Seven hundred w LW. I'm Gary Jeff Walker excited to me that he has
always and another fantastic show ready to go. We're going to start tonight with
Lisa Klee. We spoke to her last year about Save Haven Baby Boxes in
the area. Lisa's a volunteer. She works with these agencies to help women
who are in crisis and to mostly help babies. Save Haven Baby Boxes are
in many different parts of the country, all over the country, in firehouses
usually, And from two thousand and one to twenty twenty two, the last
year we've got full data for, there were thirteen hundred and forty one safely
surrendered babies in this country, totally abandoned, one ninety four left in a
dumpster or in a backpack or some other horrible thing. And there have been
fifty six babies who have reclaimed by their birth parents. But thirteen hundred and
forty one babies lives saved because of Safe havens like the ones that are going
up in the tri State. To talk about a brand new Safe Haven box
and the efforts that are continuing to save babies and to help mothers and really
just I think they're doing God's work. Lisa Klee is back with us.
Lisa, good evening, How are you good evening? Thank you so much
for having me on, and I can share about baby boxes again. Yes,
absolutely, We've got a couple of big things happening here in the area.
First off, there is a brand new baby box at a fire department
in Northern Kentucky that you wanted to mention. Yes, we actually have our
Live Safe Haven baby box dedication tomorrow and Ludlow, Kentucky at four pm.
And we're super we're excited about this location basically because it's the closest we have
to Cincinnati and Newport and Covington. So we're super excited that we have an
option for mothers who are in crisis that they're going to have a safe place
to surrender their baby. So there are not any in Cincinnati. Do you
deal with Ohio at all, Lisa, or just Kentucky? I do.
I do not at this point. I'm just trying to get some in Northern
Kentucky. We only had one in Northern Kentucky and that was in Fort Mitchell.
That box was put in I believe about four years ago. So after
tomorrow and Thursday, because Thursday's Gallatin County Safe Haven Baby Box dedication. After
that, we'll have five that we've that I've personally been involved with in this
past year. But also several weeks ago the city of Edgewall, the fire
department voted to do a safe Haven baby box and funded it all themselves,
So they had a dedication several weeks ago. So that'll put us at seven
in the local area here. So you guys, you guys raised the money
through donations and you volunteer. What is the cost of a baby box?
And you guys, you guys foot the bill that your organization actually, I
mean, how does that happen? Tell me how it happens is is first
you go and present to the city, county fire department or fiscal court and
try to get the approval. Once you get the approval, you're pretty much
on your own to raise the funds because you know, safe Haven Baby Box
is a nonprofit. So each of the five boxes we've been able to raise
twelve thousand plus and most of them have been around twenty thousand that we've raised.
It takes twelve thousand dollars raised to order the actual box itself, which
is climate controlled and alarmed obviously, So once you reach the twelve thousand mark,
we can order it. Place the order. It takes about eight to
twelve weeks to get the box. They're made at say pay and baby Box.
There, they're delivered and then they have to be installed by qualified contractor
and that usually takes several weeks at that point. But it's a minimum commitment
of twelve thousand, but that's a very low dollar amount because it's really five
thousand to get it installed. But so far, at the five that I've
worked on, I've been able to get contractors to volunteer to do the installation,
which has saved us a tremendous amount of money and fundraising efforts. What
do you think would be a hurdle or an obstacle for fire departments, be
the city or county to say, you know what, we really don't have
a need for that, because I can't imagine if if it's not costing any
money out of their budget, right, it's not costing any money out of
the county or city budget to have a safe baby box installed at a fire
department, And all the fire department has to do then is whoever is on
staff or on tour the alarm goes off, and right then what's the next
step? I mean, they obviously rescue the baby and then wait for what
child services to come or a hospital, or what's the process when a baby
is surrendered in a safe haven baby box. When a baby is surrendered in
the box, the baby is placed inside the safe Haven baby box, the
box locks, there's no putting the baby in, taking it out, or
somebody can come and take the baby out from the outside. The normal response
time by the fire department is around two minutes there with the baby. They
transport the baby to the hospital and child Services is contacted and then they're placed
in a foster to adopt hall according to whatever the states. So why in
the heck? Why in the heck if you went to a city or a
county or a fiscal court and you what would be a good reason they would
reject having one if you had the funds to install it. And I mean,
isn't their job as a first responder to protect and serve every life in
their service area. Absolutely, And it's my understanding at secondhand information that Newport
that they don't need one. They've been in that area for a long time
and they don't need one. So I don't know if it's just a sense
of pride that they don't want to admit that they would need that, or
they could that could be an opportunity for, you know, to save a
life of a baby. I'm not sure what that is, but I know
in one of the cities that was more difficult to get it approved through city
council. They were concerned about their legal liability and finally the city attorney said,
this is there's no extra liability than there isn't anything that we do.
So after about six meetings with city council, they finally approved it. But
so far, the fire departments have been absolutely amazing. I love to see
how these firemen are just all about saving these babies. It's just like they
just melt. So, you know, the the Newport situations kind of a
little bit outside of the box from what I'm familiar with so far on responses
from the fire department, so I'm not really sure what's the whole forces driving
behind that. I also approached Covington as well, and they said they maybe
consider it when they do their new building. I know Florence Fire Department they're
building a new firehouse on Dream Street. They voted on it long before I
even went and visited them. And they're using their own funds, so they've
they're already going to implement a baby box at their location. They're using their
own funds. Well, there's a shining example for first responders all over northern
Kentucky. Thank you, way to go, Florence, uh Lisa. Tomorrow
four pm the dedication of the Safe Baby Box in Ludlow at their firehouse,
right, yes, correct, And anyone's welcome who would love to attend?
And Thursday down in Gallaton, Gallatin County, correct, Yes, at the
at the EMS building and it's at two pm. And at both of the
baby box dedications. Monica Kelsey will be there. She's the founder of Baby
Save Haven baby Boxes, and she shares her story of how she was the
result of a rape and an abandoned baby, and this is kind of her
motivation for while it's not kind of, it is her motivation to save babies.
God, God bless you for everything to do. Listen, we're short
on time, but I wanted to thank you for spending some time this evening
to talk about the Save Have Baby Box. And again, if people want
to know more, where they go real quick. They can go to say
pay and Baby website. There's a Facebook page and they also have an Instagram
page. All right, fantastic. Lisa Klee with us again tonight on the
Nightcap. Andre Archie The Virtue of color Blindness. Next, a good day
starts with a good Morning. Here's Joe. His friends call him average Joe,
but there's nothing average about this man. He starts his day with Mike
McConnell. Good Morning. He likes Mike's sense of humor and common sense.
Waves getting the latest news, weather, traffic, in sports, and he
really likes the investment news, which have helped him sock away enough money to
travel on his own private yacht. Mike mcconnald Tomorrow morning at five on seven
hundred WLW. I'm starting the new year by making my home feel like new
with advanced cleaning at Zeros take advantage of their new year sale. Welcome once
again, Joe the Nightcap on seven hundred WLW. Garry Jeff our Guest is
an Associate professor of Ancient Greek Philosophy Colorado State University. Got his PhD from
Duquane University. And somebody that I've been wanting to talk to well ever since
I heard about his new book, The Virtue of Color Blindness. It's doctor
Andre Archie, PhD. And doctor Archie, welcome to the show. May
I call you doctor or would you rather just be called Andre? I don't
care. Oh, you can call me Andre, all right. I appreciate
the opportunity, and yeah, just call me Andre. And it's an important
topic and you know, we can get into the book and all of that,
but yeah, I'm happy to be here. So you highlight I'm guessing
in this book from just a little bit. I've not read the book for
a little bit, I've read about you, and the topic is that,
basically, you're making the case that things like DEI and identity politics in general
are antithetical to the actual founders and the way the country was supposed to run
and all of the things that occurred in the past, segregation and the awfulness
of slavery and everything in America. But all of those things required people to
not observe the morals and the foundations of the republic, and that's why they
were eliminated. And it seems like today the identity politics crowd and those pushing
DEI and critical race theory, for example, are really being antithetical to America's
promise, and they're kind of a slap in the face to the civil rights
movement and the early gay rights movement? Am I on base with that?
I think you're on base? And that's exactly right. So the book The
Virtue of Color Blindness basically starts with the proposition that we all find intuitive,
or at least a lot of us, and that is when we look at
seventeen seventy six and we look at eighteen sixty three. So the country was
founded in liberty, and then, of course it took nearly one hundred years
later to establish a new birth of freedom. So we have eighteen sixty three,
that idea or those ideas, those two dates basically argued that we should
all be treated equal, we should be equal before the law. And I
think we've made a tremendous amount of progress, especially when it comes to Black
Americans, in terms of that idea, those ideas, those founding principles.
But what we get today in the public square, and I discuss Kindy,
ibramex Kindy, I discuss Coats, tany Hes Coats, and several others who
are dominating the public square in terms of racial discourse. What they're doing is
divisive. They're trying to pit Americans against one another in terms of race.
And so the argument that I make oldultimately is that the only way forward as
Americans is to take seriously the idea that we should judge each other based upon
our characters, not the color of our skin. Now the opponents will say,
well, that's naive and that's simple. Well, it's not naive and
simple because it's easy. It's simple to judge someone based upon their race or
their ethnicity. That's easy. The hard part is is to assess a person's
actions. Of course, it's aspirational. We're not perfect, we're falling individuals,
we're fallen human beings, right, But it's aspirational. And that's the
only way forward is to strive to judge each other by the content of our
characters. And so the book basically argues against all those who want to say,
well, no, we can't do that, it's impossible. I say
that's not the case, and I make an argument for the colorblind proposition.
