Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
As the clock strikes thirteen here on Airstrip one. Welcome to the David Knight
Show. I'm Gardner Goldsmith, sitting in for David Knight direct from our Russian
headquarters. Yes, on today's program we will be learning all Russian and of
course I will be revealing my paymasters from Moscow. Join me inside the bunker.
Greetings, one in all, greetings, welcome to the David Night Show.
I'm Gardner Goldsmith. It's great to have you along for the ride,
everyone, and I hope your morning has started beautifully. We're going to have
lots of smiles. As I often say on my show, we're going to
turn those political frowns upside down and welcome you to the David Night Show.
I'm sitting in for David, who's a little under the weather today. So
from now until noontime Eastern time, we will gather and have a great time.
You can join us inside the Rumble, chat inside the Rock fin Chat,
watch us on d Live, watch us on David's Twitter slash x feed,
and of course you can find my work at MRCTV. The media Research
Center's television arm and every Monday through Friday at six o'clock Eastern time, you
can join me and the fellow Conspirators for Freedom on Liberty Conspiracy Live, another
hopefully very good news resource. Right. I try to take the news of
the day and tap into additional information to provide context and perhaps some intellectual ammunition
to take with us so that we can pass on the lessons of liberty to
our progeny and our friends. Welcome to the program, everyone, David.
I hope you're feeling better. Travis. Thank you so much for your help.
It's just it's amazing to be in touch with everyone and you and the
audience. Thank you for your support. Don't forget if you want to contribute
to David's show, you can always find all those links at Ddavidnightshow dot com.
You can contribute as well here in side Rockvin or Rumble, and that
is always beneficial. As a person who's filling in for the man, David
Knight, I always hope that I can engender a few people to support the
program and so that I haven't let my side down on that front as well.
I hopefully will be doing a good job for you today. In the
news and those of you who joined me last night on Liberty Conspiracy, thank
you for doing so. Yes, we joined you our new Moscow home.
As you know, I endeavor very very hard to travel all around the world
and interview as many people as I possibly can so that I can get hypocritical
accusations of cozying up to warlords and dictators from CNN hosts and pop media hosts
who just generally don't like free speech. So yes, we're here inside the
bunker. This is all a completely fake green screen backdrop. I'm here underground,
probably about i'd say ten to fifteen meters underground, inside a very special
studio that Vladimir Putin got for me. So I hope you like it.
And most all the messages that I provide to you are not done in honor
of David Knight, you know, filling in for David the great news man,
the great great reporter, the great Christian apologist. No, nothing like
that. It's all, of course for Vladimir Putin, because that's what it's
all about. Let's see what's on tap for those stories that Vladimir Putin chose
for us today on The David Knight Show. Now, of course we can
reveal it. The show has always been brought to you by no just kidding.
Today on the David Knight Show, I am going to be looking at
a few items that if you joined me last night, we discussed and I
get to amplify them. Actually, we're gonna be hearing from our friend Matt
Munroe, the great singer of the James Bond theme from Russia with Love.
Yes, it is coming to you the entire show from Russia with Love.
Specifically, we'll look at the border bill and bombs. As the Duke's of
Stratosphere otherwise known as the band XTC might have said, us Love explodes all
over the world. Some very key information coming from anti war dot com.
That will probably be our first story, after we go through a couple of
very brief blush stories, for example, information from New Hampshire to South Carolina.
Also, our major second story will be that CNN attack on attempted journalism.
As CNN avoids its own bias, or actually avoids acknowledging its own bias,
you can't seem to stop tripping over its own bias. It doesn't acknowledge
its own bias. We'll also talk about guns with new core developments about the
right to keep in bare arms and a new story for MRCTV that is a
very complex story that has to do with new rules from the ATF. David
Knight got to cover this based on an original article by Jacob Sullom, and
David brought up a couple factors that Jacob could have amplified in his story from
Reason on Friday, and I paid attention to that as well, and so
we'll go through that towards the probably the third hour, second or third hour.
We'll also discuss Biden's pop media shills, doubling down on economic fantasies.
I'll give you that information from a video I got to shoot for MRCTV plus
Football UK Speech and Surveillance another video that I got to shoot for MRCTV that
it's quite offensive if you believe in freedom, and it is I think indicative
of how far ahead unfortunately, or you might say how far the UK has
regressed when it comes to free speech. Yes, the home of the magnet
Karta seems to be magnetized to censorship right now, that's for sure. Let's
head on over into the Rockfin and Rumble Chats and say hello to everyone in
there. Really appreciate you being there, everybody, and remember, if you
want to contribute to the program, feel free today Gardner Goldsmith being the guest
host GG, I hope that you feel free to join us. I see
that we've got a lot of good people already. They're a cult Priestess is
there, Miriam Myers is there, and I love the zossov Zoszov's is in
there as well as Mary Ellen Moore. Mary Ellen, I salute you and
thank you so much for being so kind to me on a personal level.
I really appreciate it. And we'll check in with the rumble Chat in just
a little while. Right now, everyone, I want to give you something
that is just near and dear to my heart. As you know, my
last being named being Goldsmith. I went to Boston University and a lot of
the students there thought I was Jewish. I'm not Jewish. It's an old
English name, and we all know that old English names are actually we all
know that those old English names are actually Russian. So let's hear a theme.
As you know, one of the major stories we will cover in just
a moment. Not to tease you or anything like that, but one of
the major stories we will cover in just a moment, is, of course,
Tucker Carlson going to Russia to interview Vladimir Putin. And since I do
work for the Media Research Center, some of the things on which I get
to report have to do with massive media hypocrisy and media figures trying to prejudice
people against what could be just straightforward information. Have some questions as to whether
or not Tucker Carlson will ask even handed questions of Putin. For example,
if he talks to Prutin about the killing of Gonzalo Leira by the Ukrainian government,
will he ask about the Russian government holding an American reporter whom they have
accused of spying and what the evidence might be about that? All that stuff
right now, Just to lay this out, I am a libertarian, but
I'm what's called a voluntarist. I'm technically I'm an anarchist. I want no
political controls over my neighbor. There is no anarchy the Greek root, no
human ruler, no ruler. The only ruler for me is our creator,
who created us all equally, as Jefferson said the Declaration of Independence. So
when it comes to a reporter visiting a head of state. I just want
to lay it out that I am not praising a head of state in any
way whatsoever, whether it be Vladimir Putin or any of the other previous heads
of state who have popped around, or any of the people who helped contribute
to the government as so called representatives, which is mathematically and philosophically impossible,
or any of the people who are in the bureaucracy or anything like that.
There are very strong philosophical reasons to oppose the state, there are logical reasons
to oppose the state, and there are very very strong moral reasons to oppose
the political influence over my neighbor's life, which I believe is not mine to
rule over my neighbor's life. But with that being stated, let's hop over
into a couple of the fresh stories for the morning, the breaking stories,
of course. So if you go to my Twitter slash x feed everybody,
you'll see one of the major breaking stories, and that is at Guard Goldsmith.
Everything I discuss here and everything I discussed on liberty conspiracy Monday through Friday
on Rockfind and Rumble in my Twitter feed sash x is available news wise.
You can find all those lengths. I always want to make sure that the
news is available to you at guard Goldsmith, gar D Goldsmith, and so
here it is, everybody. Nikki Haley is trounced by the none of these
candidates option in Nevada's Republican primary. So I'm up here in New Hampshire and
I got to see the ridiculousness of the New Hampshire primary, and now I
get to show you this from the AP. Let's go to our newsreader's voice
headline, Nicki Haley is trounced by the none of these candidates option in Nevada's
Republican primary. Oh no, Nikki, come back, Niki come back.
As Prince might have said, yes, one and all out of Las Vegas.
She threw the dice and it didn't come up. Snake eyes. Nicky
Haley was swamped in Nevada's symbolic Republican presidential candidate as GOP voters resoundingly picked the
none of these candidates option on the ballot in a repudiation of the former UN
ambassador who is the last remaining major rival to front runner Donald Trump. Okay,
doesn't mean I'm a supporter of Donald Trump. That's for sure, but
I do think it's kind of funny and it allows us a very good reminder.
Again, if you go to my Twitter slash x feed, I just
want to let you know a little something that might be important to keep in
mind when it comes to Nicki Haley. This is a piece from Lee Fang,
and again you can find this on my Twitter feed. But it shows
us some of the interests not only behind some of these presidential candidates, but
behind the so called border bill. And I've got a very large segment reserved
for the show today to get your feedback inside the chat. And also if
you want to comment inside the Twitter slash x feed, you can do so
that also works. I can see your comments, so Niki and rumble as
well. Here is the report from Lee Fang about Nicki Haley. Now,
the curious thing about Nicki Haley is that she went from being virtually in the
in bankruptcy close to it to having a five seven hundred square foot mansion in
Kiowa Island and it's worth five million dollars. And so let me show you
a little something about this. I've got it on both screens here, but
I'll take myself off screen so you can see this if you want to join
up with Lee Fang. This is his substack. This is a report that
came out in August, but I've always kept it in mind. I mentioned
it a few times because as Nicki, Haley said things like finish them and
after the October seventh Halmas attack on Israel, and she didn't mean just hamas
she meant Iran this warmonger. It really started to show who pulls her strings.
But I want to tie that into this larger piece that I want to
give you about the warmongers and their bombs exploding all around the world from the
United States and what that border bill actually was. So just to give you
this, if you scroll down a little ways here, you'll see here over
the last year, Haley and her husband reported a vast investment. Oh so
hold on, let me just go back up here. It is this is
he talks about an incendiary exchange in one of the primary debates between Vivek Bramashwami
and Hailey, and Haley told him in the end, you made America less
safe. You have no foreign You would make America less safe safe if you
have no foreign policy experience. And it shows well if foreign policy experience is
based on her pronouncements and foreign policy experience. A lot of innocent people,
more innocent people will lose their lives because of her, and the Constitution of
the United States will be further used as the British call it as bog roll.
So we'll continue the incendiary exchange, wrote Fang from last summer, which
instantly became a viral made for television exchange clip shared widely, belied a deeper
divide in foreign policy and the curious background of Haley, who went from near
negligible wealth and virtually no assets or investments other than a bank account with less
than fifteen thousand dollars in twenty seventeen and up to one million dollars in debt
to a sizable fortune. Yes, and by the way, BAE Systems has
a complex about twenty five minutes away from my house. Yeah, it's pretty
awesome. And also, just to let you know, the woman who was
a former US senator who then lost to Jean Shaheen or I think it was
Gene Shaheen No, then lost to Maggie Hassen for Senate. Her name is
Kelly Ayott. She was a former state attorney general in New Hampshire. While
she was out of politics. Yeah, she went on the board of Boeing.
No, she was on the board of BAE Systems. And then while
she was on the board of BAE Systems, she also appeared on Fox News
to push for more weapons to go to Ukraine. Yeah. By the way,
just as a quick aside, she also was on the board of Fox
News at that time. Yeah. It's good when you're on the gravy train.
And I'm not talking dog food that makes its own gravy. Ah,
great stuff. Great. Now she's running for governor of New Hampshire. I
can't wait to talk to her at a town meeting as long as they don't
manage them out of existence. So here's a little more about Nikki Hale,
the South Carolina counterpart to Kelly Ayott. Over the last year, Haley and
her husband reported a vast investment stock portfolio, wrote to Lee langback in August
of twelve million dollars in income million dollars. The former South Carolina governor left
the Trump administration. It was the best administration, the best warmongering. We
sat in Syria, we had the oil. It was great. The former
South Carolina governor left the Trump administration in twenty eighteen at a time when her
parents were struggling financially and had just faced foreclosure. Those days are over.
Haley now received resides in a five thousand, seven hundred square foot mansion on
Kawhi Island now worth I hope I pronounced that right, close to five million
dollars. Haley and her husband also helped sell a strip mall once owned by
her parents and worked to clear the family of previous debts. How did this
happen? Well, Lee faning Wright's. Along the way, Haley became wealthy
and large part from her ties to a network of defense interests and hawkish advocacy
organizations tied to US and Israeli intelligence officials. In one of her first reported
private sector jobs after leaving her last government post, Hailey joined the board of
Yeah You Got It. Rep. Oman Boeing, a defense contractor, a
position that paid around three hundred thousand dollars a year in cash and stock.
Haley, according to disclosures, still owns up to two hundred and fifty thousand
dollars in Boeing stock. Well, you know, when you get the stock,
it's kind of like you gotta operate the same way Jennifer grand Home did.
See when she was governor of Michigan, Jennifer grand Home worked to help
get the TARP bailout money to go to GM. They got billions of dollars,
and then she worked to have GM get six million dollars to the electric
bus company called Protera. Then after she left the office of governor from Michigan,
Jennifer Grant Hoolme was invited to join the board of Prota. I know,
it's like, wow, why didn't I think of that. It could
have had a V eight engine. Oh, no, you can't because it's
an electric vehicle in there. Try to eliminate V eight engines because they don't
want you to drive on your own. You're gonna have to be on some
silly electric bus and freezing in the winter time or maybe burning up so in
the summertime. So then after she left the board, they gave her stock
options. She held onto those stock options, didn't report them according to the
way the statutes are, when she was first proposed to be Energy secretary and
then sold those stock options just about eight weeks. By the way, she
made almost two million dollars off the Protera stock options. Jennifer Grant Holmes sold
the stock options and made almost two million dollars. About eight weeks before you
got it, Potera filed for bankruptcy protection. It's always good to get on
the gravy train, not talking dog food. Haley's primary income, aside from
speaking engagements, is from United Against a Nuclear Iran, an advocacy group Shrouded
in secrecy, the group which has lobbied for military strikes on Iran. Gee,
it's kind of interesting because she almost said exactly those things right after they
accused Iran of being connected to the Hamas attack on Israel, and of course
they re revealed they have no evidence of that. Yeah, there are a
lot of other things about which they have no evidence. We'll talk about that
via Anti War in just a minute. The group has lobbied for military strikes
in Iran is advised by Zohar Palti and tamyir Pardo to former Israeli intelligence officials
as well as many former US national security officials. The Department of Justice previously
intervened in a lawsuit to prevent the disclosure of United Against a Nuclear Irans donors,
because you know, it's the Department of justice. Yeah, you'll find
out how just it is if you just want to stop paying for it.
There's government justice for you. Hey, I won my court thing. Oh
well, now, actually the real winners of the court because they operate in
perpetuity off the backs of US slaves, claiming that doing so would cause harm
to national security. Hayley also works as a consultant for PRISM Global Management,
a New York based investment fund run by Richard Kang, a position that earned
seven hundred and eight thousand dollars. While the investment fund has no substantial online
presence, Kang is active in the defense world and serves as an advisor to
America's Frontier Fund, a new group backed by former Google chief executive Eric Schmidt
and run day to day by Gilman Lewie, the former head of inq Tel,
the CIA's venture capital arm. So I just want to let you know
that. Hey, you know, I have no dog in the race for
president, and I could care less whether Donald Trump does what I think is
inevitable gets the Republican primary. But it is kind of satisfying just to see
Nikki Haley continue to fall flat as some people recognize the absolutely unhinged nature of
many of the things this warmonger crazy statements of crazy person type person says.
So there you go. That is, I hope, a powerful little item.
And you can find that Lee Fang piece over at my Twitter slash x
and that's at guard Goldsmith. So while we have the opportunity, let's talk
now about a story from New Hampshire that again, it's a smaller story before
we go into the major stories. But I want to give this to you
because it's very odd. It's a very odd one and it allows us to
play another theme by one of my favorite British bands. You got it,
my friends, it's actually the Kinks. In America, people seem so confused
about gender and biology. Oh man, I do love those guys. I
love those guys. And by the way, Ray Davies has some wonderful country
music. I'd love to see the Davies brothers get together again. It's sort
of like the Gallagher brothers from Oasis. And I'm not talking Gallagher of one
and Gallagher too the prop comics. But what can you do musicians? Hopefully
they get to do what they enjoy and they make a living at it.
