Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Wednesday, the fifteenth of May. You're
of our Lord, twenty twenty four. Well, today we're going to begin
with d banking in the United States and D banking of an investigative film producer
that I interviewed a couple of months ago. She's looking into the entrapment by
the FBI in this case of allegations of a kidnapping plot for Governor Whitmer.
And guess what, her bank has just shut down her bank account and seized
her money. Oh, they're going to write her a check. The check
is in the mail. She doesn't know when, but her entire bank account
has been shut down, and we're going to talk about the implications of that.
We're also going to talk today about while coming up in the fourth hour,
we're going to be talking to Jay Warner Wallace, cold case detective who's
got a new book, The Truth and True Crime. I think you're going
to find that very interesting, and also talk about what's going on in Ukraine.
The Russian has just walked into a city because the money that we gave
them the millions and millions of dollars that we gave them, somebody stole it
and they didn't build any fortifications. Imagine that surprise you here we are.
So let's talk a little bit to begin with with what is happening with money
and the threat to money. It's we've got a huge threat to the dollar,
huge threat to the financial system, the commercial real estate crisis that Trump
kicked off with his lockdowns and that type of thing. And you know,
so besides the inflation, besides the dollar, besides the economic hanging by a
thread, all these different banks and commercial loans which can propagate through the economy,
we also have the threat of CBDC, which is nothing that we've had
before. We all, many of us have lived through the inflation, lived
through stagflation, and we know how bad that was. But we could,
as I said, you know, it's four thirty usually a company by war.
We could wind up with the Civil War, World War, Revolutionary war,
all of these things all at once, and we could wind up with
a perfect storm of a lot of different economic things. Now I have no
funds, says Christina Urso, independent journalist. Bank of America abruptly terminated her
bank account because of the film. Evidently the FBI's involvement in Governor Whitmer's kidnapping
case. The Bank of America is highly politicized. To say the least.
Determination came without warning, without a clear explanation, even from the bank's risk
department. The risk department decided that she was a risk. How's that?
How is a documentary film producer a risk unless you don't the FBI that you
work with all the time, that you worked with during January sixth, doesn't
like her for some reason. As I've said before, free speech is not
a crime. Censorship is a crime, and censorship is used to cover up
other crimes. Isn't it always use to cover up other crimes. It's a
crime that she use to cover up other crimes, and now we have the
banks doing that as well, she says. Despite her long standing relationship with
Bank of America, access to her funds was denied and she was informed that
a check for the account balance will be mailed to her, but no specification
as to when that would happen. She says. So Bank of America has
decided to terminate their business relationship with me. Their risk department made this determination
for literally no reason. I've been with them for years. This is clearly
because my documentary, my critical reporting. Let me just tell you a personal
story about this as well. I've long imagined that when we tried to make
the move, we nearly weren't able to complete the transaction because Bank of America
they had a we had account with them, and they had really good interest
rates at the time, and so we went decided to apply through them.
I think it was a blessing even though we were able to complete the transaction
and get the move, but boy, it was hanging by a threat up
to the very last minute, and I wound up having to pay a higher
interest rate, quite a bit higher because interest rates had risen because they drunk
their feet. But I worked a loan guy and he was, oh,
yeah, yeah, no problem, Oh yeah, this is this is fine,
you know, no problem at all. And then they came up,
as manager came up with some kind of flimsy excuse I forget now the details
of it. And so we went back and we corrected that we and he
encouraged it, said, resubmitted, I know this is going to go through.
And he'd done this for a very long time. Oh yeah, I've
done all this stuff, and so that was part of the process. It
wasn't just rejecting it, but you know, kind of he was certain that
there was no problem with it. Oh yeah, this is piece of cake.
And then they rejected that again and they didn't really have any reason for
it, and then we had to start shopping around for another loan from another
bank and start the whole process over again. And again we nearly lost this
house here and really missed, nearly messed up the move. But the blessing
is that we don't have them holding a loan on our house. As corrupt
as Bank of America is, so sometimes there's a silver lining and what kind
puts us through, you know, it's like no, no, no,
you don't want that. But it may have been God that was moving that,
or it could have also been some people up in the risk management department,
right same department, the risk management department shut it down. Evidentally,
it's the risk management department at Bank of America that's going to run the shutdown
of people, the de banking of people, as we've seen in the UK
and other places like that. And it doesn't always happen to the high profile
individuals either, you hear about it when happens high profile individuals. When what
was it like twenty twenty three, I think it was that you had the
PayPal taking down the guy that has the Free Speech Union in the UK Daily
Skeptic, and he has a pretty high profile in the UK. He has
access to some politicians, and when PayPal took him down, they started making
some noise about it and they restored him. Now, when they took me
down in May of twenty twenty one, when our show was only about four
or five months old, and at that point in time, virtually all of
our support came through donations via PayPal, and they just abruptly canceled this and
would not give me an answer, And I spent hours on the phone with
a rep. He said, this is really strange. You know, I
don't There's just there's no information here except a single order says shut down this
account. Never seen anything like this before, he said. He said,
yeah, I understand, I understand what this is about, and I do
know what it's about. I don't like it, but I know what it's
about. So she said, they won't tell me why they won't allow me
to access my bank account or have access to the funds. They're telling me
I will get a check in the mail, but they won't say when I
can expect it. I'm traveling at the end of this month for my documentary,
but now I have no funds. They wouldn't say when the check will
come. I have a documentary film shoot in less than two weeks, and
I have crew members I need to pay, etc. Etc. So Yeah,
pretty amazing, isn't it. You know, By the way, let
me just just put this in here now. You know, I was going
to bring this up with politics coming up, but you know I was,
it's going to talk since it's looking more and more like Doug Berghram is going
to be the VP for Trump. I had talked a couple of months ago
about the connection between the two leading VP candidates for Trump, Gnome of South
Dakota and Bergham of North Dakota, both of them governors of those respective states,
And about there with this CO two pipeline, I mean, when you
talk about green boondoggle, pure Bolshevik projects like that, this is the worst,
absolutely the worst. We're going to pay tremendous amounts of money to extract
CO two from the air from some other processes, and we're going to pump
it across the country. Then we're going to inject it in the ground in
South Dakota and or North Dakota seriously, and pay tremendous amounts of money to
these people running it. So the CEO of this Emperor has no closed boondoggle
frequented mar Lago and of course Bergham and Gnome heavily involved in all this,
and Trump at the center of all of that. Yeah, I talked about
that, and I want to go back, and so has Harry Hound as
well. On Twitter, Harry Hound was talking about that and said back in
February, Hey, I've tried to post information about this nexus between these four
people, the CEO and the other ones, and it keeps blocking this on
Twitter. Who's doing this? And so I went back to get my report.
I don't want to play a little bit of the report that I did
a couple of months ago about this. And here's what I found. Look
at that I go to Rumble, video doesn't play ah, and that interesting.
Yeah, this is my life. This is videos taken down even on
Rumble. Who knows what the reason is. Travis was saying that he thinks
that it may not necessarily be censorship. It could be some technical issue.
I don't know. Other videos are still there. He looked up other videos
that other people did at the time, and it may not be directed.
This particular one at Rumble may not be directed. If it's censorship, may
not be directed at me personally. It might be the topic, right,
because we're going to see censorship from the right as well. You know that
they want to do the same things to people they disagree with that the left
does. Right, and you see this in what is happening with these anti
Israel protests. They come after free speech. That's that for real. They're
running the pipeline right down. I don't know if that's for real or not.
Oh a, I generated okay, yeah, I don't think that was
real. Run it right down the alley way between two houses. It's about
as bad though, these pipelines and the imminent domain abuses that we see with
it. And I talked about that even with a Keystone pipeline bringing in oil
from Canada taking it down to refineries in the United States, and I said,
look, we need the oil. There is no transportation method that is
one hundred percent safe. You could have accents with it, but the safest
is going to be the pipeline. If there's leaks, they're going to be
relatively minor compared to an oil tanker spill or something like that, and much
more easily cleaned up and fixed and so forth, and even safer than and
more efficient than sending it on a whole convoy of semi trailers. Right,
semi trucks we could we could do use them for other things. But it's
not perfect. But I said, I have a real problem with the eminent
domain aspect, especially because that pipeline was being run by a Canadian company,
trans Canada, and it set new precedents for eminent domain. We had bad
precedents for eminent domain in Connecticut with the Kelso case in the Supreme Court,
where the land was taken for the use of a corporation rather than for common
use, like they're going to build a road or something. I don't like
eminent domain period, but you know, if you're to take property because you've
got to build a road or something, that's very different, isn't it.
Then you take it because a corporation wants it. And then what we had
with this keystone pipeline was we had a corporation had the power to condemn this
property. You gave the condemnation and the seizure via imminent domain. You gave
those powers and those determinations and decisions to a corporation for the corporation's use.
You see how it keeps progressing. Oh and by the way, a foreign
corporation gets to take that property from people who have had that property in their
family for one hundred and fifty years or more and it's part of their farm,
and it messes up their farm to cut this right in the center of
it. It can't, you know, how do you get around this thing?
That type of stuff. So, yeah, there were a lot of
issues with that, but this is particularly bad. And this is the description
I had for the video there. If eminent domain were not bad enough on
its own, add crony capitalism, corruption, and a co two pipeline green
scam, North Dakota Governor Doug Bergham now running ahead in the veep sweepstakes,
and South Dakota Governor Christinome, a CEO crony of Trump, and Trump himself.
Those four people. If you think Trump's going to save you from the
un Davos Green Agenda and it's corporate looters. You need to see this.
Oh well, I guess that is enough to take it. Now, we'll
see what happens with it. Will it come back? Will I post it
again? You bet. We'll find it and we'll put it up again.
See what happens with a new posting. Also, we'll say we've got another
video from three months ago that is playing, and it's on the same page
if you go back in time. So it seems there's something specific about that
video. Yeah, yeah, but maybe the topic not me particularly, So
let's push this. I'm gonna keep pushing it till they me I'm wrong.
It's like we try to set up a channel on Roku, we get censored
with Vimeo that feeds it. I mean, it's just this is the day.
This is what frustrates me and raises my blood pressure more than the work.
It's this. Uh, And now the video right next to it doesn't
play. So maybe there's something about videos we uploaded that exact day. I
don't know. It's very strange. This is one of the problems with dealing
with sites like this. As good as they are, it's impossible to tell
what's actually going on it. Well, we'll upload it again. It'll upload
it again. It's just, you know, I don't know when it happens
to you so often. First thing I think about is that it's deliberate and
not an accident. But maybe it's an accident. Maybe it's a tech issue.
In a video statement, she gave further details and context about this,
of course, and frustrated, suspicious that her account termination at Bank of America
is linked to her hoarding and the upcoming documentary on the FBI is misconduct and
the governor Whitmer fed napping case, and it truly is entrapment, folks,
we all know, and it was the blueprint for January the sixth, As
we pointed out, we knew that before. She's got a lot of evidence
about that. They've had mixed results in the trials, which you can attribute
to the different judges right the way the judges allow evidence to be presented and
not presented, but they allowed the jury to be told and not told.
We have a long, rich history of judges who suppress exculpatory evidence of evidence
that would show that the defendant is innocent. We've seen that in so many
trials I've seen it in every one of these tax protesters trials that I know
of. I've seen it in the trials around the Bundy Ranch stand off.
The only reason that they didn't all go to jail was because you had a
good guy, a whistleblower in the BLM who said, this is what they're
doing. Busted the case wide open, and it was so damaging to the
government that they shut it down. And the judge said, dismissed with prejudice,
You're not going to reopen this case again. But it truly was prejudiced
the case on the side of BLM and some of these other things, some
of these other convictions, And I don't know if the first convictions that they
got to some of the people that were there in January sixth, I don't
know if those were overturned or not. I don't remember what happened to those.
It could be recalled that the FBI used at least twelve informants in the
Michigan Whitmer kidnapping case. There are six defendants and twelve FBI informants two to
one. They created this scam, they ran this scam. They goaded people
into saying things be careful what you say on social media. Seriously, they've
got scumbags this working for the FBI that are out there doing this kind of
stuff all the time. They do it on social media. You want to
make sure you don't get some kind of Brazil raid in the middle of the
night because of some FBI troll that you got into an argument with, or
maybe they're friendly and maybe they encourage you. You know, they're out there
saying all of these provocative things and you feel like you can join in and
say them with them as well. Need to understand have some wisdom about the
times that we're living in. So Bank of America provided customer information to federal
authorities around the January sixth events, and of course a lot of parallels between
that and this Whitmer thing. They actually took the guy who ran the Whitmer
Bolshevik Pure Bolshevik case, they put him in to run January sixth, and
of course Bank of America also turned over all kinds of credit card records and
gun purchases. Specifically, what they told what the Bank of America sent to
the FBI, and the FBI said, we didn't ask them for it,
they just did it. Voluntarily. Well, you know what's going on.
It's a very close relationship with them. Uh, they're just not they're not
guessing. Well, you know, I think the FBI would do this.
Let's spend the extra time. Now. The FBI tells them, you know,
it would be nice if we had that information. They've always run this
scam. They've run this type of scam with the phone companies, and when
people said, hey, you did you know you gave them my information,
the courts said, well, you have a phone account with you know,
the Bell system that we've given them monopoly to, and so you've agreed to
give them all this information and that's their information. Now they can do with
it whatever they want. And if they want to voluntarily turn this over to
us without a search warrant, they can do that. That's what's going on
here. The FBI tells them what they want, and the and Bank of
America says, sure, you don't need a warrant. We're not going to
ask you for a warrant. And they voluntarily give them everything that they want
because they want have a place at the table with CBDC and other stuff.
Right in the same way that Bell liked their phone monopoly at the time,
and at and T and Bell. They liked that monopoly. They wanted to
keep that going. So they were more than happy to give any information to
anybody in the government about anyone without a search warrant. So some of the
things that they got were these people in DC between January the fifth and January
the sixth, So Bank of America let them know they're there making purchases.
Did they purchase a hotel, stay or an airbnb in d C, Virginia
or Maryland after January the sixth? Now you, of course you could do
this and not be there for the you know, the January the sixth grift
and the whole thing was a setup. As I said, you know,
Trump set people up, Alex set people up. Bank of America rated on
these people. Bank of America rad it on a lot of people who had
nothing to do with any of this. Stopped the steal or save America stuff.
Either a next One airline related purchases since January the sixth, did they
fly out of January sixth? Next One? Any purchase of weapons between January
the seventh and their upcoming suspected stay in the DC area around Inauguration Day,
so you got a lot of people who had nothing at all even to do
with that grift and entrapment that we called January the sixth, and they still
had their names turned in to the FBI by Bank of America Bank of America.
And you know, it's interesting because Bank of America has had so such
close ties with the government going back to the Clinton administration. I remember because
we had a bank account with Nations Bank, which was headquartered in North Carolina.
And at that time there weren't these gigantic, too big to fail banks.
They were really more regional. So Bank of America was a California bank,
Nations Bank was a North Carolina bank, and there was a guy in
North Carolina, Erskine Bowls. He had run for office many times. He
was in the Clinton White House. I forget his exact time. I don't
know if he was chief of staff or something else, but he's pretty high
up in the Clinton White House. And he was involved in the banking industry
in North Carolina. And so they wanted to have this merger between the North
Carolina bank Nations Bank, and California's Bank of America. That as they put
that out, all of the press was saying you can't do this. This
is going to create a gigantic bank, and it's going to set off a
wave of mergers, and you're going to wind up with just a handful of
gigantic banks. But you know, Erskine Bowls did his influence thing, and
the Clinton administration approved it, and the two of them moved named all the
banks. Bank of America moved the headquarters from California to Charlotte, North Carolina,
and then that set off a wave of mergers. And ten years later,
because Clinton also took down the Glass Stegel Act, ten years later,
we had this big financial crisis because of all the speculation in the real estate
market, and you lo and behold, you had about five or six banks
that were too big to fail. They got bailed out. And so Bank
of America has been there from the inception. With all this stuff. They've
also debanked doctor John Eastman, who was pushing the corruption of the election theory.
