Attention. You're listening to the Tod Huff Radio show, America's home for conservative
not bitter Talk radio. Be advised. The content of this program has been
documented to prevents, ed even cure liberalism, and listening may cause you to
lean to the right. Here's your conservative but not bitter host, Todd Huff.
Greetings, my friends, and thank you for tuning in to America's home
for conservative not bitter talk. I am your host, the one and only
Tod Huff, the benevolent dictator here in the studio behind the microphone. It
is indeed my pleasure to be here today. Todd Huffshow dot com is where
you can go, by the way, any of the things that we talk
about on this show. Maybe with some rare exceptions, you will find links
to articles or background information that I have used in preparation for the show on
the stack of Stuff page at totofshow dot com. That, by the way,
is a hat tip to the late great Rush Limbaugh. A coin or
a shot me, I should say, a term he coined his stack of
stuff. Of course he had papers. I got some papers here. Rush
used to do that, ruffle the papers to tell you that he was holding
in his formerly nicotine stained fame fingers some stories from the day. We have
most of these things digitally now on our website if you want to check him
out at totofshow dot com. But I want to start today. You know,
I was thinking about this as the music was playing. I was thinking
because in a previous hour we were talking about Trump suggesting that Biden's going to
get a shot in the arm, actually a shot in the as he put
at the backside the ables, in order to get through the debate on Thursday
night, which we've we've talked a lot about on this program. Because we're
now in the I mean really the beginning of the final stretch towards well through
the campaign. I mean we're down to a couple of months. Votes will
be cast, not that far well, for all we know, votes have
already been cast. I'm kidding. I'm kidding. I do love the bumper
sticker that says, when I die, make sure that I don't vote Democrat.
I think that that's fantastic. By the way, whoever came up with
that, very well done, Very well done, my friends. But you
know, you think about the narratives and the storylines today, Trump is out
there saying that Biden gets a shot of a drug in order to get through
shot of something in order to get through the debates. We have fact checkers
coming together to let you know with certainty that Biden was not out there soiling
his breeches when he was in when he was in Paris for the G seven.
I mean, these have become real narratives and issues in politics here in
twenty twenty four, it's absolutely crazy times. We've got a narrative. We've
got a storyline that talks about a president who has been charged, well now
convicted, charged in other cases, having charges brought against him in other cases,
but also already been convicted in one case setting sentencing will be here in
just a couple of weeks. So we've got that to talk about. I
mean, you start listening or listing all of the things that's going on in
this particular campaign. I mean, it's crazy. I never dreamt when I
was studying political science at Butler University nearly gee heck over over twenty five years
ago. Well, I graduated in twenty so twenty four years ago, twenty
four to twenty seven years ago. Let's say that there's no way I don't
think anybody in my class would have believed that there would be actual conversations political
discourse about whether a candidate for president of the United States messed is paying in
the political discourse, or that the one candidate was saying the other candidate was
getting a shot of something in the arm or in the backside in order to
get through a debate or the State of the Union address. But that,
my friends, is where we find ourselves it certainly, you know, depending
upon your perspective, that can be disappointing. You can think, man,
what happened to the statesmanship? It could be entertaining. I don't know,
depending upon your viewpoint. And there's some days I shift back and forth as
to how I look at it. But the bottom line is we have to
use whatever's going on, whatever's going on out there in this campaign, in
the current narrative of the moment, we have to find ways to persuade people
to choose liberty, the constitution, freedom, and not the ideology, the
morally bankrupt ideology of the radical left. So lost to get to here today
in this hour of the program. But before we get started, I want
to remind you that if you're currently smoking or vaping or chewing to back the
Nicknack Naturals is here to help you crush your vice. They've created a mint,
a mint that is a nicotine mint. So this is not for you
if you are not currently using nicotine products, but if you are and if
you're looking for ways to crush your vice, Nicknack Naturals has found a naturally
better alternative to smoking, to vaping, to chewing things that don't involve the
mess. Don't involve the mess of smoke, of spit, of slimy pouches,
bad breath, cigarette brakes, maybe yellow teeth. Who knows all these
other side effects. Nicknack Naturals doesn't have those. It's a discreete mint.
