Attention. You're listening to the Todd hf Radio show, America's home for conservative
not bitter talk radio. Be advised. The content of this program has been
documented to prevent and even cure liberalism, and listening may cause you to lean
to the right. Here's your conservative but not bitter host, Todd Hoff.
Well, here's a headline that should make your day better. Democrat admits what
the worst case scenario would be leading up to twenty twenty four. And let
me just spoil the story. Here, spoil the peace. We are on
path for the worst case scenario for the Democrat Party, which of course means
what is best for this country? Three, Because, my friends, the
Democrat Party is burning this place to the ground in every conceivable way. Welcome
to the program. By the way, I am your host, Todd Huff
email should you want to be part of the conversation, Todd at Todd Huff
show dot com. Can also text three one seven two one zero twenty eight
thirty three one seven two one zero two eight three zero. This is town
Hall Katie Pavlets and kind of setting the stage for where we are heading into
twenty twenty four. Now keep that on pause for just a brief moment because
all of these things, you know, with everything going on, it's a
little challenging right now to talk about things in sort of a linear way.
They intersect with each other, these issues and things that are happening, and
it happens every election cycle. But my friends, there is so much.
There is so much going on out there, from the UAW strike and how
that impacts economic problems. Were already dealing with how that is impacted by government
regulations on certain types of vehicles, electric vehicles in particular, the type of
economy that this nation has. That's its own thing, but it intersects with
issues that we're talking about, issues that are relevant for the presidential election,
for our election of Congress, members of senators. We've got the House holding
its first Biden impeachment inquiry next Thursday, so a week from today, September
twenty eight, that will be when the first Biden impeachment inquiry hearing is held.
We're talking about subpoena ing financial banking records from Hunter Biden and Joe's brother,
I believe, I think I read that as well today. So there's
all this stuff going on. There is what's happening with Trump, what's happening
with his indictments and all of this. Of course we're on a collision course.
Puts us on a collision course for twenty twenty four, which is where
this article or the information here that Katie Pavlich is is talking about here comes
into play. So she writes the polling for Joe Biden's reelection chances against former
President Donald Trump and almost every other candidate running for the GOP comment nomination continues
to get worse by the week. Now, this is interactive polls. This
is a tweet that they sent out. When was this sent out a couple
of days ago? I think yes, September, So about a week ago.
Suffolk University saw your Business School and USA Today. That's who put this
poll together. Do you feel the economy is improving? Twenty percent of American
city economy is improving. Seventy percent seven zero say that it is getting worse.
Now I find myself wondering where are these twenty percent? I mean,
is this the twenty percent that only gets their opinions on their own life from
the media. Are these folks who see improvement to mean the destruction of a
free market so that they can replace it with a socialistic or worse type of
market. Is that? What is that what they're after? Is that what
they mean by improving? Are these people that work in the government, Are
these members of Antifa? Are these people in the administration? I don't know,
But twenty percent say it is improved improving, and seventy percent live in
the real world and know that it is getting worse. I guess ten percent
either didn't I didn't have it here, but ten percent either didn't know or
thought it was staying the same. Who do you trust more? The next
question to improve the economy? Now this is interesting. This is where it
really gets interesting. Forty seven percent say Trump, thirty six percent say Biden
again. Now, how in the world, How in the world. I
don't care. If you just let's say you hate Trump. Let's say you
think Trump tried to overthrow the country our democracy in January of twenty one.
Let's say that you just think that he deserves prison. I still don't understand.
I still don't understand. If asked the question who do you trust more
to run to improve the economy your answer being Biden, I mean your answer
should be anything else. Your answer could be a leaf Blower. I mean,
at this particular point in time, for thirty six percent of Americans to
say that Biden is more trustworthy to improve the economy. He has he and
his ideas, his policy, his policies, his view of what the government's
relation to the economy and the market should be. They have those things have
directly one hundred percent caused this one hundred percent inflation. I've said it countless
times on this program. Inflation is not simply that the simple answer for the
individuals who are either too lazy or they just don't know it passes the test
for them to hear, inflation simply means the increase, the increase in the
cost of things that they buy. And that's not one hundred percent true.