He confirmed that he's already moved most of his money from Bank of America
to USAA, which is for Armed Services accounts, over concerns that Bank of
America had this leftist advocacy or actually government advocacy, but then both of them,
both of them shut down his accounts. Both Bank of America and USAA
closed down within the space of two months. In the UK's we've talked about
before, Brexit leader Nigel Farage found that he was being denied accounts by major
banks. And of course Nigel Farrage has a very high profile in the UK.
When he talked about it, though they he's just a conspiracy theorist,
it didn't happening, and all the rest of the stuff, but he campaigned
on the issue. They actually got the text messages released and it showed that
this was coming from the CEO of that bank, one of the biggest banks
in the UK NAT West and by the way, the British government was a
major shareholder and that bank, and it caused that CEO to have to resign
the CEO. Dame Allison Rose, Oh, there's nothing like a dame.
That's Rogers and Hammerstein. The other day I was talking about that. I
told her and I got off there and I said, Oscar in Hammerstein.
Oscar Hammerstein was the guy who wrote the lyrics this is but it was Rogers
and Hammerstein Richard Rodgers, and it came to me because I sitting there,
and also in the song. I don't know if you ever saw Victory at
Sea series that was done. There's a lot of stuff like that that was
done when I was a kid, because I was born ten years after World
War two and so people started documenting stuff like that. So it was a
long series Victory at Sea, and Richard Rogers did the music for it.
You know, I'd even remember my voice there, but you get the idea,
and if you've, if you're of a certain age, you probably could
not escape hearing that little ditty there, And immediately I did that with Karen
she oh yeah, I know what that is. Anyway, I digress.
Fort worst tallest building sells for less than nine percent, less than nine thousand.
I was not quite that bad. Yet, the tallest building in Fort
Worth sold for less than nine percent of its twenty twenty one purchase. Probably,
yes, well, see, we need to figure that in to help
Biden with his inflation figures, don't we. Yeah, the price of food
and fuel and all the necessary things may be going up, but hey,
look the price of commercial real estate dropped by ninety percent. Isn't that great?
Let's just average this all in So, yeah, that's what's happening,
and it's not happening just so I can afford it, that's right. Next
year, maybe you can afford a skyscraper in Dallas. I'd tear it down,
that's right. So Pinnacle Bank had a had an auction and they had
and actually they bought it back for twelve million. I guess I got first
debs on it. They had had the people who lost it had a thirteen
million dollar loan. Pinnacle Bank bought it back for twelve million, so they've
got a sunken cost in it of twenty five million. But the people who
bought it bought it for one hundred and thirty seven and a half million just
in twenty twenty one. And then this thing sells for twelve million. So
somebody took a financial bath on this thing. The former owner Burnett Cherry Street
LLC. They're the ones who lost all the money. The bank has come
out okay on it though, actually because again their total cost on it is
twenty five million, and it was appraised most recently one hundred and four million,
so they got something worth one hundred four million for twenty five million.
It's I guess this this building is too tall to fail. It's they got
a deal. The average commercial building vacancy rate in downtown Fort Worth, however,
is about fifty percent lower at eleven and a half percent, So it's
dropping, but it's dropped by fifty percent, but it's only down to eleven
and a half percent, so the vacancy rate is not as bad as it
is in some places like New York City. Peter Schiff asks what will cbdc's
mean for Gold with the eventual introduction. He says, the CBC's now seeming
inevitable. That's right. I know Trump put it on his campaign promise list,
but he doesn't have any commitment to it. I don't believe he's going
to do anything about it. You know, there was some hope, perhaps
that DeSantis would because he made it a core issue and he did a half
hour thing. But then when he got finished, all they wanted to know
was, well, what's going on in this Manhattan trial of Trump, which
is now in process. That's all they asked him about. So again,
when we look at that, promises are cheap, especially for Donald Trump,
I don't think he's going especially considering the fact that Jared Kushner and Trump,
Goldman Sachs. Treasury Secretary Steve Manouchin started the CBDC kickoff and then you know,
handed it over to Biden. It's a left right left right. You
know, one of them starts at the other one finishing. You know,
Trump starts the vaccine stuff, kicks it over to Biden, and he completes
it. So anyway, Peterscheff says, of course, recounting for people who
I think everybody knows by now what CBDC is. He says, it's means
of surveillance. But he gives a couple of good examples here. He says,
so if you owe taxes or a parking ticket or something, it'll be
automatically deducted. Does the Fed think that it needs to cool inflation, Well,
they might deduct money directly from your bank accounts, because you know,
this is what they do with modern monetary theory. We just take the money
out to cool inflation. You know, they're not going to do this kind
of stuff of changing interest rates, contative easing. No, what they'll do
is to just directly pull money out of your account. So they could impose
a daily spending limit on you. You know, anything if you've got a
fifteen minute city. He doesn't mention this year, but he's got a fifteen
minute city thing they're trying to enforce. Sorry, you can't buy anything outside
of this little fifteen minute city radius that we've assigned you to, giving a
new meaning to that statement at the bar. Sorry, your money's no good
here. Literally, that's why what happened. Possibilities for control and profit are
endless and too tempting for control freak bureaucracies and amoral tech companies to ignore.
He's right about that, he said. CBDCs and the idea of a cashlest
society are mostly about increasing centralization and control on the societal and individual level.
It's easy to see how they might be accompanied by new legislation banning precious metals
or non state approved financial activities. All they need is a severe enough financial
crisis to provide the justification. And this isn't a theory. We saw it
during the Great Depressions, he points out, with FDR confiscating goal by executive
order, a true communist criminal if everyone was one, and with new developments
in crypto tookenization tech and a brewing global financial crisis, well, it's not
brewing. It was created created. The tech banking political complex is preparing for
what they collectively know will be a crucial window of opportunity to force CBDCs down
people's throats. Once it's rolled out, central bankers will have more ability than
ever to manipulate the money supply and your personal finances according to their whims.
Sorry, you know, we're not even going to discuss anymore of this whole
thing about meat and dairy. Just if it's meat or dairy, you can't
buy it. It's not going to let it happen. So that's one of
the big advantages of gold. But his article is, so what happens to
the price of it? And he looks at what happened to the price of
gold before and after the executive order that FDR went through, And I don't
know exactly on his chart here at exactly a point at which FDR, at
one point after he sees most of the goal that he could get this arbitrarily
raises the price. He gets it on the cheap and raises the price.
He went from twenty one to thirty four dollars an ounce. That's about sixty
two percent. I'm not sure exactly the timing of when that went up,
but it goes straight up on his chart that you see there. Some legislators
are recognizing the threat and fighting against it, declaring CBDCs to be a threat
and empowering precious metal holders. However, he says, I'm not sure it'll
be enough to fight the tide that's being engineered by the central planners. But
as precious metals emerge as the best form of physical money and a tightly control,
micromanaged financial dystopia, they'll become the only way to make private or off
grid transactions, making them more valuable than ever, not only as investments,
but as a means of survival outside the fully digitized FIAT nightmare. Financial privacy,
you know, privacy of financial transactions is what Katherine austen Fitz talks about,
and I think that is the key issue. You know. We can
talk about inflation, and we can talk about how they manipulate that. We
can talk about the interest rates and how they manipulate that, but it really
is for me the coming plans to try to centralize and control everything, and
you have to have something that's physical if you're going to have any financial privacy.
It'll still be difficult to do it. You know, they'll have informants
and things like that everywhere. It's going to be difficult to survive, but
you're going to have to survive in a gray or black market if they get
way. If we can organize at the local and state level, maybe it
won't come to that. But if we don't organize at the local and state
level, it will be that. It will be you individually trying to operate
in a gray market or a black market. Sober Gold versus the rate cut
circus show. This is from von Grayert's Gold. He says, I got
a picture that I imagine of Uncle Sam hanging off a cliff with a forced
political smile. Above the cliff is a grizzly bear. Below the cliff is
a pool of sharks. Whichever direction he picks, the end result is going
to be messy. And he says, that's that's really what we're looking at
here, you know, when we look at is the Fed going to cut
rates or not cut rates? In January, Powell was giving a lot of
Ford guidance about how he's going to do rate cuts. Everybody expected that they
would do that to support Biden, which is another indication to me that they
have basically they want to have Trump. You know, all of these trumped
up charges in these court cases have made it all about him personally. It's
all become a reality TV show circus, which is his that's his wheelhouse.
It suits him just fine. It meant that he could go through and eliminate
a large field of people challenging him, even credible candidates who had been governors
and things like that, without talking about any issues, without doing any debates,
just by making it about his own personal suffering. And so he says,
so you're going to look at the interest rates, he says, here's
my advice. Stop caring about it, because either way we're screwed. That's
what I say about the presidential races. Stop caring about whether it's Biden or
Trump. Either way, we're screwed. Right, whether Powell raises interest rates
or drips interest rates, we're still screwed. And the same thing is true
of the election. There's no solution coming from that quarter. With trillions in
US Treasury notes repricing this year and over seven hundred billion in zombie bonds from
SMP issuers doing the same, if Powell doesn't cut rates, then sovereign and
corporate bond markets are staring down loaded barrel. And he said, this is
real. Think of America. His own data confirms, and Uncle Sam is
looking at one point six trillion in interest expense payments by the end of the
year if Powell doesn't cut rates soon, So you can you can make cases
for cutting rates, you can make cases for not cutting rates. But he
said, whichever way you go, you need to understand that the end results
are going to be misreported. The government will lie to you about the inflation
rates as always. And as he points out, so what is the lesson
from history? Lesson from history? Is it all failing nations ultimately resort to
killing their own currencies in order to buy time and to save a system that's
mathematically beyond being saved. As niail Ferguson recently reminded us, any great power
that spends more on debt service than on defense will not stay great for very
long. This has been true of the Habsburg Empire, this is true of
the ancient regime in France, of the British Empire, and of course it
will also be true of the American Empire. Quite Frankly, I look forward
with anticipation to the demise of the American Empire. Regardless of what happens to
us, it'll be an improvement, I think, because they are a threat
to the life, the liberty, and the prosperity of everyone as it is.
So it will be jumping out of the frying pan. We'll see what
the fire is like. But it is a murdering I'll tick pushing infestation of
demons in Washington, DC. And you got to hope that that goes down,
whatever the cost to us, even if it costs us everything. Well,
again, you want to prepare individually. You know, we can hope
that things are going to be done at the state level. Maybe they will,
but either way, you need to prepare individually. And you can do
that at Davidknight dot Gold. That'll take you to Tony Ardban's Wise Wolf Gold
and there you can buy gold or silver large or small amounts. You can
also set up a regular savings program and you can gradually accumulate gold. You
can do it on a fixed amount each month. He has different tiers that
are there and if you get into wolf Pack that helps you with quantity discounts
on the things on whatever it is that you are picking up. There a
couple of comments I want to get to before we take a break. On
rock fan Handy good to see, says, Bank America was where my dad
banked when he moved to Missouri. They waited until the day of closing to
reject the loan. There you go. He ended up with a local bank
instead, but the deal almost crashed. So maybe it wasn't me personally.
Maybe it's just Bank of America. Stay away from these people. They will
mess you up one way or the other. Joe Biden challenged Trump to a
pair of debates. This has just been released. Travis says first one would
be as early as June, the second for early September. Biden's camp rejected
allowing the Nonpartisan Commission on Presidential Debates to run the debates and wants the debates
to be in a closed TV studio with no live audience. Gets some confused
if other people are talking, he can think, and with microphones they cut
off if they go over there alloted time. Biden told Trump, go ahead,
make my day. Well, okay, there you go. He's a
big man. He's going to sign up for debate. These guys are so
pathetic. They're not running the show, folks, They're just puppets. They're
sock puppets. The question is who's got their hand up there behind waving their
arms and legs. You know, that's that's why they ain't got to ask
yourself. Okay, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right
back. You're listening to the David Night Show. Yeah, let's take a
look at what is going on in Ukraine here before we do real quickly,
just I want to say thank you to Kishan g. Thank you for the
tip on rockfand Hi David and team. I enjoy listening with you to your
show daily, even though I don't agree with all of your opinions. Well
of course we're not. If you're critically thinking, you're probably not going to
agree with me on everything because we're going to see some things differently. I
tell you what I think. I try to give you the news objectively,
and then I tell you what I think about it. But of course even
the things that I think are important are going to reflect my personal opinions and
biases as well. Anybody tells you that they're completely objective, that they're the
sole source of truth or reject those people. They're either fools who believe that
themselves or they're cynically lying to you about it. But I you know,
again, I have my biases, and I'll tell you why I think what
I think. But and it's very important for us to understand that. And
I'm not saying that you have to listen to people that you disagree with,
it's just that you don't want to demand that they be canceled. That that
is a very big tell. I think people who you know, whether they're
left or right now, we see this on both sides want to shut down
the opposition. And it's like, Okay, what have you got to hide?
What is it that you're trying to lie to us about? Because that's
what censorship is about. It's always about covering up lines. The truth doesn't
need to be defended, it needs to be unleashed. So she said,
I can't afford much, but here's my small token of my appreciation. Well,
thank you very much. That is very generous. I appreciate that.
I really like your interviews with Eric Gerald and Tony. Keep up the work.
One question, do you think Alex's Info Wars is going to be shut
down. I'm a fan of his, but just wondering your thoughts. No,
No, it won't be. You know, he hasn't paid a penny
out of this one point four billion dollar judgment and he's not going to pay
anything. And he was bragging about He's bragged about that on air, he
bragged about it privately. How he's going to get out of that. He
knew he was going to lose. He chose not to give them the information.
And that's not a theory. Remember that clip and he says, oh,
this is your Perry Mason moment. Why was it the Perry Mason moment?
Well, because he had always said I gave him everything that they wanted,
you know, all this kind of stuff. He didn't give them everything
they wanted. He was playing a shell game. He's moving money around,
delaying this stuff, and he did not give them what they demanded. And
you automatically lose a case when you don't do that. He knew he was
going to lose a case. He was just dragging it out and he got
caught when he was on the stand. His lawyer always hired the best.
His lawyer sent. His lawyer looked great. I mean he really was out
of Fashion magazine, but evidently wasn't the brightest guy, because his lawyer sent
Alex's phone information to the opposing counsel and then never and there's a period of
time, it's like one or two weeks or something, and never said disregard
that. If he'd said, if he'd realized that he made a mistake,
sent it by mistake, or if his staff had sent it by mistake,
he could have always pulled it back and said disregard that, and the other
lawyer would have to have disregarded it. I guess I don't know what the
rules are with that, but I guess there's some kind of professional courtesy thing
or maybe the rules of the bar or something like that. If it's a
mistake and you catch it, but if it sets there for a week or
two weeks and you know, pull it back, it's fair game for him
to use it. And so opposing counsel confronted Alex and said, well,
you know, you said this didn't happen, and you said you didn't have
this information when we asked you for but here it is. It was sent
to me by your lawyer by mistake. And ale said, oh, so
this is your Perry Mason moment. Yeah, it really was a Perry Mason
moment because it showed that Alex had chosen not to defend free speech. Look,
I was there when all this stuff was going on with Sandy Hook,
and it was it was a debate, and it should have been fair to
say all that stuff. There wasn't anything that was said that was unfair in
my opinion. And yet there were, you know, there was talk about
this kind of stuff and it got to be a real hot pitato in it,
and there were problems with Wolfgang Halbig as a credible source, and so
Alex said, let's, you know, let's shut this thing down. Let's
not talk about this anymore. I was perfectly fine about doing that. I
had no interest in talking about it. And then when Owen came, Owen
wanted to open up that can of worms, and he wanted to open up
the can of worms about Pizzagate. And basically he just stepped in a whole
several different piles of dog poop and tracked them through the organization, which resulted
in these lawsuits that were there, and that's when it fired up again.
