Thank you for listening to Pictures Media Radio. Welcome to Policy and Rights,
the show about the government policy and human rights. And they should really understand
that we also have weapons and they know it. I just said it now
myself, weapons that can hit targets on their territory. Everything that the West
is coming up just now, what they threaten the world with, it can
result in a conflict with the use of nuclear weapons and therefore the destruction of
civilization. What you just heard was Vladimir Putin threatening nuclear war against Western Asians
if they send ground troops to help Ukraine in their effort to win the war
against Russia. As remember two years ago that what's probably more than two years
ago now that when we're Putin sent troops in an invasion attempt to take over
Ukraine as what he called a security measure for certain territories that wanted to remain
loyal to Russia. And now we're up to threats to nuclear war. Well,
maybe some of those starts aren't totally unprovoked. There has been a proposal
by France to send ground troops to Ukraine in order to help their efforts,
and there have been a few new Natal countries that are closer to being neighboring
to Russia at this point, but the threat still remains that rather than trying
to make a peace with Western countries so that we all can live in harmony
together, that he'd rather threaten than work with Western countries so that some sort
of agreement can work out with trade with Ukraine and that those territories can or
the people in those territories they want to remain loyal to Russia can be free
to leave and go to Russia as they wish. So it kind of kind
of frames out the lack of willingness to work together as human beings in our
world today. So onto other recordings that we're going to have today, we're
going to have a response from Joe Biden to a problem that they're having with
the Mexican border. He's going to be making a speech from Texas, which
is the state that holds the largest Mexican border to it and has some of
the most problems with Mexican nationals trying to cross illegally into the United States.
He will be talking about a bipartisan solution to upgrading the legal system that would
handle the cases for these illegal immigrants and help process them back quickly so that
they can be returned to Mexico or other points as quickly as possible. Instead
of taking years, then it would take maybe months. And some of the
opposition that he's getting against it are people talking about that it only feeds the
Democratic side and does not actually do anything for the Republican side. But as
a reminder, it is a by partisan agreement. An agreement comes that comes
from both parties, not just a single sided democratic proposal or solution. With
that, we're going to come to Canada and Pierre Pouvier is claiming to have
documents, the secret documents that are harmful to the Liberals and Justin Trudeau that
they were hiding things, and these documents prove how much they were hiding.
And again what we're looking at is that a mud slinging operation from one side
to the other, the Conservative parties slinging mud at the Liberals, trying to
make them look bad. At this point, I don't think that the Conservative
Party needs to do a whole lot to make the Liberal Party look worse than
what they are, especially when we look at some of what the public polls
actually say in the public opinion of the Liberal government is at this point,
and justin Trudeau, but again to come to some solutions that are actually going
to help people and help find more housing for those who are refugees coming into
the country and needing help, and for those who are losing their homes because
they just can't get enough paycheck to be able to make ends meet, to
a lot of different things that maybe instead of fighting against each other, that
they need to come up with more coalition ideas that will help people instead of
trying to push one way or the other way with mud slinging and name calling
in and nasty statements towards each other on the parliament floor. So why don't
we get started. We're going to start off with Joe Biden as he talks
about this bipartisan agreement, this bipartisan solution to the Mexican border problem that the
United States has, and then we'll hear from members of government in Canada and
mister Polvier talking about secret documents that are damning to the Liberal government. Again,
thank you, as my mother would say, please excuse my back and
apologize. Well, folks, good afternoon. Before we started, like to
say a few words about the devastating wildfires that are scorching in Texas pan Handle
and northwest Oklahoma. You know, yesterday one of the biggest fire events in
Texas history, with more than one million more than one million acres of Texas
land burned from the start, I directed my team to do everything possible to
help protect the people in the communities threatened by these fires, in response to
specific requests made from the state. We already had more than five hundred federal
personnel here working on fire suppression. That includes the deployment of one hundred federal
firefighters and more on the way, as well as dozens of dive of additional
fire engines, air tankers, small planes, helicopters to help fight the flames.
And FEMA has already guaranteed that Texas and Oklahoma will be reimbursed for the
cost of keeping folks safe. And we're grateful for the brave first responders risking
their lives to save others, and we urge, we urge folks to listen
to the warnings. Some of the local officials listen to them. I've flown
over a lot of these wildfire since I've been president. Matter of fact,
I've been a helicopter in the West and the southwest and northwest, flown over
more Land burned to the ground, all the vegetation gone than the entire state
of Maryland square footage. The idea there's no such thing as climate change.
I love that, man. I love some of my neanderthal friends who still
think there's no climate change. Well, my administration's going to keep building on
the progress we've made fighting climate crisis, and we're going to keep help folks
rebuild themselves in the wake of these disasters, and we rebuild to the standards
that are up up to date, standards and building codes and the rest.
Because a lot of if you fly over these areas that are burned to the
ground, you'll see in the midst of twenty homes that are just totally destroyed,
one home sitting there because they had the right roof on it. And
anyway, since I took office, FEMIS provided Texas alone over thirteen billion dollars
thirteen billion dollars in three years of disastery leave after fires and winter storms across
the state. And when disasters strike, there's no red state or blue state
where I come from. They're just communities and families looking for help. So
we're standing with everyone. Everyone affected by these wildfires. I'm going to continue
to help you respond and recover. Now turning the purpose of my visit,
I want to thank Congress from Gonzales there, you are a pal. I
thank you. I thank you for the passport into his district. But he's
been a great Partner's also want to thank merk Cowan for his partnership. And
I want to thank County Judge Trevino for over thirty and over the thirty local
officials who've joined us here today. No one, no one works harder for
a safe, secure border than all of you. And Secretary of Marcus has
joined us today, and he's joined by seven mayors in towns across Texas,
four county judges here from across the state. I told the county judge that
I used to be a county official. It's the hardest job in American politics.