When I hear political speeches by people and I'll I'll just cite him as an
example because he's the current president of the United States. When Joe Biden talks
in a campaign trail to a largely black audience and tells them, if you
vote for so and so and not for me, they're going to put you
back in chains, it seems like a very, very not only divisive statement,
but it sounds exactly like the segregationists of the old Democratic Party. I
mean, like I said, it's a slap in the face to the legacy
of people like doctor King. And you cite also a good friend of mine
named Scott Powell, who's also a fantastic thinker and author, wrote a book
called Rediscovering America, and he talked about last week for our Martin Luther King
discussion about the letter from the Birmingham jail, which you cite. And I
think this is in into the discussion too, is it not. Oh,
it's very important, And how do you started off? The question or the
comment is exactly right. I mean, for people like Biden to make such
I mean, it's condescending. I mean, it really says. It says
a lot about how that crowd, how he sees African Americans, people of
color, African American, African Americans, in particular, it's very condescending because
what it does, basically, it takes away the agency that we all have,
right, we have this, these these god given abilities to exercise our
capacities to the best of our ability, to flourish, to be happy,
and for someone to argue that America is so systemically racist that there's no way
that we can act out of our own volition. And that's the problem that
we get with the way that we talk about race today. It's as if
people of color, African Americans in particular, they don't have agency. There's
something about maybe it's a genetic argument. Maybe they're really making a quite scary
argument regarding Black Americans, but they can't. They're not in control of their
own fate, their own destiny. And so really I think the Democratic Party
honestly might believe in some of that, or for whatever reason, it's been
detrimental. And so again the book tries to take a square aim at that
way of thinking because it's dangerous. Well, you're an associate professor on a
college campus, and that's not exactly I don't know, it's not what academic
institutions started out with their goal of actually teaching people creative thinking and being able
to think from themselves and learning how to do that instead of, you know,
hoarding them all into groupthink areas. I mean, you've got to encounter
that on campuses, and maybe on your own campus. And how do you
how do you deal with that, doctor Archie? Yeah, so, I
you know, my campus is wonderful. Uh. So far, maybe people
don't take me seriously in terms of what what this book argues, but they
at least respect my point of view. And so I can say my institution,
Colorado State University, they're open. They're open. Now there are those
on campus who who argue otherwise, and and I and I get that,
but so far, so far, and and and I'm keeping a watch.
It's it's been okay. But you know, as you go up the food
chain in terms of academic settings, institutions, it's it's quite loud, it's
quite it's quite pervasive in terms of this this ideology. So I do think
that as you go up the food chain in terms of the prestige of of
of of the universe, these of the colleges, you get more of an
entitlement mentality both among the faculty and the students, and that hasn't been discussed
a lot when it comes to this topic, but I certainly think there are
certain presuppositions that you find off the board. In terms of academia. Of
course, it's left of center. With certain institutions that have a lot of
influence, you find the predominance of DEI, of anti racism, etc.
But you know there are other places, just real quick, there are other
places that I would say are starting to trend in the other way. They're
starting to take a stand other institutions. I was just going to say that
I think we're starting to see the reversal of these DEI policies not just on
college campuses, but in corporate America too, and that's a move in the
right direction in my opinion. Listen, I'm sorry we're out of time for
this session. Here, Doctor Andre Archie, PhD from Colorado State University the
book The Virtue of Color Blindness, and I got to get my copy.
Thank you so much, doctor Archie, Thank you for having me. You
bet big fun. It is the Nightcap seven hundred WLW joining us again,
and I am so thankful that he's willing to come on as often as he
does. Of the executive director of the Climate Science Coalition of America. Author
of four great books on energy, climate and sustainable development, over one hundred
thousand copies of those in print, is newest book, Green Breakdown. The
Coming Renewable Energy Failure is looking more prophetic by the day with what's happening with
cold weather and EV car chargers and EV cars, electronic vehicles just in general
due to the cold and now he says there's a brand new climate threat that
the climate cultist are touting, and that's climate deaths. So we're going to
get into all of that with mister Gorham. But first and foremost, how
are you, my friend doing great? Gary Jeff? Keeping warm now in
Virginia? So I'm out of the Chicago weather. What So you've gone to
a warmer climb? You say, how many degrees celsius is that warmer than
Chicago this time of year, Steve, Chicago is about Chicago's about ten degrees
celsius average temperature around the year and Virginia about sixteen. So it's twice as
warm as what the United Nations says of a catastrophe. So I am I
am kind of concerned. I'm endangering my wife's health. And my help by
moving down here. But nah, I was gonna say, Man, I
mean you were living on the wild side, Gorham. You really are well.
You know, in Chicago they got a new saying about electric vehicles.
Yeah, they say that ninety percent of them, wherever made, are still
on the road and the other ten percent made at home. That is a
green breakdown in a nutshell right there. Yeah, So a couple of things
here off the top. You just attended a conference over the weekend. I
don't know if you wanted to get into that at all, but you did
learn that there is a new climate scare tactic and it's climate deaths. So
tell me what you heard. But the latest, well we heard. We
heard a little bit of this. Last year, Missus Hillary Clinton, former
Secretary of State presidential candidate, came out and said, you wanted to start
counting climate deaths. And now just this morning, there is a paper published
by a guy by the name McCullin Carlson, who I think is at Georgetown
University that says, after millions of this was in nature medicine, after millions
of preventable deaths, climate change must be treated like a health emergency, and
he claims that four million people have died from the climate since the year two
thousand. And they're talking about all kinds of things in there, things like
malnutrition and diarrheal disease and malaria and cardiovascular disease even which is a proxy for
heat related illness. So basically, if you die now, it's due to
the climate. And christ has taken it up too with an article today and
says that four million is an underestimate. So I'm going out on a limb
here. I'm predicting that this is going to be the next big push,
that just like COVID nineteen, they're going to start counting climate deaths exactly what
it sounds like. And we found out later that about two thirds of the
people that were designated as having died from COVID nineteen actually died with COVID nineteen,
not because of COVID nineteen. And if that many people four million is
an underestimate of climate deaths, didn't they certainly have to take drastic action.
What will they do this time? Will they ask us, Will they ask
us to live on the streets, Will they ask us to not drive any
vehicle at all? Will they tell us that we have to spend spend every
night in the dark. I was looking at the map you've got that you
sent me. Thank you for that about the cost for electricity, rising electricity
prices and the grid under the pressure. The average is US average is something
like fifteen something since per KILLO what hour is that about? Right? That
was for twenty twenty two. The new numbers will come out in a month,
so we'll have the update. But yeah, it was fifteen cents of
kill a what hour on average? And Ohio was pretty good about fourteen cents
of kill a whatt hour. Well, I live in Kentucky and Kentucky's even
better about twelve twelve five per kilowatt hour. So I can't imagine it being
more than that because the bills are still pretty damned high. Uh, but
I'm looking at it and uh. And the other thing is liquified nature.
I want to get to the liquefied natural gas and what another one of the
policies. It was instituted almost from day one of the Biden administration, and
they certainly have continued this craziness where it comes to climate and energy. President
Biden halted the approval of new liquefied natural gas tern terminals. Liquefied natural gas
is one of the cleanest sources of energy ever thought about on the planet.
Is it not? Yeah, it is, it's uh. And I will
when I when I have time in a presentation, I will often ask the
audience which energy source it's done the most to reduce air pollution. And the
answer isn't wind, It isn't solar, it is it is natural gas and
liquid propane gas or propane, which have drastically reduced pollution indoors. If you
put a gas furnace in, you reduce a part particular pollution in the house
about a thousand times from a coal or a wood burning system, and our
air is very, very much cleaner because of that. So the environments,
the environmentalists have it exactly wrong trying to ban natural gas. Of course they
they're worried about the carbon dioxid which shouldn't be called a pollutant. But you're
right, mister Biden today has decided to halt new export licenses. We still
have three or four big LNG terminals, and we're the biggest shipper of liquified
natural gas around the world right now. But he's he's doing this to appease
the environmental groups. Well, and when you say environ mental groups, what
you really mean are these cults. Because the climate religion is rife with people
who have made this their mission in life. This is what they feel that
they are called to do. Climate crisis is their God. So you can
understand some of the craziness because these people are in something that's you know,
maybe not as deadly as Jonestown, but on the way, because it is
deadly when people do not have the proper heat or the proper amount of cooling,
when they don't have the ability to you know, support themselves in their
family because there's no energy in the strain on the grid prohibits them from having
the energy that they need to live. I mean, we're in a modern
situation here, and these climate cultists want us to go back to the Caveman
days. I believe, not just Agregiian, but you know, as small
a living space as possible, because you are killing the planet. Did I
assess that correctly? Isn't it a cult? Pretty well? Yeah? And
in developing nations to the situations is different as well. We in the United
States don't have much of a connection. But if you go to Central Africa,
for example, many people don't have electricity. The average temperature in the
summer, and which is pretty long because you're near the equator, is about
ninety five fahrenheit the average high and like four percent of the people have an
air conditioner in Central Africa don't even have a fan. They either don't have
electricity or they don't have enough income to have a fan. So the way
to solve this is not by putting up wind turbines and solar it's it's by
getting them low cost natural gas and coal and and nuclear and other reliable sources
of energy. That's the way you make people's lives better. So, yeah,
we're way off base with all this sort of thing, and I just
need to have all this breakdown. As my book is predicted. Not only
is natural gas the least polluting form of energy that we have available to us
this day, Steve Gorham, but we also have an abundance of natural gas
in our own country, do we not? We do it with the biggest
producer natural gas in the world, biggest producer petroleum in the world, biggest
exporter of natural gas. We have pipelines going to Mexico and even I think
we have a net balance who are sending some to Canada to although they have
their own sources of supply. Nevertheless, the Biden administration wants to get rid
of all that, wants to have us all drive electric cars where the batteries
come from China, wants us to buy wind turbines and solar. Eighty percent
of the world's solar panels come from China as well, So we'll get rid
of all this stuff which is low cost that we build ourselves and start relying
on China for everything. Policy. No, if an individual had the wherewithal,
had the ability to afford solar panels on their home just to power their
home, that might be a feasible thing. If you could afford the solar
panels and the maintenance thereof for just an individual house. I mean, it's
not that solar and wind are terrible ideas, but en mass and getting rid
of fossil fuels and anything that produces CO two just for the sake of solar
and wind, it's lunacy. It's ridiculous. I mean, for an average
person, individual homeowner who wanted to power their home most of their devices with
solar panels. That's that's fairly feasible if you've got the money right, it
can be done. It is expensive though, typically, and the subsidies are
kind of going away for that. California some other places have cut back.
