1
00:00:15,519 --> 00:00:20,679
What is bracklacin fellow Thermonuclear A efforts, I had Dana Valley coming at you

2
00:00:20,760 --> 00:00:26,199
once more, and as always with
my certified fantabulous Thermonuclear AF co host,

3
00:00:26,559 --> 00:00:31,199
mister Grant Hughes, we are on. I'm now sensing we're reaching the end

4
00:00:31,239 --> 00:00:34,759
of our positional ranking series. We're
on to the top ten Power Forwards.

5
00:00:35,000 --> 00:00:37,719
Yes, we know how some people
feel about positions. We found this to

6
00:00:37,759 --> 00:00:41,640
be fun in the wake of the
trade deadline coming and some nice evergreen stuff,

7
00:00:41,640 --> 00:00:44,039
and it was it made me hate
myself while I was going through it,

8
00:00:44,079 --> 00:00:47,759
and Power Forwards for me, I
hated myself the most, just because

9
00:00:47,920 --> 00:00:53,320
dealing with positional classifications on top of
a deep field became a bear. Grant,

10
00:00:53,719 --> 00:00:57,359
how are you doing? I'm doing
great. I'm I am excited to

11
00:00:59,240 --> 00:01:03,200
uncover the so of your bad feelings
and anxiety for this position. And I

12
00:01:03,239 --> 00:01:07,040
am again excited to see how we
differ because I have already used up several

13
00:01:07,079 --> 00:01:11,319
guys at different positions that probably belong
here, and so we have the potential

14
00:01:11,359 --> 00:01:15,400
for some good discussion. I think
at this position. I think so it's

15
00:01:15,439 --> 00:01:19,599
weird because we both I'm guessing you
have the same top two. So do

16
00:01:19,599 --> 00:01:23,560
you want to give me who are
your top two? Yeah, Yiannis is

17
00:01:23,560 --> 00:01:26,359
one with a bullet I feel,
you know, there's no we don't need

18
00:01:26,400 --> 00:01:32,120
to even really discuss that. And
KD is my number two. I hope

19
00:01:32,120 --> 00:01:34,879
that's your number two because you haven't. You didn't use Kde at small forward,

20
00:01:34,920 --> 00:01:37,159
and it's hard for me to imagine
him being lower than two here.

21
00:01:37,840 --> 00:01:44,000
So yeah, I will say I
had you had Kawhi as a small forward.

22
00:01:44,480 --> 00:01:47,840
I did not why I had Kauhi
as a power forward, and I

23
00:01:47,840 --> 00:01:53,640
didn't know what to do quite frankly, when it came to ranking like KD

24
00:01:55,319 --> 00:01:59,239
and Kawhi. KDE's been more available
this year. There's just there is no

25
00:01:59,280 --> 00:02:05,200
comparison for him on the offensive end, and so I leaned KD as well.

26
00:02:05,239 --> 00:02:07,599
So we have the same top two. But would you have put if

27
00:02:07,639 --> 00:02:10,719
you were ranking them positionally in the
same bucket, which you did not?

28
00:02:10,840 --> 00:02:15,919
Go check out the small forward rankings
if you want Grant's thoughts on Kawhi,

29
00:02:15,000 --> 00:02:20,159
Leonard, would you have put Kawhi? Just because I don't know how much

30
00:02:20,159 --> 00:02:22,479
of it is recency bias for me, but I'm just looking at the minutes

31
00:02:22,520 --> 00:02:25,319
played and what KD does on offense
in general, and it's it's I feel

32
00:02:25,319 --> 00:02:28,680
like it kind of has to be
him at number two. You know,

33
00:02:29,000 --> 00:02:31,960
I forgot that you hadn't used Kawhi
yet, and I made it seem too

34
00:02:32,000 --> 00:02:37,000
simple that Giannis and KD were one
two. I think there's there's for sure

35
00:02:37,039 --> 00:02:40,479
a case for Kawhi to be here
at number two over Durant, But I

36
00:02:40,520 --> 00:02:44,800
think I still would have put Durant
at number two, just like it could

37
00:02:44,800 --> 00:02:49,400
be a little better, because I'm
still, yeah, not entirely here from

38
00:02:49,439 --> 00:02:53,199
three is just hard to look away
from on like pretty good volume and just

39
00:02:53,319 --> 00:02:55,680
you know, I don't know that's
a tier, right, I think I

40
00:02:55,719 --> 00:02:59,960
think you stopped the tier after Kawhi, and maybe Giannis belongs by him,

41
00:03:00,319 --> 00:03:04,039
But Kawhi would have been no lower
than three for me had I put him

42
00:03:04,039 --> 00:03:05,719
here, and it would have been
a tough call. I think, so

43
00:03:05,840 --> 00:03:07,199
yeah, I made it too simple. I think if Kawhi were here,

44
00:03:07,240 --> 00:03:10,000
I would have had to agonize a
little bit over who's two and who's three.

45
00:03:10,680 --> 00:03:14,159
I am with you, though Yannis
at number one was just I know

46
00:03:14,199 --> 00:03:19,120
there's been some offensive weirdness and Buddy
like the free throw shooting and like could

47
00:03:19,120 --> 00:03:22,080
be a little bit annoying. Still
is over seventy percent for his career,

48
00:03:22,080 --> 00:03:25,000
though not something I necessarily would have
guessed. Uh, but like he's just

49
00:03:25,159 --> 00:03:30,120
even I know the Bucks aren't good
defensively, he is still great defensively.