The Troubadour's Out there still going to town. And I love the cakes,
love those guys, love the who, all that rock and mod from the
sixties, especially from Britain. We'll get to another British story about a state
of confusion in just a minute via my MRCTV feed, but I want to
give you this one from New Hampshire because this is just a few towns away
from me. It's a little bit north from here, and you'll see there
there's Pollyanna and she's very happy. It's the town that was the home for
the author of the character Pollyanna. And that's from that nineteen thirteen book by
Eleanor H. Porter. I know, I've never read it. I've heard
about it, but I don't know too much about it. So here's the
headline. Check us out everyone again. Little story just to break the ice
here, but town manager quits over anti gay pressure in quaint New Hampshire town.
This is making big news all around the world. It was on the
Drudge Report, for what that's worth nowadays, it's it's actually a lot of
different places. It was trending for a little while on Twitter slash x.
So what's the story, Morning Glory, Well, here it is. It's
from the Ap by Nick Perry and Kathy McCormick, and they write the quaint
town of little and by the way, as a person who works for the
Media Research Center, check out the way the different ways they phrase this.
The quaint town of Littleton, New Hampshire is seeing more our tourists drawn to
a main street of shops and restaurants where rainbow colors and gay pride symbols can
be seen alongside American flags. Its population of six thousand is growing younger and
more diverse, supporting LGBTQ themed art and a local theater's gay themed musical.
Again, this is little to New Hampshire. There's a lot of little ski
resorts around there. Okay, Well, the changes they say haven't been comfortable
for town select board member Carrie Zendro, who also serves as a Republican state
senator. Last year, she said that quote homosexuality is an abomination, and
spoke of end quote and spoke of regulating art on public property. That prompted
a backlash, drawing crowds to normally sleepy board meetings and led to the resignation
of town manager Jim Gleeson, whose late son was gay. Quote my Son
is not an abomination, Gleeson told the select Board in January to a standing
ovation. When he announced his last day was Friday. He accused Jendro of
creating a toxic work environment by repeatedly making derogatory comments about gay people. Friday
also was Gendro's deadline to file for re election to the board, but she
didn't, so her three year term ends in March. Ah, So everything's
behind everyone, right, Everything's no, not quite a former milltown in the
White Mountains, Littleton, how dare they call them? White? Littleton reversed
a long decline in part through art. Tourists come now for antiques, galleries,
boutiques, and the world's longest Canti candy counter. They also look at
the bronze statue of Pollyanna, erected outside the public library to honor the nineteenth
teen book by local author Eleanor H. Porter, whose main character came to
define relentless optimism. Pollyanna. Right. Oh, by the way, if
you ever visit Irvington, New York, Irvington on Hudson was named after Washington
irving In front of their library, they have a statue of a Rip Van
Winkle with his long beard underneath a tree, sleeping or just waking up and
looking at I can't remember if he's a sleeper waking up, but it's a
really neat statue because he's actually lying on the ground. It's kind of fun
to see. And was actually right next to the Foundation for Economic Education's headquarters
until they moved to Georgia. And what a wonderful spot at that New York
location was. It was just great. It's just great. So okay we're
talking. You know, FA Hia helped start it, Henry Hazlett helped start
it, you know, some some real heavy hitters and free market economics.
It was wonderful to be there. So so Polly and his model be Glad,
which hangs from banners up and down Main Street, has been tested as
townspeople found themselves debating over inclusion, tolerance, and equality. Controversy began in
August after three small murals funded by a diversity, equity and Inclusion grant.
That's the first flag for me, I say to myself. A grant from
Home appeared on the side of a building that houses a restaurant and clothing store,
covering boarded up windows. The murals show a white iris against a color
wheel, two birch trees bending under a night sky, and a dandelion reaching
skyward from an open book. What went up was not good, said Jendro,
urging that they select board's audience to research what the symbols actually mean.
I don't want that to be in our town. The board then sought an
attorney's advice on what they could do to regulate artistic expression on town property.
Gendro gave several interviews to on the Boston Globe that the Iris painting carried demonic
hidden images the artist and you can see the image right here. The artist
Meg Reinhold said her We Are Joy painting was inspired by Iris, the Greek
goddess of rainbows. She told the Associated Press in an email that she hoped
to evoke feelings of joy and empowerment, add beauty to Littleton, and celebrate
people living with pride in the LGBTQ community. Also, just a quick one,
you can note here if a viewer looks at those works and sees demons
in darkness, what does that tell us about how they view the world?
Reinhold said, and of course doesn't have the proper pronouns there a viewer and
they Okay, that's all right, because we're in America in the twenty first
century. Gleeson. Also, Gleeson, who answered to the board as town
manager, said he tried to resolve matters when a woman approached him demanding to
stop the November production of Lakaja Fall, depicted on screen as the bird Cage,
said she was free to protest outside the theater or not buy a ticket.
Okay, so here's where we can stop. So just to let you
know, I looked around and try to find out what form of DEI grant
that was, whether it was state, federal, or local. I couldn't
find out. And in the end it doesn't matter. Also, the La
Caja Foe play that was put on at a theater, that play was a
co production between the theater troupe and the local government, which gave a grant
for or help support the theater. So there's political intervention. There's political involvement
here, okay. So if we go back up to the top of this,
what is absolutely fascinating here is the way that they talk about how the
phrasing of this. They say the changes haven't been comfortable for town select board
member Carrie Jendro, and of course it's causing a backlash and the sleepy board
meetings. People are very upset here at these board meetings, and Gleason accused
Gendro of creating a toxic work environment. Okay, how about we step back
for a second and talk about what is actually toxic here. All of these
people are operating inside a sphere of coercion against all the other people out there.
Everything they're doing, whether it's supporting a theater to put on La Caaja
fo or it's getting a grant, whether it be local, state or federal
for diversity, equity and Inclusion DEI, whatever it is. The toxic environment
that they're missing is the aggression of the gun of government that they're pointing at
every taxpayer who, regardless of how they feel about Lakaje Foe or to what
degree their opinions, probably aren't going to be exactly the same as the other
person. And yet everybody's going to be forced to pay for these things.
How about this? How about the less often that happens the better. How
about that? How about you don't assume you have the right to tell your
neighbor what to pay for to leave a preposition dangling. How about you leave
your neighbor alone. How about you recognize what the toxic work environment is when
you are enslaving your neighbor for X number of hours a day or per week
to then fund a play that you like, whether it's Lakaja Foe or it's
it's a I don't know a Shakespeare play. What's the difference if they don't
want their money spent on it, if they have different priorities, Who the
heck am I to say to that person? I know better than you how
to support the community? And how does it support community cohesiveness to constantly have
that threat there and then get everybody arguing against each other? How is that
at all representative of community values? The constant pointing them the gun in a
round robin way. How about you eliminate those things and actually let the market
show what people like. The only way that humans can express their valuation is
through voluntary action. All action that is coerced through the police immediately negates the
ability of the person who originally earned the money to show what or how much
he admires or cherishes something. So by assuming for your neighbor that you know
better than he or she does how to spend his money. You are negating
the ability of your neighbor to actually show what he or she values. As
I've mentioned before, when when the United States government or your state puts money
into say cancer, Reese or Alzheimer's research, and then these fatuous politicians come
out and claim, oh, America cares about cancer or Alzheimer's, it doesn't
mean America cares at all because it has by definition. Logically, rhetorically,
you can go into a logic class, you can go into a philosophy class.
It immediately negates the source of choice the individual. It does this every
time politics is involved. So my position as an anarchist is I don't support
that philosophically. Practically, I would say, how about this, even if
you're not willing to come as far as I am to oppose the state on
philosophical and moral grounds, because it is an imposition on my neighbor. Even
if we can not come to terms on that, how about we get to
the point where we say the less often this sort of thing happens, the
better. The more often people are left to choose what they're entertainment or art
or whatever might be the better. So we eliminate as many public buildings as
possible, get rid of even that Pollyanna statue. Some people might have thought,
well, that's a waste of money, isn't it. And the library,
which is supposed to be this saintly thing. I worked at a used
bookstore for a long time. You know who competed against us, the library,
So we had tax funded competition against us. How can you stand against
the library? That's terrible for kids. How do you know standing against the
library is terrible for kids? Maybe a child can learn that the library,
if it's publicly funded, represents taking people's money against their will. That's the
only way a public library is funded right generally speaking, unless they get a
few grants or something like that. The premise of it is, as a
public entity, it will have access to other people's money, whether they want
to or not want to pay for it or not. I want to eliminate
as many of those things as possible, and that is on moral grounds.
The consequentialists out there might say, well, what would the outcome be.
I don't care about what the outcome is. I don't have the right to
force my neighbor to pay for a book when I worked at the bookstore.
I didn't have the right to pick the pocket of the customer and say,
hey, thanks for buying that book. Here you go. But that's what
libraries do. It's completely im moral. None of it is acceptable. It's
undebatable because in the end, if you try to debate it, you'll lose.
On the other side if you try to say that there's a moral argument,
because you're not talking morality. You're talking what you think is the practical
outcome of helping X Y or Z E kid. You're not talking about the
moral imposition of using aggressive threats against your neighbor to pay for what you want,
whether it's a Pollyanna statue or a library, or a La Caja Foe
or a painting so Lyttleton. They might learn if they pared down some of
these things, and then maybe they wouldn't argue because in the end, and
the arguments really arise when something is run in what they call the tragedy of
the commons. The tragedy of the commons being an economic principle, which is
when something is not privately owned and you pull a whole bunch of people together
and force them together, people of disperate ideas and thoughts and interests and goals
with where their money is going to go. They will start to argue,
and of course, in the end, with the tragedy of the commons,
the people who can gain the most power will try to get their bread buttered,
and everybody else will be left follow. Now, when it comes to
natural resources like forests and things like that, when the government owns those and
runs those and then they rent them out to whatever interests the politicians want,
you know, whether it's oil oil companies or forestry companies or whatever, the
people who can go in there generally have less incentive to husband that resource because
they have a limited time when to go in, get the stuff, and
get out. So the tragedy the commons with government not only gets everyone arguing
about how that resource that the government runs and forces everybody to pay for how
that will be run, But in addition to that, the tragedy of the
commons inspires resource misallocation and resource depletion. They don't husband these things. And
I'll give you the great example that I've given on my show A couple of
times. When I was leaving Vancouver where I worked at a television show called
The Outer Limits, and I was driving back east around in December, I
had to get my car repaired in Bellevue, Washington, just outside of Seattle.
I had come down from Vancouver and was starting across and one of the
guys who worked there said he saw my lift for You or Die license plate
from New Hampshire. And he said, hey, i'll take a discount off
if you promised me to send one of your license plates. So I'm like,
yeah, sure, no problem, that'd be great. And I said,
I got a couple old ones at home. I'll send them over to
you. So he goes, oh, thanks, man. So it was
really nice and we started talking about economics. I told him, you know,
I teach economics and so on, and so he said, you know,
you want a great example of that, Look on the north side of
the highway when you go through Snowsquamy pass over this mountain on the east side
of Seattle and Bellevue, and he says, look on the north side of
the highway, and then look on the south side. On the north side,
you'll see the forest that's run by Warehouser. They don't clearcut, they
selectively cut. They try to husband their resources because it's a long term investment.
They don't want soil depletion or forest fires or anything like that. They
take care of things. He said, look on the south side. On
the south side, it's owned by the federal government and they rented out clear
cut soil depletion, mineral depletion. It's a mess. And he was absolutely
right. You could see the stark difference as you drove across. It was
amazing. Somebody could have done a quick five minute documentary and shown it to
kids and economics as a terrific opening to talk about the economic axioms of private
property and husbanding. In fact, of the very concept of resource discovery an
allocation a resource. Things that people claim are natural resources, they're not resources
until human beings recognize a value in them. Right. So for example,
if you look at oil, it was a mineral sludge for centuries until someone
found a use that was more efficient and more widespread and better than just lubrication
for oil. Right. So you go from the pyramids where they're throwing the
oil on and try to slide things around, as we saw in the Ten
Commandments. And by the way, was it cecilby de mill Or Selznik was
the producer that he did a black and white version of that film about ten
years before he did the color version, and they recently they were in the
desert in Nevada talking about Nevada with Nikki Haley. They were in the desert
in Nevada and somebody discovered all these weird Egyptian things under the sand, and
it was because of the old black and white I think it might have been
silent version. Rather than finishing when they were done, rather than transporting them
back to Hollywood, they had no use for them. They just buried them
in the sand. So people in the vatter are digging on like, what's
this Egyptian stuff? It was from the original Ten Commandments. And then I
guess was David o'celznik right or Cecil Beet, I can't remember. He wanted
to do it again, and that's when, of course he brought Charlton Heston.
And by the way, Charlton Heston and another quick aside, was a
remarkable man. I wrote to Charlton Heston because I was badly injured in the
nineties. I had to do a lot of physical therapy. Wasn't sure if
I was going to be able to walk properly, a lot of weird stuff
going on. My immune system was too high. I took hydroxy chloro quein
at the time to lower my immune system, so I was very familiar with
hydroxy chloroquein, when, of course Anthony Fauci didn't want to talk about it.
I already knew that hydroxychloroquin modulated the immune system and was a potent mediator
against SARS from a two thousand and five study that of course got funding from
the NIH, and Anthony Founci knew about it but never discussed it. Strange,
that isn't it. But I was pretty badly injured, and I would
listen to these cassettes from a company called Knowledge Products, A lot of very
very good libertarian writers, just terrific people. I think David Bato wrote one
of the scripts for that. A lot of really good people on economics and
philosophy, and the narrator of the world's great philosophers was Charlton Heston. So
I learned more from those tapes as I rehabilitated and started to walk and you
know, did exercises, just repeatedly listening to those over and over again about
Bruck's Bonoza or Emmanuel Kant or Aristotle, and later bud Light did radio and
television commercials with Charlton Heston. You might remember some of those commercials. The
radio ads were actually formatted the same way as those cassettes, where the cassettes
would come on and they would have Charlton Heston say, let's uh. He
would say, let's say it's about Emmanuel Kant, right, He'd say,
according to Kant, it's the subjective nature of reality one cannot surpass. And
then they would go into a man doing the emmanual convoice and be like,
the subjectivity is the root of the problem. And then Heston would come back
and he'd say, CONT's view was blah blah blah blah blah. So these
ads for bud Light came on with Charlton Heston saying, let's see how one
man made his night a bud Light night. So the guy, the character
or whatever who's the subject, say I was in a bar, and then
Heston jumps in, like two quick, he was in a bar, you
know, And it was just like these tapes, but they sort of tweaked
it to make it funny. And so I was so entertained by the commercials
and buy the cassettes and so on. And I admired Charlton Heston's work for
the Second Amendment so much that I contacted him and I asked him if you
would be willing to do an interview for the thirtieth anniversary of Planet of the
Apes. It's one of my favorite films. Rod Serling wrote most of the
screenplay. And so I got a reply from Charlton Heston like two weeks later,
written by him, typed by him, mailed by him, and it
was really amazing because I had sent off in addition to my request, I
sent off comments about the ads and the tapes and how much I liked the
tapes, and I sent them some of my articles about freedom, and I
sent them a copy of Frederick Bastier's eighteen forty eighteen thirty nine essay The Law,
and it's about statute created by the state versus natural law, and the
opening line is the law perverted. It's politicians claiming they can write laws for
people, and so on, and he goes into how taxation is theft,
it's majority sanctioned plunder. So I sent all these things off to Charlton Heston
two weeks later get a letter from Charlton Heston from his house and uh,
and you know, I'm not too you know, I worked in Hollywood and
so on, so you meet actors, it's just their just their work and
so on. But Charlton Heston's slightly different story because of the things that he
did in philosophy and the ways he tried to stand up for what was right,
and and it was just nice. It was nice to get the letter
from him, and he said, thank you so much for your articles.