You know why they think you can do everything. You don't have the
budget. So anyway, and the two leaders from the Texas let's say,
as your state House leader Trace here the Trade Martinez deficient and the state Senate
leader Carol Alvadero, and look and all the other local officials that are here
today. I want to say, thanks, folks. It's real simple.
It's time to act. It's long pastime to act. I just received a
briefing from the border patrol at the border, as well as immigration and enforcement
asylum officers, and they're all doing incredible work under really tough conditions, really
tough because they told me what they what you already know and we already know.
They desperately need more resources. Say it again, they desperately need more
resources, need more agents, more officers, judges, more equipment in order
to secure our border. Folks. It's time for us to move on this.
We can't wait any longer, folks. On my first day as president,
I introduced a bill I sent to Congress a comprehensive plan to fix the
broken immigration system and to secure the border, but no action was taken.
Then months ago, my team began a serious negotiation and a bipartisan group of
senators Democrat leading conservative Republicans and progressive Democrats, and a result of a compromised
bill, it's the toughest set of border security reforms we've ever seen in this
country. It's pretty basic. With this deal, we could hire one thousand,
five hundred additional border security adds one five hundred edition off and officers and
between ports of entry. For the last four years, staffing has been roughly
that flat. It's flat ages working overtime, spending long hours patrolling the border,
making major sacrifices, and I know it takes a big toll on them
and their families. That's why in December, I signed a bill finally getting
border patrol agents what I've been pushed by and reminded by the congressman overtime pay
they deserve. Finally getting overtime pay. I mean, it's ridiculous. It
took this long, it was long past time, and I was proud to
do it. But we need to do more. It's time to step up.
It's time to step up, provide them with significantly more personnel and capability.
We also need more immigration judges help handle the backlaw. There are two
million cases backlog of two million cases. As bipartis JAI would provide funding for
one hundred more immigration judges immediately. Would also establish new efficient and fair process
for the government to consider asylum claims for those arriving on the border. Today,
the process to get a decision on an asylum claim takes five to seven
years now. You all know it down here, but the people the country
don't understand it. It's far too long. You command, you say,
you say, I have a credible fear, and we've changed that standard to
make it hard. We want to change make it harder. And what happens
you say, well, okay, you can win the country, but come
back in five to seven years, maybe as many as eight years, and
you get a hearing from before a judge and determine whether you can stay.
This will encourage more people. This encourages more people to come to the country.
If they get by the first say they got another five, seven,
eight years before they have to do anything, because they know they cannot handle
the caseloads quickly, and they'll be able to stay in this country in the
meantime. With new policies in this bill, in the addition of four three
hundred additional asylumn officers, we'll be able to reduce that process to less than
six months. That would have a serious to turn it effect on those coming
north. When the criminal gang say we'll get you north. What's eight thousand
bucks? They said, now, wait, let me get this tree.
I'm gonna go north. This is gonna cost me six eight probably coach at
eight I thousand dollars equivalent, And I'm gonna get there and in six months
they may be able to get rid of me. I don't know, man,
six months, seven years two different things. A person is thinking about
enter the United States understands the cases to be sided in a few weeks or
months instead of five to seven years. They're less likely to come in the
first place. They're not going to pay the car tells thousands of dollars to
make that journey, knowing that it would be turned around quickly. Look,
then we also need more cutting it inspection machines to detect and stop fentanyl.
Formenter in the United States of America. A year ago, I stood at
the border in Olpasso, and I watched these machines at work. They were
able to detect everything from ventanyl to weapons to people being smuggled in cargo containers.
This this compromise bill would provide an additional four three, four hundred and
twenty four million dollars for one hundred more of these machines and could save lives
in the process. This compromise notization will also give me, as president or
any of the next president emergency authority to temporarily shut down the border between ports
of entry when the numbers of immigrants and migrants, excuse me, overwhelm the
border starting straining the border patrols ability to process them. At the same time,
at our legal ports of entry, like Aaron Brownsville, we're making investments
in infrastructure. My bipartisan infrastructure law is going to provide nearly four billion new
dollars, the boost security, the ease waiting times at land and ports of
entry like Brownsville. And I want to thank again Concum Gonzalz help me get
that through and get the pass the law that you get the money for the
for exact. That's how you got the money for the Gateway bridge from that
fund, Folks. The bipartisan Border security deal is a win for the American
people, and it's a win for the people of Texas, and it's fair
for them will legitimately have a right to come here to begin with. It's
a win for the people of Brownsville. And I believe that's why the Border
Patrol Union endorsed it. I believe that's why the National Chamber of Commerce,
the National Chamber of Commerce endorsed it not known as the Democratic organization with a
capital B. But look, and that's why the Wall Street Journal endorsed it
as well. This is a truly bipartisan initiative. That's why the bipartisan South
Texas Alliance of Cities endorsed it. Folks, I didn't get I didn't get
everything I wanted that compromised bipartisan bill, but neither did anybody else. The
compromises part of the process. That's how democracy works, That's how it's supposed
to work. Compromise is a very positive step under critical issue for the country,
all those issues of the country, and folks here in Brownsville and all
along the border know that we need to have their backs, year backs.