But there was a lot of political angle to it. As well, of
course, no doubt about it. But Alex chose to try to preserve his
money by whatever secretive means he used offshore bank accounts and stuff like that.
He chose to preserve his tens of millions that he was paying himself every year
and to not defend free speech and a free press. So he chose not
to play that game. He chose not to participate and defend what he had
to say as being fair under the First Amendment, which it was, but
he chose to go the underhanded route. And you know, I think I
can beat him by hiding stuff rather than making arguments. And so that's the
situation he's in now. But he hasn't had to pay a penny to these
people one point four billion dollars, hasn't paid any of it. Still maneuvering,
still moving around, and so yeah, he is. He's got a
lot of connections. As I I've said before, I've never known anybody before
or since that has so many friends and family as cnia as Alex does.
Something weird about that, don't you think it seems to be a protected individual
when it comes to January the sixth or this other stuff. For whatever reason,
on rock fan Guards Goldsmith. Bank of America also bought Merrill Lynch,
that's right, and a government broker special deal where the government brought bought a
lot of Merrill Lynch debt. Yes, that's right. And well, you
know, and being able to buy Merrill Lynch that was tied, I believe
to getting rid of the you know, the Glass Stigelact, because the banks
were doing a lot of speculative stuff before the stock market crash on the nineteen
twenties, and they said, all right, to restore confidence in the system,
the federal government will set up a corporation to ensure the bank deposits.
But we're going to meet, we're going to require that you can't participate in
these risky things. And so when they took that away, Bank of America
could buy Merrill Lynch and these other people who were doing these securitized real estate
loans and everything. And yeah, and the government bought a lot of the
debt. I mean, it's just it's just revolving door, just like you
see with the vaccine stuff, like we're going to see with the agricultural stuff,
the attacks on our food supply. It is again this to think that
there's a difference between the Republicans Democrats is like thinking that there's a difference between
the multinational big corporations and the government that's supposed to be overseeing them. They're
not adversaries, they're partners. They're partners, just like the Republicans and Democrats
are not adversaries. They're partners on the key existential issues that confront us.
By the way, Rockfan Handy says, the thing with my dad happened back
in two thousand and six. Well, that's interesting, So it looks like
maybe they've got some systemic inefficiencies and how they work, so you can add
that to their craven government sycophancy. The Russians simply walked in Ukrainian troops in
Kharkiv. Tel BBC Dennis Yuoslavsky is angry. As the commander of a Ukrainian
special reconnaissance unit, he fought in Ukraine's surprise offensive in Kharkiv in the autumn
of twenty twenty two, which pushed back an initial Russian invasion all the way
back to the border. But now Dennis and his men are facing the prospect
they're doing it all over again. Russian forces have in recent days made small
but significant gains right along the border and the Kharkiv region. Their advances are
only a few miles deep, but have swallowed up around sixty two miles of
Ukrainian territory and the more heavily defended east of Ukraine. It has taken Russia
months to achieve the same penetration. They did it in just a couple of
days, and they just walked right in. By the way, do you
notice a subtext here they don't point out. BBC says, well, you
know, they've advanced over here, and they've advanced over here. They're comparing
how quickly they were able to advance into two places. But the bottom line
is they're winning everywhere. They're winning everywhere. Is an unwinnable war. It's
been an unwinnable war from the very beginning. It was very interesting at the
very beginning, and it's hard whenever there's a war to get objective information.
Usually people have a dog in the fight, and so I thought probably the
best objective information was coming out of the Indian press at the very beginning of
this, and they had some Indian military people talking about it, and they
weren't heavily allied with either the US or with Russia, so they weren't spending
it for one or the other. And they were saying this is you know,
they were talking about fighting them to the last Ukrainian. They said,
you can't win this. And I think the best summation of it was from
Colonel Douglas McGregor, who said, this is like a war between Mexico and
the United States. The United States is going to ultimately win that war,
overwhelming them with resources and people and technology and all the rest of this stuff,
right, And that's what's going to happen here. It's just a matter
of time. And they don't really care, you see. And Arrestovich knew
that. Alexei Arrestovich knew that he was. He came in in twenty nineteen
with Zelenski. They ran on a platform of peace because at that point in
time that already had five years of civil war after the CIA Victoria Newlan engineered
coup. The areas that didn't like the new government wanted to secede and be
with Russia or fighting that government, and so they shelled civilian populations for five
years. And Arrestovich was part of Zelensky's peace group and he came back and
was interviewed on TV and they said, so, what's going to happen.
We're gonna have peace. Oh, no, it's not going to happen.
Oh, that's bad. He goes, oh, it's even worse than that.
He said in three years twenty twenty two when it did kick off.
In three years, we're going to be at war with Russia. He said,
that's horrible. He says, yeah, and the country is going to
be havoced, is what he said. A stated, how can that be?
She said, and said, well, here's the good news. We
get into you into a NATO, right, they don't care what happens to
Ukraine, the the Ukrainians that the NATO people have put in charge, with
the coup and the rest of the stuff. They don't care what happens to
the rest of the country, just like the people in our country don't care
what happens to the rest of the country. Just like the Israeli government doesn't
care what happens to Israelis, let alone Palestinians. They've got their geopolitical objectives
and you know, the hell with you. We don't care what happens to
the rest of the country. And he said that matter of factly said that,
and so it's not a surprise. Yeah, but you have people like
Chris Christy and Lindsey Graham. This is good. Let's do more of it.
Let's keep this going. Because they also don't care about the loss of
life in Ukraine. They all they also don't care about the country being absolutely
totally destroyed. The only thing they care about their little geopolitical objective of weakening
Russia. And if we can use the Ukrainians to do that for us,
yeah, we'll use them as our surrogate army. We don't care about their
lives. It don't matter whatever Travis is pro Russian. Slovakian Prime Minister Robert
Fico has been shut Oh is this going to be like the Archduke Ferdinand.
No reports on his condition yet. It's apparently a close ally of Hungarian Prime
Minister Victor Orbon. Oh well, we'll see what happens with that. It
keeps escalating, doesn't But again, they really don't care. The war has
been lost. The war was lost from the beginning. This is just about
bleeding Russia, that's all. It's about all this money, all this blood,
so we can bloody Russia and and perhaps you know the real goal is
to have a world war for a depopulation. So going back to Ukraine,
this guy who was the commander of recon Unit Dennis on a Special Forces recon
he wants to know what happened to Ukraine's defenses, says the BBC. He
said, there was no first line of defense. We saw it. The
Russians just walked in. They just walked in without any mind feels. He
says. Officials had claimed that defenses were being built, they said at huge
cost. But in his view, those defenses simply weren't there. He said,
either it was an act of negligence or corruption. It wasn't a failure,
it was a betrayal. He knows that. And of course you can
look at all the villas that Zelensky has put everywhere in the Paris shopping trips
of his wife, and how he's nested the ownership of the foreign villas through
multiple you know, corporations. It's like a Madrioski doll, you know,
got a dig and then who owns this one, who owns this one,
who owns us? Eventually you get there and it's in the name of his
wife. Everyone knew this encourasion was likely to happen, just like everybody knows
that Ukraine is going to lose the war. But these guys who got the
money didn't build a fortification, as Dennis says, he says, of course
I'm angry when we're fighting back for this. We lost thousands of people,
We risked our own lives, and now because somebody didn't build any fortifications,
we're losing people again. They took this money from the likes of McConnell and
Schumer and trader Mike Johnson, and they ran, they ran, and so
that was a BBC story. There was a local story that was done by
Ukrainska Pravda on Monday. You know the truth of Ukraine. I guess military
and civilian authorities in Ukraine's Kharkov region paid millions of dollars to fake companies,
fake companies for the supply of non existent building materials to construct defensive fortifications that
they didn't build. So the newspaper Ukraineska Pravda on Monday, with no fortifications
built, Russian forces have advanced rapidly through the region. Writing on Monday,
the paper said Ukrainian anti corruption activist Martina Bogoslavits explained that the Regional Military Administration
had been given one hundred and seventy six and a half million dollars to build
fortifications to hold back this advance. Much of the money was embezzled, she
claimed. For the supply of wood, the Regional Military Administration signed contracts of
six point eight million dollars with five companies that were set up immediately after the
contracts were nounced. Oh okay, they didn't have any they didn't exist before
they get the contracts. They create these companies. Then the next thing is
they have no bid contracts. No bidding process took place. And at least
two of these three companies. Two of these companies were owned by the same
person. She said. This is almost as bad as Dick Cheney in Iraq.
There's no bid contracts with Haliburton and other stuff. Now, of course,
Haliburton was a genuine construction company. They didn't even bother to have genuine
construction companies in this They get the money from the Congress, the American Congress,
and they set up some contracts and then they create some phony companies and
they just take all the money. They said. The owners of these firms
do not resemble successful businessmen and business women. She said. They have dozens
of court cases from whiskey theft to domestic violence against the husband and mother.
Some of them are deprived of printal rights and have had enforcement proceedings for bank
loans. It's just organized crime. Boguslavits describe these business owners as avatars placed
in charge of the companies, either for a small fee or without their knowledge,
oh like Zelenski himself, or perhaps like McConnell and Mike Johnson and Chuckie
Schumer, avatars, but in place by the real government, the intelligence community,
and the military industrial complex of this American empire. The naked eye can
see how a government official mercilessly registers new companies using for this purpose people who,
due to the circumstances, may not be aware of this, and this
someone continues to make money on blood. She wrote. The lack of defensive
fortifications allowed Russian forces dinner Kharkiv region almost unopposed. They also quote this guy,
Dennis Yaroslavski that the BBC talked to no line of defense. We saw
the Russians just walked in. They walked in without any mind feels. He
said it wasn't a failure. It was a betrayal. And folks, this
war is going to be lost, and just remember when it is lost that
it wasn't a failure, it was a betrayal. It was a betrayal from
the very beginning. And then we look at the Israeli thing. Have I
don't like to cover it in detail because there is it's nothing but a slush
pool of lies from both sides. With a fog of war, you can't
really see what going on. Everybody is lying about what happened? You know,
did this atrocity happen? Did that one happened? We know people are
dying, of course, but to get the numbers and to see, you
know, who's doing what it really is not possible for us to know that.
So I stayed out of that. My position is America first, Peace,
Peace first, impose a just war restriction, not what we saw yesterday
from Mark Milly. Oh well, you know, there's here's what you need
to have for a war. You need to have a political reason, You
need to make it fast. Really well, you don't even do that.
Your wars last forever by design, they last forever. That alone would make
them unjust. But the fact that you strike other people pemptively, they have
not hit this country. It's not a it's not a legitimate prelude to war.
To see somebody making, you know, bold and aggressive statements and building
up a military that doesn't justify it. But now what we've had is a
US Army major who has quit the Defense Intelligence Agency and protest of what he
has seen. Now, this I think is credible because like the doctors who
eventually came around and started talking about what they saw happening with the vaccines and
with the hospital death protocol that Trump was paying people to do, these doctors
had nothing to gain and everything to lose by telling the truth about what Trump
and Biden were doing, and the big pharmaceutical companies and the FDA and the
CDC all of it right, and they did. They paid the price,
They lost their career. Same thing with this guy. He has nothing to
gain from blowing the whistle on this. Nothing. He resigned from this.
It's the end of his career, and he's doing it because he can no
longer be a part of what he says is ethnic cleansing. US Army officers
resigned from his posts on zero Hedge at the Defense Intelligence Agency to protest Washington's
quote nearly unqualified support for the government of Israel, unquote support that has facilitated
what he calls the killing and starvation of tens of thousands of innocent Palestinians.
He describes himself as a descendant of European Jews. He said he was raised
to be particularly unforgiving. He said, where responsibility for ethnic cleansing is concerned,
you see, we have to be careful. We don't become what we
fight. You want to say we're not going to have ethnic cleansing, you
want to say we're not going to have discrimination and racism, But then you
promote those values as part of your government, as part of what you donate
money to at the universities, you support those racist policies. You become what
you fought. And that's always That's always the trap, isn't it? And
Major Harrison Man left THEA in April. He sent a two page letter to
a group of his colleagues there saying that he felt that they were owed an
explanation for his quote relatively abrupt departure. On Monday, he shared the letter
with the public via a post to his linked end page. Well, I
can't get the full letter. I'm banned on LinkedIn as well, so,
but they do have a significant number of quotes that they've taken out on this
zero Hedge article. What he has to say, says, I'll read the
quotes that they had. He said, I cannot justify staying silent any longer.
It is clear that this week some of you will still be asked to
provide support directly or indirectly to the Israeli military as it conducts operations into Rafa
and elsewhere in Gaza. I am sharing my letter now in the hope that
you too will discover that you are not alone, You are not voiceless,
and you are not powerless. And the April letter explaining his departure zero h
says Man describes how his growing misgivings grew as the IDF's retaliation for October seventh
continued with US government help. He said, each of us signed up to
serve knowing that we might have to support policies that we weren't fully convinced of.
Our defense institutions couldn't function otherwise. However, at some point it became
difficult, he says, lost my place here Okay, this is the problem
with electronics stuff here the yeah, a little bit further here, Okay,
it just skipped into a unknown zone and we've got to recover, get back
to where we are. It's thinking about it here we are, it came
back. How about that? Okay, So he says, at some point,
whatever the justification, you are either advancing a policy that enables the mass
starvation of children or you're not. And you can see their picture of a
child literally star How many times have we men shown pictures similar to that that
the Nazis did to people in concentration camps. Do we become the monsters that
we fought in April? You know? Sef said one and three Gaza children
under two years old are acutely malnourished. When Israel began retaliating after October the
seventh, the Defense Minister Gallant declared, I have ordered a complete siege on
Gaza Strip. There will be no electricity, no food, no fuel.
Everything is closed. We are fighting human animals, and we're acting accordingly.
He said. By the way, that is the same type of thing that
we're going to see these globalists lead to. They want to shut down our
electricity, our food, our fuel. They're doing it right now with EPA.
They're going to do it gradually, and then one day they're going to
do it suddenly. Right be prepared for that. They're doing it gradually right
now, the same things they did because they're at war with us, our
own government. The EPA is at war with us. So be prepared.
He so we enabled and empowered the kill. This is the guy he resigned
again from the DA. This is him talking again. He said, we
enabled to empower the killing and starvation of tens of thousands of innocent Palestinians.
The past months have presented us with the most horrific and heartbreaking images imaginable,
sometimes playing on the news in our own spaces, and I have been unable
to ignore connection between those images and my duties here, which has caused me
incredible shame and guilt. By the way, yesterday is made public that Biden
said, I'll tell you where the Hamas leaders are hiding. We know where
they are, we know where their tunnels are, and I'll tell you where
they are if you do this. And this they've known, Israelis have known,
They've chosen not to go after the leaders of Hamas to go after so
they could go after the civilian population because they would to purge them out of
there, he said. I told myself my individual contribution was minimal, and
that if I didn't do my job, somebody else would. So why cause
a stir for nothing? I told myself, I don't make policy, it's
not my place to question it. Above all, I was afraid. I
was afraid of violating our professional norms, Afraid of disappointing officers that I respect,
Afraid that you would feel betrayed. He says, as the descendant of
European Jews, I was raised in a particularly unforgiving moral environment when it came
to the topic of bearing responsibility for ethnic cleansing. My grandfather refused to ever
purchase products manufactured in Germany, where the paramount importance of never again and the
inadequacy of just following orders were oft repeated. I am haunted by the knowledge
that I have failed those principles. But I also have hoped that my grandfather
would afford me some grace, that he would still be proud of me for
stepping away from this war. However, belatedly, he Man also noted America's
unconditional support, also encourages reckless escalation that risks a wider war. I think
that's true in the Middle East. I think that's true in Ukraine. I
think that's true in China as well. Well, we're going to take a
quick break and we will be right back. You're listening to the David Knight
Show. Well, if you oppose these wars that they have going on,
expect to pay the price. And Thomas Massey is now being targeted by APAK
American Israeli Political Action Committee. They spent three hundred thousand dollars now in the
last week or so before the primaries. He's got two opponents. And remember,
going back to twenty twenty, Trump targeted him, he said, let's
primary him out. He didn't succeed in doing that at that point in time.