I read them with great interest. Thank you for your comment about that the
Knowledge Products tapes. He says, it's funny when you mentioned those commercials,
I didn't make the connection, but now that you mentioned it, I think
you're right. They probably did. And those tapes aren't very well known at
all. They probably modeled them after the tapes and they are they're very esoteric.
Not a lot of people know about those tapes, and they're they're brilliant.
I mean, if you want to get a good philosophy class, just
get the Knowledge Product stuff. It's they're amazing. It's you'll be teaching yourself.
And so he said, and thank you for the copy of the law.
You're right, it's one of the best. I usually reread it every
few years, which again that showed me that this man was very interested in
liberty, libertarian themes and economics, and he had such a deft way of
actually expressing to me, you know, I already owned this, I've already
got it, but thank you for being one of those people connected to this.
You know, he did it in that way. You're right, it's
one of the best. I usually reread it every few years, and that
was very very cool. And later, just as as you know, a
quick note, I was extremely disappointed to see the way that Michael Moore treated
Charlton Heston, who was you know, affected by memory loss in Alzheimer's towards
the end of his life. I was I was very frustrated to see the
way that Michael Moore. Is it Michael Moore, Yeah, the way that
he did his bowling for Columbine movie. And he more went and got a
lifetime membership to the NRA, so that when he went and buzzed at Charlton
Heston's gate out in LA he was able to say, I'm a lifetime member
of the NRA. Technically that's the term that he bought but it implied that
he had been a longtime member of the NRA and he wanted an interview with
Charlton Heston about firearms and so on, and so Heston said, well,
you know, I'm a little busy right now in a meeting, but if
you want to come back tomorrow and stop, I will give you lunch.
Heston invited him into his own house, gave him lunch himself, gave more,
and of whoever was with the camera thing lunch himself, and then more
starts jawing at him, asking him questions about NRA meetings in Colorado. That
if you actually knew anything about these meetings, they came after the Columbline shooting,
but they adjusted the meetings so that they would be pared down in respect
to the people who were there and so on. And of course it has
nothing to do with the right to keep in bear arms. If more people
had firearms, there'd be fewer instances of people trying to take advantage of them
with their own violence, so Heston said, and I'm paraphrasing, of course,
but Heston said, you know, I don't know where you're driving.
You know where you're going here, but I don't think this is really a
productive conversation here, You're not. I'm giving you answers, and you just
keep saying the same things over and over again. You know, I told
you what we did. We changed the format and people have a right to
keeping bear arms. I'm going to have to ask you to leave more wouldn't
leave Heston's house. So if you're not familiar with this, and a lot
of you probably are, But again, out of respect for Charlton Heston,
whom I admired greatly coming off of this Nevada ten Commandments thing, you know,
it's an opportunity for me to get this information out. So and I
know the David Knight audience, you know, very very dedicated to principle and
generally speaking, I know maybe there might be one or two or but you
know, I'm obviously complimenting you and so on, but I think I think
this audience is just stellar, and David is stellar. And Charlton Heston left
his own house and walked down the street, leaving Moore in his house.
And get this, Michael Moore had the gall later in his bowling for Columbine
Film. And you can find websites that go through all of the inconsistencies and
false edits and false information that is in that film. He edited Charlton Heston
and took an appearance of Charlton Heston when he would raise his rifle and say
out of my cold dead hands, and claimed that the scene that he portrayed
the scene of Heston doing that which he did not do in the Colorado NRA
meeting, as showing temporarily that that happened in Colorado. He did that to
Charlton Heston, who invited him into his own house, and then Moore wouldn't
leave the house. That's the character of Michael Moore. Now maybe Moore has
changed a little bit. I've heard him speaking a couple of bits about peace
and so on here and there. I'd have to see a lot, and
you try to forgive people for stuff like this, but that was just beyond
the pale, you know, just being so blind to your own aggressive treatment
of another person and mistreatment of that person when it comes to truth. I
don't know how somebody can sit with himself to do that. How can you
make yourself feel comfortable in that sort of living environment. I don't get it.
But with that stated, let's head over from New Hampshire, the lesson
of the tragedy of the comments and so on, and get into this story
from war the warmongers and Russia. And for that, we're gonna need a
theme, everybody, And you know what, I think it's gotta be a
little something from Edwin Star. Oh boy, I hear that. Looks like
we've got a little tech thing going on here. Let me just check this
out for y'all. Here. I'm gonna put myself back on the screen and
oh, thank you so much. Everybody. Looks like we have a tech
thing happening, and I'll take care of this. I think I can take
care of it real quick. Hold on just a minute here, looks like
maybe them Hold on a second. I'm gonna be doing something real quick.
I'm sorry about that. Hold on, hold on okay, Oh gee whiz
okay, yep, okay, And I'm gonna do this and do it again,
all right, and just let me know if you can hear the audio.
I'm gonna try this again real quick here and see what I can do
and go like this, and just let me know if you can hear this
audio. Okay, everybody, here we go, I hope. All right,
let's see if that gets it going. I hope so, I hope
so great, great, great, Okay, Yeah, So let's get into
the major stories here that are on tap. And of course I think part
of the major coverage that I want to give to you has to do with
the Tucker Carlson visit to Russia. And just to give you a quick information
about Tucker Carlson's visit to Russia, don't forget everybody that we are, of
course sponsored by the Russian government here at my Liberty Conspiracy Show. And so
I hope that I can show you our sponsors there. They are right there
from Russia with love, all right, So I want to take the opportunity
up. It looks like are we getting audio? I hope we're getting audio.
I hope we're getting audio. Please let me know, I hope.
So again, I'll check in on rockfinchat and double check and see that we're
getting audio. I hope we are. Let me know. For not getting
audio, I haven't had a It's very strange because I went back through the
tech and it should be operating. And so just let me know, and
I'll cross my fingers on that, okay, because otherwise I'll make some changes
here and do something different for you. So yeah, okay, so we'll
see. We'll see it looks like Harps is in the chat no audio during
clips. Okay, thanks Harps. I'll try it again and see. I
appreciate it, Harps very much. Let me try one more time here,
just to make sure. I'll go back in here, and we're gonna do
this again. And so I'm gonna go into this and just again, sorry
about this, do this again. I'm gonna go like this. I'm gonna
go like this. Okay, go like this, go like this, try
it again. Okay, we'll see how it goes. And let's see if
we can do this up. And sorry for the the momentary mess up here.
And okay, now we're gonna go over here again and give it a
shot. There's Matt Moune and we'll go back with Matt. I'm smiled worm
moent, but oh you hooded me, so all right, let's give it
a shot. Otherwise, I'll make some changes to my video presentations which I
was hoping to show to you. Okay, Harps, thank you for being
in that chat over on X and he's got sound good. Okay, great.
I apologize everyone, gee whiz. Well, Okay, jeez, that's
a little frustrating, but thanks for sticking with it. I really appreciate it.
All fixed, says Stephen Casper. Thank you so much, Thank you
so much. Appreciate it. Okay, So let's get into a couple of
the items I want to discuss with you on this news story out of the
warmongers of the United States. So here is a quick update from anti war
dot Com. House fails to pass seventeen point six billion dollar Israel military aid
bill. Bill needed a two thirds majority and failed in a vote of two
fifty to one eighty. Senate confirms China hawk Kurt Campbell as Deputy Secretary of
State. From antiwar dot Com and Israel says more than a fifth of Israeli
hostages in Gaza are dead. Okay, they say the revelation will likely increase
the domestic pressure on netan Yahoo. All right, Well, as we saw
that border bill come around, let's hear from those people who want to make
sure that we understand that the United States border bill, which is basically a
non starter coming out of the Senate and going into the House, that the
US so called border bill, they want to make sure that you no,
it has a lot to do with stopping so called Russian aggression and stopping Hamas
from destroying Israel, when, of course, Israel, since it started its
retaliatory strikes on Hamas in Palestine, has killed upwards of about twenty five thousand
people. And they can't tell who were supposed terrorists and who weren't. They
can't tell who were innocent victims. But one thing's for sure, nearly half
of the people killed were women and children. But I want to give this
to you just so that you have this information, of course, from Nancy
Pelosi. Here she is talking about if you call for a ceasefire in the
Middle East, you're obviously or if you call for a ceasefire or peace with
Ukraine, you're obviously working the Putin agenda phill Y's address that But for them
to call for a ceasefire is mister Putin's message, mister Putin's message, Make
no mistake. This is directly connected to what he would like to see.
Same thing with Ukraine. It's about Putin's message. Okay, Now let's hear
something David Knight played yesterday Chuck Schumer talking about how, of course, if
the United States doesn't continue to fund the proxy government that it helped install in
late twenty thirteen early twenty fourteen in Ukraine after years of NATO expansion, contrary
to the agreements of James Baker that were given to the former Soviet Union,
as the former Soviet leaders promised that as Russia emerged from the Soviet Union,
they would disengage the former Soviet bloc Iron Curtain nations and they would get an
agreement from the West that the West would not expand NATO. The Russians kept
their agreement and the West did not well. Of course, they overthrew the
government in late twenty thirteen in Ukraine and the Maidan Kup. They installed a
new government thanks to Victoria Neulan and Jeffrey Pyatt from the United States, And
you can hear them in their phone call and that infamous f the EU phone
call, and you'll know very well that they worked with Nazis like Ola Townybuck
of the Slovada Party. But all of that stated, we know that it's
Vladimir Putin who has intentions on rolling across Europe, going west, just like
Hitler walking across the water and going into England and then somehow levitating to Nova
Scotia coming down Maine into the United States and attacking the United States. Chuck
Schumer knows all about it, So how dare you possibly think that he has
other interests like defense contractors or ties to the Israeli government to have them pushed
into Palestine and take it over. As Benjamin at Yahoo openly stated, from
the river to the sea himself before the Palestinians use that phrase his the Coud
party was using it as an expression of pushing all of the Palestinians out of
Gaza. But how dare you be skeptical and not want the expansion of the
warfare state from people like Chuck Schumer who folded in a lot of money for
that in the so called border bill. And by the way, Conservatives,
again, when you mix in that border thing, you've got to look at
that Constitution please and remember that the word immigration isn't in there. It is
a state matter, and the states can request aid from the federal government if
the states, under Article four Section four, claim that their form of government
is being threatened by violence or an invasion. The state legislature can ask,
or a state governor can ask, which is exactly what Abbott has done.
I know he's been very close with the WEF, and people from in that
area say he could have done a lot more on the border a long time
ago. And it's very important to remember that, regardless of Supreme Court decisions,
there is no language in the US Constitution that gives the federal government the
a priori first dibbs control over anything to do with the border that is not
there. So this entire border bill was based on a faulty assumption. But
when you see what they folded into it, you'll know that it had nothing
to do with the border. It had to do with military industrial contracts and
the people getting reelected. Here's Schumer, of course, making sure that he
threatens all of us with his fear mongering, along with the daughter, of
course, of the man who helped create the Trilateral Commission so big New Brazinski
and got the United States involved in Afghanistan supplying Stinger missiles to the Mujahideen and
propping up the you know what al Qada group. But you know, these
are totally totally cool people and you should just trust them. In America,
this bill is crucial and history will look back on it and say, did
America fail itself? Why is it crucial? Well, if we don't aid
Ukraine, Putin will be walk all over Ukraine. We will lose the war
and we could be fighting in Eastern Europe in a NATO ally in a few
years. Americans won't like that. There's Joe Biden. Biden says, if
you don't help Ukraine now or send you can help Ukraine now, or send
Americans to fight Russia with NATO later. Why why? Why is this in
any part and interest of the United States in any way whatsoever? I don't
understand it. And sending weapons over there, I'd like for them to find
for me the section of the Constitution that lets them do that if there's no
declared war, and that goes for the soldiers, if you're being sent abroad.
Please tell me how that can happen in a time when there's no declared
war. Here's Lindsey Graham with Dick Blumenthal. I showed this last night on
the show for Liberty Conspiracy. Liam McCollum has this quote from this infamous quote
from Lindsey Graham. I locked the path we're on with US weapons and money,
Ukraine will fight Russia to the last Ukrainian, says Lindsey Graham. And
of course that Ukrainian dead seventy one thousand plus, that's closer to a quarter
million now, and Russian dead it's more towards twenty one thousand. So just
to let you know about that, he's with Dick Blumenthal. Dick Blumenthal claimed
that he did active duty in Vietnam and then he got spat upon when he
got off the plane. He did not see active duty in Vietnam. That
Dick Blumenthal guy is a really repulsive character, a senator of course from Connecticut.
Unbelievable. These people just they have no shame. They're like Michael Moore.
And of course, just to let you know, here is a still
shot of Amy Klobashar, Senator McCain now deceased, and Lindsey Graham in Ukraine
with people who have been identified, some of them as members of the Azov
Battalion pro Nazis that were down slaughtering people in the Donbass for years. One
of the impetuses impeti impetuses for Vladimir Putin to go into Ukraine, so people
ought to keep that in mind. In fact, let's see some footage of
Lindsey Graham as. Oh, first, before we even do that, let
me show you the way that Tucker Carlson's being depicted for talking to Vladimir Putin.
Now, did the pop media ask any questions of Victoria Newland about their
association with the overt Nazis in Ukraine, about the United States overthrowing the government
of Ukraine? Did they ask any of that stuff? No, they didn't.
When CNN went and did an interview with Osama bin Laden, was that
considered journalism? Yes? It was. Is Vladimir Putin a person with whom
a journalist can speak? Sure? Is Tucker Carlson going to conduct an interview
with him that hopefully will be fair and ask some pertinent and pointed questions?
I hope so. But let's hear how CNN is trying to preface this and
get people to prejudge it. Okay, this is CNN again, CNN,
CNN which pushed the Steele dossier nonsense, which of course tries to depict people
who are pro freedom and anti war as being part of a Russian propaganda campaign.
Right, they don't have a problem interviewing Osama bin Laden, But the
idea of Tucker Carlson going to interview Vladimir Putin, who when he gave his
presentation about why he was invading Ukraine. As much as I don't like him
ordering troops to be invading Ukraine, everything he said was historically accurate about the
agreements that were given to the Russians by the West, and how they were
broken, about what was happening to the people in the don Bass, about
the Ukrainian energy agreements that had been made with the elected president that got overthrown,
all that stuff. Where was CNN talking about the Hunter Biden laptop when
we all know that Hunter Biden was put on the board of Barisma, and
I was talking about it in twenty sixteen with my students. He was put
on the board of Barisma to stop Barisma from dealing with the Russians, and
of course as a big payoff. Here's CNN a massive shakeup in Kiev coming
as Putin is trying to court the MAGA GOP in the United States. In
fact, one of the leaders of the Maga GOP is in Moscow tonight.
It's the man you see here with the leader, Donald Trump. Tacker Carlson
possibly there in Moscow to interview Putin. Definitely there as a putin supporting celebrity
celebrity. Just listen to how Russian state media is breathlessly. So I don't
appreciate the fact that Tucker Carlson is supportive of Donald Trump. Okay, Donald
Trump remained in Syria when he should have left. He stayed in Afghanistan far
too long after promising he was going to get out, started to prepare to
get out. As Ron Paul says, everybody wonders, how do you get
out? How do you do it? How do you extract yourself from this?
