1
00:00:00,240 --> 00:00:49,439
Then the the the the the the
the building, the the the the the

2
00:00:50,119 --> 00:01:46,719
the the the the the the the
the the the the the the the the

3
00:01:47,400 --> 00:02:43,039
the the the the the the the
the the the the the the the the

4
00:02:44,080 --> 00:03:23,639
the the the the the the the
the the the the the the the the

5
00:03:28,360 --> 00:04:21,399
the the the the the the the
the the the the the the the the

6
00:04:23,079 --> 00:05:25,079
the the the the the the the
the the the the the the the the

7
00:05:28,040 --> 00:06:28,079
the the don't then the the the
the the the the the the the the

8
00:06:43,439 --> 00:08:03,160
the the the the the the the
the Oh ho ho, humble Pastor Man

9
00:08:03,319 --> 00:08:11,360
is back in his cardigan, ready
to enlighten you about what's really going on

10
00:08:13,120 --> 00:08:20,639
in the world, and with all
of our beloved YouTubers, I thought,

11
00:08:22,600 --> 00:08:26,879
why not check in on all of
our YouTube friends from the Roman Catholic world

12
00:08:28,120 --> 00:08:39,080
and see what kind of wonderful,
mind bending logical gymnastics are at work.

13
00:08:39,600 --> 00:08:45,080
I'm talking about Olympic level mental gymnastics. We're going to have fun. We're

14
00:08:45,080 --> 00:08:46,679
also going to check in on a
couple of things that I forgot about that

15
00:08:46,759 --> 00:08:56,519
I meant to discuss many live streams. Back was Cameron from Cucking Christianity,

16
00:08:56,519 --> 00:09:05,440
I mean, Capturing Christianity. Interesting
channel title why he converted to Roman Catholicism,

17
00:09:05,480 --> 00:09:09,559
because you remember he made this video. And then we want to check

18
00:09:09,600 --> 00:09:16,639
in on our good buddy Carbohydrate Lofton
to see what his solid argumentation was.

19
00:09:16,559 --> 00:09:22,240
We want to see what Trent Horne
had to say about Oh Papa Frank and

20
00:09:22,320 --> 00:09:31,279
what was happening, because I mean, for me, remember, aside from

21
00:09:31,320 --> 00:09:37,279
Tim Gordon, that whole sphere has
been nothing but sass a, right,

22
00:09:37,360 --> 00:09:43,559
I mean, they've been nothing but
vitriol, and now they're in a tail

23
00:09:43,639 --> 00:09:52,360
spin because now they're don't go Orthodox, don't go Orthodox, and Trent's even

24
00:09:52,399 --> 00:09:58,000
having to turn to Ben Shapiro to
help prop up the boring Catholic Answers podcast.

25
00:10:01,080 --> 00:10:11,919
Now I've noticed, but wait a
minute, how are these channels growing

26
00:10:13,120 --> 00:10:20,159
given the mountains of absurdity and ridiculous
augmentation that we've seen from all of these

27
00:10:20,240 --> 00:10:26,320
actors except for one, except for
our buddy Tim, who is honest,

28
00:10:28,080 --> 00:10:31,399
all of these other people, to
put it in the words of the templar

29
00:10:33,799 --> 00:10:41,720
in Indiana, Jones and the last
crusade, you chose poorly, and now

30
00:10:41,799 --> 00:10:48,399
you have to cope and deal with
the poor choices that you made because a

31
00:10:48,480 --> 00:10:54,120
lot of them literally thought that it
was going to be a sufficient objection to

32
00:10:54,200 --> 00:10:58,399
the stuff that I've said and the
arguments that UBI and people in our sphere

33
00:10:58,440 --> 00:11:01,240
have raised for so long, that
it was just going to work to go

34
00:11:01,440 --> 00:11:09,159
after people on a personal level and
do all the backhanded nonsense that a lot

35
00:11:09,240 --> 00:11:13,039
of people have figured out now right, And I wasn't worried about this ultimately,

36
00:11:13,080 --> 00:11:20,679
because I know and have been vindicated
and it's been born out that when

37
00:11:20,720 --> 00:11:24,320
you go down this track of the
course the Vatican is set on, it

38
00:11:24,399 --> 00:11:31,120
will not correct. It will only
get worse and worse, because I actually

39
00:11:31,240 --> 00:11:35,120
know the forces and the powers that
Francis is beholden to. And remember,

40
00:11:35,159 --> 00:11:39,159
to these normy people that were going
to be looking at tonight, except for

41
00:11:39,240 --> 00:11:45,039
Tim, they're all complete normies.
They have no idea what the new world.

42
00:11:45,039 --> 00:11:48,200
They don't even know that there is
such a thing. They've actually commented

43
00:11:48,240 --> 00:11:52,159
on it says that they still think
it doesn't exist. You've got people who

44
00:11:52,240 --> 00:12:03,000
promoted all the stab stuff and they're
even doing podcasting together. Right by the

45
00:12:03,039 --> 00:12:09,000
way, Shout out to arch Angel
Mike Angel, Archangel Michael Orthodox Church because

46
00:12:09,039 --> 00:12:16,679
they sent me a cool cop.
You can go to their website and support

47
00:12:16,759 --> 00:12:22,919
them. I think they have for
a long time been big supporters and fans

48
00:12:22,960 --> 00:12:26,799
of the work that we do,
so shout out to them. Don't worry.

49
00:12:26,840 --> 00:12:35,679
I do have my cough jobs on
hand, and Father Zacharia Lynch and

50
00:12:35,720 --> 00:12:41,000
everybody at that church are big fans
and supporters of the work we do,

51
00:12:41,080 --> 00:12:46,559
and we like the We love the
essays that Father Zacharia Lynch does. I

52
00:12:46,639 --> 00:12:56,200
can't even type today, so I'll
give you for those interested in the Colorado

53
00:12:56,960 --> 00:13:00,600
region, if you're looking for an
Orthodox church up there, you can support

54
00:13:00,639 --> 00:13:05,679
them there. They probably have a
building fund as well, and so there's

55
00:13:05,720 --> 00:13:13,000
their church if you want to support
them. One of the few people who

56
00:13:13,039 --> 00:13:15,840
in the OCA, well, I
wouldn't say a few. A lot of

57
00:13:15,879 --> 00:13:20,879
the OCA does like what we do, but they actually underwent persecution for not

58
00:13:20,039 --> 00:13:24,559
going along with the KOOF and for
supporting the work that we do, and

59
00:13:24,639 --> 00:13:31,480
they're still disliked. So I'll be
sure and support them if you support the

60
00:13:31,519 --> 00:13:37,360
work that we do. Times are
pretty tough everywhere, So you know,

61
00:13:37,440 --> 00:13:39,200
the point here is not to say
that there's no problems in the Orthodox world

62
00:13:39,639 --> 00:13:43,200
and therefore we're right and you're wrong. Because we don't have any problems.

63
00:13:43,759 --> 00:13:48,279
The issue is what are the problems
and are they problems of a systemic nature?

64
00:13:48,360 --> 00:13:54,840
Now I strive over and over and
over on this channel to constantly demonstrate

65
00:13:54,919 --> 00:14:00,840
from the documents. We've got the
documents, as Alex says, to prove

66
00:14:03,039 --> 00:14:09,480
that Roman Catholic dogma has absolutely changed. Even though have you noticed of late

67
00:14:11,600 --> 00:14:18,279
that the typical, the classical Roman
Catholic arguments that you always hear, they've

68
00:14:18,279 --> 00:14:22,360
been real quiet on those lately.
Have you noticed that, remember the classic

69
00:14:22,519 --> 00:14:28,679
argument that we always hear is well, we have the Pope to give us

70
00:14:30,399 --> 00:14:39,480
doctrinal certitude. That's Michael Lofton's favorite
argument. Interesting how that tagline, that

71
00:14:39,720 --> 00:14:43,039
cliche. They've been real quiet on
that one. They've been sitting on that

72
00:14:43,080 --> 00:14:48,840
one. How come we're not hearing
all the advantages of the papacy giving us

73
00:14:48,919 --> 00:14:54,240
the certitude that we have, even
though a person from an epistemology one on

74
00:14:54,320 --> 00:14:58,639
one class could be able to tell
you that that doesn't work as a consistent

75
00:14:58,720 --> 00:15:05,000
argument, to say that this the
papsy actually grants you epistemic certitude just moves

76
00:15:05,039 --> 00:15:07,720
the problem back and stuff. How
do I know him interpreting the papal documents

77
00:15:07,799 --> 00:15:16,879
correctly, and hence why I brought
up basic epistemological challenges to Trent Horn in

78
00:15:16,960 --> 00:15:18,840
our debate, and he had no
idea what we're talking about, didn't know

79
00:15:18,879 --> 00:15:24,759
what circularity in terms of foundational critiques
was all about. Totally flush or totally

80
00:15:24,799 --> 00:15:33,240
lost. But I more and more
realized that this whole domain of these people,

81
00:15:35,240 --> 00:15:43,679
it's really just appealing to normies for
just a low tier numbers operation.

82
00:15:45,879 --> 00:15:50,799
I've been overthinking a lot of this, right, And you know, they

83
00:15:50,840 --> 00:15:54,480
get freaked out. Remember when Matt
Frat was doing a strange with Thumbnails where

84
00:15:54,480 --> 00:16:02,039
he's crying, And that's because they're
worried about losing their numbers and their audience,

85
00:16:02,399 --> 00:16:07,080
their market share. And in fact, I would venture that a lot

86
00:16:07,120 --> 00:16:18,840
of people's conversions might even relate to
attempts to gain numbers, and that's why

87
00:16:18,879 --> 00:16:26,720
they're immediately funneled into the neocon normy
Roman Catholic world, which is not really

88
00:16:26,759 --> 00:16:32,360
the tradcat world. Right. I
would class Tim more so in the tradcat

89
00:16:32,399 --> 00:16:38,679
world. But Tim has enough of
a basis in Ariskitilian logic that he can

90
00:16:38,759 --> 00:16:44,720
recognize flat out contradictions and be honest
about it. So again, we appreciate

91
00:16:44,799 --> 00:16:52,639
that, but the rest of these
goofballs can't even do that. I mean,

92
00:16:52,879 --> 00:16:57,600
they're not even able to do that. Remember when Michael often wanted to

93
00:16:57,679 --> 00:17:02,559
do a debate, but he wanted
to do written debate. Okay, Boomer,

94
00:17:02,840 --> 00:17:06,000
Yeah, what what era is this? You want to do written debates

95
00:17:06,319 --> 00:17:10,680
like two thousand and five, bloggosphere? Come on, man, So I'm

96
00:17:10,720 --> 00:17:12,640
trying to convey to you guys,
and I don't understand why you guys can't

97
00:17:12,680 --> 00:17:19,079
see this, that this whole domain
of the normy apologists is a kind of

98
00:17:19,160 --> 00:17:25,279
a grift, right, And I
get tired of people. This is overused

99
00:17:25,359 --> 00:17:30,680
now, right, everybody calls everyone
a grifter. But I mean it makes

100
00:17:30,720 --> 00:17:36,920
perfect sense why Cameron would convert because
it's a lot more a lot more numbers

101
00:17:36,960 --> 00:17:40,319
in market share that you can get
through these these angles, and you can

102
00:17:40,519 --> 00:17:48,200
with evangelical idiocy on YouTube, right, So why not enter into the domain

103
00:17:48,279 --> 00:17:55,680
of the mainstream popestplanners. So nice
market share there, and it does look

104
00:17:55,839 --> 00:18:00,640
like these channels have grown, right, So Pines with Aquinas is up to

105
00:18:00,680 --> 00:18:07,039
four hundred and seventy four thousand,
Trent is up to one hundred and eleven,

106
00:18:07,680 --> 00:18:12,559
So their channels are still growing,
but have the argument's gotten any better?

107
00:18:15,240 --> 00:18:18,839
And when I read the comments of
what's underneath these channels, I'm not

108
00:18:18,960 --> 00:18:30,400
surprised at just the overwhelming volume of
just absolutely low tier sort of newbie normy

109
00:18:30,839 --> 00:18:34,079
takes. Right. It's a lot
of new people to you know, people

110
00:18:34,359 --> 00:18:37,039
realizing, hey, something's wrong with
the world, maybe there is a god.

111
00:18:38,160 --> 00:18:41,279
What's the big churches? Oh,
Roman Catholic, let's look at this,

112
00:18:41,759 --> 00:18:45,160
And so they tumble down the rabbit
hole of a bunch of these normy

113
00:18:45,200 --> 00:18:55,960
apologists, these pop apologists. But
have the pop apologists actually made good arguments?

114
00:18:56,599 --> 00:19:00,000
Are they actually that good? Of
course, the answer is no.

115
00:19:00,319 --> 00:19:07,160
Their arguments are terrible. Their arguments
are intentionally kept at a super low level

116
00:19:07,400 --> 00:19:15,839
so that you don't go outside of
their magic circle. And so they repeat

117
00:19:15,279 --> 00:19:22,559
over and over and over very low
tier arguments because that is enough to gain

118
00:19:22,599 --> 00:19:26,880
a lot of numbers. So ironically, they're actually playing the evangelical game.

119
00:19:26,920 --> 00:19:33,279
It's not surprising, right, they're
playing the sort of megachurch model, except

120
00:19:33,359 --> 00:19:36,480
now it's online, right, So
the model of the megachurches used to be

121
00:19:36,680 --> 00:19:40,319
like ten to fifteen years ago.
Do whatever that brings the numbers in,

122
00:19:41,200 --> 00:19:48,160
right, and it worked to grow
megachurches as a business model into these gigantic

123
00:19:48,359 --> 00:19:52,640
you know, rock concert arenas,
you know, smoke a mirror and all

124
00:19:52,680 --> 00:19:56,160
that stuff. But the problem is
that they learned, as they did studies,

125
00:19:57,799 --> 00:20:00,200
Pew research and all that back in
the day, like ten years ago,

126
00:20:00,880 --> 00:20:06,559
that even though the number the megachurches
were bringing these giant numbers, they

127
00:20:06,640 --> 00:20:12,359
had a very high turnover rate and
they're actually losing as many people as they

128
00:20:12,400 --> 00:20:21,799
were bringing in. And the average
stay behind stay around rate was like some

129
00:20:22,039 --> 00:20:29,000
minuscule percent, and the average length
of time was something like two or three

130
00:20:29,079 --> 00:20:34,799
weeks. So the megachurches would boast
about having you know, like friends,

131
00:20:34,839 --> 00:20:40,599
We've convuted over forty thousand people in
the last month, and then a month

132
00:20:40,720 --> 00:20:48,880
later, forty thousand people left.
Right. So yeah, I'll get to

133
00:20:48,960 --> 00:20:55,759
the challenges to debate here in a
moment. Thank you for those super chats.

134
00:20:55,759 --> 00:21:02,880
Appreciate that. So when it comes
to the challenges to debate, well,

135
00:21:03,440 --> 00:21:07,759
what I'm saying about the all right, gotta have my damn cough drop,

136
00:21:07,359 --> 00:21:12,400
because I still got the vatakouf.
I got the same throat aids from

137
00:21:12,440 --> 00:21:26,759
Francis from being in Rome seven weeks
ago. Francis gave me aids, give

138
00:21:26,799 --> 00:21:32,599
me theological aids. I have already
asked all of the people that you're asking

139
00:21:32,640 --> 00:21:34,039
me to debate. Do you think
I haven't asked all those people to debate?

140
00:21:38,319 --> 00:21:41,559
Now here's the thing. The more
that I've studied and gone down the

141
00:21:41,640 --> 00:21:47,519
rabbit hole of the papacy and Vatican
two, which is I began studying that

142
00:21:47,640 --> 00:21:52,279
in two thousand and three, specifically, you know, Catholic theology and Catholic

143
00:21:52,319 --> 00:21:56,720
dogmatics. I mean, we've got
more than one entire shelf of Catholic dogmatic

144
00:21:56,799 --> 00:22:02,359
works, not counting Church. I'm
just talking about pure Catholic theology over here,

145
00:22:02,480 --> 00:22:08,640
right. That eventually got me into
geopolitics, I mean, not Catholic

146
00:22:08,720 --> 00:22:14,279
theology, but the geopolitics of the
Vatican, because that becomes more and more

147
00:22:14,319 --> 00:22:17,039
of an issue as you get deeper
into history, as you get deeper into

148
00:22:17,160 --> 00:22:22,799
Church, you realize the Vatican becomes
a world power, and that seems to

149
00:22:22,880 --> 00:22:30,519
affect its approach to doctrine and theology. And if the Vatican is a world

150
00:22:30,640 --> 00:22:34,319
power and it affects its theology,
then we begin to see other explanations for

151
00:22:34,480 --> 00:22:41,839
why the Vatican is doing what it's
doing, and so what we eventually get

152
00:22:41,960 --> 00:22:48,359
is different narrative accounts. So Trent
would have a narrative account that the Vatican

153
00:22:48,680 --> 00:22:52,759
the Papacy is an infallible, divine
institution guided by the Holy Spirit, preserved

154
00:22:52,759 --> 00:22:59,000
from error, and when I encounter
difficulties, I can go into the documents

155
00:22:59,039 --> 00:23:03,039
to try to make the system work. And here's my post planning example.

156
00:23:06,359 --> 00:23:11,400
For me, I have a completely
different narrative and account, and I don't

157
00:23:11,519 --> 00:23:18,079
even I don't think there's anything at
all supernatural about the Vatican anymore other than

158
00:23:18,160 --> 00:23:25,839
it being essentially satanic connected to all
kinds of organized crime. The Vatican,

159
00:23:25,880 --> 00:23:32,680
bank scandals, the mafia, the
CIA, all very well known public scandals.

160
00:23:33,279 --> 00:23:38,440
People have been convicted over this,
All the names are well known for

161
00:23:38,599 --> 00:23:45,680
them. That plays no role in
the practice of the Vatican and the Papacy

162
00:23:45,759 --> 00:23:52,240
at all. They never mentioned it, and that's because they don't even know

163
00:23:52,359 --> 00:23:57,160
about it. And I'm not talking
about going down some conspiracy rabbit hole.

164
00:23:59,200 --> 00:24:02,680
I'm talking about a line history.
If you want to call in, I'll

165
00:24:02,720 --> 00:24:11,759
open it up. You can call
in right here on Twitter x right here,

166
00:24:12,279 --> 00:24:18,240
and I'll open it up to people
here in a moment. So that's

167
00:24:18,759 --> 00:24:22,319
that's and I think that narrative actually
makes perfect sense, and it makes perfect

168
00:24:22,359 --> 00:24:30,240
sense why what Francis does actually echoes
the same sentiments of the world economic for

169
00:24:30,319 --> 00:24:33,440
him and Klaus Schwab and Davos.
But remember Trent Horn doesn't even know about

170
00:24:33,519 --> 00:24:37,279
that, or he tells you intentionally
not to look at that because there aren't

171
00:24:37,279 --> 00:24:41,000
conspiracies and it doesn't work and it
doesn't matter. It's crazy. I mean,

172
00:24:41,319 --> 00:24:45,839
if you remember Trent's initial critique was
that I was the equivalent of a

173
00:24:45,920 --> 00:24:51,000
chick trap. So remember to even
talk about there being a new world order

174
00:24:51,680 --> 00:24:56,960
and the papacy being involved, even
though Francis openly says he supports Klaus Schwab,

175
00:24:59,359 --> 00:25:07,559
that's the less vel of chick track. Now, I think that when

176
00:25:07,599 --> 00:25:11,160
we had our debate, Trent saw
that. No, actually, the level

177
00:25:11,200 --> 00:25:14,839
of debate that we are doing here
is not chick track level. We've read

178
00:25:14,920 --> 00:25:21,079
through about sixty big fat tons of
the global elite. Do you think Jack

179
00:25:21,359 --> 00:25:25,880
Chick did that nothing to do with
chick tracks? So again, all of

180
00:25:25,920 --> 00:25:34,000
these people are literally relying on your
ignorance and your low tier laziness to just

181
00:25:34,440 --> 00:25:41,839
accept their copes and accept their here, allow me to creatively invent something to

182
00:25:41,920 --> 00:25:47,119
make the system work. That's what
they do. And anyone who goes beyond

183
00:25:47,799 --> 00:26:00,960
like baby tear stuff in theology or
geopolitics, right uh, pretty soon moves

184
00:26:02,000 --> 00:26:07,680
out of the sphere of these people. But these people know that in order

185
00:26:07,759 --> 00:26:11,359
to capture a sizeable number of people
and market share, they want to appeal

186
00:26:11,680 --> 00:26:22,039
to the broadest normy neocon con inc
crowd that they can. It shouldn't be

187
00:26:22,079 --> 00:26:40,039
better if I do this. Mm
hmm yep. I look at all the

188
00:26:40,359 --> 00:26:42,079
lovely people. Do do do do? Do? Do? Do? Do

189
00:26:42,200 --> 00:26:52,079
do? Look at all the lovely
people. Okay, we should be back.

190
00:26:52,119 --> 00:26:56,400
Hopefully it's got all. Hopefully it'll
even out now we won't have the

191
00:26:56,559 --> 00:27:00,119
interruptions. But I'll have to go
back to the la inn here in a

192
00:27:00,200 --> 00:27:15,119
moment. All right, Stream Health
says is excellent. Well, that ended

193
00:27:15,240 --> 00:27:22,960
my freaking. I'll have to open
up another room if you guys want to

194
00:27:22,000 --> 00:27:26,519
call in, because there were people
in line to call in here, So

195
00:27:26,680 --> 00:27:41,640
let me make another one of these. Has Catholic dogma changed? And it's

196
00:27:41,680 --> 00:27:48,279
interesting that there is this interesting connection
between Daily Wire individuals and the normy Novasorto

197
00:27:48,440 --> 00:27:53,200
world, and they're all in a
tailspin now trying to make all this work

198
00:27:55,240 --> 00:28:02,400
right because we've been absolutely correct and
everything that we said would happen. So

199
00:28:02,519 --> 00:28:22,680
I started a new Twitter space here
if people want to join. So the

200
00:28:22,759 --> 00:28:30,799
new space is under the old space
because the Internet went out. Of course,

201
00:28:30,839 --> 00:28:32,839
it would go out when I'm trying
to do this stream, right,

202
00:28:34,519 --> 00:28:44,920
so you'll have to join underneath that
stream. So let's see what Cameron's arguments

203
00:28:45,000 --> 00:28:51,119
were. Cameron's arguments were why he
left Evangelicalism for Roman Catholicism. And as

204
00:28:51,160 --> 00:28:57,880
I was explaining before we had the
issues there, Cameron said that initially,

205
00:28:57,960 --> 00:29:00,559
if I recall, this is my
memory of the events, right, Cameron

206
00:29:00,599 --> 00:29:06,519
said, oh, Jay's wiping the
floor with Matt Dilla Hunty, right,

207
00:29:07,240 --> 00:29:11,960
and then later after the debate when
we had the fallout with him and inspiring

208
00:29:12,000 --> 00:29:17,240
philosophy, he switches to actually,
Matt Dilla Hunty mopped the floor with Jay.

209
00:29:17,279 --> 00:29:19,680
So this is a guy that says
that Matt Dilla Hunty mopped the floor

210
00:29:19,799 --> 00:29:23,079
with me in that debate. That
loads here, right, So just a

211
00:29:23,359 --> 00:29:30,640
seething, passive, aggressive emo sort
of character. I would say grifter man,

212
00:29:30,960 --> 00:29:36,119
right, because the same he also
pushed the stabbs on you all.

213
00:29:37,319 --> 00:29:40,279
Has he said sorry for that,
by the way, has any of you

214
00:29:40,359 --> 00:29:41,480
have you any of these people said
they're sorry for doing that, by the

215
00:29:41,519 --> 00:29:48,039
way, And remember I'm bad because
I talked about conspiracies and told you about

216
00:29:48,079 --> 00:29:51,720
that, right. But all of
these people pushed all this normy stuff,

217
00:29:52,039 --> 00:29:56,160
and their army of normy still pushes
all the same normy stuff. So I

218
00:29:56,240 --> 00:30:03,200
can only imagine that these are bad
faith actors, or grifters, or just

219
00:30:03,319 --> 00:30:12,400
completely ignorant. But soon after that, a year ago or so, Cameron

220
00:30:12,480 --> 00:30:18,599
became a Catholic. Now I wonder, are any of these people doubting their

221
00:30:18,680 --> 00:30:26,720
decisions? Remember how bad though,
Remember how awful? And they're all of

222
00:30:26,799 --> 00:30:30,839
your argumentation was about me as a
person, nothing to do with argumentation,

223
00:30:32,559 --> 00:30:37,039
nothing to do with the theology.
Remember when Matt fred said that he'd be

224
00:30:37,119 --> 00:30:40,759
open to inviting Ubi Petris on his
channel and then ghosted him. Of course

225
00:30:40,799 --> 00:30:44,559
he wasn't gonna have Uby on his
channel. Why did he say he would

226
00:30:44,559 --> 00:30:47,880
never have me on a channel?
He just said, because I'm an evil,

227
00:30:48,039 --> 00:30:52,359
bad person or something. Why because
I get heated in debates, and

228
00:30:52,519 --> 00:30:56,640
then he says to people coming on
his channel, feel free to get heated

229
00:30:57,799 --> 00:31:03,079
and debate as much as you want. So again, it's all just hypocrisy.

230
00:31:07,960 --> 00:31:15,400
And so this goof is with this
ridiculous like five year old haircut.

231
00:31:18,440 --> 00:31:22,480
I mean like literally like haircuts that
were popular like what like actually like seven

232
00:31:22,559 --> 00:31:32,079
years ago, right, this diplo
spencer cut. Let's hear why we're supposed

233
00:31:32,119 --> 00:31:34,519
to be Roman Catholic. Now,
if I remember in this video and I

234
00:31:34,640 --> 00:31:41,079
just forgot to ever cover it,
if I remember his his argent, he

235
00:31:41,640 --> 00:31:48,839
ran an algorithm or something in some
sort of a calculator that told him that

236
00:31:49,880 --> 00:31:52,559
it was highly unlikely that. I
mean, let's see what he said.