We'll see what happens this time. And the reason that Trump was angry
what Thomas Massey was because Thomas Massey said, we can't afford three and a
half trillion dollars for this lockdown stuff. This is insane. And you guys
want to pretend that there's a virus here, come back and vote. We're
not going to do this by acclamation. Whatever you're going to have to come
back and register, and everybody was furious with him. He really got everybody
there angry with him, but especially Trump because this was Trump's baby. The
lockdown was Trump's baby. And it's kind of interesting now because Trump is Trump
has come out and attacked during the primaries. He attacked Dysantis for opening up,
opening up, when at the time he I'm sorry for closing down.
At the time, he attacked DeSantis because he opened up. He and Kemp
and Georgia opened up about two weeks into this, two weeks to flatten the
curve. They said, that's it opening up. And then when uh and
and Trump is furious, You're gonna kill people, all the rest of this
stuff. Then when Trump is running against DeSantis, he tries to pretend that
DeSantis was the lockdown master. It was Trump, pure projection, pure lies.
And Trump knows it. And then just this last week we saw that
with r F K Junior. Yeah, he said, h r f K
Junior. H r f K Junior is you know he's he's pushing the vaccines
or something, you know he wants to And it was just the opposite.
Trump even used r f K Junior to bid up his price to the big
pharmaceutical companies and get millions of dollars during the transition period. And then Trump
responded by putting in the Pfizer of the Eli the I can't remember Eli,
what is the help me, Travis, the pharmaceutical guy. I want to
say, Eli Whitney. It's not Eli Whitney. That was Eli Lilly.
Thank you. I got Eli Whitney, which was an automobile catalog that I
used to buy stuff from when I was in high school. I couldn't get
Eli Whitney out of my mind. Anyway, it happens to us all,
doesn't it. So Eli Lilly CEO came in and he made him head of
the FDA, and he stayed there for the full four years. And he
was the one who kicked off the emergency executive orders declaring that it was a
health emergency. Then Trump in the middle of March, March the thirteenth,
Friday the thirteenth, he kicks off the money for the emergency thing. Anyway,
Trump used r F K Junior to bit up his price with these pharmaceutical
companies, and now he's accusing r F K Junior being a big vaccine proponent.
No he's not anti vaccine anything. Of course, you know, Trump
is the father of the vaccine. He's called himself that, and so now
he is Trump is attacking Biden, warning that Biden is going to do all
the things that Trump actually did in twenty twenty, you know, the lockdowns,
the mass the social distancing, and all the rest of this stuff.
It's just amazing the projection that's there. But anyway, he says, listen,
Thomas Massey put this sid I said, listen to this three hundred thousand
dollars hit piece play on me by foreign interest lobbyist group APAC. And he
says at twelve seconds, and they say fifteen times in April, Massey was
the only Republican voting. And so then he says to Speaker Johnson, he
said, Speaker Johnson, why did the US House Representatives vote fifteen times in
April on Israel's issues but not a single time on our own issues, our
own border, or any of that stuff. Johnson has been completely captured by
the military industrial complex, by the CIA. He's pushing wars, he's pushing
domestic surveillance. He won't give a penny to the American border. Here's the
attack at and listen to how many times they stress Holy Land, Holy On
They mentioned it three times. Oh, well, you know, Thomas Massey
has allied himself against God. Apparently, according to the American Israeli Political Action
Committee, Israel, the Holy Land under attack by Iran. Thomas Hesbala and
Congressman Tom Massy associated with US. But one Republican is standing in the way.
It's Kentucky's Tom Massey. Fifteen times in April, Massey was the only
Republican voting with anti Israel radicals. Massy's votes helpful for Iran, harmful to
Israel. Everyone who cares about the Holy Land needs to know Tom Massy is
hostile to Israel. United Democracy Project is responsible for the content of this advertising.
So best endorsement of Tom Massey I've ever seen. Quite frankly, he
says, in retribution for his many recent votes against Bill's in advanced Israel's agenda
in Washington, he says, House Speaker Mike Johnson recently threatened to stick the
Israeli lobby on Republicans who didn't tow the presidential line. The vaguely named United
Democracy Project, an independent campaign spending arm of the mighty American Israel Public Affairs
Committee. They don't have the guts to put their own name on it.
They create a shell corporation out here, shell Committee, Shell prot Project.
Try, you know, if it would be too obvious. I guess they
think if they said, this is brought to you by APAK, but it's
brought to you by something that they created. They announced they're pouring three hundred
thousand dollars in advertisements onto Fox TV affiliates in Massy's home state of Kentucky.
So we're trying to shine a light on the radical anti Israel record. Oh
no, it's anti Holy Land. He's anti God, right of Thomas Massey,
said a spokesperson. With its statewide attack, APAK likely intends to influence
the twenty twenty sixth election as well. Massey is considered to be one of
three favorites for the twenty twenty six Republican nomination to replace Mitch McConnell. Would
that be something you get rid of Mitch McConnell with somebody who actually cares about
America instead of selling us out. What a sellout that guy has been.
Mitch McConnell can't have somebody like Thomas Massey. Why because Israel doesn't like him.
They want somebody in there that'll sell out to them. It's amazing.
Israel, the Holy Land under attack by Iron Hamas, Hesbela and Thomas Massey.
Do you know that. Yeah, he's on the side of Iran,
Hamas and Hesbela, they say, now he's on the side of America,
these other people. Just amazing. Everyone who cares about the Holy Land needs
to know that Thomas Massey is hostile to Israel. They ad said, yeah,
well, let me just say this about the theology that's there. If
your theology is conflicting your eschatology, your end times theology, if that eschatology
is in conflict with basic fundamental moral principles that you see throughout the Old and
New Testament, throughout the Hebrew and Christian writings. If you have a vision
of politics and geopolitics and the end of the world that conflicts with clear basic
moral principles, then maybe you need to rethink what you're doing with your eschatology,
how you're applying it, or if it's even right in the first place.
But your application of that eschatology, even if it is right, is
at odds with the basic fundamental principles of the Bible. God does not need
us to murder people for him. That's what the Muslims say. Come on,
I'll never support that. Never, and you shouldn't either. If you're
a Christian, you ought to reject that. Wrap yourself in the Holy Land.
Why don't you read the Bible? This is like Ben Shapiro, who
goes on with Joe Rogan says, well, I don't believe that, you
know. Rogan says, well, you believe the Moses part of Rates.
Now I don't believe that. Now. I don't believe the miracles in the
Bible. I just want the land, right. The only thing that's holy
to them is the land. God's words not holy. God's not holy to
them. They don't honor God. They don't believe the word of God except
when it gives them something. Then they're all about that, aren't they.
I have no patience for this. I will have no part in this.
Zero Head says. Rather than having quote attacked the Holy Land, what Massy
did was he simply trying to defend the US treasury from being plundered for the
benefit of a foreign country that is among the world's richest countries. Why pay
for your defense when you can get the suckers in Washington to do it.
You got a channel, you know, a few thousand dollars to them and
get millions, or you funnel a few thousand dollars to them and you get
billions. Right, Well, it's just the bill, another fourteen point three
billion dollars to Israel. Massy knowing that he would face the wrath. Yeah,
he knew that Trump was going to push back against hen knew that he
was going to offend all the other people in Congress when he called that vote
in twenty twenty. He knew that he was going to be attacked by a
pack when he did this. Massy, knowing that he would face their wrath
and perhaps the dollars of the Israeli lobby, tweeted that he would vote no
on this fourteen point three billion dollars. He said, Israel has a lower
debt to GDP ratio than the United States. This spending package has no offset.
In other words, not saving any money anywhere else. They're not saying,
well, we're gonna we're gonna cut Remember at the very beginning you had
Trader Johnson said we're going to cut fourteen billion dollars from this IRS army that
Biden wants to build. But then as time goes by, he says,
now, we'll build the IRS army and we'll give the fourteen billion dollars to
Israel as well. He's a trader to us. He wants to stick the
IRS on us, just like Biden without any reduction. He's worse than Kevin
McCarthy. Kevin McCarthy at least had a little bit of reduction. Not so
with Johnson. Fully fund Biden's war against Americans using an IRS that is seven
times bigger than it is today, and so he has absolutely no offsets.
So that's what Thomas Massey said, there's no offsets on this, so it's
going to increase our debt by the full fourteen point three billion plus interest.
He also tried to defend the First Amendment, one of only nineteen Republicans to
do so. And again, if you are going to do something like this
Anti Semitism Awareness Act, if you have to censor people who disagree with you,
perhaps you don't have confidence in the truth of what you're saying. Perhaps
you are censoring and canceling things because you have crimes to hide that you don't
want to come to light. That is always the case with these people who
call for censorship. They want to hide in the darkness. They don't want
their works to be shown to other people, shown in the light. Still
pending in the Senate, it characterizes various statements about Israel as being anti submittic,
subjecting colleges in the universities the Civil Rights Enforcement action if somebody says the
wrong thing and taking money away from them. Look, I'm one hundred percent
for taking all the money away from all of the colleges and universities. There
is no authority in the Constitution for a single penny to be given to any
public or private schools, no authority for that whatsoever. But that's not how
it's going to be used. It's going to be used to bribing blackmail people
to be on their side. Policing speech, religion, and assembly, said
Thomas Massey, is not the role of the federal government. In fact,
it is expressly prohibited by the US Constitution. And that's exactly what this built
by this Traitoress Mike Johnson. Does. It polices religion, It polices assembly,
It polices religion because it says what we can or cannot say about what
happened to Jesus? How dare you? I will say whatever I wish,
and you will never stop me from talking about that. Absolutely amazing to be
that presumptive, Absolutely amazing for Mike Johnson to this wolf among the sheeps to
put on the sheepskin. Oh, I'm a Christian. I'm a Christian,
and you put that on people, and you let this be defined as anti
semitism, defined by a non governmental organization that's not even an American organization.
I was talking about the eminent domain being done by a Canadian oil corporation.
Look, I think we needed that oil pipeline. I think we need to
shut down racism and anti semitism. But you don't allow foreigners to take our
property, and you don't allow a foreign government to take our bill of rights.
And if you do, you're a trader to this country. Johnson and
the rest of these GOP people who vote for we had a congressman, all
of our congressmen in Tennessee voted for that Anti Semitism Awareness Act. They are
trembling in their boots. They don't want to be called antisemitic. They don't
want to have hundreds of thousands of dollars in ads run against them like they're
doing. Thomas Massey, he's the only one who had the guts to stand
up to this stuff. Well, nineteen others, but none of them from
Tennessee. I will not be voting to support any of these people in the
general election. I'm not going to vote for a Democrat. But I'm not
voting for any of these Republicans either, just like Biden Trump. If there's
some third party candidate, I'll vote for them. I'm not voting for any
Republicans running for Congress out of Tennessee because they voted for this garbage. Kentucky's
Republican primary be held May twenty first, they were really close, were only
six days away next Tuesday, so they're dumping these ads here. Massey is
being opposed by two GOP challengers. He said the Pro Israel Super Pac was
targeting him. Quote because I'm often the loan Republican for freedom of speech,
against foreign aid and opposed to war in the Middle East. A pack is
against our freedom of speech, APAK wants the aid, and APAC wants war.
That's the opposite of this stuff, right, that's what they're spending the
money for. Because they want censorship, because they want war. They want
censorship because they want our money, and they don't want anybody talking about that.
He added this as urgently requested, questing like minded Americans to help him
to thwart the attack by donating to his campaign. He told the Courier Journal
in Kentucky. There's a reason to think that Johnson may have encouraged the APAC
to give him primary challengers, he said this week in our GOP conference meeting,
as members groused about blowback from the latest anti Semitism resolution anti anti Semitism
resolution, he said, Johnson pledged to call his contacts at Jewish Israel groups
if dissident GOP represented his mustard opposition. Great guy, isn't he. You
wonder why he's so allied with the CI. He uses those kinds of tactics,
pushing in the DEFISA thing, extending it, extending it, and time
extending it in extent. This and the timing of the AD announcement, he
says, raises questions about whether the ads were suggested by or sanctioned by Speaker
Johnson. In addition to now being creatively accused of attacking the Holy Land.
Massey has endured baseless accusations of anti Semitism, including this jim from the editor
of commentary magazine John pod Horetz, who said, who called Massey a disingenuous
piece of anti Semitic filth? Well projection, because John potterrets is a racist
piece of Semitic filth, That's what you are, pod horets. Massey has
previously suggested that APAX role in US politics amounts to foreign influence in our election.
Absolutely, critics call the sentiment an anti Semitic trope. If you don't
give your money to Israel, you're antisemitic, he said, undeterred. Massy
last week posted a poll asking if a pack should be forced to register as
an agent of Israel under the Foreign Agents Registration Act. Pharah, Yeah,
absolutely, if you're love being for a foreign government, you're supposed to register.
Now. Of course, you know that was one of the charges that
they brought against Hunter Biden and the Biden family. But of course you know
there's they're privileged characters. They don't have to follow the law, and neither
does a pack. So he asked people should a pack register with Pharah No,
the only place that APAC has to register is with the gift registry for
the sellout prostitute GOP congressmen and the Democrats as well. They've got a gift
registry. Maybe you can send them some gold bars or something like that.
Right, that's what these people are about, So it truly is amazing.
We'll talk about up here in a second on Rock Fan Tornador. Thank you
for the tip. I like to make memes as a hobby, and I've
got one that I think perfectly summarizes the first Sandy Hook Alex Jones trial.
Would you mind if I send you some memes? And what would be the
best way to send them to you? David Knight's show at Proton Mail by
the best way. We'll be on to look out for it. Thank you.
Appreciate that Trump is telling you a massive crowd now that on day one
he's going to have the busiest day ever for any present and he's going to
do it by executive order, because you know, we all want to have
rule by executive orders, don't we. It worked out so well for us
in his first term. Every one of these presidents and every successive one Democrat,
Republican Democrat, Republican, Democrat, re public. They all have executive
orders, and they all have more executive orders than their predecessor. And so
he is saying that by executive order on day one, I'm going to save
the whales. I'm going to get rid of offshore wind mills. Okay,
Well, there's so many different things that he could do, isn't it.
Why don't you, on day one say that you're going to get rid of
the Paris Climate Accord, which was put in by your predecessor Obama, And
you didn't get rid of it, and you didn't call for it to come
up for a vote in the Senate because it is a treaty and it needs
to be ratified by the Senate. Maybe you could do that, except that
you're a demagoguing, liar politician. You're not going to do anything about the
fundamental issues here. You're not going to do anything about the Paris Climate of
Court. You're gonna tell people going to save the whales. This is a
guy who doesn't want to save the babies anymore, right, save the baby
whales. I know he's going to save the whales, but he doesn't want
to save the babies because that's too politically expensive for him anymore. And then,
as I said before, he's out there projecting about how Biden is supposedly
the lockdown king when he was the one who did all this stuff. Nobody
had ever done anything like that before, all of the lockdowns, and you're
not a central stuff and anything that was all a Trump precedent. The left
wing lunatics are trying very hard to bring back COVID lockdowns and mandates with all
like you did. You're mongering about the new variants that are coming. Gee
whiz, you know what else is coming? An election? They want to
restart the COVID hysteria so they can justify more lockdowns, more censorship, more
illegal dropboxes, more men. What you did? You did that the first
time, dollars and payoffs to their political allies heading into the twenty twenty four
election. Does that sound familiar, Yeah, it sounds like what you did.