So they have a thing called net metering in many states, maybe twenty five
states or so. And what that does is you're allowed to feed electricity into
the grid and it pays you the retail rate for electricity, which is a
big subsidy because when anybody else generates electricity, like a power plant or even
a commercial solar system gets about, it gets a wholesale rate about three or
four or five cents of the kilo what hour, not twelve, thirteen or
fourteen. But some of these states are not cutting back on net metering,
so the you know, the value tends to get to be lower. You
know, if you live in Florida or Arizona or somewhere you real sunny area,
then those things can break even economically. But higher latitudes, Ohio,
Illinois, you really need big state subsidies, I think to make them feasible,
and that's what we've got currently, but maybe those won't be here for
a while forever. We talked about the price per kilowot hour of electricity around
the country. It's averages fifteen cents per kiloo kilowatt hour and no surprise at
all the states where they've gone hog wild on the green energy crap, the
electricity prices are in the twenties and mid twenties or more. And no surprise
either that California. And it's not because California is more populous than the states
around them, that is true, but it's not because of that, is
it. It's because of the policies that have been embraced by California, and
the craziness continues. That's why their electricity rates are so high. It really
is green policies. And then the other thing is the lack of forest management
that they've had for many years, and they've got these wildfires because they haven't
taken care of their forests. They haven't allowed controlled burns or natural burns,
and the electric and the power companies are really getting hammered. They have to
pay very high levels for insurance, very high levels for claims and suits because
these forests tend to get blown around a little and start fires. So a
combination of those things, I think, But Yeah, California is about twenty
six cents of killo what hour, and it's going to go much much higher.
They are requests in there right now to raise that thirty percent. So
by the way, they're only Hawaii is the only state ahead of them.
Well in the United States, everything has to be imported in Hawaii, and
you figure does the sunshines all the time? So if they just covered up
all those beautiful parks with solar paths, maybe maybe it would be even higher.
So here's some storms. Yeah, right, you mentioned California twenty six
point seventeen cents per kilowat hour for electricity right next door in Arizona, right
next door thirteen point two since per kilowat hour, Nevada thirteen point seventy nine,
Oregon to the north of California eleven point three five since per kilowat hour,
and then you got California, you know, which more than doubles any
of those other states. And it has nothing to do with the populations.
It has to do with the administration and the ridiculous forcing of these things that
do not work efficiently and are expensive, so hurts. And by the way,
the liberal states all have higher electricity Oh, yeah, Massachusetts and all
of that. It's crazy. Pennsylvania, Michigan. Yeah, they have because
they've gotten rid of their coal. By the way, a lot of states
in the Midwest still use coal, and we have cleaned it up quite a
bit. They put scrubbers on the tower so that the pollution levels are very
low. But the states in the Midwest use twenty thirty, forty fifty percent
of their power from coal, and it's it's very inexpensive. Big business is
starting to get the message when it affects the bottom line, it affects the
bottom line. And Hurts has announced they are selling a pretty good portion of
the evs that they purchased from Tesla. Yeah, so business only cares about
the bottom line ultimately, and that should be the case. And it's just
not making any sense for Hurts to have this fleet of Tesla's. Is it
Hurts committed by one hundred thousand. I don't know if they received them all,
but they're now saying they're selling thirty thousand of them back, and they're
saying the reason is the the insurance and the and the I accident claim costs,
which is a big part of it, I think. But There's another
thing too. I think a lot of people just don't want an ev when
they go and rent. Uh. There are just endless numbers of stories about
people that got one and either it wasn't charged or they had to they you
know, people don't usually rent a car to go three miles or ten miles.
They want to go some distance and then and then they find out,
well, I can't get there on the charge. I got to recharge.
Then you got to charge a half hour forty five minutes before you turn it
back in. It's just not real convenient. So uh, part of the
reason they're getting rid of them is people just don't want evs as a rental
car. A large portion of the population. Well, I understand why I
don't want one either. Where can listeners get your book, Steve Gorham?
Yeah, and for my website Steve Gorham g O R E H A M
dot com and I say, I'm assigned copy. They're also available on Amazon
of course, the softcover book, and then there are ebooks as well.
All right, Green Breakdown is the latest from Steve Gorham and my friend.
Thank you so much, and for gosh sakes, enjoy those warmer temperatures.
In Virginia beach. Okay, take carry carry all right, it's the Nightcap
seven hundred WLW. Open up our live stream on the iHeartRadio app and take
a look at the screen. You see that little red circle with a microphone
on it. That's our talkback feature. Push it and send us your thoughts
on the current topic. Something you think we should discuss door heck, even
blab on about some nut job conspiracy nonsense. Your uncle's into the talkback feature.
Check it out on seven hundred wlw's live stream on the iHeartRadio app.
Man, it's the new year, and for many of us, it's a
time of deciding. Our of this nightcap for Tuesday night, January thirtieth,
twenty twenty four on seven hundred w l W. I'm Gary Jeff Walker UU.
That's perfectly fine. Expecting guests. David Ruben at any time, meadebjact.
He's went on the program before, former mayor of Shilo, Israel,
and he is the president of the Shilo Israel Children's Fund. He started that
after he and his then three year old son were attacked by terrorists in their
home country of Israel and injured in that attack, and of course that pales
in comparison to October seventh, twenty twenty three, when from Gaza came Hamas
terrorists across the border into Israel and slaughtered butchered people. I mean literally ripping
the guts out of women that they had just raped, or raped them afterwards.
Who knows cutting the hands off babies, cutting babies out of women's stomachs.
In all, the death toll from the attack as of December of this
past year, according to France twenty four, six hundred and ninety five Israeli
civilians killed on October seventh, including thirty six kids, three hundred and seventy
three security forces, and seventy one foreigners, a total of eleven hundred and
thirty nine. You realize that the terrorist attack on nine to eleven in our
country yielded almost three thousand dead, so they're more than a third of the
way to what we experienced as a country from a terrorist attack. With October
seventh and just the awful, awful stench of anti Semitism and murder and death,
Gaza has become a nest of death cultists, and that's why Hamas had
to be rooted out, and Israel has done their due diligence to do that
inside Gaza, limiting civilian casualties as much as they possibly could. But you
know what, when you're under attack, when you're at war, the rules
of civility and decency often go out the window because they have to, because
Hamas had to be destroyed. Well. Hamas, of course, is funded
by Iran, just like Hesbalah to the north of Israel, funded by Iran
and the Iyatolas and the Islamist death cultists who are always shouting death to Israel,
death to United States. And since October seventh, since the United States
has supported Israel in this fight, since October seventeenth, there have been over
one hundred and seventy rocket attacks on our own troops who were there. Of
course, over the weekend, the attack that left three American service members dead
at a base in Jordan from a drone strike from islamis terrorist funded by Iran.
What to do? What to do? Not a big fan of war,
however, the Iranians have been at war with our country and Israel since
the Ayatola took over in nineteen seventy nine. Let's not forget that. Don't
ever forget history, because it will come up to bite you in the rump
every single time when you do, and it is biting us and more acutely
the Biden administration in the rump right now after Joe says don't and the Iranians
continue to do. That's not much of a de terrence and throwing little strikes
back at post where there's nobody really there. And the Iranians, by the
way, don't care how many of their constituents, how many of their proxies
die in this, and they don't care how many missiles are blown up,
as long as they can continue to create chaos and cause the United States to
look weak on the world stage. We do, by the way, thanks
to Joe Biden, this is going to continue. What to do again?
I think that the Iranians declared war on us when they took over our embassy
in nineteen seventy nine and took all those hostages fifty two American hostages prisoner for
four hundred and forty four days before Ronald Reagan got them freed. But we
didn't keep up the fight against Iran and here they are back again. And
when you have a week leader like Joe Biden on the world stage, everybody
is going to take advantage of that, most notably in this particular case Iran.
So isn't it time, don't you think it's time to light a little
fire and or maybe do what Donald Trump did with Iran. He killed Sulimane
and he almost bankrupted them, And when Biden took off, he gave him
six billion dollars which is still supposedly frozen in accounts, and cutter Iranian skin,
and he let the oil from Iran flow again to the rest of the
world, especially with our own domestic energy policies in this country. Iran is
an enemy. They've declared themselves an enemy of ours and of Israel, and
they need to be dealt with, not by some feeble old man who needs
to be in hospice more than likely telling them don't over and over again.
So hopefully we will have a chance to talk with David Rubin again in the
near future. But just some thoughts from the edge. And here's the other
thing. The UNRAH, the UN organization that was giving aid to Gaza.
