WEBVTT

1
00:00:07.639 --> 00:00:12.400
Hey, everybody, Welcome into the
Thinking Crypto podcast, your home for cryptocurrency

2
00:00:12.439 --> 00:00:16.239
news and interviews. On your way
in, please hit that subscribe button as

3
00:00:16.280 --> 00:00:19.239
well as the thumbs up button and
leave a comment below. If you're listening

4
00:00:19.280 --> 00:00:23.679
on a podcast platform such as Spotify
or Apple or wherever you get your podcasts,

5
00:00:23.679 --> 00:00:27.359
go ahead and hit that five star
rating and leave a review. Folks.

6
00:00:27.399 --> 00:00:32.039
It's a very big week for the
Etherorem spot ETF. This is going

7
00:00:32.079 --> 00:00:36.920
to be very interesting. What will
scumbag regulator Gary Ginster and the SEC do.

8
00:00:37.560 --> 00:00:43.359
Will they approve or deny these ETFs
because we have some very big players

9
00:00:43.560 --> 00:00:48.799
who are issuers of the Bitcoin spoty
TF in the ETF race that includes Venek

10
00:00:49.039 --> 00:00:55.280
twenty one shares and arc hashtecks Racecale
Investo and Galaxy, black Rock and Fidelity.

11
00:00:55.719 --> 00:01:00.439
Now, unlike the Bitcoin SPOTYTF situation, this is more complicated because there's

12
00:01:00.560 --> 00:01:04.879
questions as to if Etherorem is a
security. Those are not questions I have,

13
00:01:06.239 --> 00:01:07.879
but these are things that are coming
up from the SEC, and we're

14
00:01:07.879 --> 00:01:12.159
going to go through multiple reports and
what different sources are saying. First,

15
00:01:12.280 --> 00:01:17.480
let's talk about the overall consensus and
sentiment, because we see a lot of

16
00:01:17.519 --> 00:01:22.159
people are saying this is not going
to happen. There's low confidence that this

17
00:01:22.280 --> 00:01:25.719
is going to get approved, and
this is coming from many top analysts.

18
00:01:25.799 --> 00:01:30.319
So here's a headline from MarketWatch saying
ether ETFs are unlikely to arrive this month.

19
00:01:30.480 --> 00:01:36.400
Get ready for more legal battles ahead. Here's what Emily Graffeo, reporter

20
00:01:36.480 --> 00:01:40.920
at Bloomberg, had to say my
latest reporting on the spot ether ETF race.

21
00:01:41.200 --> 00:01:45.560
Some issuers are expecting a rejection next
week because their private dialogue with the

22
00:01:45.640 --> 00:01:49.560
SEC hasn't been as robust as it
had been prior to the approval of the

23
00:01:49.599 --> 00:01:56.920
spot bigcoin ETFs, So unlike the
BITCOINSPOTYTF situation, there's been very limited dialogue

24
00:01:56.959 --> 00:02:00.040
and back and forth between the SEC
and the issuers, so they're getting the

25
00:02:00.079 --> 00:02:04.879
feeling that this is not going to
happen. Here's what Nate Garachi, president

26
00:02:04.959 --> 00:02:07.400
of the ETF Store, who has
a ton of experience with ETFs, he

27
00:02:07.439 --> 00:02:13.639
said, SEC decision deadline this week
on spot e ETFs. SEC must approve

28
00:02:13.719 --> 00:02:20.639
both the nineteen b nash fours exchange
rule changes and s dash ones registration statements

29
00:02:20.680 --> 00:02:25.319
for ETFs to launch. Technically possible
for SEC to approve nineteen B nash fours

30
00:02:25.680 --> 00:02:30.759
and then slow play s ones.
Especially given the reported lack of engagement here,

31
00:02:31.439 --> 00:02:35.840
folks, it gets even more complicated. It's not just the dialogue,

32
00:02:36.039 --> 00:02:40.120
but what we saw is that Elizabeth
Warren and Gary Ginster were colluding for months

33
00:02:40.159 --> 00:02:45.800
now to set the table for some
sort of denial or delay here. If

34
00:02:45.840 --> 00:02:50.919
you go back up to March,
we saw two Democratic senators sent a letter

35
00:02:50.960 --> 00:02:54.800
to Gary Ginster and the SEC saying
no more ETFs, we have concerns about

36
00:02:54.800 --> 00:02:59.680
crypto, don't approve any more ETFs. When this news broke back in the

37
00:02:59.719 --> 00:03:02.919
middle of March, I told you
guys, these random Democratic senators, they

38
00:03:02.919 --> 00:03:07.439
didn't just wake up and say we
hate crypto, we hate ETFs. They

39
00:03:07.439 --> 00:03:13.360
were strategically placed to do that,
to create the optics that it's not just

40
00:03:13.400 --> 00:03:15.919
Elizabeth Warren. But we know Elizabeth
Warren is the one pulling the levers behind

41
00:03:15.919 --> 00:03:22.199
the scene. And their names were
Democratic Senators Jack Reid and Lafonza Butler,

42
00:03:22.520 --> 00:03:27.120
and they urged the SEC to crack
down on what they called alarming deficiencies in

43
00:03:27.159 --> 00:03:31.520
crypto market and disclosure, so essentially
saying no more ETFs. So right away

44
00:03:32.000 --> 00:03:37.599
they were setting the table here for
what we could potentially see this weekend.

