have a we have a bird flu outbreak for our
own food supply, and we're in this together. They're going after any semblance
of independence, and people would roll over. I think that's a large portion
of them would and again not everyone, and there's a lot of people that
are more awake. But we're we're caught an election year and it means nothing.
It means nothing in my opinion. I'm not even I pay attention to
it at politics anymore. For the for suns, SU's maximum know your enemy.
This is mind control, its psychological warfare. That's why I pay attention
to it. But no, you're right, David, and our enemy has
made their plans clear. They've even given us a rough timeframe which they want
to do it conframe where they want to ban cars and ban other things and
all the rest of this stuff. But you know, when you look at
a situation like Amos Miller for example, right a local or state government can
make it worse or they can make it better. So what we can do
is, and I think it is something people really need to think about,
and that is to make sure that you've got things that are outside of their
system, food, energy, wealth, and things like that like gold or
silver that is outside of their system. And then of course make sure at
the local level that you've got people who are not going to be worse than
the criminals at the top. These people have taken over our government, but
you've got people who are gonna somewhat stand against that, even if they just
passively don't comply. You know, if you've got people like that and you've
made some preparations, that's kind of the best that you can do on a
material secular basis. You know, certainly, you know, having a connection
with God is going to give you a foundation there that's going to take you
through whatever comes. But from a secular, material perspective, I think the
best you can do is prepare individually, and then from an election standpoint,
if you can find any good candidates that are that you can support, that's
good. And if you can't get out of that state, that's all the
people. I do think that there will be more. They'll be better and
better candidates on local level ballots. I think as we move forward, it'll
be a natural progression because it takes a while. I mean, the things
that we're talking about are years out from being in the consciousness of the average
even conservative person that listens to talk radio. We're not. We're way ahead
of that. And again that they might catch up. They might not,
but I think a good portion of them will. I mean, places like
Texas will have just because of the sheer fact that everything's being exposed. You
have people like Greg Abbott busting up I legal aliens to Marthura's venue for political
stunts or taking them to sanctuary cities and ignoring his duty, which is to
secure the border in which the state he governs, and he has the app
he has the duty, has the ability, has the power to do that,
and he's tasked to do that. He does not do it, and
that's that's the Republican party in a nutshell. He'll do anything, but he'll
he'll run any stunt, he'll try to score any points that he can.
But I think that runs out and again when it becomes so bad, people
will just have to they have to figure out another way. There has to
be some sort of valve for that, and there will be. They'll be
better and better candidates, but it's going to take. Unfortunately, the way
things work, it has to get worse before it gets better. And so
I think just right now is a good time to prepare or change and one
of the best ways you can do that is having backyard chickens. I love
that idea. I've got backyard chickens. Love chickens, They produce eggs.
They have something you know, uh looking at having precious metals, cryptocurrencies,
a thing that's outside of the system. Cash. You know, having a
little bit of cash on hand is always good. I mean, I know
I'm in the precious metals business, but I think there's a multi pronged way
to just be in a better position for when things get a little bit more
weird. And I believe yeah, and you know, it can be a
little bit difficult to find good people, but a lot of times, you
know, if it's somebody that's really good, the eye of Sarron will find
them and identifying for you as well. You got somebody here just speaks up
at a school board meeting and the isr on focuses on them. That tells
you right there, you know, we know the politics is local and they
know it as well, and so you know they're going to focus and you
see somebody who really gets the eyeball a Sarron on them, pay attention to
that person, and a lot of times those people will move on to to
run for office. We got the guy who's running for a governor now in
North Carolina. He was he kind of elected as lieutenant governor last time.
He's got no background in politics. He's got nothing at all in his resume
that would get him to be lieutenant governor governor except that he stood up and
took these people on in a public forum over guns and over some other issues
like that, and that made him a folkey row And he's got just general
good common sense, I think. So now he's running for governor. So
sometimes you know, they focus on somebody like that and the next thing you
know, they're a lieutenant governor and the next thing you know, they're running
for governor. That type of thing can happen, and so you know,
people can focus on that, but tell us a little bit about what's going
on. As you know with this crazy gold market, what's going on with
Wisewolf, a lot of exciting things going on. Well, I tell you
what, if things get worse, I might just run again just for the
fun of it, to follow one of these establishment guys around and make their
brain melt, you know, just like having to having to face these issues.
The politicians don't like it when you actually know more than they do.
Yeah, and they don't like having to answer questions. You know what we're
doing here, And just coming off of I flew back from California. I
was out on Tenfoil Hat, which was a lot of fun, and we
promoted wolf Pack there and Sam Tripoli's is somebody we loved a sponsor and they're
spreading this around so we're helping more people. We've grown the pack significantly.
We passed over a thousand members this last week, which I've been that has
been my goal for so long. Almost I just could get so close,
but we wouldn't hit it. We finally hit one thousand, so we have
a thousand members across the country. As you mentioned, it's like most of
the country now. The states have no sales tax on gold and silver bullion
and coins, and so that's great for us. Yeah, I talked about
that yesterday. Forty five states now have. The latest one wis Kentucky overrid
overrode the veto from Andy Basher, this horrible Democratic governor, one of the
worst. Is almost up to the level of Whitmer during the pandemic. So
he fought that, but they overrode that. And there's only five left,
and one of them is New Jersey. I think they'll probably do something to
help bobbing into whether it's gold bars there, so that might be a ssue
in there as well. I've got a question for you from a listener,
Michelle Obama asks about I ask you if you can explain the Nevada goldbacks,
who makes them and how do they work. Well, there's Nevada, Wyoming,
New Hampshire, Utah. These states respectively have a gold back made by
a mint there that the state approves of and these are twenty four carrot gold
notes. As a matter of fact, I was looking at gold telegraphs.
Twitter today in Dubai has a new note. It's from the government. It's
a twenty four carrot note. There's going to be other countries that do this.
