1
00:00:08,560 --> 00:00:15,160
Today's trip gast is brought to you
by Texas Association of Community Colleges. Texas

2
00:00:15,199 --> 00:00:20,679
Community Colleges are the state's economic engine
for recovery. Our colleges provide credentials that

3
00:00:20,760 --> 00:00:28,839
meet regional and local workforce demands.
Is it tacc dot org and Texas BioMed

4
00:00:28,960 --> 00:00:34,799
pioneers and shares scientific breakthroughs that protect
our communities. Health starts with science.

5
00:00:35,679 --> 00:00:43,880
Health starts at Texas BioMed. Visit
tx BioMed dot org. From more patriocast

6
00:00:43,960 --> 00:00:47,399
listeners, We have a favor to
ask. Would you go to Texas Tribune

7
00:00:47,439 --> 00:00:53,600
dot org slash tribcast survey to take
a five minute listener survey. Texas Tribune

8
00:00:53,640 --> 00:00:57,320
journalists want to know what you think
of our podcasts. Again. That survey

9
00:00:57,439 --> 00:01:03,479
is at Texas Tribune dot org slash
trib cast survey all one word. We

10
00:01:03,520 --> 00:01:19,560
appreciate your feedback. Hello, and
welcome to the Texas Tribune trip Cast for

11
00:01:19,599 --> 00:01:23,400
August fourth, twenty twenty three.
My name is Matthew Watkins, Managing editor

12
00:01:23,480 --> 00:01:26,359
of News for the Tribune, and
this week we were going to talk about

13
00:01:26,400 --> 00:01:30,640
Texas A and M University. The
school has been thrown into turmoil the past

14
00:01:30,719 --> 00:01:34,959
month due to two cases in which
questions were raised about academic freedom and the

15
00:01:36,079 --> 00:01:40,560
influenced politics and personnel decisions at the
school. The first one kind of broke

16
00:01:40,599 --> 00:01:46,000
out into the news on June lie
eleventh, when Kathleen McElroy, a former

17
00:01:46,120 --> 00:01:49,439
editor of The New York Time at
the New York Times and former director of

18
00:01:49,480 --> 00:01:53,200
the UT Austin Journalism Program, who
had been announced, you know, weeks

19
00:01:53,239 --> 00:01:57,719
earlier too much celebration to be leading
the revived journalism program at A and M,

20
00:01:57,920 --> 00:02:00,560
told one of our guests today,
Kate McGee, that she would no

21
00:02:00,640 --> 00:02:05,400
longer be joining her all in the
matter. The reason was that A and

22
00:02:05,519 --> 00:02:08,840
M had essentially walked back her offer
of a tenured position because of, as

23
00:02:08,879 --> 00:02:14,039
she was told d EI hysteria.
It seemed that some people in power had

24
00:02:14,120 --> 00:02:17,240
raised concerns about Nacole Roy, a
black woman, leading the program, due

25
00:02:17,280 --> 00:02:21,759
to her association with the New York
Times and her work to support students and

26
00:02:21,879 --> 00:02:25,759
journalists of color. You know.
News of this development sparked outrage. The

27
00:02:25,800 --> 00:02:30,960
president at A and M eventually resigned
Kathy Banks. But two weeks after that

28
00:02:31,000 --> 00:02:36,400
story came out, Kate and her
colleague James Brian reported on the case of

29
00:02:36,479 --> 00:02:39,319
Joy Alonzo, another A and M
professor, this one in the School of

30
00:02:39,680 --> 00:02:45,080
Health, who had been placed on
paid administrative leave after she was accused of

31
00:02:45,120 --> 00:02:50,960
criticizing Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick in a
lecture at the University of Texas Medical Branch

32
00:02:50,960 --> 00:02:54,639
in Galveston. She was censured by
UTMB, but later allowed to return to

33
00:02:54,680 --> 00:02:59,000
her job at A and M,
but only after a warning about, you

34
00:02:59,039 --> 00:03:02,240
know what, to be careful about
what she said in lectures. Before we

35
00:03:04,039 --> 00:03:07,960
announced the guests, I should probably
make my own little disclosure here, which

36
00:03:07,000 --> 00:03:10,000
is that I am a two thousand
and eight graduate of Texas A and M.

37
00:03:10,680 --> 00:03:15,120
Some would say I'm an obnoxiously loud
aggie football fan. I'm not sure

38
00:03:15,159 --> 00:03:19,719
if that's a fair classification, though
I also served on the committee that explored

39
00:03:19,759 --> 00:03:24,280
bringing back journalism to Texas A and
M. I've met Kathleen mackerel mackel relay

40
00:03:24,360 --> 00:03:29,599
several times through you know, the
small aggie journalism circles, including one time

41
00:03:29,639 --> 00:03:31,960
sixteen years ago when she gave twenty
two year old me a tour of the

42
00:03:31,960 --> 00:03:36,879
New York Times building. But let's
introduce our guests. First of all.

43
00:03:37,360 --> 00:03:40,000
Kate McGee, Hey, Kate did
you know that I went to Adam and

44
00:03:40,120 --> 00:03:45,240
I had an inkling, but I
had not I wasn't really completely sure.

45
00:03:45,840 --> 00:03:49,879
Yeah, okay, very good.
And Kate of course covers higher education for

46
00:03:49,919 --> 00:03:53,639
the Tribune, and James Barragan,
who covers politics. Hey James, Hey

47
00:03:53,680 --> 00:04:00,000
Matthew. All right, so let's
talk about what happened in the developed these

48
00:04:00,080 --> 00:04:03,639
two stories this week. This has
been in the news for a couple of

49
00:04:03,680 --> 00:04:11,719
weeks, but yesterday on Thursday,
in and put out kind of reports detailing

50
00:04:11,759 --> 00:04:16,040
what they found when they investigated these
cases, both the Alonso case and the

51
00:04:16,120 --> 00:04:19,279
maclroy case. Kate, you had
a story on this. Can you kind

52
00:04:19,279 --> 00:04:25,519
of tell us the top lines of
what they found in that investigation? Sure?

53
00:04:25,800 --> 00:04:29,279
So it was a huge report.
I mean, it was a five

54
00:04:29,360 --> 00:04:34,720
page kind of summary bulleting exactly what
they determined to have happened based on interviews

55
00:04:34,800 --> 00:04:42,240
with everyone involved. And then along
with that report came about five hundred pages

56
00:04:42,319 --> 00:04:49,000
plus of emails and text messages internally
from Boards of Region met Board of Regents

57
00:04:49,040 --> 00:04:55,959
members and between former A and M
president Kathy Banks and some of the other

58
00:04:56,759 --> 00:05:03,759
kind of department level employees discussing all
this higher and kind of detailing the behind

59
00:05:03,759 --> 00:05:12,079
the scenes negotiations of what had happened
to ultimately lead Macilroy to decide not to

60
00:05:12,120 --> 00:05:17,800
come and take this position. The
report confirmed that the regents, multiple regents

61
00:05:17,920 --> 00:05:26,480
had voice concerns about macilroy's kind of
perceived left leaning credentials, that she came

62
00:05:26,519 --> 00:05:30,639
from The New York Times, that
she had come from UT Austin, and

63
00:05:30,720 --> 00:05:35,920
that their idea or their perception was
that this new journalism program was supposed to