45
00:03:37.599 --> 00:03:42.000
That is a denial. Now the
other factor is literally a week later we

46
00:03:42.080 --> 00:03:46.919
got reports that the Etherorem Foundation was
getting communications in the SEC, wells notices

47
00:03:46.960 --> 00:03:52.960
and all that stuff, looking to
classify Etherorem as a security. Now that

48
00:03:53.159 --> 00:03:57.400
is a problem. Now a security
can of course be in an ETF.

49
00:03:57.479 --> 00:04:00.319
But this could be Gary's optics,
right, He's going to use this as

50
00:04:00.360 --> 00:04:04.759
an excuse like, hey, we're
doing an investigation, we are in litigation

51
00:04:05.159 --> 00:04:10.159
with these folks, so we can't
approve anything because there's too much uncertainty here.

52
00:04:10.520 --> 00:04:14.719
So once again Gainser's building his case
here. What we also saw is

53
00:04:14.759 --> 00:04:18.160
that consensus, which of course also
works on Etherorem. They said that they

54
00:04:18.279 --> 00:04:21.240
were getting communications in the SEC,
and then what they ended up doing was

55
00:04:21.399 --> 00:04:27.199
suing the SEC. So what a
mess the SEC has created. Because if

56
00:04:27.199 --> 00:04:30.920
you go back to under J.
Clayton as the chairman of the SEC,

57
00:04:30.279 --> 00:04:33.879
Bill Hinman, which who reported to
J. Clayton and got his approval,

58
00:04:34.079 --> 00:04:40.240
said Etherorem is not a security.
Gary Genser refuses to ecodose statements and he

59
00:04:40.319 --> 00:04:44.639
refuses to even say a word to
even Congress, right, Patrick McHenry asked

60
00:04:44.680 --> 00:04:47.439
them, sir, is ETHERRM as
security or not? And Gary did not

61
00:04:47.680 --> 00:04:53.160
want to answer. So what a
complete mess. So we could see Gary

62
00:04:53.199 --> 00:04:59.079
Ginser delay the ETFs and use these
things as excuses. And remember the only

63
00:04:59.160 --> 00:05:03.199
reason the Bitcoin spot ETFs got approved
in the first place is because the courts

64
00:05:03.240 --> 00:05:08.839
forced the SEC to do so.
They called the SEC arbitrary and capricious,

65
00:05:09.120 --> 00:05:14.120
and it ended up being Gary Ganser's
siding with Hester person market way to get

66
00:05:14.120 --> 00:05:18.879
the ETFs approved. Two Democratic commissioners
denied it, right, so it was

67
00:05:18.920 --> 00:05:23.240
a three to two vote, so
it obviously went through, but you still

68
00:05:23.279 --> 00:05:27.879
had two of them who said no. Unbelievable. Despite what the court said,

69
00:05:28.319 --> 00:05:30.800
they still chose to vote no.
So this is what we're dealing with

70
00:05:30.920 --> 00:05:35.120
here. So there's certainly a major
hurdle of the SEC. Now there are

71
00:05:35.199 --> 00:05:41.319
some who are still optimistic that this
could get approved, and I don't think

72
00:05:41.360 --> 00:05:45.079
they're you know, right, you
know, the probability of this getting approved

73
00:05:45.160 --> 00:05:47.439
is very low at this point.
Now, it could still get approved in

74
00:05:47.480 --> 00:05:54.680
this market cycle. But here coinbase
says market underestimating timing and odds of Spot

75
00:05:54.720 --> 00:06:00.720
ETHEREMYTF, this is a statement by
coinbase analyst David Hahn, a quote he

76
00:06:00.759 --> 00:06:03.600
says, we think the market may
be underestimating the timing and odds of a

77
00:06:03.639 --> 00:06:09.839
potential approval on roads in a Thursday
report, Ether may yet have the potential

78
00:06:09.879 --> 00:06:13.879
to surprise to the upside in the
coming months and does not appear to have

79
00:06:13.959 --> 00:06:19.439
major sources of supply side overhangs such
as a token unlocks or minor cell pressure.

80
00:06:19.680 --> 00:06:24.600
Now, Coinbase, it's in their
best interest to say these things,

81
00:06:24.720 --> 00:06:28.600
right, because they're building on etheroreum
and etherorem is, you know, probably

82
00:06:28.639 --> 00:06:32.759
the most or the second traded assets
out there behind bitcoin, so they're making

83
00:06:32.800 --> 00:06:38.600
money off of this. Do I
think that we may see an etheroremist body

84
00:06:38.639 --> 00:06:41.959
t have in this bullmarket cycle later
in the bull market cycle? I think

85
00:06:42.000 --> 00:06:45.000
so. I think so. Now, I'm not giving it one hundred percent

86
00:06:45.040 --> 00:06:47.920
probability. I'll say sixty percent,
right, so more than fifty percent.