It can it's not messy, it's odorless. You don't have to go outside
out in the hot weather or the cold weather or the pouring rain to have
a smoke. You can sit at your desk or stay in your house and
use the product. So you can go to nicknack dot com you can shop
the variety of labors they have there in ic innac nick neck dot com.
By the way, fifteen percent discount if you use my name Todd during checkout.
Nick knack dot com. That's in ic nac nicknack dot com. Promo
code todd saves you fifteen percent. So lots of crazy narratives out there today.
I want to start here by well, actually where I want to start
today. Something I find a little bit ironic. This is at the Federalist
dot com. Here's the headline, Sean Fleetwood writing this article. Democrats love
democracy so much they're trying to keep RFK Junior off the twenty twenty four ballot.
So in addition to the debate, and in addition to what's happening between
Trump and Biden, we cannot overlook if there's another candidate. Now, this
candidate's not going well, there's actually a couple of other candidates, but there's
another candidate who's in double digits as it pertained to polling or potential votes in
the twenty twenty four election. And that candidate is RFK Junior, Robert F.
Kennedy Junior. And the Democrats who are out there telling us that they
are fighting to save our democracy, that Republicans and Trump and MAGA supporters are
out there to try to undermine our democracy, which of course we have a
constitutional republic that matters. By the way, that absolutely matters. I'm not
saying, look, there's certainly this concept of self governance that matters tremendously the
consent of the government. In fact, our entire system is predicated upon the
idea that we the people and our founders were brilliant for doing this. We
the people said, look, instead of you know, we just won this
revolution. Normally, what happens is the people that won the revolution will establish
themselves as the people who then become the ruling class over the new nation.
That's not what happened in this particular instance. Our founders said, look,
fellow Americans, we are not subject to anyone. You're not subject to some
person who calls him self king. You are made in the image of God.
Your liberties, your freedoms come from your creator. And instead of having
a government come in and tell you what you can do, we do this
a little bit differently. In fact, we do it exactly opposite. We
say that the government that is established is going to have the consent of the
governed, and so we start from the position that we're the ones that rule
ourselves, and that we are going to grant the government. The federal government
certain powers, powers, by the way that we reserve the right to oversee
powers, by the way that we don't want to become centralized and used against
us. And so with everything that we do in the creation of this new
government, we're going to make sure that we have separate branches that hold one
another accountable. We want it to be We want it to be tedious,
we want it to be difficult. We want it to be we want governing.
We want legislating to be painful. We don't want to see radical changes
that can happen quickly simply because fifty percent plus one say that they want it.
We want there to be some tension here in the system. But we
also understand that we have the consent of the government. We are a people
that governs itself. Although we don't have a pure democracy. We're not all
voting on everything. Everybody doesn't vote on every single issue as an individual and
then the majority wins. It's not the way that this that this works.
We want a representative constitutional republic where we elect people who represent us our interests.
We send them, in the case of the federal government, to the
national capital in Washington, d C. And those individuals will will make decisions,
engage in debate, will serve on committees, will cast votes for and
against certain things. And in the constituents, the people that he or she
is representing back in their home district can say we like what you did,
we didn't like what you did, whatever the case may be, and we
can vote you in for another term, or we can vote for your political
opponent next time. That's the way that this is supposed to work. So,
but the left wants you to believe that we live in democracy, democracy,
democracy, democracy. Now again, I'm not denying that there are democratic
aspects in the constitutional republic. Of course, this whole concept again of the
consent of the governed is critically important. It's we the people how the Constitution
of the United States starts out. But it is not a pure democracy.