64
00:05:35,959 --> 00:05:42,800
be bringing more conservative voices into journalism
and that this higher was going to make

65
00:05:42,839 --> 00:05:48,639
it more difficult to do that.
The text messages also confirmed that President Banks

66
00:05:48,720 --> 00:05:54,439
or former President Banks, was very
heavily involved in these negotiations, even though

67
00:05:54,439 --> 00:06:00,759
she had told the Faculty Senate that
she had no idea that the offer letters

68
00:06:00,839 --> 00:06:04,920
and the kind of negotiations with macilroy
had been watered down since the original letter

69
00:06:05,920 --> 00:06:12,879
was signed by macilroy in mid June, the text messages show that she was,

70
00:06:13,000 --> 00:06:15,920
you know, having lots of back
and forth about the different changes that

71
00:06:15,959 --> 00:06:20,000
A and M was proposing to macilroy, and there was some really kind of

72
00:06:20,079 --> 00:06:27,199
ugly comments about McElroy between her and
the interim Dean of the College of Arts

73
00:06:27,240 --> 00:06:31,600
and Sciences who also resigned from that
post, jose Bermudez. And then ultimately

74
00:06:31,639 --> 00:06:35,160
the other big news was that the
school settled with macilroy over all of this,

75
00:06:35,360 --> 00:06:40,720
and she walked away with a million
dollars from the university and is now

76
00:06:40,839 --> 00:06:43,920
going to be able to stay in
Austin and she will be, you know,

77
00:06:43,959 --> 00:06:48,319
still teaching at ut Austin this fall, James. They also looked into

78
00:06:48,360 --> 00:06:50,959
the Joy Alonzo case. Do you
want to give us a recap of what

79
00:06:51,720 --> 00:06:58,000
happened there? Yeah, Well,
essentially it's a case of political interference in

80
00:06:59,360 --> 00:07:03,439
an academic work and what they can
or can't say while giving a lecture on

81
00:07:03,480 --> 00:07:09,160
their own topic of expertise. What
happened with Professor Joey Alonzo, or respected

82
00:07:09,160 --> 00:07:13,920
opioids expert in the state, is
that in March she gave a guest lecture

83
00:07:14,079 --> 00:07:18,040
at UTMB in Galveston where she talked
about the opioid epidemic. You know,

84
00:07:18,160 --> 00:07:21,639
we were not at the lecture obviously, and there's no recording of it,

85
00:07:23,399 --> 00:07:29,279
but Kate got slides of her PowerPoint
presentation, so we saw that it was

86
00:07:29,360 --> 00:07:35,439
about the opioid epidemic, how to
administer in a lock zone to save lives

87
00:07:35,519 --> 00:07:41,519
and policies that may help in the
opioid epidemic, and everything seemed to be

88
00:07:41,600 --> 00:07:46,000
going gravy. She'd done this talk
several years in a row at UTMB.

89
00:07:46,160 --> 00:07:51,319
She's given this talk, she said, thousands of times. But then to

90
00:07:51,399 --> 00:07:57,319
her surprise, when she got home
back to college station, she had phone

91
00:07:57,319 --> 00:08:01,079
calls and emails saying, hey,
we need to get in touch with you.

92
00:08:01,240 --> 00:08:03,600
There's been a problem, there's been
an issue, and she was put

93
00:08:03,600 --> 00:08:11,480
on administrative leave. Now, our
reporting found that the Land Commissioner Don Buckingham's

94
00:08:11,560 --> 00:08:15,720
daughter is the first year medical student
at UTMB, and that she attended the

95
00:08:15,800 --> 00:08:22,439
lecture. After that, Don Buckingham
called ut I'm sorry, A and M

96
00:08:22,519 --> 00:08:31,079
University System and Chancellor John Sharpe as
well as I'm sorry Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick

97
00:08:31,199 --> 00:08:35,320
and the university system's government relations people. And then Dan Patrick gout in touch

98
00:08:35,360 --> 00:08:39,879
with John Sharp about this comment,
and you know, just a few hours

99
00:08:39,919 --> 00:08:43,039
later, Joey Alonzo was placed on
administrative leaves. A whole fiasco because nobody

100
00:08:43,080 --> 00:08:48,240
would tell us exactly what the comment
was, but it eventually came out or

101
00:08:48,320 --> 00:08:54,279
Don Buckingham eventually confirmed all our reporting
saying basically that the alleged comment was that,

102
00:08:54,840 --> 00:09:00,559
you know, the lieutenant governor that
Professor Alonzo had said something the lieutenant

103
00:09:00,600 --> 00:09:05,600
governor saying that, you know,
kids deserve to die who die in opioid

104
00:09:05,639 --> 00:09:11,799
overdoses. The investigation into Alonzo,
she was cleared. There's been a review

105
00:09:11,879 --> 00:09:16,159
now of the investigation after our reporting, and again she was cleared. There's

106
00:09:16,159 --> 00:09:20,799
no basis, there's no substantiation that
she made a comment like that, but

107
00:09:20,840 --> 00:09:24,399
it was concerning just coming off,
you know, the revelations that we made

108
00:09:24,399 --> 00:09:28,000
in our story were concerning just on
top of the previous story that Kate had

109
00:09:28,039 --> 00:09:33,039
also reported on Kathleen McElroy. And
it's been I don't know, it's been

110
00:09:33,200 --> 00:09:37,279
a full month of turmoil I think
over there and difficult times, and I

111
00:09:37,279 --> 00:09:41,080
think difficult times still to continue because
the faculty Senate is still looking into Joey

112
00:09:41,120 --> 00:09:46,000
Alonzo's case and whether protocol and policies
were followed about how to play someone an

113
00:09:45,919 --> 00:09:48,759
administrative leave. Yeah, I mean, Kate, it seems like the reaction

114
00:09:48,840 --> 00:09:54,080
to both of those stories among faculty
on UT has been a lot of concern

115
00:09:54,879 --> 00:09:58,360
about, you know, the political
influence on who has hired at A and

116
00:09:58,519 --> 00:10:03,720
M, and what the people at
M are allowed to say. Is interesting

117
00:10:03,840 --> 00:10:11,120
to see the university come out yesterday
and essentially apologize and acknowledge that they,

118
00:10:11,240 --> 00:10:18,879
you know, the quote unquote mistakes
were made statement related to Kathleen mceloy,

119
00:10:18,000 --> 00:10:22,200
but be much more I think defensive
and try to argue that they didn't do

120
00:10:22,240 --> 00:10:31,879
anything wrong in the Alonso case.
What's the distinction they're making there? I

121
00:10:31,879 --> 00:10:39,720
think that I mean the way that
especially and you know today John Sharp put

122
00:10:39,720 --> 00:10:43,799
out a an op ed in a
couple of newspapers kind of also defending the

123
00:10:43,879 --> 00:10:52,159
way in which this was handled and
really putting the the blame on this UTMB

124
00:10:52,720 --> 00:10:56,279
censure email that was put out saying
like, you know, when you get

125
00:10:56,399 --> 00:10:58,080
when you see an email like that, and when you get you know,

126
00:10:58,120 --> 00:11:03,240
as he characterized, is it like
a non threatening call from the Lieutenant governor.