You lead, you go and to the soldiers who allowed themselves to get
sent over into those places. Don't let anybody tell you you have a right
to self defense. When you're an occupying entity in a foreign country, you
have no right to self defense there, And you certainly have no right to
self defense using firearms that were purchased off the backs of other people without their
consent. That's like a mafioso saying he has every right to use a gun
and that he stole from somebody's house. It doesn't work that way. So
CNN obviously trying to portray Tucker Carlson as being pro Maaga and of course Donald
Trump being connected to the Russians, so we can't listen to anything that they
actually might come up with in their conversation, just negate it from the start,
which is what they're trying to do here. It's amazing celebrating his visit
from independent journalists Hucker Carlson has flown to Russia from the US Turkey airport.
He's how Spartacus Ballet at the Bolshoy Theater, had lunch in a nice restaurant,
would have went for a ride around town, rode the subway smart He
charged his smartphone via USB port and connected to a fast and free Wi Fi
in he charged this phone although they're knowing the details about the fact that it
was during u peport may give him reason to think twice about all of this.
But look at them talking about him like a celebrity. Everything he does
on camera breathlessly repeated. Now, it is unclear if an interview between Putin
and Carlson will take place, but if it does, it gives Putin a
chance to sit down with a big supporter. So it might be worth asking
yourself, since it is getting pretty serious, what is this really about?
Why do I hate Putin so much? Has Putin ever called me a racist?
Has he threatened to get me fired for disagreeing with him? Does he
eat dogs? These are fair questions, and the answer to all of them
is no. Vetterer Putin didn't do any of that. I'll actually always remember
watching that clip. I was standing in Ukraine forty eight hours before the war
begin there, all right, So curiously enough, everybody, as that CNN
reporter says, I was in Ukraine forty eight hours before the war began there?
Did she happen to report any of the meetings between the Americans and the
Nazis? Because she was there, she could have talked about it. She
could have asked for an interview with Oh, I don't know, old E
Tianibach, the leader of the Slovada Party. She could have mentioned the Azah
battalion. She didn't do that. She didn't do that. She's trying to
say, essentially, don't listen to Tucker Carlson in any of the information that
he comes up with, any of the questions he asked of Vladimir Putin,
why not listen? When CNN went to interview Osama bin Laden, why not
listen? Why not hear what he had to say. You thought in CNN
that it was worth talking to him, Is it not worth hearing from Vladimir
Putin? Especially when if we compare the stuff that Vladimir Putin has said about
the Ukraine situation to what you covered and what you didn't cover at CNN,
Clearly, of all things, the leader of Russia was more honest than CNN
has been support Vladimir Putin. I'm just stating the facts. If you put
the scales out, you can see CNN's got nothing on the scale. Let's
look at this video of Amy Klobashar, Lindsey Graham, and John McCain meeting
with people. In that still shot, you saw them in the Russian military,
some of whom have been claimed to have been associated with the Ash Battalion.
And then I'll show you an even closer shot of John McCain on stage
with ole Tiani Bach, the leader of the Nazi Slovada Party. Here they
are talking about how, of course your paycheck has to be used to send
money over to Ukraine, even before the Russians invaded. This is before the
Russians invaded. This was the United States arming the proxy government of Ukraine.
Prior to the Russian invasion, the Nazi proxies were getting US support in don
Bass and killing innocent women and children, and these people were there to promise
more of this, and they used the pretext of the Crimea defense. In
twenty fourteen, after the United States overthrew the government in Ukraine, the Russians
went and blocked Crimea from further incursions by the Ukrainian government, and of course
the United States portrayed that as an aggressive act. In fact, if you
look at Barack Obama, Obama issued an executive order in March of twenty fourteen
which was one of the key starts of the whole Russian narrative, saying,
the Russians are aggressive in Crimea. We have to watch out for this.
We're citing Russia as an aggressive force. Here's this check this out. That's
for you. But kids, cho, your fight is our fight. Masha
Buribas and Nasal Buriba, twenty seventeen would be the year of offense with the
RICO. Enough of them, all of us will go back to Washington and
we will push the case against Russia. Enough of a Russian aggression. It
is time for them to pay a heavier price. Our fight is not with
the Russian people, but with Putin. Let's put it in. Our promise
to you is to take your calls to Washington, inform the American people of
your bravery, and make the case against Putin to the world. I believe
you will win. I am convinced you will win, and we will do
everything we can to provide you with what you need to win. So again,
these are people who swore os to the US Constitution. Can you tell
me any of you people in politics where you find a constitutional provision to send
weapons anywhere, or teddy bears anywhere, or anything anywhere. Whether you think
it's helping people or you think it's going to help your defense contractors or whatever,
it doesn't matter what your intent is. Under your constitutional provisions, you're
not allowed to do that. They try to make it as restrictive as possible.
And yet you flout these things and fly over to these other countries and
hang out with these people. And I think it's pretty clear when you see
photographs of Joe Biden shaking Chowneybox's hand, of John McCain in the room with
Chowney Bock, of him on stage with Johnnybock that they had to have known.
When you hear Victorian Newlan speaking with Jeffrey Piot and mentioning Johnny bach as
the person they have to rope in, it's very clear they know. They
had to have known what these people were like. They had to have known
that the CIA had been working there for a long time with those Nazi elements.
They had to have known. You move on the promotion the sunt and
we have succeeded, not because of equipment, but because of your courage.
Speak so, I thank you, and the world is watching. And the
world is watching because we cannot allow Vladimir Putin to succeed here, because if
he succeeds here, he will succeed in other countries. The queer all right,
now here is the shot. I want to freeze, frame this for
you and point this out to you. That's John McCain and Keev in front
of a massive crowd. The man right here is Ole chany bach Oi chauny
Bak. If you want to look it up, I've got photographs. You
can even find it on Wikipedia. The head of the Slovada party svo b
o d a soova Da party that is a Nazi Party. And here is
John McCain talking to the people there with him. Next to him, people
of Ukraine, this is your moment, by the way, over his shoulder.
Right here is Senator Chris Murphy from Connecticut and Johnny Bach is over here
on the right. Now they will create skins, say last moment. This
is about you, no one else, Sea bravas. This is about the
future you want for your country. This is about the future you deserve,
bro Vaja. Now you get a future in Europe, my boot, the
European, a future of peace. My boy lives with all of your neighbors.
Yeah. See, the free world is with you. America is with
you. I am with you. And the destiny you seek lies in Europe.
Vahada, young man Jamas now called it European. Ukraine will make Europe
better and Europe will make Ukraine better. Here news now at APS Radio news
dot com or get the APS Radio app and never miss another story. You're
listening to the David Night Show. Good stuff, good stuff, wonderful music.
And I hope David is feeling better. And again, thank you all.
Uh. You know when you do a feeling like this, you know
you have certain things set up and you're all excited and everything and very you
know, frustrating sometimes when little something doesn't play or whatever. You get some
quiet and you know on your end you're not hearing the music that I want
to play, and so and so I really appreciated. Harps are just great.
I was actually going to wear the T shirt that you sent to me
from Australia. I was going to wear that. I'll wear that tonight when
I do my show on Liberty Conspiracy, Harps and just the sentimental connection that
I feel for all of you. I really appreciate you helping out. I'm
Gardner Goldsmith sitting in for David today. David's feeling a little under the weather,
and so I hope I've been doing an okay presentation that despite a couple
of those little technical problems a little bit earlier and getting some of this information
out to you. Luckily, actually the way that I framed things, I
only had a couple of my little themes there, and I was mostly going
through news stories, written stories, and you know, thinking sort of going
off the cuff about Charlton Heston and so on, and Michael Moore and things
like that. But I do want to present to you more video footage.
So this is good actually that I really appreciate Ananda being there on X thank
you so much for being in there. And again Harps, thank you,
and Audi Mr mrr being there. Thank you so much. We had a
contribution also, and I thank you so much. Tornator, thank you so
much for being there. And oh I hear this, yep, so Tornador
writes, and feel free to contribute, by the way, It's always a
good thing and I appreciate that very much. Not to stress it, but
you know it's always helpful. You can do that on rockfin or Rumble,
Tornator says, good morning, Guard. I hope they're treating you well in
Russia. You probably heard that Toby Keith passed away. He announced he had
stomach cancer in the fall of twenty twenty one, and from what I'm seeing,
he was jabbed. Sounds like a bit of the old turbo cancer.
Since he was from the red state of Oklahoma. I'm wondering what the death
rate was for his vaccine lot number. Yes, my sister and I speculated
about that, and in fact, it sort of ties in with a little
bit of the Tucker Carls and stuff that I want to bring up just to
sort of round off the Tucker stuff, because you know, David makes some
excellent points about Tucker's experience and behavior at Fox and the Jabs and what many
of us knew very early on about the Jabs. So Tornator, thank you.
That's very very appropriate, and I think that sort of speculation is is
quite quite valid. And a call priestess, thanks for being there. A
Syrian girl, thank you. Right over the border, a Syrian girl.
I'm in Mason right now. Mason is the home of the original Uncle Sam.
I was mentioning that to Travis on the phone last night. This is
where the original Uncle Sam lived. And yeah, and thank you for being
there and mentioning the Knights who are in the in the room rock fin Chat,
thank you so much. So let's take this opportunity now, everybody to
talk about what Tucker Carlsson has told us he is going to be doing when
it comes to his visit to Russia. Okay, so we're going to turn
to Elon Musk's retweet of this from Tucker Carlson, give you, give you
the presentation. He has this to say. And again, you know,
whether one thinks of Tucker Carlson as having grown and gotten past his his family
background tied to intelligence. Whether they looked at him and said, you know,
he went from that bow tie period. I didn't really trust him.
Then is he on some sort of long term grift or is he now free.
I'm going to play you a little something from David in just a minute
that I think frames some very striking and very valid criticism of Tucker Carlson,
and get your opinions about this visit. Again, not trying to prejudice anyone
about this interview, but just say, okay, let's take it as we
get it. So here is what Tucker said that was reposted by Elon musk
Or in Moscow tonight. We're here to interview the president of Russia, Vladimir
Putin, will be doing that soon. They are risks to conducting an interview
like this, obviously, so we thought about it carefully over many months.
Here's why we're doing it first, because it's our job. We're in journalism.
Our duty is to inform people. Two years into a war that's reshaping
the entire world, most Americans are not informed. They have no real idea
what's happening in this region here in Russia or six hundred miles away in Ukraine.
But they should not. They're paying for much of it in ways they
might not fully yet perceive. The war in Ukraine is a human disaster.
It's left hundreds of thousands of people dead, an entire generation of young Ukrainians,
and it's depopulated the largest country in Europe. But the long term effects
are even more profound. This war has utterly reshaped the global military and trade
alliances, and the sanctions that followed have as well, and in total,
they have upended the world economy. The post World War II economic order,
the system that guaranteed prosperity in the West for more than eighty years is coming
apart very fast, and along with it the dominance of the US dollar.
These are not small changes. They are history altering developments. They able to
define the lives of our grandchildren. Most of the world understands this perfectly well.
They can see it. Ask anyone in Asia the Middle East what the
future looks like. And yet the populations of the English speaking country seem mostly
unaware. They think that as nothing has really changed, and they think that
because no one has told them the truth. Their media outlets are corrupt.
They lie to their readers and viewers, and they do that mostly by omission.
For example, since the day the war in Ukraine began, American media
outlets have spoken to scores of people from Ukraine, and they've done scores of
interviews with Ukrainian President Zelenski. We ourselves have put in a request for an
interview with Zelensky. We hope he accepts. But the interviews he's already done
in the United States are not traditional interviews. They are fawning pep sessions,
specifically designed to amplify Zelenski's demand that the US entry more deeply into a war
in Eastern Europe and pay for it. That is not journalism. It is
government propaganda, propaganda of the ugliest kind, the kind that kills people.
At the same time, our politicians and media oolets have been doing this promoting
a foreign leader like he's a new consumer brand. Not a single Western journalist
has bothered to interview the president of the other country involved in this conflict,
Vladimir Putin. Most Americans have no idea why Putin invaded Ukraine or what his
goals are now. They've never heard his voice. That's wrong, Americans have
a right to know all they can about a war they're implicated in, and
we have the right to tell them about at it because we are Americans too.
Freedom to speech is our birthright. We were born with the right to
say what we believe. That right cannot be taken away no matter who is
in the White House. But they're trying anyway. Almost three years ago,
the Biden administration illegally spied on our text messages and then leaked the contents to
their servants in the news media. They did this in order to stop a
Putin interview that we were planning. Last month, We're pretty certain they did
exactly the same thing once again, but this time we came to Moscow.
Anyway. We are not here because we love Vladimir Putin. We are here
because we love the United States. We wanted to remain prosperous and free.
We paid for the strip ourselves. We took no money from any government or
group, Nor are we charging people to see the interview. It is not
behind a paywall. Anyone can watch the entire thing, shot live to tape
and unedited on our website Tuckercarlson dot com. Elon Musk his great credit has
promised not to suppress or block this interview once we post it on his platform
X, and we're grateful for that. Western governments, by contrast, will
certainly do their best to censor this video on other less principal platforms, because
that's what they do. They are afraid of information they can control. But
you have no reason to be afraid of it. We are not encouraging you
to agree with what Putin may say in this interview, but we are urging
you to watch it. You should know as much as you can, and
then, like a free citizen and not a slave, you can decide for
yourself. Thanks good stuff from Tucker Carlson there. I agree one hundred percent
with everything he's saying. I've had some disagreements with him in the past,
but I also want to mention some excellent comments from Ananda g Over at X.
The Prudent Interviews is a four part, four hour television series by American
filmmaker Oliver Stone, first broadcast in twenty seventeen. Absolutely right X excellent stuff,
and I also want to mention that the documentary that Oliver Stone did on
Ukraine Ukraine on Fire is also very very good. He did an excellent job
there, and I want to mention that there was a great comment from Stephen
Caspar inside Rockfinn said, what happened in the sixties the Dems were the peace
party. Now they're worse than worse than Hitler. Well, you know,
they're definitely pro war. And I have to mention, you know, as
a gen Xer who grew up in the shadow of the hypocritical sixties generation,
the Baby Boomers, I was well aware that the vast, vast, and
I've mentioned this on Liberty Conspiracy as well, the vast vast majority of the
sixties so called peacemongers and you know, the peace protesters and so on,
they weren't interested in peace in any way whatsoever. They were interested in using
the peace issue to change the makeup of the leadership so that they could get
their mindset, their Marxist mindset more manifested inside. The US government continued to
destroy the US Constitution even further. And of course when Bill Clinton got in
there, a supposed peace guy, Bill Clinton, when he got sworn in,
they said that fighter jets flew overhead. Somebody ducked and someone said,
oh, don't worry, they're hours now Bernie Sanders, who went with his
wife to honeymoon in Soviet Russia. Bernie Sanders the so called peace guy.
Now, I will hand it to Bernie Sanders because recently he's been calling for
a ceasefire in Gaza. But it would behove Bernie Sanders to stop calling himself
the peace guy when consistently he always votes for the NDAA to continue funding the
soldiers that he tells us shouldn't be in certain areas, and yet he will
continue to vote for the NDAA. Why because it's packed with pork. He
also worked to get Boeing to open up offices in Vermont. Boeing, of
course, one of the major defense contractors so called defense military contractors in the
history of the planet Earth. They also make nuclear weapons. So Bernie Sanders
calling himself a peace advocate is a bit of a stretch. However, I
want to bring this up and I think this is valuable and it's a perfect
time to do it. Based on your comments. We saw the story about
Nikki Haley losing to none of the above category right, okay, that I
thought was a good thing to see. But I also want to note that
if you go online, you'll see a very interesting story about former congressman who's
now running for office. In fact, I'll give you that one in just
a minute, because I don't want to lose track here. Just as far
as the CNN coverage goes, let me show you just real quickly here,
look at this. See if anybody's interested in this and you want to talk
about journalistic integrity and things like that, check this out. CNN runs Gaza
coverage past Jerusalem team operating under shadow of IDF censor. This from January fourth.