And that matters tremendously because, my friends, because my friends, at its
core, a constitutional republic says we are going to define the role of the
government on paper, this is what the government should be doing, right,
Section Article one, Section whatever, Article two, sex you know, it
lays out the role of each branch of government. And then at the end
of that document and what we call the Bill of Rights, we write down
a series of kind of examples. This is not meant to be viewed as
an exhaustive list. This is a series of examples of rights that we have
as individual people, and the ones that we enumerated include things like freedom of
speech, freedom of religion, the right to keep in bear arms, the
right to be secure in your houses and papers and property, and so forth
against the warrantless you know, searches and seizures of property and so forth.
You can't just be walking down the street and have some government law enforcement officer
come up to you and demand that you prove that you're innocent effectively, or
come knocking on your door at two am, unless, of course you're Trump
and live at mar A Lago and you know they're coming to suppose the get
papers that they may have just sent you palettes of a few months prior.
But anyway, all that those are just and that's not meant to be an
exhaustive list. That's meant to just kind of give a flavor to take to
take the time to enumerate certain rights, rights that the founders may have seen
that were infringed upon by the monarch of the King of England. Right they
wanted to take steps and measures to do that, but we don't have a
pure democracy because a pure democracy can theoretically say that we take away rich people's
rights, which the Left does this the rich that they want to target rich
people and say rich people have to pay certain taxes. The Founders didn't like
this sort of stuff. In fact, my friends, did you know,
in order for us to even have a federal income tax, the Constitution had
to be amended. We had to change what the Founders originally wrote further to
be a direct tax from the federal government to you. The Founders would have
found this absolutely appalling, my friends. But yet we've changed that, and
we've changed a lot of things, a lot of things that we should never
have messed with, including I would maintain the way that senators are elected used
to state legislatures voted for senators, which was an ingenious way again of having
representation in our federal government for the people through the House of Representatives, but
also for the states, which you could say the state is the collection of
people, but it is a different when you're being held accountable by state representatives
of state legislature. There's a different series of things that you have to keep
in mind. And it's more along the interest of the state itself, the
state government, which is important, which is important. There's no representative representation
for that today. And I think we would avoid a lot of the pitfalls
that we found ourselves in in this country if we had not changed some of
these things. Some of the things absolutely needed to be changed. Don't misunderstand,
but these particular examples I'm laying out they were not with the founders envisioned
how they're not how they viewed the federal government, your liberty and so forth.
But we don't have a pure democracy. The left talks about this in
such a way that they've now convinced large swaths of the American people that we
are a democracy, which a democracy could say that if you vote to take
away Bill's rights, that Bill no longer has them, because the democracy has
spoken, and that's a terrible proposition. And so a representative republic, a
constitutional republic, has established that in order well that the government will respect the
rights of the smallest minority, which the smallest minority you can possibly have is
the minority of the individual. The individual and his or her personal rights constitutionally
protected, but rights that come not from the government but by God. But
nonetheless, this has not stopped the left, the Democrat Party from I guess,
taking advantage of monopoly or capitalizing on the opportunity to say we're in favor
of democracy and the peace pull in the course of the Republican Party and Trump
and Maga Republicans are not. Trump wants to be a dictator. The Democrats
want to save democracy. That's what they want you to believe. The narrative
is. But wouldn't you say that if you love democracy so much, if
you love the rule of the people so much, and you wanted to give
people choices, wouldn't you say that you would not try to keep a candidate
off of the ballot. Remember RFK tried to run as a Democrat. My
friend, he tried to run as a Democrat. They opposed him there.
They didn't want a primary for Sleepy Joe. They didn't want to primary,
as I say, for President Bribery. They wanted it to be easy sailing.