Now what's true, of course, is inflation does increase the costs or the
prices of things that they're buying because there's a specific reason for that, and
it's because the government. The government overproduced the amount of money and the money
supply. That is the key factor, because there's a myriad of reasons why
prices can go up. And also, inflation hits across the board uniformly,
meaning meaning it it hits everywhere. It doesn't just hit a particular sector.
It doesn't just hit gas prices. Right when Biden comes out and blames you
know, if you blame inflation simply for the gas prices we have, you're
missing the larger point as to why they are what they are. It's not
just because the currency has been made worthless, not completely worth shit, but
worth less than it should be to where you have to use more of it
to buy the things that you normally buy. That's inflation. It's also that
there are taxes built in, massive taxes. I've been through this before.
In fact, I had an individual that I have known since I was in
high school, and he was going off on big oil. And I'm not
a defender of big oil, by the way. I'm a defender of truth,
and I think we have to understand truth. That's what's important. There
is blame to be assigned in multiple places. But we can't just uniformly wag
our finger at big oil and say you're the problem, because that's not true.
The biggest culprits, the biggest problem when it comes to our economy,
make no mistake about it, is the government. It is the government,
my friends. Does big business have some responsibility. Absolutely does in the case
of UAW going on strike, do they bear some responsibility as it pertains to
the auto industry right now? You bet you. All those things are true.
And just like the automakers, I mean, but the government, you
trace this back. I don't want to get into I'm going to stay on
this article here from Katie Pavlich. But you trace back what happened with the
United Auto Workers when the federal government basically came in and remember this back in
two thousand was it two thousand and nine or so, when they bailed out
bailed out the Big Three, Right, that's when all of this stuff.
You can trace so much of this to that point in time. And on
top of that, you can also point out some of the problems, like
government regulating the efficiency of vehicles, government regulating the production of electric vehicles,
there's no infrastructure. Look, I don't care. I have family members,
I know people that have electric vehicles. If you want to buy one,
that's great, that's your prerogative. What I don't want is for you or
anyone else to be forced to have to do this, especially especially when force
government. By the way, it's synonymous with force, when government forces you
to do anything. When government forces you to do anything, what they're also
doing is creating kind of a ripple effect across the economy. So it's not
just that they're forcing you to buy an electric vehicle. They're also forcing the
hand of let's say, building the infrastructure for charging electric vehicles. We have
no I mean we have a tiny bit. But if there were no gas
vehicles on the road today, no diesel powered vehicles on the road today,
we would not You couldn't get anywhere. You would have to stay within wherever
your car could take you on a charge because you wouldn't be able to charge
the thing, or there would have to be some other invention. The market
would have to come in and save the government from the mess that it has
created. One the problem in the economy is the government. So then the
basic question is which one of these people Trump or Biden, Which one of
these people is in favor of their being more government, Because the person who
thinks there should be more government in managing and controlling the economy is by definition
the person who's the problem. And it doesn't matter about any of these other
things that are happening. That does matter for the larger interest of the country,
your liberty or freedom. But just when it comes to this question,
who do you trust more to improve the economy, Trump or Biden? One
should be able to look at this and understand that the problem comes from the
person who wants the government to do the most. And you look at what
Trump did with the economy. He cut taxes, he cut regulation, He
tried to open up more exploration and drilling. He tried to make those processes
easier. Those are all good things. They're not magic call bullets, because
that basically just eliminates obstacles for the market and allows then the market to go
fix itself, to go do what it has to do. So but what's
also interesting here is when they asked independence. When they asked independence, whether
they believe Trump or Biden was more trustworthy to improve the economy. Forty six
percent said Trump, twenty six percent said Biden. That's plus twenty for Trump
with independence on the handling of the economy. That's a big deal. There
also was a two twenty four presidential election poll conducted by CBS News and My
Friends. Trump is up. Trump is at fifty percent. That's also interesting,
fifty forty nine. You know, normally at this stage in the process.
Normally, at this stage in the process, we're still a ways out.
We don't even know for certain that this is gonna be who's going to
be on the ticket. Unless something crazy happens, then this is going to
be who's on the ticket. But we don't know for certain. We haven't
not a single ballot has been cast in the primary. But it is a
safe bet still because Trump is trouncing the competition. He's not even competing with
the kind of thing about that he's not even competing. They're having a debate.
