This is Dan Caplis and welcome to today's online podcast edition of The Dan Caplis
Show. Please be sure to give us a five star rating if you'd be
so kind, and to subscribe, download and listen to the show every single
day on your favorite podcast platform. We've got an issue teed up right now
that goes to the heart of a lot of things. And you've got really
good, smart, well intentioned people on both sides of this issue. But
we've got to get straight on this thing in order to win these elections ahead
of us. So who's right and who's wrong? And what we're talking about
is is the call by some on the right and President Trump has suggested that
it may have to go this direction. I'll play that sound so you can
judge for yourself that hey, after this horrifically wrong and awful perversion of the
justice system that was utilized to wrongfully convict him, that that hey, his
suggestion, the way I read it, is that you know, there might
have to be politically motivated prosecutions of now in the context he's talking about he
was talking about the Hillary Clinton context. My opinion, she was clearly guilty
of multiple crimes should have been prosecuted, and his point was, Hey,
for the good of the nation, I did not prosecutor so we could be
more united. But bottom line is whether you think President Trump is suggesting,
well, we might have to go down that road or not. There are
certainly many on the right who are seeing, wait a second, we've got
to start hitting back. We've got to start doing what they're doing. I
disagree, but I want to get to a flurry of Texters who think I'm
dead wrong on this, and then let's have the discussion. I believe now
more than ever that I'm right on it, but let's have the conversation.
And I said, wouldn't it really be bad? You know, like,
as an example, Hillary with the hammering of her cell phones and all of
the things she did, But wouldn't it be terrible to grow the president's wife
and the former secretary of state think of it? The former secretary there,
butsident the president's wife into jail. Wouldn't that be a terrible thing? But
they want to do it, so you know, it's a terrible, terrible
path that they're leading us to, and it's very possible that it's going to
have to happen to them. But I personally thought, and I really did.
You know, I got a lot of credit from a lot of people,
and some people said it's very possible. It's going to have to happen
to them. The way I read that as the President's saying, Hey,
what they're doing to me, it's very possible we're going to have to do
that to them. All I'm saying is, mister President, please, you've
done so many things well, you did so many things great during your term.
This is your election to lose. Now, this wrongful conviction is only
going to help you win. Please leave this a clear choice for the American
people. You want a Banana Republic, you vote for the Democrats. You
want a fair and just America, you vote for Donald Trump. Please don't
muddy those waters. Listen, He's only human. He's only human. And
I understand, after everything that he's just been through, this this entire you
know, wrong folk conviction, that he may feel like he needs to lash
out. But all I'm saying is in terms of winning, and in terms
of how you should govern, and in terms of how you governed before.
There were so many great things about Trump's first term, and one of them
was he did not do what the left is doing it in many places locally
and nationally. He did not pervert the justice system to pursue political opponents.
He was above that. So please leave this a clear choice for the American
people, and let's not only get you elected to a second term. Let's
have that second term be as good as the first term for the good of
the country. Eight five to five for zero five eight two five five.
Before I go back to the phone lines, let me get to some of
the many textures that disagree with me, and this first one really captures it,
and I do want to take a second respond to it. Dan,
I get your point, but I honestly can not think of an example of
Republicans winning over the vote by quote being better. And I think you underestimate
how tired voters are with the we are better than that statement. We are
saying, grow a pair and make those crooks severely pay for the wrongdoing.
Kimberly, Kimberly, I understand that the visceral reaction the frustration. But if
you want to talk about growing a pair, let's talk about that. Let's
talk about what takes real strength. Let's talk about what takes real courage,
and the first in any of you seal, any special forces Gael or guy
can tell you this that the first sign of real strength is self control.
Throw smart punches, not wild punches. They self control takes probably more strength
than anything else, particularly when you're faced with all of this horrible behavior by
your opponent. But grow a pair. Yeah, let's be strong enough to
exercise self control, smart punches, not wild punches, and let's do the
things that will actually max the chance of defeating the other side and be best
for the country and be the right thing to do, and be the right
thing to do. Not to get all cosmic here or anything, but I
would guess most people in the audience have it as a fairly high priority to
go to heaven. So we are citizens of heaven first, right. We
don't want to be doing evil things to try to defeat our political opponent.