Now we know that more than a dozen of those people employed by the UN
were helping in the October seventh attack on it Is. And we've been funding
them like we fund every other arm of the United Nations. And of course,
plus the United Nations is no big fan of Israel or the United States.
And UN Women recently published the Gendered Impact of the Crisis in Gaza Report,
which makes the claim that among civilians killed in the Gaza conflicts, seventy
percent are women and children, but a review of the actual numbers points to
a different conclusion, suggesting the purpose of UN Women and the document is to
promote a false gender narrative, not to encourage inform public debate. The UN
has been all over everybody about publishing and disseminating misinformation. This is a huge
bit of misinformation coming from the UN pot kettle black stuff inappropriately combining women and
children. The UN Women report repeatedly uses the phrase women and children as if
the deaths of men and fathers does not matter, failure to report actual numbers.
The Palestinian Information Center recently published a report regarding the twenty eighty nine hundred
and fifty one civilian casualties seen during the current war in Gaza. The PIC
report states this toll includes twelve three hundred and forty five children, six thousand,
four hundred and seventy one women, two hundred ninety five healthcare workers,
forty one civil defense members, one hundred and thirteen journalists. Based on those
numbers, nine thousand, six hundred and eighty six civilian men also died,
not included in the UN report because they have an agenda. So children represented
forty two point six percent of all civilian deaths in Gaza, followed by men
at thirty three point five percent and women twenty two point four But the UN
Women Report never cite those numbers. The UN is something we need to defund
immediately. Not the police, but the UN is a danger to your health
and to my health and world peace. They're ridiculous and they're unnecessary. Let's
defund the UN, and let's take out Iran's oil platform island where all their
oil goes through. If you bankrupt Iran and you get rid of the UN,
the world will live more peacefully. Guaranteed food for thought. Don't eat
too much. It's the night cap and we continue on seven hundred. Wlw
Willy is the one person I know I can count on. My friend.
I want you to know that I Bill Cunningham am here for you. He
makes me feel good to be an American. Let me help ease your concerns,
keep you informed, and raise your spirits. I rather have my arm
not off by beavers than miss Willie's show. I'm here for you. All
you have to do is listen to me the great America. I want to
be a great American just like Willie Bill Cunningham. Tomorrow at twelve noon on
seven hundred w l W. Do you know how much one thousand dollars in
coins ways Data Privacy Week holiday? And you know what, I'm glad that
you are. You're sober now. I mean I'm glad that you didn't really
ruin yourself because I mean that is a big celebration every year, Data Privacy
Safety Weeks. So Dave Hatter is with us from Intrust to It or our
tech guy on the night cap and first and foremost, let's talk Facebook tonight
and what Facebook has been doing or meta or whatever you want to call it.
Yeah, Gary, Jeff as always, thanks for having me on.
And I like to think of myself as the punks a Tony Dave or the
Cincinnati Day that you will a privacy you know, PUNKSATONI Phil pops out of
his hole right for ground came today. I actually pop into a Faraday cage
for all of Privacy week, so I can maintain some privacy. You know.
It's it's a beautiful thing. And what happens if you see your shadow?
Then I hopefully get another week in the Faraday case, exposed to all
of this insanity out here in the real world, you know. And I
just put another layer on my tinfoil hat. So Facebook, Yeah, I
think this is really interesting. So just a reminder for folks scared. Yeah,
Facebook's parent company is now Meta. Meta owns Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp,
Messenger, and you know other very commonly used apps out there. And
Consumer Reports had a recent article based on a study they did, and I
really want to encourage people to go read about this for themselves. Don't just
take my work for it. Now. Of course, all this is alleged
that neither one of us get sued, right, But here's the headline from
Consumer Reports. Each Facebook user is monitored by thousands of companies. I didn't
misspeak the thousands of companies. And they also talk about how, for example,
even if you're not a Facebook user, you may get sucked up in
this because of this sort of background ways that they collect information. So let
me start out by saying, this is a reminder for folks. Meta is
one of several companies like Google and others who thrive off the surveillance capitalism model.
They don't make Facebook and Messenger and what's happened all this stuff for free?
You're paying with your data. You're not the consumer or the customer in
this case, you are the product, right, hence the name surveillance capitalism.
They're giving you these tools, platforms, technologies, et cetera for free,
quote unquote because they are able to suck up enormous amounts of data about
you and monetize that data. So if you dig a little bit deeper into
this story, it's truly fascinating what they did, and I think extremely infightful
because I have so many people coming ay privacy. I don't care about privacy.
I got nothing to hide, and I don't think people really understand how
invasive and per of this is. So they say in this article, using
a panel of seven hundred nine volunteers, you shared archives of their Facebook data,
which anyone can go download for themselves at any time. Consumer Reports found
that a total of one hundred and eighty six thousand, eight hundred and ninety
two companies sent data about them to Meta. One hundred eighty six thousand,
eight hundred ninety two companies sent data on average each participant in the study.
So again this they claim, they don't claim this is a scientific study.
Seven hundred and nine people volunteered to do this, But of the data that
they downloaded from Facebook and provided the consumer reports for this analysis, the average
participant in the study had two thousand, two hundred and thirty companies who were
getting data about them. Now just think about that for a second, and
then you know it's the number varied significantly. Some panelists had over seven thousand
companies providing their data to Facebook Splash Meta. So what does this inferring is
that, you know, and they mentioned later in here, even if you
don't have a Facebook account, Meta might be getting data about you because of
the way they collect this and their voracious appetite for your data, which they
then turn into money so you go visit a website, dit, sporting goods,
whatever, and because they have a relationship with Meta and other companies too.
This isn't just Meta, by the way, okay, but Meta and
you know through various tracking mechanisms, browser fingerprinting, hidden pixels, that sort
of thing, they're able to collect data about you, which they then sincin
MEETA. Obviously at some you know, there's some financial compensation provided, I'm
sure in there, but they also talk about how they have server to server
tracking and other things that are more difficult to pin down, and it makes
this, you know, really difficult for people to really understand how much data
is actually being captured, you know, sold between these data breaker brokers and
so forth. And I know we're not out of time here, but I
think this is fast. Another tidbit, one company appeared in ninety six percent
of participants data. So of these seven hundred and nine people and all the
data they submitted for this analysis, one company, Live Ramp, a data
broker based in San Francisco, showed up ninety six percent of the time that
they looked at this data. And they also mentioned Retailer's Home Depot, Macy's,
Walmart. All were of the top one hundred most frequently seen companies of
people who are sending your data to Facebook. But live live Ramp. Live
Ramp then is kind of like a collection pointed dissemination point for all the data.
If they're on ninety six percent of those, then they're sharing that with
the other companies, right yeah, and then he knows you know what else
they're aggregating into your data and selling. I mean data brokers. There are
hundreds of them, that's not thousands of them in the country. And it's
interesting when you look at the top ten that they broke down as part of
this study. Live Ramp is number one. Axiom, which is a very
well known data broker. To most of these are or sort of not very
well known, kind of hidden behind the scenes companies making gigantic amounts of money
off of this data. But Axiom has been out, you know, in
the public before for this type of thing. Experience number three. The people
should know the name Experience, right, one of the big credit bureaus.
And then you know, you see like Cone Depot is number seven, Amazon
e Commerces number ten in this list. So it's a lot of the players
we hear about all the time, but then they go on and they talk
about like what's in the data? Right. Custom audiences allow advertisers to upload
customer lists to meta, often including identifiers like email addresses, mobile advertising IDs,
these customers and so called lookalike audiences made up of similar people can then
be targeted with ads on metas platform. But when these data brokers are collecting
this data, you know, who knows again what they're aggregating from all these
different sources and then turning around and selling to other people, And they're making
very large amounts of money doing it mostly behind the scenes, mostly without people's
actual understanding of how much of this stuff is being sucked up out there.
And I would just remind folks, if you really want some insight into this,
go take a look at the Apple privacy label of common apps like Facebook
or TikTok, and when you see all of the information they can collect off
your phone, it's usually pretty eye opening for people. If you go to
the Apple App Store, you can look up the privacy label for any app
something Apple mandates, and most people when they see it the first time and
start to connect the dots, especially after you read article like this Gary Jeff,
it's pretty eye opening and I think for a lot of people quite hair
raising. So you know, I appreciate you taking the time to help me
get the word out about this. This Consumer reports are definitely worth your time,
and they have an app called Permission Slipt. I'd encourage people to check
out. It's a way to not only get a handle on this, but
try to start to scrape back some of your privacy. Well, it's about
time, and we are running out of time, Dave, but real quickly.
This is something we found out from testimony from actual Facebook people in the
past. Meta, the parent company of Facebook, knowingly developed platforms to hook
kids into this to basically it's digital crack. Yeah, and I while there
is a lawsuit out there filed by thirty three attorney generals. Again this all
alleged, right, you know, they threw whistleblowers, public release information,
et cetera. This lawsuit has been file claiming that basically Facebook was well aware
that their platforms are designed to be extremely sticky to get people on their you
know, using them as long as possible, keep people using them, et
cetera, and that you know, they're aware of the harm this is causing
to young people and you know, basically have sort of turned a blind eye
to it. There's a whistle famous whistleblower who you know, basically absconded with
thousands of documents that were least I'm drawing a blank on her name at the
moment. But it's pretty interesting because while you know, Facebook is in the
cross met us slash Facebook is in the crosshairs of this particular situation. You
know. It's most of these social media platforms ultimately have a similar goal,
which is to get you on it and to get you using it as long
as possible, you know, all the time, because they are collecting enormous
amounts of data about you, as we just said, and then using it
to make enormous amounts of money. You know, if you go look at
the amount of money the Facebook slash Meta brings in from these so called free
services, it's, you know, it's in billions of dollars you've had.