It's approximately like point zero one gram or something of in each note.
So if you take that note and you melt it, you're going to get
that amount of gold. So you're walking around with not just you know,
like a gold bar, but it's twenty four carret gold spread over this goal
I wish I could get. I should have had one on hand get and
they don't have a dollar denomination on them because it's always changing, right,
So it's just a total it'll be it'll be measured, and yeah they haven't
they have denominations, but it's it's basically measured in how much gold is in
there. So it goes from like one to to five to tens and so
you'll have a little bit thicker note as it goes up. What wolf Pack
does what I did, David is I just bought the one denominations, the
singles, and and I just spread it over the different states. So I
get all the different states with the one denominations and we put those in every
single wolf pack. So if even one denomination is that, is it marked
as one dollar? Is it marked as one you know some uh, you
know it's marked it's marked as like a dollar, but that's not what it
means. It's it's kind of like how the the American silver eagles marked as
a dollar, yeah exactly, yeah, yeah, or dimes or things like
that. You know they have a yeah, but it's it's not translatable.
It's again you're going to be looking at what the conversion rate of that is.
And you can look at some of the online retailers like jay and Bullion
and others they list them for like I think they're in the mid like six
dollars and fifty cents range if you buy them with a credit card or something
like that. And we're under the into the five range for them, and
when we put them in a wolf pack, so and they're not cheap.
That they're not cheap, and there's only a few places that you can get
them, but I think there's going to be more and more of a future
form. It's not the best way to invest in gold, but it's a
great way to have something outside of the system for trading, for bartering for
smaller items. As a matter of fact, I was going to tell you
one of the things that I've been telling people right now is if you're able
to get gold and hold it for the long term, one of the best
things you can do is buy fractional gold. In my opinion, because again
we're looking at the gold price. If you're able to get ten thounced gold
coins that's about the size of a dime. You can get ten thoundced gold
coins right now and hold them. You've got a divisible because it's going to
cost you around three hundred dollars. You've got a divisible trading piece that you
can use. It's actually could be like this is the week's worth of groceries,
and it's in a dime size instead of being in a one ounce coin.
So if you can hold it for the long term, and that's one
of the great things about wolf Pack is we save you a significant amount on
items like that. Whether it's a tenth ounce and I say one tenth one
tenth of an ounce bar or coin. We usually start putting those in the
in the wise wolves which is the five hundred and up. You start getting
gold in the alpha, which is the two to fifty that's the gram bars.
But I bet some of the best ways to get fractional gold is through
wolf Pack right now and I'm doing Inframerger, but that's one of the best
ways because we buy them in bulk and then and then beat the other online
retailer significant. Yeah. So I think, you know, when we're talking
about these gold backs and stuff, you just kind of think of them like
you would at Kennedy half dollar that's not worth fifty cents anymore. That's I
used to have a lot of those. And if we go back to having
some things like a you know, gold that's the size of a dime and
buy a week worth of groceries, and you go back to where it was
when my parents were kids, where they could actually get a week's worth of
Grossly, somebody put up a meme the other day. I wanted to correct
them, but I didn't have the heart. But they it was it should
have been. They just got it wrong on what the bar was. It
should have been like ten ten ounce bars of gold. It says like ten
of these would have bought you a median priced home in the nineteen twenties,
and then it shows in today's world says ten of these will buy you a
medium priced home in the in the twenty and twenty four. Yes, because
gold just held its value. It's the currency that was separated from that value
and then used, you know, over and over again and printed into oblivion.
That's debased itself. And so yeah, if you just as a store
of value, Gold's just a good thing to have. Silver is a good
thing to have. I think a silver because is so undervalued, and we
hit a little bit on that today, but it's gonna be like two hundred
million ounces deficit this year on above ground supplies versus demand. I think we're
gonna there's a lot of reckoning happening in the commodities markets, and we're trying
to prepare for that. The prices are moving all over the place. But
wow, we're definitely meeting the challenge. I think, Dave, well,
that's great, and of course you can find you can get to Tony,
go to David Knight dot Gold. I'll take you to Wise Wolf Gold.
Get in on the He's now got over a thousand people with wolf packs.
So you get in with that buying group and that helps you to buy smaller
quantities and get a better price on smaller quantities because you're part of the bigger
group there and so. But he can handle gold or silver orders at any
size. So I've known Tony for a long time. I've seen articles this
last week, Tony where they say, well, key thing is got to
now everybody's jumping into gold thing and everybody's paying attention to it. So there's
going to be some scammers out there. Make sure you're dealing with somebody that
has been around for a while that you know that's the key thing. So
thank you so much for what you do for us. Thank you for your
support. And you've got a program it's coming up after this program, don't
you, Yes, sir, I'll bet at eleven am Central time the Arderburn
Radio transmission Rock Finn I'll be live on Freeworld dot FM and and my Twitter
come join me over there. All right, sounds great, Thanks again,
Tony, and folks will be right back. Stay with us, joy listening
to the David Knight Show. Whether you're feeling like the booze or bluegrass,
APS Radio has you covered. Check out a wide variety of channels on our
app at apsradio dot com. All right, welcome back, as I was
talking before about the pandemic, and I do want to get back to this
because this is an article I see happening everywhere. Now Rampaul has made the
rounds with Tucker Carlson, He's being focused on by pretty much every conservative media.
This is penned all day yesterday at zero Hedge headline, we have fifteen
thousand samples in Wuhan could do full genomes of seven hundred covids. Rampaul drops
a COVID bombshell. Now, all that is fine, and I have opposed
since twenty fourteen, and it was basically, you know, what woke me
up to what was happening with this stuff was Alison Young's series of articles on
USA Today about accidents down at the Tulane National Primates Center. But then she
saw, well, this is happening all over the place. We've got two
hundred or so of these labs that are you know, affiliated with universities,
biosafety level three and biosafety level four four being the highest, you know,
the most dangerous stuff that they're working with, and all these different accidents where
they've got infected animals with very serious diseases escaping from the lab. Where you
got the disease being found outside of the lab, which is what happened in
Tulane the Primate Center. People who go down there from the CDC to investigate
it, one of them got sick and they say, oh, what's it?