So they were able to kick RFK Junior to the curb. And I
would tell you, if you're a Democrat, if you're a Democrat and you
like RFK, do not forget that do not forget that you're party much like
it did in twenty sixteen to Bernie Sanders, although a little bit differently,
but it's the same basic thing. They prevented the opposition, right, They
didn't let they didn't really let the people vote. By the way, if
you go back to twenty sixteen and you look at the way that candidates were
selected by the Democrat Party, look into what the term super delegate meant.
If you believe in democracy, and you believe that your party is in favor
of democracy, then I ask you to please reconcile, for me and for
the American people people who study this stuff, the concept of a super delegate
when selecting your party's nominee for president, That, my friend, that is
an incompatible notion where one person's vote has dramatically more value in the process of
selecting the presidential nominee for your party than the average person's vote does. That
is not democratic, And the Democrat Party, of course, is not for
that. They are for power. They are for using whatever they can to
manipulate people to believe that Republicans are dangerous, Democrats are good, and that
we should be well electing Democrats and empowering these jokers and clowns. That's the
real narrative. So I'm gonna get to this article here in just a moment.
But friends, let me tell you. Let me tell you that I
a couple of a couple of months ago now, when I was thinking about
losing weight. I was and I was beginning this conversation with myphdeweight loss dot
com. I was asked the question about why why do you want to lose
weight? I packed on some pounds. I'm not proud of that, but
it's the truth down by the way, about thirteen pounds. But at the
time before I started this program, I was asked, what is you know,
what's the reason you want to do this? And that's important to understand,
right because there's tough days when you do something like start a weight loss
program or any any sort of you know, improvement program or something that causes
you to change a behavior, change a habit, to just to do things
and to be a little bit more conscious and maybe even strict on yourself,
whatever the case may be. You have to know your why to get through
those tough times. And I just remember, you know, as as a
guy, that was when I was younger. I was a college athlete.
I was always very physically fit, and I'm a family guy, and I
thought, you know, I don't ever want I don't ever want personally my
physical condition to prevent me from being able to do things with my children or
god willing, one day, my grandchildren. I don't want that. And
I know, look, we're all fighting a battle against time, and ultimately
we can't beat can't beat father time. I'm not suggesting we can, but
we can certainly be in a better position from a health perspective. And that
was the reason that I ultimately decided to do this and to work with my
phdeweightloss dot com. And so I started a program of well six or so
weeks ago, and I feel better. Inflammation and my knees are down.
I've had two I've had two ACL surgeries and arthroscopic surgery over the past.
It's been a while, it's been thirty years. But nonetheless I've I've had
knee problems and inflammation in my knees. That stuff's down. I didn't I
don't think I was expecting that, to be quite candidate, The inflammation's down.
I feel I feel better. I'm not hungry with this program. If
you're looking to start your weight loss journey, if you have a good why,
you know, there's some things that are important to you, something like
being there for family, being healthy, taking care of yourself so that you
can stay active and do things and see things and go places. Maybe that
if you didn't take care of yourself, maybe you couldn't do as easily or
in some cases at all. My PhD Weight Loss can help you with that
website again, My the Word by m Why PhD, phdweightloss dot com,
My phdweightloss dot Com. Just be sure to telling me you heard about him
here on the Todd Half Show. So I'm gonna start this, but I'm
gonna have to pause for the break headline here at the Federalist dot com.
Democrats love democracy so much they're trying to keep RFK Junior off the ballot off
the twenty twenty four ballot. Worried his campaign may hurt Joe Biden's reelection chances.