Dave Heater, thank you as always for joining us on the Nightcap and you
can hear Dave six thirty five Friday morning on fifty five KRC I see on
Local twelve all the time. Great information and something that we all need to
be aware of. Dave Hatter with us on the Nightcap on seven hundred Wlwe
welcome back to the nightcat find seven hundred wl W Garrett Jeff sitting in my
chair getting ready to talk to somebody I've been looking forward to, really for
ever since i saw the pitch. Daniel Street is his name. He's an
attorney and author over two decades of experience handling civil litigation in state and federal
court. Is a three volume book series called Fake News Exposed about Trump,
and he regularly appears on Substack and the Latest News. First Off, Daniel
Street. Good evening, and welcome to the show. So thank you for
having me on. Yes, glad, And the latest fake news you say
is in this verdict against Donald Trump in New York Civil Court, the Egene
Carol defamation suit, where Trump was ordered to pay eighty three million dollars,
most of that impunitive damages for defaming Carroll by calling her a liar about the
supposed the alleged sexual assault years ago in Bergdorf's bathroom or a changing room or
whatever where she said this occurred. First and foremost, Egene Carroll is no
stranger to accusing and sometimes we found out falsely men of sexually abusing her.
I was gonna say that it kind of reminds me back during the Kavanaugh trial
of the woman they tried to say that the Spike Bowl was punched and women
were getting raped by Matt Kavanaugh and his buddies, his college buddies, because
they were leading women to the Spike punch Bowl and was at she was at
three or four of those parties. And if she knew women were getting raped,
was she standing in line to get raped or what? You know,
what was happening here. So you kind of wonder about the motivation of Egen
Carrol other than she's a Trump hater to make the original claim and to file
this defntion lawsuit, don't you. Yeah. And I think an important thing
for people to remember about Eging Carroll is she has no corroborating evidence of any
kind. She doesn't have a receipt from the stores, she doesn't have a
contemporaneous witness, she doesn't have any security videos, she doesn't have an itinerary
proving that she or anybody else is traveling on that day. So anything that
will to substantiate the claim she has none. I mean none as a zero,
and so it is it's just incredibly finn Yeah, I mean on the
evidentiary say. And by the way, Donald Trump was never, never convicted
of sexually assaulting Eging Carroll. She just said so and then filed suit when
Donald Trump said she lied. Is that basically the way this all came down
in the first place, right, Well, that's not a bad summary of
it. It's actually one of the most incredibly complicated procedurally. The procedural posture
in this case is incredibly complicated. And you know, it started out in
twenty nineteen as a purely a state law defamation suit that Carroll filed in New
York State court, and it got removed to federal court by President Trump and
the federal government. And I can explain how that works. But basically with
Trump and the government saying, hey, look, anything she's accusing me of
this was done in connection with my official duties, and therefore the United States
Government has to be substituted as a party defendant and has to be removed to
federal court. And that issue just Caplin ruled against the district judge, and
federal court ruled against the government on that and went up on the peace.
And in the interim, while that issue was on appeal, the State of
New York passed the statute that revived of fale prescribed or timed out sex offense
claims or sexual harassment or sexual assault claims, and then she came back and
added that claim in federal court in twenty twenty two. I believe it was.
Yeah, that's when, that's when the New York that's when the New
York law was juiced in twenty twenty two. So that opened the door for
her to do what she did. That's right, and so any claims she
had. You know, this is another issue with her. The sufficiency of
her evidence is that her own testimony is contradictory. She said in the past
that this happened in nineteen ninety four, then she said nineteen ninety five,
announced she's just like mid nineteen ninety She's not really sure. And so that
claim was lost due to the passage of time, due to the status to
the limitations in New York. And then in twenty twenty two, the State
of New York, the New York legislature passed this statute that revives certain of
these claims for people who over the age eighteen whose allegations satisfy particular statute in
the New York Penal Code, which is Section one thirty, and that gave
all those people twelve months to file suit and of course, he's one of
the people who had lobbied for the law. In fact, I think it
was probably drafted for her. I can't prove that just yet, and filed
suit. And that's that's where this came from. So the original we started
in federal court after being removed from statehourt on pure defamation claims from twenty nineteen.
All right, So, in any regard, this judgment for any three
point three million dollars against Donald Trump is now obviously going to be appealed by
Trump's attorneys. Do you think they've got a good leg to stand on when
they look at the conflict of interest between the judge in the case and eging
Carroll and all of the rest. Tell me how that house of cards could
fall in very easily on appeal, Daniel, Sure. And the thing to
keep in mind is the original judgment that where the jury actually found that was
in May twenty twenty three when the first trial was held. The one most
recently is the second trial. That trial, I mean, that case is
on appeal right now and hasn't been ruled on yet. That's how quickly all
of this came down, So the whole house of cards could get pulled out
from under the eging Carroll's feet, and I could explain how that can happen.
There's a number of different ways. There are a number of appealable issues
with the most recent judgment of the one to eighty three million dollars. I
think there's going to be some post trial motion practice on that to knock it
down, to cut it in various different ways, and I can explain that
intil some of it gets kind of This case involves a lot of hyper technical
legal issues, but I think the big ticket items here are what people need
to understand. When the first trial was held, remember that suit was filed
over the twenty nineteen statements when EG and Carrol came out and claimed all this
happened and President Trump made some strong statements to the effect that didn't happen,
and he know knows she talking about and things like that. That was the
original suit. Then she added the rape claims, and then the cap went
to trial on the rape claims. But then she added in twenty twenty two,
after President Trump was no longer president, she added more defamation claims.
So the last defamation claims, the twenty twenty two claims, and the rape
claim went to trial in made of twenty twenty three, and then most recently,
the twenty nineteen defamation claims went to trial. So what we actually just
got through with was the trial on the twenty nineteen claims, which were the
very first ones ever found. Got One of the issues that the judge did
here was limit the evidence that could be entered by Trump on the twenty nineteen
defamation claims on the on the grounds of what is known as collateral estomple.
And the judge was like, hey, look, we already ruled on that,
but they haven't. The jury hadn't ruled on that because they hadn't even
heard the twenty nineteen defamation claims. Now, some of the underlying issues have
been ruled on. But keep this in mind. If the Court of Appeal
affirms the dismissal of the government and say the government couldn't been part of this
case, then once you have is a federal court exercising what is known what
used to be called pendent or ancillary jurisdiction is now called supplemental jurisdiction, a
case over which there would otherwise be no subject matter jurisdiction in federal court.
Okay, because The purpose behind it being removed from state court was because the
US government says, hey, he should be the defendant here. This is
the president action in the course of the president's job. If that's wrong,
this case really should have never been in federal court. You should potentially have
the Court of Appeal to kick the whole thing out, wipe the slate,
queen, send them back a state court. On substack. You have this
continual fake news exposed Daniel lar Street's fake news exposed. Has there ever been
a president, sitting or former who has been subjected to more fake news than
Donald Trump? And Kenyons cite some of the most egregious examples. Dan Sure,
yeah. Number one, No, I don't think anyone in the history
of history has been the subject of more fake news than Donald J. Trump.
And you know, there's just a litany of it. I think.
Let me highlight some of the worst lives and misinformation campaigns that have been wasting
against President Trump. Number one is the Russia collusion hoax. That's what I
call it, is the Russia collusion hoax because it was a hoax and it
was concocted in large part by contractors working for the Hillary Clinton campaign and Democrat
National Committee. They hired Glinn Simpsons who in turned his outfit Confusion GPS,
and then he subbed out the nastiest bit of it to a former British intelligence
officer, nam Christopher Steele. So all of that turned out to be the
worst form of misinformation, and it was in large parts bought and paid for
by the Clinton campaign and Democrat National Committee. So for years, literally President
Trump's administration was hamstrung by illegitimate investigation into non existent collusion with Russia that was
really based on uh, information and misinformation and malinformation bought and pagroll a by
the Democrats. Well, they certainly had a lot of help from mainstream media
who reiterated that that whole mantra over and over again every day about uh,
well they did and they yeah. They also had a lot of help from
the federal government, from federal law enforcement and federal intelligence community. So it
was all hands on deck, let's do whatever we can to hinder and undermine
this president and his administration from implementing policy and uh, and that's what it
was all about. That So it was designed to do and all probability and
that's what the effect was. But yeah, the you know, the news
media, even to this day, most of the legacy media won't report truthfully
about the Russian collusion hoax. Hey there's still not and it's been totally debunked.
I mean over and over and over again, reams and reams of real
evidence showing that none of this ever happened and none of it was real.
So what about And it's amazing to me that President Trump got as much done
in his four years as he did with all of that noise and then COVID
on top of it. You're right, and you know, the thing to
keep in mind too, he was also battling the GOP establishment yep, his
entire his entire term. I think that if you look back at what Donald
Trump and his administration were able to accomplish in the four years that he was
an office, it as a testimony to the man's ability to get things done.
It just really is, because he had an incredible amount of obstacles at
every turnery and people who are supposed to be on his team who are undermining
him and undermining him administration. I just think that the man is really remarkable
in that respect. And if he could get another four years, they're just
going to cook up more information, but they'll never be that successful again.
So there's no telling what he'll be able to accomplish. Well, there was
that narrative to when he want to talk about fake news about Donald Trump that
he was while he was in office as president, he was using that position
to enrich himself and his companies. When I remember the table of all of
the doc you remember the table with all the documents and Donald Trump's there,
and that said, this is what I'm taking my hands off of. So
there's no conflict of interest with me personally. I mean, I want to
talk about one of the most transparent guys in elected office when it came to
not taking advantage of his elected office. And we've seen what's happened, you
know, with both House Democrats and Republicans and Senate Democrat Republicans who are up
to their over their heads in conflicts of interest when it came to enriching them.
