Attention. You're listening to the Todd Huff radio show, America's home for conservative
not Bitter talk radio. Be advised. The content of this program has been
documented to prevents and even cure liberalism, and listening may cause you to lean
to the right. Here's your Conservative but not Bitter host, Todd Hoff books.
Do you remember a couple of years ago when Trump It was actually right
after Trump was elected. I've referenced this in recent days, weeks, months.
This may have come up over the course of time many times in our
conversations about what's happening in well, American culture, American politics, American worldview,
and so forth. But as I'm queuing this up Chuck Schumer, he
was on with Rachel mad Out, and I think, you know, I've
thought, I've actually considered playing this SoundBite almost daily, even daily, because
I think if you have this in mind as you interpret the day's events,
it explains a heck of a lot. Actually, you could make the case
that it explains everything. And this is when, Chuck Schumer, Now you
got to remember what the at the moment, what the kind of the narrative
was, where we were as a country. This was right before right during
I don't know Trump's actual inauguration. Remember Trump never had a honeymoon. When
he was elected president to this great nation. There was no honeymoon, as
is normally the case. Usually you get about ninety one hundred days or so
of just getting acclimated, getting the questions about what's your favorite ice cream?
Now they still ask Biden that because of course he's a leftist. Well,
I don't know. Biden's an opportunist. I think I don't know that he's
a principal leftists. He's whatever's good for him and his party's agenda. Potentially,
allegedly, if you follow the money here, you could say certainly the
case that you could make the argument that what's good for his pocketbook or his
family's pocketbook. Anyway, the point is is that the time that we were
in when this SoundBite took place, was we were trying or they were trying
to really discredit Trump. Trump had positioned themselves as this businessman with sense and
just you know, doing the obvious things. And so Chuck Schumer comes on
to Rachel Maddow. And remember this was in the wake of Russian collusion and
all the very beginning of it. Russian collusion, and so he had to
set the expectation, or I guess established the counterpoint that says, if Trump
was really that smart, if Trump was really that insightful, if Trump really
had common sense, he would know. And this is the point that the
intelligence community, as Chuck Schumer says, has six ways to Sunday for getting
back at you. That's what he said to Rachel Maddow. And so here
we are fast forwarded into two twenty three, six and a half years roughly
later, and now we're looking at the fulfillment of that. I would you
could say a type of prophecy in the sense now it's a self fulfilling prophecy.
It's not like there's some divine intervention on behalf of these scoundrels. What
there is is there is an intentionality behind the scenes. It was a telling
of what was to come. They were telling us what was going to be
going on behind the curtain. And many Americans, I guess at the time
it just sounded to them, to the left, to the folks who are
the low information voter or whatever, this sounded like a criticism of Trump's intelligence.
Why would you mess with the intelligence agency? Why would you why would
you cross them, Why would you do anything to upset them, because they
could get back at you. They could just think about it. Chuck Schumer
was admitting on television, admittedly not a station that many people watch, thankfully,
Rachel Maddow MSNBC, but enough people watch it, enough people watch it
to be concerned learning. But this is he was admitting that intelligence agencies could
get back at the president of the United States. Why would we ever even
accept that as a reasonable thing. I don't want the intelligence agencies getting back
at Joe Biden. I don't want the intelligence agencies being used to get back
at Barack Obama or Bill Clinton or Hillary Clinton or anyone for that matter.
Now, I do want justice to be served as someone is guilty of crimes,
legitimate crimes, if they're not the subject of political witch hunts and so
forth. That's look I mean to me, this is obvious. This is
just common sense, although I wonder how common it is anymore when I listen,
Actually I got a sound bite. I don't I probably won't have time
to get to it today, but it is in the stack of stuff.