127
00:11:03,799 --> 00:11:07,960
Of course you need to check out
exactly you know, what went down

128
00:11:09,120 --> 00:11:13,159
here. I think the concern from
the faculty has been the speed in which

129
00:11:13,480 --> 00:11:18,120
this all happened and the way in
which it was a little bit as if

130
00:11:20,120 --> 00:11:26,120
Alonso was really put on the defensive
to prove her innocence rather than trying to

131
00:11:26,159 --> 00:11:30,840
confirm if there was any basis for
the allegation to begin with. I think

132
00:11:30,840 --> 00:11:33,320
the McElroy situation, you know,
it could be a matter of there were

133
00:11:33,360 --> 00:11:39,919
just very I mean that the text
messages were so blatantly like clear that there

134
00:11:39,960 --> 00:11:46,279
had been some and that banks had
lied, and to the faculty Senate that

135
00:11:46,360 --> 00:11:52,440
it was harder to a harder situation
to potentially defend. But I think it's

136
00:11:52,480 --> 00:11:56,840
a matter of perspective of where you
maybe sit in the Alonso case and how

137
00:11:56,960 --> 00:12:03,279
much you know, a phone call
from the lieutenant governor might appear to be

138
00:12:03,840 --> 00:12:09,720
m like influencing, influencing someone's decisions, and the kind of chilling effect that

139
00:12:09,120 --> 00:12:13,519
you know, an innocuous call from
the lieutenant governor to Sharp has much more

140
00:12:13,519 --> 00:12:18,159
meaning to a faculty member who is
hearing that the lieutenant governor is concerned about

141
00:12:18,159 --> 00:12:22,080
what they're saying, Yeah, and
I mean, this is this is their

142
00:12:22,159 --> 00:12:24,120
spin on it. Obviously they're saying, well, it's just just you know,

143
00:12:24,159 --> 00:12:26,399
we get these calls all the time. We had to check it out.

144
00:12:26,960 --> 00:12:31,279
But I mean I trust our readers
to to, you know, look

145
00:12:31,320 --> 00:12:35,240
at the story and make sense of
it and look at the timeline and just

146
00:12:35,440 --> 00:12:39,440
figure out that their timeline does not
make sense. They're trying to say that,

147
00:12:39,519 --> 00:12:41,759
you know, they did this because
of the UTMB censor, But if

148
00:12:41,759 --> 00:12:46,480
you look at our original story,
you know the Lieutenant Governor and his team

149
00:12:46,480 --> 00:12:50,519
were talking to Chance or Sharp in
the system like two hours after the lecture

150
00:12:50,519 --> 00:12:54,960
and two hours at least two hours
before the UTMB sensor came out. Like

151
00:12:56,320 --> 00:12:58,399
they are trying to spin it every
which way they can to say, well,

152
00:12:58,440 --> 00:13:01,639
what else did you want us to
do? This was? This was

153
00:13:01,759 --> 00:13:05,159
you know, there's the UTMB is
making a serious allegation. But if you

154
00:13:05,200 --> 00:13:09,159
look at the timeline that we've clearly
laid out, and then they repeated in

155
00:13:09,399 --> 00:13:15,480
their memos of the review that timeline
that it doesn't add up. It doesn't

156
00:13:15,480 --> 00:13:18,720
add up that the censor is what
set this thing off, and it's it's

157
00:13:18,759 --> 00:13:22,440
clear that there was a chain of
phone calls and text messages that began with

158
00:13:22,519 --> 00:13:28,200
Don Buckingham UM and that you know, maybe it was a minute phone long

159
00:13:28,279 --> 00:13:33,159
phone call with Dan Patrick UM,
but that doesn't matter if my boss that

160
00:13:33,240 --> 00:13:39,120
pays me my salary and funds my
programs is calling me and complaining that somebody

161
00:13:39,200 --> 00:13:43,720
is saying something mean about him.
UM. And then and then you're in

162
00:13:43,720 --> 00:13:48,200
the middle of negotiations and the legislature
over how much money you're going to get

163
00:13:48,240 --> 00:13:54,799
from that boss to fund your programs
and like debating different legislation that you know

164
00:13:54,960 --> 00:13:58,960
is going to have a direct impact
on your faculty and how your universities work.

165
00:13:58,720 --> 00:14:01,240
Right, and then you turn around, you turn around and and say,

166
00:14:01,279 --> 00:14:05,559
hey, let's look into this.
Um. You know, I think

167
00:14:05,559 --> 00:14:09,559
that's pretty clear, you know,
political interference and they spend which whichever way

168
00:14:09,559 --> 00:14:11,360
they want. But I think we
should talk about what Kate is talking about,

169
00:14:11,440 --> 00:14:16,200
which is that you know, sharp
in the system are dealing with massive

170
00:14:16,240 --> 00:14:20,200
amounts of pressure at that point in
March when when when this all goes down,

171
00:14:20,240 --> 00:14:24,159
there's the d EI push, there's
tenure push, which they ultimately just

172
00:14:24,240 --> 00:14:28,759
adopt what what A and M does. So we can talk about that.

173
00:14:28,799 --> 00:14:31,960
But I think like our readers are
smart enough, and any reader really just

174
00:14:33,080 --> 00:14:35,799
look at the story like they are
going to try to spend it every which

175
00:14:35,799 --> 00:14:39,799
way they can. But the timeline
is pretty clear. And you know,

176
00:14:39,000 --> 00:14:43,480
I think the fact that the way
the complaint went down, I mean,

177
00:14:43,519 --> 00:14:46,840
one of our issues as reporting this
story is like we can even figure out

178
00:14:46,879 --> 00:14:48,759
what the complaint was or who made
a complaint like there to our knowledge,

179
00:14:48,759 --> 00:14:52,519
there isn't like an official like paper
complaint. Like what sets this thing off

180
00:14:52,720 --> 00:14:56,200
is the Dan Patrick phone call to
Sharpe, who then you know, now

181
00:14:56,240 --> 00:15:01,039
he's talking about you know not then
the staffer went to But there's a clear

182
00:15:01,080 --> 00:15:05,200
connection here between Sharpe in that phone
call and then Sharpe telling his team to

183
00:15:05,240 --> 00:15:09,679
go to Banks and then Banks now
is what they're saying. Then they start

184
00:15:09,720 --> 00:15:15,080
the investigation like it's it's pretty clear
here, and I don't I don't know

185
00:15:15,120 --> 00:15:16,399
what kind of yarn they're trying to
spin over there. Well. Also,

186
00:15:16,480 --> 00:15:20,440
I mean in one more little connection
there that you mentioned in your original story

187
00:15:20,559 --> 00:15:24,320
is the text message from Sharpe to
Dan Patrick the you know, the day

188
00:15:24,320 --> 00:15:28,480
of this, saying, essentially,
the professor has been put on administrative leave

189
00:15:28,799 --> 00:15:33,279
pending her possible firing should be done
at the end of the week. She

190
00:15:33,399 --> 00:15:37,080
was, of course not fired,
and you have a and MS essentially saying

191
00:15:37,120 --> 00:15:39,960
here, yeah, we looked into
it. She didn't say anything bad,

192
00:15:41,399 --> 00:15:43,559
and she you know, was allowed
to return to her job. There's nothing

193
00:15:43,559 --> 00:15:46,000
to see here, you know.
One question that I would ask of them

194
00:15:46,120 --> 00:15:50,399
is what if they had found that
she had directly criticized Dan Patrick, what