I want the people to understand clearly what happened here. This bill was the
United States Senate was on its way to being passed, then it was derailed
by rank and file politicans ranked partisan politics. The US Senate needs to reconsider
this bill and those senators who oppose it need to set politics aside and pass
it on the merits, not on whether it's going to benefit one party or
benefit the other party. It's about whether it benefits the American people's what the
American people to deserve. The Speaker of the House needs to put this bill
on the floor, because if he put it on the floor unrestricted, it
would pass. The majority of Democrats and Republicans both houses support this legislation until
someone came along and said, don't do that. It will benefit the incumbent.
That's a hell of way to do business in America. For such a
serious problem, we need to act. It's time for the speakers and some
of my Republican friends in Congress who are blocking this bill to show a little
spine pass a bipartisan bipartisan as another member by part conservative leaders supported this border
security bill. Let's remember who we work for. For God's sake, we
work for the American people. Let me am with this. I understand my
predecessor's legal paths today. So here's what I would say to mister Trump.
Instead of playing politics issue, instead of telling members of Congress to block this
legislation, join me or I'll join you in telling the Congress to pass this
bipartisan border security bill. We can do it together. You know, and
I know it's the toughest, most efficient, most effective border security bill as
country has ever seen. So instead of playing politics with the issue, Why
don't we just get together and get it done. Let's remember who the heck
we work for. We worked for the American people, not the Democratic Party,
the Republican Party. We worked for the American people. And let's remember
who we are with the United States of America. No, I mean,
just think about this. There's nothing, nothing beyond our capacity. Nothing when
we work together. And if all things that we should be working together on
this, we have the formul to get it done. God bless you all
me. God protect our border patrol, and God protect our troops. Now
a NDPP is stepping down to help US constituents in a different way and what
he thinks could be a better way. So let's listen to that. Like
you, I believe you have some news for us. What's happening with your
career right now? Please? Do you? Indeed, today I announced that
I'll be vacating my seat as a Member of Parliament for Elma Transcona effective March
thirty first, to go work with the new government of wab Canoe in Manitoba
as a senior advisor on inner governmental affairs. You've been here a good while.
You've fallen the footsteps of your late father. Why the transition time now
other than obviously the new government now, Well, I'm really proud of all
the work that we've done as a caucus here in Ottawa under jag Meat Singh,
and I'm really excited by the work that the government wog Canoe is going
to be doing in Manitoba. For me personally, this is an opportunity to
continue on in the same vein of work working for people trying to have better
public policy, but to get to do it from a position where I'm closer
to home and I get to see a lot more of my young children and
my wife and support her in her career as well. The adp cocus is
to split both sides of the aisle. You sit on the fire side from
mister Singh is do you have any confidence still in mister Singh's leadership. We
absolutely have confidence in jig Meat Singh's leadership. As I say, we're doing
a lot of great work here in Ottawa. The new pharmacare deal that the
details of which are going to be announced shortly is very exciting and I think
is going to make a big difference in the lives of a lot of people,
along with the new dental care plan, along with the anti scab legislation
that just went to committee yesterday. So there's a lot of great work here
that's been happening under the leadership of jig Meat Singh. And I've been very
honored to be a part of that work. But looking forward to get to
do simil are kinds of work well, being closer to home with my family.
You used some I believe parliamentary language. The speaker called it today,
was this, I think you were describing the lead with the opposition, if
I got that right, or I'm still I was expressing concern for certain members
of his caucus that I felt might end up getting dragged out behind him by
their tongues. And I believe you apologized for that of zech r I did.
Indeed, was that a parting shot orvative? It was that was impulsive,
and I think you know, with hindsight, perhaps not the best day
to do something like that. Of course, the House of Commons is a
place that can get quite contentious at times, and the Conservatives certainly delivered their
fair share of various kinds of phrases on the floor of the House that I
think would be deemed on parliamentary I think it's worth noting that it wasn't something
I had intended to put on the record. It was a Conservative MP who
invited me to do so. Just too things. To wrap it up,
What is your message to your constituents? You know, I just thinking of
your constituency when you walk the streets. What is your key message to them
now that we're going to be going down a by election and so on to
replace me? My means message to folks in Elma Transcona is thank you and
a lot of gratitude for the honor of having been able to serve our community.
I intend to continue that service in another way, trying to make life
better for people, and I hope that that as I exit, voters in
Elmwood Transcona will continue to support the good work that jig Meets Singh and his
team is doing here in Ottawa. Do you think your late father would be
proud of the move that you're making. I don't know exactly what my father
would think, but I know that he always supported me in my decisions about
my career, whether that was when I was studying philosophy or becoming an electrician
or entering into politics, and I would ex fact that he would be happy
to support me in this latest move as well. And the final is just
a procedural question. I believe you have yet to stand up to the speak,
stand up in the house and resign. That is the press release went
out first, we're still you still have to do that last. Yeah,
those pieces will will come before March thirty. First. Yeah, thank you.