It's a doctor's it's a where'd I get this off? Of social media,
but it was from libs of TikTok and it was a basically a social media
clip where a young lady gets on you know, her camera, post to
social media something about only women can have babies, which to anyone with the
brain, that's true to anyone who follows the science, that's true to anyone
who cares about truth and reality and objectivity, who lives in as Rush used
to say, Realville, then these things are not offensive to you. But
we now have doctors or someone who's purporting to be a doctor responding upset and
saying not all people who have babies or women. So I wonder, you
know, my dad had a term over educated idiots. And look, I'm
not against education. If it's legitimate education, it's a good thing. It's
legitimate education. If it's the seeking of truth and understanding things as they are
trying to make sense of the universe or master your career path, or you
know, just follow it where it actually leads in reality, that's a great
thing. And it doesn't have to take, by the way, the form
of formal education. It can help, sometimes it can hinder in the case
of these over educated idiots, and that's the term my Dad had to describe
these people who have been through so much schooling, so much of the wrong
type of schooling. Let me say it that way, so much of the
wrong type of formal schooling, that the ability to think for themselves and use
sense and logic and reason had been beaten out of them and replaced by mumbo
jumbo, replaced by complete stupidity. Reminds me of a line from the movie
JFK. I was a big fan of that movie back when I was in
what junior hire whenever it came out, and maybe high school, and the
Kevin Costner, who was the main character of the movie, said, theoretical
physics can prove that if we tie the tail of an elephant to a daisy,
it can hang off the side of a cliff. But we've got something
different. We've got common sense, and we know that's not how that works.
I think he was referencing the magic bullets which paused in the air and
went through multiple victims and made ninety three turns and all that sort of stuff.
Anyway, I don't know that I can get to that, but it's
in the stack of stuff. But so what I what I say to you
when Chuck Schumer is admitting on live television this was years ago, that the
CIA or the whoever whoever's in the intelligence agent the community. I don't even
know that we know everybody in the intelligence community, you know, CIA,
DNI. Do we throw FBI in there? I mean, just what are
all these these agencies and why are they going after the president? Why are
they going after anybody? Why is that something that we accept If Chuck Schumer,
who was a high ranking senator at the time, and of course now
is the majority majority leader in the sentence, I think he was the back
in those days, I think he was the minority leader because I think the
dinner the Republicans were in control. But the point is, why is he
bragging? Why is he saying this and almost using it as in a threatening
way to say to Trump, Hey, you're not as smart as you think
you are, because these intelligence agencies are gonna come and take you out.
Man. Why why are we bragging about this in the era in the era
of when the JFK, A lot of what we you know, there's been
some some more information released from that, uh you know, government rees or
whatever, papers and information and so forth, but not all of it's been
been released. Why in lin of those times, in lined of what happened
in the nineteen sixties, nineteen sixty three, the assassination of Kennedy and all
the stuff that we're learning about corruption at the highest levels of government, things
were before our eyes. Why are we bragging about this? Why are we
using it as a way to say, you're so stupid you don't even know
how they can get back at you. Why are we accepting that? I
know you're not, but why is that okay to say it on TV?
Why would Rachel Maddow say whoa, whoa? Whoa? Or why wouldn't she
say why is an agency that's supposed to be under supposed to be under the
authority, control, purview of the President of the United States? Why is
that organization allowed to go after the president? Does that seem right to you?
Does that seem just to you? Meanwhile, these jokers and clowns want
to tell us and I got another sound bite. I do hope to get
to this one. Got another SoundBite that shows some MSNBC lunatic saying that Trump
wanting to cut the bureaucratic state to reduce the size of government is the textbook
definition of fascism. So to be clear, they're okay with the government that
has an intelligence community that can go after the sitting president of the United States,
and of course if they can do that, they can go after any
citizen, any person in the United States. So they're cool with that.
But if you try to cut the bureaucratic state, you're considered a fascist.
Tell me you know nothing about fascism. Without telling me you know nothing about
fascism. Thank you MSNBC for doing this. So all that being said,
what do I want to do here today? I want to play this sound
by it from Chuck Schumer. I want to play this just to remind you
that this explains this was said I think seven six and a half a years
ago. I guess this is what he said, and this is what is
coming to fruition now, intelligence community, just insert maybe deep state, bureaucratic
state, the swamp. That's what this that's what's coming to fruition here.
Chuck Schumer was actually in a way prophetic, not pathetic. He is often
pathetic, but he was also prophetic in this instance. Here's what he has
to say. Listen carefully because this will explain so much of what we're experiencing
now and what we will experience in the days, weeks, months, and
years to come. He's taking these shots, this antagonist, and it's taunting
to the intelligence. To you, in a day, you take on the
intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you.
So even for a practical, supposedly hard nosed businessman, he's being really dumb
to do this. What do you think the intelligence community would do if they
were mad? I don't know, but I from what I am told,
they are very upset with how he has treated them and talked about them.
Oh where where they're very upset? They're feelings are hurt. Oh so it's
okay now, Rachel Maddow, who's supposed to be this arbiter of truth.