From this? They must have been a prior exposures like that, people
who are working in the labs having faulty equipment and getting exposed to it,
and then they could pass on to other people. So these things are not
only a waste of money, but they're very dangerous. And following those stories,
it got a lot of attention and it was picked up by Congress,
and they told Fauci stop it. That told Francis Collins stop it. And
so then they started continuing to do that in China, continued to do it
even at the University of North Carolina, one of the domestic labs that they
continued to do it in defiance of Congress, Ukraine other places like that where
they're running this stuff. I do not support gain of function research, but
folks, this is a red herring. And I say that because rand never
talks about the JAB, he never talks about the ventilators, he never talks
about rim dezevir, he invests in rimdesivir. He said, these officials knew
the Chinese lab was proposing to create a COVID nineteen like virus, and not
one of these officials revealed this scheme to the public. In fact, fifteen
agencies with knowledge of this project have continuously refused to release any information concerning the
alarming and dangerous research. Well, I'm glad that they failed, and they
did fail because, as I pointed out before, the excess DE'THS began with
the vaccine, the vaccine is the bioweapon. And to continue to talk about
this lab in Wuhan is a deliberate political ploy. It is a deliberate red
herring and it really gets me out. He won't talk about the JAB,
he won't talk about Trump, and he wants to give cover to all the
people who participated in this. That's what's really going on. And so,
as I was talking to Tony this article out of expose a news you have.
Will a false bird flu pandemic be the end of animal agriculture and will
it be used to usher in food rationing? And also CBDC right, sorry,
we don't have any more food, but we'll give you some food.
If you've got this code, you remember it's Anybody who's familiar at all with
the Bible knows the story about the massive famine and Joseph and how he got
in on the good side of Pharaoh and told him that coming up, you
know, there's going to be seven years of plenty and then seven years of
famine and that type of thing, and so Pharaoh put him in charge,
and he stored all this stuff up, and then in order to survive,
people had to come and you know, they were the only ones with any
food, and they had to buy the food from them, and after a
while nobody had anything left and they sold themselves into slavery. This, I
believe is what they want to do. And the overhyped threat of a human
bird flu pandemic is a hoax to reset our food system, argues Alexis Baden
Mayor and a sub stack, and I agree with that. I think it
is a hoax. I think it is another one of these things that we've
got all these coincidences, as Tony was talking about, of you know,
accidents at places where there's a lot of food being produced. We've had the
biggest fire they've ever had I think in Texas where the most of the cattle
was burning up, cattle, burning up the grasslands where they feed them.
It's just amazing to see how much of our food infrastructure is being taken out
by quote unquote accidents over and over and over again. And then there's the
fear every year now this bird flu coming out and killing millions, tens of
millions of birds everywhere, shooting the price of eggs up, shooting the price
of chicken up, and all the rest of this stuff. And you have
to ask yourself, you know, what are they practicing, because they do
practice this stuff, and they do create an expectation with people. Oh yeah,
that bird flu thing that's been getting worse every year, isn't it Now
it's just taken out everything. Yeah, moving the Overton window, you know,
people's uh, they move the window so they can defenestrate us, that
they can throw us out the window. They're gonna they are gonna throw us
out the Overton window, you know, that's the plan. The response to
bird flew outbreaks so far been to kill healthy birds and masks. There will
come a time when the only alternative to the mass culling of birds will be
to vaccinate them, and we'll have to have all the you know, all
the birds have to be vaccinated, and we'll have to kill all the birds
that aren't vaccinated. Well, they're going to say, right, because even
if they this is the other thing that they've built the expectation for with everybody.
Your vaccine doesn't protect you, it protects other people. See if until
we always used to say about measles and stuff like that, it's like,
okay, well, if you think it works and you think it's the right
thing for you, go ahead and get it. I will tell you otherwise.
But you don't have to listen to me. I'm not your doctor,
and you know I'm not arguing that government should keep you from getting measles vaccine
or an MMR vaccine. I'll talk to you about autism. I'll talk about
the harmful adjuvants that they put into it and all these other things, and
how you don't really need to take that risk. But they won't go with
that. No, No, everybody has to get vaccinated. It's like,
no, if your vaccine works, you're protected. They have used that now
for such a long time that is very easy for them to sell the idea
well, I could get my COVID shot, but I'm still going to get
sick if you don't get a COVID shot. I can wear my mask,
but I'm still going to get sick if you don't wear a mask. And
they're going to use the same thing. You know, your chickens are going
to have to be. If you've got backyard chickens, you better register them
with us, and you better get them vaccinated because if you don't, your
backyard chickens will kill our chickens. I got an idea, We'll just outlaw
all backyard chickens. How about that that'd be better, right, So the
people who run the vaccine is the big pharmaceutical companies, will be their partner
in all of this. Creating food shortages could result in food rationing, which
would then be the easiest way for them to get people to adopt the digital
IDs linked to the cbdc's things get bad enough, you literally sell yourself into
slavery, like everybody did at the time of Joseph. And they've already planned
this, as I said, you know, were in March they were saying,
come September in the UK, you're going to have to register your backyard
chickens, so they substacked by Lexus baden Mayer. There's all the hype about
whether the bird flu will become a human pandemic might just be a distraction.