237
00:31:52,559 --> 00:31:56,640
If he used this stupid calculator argument, that I could say, okay,

238
00:31:56,920 --> 00:32:32,480
yeah, here's this piece of data. Here's this piece of data. I

239
00:32:32,839 --> 00:32:38,480
created what I call a Bayesian like
analysis of all of the evidence born against

240
00:32:38,519 --> 00:32:45,680
the papacy, and so I use
the Bayesian framework because I think, yes,

241
00:32:45,799 --> 00:32:49,279
I know, I had to click
the stupid thing to make the sound

242
00:32:49,359 --> 00:32:52,279
come on for you. So he
had just said, yes, it is

243
00:32:52,400 --> 00:32:59,240
an algorithm based on Bayesian analysis.
So he came, right, we're supposed

244
00:32:59,240 --> 00:33:01,640
to believe that he's like I guess, I guess we're supposed to think,

245
00:33:01,640 --> 00:33:06,039
Oh, he's a genius mathematician,
and so he's going to prove the papacy

246
00:33:07,039 --> 00:33:12,640
with mathematics. Uh huh, what's
the Bayesian analysis of butt stuff? Can

247
00:33:12,680 --> 00:33:16,359
you get? Can we get a
Bayesian analysis from Cameron about the legitimacy of

248
00:33:16,519 --> 00:33:22,000
blessings of butt stuff or or not
variety? Right? And so the fact

249
00:33:22,000 --> 00:33:25,319
that he was impressed with that,
and then you assigned what points to each

250
00:33:25,480 --> 00:33:30,319
line of evidence against So what I
did was I created what I call a

251
00:33:30,440 --> 00:33:36,839
Bayesian like analysis of all of the
evidence born against the papacy. And so

252
00:33:37,319 --> 00:33:40,039
I use the Bayesian framework because I
think that it's a more formal way of

253
00:33:40,160 --> 00:33:43,960
doing Like, I mean, is
this not like the ultimate sort of Sperg

254
00:33:44,039 --> 00:33:47,039
approach? Right? I mean,
maybe they're just trying to appeal to Internet

255
00:33:47,079 --> 00:33:52,279
spurgs with this argument. I'm gonna
put all of the pieces of evidence into

256
00:33:52,559 --> 00:33:59,400
a spreadsheet. We'll call this the
quick Books Cameron's quick Books analysis. Remember

257
00:33:59,480 --> 00:34:02,680
quick books for the papacy, Right, Cameron's quick Books argument for the papacy.

258
00:34:02,799 --> 00:34:07,160
I'll put put all of the arguments
into a spreadsheet. How do we

259
00:34:07,200 --> 00:34:10,679
even know you're putting good arguments in
there? I'll link the spreadsheet below.

260
00:34:10,880 --> 00:34:16,360
You could go through it and deduct
the mathematical quantification of the argument. This

261
00:34:16,559 --> 00:34:22,800
is ridiculous, a Bayesian spreadsheet argument
for the papacy. You can't make this

262
00:34:22,960 --> 00:34:28,320
up. This probably has what thirty
one thousand views? At least it's not

263
00:34:28,400 --> 00:34:32,480
three hundred thousand views because this is
utterly ridiculous. Everyday probabilistic calculations that you

264
00:34:32,559 --> 00:34:37,679
do in your own like in your
head, Yeah, everyday probabilistic calculations that

265
00:34:37,760 --> 00:34:42,880
we do in our head. I
mean, do you sit around doing everyday

266
00:34:43,039 --> 00:34:49,800
probabilistic Bayesian calculations in your head?
Did you ever consider that that might be

267
00:34:49,920 --> 00:34:52,480
an argument for the papacy? But
how is an argument for the butt stuff?

268
00:34:52,519 --> 00:34:55,039
That's that's what we want to know
next, right, And I'm sure

269
00:34:55,039 --> 00:34:59,679
we're going to get some amazing explanations
as to how it doesn't mean what it

270
00:34:59,719 --> 00:35:02,599
says it means in paragraph arety one, Right, you're like, Okay,

271
00:35:02,639 --> 00:35:06,440
how likely is this happens? And
you'll say, oh, it's really likely.

272
00:35:06,519 --> 00:35:08,079
That might be some you know,
some example that you would just come

273
00:35:08,159 --> 00:35:12,880
up with but in invasion terms,
like what you'll do is you'll assign a

274
00:35:12,960 --> 00:35:16,119
figure to that probability, and so
you can be a little bit more precise

275
00:35:16,719 --> 00:35:21,519
in seeing like, Okay, well, how much of an effect probabilistically,

276
00:35:22,639 --> 00:35:28,960
but what's the probability of the ding
dong touching the other ding dong in the

277
00:35:29,079 --> 00:35:32,199
Roman Catholic blessing services? Right,
what's that probability? I would say it's

278
00:35:32,400 --> 00:35:39,159
ninety eight point nine percent probability abut
stuff. But again I just Cameron,

279
00:35:39,280 --> 00:35:44,559
did you figure in that into your
equations? Please let me know, as

280
00:35:44,599 --> 00:35:46,800
opposed to just going on the sort
of more informal Okay, this is some

281
00:35:46,920 --> 00:35:50,760
evidence, here's some evidence, here's
some evidence. Here's a lot of evidence.

282
00:35:50,760 --> 00:35:52,880
There's a lot of evidence. But
then you know, but then you

283
00:35:52,920 --> 00:35:55,199
don't really know at the end of
that how it all combines. How many

284
00:35:55,280 --> 00:35:59,239
lines of evidence did you have full
and against the Papa seed? Roughly,

285
00:35:59,360 --> 00:36:01,559
there weren't a lot for the papacy. There was the biblical there were the

286
00:36:01,599 --> 00:36:07,159
biblical arguments I see, and there's
a lot of Protestant objections, there's a

287
00:36:07,199 --> 00:36:15,159
lot of what so there aren't a
lot of arguments for the papacy except for

288
00:36:15,239 --> 00:36:19,360
the biblical arguments, of which there
are none, at least the Vatican One.

289
00:36:19,400 --> 00:36:25,480
Papacy is nowhere in the Bible.
There is the successor to Peter via

290
00:36:25,639 --> 00:36:30,320
having the keys argument, which is
an orthodox argument. Sure, but a

291
00:36:30,440 --> 00:36:35,800
Bayesian spreadsheet that now it's getting ridiculous, and I actually think this is a

292
00:36:35,840 --> 00:36:40,719
bunch of actual just total bs flim
flam. He put into his Bayesian spreadsheet

293
00:36:42,719 --> 00:36:47,000
mostly anti Catholic arguments and he still
comes out of this. I mean,

294
00:36:49,320 --> 00:36:53,000
I smell total grifter here. Counting
in love, I probably had like four

295
00:36:53,719 --> 00:36:59,280
for the papacy and about fifteen against
the papacy. And it seems to me

296
00:36:59,320 --> 00:37:01,599
that what's interesting about this analysis is
that rather than going on you will kind

297
00:37:01,599 --> 00:37:07,760
of intuition, you actually don't know
what the evidence is going to show you

298
00:37:07,079 --> 00:37:10,559
because you're going through the one by
one and signing a number. This is

299
00:37:15,039 --> 00:37:17,440
who would fall for this? Let's
say, I gotta see these comments.

300
00:37:17,440 --> 00:37:24,039
If people actually think that this would
be a good argument, This is a

301
00:37:24,119 --> 00:37:30,840
brave man. Are you serious?
Who in the who did Cameron ever actually

302
00:37:30,920 --> 00:37:34,360
debate? I asked to debate this, dude, I mean I immediately wanted

303
00:37:34,360 --> 00:37:37,880
to debate this dude when he had
a falling out with me, and all

304
00:37:37,960 --> 00:37:40,519
he did was post all the DMS, trying to make me look like a

305
00:37:40,559 --> 00:37:45,320
bad man, right, which is
what they do. Which if I actually

306
00:37:45,519 --> 00:37:47,519
was a bad man in the DMS, I don't care, right, because

307
00:37:47,519 --> 00:37:51,239
I'll post a DM if you're talking
a bunch of bull crap to me.

308
00:37:51,400 --> 00:37:55,280
Sure, But what happened was they
wanted me to not I kid you not.

309
00:37:55,960 --> 00:38:00,639
They wanted me to have a debate
but not say anything mean. And

310
00:38:00,719 --> 00:38:06,920
I'm like, I'm not gonna subject
my free speech to your arbitrary deciding.

311
00:38:06,960 --> 00:38:09,760
I don't know what you think is
mean, because debates include rhetoric, and

312
00:38:09,840 --> 00:38:14,920
if I utilize rhetoric, which is
a central part of debate, I'm not

313
00:38:14,960 --> 00:38:22,559
gonna submit to your evangelical arbitrary that's
mean. It's not pious. So I

314
00:38:22,639 --> 00:38:24,880
said, no, the debate was
already agreed upon. You introduced a new

315
00:38:24,960 --> 00:38:30,880
criteria that I cannot be mean in
the debate, which is just ridiculous.

316
00:38:30,280 --> 00:38:34,840
And I said no, I wouldn't
concede to that because we had already agreed

317
00:38:34,840 --> 00:38:37,719
on the debate terms. And then
he said, oh, well, then

318
00:38:37,719 --> 00:38:39,039
there won't be a debate and I'm
gonna leak all the dms and make you

319
00:38:39,119 --> 00:38:43,559
look bad. Okay, Yeah,
good job dude. Right, So I

320
00:38:43,679 --> 00:38:46,960
guess it kind of worked in that
people still think that I'm mean because I

321
00:38:46,960 --> 00:38:57,760
wouldn't agree to their arbitrary decisions to
not be mean. I mean, do

322
00:38:57,800 --> 00:39:01,159
you guys understand what this is?
The crap that I deal with? And

323
00:39:01,239 --> 00:39:05,639
then it's like, dude, come
on, just do the damn debate.

324
00:39:05,679 --> 00:39:09,719
We've already agreed to it now ironically
inspiring philosophy, and I already made up,

325
00:39:09,760 --> 00:39:12,719
and we don't care about this anymore, right, so we let this

326
00:39:12,880 --> 00:39:17,920
go. H haven't heard from this
guy, don't expect to. Don't care

327
00:39:19,000 --> 00:39:27,400
anyway. But the ignorance of these
commenters. Roger says, this is a

328
00:39:27,519 --> 00:39:32,840
brave man who never failed to debate
any Catholic. What solid Orthodox person did

329
00:39:32,880 --> 00:39:43,920
he ever debate? And is nobody
in the question the comments here even remotely

330
00:39:45,079 --> 00:39:49,880
questioning his Baysian algorithm for the papacy
that he just made up. I mean,

331
00:39:49,920 --> 00:39:53,800
this is ridiculous. Yeah, here's
at least one solid commenter here,

332
00:39:55,199 --> 00:40:04,000
both sides as if orthodox he doesn't
exist exactly. But look, Orthodoxy isn't

333
00:40:04,119 --> 00:40:07,400
necessarily going to give you a big
market share. So did anybody consider that

334
00:40:07,480 --> 00:40:13,239
that might have had something to do
with his decision? Right? I mean

335
00:40:13,280 --> 00:40:20,559
these comments are just ridiculous. As
ridiculous says that the quick Books argument for

336
00:40:20,599 --> 00:40:22,320
the papacy. All right, I
got to hear more of this. This

337
00:40:22,440 --> 00:40:28,679
is gold. I didn't even I
forgot about this, this this whole thing

338
00:40:28,760 --> 00:40:30,960
here. I'm glad I went back
to this. Right now, he's going

339
00:40:31,039 --> 00:40:36,400
to have to have a Gayzian argument
for the papacy. Thank you. Shout

340
00:40:36,440 --> 00:40:40,239
out to William in the chat.
Right, because we need to know the

341
00:40:40,320 --> 00:40:45,159
probability. What was the probability in
twenty when was this a year ago,

342
00:40:45,719 --> 00:40:52,280
twenty twenty two of the legitimacy of
butt stuff back then? Well, I

343
00:40:52,280 --> 00:40:58,079
would say it's ninety eight percent,
right according to the Gayzean algorithm. Yeah.

344
00:40:58,320 --> 00:41:01,320
And so what I did at the
beginning was I wanted to be charitable

345
00:41:01,360 --> 00:41:05,599
to both sides. Again, I'm
trying to fight my bias, so I'm

346
00:41:05,599 --> 00:41:08,280
trying to be charitable to the Catholics. I'm also trying to be charitable to

347
00:41:08,400 --> 00:41:13,000
the Protestants. And so what I
would do is I would assign a charitable

348
00:41:13,440 --> 00:41:17,639
oh, he assigned a charitable number. So this is like utilitarian calculus,

349
00:41:17,719 --> 00:41:21,880
right, where this is like Jeremy
Bentham's argument for the papacy, right,

350
00:41:22,239 --> 00:41:24,400
which actually works. I could see
Jeremy Bentham making an argument for the papacy

351
00:41:24,480 --> 00:41:30,920
because Jeremy Bentham was an outright ped
oh right, So Jeremy Bentham would have

352
00:41:30,960 --> 00:41:36,280
made a great Jeremy Jeremy Bentham should
have been the pope, I mean,

353
00:41:36,320 --> 00:41:42,039
being an open ped oh right,
we get a straight up Pedosian analysis,

354
00:41:42,480 --> 00:41:49,719
right to go to go to to
to Rome. Are they sitting up on

355
00:41:49,800 --> 00:41:55,840
a on a balcony outside of Saint
Peter's This is ridiculous. So again I'm

356
00:41:55,880 --> 00:42:00,119
glad that it's charitable, and I'm
glad that he assigned the charity number to

357
00:42:00,320 --> 00:42:05,360
the various arguments. Yes, you
heard him right, he assigned charitable numbers

358
00:42:06,159 --> 00:42:12,239
too. What's the charito is that
like a seven or a six or maybe

359
00:42:12,280 --> 00:42:15,400
a six six six, Maybe that's
the most charitable number that we coubscribe to

360
00:42:15,440 --> 00:42:20,800
the papal arguments? Right, I
mean this is this is Jeremy Bentham's moral

361
00:42:20,880 --> 00:42:29,719
calculus argument from Cameron Bertutez of the
pieces of data, and you're like,

362
00:42:29,800 --> 00:42:32,320
Okay, well, yeah, how
likely is this? Like let's give the

363
00:42:32,360 --> 00:42:36,199
Protestants something here, and so we'll
give him a little like this is a

364
00:42:36,239 --> 00:42:38,760
little bit of evidence against the papacy. I can't really stay this a whole

365
00:42:38,800 --> 00:42:42,800
lot, but this is still being
charitable and so, but what you can

366
00:42:42,880 --> 00:42:46,199
do with the with the Protestant case
is you can by the way, I

367
00:42:46,320 --> 00:42:51,760
forgot, I just remembered. This
is the guy who hates the transcendental argument,

368
00:42:51,800 --> 00:42:55,239
by the way, which I think
is literally just too high IQ for

369
00:42:55,360 --> 00:42:58,599
him to get. He just doesn't
get it, and that's part of the

370
00:42:58,639 --> 00:43:00,639
reason. It makes him mad,
and that's why that's the real reason that

371
00:43:00,719 --> 00:43:07,000
he insists that I totally lost the
debate that Matt Dilhundy wiped the floor with

372
00:43:07,079 --> 00:43:12,039
me, according to Cameron, And
I think it's because he just can't get

373
00:43:12,159 --> 00:43:14,920
TAG. He doesn't get it and
no idea what it is. And so

374
00:43:15,079 --> 00:43:21,000
you're getting the most ridiculous evidentialist argument
I've ever heard for anything in the religious

375
00:43:21,039 --> 00:43:28,559
world. I mean, Jeremy Bentham's
moral calculus argument is dumb and completely like

376
00:43:28,760 --> 00:43:36,360
Internet spurg coomer Man level stuff.
But in a naturalistic, atheistic universe,

377
00:43:36,760 --> 00:43:40,760
I can at least see why Kumerman
Bentham would make that kind of an argument

378
00:43:42,400 --> 00:43:45,199
if that's the universe that he lives
in, and we're all just machines determined

379
00:43:45,199 --> 00:43:50,840
by this giant, you know,
mechanistic universe. We're all in this in

380
00:43:50,920 --> 00:43:58,440
the machine. Welcome my son to
the machine. But to make this argument

381
00:43:58,920 --> 00:44:02,719
in some evidential us stack up the
arguments in an algorithm for the papacy is

382
00:44:02,880 --> 00:44:09,239
so dumb. This is preposterous.
So no wonder kimra Bertozi would never debate

383
00:44:09,920 --> 00:44:14,679
anything. I asked this guy multiple
times. Okay, you think I'm dumb,

384
00:44:15,079 --> 00:44:16,199
You think Matt del Honey wiped the
floor with me. How about you

385
00:44:16,320 --> 00:44:19,880
come on and we'll have a debate. Oh you're mean. I don't have

386
00:44:19,960 --> 00:44:23,320
to. I got an excuse your
mean, So remember the excuses he's me.

387
00:44:25,400 --> 00:44:32,159
Meanwhile, he's got a quick books
argument for the bay. They've got

388
00:44:32,199 --> 00:44:36,559
the dedicay, They've got these different
documents, these early church documents where you

389
00:44:36,679 --> 00:44:42,960
don't see, like why is Matt
Fratt smoking a cigar on top of a

390
00:44:45,679 --> 00:44:50,280
in front of the Vatican? Are
we supposed to think that like I can

391
00:44:50,360 --> 00:44:57,679
be some like some sort of like
Australian James Bond in Rome. He's like

392
00:44:57,719 --> 00:45:00,039
he's trying to do pull a Daniel
Craig, Like when Daniel Craig goes to

393
00:45:00,039 --> 00:45:07,159
the Vatican. It's trying to be
like the Aussie James Bond home Hero and

394
00:45:07,199 --> 00:45:14,159
a mission for Francis to make sure
the world accepts the quick books. Gaysy

395
00:45:14,199 --> 00:45:19,599
in argument for the Papacy. By
the way, he sounds like he sounds

396
00:45:19,679 --> 00:45:23,440
like the guy who sells you ship
in Resident Evil. Hey there, stranger,

397
00:45:24,119 --> 00:45:30,320
want to buy a little bit of
butt stuff. Welcome to Vatican City,

398
00:45:30,440 --> 00:45:35,039
stranger. You might need some pendance
to ward off the Setanic Evil and

399
00:45:35,119 --> 00:45:40,039
say the Vatican got a news,
got some items for sale, stranger.

400
00:45:40,719 --> 00:45:45,159
Literally the dude that I was just
talking to in Resident Evil, all right,

401
00:45:45,199 --> 00:45:50,920
that's Matt frad laid out and specific
names and everything. And so they'll

402
00:45:50,920 --> 00:45:54,000
say this is a document, we
would expect to find the papacy in this,

403
00:45:54,199 --> 00:45:58,400
in this early, this early document, and so and then. But

404
00:45:58,519 --> 00:46:00,320
there are obviously Catholics who want to
respond to that, like Jimmy Aikan and

405
00:46:00,480 --> 00:46:05,159
be like, well, no,
there's actually reason to suspect that they wouldn't

406
00:46:05,199 --> 00:46:10,000
have named specific names in the early
Church because does Jimmy Aiken respond to that

407
00:46:10,280 --> 00:46:15,039
while he's doing his Star Wars streams? Or is it after the Star Wars

408
00:46:15,079 --> 00:46:17,440
stream? So, because I can't, I can't remember who like as an

409
00:46:17,519 --> 00:46:23,639
actual like Star Wars? Soy man
right? Jay Dyer is worldly? Johnny

410
00:46:23,679 --> 00:46:27,840
g would you like to come on
the chat and debate? So again,

411
00:46:28,039 --> 00:46:31,800
I sense I sense a Roman Catholic
in the chat. Since a Roman Catholic

412
00:46:31,800 --> 00:46:34,880
in the chat? Now, if
I did a Star Wars stream, it

413
00:46:34,920 --> 00:46:38,400
would be to make fun of it. It would not be because it's cool.

414
00:46:39,079 --> 00:46:43,960
Resident Evil actually is cool, though, who would have ever thought that

415
00:46:44,039 --> 00:46:49,480
Resident Evil would be more based in
Chad one day than Star Wars would be?

416
00:46:50,400 --> 00:46:52,880
And yet here we are. If
you remember when Resident Evil five came

417
00:46:52,960 --> 00:46:59,840
out, they were already trying to
cancel it because they said it was Resident

418
00:47:00,000 --> 00:47:06,280
Pepi fit. Anyway, Hey Jamie, could you make me a coffee?

419
00:47:07,280 --> 00:47:12,400
I don't know if you heard me
or not. Uh, you have a

420
00:47:12,480 --> 00:47:19,119
gift for impressions, Thank you.
I did impressions for my entire high school,

421
00:47:19,159 --> 00:47:22,519
my senior year. I think I
do have somewhat of a gift.

422
00:47:22,480 --> 00:47:29,760
Maybe one day'll be really good.
Anyway, this is too funny, go,

423
00:47:29,960 --> 00:47:32,280
this is better. This is more
comical than I ever dreamt of.

424
00:47:32,760 --> 00:47:37,320
Why is being persecuted? So you're
not going to just spell out all the

425
00:47:37,440 --> 00:47:43,159
names of the most important figures in
your religion so that people can just read

426
00:47:43,199 --> 00:47:45,719
the letter and then go hunt them
down and kill them. And so there's

427
00:47:46,320 --> 00:47:51,559
there's reasonable responses to that, But
nevertheless, I was still being charitable to

428
00:47:51,679 --> 00:47:55,519
the Protestants and giving it some weight
of evidence against You would think if you

429
00:47:55,599 --> 00:48:00,920
have around fifteen arguments against the papacy
and only four, yeah, favor of

430
00:48:00,960 --> 00:48:04,320
the papacy, that it's going to
be hard for the papacy to come out

431
00:48:04,320 --> 00:48:08,360
on top unless those four arguments are
very strong. Yeah. So there's there's

432
00:48:08,400 --> 00:48:14,400
really three passages in the New Testament
that are sort of relevant to the papacy

433
00:48:14,440 --> 00:48:17,119
in terms of like giving some positive
boost to it, which is Matthew sixteen,

434
00:48:17,199 --> 00:48:22,039
John twenty one, and Luke twenty
two. And you if you look

435
00:48:22,079 --> 00:48:30,440
at the interesting So I like the
admission there that there's really only three passages

436
00:48:30,519 --> 00:48:37,960
that we build this entire edifice on
and allow me to explain via intense isid

437
00:48:37,039 --> 00:48:42,199
Jesus we don't know what isaid Jesus
is. That's where you read back into

438
00:48:42,280 --> 00:48:45,039
a passage something that was never there
initially or in the minds of the author

439
00:48:45,960 --> 00:48:53,000
is said Jesus. Is very common
when people like to bolster a new doctrine

440
00:48:55,159 --> 00:49:01,000
via mining the passages for something that
was never there than creatively constructing an argument.

441
00:49:02,400 --> 00:49:06,400
For example, allow me to start
out. Let's say I started a

442
00:49:06,480 --> 00:49:17,599
cult, right, and my cult
was centered around the idea that instead of

443
00:49:17,760 --> 00:49:25,199
having a male patriarchal tyrant, or
even a female run things, the fairest

444
00:49:25,280 --> 00:49:30,360
type of governance should be kids.
Kids rule, kid order. Dude,

445
00:49:31,719 --> 00:49:37,039
shout out hashtag kids rule. Now, why would I want kids to rule?

446
00:49:39,559 --> 00:49:44,760
Because there's a passage in Isaiah it
says a child shall lead them.

447
00:49:45,599 --> 00:49:52,360
Clearly, that's talking about the true
head of the church should be a teen

448
00:49:52,519 --> 00:50:01,559
dude, teen pope, thank you. I mean the passage says a child

449
00:50:01,599 --> 00:50:05,960
shall lead them, the pope is
the leader. Clearly, that's saying we

450
00:50:06,039 --> 00:50:09,920
need a kid pope. By the
way, a teen pope would be better

451
00:50:10,000 --> 00:50:15,639
than Francis. I mean, let's
bring in Pope Jeoffrey. Put Pope Jeoffrey

452
00:50:15,719 --> 00:50:20,280
up in there, he'd be better
than Francis. Dude, Geoffrey isn't even

453
00:50:20,280 --> 00:50:24,239
as Geoffrey wouldn't be making people,
you know, sign on to the boute

454
00:50:24,400 --> 00:50:30,639
stuff. But the passage says that
a child shall leave them, and all

455
00:50:30,719 --> 00:50:36,679
the passages are about the Pope.
Isaiah twenty two. The Steward, the

456
00:50:36,800 --> 00:50:42,440
Steward, the Steward of Gondor.
He's a symbol of the Pope for Gondoor.

457
00:50:43,920 --> 00:50:50,920
Right, Remember seeing Bean, Remember
Sean Bean, the Steward of Gondor

458
00:50:51,000 --> 00:50:54,000
basically is the Pope him over there, right, But he's over there suckling

459
00:50:54,079 --> 00:51:00,480
on them berries with meat giblets running
down his face. But hell, I'd

460
00:51:00,559 --> 00:51:07,039
rather have the Steward of Gondor as
the Pope than Francis. Who would y'all

461
00:51:07,119 --> 00:51:16,239
rather have the Steward of Gondor or
Geoffrey either want to be better than Francis

462
00:51:16,840 --> 00:51:20,639
because neither one of them and they
were corrupt, but they didn't make anybody

463
00:51:20,679 --> 00:51:32,519
do butt stuff for Gondor. Fu
girdle. Right. If the Steward of

464
00:51:32,559 --> 00:51:39,360
Gondor was pope, then you'd have
a Borimir over there, who's Geoffrey.

465
00:51:39,400 --> 00:51:45,159
People don't know who Geoffrey is,
right, you'd have Sean being over there

466
00:51:45,239 --> 00:51:51,400
going fu girdle. Come on,
now, that was pretty good jokes.