He says, go do your thing, it doesn't matter. I'm walloping
all of you. I'm going to go speak, he says during the debate
with UAW members, which, by the way, I saw an article today
that says that the head of the UAW is very upset that Trump is going
to be speaking to union members, which is exactly what I think Republicans should
do. There are a lot of people in the Union who either vote voted
for Trump, will vote for Trump. They see the problem that Biden has
created, they see the problems. Look, they see the problems that their
union has created as well. Anyway, but you got this poll, Trump's
up fifty forty nine, and amongst the independents, he's up fifty seven to
forty two. So you start looking at these things, you look at what's
coming here in the next well next week, I mentioned off the top the
beginning of the Biden impeachment inquiry. That's going to begin. Trump's going to
be getting back in front of more people. We talked about this yesterday.
The more he is able to talk about things and more people hear him,
the more he moves the needle. I shared earlier in the week, back
in earlier this summer, or maybe even later later than that, back into
the spring or late last year, the number of Republicans who believed that the
Biden election was legitimate, well, let's say illegitimate. People in the Republican
Party who said I don't believe that Biden won a legitimate election in twenty twenty
was in the low sixties right back in the springtime. It's now up to
sixty nine percent, So it increased. People have more doubts about the election
results now than they did six months ago or whatever a year ago. And
whatever you think about that, don't get stuck on that at the moment I'm
just saying, Trump's out there talking about it. The needle has moved right,
The needle has moved in Trump's favor. The people more Republicans are agreeing
with Trump. I'm saying, forget about the issue, take the emotion out
of it for just a moment, and say that is how. That is
the other thing that's going to happen during this campaign. He's going to go
out there and he's going to move more people. He's not, folks,
his starting point was going to be his low point, you know. I
mean, after think about it, what he's gone through with impeachments and Russian
collusion, nonsense in Ukraine and the perfect call in January sixth, and in
indictment one, two, three, four, whatever indictment we're up to now
though he's the negatives are baked in. Trump only has one way to go
from here. I can't even imagine the only other play, the only other
thing that they can do that could they hope hurt Trump as if they somehow
get a conviction before the election, which is unlikely just because of the timelines
of how court cases work. But again, I don't put it past them
to ram this thing through simply for that purpose. They'll probably set a trial
date for October thirty one of twenty twenty four or some such thing, or
you know what I mean. This is how they do it. Put it
right in the heart of the election season, the general election, right before
it, when they were hiding Hunter Biden's laptop last year or last election,
I should say, twenty twenty. That's the same time that they might want
to see Trump and cameras in the Trump courtroom, him testifying. They can
get him in handcuffs or an orange jumpsuit. They would love that. But
that's the only play they really have left. It is, and it's a
big one, and would it persuade people maybe, But it's also I think
going to infuriate people that still, for whatever reason, are not ready to
vote simply seeing what they've already seen, which is crazy to me. There's
gonna be people that are still gonna say, I'm going to vote for Trump
because what is happening in this country, what is happening to this president,
absolutely should not be happening. And so it's a worst case scenario for the
Democrat Party. So that's what Katie Pavlich article is talking about. And that's
what these other pieces of the puzzle. This is not a good situation for
the Democrat Party and that should bring us hope. Not because I personally want
the Democrat Party to fail. I want anything to fail that is in the
best interests of liberty in this country and for the American people. And right
now, my friends, and for some time, the Democrat Party has not
been on the side of liberty. The Democrat Party has not been on the
side of the American people the constitution. It is full of radical leftist hatred
and venom, and that has to be stopped at all costs. It's not
personal to me, but that Democrat Party must not have political power or else,
my friends, we are even in for even worse problems beyond twenty twenty
four. Quick time out long in this segment. My friends are listening here
to conservative not better talk. I am your host, Tod Hugh. Back
in just a minute. I'll come back, my friends. So I mentioned
a little bit about this you aw strike, excuse me, you aw strike.
The Big Three President of the union UAW United Auto Workers Union is Sean
Fayne. He released a statement recently in the past couple of days about Trump
speaking to the union members. And remember when the debate, the next debate
happens, Trump is going to be speaking with union members that night instead of
on the debate stage with the other Republican quote unquote candidates. So this is
what that statement read, in part. Every fiber of our union, I'm
looking here by the way at hotair dot com. Every fiber of our union
is being poured into fighting the billionaire class and an economy that enriches people like
Donald Trump at the expense of workers. We can't keep electing millionaires and billionaires
that don't have any understanding of what it is like to live paycheck to paycheck.