50
00:03:30,520 --> 00:03:32,599
So Yiannis was easy? Was the
KD Kawhi stuff? Who did you end

51
00:03:32,719 --> 00:03:36,120
up? So you don't have Kawi
in this bucket? Yeah? Did you

52
00:03:36,120 --> 00:03:38,919
have it three? So I had
Lebron at number three? Oh I don't,

53
00:03:39,199 --> 00:03:43,520
I mean like there? And I
think maybe, well, I'd be

54
00:03:43,560 --> 00:03:46,560
curious if you even think, well, you've still got a bunch of other

55
00:03:46,560 --> 00:03:50,120
guys that I don't have here.
So because you've got a certain Boston Celtic

56
00:03:50,199 --> 00:03:52,960
that you haven't listed yet that I
think, well, then, honestly,

57
00:03:52,960 --> 00:03:58,960
why don't we have that discussion I
have that certain Boston Celtic behind Lebron number.

58
00:03:59,080 --> 00:04:01,560
Lebron was number four for me,
And it's funny. I think a

59
00:04:01,560 --> 00:04:04,479
lot of people would be like,
well, why wasn't he a point guard

60
00:04:04,639 --> 00:04:08,919
or why wasn't he a small forward? And it's defensively now he's just more

61
00:04:08,919 --> 00:04:12,039
of a four. And with Davis
playing so much five in general, like

62
00:04:12,039 --> 00:04:15,479
there wasn't no matter how you slice
it. Quite frankly, it was just

63
00:04:15,520 --> 00:04:18,040
tough to make Lebron. In other
years, I think you could have very

64
00:04:18,720 --> 00:04:24,839
very easily, or at least doably
made Lebron a three. I don't know

65
00:04:24,879 --> 00:04:30,120
that that's like an option this season. Yeah, I think I don't know

66
00:04:30,160 --> 00:04:32,199
what I would have done if I
had had Tatum still here to choose from.

67
00:04:32,399 --> 00:04:34,839
So I did have him over Tatum. And the thing is for me

68
00:04:35,000 --> 00:04:40,680
is just Lebron's the better passer.
Yeah, and he is just like,

69
00:04:40,800 --> 00:04:46,160
yeah, the there's like a Wax
and Waney feeling to when he's shooting his

70
00:04:46,240 --> 00:04:47,800
jumpers, but like he can still
get to the rim at will, which

71
00:04:47,839 --> 00:04:53,360
is something that Jason Tatum just can't
do. Yeah, And so I just

72
00:04:53,399 --> 00:04:56,199
I mean, I look at the
numbers. It's like he's averaging basically twenty

73
00:04:56,240 --> 00:05:00,120
five eight as sis and he is
shooting almost forty percent from three. So

74
00:05:00,120 --> 00:05:01,360
it's like, you look at him, this isn't last year when he was

75
00:05:01,360 --> 00:05:05,160
shooting thirty two percent from three.
He's hitting his off the dribble threes.

76
00:05:05,399 --> 00:05:10,879
So I'm just there's a case for
Tatum over Lebron because Tatum does shoulder a

77
00:05:10,879 --> 00:05:15,720
heavier defensive workload, but like just
the passing and the scoring or so close

78
00:05:15,800 --> 00:05:17,560
to how would you have put Tatum
over Lebron? I guess if you were

79
00:05:17,600 --> 00:05:21,079
ranking them. So it's like the
KD versus Quid discussion we're having it with

80
00:05:21,240 --> 00:05:24,959
Lebron and Tatum. Yeah, I
guess I would just say, I'm glad

81
00:05:25,000 --> 00:05:27,639
I don't have to make that decision
because it will be That's why do you

82
00:05:27,720 --> 00:05:30,279
understand now why this was the hardest
one for me? I I almost I

83
00:05:30,319 --> 00:05:32,720
did. I don't know if I
did this consciously, but I did divvy

84
00:05:32,800 --> 00:05:35,920
up the positions in the way that
made it like so I had fewer of

85
00:05:35,959 --> 00:05:40,879
these kind of like I'm pulling my
hair out, you know, close calls

86
00:05:40,920 --> 00:05:43,560
between good players. By the way, I was prepared to do what you

87
00:05:43,600 --> 00:05:46,120
did, and people who've listened and
watch know how we feel about the players

88
00:05:46,120 --> 00:05:48,920
on the same team being the same
position. I was either going to move

89
00:05:48,959 --> 00:05:51,720
Jail into the two or have him
and Tatum both be threes. I was

90
00:05:51,759 --> 00:05:54,879
convinced, but I was just digging
into it, and I was like,

91
00:05:55,240 --> 00:05:58,000
he's kind of like a four.
Yeah, on defense, And so it's

92
00:05:58,040 --> 00:06:00,839
like when they're functionally just the blurred
lines between while he's a point forward,

93
00:06:00,839 --> 00:06:04,000
should that make them a three?
I don't care about that as much.

94
00:06:04,040 --> 00:06:09,279
So I just I did not think
I went into this the rankings, and

95
00:06:09,319 --> 00:06:12,040
I thought I was gonna have him
with small forwards. Yeah, I mean

96
00:06:12,079 --> 00:06:15,399
Tatum starts and closes at the four
most of the time for his team.

97
00:06:15,480 --> 00:06:17,040
So it's just like, I just
think it's more for me. It's more

98
00:06:17,079 --> 00:06:20,959
a case of like, you know, what's the Like, yeah, that's

99
00:06:21,040 --> 00:06:25,839
true, but like does he have
Well maybe the problem is like there is

100
00:06:25,959 --> 00:06:29,759
really no such thing as like the
traditional power forward skill set anymore because the

101
00:06:29,800 --> 00:06:32,399
game has changed so much, so
you can kind of just say there's you

102
00:06:32,399 --> 00:06:38,160
know, we could have just totally
like gone crazy with this and been like

103
00:06:38,519 --> 00:06:42,360
lead ball handlers, wings bigs,
you know, and just ranked that that

104
00:06:42,399 --> 00:06:45,600
would have only been three podcasts though
instead of five. We would have had

105
00:06:45,639 --> 00:06:47,439
to do like twenty five players at
each position. Though, all right,

106
00:06:47,480 --> 00:06:51,240
so no qualms with what you did
there my number four and we moved down