On top of that, the evil things are going to make it less likely
we win, and actually doing the evil things would really make our country a
lot worse instead of better. A fib to five for zero five A two
five five text d an five seven seven three nine. And I do not
doubt that Kimberly is very well intentioned. I also don't doubt that you probably
agree with her, Dan, Dan, Dan, how are you going to
take the high road when the road is demolished ahead of you? They are
cheating. You can't drive down that road. That's not there. No facts
history prove that premise wrong. I'll use a modest example before I go to
the phone lines. But forty years I've been a trial lawyer, hopefully forty
years more, and very often, not always, I'm faced in court with
people on the other side, who who are lying, people on the other
side, and you know, who are doing very bad things. I'm not
talking about the lawyers. I'm just talking about different situations. So I'm faced
with that, and time and time again we have one by just bringing the
truth. And it's not Dane Caplis beating them, it's the truth beating them.
And time and time again we win in court with the truth. And
then I'm just convinced through that experience. But everything else I've mentioned, But
then politically, you know, you look at it as well. I mean,
are you suggesting to me that Ronald Reagan won by taking the low road,
that Donald Trump won in sixteen by taking the law. I don't think
so. And I think there are lots of other examples out there. Let's
go up to beautiful Fort Collins, Colorado on maybe the nicest day in Colorado
history. Tom, you're on the Dan Kaplis Show. Welcome, Thanks Dan,
Thanks for taking my call. Sure where I disagree with you, I
think you're putting too much faith in the American people. I really do believe
that. And also, you know, one side is not following the constitution.
They're going to do whatever it can by whatever krup means to win.
And at the other side is following the constitution. Who do you think is
going to win? Well, first of all, it's up to the people's
Second, I'm not saying never prosecute anybody. What I'm saying is, do
not have politically motivated prosecutions. Do not do what they just did in New
York. Listen, Trump was not guilty of any crime that that was obviously
a politically motivated prosecution. Do you really believe we should do that to the
other side. Listen, if you've got somebody who happens to be a prominent
Democrat, obvious examples Hillary Clinton engaging what I consider to be obvious crimes,
prosecute the hell out of them, but don't go beyond either in motive or
in act. Don't go beyond what you would do under any other circumstance,
and then apply the law equally to Republicans. That's all I'm saying. I
agree with you that it shouldn't be politically motivated. The reality is any type
of you know, everything gets put into that, everything's going to be politicized
anyways. But also if you win elections, that's not going to change the
Attorney General of New York continuing the process. So I this goes a lot
deeper. And I can remember when Trump was being spied on, and i'd
have Democrats. I'd have to ask him if it's okay to listen to his
phone calls, read his emails, send in human spies, and the Democrats
would say it's fine. Yeah, And well, the point I'm trying to
get is people the voters don't know and respect the Constitution. We're just in
a post constitution society right now. And that's my position. Tom. Thank
you, and I've got to hit the break and thank you for that interesting
idea. I do respectfully disagree with you. I do think the left is
trying to get us to a post constitutional America. I don't believe they're there
yet. I believe there's still a chance to save the country. And to
your great point about states still, you know this horrifically abusive, perverted thing
we just saw in New York, You're right, you know you're still going
to have the ability of leftists on a state level to do that. I'm
not suggesting we just roll over and say scratch our belly. What I'm saying
is you got to win the White House, and you win the White House,
and then what you can do in a situation like that is you can
use the full appropriately, use the full force of the power you have,
hopefully you get Congress as well, to launch whatever investigations you can launch into
those state abuses of justice and abuses of the system for the purpose of getting
all the facts out there, and then apply whatever laws can be properly applied
to try to deter and then punish those who are violating the law to wrongfully
prosecute others, including on a state level. Here on the Dankplas Show,
and now back to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast, Attorney General, have you
listened to the audio recording I have not because there's no reason for me to
listen to it. In order to make the determinations that I had to make.