Democrat are working overtime to prevent independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Junior
from appearing on the twenty twenty four ballot On Saturday, This would have been
last weekend, left wing mouthpiece CNN reported Democrats have accelerated efforts to deny Kennedy
ballot access in key battleground states ahead of the November contest. Does this sound
like democracy at work to you, my friends? According to the report,
the Democratic National Committee, the DNC, and Clear Choice Pack, a pro
Biden super pac focused on countering third party candidates, have filed legal bids contesting
Kennedy's ballot access in four states in the last month. These include battleground states
such as shocking right battleground states such as North Carolina and Nevada which Trump taught
me to say correctly I used to say Nevada, as well as quote Democratic
strongholds. Each of the filings, the report says, claims de violated state
laws that stipulate how independent candidates as symbol of the paperwork needed to qualify for
a state's ballot. Democrats are alleging Kennedy's campaign misled voters to sign their petitions
and properly formed a minor party to ease ballot qualification, and committed procedural errors
in its petition across five states. According to The New York Times, Kennedy
has officially gained ballot access in seven states, including Michigan. The independent candidate's
campaign has claimed it's acquired enough signatures to appear on the ballot in thirteen other
states, although official certification is still pending. Among those states are North Carolina,
Pennsylvania, and Nevada. So bottom line here, this is not very
democratic from the party that tells us they're fighting to save democracy number one.
Number two, Look, I'm all for if something is questionable, certainly there
can be legal challenges, and RFK juniors should not be out there. None
of the candidates should be doing things that are or the political parties or anything
that are breaking the law. Of course. Of course, usually what happens
is that people are targeted for things that maybe everybody else is doing. That's
not a good thing either. This legal system has been used to justify political
prosecution and persecution here. I don't know if I want to call it persecution,
but basically they don't want him on the ballot because they're afraid. They're
afraid that that can hurt their chances. Make no mistake about it. All
this talk about who Kennedy hurts and helps. In the twenty twenty four general
election. This is all you need to know. Democrats are not pro democracy,
and they know that a strong RFK junior candidacy in states, especially battleground
states, can hurt them in a massive, massive way. That being said,
it's time to take a quick time out. My friends, Sit tight.
You're listening here to conservative not better talking on your host Todd huff back
here in mere moments, my friends. So lots of things here in today's
stack of stuff, but I want to shift gears a little bit to something
that we've you know, we've hit on in the past. In fact,
I need to compile let's put a note down. Let's compile a list of
people who say that Trump's coming after them if he's elected in twenty twenty four.
And I think we need to who do we add to that immediately?
Rachel Maddow, I think right. I think we need to add Robert de
Niro AOC. I think those are three that I can think of off the
top of my head. I'm sorry, Oh, Chrissy Tagan, that's right.
We talked about Christy Tagan recently. So there's four of confirm all of
it. But we'll we'll start a list. And by the way, listener,
if you have someone that I need to add to that list, we'll
make sure we'll keep an eye on it. Here's my vow to those people.
I will personally keep an eye on you. I mean, look,
I'm here in central Indiana. We do travel, we have it for a
bit, but we travel on the Truth Tour around the country. We will
keep an eye on you. I'll make sure that people know about your whereabouts.
If there's concerns, legitimate concerns of brown Shirts showing up like they did
at mar A Lago to do a raid down there, I will make sure
that the people know. I don't want you going to prison just because you
opposed President Donald Trump. Even if I think your movie sock Robert de Niro,
or even if I think you're a lunatic politically AOC will, I certainly
don't want you to face legal consequences because of your political affiliation, your opposition
to Trump. That's something I actually oppose. I actually oppose, and the
people in this audience oppose as well. It's of course used as a weapon
by your side, but nonetheless we're not going to sync to that level.
So I'm going to personally keep an eye on you. But I need to
have a list, and so that's why we're going to start that. But
it's even beyond that. It's even beyond Trump coming out out for me headline
here the Daily Fetch. Maxine Waters, the congresswoman from the People's Republic of
California, says that there will be more killings, more killings if Trump becomes
president. I'm concerned for my safety, she says, if Trump becomes If
Trump becomes president. So she's on an MSNBC. I'm just gonna start playing
some of this. I wasn't sure how I wanted to do this, but
I'm gonna play some of this. She's on an MSNBC, And so again,
what are they doing here? The idea is to say, look,
we have to against the Seinfeld Newman strategy is doing whatever they whatever it takes,
as long as it takes them, so long as it takes Trump away
from sixteen hundred Pennsylvania Avenue. This is their strategy. This is what they
want to do. If you've got to plan claim that you're going to go
to prison if Trump is elected, then that's fine if you've got to claim.