There are certainly pharmaceutical companies that would benefit from a human bird flu pandemic,
but the industry might make even more money preventing a human pandemic by vaccinating farm
animals, especially the world's thirty three billion chickens. Yeah, they could sell
more vaccines. If there's a vaccine, if there's a shot for every chicken,
they can make you sell more units of that than if there's a shot
for every human being. We've only got about what eight billion people, but
we got thirty three billion chickens. So far. The government's response to the
bird flu has been to kill millions of chickens. Eighty five point nine million
birds killed since twenty twenty two, and it so it's become an annual ritual.
Frankly, you know, we got to kill healthy birds. We look
at what happened in Norway with the lockdowns. Brownstone Institute has the article a
retrospective of the Norway Lockdowns. History has never seen anything like the globally coordinated
lockdowns. This is what I always and as a matter of fact, and
when I talked about this ridiculous thing, Fauci didn't do it. Guess who
did it? You know, watch my little twenty five minute video and I'll
tell you that it wasn't Fauci. And of course we know it can't be
Trump. It could never be Trump. That's unthinkable that it could be Trump.
Unthinkable that it could be the guy who was in charge, the guy
who appointed these people, who left them in place, and who left not
only Foun't you, but left Burks in place as well. Now there's got
to be several levels down. And I said, this is ridiculous. This
is globally coordinated. Everybody was doing the same thing in every country, every
Western country. So to say that it's Burkes, you know, it's not.
You know, the presidents and leaders, you know, Trudeau and Trump
are are responsible, but they're not the ones who are running it. There
are people above them, part of the global governance that's already in place,
that was running it. It was globally coordinated lockdowns of mid March twenty twenty,
all at exactly the same time, doing exactly the same thing with nearly
every nation in the world simultaneously jettisoning its laws and its liberties in favor of
an experiment without precedent, one without a clear goal or an exit strategy.
Well, the only way that the only place where I disagree with that the
Brownstone Institute. It did have precedent, and it did have a clear goal,
and it did have a clear strategy to exit. The strategy to exit
it was the JAB and they even said that, and of course that was
what they had practiced from Dark Winter two months before nine to eleven. All
for twenty years, the practiced this, We're going to lick everybody down,
create a fast vaccine emergency thing, and everybody's going to have to take that
to get out of lockdown. So that was the precedent, these games that
they practiced for twenty years. That was the exit strategy, and that was
the goal. The goal was not just to vaccinate and kill people the vaccine.
The goal was to establish the political power to do that as well.
But it is interesting to see what's going on with the Norwegian lockdowns, and
I'm glad that they pointed out that it was March twenty twenty. Everywhere nation
that did this at the same time simultaneously. So the Norwegian Commission pointed out
that scenarios for serious influenza pandemics had already been drawn up in their country as
well. Isn't that interesting? But not even for their worst case scenario with
up to twenty three thousand dead Norwegians were the dramatic measures that we experienced under
the so called Corona pandemic. They didn't even recommend that stuff for their games.
So they were wargaming about an influenza epidemic, just like the United States
was, But unlike the United States war games, their war gaming even if
they had twenty three thousand dead Norwegians, which is, you know, they
have much much, much smaller population we do. I don't know what percentage
that is, But even with that, they would not roll out these things,
but we would, you know, we did have that in all of
these germ games Dark Winter on. So why was Norway shut down on the
twelfth of March twenty twenty, I tay you, you know, you look
at the time frame differentials and anything, it's almost exactly the same hour that
we do our stuff. On the sixteenth of March twenty twenty, the Imperial
College of London published an article which recommended a knockdown strategy based on computer models.
But of course they had already had the other computer model that was about
lockdown, and it was a pre print of that that Trump said, two
very smart people meeting Fauci and Burks showed this to me. So that's what
I did it on thirteenth. On the twenty fourth of March, the Norwegian
government announced that it had switched to a knockdown strategy, where the goal was
that every infected person would infect fewer than one person. Their initial simulation was
that every person would infect two or more two to two and a half people,
and it would do it forever. As I said many times, the
fundamental model that the Imperial College of One had was in denial of everything that
epidemiologists had ever seen with any kind of a disease outbreak. The reason we
talked about flat in the curve was because there was a curve that associated with
every kind of outbreak. I mean, whether it is cholera or whether it
was chicken pox or whatever, they would always have this bell shaped curve.
And that goes back to the eighteen thirties. A guy named Farr identified that,
and so the curve was called Farre's law, but their model didn't have
that, you know, it was like, we're going to affect every person
gets infected, is going to affect another two and a half people forever.
And so then they came up with another one a few days later, Well,
every person. The goal is that an infected person will infect fewer than
one person. So if it's fewer than one, it's going to just like
our reproduction thing. You know, if you have less than to slightly over
two children per bearing woman, your population is going to continue to go away
very rapidly. So that's what they're looking at with a virus. That was
going to be their goal. According to the Director of Health in Norway,
the Imperial College Report changed the way of thinking for the entire Western world.
The commission that is looking at this now in retrospect in Norway, and you
do have some of these commissions. There's an inquiry going on the UK and
Norway some other places like this, and a lot of times these commissions are
or these inquiries are done like the jfk assassination thing, it's just there to
do a cover up. Many times that's the case many times, even if
they come up with a recommendation that'll be ignored. You had a commission that
was put together after they had climate Gate, which began in the UK at
the University of East Anglia, and there were damaging admissions. As these emails
were released, we got to hide the decline, our models are not working.
On and on put together this commission, and the public was really upset
about that. The purpose of the commission was to tell people that's okay,
really it's still a real problem, and that was what they did, was
a propaganda move to do a cover up of how these people rigging the data
and to assure the public that this climate alarmism was real and justifying. So
this commission is critical of the way in which the decision was taken. In
the closure of the twelfth of March twenty twenty, it appears the Directorate of
Health made this decision, Brownstone says. The commission points out that this should
have been made by the government. Well, not even the government should have
that kind of power to do that, And they say the commission believes that
the government should have made more thorough assessments against the Constitution and against human rights
and the Infection Control Act. In Norway. Proportionality is a central concept.