Sorry, I can't even stay with this ray face, an arbiter of truth,
someone who wants you to believe she can explain the way that you know
things are working in the country, ways that the things should work in this
country, instead of saying whoa, whoa, whoa. Senator Schumer, why
would we ever be okay with the FBI or the intelligence community or any of
these organizations going after people, including the current president of the President elect of
the United States. Why is that? Okay? She's like, wells.
Instead of that, her response was, well, how would they How are
they going to go after him if they were motivated to do so? What
would that look like? Tell me more? You know what it looks like,
Rachel Maddow. It looks precisely like what we're dealing with today. Indictment
number three, which we talked about in great detail yesterday. It looks like
Trump Russian collusion, delusion. It looks like impeachment one. It looks like
impeachment two. It looks like January sixth. It looks like again indictment one,
Indictment two, and now soon to be Indictment number three. Folks,
we are in the midst of a cold civil war. You had best or
no many of you have. I hope everybody listening to my voice realizes just
how serious this is. These are you know, when history looks back at
this and well, assuming the leftists don't get to write the history books,
so the woke people that are actually rooted in reality and have concern for ration,
a rationale and logic, when they hopefully write the history books, they
will point to these events. They will point to these events as history making
events. What are we doing about it today? Are we just idly on
cruise or do we realize this how intense and serious things are that's going on
anyway time out. I know most of you are well aware of this,
but the alarm bell should be sounding. Rush used to say, I will
tell you when it's time to pining. And it's not time to penic,
but it is well passed time to be sitting on cruise control. Things are
personally comfortable, and life is easy and so forth. It's it's sometimes that
prevents us from maybe doing or engaging in the things that we should do.
Being aware it can lull us to sleep, it can lead to apathy,
it can lead to just a comfort level that's such that you know that's not
today's problem, but it is today's problem. This is two day's problem,
one hundred percent. It is being waged right before our very eyes. And
the reality is, even though many people don't still believe this, this is
within. This is absolutely within the power of the American people to do something
about The question is are we going to have enough manpower and woman power for
that matter. I just mean that in general terms like supposed to use that
word, the woke tells me. But will we have enough people pushing in
the right direction against this insanity, against this corruption, against this evil.
I've got to take a break, my friend, Sit tight. You're listening
to conservative not better talk. I am your host, the one, the
only Tod Huff back in a minute. All right, my friends, welcome
back. I did not I normally do this at the beginning of the program,
but if you want to be a part of today's conversation, I welcome
you to do that. You can email Todd at Todd huff Show dot com.
Look, we're growing. I know we've got new listeners and just we're
looking at even expanding hopefully in the near future. You're into some some other
markets, and that's m we continue to get new People's the point. So
it's huffed, by the way, with FS the letter f HU Frank Frank.
That's how you spell that. I occasionally see Google searches that end up
on our page. H O U g H. I like to tell people
we spell it the right way. HU. I'm kidding, of course.
So tap show dot com is the email, or you can text us three
one seven two one zero twenty eight thirty. I'll say that again slower three
one seven two one zero two eight three zero messaging data rates may apply.
So I mentioned here in the last segments that the left, of course,
they are okay with the FB think about this. They're okay, They're okay
with the FBI being used to target the president of the United States or the
sitting president of the United States. Totally cool with that, not concerned whatsoever.
Instead of asking why is that okay, Rachel Maddow says, well,
what are they going to do? How can the FBI be used to stop
Trump? That's really what she wants to know. Man, what can they
do? Can they take this guy out as president? Tell me more,
Senator Schumer, tell me tell me more. Can they put him in jail?
Can they you know, can they create an audio file that sounds like
his voice or a video, a deep fake and convince people that Trump is
mentally unstable? Can they do that? Tell me more. I'm open to
anything whatever it takes to stop this guy, Senator Schumer, I'm okay with.
And the whole time, we're supposed to believe that these jokers and clowns
care about democracy, care about the integrity of this country, its elections,
the will of the people. They care about their agenda. Any normal person,
when Chuck Schumer would have said that stupid thing that the intelligence agency can
get back at you as president of the United States, any normal person would
said, beat beat back it up, dude. Why in the world are
we having a discussion about this. This is not something that is even remotely
acceptable in a free society. This is not the way our government's supposed to
work. This is a totalitarian state. What is going on? Who's running
the show? You know that there's so many things that should have been said
to this besides tell me more, Tell me more, Senator Schumer, tell
me more. Bs So I can come back on here the next several months
and give my viewers, Rachel Maddow would say, give my viewers a false
sense of hope that some of these things are going to happen, that the
CIA is going to come and do a night raid like the Osama bin Laden
raid on the White House or something. What on earth is going on here?