107
00:06:51,279 --> 00:06:56,959
a tier. I think here is
Laurie Markinen. I will just so I'm

108
00:06:57,000 --> 00:07:00,519
just gonna interrupt and say, so
I have him as you have your number

109
00:07:00,560 --> 00:07:02,360
four, I am of my number
six, like he's the next player for

110
00:07:02,399 --> 00:07:05,519
both of us. Yeah, so
yeah, basically because I don't have a

111
00:07:05,519 --> 00:07:11,639
couple guys here. That's we're actually
so far we're we're in lockstep. Except

112
00:07:12,120 --> 00:07:14,519
yeah, that's why I introduction it, all right, So we are in

113
00:07:14,600 --> 00:07:17,120
lockstep, not with positional classifications,
but how we ranked them for the most

114
00:07:17,120 --> 00:07:20,079
part. Right, So I'll and
you know, I don't know what to

115
00:07:20,079 --> 00:07:23,959
say about him. I think the
knock on him is probably that like he's

116
00:07:24,000 --> 00:07:26,839
not a number one on a great
team, but he's about as good a

117
00:07:26,879 --> 00:07:30,800
player as you can have offensively that
is not quite that level just because of

118
00:07:30,800 --> 00:07:34,680
the self creation is not the same
as someone like Tatum Kowhile. It's just

119
00:07:34,759 --> 00:07:38,399
it's just a little different. But
he's just an ace shooter on the move.

120
00:07:38,800 --> 00:07:42,120
And he's got i mean size wise, like he is a power you

121
00:07:42,160 --> 00:07:46,279
know, traditional power forward size,
and he's playing there more this year,

122
00:07:46,399 --> 00:07:48,879
like in that true spot. And
I mean he's had stints in his career

123
00:07:48,879 --> 00:07:51,319
where he's played some five, and
he's had stints where he's played some three.

124
00:07:51,439 --> 00:07:55,600
So like, you know, I
think that's that's a feather in his

125
00:07:55,639 --> 00:07:59,639
cap is there's there's versatility here that
you maybe don't get from some of the

126
00:07:59,639 --> 00:08:03,160
guys for they're down the list.
The next guy for me is Siakam at

127
00:08:03,199 --> 00:08:07,279
five, and I think you could
justify as flip flopping him and market in

128
00:08:07,399 --> 00:08:11,600
just kind of depending on what you
value. But then after that, I'll

129
00:08:11,639 --> 00:08:15,120
stop there and give the floor back
to you. But after five, it's

130
00:08:15,160 --> 00:08:18,199
like, I don't I'm not in
love with any of the rest of my

131
00:08:18,199 --> 00:08:20,959
my top ten or the order necessarily, but I do feel strong about the

132
00:08:20,959 --> 00:08:24,839
top five. I'm in love with
so many in my top ten, maybe

133
00:08:24,879 --> 00:08:26,600
just not the order because guys will
ask. So Siakam was my next guy

134
00:08:26,639 --> 00:08:30,879
too. That puts him at seven, which again, when you have Kauhi

135
00:08:30,920 --> 00:08:33,120
and Tatum on this list, it
sounds so low, but yeah, look

136
00:08:33,159 --> 00:08:35,679
at who's in front of him.
Now, this is where it gets interesting.

137
00:08:37,120 --> 00:08:41,240
Is so the case I think we
have like kind of the the one

138
00:08:41,279 --> 00:08:43,000
through five might be its own tier, or it's Giannis is in his own

139
00:08:43,000 --> 00:08:46,840
tier, and then you have Katie
and Kawhi, or maybe it's Yannis,

140
00:08:46,919 --> 00:08:50,519
Katy, Kwhi whatever. Once you
move from five to six, there's like

141
00:08:50,639 --> 00:08:54,840
a fundamental shift. Yeah, it
feels like having Lowry over Siakam and some

142
00:08:54,879 --> 00:08:58,799
of the players to come is something
I labored over. But I made this

143
00:08:58,840 --> 00:09:01,440
comparison. It was spurred by bad
question. I can't remember which user asked

144
00:09:01,480 --> 00:09:05,519
about it, but they were talking
about people were comparing Lowry to a seven

145
00:09:05,519 --> 00:09:07,960
foot Clay Thompson, and I was
like, he honestly reminds me of more

146
00:09:09,000 --> 00:09:11,879
so of the Golden State Warriors or
Kevin Durant. And that is the level

147
00:09:11,879 --> 00:09:16,960
of efficiency and like play finishing that
we're seeing now. Kevin Durant was better

148
00:09:18,039 --> 00:09:20,320
because he is a better self starter. But the fact that Lowry can come

149
00:09:20,320 --> 00:09:24,960
in, can play the three or
the four holds up defensively. This is

150
00:09:24,000 --> 00:09:26,279
not I'm not making a case for
him over Durant. I'm saying, why

151
00:09:26,320 --> 00:09:30,600
do you have someone who's more of
a self creator below him when we all

152
00:09:30,679 --> 00:09:35,480
value the frum scratch creation we're dealing
with. Scalability is important. Scalability on

153
00:09:35,600 --> 00:09:39,519
Bonker's efficiency, historic efficiency. When
you look at his twos and threes,

154
00:09:41,399 --> 00:09:46,639
it matters, and it makes building
out a team around him. That's Lowry.

155
00:09:46,679 --> 00:09:50,039
Marketing is the reason why the Utah
Jazz have so access to so many

156
00:09:50,039 --> 00:09:54,720
different directions. That's a moment and
that matters to me as does like he'll

157
00:09:54,720 --> 00:09:58,080
give you a little bit of rebounding
if he's gonna need to play the four

158
00:09:58,440 --> 00:10:03,000
more or when he does play.
And he's not a sieve on the defense.

159
00:10:03,039 --> 00:10:03,879
No, he's not like a good
rim protector, but he has the

160
00:10:03,919 --> 00:10:07,440
size and sort of knows how to
use it and he's not super slow.