So what they're saying is the way they they overreacted to put it mildly,
and so you have to keep this in proportion. And as other people have
said, and it needs to be repeated all the time, the Constitution doesn't
go away when there's a virus out there, or disease or something like that
going around. It doesn't go away. Except they have now essentially established that
the Commission criticizes a government for having exercised too strong central control. And of
course you know how they do that here in the US. It's done with
the money. It's done via money, it's done the plans that were long
laid in the state. That is exactly how they run this stuff through.
So they finish up the article, Brownston saying, in my opinion, it
seems obvious that the authorities pandemic management was an ethical, social and economic abuse
of the population, albeit to a lesser extent in Norway than in many other
countries, and it must never happen again. Well, except that we're going
to have a second term. Of the two guys that did it, right,
one of these two guys that did this to us, we're going to
give them a second term. And everybody's whipped up in such a frenzy that
we imagine it'll just be the end of the world if one of these guys
doesn't get elected for us. I mean, you know, the people who
support Biden, if Trump gets elected, that's the end of everything. The
people who support Trump, if Biden gets elected, that's the end of everything.
These two people responsible for the end of everything pretty close to it,
and in their second term, that'll be what they're working on, the end
of everything. The question is not who are you going to vote for for
president, but who does the I and the pentagram want for president? Who
do they think is going to be their most useful puppet to get this stuff
run through. That's the real issue. That's what this is really about.
As well. There's no election except at the local level. You need to
understand where this really is now. Part of that, when we talk about
the pandemic, part of that is universal basic income, of course, and
there's been several articles picked up. Actually they all come back to an article
from state Line by Kevin Hardy talking about how conservative states are pushing back against
UBI because and they kind of quote one guy in North or South Dakota.
He says, you know, I don't like to introduce a lot of laws.
He's my kind of legislator. I'm not one who's always introducing laws.
But I try to look and see trends that are out on the horizon,
what's happening in these other places that are bad, and try to prevent it.
We got a lot of people like that here in Tennessee. Frankly and
yeah, frank nicely, Frankly who is looking at stuff like that, and
other people as well. And that's a good thing. They're proactive. They
see the stuff coming and sometimes they shut it down even before it hits the
state. But when we look at universal income, this is something that was
sold by Bloomberg when he was running for president. He said, look,
and everybody got upset with him because you just dissed and disrespected farmers. You
called him stupid. Well, he was saying, you know, we used
to have everybody doing farming, and we replace that. Then we got everybody
working in factories. And now the smart people like me, the smart ones
of us, are working to take everybody's jobs. And we just got to
figure out how we are going to keep these people from who've lost their job
and lost their income, lost their ability to feed themselves and their family.
How are we going to keep them from grabbing guillotines and coming for us.
He used that phrase guillotines, and everybody ignored that, said he just disrespected
farmers. Yeah, he disrespected all of us. He wants to make all
of us slaves to him, and so he was pushing that. Andrew Yang
was pushing universal basic income. That was his single issue when he began,
and Elon Musk gave him lots of money because Elon Musk is all about universal
basic income as well. So is Sam Altman, the guy who is now
running open Ai, the guy who also has his world coin thing. Yeah,
just we got this thing looks like an eyeball and you just stare into
it and it gets your biometric information about your retina or whatever, and we'll
give you a little bit of a coin. You know, just sell your
freedom, your inheritance of freedom. Just just sell it for a bowl of
porridge. Here, just look into this little orb. And so it's it's
pretty widespread with a lot of the technocrats. But of course it was a
precedent that was also helped along by Donald Trump. Never before in history have
we had people be able to stay home and collect a check for doing nothing.
And he didn't have to qualify. It went to everybody. Everybody got
that stimulus check. Everybody needed to stay home. And so this is another
president that Trump did you know, moving the universal basic income, moving the
Overton window for everybody. As a technocracy dot com says, the universal basic
income movement is global, is being pushed straight from the top at the UN.
What they don't say is that a person who pushed it and who established
that precedent was Donald Trump. In twenty twenty, how South Dakota State Senator
John Wilke likes to think of himself as a lookout, keeping an eye on
new laws, programs, and ideas that are brewing across the states. He
said, I don't bring a ton of legislation. The main thing I like
to do is to try to stay ahead of friends and try sorry, trends
not friends. I like to stay ahead of trends and try and prevent bad
things from coming into our state this session. That means sponsoring successful legislation banning
cities or counties from creating universal basic income programs. And let me just comment,
this is again, this is on state line publication looking at what's happening
at states. This is a global agenda's technocracy at technocracy dot compoint. This
is coming from the un on down. We all know what this is about.