We had the Special Console described in detail his explanations for his solimination.
He yet total garbage, total good. Now, I'm not saying that he
listened to the tape. And I want to take a quick second on this.
It ties into our bigger topic, and that is, wait a second,
that the fact that DOJ now is preventing the release to the public of
this audio tape of the interview with Joe Biden during the investigation into, in
my opinion, his clearly criminal handling of very highly classified documents. It just
proves multiple things. First of all, it proves that the Special Council was
right when he concluded that essentially that Joe Biden lacks the mental capacity to charge
with these crimes because and I'm paraphrasing, the Special Council believes there'd be jury's
sympathy, etc. Otherwise they'd released the tapes. Remember after the Special Council
report came out, that the left and the leftist media was all screaming,
oh no, this is a big lie. Look at the transcript. Joe
Biden sounds like Einstein, but they won't release the tapes. And now we
learn those transcripts are cleaned up after the fact, so we know they won't
release the tapes because they prove what the Special Council said and Biden lacks the
mental competency to be president. But the push is going to continue. They've
claimed that this BS basis to not release the tapes because then there could be
deep fakes made of the tapes. There can be deep fakes made of anything.
Obviously, the tapes bury Biden. And for Garland to say that he
didn't listen to it because they didn't need to wait a second. It was
at the heart of the determination by the Special Council, and then Garland had
to decide what his reaction was going to be to the Special Council report.
His starting points should have been these tapes. So I believe him when he
says he didn't listen. You can bet the people around him did and said
you don't want to hear this. And so Garland's willful decision not to listen
to this key evidence is designed to protect Joe Biden. But please, as
we get back to the bigger topic and calls and texts. The next time
I talk about Joe Biden, Ryan, you have full permission to come in
here and just slap me as hard as you can or hit me with a
board or something, because we waste so much time talking about Joe Biden when
clearly Biden is not going to be the nominee. We need to be focused
on. Okay, who is their likely nominee? What does that mean for
Donald Trump and saving American election day? That's where we need to be focused.
And the business of this Hunter Biden trial right now. Listen, I
think it is so clear right now that that a conviction of Hunter Biden tremendously
benefits Joe Biden. And don't be at all surprised if this whole thing times
out so that Hunter Biden gets convicted. You know, Joe Biden can go
out there and hold himself out as that the paradigm of equal treatment under the
law, you know, and then he pardons as he's obviously going to pardons
Hunter Biden on this and the tax of asion charges September, and then Biden's
done is the nominee finishes the presidency in theory at least, and he's done
as the nominee. Is there any doubt that that's what's unfolding before our eyes?
And why do you think he didn't pardon them before the trial? Think
about that for a second. A conviction helps Joe Biden. Conviction of Hunter
Biden makes Joe Biden look good. Do you think Joe Biden is actually sitting
there pulling for an acquittal. It's his nightmare? All right. We're talking
about whether the GOP, now led by President Trump, should start doing two
Democrats what Democrats have been doing to President Trump, which has been heinous and
a horrific abuse of our system and threatens the very existence of America as we
know it. Many people say, yes, you should be doing the same
thing. I say no to that. Eight five five for zero five A
two to five to five the number. Let's start in Westminster. You're on
the Dan Kaplis Show. Welcome Tom go Dad. Completely off topic. I'm
on Spirit Bulevard. It just on my windshield washed by a nice Ouiji expert
from Venezuela. I think, Okay, did you give him anything? Actually
I didn't, but he was very gracious. Yeah. I didn't have to
get out of the car either. Yeah, yeah, it did did the
person look kind of ragged and scary or just look kind of nice and appropriate
and it's just trying to make a buck. I actually look pretty decent.