I really appreciate it. Thank you very much, and we'll send that
off. Appreciated you. Mister Povier with secret documents that will do harm to
the Liberal government after they've been released. Well he's releasing them now, isn't
he. So that's here what mister Povier has to say. Dejatank no locuple
nio flash may met now on packap a the protege energy of the end the
reservoir say document see document because rude camound this any document mount down the down
the laboratoire Mount Rudeau Kie response AB pogerre a h u z a the verius
virus a patogen lepredangerer lund. The response AB paul a program collaborare avec larmasion
was a specific mount. The response AB the darmission was poor Lebero bio terrorism
vossi le consta vena, the reservoir guade, luc laboratoire, the Winnipeg doctor
Chu kid Unite the pato gens pace you solely document a page do some car
represented in down Jay tre Gravida Canada down so sound a particularly down Lisa Stella
consider comes autemnt securities on reisonil the vol de Mattier down Gerouse kietire de terrorists
elizatte a traire he found the lesbionage for Saint fu Tree in real l security
Economic Canada fancy as arapage do son nev q. He's a side leison cats
team doctor Chu a communicy key a vectors de voyage ancien. They prove up
to a new law desire. It is information collect apartier new electronic revel oocuse
is effect city effective man leca a town expert on a Matzia is information sansible
Mattia doangerous. Doctor Chu represented in Mena's realist a credib polar security economic to
Canada an organizan rapide a clown deestin a vectist tranchi Fansitasian doctor Chu rapet stail
response, ab Trudeau poor de virus, the patrogen down soon labor laboratoi le
secresy and many the way the major General chen Wang, the lame popular,
the liberation, the peking he Solari document alapage de sant francis a considered you
sit cause come le mao viral, the lackad media medical military. The principal
expers in one mats that they found counts on don lie ala bio security alabeo
bio de found a or bio terroorism fain the Cita con strude, the news
document lofe eskila in for male public, No it come came the reason,
the security National Baselon and committee, the parliamunt the Para Montel, the Tuley
Party, Econ prix deliberal it, cete per porte, ex curitan nasionnel the
camouflage step protge carrier politics that you stay to on Abita Lamberg is just sit,
the committee, the Cat party Lisa informac Saint Tavoi pooru Principal, the
protege logan. Is there a check that the politic and the misson and now
there pound at the precupacy on legitim the security nasionnel a lord is scel for
domant de de count up okay le paramat at demand the say document cat for
you stand to refuse I la meme pos reveal the president. The chambres des
come in perche la divasion the document. So what example is on the security
security nasional sweet de clan and alexion. So then just ga down the cal
las shin a d Just stand Trudeau again met now in the ka the protege
not security national ser ridicule reality seek protege not system sciencia mette fen espionage a
lee because you stand to me if we and premunist und mere par ledictas communists,
the peking comes, you stand Trudeau, the fire and premieres but they
founder not repe founder, not repee countre do thank you very much. And
now in English we already knew that Justin Trudeau was not worth the cost,
the crime, the corruption and the cover up. But now we know that
he cannot protect our people or our country. We just received these documents that
Trudeau has been covering up for years. Documents related to a massive security breach
at the Trudeau government's most sensitive laboratory where the most dangerous viruses and pathogens are
studied and handled. We have learned that the Trudeau government's head of pathogens was
collaborating with members of Beijing's People's Liberation Army, who are responsible for bioweapons and
bioterrorism. We know now that a People's Liberation Army official was able to gain
personal access, walk in the door, look at computers. It has access
to all of our most important virological secrets. Let me if you think any
of this is hyperbole, read the report yourself. This is from government documents,
the true government's own documents. It says here on page one forty two
Winnipeg lab scientist doctor Chwu is head of the Special Pathogen's Unit, the top
person in that job, according to documents. On page two forty two,
quote represents a serious and credible danger to the Government of Canada as a whole,
and in particular at facilities considered high security due to the potential for theft
of dangerous materials attractive to terrorists and foreign entities that conduct espionage to infiltrate and
damage the economic security of Canada. End quote. It states further on page
two thirty nine, investigators assess that doctor Chu communicated with foreign entities during her
trips to China. The evidence obtained from interviews and from information collected from the
electronic content of her devices reveal that this is indeed the case. As a
subject matter expert with access to sensitive information and dangerous materials, doctor Chu presents
a realistic and credible threat to Canada's economic security when conducting repeated and clandestine meetings
with foreign entities end quote. Then it says doctor Chu conducted joint research with
the Major General Chen Way of the People's Liberation Army, who, according to
page two thirty six, is a noted top virologist at the Academy of Military
Medical Scientists and is China's chief biological defense expert, engage in research related to
biosafety, biodefense, and bio terrorism bioterrorism end quote. And are these are
documents? This is right out of the government's own documents, Trudeau, What
did he do when he found out about this? Did he immediately informed Canadians
of the breach? Did he fire anybody? Nope, no one was fired.
Did he call inquiry to get to the bottom of it, Nope,
we didn't do that. Either. Instead, he covered it all up.
He defied four parliamentary orders to release these documents when the Speaker tried to get
them. He sued the speaker to cover this up. He said it was
all for national security. But who don't we know from a committee composed of
four members of Parliament, including one Liberal and three judges, and I quote,
the information appears to be mostly about tech the organization from embarrassment for failures
in policy and implementation, not legitimate national security concerns, and its release is
essential to hold the government to account. In other words, there was no
national security reason why we couldn't have had this before. It was only because
Trudeau didn't want the embarrassment before an election. So what did you do?
Then? He collaborated knowing this, He collaborated with Beijing by a vaccine for
COVID. Could you imagine if the deal that Trudeau wanted to sign with Beijing
had gone ahead and we had procured China made vaccines after learning this information,
That's what was in this guy's head. And if you think for a minute,
because I know there'll be all kinds of excuses while he's not responsible,
and how could he possibly take ownership of what happens in his government. Let
me quote him. He has a document called Open and Accountable Government, and
I quote, as head of government, the Prime Minister has special responsibilities for
national security end quote. It's his responsibility. This is his government's lab.
It's not a random university lab. It's the top lab for the prime minister's
public health agency. And he is exclusively responsible for the machinery of government as
prime minister of the country. So this is on Justin Trudeau. I will
add one last thing. Not only did he cover it up, not only
did he try to get a vaccine from China. After knowing this, he
called a snap election to make sure that the voting would happen before this came
out. And what happened in that election Beijing interfered to help him win it.