He then added that about Trump that those who struggle to get by and
expecting them to solve the problems of the working class. So a couple of
things about this number one. Number one, it's a you know, I'm
I am. I've shared before that I'm my dad. My dad was a
member of United Auto Workers Local nine thirty three, actually when I was younger.
He's since retired. I'm not a guy that's just at anti union in
general. I mean I think that hey, that's between the company and its
workers. I am not a fan of unions amongst the federal workforce, because
I'll tell you why that the reason I'm not in favor of unions in the
federal workforce is that they're effectively unizing against the taxpayer. And pause that for
a moment. And this is this coincides with what I'm saying here. So
you may have heard people like the Santas Ramaswamy, Trump's said stuff about this
reducing the size of the federal bureaucracy, right, because over the past several
years, it's obvious, it's obvious to any person interested in seeing things objectively
and seeing things for the way that they are, that there's massive problems within
the bureaucratic state. The unelected professionals who are who are basically in positions to
make decisions, in positions to either support the president. They should be supporting
the president that's in office no matter what, because that's their job, because
that's part these jobs are in the executive branch. And there's reason to believe
there's evidence that there that that didn't happen when Trump was president. And why
didn't it happen, Well, because they didn't like his policies or some of
those policies may impact the federal the federal workforce. And so Biden is actually
trying to do something now that was in the stack of stuff earlier this week.
I might put it in today's stack of stuff too, since I'm mentioning
it. But Biden is trying to make it harder for Trump or whoever de
Santis or Ramaswami or whoever eventually becomes commander in chief, chief executive in this
in this country. And maybe this is multiple of these individuals in a row,
because again I think it's clearly going to be Trump or the Democrat in
twenty twenty four anyway. So, but the idea is that they're going to
try to make it harder to come in and get rid of the workforce.
And it has to do with technical stuff about how they're classifying the types of
jobs and how hard it is to get rid of folks. And part of
that is the federal union process and how they protect people, how they protect
people that sometimes just simply need to be fired. I mean, that's there's
no two ways about it. Look, I'm not I understand people looking for
protection of their jobs. I don't. I don't have a problem with that.
I have a problem when we're defending people and making it impossible to hire
people that are in some cases trying to thwart the intention of the President of
the United States when they're in the executive branch. And even if they just
need to be eliminated, maybe maybe they're their wages are way out of control,
They're benefits are astronomically expensive. Those things, by the way, their
retirements, those things are unfunded liabilities. When we talk about thirty three trillion
in debt, we're not even talking about some of the federal expenses we have
in these categories. There's no doubt whatsoever that the federal workforce needs to be
reduced. And Ramaswami and Trump and the Santis are absolutely correct for saying these
things, up to and including even the complete eliminations of departments, departments of
education or whatever else IRS has been floated out there as well, which I
mean, again, I'm fine. I'm fine with these things. I absolutely
am. Anyway, So, federal unionization is something I'm one hundred percent against.
If you want to have a union between a company and its employees,
I mean, I suppose that's between them. So but at the same time,
at the same time, I'm not okay with some of this what's being
said, because what's being said here is creating a false narrative, right,
creating a false narrative here, and it's creating it's creating the fight between the
wrong types of people. So when mister Fayne writes how the fight is against
billionaires and the working class, I would suggest, and look, I'm not
saying that there's not problems with either of those groups or either of those individuals
within those groups. But what I am saying is the first battle we have
to fight, and we have to fight it together, is Americans against their
government. That is the first and most important fight because why are people struggling
financially? It's inflation? Why is their inflation? We've been through that.
Why do we have thirty three trillion dollars of debt? Why are we giving
Ukraine bazillions of dollars every time the sun rises? Why are we? And
I know there's a lot that goes into these discussions. That's a whole nother
that's a whole other rabbit hole to go down, But but the question is
why, ultimately, why are we spending money at the rate we're spending it
and creating massive problems for both groups of people. You're taxing people who have
more, more resort, more income or whatever. You're taxing those people,
taking more of theirs. And for those who don't have as high incomes,
you're making it harder on them by interfering in the economy, adding to inflation,
making it harder to pay the bills, making it harder to survive.