195
00:15:50,440 --> 00:15:54,879
do you do then? I mean, the fact that you're investigating would suggest

196
00:15:54,960 --> 00:16:00,840
that there's some reason to believe that, you know, there there is some

197
00:16:00,960 --> 00:16:06,440
kind of possible fireable offense of saying
something bad about the Lieutenant governor in a

198
00:16:06,519 --> 00:16:11,600
lecture, and that in and of
itself raises questions of academic freedom and the

199
00:16:11,639 --> 00:16:15,559
ability to kind of speak your mind
and give your opinion as a as a

200
00:16:15,639 --> 00:16:18,000
as a professor or someone who studies
this issue well. And the fact that

201
00:16:18,080 --> 00:16:22,840
the way they that the chance awarded
that text message, like that last part

202
00:16:22,840 --> 00:16:26,480
too, like about regarding firing her, Like why you know that it just

203
00:16:26,519 --> 00:16:30,360
seems to like just jump the gun
all the way? You know, perhaps

204
00:16:30,440 --> 00:16:33,200
they had you know that he says
it's an innocuous short phone call, but

205
00:16:33,320 --> 00:16:37,960
then we're talking about firing her in
this text message. So was that something

206
00:16:37,039 --> 00:16:41,480
that that was implied in the phone
call or why is he bringing it up

207
00:16:41,519 --> 00:16:44,919
like it does seem to like jump
the gun. And if if I'm the

208
00:16:44,960 --> 00:16:48,919
faculty, I would be very upset, and I understand why they are concerned.

209
00:16:48,960 --> 00:16:51,440
I mean, it just seems to
be jumping the gun. And I

210
00:16:51,480 --> 00:16:55,639
don't I'm no HR expert, but
it just seems to not the appropriate way

211
00:16:55,679 --> 00:16:57,639
to handle that or to message that, even even if the complaint was a

212
00:16:57,720 --> 00:17:03,440
legitimate complaint, know, you want
to have due process here, and if

213
00:17:03,480 --> 00:17:07,359
you're already talking about firing her,
you know, just bright does bring up

214
00:17:07,359 --> 00:17:10,279
a lot of other questions. Yeah, And I think that's why the Faculty

215
00:17:10,279 --> 00:17:14,920
Senate has been so adamant that they
want the school to spell out what exactly

216
00:17:15,160 --> 00:17:18,920
the policy is around administrative leave,
What would warrant putting someone on that on

217
00:17:19,079 --> 00:17:26,480
administrative leave, and how do you
ensure that that person received due process?

218
00:17:26,519 --> 00:17:30,359
Which I think, you know,
the faculty Senate and from faculty we spoke

219
00:17:30,400 --> 00:17:34,960
to. The concern was the perception
from these text messages that she was guilty.

220
00:17:34,960 --> 00:17:40,559
I needed to prove her innocence rather
than the other way around, right,

221
00:17:40,799 --> 00:17:45,759
And I think there is a similar
question of like specificity to be asked

222
00:17:45,759 --> 00:17:49,160
about the Machelroy case as well,
because John Sharp comes out here and says,

223
00:17:49,319 --> 00:17:53,440
you know, mistakes were made,
he apologizes to Macilroy. They're not

224
00:17:53,519 --> 00:18:00,440
being very specific about what those mistakes
they think were actually made where there was

225
00:18:00,440 --> 00:18:03,720
it a mistake in the vetting process? Was it a mistake in allowing you

226
00:18:03,759 --> 00:18:08,240
know, conservative forces that are to
raise concerned about this and to influence the

227
00:18:08,279 --> 00:18:12,759
offer that was made. I think
there are a lot of questions now about

228
00:18:12,839 --> 00:18:17,880
you know, hiring a journalist and
professor, or you know, maybe even

229
00:18:17,960 --> 00:18:22,960
a future history professor or a future
you know, communication professor or any other

230
00:18:23,039 --> 00:18:27,279
kind of job. About what kind
of scrutiny is this higher going to get?

231
00:18:27,480 --> 00:18:33,960
Am I going to face heat from
the university president or the regions for

232
00:18:33,039 --> 00:18:38,640
making this higher? Or even you
know, if I'm a professor giving a

233
00:18:38,720 --> 00:18:41,960
lecture? Am I going to be
get paid on it? Put on paid

234
00:18:42,000 --> 00:18:47,119
administrative leave? Is my job going
to be at risk if the lieutenant governor

235
00:18:47,200 --> 00:18:51,319
or someone else comes and complains about
this. It's not just the outcome that

236
00:18:51,359 --> 00:18:53,240
matters, it's the process that you
went through, in the message that that

237
00:18:53,359 --> 00:18:59,880
sends, in the possible chilling effect
it might have the next time someone wants

238
00:18:59,880 --> 00:19:04,440
to to share their professional opinion on
something or make a hire of someone you

239
00:19:04,480 --> 00:19:10,640
know from a background that certain people
of political stripes might object to. Well,

240
00:19:10,799 --> 00:19:12,359
I think that's happening now right,
I mean that that is the concern.

241
00:19:12,400 --> 00:19:15,640
I mean, we've seen we've seen
people talking about professors who now are

242
00:19:15,680 --> 00:19:22,720
scared to, you know, talk
about issues in which they have expertise.

243
00:19:22,759 --> 00:19:25,839
I mean, I saw a comment
from someone, a fellow reporter, saying

244
00:19:25,839 --> 00:19:29,559
they try to interview someone over there
about the topic of immigration, and that

245
00:19:29,640 --> 00:19:32,039
professor said, you know, I
think I'd rather not. I don't want

246
00:19:32,039 --> 00:19:33,799
to get in trouble. And that's
what you don't want to see. That's

247
00:19:33,799 --> 00:19:38,759
the whole point of academic freedom.
And listen, I mean, let's let's

248
00:19:38,839 --> 00:19:45,279
just say that perhaps Professor Alonso did
say something objectionable, but it is clear

249
00:19:45,359 --> 00:19:49,119
from the investigations that there is no
substantiation that she said these things that she's

250
00:19:49,119 --> 00:19:56,799
alleged to have said. But if
she said something, you know, that

251
00:19:56,960 --> 00:20:03,279
is opposite of Lieutenant in our Patrick's
policies because of her expertise and in her

252
00:20:03,519 --> 00:20:12,519
expert opinion, that is harming the
fight against opioid overdoses, should she not

253
00:20:12,680 --> 00:20:17,920
be allowed to say that? Or
in the case of Kathleen McElroy, whom

254
00:20:18,279 --> 00:20:26,000
you know, focuses on diversity initiatives
in newsrooms and how to cover diverse communities,

255
00:20:26,960 --> 00:20:32,200
perhaps some people in the legislature is
clear they don't like that and they

256
00:20:32,200 --> 00:20:33,839
don't like focusing on that, but
should they be punished for that? Like

257
00:20:33,880 --> 00:20:37,079
that is their expertise, and I
think that is what we're talking about here.