This is a man who says he admires China's basic communist dictatorship. We
cannot trust Justin Trudeau to keep our people and its country safe. We need
a strong, concernervative, common sense government that will root out foreign interference,
protect our critical secrets and our medical research, and stand on guard for our
country to keep our people and our nations safe. Thank you on a arrive
Can. There is a report by CTV that says that there was a man
who runs a company that got eight million dollars for a arrive Can. He
is still employed by the Department of National Defense. What does that say to
you? It says to me that there's no accountability. Now that we know
this, this individual should be immediately fired and there should be an immediate police
investigation of his conduct and that of the company with which he's associated, and
a broader inquiry within the public service about how this contracting was allowed to go
on for so long on the Winnipeg Lab. On the Winnipeg Lab, do
you think the National Microbiology Lab Infectious disease researchers should be allowed to do any
collaborations with China at this point? Why? Because we know that in this
instance that our highest placed, most sensitive lab was infiltrated by people who collaborated
with the People's Liberation Army, who did not reveal any of their ongoing partnerships
with the regime in Beijing, and who transferred materials from our most critical lab
containing our most dangerous viruses over to Beijing to and worked in collaboration with the
Wuhan Lab. So I don't think this is the kind of collaboration we want.
We should be collaborating with like minded democracies that we can to trust,
not those that want to attack our interest. Pharmacare so, As mister Paulis
has said, the government's own documents have confirmed that the national security breaches at
the Winnipeg Lab represent a very serious, incredible danger to Canada and a very
and a realistic and credible threat to Canada's economic security. As mister paulib has
also said in the government's own founding document, Open and Accountable Government, the
Prime Minister alone is responsible for the machinery of government, and the Prime Minister
has a special responsibility for national security. It is clear in these documents that
the Prime Minister failed in his responsibility to protect the security of Canadians against a
very serious threat against this country and its citizens. It's also clear that the
Prime Minister failed to ensure that the machinery of government was set up on a
way to ensure that these kinds of things did not happen at the Winnipeg Lab.
In addition to all of this, what is equally appalling is the cover
up. It was three years ago that we asked for these documents. In
fact, as mister Paulyev has said, the House of Commons and its two
committees issued four orders for the production of these documents three years ago. It
was four years ago that these scientists were marched out of the lab in Winnipeg.
And during these last four years the government covered it up. It initially,
as you will recall, tried to punt this to the Enzikop Committee,
and then it took the Speaker to court, and then it actually created this
ad hoc committee of four and ps and three judges that took another year and
a half to review these documents. So this has been a massive cover up
on part of this government, and it's particularly appalling in light of the fact
that this is a government that came to office promising greater transparency. We have
seen anything butt. In fact, it is been said by Information Commissioners that
we've seen a reversal in transparency. I'm part of this government, probably one
of the worst reversals in modern government Canadian government history. We've also had a
government here that promised to respect parliament and here we are, three years after
we asked for these documents and finally starting to get some of the truth behind
what happened, and so this is a damning indictment on this Prime Minister,
his management of the government of Canada and his lack of respect for our democracy.
Good morning everyone. Canadians need to know that two scientists with deep relationship
with many institutions inside the People's Republic of China infiltrated Canada's top microbiology lab in
Winnipeg. While there. People's Liberation Army scientists from the Academy of Military Medical
Scientists, which is charged with biology enabled weapons, were able to gain a
secret security clearance which gave them unfettered and unsupervised access to the laboratory and to
the computer based science network. This is a travesty and a breach of security
at the highest levels that cannot be tolerated. Aside from all this, we
know very clearly that the Trudeau Liberal government wanted to cover this up, denying
four orders of Parliament, take the Speaker to court, and calling an unnecessary
election during COVID, which of course resulted in US understanding now very clearly that
there was Chinese interference in that election. Canadians need to know also that this
was not a national security threat cover up. It is a cover up to
avoid political embarrassment. This is an embarrassment to our country and Canadians also need
to know who is going to be held responsible in this Sunny Ways government.
Who covered this up, who is at the head from a political nature,
Why did they cover up for so long? And when will someone such as
a minister or a prime minister be held responsible on behalf of all Canadians.
I thank you. Just one thing where we just want to add to this
is as we actually look at this and you think about the documents that we
all took a lot of time last night going through, in the cover up
that we've been going under for the last three years because of Justin Trudeau and
his corruption and his cover ups. We've got to remember that if you look
at page ninety seven, paragraph number five in the CESIS document, it says,
and this is where this gets really critical here when it comes to our
national security. The Academy of Military Medical Sciences of the People's Liberation Army of
the People's Republic of China and has offensive, chemical and biological weapons capabilities.
As for China's key national research and development priorities is to support national offense research
projects by transforming the results of basic civil research into military applications. So,
although you have Justin Trudeau not at all concerned about our national security, more
concerned about his political embarrassments, us as Conservatives under Pierre Poliev want to make
sure that we continue to go out there and support our national security and make
sure that this never happens again. We don't know exactly what materials, technology,
viruses and other biological things that they're in that lab were actually turned over
to the PRC and to the People's Liberation Army. We know that they're interested
in weaponization, and so we cannot have these biological weapons created in China and
used against us here in Canada or our allies. You want to talk about
an embarrassment, this is a national embarrassment. It's an international embarrassment, and
our own national security is at risk. Let me just say that this is
a national security failure on the highest level. The head of the unit at
the Winnipeg Lab responsible for pathogens was collaborating with the foremost expert in the PLA
with respect to bio defense and bio terrorism, and through it all the Prime
Minister was less than trans parent with Canadians and he covered it up. And
the question is who bears responsibility And the answer to that question is very simple.