Donald Trump never did that. He donated all of his salary as president
to charities. Every time he got paid, the money went right out the
door. And you say, well that's you know, it's just out of
his abundance because he's a billionaire. He's doing that. It's a big show.
But the fact of the matter is Donald Trump did not, I believe,
want to run for president, become president, and now wants to become
president again for his own benefit. I just don't see any reason why anyone
would do that unless they just love this country and know that we need a
change at the top. I agree. And in fact, you know,
running for office and holding office actually cost President Trump a lot of money,
and not just to legal, legal fees and things like that, but you
know, turning over the day to day operations of his companies to other people
did not enhance, you know, his wealth. I mean, there's been
a number of studies of President Trump's wealth, but before twenty sixteen and currently,
and he took a big hit in his network by not running his companies
for four years. And so I think, you know, there's actually a
chapter in one of my books, it's the volume one of the Fate News
exposed about Trump's series, where you know, the fake news media says nobody's
profited off the presidency like Trump, and you know, and that's just not
true, and in fact, no one has profited off the presidency like the
Clintons, and the close second to them are the Bombs and President Trump is
a very very distant third behind those two. And you know they've always got
a sixty five million dollar advance for a book. I mean that anybody else
would probably wound up being investigated by the federal government and federal law enforcement over
sixty five million dollar book advanta. I mean, how much was your book
advancement? Daniel? It wasn't club out the ospite of an advance. You
had to pay to get it published, right, Daniel R. Street.
Fake news exposed about Trump on substack and there's a three book series. And
thank you for taking some time tonight to talk with us. The latest fake
news, which is this eighty three point three million dollars settlement against Donald Trump
by in favor of EG and Carroll, which will again be on appeal maybe
until after the election, who knows. Dan, thanks for taking the time
tonight. Thank you, thank you for having me on. I'll be glad
to do it. You bet. Another hour of the Nightcap just ahead on
seven hundred WLW. Let's talk about Scott's loan. When do you listen?
I like to listen while I'm walking the dog that sounds like fun. I
like to listen to his show while I'm in the steam room. Oh,
I might try that one. I like to listen to a show while I'm
at work because it drowns out the sound of my idiot boss. Not a
bad idea. I listened to his podcast when my husband is watching one of
those stupid Star Wars movies. I guess anytime is the right time for Sloaney.
You got that right. Scott's Loan tomorrow morning at nine on seven hundred
WLW, and check out his podcast on the free iHeartRadio app teching procy policy
in terms of Condition. Welcome into another hour of list nightcaps on seven hundred
w LW. Time to lighten up a little bit. You know, the
news is so bad, and sometimes it's not really even news. But you
know what, every once in a while, you just gotta take a step
and enjoy good friends, the conversation with good friends, you know, like
say, this guy the fer Ball who claims Andy Furman actually claims that I'm
his only friend. I don't believe that at all. He's got lots of
friends at the point arc He's got friends who read him in the Brooklyn Daily
Eagle. He's got friends who read him online in the nk Y Tribune,
and he's got all kinds of friends, as Strauss tobacconists, in fact,
I don't know what he needs me for it all, but I think he's
an invaluable resource as a friend and a guest, and that's why he is
back once again. Furball, How are you great? You know my favorite
theme song? You know, my favorite song is by Harold Melvin and the
Blue Notes. Where are all My Friends? That's my song, Where are
my Friends? Harold Melvin and the Blue Notes. Well, I would recommend
to you then, and you're if you're listening in that vein, I would
recommend to you if you don't know me by now, you will never.
And I would recommend cut back and up yours with bad luck? What about
the love I lost? That's a great sort, it really is. I
like her, give me a favorite. On Saturday when you talk to the
music professor, bring up Harold Meldon the Blue Notes just out without even warning
him that I'm gonna So he can't like write notes down about his personal experiences,
So I should just I should just surprise him with it. Right,
No, you could try it. So I'm sure you do a little prepping
with him, and I'm honest that. But he's probably met them. Oh,
I'm sure he has. He's met everybody, anybody, anybody that was
a star before nineteen seventy five. Jim Lebarba knows and has probably sat down
with them for extended conversations or had parties. Okay, he's the party with
Jerry Lee Lewis. For God's sake, if they ask kissing with Jim Lebarba,
I mean, you talk to him on Saturday. This is my turn.
Now, this is my thing. You're the one who brought him up.
I just said, Harold Meldon boom, but a bang and that's it.
You said music biography. Okay, he has enough time said it.
You know, I've got something that really and truly is is a news story,
but no one's really touching it. Okay. That is Friday is Groundhog's
Day. Yeah, okay, I think I know. Hold on, Andy,
I believe everyone will be covering Groundhog Day like they do every year.
There are wanna be There are want to be Bill Murray's and Andy McDowell's all
over the country that want to go to wherever Poxatani up to Gobbler's knob to
see the little furry rat come out of his hole. Right, that's Groundhog's
there. But there's a story connected with ground Dog's day. Sweet Peta feal
good friends that Peta expressed concerns that the groundhog is being cruelly exploited for publicity.
Are you talking about having about and hold on? Are you talking about
please eat tasty animals? Is that what you mean by Peter? Could very
well be really, but I will tell you this much what they want to
do is replace the groundhog with a coin flip. I mean, you know
what, I credit them. I credit Peter because they're ingenious, working and
morving their way into getting publicity. But I guess it's news. I guess
it is. But I wish some enterprising news editor or news director of a
TV or newspaper saying, you know what, God bless you, you're not
getting any space or airtime on my network, on my newspaper. That's what
they want. They want, And there's also people out there after they're reading
this this here, let's have a coin to us the heck with it?
Come on, how many people have groundhoss of pets? Anyway, the only
good thing Peter has ever done as an organization is occasionally have some of their
volunteers and paid people be nude in front of in public. I mean,
and in some cases it's a good thing that they're nude. In some cases
it's like a nudist colony where the people who are nude should never be nude
even in their own homes. But yeah, Peter does some great stuff when
it comes to newd in public. I'll give them that look. Peter said
that they offered to send the organization to punks at twenty groundhog clubs in a
circle. They admitted they wanted to send that organization to a sanctuary. Peter
offered to send the organization a giant coin, a giant coin that could easily
replace the groundhog as the Pennsylvania town's gimmick to draw in tourists. I'm not
so certain to draw us some tourist against publicity. It's a one day thing.
It's a lot of fun, and that's basically it had to be quite
honest with you. Last year was the third straight year the groundhog at spotted
the shadow, something he has done one hundred and seven times. Just his
first prediction when way back in eighteen eighty seven. So he's apparently seen the
shadow and eighty four percent of his predictions. Phil has only been right about
thirty nine percent of the time. According to the Storm Facts. Weather Almond
app well, you got a fifty to fifty chances like a coin flip,
but nobody's traveling to Pucksatawny, Pennsylvania to watch a coin flip. Andy,
we can sit at home in our in our in our homes and do that
every time there's something really important that deserves a coin flip, like say the
upcoming super Bowl. You know what, I think it's a choke. I
mean you you're kind of like pooh pooing this off. This is ridiculous,
I mean a coin flip. You know, I'm not so certain how many
people go to uh, Pennsylvania to see the grounds office. I do know
what they do the Pennsylvania Poka. Didn't you watch the movie Groundhog Day.
It's an incredible party. I feel like I'm talking to a wadi, I
really do. Look, I'm sure Good Morning America is gonna have it.
It's it's a news shot shot, it's tradition, it's funny, it doesn't
hurt. Anybody had to have a coin flip. I mean, I don't
know what the rection this world is going into now. I don't know what
the rection you were going in now. It's unbelievable. Good Morning is Good
Morning America. That hasn't been relevant since David Hartman was a host. What
do you talk? Good Morning America? Nobody watches that? Are you kidding?
What the there you go? I mean that's because you don't watch it.
Good Morning America probably, And I don't have any statistics to base of
course, this Morning the largest morning show in America. Let's let's not let's
not confuse. Let's not confuse the listeners with the real facts and stories.
Let's just conjecture and say that good because you watch it, you think it's
the most watched morning program. I don't watch it because I'm not normally home
for the entire show. But I will pay this. I did preface by
saying I don't have any statistics to back me up, but I could rest
assure it is probably the most watched morning show in America. I can tell
you that right well, based on what so, based on the popularity of
the show. But if you don't have If you don't have the numbers,
Okay, hold on here. Audience rating summary for Good Morning America. Two
point six is the average rating for Good Morning America on a many people.
I don't know that three and thirty million people in the country. What.
Okay, So, what's what's the morning show on CBS? Oh? I
don't know, it's terrible. It's that that kingwoman who's a friend of Oprah.
What's your name? Uh? I don't know if an Today Mason is
still Today's Show. I have absolutely no idea. The Today Show on NBC
hasn't been good since the Chimp left back in the fifties. Dave Gway,
Yeah, and the and the Chimp. What was the chimp's name? Do
you remember the chimp's name? No? But I number Dave Garaway. But
see how many numbers of the Today Show. I would say of the three
major networks, the Good Morning America Show probably is number one. I can't
believe we're even debating this, but uh oh, hold on, hold hold
on, here we go. I'm going to look up the Today's Show ratings
and see how Today's sure. Oh, Today's show was two point three.