These are sick people we're dealing with. But to every COVID tyrant who
wants to take away our freedom, hear these words. We will not comply
with a constitution about it. We will not shut down our schools, We
will not You did all of that lockdowns. You did all of that.
God abide but your mask mandates, and we will not tolerate your vaccine mandates.
Unbelievable twenty twenty election. And now they're trying to do the same thing
all over again by rigging the most important election in the history of our country,
the twenty twenty four election, even if it means trying to bring back
COVID. But they will fail because we will not let it happen. When
I'm back in the White House, I will use every available authority to cut
federal funding to any school, college, airline, or public transportations. He
knows how he did it. That imposes a mass It was with funding he
paid for them to do it. Thank you very much. Say this is
what the MAGA people can't get through their thick skulls. He paid the airlines
and the schools and everybody to live the lockdowns that he told them to do.
He is such a sick, disgusting liar. Just unbelievable. And then
show this picture Trovis Trump's big gun entourage torches the merits of the sham business
records trial outside the courthouse. Now it is a sham trot, but look
at these guys, this is the red tie brigade. They're all dressed exactly
alike. They've all got a gray suit and a red tie red ties.
I try not to wear one every single day, but here we are.
You've got Ramaswami and you got Doug Bergham and everything. The red tie rigading
because it is a beauty contest. You know, it's kind of like,
you know, if there were women, that'd be there in a swimsuit,
I guess, but since they're men, they're all wearing their red Trump tie
and they're all defending Trump at this courthouse as if he needs any defense.
Look, it's a rigged process. They'll probably find him guilty and he'll probably
overturn it on appeal at some level because it is a rigged process and the
rig process, they're probably going to get a conviction and then they will over
overturn it. But it's really just about creating a big reality TV show,
this salacious you know Trump and his women show. You know, it's like
which they always do. Uh. So they're all in a beauty contest to
see who's going to be awarded mister Trump viep you know, and runner up
Trump viep. They're all there and you know, shilling for him, and
of course so Johnson was there yesterday as well. But when we look at
Doug Burnham, as I mentioned earlier, he is a special case, and
many people believe that he is going to be the pick. He's going to
be the pick, not because Trump is going to try to do something too
in a dei sort of way. You know, get Tim Scott because he's
black, or Christine Noman because she's female, or somebody else now that she
shot her dog and bragged about it. But what Doug Burgham brings to the
contest is very simple. Lots and lots of money. He's a billionaire himself,
and of course Christine Oman, Doug Burnham, as I said earlier in
the show, and Trump and the CEO of this pipeline scam to extract CO
two out of the air and to pump it across the country at great expense
and into the ground and the Dakotas at great expense. What an unbelievable boondoggle
this is. And yet they're all tied up in it. And so for
all those reasons, and for all of Doug Bergham's big cash and everything that's
what everybody believes is going to happen. And again, I'll put up that
report on Rumble since you can't see it for some reason, and we'll see
what happens when we repost it. But Daniel McCarthy is not the only one.
I'm not the only one. Harry Hound thinks it's going to be Doug
Burgham. I think it will be as well. Uh. And Daniel McCarthy,
writing at WND, says Donald Trump really knows how to run a talent
show. He really knows how to run a reality show. He's had Beauty
Contest. This is beauty contest. He's had The Apprentice. This is like
the Apprentice. You know. It's these vice presidential candidates, he said.
And it's kind of interesting because you know, and he's very sympathetic to Trump.
He likes Trump, unlike me. He says, nobody's going to watch
these reality TV shows if you don't have a competition that is credible. So
he plays up the competition. Folks, this is what's going on with the
entire election between Trump and Biden. You know, the winner has already been
chosen by the powers that be. They want you to watch this. They
want you to focus on this because they don't want you to focus on your
own life. They don't want you to focus on your own community, your
own state where you could actually change things. No, you need to be
caught up in the presidential reality show. And he's going to pick this guy,
just like RFK Junior picked you know, a Google billionaire by marriage to
be his running mate as well. And he talks about this, he says,
this is kind of interesting. You know, when you look at Doug
Bergham, he's in nothing. He had so little support that he offered twenty
dollars gift cards if he gave him a dollar donation. Remember I reported that.
He goes, that's going to be a scam. It's not a credit
card scam. He did that. What they said was you have to have
a certain number of unique donors in order to be able to participate in the
first debate, and they had a similar thing for the second debate, and
he had. It only cost him like a million dollars is nothing to him.
Million dollars in presidential politics, especially if somebody wo's already independently wealthy billionaire,
that's nothing at all. So he paid a million dollars to get into
the debate, and you could have a piece of that. If you sent
him a one dollar donation or more, he would send you back twenty dollars.
And that's how he got in. And he had to do that because
nobody cared about him. He had to buy his way in and he'll probably
buy his way in as Trump's running mate as well for the same reason and
in the same way. And even with that, after the first one or
two debates, he couldn't hack it, and so he had to drop out.
Even buying his way into debate wasn't going to work for him. So
it truly is about money. As I said, Look, you could have
he'd have Tim Scott to get the Black vote, Marco Rubio to get the
Hispanic vote, or you know, a woman to get more. But what
does Doug Bergham bring? Money? Lots of it money. This co two
gas lighter project is the real issue, the financial angle. Just like rf
K JR R f K Junior's running mate is an empty suit, and so
is Bergham quite frankly, even though he is the governor there. Biden once
slammed Trump's China terrace, and now he's building on them. That's right,
left, right, left, right. Yeah, he built on Trump's lockdowns.
He built on Trump's six foot magic distance, Trump's masks. He built
on Trump's vaccine. As a matter of fact, he built on Trump's vaccine
mandate. Trump had put in the mandate for the military. It was going
to kick in at exactly the time that Biden's mandate kicked in. How did
they know? How did they know? Yeah, we all knew, and
I talked about it at the time. We're gonna take a quick break and
we'll be right back making sense common again. You're listening to the David Night
Show. All right, welcome back. Let's talk a little bit about the
pandemic, about the bird flu pandemic that they just keep pushing and pushing.
It's like the everready bunny. Unlike the battery operated cars, this one just
keeps going and going. Scientists sell fear that cattle may become a permanent host
for bird flu. Well, then maybe you need to call it cow flu.
They're going to become a permanent host for it. Be very afraid.
We got a lot of cows, and we've got lots of people who are
working around cows. They say, and so it's just inevitable, it's going
to happen. Wait a minute, Wait a minute. You don't have any
cows that are sick. You don't have any cowboys who are sick either.
You got a guy who got pink eye. That's not the flu. His
lungs were clear, he didn't have fever, he had no flu symptoms whatsoever.
You can get pink eye by not washing your hands and rubbing your eyes.
He's working in a dirty environment. Could that be the Oh no,
we're going to use that. And they continue to use this. So the
latest fear, it's coming from outlet Earth, and they said cattle may become
a permanent host for bird flu. The recent findings that pasteurized milk in the
United States is no longer suspected. Why would you suspect it? And again,
do you notice they haven't tested eggs at all. And this is a
bird flu. They've killed tens of millions of birds in the last couple of
years, using this as an excuse to raise the price of chickens, to
raise the price of eggs and everything. And yet even though they've killed tens
of millions of chickens, they didn't say that they were sick, they would
come in if they used the PCR test and got a positive result from this
process of magnifying whatever they pull out there by one point one trillion times.
If they're using the same cycle of magnification that they used during the COVID fake
pandemic. If that's that's what they're still doing, likely they are, or
even more, they didn't bother to test any chicken meat. They didn't test
any eggs. But it's all about the cows. All about the cows.
Now, bird flu is all about cows. They're so obviously transparent in all
of this because they have made it very clear they want to shut down the
farms and they want to shut down cattle and all the rest of this stuff.
They want to ban meat and dairy and so that's what this is all
about. Can't people see this? So they said, the persistence of the
bird flu virus and the US cattle population is alarming. Experts say, who
fear that cattle could become a lasting reservoir for the virus. Again, we
need to have this, We need to have the cows from chick fil A
holding up a sign test more mor chickens, spell it, miss spell it
test, the chickens leave us alone. Stop, you know, but that's
the chickens, and I have the chickens standing around with some masks on their
faces. I guess eventually the wrong combination of gene segments and mutations inevitably come
along, said the This is Earth outlet Earth magazine. So eventually the wrong
combinations of gene segments and mutations inevitably come along. Whatever opportunity we may have
had to nip it in the bud, It's like it's a Deputy Barney Fife
nip it in the bad andy. We gotta nip it in the bud.
Well, we whatever chance we may have had to nip it in the bud,
we lost by a really slow detection. See, we're going to go
even faster, says Michael Warribe, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Arizona.
This guy is an evolutionary biologist. In his entire career is built on
a lie of evolution. Evolution, evolution of bacteria. Well, we're not
even talking about bacteria. We're talking about a virus. But again, when
we talk about oh look we got a super bug that evolved, you know
where that is there wasn't any additional DNA added to this superbug. Whenever they
have a situation they say, well, we got bacteria that are resistant to
this or resistant to that. What has happened is that they applied it.
And you'd just like to say, take your full course of antibiotics, right,
but you've got you apply this. And it's just like when they poisoned
us with the shots. Not everybody is going to succumb to it. Because
of genetic variations. Some people will be immediately killed by the trump shots.
Other people will die slowly, and so the same thing is true of the
bacteria. Not all of them are going to be killed. And so what
happens is, you know, you got a better chance of getting all of
them if you let it run for a very long time. But if you
just do it a little bit, you're gonna kill the bacteria that are most
susceptible to it, and the other ones who have some resistance to it or
a lot of resistance to it will survive, and they'll be the ones that
will continue to breed. They call that evolution. It's not evolution. They're
not gaining any function, they're not turning, they're not going from molecules.
To man, they're not evolving into some higher life form. Hi, he
tried to kill me as a bacteria, but now I'm back and now I'm
an insect. No, that's not happening. That's not happening at all.
Evolutionary biology is a lie, folks. If it's molecules, de mand.
Yes, they do change, but you know, they play these games,
you know, like Darwin's game about you know, finches and stuff like that.
And some of the people who succeeded him, I said, oh,
look, we've got these these finch that are around the Grand Canyon, and
they look identical to the ones on the south end, look identical to the
ones on the north end. But because they've been separated, their mating song
has changed, and so they won't the ones who combine, the ones from
the south and the north, they won't mate with each other anymore. So
they've evolved into different species, and they start calling them a different species.
No they're not. They're biologically identical. It's like cormonati and the Pfiser bio
intech. But legally, from an evolutionary biologist standpoint, they're legally distinct,
just like Cormonati and Pfizer Biointech. If you have a virus that is hopscotching
back and forth between cows, humans, and birds, then that virus is
going to have selective pressures to grow efficiently in all of those species, says
a virologist at the University of Saskatchewan. Well, we don't have a virus
that is hopscotching back and forth between cows, humans and birds, do we.
That's fun them in a lie. It's not happening, and they go
on to try to make this the case. The constant interaction between humans and
these vast numbers of animals makes cattle and extremely concerning reservoir for bird flu.
Well, if there is constant interaction between these gazillions of cows and the humans
who take care of them, you might also think about the fact that since
no humans or cows have gotten sick in spite of this constant interaction, then
maybe it's not being transmitted. If it was transmissible, don't you think you
would have some people who are sick, and yet you don't. And this
article, though, will then bring back this tired canard of the guy who
got pink eye. No fever, no congestion, no cold, no nothing,
nothing in his lungs. He got pink eye, and he was working
with cattle. Therefore he's got bird flu. Therefore he's made of wood.
There we goes. It's like mighty python science. It really is. When
you see symptomatic patience, it's just the tip of the iceberg, said another
falsely labeled scientific expert. We have awareness now from the COVID pandemic of how
devastating that could be. And this is not a virus is going to disappear
by any means. And of course we have Trump's fearmonger and Chief Redfield has
now made three separate time this is the next pandemic. This is the big
thing. He's pushing it and pushing it and pushing it. Nothing has changed.
There's no difference between Trump and Biden on this issue, folks. Trump
is more dangerous because people who would oppose this and have opposed it under Biden
will just back off and let Trump push. That's lie, and he will
push the line just like he pushed it. In twenty twenty, bird flu
virus is possibly found and a handful of wastewater sites, says the CDC.
You know what else is found? And when water sites fluoride, and the
CDC has fought tooth and nail to keep that in there and to keep that
hidden from people, and to keep the effects of fluoride hidden. Yeah,
fluoride is found. We've got SSRIs, We've got all kinds of disruptive chemicals
that are not filtered out by the water systems and the wastewater sites. So
but be afraid, be very afraid. Listen to how they carefully push this
fear. They crap. This is NBC. So here's their headline. Bird
flu virus is possibly found in a handful of wastewater sites, says the CDC.
What do they mean by possibly, Well, further down in the article,
it says the bird flu currently circulating in cows is a type of influenza
A. So this is a category. This is a not that specific bird
flu. They didn't find specifically bird flu. They said they found influenza A,
and bird flu is one type of many types of influenza A. They
didn't come anywhere close to finding it. They magnify this stuff, as carry
Mullis said, you know, you can find anything with this process or the
PCR, if you can find anything in the world, magnifying it enough.
And now they didn't find bird flu, but they found traces of influenza A,
and influenza A is a broader category of which bird flu is one specific
thing. But they didn't find bird flu specifically. So influenza A has been
detected at a higher than average level. It's always there. And is it
detected at a higher than average level of existence or a higher than average level
of quote unquote PCR magnification? Right? Is it a more magnification from PCR
or is it a greater density? And of course it's not bird flu,
it's influenza A that is there. The agency is monitoring two hundred and sixty
people. CDC is monitoring two hundred and sixty people who have been exposed to
infected dairy howse for flu like symptoms? Now what does that tell you?
See? How they they the truth, the whole truth, and nothing by
the truth. They're spinning this. They're telling you the truth, but they're
not telling you the whole truth. If they're monitoring two hundred and sixty people
looking for flu like symptoms, they're implying that two hundred and sixty people have
flu like symptoms, not a single one does. They're monitoring them. They're
hoping that they will get flu like symptoms, but they're not getting flu like
symptoms. They got two hundred sixty people that they're watching in You better believe
that if one of them catches a cold. Let's hope that they don't catch
a summer cold, because if one of these two hundred and sixty people catches
a cold, that's it. It'll be global headlines, a global pandemic.
Bird flu has finally gotten out. Coach is going to happen. They're monitoring
two hundred and sixty people for flu like symptoms, but they haven't found any.
And they're not even saying that they've tested positive with this PCR process,
which is again an invalid test. They say, and then they repeat this,
We've had a severe case of conjunctivitis or pinki. It's a kitty disease.
It was not severe. I showed you pictures. I said, here's
all these pictures. You know, pinky uvi idis, which by the way,
is a identified adverse effect from the Pfizer shot. And you can't tell
the difference between pink eye from a gnat or from somebody wiping their dirty hands
on their eyes. You can't tell the difference from conjunctivitis, which is from
the outside, and uv idises, which is from the inside, with these
shots or some other thing like that. And I said, take a look
at these and can you tell which one is which? And so I showed
a whole bunch of people had pink eye, whole bunch of people had uv
itis. And I showed the guy that had bird flu. Is he any
worse than any of these other people? No? So the other was a
lot worse than what he had. So again, it's not flu. Nobody
is sick, not a single one. If one of them is sick,
it'll be a worldwide global headlines. And it's not going to be if,
but it'd be when eventually, as they're monitoring these two hundred and sixty people,
somebody's going to get sick with something. And even if it isn't a
cold, if it's something like conjunctiveis pink eye, If they get sick with
anything, they're going to call it bird flu. It doesn't even have to
be the flu. They're going to call it that absolutely amazing unrumble uh travagline.
I thank you for the Depp says, give the animals. Ivermectin problem
solved. Yeah, that's right. Hey, y'all, it's horse medicine.