Anyway? So but I mentioned in addition to that, I said,
they're okay with that. They the radical left, they're totally cool with the
president being targeted by the CIA, the intelligence community, whatever. But in
addition to that, so that's on the one end of the spectrum. On
the other end of the spectrum, they want to tell you. They want
to tell you that Trump's the fascist. They want to tell you that Trump's
the one that's trying to abuse his power and authority. They want to tell
you that Trump's the one that's trying to subvert elections, that's trying to overthrow
our democracy. And again, we have a constitutional republic, certainly with this
concept of self governance, but we are in no way shape man or reform
a pure democracy. We need to stop saying that, actually it's a constitutional
republic. And the reason that matters I hit on this recently, but I
want to repeat it. The reason that matters is because the constitutional republic protects
the rights of the one, of the individual. You want to care about
protecting the rights of the minority, then you should absolutely be a constitutional You
know, someone who's in favor of a constitutional republic, because what that says
is it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter if the majority say that you can't
say something. It doesn't matter if the majority says that you can't keep and
bear arms. It doesn't matter if the majority says you don't have the right
to worship as you choose or to live your life according to your conscience.
It doesn't matter what the majority says. That's why the constitutional republic is built
to say, we respect the right of the one, and the majority cannot
impact those things. They cannot. Pure democracy, on the other hand,
does not have that safeguard anyway. So these jokers and clowns at MSNBC.
I didn't intend for this to be a show about MSNBC, though. It
turning into that. There's a guy there. It's name's Eugene Robinson. I
found this clip, you know what. I think this came from bos Nerdley's
daily email, but I'm not. I can't swear to that. If this
is a tweet from Tom Elliott, you might have to Tom s Elliott is
his Twitter handle. And so this is a SoundBite of somebody at MSNBC explaining
something He clearly doesn't know what he's talking about. But he's explaining on MSNBC
to people that have no idea who are watching this, what fascism is.
And so again Rachel Maddow cool with the FBI being used to take Trump out
totally fine intelligence community, whatever it takes. She just wants to know how.
She doesn't want to know why we're allowing this same network. Eugene Robinson
now wants to tell us what fascism really is, and according to him,
I just I can't even believe this. These are the people that think that
they're smarter than you. These are the people who think they are worthy of
making decisions to run your life. These are people who think they are superior
and the rest of us Hayseed Hicks in fly Over Country like I am,
like many of you are in any town, USA. As Cosmo Kramer would
say, they want to tell you that Trump cutting, this guy, Eugene
Robinson wants to tell you that Trump cutting the size of the bureaucratic state is
actually textbook fascism. What in the world is this joker talking about. Here's
the club that gathered around Donald Trump and that will enable this move toward fascism.
I mean, this is textbook fascism, and it's outrageous. It's incredibly
dangerous, not just to our system of democracy and our democratic values. It's
just it's just dangerous because he's talking about wanting to essentially fire the people in
the federal bureaucracy who who know how to run things, who makes the country
work, who keep our air clean and our water safe, and who who
keep up safe in the intelligence agencies and in the Defense Department and everywhere he
sees somebody who who doesn't tell the line, who doesn't go along with every
crazy anti democratic idea he has, he wants the ability to fire that person
and replace him or her with a lackey. Um, that's what he wants.
That's what he intends. We should believe him when he says says it
and this is a great danger to the country that we know the country.
I cut that off. I don't even know that. I just wanted to
hear that part. But he says a couple of things that I want to
talk about that just lit my fire a little bit. I'm gonna have to
do it on the other side of the break though. He says that the
government, oh, the bureaucratic state, the bureaucrats, they're the ones that
make this country work. Oh, my friends, he's got it completely backward.
And look, I if I'm talking to someone who is a person who's
doing your job in government, I'm not criticizing that, but I want to
point something out on the other side of this break, the way that this
country is set up to work, the reason there are federal jobs, state
jobs, local government jobs. There's such a massive misunderstanding, a massive misunderstanding.
And I don't know, this is so stupid what he said. I
don't know if he just doesn't know. I don't know if these programmed to
say the talking points in sequential order and just you know, pieces those together.
And it sounds like it means something to the radical left, the mindless
people who don't think for themselves and aren't critical. I don't know if it
means something to them. But none of that meant anything of substance. It
meant zero. It was talking point stitched to talking point, stitched to talking
point. And if you drill even a millimeter deep beneath the surface of these
superficial, stupid and idiotic talking points, there's nothing there. There's nothing to
this. This is asinine, is what this is. And it's considered in
liberal circles and journalistic circles run by leftists to be profound thinking and analysis.