From the intercept, Daniel Boguslaw says, whether reporting from the Middle East,
the United States, or anywhere else across the globe, every CNN journalist
covering Israel and Palestine must submit their work for review by the News Organizations Bureau
in Jerusalem prior to publication, under a longstanding CNN policy. While CNN says
the policy is meant to ensure accuracy in reporting on a polarizing subject, it
means that much of the network's recent coverage of the war in Gaza and its
reverberations around the world has been shaped by journalists who operate under the shadow of
the country's military censor. Like all foreign news organizations operating in Israel. CNN's
journalism bureau is subject to the rules of the Israel Defense Forces Censor, which
dictates subjects that are off limits for news organizations to cover and censor's articles it
deems unfit or unsafe to print. As The Intersect reported last month, the
military censor recently restricted eight subjects, including security cabinet meetings, information about hostages,
and reporting on weapons captured by fighters in Gaza. In order to obtain
a press pass in Israel, foreign reporters must sign a document agreeing to abide
by the dictates of the censor. That's CNN. That's CNN, the entity
that is attacking Tucker Carlson. Okay, I don't think it's valid to attack
Tucker Carlson in his attempt to interview Vladimir Putin. I think it is valid
to criticize CNN for saying that they're going to get permission from the Israeli government
before they put out reports. I do think this next criticism of Tucker Carlson
from David Knight is quite worthwhile. I don't necessarily agree with everything David says
here, but I think it's worthwhile. Check it out on a second.
All right, here you go. But you're saying that pharma buys TV spots
not to convince people to ask for specific drugs from their positions, but to
subvert the news business. This is an open secret working for pharma. I
got even thought of that. Isn't that amazing? Great, Scott, what
a revelation. Who knew that? Did you know that? I think everybody
knew that. Why is Tucker think that his listeners are that stupid, that
gullible? This is a con man. He's playing a confidence game on you.
He's pretending that he didn't know that the twenty five million dollar salary or
whatever it was that he was getting from Fox News was paid for by these
murderers and pharmaceutical companies. He didn't realize that they were buying influence with Fox
News. He didn't realize when he threw to these reports from this phony doctor
that they have there so talking about how well we got to do this and
that and got to get the vaccine. And you know, he goes down
and he interviews Trump, are you going to get the vaccine first or later?
Well? If I do it first, He'll say that I'm going to
have the line if I do it. Later they say that they don't have
any confidence in it. I don't know. We'll see what happened. Yeah,
well, we've all got to get the vaccine, right, got to
get the vaccine. Tucker through to him, and I said, well,
there are he knows all that stuff. Very good, very good. Now,
obviously Tucker knew that stuff. And so I ask you, and you
know we I can't put myself in this position in Tucker's position. I wasn't
in his position, Okay, So I want to be as as fair as
possible. Even though as Tucker was sort of making the rounds and trying to
find his way and you know, editing here and doing this and getting away
from the bow tie look and all these things, I thought, do I
like this guy or I not like this guy? Sometimes that he annoyed me,
and I'm like, then he visited Alex and you know, I had
who knew? Who knows? You know. David brings up some very good
points about his about his family and so on being involved with the intelligence community,
and David makes an excellent point about the fact that Tucker Carlson worked at
Fox News and he did not speak up until just before he was going to
be leaving and doing it only in an indirect way, talking about the my
pillow analogy and so on, very clearly, sounding very nervous as he went
through it, and said, you know, imagine you had an advertiser say
it was my pillow, and then you found out that my pillow was involved
with basically supporting your network, and that network was pushing the MyPillow stuff.
But it turned out that the my pillow was killing people. So he's talking
about essentially obviously he's talking about the jabs. The thing that gets me is,
you know, and I don't look at it as I look at that.
As he was getting ready to leave, he finally got up the gumption
to say something. Could still didn't have the guts to say it directly.
Maybe there was he was wondering about his contract and so on and so forth,
so he went grudgingly try, I didn't, you know, sort of
like a teenager trying to stand up to the bully and sort of like falling
flat that sort of thing. But the point that gets me is he had
a lot of time to bring that up. And this is the question that
I posed to you, And again I don't want to judge Tucker Carlson in
any way here. But I just posed the question, if you were in
a position, and I've worked in radio, Okay, if you were in
a position where you knew by speaking up and leaving your job, you could
save people's lives, even if you knew you weren't saving lives, if you
just knew you were speaking out the truth. Okay, But we can maximize
it because I knew right off the bat that those jabs were going to cause
autoimmune problems. I knew immediately because I was familiar enough with virology and the
immune system and human biology that I knew transfaction was going to occur, and
I knew it was going to create an autoimmune sit where the body was now
going to be creating something that was non human. It would be recognized as
non human by the human immune system and cause all sorts of problems. So,
and it's even worse when you look at the pigilation and all the other
types of things that were involved, the different amounts in the jabs and so
on and so forth. We talked about Toby Keith's deaths and so on.
So you know, let's say that Tucker was just so busy it took him.
He had plenty of time to find out what was going on and also
know that the numbers they were giving people about the R factor and the death
rate for so called COVID nineteen were bogus. He had to have known,
because Devor Burks admitted it at the White House in April twenty twenty that the
federal government was subsidizing healthcare systems that were claiming that deaths that they had at
the hospital that might have had a faulty PCR test saying that they had COVID,
which probably wasn't the case either, but claiming that those deaths were from
COVID. All the money they gave people to give them on intubation and things
like that, the ways that they inc incentivized things such that we can never
no one in history will ever know how many people died from this supposed virus
or whatever. But beyond that, all of that stuff Tucker could have spoken
about. Right now, let me give you an example. When I worked
in radio in New Hampshire, and I've mentioned this before, I had a
friend come over from Siberia, and she had grown up in Siberia. She
wanted to go to law school here, and so I helped her find an
apartment and talked to a couple of different law schools, sitting on some classes
and so on. She was here for a week in two thousand and seven,
I think, And so she started to notice a lot of things that
just because of acclamation and normalcy bias, we frogs don't realize how hot that
water is when it comes to the police state. And she knowed a lot
of things, and she said, I've seen these things before in Siberia.
So we were at the studio and I was getting ready to do my radio
show and I was going through the State of the State address by then Democrat
New Hampshire Governor John Lynch. I had the recording. I was going through
it, picking out soundcuts from my radio show, and she was over my
shoulder in the studio and watching, and she started laughing as they introduced the
governor and everyone's applotting. They're on their feet applotting. I was like,
what's so funny, Nadia. She said, Oh, it's just like all
the old Soviet gatherings. They're just applauding the state. It's all this,
you know, this icon worship for the state. The state is the totem,
this is where we do our good. And I was like, you
know, that's a really good point. They're applauding the state. So I
was like, you know, Nadia, all these observations about the police,
like we got we were sledding on a hill and the police didn't want us
on the hill at night, and they were using a spotline. Just crazy
stuff, crazy stuff that she noticed. I said, would you like to
come on in the last half hour of the show and talk about these things?
So she did, and she came on, and she was so powerful.
She said, guys, listen talking to the audience, I've seen these
things. I've seen what a police state is. Like. I grew up
in that you're losing your freedom. You have a constitution that's supposed to stop
these people. You're losing that. You're not paying attention. Stop this,
Stop this. My mother, who was at the time kind of sick,
would listen to my show back at home, and Nandy and I went back
to the house. My mom cried because she was so affected by what Nadia
said. And my dad had passed away by that time, and my mom
had grown up in a world where she saw it getting worse and worse,
and she said, Nadia, you're right, You're right, and I have
to tell you. The management of the station approached me after naughty as segment
before we saw my mom, and they said, did your girlfriend just compare
our governor to a Soviet leader? Because that's what she said. I said,
you know, Naddy, you don't want to tell people about what you
saw their how it was so similar to the old Soviet gatherings. And she
described it and I said, oh yeah, yeah. They said, well
that's not going to happen again. And I said, what they said,
guard, you got to understand, we want these people to advertise with us.
If you're doing that to the governor, if you're critical of the governor
that way, they're not going to bring in their political ads on our station.
And I was like, okay, whatever. I didn't stop. I
told him I'm not going to stop. So they fired me. Eventually,
they fired me. David Knight January sixth, don't go, they fired him.
You have choices. You make your choices. So Tucker Carlson had many
opportunities to speak up. Now, I would want to be very kind and
very fair to Tucker Carlson to let him explain what went through his mind,
how he wrestled with it, at what point did he decide, Okay,
I've had enough, Because clearly he did have enough. The question is can
I be critical of him of not speaking up more overtly and sooner, and
of course the background stuff, But as far as his interview goes with Vladimir
Putin, first of all, to get criticism from CNN after all of the
unbelievable things CNN's been doing in Israel, with real slaughter happening right now,
right after what we know NATO did in Ukraine, the United States did in
Ukraine, and expanding into the former Warsaw Pact nations, contrary to the agreement
of James Baker that he verbally gave to the Russians. After all those things.
Am I going to be critical of Tucker Carlson for wanting to get an
interview with a guy who, when he did what I think is improper,
invaded Ukraine. I'm an anarchist again. Actually, Vladimir Putin's points were all
correct as far as I could see. Of course, I'm not. I'll
be critical of CNN for trying to get people to prejudge information that hasn't even
come out yet. You look at what he says and see you look at
the questions that Tucker Carlson asks, and see you look at Tucker Carlson's departure
from Fox, and you assess it and say, well, would I have
done in this situation? Do I have enough information? Right? I think
there is a valid criticism there. But by the same token, I wasn't
in his shoes, right, So if I had been in his shoes,
I would have left right off the bat, knowing that the farmer companies were
investing in this right but not an issues. So just to lay that out
there and give you that information. Uh now, to give you some more
information about a guy who seems to stand for principle as far as peace goes.
You'll find over on my Twitter slash x feed that I've posted the story
about Dennis Kucinich. And so if you see my story about Kucinich, you'll
see that Kucinich left the RFK Junior campaign because RFK Junior said some terrible things
about the Palestinians being the most coddled or privileged. Is one hundred percent in
support of the Israeli government. So called having a right to defense. No
government has, no state has any rights. Only people have rights. And
as I stated, if you're a soldier and your firearm is in your hands,
and he came off the back of a taxpayer, you don't even have
the right to self defense with that weapon. You certainly don't have the right
to self defense when you're an occupying entity in Gaza. But if you go
to my Twitter feed, you'll see Dennis Kucinich is running once more for the
House he left the RFK Junior campaign. This one is coming from AP News.
This is from a while ago, but I wanted to hand it to
him because he has spoken up. It's been good to see. I don't
agree with him as far as the welfare state and the Constitution, but as
far as peace goes, he's a guy who puts his money where his mouth
is. Former Ohio Representative Dennis Cucinic running for a House seat again, this
time as an independent. I wonder why the Democrat Party is not a good
home for him anymore. Former Ohio Congressman a two time Democrat presidential candidate,
Dennis Kucinich said Wednesday that he's running for Congress again this time as an independent.
He's seventy seven. Former Cleveland mayor, who was consistently rated as one
of the most liberal House members, said he's seeking the seventh district seat now
held by Republican Representative Max Miller. Two Democrat hopefuls have also filed paperwork to
seek their party's nomination. Referring to himself as someone who has shown he can
work with Democrats and Republicans, Kucinich said the nation's ongoing political polarization and congressional
gridlock are a threat to national security. So he also brings up the massive
welfare warfare state and the lies of the federal government. Let's look at another
one. Did you notice CNN didn't seem to cover this. White House falsely
declared it warned a rack of impending airstrikes. Yeah, this came from the
intercept. John Kirby made a statement last week that the United States had warned
Iraq that it was going to strike supposed Iranian connected forces inside Iraq. Well,
the Iraqi government has asked the United States government forces to leave the two
and a half thousand troops at least that are there. The United States government
has more than once refused to leave. The Iraqi government, if it has
ties with Iran, has invited those people in. But even there they have
not been able to show that the Iranians had any ties to these forces that
were struck inside Iraq. And of course we see another lie coming from the
United States government. As Ken Klippenstein and Ryan grim Wright, the US did
not notify the Iraqi government before conducting airstrikes in the country on Friday, contrary
to an assertion by the White House that it did. During a press call
on Friday, White House National Security spokesperson Retired Addmiral John Kirby said, quote,
we did inform the Iraqi government prior to the strikes occurring. Well,
whether you inform them or not, even if you had, it would have
been unconstitutional. But let's continue. On Monday, in response to questions from
the Intercept, the White House said the Iraqis had not gotten advanced warning of
the strikes. Quote for operational security, we did not provide any kind of
official pre notification with specific details on these strikes, a National Security councilperson acknowledged
during Monday. State Department press brief ring spokespersonman Person Vedant Patel also acknowledged the
Iraqis had not gotten a warning. I know, shocker, right, all
right, now, let's hit this one. I think this is very worthwhile.
This is coming and now that I can show this on screen, this
is coming from anti neews War, anti warnews dot com. This is Dave
DeCamp talking about Mitch McConnell and the one hundred and eighteen billion dollars in aid.
The bill will not become law, according to McConnell. Now, I'm
going to amplify on this a little bit more to show you if you saw
the Speaker of the House, he stated that the border bill was just not
going to be happening. In fact, i'll show you footage in just a
minute. It wasn't that the border bill was to porous or that, as
I would bring out, the federal government doesn't have anything to do with the
border constitutionally. It was that he wanted a separate package for Israeli aid.
Let's hear a little bit from Dave to Camp as he talks about this one
hundred and eighteen billion dollar military aid bill that they're calling the border bill.
All right, So the next one here, Mitch McConnell says that the one
hundred and eighteen billion bill will not become law. So more good news,
I think. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Republican from Kentucky, he said
on Tuesday that the one hundred and eighteen billion dollar military aid and border bill
that was unveiled over the weekend will likely not become law due to GOP opposition.
He said, quote, we had a very robust discussion about whether or
not this product could ever become law, and it's been made pretty clear to
us by the Speaker that it will not become law end quote. So a
day earlier, the Associated Press reported that McConnell recommended to GOP senators that they
vote against the first procedural vote on the bill that's expected to happen on Wednesday.
Mike Johnson, the House Speaker, has said that this bill is dead
on arrival and he's looking to push forward the standalone resolution and that has failed.
So the Republican opposition to the one hundred and eighteen billion dollars is over
the border POP Senate negotiators spent months working on a border deal for the legislation,
but Johnson said the House was left out and Democrats are blaming Trump for
this Republican opposition because Trump says he's against it, says Republicans should kill this
bill. So Chuck Schumer said on Tuesday, quote Leader McConnell and the Republican
Conference did a one hundred and eighty degree reversal. They're quaking at the knees
in fear of Donald Trump. End quote. So this spending includes sixty billion
for the proxy war in Ukraine, about fourteen billion for Israel, four point
eight billion for Taiwan and the Indo Pacific Region, and two point four to
four billion for US Central Command and this new war against the Huthies. So
I think, you know, infighting and delays and them not agreeing on things
is kind of the best that we could hope for right now, is that
this just gets pushed back and pushed back as much as possible. All right,
So again, folks, just to show you real quick there, the
spending bill includes sixty billion for the proxy war in Ukraine. You've you know,
the hours and days have gone by since this information came out. But
I want to use this to fold into something bigger, and it has to
do with some very insightful points from Glenn Greenwald that I want to show you
that I prepared. The spending bill includes sixty billion dollars for the proxy war
in Ukraine, about fourteen billion for Israel, four point eight for Taiwan and
the Indo Pacific region, and two point four to four billion for US Central
Command and President Biden's new war against the hooties in Yemen. It also includes
twenty billion dollars for border spending. Okay, so just keep that in mind
of this one hundred and eighteen billion dollar bill if you believe that the federal
government has something to do with the border that they call the border bill.