Why don't you give the horse medicine to the cows, because you're giving all
the bird flu tests to the cows, give them some of the horse medicine.
That FDA says ivermectin is exactly right. CDC issues an urgent warning against
raw milk. See, they've got their targets. Their targets are meat dairy.
Their targets are local production, local farms who might do something like raw
meat and all that kind of stuff. So that's what they want to pin
this on. Don't have any raw milk because of bird flu. Not a
single person sick. But again, always go to every story a false narrative,
narrative. Every story is focusing on what they want to achieve their quote
unquote solution. And as I said before, former CDC director, this is
the way it's always put out there by the Trump press. They don't identify
that the headlines at least that he is a Trump guy, the Trump guy
that scared us, that lied to us. In twenty twenty, Robert Redfield,
he says for the third time that the bird flu will be the next
great pandemic. And again he's talking about its gain of function and all the
rest of this stuff. These people, these evolutionary biologists, don't pay them
any attention. They are lying out one side of their mouth the other.
Let's take a quick look before we have our guest join us at the top
of the hour. I got this email from Australia Victoria, Australia listener there,
I'm glad to know that you're listening in Australia, said that this is
what is happening in Australia. After banning gas cooking and new home home buildings
in Victoria, they're now coming after wood heaters. And I said, I'm
confused. Up until the early eighties and Victoria, everyone used to incinerate their
garbage in the backyard. Nobody died in my neighborhood from all those fumes.
However, all of a sudden, people are dying from wood fire smoke.
I don't get it. Yeah, yeah, if you're burning plastics or some
other things, right, that could be very toxic fumes, but not wood.
Well, here's the way this runs. And I had a long experience
with this research. Triangle Park in North Carolina. It's right around. I
have three cities and have three universities. You got n C State, you
got UNC, and you have Duke and they're in Raleigh, Chapel Hill,
and Durham respectively, and then the center of that they have a research area
and in a lot of different companies. I worked for one of them there,
and EPA has a really big presence there. I knew some people who
worked for EPA. I also knew some people who were Steve Maloy and others
who were exposing the lies that they were doing in the EPA. When we
built our house quite a bit before all this stuff happened, we had a
guy who put it in and he said, yeah, that I just did
this for some guys who worked for the EPA. They said that they had
tested wood fired fireplaces, and they said this is by far and away the
cleanest burning, most thorough burning of all them because it had an inn ceramic
core. You built a masonry thing around it, and it had baffling that
went up and down before it went out, so it burned everything pretty thoroughly.
But right at the time I was leaving North Carolina in twenty twelve to
go to info wars. There was a situation that Steve Mulloy saw where they
were looking for people who had respiratory and heart issues and they brought that and
then some of them got sick, and so they got his attention, and
he dug further and he found that they were searching for people had these issues.
They were exposing them to find particulate matter two point five nanometers, and
that's for diesel, right, and also for this type of thing, which
is exactly what's happening there in Australia. They're still talking about fine particulate matter
of two point five and as all that was happening, and they were doing
that experiment and they were exposing people to seventy two times what they said was
the maximum amount people should be exposed to. You had Obama's EPA director Lisa
Jackson giving testimony in a little back and forth scripted thing with then Congressman Ed
Markey, who's now a senator, and she said, Congressman Marque, I'm
not talking about people getting sick. I'm talking about people dying. We got
people dying from fine particulate matter at a higher rate than people who are dying
from cancer. She actually said that, and at that time, they were
exposing people that they'd screened who were sick, who had respiratory and heart issues.
They were exposing them to seventy two times a level that the EPA said
was allowed. When I did that report about them, and I showed their
website, they've scrubbed it now, but on their website they said, well,
smoky mountains. You know, this is a good example, and that
was their picture at the top of the thing about fine particular matter. Two
point five smoky mountains. This is an example of fine particular matter. Well,
how profoundly did they not realize that the Smoky Mountains were called the Smoky
Mountains by the Cherokee long before there was an industrial revolution, long before there
were you know, wood fire probably places at a large enough amount to make
it smoke. It's it's that way because of the condensation of the moisture and
things like that. Whenever it rains, you see the Smoky Mountains get like
that. But they tried to make it about industrial pollution, about diesel engine
and stuff. It was absolutely absurd, And I called him out on that,
and we called him out because the people I've been working with sued them
under the He said that you violated the the prohibitions of experimenting on people without
their consent, which of course we've now seen that done in space, right,
and so you know they were suing them with that. I did that,
and I knew a guy from Church who worked for the EPA in research
Trungle Parky, and he was telling me about this because he didn't like what
they were doing either, and he wasn't the source of the stuff. But
what he told me was, he said, they're really upset about what you
just said, you know all of stuff. I said, Really, they're
watching me, watching me. I was surprised that they were watching the stuff
that I was doing, but I got their attention. They were being sued
by these other guys I was covering that I was interviewing them. I was
doing my own reports about the EPA and everything. And he said, and
I just mentioned on air, I said, you know, one of the
guys that I know at church, are you know, has told me that
they're they're really upset about this. And I didn't mention his name or anything.
But then he tells me, he says, I got called in on
this, and he said, we know you're the one who's talking to him
and anything, and it's like wow, you know, so, yeah,
it's been a long game. And now they're playing this game in Australia and
that's exactly what it is. Wood Heater smoke is estimated to kill up to
sixty three people, they said in Australia each year, prompting calls for a
national band. And again they're playing all through this article that he sent the
big lie about how smoke from wood is causing people to die. We're not
talking about him getting sick. And at the same time you had the EPA
exposing people these extremely high levels and again it's PM two point five particular matter
two point five microns or so. Wood heaters estimated to be a nine hundred
thousand Australia homes. Well, if that's the case, then why aren't people
dropping dead left and right. As they said they used to burn their garbage.
A lot of that's going to be a lot more toxic. They go
through different geographical areas of Australia projections and estimates. Oh, we think eleven
to fifteen deaths in the capital. We think twenty six to thirty six deaths
annually during milder years. I think wood heater use is highlighting pollution means only
a few of them can affect entire neighborhoods. This is all just propaganda,
it's all fear, it's all unbased. They set up to forty thousand wood
heaters are sold in Australia each year. They're estimated to be in nine hundred
thousand homes. Well, then again, by the same logic, if it's
dangerous, there'd be a lot more deaths than ten or fifteen, wouldn't there.
When are we ever going to when are we ever going to respond to
these government and media reports with the right amount of skepticism and even cynicism.
Are cynical liars and propagandists, and we need to understand what is going on
with that. And yet of course they'll respond by shutting things down and by
censoring him, as they always do. When we look at the MAGA people,
and it is interesting, you know, when you look at the purging
of this and how even the fact that you had this former NFL star Lawrence
Taylor showing up at the Trump rallies, and I have seen that in so
many different places. Did you know that I didn't realize this until Harry hun
senate to me, did you know that he is a convicted sex offender?
Back in twenty eleven, he was convicted of sex with a sixteen year old
a prostitute. He said, well, I thought she was older. But
they registered him as a sex offender and then they rearrested him ten years later
in twenty twenty one because he didn't notify them of a change of address.
But hey, you know, he is a football player. That's all that
matters. We're just fine with whatever else. He's a football player and he
supports Trump, so that's all we need to know. Nothing else really matters.
We're going to take a quick break and we're going to be joined by
Jay Warner Wallace. I think you're really going to enjoy this book he does.
He is a former cold case detective and the name of the book is
The Truth in True Crime. You know what can we learn from the kind
of detective work that he was doing. We'll take a quick break and we'll
be right back. You're listening to the David Night Show. You're listening to
the David Knight Show. All right, welcome back in joining us now is
Jay Warner Wallace. He's been a guest once before. We've talked about his
background. He was a cold case detective. This is somebody who goes by
and investigates murder cases, things that don't have a statute limitations, murder cases
where perhaps all the witnesses have died and he's just going back looking at the
physical evidence of it. He's now written a book called The Truth and True
Crime, and I love the tagline here, when investigating death teaches us about
the meaning of life. It looks like a fantastic book, and so I
wanted to get him on to talk about that one as well. Thank you
for joining us, sir, Well, thanks for having me. I really
appreciate. This is my favorite book I've written so far, so I'm glad
to talk about it. Oh, it looks like a great angle and you
know, and something that you know really affects all of us, and everybody
loves the crime aspect, and the things that you gleaned from it too are
really interesting. I think, Yeah, I think there's actually some hidden Like
I was not a Christians through all my career, but to you know,
the first eight years or so, I was not a believer until I was
thirty five. I became a believer by examining the Gospels kind of from a
forensic perspective. How do we know or why would we trust if we tested
these people as eyewitnesses. Why would we even think Number one, that they
are written by eyewitnesses or even anybody who had access to eyewitnesses. And if
you did believe that, how would you test them to see if they could
pass the test? Now, once I was in I started to look at
human behavior a little bit differently. Right, if you work murders, you
are seeing people at their rawest point, the point at which all of the
kind of bars are off. I mean, this is Sadly, when you
get to the point where you're willing to do something crazy like this, it's
probably because you've been pushed to a certain limit and your true nature is now
going to be revealed, and it really, I think, exposes all of
our true nature. So I wanted to write a book that has talked about
like, what are these attributes fifteen attributes of human flourishing that I discovered in
fifteen separate crime stories, and then talk about you know, is that something
number one that Yeah, secular people they do studies on this and they confirm
that this is these are fifteen things that if you simply embrace these fifteen prints,
suppose you will have a better life. But it turns out these are
fifteen ancient descriptions of human nature from scripture that people for the most part,
think they're discovering them in the last three three decades, when in fact these
have been on the pages of the New Testament for two thousand years. And
so I really wanted to do a book where I kind of demonstrated that that's
amazing. Yeah, it's And why did you do a forensic investigation of Christianity
in the first place. Well, I was thirty five, so it was
probably about nineteen ninety five or six, right in that range. It took
me about eighteen months, I would say, to complete that stuff that I
was. I was so skeptical and not raised around Christians or anybody really believed
in God in a way they could articulate. So I didn't have like a
leg up like somebody who could say, hey, look at this or look
at that. I had to commit a raw and so I bought my first
Bible. I was thirty five, and it took me a while to kind
of go through the Gospels, and I was just tearing them apart from just
word usage. You know, all the attributes. I wrote about this in
a book called Cold Case Christianity, and that book just kind of covers that
journey. But that's something that'll get you to the point where you might believe
it's true. Look, I think that as a boomer, as somebody who's
older, I have a high value for whether something is true or not.
And there are people in my generation would probably agree. But I don't know
that that's the case for young people gen z and millennials. I think they're
not as concerned about whether something's true because they've co opted that word. That
war doesn't mean it's true anymore. It means it's true for me. That's
right. It's true based on my lived experience, or it's true based on
how I have applied it to my life. Doesn't mean it's true for them.
Now. When I use the word true, I'm using it in a
more objective way. But it's true for all of us, whether we like
it or not. I think that this generation I'm talking to now is more
concerned about whether or not it's good because they believe they've been sold by the
culture that Christianity is the source behind every evil intent, misogyny, racism,
homophobia, whatever it may be, it's really they are going to attribute it
to this traditional Western culture worldview that we hold as Christians. So I wanted
to show that. Yeah, but if you didn't believe in Christianity, you're
probably already employing its teaching if you're flourishing, and the more you detach from
its teaching, the more you're going to struggle. So I just look,
this is what we're seeing in culture. And so I wrote a book this
time which really looks at all of the data. So most of my books
I spent a lot of time researching. And although this book has about fifty
pages in the printed edition of footnotes, there are two hundred pages in the
pdf file you provide online. Why because I want you to see that if
I'm making this claim, it's supported by the data. But it turns out
that that data simply supports what was claimed in scripture two thousand years ago.
So it's eye opening for me to realize that our human it makes sense though.
Think about it. If we are designed by a creator God who knows
something about us, and we are in his image. Then it turns out
that that book we have called scripture, called the Bible ought to describe us
the way we really are. Yes, And if it does describe us the
way we really are, you could consider that at least. I was listening
to a pundit who usually talks about politics recently who's Jewish, and when asked,
when he defends why he's Jewish, he says, well, because it
turns out that these principles work. M hm, oh, that's interesting,
and he sees that as an evidence that the worldview is true. Okay,
And by the way, that may or may not be an evidence that your
worldview is true. But it strikes me that if your worldview is true,
it ought to describe you the way you really are. And so in that
sense, it could provide you with some insight into your human nature and how
you could flourish. Yeah, it would be necessary, not necessarily sufficient,
but it would be necessary for that. Yea's true, right, that's right,
exactly right. Yeah, what's the most surprising thing that you found out
about human nature? And investigating this? Well, so every chapter is a
crime story, right, So in one of these stories, I talk about
celebrity and how sometimes when you are a local, especially in the gang cultures,
if you're somebody who's known locally, you can kind of become like a
celebrity in your own neighborhood or at least in your own click or your own
gang. And I've got one of these stories here to show how detrimental our
pursuit of celebrity is. And the reason why I wrote that chapter is because
I don't think it's just it's just not just a few of us who are
seeking celebrity anymore. I mean, there are no gatekeepers. You know this,
even think about it. We are able not to develop our own personal
platforms without a gatekeeper at NBC, ABC or CBS that used to be or
Salem right, whatever the radio station was that used to be the gate cape
keepers that kept people from becoming a celebrity. Those are gone. So now
all of us, if we can develop a following, we can make it
from zero to a million listeners without any support. And that's where I think
we have to be careful. It turns out that one of the most powerful
attributes that we could adopt as humans that would change your life. As a
matter of fact, if you simply embraced this virtue, you will have increased
flourishing in every single metric that we use to actually measure human flourishing, longevity,
mental health, physical health, the deepness of your relationships. That I
will improve your marriage, I'll make you a better employer, a better employee,
You'll learn at a higher level, you'll get better grades, you'll make
more money. I mean, every way that we measure flourishing improves if you
simply adopt this one thing, and it's really the opposite of celebrity. It
is the attribute we know as humility. Now, they've been studying this for
about three decades and looking at all kinds of studies that are out there that
talks about how humble people succeed at levels that are far higher than the rest
of us, and why that might be true. Okay, fine, but
it turns out that humility is one of those things. I think if I
ask people, hey, what do you think the one attribute you could adopt
that would help you in every aspect of your life at a higher level than
anything else, I don't think many people would come up with humility. But
it turns out, yeah, it is actually the thing we need to embrace.
Now, what's interesting about that. Think about every worldview that's out there.
None of them leverage humility like the Christian worldview. What I mean is
if your theistic worldview, your spiritual worldview encourages you to do these certain things
to reach the highest level that your spiritual worldview offers. In other words,
if it is about earning something, it's a transaction between you and God,
a transaction between you and the universe. There's no way to avoid pride in
that kind of a system, because at some point you're going to look across
the room and say, I'm doing better than that. Did We measure based
on our achievements, right. And I have a friend who's now no longer
with this name, Mike Adams. Mike and I would travel and do a
lot of events together, and he used to always tease writ in this book
how to become a humble in ten easy steps and how I made it in
eight You know, it's like this, there's no way that you can pursue
humility without at some point doing just the opposite and becoming prideful. So it
turns out that humility is something you It's an assessment. Spurgeon calls it the
proper assessment of who we are before a holy God. Now, Christianity leverages
this because it's the one worldview that says, no, it's not a transaction.
There's nothing you can do to earn this. As a matter of fact,
if whatever the highest thing you think you hope to achieve in your worldview
is, We're going to give it to you. It's a free gift over
here. Why so that Paul says, no one can boast. It's an
antidote to pride and celebrity. It's an antidote to look what I did is
look what's been done for me. This view requires us to begin in humility
because to say that, Okay, there is God and it's not me,
well, it's a very humble position. I'm not the God of my own
the center of my own decision making universe. Well, this begins and ends
in our Savior says this pulses have the attitude that Jesus had, who,
although he existed in the form of God, did not regard equality with God
a thing to be grasped, but instead emptied himself taking the form of a
bond servant, taking the form. In other words, it's all humility.