467
00:51:51,599 --> 00:51:55,480
That was all right? Right,
let's three. I mean I think being

468
00:51:55,559 --> 00:51:59,159
charitable you can say, okay,
this does give a little bit of weight

469
00:51:59,400 --> 00:52:06,320
to Is this a buzzword that him
and Lofton all just decided to suddenly hammer

470
00:52:06,400 --> 00:52:09,519
everybody with being charitable while being charitable? Being charitable, being charitable, being

471
00:52:09,559 --> 00:52:15,079
charitile, church charitable, charitable?
Is this this thing to beat people's heads

472
00:52:15,079 --> 00:52:22,079
over with as some sort of lame
like one time over blanket excuse for everything?

473
00:52:22,199 --> 00:52:25,039
Right? What do you even mean
being charitable? I mean, I

474
00:52:25,079 --> 00:52:29,280
know what the word means, but
what do you mean? Because I feel

475
00:52:29,320 --> 00:52:36,159
like it's getting over used here?
Right, yeah, exactly what legit would

476
00:52:36,159 --> 00:52:40,119
have a hard time choosing between Francis
or Pope denethor or Pope Geoffrey, Like

477
00:52:40,360 --> 00:52:44,800
you could go either way. This
is why I spent so much time posting

478
00:52:44,840 --> 00:52:50,320
on this one piece of data.
Or it's just a ridiculous grift argument that

479
00:52:50,440 --> 00:52:53,679
you thought would dupe a lot of
dummies into thinking that you had a mathematical

480
00:52:53,840 --> 00:52:59,559
Bayesian proof of the papacy. I
mean, who actually believe did you?

481
00:52:59,599 --> 00:53:08,519
Guys who believed this a Baysian spreadsheet
argument for the PAP I mean, is

482
00:53:08,599 --> 00:53:15,800
this due truble? Maybe he's troubling. Maybe Cameron is actually super based Baisdian.

483
00:53:15,920 --> 00:53:20,159
I'm gonna give you a Baisdian spreadsheet
right now from Quick Books as to

484
00:53:20,199 --> 00:53:29,480
how this argument is tarted, a
Basian spreadsheet for the PAP. I remember

485
00:53:29,519 --> 00:53:32,599
what I remember when I saw this
video a year ago, I was like,

486
00:53:34,000 --> 00:53:37,000
is that real? And I totally
forgot about it. I'm so glad

487
00:53:37,000 --> 00:53:39,679
I remembered this thing. This is
a This is a gem, dude.

488
00:53:44,400 --> 00:53:46,440
I want to remind y'all because we've
got a bunch of young boys in the

489
00:53:46,599 --> 00:53:52,800
chat. We got a bunch of
young boys. Does this even exist anymore?

490
00:53:52,840 --> 00:53:59,159
Didn't Bill Gates put this on everybody's
computer back in the day. I

491
00:53:59,280 --> 00:54:01,199
want to see an and here we
go. Check this out. This is

492
00:54:01,239 --> 00:54:06,920
what we're talking about right here,
Yes, really quick, especially not those

493
00:54:06,960 --> 00:54:12,000
crap for those that don't know.
And you want to would you like to

494
00:54:12,039 --> 00:54:16,880
construct your own Baysian argument for the
papacy. Allow me to show you Quick

495
00:54:16,960 --> 00:54:24,480
Books. Just install Windows XP or
whatever they had in nineteen ninety seven.

496
00:54:24,880 --> 00:54:28,559
What if we have in nineteen ninety
seven. I don't remember. So for

497
00:54:28,639 --> 00:54:37,159
those that don't know, here's Windows
Quick Books nineteen ninety seven. Bad yours

498
00:54:37,239 --> 00:54:43,719
is okay o that quick Books to
County software from the makers of Quickens.

499
00:54:44,199 --> 00:54:46,320
I called a total free number and
got a free trial version. My system

500
00:54:46,360 --> 00:54:50,880
works fine for me, That's what
I thought. But if you have bills

501
00:54:50,920 --> 00:54:52,400
to pay a customers who owe your
money, you really ought to try this.

502
00:54:53,039 --> 00:54:59,440
Yeah, Or if you have apologetic
work that's super lazy and dumb and

503
00:54:59,519 --> 00:55:07,559
grifty and like kind of a joke, you can also use quick books like

504
00:55:14,840 --> 00:55:24,320
Number or a religion that would like
to easily make dumb people convinced. I

505
00:55:24,400 --> 00:55:27,920
think Vatican City is more door.
So what are you'all talking about? Right?

506
00:55:28,960 --> 00:55:32,800
More door or back door? Y'all
tearing it up in the chat.

507
00:55:35,000 --> 00:55:38,639
It's on fire tonight. This is
the quick book. This is the Pope

508
00:55:38,679 --> 00:55:45,119
Francis edition. Right here, you
get a you get a remember remember in

509
00:55:45,440 --> 00:55:47,599
Microsoft word that little clippy, right, you get a little you get a

510
00:55:47,639 --> 00:55:53,159
little a little dollar sign with a
with a papal with a pope hat that

511
00:55:53,199 --> 00:55:59,559
pops up helps you out on on
Pope books. Now quick books, what

512
00:55:59,639 --> 00:56:02,000
do we want to call it?
Trying to think of the right word Microsoft,

513
00:56:02,440 --> 00:56:09,039
Microsoft Pope Splaner, Microsoft Pope Splainer. By the way, you could

514
00:56:09,079 --> 00:56:15,840
literally write a program for this crap, the Microsoft Pope Splaner program like quick

515
00:56:15,960 --> 00:56:23,119
Books. Type in your problem and
it will spit out a Gaysian algorithm based

516
00:56:23,159 --> 00:56:32,719
on camera member twos these calculations and
you'll never lose an argument. Yeah,

517
00:56:32,719 --> 00:56:37,599
but does it do the Vatican banks
payroll? Because that funds a lot of

518
00:56:37,199 --> 00:56:42,920
organized crime and money laundering and weapons
trades. Remember how it came out that

519
00:56:43,519 --> 00:56:47,360
all the weapons sales that were being
funneled to Vatican bank accounts. So does

520
00:56:47,440 --> 00:56:52,880
quick Books work with the Vatican Bank
or is that a separate private bank?

521
00:56:53,199 --> 00:57:01,320
So that's probably that's probably off the
records right to report that you control.

522
00:57:05,559 --> 00:57:13,280
I'm so every Roman Catholic pop apologist
should I don't over here and get quick

523
00:57:13,320 --> 00:57:19,079
Books because Cameron solved the I mean, who knew you thought you had to

524
00:57:19,119 --> 00:57:23,000
do all this boring as apologetic work, read all these books. You only

525
00:57:23,079 --> 00:57:30,480
needed one book Quick Books. The
typological there's there's all sorts of names for

526
00:57:30,599 --> 00:57:35,280
it, but the typological Eliakhan argument, you call it something like that.

527
00:57:36,000 --> 00:57:40,360
But there's a connection, there's a
textual illusion. Ah, you see three

528
00:57:40,480 --> 00:57:45,880
passages that have nothing to do with
Batican one. And now let's move to

529
00:57:45,000 --> 00:57:52,679
the Eliakim type of logical argument of
the steward of gondor right is somehow equal

530
00:57:52,800 --> 00:58:00,360
to the quisa the God Emperor on
Earth. I'm gonna remind you what this

531
00:58:00,480 --> 00:58:04,960
doctrine actually was in history, because
all of these goobers don't even talk about

532
00:58:04,960 --> 00:58:08,639
it, and they don't even know. Like, I can't stress to you

533
00:58:09,880 --> 00:58:15,559
how low tier normy pop apologetics for
the Roman Catholic world actually is. And

534
00:58:15,639 --> 00:58:17,280
I know because I was in it, and I did it for a while

535
00:58:17,480 --> 00:58:25,519
when I was dumb, before I
learned about quick books. I'm gonna show

536
00:58:25,559 --> 00:58:30,159
you another change that nobody ever talks
about except over here on this show.

537
00:58:30,280 --> 00:58:37,079
No one talks about one of the
biggest changes that, by the way,

538
00:58:37,320 --> 00:58:40,760
was backed up in part via the
stupid is of Jesus. Of what he's

539
00:58:40,800 --> 00:58:49,400
talking about, the steward Eliah Kim
is Christ. First of all, it's

540
00:58:49,440 --> 00:58:55,199
not a worldly office of Peter that
mirrors a worldly steward in the Old Testament

541
00:58:55,840 --> 00:59:01,400
kingdom. I mean, they're literally
like owing back in time to Old Testament

542
00:59:01,519 --> 00:59:07,480
relations to try to make the papacy
into the equivalent of an earthly high priest,

543
00:59:08,440 --> 00:59:12,679
which would be a version of judaizing
heresy. It's just so stupid.

544
00:59:16,920 --> 00:59:22,880
I mean by this type of argument, everyone in the Old Testament who is

545
00:59:22,960 --> 00:59:25,920
the leader of anything is now a
type of the pope. You see how

546
00:59:25,960 --> 00:59:30,760
stupid this is. Now, let's
get creative with our isogesis. Oh,

547
00:59:31,320 --> 00:59:35,199
well, we had some female judges, didn't we, In the Book of

548
00:59:35,280 --> 00:59:43,679
Judges. I think a name is
Deborah. Oh to quote back, remember

549
00:59:43,760 --> 00:59:46,519
Deborah. Why Deborah was a type
of the pope. You see, she

550
00:59:46,800 --> 00:59:52,639
was a head of Israel. The
New Testament needs a living, earthly head.

551
00:59:53,400 --> 00:59:58,559
The pope should be woman. Oh
but wait a minute, that's a

552
00:59:58,679 --> 01:00:01,599
violation of paper code. Blah blah
blah blah blah blah blah. Oh really

553
01:00:01,719 --> 01:00:07,360
is it? You mean, like
how blessing unions was a violation. Oh

554
01:00:07,400 --> 01:00:10,639
but that's changed. But it didn't. But nothing changed, ain't it?

555
01:00:10,719 --> 01:00:16,679
Damn thing changed? All? Ain't
nothing changed? All yo doesn't change?

556
01:00:17,079 --> 01:00:20,320
Why doesn't he? He should have
a rap song about that, right,

557
01:00:21,960 --> 01:00:25,679
loft dog dn't change, dog under
durn ding change. By the way,

558
01:00:25,840 --> 01:00:30,719
we're gonna we had an awesome clip
of Michael Lofton lying, So we'll play

559
01:00:30,760 --> 01:00:34,480
that just in a second. How
many times did I tell you these guys

560
01:00:34,519 --> 01:00:39,880
were just complete goobers. Number One, they're actually not that smart. The

561
01:00:40,280 --> 01:00:44,199
lack of the reason they're not debating
with me has nothing to do with me

562
01:00:44,280 --> 01:00:46,480
being mean. And by the way, all of these people, except for

563
01:00:46,559 --> 01:00:57,039
Tim, are totally passive, aggressive
and totally cunning and shifty in the background,

564
01:00:57,159 --> 01:01:01,119
so they present you this pious case
the face, and in the background,

565
01:01:01,119 --> 01:01:07,599
they're not pious. These people are
ridiculous. Now, maybe Trent does.

566
01:01:07,639 --> 01:01:10,519
I don't know Trent so, but
the rest of these goons are goons,

567
01:01:13,639 --> 01:01:20,280
and we're seeing that they're goons because
I'm not waiting. It's about Jay's

568
01:01:20,280 --> 01:01:22,360
being we I'm not wasted. I'm
wasted. This is normal me, dude,

569
01:01:22,360 --> 01:01:25,519
I'm not wasted. I did take
chalk today, so if I'm ramped

570
01:01:25,599 --> 01:01:30,679
up, it's because of chalk.
But I'm not wasted. In fact,

571
01:01:30,760 --> 01:01:36,320
I'm never wasted. I do not
I never ever drink. I know people

572
01:01:36,320 --> 01:01:38,480
are surprised when they hear that I
had one glass of wine for the first

573
01:01:38,519 --> 01:01:45,480
time in five years when we met
the Italian Strotzy Joccardini family, the nobility,

574
01:01:45,880 --> 01:01:49,199
and I did that because they have
a winery and I don't want to

575
01:01:49,199 --> 01:01:53,440
be rude and not drink their wine. But Jamie can tell you that I

576
01:01:53,599 --> 01:01:58,559
hate alcohol and I don't drink,
and I quit drinking. We're coming up

577
01:01:58,599 --> 01:02:01,039
close to a decade, dude,
Like we're getting up towards a decade.

578
01:02:04,599 --> 01:02:08,199
I just I don't like alcohol.
I quit liking it, like almost seven

579
01:02:08,239 --> 01:02:10,960
eight years ago. Just woke up
and I was like, you know,

580
01:02:12,039 --> 01:02:14,400
this sucks. I don't like it
anymore. And by the way, I

581
01:02:14,480 --> 01:02:16,000
drank enough of my twenties anyway.
And every time I tell this story,

582
01:02:16,039 --> 01:02:21,480
they're like, you were an alcoholic. We got him exposed. I think

583
01:02:21,519 --> 01:02:25,119
I could have become an alcoholic if
I had constantly kept drinking. But no,

584
01:02:25,239 --> 01:02:28,639
I wasn't an alcoholic. I never
went to AA or any of this

585
01:02:28,679 --> 01:02:30,599
stuff. I just one day woke
up and said, you know what,

586
01:02:30,960 --> 01:02:35,960
I don't get much work done when
I drink, and it's not fun anymore.

587
01:02:36,119 --> 01:02:37,760
Once you get to about age thirty, you can't drink like it you

588
01:02:37,800 --> 01:02:42,480
did when you're in your twenties,
and you wake up feeling like crap and

589
01:02:42,639 --> 01:02:45,679
you're you feel like garbage for three
days in a row. It's like,

590
01:02:45,719 --> 01:02:51,440
all right, I'm done drinking.
And then by age thirty. Anyway,

591
01:02:51,480 --> 01:02:52,679
all your friends are married and have
kids and they don't go out to bars

592
01:02:52,679 --> 01:02:58,079
anyway, So you're just gonna drink
it home alone. That's that's freaking losory

593
01:02:58,159 --> 01:03:05,440
dude. Anyway, we gotta get
back to Cameron. This is too good.

594
01:03:05,880 --> 01:03:07,480
This is by the way, thank
you for the super chat, so

595
01:03:07,559 --> 01:03:10,199
much appreciated. Uh, we're gonna
get to Trent and we're gonna get to

596
01:03:10,800 --> 01:03:21,679
loft Dog and is that it?
Oh there was a Scott Han clip here,

597
01:03:21,880 --> 01:03:29,840
so I think Cameron. Yeah,
it gives me heartburn too. By

598
01:03:29,840 --> 01:03:31,639
the way, when I quit drinking, all my ascid reflux in a way,

599
01:03:32,119 --> 01:03:36,360
so people are always complaining about acid
reflux. Oh cool, gooble,

600
01:03:37,199 --> 01:03:39,800
gonna take all these pills, gonna
take zero tech and blah blah blah,

601
01:03:39,840 --> 01:03:45,840
but taking all these alien planet name
I gotta take zero tech from the planet

602
01:03:45,840 --> 01:03:49,719
play at eight. Why are you
taking alien name pills? Dude? You

603
01:03:49,800 --> 01:03:52,199
want a big secret. Stop eating
cake and drinking alcohol and you won't get

604
01:03:52,480 --> 01:04:01,559
acid reflux anymore. Revelation. All
right, this is too good. This

605
01:04:01,679 --> 01:04:11,599
is comedy gold. And by the
way, if somebody would actually like to

606
01:04:11,679 --> 01:04:15,320
see a complete deconstruction of this dumb
argument from Isaiah twenty two of eliak Him

607
01:04:15,400 --> 01:04:19,199
as if it's a proof of the
papacy. There was the classic debate on

608
01:04:19,400 --> 01:04:27,239
Suan's channel with ubi Uh and I
don't remember who he debated. Maybe it

609
01:04:27,320 --> 01:04:34,079
was it was Suan. W wasn't
it the new Eliah? And the funniest

610
01:04:34,119 --> 01:04:39,639
thing about this debate, I'm not
kidding if you go, if you really

611
01:04:39,679 --> 01:04:45,880
want to go watch it is that
Suan ends up going into Uh quoting elements

612
01:04:45,920 --> 01:04:51,800
of the Talmud to prove how Jews
viewed Eliakim and the I mean, so

613
01:04:53,840 --> 01:04:58,360
I love that. I mean,
let's go to the Talmud to prove the

614
01:04:58,719 --> 01:05:04,440
earthly temporals premacy power of the papacy
exactly again demonstrating that the real essence of

615
01:05:04,480 --> 01:05:15,119
the papacy is a step back into
Old Testament methodology and ideology when what Jesus

616
01:05:15,199 --> 01:05:18,159
was setting up was not an earthly
power in kingdom. That does not mean,

617
01:05:18,320 --> 01:05:21,159
you guys know, I'm not a
Baptist, right, I'm not some

618
01:05:21,320 --> 01:05:29,760
kind of goofball that thinks that the
state has no role. The dual headed

619
01:05:29,800 --> 01:05:36,559
eagle is the role. Okay,
the dual headed eagle doesn't fit anywhere into

620
01:05:36,599 --> 01:05:43,480
the papacy, because if the pope
is the church and state, then it's

621
01:05:43,559 --> 01:05:54,079
a single headed eagle, not a
dual headed eagle. But everybody knows that

622
01:05:54,239 --> 01:05:57,719
the classic image and symbol of the
Church from the Patristic Byzantine period is a

623
01:05:57,800 --> 01:06:03,719
dual headed eagle. I'm not lit. I don't know what you're talking on

624
01:06:03,840 --> 01:06:08,679
chocolate. If you're talking about lit, I'm on chalk. I'm not on

625
01:06:08,800 --> 01:06:12,800
any drugs. I ain't lit.
And it's a textual allusion back to this

626
01:06:12,920 --> 01:06:17,239
Old Testament character alike him. And
so the argument goes is that Peter that's

627
01:06:17,280 --> 01:06:24,280
mentioned in Matthew sixteen nineteen is the
fulfillment of alake Him. So he is

628
01:06:24,360 --> 01:06:29,760
the new aliak Him. He's the
type that's the typological. Interesting you notice

629
01:06:29,800 --> 01:06:33,000
that for the first thousand years of
the Church, as far as I'm aware,

630
01:06:34,159 --> 01:06:39,280
Isaiah twenty two is never used as
a Vatican one style proof of the

631
01:06:39,320 --> 01:06:45,320
papacy. Naturally, it would only
become in a creative exigesi or isigesis after

632
01:06:45,400 --> 01:06:48,719
the Gregorian reforms. After the eleventh
century when we get the papal revolution.

633
01:06:49,599 --> 01:06:56,559
Shocker, right, You think any
church father exegted Isaiah twenty two has a

634
01:06:56,639 --> 01:07:02,880
proved that the pope has not just
universal jurisdiction, but also that he has

635
01:07:02,960 --> 01:07:06,920
temporal supremacy. And I'm gonna show
you that that's where the doctrine goes.

636
01:07:09,920 --> 01:07:15,400
Because none of these people ever talk
about the dogma. The audio of what

637
01:07:15,599 --> 01:07:21,400
is too low. I'm my audio
is too lower his. Let's see if

638
01:07:21,440 --> 01:07:28,159
I can turn cameraon up any turn
it up, bring the noise. All

639
01:07:28,239 --> 01:07:30,400
right, we got cameraon up as
far as he'll go. Let's see if

640
01:07:30,440 --> 01:07:34,960
that helps. Let's see if we
can try one more thing to make it

641
01:07:35,039 --> 01:07:41,480
even. That's about as loud as
we can get it. So let's see.

642
01:07:44,159 --> 01:07:46,840
Because they don't talk about the fact
that the temporal supremacy of the pope

643
01:07:47,719 --> 01:07:57,199
became a dogmatic definition that was necessary
for salvation, you see. And I'm

644
01:07:57,199 --> 01:08:04,000
gonna have to freaking turn the dang
internet. I'm gonna have to turn the

645
01:08:04,079 --> 01:08:14,480
dang WiFi on because the battery is
running down. I'm to grab another cough

646
01:08:14,559 --> 01:08:21,159
drop and to remind you to smash
that like button. Support the show via

647
01:08:21,199 --> 01:08:27,840
super chat function if you have a
question, comment topic, feel free to

648
01:08:27,880 --> 01:08:33,319
bring it up. I was inspired
today, Yes, a literally, I

649
01:08:33,399 --> 01:08:38,199
have the vaticouf. Some id said, are you sick? I've had Vatican

650
01:08:38,319 --> 01:08:44,000
cough since I was at the Vatican
seven weeks ago where I was smoking cigars

651
01:08:44,079 --> 01:08:51,239
on the balconies of the Vatican.
Psich I would turn down smoking cigars on

652
01:08:51,279 --> 01:08:58,039
the balcony bat it actually sounds like
somebody that's actually sounds like something Skittles,

653
01:08:58,119 --> 01:09:01,359
Rainbow meet up. Let's smoke some
cigars on the balcony of the Votic and

654
01:09:01,479 --> 01:09:06,319
if you know what I mean,
it's a big fabulous all right, let's

655
01:09:06,319 --> 01:09:11,239
get back to the Bayesian proof of
the papacies. Oh, this was about

656
01:09:11,319 --> 01:09:15,159
real Isaiah twenty two Eli, I
can it's fulfilled in Christ has nothing to

657
01:09:15,239 --> 01:09:21,560
do with a temporal papal ruler,
the Old Testament character the New Testament character.

658
01:09:21,960 --> 01:09:25,800
And what you did then is you
see that the office of the Old

659
01:09:25,840 --> 01:09:30,079
Testament office is going to be very
similar in all sorts of ways to the

660
01:09:30,159 --> 01:09:31,840
New Testament office. Not in every
way. Obviously, there's going to be

661
01:09:32,119 --> 01:09:38,680
because the Jesus' kingdom was greater than
David's kingdom. There's going to be greater

662
01:09:38,840 --> 01:09:44,319
properties that are going to exist in
the anti type, the type that you

663
01:09:44,399 --> 01:09:46,840
see the fulfillment that you see in
the New Testament. So it's not going

664
01:09:46,880 --> 01:09:50,399
to be a one to one correspondence
between the two, but you're nevertheless going

665
01:09:50,439 --> 01:09:54,319
to see some correspondences. Now you
might think, well, now, wait

666
01:09:54,319 --> 01:09:58,399
a minute. Surely when we object
to this and point out that this is

667
01:09:58,520 --> 01:10:02,159
creative is to Jesus and nobody in
the New Testament thought of Isaiah twenty two

668
01:10:02,199 --> 01:10:09,000
as a reference to a temporal papacy
with universal supremacy and jurisdiction and all scope

669
01:10:09,039 --> 01:10:13,319
and the Quisa's Hotterock doctrine. Surely
right, the universe is super being.

670
01:10:15,560 --> 01:10:19,600
Right, Surely they have a response
to that. What do you think the

671
01:10:19,680 --> 01:10:26,399
response is high IQ, beloved audience, and I'm not trolling my audience,

672
01:10:26,439 --> 01:10:30,880
actually is high IQ. We don't
fall for these dumb quick books arguments for

673
01:10:30,920 --> 01:10:39,039
the papacy. What do you think
the response is doctrinal development? Ah,

674
01:10:39,399 --> 01:10:47,199
yes, the great umbrella uber mention
argument. Right. Well, you see

675
01:10:47,640 --> 01:10:54,479
it wasn't necessarily immediate there in Isaiah
twenty two or in the Patristic exegesis for

676
01:10:54,560 --> 01:11:00,199
the first thousand years it's a doctrine
that developed where we learned the seeds coming

677
01:11:00,279 --> 01:11:05,079
to full fruition of the papacy to
become the temporal ruler. And how exactly

678
01:11:05,279 --> 01:11:11,960
was the temporal authority of the pope
backed up for many many centuries? Oh,

679
01:11:12,159 --> 01:11:16,640
the forgeries? Exactly were the forgeries
also seed doctrines contained in Isaiah twenty

680
01:11:16,680 --> 01:11:21,479
two. Well, you see there's
a development, and then it takes time

681
01:11:21,600 --> 01:11:27,159
to weed out the bad Oh okay, interesting, So it's taken time to

682
01:11:27,319 --> 01:11:30,560
weed out the bad arguments and the
bad reasoning as to why it's wrong to

683
01:11:30,680 --> 01:11:38,640
bless skittles unions. You see,
you see that doctrinal development is the same

684
01:11:38,760 --> 01:11:49,880
basis for moral development. Dummies,
what properties the life had? Then it

685
01:11:49,960 --> 01:11:56,079
was very close to the papal office. And so then the question is does

686
01:11:56,159 --> 01:12:00,199
that really transfer over? Does that
office transfer over to Peter? And so

687
01:12:00,039 --> 01:12:04,000
I was not convinced about this argument
for a while. But what I saw

688
01:12:08,520 --> 01:12:11,800
so even he knew this was a
stupid argument, right, But what was

689
01:12:11,880 --> 01:12:14,840
the thing that changed his mind on
this Isaiah twenty two argument? I gotta

690
01:12:14,840 --> 01:12:20,000
hear this was that if this argument
is true, And again I was trying

691
01:12:20,000 --> 01:12:26,640
to be charitable to both sides.
If this argument is true, it is

692
01:12:26,880 --> 01:12:32,760
so unlikely that Protestantism or Orthodoxy is
true. Again, this is the distinctive

693
01:12:33,079 --> 01:12:40,319
doctrine, is the papacy. And
so basically it's like, now, wait

694
01:12:40,319 --> 01:12:44,560
a minute. This started out as
a quick books Bayesian argument of some sort

695
01:12:44,560 --> 01:12:50,079
of algorithm, some sort of Suss
algorithm that he came up with, and

696
01:12:50,199 --> 01:12:57,079
now he's decided that Isaiah twenty two
is the lynchpin of all arguments. This

697
01:12:57,359 --> 01:13:03,760
is the lynch pin. Again.
Please go watch uh Ubi's debate with Sewan

698
01:13:03,920 --> 01:13:08,239
Suna on this stupid ass argument.
This is so dumb. I can't believe

699
01:13:08,239 --> 01:13:15,520
that people think this is the clincher
for the papacy. I mean, how

700
01:13:15,560 --> 01:13:17,520
are people how are people falling for
this? I'm trying to figure it out.