One hundred and eighteen billion dollars twenty went to the border. And looking at
that, a lot of people haven't broken that down because and you'll see this.
You'll get a little hint of this when we hear from Glenn Greenwald,
and I'll give you a preview right now that's not even the border. Give
you a hint in their in certain reports, and I've got one of my
tabs saved on this. In certain reports, you're going to be hearing from
governors of various states like Massachusetts Mari Healy, where of course she claimed that
there was an emergency then they turned to Alejandro Mayorkas, who, by the
way, is not going to be impeached. They've withdrawn the Impeachment's not going
to happen, of majorcas. But they want federal money. A lot of
that money is not going to be going to the border that you want to
be protected by the central government. Conservatives, even though I thought you were
opposed to central command and control and you were supposedly constitutionalists, and the word
immigration is not in the constitution. Jefferson and Madison both stated that handling a
migrant and immigrants is a state purview, unless, of course, the states
claim that they are having a problem and their government is threatened than Article four,
Section four allows them to ask for federal help. That's all which Abbot
has done. But what I think is quite interesting here is that this money
is not just supposedly for border protection and stopping people on the Rio Grande and
the Arizona border or anything like that. This is more money. This twenty
billion, this little chunk is more money. Part of it is going to
go to Chicago, New York, Massachusetts to give more housing and free food
to the migrants. That's part of it. It's a handout deal. It
is part of the parallel to the military industrial complex that you're seeing with all
this money going to the proxy war in Ukraine and Israel and so forth,
that itself, as we hear from Mitch McConnell's side, the information that I
got on Mitch mcconnald's on from Glenn Greenwald, when we think about this,
it's about weapons contractors, and it's about giving money to special favors, for
special favors for politicians in various states, in addition to putting up the front
that they're going to protect the border, which of course they're not going to
protect the border. The Republicans, many of them, don't want to protect
it either. Donald Trump didn't do much at all because they want to perpetuate
the problem so they can use it as a campaign issue to get more money
to claim we're going to fix it now. We're going to fix it now.
So let me show you this from Glenn Greenwald, as he did an
absolutely spectacular job covering this story. Here we go from Glenn Greenwald, and
of course he is exclusive on rumble Causes one. In reality, seventy seven
billion of this one hundred and twenty billion is solely to pay for Ukraine and
Israel's wars. There's a bunch of money in there for the new war and
Yemen. We're also going to devote ten million dollars to giving humanitarian aid to
the Palestinians in Gaza. So we're paying Israel to destroy Gaza, and then
we're paying for the humanitarian aid that they now need to not starve to the
out there buy of mass treatable infections. So we're I wouldn't say financing both
sides of the war, because we give way more to Israel than to the
Palaestinians, but we're paying for Israel to destroy Gaza and then paying to try
and assuage your own conscience about the kind of human stuffering that's there. So
you have ten billion dollars going to Gaza. That's now eighty seven billion of
one hundred and twenty. You have another five billion for more aggression in the
area around China. You have several billion more for the new campaign that we're
bombed in Yemen. And so by the time you actually look at it,
a very small percentage of this actually goes to American citizens that has any effect
on their life. Yet, as a result, what really happened. As
soon as this bill got unveiled, the populace in the Republican Party do something
liberals and the Democratic Party never do. They were revolted against their leadership and
they said, there's no way that you can support this bill. Donald Trump
came out and said this bill should be immediately rejected, and as a result,
according to Reuter's quote, House of Representative Speaker Mike Johnson declared the bill
quote dead on arrival if it even reaches his chamber, quote, this bill
is even worse than we expected and won't come close to ending the border catastrophe
the President has created, he said in a statement on the next formally called
Twitter. How long are we going to have to, by the way,
qualify every time we say X by reminding people that that's actually Twitter. It's
so annoying out to say. It's been months since it's been renamed anyway.
The article goes on quote the Democratic and Republican Senate backers of the wide ranging
US Border Security and Foreign Military a bill pledged to push ahead despite opposition by
Donald Trump as well. In addition to twenty billion dollars for border security,
the bill included sixty billion dollars to support Ukraine and its war with Russia,
fourteen billion dollars in security assistance for Israel, and that member's really closer to
the seventeen billion, two point four billion to the US Central Command and the
conflict in the Red Sea, and four point eight three billion dollars to support
US partners in the Indo Pacific facing aggression from China. According to figures and
Senator Patty Murray, who cheers the Senate Appropriations Committee, now what they really
mean. You see what everything's always phrase to push the foreign policy audition of
the United States that five billion dollars for the seas near China are not to
protect American allies under attack. It's to deploy more and more military and then
immediate miscentity of China, basically keep them militarily encircled in a way that obviously
the United States would never tolerate China doing to the United States. Here's a
chart just to give you a visual idea of how little of this money actually
goes to the United States and to the lives of American citizens. So here
is the I'm just going to grab my any little pen that I love to
use. Here is the US border security. I'm going to try and get
these pens up here. If we can do that, is that possible?
There? We got to erase that here is for US border security. I'm
making a mess of these pens. But here the US border security is twenty
billion dollars. That's the only thing that is even arguably going toward the United
States. And a lot of that twenty billion dollars is not really to border
security. It's to fund NGOs that represent asylum seekers. It's to help Sanctuary
City with more financing. Blue state mayors and blue state governors that are defending
it, that are demanding it. But let's just even be generous and let's
say that all twenty billion dollars is going to fortify the border of the United
States. Members of both political parties are saying in polls they regard this integration
problem as a major priority. And here you have. You can just see
graphically sixty billion dollars for Ukraine, fourteen billion dollars for Israel, ten billion
dollars for Gaza, five billion dollars for the Indo Pacific, and two point
four billion dollars for quote, red sea conflicts. Red sea conflicts that we
are now fighting by virtue of our support for Israel. The Huthi began attacking
the American ships because there are They argued the United States was the country financing
the war in Israel or the war in Gaza, helping Israel destroy Gaza.
So there's just another cost of our tying ourselves to the hips with Israel and
financing its war. So you just see graphically what the priorities are of bipartisan
Washington has nothing to do with the last of the American people. Now Here
from Bloomberg is a little bit of analysis about who really is benefiting most from
this bill. And I know it'll shock you to find out that it's the
US defense industry that is going to profit enormously from this bill. Surprise,
US defendant industry would get thirty five billion dollars boon in the Senate Ukraine border
deal. Lockey Martin RTX, General Dynamics are among those boosted by spending on
artillery, air defense, and submarines. Quote Lackey Martin, Artiacs, General
Dynamics, Boeing, Northrop Goodman, and the Hill formerly known as Huntington Eagles.
Oh it's hi, believe yeah, Huntington Engles Industry are among the companies
likely to gain the most business from the overall package, which the deal will
help the US invest in his own defense industrial base and support American jobs producing
weapons and equipment. The US consenting Ukrainey's senior administration officials said, do you
see what they do? Someone from the Biden White House came in delivered propaganda
to Bloomberg. Bloomberg wrote the first two paragraphs of their article based on White
House propaganda and added and then senior administration official set so they gave him anonymity.
Why he wasn't spilling any secrets in an unauthorized way. He was giving
Bloomberg its propagandistic framework for how to understand us. In the words, they're
trying to say, yeah, I know, it seems like we're sending all
these billions of dollars to other countries, but don't worry, it's going to
go into the pockets of the military industrial complex, which in turn will help
you. It's all about helping you. That's the reason why they're feeling these
wars in other countries. Senior administent, Now, before go any further,
everybody, and this is part of the presentation. I want to give to
you some extended clips from Glenn Greenwald's presentation here to sort of fit this together
to show the forces that are pushing the legislation. Okay, when I did
my journalism internship on Washington, DC, you could see a lot of this
stuff happening right in front of you in some of these conference rooms, and
it was just vile and disgusting. You know, you go out in the
hallways, they're meeting with each other and stuff. But I didn't see a
lot of the defense contractor stuff, but I was aware of that sort of
thing. And in a moment, Glenn Greenwald is going to replay what I
played a little bit earlier of Chuck Schumer, Okay, and he's going to
make an observation that you probably noticed as well, and I think it deserves
amplification or at least reiteration as he expresses something that is key in this observation.
We'll continue with Glenn greenwall presentation real quick. The stration official said quote
Israel would receive ten point six billion in its fight against the Moss, including
four billion dollars for its Iron Dome and David Slaying defensive systems, both made
by Rafael advanced defense systems in the US based RTX. It would also receive
one point two billion dollars from the laser based iron Beam air defense system made
by Raphael and Israeli company. The Senate bill includes two point four billion dollars
to support up operations in the Middle East and to cover combat expenditures for weapons
to counter Iranian back groups with attack red sea shipping, and American troops and
allies stationed in Iraq in Syria. Isn't it remarkable that if you look at
every poll going back a decade now, Americans overwhelmingly say they want these endless
wars in the Middle East to stop. And as a result, you have
politicians constantly promising when they run for office, they're going to put an end
to endless war in the Middle East. And yet over and over and over
and over again, bipartisan Washington can cox reasons to ensure that we are constantly
an endless war in the Middle East. You have to go back to the
nineteen seventies to find the last decade when the United States was not bombing a
rock. Now you can debate the motives, but the reality is that the
priorities of Washington clearly is to ensure that endless war remains endless. And while
they can't hide any longer who the real beneficiaries are the arms industry that funds
both parties campaigns. Now they're pretending that, oh, don't worry when they
get rich, you do well. Also, you should cheer for higher profits
for the military industrial complex because the benefits will trickle down to you. Here
from responsible state craft on February two, early this week, Congress is poised
to seed more foreign weapons oversight. Why the new bill would speed up the
delivery of deadly arms while scaling back the ability of elected representatives to monitor the
implications. At a time of record US weapons sales and many wars, the
House Foreign Affairs Committee has decided that Congress should provide a less rather than more
oversight of the booming business. Current law requires the executive branch to notify Congress
of a proposed weapons deal over a certain dollar threshold. Congress that has fifteen
or thirty days, depending on whether the country is a treaty ally or not,
to review the transaction before the administration can proceed. But if Congress has
not even notified about a sale, the administration is planning. There's absolutely no
chance it can block the transfer. This arms industry backed deal. This armed
industry back bill the House is marking up raises the dollar threshold for notice to
Congress substantially by sixty six percent and would dramatically reduce the number of potential sales
Congress is told about each year. In addition to exempting more sales from its
own oversight, with this bill, Congress would require the Secretary of State to
take weapons from US government stocks for delivery to foreign forces and reasons where the
production and delivery of the weapons is taking more than three years. It would
achieve this through the use of quote drawdown Authority, an emergency mechanism used that
at very large scale to move weapons from US stock files to Ukraine over the
past two years. In some of Congress were to pass this bill, it
would have less knowledge of which weapons are being transferred to which countries and less
ability to ensure that transfers are consistent with US law, policy, and interests.
Do you see how everything they think about doing is benefiting the corporate donors
in the arms industry that finances both of the party's campaigns. So that you
can vote for Republicans. You can vote for Democrats and this industry will be
served. Now here's something I find unbelievable about a admission that Mitch McConnell made
during the process of negotiating this bill. Here from The New York Times on
January twenty fifth, about two weeks ago. Less than two weeks ago.
Argument was that all of this is from Trump. Trump strengthens his grip on
Capitol Hill as he presses nomination the president's former opposition. The former president's opposition
to this bill has all but killed the prospects for a bipartisan border deal,
reflecting how his influence in Congress has grown as he gains ground in the Republican
primary. Republicans are quote in a quandary, mister McConnell said in a closed
door meeting on Wednesday. According to lawmakers who attended, what was supposed to
be the sweetener for conservatives opposed to sending tens of billions of dollars to Ukraine
had become just as politically treacherous terrain as the foreign ad itself. The acknowledge,
in other words, what the Bide administration was saying was, look,
we want as our priority to send sixty billion dollars to Ukraine. Why is
that the administration's priority heading into an election here to send sixty billion dollars to
keep the war going in Ukraine? Think about that. Why is that their
priority when it's not Ukrainians who will vote for them, but Americans. Because
what determined's elections is who finances campaigns. And the administration said, we know,
we told our voters when we got elected that we're going to end all
of Trump's immoral and repressive restrictions on immigration. We are so desperate, though,
to fund this war in Ukraine, to send another sixteen billion dollars to
Ukraine, that we di Biden, White House and the Democratic Party are willing
to screw over our own supporters and abandon the promises we made to them by
embracing at least some are the immigration restrictions that we weren't denouncing as immoral and
even not too like when Donald Trump was advocating them. Now, the reality
is this is not if you're looking for border security, this bill does not
give you that. It allocates more money to border security, so people like
the Border Patrol are happy with it because it gives them a lot more funding.
But in terms of actually trying to reduce the number of people illegally entering
the country. That's a priority of yours. This bell would not go very
far at all in doing that, and the REAP. So now I'm going
to take a quick detour from what Glenn mentioned and now bring up something that
I've been looking at. First off, on the defense side, here is
this from January eleventh. Just want to remind you of this. US failed
to track more than one billion dollars in military gear given to Ukraine, Pentagon
Watchdog says, And don't forget that. Rand Paul wanted to have oversight.
He wasn't supportive of handing the weapons to Ukraine, but he said, just
like Ron Paul his father when they wanted to invade Iraq, I don't support
this, but if you're going to do this, do it properly and have
a declaration of war. Rand Paul did not support the weapons to Ukraine,
but he said, if you're going to do it, at least have some
sort of oversight to find out what's happening with this. And of course that
got shot down. So I want to turn now to this story out of
let me see if I got this yes, here it is. This is
Politico. And last night, when I knew I was going to be sitting
in today, I wanted to make sure I got this information to you,
to tie this into what I had observed from Glenn Greenwald. Here's the story
from Politico, and you'll see the headline here Biden gets help from blue state
governors as border deal falters. There's Joe Biden with the governor of New York,
Governor Kathy Hokeel. Now, you got to dig into this a little
bit. But I knew when I was My instincts were pretty strong. I
knew that the border bill when I started to see Glenn Greenwall talking about why
would it be so important to get this funding for sixty billion dollars more for
sending weapons to Ukraine? Well, of course the weapons contractors to help the
financing of elections for people like all the other folks other than probably Dennis Kucinich.
Right, So that's a very key thing. Mitch McConnell, Chuck Schumer,
Nancy Pelosi, all those people, even the governor of the gubernatorial candidate,
Kelly Ayott, all these folks, Nicki Haley. So I started the
program talking about Nicki Haley in South Carolina. One of the things I want
to bring up is if you look at at the debate between New Hampshire and
South Carolina and other states. Here in New Hampshire, it's pretty well understood
by anybody who's skeptical of government that the New Hampshire politicians and the political class
in both the Democrat and the Republican parties have pushed very strongly to have New
Hampshire always be the first in the nation primary. Why well, first of
all, that gives a lot of power to the parties to be able to
control politics in New Hampshire. But second of all, that allows the political
players in New Hampshire to feedback in the feedback loop to make sure that New
Hampshire has leverage over those politicians that they will promise things to New Hampshire.