Justin Trudeau bears responsibility. The buck stops with Justin Trudeau as Prime minister.
He has special responsibilities for national security and he has a lot to answer
for for this colossal failure that occurred under his watch. Quebec Clalberta took his
province there on that curse. The note promise, the neuvil Neo Democrat Liberal
UHM and grand program is don nou veren de foto up a the the polpet
yeah, ask you Mexican, The question was so so the question was on
Mexican visas. We the Harper government put in the visa for Mexico which all
but eliminated false asylum claims from that country. When Prime Minister Harper left office,
there were two hundred and fifty asylum claims per year from Mexico. After
Justin Trudeau got in and lifted the visa requirement, that rose to seventeen thousand,
of which only eleven percent were actually found to be legitimate asylum claimants.
The rest were presumably illegitimate, and as a result, we have the social
services and our housing market completely overwhelmed with false claimants. We called, first
of all, that the visa never should have been lifted by Trudeau. He's
the one that caused the chaos in our immigration system. He and he alone,
is to blame for it. We called for him to reverse his mistake
a month ago. Finally he has backed down to me on that demand,
and I only wish that he had done it soon, or I should do
that. In franchise Francis aby demand league la harper a mian place, la
briga mexic Soukia presca le flu de Saint san Conte da mondal dazil don la
Stephen harper ye met now these set mill demand this a mill regardedly chef men
down owns, posson sound, trouve legitim dont loaders south sa di borde.
The system, the service socio a, the legem to okay back the quebec
are in point, the ripture cause, the line competents, the just rude
as conseil not system, the lima y moir to retablist le visa q if
you al ma s a la press conservatress pratt visa at le prix now vou
pa Lecu, Well, well it's not worth the cost. Well will you
just garment care? If you are, will you not answer more questions?
Inquiry? And from the United Nations, we have Dinnist France, President of
the General Assembly of the United Nations, speaking to the press on Climate and
Human Rights. Good afternoon all, Thank you for your interests and for joining
me here today. Allow me to start by thanking the people and Government of
Kenya for the warm reception and gracious hospitality extended to myself and my delegation since
arrival in this vibrant city of Nairobi. I would also like to congratulate as
Excellency the President of Kenya as gracious host and the executive Director of YUNAP for
successfully hosting the sixth session of the UN Environment Assembly here in Nairobi. It
is my strong hope that these discussions will provide us with additional guidance in tackling
the challenges of climate change, biodiversity loss and pollution and help to mobilize urgently
needed action across the twenty thirty agender for sustainable Development. You will note that
I deliberately said additional guidance because we all know that we were warned long ago
about the climate crisis, but we have been slow to take countervailing action.
This morning, UNEA six opened under the theme effective, inclusive and sustainable multilateral
actions to tackle climate change, biodiversity loss and pollution. I use the occasion
to reiterate my appreciation to UNA not only as the premier platform to provide the
needed leadership on global environmental policies and international environmental law, but also to ensure
interlinkages between addressing the environmental challenges on the one hand and achieving sustainable development on
the other. I urge member states and stakeholders alike to harness the value of
the UNAA six to scale up commitments and importantly, to make a robust contribution
to the reinvigoration of multilateralism so that it can more effectively deliver two people and
planet. Indeed, the current climate, and I mean that politically and literally
is marked by profound instability. Our multilateral system is regrettably on trial. High
level gatherings such as UNA six are therefore prime occasions for world leaders whose countries
and peoples are adversely affected by the climate crisis, to both advocate and enact
transformative change. Time and again, Member states have reaffirmed the importance of integrating
the environmental dimensions throughout the sustainable development of gender and acknowledge that a healthy environment
is both an essential requirement and a key enabler of sustainable development. Yet,
far too often, the voices of the very developing countries who are deeply and
disproportionately affected by the climate crisis are relegated to the margins and periphery, while
those at the center differ as the situation grows worse daily. This is wrong
ethically, morally, politically, and pragmatically. Pragmatically, it is wrong.
I am absolutely convinced that effective, inclusive and sustainable multilateral action is as much
about designing mutually beneficial commitments as it is about nurturing trust and implementation, including
all voices and concerns. This forum, therefore, is an opportunity to demonstrate
that human centered cooperation and collaboration are not only still possible, but are in
fact indispensable. During my visit to Kenya, I will also engage with senior
government officials, including His Excellency the President, Doctor William Sumiuto, the Prime
Cabinet Secretary and Cabinet Secretary for Foreign and Diaspora Affairs who His Excellency Mister Musalia
Mudavadi and Cabinet Secretary for the Environment, Climate Change on Forestry, Her Excellency
misunder Soipan two year I have already held separate meetings with key un officials including
the EUNIP Executive Director, Miss Inger Anderson, Director General of u N Office
in Nairobi, Miss Zainaba Hawa Bangura, as well as senior officials of un
Habitat. Furthermore, I will use the opportunity of being in Nairobi to engage
with civil society and visit projects managed by un Habitat in the vicinity of Nairobi.
In each setting, I will endeavor to draw attention to the diverse impacts
of climate change and environmental crisis on the full and effective enjoyment of human rights,
including through my address at the University of Nairobi, where I will discuss
the broader topic on how Africa can contribute to reinvigorating our fractured multilateral system.