And you know what, as much as I criticize it when I see it
happening around me, you know, in this particular case, it's like,
Okay, the guy's not out there stealing, he's not dealing drugs. He's
trying to make a buck. I can't condole it because of where it's coming
from and how it's getting here. But at the same time, it's just
like, all right, the guy's making an effort. At least he should
be out there juggling. At least he's doing something well. And it's a
matter of who you're angryous. Listen, he shouldn't be here because our borders
shouldn't be open. You know, he's been put in this very difficult situation
because Mike Johnston and Jared Polis and other Democrats want to use him as a
political pawn. So a guy like you described, who's not engaging in any
crime or anything else is probably doing the exact same thing I'd be doing if
all of a sudden, I'm drug into, not drug in but essentially invited
into America by lefties who want to use me as a future vote. Then
I'd probably be out there doing the same thing. I wouldn't be committing crimes,
I wouldn't be selling drugs, but I'd be doing whatever I could to
get money to eat and for my family. But blame Mike Johnston, blame
Polis, Blame the Left. That gentleman should not be here in that very
difficult situation. That's why I blame. And I'm glad I have that experience
because I had a different opinion about that, but it's changed a little bit.
But I definitely agree they are the ones that are responsible. Now.
I just wanted to kind of make a case for you know, what Trump
is may be suggesting, and that is going after someone like a Hillary,
even Alvin Bragg, perhaps Joe himself, that it wouldn't be necessarily well it
might be, you know, fide, but not necessarily any more politically motivated
than not going after someone who you know has broken the law, who you
know is morally corrupt and is witnessed by the entire nation. Just letting that
slide. It's sort of like you know, a live by O mission.
You might say, well, it's worse. You raise a great point,
Tom, And I was on air when James Comey committed that great offense against
America. I was on air when he popped on in that press conference to
say Hillary Clinton was not going to be prosecuted. And I sat on air
on the time. I don't remember the verbatim. I sat on air at
the time. This is going to distort American politics for the rest of our
lives, because now, how can you prosecute anybody? So let me ask
you this. And Tom, you're welcome to stay into the next segment,
which we rarely do, but you've raised several really interesting scenarios, and I'd
love to get your take on this on the other side. But let's start
with this. Everybody can sink their teeth into this one. You can text
E and five seven seven three nine. All right. If Donald Trump wins,
as we expect and hope, should Hillary Clinton be prosecuted? Now?
I'm assuming, now I haven't researched it, that the statute of limitations has
not run. But if the statute hasn't run, should she be prosecuted for
those client crimes? I believe she clearly committed should Joe Biden be prosecuted?
Do you really want to see that after Donald Trump wins? You're on the
Dan Kapla Show. You're listening to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast. Boy,
the left have they ever been more obsessed about anybody than Congressman Bobert? She
had four or six tomorrow. I know one poll out showing that she has
a very big lead in that CD four primary. I haven't gotten into the
guts of that poll, so I don't know if it's reliable or not.
And a similar polls showing down in CD three with her having a substantial lead
there. So we'll have more on that tomorrow. January June twenty fifth not
that far away. Boy, don't even think about January twenty five. Right
at the moment, talking about really really important issue and something that you've got
a lot of good people on both sides of within the GOP, and you've
got a lot of people saying, hey, now, after what's happened to
Trump, it really need to dig in and start prosecuting these Democrats. President
Trump making a comment today that they can be interpreted as saying that we should
be doing to the left what they did to him. Maybe that's not what
he meant to say. I hope not, because I don't think that's the
right thing to do or good politics. But let me tee that up and
then we can get into the heart of this. Eight five five four zero
five eight two five to five the number text d an five seven seven three
nine, And I said, wouldn't it really be bad? You know,
with like as an example, Hillary, with the hammering of her cell phones
and all of the things you did, But wouldn't it be terrible to throw
the president's wife and the former secretary of state think of it, the former
secretary saip but the president, the president's wife into jail. Wouldn't that be
a terrible thing? But they want to do it, so you know,
it's a terrible, terrible path that they're leading us to. And it's very
possible that it's going to have to happen to them. That's the line that's
being used now by the left to say Trump threatening to jail opponents. It's
very possible it's going to have to happen to them. Listen if what the
President was saying, and he's only a human, I can understand that moment
of frustration with the awful, wrong, wrongful prosecutions that have been brought against
him. But if what he's saying is okay, what's been done to him
needstapping to them, no blanket way, It would be wrong for America.