We've all seen it. They've given us some rough time frames they would
like to get this through. How do you stop it at the state and
local level. You have to understand what the global plans are, but you
understand that where the rubber meets the road is at the state level. The
globalism is only going to be blocked at the local and state level. You're
not going to have people like Mike Johnson or Donald Trump or Joe Biden block
it. They're going to help it. They're going to help it. The
solution is not in the district of Columbia. The solution is not in the
oval office with a president. The solution is going to be done in at
the state level and or the local level. While wilk isn't aware of any
local governments publicly floating the idea in South Dakota, he says such programs as
bureaucrats trying to hand out checks to make sure that your party registration matches whoever
signed the checks for the rest of your life. That's the way he phrases
it. That's right. They want to make you dependent. That's always been
the purpose of welfare, and the purpose of central bank digital currency is the
same as welfare for all. And it truly does amaze me to see libertarian
economists, people who have in the past warned us about the welfare state,
Murray, who wrote books about that that were the basis of used for welfare
reformed by conservatives in the nineteen eighties, now becoming Charles Murray, now becoming
a supporter and a pusherl bank digital currency. It is a Marxist system of
welfare, just like the systems that he used to oppose, but he's allied
himself with the technocrats. The economic gut punch of the pandemic, No,
it wasn't a pandemic. It was the government action that they tried to justify
by fake pandemic. But it was an economic gut punch and expanded many things,
not just a stimulus check, but the child tax credit, all these
other things. But it directly handed cash to people from the federal government who
just puts it on their tab. South Dakota is among at least six states
where GOP officials have looked to ban basic income programs. The basic income concept
has been around for decades. In twenty nineteen, they did an experiment in
Stockton, California. By the way, Stockton, California was the first municipality
to go bankrupt. So but they still have all these bankrupt democrat ideas is
and they select one hundred and twenty five individuals to get five hundred dollars a
month with no strings attached for two years. But you know they can't afford
to do that. And once you start this stuff then it becomes very difficult
to stop it. They quote I Ronald Reagan who said the closest thing to
eternal life on this planet is a government program. It's absolutely right. We'll
be right back. Elvis a Beetle and the Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find
them on the Oldies channel at apsradio dot com. You're listening to the David
Knight Show. Welcome back on rock Fan Jason Barker, good to see you
there at Nights of the Storm and Foxhole Report, and of course he has
Knights of the Storm with Angry Tiger who has a snake in Tiger Financial Report,
Jason says, when I lived in Japan, they had a tax on
all imported American cars. We had little to no tax on their cars coming
in, and it was killing our industry. Yeah, talk about asymmetry that
is happening there. And of course it was the type of thing that that
went on for a long time, and with a lot of different types of
goods, not just cars. When you look at the European tax structure,
the value added tacks that they have, where there is a tax, a
sales tax that is added at every stage of production or you know, when
you hand it off to somebody else and they do something else with it.
At every stage you have a tax, whereas here with a sales tax,
you only pay the tax at the final sale. There they had a tax
at every level, and so it got to be very expensive, and they
would make sure that if their goods were going to be exported, whether it
was a car or a candy container. If you've ever been to Europe,
you know you could say, well, you know I'm going I'm shipping this
to the US. Oh okay, well you get a VAT credit or you
don't have to pay it or something. They fill out a form and give
them a passport number. Well, the same thing was happening with the cars.
The cars would arrive without any taxes on them, whereas if we were
selling, we would put that kind of penalty on American cars. The American
government would put a penalty tax penalty on American cars, you know, the
American car companies would have to pay their income taxes and other things like that,
and those cars would go abroad having not only the American taxes, but
the taxes that were imposed on them in foreign countries. And if they're very
protective, like Japan with a one hundred percent tax, right, they get
one hundred percent tax plus all the American taxes are on that car as well.
Yeah, we've been playing stupid for a long time, really long time.
On Rock Fin Andromeda one, thank you very much for the tip,
and Eric thank you as well. And on Rumble, Milton Friedman two is
now a monthly supporter. Thank you so much. I appreciate that. Let's
do an update here. I talked a couple of days ago about what happened.
I think when was it over the weekend or something where that Bishop and
Australia was attacked. Bishop mar Maury Emmanuel is his name. He was stabbed
multiple times during a live stream Sidney and Sydney at the church service. He's
been in stable condition. And when you look at that and you when you
first look at that video, and it's truly horrific, and I wonder if
he survived that. Well, yeah, and he's in stable condition. As
a matter of fact, the Guardian instead of saying this person who allegedly stabbed,
they usually put allegedly there until somebody has been convicted of something, but
not there with the victim, and so they put that he was allegedly stabbed.
No, he was really stabbed. The question is who did it.
But we've got the video so we pretty much know who did it. And
then of course the Guardian other media turned around and attacked this guy because they
said that he's transphobic, he's an anti vaxer, all the rest of this
stuff. Allegedly stabbed. So, speaking from his hospital bed on Thursday morning,
the bishop delivered a message to the attacker. I say to him,
you're my son. I love you and I always pray for you. He
said an audio message. Whoever sent you to do this, I forgive them
as well. In Jesus Mighty name. I have nothing in my heart but
love for everyone. Whether that person is a Christian or not, is totally
beside the point. The Lord Jesus always taught us to love one another.
And for this young man, I say to you, you're my son.
You always will be my praise in the name of the Lord Jesus. He
said to him, Well, when you look at what happened, and of
course no charges have been laid against him, yet they've got counter terrorism.
A police or there there finally came around to saying it was a terrorist attack
because he's shouting alahuakbar as he stabbed him. But he said to undergo surgery
because he cut off one of his fingers. Now, I wanted to wait
a little bit to try to get some clarity on this. Some people reporting
that he had several fingers cut off. Other people reported that he had cut
off one finger. Other people said that his switchblade had not opened up properly,
so the first few stabs that he got in didn't count. Here's the
video of this again, and he's attacked there. He did get the blade
out, he did stab this Bishop and other people who were trying to stop
him, but it could have been worse because he first came after him with
his face, but he did not have the blade deployed. So the response
of the premiere there in New South Wales said that what needs to happen is
we need to have social media platforms need to be held to account after this,
and they need to be held to account because they show people what I
just showed you. That's the problem. See where the problem. It's not
the newcomer, they're fine. Their response to everything is going to be censorship
of some way, control of some way. They want to control speech,
not borders, and so that's where they are coming up. We've got to
control that well. As people are looking at this, they point out this
was something of a miracle, said one guy who was close friend of this
guy who got stabbed as Bishop Emmanuel. He said, say from death because
the alleged attacker's knife failed to open properly during the stabbing and the suspect cut
off his own finger in the botched attack. Close friend Danny Abdallah, spoke
to the bishop as he recovered in hospital over night on Tuesday, revealed further
details and had come to light he was The bishop was stabbed multiple times rushed
to the hospital in stable condition. He appeared to strike the bishop a series
of blows to the head and neck, repeatedly swinging down in a stabbing motion.