New Hampshire will get gravy because if those politicians don't treat New Hampshire well,
then they won't be received well in New Hampshire. How does that time into
the military industrial complex, same sort of thing. Of course, if the
politicians don't treat the military industrial complex well, they won't get the support for
their reelections or their elections. Similarly, in this story from Politico, when
I went to go look for this, I found it here. It was
I don't even remember the terms I used for my search. Lisa Koshinski writes
this, and it came up yesterday. The White House is turning to blue
state governors to help salvage its border deal that appears to be on the brink
of collapse. Democrat governors whose states are grappling with a surge of migrants have
been in talks with the White House about turning up the pressure on Congress to
pass the Senate bill, as Republicans threatened to doom the deal. According to
two state officials familiar with the conversations about who granted who were granted anonymity to
discuss the strategy. So again, right there, they're not saying anything about
the Constitution. If you are a reporter and you're reporting on something to do
with the US government, you would think you would try to familiar familiar eyes
yourself with the internal mechanism of how the government's supposed to work. You know,
if you're writing for say Popular Science or popular mechanics, you might want
to find out the engineering behind, say a component for a car or something
like that. How does it work, How's it supposed to work? No,
they don't do that. The way that they see it is how it's
supposed to work is the political angling. It's the personalities, it's the hands,
it's the graft, it's all that stuff. And that's totally fine for
them. That's the way the system works, not the constitutional way that the
government tells us they're going to operate by, but the superficial way, the
horse race, the trade offs, all that stuff. That's the normal way
that they see it here at Politico, and that's the way that at first
you get this impression of oh, I see so he's relying on these blue
state governors to try to pass the border bill for this support down at the
border. So obviously the implication at the opening of this article is these blue
state governors are very concerned because they're seeing influxes into their states and they want
the border bill to be passed. They're implying this at first when you read
this, they want this border bill to be passed to stop the influx of
migrants coming into say New York State, Massachusetts, Illinois, Chicago, that
sort of thing, right, So their incentive as we get the first blush
on this political article is their incentive is we're going to stop this influx of
migrants. We're going to get tougher US government, central command and control power
on the border so that the problems we're having in this state will be reduced,
will see fewer migrants coming to Massachusetts being put up in holiday inns or
outside of Jellette Stadium when the Army Navy game is go to be going on.
That sort of thing, Right, that's the first blush that they give
you in this piece. But that's not what it is. It's all about
money handoffs. That's what it's about. Democrat governors again, whose states are
grappling with a surge of migrants, have been in talks with the White House
about turning up the pressure on Congress to pass the Senate bill as Republicans threatened
to doom the deal. Yes, wonderful reporting there, Lisa, According to
two state officials familiar with the conversations who were granted anonymity to discuss the strategy.
The White House also confirmed it has been in talks with elected leaders across
the country about supporting the bill. Okay, okay, see obviously they don't
want all these migrants in there, so that must be what's going on right
According to Kathy Hokeel on Morning Joe, she said, we're going on offense
because guess what, there was a solution sitting right in front of you,
New York Governor Kathy Hokeel said Tuesday of Republicans on MSNBC's Mourning Joe. Hochal
continued, it was gift wrapped. You could have taken it. You could
have helped solve this problem. And I guarantee Republican governors on the border wanted
this to happen. End quote. Okay, that's what Kathy Hockel stated.
It was gift wrapped. I think gift is the operative part there. Democrat
leaders in northern cities and states are now on the front lines. These,
of course, people who have spoken in the past, like the governor of
Massachusetts, Mara Healy, saying that they were one hundred percent in favor of
so called sanctuary cities and so on and so forth. Well, curiously they
have in political Democrat leaders in northern cities and states are now on the front
lines of the migrant crisis, and they have long been pressuring Congress and President
Joe Biden to toughen up on the southern border again, giving this impression toughen
up on the southern border. That's what they want. These northern cities,
these northern governors, all these mayors, those people who are involved on the
left wing side, they want a tougher border policy. That's the impression they
give you a political So you've got to dig in a little further because you
know eventually it's going to come down to something different. Yes, I'm sure
it will yeap. But with a new deal, with the deal now on
the table, they're playing proxy for the White House in a battle. It
looks increasingly likely that Biden and his allies will lose. Hulkal in particular,
has seized the bully pulpit in a state that has seen more than one hundred
and eighty thousand new migrants since twenty twenty two for rating New York's House Republicans
in television appearances and press conferences for trying to tank the deal in a flash
of uncharacteristic aggressiveness. So this coming from the woman who wants to give them
free housing, free medicine, free food. And of course we saw New
York Mayor Eric Adams saying that he can't handle all these migrants. And then,
of course we found out just after that that he wants to give them
one thousand dollars prepaid cards, because you know, he's so concerned about the
influx that he has to attract them by saying, I'm gonna hand you more
stuff. That's kind of odd, isn't it? Is there something peculiar about
that? Very peculiar? Very Quia Hulkal is threatening to make its failure the
Bills of failure a cudgel and key congressional races New York City suburbs well.
Massachusetts Governor Mara Heely is also going on the offensive, calling on House Republican
leaders who declared the bill dead on arrival to quit their election. You're posturing
and pass it without delay. Colorado Governor Jared Polis, too has re upped
his calls for Congress to act. Rather than complain endlessly about the lack of
border security, let's finally secure the border, Polis posted on X Really is
that really what you want? Is that really what they want? Well,
we know that Hokal, when she declared an emergency, made sure that that
kicked in in nineteen eighty six Mike Doucoccus era statute that requires the state to
give two years of housing to families that claim sanctuary, and they have to
give them food and medicine. New York they do this for individuals in New
York City. They have a similar statue in New York City, and they're
sweetening the deal with even more money. They're giving legal aid to people who
claim sanctuary status in Massachusetts. Now, again, there's nothing in the federal
constitution that blocks Massachusetts and New York from doing this, but the hypocrisy of
these people is stunning, and the immorality of it is also quite stunning when
you think about the fact that these people are taking money from not just taxpayers,
but from future generations, claiming they're having a problem with the migrants as
they incentivize more migrants to come in, and then they claim that they want
the border bill to pass, But it really isn't about stopping the migrants.
It's actually about getting more money. Just like the defense contractors with the international
stuff, you have to go a little further, and it says this.
Republicans, including some GOP lawmakers, are showing no signs of listening to the
President or his Democrat deputies. GOP infighting in the Senate is diminishing the bill's
chances of passing the upper chamber, and Biden is even losing support for the
deal within his own party. But Democrat governors and mayors who've run out of
resources to serve the tens of thousands of migrants who have flooded into their states
and cities, have little choice but to fight for the deal. Quote,
we don't expect it to be perfect. Denver Mayor Mike Johnston said Monday to
CNN on the border bill, but quote, we have moms and kids sleeping
on the streets in tents, and we're also looking at a one hundred and
eighty million dollar impact to our budget this year without you got it support,
without support, they want money, and both of those are unacceptable to us.
That is why the woman that you see pictured here, Moray Healey,
turned to Alejandro Maorcis when she declared an emergency, and that's the reason she
declared the emergency for money. She wanted money. Nine governors in blue states
last month wrote a letter to Biden and the Congress to urge a remedy to
a humanitarian crisis. The one hundred and eighteen billion dollar deal a bipartisan group
of Senators put forward on Sunday would throw billions of dollars at border security,
overhaul the asylum process, and give the president the authority to shut down the
southern border once crossing reached a certain threshold, but only after five thousand per
per day for a week. Otherwise he can't. Okay again, Conservatives,
look at the constitution. It's the central government, isn't your answer. It
includes key provisions that Democrat mayors and governors have been advocating for, such as
speeding up work authorizations for asylum seekers and funneling one point four billion dollars into
a program that sends money to local governments for the migrants. Those funds are
sorely needed. In Massachusetts, a right to shelter state that is spending more
than forty five million dollars a month providing shelter in basic services. They want
money. Now, let's go back to cap it Off. We'll talk once
more to Glenn Greenwan. Glenn hit me. Reason is because the person who
negotiated the bill on behalf of the Republican Party, Mitch McConnell has acknowledged that
he doesn't care about border security either, at least nowhere near as much as
he cares about sending this money to Ukraine. In other words, Mitch McConnell
has the same priority as Joe Biden and Chuck Schumer. So when he was
negotiating, he was on the same side as them, and he was just
there to pretend that Republican Party voters had a representative in this process. And
yet here's what The New York Times said. This is an amazing admission.
Mitch McConnell himself regards the border deal as less important than sending military aid to
Ukraine. It's less important the border deal. What is more important to him
sending military aid to Ukraine. So, Mitch McConnell is the head of a
party that has said forever that border security is its top priority, and that
increasingly is opposed to sending more money to the war in Ukraine. And yet
Mitch McConnell admits that his priority has nothing to do with the voters he supposedly
represents. Now think about this way as well. Mitch McConnell represents a state,
Kentucky, that is one of the poorest, poorest states in the region
in the country. They have extremely literacy rates has compared to other states,
a low life expectancy, very poor access to education, higher education, and
healthcare. You would think, right that the person elected to the Senate to
represent the people of Kentucky would prioritize bills that benefit the lives of the American
people in general and the people of Kentucky. That's the concept of how this
is is supposed to work. Now, there you see obviously difference of opinion
between where I stand and where Glenn Greenwald stands. Where I stand on the
Constitution and morally, it's not the place of the politician to be handing stuff
out to supposedly help people in Kentucky either, folks who might be poor,
that sort of thing. It's not my place to try to do that through
the force of government, and it's certainly not constitutional. As Davy Crockett said
in his eighteen thirty speech not Yours to Give during his second term in Congress,
he learned very early on from a farmer in Tennessee that when he originally
voted to send money over to help some people who had lost houses in Georgetown
due to a fire. Later he went back home that a farmer, and
the farmer said, you don't have the power to do that. It's not
your money. It's not in the constitution. Now I should mention as an
anarchist even if it were in the constitution. The Constitution has no authority over
anyone. That's like a group of people who we got one hundred people together,
we sign this document, we're going to operate by this, and we
can amend it, and we've just amitted it to say we can take more
of your stuff. The Constitution is not authoritative. It has no authority.
That is just a translation of people from centuries ago writing something down and other
people promising that they're going to abide by it. But again, regardless of
whether they abide by it or not, even if they did, logically and
structurally speaking, morally speaking, people claiming they have authority over you doesn't mean
they have authority over you. Okay, Now, I would be happier if
they were to operate by the Constitution rather than the way they're going now.
But again this shows a bit of a difference of opinion that I have with
a guy who I think is very good on peace and privacy. And things
like that. Glenn Greenwald and does excellent reporting. We have just a different
difference of opinion on the morality of social welfare programs and what the Constitution might
say, and we could probably have a fine conversation about it and probably walk
away friends and say, Okay, we disagree on this. But of course
I would be successful in pointing out that there's nothing in the Constitution that allows
it, and I would also logically be superior in the argument I think to
say I never signed the Constitution. I don't give my permission just by existing
that the Constitution applies to me, because that opens the door to anybody who
has enough people to sign a piece of paper saying where we have control over
you, to say we have control over you. It doesn't work that way.
And yet Mitch McConnell's top priority, according to him, something he's willing
to sacrifice everything for it, including the top priority of the Republican Party,
which is border security. Is something that has nothing to do with the lives
of people of Kentucky. Are benefiting the lives of American citizens to send sixty
million dollars over to Kiev with no accountability in order to keep that word.
Going week, I'm going to be traveling, so we're getting some shows and
interviews ready while I'm traveling. And earlier today we conducted an interview with Rand
Paul that I'm the Senator from Kentucky they're hoping and Senator from Kentucky the other
one. Then I'm very excited to show you about. And one of the
things I as I was preparing for this interview that I remember is that when
Democrats were joining with Republicans to send billions and billions and billions more to the
war in Ukraine, Rand Paul set up and said, look and against this,
but I know it's going to pass. So all I want to do
is assign an inspector general to monitor where this money is going when we send
it to Ukraine, whether or not it's reaching its intended destination, whether or
not it's being used for the purposes that we tell the American people we're sending
this money for. And the Senate, on a bipartisan basis, overwhelmingly rejected
Senator Poll's attempt to impose oversight scrutiny on the use of this money. This
this personmon of money to Ukraine. Why would they do that? And of
course, now we're getting all kinds of reports that people close to his Vilenski
and people in Ukraine have been embezzling tens of millions of dollars, the most
predictable thing in the world. Why would Mitch McConnell, beyond wanting to send
sixty million dollars to Ukraine when he represents the Republican Party in the state of
Kentucky, also block efforts by his fellow senator from Kentucky just to put some
oversight on that money. As soon as that Inspector General began monitoring the flow
of money to Afghanistan, he began discovering enormous amounts of abuse and embezzlement and
theft and disappearing money. That was why Mitch McConnell didn't want it. He
doesn't want his precious war to be questioned or reflected poorly on by showing evidence
of where that money is actually going. There are a lot of people profiting
from this war, a lot of people in Kievan, Washington. The people
who are not profiting are the American people who are being saddled with debt.
When we finance Ukraine's word, we're borrowing that money from China and settling Americans
with debt to fuel this war. And if you think Mitch McConnell and the
establishment leadership of the Republican Party have anything in their mind having anything remotely to
do with the welfare of the American people, I think you need to look
again. The evidence is so clear right before you that it has nothing to
do with it. Now Here is Mitch McConnell's ally and partner, and I
would say ideological fellow traveler Chuck Schumer. It's says at all that the two
senators who lead the two opposition parties in Washington are in full agreement. They're
in full alignment on most everything in terms of the priorities of Washington. He
went on MSNBC and warned of how scary it will be if we can't keep
that war in Ukraine going. Here's what he told Mika Brazinski, whose dad
was the National Security advisor for the Carter administration. We're the turning point in
America. This bill is crucial and history will look back on it and say,
did America fail itself? Why is it crucial? Well, if we
don't aid Ukraine, Putin will be walk all over Ukraine. We will lose
the war and we could be fighting in Eastern Europe in a NATO ally in
a few years. Americans won't like that. If we don't help Israel defend
itself, Agreeaince Thamas, that perpetual war will go on and on and on
if we don't help humanitarian aid to the starving Palestinians in Gaza, hundreds of
thousands could starve, and the border. Everyone has said, it's chaos.
A speaker you just saw, speaker Johnson, he said, it's chaos.
We have to do something legislative a few months ago. But what has happened
and so your question. So this is crucial for America. It's a turning
point. History is going to look over our shoulders and say, did we
rise to the occasion? So it was credit Mitch McConnell did by two many
in the problems. Mitch McConnell rose to the occasion to his credit. Chuck
Schumer says, because they are behind this bill and they both think exactly the
same thing. We need to send billions more to Israel to finance it's more,
we need to spend billions more on Ukraine to finance that war. And
then we have to throw a small amount into America's own border to cast the
illusion that they kind of also care about the United States. And it's a
bill that people on the right who have prioritized stopping legal immigration took one look
out and laughed in their face as they read the bill and what it permits.
But look at how these two parties, the leadership of them. Do
you see how they have the same exact views on the most fundamental questions.
And here's Chuck Schumer trying to tell you that the reason we have to finance
the war in Ukraine is because if we don't, then Putin's going to what
attack pull end and then onto Germany and then onto France, and suddenly we're
going to be involved in a new or do you do any of you believe
that? Do any of you believe that Putin has broad ambitions to go to
war by invading NATO countries and forcing the United States? Do you think that's
what Putin wants? Do you think that's a reasonable or likely fear mongering scenario
as to why you have to stop Russia and Ukraine? Of course not.
And of course if you flip it and see the expansion of NATO into the
Warsaw Pact of former Iron Curtain nations. It's acts. It's the exact opposite
since the nineteen nineties of what the West has been doing to those Eastern nations.
Final bit from Clink Greenwald here on the David Knight Show. Excellent stuff
from Clint Greenwald. Beyond the fact that there's no hope for that war,
the Ukrainians just don't have any people to fight it any longer. No matter
how much we give them in money, we can't provide the artillery they need,
and they don't have the citizens to fight in this war. Increasing the
Ukrainian men are saying no and are doing everything possible to evade the draft because
they know they're being sent as canon fader to the front lines for a war
that is completely futile, that is enriching Western elites and Ukrainian elites, and
has very little to do with the security of their country. Let's listen to
the rest, including Speaker Johnson, are just scared to death of Donald Trump.