It would be the wrong thing to do. It would be wrong politically because
what's happened to Trump are a bunch of wrongful prosecutions. We should not engage
in that. If he's saying that, hey, if Democrats are guilty of
crimes, we've got to prosecute them now and not let them off as he
did with Hillary Clinton, well that's a different story. Sure. I mean,
if you're talking about actual crimes that they've clearly committed that should be prosecuted
and would be prosecuted against Republicans, then yeah, of course they should be
prosecuted. But I think the president needs to be very careful on that because
right now this is his to lose. He has earned it, he's going
to get it, barring Martians landing, And one of the reasons he's going
to get it is now people who don't want to vote for him have to
vote for him in order to stop this country from becoming a banana republic.
So just make it real clear they're the ones who engage in that evil,
not us, we're rule of law. They're the ones who would destroy this
country and our legal system. Make it a very clear choice. Is there
any flaw in that logic? Can somebody point that out to me? And
please spoiler alert? And I don't blame you if you get mad at me
for this, because so many things then aren't exciting because we predicted him on
the show long before. But the way this whole thing is going to roll
out with Joe Biden, you know it's going to be so useful to him
to have the conviction of Hunter Biden out of this this trial. And he's
got too right. He's got the thing I wrongfully obtaining the gun by lying
about drug addiction. And then he is a separate trial in September on his
tax evasion. So Biden lets this one go forward before the pardon because it
helps Joe Biden so much to say, oh see, I believe in equal
justice for everybody. My own son had to stand trial. So yeah,
it helps him a lot to have Hunter convicted. Then what you're going to
get on Joe Biden's way out the door as the dem nominee is you're going
to get the pardon of Hunter Biden, and you're going to get the pardon
of Donald Trump, because now you've got all these prosecutions against Trump falling apart
Georgia, and he can't pardon Trump and Georgia. But that case has fallen
apart on its own weight, with the Georgia High Court now staying all action
in the Trump case now until at least October. So that case falling apart,
the federal judge down in Miami ordering up a hearing now on whether Jack
Smith even has the legal authority to be prosecuting that case. So all that
stuff against Trump, all this lefty motivated initiated stuff against Trump, including law
fair from the White House, all of it's falling apart. And so it's
so obvious and so easy for Biden to come out now, take advantage of
a conviction of his son, then pardon his son on this, pardon his
son on the tax evasion charge, which is much more embarrassing to Biden because
that starts to get into some Joe Biden's stuff, and by implication at the
very least, and then magnanimously pardon Trump. Because all the cases, or
most of the cases against him are falling apart right now, and the federal
case, the DC case against him isn't going to get to trial before election
day, and that had been I believe the Biden administration's whole intent there get
these to trial before election day. What do you make of the smirk,
though, Dan, you know what I'm talking about the press conference that Joe
Biden held at the White House about how the rule law must be respected.
We must respect this verdict, even though he doesn't respect the Supreme Court on
student loan forgiveness. That's beside the point. But he's walking away, and
one of the reporters asks him, you know, Donald Trump says that he's
a political prisoner, and Biden just turns back and smiles. You know,
But isn't it clear to everybody now, politics aside. Biden is very often
just a hateful little man who's never been very talented at all. He's on
his best day, he's mediocre. And can you imagine that the heat of
a thousand sons with which he hates Donald Trump? Because Donald Trump has has
been the opposite of Biden in so many of these ways, you know,
living very large, very smart, very successful. He's got this incredible,
intensely loyal following. There aren't five people in America loyal to Joe Biden.