But see, it's gonna get ratcheted up from this point in time.
So it went from someone's gonna be thrown in prison, Trump's gonna come after
them politically, to now Trump, There's gonna be more killings, according to
max And she's a sitting congresswoman, sitting congresswoman from the People's Republic of California,
saying that there will be more killings if Trump becomes president, and that
she is concerned for her safety. I don't want Maxine Waters to be concerned
for her safety. I don't want anybody to be concerned for their safety because
of their political beliefs and so forth, because there's lunatics out there that would
hurt people really of all different ideologies and political beliefs and so forth. There's
crazy people out there. I don't want that. But I also think that
this is a little bit of a stretch, or maybe a lot of a
stretch of the imagination here, faux outrage is designed again to get people to
think that, I mean, think about where we've come. The narrative now,
they don't have a lot of places to take us from here, my
friends. The narrative now is your country will collapse if Trump is president.
That's the narrative, and it's the narrative that's in the wake of political prosecution,
of law fare, of political warfare against the current Republican nominee, the
presumptive nominee from the Republican Party, Donald J. Trump, who is going
to be announcing, hopefully here soon, his VP choice, which he's hinted
at a couple times. The VP will be at Thursday's debate, although I
don't know if they'll announce them there. I think they're gonna wait a little
bit on that, but we'll see. Anyway. All this is to say
Maxine Waters, she's the one that's kind of doing the test. She's kind
of you know, there were canaries in the coal mines right back in the
day, and when you take the canary down there, and when the canary
was having trouble, ultimately, if the canary passed away, that the miners
knew we better get out of here. The gases are such that this is
a dangerous place to be. Let's get out of here before it hurts us.
And so Maxine Waters, she the entire Democrat Party has become crazy,
but she's on the fringe of that. She's actually there's another fringe that kind
of starts with the squad, and I would say Maxine Waters, and their
job is to even step outside the crazy of the Democrat Party took fringe,
and to see how far that they can. But they can take these crazy
ideas and make them appear to seem reasonable or you know, how far they
can advance the political narrative with them. And then you've got the core Democrats.
Of course, the the folks who are less from less radical districts have
to distance themselves as far as possible from that. That's why you actually have
some Democrats who are calling for border security. Now they're from districts that are
not radically insane leftist districts. But meanwhile, the radical leftists can go out
there and do all sorts of ridiculous things and make ridiculous claims because of course
they're guaranteed to win anyway, because crazy wins in those places. So that
being said, Maxine Waters on MSNBC telling people that she's concerned about the safety
of so many people in this country, particularly people of color. Okay,
here we go seen Waters talking about what happens if Trump is elected and how
she's going to be concerned and afraid for the threats against lawmakers are on the
rise again after hitting an all time high in twenty twenty one when Donald Trump's
followers stormed the Capitol on January sixth. Last year, the Capitol Police investigated
more than eight thousand threats against members of Congress, an increase from twenty twenty
two. A spokesman for the department paused eight thousand threats against lawmakers and twenty
twenty three, is that what he said? An increase over the previous year,
But so eight thousand, folks, In case it needs to be said,
threats against lawmakers is unacceptable. It doesn't matter if they're made to Republicans
or Democrats. It doesn't matter if it's made against men or women, white
candidates, black candidates, Hispanic whatever. This is unacceptable. It's unacceptable.
But they want you to think that Republicans and Trump's they want you to think
that Trump's out there condoning this stuff. Predicted twenty twenty four will be quote
a very busy year for our special agents. This week, a Texas man
who vowed to kill Congresswoman Maxine Waters was sentenced to thirty three months in prison
and a ten thousand dollars fine. The man left good by the way,
well, I mean, look, assuming that this is a legitimate case,
I'm not following it. But if this is what happened, if he's threatening
to kill a sitting congresswoman, again, it makes no difference to me,
your political affiliation, background, whatever, there should be consequences for that.