So Good Morning America has more viewers on average than Today America is one and
it and it doesn't surprise me at all. Okay, well, let's go
ahead and look at what's the other one CBS, CBS This Morning, CBS
this Morning ratings. I do I think they don't crack two. You don't
think so, No, let's see ratings for CBS this Morning two point eight,
which means that they are the champs, not Good Morning America. Andy,
that I can't believe. Now, I'm sure this is Abitron numbers.
I don't it's the ratings I just typed in CBS Mornings ratings, Good Morning
America ratings, NBC Today Show ratings. So actually, numbers prove that you
were wrong once again, Andy, Well, you know what numbers prove I'm
wrong. But I just said I think it's one of the most popular shows.
I said it was the number one show, but I said I precftaceed
this by saying I didn't have the numbers. Okay, so I'm wrong,
all right. Well, and while we've been talking about this, my numbers
have been going down precipitously. So let's move on to something else. I'd
like to see your numbers, really like I would too. I would too,
but they don't show them to me because they're so good that no,
they don't want to hurt everybody else's feelings on the station. Let's take a
quick break, Andy, take a quick break and come back, and I
want to recap. I want to ask you about something specific that goes well
beyond the importance and relevance of morning show ratings on television. Andy Furman,
are you brought it up? You brought I didn't bring it up. You
brought it up. No, you brought up Good Morning America. And I
don't, No way, let me refresh you, madman. Let me tell
you how you brought it up. Okay, we would talk about We were
talking about groundhog Day, and I said, I don't think many people go
to Pennsylvania for groundhog Day, but it's viewed on the newscast, including Good
Morning America. And you say, oh, Good Morning America, I said,
and I have this up. I say, it's probably the most popular
morning show on TV. And then you went off on a tangent looking up
ratings, which I didn't even care to do. Little Under could have left
it at that morning because it's one of the most popular shows I shouldn't.
I should have just said morning TV is crap. Kind of an umbrella statement,
a blanket statement. I want a subject matter that you actually like.
I've got something for you. Hang on after the break, we'll be back
with more of the fur ball on the nightcap. Meanwhile, in the integed
forest, Goldie Locks is rubbing something. It's a lamp. A lamp.
Yeah, you rub it and a TEENI pops out and you get three wishes.
Don't you know how these fairy tales were? But what will you wish?
Hard to listen to Eddie and Rocky without those bears. All they do
is talk toilet paper. It's so soft, I'm so clean. Good plan,
Eddie and Rocky, give your day a fairy tale ending Eddie and rock
Tomorrow afternoon at three on seven hundred WLW, cold weather has arrived in Cincinnati.
Vonderhar Fireplace wants you to be safe this winter and recommends having your chimney
cleaned and inspected before lighting a fire. With over thirty five years experience,
Vanderhar Fireplace is the premier chimney sweep in Cincinnati and offers expert masonry repair and
servicing. A damaged or dirty chimney is hazardous to your home's health. Visit
vonderheart dot com or call five one three two four two one one one zero.
That's five one three two four to two one one one zero. Our
service is over the top. Vanderhart texting privcy policy in terms of conditions,
posted a text plan dot us text two Tuesday evening, January thirtieth, twenty
twenty four. And the question I had from you, by the way,
Andy's wife Wendy in the first part of our conversation wondering what the chimp's name
was on the original Today Show was Jay Fred Muggs with David. So,
thank you, thank you Wendy Furman for that. What I want to do,
well, I know you drive a little bit. You don't drive all
the time, but you like to get in your car and go out and
run your errands and go to the ups store, go to Straus Tobacanis,
go to the Point Arc, going down a little perk cafe and stuff like
that. And you know, you get around for a septagenarian. Have you
noticed have you noticed that more and more often as you pass cars on the
road and you were behind somebody who was maybe swerving a little bit, or
going too slow and then going very fast. How many people have the damn
phone right up on their steering wheel looking at it as they're driving, which
I believe violates laws or should violate laws all over the country. There's no
reason for this. I know you're a ten and two I straightforward guy because
you care about safety. Well you're so nervous anyway, but you care about
your safety and you care about the safety of others around You are very considerate
that way, Andy Furman. But I just find it. I find it
infuriating when I'm behind people and they obviously I don't care much about where they're
going or what lane they're in. All they care about is a stupid phone.
Can't you put it down for frigging fifteen minutes while you're getting to your
destination? But no, these people can't their addicts. Do you find the
same thing as true in your observation? I could live with the phone,
although I know more often than not, when you're driving you could actually tell
if someone's on their phone with just swerving in their lane. I don't realize
they are, but they're coming right near the line. But I to live
with the phone. I'm not happy with it. But when I see them
texting, that blows me away. Now, there was a time when I
would drive by these guys a woman who hump my horn and point at them.
I don't do that anymore. I'm afraid to get shot. Really,
people are crazy. I'm not doing that. I know road rage is out
there. I think it's disgusting. Although I saw a commercial on TV last
night saying that put it down or if you get courts one hundred and fifty
dollars making a phone call in your car. So maybe they all cracking down,
but it's ridiculous, and it talk about people getting into recks and accidents.
I will tell you this. I read something just the other day.
People in Germany are on the autobond doing one hundred and twenty miles an hour.
There are less wrecks and deaths and accidents on the autobond than there are
an I seventy five. How's that? That's because they're probably not on their
frigging phone. Handy wowed, probably not allowed. You're right, you know
me. I'm not a big fan of big brother or big Obese government.
The last thing we needed more regulations in general. However, this is if
we're in a seat belt is a public safety health thing, then certainly being
have your eyes glued to your screen while you're supposed to be driving has to
be a huge public safety health issue and probably the most even more than DUIs,
I would think. I'll go one step further. Okay, you want
to talk about cars and car safety. I agree with you with the phones
one thousand percent. Next thing number two, if they if they don't want
to use the directional, why don't they put directionals in cars? You know?
I stay behind these people they're going to make left turns, and where
they've got a four way stop and they don't even have directional lot, I
don't know if they're going to turn or not use the freaking directional. Number
two. Sometimes you're at a full way stop where there's no light, you
know, and you want to make sure you're supposed let the person on your
right go first, that's the rule of right. But you can't tell sometimes
you know why, because they're a freaking tint in their window. I don't
want to see tinted windows and cars anymore. Maybe ten percent tent in the
front driver's window. You don't need a tint and your window on your side.
You don't need that every tint. I don't know why they do it.
You can't see. There was a time way back during the day when
you could see the driver. I kind of wave to him or give them
the signal. Yeah, go ahead, go ahead, make your turn,
do it. You can't do that anymore because the tinted window. You want
to get rid of this, You want to get rid of the phone deal.
Make it a package, no phone, no tint. How's that I
use your directional? I have the cops going out there start ticking people that
aren't using the directional on that I wish. I say it every time I'm
out Andy and Ohio drivers are the worst. They always blame Michigan, but
Ohio drivers are the worst. I live in northern Kentucky and the difference between
uh, Northern Kentucky drivers and Ohio drivers is just its mammoth. It is.
They will get, they will give you, they will give they they'd
give Jay Fred Muggs the Chimp from Today Show. Way back when a driver's
license in Ohio in Kentucky, you've got to at least have a trained chimp.
You know, no, no, because there is a big because everybody
in Kentucky don't have cars, they to have tractors. What are you saying,
You're you're insane. There are great, great drivers, uh everywhere,
and they are terrible drivers every where. But the right the majority of terrible
drivers around here have Ohio plates, I guarantee every single We got to challenge
you on that, and I'll tell you why you challenge me on the Good
Morning America. Ranging you've got to come up with stats telling me that Ohio
drivers are in fact worse than Kentucky driver. Really, you throw out,
you just put a blanket of for everybody who drives a car in the Great
Buckeye State, and I think it's wrong. Maybe there are some bed drivers
there. We know that there are bad drivers everywhere, but for you to
come out blattly and say that on a fifty thousand WAT station that goes to
thirty eight states, that's wrong and it's just not right to do. All
right, Really, you know what, you know, you know what that
proves, Andy, What you just pointed out once you just pointed out right
there proves one thing once and for all. I am a hater, oh
you are. I know that. I still like you, but you are.
You are a hater. You are definitely a hater, and for you
to put a blanket over the state of Ohio is wrong. I want a
fact checker on your show. You're right, need one? No, you're
you're right. Well, you can't trust the factor checkers because they're all libs,
like Snopes dot Com, what used to be the great fact fact checking
giant of the industry. They do admit they were wrong just the other day.
They're wrong. They're wrong all the time. That call Columbus and find
out the the next time, the next time we speak, I will have
the figures of fatalities committed behind the wheel by Ohio drivers and fatalities committed behind
the wheel of Kentucky licensed drivers. I will have that information your and makes
it makes you look Bitter's they're responsible, that's what it's. They're responsible to
go out there and just throw that out there and say it. Well,
and I'm not here by in particular. I just want the facts. I
want it with this correct and that's why I have you on the program to
keep me in check, to balance me out. Thank you so much,
and remember, as always, you can't spell furman without f you. Yeah,
but seven hundred w l W joining us in studio, one of my
favorite guests. We don't get to talk as as often as I'd like because
you know, you've got basketball games interrupting good programming, right, Sorry,
you see sorry Xavier Gary Jeff with Roccocostelano trained with Rocco dot Com. And
tonight, Uh, we're talking about What the Health, which is a movie,
right, yeah, So, so I wanted to talk to your audience
about veganism, the stupidity sometimes of of of veganism, and the propaganda of
veganism a lot of times, and and What the Health is basically a movie
that's all propagal propaganda and uh, it's it's made by the same people that
made uh, Cowspiracy, and so they really and Conspiracy is about is more
about factory farming, and they and they talk about factory farming in this movie.