The Biden voters were voting against Trump. And so yeah, he's just to
me, such a jealous, hateful little man most of the time. And
what a great sadness for America that he's still an American politics, let alone
president. Dan says a Texter. If Donald Trump believes that what happened to
him needs to happen in Democrats, I will not be voting for him.
I am so disappointed with our choices, so disappointed. Dkay in Broomfield.
Listen, Trump's only human. I believe he was talking out of frustration.
He did not. And Ryan, this is one of the many reasons to
believe Trump's going to win. All these things. They say he's going to
destroy a democracy, he'll never leave, He'll do this to blacks and this
Hispanics. The guy was president for four years. This isn't theory. Well,
we had a chance to see what he'll do and don't do and not
do, and he did leave office. They didn't have to bring in tanks
to get him out of there. So that's why all of this doom and
gloom sky is falling. Stuff isn't going anywhere with anybody smart because we had
four years of him. So no, I believe that was temporary frustration from
Trump. And to my last point, he did not have Hillary Clinton prosecuted.
I think she was obviously guilty of sin and he did not do it.
And I believe him when he said he didn't do it for the good
of the country, and I think that was a noble thing to do.
But now I want to know from you. Do you think Hillary should not
be prosecuted. Do you think after Trump wins, she should now be prosecuted,
assuming the statute doesn't run. I haven't researched that. Do you think
that Joe Biden should be investigated and prosecuted by a new Trump administration. I'd
really like that, Dan, Trump should pursue righteous convictions that magnanimously pardon them.
Dan, prosecution may be necessary to get rid of the deep state.
Listen, where you have real crimes committed, they should be prosecuted. Somebody
should not be protected from prosecution just because they're a Democrat. Operative. All
I'm saying is, don't do what was done to Trump. These were politically
motivated prosecutions for political ends that should not be done. But anybody, yeah,
true crime that would otherwise be prosecuted. Of course, State five for
zero five E two five five text d A five seven seven three nine.
When we come back, I want to talk about a Denversity Council member who
who is issued this statement about being harmed at a public event, and what
do you think is going on there? You're on the Dan Capla Show and
now back to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast. What we're talking about just joined
us, Thank you. Is President Trump making some comments that suggested that it
might be necessary to do to Democrats what they've done to him. Now I
think he needs to clarify that he will not do that as president, just
as he did not do that before. Now Democrats who have committed actual crimes,
Yeah, they shouldn't be immune. They should be prosecuted just like anybody
else. But there should not be politically motivated prosecutions. Cases that would otherwise
not be prosecuted, but are now only going to be prosecuted for political revenge,
because that's what was done to Donald Trump and it threatens the very foundation
of our country and We cannot do that. President Trump cannot do that when
he regains power. He also cannot be out there saying he's going to do
it, because it makes it first it would be wrong to do, but
it makes it less likely he'd win. Right now, Americans have a clear
choice. You want to banan a republic, vote Democrat, you want rule
of law, vote Trump. Do not muddy those waters. Okay, let's
give back to our text. We had a text to Ryan praising your last
segment today. Ryan does a really wonderful show in Denver two to four each
day on six thirty kitchw praising your last segment talking about abortion. I'm trying
to find that right now. I would imagine you know where it is.
But anyway, I just wanted to echo that because it really was superb.
I hope people go back on Ryan's podcast and listen to that last segment.
Congressman Bobert tomorrow at four oh six, and she has become just the all
consuming obsession of the left, so we'll check in with her. And then
I wanted to talk about this story. I've got some text on the two
Denver councilwoman says, exposure to quote contaminated documents made her sick. This is
the sort of thing you hear about in Russia, you don't hear about around
here. This is KDVR out of Denver. One of Denver City council members
is taking time away from in person meetings with voters after she says contaminated document
and said such an event caused her to fall sick. The meetup was held
Thursday, May thirty at Table Public House. Have you been there, Ryan,
Table Public House? No? Okay, Nora? I is it like
ping pong? Is it? Is it a picnic place? I don't know,
Kelly, I'm either councilman floor alv I DRez Alvidrez el Viterrez pronounced So
you add a letter in there, Okay. Who represents Denver's District seven,
posted about the incident on June three. She said that a quote incident caused
her to come in contact with quote some contaminated documents, causing me to fall
sick. She said she's recovering well, good to hear, but was suspending
all in person meetings with constituents in the meantime. Our community's well being is
my top priority, and the incident is under thorough investigation. We have added
safety measures to prevent this from happening again. What do you think is going
on here? I mean, I think we need more Public safety is served
by having all the facts out there so the public knows how to protect themselves.