And it sounds like there worth thirty three months in prison for this. Water's
voicemails with violent and racist threats in twenty twenty two and doubled down when police
warned him to stop. Congressman Waters attendant demand sentencing hearing. She told the
court the threats gave her nightmares, it made her and her family fear for
their lives. The Los Angeles Times reported that the congresswoman described herself as quote
haunted. Joining me now is Democratic Congressman Maxine Waters of California. She's the
ranking member. Okay, so he's introducing her. She's going to say something.
So the background there is troubling. It's one case, for starters,
it's one case, and it's one unacceptable and it sounds like it was handled
properly from what I know, which again I never know what I'm being told
from these jokers and clowns in the media. But shouldn't happen. They should
She shouldn't be treated like this, even though, by the way, remember
this is the same woman. I'm not saying this, this is does not
justify this whatsoever. Do you not misunderstand? But remember when Trump was was
president, she told people to follow around and harass Trump's cabinet people that were
on Trump's team. Remember this. I remember this. I can see the
clip in my mind as she's She's telling her people, telling her people,
the people in the audience to basically harassed these Don't let him eat in peace.
Remember that if you see him at a restaurant, don't let him eat
in peace. Now does that mean that she should be treated like she was?
Absolutely not. But to act like she's not contributing to this sort of
environment, not to that same degree. Don't misunderstand in would be an erroneous
thing to say or to believe. Here she is of the House Financial Services
Committee. Congreso Waters, as always, thank you for coming to the Saturday
Show. You've been in the public eye for decades. Why were these threats
particularly painful? Well, you know it was sinister. Here was a man
who continued to call four times and he made ratio comments. He basically said,
not only was he going to put a bullet between my eyes, he
was going to cut my throat. And I want to tell you it did
get to me. I'm not someone who walked around, you know, just
fearful all the time. But this was more sinister. Again, it was
deadly. And so I wanted by those kinds of comments coming from him.
Congresman, what made you want to face your harassmer in court? I wanted
to see who this human being was and when he saw me, what was
it about me that made him want to kill me? What had I said?
What did I that made him want to slip my throat or to put
a bullet between my eyes? And so I listened to him, and I
hope he listened to me. I had my children in court with me.
My daughter was there and my son was there, and they're always fearful that
I'm going to be killed. And of course my staff has to endure these
kinds of threats. This isn't the first one we've had. We've had some
others sentence and put in jail, but this one seems more consistent and seems
more serious. Again, it seems as if this man was intent on not
only threatening me, but he said he had people in the Los Angeles area,
some of his friends or groups of people that he works with, that
we're going to get me. That they had a contract out on my life.
Okay, so you get the idea of reprehensible stuff, no doubt.
But also they want to use this, of course, to say that voting
for Trump's going to lead to more this. Voting for Trump is going to
lead to more of this. That's the narrative. I got to take a
break here, my friend, Sit tight, you're listening to conservative not being
to talk. I am your host, the one and only time to back
in just a minute. Welcome back, my friends. This is the third
and final segment of this hour of the program. We've been talking about Representative
Maxine Waters, who had been threatened, who had been threatened to be killed
by an individual. This individual was charged, has been convicted, has been
sentenced to thirty three months, which is terrible stuff. Again, it's terrible
no matter who it happens to. I find it ridiculous. I have to
say this part because in today's world. In today's world, of course,
everything stems from narratives. Those narratives often stem from, well, this idea
that one group of people is of course responsible for all the rage and just
the condition, the overall climate, political climate. Now I'm not talking about
the climate as far as temperatures go. That, of course we know is
for people who are driving SUVs. I'm kidding. I'm kidding, But that's
the narrative that they've established for that. But I played that part of the
interview last segment that leads to what I want to get to this segment,
This is really what I wanted to get to, where she's asked by the
host of the show, Maxine Waters, representative from the People's Republic of California.