Start to finish, and as difficult as that is for us to achieve,
if we don't recognize its power in our lives, will never even try to
submit, will never even begin to let go of the things that possess us.
So I just want to spend one chapter in these fifteen chapters talking about
the role that celebrity plays. And by the way, almost every crime you're
going to, every crime you're going to commit, is driven by the different
chapter. But these three prideful motives. It's the pursuit of money, the
pursuit of sex, or the pursuit of power. Now, that pursuit of
power, that's a huge category of misbehavior, and that's where celebrity fits all
of us. Look, you and I both would we like more people to
listen to what we're saying? Of course we would. So although we might
protect ourselves from the pursuit of money and the pursuit of sex with knowing that
that can derail us, we don't usually protect ourselves from the pursuit of celebrity.
In fact, what we typically do is want to increase that area of
our life, so we can We'll argue, oh, because I want to
reach more people with this divine message really, so we will increase the celebrity.
Now, now here's the danger in it. And this is a different
chapter, but there's a danger in this. I have never known anyone of
those three motives for misbehavior, and there are only three. There's not a
fourth motive. There isn't. Now you can discover this secularly working as a
homicide detective, or you can discover this on the pages of scripture, because
John writes about it in one of his letters. But my point is,
these are only three motives out there for stupid, and if you don't protect
yourself from those three motives for stupid, you will eventually do one of them.
Here's what I've noticed. If you begin to scratch one of those itches,
you will eventually scratch the other two because the other two become available to
you on the basis of what you've achieved in the third. So you see
this, and even Christian leaders right where they fall for someone Why, well,
here's why, in my opinion, because as a congregation, or as
your deacon board or your elder board, they're trying to protect their pastors from
the sex and money. But everyone wants their pastor to be known more so
they can build a bigger church, and when you increase your celebrity, you
only open the door to the other two. So this is why I've struggled
with this even in writing this book, because as I'm writing this book,
if I'm going to heed my own advice, I have to do less of
this, because it turns out all of this talking about a book you've written
is about you trying to amplify your platform, amplify your influence in culture.
And that's I think there's a good by the way all three of them,
these things have been designed by God for his glory and for our good.
We just happened to distort them. So sex, money, in power is
something that God is giving us in a positive way. This is another chapter
in the book. It's a chapter about a guy who was basically homeless and
was killed. And I'm thinking, what are these three motives? What did
this killer have to gain from this homeless guy who was so sweet They called
him Santa Claus because he looked like Santa Claus and he was as sweet as
Santa Claus. And what does he offer in terms of sex, money,
or power that would be worthy of killing him? Well, here's what happens
is that when we focus on those things that are given to us by God
instead of on the God who gave him to us, we're stopping one level
short of our worship. And we all worship. Everyone worships, whether you're
a believer or not. There is something that you think as of utmost importance
that you dare not take that from me, because that's the thing that I
covet And this idolatry is what causes us. So in this particular case,
this poor guy had slipped over. They were he was recycling stuff. Every
day, he would go out and spend the first half of his day picking
up trash cans, going through trash cans and picking up recyclables. Then he
would take them to the recycling center and get just enough money to go and
he would buy alcohol and food in the afternoon. And that was his day
every day, very very workmanlike. And he had slipped into an area of
our city that another guy who was doing the same thing felt was his alley.
Don't be picking trash out of those two cans. And although the amount
of money that Santa Claus probably got from that was what pennies dollars, maybe
it was enough. So he confronted this guy. He confronted Santa Claus and
said, don't be doing that anymore at a recycling center, and Santa Claus
kind of just blew him off. Well, it turned out in that one
moment he had triggered the two of the three things. Number One, he
had disrespected him. So the idea of power, authority, respect, that's
in the third category. Now I'm upset because you disrespected me in front of
my peers too. You take pennies or dollars. But because I've turned both
of these things, I covet them at a high level. I've now turned
them into idols. You dare not try to destroy my idols. And that
night he stabbed into death over virtually nothing. This is the power of idolatry.
And by the way, it's not just people you work and work in
homicides, it's all of us. And so on that chapter. What I
try to do in every chapter is show you, hey, if this is
your struggle, whatever these things are, here's a way for you to address
it. And in this chapter, I just to ask fifteen questions, like
what you want to know what your idols are? Because we all have them,
well, ask these fifteen questions and you probably identify them. And then
once you've identified him, you can start to actually think, Okay, look,
it's something that God has created it rather than the God who created it.
We simply have to transfer our worship up one levels, just from the
level where we're stopped in God's creation and back to the creator. And so
it's something that if you do it, you will flourish. Will you will
not Number one, you'll protect yourself from stupid and number two, you'll actually
start to pursue the things that contribute to a meaningful life. And I think
that you do that with thankfulness because when you say thank God for what that
is, and sincerely think about what it is that God is giving you,
you look at it as not something that you've achieved, then that does move
it to the higher level. And yeah, with that right now, I'm
I'm skipping across a number of different chapters here, but yeah, I think
you're right. I think the part of it is is that what I've discovered
and is true of all of us is the least thankful people are the people
who think they have nothing to be thankful for, or the least forgiving people
are the people who think they have nothing to be forgiven for. So it
does turn out that a proper assessment of who you are, because it's really
easy for me to think, well, everything I've got in my life I
achieved that. Yes, I am the reason for all my success, the
reason for everything I've ever possessed. Okay, if that's your view, well,
that kind of pride is it doesn't lead any more positive. That's right,
because anytime anyone challenges that that might not be the case, you're now
offended. And so it turns out that whatever it is we've worshiped that becomes
the master, the master that you dare not question, the Master that I'm
now willing to give up tons of time for resources for. I can say
that, you know, I had that early on when I was young.
I had a lot of success with a lot of stuff very easily, and
I did think it was what I had done. And I got to say,
it was such an amazing blessing for God to take that away from me
and humble me, you know, And that's exactly what it was. And
I thank God for that taking that away from me. The biggest blessings of
my life. And you're absolutely, and I think you and I as guys,
we are even more prone to this because and this is a differentis chapter
two of the book. It's an identity issue for us. I mean a
lot of it is is that I don't have my as a Christian, ought
to have my identity in Christ. But the way we form identity, and
I covered this in the book, we don't typically form it that way.
What we typically do instead is we form it as men in our achievements,
in what it is we've achieved. So if I asked, you know,
who are you David Well, You're going to say I'm the host of this
show. If you said, who are you, Jim Well, I'm a
cold case detective. Okay? Is that who I am? Look, I
haven't been in a dayline episode in three years. Okay, I need at
some point you need to say, Okay, who are you really, Jim?
And this struggle of identity is so key to how we function in the
world because identity is really exposed as our forms of worship, because I guarantee,
as men, we typically form our worship based on what we do.
You know identity when you study it in the surveys and the research on this,
it's inseparable from value and purpose, and unfortunately a lot of us form
our identity based in reverse. In other words, we asked the question where
am I valuable? What am I good at? What do I have purpose
in? That's who I am? Rather than say, well, no,
who am I? I want to form my value and purpose based on my
identity first, not my identity based on my value and purpose, because that's
the problem, because there's nothing but pride that comes out of forming your identity
based on what you're good at, because it's about what you're good at.
Yes, so this is and it's the biggest, one single move that leads
to contentment is to reform your identity not based on what you can achieve,
but based on what you receive from a holy God. That is amazing.
When you're talking about that, you say, you know, how do you
define yourself? Is it the show that you have, is it the book
that you've written, or is the career that you have. It makes me
think back to the Austrian Empire when they would have their emperors die. They
had these big, elaborate funerals and they would take them to this amazing crypt
Actually I've been there with my family to see this thing, and it truly
is amazing. And they would have as they bring the body into the crypt,
they would knock, and the person inside would say who goes there?
And they would give all of the big political titles, you know, he's
the empire of the empire of this, and the king of that and all
the rest of the stuff. I don't know him. And then they would
knock again and they say who is it, and he would give family relationships
right that he has. I don't know him. And then he'd knock a
third time and it would say and it's a humble sinner, Ronz Joseph,
I know him, enter, you know. And that's a kind of an
interesting thing. Awesome. Yeah, that's an awesome just a word picture of
what we're talking about here. Now. This is something that is and I
don't know how much time we have on this, but let me just say
I've got a friend named Joe Martin who's a doctor, who is a philosopher
and a theologian. We got plenty of time, by the way. So
he says that men are all about the Asians. When we have conversations,
it's all about the Asians. And I think it does expose how we form
identity. So here, for example, he would say, when we meet
another guy, we shake hands and we say what do you do? First
day is occupation? Okay, that's the first aation. And when we're not
really asking what do you do? We are because of how we form identity.
As met we're asking who are you now? As we ask that,
all identity, remember, is comparative. It's not about well, how wealthy
are you? It's how wealthy are you compared to this guy or everybody else.
That's how you know if you're wealthy, how smart are you compared to
others? Sadly, identity is for by comparing, and that's why it's so
prideful, right, because we have a tendency to say, well I'm better
over here, I'm better over there. So occupation is the first ation,
and then what we're measuring. We're saying, okay, well I know what
that job requires in terms of education. Second aation, we're now we're saying,
well he's better educated or I'm better educated. We're measuring here we are
in that first conversation with another guy, and by asking what is your occupation,
we're starting to measure the other ass second one as education. Third,
well, we're asking, well, I know what that makes. If you're
a surgeon, I know you're making some or if you're an accountant, whatever
it is, you're measuring compensation. That's the next station. So at some
point then you're asking, too, how good are you at this? You
could be a doctor, but just be a terrible doctor. Reputation is the
next ation. What are we doing here, Well, we're measuring based on
we're assigning value based on the answers here. And if you're a guy,
if you're a cop, especially, you could be somebody who's that's got nothing
more than a high school education and you're working as a patrol officer and I've
been making that much money, you've never tried to do anything other. But
if you're six foot eight and cut like a Greek god, you're still the
biggest dog in the room. Because now it's about intimidation at the last station.
So I think he's got a point. It's very unlike now. I'm
sure that for all of us. If you're not a guy, you're a
woman, and you're listening to this, then there's probably some other level of
but be honest, we do this all the time, and because identity is
comparative, it really takes it rears its head, most notably in group gatherings
where you're introducing yourself, because now you're getting the opportunity to compare. Well,
there's the danger in it, and identity becomes the thing that, sadly
is behind so much of our trauma and struggle. This is a separate chapter
of this book. I'll give you an example of this. We would do
a lot of work now with officers to Billy Graham Association in the summer.
So we're getting ready to lead in two weeks here to do the first of
six weeks of counseling for marriage resiliency for officers who have been involved in critical
incidents and now they're struggling in their marriage. And sometimes they only men get
there before they get a divorce. They get a divorce, they say,
we're not coming. I always say, just hold on, just try to
get through this trip first before you make a decision that big. But this
is the the dire straits therein Okay. I discovered only three or four years
ago that the thing that is the biggest struggle for officers is, especially if
you're injured is identity. It turns out that if you were to look at
all of the trauma in your life, whatever it was, if it was
an injury, you suffered, a divorce, a loss of a job,
a child being loved, whatever you lost, whatever it was you suffered in
the trauma, you'll see that at that same point you were suffering the trauma,
you had a relatively dramatic shift in your identity. You thought of yourself
as married. Now you're divorced, you see yourself differently. Identity is simply
how you continuously see yourself. The self is at the issue, and every
time you suffer a trauma, you suffer an identity shift. So it's interesting
that trauma typically causes an identity shift, but the opposite is also true.
An identity shift often causes trauma. So if you wanted to protect yourself from
trauma, or minimize the kind of trauma you'll experience, you need to put
your identity in something that can't be shifted, stolen from you, taken from
you, bruised in some way, damaged in some way. And of the
three ways that we form identity inside out, outside in, or top side
down, only one of these three ways is stable enough to protect you from
shifting. If you're forming your identity outside in where you say it like,
this is how the ancients did it. You know, this thing outside of
me existed before I was ever born, and I'm just going to reach out
and grab that and form my identity. So it's a tribe. That's the
tribe I was raised in. It's the name of my family name, it's
the profession of my family. We're all cops, so that's like who I
am. Okay, that's outside in identity, and I all of us do
some of that inside out based on my desires, my preferences, even my
sexual preferences. I'm going to ask you outside of me to identify me based
on my innate hearts, desires. Okay, that's inside out identity. Both
of those are unstable because at some point your job, you're going to retire,
than who are you then? Or you're going to get injured and or
your desires are going to change because your heart is fickle. It's just the
nature of it. Well, then get ready to suffer some trauma on the
course you're like, now, if you've formed your identity top side down,
where you put it in something that's transcendent and unchanging. Then you're going to
have lows in your life, of course, but they're going to be not
quite as deep because that the day before you suffer the injury, you were
a child of You were in Christ. That day. The day after you
suffer the injury, you're still in Christ. You're still the same. God
sees you the same way. Now, are you going to struggle because you're
an injury? Of course? But who you are hasn't changed. And it
turns out that's the thing that we struggle with the most, even in an
injury. It's not so much just the pain of the injury, it's who
am I now? And that's why we have to kind of really be serious
about our identity formation or we're going to find ourselves. It's about human flourishing.
It really is. Yeah, And of course you know it's about integ
and we often think about integrity is how other people perceive us or something,
but it really is how you perceive yourself. Do you have that integrity?
And you have that integrity if you're thinking about that from top down? This
is so wise. I'm really enjoying listening to you talk about this, and
I think about how unique things are right now, as you begin talking about
that, you said, you know, this lure of being famous or a
lot of people following you, that all comes as a social media stuff.
It truly is amazing to me to see that and how that has transformed younger
people. And it is such a transformational thing to think that there is some
value in having a bunch of people that you don't know, you know,
following you and everything I'm tell you focusing on that, it's amazing. Yeah,
that is something that we take for granted, David. We take it
for granted because yes, we are now in an age the information age has
become the identity age. Why because, so how do we start? If
you go on our social media platforms? What's the very first thing? We
have a moniker, like, what is the public name? I'm going to
adopt that I want you to see me. As second, we're going to
put a bio. Now we're going to list a series of priorities, identity
priorities in the bio. So all of this, then we're going to spend
the next how many years on social media posting only in a way that amplifies
the way I already want you to see me, that's right. So I'm
not going to reveal something of myself that violates the identity I've already established.
And even if I'm not even thinking about it, my posts always expose who
I am. And there were times in generations prior where you didn't know who
people were, and the way you know who they are now, having access
to everything we think gives us gives people complete access to who we really are.
And I think we know that if a republic figure, and so we're
careful. You know, I never post anything about my family on social media.
I stay pretty focused in that area of what it is I'm trying to
communicate related to the gospel, and I just stay focused on that. Now,
that doesn't that gives people a view of me that's not actually true.
It's the view that I'm crafting for them, and we have to be aware
of that. But everyone does that. I mean, I see people I
follow who you think all they do is eat getting But it's really that it's
not just that we are in some way forming and sharing our identity. It's
that we are also revealing our idols, We're revealing our priorities, We're revealing
this stuff that we think is so consequential, so important that we are willing
to proclaim it. That's one of the ways you can you can see what
your idols are. Ask yourself, like, look at your social media streams,
Well, I want to know what your idols are. I can kind
of figure it out if you've got a social media platform, right, that's
right. Yeah, we got a full lifelog that is up there. Yeah.
You know, it's such a shallow things we're talking about with social media.
It's there so that you know, you can glorify yourself. Isn't it
interesting that in the last days people become such lovers of self that that we've
never had those tools, that we've never had the tools to magnify it exactly.