Give me a break. I gotta take a break. You're listening here to
conservative not bitter talk. I am your host, Todd Huff, the home
of sanity. By the way, back into the minute, Welcome back,
my friends. OZ is trying to carry on a conversation about something totally unrelated.
I don't know what she thinks as going on in my head, but
I can't. I am the world's worst. I'm telling you, I am
the world's worst multitasker. If there's what's the population of the planet, is
it eight billion? If there are eight billion people, I think I am
eight billion in terms of multitasking. OZ knows this too. Anyway, Welcome
back. So the before the break or last segment, I should say,
we were talking, well, we played this stupid SoundBite from MSNBC, which
that's redundant to say stupid SoundBite and then to say MSNBC, of course it's
stupid. Of course it's stupid coming from MSNBC. It's it's it's lunacy over
there. It's absolute lunacy. It'd be great entertainments if they were not representative
or the things that they say on that station did not translate into the way
that some of these Democratic congress people, senators, presidents think so it's it's
actually dangerous, but it's it's still comical to think how ridiculous this is.
Look, folks, you can have we can have different opinions, but we
can't. We just can't have different universes of reality. And they live in
a totally different universe, or they've better stated, more correctly stated, they
have convinced themselves or they've convinced the people that are in their audience that they
live in a different universe because it is not reality at all. What they
are talking about has no basis, no bearing in reality at all. It's
dangerous stuff. To say that Trump firing people in the bureaucratic state is an
act of overt textbook fascism is insane. It's absolutely ridiculous to say that,
so the founders were fascists by wanting a limited government. Is that what this
clown saying. I just I cannot It makes no sense. It doesn't stand
up to any scrutiny at all. It's not what fascism is. He also
said bureaucrats and people in the government are the ones who make this country work.
That's demonstrably false and that is not meant. Please, I don't want
to be misunderstood. I know I had people that work state jobs federal jobs.
That is not an insult on what you do. I'm saying the only
reason that there are there even is a government in this country is because there
was a prosperous private sector. The government takes money out of the private sector
by force, by the way, and then takes it to run what they're
supposed to be running. Of course, they add to that massively over time
to where we're doing things in the federal government, in our state governments,
and our local governments in many cases, and our schools in many cases that
are completely one hundred percent not what we were supposed to be doing. It's
not what these things were designed to do. So we just continue to pour
more and more money into it. We take more and more money out of
the private sector. Then we put people in positions of government, we pay
them more than the private counterparts, meaning if you're an accountant in the private
sector, you get paid less on average than if you're an accountant in the
federal government. Not to mention the federal benefits, folks, when you look
at the federal unfunded liabilities, that's not even included that part of the number
that's not even included in the number of our current federal debt. So we
say it's thirty one or thirty two trillion now or whatever it is. But
the truth is it's much more than that, because there are unfunded liabilities,
meaning there are retirement funds that don't you know, when people retire, they
are going to continue to get a paycheck that doesn't show up as debt.
But that is of a liability that the government has taken on. And I'm
not saying people shouldn't have retirement. I'm just saying the whole thing should be
scaled back. There shouldn't be as many people. Federal budgets should be much
less, Federal departments should be fewer. The role and scope of our federal
government should be massively cut. How in the world is cutting the bureaucrats,
eliminating jobs in bureaucracy, reducing departments, eliminating departments. How is that fascism?
What is this guy talking about? See, it doesn't have to make
sense to the people that don't need sense to make decisions. They just need
to hear a narrative. They don't question a narrative. They trust the MSNBC
logo or they trust Rachel Mattau, or they trust whatever this guy Eugene was
at Eugene Robinson. I think, whoever it is, it doesn't matter in
certain new name, in certain new face. It's just another leftist. They
just believe it. Why do they believe it because of the authority that they
you know. It's just like there's a there's a fallacy and logic called an
appeal to authority. An appeal to authority. So, for example, I
can say that, let's just take this issue of transgenderism. I can say,
well, someone is biologically male or female, which is a fact,
by the way. But you can have some doctor come along and some doctors
say, well, men can have babies, which is what I've referenced this
earlier too. It's in the stack of stuff. I'm probably not gonna play
it. Maybe I will. I looked at the clock. If I got
time, i will. But so someone will say, well, the doctor
knows. The doctor knows because she's a doctor, men can have babies.