She's asked how she feels about these sorts of threats continuing if Trump is
reelected. Remember, we've gotten to the point where they've already threatened that if
Trump wins, he's going to establish himself as king. He's hitler, they've
told us. Now we are being told that individuals are just going to I
guess, be killed more frequently because Trump's in office. That's I mean,
that's where they've gotten. This is the only way just think about it.
This way, the only way that they can I guess win. The support
of some people is to take the conversation this far. None of this is
rooted in reality, none of this has any sort of basis in logic and
so forth. But this is of course what is being proclaimed out there.
Before I play that SoundBite, my friends, let me remind you about our
partnership with the good folks at z Stack. Z Stack is a trusted brand
that has been formulated by doctor Zolinko, and they create natural health supplements that
allow you to take better care of your health. They got a series of
products, a series of formulations that you can find on their website zstacklife dot
com slash todd and you can see how these products can help you help you
with everything from just general immunity to sleep to dealing with flu like symptoms.
They've got some most of the formulations are for adults, but they've also got
formulations for kids as well. Folks, we are responsible ultimately for our overall
health, and yes, diet and exercise are important, but it also is
important to supplement ourselves with things depending upon our personal needs, that maybe we
aren't able to get enough of through our regular diets and so forth. So
zstaklife dot com is where you can go zstack life slash excuse me, zstacklife
dot com slash Todd, use my name Todd check out. You're gonna save
fifteen off of your fifteen percent off your purchase. Z stack empowering you to
stay prepared, stay safe, and stay strong. So here's Maxine Waters.
I'm not going to get to all of this, but I want you to
hear this back and forth about how much more of a threat people like Maxine
Waters and other Americans will face. According again to the narrative here, if
Trump is elected president here in November. Here it is concern are you,
congresswoman, about your safety if Donald Trump is re elected. Well, I'm
very concerned, not only about my safety and not only about the safety of
members of Congress. I'm concerned about the safety of so many people in this
country, particularly people of color. Donald threat. Donald Trump has said that
if he does not win, it's going to be fraud. And because I
thought we were more afraid if he were to win, now you're saying you're
more afraid if he doesn't win, because that's when he's going to tell people
it was fraud. It's going to be fraud, there's going to be blood
in the streets. He threatens about a civil war, and he threatens there
it's going to be violence. So I say all of this it's motivational with
many of those who are racist, who are sending it home, listening to
him, and they're taking him up on his threats even before the elections take
place. And so it's about thousands, maybe millions of people, you know,
being threatened and being risk because of Donald Trump and his desire to wreak
revenge on anything and everybody. And this is quickly. I don't have a
lot of time left. But so it sounds like she's making the case if
you don't, I'm just I'm just using her own thinking, her own logic.
Here she says he asked her you worried about there being more violence if
Trump wins. It sounds like the way she answered the question, she was
afraid of more violence if Trump loses or if Biden wins. So I guess
if you flip this on its head and actually follow what she's logically saying,
I think she's saying that you better vote for Trump if you don't want there
to be violence in the streets. That's how I take this. I mean,
this is just incoherent gibberish. This just I don't know the details the
dates of when these You know, the gentleman that's been convicted and spending thirty
three months in jail in prison for his threats against her, I don't know
when that took place, but I don't believe it. I don't believe it
was during Trump's presidency. Maybe it was, so then it sounds like there's
more of a risk, more of a danger if you don't vote for Trump.
So I guess Maxine Waters is out there endorsing Trump. That's what I'm
starting to piece together from that incoherent answer. She just scaveed there. But
anyway, music's telling me it's time to wrap up. My friends, Thank
you so much for listening, Have a wonderful day. We'll talk soon. SDG