258
00:20:37,160 --> 00:20:41,279
That is the chilling effect that you're
referring to, and we I think

259
00:20:41,279 --> 00:20:45,000
we're already seeing. All right,
let's pause for a minute and hear from

260
00:20:45,000 --> 00:20:51,000
our sponsors. Find affordable healthcare coverage
through Texas Farm Bureau Health Plans. For

261
00:20:51,160 --> 00:20:56,599
more information or to get a quote, go to www dot TFB health Plans

262
00:20:56,640 --> 00:21:04,599
dot com or call eight seven seven
five zero zero zero one four zero and

263
00:21:06,559 --> 00:21:11,319
at BNSF. Our commitment to community
doesn't stop at the tracks. In twenty

264
00:21:11,400 --> 00:21:18,519
twenty two, the BNSF Railway Foundation
contributed one point nine million to support Texas

265
00:21:18,599 --> 00:21:22,880
communities BNSF dot com. Okay,
Kate, I want to talk a little

266
00:21:22,920 --> 00:21:27,200
bit more about the climate that this
happened and because what we saw from these

267
00:21:27,279 --> 00:21:32,480
this reaction to Kathleen McElroy was a
lot of conversation. You know, a

268
00:21:32,759 --> 00:21:37,079
m released text messages, but among
regions, they released text messages and other

269
00:21:37,160 --> 00:21:41,960
kind of messages and emails among top
administrators some of whom Kathy Banks that the

270
00:21:42,319 --> 00:21:49,839
interim dean of Liberal Arts of Arts
and Sciences, who have both resigned from

271
00:21:49,839 --> 00:21:56,279
those posts posts since then. But
you saw in some of those conversations a

272
00:21:56,440 --> 00:22:00,960
lot of concern, particularly around the
idea of d EI right, and of

273
00:22:00,960 --> 00:22:07,480
course, we had this legislative session
in which the legislature passed a measure kind

274
00:22:07,480 --> 00:22:14,119
of banning d EI practices d EI
departments within universities, and there was some

275
00:22:14,400 --> 00:22:18,640
kind of alarm being raised that you
know, Kathleen McElroy had been asked or

276
00:22:18,680 --> 00:22:22,279
had had spent some time, you
know, on some committees doing some work

277
00:22:22,359 --> 00:22:27,480
for the university around diversity initiatives.
She was not hired to do that.

278
00:22:27,599 --> 00:22:34,359
She was hired to lead a journalism
program. And she clearly has a lot

279
00:22:34,400 --> 00:22:41,160
of you know, credible experience within
journalism, working not just at The New

280
00:22:41,240 --> 00:22:45,880
York Times, but at papers,
you know, all across the country.

281
00:22:47,000 --> 00:22:51,839
And it seemed to me that there
was a fear that just her past association

282
00:22:52,279 --> 00:22:57,759
or advocacy for you know, supporting
journalists of color or students of color was

283
00:22:57,880 --> 00:23:04,759
viewed by some potentially disqualifying and you
know, or a reason that this could

284
00:23:04,799 --> 00:23:10,240
create a problem you know, among
you know, the politicians in this state

285
00:23:10,359 --> 00:23:12,920
or the the you know, politically
appointed board of regents in this state.

286
00:23:12,960 --> 00:23:22,480
It seems to me like what we
see here is some fear and concern going

287
00:23:22,599 --> 00:23:32,000
beyond, far beyond even what the
official policy in laws of this state's say.

288
00:23:32,119 --> 00:23:34,720
Yeah, I mean, I think
that was some of the concern that

289
00:23:34,759 --> 00:23:40,839
we heard throughout you know, the
legislative session when these bills around d EI

290
00:23:40,920 --> 00:23:47,359
were being considered, that this was
kind of creating like a scarlet letter of

291
00:23:47,440 --> 00:23:52,880
sorts of people who were working in
this um, in this area of d

292
00:23:52,960 --> 00:24:00,880
EI and has you know, which
has now been oversimplified and mischaracterised as being

293
00:24:00,039 --> 00:24:07,839
kind of this area of proposed like
pushing a certain ideology onto students rather than

294
00:24:07,000 --> 00:24:11,319
maybe some of the work they're doing
in other ways to you know, build

295
00:24:11,319 --> 00:24:17,599
a more diverse and you know,
inclusive campus where student all students might be

296
00:24:17,640 --> 00:24:21,559
able to be successful. You know. Obviously where you fall in the political

297
00:24:21,559 --> 00:24:26,559
spectrum kind of depends on how you
view what DI is these days. But

298
00:24:26,640 --> 00:24:32,039
I think, you know, the
text messages among the regions made it very

299
00:24:32,039 --> 00:24:37,559
clear that many of them kind of
saw the work that was being done either

300
00:24:37,559 --> 00:24:41,720
with the journalism program, and with
kind of the changes that Banks was trying

301
00:24:41,720 --> 00:24:45,759
to make an A and M overall
as kind of a pushback to that and

302
00:24:45,960 --> 00:24:51,119
kind of to create a climate within
higher ed or within A and M that

303
00:24:51,240 --> 00:24:56,880
was more accepting and open to like
conservative voices on campus. You know,

304
00:24:56,519 --> 00:25:00,200
one of the regions mentioned that you
know that they want on it that the

305
00:25:00,200 --> 00:25:04,880
whole point of the journalism program was
to bring these high quality aggie journalists with

306
00:25:06,000 --> 00:25:11,480
conservative values into the market. And
you know that even saying that some of

307
00:25:11,480 --> 00:25:15,680
the changes to combine arts and sciences
with um, you know, geosciences and

308
00:25:15,920 --> 00:25:21,359
the other schools was to kind of
tamp down on some of the liberal perspectives

309
00:25:21,359 --> 00:25:26,319
that some of these other professors had
at A and M. So I think

310
00:25:26,359 --> 00:25:30,000
that is kind of the tension that
we're we're kind of seeing right now,

311
00:25:30,119 --> 00:25:37,200
is this push to kind of correct
this perception of like a left leaning university

312
00:25:37,640 --> 00:25:42,640
and higher education system. And this
was kind of an attempt to redirect this

313
00:25:44,319 --> 00:25:48,200
and with you know, which is
also you know, di has also been

314
00:25:48,240 --> 00:25:55,359
included in that. Okay, James, let me play the kind of advocate

315
00:25:55,400 --> 00:26:00,200
for the other side on this topic. Right. It is not an unreasonable

316
00:26:00,279 --> 00:26:08,640
thing to say that universities in Texas
and elsewhere are very liberal climates. Right,

317
00:26:10,359 --> 00:26:15,880
Um, it's not unreasonable to say
that faculties seem to be liberal leaning.

318
00:26:17,440 --> 00:26:19,799
Obviously, you can't paint with a
broad brush and say every single person.

319
00:26:21,359 --> 00:26:26,000
But but I think it's fair to
say that that that most university faculties,

320
00:26:26,000 --> 00:26:30,119
at least in the flagship schools in
Texas are are are likely more liberal

321
00:26:30,240 --> 00:26:34,839
leaning, and that universities could benefit
from more kind of diversity of thought and

322
00:26:34,920 --> 00:26:40,079
perspectives, and that there is a
concern among you know, conservative students and

323
00:26:40,160 --> 00:26:48,319
even conservative president professors of being shouted
down or you know, silenced, or

324
00:26:48,480 --> 00:26:52,640
or having you know, certain views
held against them, um, in higher

325
00:26:52,759 --> 00:27:00,440
education. So why is this not
a defendable position for the Board of Regents

326
00:27:00,480 --> 00:27:03,559
to be to be to be,
you know, advocating for some of these

327
00:27:03,559 --> 00:27:07,920
things. Well, I think you're
right. I mean, I think Academis

328
00:27:07,920 --> 00:27:11,119
certainly would benefit from more conservative voices. Um. And that's I think that's

329
00:27:11,160 --> 00:27:15,319
a pretty well documented thing that most
most academics are probably more liberal leaning.