701
01:13:18,560 --> 01:13:23,199
I do remember the first time that
I heard this argument back in maybe

702
01:13:23,199 --> 01:13:26,840
two thousand and five. I think
I heard it from its front. It

703
01:13:26,960 --> 01:13:29,880
was in the Butler, Dolgren and
Hass book, which is a popular Roman

704
01:13:29,920 --> 01:13:32,039
Cawolic apologetics book, Peter and the
Keys or whatever. I got it over

705
01:13:32,079 --> 01:13:40,119
here, and I remember thinking,
interesting, that's a fascinating argument. That

706
01:13:40,319 --> 01:13:44,920
is an interesting take. But I
was not very well studied in the Book

707
01:13:44,960 --> 01:13:49,880
of Isaiah at the time, nor
was I really good in New Testament theology

708
01:13:49,960 --> 01:13:59,279
either, So I have to think
that this could only be a convincing argument

709
01:13:59,399 --> 01:14:03,840
to really low tier, low information
voters. That's all. That's all all

710
01:14:03,880 --> 01:14:09,880
I can think here, because I
mean, in Suan's case, it took

711
01:14:10,000 --> 01:14:16,279
him going to the Talmut and digging
up ridiculous out of nowhere Jewish tradition,

712
01:14:16,520 --> 01:14:21,680
exegesis isa Jesus inventing stuff about Isaiah
twenty two, and they're, you know,

713
01:14:21,720 --> 01:14:26,800
the high priest or something, I
mean, just crazy stuff that would

714
01:14:26,800 --> 01:14:38,920
have nothing to do with the practice
of the church obviously. And he's got

715
01:14:39,039 --> 01:14:44,960
these people like qualities with his office
being the new alike him. How likely

716
01:14:45,079 --> 01:14:50,720
is that on the papacy seems pretty
likely. So interestingly, he just stated

717
01:14:50,760 --> 01:14:54,560
the thing that was in question.
So you've got Peter who's got these papal

718
01:14:54,720 --> 01:14:59,399
like things in the office. That's
what he said. That's not me making

719
01:14:59,439 --> 01:15:02,119
fun of him. You've got Peter
that's got these papal like things of the

720
01:15:02,199 --> 01:15:09,399
office. Let's hear this beautiful,
eloquent, wonderful statement again. And so

721
01:15:09,640 --> 01:15:14,680
basically it's like if he's got Peter, he's got these people like qualities.

722
01:15:15,680 --> 01:15:18,880
If you've got Peter, he's got
these paple like qualities. Well that's the

723
01:15:18,960 --> 01:15:25,600
thing in question, Cameron. So
you notice that it's not surprising by the

724
01:15:25,640 --> 01:15:28,600
way that this is also the guy
that can't get tagged. He doesn't he

725
01:15:28,680 --> 01:15:34,359
can't understand tag literally, and so
he doesn't understand that. Your presupposition is

726
01:15:34,640 --> 01:15:40,640
that Peter equals Vatican One, and
that's not what's been demonstrated. I guarantee

727
01:15:40,640 --> 01:15:45,079
you, I guarantee you one percent
that this guy hasn't read Vatican One,

728
01:15:45,960 --> 01:15:48,479
much less any of the other councils. With his office being the new Elia

729
01:15:48,600 --> 01:15:56,520
Him, how likely is that on
the papacy seems pretty likely. Is no

730
01:15:56,640 --> 01:16:00,079
one going to talk about how eliak
him is a type of Christ. The

731
01:16:00,239 --> 01:16:04,479
very office and the statements of a
like him, and what he does is

732
01:16:04,560 --> 01:16:09,720
the thing that Christ has. So
in the liac and passage it does state

733
01:16:10,439 --> 01:16:14,800
that he's the he will open and
close right as the steward of the House

734
01:16:14,840 --> 01:16:25,600
of David. And remember when we
had the debate with a certain Catholic and

735
01:16:25,680 --> 01:16:29,479
the Book of Revelation came up,
and the quote where it says I have

736
01:16:29,760 --> 01:16:33,479
the keys of Death and Hades,
and this certain Catholic person said, that's

737
01:16:33,560 --> 01:16:39,399
Peter, when it's Jesus talking to
the seven churches. Do you notice the

738
01:16:39,479 --> 01:16:45,159
pattern there of type and fulfillment type
anti type things that are typically referred to

739
01:16:45,359 --> 01:16:51,560
as fulfilled in Christ and in his
ministry the person of Christ are transferred consistently

740
01:16:51,600 --> 01:16:57,520
from Roman Catholics to the Pope.
Now, to be fair, we would

741
01:16:57,560 --> 01:17:03,159
agree that you could say that every
bishop and every priest in a way also

742
01:17:03,520 --> 01:17:13,359
represents the Father and represents Christ.
It doesn't follow from that that that becomes

743
01:17:13,439 --> 01:17:20,520
then a retroactive proof of Vatican Ones
claims that should be so obvious in their

744
01:17:20,560 --> 01:17:30,039
own church. In the Alexandria document
admits this even more forcefully than the Chi

745
01:17:30,119 --> 01:17:36,359
eighty document. But of course they
haven't read that, because this is all

746
01:17:36,399 --> 01:17:43,880
relying on little information voters who haven't
read the documents and don't know what all

747
01:17:43,920 --> 01:17:47,039
this stuff actually says. We did
a whole live stream going through the entirety

748
01:17:47,119 --> 01:18:01,560
of the Alexandria document. Do you
even know what that is? That's where

749
01:18:01,600 --> 01:18:12,720
they admit all of our positions again
again under a papally approved commission me David

750
01:18:12,800 --> 01:18:18,560
and snacky right here. We put
the whole thing on the screen for you

751
01:18:18,680 --> 01:18:26,279
because you're all lazy and won't read
it. Roman Catholics and every Roman remember

752
01:18:26,319 --> 01:18:32,199
when this came out, what six
months ago? I posted this? I

753
01:18:32,279 --> 01:18:35,199
sent this to every Roman Catholic I
could think of. Do you know what

754
01:18:35,279 --> 01:18:43,800
I got in response? Silence?
Silence, absolute silence. No one responded.

755
01:18:45,399 --> 01:18:49,119
Remember that trad cap mom that would
call into the streams and talk for

756
01:18:49,640 --> 01:18:57,039
an hour she said, oh uh, I'll watch this later. Silence.

757
01:19:00,479 --> 01:19:04,359
By the way, have any of
the Roman Catholic apologists commented on the Alexandria

758
01:19:04,399 --> 01:19:10,479
document? How come? Where's the
Pope's planning on the Alexander Dark? Now?

759
01:19:10,479 --> 01:19:14,640
Maybe they have, because I don't
watch these gebers. But if they

760
01:19:14,720 --> 01:19:16,960
have, feel free to enlighten me
and put it in the Chat or something.

761
01:19:17,359 --> 01:19:23,319
Maybe we can go watch it.
But I mean, here's the Papal

762
01:19:23,359 --> 01:19:28,439
Commission admitting about ninety percent of the
Orthodox complaints and arguments. And guess what

763
01:19:28,560 --> 01:19:35,960
if that's true, then Vatican One's
not true. Fred says, I've watched

764
01:19:35,960 --> 01:19:40,439
a lot of you, and I
find you hard to follow. We'll ask

765
01:19:40,520 --> 01:19:48,039
a question, what is hard to
follow? I? Mean, how many

766
01:19:48,119 --> 01:19:53,800
are how difficult is it to understand
that? Unam Sankdam says that you have

767
01:19:53,920 --> 01:19:57,920
to believe in the temporal supremacy of
the Pope to be saved, And now

768
01:19:58,439 --> 01:20:02,000
that's no longer Roman Cathlic dogma post
Vatican two. The Pope took off the

769
01:20:02,039 --> 01:20:04,439
triple tr Do you know what that
is? Do you know why he took

770
01:20:04,479 --> 01:20:10,000
the triple tr off? To signify
that he no longer cares about supposedly temporal

771
01:20:10,039 --> 01:20:17,640
supremacy. The triple crown symbolized that, and Roman Catholics no longer confess that

772
01:20:17,720 --> 01:20:21,800
post Vatican two. So that's a
thing that was necessary for salvation in when

773
01:20:21,800 --> 01:20:27,760
I'm sunktum, But you don't have
to believe anymore. Do you want an

774
01:20:27,800 --> 01:20:34,319
easier example? How about Urban the
second calling a crusade versus. Now you

775
01:20:34,439 --> 01:20:39,640
can go and pray in the mosques
with the Muslims. How about that?

776
01:20:39,840 --> 01:20:43,039
Is that clear enough for you?
Do? Do people not have any discernment

777
01:20:43,119 --> 01:20:46,199
to understand that you can't as a
Christian go pray in mosques towards Mecca?

778
01:20:47,319 --> 01:20:54,119
Do you not know this? What
kind of Christianity? What do you even

779
01:20:54,119 --> 01:21:02,880
think this religion is? And do
you understand that the trad pope Benedict did

780
01:21:02,920 --> 01:21:11,960
the exact same thing, And do
you know the pulpsplanners never tell you this

781
01:21:12,119 --> 01:21:17,439
because there is no explanation for this
except that it's just simply an apostate religion

782
01:21:17,600 --> 01:21:25,439
that's a tool of geopolitical power.
But remember there's no a thing as a

783
01:21:25,479 --> 01:21:29,760
new World order, so that doesn't
exist. So problem solved. I mean,

784
01:21:30,079 --> 01:21:39,039
why are you falling for these people? Oh it's a liberal publication.

785
01:21:39,560 --> 01:21:42,760
Oh so it didn't happen because it's
a liberal publication. You can go find

786
01:21:42,800 --> 01:21:49,159
it in a thousand publications. You
can't as a Christian pray in a mosque

787
01:21:50,920 --> 01:21:56,920
because it's a public sign of defecting
from the Christian faith in Roman Catholic theology,

788
01:21:56,960 --> 01:22:01,840
it's that moral theology tells you that. Does this not make it clear

789
01:22:01,920 --> 01:22:08,399
for you that that's a different religion? Is this the same religion that Urban

790
01:22:08,439 --> 01:22:15,680
the second believed, that called for
a crusade against the godless infidel Turks?

791
01:22:25,880 --> 01:22:30,279
Is building an Abrahamic faith center the
same religion. And it's not just francis

792
01:22:30,880 --> 01:22:36,560
what that frenchs? No, you
mean Benedict? You mean, like right

793
01:22:36,640 --> 01:22:47,960
here, trad based trad Benedig going
praying in the moss towards Mecca. He

794
01:22:48,159 --> 01:22:59,119
just praying silently to Jesus. That's
called casusedrie consused tree. That means that

795
01:22:59,239 --> 01:23:08,119
you justify obvious moral infractions with Pube's
blaming and Roman Catholics are notorious for this.

796
01:23:11,159 --> 01:23:15,279
This is a surrendering of the religion
because it signifies by the action that

797
01:23:15,479 --> 01:23:23,359
you are giving credence to blessing,
just like their skittles blessings. You're blessing.

798
01:23:24,680 --> 01:23:31,239
You're affirming that Mecca is a site
of God and that the mosque genuinely

799
01:23:31,319 --> 01:23:38,159
worships and has a connection to God. And that is not Christian teaching.

800
01:23:39,560 --> 01:23:45,800
Islam is an aryan anti christ religion. They completely reject the deity of Christ

801
01:23:45,840 --> 01:23:53,000
and the Trinity, and that everyone
knows this. Is that clear enough for

802
01:23:53,079 --> 01:23:56,680
you? Is that clear enough to
signify that this is a different religion.

803
01:24:00,199 --> 01:24:02,760
So we had one tried cat the
other day saying that, oh, it's

804
01:24:02,840 --> 01:24:09,600
not a change, because it's a
change in practice about how we operate with

805
01:24:09,720 --> 01:24:15,119
Muslims. No, No, you
understand. You can't go and worship publicly

806
01:24:15,760 --> 01:24:25,840
with other religions in your own theology. You can't build a Brahmic faith center

807
01:24:25,960 --> 01:24:33,119
together with Muslims and Jews, unless
you actually do have a false religion that

808
01:24:33,279 --> 01:24:39,159
is the same God of Muslims and
Jews, which is essentially not the Trinity.

809
01:24:40,000 --> 01:24:45,000
So actually it is more honest for
Francis allah Vatican two's natural theology to

810
01:24:45,079 --> 01:24:48,119
build an Islamic faith center and a
Jewish faith center together with his Vatican two

811
01:24:48,159 --> 01:24:53,159
faith. That is more honest.
And they do worship the same Little g

812
01:24:53,279 --> 01:24:58,960
God together, which is not the
Trinity. So all of you in communion

813
01:24:58,960 --> 01:25:03,720
with Francis are partaking of that spirit, and that is a spirit of delusion,

814
01:25:06,600 --> 01:25:10,399
and it's odd again. Yeah,
exactly why does this even need to

815
01:25:10,439 --> 01:25:16,199
be explained to a person who persons
who profess to be Christians? M h,

816
01:25:23,000 --> 01:25:29,119
what are the what are the what
are they saying about? Do the

817
01:25:29,520 --> 01:25:35,199
do the Catholic apologists even talk about
this? I mean, are they not

818
01:25:35,319 --> 01:25:45,439
telling you that this exists? I
mean, so here it is. Oops,

819
01:25:47,279 --> 01:25:55,159
we're not playing London grammar. So
I remember, according to Trent Horne,

820
01:25:55,279 --> 01:25:59,640
this should be absolutely okay. What's
wrong with because we have in common,

821
01:25:59,680 --> 01:26:03,199
suppose with Muslims and Jews, the
worship of one generic God, that's

822
01:26:03,319 --> 01:26:08,880
natural theology. So there's nothing wrong
with an Abrahamic faith center, because as

823
01:26:08,960 --> 01:26:12,920
Vatican two says, we share the
same God as the Muslims and the Jews,

824
01:26:13,319 --> 01:26:16,800
even though they're not Tranitarian, so
we don't. But I mean,

825
01:26:19,000 --> 01:26:26,399
Trent shouldn't have a problem with this. Maybe he doesn't loten all these idiots.

826
01:26:49,000 --> 01:26:56,319
So here they are all at this
Masonic looking ceremony, and they're bringing

827
01:26:56,359 --> 01:27:00,399
their cubes of light, which is
all very ominous here, bizarre ominous thing.

828
01:27:02,119 --> 01:27:09,720
And this came about from Francis's joint
declaration with the Grand Emam. For

829
01:27:09,920 --> 01:27:13,399
you Pope's planners out there that are
ignorant and trying to say Pullridges have known

830
01:27:13,479 --> 01:27:17,359
to do with this. It comes
from his document. Of course, he

831
01:27:17,479 --> 01:27:23,720
has something to do with this.
And have you all forgotten this? Did

832
01:27:23,760 --> 01:27:26,479
you forget Pacha Mama? Did you
forget the Amazons and on? Did you

833
01:27:26,560 --> 01:27:34,279
forget all these Francis' greatest hits.
But remember, the papacy provides certainty,

834
01:27:34,800 --> 01:27:43,399
epistemic certainty, doctrinal clarity, moral
support and guarding of and maintenance of tradition.

835
01:27:44,000 --> 01:27:49,600
Remember that's what the tradcats and the
Pope's planners and all these Roman Catholics

836
01:27:49,640 --> 01:27:55,359
have been saying for years. Oh, but they've been pretty quiet on that

837
01:27:55,439 --> 01:28:00,800
one, haven't they remember they were
quiet on this And they're not using this

838
01:28:00,680 --> 01:28:04,840
trump card of the papacy making everything
clear anymore, are they? How come?

839
01:28:05,840 --> 01:28:12,760
How come? Well, because nothing
changed? Ain't nothing changed? Oh?

840
01:28:12,880 --> 01:28:15,800
If nothing changed, then why did
Francis have to issue a new document?

841
01:28:16,079 --> 01:28:21,319
And how come the they're all going
wild with it with their schedule stuff.

842
01:28:21,439 --> 01:28:27,960
Nothing changed because the document says in
one paragraph nothing changed. Oh yeah,

843
01:28:28,000 --> 01:28:30,399
that's called double speak. That's called
a contradiction, as even doctor Ed

844
01:28:30,399 --> 01:28:39,000
Fazer pointed out about the document.
So wait a minute. I thought Francis's

845
01:28:39,119 --> 01:28:42,920
documents make things clear and they're the
final court of appeal. But no,

846
01:28:43,079 --> 01:28:46,880
no, you need all the pop
Catholic apologists to interpret the interpretation of the

847
01:28:46,920 --> 01:28:54,439
interpretation. What would Francis do without
Michael Lofton to interpret the papal documents?

848
01:29:00,079 --> 01:29:02,640
Yeah? Right, you have to
interpret the magisterium. But wait a minute.

849
01:29:02,760 --> 01:29:10,159
The Magistarium was supposed to be the
final court of appeals. Why do

850
01:29:10,279 --> 01:29:15,439
I need Michael Lofton all these papal
apologists If the Magistarium is the final court

851
01:29:15,439 --> 01:29:17,399
of a view, why do we
need them? Why do I need an

852
01:29:17,560 --> 01:29:21,039
army of pope splainers? And by
the way, the popes players themselves now

853
01:29:21,119 --> 01:29:30,560
have their own mini army of Lofton
splainers on Twitter. But let's let's finish

854
01:29:30,880 --> 01:29:34,560
Cameron's Bayesian quick books argument for the
papers. This is the stupidest stuff I've

855
01:29:34,560 --> 01:29:41,000
ever heard. But if you're doing
this Bayesian analysis, and then you ask

856
01:29:41,439 --> 01:29:46,920
how likely is that data given something
other than Catholicism, something other than the

857
01:29:46,960 --> 01:29:51,920
papacy, so like Protestantism or Orthodoxy, how likely is that data? And

858
01:29:53,000 --> 01:29:57,479
I have to say, I just
have to say, Now, the whole

859
01:29:57,560 --> 01:30:00,560
question is do these texts actually prove
the in one doctrine of the papacy?

860
01:30:00,920 --> 01:30:04,000
And his move is just basically say, well, look let's have Peter with

861
01:30:04,039 --> 01:30:09,640
all that papally stuff, all that
papal equalities, papal equalities, he said,

862
01:30:09,680 --> 01:30:15,239
papally papish qualities. And then how
likely is it that Orthodoxy or Protestants

863
01:30:15,279 --> 01:30:18,039
could explain these texts? Not very
likely. So there you go. This

864
01:30:18,199 --> 01:30:25,840
is the dumbest slide of hand,
stupidest argument. This is the crowning dumb

865
01:30:26,000 --> 01:30:29,960
argument for the papacy of all time. It is dumber than all of the

866
01:30:30,159 --> 01:30:33,800
like it's this is dumber than a
forgery. Like a forgery is a better

867
01:30:33,800 --> 01:30:35,880
I mean, because it's at least
kind of cunning, you know what I

868
01:30:35,960 --> 01:30:46,039
mean. But this is just looney
tunes, dude, Looney Tunes against super

869
01:30:46,159 --> 01:30:50,560
Low. It's gotta be very very
low. I see. And so this

870
01:30:51,079 --> 01:30:58,479
this is really strong. Even Matt
Fraser, uh huh, I see.

871
01:30:59,520 --> 01:31:02,159
I mean it's by that little giggly
I see there. It's almost like maybe

872
01:31:02,239 --> 01:31:04,720
even Matt fraz kind of doubting.
This is like that, this is a

873
01:31:04,760 --> 01:31:09,600
little this a little goofy here,
this is well a no fault. I

874
01:31:09,640 --> 01:31:12,920
don't know about these. How do
you do? It's stranger? Could I

875
01:31:13,159 --> 01:31:23,279
sell you a bit of argument,
our resident evil merchant, evidence for the

876
01:31:23,359 --> 01:31:26,399
papacy if you're convinced of the type
of loge I see. So if you're

877
01:31:26,439 --> 01:31:30,079
not, it doesn't do much damage. Oh that was an interesting admission.

878
01:31:30,880 --> 01:31:33,840
So if you're convinced of the typology, then it's a great argument for the

879
01:31:33,880 --> 01:31:40,039
paper. So in other words,
grant me my papal presuppositions, and then

880
01:31:40,119 --> 01:31:44,279
we can read into Isaiah twenty four
or twenty two. All the Vatican one

881
01:31:44,359 --> 01:31:51,319
stuff. Wow, amazing, how
this is a strong argument. Is that

882
01:31:51,399 --> 01:31:57,600
what you're saying, there's a caveat
there? So I was going to wait

883
01:31:57,680 --> 01:31:59,720
to talk about that a little bit
later. Let me, do you mind

884
01:31:59,720 --> 01:32:02,880
if i'm of course, and just
while you're doing that, just so for

885
01:32:03,000 --> 01:32:08,920
those when we talk about does quick
books run on an iPhone? So I'm

886
01:32:08,920 --> 01:32:13,680
confused here, So he's trying to
pull up his quick books? Uh that

887
01:32:13,800 --> 01:32:19,319
does it still run on the Mac
operating system? I wonder a person's places

888
01:32:19,439 --> 01:32:25,359
events in the Old Testament foreshadow of
greater reality in the New. So Saint

889
01:32:25,439 --> 01:32:29,319
Augustin says, the New Testament is
concealed in the Old, the Old is

890
01:32:29,399 --> 01:32:32,680
revealed in the New. And this
is not some medieval invention. Saint Paul

891
01:32:32,800 --> 01:32:39,520
talks about Christ is the New Adam
and many other examples. Yeah, yeah,

892
01:32:40,239 --> 01:32:46,760
nobody doubts typology, but you are
creative isigesis of reading Vatican one into

893
01:32:46,840 --> 01:32:51,800
Isaiah twenty two is is just ridiculous. That's what people doubt, not not

894
01:32:53,000 --> 01:32:57,520
typology. Notice he doesn't even think
his audience is like intelligent enough to even

895
01:32:57,560 --> 01:33:00,920
know what that is. Right,
So again this is like, let's speak

896
01:33:00,960 --> 01:33:04,159
to the lowest tier people who have
no clue about anything, and rope them

897
01:33:04,239 --> 01:33:10,279
in with this mathematical Bayesian argument for
the papacy. This is just unbelievable.

898
01:33:12,359 --> 01:33:15,640
Recently said that Christianity is a type
of logical religion. And this is one

899
01:33:15,640 --> 01:33:19,960
of the things that's really gave me, given me like a better appreciation for

900
01:33:20,079 --> 01:33:25,279
the Bible is the fact that the
New Testament ties in to the Old Testament.

901
01:33:25,279 --> 01:33:28,239
It's the fulfillment of the Old Testament. It's not as if, I

902
01:33:28,319 --> 01:33:30,800
mean, as a Protestant, my
view was kind of like, oh,

903
01:33:30,840 --> 01:33:33,600
we could kind of like get rid
of the Old Testament, like let's forget

904
01:33:33,640 --> 01:33:40,279
about it. Let's try to forget
about it, because well, that's interesting

905
01:33:40,359 --> 01:33:48,199
because that runs counter to the type
of approach that the Vatican put out on

906
01:33:48,560 --> 01:33:54,279
It's the document on the Relationship of
the Church to the Jews. Remember that

907
01:33:54,439 --> 01:34:00,680
document, because it actually said that
rejecting type is a valid way to read

908
01:34:00,680 --> 01:34:05,239
the Old Testa. Remember that that
was a huge scandal. All the Roman

909
01:34:05,319 --> 01:34:16,119
Catholics were in an uproar for years
over this document. What was the name

910
01:34:16,199 --> 01:34:20,560
of that document. It's escaping me
at the moment. The Church's relationship to

911
01:34:20,600 --> 01:34:30,239
the jewsus not no stratate. It's
a document that they put out in the

912
01:34:30,760 --> 01:34:36,520
two thousands, because even people like
Jimmy Aiken and even the all the normy

913
01:34:36,600 --> 01:34:40,359
Catholic even they had to try to
explain this thing away back in the day.

914
01:34:42,319 --> 01:34:45,479
Can anybody remember the name of that
document. I haven't thought about this

915
01:34:45,560 --> 01:34:47,359
in a long time, but actually, if you read rat Singer's book,

916
01:34:47,399 --> 01:34:50,720
he basically says the same thing in
his book too. Two religions, one

917
01:34:50,800 --> 01:35:06,880
covenant. Excuse me, many religions, one Covenant. It's a real book.

918
01:35:09,199 --> 01:35:13,119
I know none of you Knube Catholics
have read this, but I've actually

919
01:35:13,159 --> 01:35:25,840
read about six or seven of Ratzinger's
books, and rat Singer refers to the

920
01:35:25,920 --> 01:35:29,560
document in this book. I mean, even Ratzinger's book was kind of a

921
01:35:29,600 --> 01:35:34,920
scandal because it says that the Jewish
reading of the Old Testament is a valid

922
01:35:35,000 --> 01:35:40,079
reading. Oh but that would mean
that all the prophecies of Christism, Assiah

923
01:35:40,079 --> 01:35:45,600
and all the typologies are also no
longer the case. You see, So

924
01:35:45,840 --> 01:35:53,359
just classic Vatican double speak. People
ain't talking about Rusia. Russia don't have

925
01:35:53,359 --> 01:35:55,159
anything to do with what we're talking
about tonight. No, it's not no

926
01:35:55,279 --> 01:35:59,840
sertate. They it's a separate document
in the two thousands that came out.

