Hey. They are data and you have to give them they say out there,
but how they are transmitted or how they interpret the data, because it
can completely divert information, because this week, not once but twice we fell
into improper presentations of data and from the very front page of the printed newspaper,
no more and no less. The truth is that I am trying to
record here a video on a temporary basis to repeat every time there is a
march now that it seems that we are not going to pass them out on
the street to see who counts more heads, because precisely how we are in
those, because there is no march in which we do not end up scolded
with any number of people that we say went out to march with the massive
marches this Sunday, because again it happened to us and we received hard ears
for retaking the figures of the mandum posts that give the official figure, as
they told them some previous march, because our journalists do cover on the ground
or go to the marches. They' re there. You can get an
idea of a number of people, but they are not counting heads or having
the techniques and instruments to give a figure that can be more reliable. Of
course, this time it was worse because the figure we used, because it
was the same figure that was received and used by President Petro in his decentoned
reaction, minimizing and demonizing the protest, so it was as if we were
playing the game. The President in his unusual reading of the day and in
his intention to minimize it but it was not the number of PMs the main
cities at the concentration points. That is why, then, it was a
partial figure that did not include all those who came out. And so,
I think we did fail to assume it from the headlines themselves, such as
the number of people who went out and the accuracy of who gave the data.
Let' s say we missed in the headlines and just over there,
in a missing paragraph or in a legend of a photograph, we ended up
getting rid of one always the data there just keep them almost always it is
necessary to specify where it comes from. And something similar happened to us also
with the end of the first cycle of rationing of water here in Bogotá,
right on the cover of our printed edition said the hook of that headline that
in none of the days of that first cycle had lowered the consumption of water,
but what the data actually said and the corresponding article said inside is that
the consumption had actually gone down, but not enough so that in any of
those days it would have reached the expected consumption goal, which is quite different.
So, on Monday, we should have published a correction of that data.
Well, I don' t have any more. See you, Chao.