In the video clip, the alleged attacker pauses briefly to look at his
hand before returning the attack, but was unable to properly open the knife.
It's since been confirmed that the attacker cut off his own finger with the knife
during the attack. Was that interesting, you know, God using the weapon
against him. It's not a weapon, very much like the psalms and so
many of those, you know, May he fall into the pit that he
dug for others. He the alleged knife and went for the face, and
he was going for the face, but the knife didn't open, said mister
Abdallah, who has spoken to this bishop in the hospital. So in California
we have now they're going at California lawmakers veiled plans to try to move reparations
along, and of course one of the real practical problems with these reparations is
even deciding who gets them right. Barack Obama is half white, half black,
you know who, and there's even questions about who who is his father
on the on the black side. Is it the guy from Africa or is
it somebody from Chicago that's been identified by some people. You've got Angela Davis
who is horrified to find out that both of her grandfathers were white. It
says a black Marxist who has, you know, lived her life pushing racism,
and she's horrified to find out that she has she's half white. And
then you have people like Elizabeth Warren. I don't know that reparations I don't
think are going for Indians, but you know, she she might have some
genealogy office looking into her if they do something like this in her neck of
the woods. So California lawmakers unveiled plans for a genealogy office to decide which
residents are genuine descendants of slaves and could get life changing benefit payouts. Well,
we already know that it's not going to include La La Harris. You
know she didn't come from this country. It was her father, I think,
was it Jamaica or something, bragged about the fact that their family owned
slaves. So you know, she's got a mother from India, father from
Jamaica, and his family owned the slaves. So she's going to have to
pay for some of that. Well, that's Jamaica, it's not not in
California. But again, California never was a slave state either. And so
the states First in the Nation Reparations Task Force last year decided that some residents
should win one point two million dollar payouts as compensation for injustice from a slavery
era onward. The purpose of this is to divide, it is device.
It is going to be unjust. They're going to have people will be penalized
because of what their ancestors did. That's what this is about. This is
the This genealogy office is the ultimate and this kind of maoist you know,
civil war they want to create over race. It is absolutely unworkable besides being
unjust. But you know what is really sad about this is that if you
look at some of the churches, I think it was in Boston where you
had some of the churches demanding some black churches demanding that white churches pay them
or something like that, And I said, do they not understand the fundamental,
fundamental method a message of Christianity, which is exactly what this bishop was
saying. You know we forgive people. Why do we forgive people? Well,
because if you're a Christian, if you're a black Christian and you're going
to demand that white Christians pay you for something that you didn't do that you
think maybe their ancestors did, you have Absolutely you're harboring unforgiveness in your heart
and you are not willing to lay the things that have been done to you
that you imagine actually they are done to your ancestors many generations back. You're
not willing to leave that at the cross. Well, then you're not going
to be able to leave your sins at the cross either. The things that
you have done. He died for what the wrongs that we did and the
wrongs that were done to us. The churches don't understand that anymore. In
North I'm sorry New Jersey, New Jersey, not North Carolina, New Jersey,
you have student members of an unofficial club or under investigation for alleged racism.
What is this unofficial club? It is the White Student Union. What
a It's not okay to be white. You know, That's one of the
things I talked about seeing this happening at the University of South Fard in Tampa
fifty years ago. When I was a student there, we had the Black
Student Union, which is incredibly racist. We had the Gay Coalition. These
two organizations were not only know the Black Student Union Gay Coalition exclusion, they
excluded other people, very divisive and they hung together. And even though it
was a large student body of twenty five thousand students, they were able to
hang together because most of the people were commuting students and didn't really have much
connection to what was happening on campus at the time. That's changed now,
I understand they've got sports teams and stuff like that. But at that point
in time, they could hang together. They could make sure they won the
elections because nobody ever voted. I never voted in any of those elections.
I never knew when they were who was running in any of them. The
only reason I knew about all this stuff or even knew about what happened with
student government was because, you know, we had twenty five thousand students and
everybody had to pay a student activity fee, and the student government got control
of all those funds, and these guys with the Black Student Union and the
Gay Coalition gave it to themselves, and there were some criminal allegations, but
they never convicted anybody. They got away with it. And I've been watching
that same pattern in government for the last fifty years. So here's a white
student union again. Yeah, racist, probably, But is it any different
than the black student union. Probably not. But one form of racism has
encouraged, the other is discouraged because they want to divide the country over race.
That's what Bill Airs Bernardine Dorn the weatherman underground. They knew they couldn't
get a traditional Marxist revolution between different economic classes, so they wanted to do
it over racial issues. In North Carolina, a high school student sixteen is
suspended for saying illegal alien in class. He got suspended and it's on his
permit record that he's a racist, and he was hoping to get a scholarship
as a track student. He believes that this is going to keep him from
being able to do that. He questioned the term alien in an assignment.
He says, does this referred to space aliens or illegal aliens without green cards?
He's joking around and they didn't think that was funny. Should he use
the term squatter? That's the better term anyway? I guess he wanted him
to refer to him as newcomers. But perhaps he doesn't realize that this might
be the best thing that ever happened to him. If he doesn't go to
college, if he thinks this is mad, you know, he gets labeled
a racist and suspended from school for talking about using the term illegal alien.
Oh well, he think is going to happen when he gets to college,
I said earlier, you know, he had the South Dakota representatives looking at
universal basic income, trying to shut it down before it gets to South Carolina.
Well, we have a people in Tennessee that are pretty proactive with things
like this, and of course what we've seen happening in New York with squatters.