330
00:27:15,799 --> 00:27:18,519
UM. But the problem with that
is, like, there's nothing wrong with

331
00:27:18,559 --> 00:27:22,000
what you just said, and there's
nothing wrong with pursuing that goal. Um

332
00:27:22,599 --> 00:27:27,200
what what what is wrong here is
that that's not what they did. They

333
00:27:27,319 --> 00:27:30,799
hired Kathleen McElroy, they offered her
the position, they gave her a ten

334
00:27:30,880 --> 00:27:38,759
year position, and then because there
was uproar from conservatives who didn't like her

335
00:27:40,160 --> 00:27:42,599
previous work, thought she was too
liberal whatever the case may may be,

336
00:27:44,039 --> 00:27:48,799
thought she was a you know,
and rightly thought that she was, you

337
00:27:48,839 --> 00:27:52,559
know, a person who was invested
in diversity. They pulled the rogue out

338
00:27:52,599 --> 00:27:55,920
from under her. Like that is
what happened. There's nothing wrong with the

339
00:27:56,119 --> 00:27:59,279
you know, the pursuit that they
were trying to do, except that they

340
00:27:59,319 --> 00:28:03,359
that's not what the person they hired
was not that person. Um. So

341
00:28:03,400 --> 00:28:11,240
then the problem comes when you get
this uproar from outside forces, from small

342
00:28:11,359 --> 00:28:18,039
but very loud voices. Um.
And then you've got to and then you

343
00:28:18,400 --> 00:28:22,319
basically rescind the contract. I think
that's where the issue is, Like,

344
00:28:22,400 --> 00:28:26,920
that's that's the problem, and the
reasons for why they why they did those

345
00:28:26,960 --> 00:28:30,000
things. So that is the issue. It's not so much the pursuit of

346
00:28:30,519 --> 00:28:33,839
you know, you know, getting
more conservative voices and journalism like that's that's

347
00:28:33,880 --> 00:28:37,920
fine. I think you know,
but the issue is what happened with after

348
00:28:38,319 --> 00:28:42,359
after the uproar. Yeah, And
I would also question whether regents and other

349
00:28:42,400 --> 00:28:48,440
folks had enough information about Kathleen mackelrey
to make the determination that she couldn't be

350
00:28:48,519 --> 00:28:55,440
supportive of a conservative young journalist,
right, Like, could she not um,

351
00:28:56,640 --> 00:29:00,000
you know, because of her background, because of her race. Is

352
00:29:00,039 --> 00:29:06,400
there anything to suggest that she couldn't
be a great mentor to a journalist who

353
00:29:06,480 --> 00:29:08,319
might be conservative wants to do that? I would argue no. I mean,

354
00:29:08,359 --> 00:29:14,079
basically what was being done to make
the judgment on her was her resume

355
00:29:14,839 --> 00:29:18,359
and you know, one or two
quotes she gave that were pretty vague,

356
00:29:18,440 --> 00:29:22,480
quotes about you know, the idea
of diversity and the idea of kind of

357
00:29:22,480 --> 00:29:26,759
what perspectives get represented in journalism and
things like that. Right, I mean,

358
00:29:26,839 --> 00:29:30,559
the people who opposed are prejudged her
and said she can't do the job

359
00:29:30,759 --> 00:29:36,559
based on a little information and like
a Google search literally, Right. But

360
00:29:36,599 --> 00:29:40,799
the issue is too like whatever,
people are going to complain about everything,

361
00:29:40,799 --> 00:29:42,640
you know, when you're when you
guys get to eventually get a new football

362
00:29:42,640 --> 00:29:45,359
coach, you know, people are
going to be mad about that football coach

363
00:29:45,480 --> 00:29:49,400
or whatever right. But when people
are always going to yell, it's the

364
00:29:49,720 --> 00:29:56,160
system and the university's job to defend
their position and to um to make sure

365
00:29:56,240 --> 00:30:00,240
that you know the offer that they've
made and they shake that they've done and

366
00:30:02,039 --> 00:30:04,519
that is intact, and that people
feel like that will be intact and won't

367
00:30:04,519 --> 00:30:10,039
be affected by criticism. The issue
is that the criticism led them to,

368
00:30:10,799 --> 00:30:14,559
you know, go back on their
word and sully their handshake like that is

369
00:30:14,599 --> 00:30:18,480
the issue. And I would even
say that that relates to the Alonso situation,

370
00:30:18,599 --> 00:30:22,640
like when you're running a university and
with that claims to uphold academic freedom.

371
00:30:22,680 --> 00:30:26,920
The whole point of academic freedom is
that a professor is able to talk

372
00:30:26,920 --> 00:30:33,000
about their research, their expertise,
what they're learning in the field, policies

373
00:30:33,039 --> 00:30:37,319
that are happening at a state or
federal level, with a freedom that they

374
00:30:37,319 --> 00:30:41,160
are not going to be that political
leaders are not going to intervene in what

375
00:30:41,200 --> 00:30:47,279
they are saying or researching. And
a leader of a university or a system

376
00:30:47,279 --> 00:30:51,799
like John Sharp should know that and
when he gets a call from Dan Patrick

377
00:30:52,000 --> 00:30:55,640
be able to explain that, you
know, yes you might not like what

378
00:30:55,680 --> 00:30:57,880
she said, but she has a
first Amendment right to say it and a

379
00:30:57,960 --> 00:31:03,599
right to say it within academic freedom, which our university upholds, and in

380
00:31:03,640 --> 00:31:08,200
some ways allowing this kind of investigation
to happen also rescinded on the kind of

381
00:31:08,359 --> 00:31:14,079
handshake of academic freedom that this whole
entire university system is working under. So

382
00:31:14,119 --> 00:31:17,440
I think they both kind of relate
in the way in which they walked back

383
00:31:17,640 --> 00:31:22,279
the promises that these schools are working
under. And one more point to make

384
00:31:22,319 --> 00:31:26,599
off piggybacking of Kate's thought, there
is that like and we covered this in

385
00:31:26,599 --> 00:31:32,599
the initial story on Alonzo, but
the stakes are so much higher for professors

386
00:31:32,599 --> 00:31:38,640
who work in public health, like
they are going to take positions inevitably that

387
00:31:40,440 --> 00:31:45,200
will not be aligned with where Texas
and that doesn't just it's not just Texas

388
00:31:45,319 --> 00:31:49,039
or where other states are. You
know, other states also don't allow servingex

389
00:31:49,119 --> 00:31:53,720
change programs. Other states also don't
allow fentonel test strips. They're criminalized.