I will also use this opportunity to communicate the ongoing work in New York,
especially the preparations for the Sustainability Week in April. One of the signature events
of my presidency and the Summit of the Future in September. My visitor Kenea
is therefore part of a broader effort to underscore the UN's commitment to building a
safer, more prosperous, and indeed more harmonious world, paving the way towards
a sustainable future for all everywhere. Together, we can deliver on peace,
prosperity, progress and sustainability for all, a message I am glad to have
shared with all the UNA six participants. To this end, my door will
remain open to any nation or leader desiring to engage in further cooperation across borders,
sectors or UN departments. I thank you for your kind attention, and
now I turn the floor over to you for any questions and or comments that
you may have. Thank you, Thank you very much, President His Excellency
Dennis Francis. We will open the floor now and I will encourage you to
ask questions. We will take group questions in value of time. So let's
raise your hand or start the questions. If you have any yes, can
you introduce yourself as well? And then so I'm Gordless from the Spanish News
Science. Thank you, Denise. I want to ask you that according to
the latest that from the war in Gatsa, more than thirty thousand people have
been killed. What measures should be taken to stop Israel's war against Hamas in
the Gaza strip? Thank you? You have two questions. Let me be
sure that I got the question. What message was it? Message? Measures?
Measures? Yes for your questions called from Radio Africa Group. Two questions.
We understand some of the s dgs are of the track. Which are
these and what needs to be done to scale them up? The second question
is on the interigs be doing conflict and climate change. We have seen communities
fighting overcast resources. As the President of UN, what is your message to
community that are fighting over cast resources? Thank you very much. We have
one more question and then we can have a next round. Yeah, okay,
Helen Kinda from the Nation Media Group. You've mentioned that you'll be meeting
President Truteau and the Prime Cabinet Secretariam Salium Davadi. Do we know the agenda
of your meeting or can you talk about it? Thank you? Would you
yes? Yes, Well let's start at the end. I do have a
meeting schedule uh for to meet with his Excellency the President and the Prime Cabinet
Secretary. But I think it would be premature and in a way discourteous of
me to reveal the substantive content of that interface before it happens. So with
the greatest of respect, I'm unable to give you details. But the fact
of the matter is this is the largest This is the only UN station in
the global South, and it is the largest UN station. It's the only
one that deals viscerally with issues related to the environment. And so in a
sense, while the UN itself is a grand a brand, a global brand,
Uniar in Nairobi carries the environmental brand of the U. N It's a
very important duty station. And the fact of the matter is, as we
know, environmental issues have become increasingly important as a development issue in the last
fifteen to twenty years. In particular, whether our civilization succeeds or fails to
a large degree will depend on the extent to which we can effectively address the
environmental issues that are confronting us, perhaps the most pernicious of which being climate
change. In some parts of the world, people are at risk of losing
of being inundated by the seas, and of losing their culture and their lifestyle
and heritage. So the issues on the global agenda that are discussed routinely in
Nairobi I extremely important issues, and I would like to use this opportunity to
congratulate the government and people of Kenya for their unfailing commitment and deep engagement with
the UN on these issues. It's a dream of a partnership really that you
have this level of engagement and support, and I think it works well in
the interest of both sides. But because the environment must continue to be a
priority going forward, otherwise, I'll leave it for you to imagine what the
consequence might be. So thank you for your question. What needs what measures
need to be taken to see the war in Gaza? Well, war is
a decision, isn't it. It's a decision. It's a human decision,
and therefore it's not difficult to stop the war. Those who are waging war
can, in an enlightened moment, decide, Okay, we're stopping it.
Stopping it does not mean giving in. It does not mean canceling the legitimate
right of the Israeli people to live in peace and security. It means none
of that. It simply means, unimportantly avoiding further bloodshed, pain and suffering.
It simply means not risking any further the loss of human dignity by the
people who live in Gaza. It means respecting their rights as innocent civilians who
are non combatants to live. What I would also hope it means is that
those who are directly involved in the conflict would be open and amenable to a
process, a political process of dialogue that could lead the way towards finding a
lasting settlement. We cannot have in perpetuity these cycles of war. It's been
going on now from the late nineteen forties nineteen fifties, every three or four
years, a lot of blood spilled on both sides. It's just not sustainable.
But that should surprise no one. Peace is never made in war.
Peace is made in peace around the table, through dialogue, through confidence building,
through building trust. You know. President Reagan used to say in his
negotiations with the Russians in the nineteen nineties, trust but verify. It's a
good practice. So it's a decision now. Lots of people might say or
think, well, why isn't In fact, today I was asked this question,
is why is this being permitted to go on. It's not being permitted
to go on. The United Nations General Assembly has spoken decisively in the context
of two resolution resolutions about Gaza. Every major statement I've made on peace and
security, I've repeated the demands that we've made. The war must stop,
all the hostages must be returned unconditionally, and there has to be there must
be an opening for the provision of humanitarian aid and support to the people of
Gaza. Because what has taken place and what is taking place is offensive to
the human spirit and to human dignity, causes a great deal of disquiet and
angst among people. So our hope is that wise judgment will prevail, even
as quiet negotiations behind the scenes are taking place with the key players, which
initiatives the UN fully supports. Because our object we have two objectives, really,
one to stop the blood letting and the suffering, and two to move
decisively towards a peace process that will endow Because in our view, the rights
of the people of Israel and the rights of the people of Palestine are not
irreconcilable. They're not irreconcilable. The two state solution really is the only credible
way to deal decisively and finally with this issue. So peace is our brand
and we promote it and we defend it, and that is why, for
example, we have made the statements that we've made on Gaza. There are
other initiatives that are in the works that the General Assembly will be taking next
week to deal with issues around Gaza, and we hope that that would lead
to the desired outcome. Okay, s the SDGs. Yes, the SDG's
progress in the SDGs has has faltered, and it's it's a confluence of things
that has created this problem. First of all, we had the pandemic,
nobody anticipated it and so progress towards the SDGs. Then we had this the
war in Ukraine. Now we have the war in Gaza. Then you had
rising inflation, then you had global food insecurity. It's a confluence of things.