927
01:36:00,239 --> 01:36:12,000
Let me see, maybe it's mentioned
here. It's something like this the relationship

928
01:36:12,079 --> 01:36:17,319
of the Church to the Jews or
something like that. He caused the big

929
01:36:17,359 --> 01:36:20,800
start. They also had to downplay
it. They all tried to downplay it,

930
01:36:21,920 --> 01:36:27,279
like even E. MJ. He
says stuff like, oh, this

931
01:36:27,439 --> 01:36:30,359
document has been canceled out, it
doesn't matter anymore, and when and when

932
01:36:30,439 --> 01:36:35,119
do the Vatican do that exactly?
It's just they just say this stuff,

933
01:36:35,199 --> 01:36:38,479
right, Oh, well, we
don't care about that anymore. I'm sure

934
01:36:38,520 --> 01:36:44,840
you don't because it's pretty like it's
pretty contradictory. Right, there's nobody remembers

935
01:36:44,880 --> 01:36:57,800
this document. Let me think,
all right, it'll probably be in this

936
01:36:57,920 --> 01:37:14,600
article here somewhere. I'm trying to
think what the name of it was.

937
01:37:14,920 --> 01:37:20,840
Now. It might have even been
a document specifically put out by the US,

938
01:37:21,239 --> 01:37:30,720
like the American US Conference Catholic Bishops, and the document came out maybe

939
01:37:30,720 --> 01:37:34,920
even then. It's either the nineties
or the two thousands, and it's one

940
01:37:34,960 --> 01:37:42,039
of these things that people have forgotten, like the Joint Declaration with the Lutherans,

941
01:37:42,920 --> 01:37:45,600
I mean, the joint Declaration with
the Lutherans is another example of contradiction,

942
01:37:46,239 --> 01:37:53,640
because Lutheranism is an infallibly condemned heresy, and the joint Declaration says that,

943
01:37:54,079 --> 01:37:57,319
well, that doesn't really apply anymore. Okay, sure, I mean

944
01:37:57,439 --> 01:38:04,119
Lutherans still believe Lutheranism. Oh maybe
this is it. This is back to

945
01:38:04,199 --> 01:38:10,279
twenty fifteen. New document doesn't seek
for conversion. Yeah, it had all

946
01:38:10,359 --> 01:38:14,560
kinds of stuff in it like this. Maybe this is it. Oh,

947
01:38:14,600 --> 01:38:19,079
come on, now, a damn
pay article. Come on, let's see

948
01:38:19,079 --> 01:38:29,640
if we can cheat. The Catholic
Church does not seek to convert Jews anymore.

949
01:38:29,800 --> 01:38:31,119
The document says, yes, this
is it. What's the document?

950
01:38:31,199 --> 01:39:00,680
Though? It's not nosratat this is
a post Vattican two document. Hmm,

951
01:39:02,439 --> 01:39:06,560
that's not it. I want to
find this because everybody's forgotten this. Here

952
01:39:06,880 --> 01:39:20,359
we go, everybody's forgotten this.
I didn't forget it. Let's see new

953
01:39:20,439 --> 01:39:30,039
document. You Catholics should not try
to make converts. None of these docum,

954
01:39:30,119 --> 01:39:32,720
none of these things say what the
document is. Oh, the document

955
01:39:32,840 --> 01:39:36,239
is called the Gifts and Calling of
God are irrevocable. Here we go,

956
01:39:38,079 --> 01:40:02,840
bingo, this is it. Aha, that's it. So this was a

957
01:40:03,039 --> 01:40:11,560
document that was put out on the
fiftieth anniversary of nosretate about it in two

958
01:40:13,600 --> 01:40:17,880
and it specifically says that the Old
Testament is there's a valid way to read

959
01:40:17,880 --> 01:40:21,560
the Old Testament that Jews have.
We're not going to convert Jews anymore.

960
01:40:21,640 --> 01:40:27,199
It's all just totally like surrendering the
entire mission of the church. Right.

961
01:40:29,159 --> 01:40:36,159
I'm trying to see what year this
came out, twenty fifteen. I think

962
01:40:36,199 --> 01:40:42,880
there's actually an older document than twenty
fifteen. But here is that document if

963
01:40:42,880 --> 01:40:45,119
you want to read that one.
I mean, there's a ton of these.

964
01:40:45,159 --> 01:40:49,079
By the way, Oh here we
go, we should just go here

965
01:40:49,199 --> 01:41:15,680
with relations with Judaism. So basically
there's a bunch. I'm not sure which

966
01:41:15,720 --> 01:41:23,439
one it is, So let's see
commission documents. To the Commission, there

967
01:41:23,520 --> 01:41:32,079
was a specifically notorious one though,
and it prompted all the Roman Catholic apologists

968
01:41:32,079 --> 01:41:40,279
to go into overdrive hyperdrive to make
it work. Do we have any former

969
01:41:41,000 --> 01:41:50,720
tradcats that remember this the address to
Mines? No, that's not it confide

970
01:41:50,720 --> 01:42:04,640
it on EWTN. Hmm. It
just seems like so I thought Gifts and

971
01:42:04,680 --> 01:42:23,279
Calling of God document was older,
But I mean the covenant that God has

972
01:42:23,319 --> 01:42:30,600
with Israel is irrevocable. That's actually
I mean, God says he will divorce

973
01:42:30,720 --> 01:42:34,880
Israel. It's simply not true.
And Roman Catholic dogma actually says in the

974
01:42:34,880 --> 01:42:39,359
Middle Ages that the Covenant of the
Old Testament is no longer in force.

975
01:42:39,439 --> 01:42:43,600
I think it's a I think that's
that Cantade Domino at Florence. So this

976
01:42:43,760 --> 01:42:46,239
is just an outright contradiction right there. But I remember, these are papally

977
01:42:46,279 --> 01:42:51,720
approved dialogues, right, and of
course they're all just going to say,

978
01:42:51,760 --> 01:42:55,000
oh, we don't have to listen
to that. Yeah, but the Pope

979
01:42:55,000 --> 01:42:57,640
has approved these documents. Even if
you don't like it or you don't listen

980
01:42:57,720 --> 01:43:00,760
to it, the Pope has approved
it. So this is what he that

981
01:43:00,000 --> 01:43:03,039
what this is what he thinks,
right, he agrees with this, So

982
01:43:03,159 --> 01:43:13,399
that means that he doesn't believe the
Christian faith. Cardinal Koch And by the

983
01:43:13,439 --> 01:43:15,920
way, if Francis disagreed with these
documents, he would simply say, do

984
01:43:16,039 --> 01:43:19,319
not follow with these documents. I'm
the supreme teaching authority of the Romancolic Church.

985
01:43:19,680 --> 01:43:23,680
These documents are telling you not to
make converts of other religions and that

986
01:43:23,880 --> 01:43:30,920
is a horrendous evil action, because
to make converts is an action of love.

987
01:43:31,159 --> 01:43:34,520
Anyway, if you really want to
though, I mean, there's a

988
01:43:34,560 --> 01:43:40,159
whole host of these documents here if
you go to the Vatican's website for Ecumenism,

989
01:43:40,920 --> 01:43:43,920
and all of the documents are right
here, so it's actually a giant

990
01:43:44,000 --> 01:43:48,560
trove of them. And the joint
declaration with the Lutherans I'm sure is also

991
01:43:48,640 --> 01:44:00,399
on here. There's too many documents
on this thing. You have to go

992
01:44:00,479 --> 01:44:03,520
fish for if you want it.
But anyway, there's the link. Let's

993
01:44:03,520 --> 01:44:09,800
get back to Cameron here. Remember
these documents say to not make converts,

994
01:44:12,159 --> 01:44:16,239
right, Remember how Lofton was saying
that Francis never said that. By the

995
01:44:16,279 --> 01:44:20,560
way, I lost my place.
Where are we at with the quick books

996
01:44:20,560 --> 01:44:26,680
here and attacking Hilder It's like,
let's can we just forget about the Can

997
01:44:26,720 --> 01:44:29,880
we just forget about that and just
focus on the New Testament? Because it's

998
01:44:29,880 --> 01:44:32,279
all about love and the MASSI and
Harry's heresy, isn't it. It's not

999
01:44:32,359 --> 01:44:35,399
a new well, it's something that
I was just sort of like drawn to,

1000
01:44:35,760 --> 01:44:40,840
like you know, unconsciously, I
was like I wish that I could

1001
01:44:40,920 --> 01:44:43,840
just do away with the Old Testament, yes, because it was just like

1002
01:44:44,920 --> 01:44:47,920
yeah. But Benedict also says similar
things like when it comes to modernists,

1003
01:44:47,960 --> 01:44:55,920
exe Jesus of passages too. So
I mean the Vatican has adopted higher criticism

1004
01:44:56,000 --> 01:45:00,800
and higher critical methods at least pre
Vatican to and then pretty much dominates in

1005
01:45:00,840 --> 01:45:04,960
the Roman Catholic world. So they're
trying to sell you on this, uh,

1006
01:45:05,159 --> 01:45:11,800
you know, classical patristic exegesis when
the Vatican has already accepted modernist,

1007
01:45:11,920 --> 01:45:16,600
higher critical ext to Jesus and doesn't
do typology in their seminaries anymore. So

1008
01:45:16,960 --> 01:45:20,199
he could say, well, but
I'm not I'm talking about at the church

1009
01:45:20,359 --> 01:45:26,159
level. Yeah, but the Vatican
promotes the modernism that you're critiquing. So

1010
01:45:26,520 --> 01:45:32,600
I'm talking about the head of your
church level with atheists. Yeah, when

1011
01:45:32,640 --> 01:45:36,439
he's embarrassing. By the way,
keep in mind his debates with atheists.

1012
01:45:38,039 --> 01:45:45,000
This is the uber evidentialist man.
It's not It's not accidental that he went

1013
01:45:45,079 --> 01:45:50,439
to Rome, isn't it? Because
evidentialism is bound up with foundationalism and bound

1014
01:45:50,560 --> 01:45:58,760
up with foundationalists epistemology and natural theology. So interesting that it's very telling that

1015
01:45:58,840 --> 01:46:02,119
he went to Roman Catholicism. I
love that. Yeah, helped me see

1016
01:46:02,239 --> 01:46:05,800
the importance of the Old Testament and
how important it is for the New Testament

1017
01:46:05,840 --> 01:46:12,880
authors, including Jesus. Jesus went
through and Luke all the Old Testament scriptures

1018
01:46:13,760 --> 01:46:15,239
and was like, yeah, this
is what Moses had to do, this

1019
01:46:15,399 --> 01:46:20,399
and all that. And but wait
a minute, Cameron, if Jesus went

1020
01:46:20,439 --> 01:46:26,000
through Luke and told him that the
Old Testament was about him and all those

1021
01:46:26,079 --> 01:46:30,560
passages were typological to Christ, to
his ministry, then that would mean that

1022
01:46:30,600 --> 01:46:33,039
the Old Testament is not validly read
by the Jews, which the Vatican says

1023
01:46:33,079 --> 01:46:36,880
it is. So so you're going
to get the Vatican there, Cameron,

1024
01:46:38,039 --> 01:46:44,000
did you know that? And so
it is a typological religion Christianity. Would

1025
01:46:44,039 --> 01:46:46,319
you mind if I pressed back against
this, maybe try to play a devil's

1026
01:46:46,319 --> 01:46:49,319
advocate with this, or would you
rather not do that? Well, I

1027
01:46:49,920 --> 01:46:56,079
let me you mind if I just
continue the journey. So at this point

1028
01:46:56,159 --> 01:47:00,439
I did start to look into this
one argument, so because I saw if

1029
01:47:00,560 --> 01:47:05,800
this argument actually works, then it's
really powerful evidence, and so then I

1030
01:47:05,840 --> 01:47:11,600
wanted to actually study it. Yeah, so again accept on my presuppositions,

1031
01:47:12,239 --> 01:47:16,000
and then I'll overwhelm you with this
wowing is Ofgesis passage from Isaiah twenty So

1032
01:47:16,600 --> 01:47:21,359
I thought he started with Baysian quick
books. And now we spent the last

1033
01:47:21,399 --> 01:47:26,880
five minutes on Isaiah twenty two as
the killer killed, the kill shot papacy

1034
01:47:27,000 --> 01:47:32,800
argument, and so as I studied
it, I continue to remain sort of

1035
01:47:32,840 --> 01:47:36,239
agnostic about it. I continue to
just see I mean, yeah, like

1036
01:47:38,039 --> 01:47:43,039
this argument, there are good reasons
to think that it's successful. Right,

1037
01:47:43,159 --> 01:47:46,239
But then you hear objections from Gavin
ORTLND like a typology run a monk,

1038
01:47:46,600 --> 01:47:49,640
right, like that seems like a
good objection. Yeah, I don't really

1039
01:47:49,720 --> 01:47:56,760
know what you're just reading into this, Yeah exactly. I mean, for

1040
01:47:56,840 --> 01:48:00,920
example, we should expect to see
in the first eight hundred years of the

1041
01:48:00,039 --> 01:48:06,359
church, anybody, any counsel,
any church father utilizing Isaiah twenty two about

1042
01:48:06,520 --> 01:48:10,800
the papacy, Right, wouldn't we
expect to see that? If this was

1043
01:48:10,840 --> 01:48:15,920
so obvious and has anyone shown this? I mean again, perhaps there is

1044
01:48:15,239 --> 01:48:20,319
a church father somewhere that utilizes Isaiah
twenty two in some tip of lige.

1045
01:48:20,359 --> 01:48:30,399
I've never seen this. I would
be surprised perhaps it exists. Do you

1046
01:48:30,439 --> 01:48:36,039
want to come on the stream.
So we got a bunch of people in

1047
01:48:36,079 --> 01:48:39,159
the chat. We've got eight hundred
nine undred people over here in the chat.

1048
01:48:40,079 --> 01:48:46,000
Make it a bunch of fuss.
So you can call in. If

1049
01:48:46,039 --> 01:48:49,640
you're gonna fuss in the chat,
just come talk to me, call in

1050
01:48:49,760 --> 01:48:57,079
right here via Twitter. Otherwise,
stop fussing in the chat. I'm talking

1051
01:48:57,159 --> 01:49:02,840
to the pope'splainers in the chat.
So yes, Marco JB. Come to

1052
01:49:02,920 --> 01:49:10,199
the to the chat here, because
we're going to go. We'll go to

1053
01:49:10,319 --> 01:49:14,199
more documents. We've got all the
documents you want. I've got papal documents

1054
01:49:14,239 --> 01:49:19,880
out the wazoo here. You don't
know that. And so I remained agnostic

1055
01:49:19,920 --> 01:49:23,960
about it, and so I was. But I was talking one day with

1056
01:49:24,239 --> 01:49:28,359
a friend of mine who's an expert
in Bayesian analysis, and I was like,

1057
01:49:28,439 --> 01:49:30,920
so what do I do at this
point? Do I do? So?

1058
01:49:30,000 --> 01:49:34,760
Wait a minute, it's not actually
Cameron's argument. It's his friend that's

1059
01:49:34,800 --> 01:49:43,039
an expert in Bayesian analysis that's going
to give us the quick Books Baysian proof

1060
01:49:43,079 --> 01:49:45,680
of the paper. So you can't
make this up. This was the dombin

1061
01:49:45,840 --> 01:49:51,119
this again, worst papal argument of
all time? Or what do I do

1062
01:49:51,199 --> 01:49:55,560
with it? If I'm not convinced
about this this data being an actual data

1063
01:49:55,640 --> 01:49:59,760
point, do I ignore it?
And then just like go with whatever the

1064
01:50:00,119 --> 01:50:01,159
evidence that I've got. And he
was like, no, you don't ignore

1065
01:50:01,199 --> 01:50:06,520
it. What you do is you
cut its probabilistic force in half. If

1066
01:50:06,560 --> 01:50:11,560
you're unsure about that piece of data, then you cut its probabilistic force in

1067
01:50:11,720 --> 01:50:16,920
half. And so naturally I went
directly to my document and I did that,

1068
01:50:17,720 --> 01:50:24,039
and the probability after I cut the
probability in half came out two point

1069
01:50:24,119 --> 01:50:31,319
ninety one. I think, all
right, I've had I've had about enough

1070
01:50:31,359 --> 01:50:34,039
of this, this argument, this
is this is We're gonna move on.

1071
01:50:34,239 --> 01:50:41,039
I mean, so point nine to
one chance that the Isaiah Isaiah twenty two

1072
01:50:41,279 --> 01:50:44,000
is not about the papacy, Okay, yeah, and that's why you're a

1073
01:50:44,079 --> 01:50:46,359
Roman Catholic. Good luck with that, and we'll see how long that lasts.

1074
01:50:47,279 --> 01:50:55,439
I imagine it could last infinitely because
these people It's like Dolinger said,

1075
01:50:55,560 --> 01:51:00,159
right that once Vatican One happens,
the entirety of Roman Catholic pologetics would become

1076
01:51:00,319 --> 01:51:04,760
papal lawyurism, meaning that everybody would
no longer defend Christianity, the d do

1077
01:51:04,880 --> 01:51:09,840
Christ, the Trinity, all that
it would be now to defend the papacy

1078
01:51:09,880 --> 01:51:14,600
in Vatican One? What did ninety
nine percent of the papal apologists do argue

1079
01:51:14,640 --> 01:51:18,279
the papacy? And so Trent.
Someone reached out the other day and said

1080
01:51:18,479 --> 01:51:23,000
it wasn't for Trent and was reaching
out independently of Trent, said why won't

1081
01:51:23,000 --> 01:51:26,920
you have the Trent debate? We
had a Trent debate? What are you

1082
01:51:26,960 --> 01:51:30,800
talking about? No, the papacy. Oh, I've offered twice to off

1083
01:51:30,960 --> 01:51:34,840
to debate Trent on the papacy because
I think that the papacy is a geopolitical

1084
01:51:34,920 --> 01:51:41,520
power and institution under the sway of
things like the econom World Economic Forum and

1085
01:51:41,760 --> 01:51:45,720
the State Department. And Trent had
no interest in debating that. Trem will

1086
01:51:45,800 --> 01:51:53,359
only debate the topic of the infallibility
and errancy of the papacy as a institution

1087
01:51:53,640 --> 01:51:59,000
created by Christ. When that debate
has been had about a million times,

1088
01:52:00,399 --> 01:52:03,479
and so how many times do we
have to see the same proof text,

1089
01:52:03,560 --> 01:52:08,800
the same quote, mining I mean, it just gets old that debate has

1090
01:52:09,000 --> 01:52:14,439
Ubi's had this debate with every one
of these Catholic apologists already, So I

1091
01:52:14,560 --> 01:52:20,319
want to know because the papacy has
a tremendous amount of geopolitical connections. There

1092
01:52:20,399 --> 01:52:27,039
have been countless public scandals in court
cases. Can somebody please help me understand

1093
01:52:27,159 --> 01:52:29,760
the meaning of those things? Because
that actually seems to make a lot more

1094
01:52:29,880 --> 01:52:34,399
sense to explain the papacy than your
pope's planning. But they will not debate

1095
01:52:34,600 --> 01:52:38,640
that. Why will they not debate
that? None of them. I have

1096
01:52:38,760 --> 01:52:44,760
reached out to professors, I have
messaged everybody who has Catholic scholar friends.

1097
01:52:45,960 --> 01:52:50,840
I've asked all of them, somebody
please debate the geopolitics of the papacy.

1098
01:52:53,199 --> 01:52:58,359
Not one of them will touch it
with a ten foot pole, because remember,

1099
01:52:58,640 --> 01:53:01,680
according to Trent, there are conspiracies. It doesn't I'm Jack Chick.

1100
01:53:02,880 --> 01:53:14,479
That was literally what he said,
literally the I mean sure, right right,

1101
01:53:14,920 --> 01:53:17,319
I'm Jack. I wrote sixty plus
writings of the elite we've lectured through.

1102
01:53:17,720 --> 01:53:21,920
I'm Jack Chick. Uh huh.
But I'm telling you they won't debate

1103
01:53:24,319 --> 01:53:31,079
that topic because I will demolish them
because even their own trad cats write gigantic

1104
01:53:31,159 --> 01:53:39,319
scholarly tones and go on their buddies
channels to talk about geopolitical influence and control

1105
01:53:39,319 --> 01:53:44,279
of the papacy, like David Wimhoff, the lawyer, and so if I've

1106
01:53:44,319 --> 01:53:46,600
read that book, it's like eight
in our pages. And he goes on

1107
01:53:46,720 --> 01:53:56,640
Flanders podcast and all these people and
I talk about the same stuff. They

1108
01:53:56,760 --> 01:54:02,560
call that crazy conspiracies. When the
very guy who writes the book goes on

1109
01:54:02,720 --> 01:54:10,199
people in their circles podcasts, meaning
they support by a proxy, crazy conspiracies.

1110
01:54:11,520 --> 01:54:16,720
It's so ridiculous. None of these
people wanted to have a serious debate

1111
01:54:16,800 --> 01:54:25,000
about real on the ground world issues. They want to already have you debating

1112
01:54:30,159 --> 01:54:43,760
fan fiction infallible papacy nonsense. So
I'm talking about probably the last two years.

1113
01:54:43,960 --> 01:54:48,159
I've asked specifically to find Roman Catholics
that would debate the geopolitics of the

1114
01:54:48,199 --> 01:54:53,479
papacy, and there are none.
I've gotten a resounding no from every one

1115
01:54:53,520 --> 01:54:57,680
of them. And I've even reached
out to guys I don't even know I've

1116
01:54:57,720 --> 01:55:00,239
never heard of. Like I asked
him, I said, tell tell me

1117
01:55:00,319 --> 01:55:06,600
the scholars, tell me the papal
historians that can explain to me the Vatican

1118
01:55:06,680 --> 01:55:17,399
banking scandals and the p two mafia
and Gladio. Nobody, and again,

1119
01:55:17,840 --> 01:55:21,840
have any of these people ever even
talked about those things. No, they

1120
01:55:21,880 --> 01:55:26,880
don't even know about it, and
they have the gall to call me Jack

1121
01:55:27,000 --> 01:55:33,920
chick. So I want to hope
that maybe Trent just doesn't know about those

1122
01:55:34,000 --> 01:55:43,399
things, right. But I can
guarantee you this, if we did have

1123
01:55:43,520 --> 01:55:46,680
that debate, not one of these
goobers would last five minutes, would they?

1124
01:55:46,760 --> 01:55:48,520
And they know better. That's why
they don't have it. And the

1125
01:55:49,000 --> 01:55:53,880
excuse that I mean is an excuse. So that's it. So let's see

1126
01:55:53,920 --> 01:56:00,319
what Trent's explanation is and who does
Trent go to interesting Ben Shapiro, Hey,

1127
01:56:00,319 --> 01:56:03,239
everyone, welcome to the Council Trent
Podcasts. I'm your host, Cat

1128
01:56:03,279 --> 01:56:08,720
Against' apologist and speaker Tren Horne.
I wasn't planning on talking about the issue

1129
01:56:08,760 --> 01:56:13,239
of the new Vatican document on Blessings
for same sex couples and couples in your

1130
01:56:13,279 --> 01:56:15,880
regular situation. He wasn't planning on
talking about it. I wonder why do

1131
01:56:15,920 --> 01:56:19,520
you want to talk about it?
Maybe because it's another big contradiction Trent.

1132
01:56:20,720 --> 01:56:24,760
Is that why or is there an
other reasons? Because a lot of other

1133
01:56:24,880 --> 01:56:28,600
voices were addressing it. But Ben
Shapiro asked me to come on to his

1134
01:56:28,720 --> 01:56:31,520
show to give my perspective. So
I thought this would be a good opportunity

1135
01:56:31,600 --> 01:56:38,800
to discuss this issue and the Catholic
faith in a broader way. Well,

1136
01:56:38,840 --> 01:56:42,199
I'm curious, Trent, did you
abide by the Vatican documents that tell you

1137
01:56:42,520 --> 01:56:45,479
not to try to attempt to convert
Ben Shapiro? Did you stick to that

1138
01:56:45,880 --> 01:56:49,760
or did you want to try to
convert him because you know that deep down

1139
01:56:49,840 --> 01:56:53,920
that's what Christians do as they try
to convert people. Or did were you

1140
01:56:54,000 --> 01:57:00,840
faithful to the Vaticans apostasy telling you
not to convert Jewish people to his audience.

1141
01:57:01,600 --> 01:57:04,039
In the interview that I have with
Ben, which i'll share with you

1142
01:57:04,279 --> 01:57:11,079
shortly, I wanted to communicate that
some reports about this new Vatican document are

1143
01:57:11,319 --> 01:57:15,600
simply not true, like reports that
the Church has changed its teaching on marriage,

1144
01:57:15,960 --> 01:57:21,399
or that the Church is now allowing
for formal liturgical blessings for same sex

1145
01:57:21,479 --> 01:57:26,560
couples that resemble gay weddings. That's
not true. The Church has not changed.

1146
01:57:28,000 --> 01:57:35,960
False, the Church has changed because
the response of twenty twenty one about

1147
01:57:36,000 --> 01:57:43,920
the blessing of same sex couples was
what what did the CDF say in twenty

1148
01:57:44,079 --> 01:57:49,960
twenty one about the blessing? Do
you remember the word? For this reason,

1149
01:57:50,960 --> 01:57:58,159
it is not listed to a part
of blessing to these relationships. Did

1150
01:57:58,239 --> 01:58:02,199
you notice that he changed that He
cleverly said sacraments in marriage. No,

1151
01:58:02,279 --> 01:58:06,520
no, we know that it's not
sacraments in marriage. It's the blessing,

1152
01:58:06,640 --> 01:58:13,760
the priestly blessing of the couples twenty
twenty one. Can you read response on

1153
01:58:13,880 --> 01:58:19,920
twenty twenty one? Holy Office of
the Inquisition? Can we do but stuff?

1154
01:58:20,840 --> 01:58:25,439
If we're on our way to do
the butt stuff? But we're also

1155
01:58:25,560 --> 01:58:29,319
sorry for it, but also we're
not and also please bless us, yes,

1156
01:58:30,399 --> 01:58:33,520
yes, please give us this CDF. No, it is not listed

1157
01:58:33,600 --> 01:58:41,319
to impart the blessings. So you
just heard Trent say nothing changed, nothing

1158
01:58:41,439 --> 01:58:45,800
changed. Oh but wait a minute, what does the new document say paragraph

1159
01:58:45,840 --> 01:58:56,800
thirty one, fiduccia. Can you
guys read within the horizon outline here appears

1160
01:58:56,840 --> 01:59:00,760
the possibility of blessings of couples in
irregular situations and for the couples of the

1161
01:59:00,840 --> 01:59:10,319
same sex. Oh but it's not
liturgical, so what stop with the sophistry?