Yeah, And I think at some point we are going to have We're
going to see that this is not beneficial to our well being and we're going
to volunteerly pull back a little bit, or we're going to reach a point
in our lives where we're going to burn out on it and we're going to
put so you might be more active on social media at some point in your
life than you are later. But I'm also trying to be very careful not
to be the old guy who's just shaking his fist at the moon, right,
Because yeah, I use social media as much as anybody else, but
I do want us to be very practical about it. Like, look,
if we're trying to protect ourselves from what causes us to do bad things,
we have to have a very honest assessment of who we are. Are we
buying instant different chapter in the book, But are we by nature innocent,
born innocent, born virtuous, and we are corrupted by our families, by
our environments, by the systems that are in place, from government systems.
Is that who we are? Or is the flip true that we are by
nature fallen and depraved enough, but no matter what system you put us in,
we'll find a way to corrupt it, even religious systems. Which of
those two things is true? We need to figure that out because if the
second is true, which has always been the claim of the Christian worldview,
that we are by nature fallen, well, now we can explain certain aspects
of what happens in culture, and we can put our resources in the right
direction. Look, Luther put it this way. We are so inwardly focused
that we can take even things that are good and corrupt them and do them
for selfish You can even behave uber morally, but you're doing it for selfish
reasons. Yea. Even our efforts to do something godly are entirely depraved and
selfish, is what his claim is. This is what you find also in
the modern studies of about altruism, like people are trying to figure out,
like, how could it be that someone who could be a Pulitzer prize winner
can also kill his spouse or her spouse? How could that be? How
could it be that there's somebody who, for the last thirty years has been
an exemplar in our community, the deacon at the church, the doctor who
delivered my babies, Yet thirty years ago he killed his wife. How could
that be? There's no way he could be that duplicit? Is there?
This enigma of man has to be sorted out. Now. What I see
in the studies is that, yes, we do have good examples of the
altruism of humans. Humans are capable of great altruism. They are until it
doesn't serve them personally. So in other words, I'm usually the studies show
that humans are usually pretty generous until resources get tight. Then we start hoarding
toilet paper. Well, why are we doing that? Because we are,
at our base nature self serving, and even when we are doing good for
others, it serves us in some way. That's why we're doing it.
We want to be seen a certain way. Very seldom do you see people
who you know do good things who aren't proclaiming to you that they do good
things. That's how you know they're doing good things. Well, that's because
that proclamation is what they're really after. Yeah, okay, that's the truth.
If that's the case, then now we can make a proper assessment of
our own condition. Number One, it causes me to know that I am
not trustworthy, that I am no different. Number One, It's leveled the
field for me. So I never went into an interview once I had this
realization. I never went into an interview and thought I was somehow better than
the guy I was interviewing. No, I knew that we're all the same
person. But for the grace of God, my buttons haven't been pushed the
way that this poor guy's buttons have been pushed. Now, look, this
is not to try to elevate people who do bad behavior. I'm a justice
guy, so we're going to take care of this. But I recognize that
I am just like him. We are all just like him. When you
watch an episode of Dateline, I'm hoping you're not sitting there and going,
yeah, what an idiot. I hope you watch it with a certain amount
of introspection and you're thinking, Oh, that could easily have been me,
Because that is where humility begins. It begins when you realize the proper role.
By the way, if you know the fallen nature of humans, if
you know that's really true, well that also changes the way you establish systems.
This is why our country was built in a way that had the kinds
of checks and balances between the three arms of the federal government. Why is
that there because the people who formed it new you can't trust people, you
can't trust humans. We are, by nature of fallen if we don't have
a way to check and balance each other, if we don't have a community.
Basically, this is why the Christian worldview has not lived in isolation,
because this is why marriages. So this is another chapter of the book why
marriage is so important. Because I've close enough to another human that I have
given her permission to tell me what I'm wrong. I've given her permission to
help shape me toward what it is God wants from me. And if you're
not in a relationship with somebody who you know well enough to have given them
permission to tell you what an idiot you are right now, and you don't
have true friends, and you don't have the kind of relationship that will urge
you towards something better. So it turns out that those are other things that
sociologists have discovered. There was a chapter in here about true friendship. Well,
why because I've worked so many cases where people were killed by somebody they
thought was their true friend. M Well, so what is the nature of
quality relationships? We need to kind of dig into that because it turns out
that there are some relationships that if you're listening, that you're holding right now,
that are hurting you, that are detrimental to your well being, and
that it might at some point, by the way, likely if I'm the
first time I'm going to do, if I'm working your homicide, is I'm
going to look back at all your relationships because the chances are somebody you knew
really well who kills you. And in the end, we have to ask
the question what am I doing wrong that I'm hanging out with somebody who I
have not in some way vetted better? You know. So I think a
lot of this is important for us as Christians to say, oh yea,
by the way, the Scripture has an antidote for that. This Christian's got
great guidance for that. We just haven't been paying attention in this generation.
It seems. Yeah, you have a statement. Many crime stories are centered
around poor relationships, you know, not having a relationship or having a relationship
that's going to I guess goed you into that right some way. Yeah,
I mean this is why. So if you're looking at what causes, and
we've got enough time, I think you're to cover this. If you look
at what is causing, what really describes relationships that will cause you to flourish.
It turns out that studies show this. One of the longest studies ever
done on human happiness, looks like sixty year study that was done, and
it really revealed that is your relationships there at the key the core of what
causes you to feel content, to be happy, to have satisfied life.
Satisfying life. But it's not just any kind of relationship. It turns out
it's the kind of deep relationships that you cannot have with hundreds of people on
social media. So there's three things, three things that lead to the quality
of flourishing in your relationships. Here. They are, First, you need
deep committed relationships with people you've given permission to be like a brother to say,
hey, you know what did your off the rails here? And that
has to be with a small number of people. You can't have those kinds
of deep committed relationships because they require a certain amount of vulnerability and a certain
amount of time. So if you're somebody who says, oh, I know
lots of people, I got lots of friends, well they're probably not.
Then these kinds of friends you need to have a small number of deeply committed
relationships with. Third piece, virtuous people. Now here's the reason why.
I've met lots of folks who are deeply connected to others who are not verstal
us, and they're they're they're basically they're part of their crime family. And
so you can have deep connected relationships that lead you astray because there's no virtue.
Now here's the tricky question is what do we call virtuous who gets to
decide. So there's a code of ethics amongst gangsters, is that what is
virtuous? What they say is because they would say, Hey, if you
offend us, we're going to come over there and kill you. That's just
the code. You knew better before you did that. You should have known
that was coming, because you know that's what you're going to get. And
so who just gets to decide what is righteous, right or wrong virtuous?
Who gets to decide that is it a group of people or is it a
single individual, or is there something that transcends all of us that it overarches
all communities. So it turns out that virtue is something that does require a
transcendent, unchanging, overarching virtue giver the authority that we would actually say virtue
is grounded in because if we say it's grounded in groups, and get ready
for all kinds of stupid and we're already seeing this because what's virtuous to even
politically, what's virtuous to one side or the other is very different. Then
we're arguing as if there's no transcendent, overarching virtue. So this is one
of those areas your relationships that does benefit from a worldview in which you can
ground virtue objectively. There's a couple of places where that happens in this book,
but this is one that's very important because we can say you tell your
kids all the time, but don't be handles with there's a bad people who
gets to decide they're bad. This is now suddenly caught is going to have
to cause us to think about how we ground good and bad? How do
we ground a righteousness? And if you're going to ground it in just the
opinion of people, well that's every case. I work at some point you
have to be wiser than that. And that's why I think it's important for
us to adopt the one worldview grounded a humility that provides you with an objective,
transcendent source for virtue. That is such great wisdom. I'm really looking
forward reading this book, and of course it's just come out, but it
is available now, right, Yes, it's available now, and I appreciate
you can learn more at the truthantruecrime dot com The truthantruecrime dot com. And
because I'm so sensitive to the idea that this should not be about us just
building a platform and trying to sell something, what we do at that website
you'll see there's a ton of free stuff that comes with the purchase. We
simply wanted to try to level that a little bit right so that you don't
feel like this is about spending money on a book. I really want to
advance the causes that are in the book, and that's that's the challenge,
of course. Excellent, excellent book. Again, it is the Truth in
True Crime. That's I in nott nd the Truth in Truecrime dot com.
And just before you go, I know you got to go. This message
is from guard Goldsmith and Rock Finney says thank you both. Cold Case Christianity
is excellent, and in the conversation today, I'm reminded that the trap that
even catches people who try to spread freedom messages or biblical messages, it seems
that one must beware of commoditizing oneself. Difficult to promote one more, even
freedom or biblical work without that promotion becoming self promoting rather than praising God.
That's absolutely so good, so good. Yeah, great observation. He's written
me before he loved Cold Case Christianity, which he got the first time I
interviewed you. But I'm really looking forward to the Truth and True Crime and
again there's a website, the Truth and Truecrime dot Com. Thank you much,
Thank you so much for joining us, Sarah. Excellent stuff and such
wisdom. It truly is amazing. Looking forward to reading it myself. Thank
you. Well, I'm indebted to you. Thanks so much for having me.
Well, thank you, folks. We're going to take a quick break
and we'll be right back. Stay with us. Unlike most revolutions, whether
people rise against the real economic oppression, in our case, here in Boston,
we are fighting for purely an abstract principle. It is, however,
not nearly so abstract as a young gentleman supposes. The issue involved here is
one of monopoly. Today the British government will monopolize the sale of tea in
our country. Tomorrow it will be something else, liberty. It's your move.
You're listening to the David Knight Show. I thought it was always great
listening to Jay Warner Wallace. I really enjoy that. And on Rocksan,
thank you very much, dougle Long. I appreciate the tip there as well.
When I asked him about you know what was, I got him to
investigate. He actually started investigating is because his wife became a Christian, and
I thought it was really funny. This last weekend, my wife was talking
to somebody at church where we go, and her husband is a Christian and
a cop who attends that church and a really great guy, and she said,
yeah, she became a Christian. And she said he really didn't like
that. He even told her. He says, yeah, I liked you
better before you were a Christian. For the same reason that Jay Warner Wallace
started doing an investigation. He did it, and she said after a few
months he came back to her and he had read through the Bible twice at
that point, and he said, I've become a Christian. He's kind of
surprised and stunned by that, but yeah, it is interesting. You know,
God's word will accomplish the purpose for which he sent it. And like
I was saying the other day, you know, we look at these people's
reactions to artificial intelligence. Yeah, there was a little bit of change there
by people were self identifying as Christians and people who were, as they put
it, quote scripture engaged. They defined that as reading the Bible two or
three times a year, and they don't mean reading it through two or three
times from cover to cover. They mean just picking it up and glancing at
it and reading it for a little bit two or three times a year,
you know, outside of something that they might hear at Easter and Christmas or
something like that. You have to invest the time for to really have a
change. I have to actually read it and then it will make a big
change in your life. And the time that we got left, I want
to go back to some of the climate stuff because there are some major things
that are coming along. But remember, as we always look at this,
there's two key things that carry over into all these other areas. One of
them is to the great reset aspect, the depopulation aspect, taking away food,
fuel and many other things like that to impoverish and enslave us. And
then also key and all of that is taking away our ability to speak.
And out of the UK we get yet another one of these stories. On
gb News, a Great Britain News, a British environmentalist was having a back
and forth a debate with Andrew Doyle and the environmentalist was Jim Dale and he
was saying basically what RFK Junior said, Jail the deniers, you disagree with
my religion, climate change I'm going to throw you in jail. According to
the environmentalist Jim Dale's, climate skeptics would still be allowed to talk to family
and friends. Nobody, he said, would kick in the door, but
you would face criminal sanctions if they quote, pollute people unquote by voicing their
opinion in public very much what they want to do with religion, that type
of thing. And it always begins that way, but eventually it ends with
them kicking the door in. They don't stop at that. As for an
example of how climate denial could be suppressed with criminal sanctions, Jim Dale suggested
it would be like racism that's been driven from public discourse. Oh has it.
Britain has very harsh anti hate speech laws, and we've seen those used
against Christians, haven't we In the sense that, well, if you say
that certain activity is armful for the individual, or that it's a sin,
even if you point out that God has you're still alive. God has extended
grace to you to give you an opportunity to change, and it's a free
grace that is there. But even if you say that that's not good enough,
right, and so Andrew Doyle tried to get Jim Dale to admit there's
a few issues with banning disagreement. He's had example about how people who questioned
the narrative about COVID were vigorously suppressed. Now he talks about the COVID lab
thing, but again even more so vaccines and death. Does it really matter
how this thing started? What was the result of all this? And if
you can't talk about people who've been injured by their solution, people have been
killed by their solutions, that is a far more important thing than what basically
has become a side issue, a red herring, and that is why did
this virus come? I don't see any evidence of it having any effect,
and so it doesn't really matter to me, And I think that part of
it is a distraction. But the fact that council be deleted in that type
of the reality of climate change is that the Earth is currently experiencing a very
cold period by geological standards, and it is true, you know, when
we look at this and we look at what is happening in the Antarctic,
there's evidence now that just a few thousand years ago there are a lot of
mammal bones that they found. They tried to say, well, maybe that
was human there's no evidence of any human activity whatsoever, but animals that could
not survive in that weather. We're roaming freely in the Antarctic at that time.
It's going to gradually the truth is coming out, and those who are
seeking the truth are not trying to shut down and to censor those who are
truly investigating it. But we need to understand they're going to just jump to
these end game solutions. And when we look at the push from California,
and we look at the push from Water Washington, a push from Gavin Nuisance,
and the push from Joe Biden. One of the things that they're pushing
right now is electric semi trucks. And so you've got a lot of states
that are pushing back on this to try to slow that down or to halt
it all together, because we know what's going to happen. This is not
ready and it's going to cripple the infrastructure, cripple the economy. So we
have several state attorneys general who are now pushing back against these arbitrary rules that
have been pushed out by Biden's EPA. Again, it's the EPA that is
always trying to They want to kill the power plants. They want to kill
diesel trucks, they want to kill cars, they want to kill ranges and
heaters, gas ranges, gas heaters, any of that kind of stuff,
fireplaces, you name it, and everything has to be electric. As they're
pulling down the power plant at the same time, maybe what we should do
is, maybe we should keep the power plants and the trucks and the cars,
and the ranges and the heaters and the fireplaces. Maybe we could kill
the EPA instead, right, because it's unconstitutional. It's another one of these
Nixon things that we're put in. I think we need to get rid of
it. As they point out, the EPA does not have This is a
letter from the Attorney's General. EPA does not have, neither does California the
constitutional power to dictate these nationwide rules to Americans. Of course, California is
using this alliance of several states and said, well, whatever California does,
we're going to follow that. I said, I'm proud to lead the efforts
to stop these unconstitutional attempts to remake our economy. I'm grateful to our sister
states for joining our coalition. And so this is a Nebraska Attorney General Mike
Hilgers, a Republican, he said, California and an unaccountable EPA trying to
transform our national trucking industry and our supply chain infrastructure. This effort, coming
out a time of heightened inflame with already strained electric grid, will devastate the
trucking and logistics industry. It'll raise prices for customers, It'll impact untold numbers
of jobs across Nebraska and the country. Yeah, if you're going to dictate
something to somebody, you might want to see if it works. But we've
had enough of these unworkable, unaffordable, unconstitutional rules. These people who decide
that they are going to rule us by executive order, rule us by bureaucratic
fiat and dictates. Have you had enough of the regulation with that representation thing?
I think I have. And if we don't fight back against this,
and we don't push back against this, and at least we're now getting a
few state attorneys general that are doing that. If we don't push back against
that, they truly will turn us into poor slaves. That's the intention.
Thank you for joining us. Have a good day. The David Night Show
is a critical thinking super spreader. If you've been exposed to logic by listening
to the David Night Show. Please do your part and try not to spread
it. Financial support, or simply tell the others about the show causes this
dangerous information to spread. Father people have to trust me, I mean trust
the science. Wear you mask, take your vaccine, don't ask questions using
free speech to free minds. It's the David Night Show. Mm hmm.