390
00:31:55,279 --> 00:32:00,400
Their position is these tools actually help
people not die of overdose and not die

391
00:32:00,559 --> 00:32:04,359
when using drugs, so that we
can get them to help. And just

392
00:32:04,599 --> 00:32:08,079
one like you know, very good
example, Joy Alonso is a leader in

393
00:32:08,079 --> 00:32:15,599
the state of providing the lock zone, narcan to communities, to police departments,

394
00:32:15,680 --> 00:32:20,759
to schools training people on how to
use narcan and the locksone. I've

395
00:32:20,799 --> 00:32:23,599
interviewed her before for a story about
that. And because of her and people

396
00:32:23,720 --> 00:32:29,799
like her, the state has finally
budged and devoted eighteen million dollars to providing

397
00:32:29,880 --> 00:32:34,440
the locks zone two communities that need
it. And that is a position where

398
00:32:34,720 --> 00:32:37,960
experts were saying the state is not
right on this, the state needs to

399
00:32:37,000 --> 00:32:42,359
provide these things. Joy Alonzo was
one of those voices that led to the

400
00:32:42,480 --> 00:32:46,319
change that happened this session. And
this is a situation in which she's saying

401
00:32:46,400 --> 00:32:50,839
something like, the policies are wrong, the policies are not helping us,

402
00:32:50,839 --> 00:32:55,079
the policies need to change. There
are people who are opposing these policies.

403
00:32:55,880 --> 00:33:00,079
And because she did that, she
got in trouble. Like that is and

404
00:33:00,480 --> 00:33:05,559
so there were real life consequences to
this. Okay, what do you what

405
00:33:05,640 --> 00:33:09,519
about the consequences to the university.
How do you see this playing out?

406
00:33:09,680 --> 00:33:14,519
What are you hearing from professors about? You know, is this going to

407
00:33:14,599 --> 00:33:17,839
have a long term impact on you
know, not just academic freedom, but

408
00:33:17,839 --> 00:33:23,279
the reputation of the school, the
ability to recruit faculty, the the things

409
00:33:23,279 --> 00:33:29,440
that you know, universities are are
always kind of worried about. Yeah,

410
00:33:29,440 --> 00:33:30,440
I mean, I think it's going
to have a huge impact. Like,

411
00:33:30,720 --> 00:33:35,480
you know, we heard a lot
about these concerns in this legislative session when

412
00:33:35,680 --> 00:33:40,359
d EI and tenure were on the
chopping block, and m professors were kind

413
00:33:40,400 --> 00:33:47,480
of making noise about the you know, ability to recruit and retain talented faculty

414
00:33:49,039 --> 00:33:52,400
who would want to stay here if
they're you know, they weren't able to

415
00:33:52,400 --> 00:33:57,079
get tenure or if they weren't able
to um, you know, or if

416
00:33:57,119 --> 00:34:00,279
you know, diversity was not going
to be a priority, and student as

417
00:34:00,319 --> 00:34:04,759
well. And I think that these
two situations are kind of that concern come

418
00:34:04,839 --> 00:34:12,840
to life, you know, and
in also kind of more less concrete ways

419
00:34:13,159 --> 00:34:17,119
that with the Alonso case in particular, you know, it creates this chilling

420
00:34:17,119 --> 00:34:21,280
effect that goes beyond you know,
whether or not you can have tenure or

421
00:34:21,280 --> 00:34:24,000
not. It's about your speech and
what you say and how it's how it

422
00:34:24,079 --> 00:34:30,159
might be misconstrued and how you might
be forced on the defensive to try and

423
00:34:30,559 --> 00:34:35,079
prove that a maybe you didn't say
that at all, or that's not what

424
00:34:35,159 --> 00:34:39,800
you meant, And why would someone
who is working in a different state where

425
00:34:40,079 --> 00:34:45,480
they have the backing of their university
that supports academic freedom, why would they

426
00:34:45,480 --> 00:34:50,639
come here or why would they stay
if they could go somewhere else where they

427
00:34:50,639 --> 00:34:54,599
could feel more protected. You know, I think that the faculty in particular,

428
00:34:54,679 --> 00:34:58,519
and the reason the Faculty Senate has
been so vocal, is that there

429
00:34:58,599 --> 00:35:02,280
is a real concern about the reputation
hit that AM has taken, and there

430
00:35:02,519 --> 00:35:06,159
is you know, a lot of
damage control to kind of do, to

431
00:35:06,320 --> 00:35:12,119
prove to future aggies and future faculty
who might want to come here that this

432
00:35:12,199 --> 00:35:16,000
is a place where, you know, the tenets of what American higher education

433
00:35:16,119 --> 00:35:21,679
is all about are still supported and
can kind of thrive. And I'll add

434
00:35:21,719 --> 00:35:24,320
one more thing, Matthew, because
I know you guys are both higher ed

435
00:35:24,360 --> 00:35:29,480
and former hired reporters, But we're
talking about A and M here because both

436
00:35:29,480 --> 00:35:31,519
of these stories happen at A and
M. But the reality is that the

437
00:35:31,559 --> 00:35:37,440
issue is a broader issue. Two, Kate's point about every school in Texas,

438
00:35:37,559 --> 00:35:42,639
like because we you know, I've
covered the harm reduction you know,

439
00:35:42,679 --> 00:35:46,840
harm reduction experts and the opioid epidemics
in conversation with a lot of people who

440
00:35:47,400 --> 00:35:52,079
deal in these spaces, and they've
told us that there are other professors who

441
00:35:52,119 --> 00:35:55,559
are scared to talk about these policies
because of this reaction and are trying to

442
00:35:55,599 --> 00:36:00,880
get advice on how they can discuss
these policies without getting in trouble. So

443
00:36:00,960 --> 00:36:05,599
we're talking about an M, but
it just so happened to be at an

444
00:36:05,800 --> 00:36:08,840
M. It could have been at
ut It could have been at the university

445
00:36:08,880 --> 00:36:12,159
in our Texas, could have been
at UTEP, it could have been anywhere.

446
00:36:12,960 --> 00:36:15,840
And that's the real issue. Are
we creating this climate not just at

447
00:36:15,840 --> 00:36:20,840
A and M, but in every
Texas public university where if someone says something

448
00:36:22,039 --> 00:36:27,320
that is unflattering towards one of our
top state officials, those state officials can

449
00:36:27,400 --> 00:36:31,920
hop on the phone and call the
university president or chancellor and launching investigation.

450
00:36:32,360 --> 00:36:37,079
Well, and I mean UTNB is
an example of that right that is part

451
00:36:37,119 --> 00:36:42,920
of the University of Texas system.
And they censured Alonzo for something that she

452
00:36:43,039 --> 00:36:46,159
gave without really any indication that there
is much of an investigation in terms of

453
00:36:46,159 --> 00:36:51,079
what was said, I think,
and they did not repeat the claim.