1162
01:59:11,520 --> 01:59:15,720
Trent and Michael Lofton are liars because
the document clearly is a change.

1163
01:59:17,319 --> 01:59:21,079
What does the document right here say
for this reason it does not listen?

1164
01:59:21,600 --> 01:59:28,439
The Vatican's Doctrinal Office, the CDF, in twenty twenty one the other day,

1165
01:59:30,560 --> 01:59:40,680
blessings are possible. You are being
lied to. These people are liars,

1166
01:59:40,800 --> 01:59:46,800
and they are forced to lie because
they are bought into a system that

1167
01:59:46,960 --> 01:59:54,119
they are coping for with their mental
gymnastics. When it clear as day says

1168
01:59:55,079 --> 02:00:01,000
a change, not listit can now
be done. Can you read? Can

1169
02:00:01,119 --> 02:00:08,960
you read? Stop lying? All
of you lying liars? Do you know

1170
02:00:09,039 --> 02:00:15,399
what their response is? Can you
guess? Oh? But in the earlier

1171
02:00:15,520 --> 02:00:18,800
paragraph it says you can't do it, and nothing the earlier paragraphs is nothing

1172
02:00:18,880 --> 02:00:25,199
changed. Oh so if there's an
earlier paragraph saying nothing changed, and then

1173
02:00:25,239 --> 02:00:30,880
a later paragraph says that you can
now do this, that's called a contradiction.

1174
02:00:33,760 --> 02:00:41,359
And even your famous professor, doctor
Ed Fazer went on Twitter to show

1175
02:00:41,439 --> 02:00:47,640
you that that's a a contradiction.
So you're lying because it is a change,

1176
02:00:49,039 --> 02:00:54,359
And if nothing changed, there was
no need for a document because the

1177
02:00:54,439 --> 02:00:59,840
CDF had already said you can't do
it right here, And that has all

1178
02:01:00,000 --> 02:01:02,159
always been the teaching back to the
two thousand and three document from Ratzinger that

1179
02:01:02,199 --> 02:01:06,279
we covered last time. So two
thousand and three you can't do it,

1180
02:01:06,479 --> 02:01:11,800
two thousand and one can't do it. Twenty twenty three you can do it,

1181
02:01:13,520 --> 02:01:17,720
and all those skills men immediately started
doing it. So you are liars,

1182
02:01:19,960 --> 02:01:26,880
Trent, You're lying. Matt Frad
lying, Actually Matt Frad. Now,

1183
02:01:26,920 --> 02:01:32,640
wait a minute, does Matt Frad
differ from Trent Horn? Because why

1184
02:01:32,760 --> 02:01:35,279
is it Matt Frad say, want
nothing changed? Maybe it is. Let's

1185
02:01:35,319 --> 02:01:40,880
see episode might say what did I
say? Thanks to Trent Horn for letting

1186
02:01:40,920 --> 02:01:45,199
me use his studio. I want
to read what the head of the Ukrainian

1187
02:01:45,279 --> 02:01:49,720
Greek Catholic Church, the church of
which I am a member, just had

1188
02:01:49,800 --> 02:01:55,600
to say about Fiducia supplicants. So
we'll read together. By the way,

1189
02:01:55,680 --> 02:01:58,560
as the church basically run by the
CIA, So if you don't know,

1190
02:01:58,760 --> 02:02:03,000
I mean the Ukrainian Catholics or we're
big involved in trying to split the Orthodox

1191
02:02:03,119 --> 02:02:08,000
Church in the Ukraine, which thank
God has failed. It did lead to

1192
02:02:08,199 --> 02:02:13,000
basically the persecution of the Orthodox Church
in the Ukraine. But the thing he's

1193
02:02:13,039 --> 02:02:15,760
touting that he's all because by all
these rumman Catholic pap Apologists. They don't

1194
02:02:15,760 --> 02:02:18,000
go to the Novasordo by the way. You know that, right. They're

1195
02:02:18,039 --> 02:02:26,359
all involved in the subversion of passing
themselves off as LARPing Orthodox because their state

1196
02:02:26,399 --> 02:02:30,600
department run churches are basically all about
that. So that's another element to this

1197
02:02:30,680 --> 02:02:32,720
that people don't know, right.
So he's basically saying, oh, I

1198
02:02:32,800 --> 02:02:38,600
got to the fid chitch out of
Ukraine, and let's convit to Orthodox people

1199
02:02:38,640 --> 02:02:42,840
as I wit Orthodox t shits and
present myself like I'm the Orthodox, but

1200
02:02:42,920 --> 02:02:49,159
I'm trying to get everybody in union
with Frenzies. Hey, stranger got some

1201
02:02:49,319 --> 02:02:53,600
new ways. But it's a pretty
short documented about it, quite powerful.

1202
02:02:54,600 --> 02:03:02,239
So communicate regarding the reception in the
UGCC that's Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church of the

1203
02:03:02,359 --> 02:03:06,760
declaration of the Decastroy of the Doctrine
of the Faith for Ducius Supplicans on the

1204
02:03:06,800 --> 02:03:14,720
pastoral meaning of Blessings. In response
to numerous appeals from bishop's clergy, monastics,

1205
02:03:14,760 --> 02:03:19,520
ecclesial movements and individual laity of the
Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church regarding the declaration

1206
02:03:19,680 --> 02:03:25,359
of the Decastrey of the Doctrine of
the Faith for ducias supplicans on the pastoral

1207
02:03:25,479 --> 02:03:30,880
meaning of blessings, and after consulting
with relevant experts and competent institutions, I

1208
02:03:30,000 --> 02:03:34,680
wish to inform you of the following
and as four short paragraphs is the first.

1209
02:03:35,600 --> 02:03:42,880
The above mentioned declaration interprets the pastoral
meaning of blessings in the Latin Church,

1210
02:03:43,039 --> 02:03:46,199
not in the Eastern Catholic Churches.
It does not address questions of Catholic

1211
02:03:46,319 --> 02:03:51,000
faith or morals, nor does it
refer to any prescriptions of the Code of

1212
02:03:51,239 --> 02:03:58,560
Canons of the Eastern Churches or c
CEO, nor does it mention Eastern Christians.

1213
02:04:00,520 --> 02:04:02,239
So they're clever out is that,
oh, we don't have to listen

1214
02:04:02,279 --> 02:04:08,079
to it because we're under another canon
law, Eastern Canons and the Roman Calloary

1215
02:04:08,159 --> 02:04:12,199
Church. Have you read Vatican One? You have to accept Vatican one.

1216
02:04:12,239 --> 02:04:15,840
If you're a Roman Catholic. You
don't get to not accept Vatican ones teaching

1217
02:04:15,960 --> 02:04:20,159
about the universal jurisdiction and supremacy of
the Pope because you're in an Eastern Rite.

1218
02:04:20,399 --> 02:04:26,359
This is a fiction that Eastern Catholics
have made up to make Eastern Catholicism

1219
02:04:27,079 --> 02:04:30,640
some offer and some opportunity to Orthodox
people. This scam has gone on for

1220
02:04:30,720 --> 02:04:33,920
way too long. People that have
watched David's video begin to figure out that

1221
02:04:33,960 --> 02:04:41,079
it's LARPing because there's nothing in Vatican
One that gives Eastern Rite people some excuse

1222
02:04:41,239 --> 02:04:45,359
to not have to not to submit
to the papacy. The papacy when it

1223
02:04:45,399 --> 02:04:51,439
speaks on faith and morals, is
authoritative. That's his ordinary teaching. So

1224
02:04:51,600 --> 02:04:57,920
Michael Lafton is actually more consistent than
these people because Lofton understands what Vatican One

1225
02:04:58,000 --> 02:05:00,439
says about the ordinary teaching of the
papers, meaning that you have to follow

1226
02:05:00,479 --> 02:05:05,279
it. You don't get to go
to a national group of churches. Look

1227
02:05:05,319 --> 02:05:11,279
at what these guys are doing.
How long have they said and critiqued Orthodoxy

1228
02:05:11,600 --> 02:05:17,319
Orthodox He's nationalistic. Now he's going
to a nationalist church, the Ukrainian Catholic

1229
02:05:18,079 --> 02:05:26,199
Nation State Church. He's repealing to
a nation synod of church to be more

1230
02:05:26,279 --> 02:05:32,920
correct than Francis. That's not how
papism works, Matt. Vatican One doesn't

1231
02:05:32,960 --> 02:05:40,600
allow you to pick and choose Eastern
rights that aren't subject to papal rulings.

1232
02:05:42,359 --> 02:05:45,840
Now you might think you can do
that, and you might think the papal

1233
02:05:45,920 --> 02:05:49,520
system allows for that, that's just
the incoherence and contradiction of the papal system.

1234
02:05:50,960 --> 02:05:57,920
That's not true Eastern sonodal practice.
That's called orthodoxy. So he wants

1235
02:05:58,159 --> 02:06:03,399
orthodoxy within papers, which is the
whole scam of Eastern Catholicism. And he's

1236
02:06:03,439 --> 02:06:06,520
going to say, I'm going to
saw it with a bunch of bishops in

1237
02:06:06,560 --> 02:06:12,439
a nation state against Francis. That's
called schism. Have you ever heard of

1238
02:06:12,720 --> 02:06:16,880
nation states going against the pope in
papism, that's called schism. Have you

1239
02:06:16,920 --> 02:06:25,840
ever heard Old Catholics. So these
people have no concern for consistency. They

1240
02:06:25,880 --> 02:06:29,720
have a ministry of grift that they've
erected over the last several years. And

1241
02:06:29,880 --> 02:06:32,199
that's why they won't to ever a
debate anybody who's serious. Why have a

1242
02:06:32,279 --> 02:06:38,319
debate when you can just keep this
nonsense going us on the basis of Canon

1243
02:06:38,520 --> 02:06:44,560
fourteen ninety two of the Cceoh this
correct, By the way, I'm skipping

1244
02:06:44,640 --> 02:06:50,960
this because Eastern Canons have absolutely nothing
to do with this. The Eastern Catholics

1245
02:06:51,039 --> 02:06:56,399
pretend that they're not governed by the
pope, and that they're governed by some

1246
02:06:56,640 --> 02:07:00,560
mythical Eastern canon law which is not
subject to the Pope. I'm not saying

1247
02:07:00,560 --> 02:07:03,720
that canon law is mythical. The
idea that they're not under the pope is

1248
02:07:03,800 --> 02:07:11,119
mythical. Vatican one says anyone who
does not accept Vatican one is excommunicated and

1249
02:07:11,319 --> 02:07:15,319
damned. So for you to say, I don't have to accept Vatican One

1250
02:07:15,319 --> 02:07:18,399
because I'm an Eastern Catholic and we're
governed by our own canons. Your canons

1251
02:07:18,439 --> 02:07:26,199
have nothing to do with the Pope's
overruling and supreme universal jurisdiction. And by

1252
02:07:26,239 --> 02:07:29,680
the way, that's proven by the
fact that the Pope determines what the Eastern

1253
02:07:29,720 --> 02:07:34,720
canons are. This is so stupid. This is all deception. They're coming

1254
02:07:34,840 --> 02:07:39,560
up with creative ways to lie to
you because they're liars at all. Be

1255
02:07:39,720 --> 02:07:45,720
separated from the rest of the priests, always has an evangelical and catechetical dimension

1256
02:07:45,760 --> 02:07:50,239
and therefore can in no way contradict
the teaching of the Catholic Church about the

1257
02:07:50,359 --> 02:07:55,399
family as a faithful, insoluble Oh
but wait a minute, So but I

1258
02:07:55,439 --> 02:08:00,439
thought there was no contradictions. I
thought nothing changed. If nothing changed,

1259
02:08:00,479 --> 02:08:03,199
then why do we have to listen
to the Ukrainian Catholic Church disagree with the

1260
02:08:03,319 --> 02:08:07,680
document, but remember, nothing changed. These people are in free fall.

1261
02:08:09,359 --> 02:08:13,000
They're frauds, they're liars, and
they have to repent and turn from this,

1262
02:08:13,600 --> 02:08:20,479
but they won't do it because of
pride. I hope everyone can see

1263
02:08:20,560 --> 02:08:24,199
how ridiculous this is. And these
are the same people who have dissed me,

1264
02:08:24,439 --> 02:08:28,560
come after me, same people try
to get me deplatformed, all the

1265
02:08:28,640 --> 02:08:33,279
skullduggery that they've engaged in lying about
me, coming up with nonsense for years

1266
02:08:37,119 --> 02:08:39,439
and the last we haven't made a
stream like this in years, right,

1267
02:08:39,520 --> 02:08:43,199
we did a lofton stream two years
ago. I don't even pay attention to

1268
02:08:43,239 --> 02:08:46,560
these people, So don't come over
here be like, oh you're all salty,

1269
02:08:46,760 --> 02:08:50,680
will you have such a bird altitude? Dude, I don't don't.

1270
02:08:50,720 --> 02:08:54,199
I don't pay any attention to these
people, but I will pay attention to

1271
02:08:54,239 --> 02:08:58,760
them when some big scandal comes out. Which is a contradiction where francis completely

1272
02:08:58,840 --> 02:09:09,000
check whether it is morally appropriate to
bless people engaged in what they call mortal

1273
02:09:09,039 --> 02:09:13,600
sin, and it changed, and
Trent just flat out lied and said nothing

1274
02:09:13,680 --> 02:09:16,560
changed. But now, if nothing
changed, why is this guy having to

1275
02:09:16,800 --> 02:09:20,479
side with people that say that the
document is wrong and fruitful union of love

1276
02:09:20,600 --> 02:09:24,960
between a man and a woman,
which our Lord Jesus Christ raised the dignity

1277
02:09:26,439 --> 02:09:33,399
of the holy sacrament of matrimony.
Pastoral prudence urges us to avoid ambiguous gestures,

1278
02:09:33,760 --> 02:09:39,279
expressions, and concepts that would distort
or misrepresent God's word and the teaching

1279
02:09:39,479 --> 02:09:46,079
of the Catholic Church. The blessing
of the Lord be upon you Spiatu's love.

1280
02:09:48,560 --> 02:09:54,640
Right, So this LARPer who pretends
to be Orthodox is knowingly going against

1281
02:09:54,800 --> 02:10:01,399
the teaching of Rome, siding with
a national church. Guys, remember how

1282
02:10:01,279 --> 02:10:09,079
how many thousand times have the tradcats
said your church fails because it's nationalistic,

1283
02:10:11,520 --> 02:10:15,600
as if Roman Catholicism isn't, by
the way, completely nationalistic throughout Europe and

1284
02:10:15,680 --> 02:10:22,800
many countries. Right now, we're
supposed to listen to the Ukrainian Catholic Nation

1285
02:10:24,079 --> 02:10:31,520
Church against Francis Matt You were selling
people on the papacy and its ability to

1286
02:10:31,600 --> 02:10:37,680
provide clarity, unity and certitude.
But wait now we're supposed to listen to

1287
02:10:39,600 --> 02:10:45,560
the Eastern Ukrainian Catholic bishops. Well, but that's Orthodox, that's not papalism.

1288
02:10:50,840 --> 02:10:54,600
So that's about enough of that.
I'm not going to play this nonsense

1289
02:10:54,640 --> 02:10:56,800
of him trying to explain this for
an hour. All right, let's listen

1290
02:10:56,880 --> 02:11:01,000
to this, because this one was
gold. This is pure gold, because

1291
02:11:01,840 --> 02:11:07,720
of course a popeplanner in chief,
Michael Lofton. What does Michael Lfton say

1292
02:11:07,720 --> 02:11:13,640
about this? And does he contradict
himself that the blessings which he also extended

1293
02:11:13,680 --> 02:11:20,119
and remarried couples could take place in
churches in the Diocese of Spire. The

1294
02:11:20,239 --> 02:11:24,600
ceremony must differ from a church wedding
ceremony in terms of words and signs,

1295
02:11:26,199 --> 02:11:33,279
and should explicitly now here's a kicker
reinforce the love commitment, love commitment and

1296
02:11:33,520 --> 02:11:41,279
mutual responsibility in the couple's relationship as
an act of blessing. So for context,

1297
02:11:43,079 --> 02:11:48,600
this is just a month ago when
German bishops were saying that there could

1298
02:11:48,600 --> 02:11:54,680
be a blessing for sames, for
unions, for skittles unions. And what

1299
02:11:54,880 --> 02:12:01,880
was Michael Lofton's argument? It violates
the magisterium, the very thing that this

1300
02:12:01,359 --> 02:12:07,239
new document says can be done.
Do you see this? So let's listen

1301
02:12:07,319 --> 02:12:11,319
to him. You can hear himself, you can hear him yourself. As

1302
02:12:11,439 --> 02:12:20,239
I said, you know some people
disguise certain things in very cunning ways.

1303
02:12:22,279 --> 02:12:24,960
I mean, like Francis's documents,
here's how they're going to try to sell

1304
02:12:26,000 --> 02:12:30,720
it. They're going to try to
sell it as well. We're not blessing

1305
02:12:30,960 --> 02:12:35,880
sin oh disordered in this union.
By the way, this is the very

1306
02:12:37,000 --> 02:12:41,960
thing that this liar now uses to
Pope explain about the document. Do you

1307
02:12:43,039 --> 02:12:46,239
hear this? The very thing that
the document that he's critiquing a month ago

1308
02:12:46,399 --> 02:12:52,760
says is now what he says,
We're just blessing whatever good is found in

1309
02:12:52,840 --> 02:12:58,439
this union, such as monogamy,
commitment, friendship. We're just blessing the

1310
02:12:58,560 --> 02:13:07,640
good there not that the very thing
that Francis's documents tut. The very thing

1311
02:13:07,760 --> 02:13:15,399
that the armies of Novasorto people are
now doing to explain Francis's document, Michael

1312
02:13:15,479 --> 02:13:18,880
Lofton in this video says, is
the trick they would use. This liar

1313
02:13:20,119 --> 02:13:24,119
uses the tricks now because he's a
frawl and he's a liar. You see

1314
02:13:24,199 --> 02:13:26,600
the way that they're going to try
to couch it, and in fact we're

1315
02:13:26,720 --> 02:13:33,159
seeing him couching it in just that
way. And you're probably familiar with what

1316
02:13:33,439 --> 02:13:37,840
my response has been to that,
which is exactly what the magisterium actually said.

1317
02:13:37,880 --> 02:13:45,319
In response, as we'll look at
here in a moment. Oh right,

1318
02:13:45,560 --> 02:13:48,800
So magisterium within a month develops to
be the opposite of what it said

1319
02:13:48,840 --> 02:13:52,800
a month ago, according to you, So now we have the opposite on

1320
02:13:52,039 --> 02:14:00,199
the blessing. The magistrum has developed
within a month. My response is he's

1321
02:14:00,239 --> 02:14:07,680
been. You can't isolate any good
that you find, such as fidelity and

1322
02:14:07,720 --> 02:14:13,399
commitment. You can't isolate them from
the context in which they are found.

1323
02:14:13,680 --> 02:14:24,319
We can speak of commitment, dude, uh Jocal in the chat Joker in

1324
02:14:24,399 --> 02:14:33,119
the chat, I already addressed this
stupid objection. It does not say the

1325
02:14:33,239 --> 02:14:37,439
document literally says it is. Can
you read. You're sitting there saying it

1326
02:14:37,560 --> 02:14:43,079
doesn't say what it says right there
and all I know what you're gonna do.

1327
02:14:43,119 --> 02:14:45,800
You're gonna say. But in another
place in the document it says that

1328
02:14:45,920 --> 02:14:54,439
nothing has changed. That's called a
contradiction, Jokal, What does it say

1329
02:14:54,640 --> 02:14:58,960
right there? And what did if
nothing changed? Why do the Ukrainian bishops

1330
02:14:58,960 --> 02:15:05,399
say that it's wrong? What do
you mean nothing change? You're just lying.

1331
02:15:05,119 --> 02:15:11,479
It's called a contradiction. Look at
this, What does it say for

1332
02:15:11,680 --> 02:15:16,560
this reason, it is not listit
to impart this this is twenty twenty one.

1333
02:15:18,399 --> 02:15:28,560
And then the new document. The
new document says, what within the

1334
02:15:28,680 --> 02:15:35,920
horizon outlined here appears the possibility of
blessings for couples in irregular situations of the

1335
02:15:35,039 --> 02:15:41,760
same sex. It literally says it
right there for you. And you are

1336
02:15:41,880 --> 02:15:46,760
lying and you can't either you can't
read, or like battered wife syndrome,

1337
02:15:46,760 --> 02:15:52,560
you double down and look to the
other places in the document where it seems

1338
02:15:52,640 --> 02:15:58,439
to say what you want, and
ignore the part that's a contradiction. So

1339
02:15:58,600 --> 02:16:01,399
tell me how it's not a contradiction, jocal. And by the way,

1340
02:16:01,399 --> 02:16:13,159
why don't you call in It says
only people can be blessed. It says

1341
02:16:13,479 --> 02:16:20,800
cop boles, cop boles, couples, couples. The document is on the

1342
02:16:20,880 --> 02:16:26,199
screen for you. Look at the
Roman Catholic lying in the chat as the

1343
02:16:26,279 --> 02:16:30,680
document is on the screen. What
does he say right here? It says

1344
02:16:30,720 --> 02:16:35,719
that only people can be blessed.
The headlines or the media lied about it,

1345
02:16:37,040 --> 02:16:41,319
No, Jocal, you're lying,
joker. The media did not misrepresent

1346
02:16:41,399 --> 02:16:48,319
it because it says couples, couppules. It's even in the headline of the

1347
02:16:48,399 --> 02:16:56,360
section how do you lie right there
to everyone's face? Are you gaslating us?

1348
02:16:56,399 --> 02:17:03,840
Do you think that we can't read
it says couples? Are you running

1349
02:17:03,000 --> 02:17:09,319
a capturing Christianity? Quick books Bayesian
analysis, which tells you that couples just

1350
02:17:09,440 --> 02:17:13,719
means two individuals? Is that how
you make it work? This is why

1351
02:17:13,840 --> 02:17:20,639
your religion is collapsing because you're lying
to yourself. You're liars. Couples is

1352
02:17:20,719 --> 02:17:24,959
a neutral term? A neutral term? Was it an Oh my gosh,

1353
02:17:26,959 --> 02:17:30,079
this is his code. Couples is
a neutral term. Doesn't even make any

1354
02:17:30,159 --> 02:17:37,520
sense. A neutral term. The
fricking term was in the old document it

1355
02:17:37,600 --> 02:17:41,520
said you can't do it? Was
it a neutral term? Then you are

1356
02:17:41,520 --> 02:17:45,159
a liar. Dude. Just boot
this liar. These people are unbelievable,

1357
02:17:45,520 --> 02:17:48,600
And this is why your church is
collapsing because you can lie all day long

1358
02:17:48,680 --> 02:17:52,600
to yourself. But guess what,
this empire of lies isn't gonna work because

1359
02:17:52,639 --> 02:17:58,920
Francis is doing our work for us. Joker, Get this liar out of

1360
02:17:58,920 --> 02:18:01,840
here. I'm so sick of these
people. I'm putting out with these people

1361
02:18:01,920 --> 02:18:07,959
for years. Look at the level
of lying that these people resort to.

1362
02:18:09,239 --> 02:18:13,440
Just made up some nonsense. The
word couple is a neutral term. What

1363
02:18:13,600 --> 02:18:20,680
does that? That doesn't even make
any sense a neutral term. These people

1364
02:18:20,760 --> 02:18:22,920
are disgusting. That's why, well
you get so mean on the look,

1365
02:18:22,959 --> 02:18:28,000
because these people are disgusting. They
act ridiculous, They lie all the time,

1366
02:18:28,840 --> 02:18:33,040
and they pretend and present to everybody
that they're pious. Like Michael Lofton's

1367
02:18:33,079 --> 02:18:37,639
big giant crucifix, go big dog
crucis fix bha my head? Do you

1368
02:18:37,760 --> 02:18:43,120
go, Paus by the way,
buy my new repp dog. Listen to

1369
02:18:43,239 --> 02:18:48,239
his liar again with his nonsense.
Blessing whatever good is found in this union,

1370
02:18:48,639 --> 02:18:56,159
such as monogamy, commitment, friendship. We're just blessing the good found

1371
02:18:56,319 --> 02:19:01,319
there, not the bad. You
see they that they're going to try to

1372
02:19:01,440 --> 02:19:05,760
couch it, and in fact we'd
seeing him. I mean for you utterly

1373
02:19:07,079 --> 02:19:11,360
super slow people. Let me explain
it. This is Michael Often a month

1374
02:19:11,440 --> 02:19:16,200
ago explaining when the German bishops in
his in his organized crime sect that he

1375
02:19:16,360 --> 02:19:24,040
worships in, when they wanted to
do union blessings. Michael often is saying

1376
02:19:24,319 --> 02:19:28,319
it's against the magistarium, and he's
even picking apart the logic they use now

1377
02:19:30,159 --> 02:19:35,239
in Francis's document. They're doing that
very thing, and so he's contradicting himself.

1378
02:19:35,399 --> 02:19:39,719
Hopefully everyone can see this. And
if you can't see this, then

1379
02:19:39,879 --> 02:19:43,840
just go somewhere else. Man,
don't even come to these dreams because I

1380
02:19:43,920 --> 02:19:46,639
don't want you to be here.
This is not for you. Go lie

1381
02:19:46,719 --> 02:19:52,120
to yourself elsewhere. Go have your
patcha Mama and your voodoo elsewhere. Go

1382
02:19:52,239 --> 02:19:54,680
do your butt things elsewhere. Man, we don't want you here. This

1383
02:19:54,879 --> 02:20:01,360
is not for lying liars who wanted
tolude themselves. Go to Michael Lofton's chat.

1384
02:20:01,399 --> 02:20:05,280
That's where you should be. You
should go buy into his grift and

1385
02:20:05,360 --> 02:20:09,159
provide him with more donuts and go
download his ridiculous, horrible rap songs.