161
00:10:07,720 --> 00:10:11,679
So that's why I had him over
Siakam. And also I'm well, yeah,

162
00:10:11,720 --> 00:10:15,320
we'll Sayvix, I think you're gonna
get to that name after Siaka or

163
00:10:15,320 --> 00:10:18,039
maybe you won't, but that was
the we're gonna deal with guys who are

164
00:10:18,039 --> 00:10:22,279
coming that are still these better self
starters than Larry market In. But Larry

165
00:10:22,279 --> 00:10:28,120
Marketing in his role is a megastar. And because his role exists, and

166
00:10:28,159 --> 00:10:31,639
sometimes you could say, you know, KCP is an example superstar in his

167
00:10:31,759 --> 00:10:37,240
role, but that doesn't make him
a superstar. Larry Marketin's role unlocks so

168
00:10:37,360 --> 00:10:39,679
many team building options that that's why
I have him as high. And I

169
00:10:39,720 --> 00:10:43,919
think you could even simplify it and
just say, like if we're just talking

170
00:10:43,960 --> 00:10:48,240
about Siakam versus market In, Siakam
is probably the more well rounded player,

171
00:10:48,399 --> 00:10:52,759
like just because of the defense he
brings in the facilitation and stuff. But

172
00:10:52,799 --> 00:10:56,159
Marketen has the premium skill, which
is just like lights out shooter that every

173
00:10:56,159 --> 00:11:00,279
defense is terrified of whether he's got
it at a standstill or on the move.

174
00:11:00,320 --> 00:11:01,840
So it's like it, you know, it's kind of just depends what

175
00:11:01,879 --> 00:11:05,639
you're what you're after. And like
I, I would have no problem if

176
00:11:05,759 --> 00:11:11,240
if you had flipped those two guys. Let's see, this is where it

177
00:11:11,240 --> 00:11:15,559
gets. So so I went Julius
Randall six. Oh okay, and I

178
00:11:15,600 --> 00:11:20,279
feel like that's hypocritical because we have
docked guys for injuries and it sounds like

179
00:11:20,320 --> 00:11:24,600
even though this shoulder injury is not
as severe as it otherwise as it maybe

180
00:11:24,840 --> 00:11:28,039
could have been, it's still a
long time and it kind of cuts against

181
00:11:28,120 --> 00:11:28,679
our hole, like, well,
you got him for the rest of the

182
00:11:28,759 --> 00:11:33,679
year in the playoffs. I'm an
admitted, like I don't. Randall is

183
00:11:33,720 --> 00:11:37,679
not like my player type, even
the best version of him not my favorite,

184
00:11:37,679 --> 00:11:41,279
but like at some point here before
those are honestly, those might be

185
00:11:41,799 --> 00:11:43,679
the toughest players, even more than
a pure two. Yeah, it might

186
00:11:43,720 --> 00:11:46,240
be the toughest players to build around. They might be better than pure twos

187
00:11:46,240 --> 00:11:50,480
because they're going to have more size. Yeah, but I yeah, so

188
00:11:50,480 --> 00:11:52,840
positionally very easy for me, but
just skill wise, you know, I

189
00:11:52,919 --> 00:11:56,120
just don't love his game. But
twenty four, nine and five on like

190
00:11:56,360 --> 00:12:00,679
good enough efficiency and he plays a
major role for a really good team.

191
00:12:00,720 --> 00:12:03,360
Like, I'm not gonna overthink this
too much. I think I think I

192
00:12:03,399 --> 00:12:07,320
feel okay with him there. But
you could talk like the guys I have

193
00:12:07,399 --> 00:12:11,399
at seven and nine, seven and
eight, I think there's a strong case

194
00:12:11,440 --> 00:12:13,440
for moving up. And I will
say, so, I'll get to I

195
00:12:13,440 --> 00:12:16,799
have Julius rand on my list,
So I'll go through my list of until

196
00:12:16,799 --> 00:12:20,440
we get to Julius Randall and spoiler
alert, there's a couple of names here.

197
00:12:20,519 --> 00:12:24,720
My first guy, I have Zion
at eight. I didn't know what

198
00:12:24,879 --> 00:12:28,519
to do with him because at any
given point of like whatever, Zion just

199
00:12:28,639 --> 00:12:33,360
might be the like long number.
I mean, like even the names I

200
00:12:33,360 --> 00:12:35,840
have in front of him, but
like on any given night, you might

201
00:12:35,039 --> 00:12:39,159
just be ready to declare Zion better
than Lebron and Tatum. Yeah, I

202
00:12:39,279 --> 00:12:45,440
just the defensive limitations that he still
has. And then there's just been more

203
00:12:45,480 --> 00:12:50,519
of these offensive pits and peaks really
just worry me. And then there's not

204
00:12:50,600 --> 00:12:54,720
so much this year, but there's
the injury concerns, and then just athletically,

205
00:12:56,039 --> 00:12:58,960
he still has real pop. But
and since we're talking about justice,

206
00:13:00,240 --> 00:13:01,200
I don't think you can hold that
too much against him. Where yeah,

207
00:13:01,200 --> 00:13:05,159
if you're worried two to three years
down the line, but there are just

208
00:13:05,200 --> 00:13:09,120
some nights even now where he doesn't
look like the capslock dominant version of Zion.