And then you're pitting them against each other. This has to stop. And
that's not a defensive billionaires or anything like that, because, by the way,
they're not bad people by virtue of being billionaires. And that's and some
people have a problem with me saying that, well, they have too much
money, they could write a check and solve the world's problems. If only
it were that easy, my friends. It's most of the world's problems are
not due to money. Most of the world's problems are due candidly to two
things, to governments and to people making really atrocious choices that in some cases
impact a lot of people, or sometimes impact it's just my personal choices impact
us personally. The idea that some billionaires you have less because some billionaire has
it is just not the way that a free economy works, the pie grows,
the pie grows. The government needs to get out of the way.
Let it happen. Quit pitting side, picking sides, and quit pitting people
against each other. My goodness, my friends, quick time out back in
just a minute. Welcome back, my friends. You know that we are
in expansion mode. In fact, we're looking. We're looking now. I
hope to here in the next a few weeks have some new stations to tell
you that we'll be adding to the to the lineup around the country. I
can't do it yet. This is all new for me, by the way,
this whole process of joining the network at Audio one and so forth,
and just you know, getting ramped up and all that sort of thing.
But anyhow, you know that as we do this that I have needed some
help. I've needed some help in one of those areas I've gotten you,
and I think Todd needs a lot of help. And you know what,
you wouldn't be wrong. The area that I have gotten a ton of help
in that's been much need is in the area of our ad sales. I
used to do early on. I used to tell you that I used to
talk. I used to know personally every advertiser I still know many of them,
but as we've grown, it's become, you know, impossible to do.
But some folks literally have been with us, like Economy, heating,
air conditioning, and plumbing. I've been with us for eight seven years,
starting about to start their eighth year. It's just crazy to me how fast
time goes and just the loyalty that these folks have, and it's just been
a wonderful experience. But that responsibility I've had to pass off to other folks.
And we've passed off building the sales team and ad sales to a group
called Sales Arbiter. It's my friend Crispin Cruise. Don't tell him I said
that he gets we get a big head over these things. Crispin, if
you're listening, I guess I'm busted. But Crispin and his team help us
a lot. They are able to help come in if you have a company,
if you're an entrepreneur, if you maybe you have a role at a
larger company and you know that your business to business or even business to consumer
sales are down and you just need someone to help coach and navigate and help
people to learn the sales process and all of that Crispin and his team at
Sales Arbiter have been incredibly helpful. They help build highly profitable teams by teaching
your salespeople the best tools of the trade. They help improve sales production,
they shorten sales cycles. Very very helpful to have on board. If you're
interested in or have that need, I encourage you to reach out sales arbiter
dot com or Google Crispin Crews. Check him out, reach out, be
sure to tell them that you heard about him here on the Titup Show.
So right, I look at the clock here. Let me think about this.
I need to take a break. I don't want to start something and
cut it off too short. So we're gonna take a break here. As
we're continuing to this conversation into some of these comments made by the UAW president
as it pertained as it pertains to just well overall the election. He's not
happy. He's not happy that Trump's going to be speaking to union members,
which says a lot, right, I mean it says a lot. I
wonder how upset this union president is with Biden president bribery. He seems like
he, I mean, didn't bad hasn't bad mouth that at all. That
I've seen, but he doesn't want Trump speaking to the members. That's it's
crazy if you stop and think about it, especially when you understand what we
laid out last segment, which is the problem that we have in this country.
Economically starts and I would say ends with ends with government, and it
starts and ends with those who think they can control it. It doesn't mean
that there's no bad capitalists, because obviously there are. There's bad individuals in
every group. But when you give these jokers and clowns too much money and
they start trying to manipulate situations, the market pick winners and losers. In
the case of where the Hunter Biden laptop may take us takes us to actually
all out corruption and pay to play scandals allegedly, possibly, you can see
full blown problems happening in massive, massive ways. So I'm gonna take a
break. There's another thing in the news that I want to get to as
well, time permitting. Here an election that a Democratic candidate has said has
been stolen from him. I want to talk about that time permitting as well,
because I've been told that elections are perfectly secure and that nothing there's not
even a single ballot that's cast, that is fraudulent. It's the safest thing
in the history of the world. Remember when they were saying, by the
way election this is the safest, most secure election ever. What does that
even mean? Were the others not secure? It just it's just stupid,
stupid words that come out of these fool's mouths. Anyway, timeouts in order
come back after the break and hit those two things back in just a minute.