But for example, there is no good reason why in twenty twenty four
there should be eight hundred and sixty million people on Earth living in abject poverty,
no reason. It is unacceptable. You know, war, you know
it is as if it's not exactly equivalent, but having those large numbers of
people living in poverty, in abject poverty, it's almost as if they Those
people are living a life of war every day, they are in a war
for their survival, and we can do something about it. We know what
we need to do about it. But the key missing ingredient has been something
referred to in the SEGS as the means of implementation, the resources to make
it happen, because implementing the reforms will cost money, money that many developing
countries, particularly the most vulnerable, the LDCs, the landlocked countries, and
the small island developing states, they do not have the resources to implement the
commitments. It is not that they are not committed. They are highly committed,
but the resources are not in place. Same thing hunger. About nine
hundred million people on this planet living in hunger. And guess what, even
if we achieve the goal of dealing with abject poverty by twenty thirty, there
will still be a couple hundred people living in poverty. So we have to
up our game. We have to honor commitments that we've given that has been
lacking thus far. We have to mobilize the resources necessary to impactfully change people's
lives, to give them hope, to lift them up, to empower them
really so that they can be encouraged and supported in undertaking personal initiatives that would
improve the conditions of living and the level of welfare for themselves and their families.
Now, this is a human the SD Jesus, you know, is
very human centered. It's all about people, and so our hope is that
the Summit of the Future will produce a strong, ambitious outcome in terms of
the commitments that will be given, the further commitments to address the problems confronting
both the planet and the population. In twenty thirty one more question about climate.
You had a climate question, I do have STG and the connection between
the climate. Can you repeat your question and didn't hear that one? My
question was about conflict and conflicts and climating or discuss resources. As the president,
I know, yes, yes, yes, Well, this is a
this is a situation that uh, we will we will have to learn to
live with because resources are under great pressure and if we do not manage them
sustainably, we will run out of them. Soother or rather than later.
Take for example, let's just take for example water portable water. There are
many places in the world where water is already in short supply, perennial drought,
in the Southwest region of the United States, for instance, in parts
of California, which has a large agriculture agricultural sector, a large viticulture sector
producing fruits and vegetables. Water is an issue in many parts of the world.
That's why the UN has a process dealing with water, because we have
to learn to manage resources more sensibly and more sustainably. Most people do not
understand that water is very costly to produce. You don't just wave a wand
and make it happen. It's very costly to produce and to distribute, and
most governments are not in a position to finance that, even if on one
could find and the water. So we have to be sensible. The answer
is not to engage in conflicts and fight over it. The answer lies has
to lie in a very sensible, rational discussion, first of all about how
to improve the production of water and secondly, how to manage it sustainably so
that both sides can share it. That's the only real solution. There has
to be some agreement, some understanding between both parties about how to share the
resource. And particularly since you know it happens that many rivers, important rivers
in the world straddle five four or five six countries. Those countries will have
to come together and work out of formula by which they will share those resources.
Otherwise what you will have is repeated conflict, angst, pain, people
losing their lives over something that cannot be fixed, certainly not in the short
term because of climate change. And to square the circle, part of this
allusion to that is for each of us individually to reconsider our own actions and
the impact it has on climate change, so that, for example, when
you're brushing your teeth in the morning and the tap is on and the water
is just running, that's water that's being lost to the system that you might
need tomorrow. It's the cumulative effect of little things and the cumulative effect of
big things that will help to save us. So there has to be cooperation
at the community level, at the national level, at the regional level,
and at the international level to manage these resources more sensibly, because by twenty
fifty, I think there will be nine billion of us inhabiting the planet.
The numbers are growing and swiftly, and so what we call in geography population
pressure is going to intensify. It cannot be that we allow this to so
destabilize our society as to risk a total breakdown and war. So sustainable living
involves each of us. Is it wise to keep demanding more or is it
more sensible, perhaps to consume and demand less, so that there will be
some left for tomorrow, and more than tomorrow, there will be some left
left for the next generation, your children, your grandchildren, your great grandchildren,
to ensure, for example, that the rich biodiversity that we have,
they have because guess what, many of the medical solutions that could address some
of the diseases that are so rampant nowadays, maybe the source of the cures
might rely might reside in that biodiversity. So we have to find a way
to live responsibly and harmoniously with the environment. That is the only way we'll
be able to succeed with these alarming figures in mind. Let's move to the
next round of questions. So you had a question, okay, So if
we have no more questions, okay, do you have a question? No?
Okay, So I will thank my dear correspondence for being here and engaging
with us on behalf of President Dennis Francis. Thank you for coming and have
a great evening. Thank you very much. Thank you for listening today.
If you've been listening to Pology and write to OA Depictions of Media Radio,
it would seem that what we really need are peaceful solutions where people are learning
to work together in order to solve today's problems. That what affects one country
seems to affect another country on the other side of the world with our global
economy and how things are working today, So why not just simply work together
and solve the problems of the day. It seems simple, but yet governments
don't seem to understand that working as one is the best solution overall. The
only way that we the people can make that problem go away and help our
governments work together is by casting the vote, by marching in protests peacefully,
and voicing our opinion to government officials with letters, emails, and other peaceful
statements and demonstrations. Thank you for listening. Please find that subscribe button wherever
it may sit on your screen. The show has been produced by Depictions Media.
Please contact us at Depictions dot media for more information.