1386
02:20:09,200 --> 02:20:16,479
By the way I can. I'm
a joke rapper better than he ish in

1387
02:20:16,680 --> 02:20:22,760
just that way. And you're probably
familiar with what my response has been to

1388
02:20:22,879 --> 02:20:28,239
that, which is exactly what the
Magisterium actually said in response, as we'll

1389
02:20:28,280 --> 02:20:33,440
look at here in a moment.
My response has always been, you can't

1390
02:20:35,959 --> 02:20:41,200
any good that you find, such
as fidelity and commitment, you can't isolate

1391
02:20:41,280 --> 02:20:46,239
them from the context in which they
are found. We can speak of commitment

1392
02:20:48,120 --> 02:20:56,239
fidelity, friendship isolated. Objectively speaking, these are goods, right, but

1393
02:20:58,399 --> 02:21:05,079
we relate. We don't live in
the world of ideas Plato's ethereal realm.

1394
02:21:56,159 --> 02:22:01,040
Why are all the people apologies contradicting
each other? I thought the papacy provided

1395
02:22:01,280 --> 02:22:07,440
clarity and certitude, and yet all
of the pawp apologists are all having different

1396
02:22:07,479 --> 02:22:11,520
takes and contradicting it. They're they're
melting down. Bro, This system is

1397
02:22:11,639 --> 02:22:18,959
itself melting down because the system itself
is a geopolitical power structure in reality.

1398
02:22:20,520 --> 02:22:26,120
In reality, you'll find what's going
on in books like this, not in

1399
02:22:26,200 --> 02:22:30,399
Trenthorne's apologetic pop books, but in
books that show you the history of the

1400
02:22:30,479 --> 02:22:35,719
papacy becoming a world power and becoming
a giant banking institution. That's the real

1401
02:22:35,879 --> 02:22:41,040
explanation and narrative of the papacy.
That's what's really going on, not the

1402
02:22:41,159 --> 02:22:43,760
stories of the Pope splaneers, and
they're made up narratives at all contradict Again,

1403
02:22:43,879 --> 02:22:50,120
why are they contradicting each other?
Is it no change or a change?

1404
02:22:52,799 --> 02:22:56,600
Which of the pope splanners is the
correct interpreter of the interpreters? You

1405
02:22:56,680 --> 02:23:01,280
see? Do we need a pope
splainer, for the popes splainers for the

1406
02:23:01,319 --> 02:23:07,479
popes splanners. How many levels removed
do we need to be before we can

1407
02:23:07,600 --> 02:23:11,159
get an accurate interpretation of the interpretation
of the interpretation? Remember the video that

1408
02:23:11,319 --> 02:23:16,840
I made six years ago, six
years ago, laughing and making fun of

1409
02:23:18,120 --> 02:23:22,280
the interpretation of the interpretation of the
interpretation of the interpretation. What do we

1410
02:23:22,520 --> 02:23:26,760
have? The very thing I put
in my damn video. That's what we

1411
02:23:26,879 --> 02:23:35,520
have. Let me find my video
and see if we're not vindicated. Remember

1412
02:23:35,600 --> 02:23:43,600
my video. The papacy is circular. By the way, just a little

1413
02:23:45,079 --> 02:23:50,239
note for the Roman Catholic paup apologists. I have had an influx, a

1414
02:23:50,399 --> 02:23:58,520
mountain of people saying, even salty
Roman Catholic submitting it you were right.

1415
02:23:58,639 --> 02:24:03,920
I'm sorry. Have been a mountain
of people saying I am leaving Rome and

1416
02:24:03,000 --> 02:24:09,079
I'm gonna look into Orthodoxy or become
Orthodox. An avalanche is coming and it's

1417
02:24:09,079 --> 02:24:15,399
only gonna get bigger. And as
I told you guys before, it's not

1418
02:24:15,559 --> 02:24:20,680
gonna work to say, well,
he's mean. I mean. I tried

1419
02:24:20,719 --> 02:24:26,639
to tell you guys like three or
four years ago, when we were already

1420
02:24:26,719 --> 02:24:28,920
seeing thousands of people convert to orthodoxy. I was already trying to tell you

1421
02:24:28,959 --> 02:24:33,040
guys then that it's not gonna work
to just keep saying Jay's mean, Jay's

1422
02:24:33,079 --> 02:24:37,360
mean, Jay's mean. That's all
they've had is personal attacks and Michael Lofton's

1423
02:24:37,399 --> 02:24:41,239
low tier, five hour boring ass
streams that nobody can make it all the

1424
02:24:41,239 --> 02:24:48,639
way through. So what did I
say? Let's say I know how it

1425
02:24:48,719 --> 02:24:54,440
works. Fact, because as soon
as you start trying to figure out who's

1426
02:24:54,520 --> 02:24:58,920
interpreting the popes or the councils correctly
in Rome, there's a million different debates

1427
02:24:58,959 --> 02:25:01,239
and nobody can know. Nobody can
decide for sure, And it doesn't matter

1428
02:25:01,280 --> 02:25:05,079
how many times to the pope reaffirms
what have we seen in the last few

1429
02:25:05,120 --> 02:25:07,840
months? What have we seen in
the last few months? This is my

1430
02:25:07,959 --> 02:25:11,520
video from five years ago. So
who are we supposed to listen to,

1431
02:25:11,639 --> 02:25:18,559
Tim Gordon, Matt frad Carblohydrate Lofton, Like, who's the correct pubs planner

1432
02:25:18,639 --> 02:25:22,799
that we're all supposed to look to
because they're all contradicting. Do we look

1433
02:25:22,840 --> 02:25:28,840
to the Ukrainian Catholic bishops? Do
we look to James Martin? I thought

1434
02:25:28,879 --> 02:25:37,520
we were supposed to look to Francis. But oh, that doesn't work,

1435
02:25:37,680 --> 02:25:43,360
does it. Now we're in the
position of interpreting the interpretation of the interpretation

1436
02:25:43,399 --> 02:25:48,159
of interpretation. And then I did
this in the video, I drew father

1437
02:25:48,360 --> 02:25:52,360
Bruce. Father Bruce is the one
that really interprets Francis, not Michael Walfton.

1438
02:25:52,399 --> 02:25:56,680
It's Father Bruce. Come to the
guitar mouth, by the way,

1439
02:25:56,959 --> 02:26:01,840
makes sure feedback there haad to fix
that. So here's our little Pope figure

1440
02:26:03,040 --> 02:26:09,079
and here's a little we're gonna put
a little lowly normy Roman Catholic guy here.

1441
02:26:09,920 --> 02:26:13,760
Now, Pope Figure just decides one
day that it is time for an

1442
02:26:13,799 --> 02:26:20,120
infallible declaration. Now he doesn't just
simply cite in the document that it is

1443
02:26:20,200 --> 02:26:24,120
infallible, which would make it pretty
easy for everybody wouldn't know. What he

1444
02:26:24,200 --> 02:26:30,360
does is he says that with full
apostolic authority. Uh, by the way,

1445
02:26:30,799 --> 02:26:33,120
that is actually I think a good
question to keep asking, why don't

1446
02:26:33,120 --> 02:26:37,440
they conveniently identify for everyone when this
is infallible? I mean, perhaps they

1447
02:26:37,479 --> 02:26:43,840
could actually just say this is ex
cathedra infallible teaching. But have they ever

1448
02:26:43,959 --> 02:26:46,920
given us an actual list of infallible
ex cathedra teaching. No they haven't,

1449
02:26:48,000 --> 02:26:52,280
Which wouldn't that make it a lot
easier if you were the supreme pastor?

1450
02:26:52,680 --> 02:26:56,760
Maybe the supreme pastor could give us
a list of the infallible teachings. Remember

1451
02:26:58,159 --> 02:27:05,159
they always ask us this, Where
to ortodogs listened to infallible things? Where

1452
02:27:05,200 --> 02:27:09,319
did you listen to you valible things? Yeah? Where's the list of the

1453
02:27:09,360 --> 02:27:11,719
infallible papal things? Oh there's not
one. Oh wait a minute, is

1454
02:27:11,799 --> 02:27:16,559
it? Is it this book?
No, it's not just this book.

1455
02:27:16,680 --> 02:27:18,200
Uh oh dang. See, I
thought I could just read Densier. No,

1456
02:27:18,440 --> 02:27:20,840
sorry, I got to read a
lot more than that, because there's

1457
02:27:20,879 --> 02:27:24,840
also these ecumenical councils and Vatican two, and I'll see that that's also part

1458
02:27:24,879 --> 02:27:31,799
of it. Where did you used
to do? Impeibook things? The chair

1459
02:27:33,840 --> 02:27:39,280
right, Herry, he's gonna be
proclaiming it in his proclamation bubble I decree

1460
02:27:39,280 --> 02:27:41,879
blah blah blah blah blah blahlah blahlah
blahlah blah blah. And then later he

1461
02:27:43,360 --> 02:27:50,719
issues an encyclical that helps interpret this, and then later there's I don't know

1462
02:27:52,280 --> 02:27:58,399
another Uh. The Congregation for the
Doctrine of the Faith issues a proclamation that

1463
02:27:58,479 --> 02:28:03,760
helps interpret this, and then later
there's another I don't know, papal whatever,

1464
02:28:03,879 --> 02:28:07,120
it doesn't matter. Just come up
with all the different layers and levels

1465
02:28:07,000 --> 02:28:16,799
PC, papal claim clarification, papal
claim clarification. Now let's say this is

1466
02:28:16,840 --> 02:28:18,840
how because also works. I'm I'm
not joking, right, this is really

1467
02:28:18,879 --> 02:28:28,319
how it works. Okay, Now, what is what is necessary for something

1468
02:28:28,399 --> 02:28:33,280
to be ex cathedral from the chair? Well, it's for the whole universal

1469
02:28:33,360 --> 02:28:39,680
Church. It's proclaim a full apstock
authority right from the chair and supposedly,

1470
02:28:39,200 --> 02:28:45,000
or I'll put an inverted cross on
him here, since they they love those

1471
02:28:45,040 --> 02:28:52,239
inverted crosses in Rome. Just Chair
Proclamation xxx, which is also clarified in

1472
02:28:52,440 --> 02:28:56,840
encyclical b c D, which is
also clarified by the Congregation of the Doctrine

1473
02:28:56,840 --> 02:29:01,079
of Faith with Rattinger as its head, suppose years ago. Now you notice

1474
02:29:01,120 --> 02:29:05,159
what I was doing in this video, ironically, is the very thing that's

1475
02:29:05,159 --> 02:29:09,360
happened now, right. We didn't
get an ex cathedral statement from Francis about

1476
02:29:09,440 --> 02:29:15,079
butt stuff, but we got multiple
statements from Francis which have then become a

1477
02:29:15,479 --> 02:29:20,440
devolving kicking the can down the road
operation of the new document that interprets the

1478
02:29:20,520 --> 02:29:24,920
Dubia, which interprets the previous statements
of Francis, which relates to the previous

1479
02:29:24,920 --> 02:29:28,920
CDF documents from twenty twenty one,
which relates to the previous CDF documents from

1480
02:29:28,959 --> 02:29:33,799
twenty two thousand and three. So
do you see the spiraling out of control

1481
02:29:37,239 --> 02:29:39,559
that's going on here? That's what
I was illustrating in this video from five

1482
02:29:39,639 --> 02:29:43,799
years ago, and that's exactly what's
happening right now. Because this is how

1483
02:29:43,920 --> 02:29:48,639
Roemancatholicism works. You can see I
drew it on the famous whiteboard right there

1484
02:29:48,719 --> 02:29:54,079
for you. Look what I drew
five years ago on the whiteboard is happening

1485
02:29:54,280 --> 02:30:01,600
in live time for you? Is
it working? Is it providing clarity,

1486
02:30:03,040 --> 02:30:09,159
unity, certitude, preservation of faith
and morals? Is it? Come on?

1487
02:30:09,440 --> 02:30:13,239
And you all know the answer to
that question. Except for the lying

1488
02:30:13,360 --> 02:30:18,040
joker in the chat who said that
couples is a neutral term just made up,

1489
02:30:18,520 --> 02:30:20,559
pulled that out of his butt.
Couples is a neutral term. It

1490
02:30:20,559 --> 02:30:24,159
didn't make any sense. Couples is
a neutral term. But I mean,

1491
02:30:24,200 --> 02:30:30,120
I guess if we're gonna use quick
books to prove the papacy, then that's

1492
02:30:30,159 --> 02:30:31,879
where we're at, right, I
mean, we're at quick books level arguments

1493
02:30:31,920 --> 02:30:37,479
for the papacy. Then uh,
the papal clarification that comes later down the

1494
02:30:37,559 --> 02:30:43,440
road. And here's a U lowly
little Roman guy. And you think we

1495
02:30:43,600 --> 02:30:46,719
just need the pope to solve these
questions of theology. It solves it,

1496
02:30:48,200 --> 02:30:52,440
does it, really? But see
what we've already done is we've introduced the

1497
02:30:52,040 --> 02:30:58,920
mysterious chair of authority that isn't always
made clear when and yes, Roman cal

1498
02:31:00,280 --> 02:31:03,799
will debate ad nauseum which statements are
ex cathedral and which ones aren't, which

1499
02:31:05,280 --> 02:31:09,360
shows us where's the ex cathedral list
of the ex cathedra statements Roman Catholics.

1500
02:31:09,360 --> 02:31:11,680
I mean, that's what you should
have if your system. If you want

1501
02:31:11,680 --> 02:31:13,760
me to buy into your system,
at least give me that. Oh it

1502
02:31:13,799 --> 02:31:18,440
doesn't exist and it never will.
This whole nonsense doesn't really do anything like

1503
02:31:18,520 --> 02:31:20,200
it's supposed to. It doesn't solve
the problems it's supposed to. If we're

1504
02:31:20,200 --> 02:31:26,479
all sitting around for decades debating which
ones are the ex cathedral pronouncements, that's

1505
02:31:26,559 --> 02:31:30,319
because it just moves the problem back
a step? Can you not see that?

1506
02:31:31,879 --> 02:31:33,799
So here's can you not see it
five years later, six years later,

1507
02:31:33,879 --> 02:31:37,120
with it in front of your face
in real time. Can you guys

1508
02:31:37,200 --> 02:31:39,200
not see this? Everything I was
telling you five years ago is happening in

1509
02:31:39,280 --> 02:31:43,280
live time for you now want to
He says, all right, I'm gonna

1510
02:31:43,319 --> 02:31:50,719
interpret this so in his mind.
And by the way, think about all

1511
02:31:50,760 --> 02:31:54,639
the Orthodoxic humanists who want to join
with Rome. What does it say All

1512
02:31:54,719 --> 02:31:58,719
those gubers have just as much egg
on their face too, right? And

1513
02:31:58,879 --> 02:32:01,200
this is, by the way,
I think deep secretly, they're all a

1514
02:32:01,239 --> 02:32:05,920
bunch of They're into the the skittles, you know, touching pps thing too.

1515
02:32:05,040 --> 02:32:07,959
So that's that's what they want deep
down. And I say, go

1516
02:32:09,120 --> 02:32:11,959
for it. Go to Rome.
You don't need to join the Orthodox Church

1517
02:32:13,120 --> 02:32:18,479
that you can just go have that. Go have that over there. He's

1518
02:32:18,520 --> 02:32:24,479
got to be sure that the improper
interpretation of all this layers of gobbledinggook is

1519
02:32:24,719 --> 02:32:28,959
proper, properly entering into his mind
and interpreted correctly. Now, guess what

1520
02:32:30,079 --> 02:32:33,079
every Roman Catholic will tell you to
do in this process. Oh, you

1521
02:32:33,159 --> 02:32:35,680
can't just do this. This is
kind of this is kind of Protestant,

1522
02:32:35,719 --> 02:32:41,680
bro, It's kind of Protestant,
going directly to these papal proclamations, assuming

1523
02:32:41,719 --> 02:32:43,879
that you can figure this out.
Yeah, right, like in the Roman

1524
02:32:43,920 --> 02:32:48,920
gallic system kind of. I thought
I could just go read Francis's statements and

1525
02:32:48,000 --> 02:32:50,760
that made it clear, right,
and that's his that's the point of the

1526
02:32:50,799 --> 02:32:56,120
papacy that these pope sellers, these
car salesmen of the papacy have been selling

1527
02:32:56,239 --> 02:33:01,040
us. Aha, Orthodox don't have
it, we got the go ha haha.

1528
02:33:03,239 --> 02:33:05,280
Oh okay, So now that I'm
Roman Catholic, as these goofuses have

1529
02:33:05,399 --> 02:33:09,159
been themselves saying, I can just
read Francis right. Oh well, wait

1530
02:33:09,159 --> 02:33:11,719
a minute. Now the whole church
is an uproar trying to figure out what

1531
02:33:11,799 --> 02:33:16,719
France has meant. So who's right? Oh well, you see now you

1532
02:33:16,799 --> 02:33:20,559
need to go to a postplanner doctor
so and so, postplanner x y Z.

1533
02:33:22,639 --> 02:33:26,840
So the very thing that you bought
into the system for doesn't actually work,

1534
02:33:26,879 --> 02:33:30,040
as I told you years ago,
because I bought into the same thing

1535
02:33:30,120 --> 02:33:31,559
years ago, back in two thousand
and three. I fell for these dumb

1536
02:33:31,680 --> 02:33:35,520
arguments. I didn't fall for the
quick books papacy argument, but I felt

1537
02:33:35,559 --> 02:33:39,639
for the other arguments back in two
thousand and three. Also, you too,

1538
02:33:39,760 --> 02:33:43,200
Before you can do that, you
need to go talk to your local

1539
02:33:43,399 --> 02:33:48,120
priest, because your priest is there, Father so and so, Father Bru,

1540
02:33:48,479 --> 02:33:52,959
Father Bruth, Father Bruth is there
for you. Yeah, So where

1541
02:33:54,000 --> 02:33:58,079
do I get the authoritative, correct
interpretation of the interpretation of the interpretation?

1542
02:33:58,680 --> 02:34:01,639
Do you know? I see now
why I took the entire debate with Trent

1543
02:34:01,920 --> 02:34:07,799
to epistemology. This is why I
made the debate about epistemology, and Trent

1544
02:34:07,920 --> 02:34:13,680
miserably failed in the debate. To
anybody who knows anything about epistemology, as

1545
02:34:13,760 --> 02:34:20,959
they can see clearly, do you
understand that not a one of them has

1546
02:34:20,079 --> 02:34:28,479
yet even grassed or grasped or replied
to this epistemic objection because they can't because

1547
02:34:28,520 --> 02:34:33,239
they're wedded to a foundationalist of pistemology
which will never allow them to answer this

1548
02:34:33,360 --> 02:34:39,559
question. There we go, All
right, enough of those, right,

1549
02:34:39,600 --> 02:34:43,120
I don't have to You want to
go watch this old car bloated version of

1550
02:34:43,200 --> 02:34:46,399
me, you can do it right
here. That was pre chalk, by

1551
02:34:46,399 --> 02:34:50,680
the way, pre chalk. Listen, you want to get uncar bloated like

1552
02:34:50,760 --> 02:34:54,360
me, But before I was on
chalk, and you're like, why are

1553
02:34:54,360 --> 02:34:56,680
you so agitated and up and up
at EA to day because the Chalk dot

1554
02:34:56,719 --> 02:35:01,799
Com. Maybe I took my chalk
I did. I took a gold hefty

1555
02:35:01,879 --> 02:35:09,440
dose of a tong cat, so
I took my tonguekettle Lee and it worked.

1556
02:35:11,680 --> 02:35:16,879
So I'm fired up. You too
could get fired up by boosting your

1557
02:35:16,920 --> 02:35:20,399
testas rum by going over to Chalk
dot com and using the promo go J

1558
02:35:20,479 --> 02:35:24,360
three to this ja Wi fi zero
Jay five zero to get fifty percent off

1559
02:35:24,159 --> 02:35:31,360
these beloved wonderful Chalk products. Don't
forget the chad mode, the Alpha chad

1560
02:35:31,760 --> 02:35:35,399
listen. I played the chad mode
ad so many times. I'm just gonna

1561
02:35:35,399 --> 02:35:39,559
I'm gonna take a brief break from
it because it's funny. But look,

1562
02:35:39,120 --> 02:35:43,159
how can you not buy a product
with the chad meme dude on it?

1563
02:35:43,319 --> 02:35:48,520
Right But as you know, my
favorite is the tong Kettlee And right now,

1564
02:35:48,719 --> 02:35:54,360
Chalk has that amazing stack wherein you
can get both the Action two point

1565
02:35:54,399 --> 02:35:58,200
zero and the ton ketaly and the
chad Mode altogether and you still get fifty

1566
02:35:58,200 --> 02:36:01,879
percent off using the promo go J
fifty. Also the promo co J five

1567
02:36:01,959 --> 02:36:07,239
three life this j J Y five
three LFE that gets you fifty three percent

1568
02:36:07,280 --> 02:36:09,440
off all recurring subscriptions, and you
might as well set up a recurrent subscription

1569
02:36:09,520 --> 02:36:13,399
because I know you're gonna want it
when you get these excellent products coming to

1570
02:36:13,440 --> 02:36:18,639
you in the mail. Just like
Jeffrey Bazas has over on Amazon. You

1571
02:36:18,680 --> 02:36:20,719
don't have to put all your information
back in there, just get it on

1572
02:36:20,840 --> 02:36:31,000
recurring subscriptions. Listen, dog chalk
dot Com will not make you charitable and

1573
02:36:31,120 --> 02:36:33,719
it will not make you nuanced.
How's that for a selling point? Boom?

1574
02:36:37,239 --> 02:36:39,200
All right, so we went through
this one. We went through this

1575
02:36:39,719 --> 02:36:50,120
now listen, Tim was so this
was actually a genius. Tim actually broke

1576
02:36:50,159 --> 02:36:52,440
down the grammar for you slow boys. And I don't even remember my grammars,

1577
02:36:54,959 --> 02:36:58,399
right, I don't remember a freaking
grammar. But Tim, because he

1578
02:36:58,479 --> 02:37:05,200
homeschooled, he remembers grammar, and
he breaks down the grammar of what it

1579
02:37:05,319 --> 02:37:09,760
actually means, especially the joker over
there talking about neutral terms. No,

1580
02:37:11,000 --> 02:37:15,920
the word couples is the word used
in the document on purpose. And would

1581
02:37:15,959 --> 02:37:20,280
you like a grammatical breakdown? October
the ninth, I played you the clip

1582
02:37:20,559 --> 02:37:24,399
I told you so, then he's
going to do the same thing. Create

1583
02:37:24,479 --> 02:37:31,239
this false middle category that's really meant
to be that which is proscribed blessings women

1584
02:37:31,319 --> 02:37:37,239
deacons. He's going to do that
later in the year, and so I

1585
02:37:37,360 --> 02:37:45,360
have a few things I want to
do really quickly. I'm playing this because

1586
02:37:45,399 --> 02:37:48,120
I thought it was funny. This
is like, you need people to break

1587
02:37:48,200 --> 02:37:52,159
the grammar down for you as to
what the sentence means if you're being lied

1588
02:37:52,200 --> 02:38:00,760
to or gas lit. In twenty
twenty one, Cardinal Ladaria optional chief at

1589
02:38:00,799 --> 02:38:05,879
the time, who got fired.
It is whispered for this document, for

1590
02:38:05,000 --> 02:38:13,399
this defense of teaching, for censuring
Fernandez and especially Heiner Wilmer. The two

1591
02:38:13,600 --> 02:38:20,399
CDF replacements that Francis tried immediately afterwards. This is the document in twenty twenty

1592
02:38:20,520 --> 02:38:24,680
one. It is not lisicit to
impart a blessing on relationships or partnerships.

1593
02:38:24,760 --> 02:38:31,879
He's talking about the document right here
that involve sexual activity outside marriage, as

1594
02:38:33,600 --> 02:38:35,879
is the case of the unions between
persons of the same sex. This is

1595
02:38:35,959 --> 02:38:48,440
not civil unions, just any relationships
partnerships. Unions three three synonyms for couple.

1596
02:38:48,520 --> 02:38:52,920
It is not listen to a part
of blessing on any relationships or partnerships

1597
02:38:52,680 --> 02:38:56,719
involving sexual activity outside marriage. Is
this the case of the unions between persons

1598
02:38:56,760 --> 02:39:01,879
of the same sex. That's twenty
twenty one. If your lying friends tell

1599
02:39:01,920 --> 02:39:05,479
you no change. Here's the document
in twenty twenty three from December the eighteenth.

1600
02:39:05,399 --> 02:39:11,959
Within the horizon outlined here appears the
possibility of blessings for couples in irregular

1601
02:39:13,040 --> 02:39:18,040
situations and for couples of the same
sex twenty twenty one. It is not

1602
02:39:18,200 --> 02:39:26,120
listed to impart a blessing on dot
dot dot, relationships, partnerships, unions

1603
02:39:26,120 --> 02:39:28,000
between persons of the same sex,
any of those three twenty twenty three.

1604
02:39:28,159 --> 02:39:33,520
One more time, this is an
ad phaser quote. Who's been great on

1605
02:39:33,600 --> 02:39:39,399
this? The possibility of blessings for
couples of the same sex. Those are

1606
02:39:39,479 --> 02:39:43,639
dense quotes from twenty one to twenty
three. This is a reversal of doctrine.

1607
02:39:43,920 --> 02:39:50,559
This is formal heresy. There's no
question about it. The text is

1608
02:39:50,760 --> 02:39:56,200
that clear. Twenty one, twenty
twenty three. And I even because I'm

1609
02:39:56,200 --> 02:40:01,040
a grammar master, I even diagrammed
the sentence for you paragraph thirty one of

1610
02:40:01,079 --> 02:40:11,239
Fiduccia Supplicans. Uh. Here appears
the possibility Grammars mean exactly mean grammar.

1611
02:40:11,520 --> 02:40:15,680
So here we have. This is
Western says oppressive grammar. This is this

1612
02:40:15,840 --> 02:40:24,520
clear there we go, So,
uh, who champion the white board?