You know, I really want to talk about this election thing, but
let me just say this. In closing about these Union the UAW President's remarks,
he says, we can't keep electing millionaires and billionaires that don't have any
understanding of what it is like to live paycheck to paycheck and struggle to get
by and expecting them to solve the problems of the working class. I get
it. Look, I understand, and there's nothing wrong with wanting to elect
people who can relate, obviously to what you are experiencing. However, however,
it focus focuses us on the wrong thing. It focuses us instead of
on the problem that is coming out of Washington, DC, out of our
state houses, out of our city government, government's county government, all of
it. It focuses us instead of those things. It pits us against each
other. It creates a series a type of class warfare, and I just
vehemently disagree with us. We are Americans. We are Americans first. I
would be much more concerned if I was a member of a union, not
with the next worth of the president. I would be much more concerned about
a president that was creating policies that was harming my family, that was making
my pay worth less, that was potentially potentially selling this country down the river
so that his son could allegedly get wealthy off of these lucrative business deals.
That to me would be much more concerning. And I think that the vast
majority of Americans agree with that, agree with that as well. So shifting
gears here. I know that there's a lot more to say about the union,
the deal that they've refused and twenty one percent paid pay increase and a
four day work week and all that. I just don't want to get into
that at the moment, because I want to put this on your radar.
I want to put this on your radar. If you have not seen this
yet, this is again. I'll put this in the stack of stuff.
The Federalist dot com Democrat produces video alleging Bridgeport mayor stole election by stuffing ballot
boxes. Again, this is at the federalist dot com Mark Hemingway. Democrats
and media keep insisting that absentee ballots and mail in voting don't contribute to voter
fraud, but a mayoral election in Connecticut could blow a big hole in that
dubious claim. So, according to the Brookings Institution, there's no evidence that
mail ballots increase electoral fraud. That is a quote from the Brookings Institute.
USA Today purports to quote fact check the false claim that mail in ballots,
mail in voting is connecting to bad act connected to bad actors fraudulent ballots.
The Brennan Center for Justice informs US extensive research reveals that fraud is very rare.
While it's important not to make claims about it, the existence of voter
fraud you can't prove. What's also true is that nearly all of the analyzes
dismissing concerns about voter fraud and mail in ballots rest on a logical fallacy.
Now listen to this. This is this is putting it very very concisely,
and this is exactly right. Again, this is Mark Hemingway at the Federalist.
So this is the logical fallacy that people who are trying to dismiss claims
of actual voter fraud election fraud. This is the fallacy they're making. And
this is how he puts it. The absence of evidence is evidence of absence.
Let me say that again. He's saying they are making this logical fallacy
believing that the absence of evidence equates to or is equal to the evidence of
absence. So, in other words, that just because you cannot you don't
have a video of everything that's happening, it doesn't mean that there that there
is evidence that this was the most secure election on history in the history of
the world, right, the most secure, safest election ever, which is
preposterous, by the way. And so here we go. And then when
you combine that with the fact that we're not allowed to look at these things,
the problem becomes much much bigger. Anyway, that's gonna be on the
stack of Stuff page on the website at todtufshow dot com. I think it's
worth a read if you can find your way over there. But I'm gonna
take a break with my friends. You're listening to conservative not better talk.
I'm your host, Todd Huff back in just a minute. Welcome back,
my friends. Unfortunately, all the time that we have today, I know,
I know, I know, it is gotta be a rough. It's
rough for me to turn this mic off. I love what we do so
very much, but never fear you can all. Please go to the website
and hear archives of episodes of this program Toadhoffshow dot com. You can also
sign up for our free, absolutely free email column, which goes out every
Wednesday. Just go to the homepage, enter your email address and you'll start
getting those as well. My friends, the music is telling me it's time
to wrap up. Thank you so much for listening. Have a great day. SDG.