Find a documentary of Carlos Andrés Pérez' s days in Venezuela. I don
' t remember the exact name Meru who is out there in the days of
Carlos Andrés Pérez in Venezuela. In the eighties and nines, Venezuela made the
decision of the Venezuelan people to vote again, because the Andrés Pérezs to see
if they would return those days of glory that this politician gave to Venezuela.
Between seventy- four and seventy- nine, the time of Tabara Totamedo,
many Venezuelan planes in the domestic and international airports of Venezuela. Many Venezuelan pods
were leaving in their private planes, small planes, etc, because they had
an economic bonanza those good years of the oil of the deprivation of the east,
that sheath to put in the name of State the Venezuelan oil companies,
that sheath. Carlos Andrés Pérez was for many an excellent President, with his
shadows and lights. He returned to power in the eighties, but Carlos Andrés
Pérez had made a series of mistakes and proposed to remove Venezuela from the hole
in which he had left it the product of all the environment that was generated
at the end of his government and Campings. When he was sworn in,
he said that what he had been given was a briefcase full of bills.
That it was the President who succeeded Carlos Andrés Périz, who had to pay
the price of the mistakes of the previous years, of the previous governments here
was fixed point agreement of one thousand nine hundred fifty- eight. Well,
then in that Venezuela of nineteen hundred and eighty- nine, with almost thirty
years or thirty years of fixity and democracy, of accumulated crises, of a
bonanza that did not flow, as the average Venezuelan was accustomed and as it
had sold out. Venezuela was the richest country in Latin America, as Carlos
Andrés Pérez arrived and a lot of decisions had to be made. And Carlos
Andrés came determined to reverse a lot of decisions that he made in his government
and that were taken after his government to re- route Venezuela on the path
of progress and development. But he didn' t tell the Venezuelans. He
did it after he arrived and before arriving he decided Carlos Andrés Pérez that the
congressional hall where traditionally the presidents in democracy in Venezuela were sworn in, as
it was not enough and chose the Teresa Carreño theater, the daughter of that
gentleman of the author of the Carreño manual. Well that theater, which is
one of the most sumptuous and important theaters in America. For there and a
spectacle of swearing for more than swearing, seemed the coronation of one of a
tsar or a king, Fidel Castro himself. I would comment to Carlos Andrés
Pérez that, if he did not think the pomp for an oath for a
period of government was exaggerated, Fidel, you know, very close friend and
ally of Carlos Andrés, was critical of him. For this reason, Carlos
Andrés, in February of a thousand nine hundred and eighty- nine, staged
his show. It was an orationation, I repeat, sumptuous, magnificent in
this theater and a week after all this began the problems to bloom and Carlos
Andrés, because he would end up having to resign the Presidency and a lot
of pods. So there' s, behind that documentary, a comment that
says it seems that Carlos Andrés dropped a sacues salt for having removed the president
' s mandate from the National Congress. Venezuelans are ten times more powerful than
us. You ask that Venezuelan that what you think had to do with Carlos
Andrés' s failure, and many will tell him about those who lived in
that time that he put on saracs. The swearing out in Venezuela is the
curse of Bolivar. I don' t know what sheath Venezuelan, like all
Latinos, is well- mandated. I say all this because sometimes cabals allow
you to leave the pods as they are. And the President of the Republic
announced yesterday that why they can' t be sworn in by him and raquel
in the National Theatre. And you' ll say, Pussy Alberto. We
thought you were a smart guy. You believe in those pods. I believe,
in those pods. I believe that the symbolism he has for power,
the hall of the Chamber, the Hall of the National Assembly and more than
that, that building symbolizes the first power of the State, to which he
owes submission, the executive power. No, if you know that the National
Congress is the first power of the state, it is the one that controls
and controls the entire state through the representatives who are there, who are deputies
and senators, from where the laws are commanded and where it is governed.
One understands the country, but the executive is the one who executes, the
one who administers, the one who manages. And I don' t think
I know. It seems symbolic to me that if the Dominican tradition has traditionally
been, the redundancy will be sworn in there because there are no three guests
to move that to the National Theatre. I am a cavalosian and I can
be of no, because there are other countries. I don' t make
ad populum arguments. I am very thorough and I believe and think that in
symbolic terms, it gives me a bad omen of the idea personally. What
doesn' t call me sorry, what strikes me powerfully is that there'
s no room for people or something that pre they can tell completely exactly,
but isn' t there room for people? But renting the National Theatre and
making that expense, of that montage in the middle of the conversation of a
possible tax reform and all the loans they have taken, does not seem to
me a smart decision. I think it' s absurd. If it doesn
' t fit, in the Senate they gather somewhere else, somewhere after the
inauguration and I don' t care about it, you do the book and
I don' t like it either. Everything I do, I say.
I wanted to bring back that history of Venezuela, because sometimes it is good
to reflect already, as he says Sunday ora, if there is a little
doll, a little thing that his martita, at what time it will be
carpet at eight in the morning. A ridiculous one. It' s ridiculous.
All logistics is going to be the first. The deputies and senators will
take office at eight in the morning. Surely they will make the directives of
both chambers and will be transferred by bus to the National Theatre the members of
the National Assembly, which are the two chambers together, gathered in session to
swear to the President, in joint session to swear to the President and the
Vice- President of the Republic. There' s an orchestra playing there,
there' ll be a lot of pomp and lots of parties. I'
m sure cheer fund, the one or earlier than in these four years there
was something that wasn' t in the twenty. There' s no closure,
there' s no closure, and there' s room, because there
' s a lot of people there that' s already cleaned up and there
' s room, to hire the sixteen, there' s got to be
at least twenty dances here in town. They have to get their hands on
announce where they hire cheerleaders. What I was telling you, the main restaurants,
their lounges, the main ones of the most expensive and exclusive, are
already reserved for the 16th of August, after noon. I don' t
want anyone to say no, it' s too late. He' s
saying, making ominous and random parallels about no. I believe and think that
the National Congress and as they say the Constitution, says no side that it
has to say there. Well, by the tradition bands it is there.
And more than anything else, because, while the palace is the symbol of
power, of the executive power of the Presidency of the Republic, the first
power of the State, its symbol and seat is the palace of the National
Congress. I think that for a matter of symbolism, out there simply because
countries also build traditions and these traditions occur over time and I do not,
but nothing do that you want the producer of that. There' s a
tirijala. Let me tell you the devil don' t relax. If we
don' t have to produce someone, otherwise wait. There' s a
long pull of that. Why, because the campaign of good friendships yes,
yes, on the issue of production, if the closure of the campaign closures
of oron enmitys. There' s a tug in that red shape. He
must have introduced himself to whom I' ve seen. You guys who saw
him today, we' re coming.