1613
02:40:24,600 --> 02:40:33,920
Who champion the white board? Who
champion the white Let's let's let everyone see

1614
02:40:33,040 --> 02:40:39,000
this. Okay, So what we
have and this is also free homeschooling lesson

1615
02:40:39,040 --> 02:40:43,520
because I told you the main thing
your grammar school aged children need to be

1616
02:40:43,600 --> 02:40:48,280
doing ninety percent of the day should
be grammar. Here appears, Here is

1617
02:40:48,399 --> 02:40:56,079
the subject of a sentence? Appears
is the verb the possibility. Then we

1618
02:40:56,200 --> 02:41:01,360
have a bunch of possibility. Is
either a direct object or predicate nominative,

1619
02:41:01,639 --> 02:41:05,559
depending on how you qualify appears,
which is a unique kind of verb that

1620
02:41:05,639 --> 02:41:09,399
can either count as an action.
So listen, dom Roman Catholics. Here's

1621
02:41:11,040 --> 02:41:16,479
a smart Roman Catholic breaking down grammar
for you. Because you can't read.

1622
02:41:16,079 --> 02:41:20,680
That's why we're doing this verb which
takes a direct object noun on the other

1623
02:41:20,760 --> 02:41:24,600
side, or a linking verb,
which takes a predicate nominative noun on the

1624
02:41:24,680 --> 02:41:30,799
other side. This is a vague
sentence. Appears can be one of those

1625
02:41:30,920 --> 02:41:35,440
rare verbs that's like is or becomes. There aren't that many linking verbs.

1626
02:41:35,639 --> 02:41:43,079
So the possibility is either the direct
object receiving the action, or more likely

1627
02:41:43,159 --> 02:41:48,399
it's a linking verb appears, and
possibility is the renaming of the subject the

1628
02:41:48,399 --> 02:41:52,440
predicate nominative. So what appears is
the possibility. That's why I like this

1629
02:41:52,559 --> 02:41:56,440
sentence is a linking verb sentence.
Now, of blessings, four couples of

1630
02:41:56,639 --> 02:42:05,719
the same sex. These are three
prepositional phrases. The first is of blessings

1631
02:42:05,799 --> 02:42:13,920
is an adjectibal phrase of blessings describes
possibility. I mean, imagine how dumb

1632
02:42:13,040 --> 02:42:18,440
this actually is that we're having to
use grammar to break down the sentences for

1633
02:42:18,559 --> 02:42:24,600
people in the Roman Catholic documents.
We just just stop for a moment and

1634
02:42:24,719 --> 02:42:28,280
think about the absurdity of this.
Supposedly, Francis was gonna be the thing

1635
02:42:28,479 --> 02:42:35,360
that would give a certitude clarity in
doctrine, but we need Roman Catholic apologists,

1636
02:42:35,639 --> 02:42:41,120
which I'm glad he did this.
I'm not dissingc Tim, but it

1637
02:42:41,200 --> 02:42:45,959
illustrates the absurdity of the notion that
this that Francis is giving. Anybody need

1638
02:42:46,000 --> 02:42:50,799
clarity. Now, we gotta have
robic like just doing grammar to show people

1639
02:42:50,879 --> 02:42:58,520
what the freaking grammar actually says.
Dude, come on four couples is an

1640
02:42:58,639 --> 02:43:05,479
adverse verrbial prep phrase describing an adjectible
prep phrase. The one of blessings and

1641
02:43:05,719 --> 02:43:13,719
of the same sex describes couples,
meaning it is another uh, what kind

1642
02:43:13,719 --> 02:43:18,159
of couples? Couples of the same
sex, So it's another adjectible prep phrase.

1643
02:43:18,440 --> 02:43:22,719
Obviously, prep praises are almost always
adverbial or adjectable. They act just

1644
02:43:22,799 --> 02:43:26,120
like an adverb or an adjectide.
What means, what this all means is

1645
02:43:26,159 --> 02:43:33,559
that what appears here? What mean
this is existing? Here is a possible?

1646
02:43:33,959 --> 02:43:43,879
What means this? This means all
right? All right? I mean

1647
02:43:43,319 --> 02:43:46,040
if you don't get it after this
point, then just go some go to

1648
02:43:46,120 --> 02:43:50,840
some other channel. Man Roman Catholics
in the chat mad but her, just

1649
02:43:50,920 --> 02:43:54,479
go somewhere else. Like we're done. That's it. There's nothing else I

1650
02:43:54,559 --> 02:43:56,920
have to say to you. You
don't like me, We're good, that's

1651
02:43:56,000 --> 02:44:03,399
fine. Go for it. Go
go have a uh purple source res and

1652
02:44:03,479 --> 02:44:05,159
donuts with Michael lofton all day long. Let's open up the chat. We've

1653
02:44:05,159 --> 02:44:11,280
got a few people here requested to
fuss cozy Kevin, what's up, Kevin?

1654
02:44:18,239 --> 02:44:35,159
You gotta un mute dude? Are
you gonna unmute hm hm, yes,

1655
02:44:35,319 --> 02:44:41,440
not bones. What's up the Roman
baron? Uh oh, that sounds

1656
02:44:41,479 --> 02:44:46,440
like a Roman Catholic. Let's set
it straight. I gotta ummute, Tony.

1657
02:44:46,479 --> 02:44:52,719
Can you hear me? Yes,
Christ is born. I just wanted

1658
02:44:52,760 --> 02:44:58,920
to say I'm a former Roman Catholic. And as soon as I saw this,

1659
02:45:01,239 --> 02:45:05,399
I read the entire document because I
knew people would just be reread the

1660
02:45:05,440 --> 02:45:07,520
document. No, no, no, you haven't read the document. Well

1661
02:45:07,559 --> 02:45:11,680
I read the document and I'm not
retarded. And it says too blessed a

1662
02:45:11,840 --> 02:45:18,520
sodomy. I just you know,
I don't understand how Catholics can't read that

1663
02:45:18,879 --> 02:45:24,360
in plain language, and it's lying. And doesn't this illustrate, by the

1664
02:45:24,399 --> 02:45:30,120
way, that evidentialism isn't true.
I mean, here's the evidence, hawk

1665
02:45:30,120 --> 02:45:35,159
com everybody isn't clearly interpreting the clear
meaning of the passage. Right. It

1666
02:45:35,559 --> 02:45:41,719
also gives credence to like the Western
heresy of gradualism, right, And I

1667
02:45:41,799 --> 02:45:48,000
mean it's pretty powerful because I'm suspecting
maybe here in a year it will probably

1668
02:45:48,079 --> 02:45:52,760
be full blown homosexual marriage. Now
that's my schizo theory. But I mean

1669
02:45:52,799 --> 02:45:56,120
they did the same thing for quote
communion in the hand, they did the

1670
02:45:56,200 --> 02:46:01,200
same thing for quote older women,
Well, we have altered girls, which

1671
02:46:01,280 --> 02:46:05,000
is the preparation for female deacons.
Deacon Essa's right, yeah, and that's

1672
02:46:05,040 --> 02:46:09,879
the preparation for female priests. I
also saw your show on predictive programming on

1673
02:46:09,920 --> 02:46:15,200
avoiding Babylon, and this is,
in my opinion, like the predictive programming

1674
02:46:15,360 --> 02:46:20,200
of the Roman see I mean,
if that makes sense. Yeah, I

1675
02:46:20,280 --> 02:46:24,920
think they throw ideas out to test
the waters and see how far they can

1676
02:46:24,000 --> 02:46:28,639
go. And actually, actually Tim
did an entire stream on incrementalism and he's

1677
02:46:28,680 --> 02:46:31,840
totally nail. He's absolutely spot on. Yeah, absolutely, And if there's

1678
02:46:31,840 --> 02:46:39,319
any Catholics here who I mean are
still coping that Catholic who whoever that was,

1679
02:46:39,680 --> 02:46:43,840
who completely dismantled the you know,
the the grammar theory. I mean,

1680
02:46:43,920 --> 02:46:48,719
he did such a good job on
proving that the document reads in plain

1681
02:46:48,760 --> 02:46:54,760
English, and you know, the
verbiage used is very clear. Yeah,

1682
02:46:54,799 --> 02:46:58,639
it's Tim Gordon, who's the buddy
of ours, who is basically, along

1683
02:46:58,680 --> 02:47:03,520
with a waiting Babylon, about the
only Roman Catholics that we can still interact

1684
02:47:03,639 --> 02:47:07,879
with of it. We haven't completely
run off or whatever. So I you

1685
02:47:07,920 --> 02:47:11,079
know, I appreciate them, and
I like, on a personal level Tim

1686
02:47:11,159 --> 02:47:13,040
quite a bit. He's really cool. Yeah, we fung out in person.

1687
02:47:15,360 --> 02:47:18,319
But there's the full video if you
guys want to watch Tim's full discussion

1688
02:47:18,479 --> 02:47:24,399
of the the incrementalism that the guy's
talking about. So any other points I

1689
02:47:24,440 --> 02:47:28,680
appreciate that. Yeah, no,
no, no, none other God bless

1690
02:47:28,719 --> 02:47:33,920
me man. Good, thank you
you as well. Bones. What's up,

1691
02:47:35,000 --> 02:47:46,159
Bones? I'm you hey, Jay, thanks for having me on,

1692
02:47:46,559 --> 02:47:54,399
Sir. I just I kind of
debased the Roman Catholics online rather frequently,

1693
02:47:54,479 --> 02:47:58,760
actually, and one of their biggest
arguments against the Orthodox Church is that it's

1694
02:47:58,799 --> 02:48:05,120
autocephalus, and they're trying to make
autocephally akin to Protestantism. They're trying to

1695
02:48:05,159 --> 02:48:07,879
be like, oh, you're basically
well, that's awesome, because that's the

1696
02:48:07,959 --> 02:48:11,719
great one of the greatest owns that
you could ever have, because they don't

1697
02:48:11,719 --> 02:48:18,319
even know that autocephalosy comes out of
the Council of Ephesus. Really, oh

1698
02:48:18,440 --> 02:48:24,600
yeah, So that's how dumb they
are. They think that that would then

1699
02:48:24,760 --> 02:48:28,479
mean that the Council of ephicis taught
Protestanism, so that's a great So they're

1700
02:48:28,559 --> 02:48:33,000
just owning themselves, right, yeah, yeah, I always thought that was

1701
02:48:33,120 --> 02:48:37,600
ridiculous that and I also tried to
use your argument that I watched in your

1702
02:48:37,840 --> 02:48:43,719
debate with Nick Flint, is about
the Old Testament Church is being a decentralized

1703
02:48:43,920 --> 02:48:48,319
unit and kind of what Christ wanted
in the church going forward, and they

1704
02:48:48,440 --> 02:48:50,680
just they think that that's ridiculous and
they're like, oh, well there was

1705
02:48:50,799 --> 02:48:54,639
kings in the Old Testament. I'm
like, what what does that have to

1706
02:48:54,680 --> 02:48:58,360
do with the I don't know.
Yeah, well, they just think everything's

1707
02:48:58,360 --> 02:49:01,680
fulfilled in the pope because the religion
basically is the religion of the pope.

1708
02:49:01,799 --> 02:49:07,719
So, as you can go read
about Council of Ephesus, autocephalasy autocephaly of

1709
02:49:07,840 --> 02:49:15,440
the Church of Cyprus was granted at
the third Ecamenical Council of Ephesus. The

1710
02:49:15,559 --> 02:49:22,440
Jerusalem Church was declared a patriarchate and
autocephalus at quintessext and this is also accepted

1711
02:49:22,479 --> 02:49:26,280
in the canons of the six Ecmenical
So two Econmical councils recognized autocephalus churches.

1712
02:49:28,000 --> 02:49:31,479
And they don't even know that.
They're completely ignorant they because they just think

1713
02:49:31,520 --> 02:49:35,120
everything is about the pope. So
yeah, classic, that's a classic m

1714
02:49:35,639 --> 02:49:39,520
thank you m Jason to be the
last one that we got to go.

1715
02:49:50,200 --> 02:49:54,600
Yes, sir, all right.
I just wanted to ask, so,

1716
02:49:54,840 --> 02:49:58,879
Okay, have you read that new
or maybe it's something of the article of

1717
02:50:00,040 --> 02:50:05,799
of what the bartholowing me, the
hecy medical patriarch has been saying about Constantinople.

1718
02:50:07,280 --> 02:50:11,479
No, but I'm guessing that he
says something about the concept of being

1719
02:50:11,559 --> 02:50:28,079
like a pope. Hello, are
you there? Well, I guess he's

1720
02:50:28,239 --> 02:50:41,120
gone beardy. What's up beardy?
Last one gotta gotta un mute beardy.

1721
02:50:43,600 --> 02:50:48,879
Yeah, thanks for bringing us on. Appreciate it, Jay. I wanted

1722
02:50:48,879 --> 02:50:52,479
to bring up what Michael Knowles was
saying. So he just agrees with you.

1723
02:50:54,399 --> 02:51:03,319
He says that the the so called
blessing is is outside of the we'll

1724
02:51:03,360 --> 02:51:11,680
say this spiritual inner circle of the
church, outside of the spiritual inner circle.

1725
02:51:11,799 --> 02:51:15,799
Okay, So he didn't use those
words. I'm sorry, I'm paraphrasing.

1726
02:51:16,280 --> 02:51:18,840
I don't actually remember exactly what he
said, but I don't know if

1727
02:51:18,840 --> 02:51:22,760
you watched his little borb on it. No, I don't keep up with

1728
02:51:22,840 --> 02:51:26,239
these people. I did ask him
to debate, though, and it was

1729
02:51:26,280 --> 02:51:35,239
all of course ignored. Yeah,
so I mean he's basically saying that the

1730
02:51:35,440 --> 02:51:43,319
so called blessing is for people that
are not professing Christians, you know,

1731
02:51:43,479 --> 02:51:48,079
that aren't part of the Catholic Church. Total baloney. I think so too,

1732
02:51:48,760 --> 02:51:52,799
total one, because the same blessing
was asked for people in the church

1733
02:51:54,360 --> 02:51:58,719
in the twenty twenty one document very
clearly, and Michael often even pointed out

1734
02:51:58,760 --> 02:52:03,719
that the same question asked and by
the German bishops who are trying to do

1735
02:52:05,280 --> 02:52:07,520
blessings of people in the church.
Of course, I mean this is just

1736
02:52:07,639 --> 02:52:13,520
sophistry that they use because these people
are salesman. So yeah, I mean

1737
02:52:13,440 --> 02:52:20,559
that's that's I will give them a
point for the creative attempts here to act

1738
02:52:20,719 --> 02:52:24,040
like to act like these are people
called outside the church. Give me a

1739
02:52:24,079 --> 02:52:31,680
freaking break. Everybody knows that this
is about blessings from the bishops and the

1740
02:52:31,799 --> 02:52:39,879
priests towards people who will come to
how many non Catholic. First of all,

1741
02:52:39,959 --> 02:52:45,799
it doesn't make any sense anyway that
the priests can bless people outside of

1742
02:52:45,840 --> 02:52:48,799
the church. As a same sex
couple, that doesn't even make any sense.

1743
02:52:48,280 --> 02:52:52,120
Secondly, it's not for people outside
the church, because this is not

1744
02:52:52,239 --> 02:52:58,319
some giant scandal where millions of gay
couples are rushing to roam to Novasorto priests

1745
02:52:58,600 --> 02:53:01,159
to get blessed outside of the church. Church. Everyone knows this is an

1746
02:53:01,159 --> 02:53:07,120
attempt to bring in skittled marriage.
It's clear as that, well, what

1747
02:53:07,239 --> 02:53:13,719
it is is grooming. It's prepping
for the next stage, because it's incrementalism.

1748
02:53:13,559 --> 02:53:20,360
So I mean, that's just that's
just another example of sophistry. But

1749
02:53:20,799 --> 02:53:26,840
thank you for that last one.
We don't really have time for anymore BMX

1750
02:53:26,959 --> 02:53:31,719
since twenty bucks, Thank you so
much, BMX. Catholic becoming Orthodox.

1751
02:53:31,799 --> 02:53:35,319
There we go. That's a nice
name. One dollar. Robertson Jenas says

1752
02:53:35,319 --> 02:53:39,719
that the Church fathers agreed about a
geocentric universe and that if you deny at

1753
02:53:39,799 --> 02:53:45,479
least to a foundation of atheism,
does Orthodoxy generally believe in this. I

1754
02:53:45,520 --> 02:53:48,959
don't think there is any general Orthodox
statement on this. I think that you're

1755
02:53:48,040 --> 02:53:52,959
free to believe either of these positions. And I don't have any problems saying,

1756
02:53:52,000 --> 02:53:56,239
you know, I'm sure there are
good arguments for geocentrism. Sat Herman

1757
02:53:56,280 --> 02:54:00,520
of Alaska ten dollars jay I was
baptized and receiving in the church a Nativity.

1758
02:54:01,959 --> 02:54:03,920
Thank you. You helped bring me
out of atheism and you led me

1759
02:54:03,959 --> 02:54:07,479
into the church. So thanks,
thank you. Glad to hear that Chase

1760
02:54:07,520 --> 02:54:13,520
Haggard three dollars. He waited each
piece of evidence in the analysis. Oh,

1761
02:54:13,600 --> 02:54:20,920
he's a Chase's talking about the Bayesian
quick books. So it was an

1762
02:54:20,040 --> 02:54:26,639
arbitrary spreadsheet waited on his presuppositions,
classical foundationalist moment exactly, Fumpel three dollars.

1763
02:54:28,520 --> 02:54:35,879
Honestly, imagine Michael Lofton defending the
election of a child pope. Of

1764
02:54:35,959 --> 02:54:39,879
course he would right, So if
the Roman College voted and accepted the Joffrey

1765
02:54:39,920 --> 02:54:43,280
as pope, they would have to
go with it. Fumple three dollars.

1766
02:54:45,000 --> 02:54:50,600
Is there a Bayesian argument for orthodoxy? No, but good question, Punky

1767
02:54:50,719 --> 02:54:56,159
Dennis five dollars. Jay Catholics are
always droning on about it only counts off

1768
02:54:56,159 --> 02:55:00,120
its ex cathedral. Vatican One teacher
that they have to submit to things an

1769
02:55:00,120 --> 02:55:03,319
outside of excothed exactly, it's called
ordinary magisterium. So where do this ExCathedra

1770
02:55:03,440 --> 02:55:07,040
come from? Well, I mean
there is a doctrine that the pope has

1771
02:55:07,120 --> 02:55:11,719
the ability to pronounce doctrines ex Cathedra
if he chooses to. So that's sort

1772
02:55:11,760 --> 02:55:16,239
of like this thing he has as
like his backup right, but that's for

1773
02:55:16,559 --> 02:55:24,520
supposedly extreme or extraordinary circumstances. Who
even knows when that is. But you

1774
02:55:24,639 --> 02:55:30,639
see it's clear. It's it's never
laid out as to what the exact instances

1775
02:55:30,680 --> 02:55:33,440
are, and it's I believe it's
left vague on purpose, because if you

1776
02:55:33,520 --> 02:55:37,479
leave it vague on purpose, this
allows the papacy to have this ultimate kind

1777
02:55:37,479 --> 02:55:43,239
of bait and switched thing to where
it can always be interchangeably dogmatic or not

1778
02:55:43,399 --> 02:55:50,000
dogmatic as the situation calls for.
So if they need to say something retroactively,

1779
02:55:50,280 --> 02:55:54,159
oh well that wasn't a dogmatic definition, does it appears to contradict?

1780
02:55:54,360 --> 02:55:58,280
Oh well, then you see it
wasn't dogmatic. So it's dogmatic when it

1781
02:55:58,399 --> 02:56:01,159
needs to be, is what that
amounts to. So you're absolutely correct,

1782
02:56:01,520 --> 02:56:05,360
doctor Badges at one dollar. The
Pope consulted the church fathers, and TD

1783
02:56:05,520 --> 02:56:09,719
Jakes and P Diddy agree with his
decree as long as Alexander Soros is officiating

1784
02:56:09,760 --> 02:56:16,399
the blessings. Another creative attempt to
maybe give an account of what's going on,

1785
02:56:16,600 --> 02:56:20,440
Thank you so much, doctor badgetself, Frankie E ten dollars. So

1786
02:56:20,799 --> 02:56:24,079
we can all then just go to
mosque's bower a head and say that secretly

1787
02:56:24,120 --> 02:56:28,760
we're praying to Jesus and not Allah. And if this is the case,

1788
02:56:28,799 --> 02:56:31,479
then how come all the early Christians
didn't do this when they were being martyred?

1789
02:56:31,520 --> 02:56:33,520
Exactly. Yeah, they could have
just said, oh, I'm just

1790
02:56:33,639 --> 02:56:39,079
praying secretly to Jesus, not to
Zeus sort of the Roman emperor. Yeah,

1791
02:56:39,120 --> 02:56:43,399
we would have never had any martyrs
exactly, because everybody knows that this

1792
02:56:43,559 --> 02:56:46,239
is maloney. Gary twenty five dollars, think it's much gre Ricky five dollars.

1793
02:56:46,280 --> 02:56:48,639
Pope slayers will go all the way
until they eventually have to defend the

1794
02:56:48,639 --> 02:56:52,959
blessings of the Skittle's marriage. Yeah, and then it'll go on into I

1795
02:56:52,040 --> 02:56:56,639
mean, the floodgates have been opened. Pandora's box is open. And the

1796
02:56:56,920 --> 02:57:01,680
area where I disagree with Tim is
that thinks that some conservative band of cardinals

1797
02:57:03,040 --> 02:57:07,559
will be able to like come together
maybe and like stop Francis, I don't

1798
02:57:07,559 --> 02:57:15,360
think so, Siggy five dollars Catholic. Uh is that Muslim youth marriage?

1799
02:57:15,360 --> 02:57:18,719
I guess? Uh? When will
that happen. Well, who knows.

1800
02:57:18,760 --> 02:57:22,440
I guess the floodgates have been open, right, tag Hua three dollars.

1801
02:57:22,159 --> 02:57:28,479
There's no definitive definitive teach Excuse me
if there's no definitive list of infallible teachings.

1802
02:57:28,559 --> 02:57:31,319
This is illuminating. Creating a document
would be too strong of a claim,

1803
02:57:33,120 --> 02:57:37,639
just like some sort of new Biblical
revelation. It's better to just have

1804
02:57:37,760 --> 02:57:39,600
a vague do it yourself, and
fallibility exactly as the point I was just

1805
02:57:39,639 --> 02:57:46,639
making exactly. Thus, Roman Catholics
would lack Roman cause also then lacks the

1806
02:57:46,799 --> 02:57:50,360
courage of its own convictions. Sometimes
I'm very bad at reading super chats,

1807
02:57:50,360 --> 02:57:54,479
and I kind of miss stuff.
And somebody got mad the other day because

1808
02:57:54,479 --> 02:57:56,840
I thought I was skipping their super
chat. Sometimes I skip them because there's

1809
02:57:56,879 --> 02:58:00,959
just a small window of what I
can see. So if a bunch of

1810
02:58:01,040 --> 02:58:03,079
them commit at once and you scroll
a little bit, it scrolls past a

1811
02:58:03,159 --> 02:58:07,719
bunch of them, And if somebody
walks in, or if I get distracted,

1812
02:58:07,879 --> 02:58:11,280
I might miss a super chat,
or I might miss half of it

1813
02:58:11,399 --> 02:58:13,440
if it's a long one or something
like. It's not I'm not doing it

1814
02:58:13,520 --> 02:58:18,440
on purpose. Sometimes I'm in a
hurry sometimes I get distracted, So any

1815
02:58:18,520 --> 02:58:20,799
people that I missed your super jazz, forgive me. I'm not doing it

1816
02:58:20,879 --> 02:58:26,879
on purpose. Remember, you can
subscribe and go to the shop at the

1817
02:58:26,879 --> 02:58:31,000
website get the books at Jason Elsion
dot com. We have in my Big

1818
02:58:31,120 --> 02:58:37,040
Red Book there's actually about three hundred
pages critiquing Rome Catholicism, so that's not

1819
02:58:37,479 --> 02:58:39,840
I mean the book six hundred pages, but about two or three hundred of

1820
02:58:39,879 --> 02:58:43,879
its critiquing Rome, about two hundred
of it critiquing Protestant stuff, and then

1821
02:58:43,959 --> 02:58:46,680
geopolitical philosophical essays in the Red Book. You can get that in the shop

1822
02:58:46,719 --> 02:58:54,239
at Jasonelsis dot com, as well
as all my other books, and be

1823
02:58:54,319 --> 02:58:58,040
sure and subscribe to Jamie as well. Heading over to Rockfinn all of our

1824
02:58:58,079 --> 02:59:01,319
great buddies and friends over at rockfinn
dot com. Also, Tristan and I

1825
02:59:01,440 --> 02:59:05,520
will be streaming this week. We've
chosen an amusing little ditty known as Stepford

1826
02:59:05,600 --> 02:59:13,319
Wives. We thought that would be
a fun feminist film which oddly has a

1827
02:59:13,360 --> 02:59:16,719
bunch of m K ultra stuff and
it you think you're watching some kind of

1828
02:59:16,760 --> 02:59:20,079
conspiracy m culture thing, and then
it turns into this like total feminist propaganda

1829
02:59:20,120 --> 02:59:26,600
thing. So we will be deconstructing
Stepford Wives, the original movie. I

1830
02:59:26,600 --> 02:59:30,799
don't know if we're gonna do the
stupid remake one with Ferris Buehler, but

1831
02:59:31,639 --> 02:59:37,079
there is the an Ai Pope might
actually do better than Francis. People are

1832
02:59:37,120 --> 02:59:39,360
dissing an Ai. I think we
make it. Actually, I should have

1833
02:59:39,440 --> 02:59:46,639
an Ai Pope anyway. Subscribe to
me over on Rock fin as well as

1834
02:59:46,760 --> 02:59:50,559
all of our buddies and friends over
there, and look for the upcoming stream

1835
02:59:50,600 --> 02:59:50,000
this week with