209
00:13:09,159 --> 00:13:13,440
It's not just because the Pelicans are
deeper or better. And then I

210
00:13:13,600 --> 00:13:18,759
have at number nine Scotty Barnes,
who you had as the three which I

211
00:13:18,919 --> 00:13:22,919
was I railed against under the new
context of the Raptors. But for most

212
00:13:22,960 --> 00:13:26,200
of this season I think that you
had a stronger case there. I just

213
00:13:26,559 --> 00:13:31,399
he's improved so much, and I
think the argument against him right now might

214
00:13:31,440 --> 00:13:33,759
be, well, he has not
looked completely at home in the new dynamic

215
00:13:33,799 --> 00:13:39,840
in Toronto, But you just traded
two of your three best players in Ogiannobi

216
00:13:39,879 --> 00:13:43,360
and Siakam for players in RJ.
Barrett Emanuel Quickly who you now want to

217
00:13:43,399 --> 00:13:48,000
be two of your three best players
essentially, So there's gonna be some ecosystem

218
00:13:48,000 --> 00:13:50,440
adjustments that need to take place.
But Scotty is a playmaker. This year

219
00:13:50,519 --> 00:13:54,679
is better. His interior passing has
been incredible. The shooting is real,

220
00:13:54,919 --> 00:13:56,519
even when it's come down a bit
as a standstill shooter. The pull up

221
00:13:56,559 --> 00:14:00,240
jumper, we've already seen it kind
of fade. You can run stuff through

222
00:14:00,320 --> 00:14:03,919
him in the post. And then
defensively they have him guarding more like size

223
00:14:03,960 --> 00:14:09,120
guys and he's just been a monster. He's already blocked more jumpers outside of

224
00:14:09,159 --> 00:14:13,080
the restricted area this season than all
of last year. And like he's just

225
00:14:13,120 --> 00:14:16,600
he's blocked. I think he leads
the league and block three pointers as well,

226
00:14:16,600 --> 00:14:18,720
where he's right there. This is
just someone who's wearing so many different

227
00:14:18,759 --> 00:14:24,480
hats and actually excelling. It's not
purely experimental, and I value that a

228
00:14:24,480 --> 00:14:28,200
ton. And then that's when I
have Julius Randall coming in at number ten.

229
00:14:28,200 --> 00:14:31,360
I didn't know there was the injury
that factored in. There's you know

230
00:14:31,600 --> 00:14:33,919
the fact that he takes these off
the dribble jumpers and even the off the

231
00:14:35,000 --> 00:14:39,799
dribble threes, but then they're shaky
percentages on them. He can be This

232
00:14:39,919 --> 00:14:41,240
is a weird thing to say and
I'm curious what you think about this.

233
00:14:41,559 --> 00:14:46,000
He's super important to what the Knicks
do defensively because you look at the scope

234
00:14:46,039 --> 00:14:50,600
of his assignments, there are very
few players on defense. We're more frustrating

235
00:14:50,600 --> 00:14:52,759
than Julius Randall because there are just
nights where he clearly doesn't give a flying

236
00:14:52,799 --> 00:14:56,320
fuck. Yeah, and it's so
frustrating. So that coupled with the injury

237
00:14:56,519 --> 00:15:00,399
and then some of the you know, is he taking enough three is he

238
00:15:00,440 --> 00:15:03,519
hitting them at a high enough clip? The fact that that question still exists

239
00:15:03,600 --> 00:15:07,480
even though he answers it a lot
of the time in the affirmative, That's

240
00:15:07,480 --> 00:15:09,240
why I have him here again.
I'm open if you need to have a

241
00:15:09,240 --> 00:15:13,440
discussion like does he belong above z
Eyeon or Scotty At this point, it's

242
00:15:13,720 --> 00:15:16,799
it's possible. But you know,
the big thing for me is just only

243
00:15:16,840 --> 00:15:20,440
five three point attempts per game and
you're under thirty two percent. That's you

244
00:15:20,480 --> 00:15:22,960
know, I get that you're really
good and you're he's an All Star.

245
00:15:22,000 --> 00:15:26,240
Don't have an issue with it.
There will be an injury replacement for him.

246
00:15:26,240 --> 00:15:30,320
But so this was again the names
that will get to what I left

247
00:15:30,320 --> 00:15:33,759
off. I'll let you take us
there. Power Forward was fucking hard,

248
00:15:33,799 --> 00:15:37,440
man. Yeah, it was hard
for me for a different reason, just

249
00:15:37,480 --> 00:15:41,399
because this next chunk is, you
know, there's knocks against all these guys.

250
00:15:41,519 --> 00:15:46,080
I actually, so I'll just stick
with my list and then if it

251
00:15:46,120 --> 00:15:48,960
looks bad. And I was gonna
shuffle around like seven, eight and nine,

252
00:15:48,000 --> 00:15:52,120
but whatever I have, I have
Karl Anthony Towns at seven. That's

253
00:15:52,200 --> 00:15:56,519
like gonna bump a lot of people
positionally because he's so clearly a center.

254
00:15:56,559 --> 00:16:02,879
But he's played power Forward each of
the last two years predominantly. So he's

255
00:16:03,000 --> 00:16:06,840
kind of a marketing case where the
premium shooting is just the premium skill that

256
00:16:06,919 --> 00:16:10,159
I really value. And like he
you know, defensively, I don't know

257
00:16:10,159 --> 00:16:12,240
that you rely on him. They
don't really have to. He's part of

258
00:16:12,279 --> 00:16:15,919
a really great defense and he's you
know, i'd say he's been probably break

259
00:16:15,960 --> 00:16:19,440
even, maybe a little better than
that defensively this year. But just like

260
00:16:19,600 --> 00:16:25,080
that level of shooting from that position
with that volume is you know, I

261
00:16:25,120 --> 00:16:27,919
mean, he belongs there. I
think at seven. For me, I

262
00:16:27,960 --> 00:16:33,919
do have Zion at eight. So
I'm like, I had a semi important

263
00:16:33,960 --> 00:16:38,279
message. I was answering who was
your number seven seven is Karl Anthony Towns

264
00:16:38,519 --> 00:16:44,440
and eight is Zion so a Karl
Anthony Towns. Yeah, I mean that's

265
00:16:44,480 --> 00:16:48,039
that's interesting. I wouldn't. Yeah, I guess I'm not like really pumping

266
00:16:48,080 --> 00:16:51,440
him up. I having him at
eight at his position, so Towns,

267
00:16:51,879 --> 00:16:55,720
yeah, town seven, Zion eight. I have Paula Mancaro at nine.