I really hope we get more facts here. I got the texts that
you were referencing from Patty earlier. Dan, we got deluged with texts today
and we appreciate that. At five seven, seven thirty nine. But she
said the following, She said, I was just listening to Ryan's last segment
on abortion, the topic of rape came up. I'd really like to see
more support for women pregnant from rape and how the life of the unborn child
is still of value. These women need to know adoption can be an option,
but also highlighting the value of the unborn child. Patty. Yeah,
it was a great segment for anybody who has the chance to pick it up
off the podcast. And I got to tell you before I get back to
this other stuff. I not only like the topic, I just love the
way you handled it. I mean it was really high end talk radio stuff.
Thanks to it really sounded like national stuff thoroughly. Yeah, Yeah,
it Dan. Biden can't pardon Trump on the New York brag bs hush money
case, right, Alexa, that is absolutely correct. I can't pardon on
state offenses, and I don't think Trump would want that. I don't think
Trump would want what I think is coming, which is Biden when he on
the way out as demnominee, which is coming soon, when he pardons Hunter
Biden on his actual crimes. You know, I expect is going to pardon
Donald Trump on these crimes he didn't commit. Would Trump then reject the pardon?
So you know there's a lot coming down the pipe very soon. Yeah.
You and I both like the line that he had was like you're not
going to beg to go to jail. Yeah, But but this is different
because Biden, if he wasn't so small and mean and all that other bad
stuff just for his own political welfare, you know, should have pardoned And
I put that in quotes Trump a long time ago. I don't believe that
that Trump is is guilty of all this stuff he's been charged with. But
Biden, yeah, politically, should have done that. But now I believe
that he will at the same time or right around the same time he pardons
his son, who, in my constitutionally protected opinion, is obviously guilty of
what he's charged of and should have been prosecuted a long time ago. What
else do we have here? So much? Dan? Put them all in
jail. It's about time, no brainer. I'd love to get a call
from that texture would you really want and I think the statute of limitations is
run? But would you really want Hillary Clinton prosecuted? Now? If you
could? Do you think that would be good for the nation? Dan,
I don't think you can throw the same type of punch now, especially after
Trump has said it's about more than him and it's about the presidency, it's
about saving the constitution. You cannot say that and then turn around and do
the opposite. Obviously, I agree. So let's stop wasting time talking about
Joe Biden, who, it has to be clear right now, is not
going to be the nominee. Ryan Went, do you think he makes that
official? And who do you think the nominee is? Because it is vital
that Trump wins this second term, and the dynamic is going to change considerably
once that new DEM nominee comes in. Now, if it's Kamala Harris,
we can stop talking about the election. We can just go true full time,
you know, bathing suit radio or something, because stuck with Biden,
Trump wins fifty states. At that point, They're stuck with them. It's
Biden. I'm staying on that train. I'm gonna get my tomahawk, Rabbi
Dan, Yeah, yeah, only by stealing it, Kelly, tremendous job
behind the glasses. Always thank you Ryan for your great effort. But seriously,
think about this overnight. Let's talk about a little bit tomorrow. In
day's coming very soon. Right, who do you think the DEM nominee is
going to be? We know, if it's Kamala it's over. Trump probably
wins not fifty but forty six states. But who do you think the Dems
will actually nominee? And how does nominate? How does that race turn out?
Join us tomorrow on The Dan Kapla Show.