We now have a Tennessee bill to protect property owners from squatters. I
put this in here because again, whatever state you're in, you need to
understand that the state can make it better or worse. Has anything been done
in New York to stop their excessive squatter laws and you could go in and
if you're there for thirty days now you own the place essentially. And we've
seen people in New York get arrested by the police because they try to get
these squatters out, they take the side of the squatters. We've seen property
owners in New York get killed by the squatters. So here in Tennessee,
they're trying to head this off. Home Ownership is the American dream for many,
so State Representative Tim Rudd from Murphreysboro and a press release, he says,
this proactive legislation that protects property owners but also deters bad actors who have
learned to exploit the law and to terrorize homeowners. This creates a streamlined process
for Tennesseeans to quickly take back control over what is rightfully theirs. You see,
you've got laws being drawn up in Tennessee maybe other places as well,
to make sure that if somebody moves in, you streamline the process to get
them removed. Whyas New York has done nothing. Nothing has been done in
New York. They've got the worst laws to start with, and when I
looked it up, I think in Tennessee they had to live there for seven
years before they could assert in any legal type of thing. But of course
evicting somebody is a different situation. That's what they're trying to address with this,
And so New York has done nothing about this. So I say,
you can solve some of these problems at the state level, or you can
make them worse. The press release says, the bill removes much of the
burden from legitimate property owners by establishing a clear process for law enforcement to restore
possession. It cann expedite the removal of illegal occupants in as little as seventy
two hours, and the legislation also clarifies that the sheriff may arrest the trespassers.
Dishonest trespassers have learned to exploit the law in places like New York,
where a squatter who occupies the home for at least thirty days can be granted
tenant rights, says a press release. Lawful property owners are then forced to
go through a court eviction process to reclaim their homes. And so still nothing
is being done in New York, but in some other states they're already working
on it. This I thought was kind of interesting from a personal Standarin Red
Lobster is considering Chapter eleven bankruptcy after they lost eleven million dollars. Most of
that they said was because of their endless shrimp promotion. Wow, this is
a jumbo shrimp problem. It got the shrimp problem got really really big,
so and when I saw this article, it hit with me personally. The
chain started as a single restaurant in Lakeland, Florida in nineteen sixty eight,
had about has about six hundred and fifty locations in almost all the states.
And I worked at one when I was in high school in Tampa. That
was near Bush Gardens on Bush Boulevard, and I had some friends who went
there got some jobs. They're getting paid pretty good. They're working in the
kitchen or as dishwashers, and so I went there to apply for a job.
Unfortunately, I went in wearing a white shirt and a tie, and
you can be a bus boy. It's like what that doesn't pay as well?
And I did that for about six weeks, I guess. And you
know the thing is, I hate seafood. Anyway, I just went there
because my friends were working there in the kitchen. I thought I'd get a
job with him, and I thought, all right, I'll give it a
try. I needed the money, so the so I did that for just
a short period of time. But I is something about the butter sauce or
something had would get onto my shirt right above my pants, you know,
when I'm carrying the busboy thing and my mom couldn't get it out even with
bleach. What is this stuff? I said, I don't know, but
they're eating it. You know. It's one of these fast food things.
The final straw was one waitress who was kind of crabby working at Red Lobster,
and she did not get a tip at one of these tables, and
she accused me of stealing her tip. It's like steal your tip, but
you know, the person who was the manager there, she asked me about
it. She didn't believe that I stolen it. But I said, well,
if I'm even going to be suspected this, I'm done and I walked
out. You know. So so now they did their Endless Shrimp promotion.
Evidently the shrimp was pretty good from because the people ate so much of it
that put them out of business. And then we have this Boston Dynamics.
Look at this. This is their new robot. You've seen the robot that
does tumbling somersaults all the rest of us. Look at that. This is
electric. Look at that it's coming to life. It's like something straight out
of terminator. It's double jointed, it stands up the legs go backwards.
Now look at this. The head looks at you, walks towards you.
Now the body turns around. Wow. Wow. And as one person said,
just make sure that if that light you know, you look at the
face there of Boston Dynamics. So it's got this big black circle as its
head. Its head is like a cylinder. There's a big black circle,
no eyes or anything like that, but just a white thing around it.
I said, if that goes red, you better start running. You know,
I don't know what it is about Bostondynamics that they seem to revel and
this kind of dystopian approach to their products. They like to do videos about
that. They go out of their way to look sinister. Unlike you know,
the one that we showed last week. You know what was Open Ai
working with this company called Figure and you were teld to do something. It's
working out these puzzles. But it had this California dude kind of voice,
Oh yeah, I got it, yoh okay, let me think sure,
yeah whatever, you know that type of thing. And so they went out
of their way to do that, even to have it say uh yeah,
yeah, I could do that, you know. And so they're trying to
create this esthetic that is, you know, this laid back California dude guy,
which really has a cognitive dissonance with the robot thing there. But Boston
Dynamics just owns it. Oh, they want to go full terminator, and
they are constantly pushing that. We designed the electric version of at List to
be stronger, more dexterous, more agile. Atlas may resemble a human form
factor, but we're equipping the robot to move in the most efficient way possible
to complete a task, rather than being constrained by human range of emotion.
Again, look at the way this thing stands up. At List will move
in ways that exceed human capability. You know, isn't that nice? They
said they're exploring commercial uses for the new at List, beginning with Hyundai,
which acquired the robotics firm in twenty twenty one. Competitor Agility Robotics has a
partnership that lets Amazon use its biped robots called Digit to lift and to move
items in some warehouses. Of course, they have this backwards insect kind of
leg that you saw with that Charlie Sheen movie I talked about that. It's
amazing and then the dog, the dog that looks like it's stepped. Well,
of course they use that form factor for black mirror, you know,
looks more like an insect and middle insect that does a dog. Yeah,
the future is kind of interesting, is think for joining us? Have a
good day. Let me tell you the David Night Show. You can listen
to with your ears. You can even watch it by using your eyes.
In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to the
David Night Show right now. Yeah, good job. And you want to
know something else, You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or
listen to the show at Thedavidnightshow dot com. That's a website.