Donald Trump has said he wants chaos. Donald Trump has said, well
wait till I become president. That'll take at least a year. Ukraine could
be gone the border will get much worse, war in the Middle East will
get worse, maybe bringing us into it. He's doing it all for political
reasons. And let me just say, will senators the crucial question, the
sixty four thousand dollars question. The majority of Republican Senators know this bill is
the right thing to do. It's a compromise. I don't like everything in
it, need it does, McConnell, but it's a compromise. That's the
only way you get things important done in the Senate. We prove that two
years ago. I want our bipartisan legislation. And will the Senators drowned out
the political noise from Trump and his minions and do the right thing for America.
It's a cru question, first of all, as we're about to hear
when we get to the segment about the media reaction Till Carlson confirming an interview
with Vladimir Putin. They're all pretending today that they hate interviews, that they
don't have an adversarial push back to them, that everybody in powerful positions needs
to be challenged. Chuck Schumer is reading talking points from his prepared paper that
his staff prepared. You can see him doing it right here, watching his
looks down question history is looking down and will the senator there you go.
He's reading talking points. That's why he has his glasses on. I use
glasses to read. I would never go on TV and in front of the
camera and use my gosses because I'm not reading anything that's in front of me.
I don't have notes here, and I'm a script prepared. But he
does so exactly exactly good coverage from Glenn Greenwalls. Stop it right there,
because I want to point out a couple of things. First of all,
Chuck Schumer, just to show you the freeze frame here, this fatuous character,
this slimy, eel like personality of Chuck Schumer has the gall to talk
about the United Nations and UNAH, the United Nations Recovery Emergency Recovery Organization that
the has been helping people in Palestine in Gaza with food and aid and things
like that. Now I'm opposed to the United Nations on moral grounds, on
constitutional grounds, and so on. But I got to interview Craig Murray recently.
Craig Murray, former Ambassador for the UK, and he was at the
Hague. I had him on my you can find it on the Liberty Conspiracy
page at Rumbull and rock Fen and so on, and I hope to have
Craig on again. He talked to me from the UK and he was at
the Hague and he watched the arguments that were presented against Israel against on the
claims of genocide that were brought up by the African South African government, and
he did a terrific job going over those things, and I really appreciated being
able to chat with him. But one of the things that he brought up
was, and we talked about this, I actually brought it up to him,
was that immediately after the decision from the National Court of Justice regarding the
Israeli genocide accusations and now they have to work out there's Israel supposed to stop
these things, supposed to be a check on them, that's not going to
happen. But immediately after that, the UK, the United States and other
nation states cut their funding off from the United Nations Emergency Aid Organization and they
claimed that there were members of it that had been involved with the attacks on
October seventh. Well, it turns out that that is not the case.
They have not presented evidence. This might surprise you for this weird lamber.
Let's show you what comes to us from anti war dot com. I think
you'll find this worthwhile check it out. The next one here, Israel has
failed to provide evidence for the UNRA Hamas Taighs claim. So this is one
from Kyle at the Libertarian Institute and it says news outlets with access to the
summary of an intelligence dossier that claims employees of the un AID Agency for Palestinians
participated in the Hamas attack say that it does not include evidence to back up
the claims. So, if you remember I covered something Kyle wrote yesterday that
said Israel is not giving up this intelligence dossier that it has that supposedly shows
these UNRAH employees were involved in the October seventh Hamas attack. Well, Channel
four, the British television channel, and The Daily Beast both reviewed a six
page summary of the dossier and they found that there's nothing there. There's no
actual evidence to prove the Israeli claim. And again this is something that the
US jumped on. Israel made the allegations and they cut off UNRA the same
day that the ICJ ruled that it's plausible Israel's committing a genocide. Now again,
just to pause this, did you hear either Mika Brzhinski or Chuck Schumer
as Chuck Schumer tried to portray his heart on his sleeve to bring aid to
those people that are being slaughtered by the weapons that the United States government is
furnishing the government of Israel. Did you hear him mention anything about how the
Israeli forces had told the Palestinians to fleet to Conunis and in the south,
and then of course they started blasting Conunis in Gaza. Did you hear anything
about that? Did you hear anything about, for example, the reports that
I mentioned on Liberty Conspiracy about how even going back to twenty eighteen, the
Israelis were in charge of the water in Gaza and that they were depleting the
water sources there. Did you hear did you hear talk about that? I
didn't? Did you know? And did you hear either of them when they're
talking about getting the humanitarian aid to the very place where of course they're telling
the Israelis, well, you better use those weapons we're giving you to in
a very very targeted way, and they continue to do it despite what the
Israelis continue to show them. They don't care and they're going to blast everything
to absolute powder. Well, it's strange that neither of them, when they're
talking about humanitarian aid, noted that the United States, Germany, the UK,
and Australia, by the way, have all tied in and said that
they're not going to fund the United Nations Relief and Works Agency un RWA,
UNRU UNRUA. They're not going to fund it after the very valid arguments were
made and the court ruled that yes, it is likely that Israel has engaged
in genocide. So they've vindictively put this new policy in place, and then
he, mister Schumer has the gall to talk about getting humanitarian aid to those
people in Gaza. Unbelievable, just incredible. They seem much more interested in
making sure that the military industrial complex is funded and I'm sure Dennis Gussinisch will
probably talk about this, than they are in making sure that innocent women and
children are not pulverized and not starved to death in that region. It seems
very clear to me that Chuck Schumer has one hundred percent confidence in the Israeli
government under Benjamin and Yahoo pulling off another Knakba and flushing those people out of
that region and then taking it over. That seems to be the agenda.
Let's get the final bit from Dave de Campbell of Anti War in Gaza.
Ignore all the allegations about the IDF, about the military that they're funding,
you know, to the hilt with all these bombs and stuff. Ignore all
those allegations. The second there's allegations about unra cut them off even as Palestinians,
hundreds of thousands of Palestinians are starving to death. All right, So
the next one here shocking spike in the legal force against Palestinians in the West
Bank. This is another one from Kyle at the Libertarian Institute, and it
says a new report from nc International Documents that over the past four months,
Israeli forces unleashed a brutal wave of violence against Palestinians and the occupied West Bank.
Did you hear them talk about that on Mika Brasiniski's show, No you
didn't. Now, to round it all off, everybody, I want to
give you one final bit. You know, we're talking about Tucker Carlson going
into Russia, getting all this criticism from CNN, the double standard of CNN
where they have to have their stories vetted by the IDF and in the past
they actually interviewed Osama bin Laden. Didn't hear anything about that? And you
know, trying to keep things honest about skepticism about Tucker. Will he ask
questions about the Russian Russian government and what they're doing to journalists, What is
the story behind that. Did we hear CNN talk about Gonzalo Lira, the
reporter who was killed in Ukrainian custody. No? Do we hear them talk
about the postponement of elections in Ukraine, the cancellation of elections in Ukraine.
No, how about the constitution of the United States? No, none of
that stuff. But of course, there is some question that one might have
about Tucker's background at Fox and whether he did the right thing or the wrong
thing in waiting a Syrian girl who made an excellent comment about the jab position
of Tucker and his former slot at Fox News. Not to make this about
Tucker's personality or whatever, but this information clearly exposes double standards on the part
of many of the pop media people and gets us interested in seeing what we're
going to hear from Russia also reminds us to remind other people about the dark
past, the United States influence with NATO going into Ukraine and all sorts of
things like that. Right, But Syria girl says, if I were in
Tucker's place and knew those things, I would I would leave to expose it.
After all, who knows how many millions he already had in the bank.
He wouldn't go broke because he left Fox and she spells it fau x
and yeah, and again, you know, regardless of the consequences or regardless
of how well healed you are. And again, you know, it's easy
for me to say that because I'm my own person and I can make decisions
for myself, So I can't, you know, ascribe motivations or say you
should think this way Tucker carlsoner that way or whatever. But I would look
much more kindly on someone who knew, should have known that those jabs are
bad mojo, that they were unconstitutional, they were immoral, and that much
of the rhetoric we were hearing about the masks and so on, the censorship
that was happening to people like me, MRCTV. I mean literally, we
had news guard funded by DARPA attacking me on the weekends. I was one
of those guys, right, So you know, it's it's a weird existence
when you know, I'm only on contract with MRCTV and it's not my full
time job, right, but I do that, and and I've got forces
of the US government and Defense Department slamming sixteen ton weights on me. It's
like crazy. You'd never imagine you'd be in that situation when you're a kid.
You know, it's just bizarre. It's like what is going on?
You know? So you make other contacts with good people, and I would
think that Tucker Carlson would take those chances going up against big pharma. And
it's not just big Pharma, it's the it's the pharmacological police state, government
police state. It's all integrated, right, And I'll tell you later on
liberty conspiracy. See a little bit more about that British story. It's about
a football fan who she's actually what is it lesbian or whatever, but she
spoke up about the trans ideology online and they banished her from this Newcastle Soccer
Club football matches and stuff from watching. But yeah, very very interesting stuff.
I want to bring this up though before I go, because Really Graceful
has an excellent video and you can find this. I retweeted this on my
Twitter feed, my ex feed or whatever, and so let me make sure
that I can find this for you. I think you'll find this worthwhile.
Just to give you again, I didn't want to play it immediately after bringing
up David's criticism of Tucker Carlson in his position, but just to give you
a quick outro on a couple of the things that I think are very very
valuable here from Really Graceful, and of course she's terrific. One of my
favorite interviews is between her and Steric Detective Ed that they did a couple of
years ago. Here she is. She has a new little documentary that she
put out Unvaxxed in twenty twenty four. This video details the COVID nineteen journey
from fifteen days to slow the spread to now. In February of twenty twenty
four, we discussed the COVID vaccine, its consequences, the JAB, the
trials on children and babies, recent updates regarding the safety or a lack thereof,
and so on and so forth. Let me give you this check it
out Painternet friends. It's been nearly four years since two Weeks to slow this
spread was announced in March of twenty twenty, when the entire world went crazy
and life as we knew it completely turned upside down from the very onset.
I documented the absurdity on YouTube until mainstream social media platforms no longer allowed coverage
of such events unless presented by legacy media sources. Since then, any information
regarding COVID nineteen or the Klot shot has been incredibly suppressed. For a time,
many folks just waited. They believe Patreon were in control and that ultimately
there would be justice to be seen in our country for their loved ones dying
alone in nursing homes, rushed onto ventilators and hospitals because of monetary incentives,
having their small businesses forced to close, while big box stores like Amazon,
Home Depot and Walmart were given the go ahead to stay open, and all
the while the greatest transfer of wealth in modern history was happening. To demonstrate
just how far we've fallen, I've got some data points for y'all. In
the United States, overdose deaths by thirty percent between twenty nineteen and twenty twenty,
and they rose another fifteen percent between twenty twenty and twenty twenty one,
while suicides in the US reached an all time high in twenty twenty two.
According to the National Association of Realtors, the April twenty nineteen median home price
for a single family home was two hundred and sixty nine thousand dollars. Meanwhile,
the median home sales price in the United States is four hundred and thirty
one thousand dollars as of the third quarter of twenty twenty three. According to
twenty nineteen data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the average spending on food
at home is about four thousand, six hundred dollars annually, or about three
hundred and eighty six dollars per month. Now in twenty twenty four, the
average family spends about two hundred and seventy dollars at the grocery store per week.
Families with children spend on average of about three hundred and thirty one dollars
a week on groceries, with a family spending over one thousand dollars just on
groceries per month in twenty twenty four. And y'all know they get up to
some funny stuff. Our government puts out reports that inflation is transitory and has
only risen like two percent in the last couple of years. They think you're
dumb. They're gaslighting you. They're hoping you forget everything that's transpired just in
time for the next worldwide psychological operation. While this one is still ongoing.
There's this big elephant in the rear, and it's these rush mandatory COVID vaccines
that a lot of adults and children were forced to get in order to keep
their jobs, attend school, and travel to see their loved ones that they
hadn't seen since before the worldwide lockdown. In this video, I want to
give you an update on the consequences of COVID vaccines. I'm also going to
show you some shocking clips regarding the vaccine trials on children and babies. And
basically my goal is just to open up the continued discussion on these vaccines because
nearly everybody has a story about them, about someone who's taken them, and
apparently what they call quote unquote COVID cases are surgery higher than ever. If
they didn't prevent against COVID, what was their ultimate purpose This is by no
means an exhausted video, But y'all know I'm a video clip hoarder. I'm
a quarter of clips that get memory hold. So in order to examine the
present, let's first see how we got here. My dad taught me from
a very early age be at one with the sniper feel it. I'm gonna
get the camera, I'm gonna be I have to get fish back into the
action here. I'm gonna push it under the water in the hand. Scotty,
you gotta big dooty, big, big dooty, what you gotta big?
She does an excellent job going through the stats, really good stuff from
really Graceful, and I bring that up splitting it off a little bit,
just to remind us after we heard I thought very very good words from David
about Tucker not taking that time, not going full bore, and you know,
David being much more overt and and and forceful about it. Then you
know I'd sort of step back just a little bit. But really Graceful bringing
up in this video. And you'll see this retweeted, not to just you
know, attract people to my Twitter feed or anything like that, but check
out Really Graceful on Twitter, because this is this is a fantastic presentation she's
done. Even though she has that, you know, the little music bits
in there, the rest of this thing is just phenomenal. And it really
brings home that people should have known, they should have known, they could
have known, and some people didn't take steps to speak up. And I
tried, David tried. I know many of you tried, and so many
of you have been such great allies and heroes not just for freedom, but
for truth. And I think it's so important to keep that in mind.
And you know, I try to give play to people, try to forgive
them if they've been in positions where maybe they didn't stand up strong enough at
first, you know that sort of thing. Yeah, you know, people
can be in those positions, and so I try to give them second chances.
But if people don't show that they're sorry, if they don't express some
attempt to make amends, to do something better, to make up for what
they did in the past, boy, that that is really that that's a
bleak world, that's for sure. Listen, everybody, thank you so much
for being there. Harps, thank you for being a great observer inside X.
I really appreciate your kind words, and thank you to Travis for helping
get the show off the ground today. Really appreciate all his help. Remember,
David will be back tomorrow nine am for the David Knight Show. You
can watch me on Twitter. It's at guard Goldsmith on Rumble the Liberty Conspiracy
just look up the Liberty Conspiracy page on Rock Finn the same thing. Love
to have you there in the audience. We're just growing, We're just a
little bit over a year old, and so find us there and spread the
word and looking forward to being there with you. And I really appreciate you
being here with me and for David as well. David get better. I
have one final thing I want to give you before we close off. It's
a little Bible quote from blue Letter Bible for today. I think you might
find this worthwhile. Trust in the Lord and do good. So thou shalt,
so shalt thou dwell in the land, and verily thou shalt be fed,
delight thyself also in the Lord. And he shall give thee the desires
of thine heart. Now I would just pause there to say the desires of
thine heart. I would hope start to orient towards recognizing that it's all for
God, commit thy way unto the Lord, trust also in him, and
he shall bring this to pass. And he shall bring forth thy righteousness as
the light, and thy judgment as the noonday. So David, blessings to
you and to all the family. Thank you so much. Everyone, have
a great afternoon. And I will sign off with a little something from David
that he composed, of course, with a little mention of where else you
can find David Knight. Have a great, great afternoon. See what at
six o'clock for liberty conspiracy. Please spread the word about that too. Thanks
David, Thanks Travis and the family. Take care here News now at apsradionews
dot com or get the APS radio app and never miss another story in the
you're listening to the David Night Show. You're saying