1
00:00:00,320 --> 00:00:04,200
Let's talk a bit about your tweets, um, because it comes up a

2
00:00:04,200 --> 00:00:09,039
lot um even today, it came
up in you know, anticipation of this.

3
00:00:09,119 --> 00:00:12,480
I mean, um, you know, you do some tweets that seem

4
00:00:12,560 --> 00:00:17,600
to be or at least give support
to some who would call others conspiracy theories.

5
00:00:19,120 --> 00:00:25,640
Well yes, but I mean honestly, you know some of these conspiracy

6
00:00:25,719 --> 00:00:31,239
theories, uh have turned out to
be true? Which ones were? Like

7
00:00:31,320 --> 00:00:36,439
the hunter Biden laptop that's true?
Yeah? Yeah? So uh you know

8
00:00:36,679 --> 00:00:40,799
that that that that was a pretty
big deal. There was Twitter and and

9
00:00:40,799 --> 00:00:44,479
and and others engaged in active suppression
of information that was relevant to the public.

10
00:00:45,000 --> 00:00:47,280
Um. That's that's a that's a
terrible thing that happened. That's like

11
00:00:47,399 --> 00:00:51,359
your interference. But how do you
make a choice you don't see, I

12
00:00:51,439 --> 00:00:54,280
mean in terms of when you're going
to engage. I mean, for example,

13
00:00:54,320 --> 00:00:58,320
even today, elon you you you
tweeted this thing about George Soros.

14
00:00:59,600 --> 00:01:02,439
Well looking for because I want to
make sure I quote it properly, but

15
00:01:02,520 --> 00:01:06,200
I mean, you know what you
wrote, but you basically this is like,

16
00:01:06,280 --> 00:01:08,280
you know, calm down, people, this is not out of it.

17
00:01:08,680 --> 00:01:12,920
As you said, he wants to
rode the very fabric of civilization and

18
00:01:12,959 --> 00:01:17,519
source hates humanity. Like when you
do something like that, Yeah, I

19
00:01:17,560 --> 00:01:19,319
think that's true. That's my opinion, Okay, but why share it?

20
00:01:19,719 --> 00:01:25,519
Why share it especially? I mean
why share it when people who buy teslas

21
00:01:25,519 --> 00:01:29,040
may not agree with you, advertisers
are on Twitter may not agree with you.

22
00:01:29,840 --> 00:01:32,400
Um, why not just say hey, I think this. You can

23
00:01:32,400 --> 00:01:34,680
tell me, we can talk about
it over there, you can tell your

24
00:01:34,719 --> 00:01:40,560
friends, But why share it widely? I mean, this is freedom of

25
00:01:40,560 --> 00:01:42,200
speech. I'm allowed to say whatever
you absolutely are, But I'm trying to

26
00:01:42,239 --> 00:01:46,120
understand why you do, because you
have to know it's got a there.

27
00:01:46,400 --> 00:01:49,480
It puts you in a in the
middle of a partisan divide in the country.

28
00:01:49,560 --> 00:01:53,599
It makes you a lightning rod for
criticism. I mean, do you

29
00:01:53,680 --> 00:01:57,760
like that. You know people today
saying he's an anti Semite. I don't

30
00:01:57,799 --> 00:02:00,200
think you are. No, I'm
definitely. I'm like, I'm like a

31
00:02:00,280 --> 00:02:05,239
process might if anything, I believe
that probably is the case. Why would

32
00:02:05,239 --> 00:02:08,759
you even introduce the idea of it
that that would be the case. I

33
00:02:08,759 --> 00:02:12,439
mean, it looks we don't want
to make this a George Stars interview.

34
00:02:12,560 --> 00:02:14,240
No, God, no, I
don't. I don't want to at all.

35
00:02:14,280 --> 00:02:15,919
But I'm what I'm trying even came
up there in the annual meeting.

36
00:02:15,919 --> 00:02:20,680
I mean, you know, do
your tweets hurt the company? Are there

37
00:02:20,680 --> 00:02:23,560
test loaners to say I don't agree
with his political position because and I know

38
00:02:23,639 --> 00:02:27,919
it because he shares so much of
it? Or are there advertisers on Twitter

39
00:02:27,919 --> 00:02:30,360
that Linda Yak Greena will come and
say you gotta stop man, Or you

40
00:02:30,400 --> 00:02:34,520
know, I can't get these ads
because of some of the things you tweet.

41
00:02:46,560 --> 00:02:54,080
You know, I'm reminded of as
a see it in the Princess Bride,

42
00:02:55,240 --> 00:03:00,840
great movie, Great Um, where
he confronts the person who killed his

43
00:03:00,879 --> 00:03:15,560
father. He says, offer me
money, offer me power. I don't

44
00:03:15,599 --> 00:03:23,439
care. So you just don't care. You want to share what you have

45
00:03:23,520 --> 00:03:27,000
to say, I'll say I don't
want to say. And if, if,

46
00:03:27,039 --> 00:03:30,800
if the consequence of that is losing
money, so be it. Okay.

47
00:03:34,120 --> 00:03:38,319
But I mean when you when you
when you link to somebody who's talking

48
00:03:38,360 --> 00:03:44,240
about the guy who killed children in
a mall in Allen, Texas, you

49
00:03:44,360 --> 00:03:46,680
say something like it might be a
bad siop. I'm not quite sure what

50
00:03:46,759 --> 00:04:00,840
you meant, but oh, in
that particular case, there was a somehow

51
00:04:00,120 --> 00:04:05,199
that's that's not not not that the
that the obviously people people were killed,

52
00:04:05,199 --> 00:04:11,439
but the it was I think incorrectly
ascribed to be a white supremacist action.

53
00:04:12,400 --> 00:04:17,399
Um. And the evidence for that
was some obscure Russian website that no one's

54
00:04:17,399 --> 00:04:24,720
ever heard of that had no followers. Um. And the the company that

55
00:04:24,720 --> 00:04:29,120
that found this is belling Cat,
Right, you know what bellect does psy

56
00:04:29,199 --> 00:04:32,839
ops. Right. I couldn't really
even follow exactly what it was you were

57
00:04:32,920 --> 00:04:35,959
trying to express there, So that's
part why I was curious. But I'm

58
00:04:35,959 --> 00:04:41,079
saying that I thought that the ascribing
a too white supremacy was bullshit, okay,

59
00:04:41,480 --> 00:04:46,399
and and uh and and and that
the information for that came from an

60
00:04:46,439 --> 00:04:50,319
obscure Russian website and was somehow magically
found by baling Cat, which is a

61
00:04:50,319 --> 00:04:56,040
company that does psy ops. And
there's no proof, by the way,

62
00:04:56,079 --> 00:04:59,800
that he was not. There's no
I would say that there's no proof that

63
00:04:59,839 --> 00:05:03,879
he And that's a debate you want
to get into on Twitter. Yes,

64
00:05:05,160 --> 00:05:09,519
because we should not be ascribing things
to watch supremacy if there if it's false