Because that doctor said men can have babies. Forget what Forget what the laws
of nature are, forget what science can actually prove. I've got someone in
a white coat with a MD beside their name that says women, excuse me,
men can have babies, and suddenly that's supposed to matter because they're a
doctor. We'll forget about their position of authority for a moment. And this
is used, by the way, on any any number of levels. Like
you could say, in religious circles, you could say the church said,
and my pastor said. You could say, in business circles, the boss
said. Now, I mean to a certain degree. I mean like the
boss at a company can say this is how things are going to be run.
But a boss of the company that says that the sun isn't going to,
you know, rise tomorrow, you don't have to. He's he's either
right or wrong. And he's not just right because he's the boss. He's
gonna If he's saying it's not gonna rise, he's wrong. And I guess
the point is is that too many people just get sucked into that. I
don't care what MSNBC says. I don't care honestly what anybody says. I
care about whether they can articulate it and make it make sense, whether how
does that claim match up against truth and claiming that Trump is a textbook fascist
for wanting to reduce the size of government or get rid of bureaucrats in our
system that are candidly the problem, people that are abusing their power, they
are the problem. To call him a fascist is absolutely Maybe you don't have
to like it, but it's not fascism. What on earth is this guy
talking about? Because he's got a appearance on MSNBC or a show. I
don't know if he's I don't even know who the guy is. He's just
on MSNBC. I saw the stupid clip. I wanted to share it with
you. I read about it. But you know, the point is,
there is no reason just to believe someone because they say, listen to me,
I'm the authority figure. Same thing happened in COVID. Follow the science,
but don't ask us about the science. What about the science has been
established for many, many years. Why why should we be vaccinated against something
that we've already contracted and had at one point in time. Our body has
antibodies that they've created. They go back into the bone marrow over time,
they're not just actively floating around the bloodstream until they detect in the future that
virus in the bloodstream again. Then the body says, go get it,
antibodies anyway, But none of that matters because there's no context, there's no
room for debate, there's no room for discussion. People just listen to their
tribe. People listen to the authority figure at the moment, which for some
people, somehow, some way as MSNBC anyway, I gotta get a break.
Long in the segment sits out of my friends back in a minute.
Welcome back, my friends. By the way, this program is brought to
you in part by our good friends that I sell health. As we get
into the latter half of the year, and my friends, we are in
the latter half of the year. Now, it's crazy to think that,
but we're in the latter half of twenty twenty three. We're about to enter
into debate season. Who knows if Trump will be there, who knows if
Pence will qualify. Who knows what's going to happen next? How many more
Trump indictments, all of this sort of stuff on the radar screen. But
as we move toward the end of twenty twenty three, a lot of folks
consider the possibility of changing or amending or adding insurance and so forth. If
you're in the market for that. Encourage you to consider reaching out to Eric
Wilson of I Sell Health. I sell health dot com is the website for
more information. He helps folks all over the country. If your business in
particular, or the business you work at is looking to add coverage. UM
now might be the good a good time to to think about reaching out.
But I selehealth dot com. Eric Wilson, good friend of the program m
most states he can help I sihealth dot com. He's sure to tell him
you heard about him here on the Todd huff Show. So, like I
said earlier, I don't have the time to play another SoundBite that I wanted
to play. You can see it in the stack of stuff at Todd huff
Show dot com. What you'll want to do, I'll move it up towards
the top. I think I currently have it down low, but anyway we
will UM it's it's doctors a doctor. It says doctor attacks woman who says
only women can have babies. And I've referenced it twice. I just want
you to hear it, and it's it's crazy and some of the things the
American Medical Association is now saying is crazy is anti science. Especially as it
comes into relation with the LGBTQ, in particular the trans agenda. We are
losing truth, my friend. That's why it's so important that we proclaim it,
because the second we quit proclaiming at the liars and deceivers step in with
their version of well reality. But of course it's not that at all.
Time outs in order, though, I gotta take a break, so back,
sit tight, back in a minute. Welcome back, my friends.
Cut this way too short today, My apologies for that, but we live
in a messed up world. As I said at the end of last segment,
truth is something that we've learned, that's been revealed to us. It's
our job to proclaim that. The second we stop proclaiming it, someone's going
to step in and try to redefine it. And if people are not constant,
we don't have it all figured out. But the things we have figured
out, we better learn how to communicate and understand the importance of continuing to
communicate it. Otherwise we've got jokers and clowns want to step in with lies.
I've got to go SDGC tomorrow. Take care