268
00:16:56,360 --> 00:17:00,559
I think, like the scoring efficiency
is still just something that it's hard to

269
00:17:00,879 --> 00:17:03,680
scoring inefficiency, to be more exact, is something I have a hard time

270
00:17:03,720 --> 00:17:07,519
looking past. But it's a tough
role. He's really young, and like

271
00:17:07,680 --> 00:17:12,079
there are just nights where you watch
him play and you say, like we're

272
00:17:12,079 --> 00:17:17,079
not that far away from teams just
like we can't do anything with this guy

273
00:17:17,319 --> 00:17:21,359
like on like matchup wise, like
he's too strong, he's too able to

274
00:17:21,400 --> 00:17:25,319
get where he wants like that.
You know, he's he's not there yet.

275
00:17:25,440 --> 00:17:29,279
I think he's getting closer. But
I'm fine with him, you know,

276
00:17:30,000 --> 00:17:33,119
just at the tail end of the
top ten. So kat Zion,

277
00:17:33,200 --> 00:17:37,400
Paolo, and then I just I
didn't love any of my other options for

278
00:17:37,519 --> 00:17:41,240
ten, and so here's you can
you'll just laugh, I guess, but

279
00:17:41,319 --> 00:17:45,279
I have Draymond Green at ten.
Look so so, I mean you have

280
00:17:45,319 --> 00:17:51,119
to look at consider who else was
on my list, So like my toughest

281
00:17:51,119 --> 00:17:55,000
cuts were, So my eleven was
Jalen Williams, JDub, Then I had

282
00:17:55,079 --> 00:17:56,960
Karl Anthony Towns. Then I had
Palo Bank Carol. The efficiency stuff just

283
00:17:56,960 --> 00:18:00,880
worries me with Paalo and part of
it is on the magic. But like

284
00:18:02,559 --> 00:18:06,480
it's a big deal, I might
he was. I think you can make

285
00:18:06,559 --> 00:18:07,720
like I just when I look at
the names I have in front of him,

286
00:18:07,759 --> 00:18:11,880
like what is the case for Palo
Bank, Caro over Randall or Scottie

287
00:18:11,880 --> 00:18:15,240
Barnes or even Zion at this point
is kind of where I lands. Like

288
00:18:15,240 --> 00:18:18,559
that's why he's off. I had
Dre though was after that as my toughest

289
00:18:18,559 --> 00:18:22,039
cut. So I don't think that
this is given who your names are,

290
00:18:22,359 --> 00:18:26,359
Like you already used Jail and J
Dubb for instance, I don't think that's

291
00:18:26,880 --> 00:18:30,240
egregious. Then you already used you
also used Kawhi and Jadata as well.

292
00:18:30,279 --> 00:18:36,240
Yeah, so all right, good, So I want to get to part

293
00:18:36,240 --> 00:18:40,359
of the like you know, the
Draymond case is just defense and facilitation from

294
00:18:40,359 --> 00:18:42,680
that position that you just really rarely
get site the line up data with Andrew

295
00:18:42,680 --> 00:18:45,559
Wiggins and comingo like he's the reason
that he fixed it. Dan, it's

296
00:18:45,559 --> 00:18:48,319
not a problem anymore. The worst, the worst two man combos now the

297
00:18:48,319 --> 00:18:51,920
best. It's it's all Draymond.
He just solved the problem. He just

298
00:18:51,960 --> 00:18:53,319
had to. You put him out
there with somebody and he figures out how

299
00:18:53,319 --> 00:18:59,319
to make them work. Names I
didn't include that, I I probably I

300
00:18:59,319 --> 00:19:03,799
don't know that there's case for the
top three for me. Aaron Gordon just

301
00:19:03,079 --> 00:19:07,880
like that's another role playing guy though
that this season buddy. Beyond that,

302
00:19:07,960 --> 00:19:11,559
Yeah, the shooting is if he
but again, I'm not gonna forget the

303
00:19:11,599 --> 00:19:15,599
playoff runs and and just the theory
of what he brings defensively and as a

304
00:19:15,599 --> 00:19:18,640
playmaker. At the four. Jeremy
Grant had him as a four. He

305
00:19:18,640 --> 00:19:21,480
didn't quite make it. Tobias Harris, I had him as a four,

306
00:19:21,599 --> 00:19:23,839
didn't quite make it. I'm not
sure if there's any other like egregious.

307
00:19:25,160 --> 00:19:29,920
Did you say not egregious? But
I also considered on my long list,

308
00:19:30,000 --> 00:19:34,440
Cam Johnson, Kyle Kuzma. I
think that was that's those guys were threes

309
00:19:34,599 --> 00:19:37,319
more threes for me. But yeah, Cam, Cam would definitely have gotten

310
00:19:37,359 --> 00:19:41,480
some consideration. I just want to
make sure I'm really not forgetting. Yeah.

311
00:19:41,920 --> 00:19:45,079
Oh, Jalen Johnson was also tough. Yeah, he just did there

312
00:19:45,119 --> 00:19:48,599
was he missed some time already And
it's like, does he do enough,

313
00:19:48,319 --> 00:19:52,599
like offensively that's not solely complimentary,
and is he good enough to like he's

314
00:19:52,640 --> 00:19:56,079
a very he's gonna get paid and
I think he's a fantastic player. But

315
00:19:56,440 --> 00:20:00,599
like that was someone who I also
had on my list, Like we wouldn't

316
00:20:00,640 --> 00:20:03,640
have thought of these guys, but
like Boya and Bogdanovich, Kelvin Johnson,

317
00:20:03,720 --> 00:20:07,079
both those guys are diminished from I
think where they're where they would have been

318
00:20:07,160 --> 00:20:11,519
viewed last year. Not a lot. Jabari Smith junior on the rise but

319
00:20:11,599 --> 00:20:15,200
not there yet. Tari Easton is
basically a four too. That would have

320
00:20:15,200 --> 00:20:18,359
been an interesting one. Yeah,
I mean if you look at EPM Easton,

321
00:20:18,440 --> 00:20:21,400
Easton's not quite top ten, but
he's like not that far from Zion

322
00:20:21,440 --> 00:20:26,920
and Pallo in terms of so future
Utah Jasmine Tars, Jonathan Kaminga. I

323
00:20:26,920 --> 00:20:30,720
mean, obviously this version of Kaminga
man is it? How sad is it?