But I want to bring it up because one of my clients it basically
made him convert to becoming a vegan. And I was very shocked because I
remember when the movie first came out, like in twenty or seventeen. I
watched it and I was very unimpressed. To say, the lead you were
turned off because you said it's a junk movie. There's no real science in
it that supports There was zero, zero science. It was all a scare
tactics they're putting. They're saying that that one egg is equal to five cigarettes,
and there's or that two slices of like bacon was equal to more cigarettes,
and that basically you're eating cigarettes and they have these these cigarettes. At
first, the Malayia, the way that that that bacon and that eggs go
into your body. First of all, it's a great breakfast, so just
shut up right there. But then then to back up the science, the
way that smoke and the carcinogens that that you and hal bind very differently in
your lungs than how bacon and and and eggs bind in the gut and how
they're digested and and all that, and and one of the big things that
they say is absolutely science was the that bacon great yeah, yeah, I
mean everything's facts now, right, And so so what happened is that they
were saying that bacon and that lunch meat right uh still, and this has
been a debunked hundreds of like times. Uh. They tried to conflate that
the the relationship between the nitrates and the night the night trites and the night
trates in in like a boys head meets or or anything like that. And
bacon. Two that it absolutely causes a cancer. And and what's really relevant
here is that we all we all first have a cancer cells in our body.
We all do every single day of our life, we are fighting and
our our immune system fights those those can cells. And every single person in
America has a five percent chance of getting cancer with or without blown without Right
now, if you eat lunch meat and bacon every single day of the year,
right right, it raises your likelihood of getting cancer if you did it
every single day, so you will be raised. It will raise your chi.
You went from you went from five percent to six percent, six percent
just eating lunch meat and bacon every day every single day. So if you
if you eat it, if every other day, I mean, okay,
so let's just trying to hatch my bets here, Roco. Well, let's
do the math. If you did it every every every other day, it'd
percent, right sure, so maybe it's maybe it's five and you know,
and and a half percent, and then maybe if you did it every third
day, it'll be you know, I mean, there is a mathematical formula
to science and if you want to listen to the science. Well, you
know, every time I think vegans, I always think of everything as soy.
Everything is and soy is so terrible, especially like for men and and
and women. But soy is if you overeat soy and you're a man,
your breast grow and and all this other stuff happens to you. Internally,
it isn't soy bad. Okay. So because I don't like I don't like
me some tofurky at all, So well that's kind of annoying. But yeah,
it's just it's really just just annoying. I'm I'm not a big fan
of these of vegans making food that tastes like meat and then but it's so
it's so ultra ultra process. But there's another thing that really annoys me till
no end is that if you were to not eat eat meat, and you
said, okay, where gonna just have gardens and crops across America. There
was a beautiful line in the movie A Yellowstone by Kevin Cosson says said,
do you know how much death veganism causes? And if you if you didn't
realize this. When people grow crops, they have to kill chipmunks, squirrels,
moles, all the gophers and there's a lot of birds. There's a
lot of lives that are actually kill Yeah, a lot of those same people
that insist on a vegan lifestyle and just growing crops are the same ones that
are in favor of winds, of wind turbines and solar panels which also kill
animals, and electric cars and electric freeze and the trees when the weather gets
below thirty two degrees because the supercharge stations don't work well well. And I
you know so. And what what always makes me laugh is if you ever
have dinner or you go out. I tried very very hard not to,
but vegans are very much like virgins. For some reason, they have to
state their their their virginism or their veganists, oh, their militaries. Yeah,
so when you're at a dinner table. I had this beauty queen at
one time that I that I trained, and the second she sat down at
the at the table, she goes, I'm a virgin, and I was
like, who cares, I don't want it's twenty four years old. It
almost sounds like an invitation, right, It's like I wasn't even gonna try,
but now you put that gauntlet in front of me, maybe I will.
Well, well, it's with vegans when you go I'm a vegan.
I want to shove a steak down. You show. That's a perfect that's
a perfect place in this discussion. Roco's shoving a steak down a vegan's throat.
I want to watch that movie more with Rocco soon. On the Nightcap
on seven hundred w l W, I get ready for Wednesday nineteen, I
have dot fair cat West millers Man make their way to Morgantown for a matchup
with a mountaineer son a perfect swish. It's U see in West Virginia in
a big twelve grim record. I'm a Hawk plaque in every second of the
action line Think Tomorrow night at six thirty on seven hundred WLW and on seven
hundred wlw's live stream on the free iHeartRadio app. Game time is always a
good time for Skyline. You can pregame with friends in Alano. The dawn
of the first Family of Fitness in the Tri State and he is back too
well. He came into the studio in anticipation that I would kick his ring,
and that hasn't happened yet, but you never know. I mean,
he can make me an offer I can't refuse at any moment. Well,
I always make you an offer you can't refuse. But right, so,
anyway, Rocco and I are this time around talking about something called structured water.
I have no idea what you're talking about, so please elaborate enlighten me
well, and most people in Cincinnety, I don't know anything about structured water.
But the reason why I wanted to talk about water and structured water in
a particular is because like there's too many water companies out there, and the
water is just is just absolutely garbage. And on one specific waters are called
alkaline water. Yeah, and alkaline water is literally one of the biggest scams.
I I probably shouldn't say scam. It's probably one of the most disappointing
things I've i've really ever ever seen because if you ever look on the bottle
of of a alkaline bottle, in the fine print, it says nine point
five p h Right, so that's the alkalinity of the water, and supposedly
alkaline. If you drink anything alkaline I would recommend orange juice or grapefruit juice.
Actually the acidity the city, no, not just the acidity actually converts
to alkaline in the body. It's it's much much better for you. If
you do lemon water, that's gonna be much much better water for you.
And just taking minerals in general. But alkaline water at when it's bottled,
it says, when you know at first bottling it is it is a nine
point five a pH, but uh, the pH dies and actually a lessons
the more shelf life it has on it. So so with that whole that
reminds me. Water gets old, is what you're saying. Alkaline water gets
old. It reminds me of the movie Signs where the little girl had glasses
of water all over the house. It's no, I don't want that water.
I want a new glass that's old. So she knew, she knew,
she knew. So take your your health advice from little girls in movies
on the movies. ALIAS, right, that's right. So so I just
want to say buying that stuff is really I'm not gonna help you. I've
actually tested. I have a video online that I tested the alkaline water from
the bottom and I tested tap water, and the tap water was actually a
more alkaline because of the minerals at a higher pH way way higher pH than
the alkaline water the virus. I think that the alkaline thing is a scam.
Oh well, if you say scam, you can get sued. So
I don't like people, so I don't like it. If if you say
I think it's a scam, they can't see you because they can't see you
for thinking something, you know, saying it definitely, yeah, I think
it might be a scam. You could say that and be totally unlitigated.
Call me right now, shut up, tell Gary, Jeff Walgan and shut
up now. But there's something actually better, and there's something that actually holds
well, not not pH but it's called it's called a structured water. And
basically what structured water is, and it's also called hydrogen water, it actually
creates a structure that's hexagonal, so so the molecules form and it becomes it
is three more hydrogen molecules in it. And with that hydrogen, it helps
to facilitate a more cellular activity in the mitochondria and the and the ocellular structure.
So is it truly h two o. Then if it has more hydrogen
molecules, it's not it's not H two oh, it's actually H three oh.
Yeah. And so it's going to have you know, a more of
of the hydrogen, like the hydrogen molecule, and it absorbs much much faster
into you know, because we're carbon where carbon you know, or right,
So so it's gonna be a much more much more absorbed and much faster.
Well, you listen to the green idiot's carbons destroying the planets. That's why,
that's why their movement is an anti human movement because we're all carbon based
creatures. Well, and the and and that's the craziest thing I've ever heard
where you know, I definitely see all the transhumanism and the and the and
the evilness that's out there against a human's and and you know, we have
to literally live with with the notion that we are carbon bing that's right,
and we have you know, organic beings, all carbon based life forms please
report to the detention center for elimination, right, And I mean that's what
they want sure, right, because the whole a whole group of them in
dominos, That's that's what they're all about. And my my friend Karen Kataline
says it all the time. Rocco. My advice to them is, Okay,
you go first, Yeah, and why not do you believe it's a
good thing for the planet. Maybe you can volunteer to be the first on
the list. Well, and because you're really not that special, Yeah,
and we're gonna we're going away off off off structure. But I would really
rather people look more into structured water, you know, and then and then
start drinking that if you're gonna pay extra money for water, right, And
I mean is it sold? Where would you find? Yeah, you can
buy a molecule of hydrogen. You can buy it online. I think that
a Fresh Time has has some and and there's a and there's a company called
a Sprouts that's in you know, in Tennessee, Oklahoma. But I just
go online Amazon sells it. But structured water, yeah, structured water.
And then you know, I'm and I'm just a big, a bigger fan
of just you know, like the big Burkey filter or Alexa Pure where they
have the the ceramic filters that take out the floor ride that take out Because
we talked, you know, the other night about the floor ride and how
you know how so so when you can and you want to pay extra for
a water and and it's not sam pellogrino, and get some structured water?
How was how was sam pellogrino for your health? How is that? As
long as you get it in the glass bottles, it's fine. We talked
about the Yeah, like the microplas. I'm drinking out of a damn styrofoam
cup again tonight, Rocco annoying as a train with Rocco dot co? Is
it so annoying that you want to shove a steak down my mouth like I'm
a vegan? Okay, good, all right, rap though, thank you
brother. Well we'll talk soon. I know. It's the nightcap on seven
hundred W l W