454
00:36:51,360 --> 00:36:54,559
Yet they also didn't didn't say what
the claim was, were quiet about the

455
00:36:54,559 --> 00:37:00,320
whole situation, and even I mean
the UT system as well. We know

456
00:37:00,400 --> 00:37:02,719
that Kevin L Type, the chair
of the UT board, also got a

457
00:37:02,719 --> 00:37:07,679
call from Dan Patrick. So this
was, yes, not just isolated to

458
00:37:07,719 --> 00:37:10,000
A and M. But you know, also we're talking about the A and

459
00:37:10,079 --> 00:37:14,840
M Board of Regents. They oversee
eleven universities public universities in this state,

460
00:37:14,920 --> 00:37:19,440
and so I think professors at all
of those universities are reading these text messages

461
00:37:20,039 --> 00:37:25,960
and getting the message of the kind
of you know, positions that the people

462
00:37:25,960 --> 00:37:32,440
who essentially you know, control their
university are taking as well. James,

463
00:37:32,440 --> 00:37:37,519
are you surprised that this has prompted
such a reaction. I mean, when

464
00:37:37,639 --> 00:37:40,079
when we these stories were in the
works and we knew they were coming,

465
00:37:40,119 --> 00:37:45,880
I don't think I ever imagined that
it would result in the resignation, you

466
00:37:45,920 --> 00:37:51,079
know, perhaps under pressure of the
A and M university president, that there

467
00:37:51,079 --> 00:37:55,360
would be these you know, big
document dumps and investigations by the A and

468
00:37:55,480 --> 00:38:00,400
M system. I mean Dan Patrick
felt then to respond to this. He

469
00:38:00,480 --> 00:38:05,440
wrote an op ed in the Houston
Chronicle sort of defending his decision. In

470
00:38:05,559 --> 00:38:10,079
this Don Buckingham you know, has
has had you know, felt the need

471
00:38:10,079 --> 00:38:14,800
to speak out to this. It
does feel like this has resonated in a

472
00:38:14,840 --> 00:38:17,519
way. I wonder what the impact
of that will be and if there might

473
00:38:17,559 --> 00:38:22,320
be some more hesitation on on the
other side of this to push some of

474
00:38:22,320 --> 00:38:27,280
these things. I don't know.
I don't know. I didn't have anything

475
00:38:27,320 --> 00:38:30,800
to do with Kathleen McElroy, so
I so that's all Kate, and I

476
00:38:30,880 --> 00:38:35,079
don't know she expected all that has
happened. But obviously it was a very

477
00:38:35,119 --> 00:38:42,360
big story UM about outside influences in
the university. I think with the reaction

478
00:38:42,800 --> 00:38:45,840
that the Joy Alonzo story has gotten, UM, you know, Dan Patrick

479
00:38:45,880 --> 00:38:50,920
and Don Buckingham's have sort of extended
the you know, the legs of the

480
00:38:50,960 --> 00:38:55,400
story by responding. And am I
surprised. I think so, because we

481
00:38:55,559 --> 00:39:00,840
gave them, I mean, we
gave them weeks noticed we were working on

482
00:39:00,880 --> 00:39:05,280
this, to be upfront with us
and send us a statement tell things.

483
00:39:05,280 --> 00:39:07,119
From their perspective, they could have
done that and they chose not to.

484
00:39:07,679 --> 00:39:13,159
UM. Once the story hit,
I think it speaks to how much it's

485
00:39:13,239 --> 00:39:19,679
resonnated and how I mean, how
bad everyone looks here except Professor Alonzo honestly

486
00:39:20,119 --> 00:39:22,400
that you know, Chancellor Sharp doesn't
look well. He looks like he's sort

487
00:39:22,400 --> 00:39:27,400
of rolled over to this political interference
from Dan Patrick. Don Buckingham doesn't look

488
00:39:27,440 --> 00:39:31,199
well. Lieutenant Governor Patrick doesn't look
well. I mean, everyone just looks

489
00:39:31,320 --> 00:39:34,480
looks bad. I mean it could
have just ended. It could have just

490
00:39:34,519 --> 00:39:37,360
said I didn't like that comment,
and chance Sharp could have said, hey,

491
00:39:37,400 --> 00:39:39,880
you know too bad, like that's
you know, that's how these things

492
00:39:39,920 --> 00:39:44,639
go. But it didn't. That
it's snowballed, and so I do think

493
00:39:44,639 --> 00:39:50,079
that it's resonnated with the public,
and even even an average person understands.

494
00:39:50,239 --> 00:39:53,039
Maybe they're not talking about it in
an academic freedom terms quote unquote, but

495
00:39:53,079 --> 00:39:58,719
they understand that a professor should be
able to say things in a lecture that

496
00:39:58,760 --> 00:40:04,320
may be controversial but that they have
expert authority on. And so I think

497
00:40:04,320 --> 00:40:07,199
that that's why it's resignated. But
I have been surprised at, you know,

498
00:40:08,119 --> 00:40:14,239
Lieutenant Governor Patrick and Land Commissioner Buckingham, how much they've commented on it

499
00:40:14,440 --> 00:40:17,239
afterwards. And I think it also
speaks to maybe there's some pressure on them.

500
00:40:17,239 --> 00:40:21,000
I did see some comments from people
saying, you know, I voted

501
00:40:21,039 --> 00:40:23,320
for I voted for you guys.
I'm a Republican, but I don't like

502
00:40:23,440 --> 00:40:28,000
this, and so I think they
are geting pressure even from Republican voters.

503
00:40:28,599 --> 00:40:35,079
All right, I had that on
the McElroy story. I think I was

504
00:40:35,800 --> 00:40:39,159
did not expect a resignation to come
out of this. But I think you

505
00:40:39,199 --> 00:40:45,199
know, the statement and not to
place all of it on this the decision

506
00:40:45,239 --> 00:40:49,559
of the heart Plant and the Department
chair to release that statement after the fact

507
00:40:50,559 --> 00:40:53,760
saying, you know, basically accusing
Banks of lying to the faculty Senate.

508
00:40:54,199 --> 00:41:00,360
I think that and the documents that
he you know, apparently handed over to

509
00:41:00,360 --> 00:41:04,440
the Office of General Counsel. I
think that changed the game a little bit.

510
00:41:04,480 --> 00:41:08,719
That there were documents out there that
were clearly countering U the claim she

511
00:41:08,760 --> 00:41:14,639
had made publicly was a factor in
that, I would all, yes,

512
00:41:14,719 --> 00:41:19,440
correct. So I think that statement
really escalated things. And you know,

513
00:41:19,559 --> 00:41:23,719
someone like which goes back to you
know something that sharp h Sorry didn't mean

514
00:41:23,760 --> 00:41:30,599
to call you sharp, James.
Something changed about you know, the high

515
00:41:30,639 --> 00:41:35,239
stakes. You know, Alonso did
not have tenure, and that was one

516
00:41:35,239 --> 00:41:38,400
of the kind of characterists or issues
with that about how easily it could have

517
00:41:38,480 --> 00:41:43,800
been to terminate her um. Someone
like Hart Blanton does have tenure and does

518
00:41:43,880 --> 00:41:47,119
have those protections to be able to
speak up and say something, and I

519
00:41:47,159 --> 00:41:52,039
think that might have not been,
you know, the final straw, but

520
00:41:52,079 --> 00:41:58,039
it did make a difference in terms
of how the university started and the Office

521
00:41:58,039 --> 00:42:01,440
of General Counsel started to respond to
you know, how that situation was unfolding.

522
00:42:02,159 --> 00:42:05,880
All right, Well, Kate,
you've done some fantastic reporting on this,

523
00:42:06,000 --> 00:42:08,039
as have you James. Thank you
both for that reporting and thank you

524
00:42:08,079 --> 00:42:13,079
for joining us on this. Thank
you also to our producer Todd, and

525
00:42:13,239 --> 00:42:17,480
thank you to our sponsors Texas Association
of Community Colleges, Texas BioMed, the

526
00:42:17,599 --> 00:42:24,639
Texas Farm Bureau and bat NSF Railway. We'll talk to you next week.