324
00:20:30,799 --> 00:20:36,000
Where would Wiggins have ranked on this
list after the title and I didn't

325
00:20:36,000 --> 00:20:40,079
consider him for three or four at
all. If if we had done small

326
00:20:40,119 --> 00:20:44,200
forward rankings after the title, Wiggins
would have been like top eight, I

327
00:20:44,240 --> 00:20:47,559
think right, Like you couldn't put
him anywhere else. He looked like one

328
00:20:47,559 --> 00:20:49,920
of the best wing defenders in the
league and he was getting me scoring in

329
00:20:49,960 --> 00:20:53,680
the teams, Like that's just that's
that's Michel Bridges esque. Like he would

330
00:20:53,680 --> 00:20:57,359
have been up there in that range. I think, why these new mac

331
00:20:57,359 --> 00:21:00,559
effects? Did you just see the
balloons rise up? And I thought you

332
00:21:00,559 --> 00:21:06,119
had were having a party in there
during our podcast with Carter Rodriguez, I

333
00:21:06,279 --> 00:21:10,240
like, I moved my hands and
fireworks started going off. It was the

334
00:21:10,240 --> 00:21:12,960
most bizarre thing. Are you magical? Do you have? Like? Is

335
00:21:14,000 --> 00:21:17,480
that it? I so, what's
interesting? And I think we should talk

336
00:21:17,519 --> 00:21:18,640
about this because we haven't put the
centers one out yet. By the way,

337
00:21:18,640 --> 00:21:22,759
I didn't even consider and I don't
know if I would have Miles Bridges

338
00:21:23,599 --> 00:21:29,640
this like I didn't know I have
him and Mobley as a five because the

339
00:21:29,680 --> 00:21:33,720
staggering and I don't know that he
would have on your list. He probably

340
00:21:33,759 --> 00:21:36,039
has a case above Dre. I
don't know if he has a case above

341
00:21:36,039 --> 00:21:37,640
anybody else on my list. He's
not cracking it even if he was a

342
00:21:37,680 --> 00:21:41,720
power forward. But like him and
Jared Allen are staggered enough. That was

343
00:21:41,759 --> 00:21:45,640
the team because I separated Cat and
go Bear clearly like that was the team.

344
00:21:45,680 --> 00:21:48,400
I was looking at how many minutes
they play separately, And of course

345
00:21:48,440 --> 00:21:51,400
Mobley has missed a ton of time
this year he's back. Now, that

346
00:21:51,440 --> 00:21:52,680
was a team. I was like, noo, these dudes are both centers.

347
00:21:53,920 --> 00:21:56,319
Yeah, I think that's right.
I think that's right. It does

348
00:21:56,359 --> 00:22:00,279
feel a little incongruous if we're gonna
if I I'm allowed to use Cat here,

349
00:22:00,599 --> 00:22:03,519
and like I would only consider Mobi
a five, I did think of

350
00:22:03,519 --> 00:22:07,720
Mobley as a five. I will
say I was a little bit more consistent

351
00:22:07,759 --> 00:22:11,799
with this than you were then because
I have Mobley and Jared Allen are my

352
00:22:11,880 --> 00:22:15,799
only exception. You had Jaylen Brown
and Jason Tatum were both both threes.

353
00:22:15,839 --> 00:22:18,960
Paul George and Kawhi are both point
guards or whatever. Like what, I'm

354
00:22:18,960 --> 00:22:21,079
all over the place, Dan,
Just do it, do what you feel.

355
00:22:21,200 --> 00:22:22,640
That was my approach to this exercise. What with your heart? I

356
00:22:22,680 --> 00:22:26,319
respect it. Yeah, I went
with my heart. I just this guy

357
00:22:26,400 --> 00:22:27,920
feels like a three to me,
So I'm gonna go with it. Can

358
00:22:27,960 --> 00:22:30,920
you do you want to recap your
top ten power forwards? Yeah? My

359
00:22:32,039 --> 00:22:36,079
number one power forward is Yiannis.
We agree there. Number two is KD

360
00:22:36,480 --> 00:22:40,759
number three. I have Lebron number
four, Lowry Markinen number five, Pascal

361
00:22:40,799 --> 00:22:45,720
Siakam, Julius Randall six, Kat
at seven, Zion at eight, Paalo

362
00:22:45,799 --> 00:22:49,680
Bancaro at nine, and Raymond Green
at ten. So I have Giannis at

363
00:22:49,720 --> 00:22:55,039
one, I have KD at two, Kawhi at three, Lebron at four,

364
00:22:56,480 --> 00:23:00,240
Tatum at five, Lowry Marketing at
six, Pascal Siakam at sian,

365
00:23:00,640 --> 00:23:03,480
Zion, Williamson at eight, Scotty
Marnes at nine, Julius Randall at ten.

366
00:23:03,880 --> 00:23:08,039
So Man two notes on this,
think about how much the game has

367
00:23:08,119 --> 00:23:14,680
changed or how old we're all getting
the fact that like KD and Lebron like

368
00:23:14,799 --> 00:23:17,319
just weren't even considerations for me three, it is like, no, these

369
00:23:17,359 --> 00:23:18,559
guys are just fours now, yeah, like that's just where we're at.

370
00:23:18,960 --> 00:23:23,519
And then Zion being eight, and
then it doesn't feel too high. But

371
00:23:23,559 --> 00:23:26,359
it's like I'm looking at the names
in front of him for mine and I'm

372
00:23:26,359 --> 00:23:29,519
like, Okay, are you really
mad. You can't be at my top

373
00:23:29,559 --> 00:23:30,480
five if you're mad, Zion's not
in it. I don't know what to

374
00:23:30,519 --> 00:23:33,920
tell you. But like Lowry and
Siakam, like, I guess that's the

375
00:23:33,960 --> 00:23:37,039
debate. So it's like, Zion
at eight feels so low, and then

376
00:23:37,039 --> 00:23:40,240
I'm looking at yours and I'm like, maybe it really isn't. Like he's

377
00:23:40,240 --> 00:23:42,400
not going to crack your top three, that's for sure, And so it's

378
00:23:42,400 --> 00:23:45,759
like Zion eight feels low and then
it doesn't. At the same time that

379
00:23:45,880 --> 00:23:49,160
weird, Well, like the best
version. It's interesting, like you can't

380
00:23:49,160 --> 00:23:52,880
talk about the best version of Randall
or Cat or Siakam in the same way

381
00:23:52,880 --> 00:23:56,759
you can talk about the best version
of Zion, which we which I think

382
00:23:56,880 --> 00:24:00,519
if you got peaked Zion whatever that
means, or if we ever it again,

383
00:24:00,759 --> 00:24:03,240
he probably is like, you know, right there with Lebron or even

384
00:24:03,440 --> 00:24:07,640
you know, somewhere there. But
like, and that's just not true for

385
00:24:07,680 --> 00:24:10,759
those other guys, but I'm not
I guess what. I guess him being

386
00:24:10,799 --> 00:24:12,880
at eight for both of us is
kind of an admission that we're not we

387
00:24:12,920 --> 00:24:18,880
don't think we're getting the twenty seven
a game on sixty five percent true shooting

388
00:24:18,960 --> 00:24:22,599
version of Zion again, which is
kind of blasphemous because while there are guys

389
00:24:22,799 --> 00:24:25,839
I would love for New Orleans to
have instead of what their roster looks like

390
00:24:25,920 --> 00:24:29,160
right now, I'm so unbelievably high
on the Pelicans still, but like,

391
00:24:29,279 --> 00:24:32,000
I don't for me, it's more
of an emission that I don't know what

392
00:24:32,039 --> 00:24:36,200
to think of Zion now or later. At this point, I'm pretty anchored.

393
00:24:36,640 --> 00:24:38,680
I mean, this is not a
good quality, but I'm pretty anchored

394
00:24:38,680 --> 00:24:44,000
on like the idea that we've seen
the best of Zion already. I think

395
00:24:44,160 --> 00:24:47,680
he and he's not that so part
of that is last year he was an

396
00:24:47,720 --> 00:24:52,559
MVP candidate before he got injured,
So like that's not too ludicrous to say,

397
00:24:52,559 --> 00:24:56,640
but it's very sad to think because
Zion Williamson is twenty three years old,

398
00:24:56,200 --> 00:25:00,359
right, yeah, So do you
want to take this out of here?

399
00:25:00,359 --> 00:25:03,119
On the uh, Paolo, you
just didn't the inefficiency was the issue

400
00:25:03,200 --> 00:25:06,440
for for not having Ben Caro in
the top ten. Just so, what

401
00:25:06,519 --> 00:25:11,799
is the name on my list that
he bumped? It's I guess if you

402
00:25:12,480 --> 00:25:15,519
like, are you just gonna say
I think and we haven't really touched upon

403
00:25:15,519 --> 00:25:18,039
this they're gonna be. People say, well, you should reward winning,

404
00:25:18,160 --> 00:25:21,759
and you know what, Magic haven't
been winning lately. They have like a

405
00:25:21,759 --> 00:25:27,519
bottom three offense over the past,
like since December fifteenth basically, So there's

406
00:25:27,759 --> 00:25:32,920
if you want to say him instead
of I think the only ones where they're

407
00:25:33,079 --> 00:25:37,839
I would listen would be Scottie Randall
and maybe Zion. But like my top

408
00:25:37,880 --> 00:25:41,839
seven, it's just sort of like, I don't know, I wish it

409
00:25:41,880 --> 00:25:48,480
was him, look him and not
even having Cat like because I already spoiled

410
00:25:48,480 --> 00:25:51,079
it. I don't have Cat listed
with my centers not having Cat top ten,

411
00:25:51,519 --> 00:25:52,880
I know, I thought Rudy Gobert
should have been all start like.

412
00:25:52,880 --> 00:25:56,319
That's also kind of wild, that's
true. Well, yours is just so

413
00:25:56,400 --> 00:26:00,440
much harder because you had to fit
Kawhi and Tatum. I had a lot

414
00:26:00,480 --> 00:26:03,119
more like. It didn't get any
easier. It's not like it made centers

415
00:26:03,160 --> 00:26:06,640
easier for me, And it made
the field of small forwards so shallow that

416
00:26:06,640 --> 00:26:08,799
then it made small forwards more comple
I should have went with you and done

417
00:26:08,960 --> 00:26:14,759
what was better for my heart and
my chest. That's a good spot to

418
00:26:14,799 --> 00:26:18,279
go. That's power forwards, folks. Thanks for listening. Thanks for watching.

419
00:26:18,279 --> 00:26:19,960
If you watch, let us know
what you think, what you agree

420
00:26:21,000 --> 00:26:25,000
with, what you disagree with.
Follow us on our socials, rate reviews,

421
00:26:25,000 --> 00:26:26,799
subscribe, thumbs up, Tell your
friends, Tell your enemies you know

422
00:26:26,799 --> 00:26:32,319
the drill. At this point links
to our discord and merch art and YouTube

423
00:26:32,319 --> 00:26:36,039
and podcasts. Close, as always
with a shout out to Frank Milakina and

424
00:26:36,079 --> 00:26:37,400
an apology to Jared Allen