87
00:06:48.120 --> 00:06:50.920
But I don't think we see it
this week. But you never know,

88
00:06:51.120 --> 00:06:55.519
right, we could get surprised,
maybe folks, and hear me out now,

89
00:06:55.800 --> 00:06:59.759
maybe Gary doesn't want to get sued
by black Rock, Fidelity, Arc,

90
00:07:00.079 --> 00:07:01.800
all of the above, great gray
scale and so forth, with the

91
00:07:01.800 --> 00:07:05.959
bitcoin ETF situation, it was only
gray scale suing them. Now you have

92
00:07:06.439 --> 00:07:13.240
massive Wall Street powerhouses who have huge
legal teams, tons of money and resources

93
00:07:13.240 --> 00:07:16.000
and so forth, who can tie
you up in litigation. Does Gary want

94
00:07:16.000 --> 00:07:19.959
to deal with that? I think
the question goes back to Elizabeth Warren and

95
00:07:20.480 --> 00:07:25.399
you know how hard of a stance
is she taking here? Maybe the losses

96
00:07:25.519 --> 00:07:29.519
they took last week with the Senate
repealing SAB one two one, and then

97
00:07:29.759 --> 00:07:32.000
in the previous week the House repealing
SAB one to one, the narrative and

98
00:07:32.079 --> 00:07:38.680
optics changing for them, maybe they
back down a bit, right, Who

99
00:07:38.680 --> 00:07:42.000
knows? These are the questions and
things are going to happen this week.

100
00:07:42.040 --> 00:07:46.000
It's it's very fascinating, folks.
Also, yesterday I shared with you guys

101
00:07:46.000 --> 00:07:54.000
crypto wizards analysis about etherorem saying,
look, the theorem ETF denial is priced

102
00:07:54.040 --> 00:07:57.399
in and ETH has been bleeding,
you know, on the bitcoin chart,

103
00:07:57.680 --> 00:08:01.199
the eth the bitcoin chart, so
it is forming a falling wedge, which

104
00:08:01.240 --> 00:08:03.920
is bullish. And he said,
look, we could see a breakout to

105
00:08:05.040 --> 00:08:09.079
fifty one hundred over the next couple
months, of course, so things are

106
00:08:09.160 --> 00:08:13.399
still going to move forward with the
market so we'll see what happens. It's

107
00:08:13.519 --> 00:08:16.319
it's fascinating. There's so many things
here. We're going to talk about the

108
00:08:16.439 --> 00:08:20.759
fit bill vote coming up as well. But quick word from our sponsor,

109
00:08:20.759 --> 00:08:24.600
and that is Bitgo. Bitgo is
one of the top crypto custodians in the

110
00:08:24.639 --> 00:08:28.480
market. They are working with many
big brands such as a crypto exchanges,

111
00:08:28.519 --> 00:08:33.480
wallets and so forth. They work
with Pantera Capital, that's Dan Moorehead's hedge

112
00:08:33.480 --> 00:08:37.960
one, bitstamp, Bitcoin Ira.
In fact, Nike uses Bitstam's wallet at

113
00:08:39.000 --> 00:08:43.960
a service for their NFTs. Some
of the services that bitgo offers includes hot

114
00:08:43.960 --> 00:08:48.240
wallets, custodial wallets, self managed
co wallets, NFT wallets and more.

115
00:08:48.559 --> 00:08:52.440
So they have top tier security insurance
and all that stuff. And it's headed

116
00:08:52.519 --> 00:08:56.000
up by Mike Belshie, who is
building in Web one point zero two point

117
00:08:56.080 --> 00:08:58.600
zero and now is here in Web
three point zero. So if you'd like

118
00:08:58.639 --> 00:09:01.360
to learn more about bidgo, visit
bitgo dot com or check out the link

119
00:09:01.440 --> 00:09:05.080
in the description. Now, folks, the other big thing happening this week

120
00:09:05.200 --> 00:09:11.960
is the FIIT twenty one crypto regulation
bill in the House. What a week

121
00:09:11.200 --> 00:09:16.480
that's coming up, right, and
the so called FIT twenty one, legislation

122
00:09:16.559 --> 00:09:20.039
to establish a US regulatory regime for
digital assets, is set for a floor

123
00:09:20.120 --> 00:09:24.159
vote next week, and the sector
is telling House leaders the effort is crucial.

124
00:09:24.559 --> 00:09:30.559
So many industry powerhouses and leaders send
a letter to the folks in the

125
00:09:30.600 --> 00:09:35.159
House saying we got to get this
through, including coinbased cracking Andreeson Horowitz Digital

126
00:09:35.159 --> 00:09:39.320
Currency Group in about fifty others.
Now, this bill would set the CFTC

127
00:09:39.440 --> 00:09:45.279
as the leading regulator of digital assets
as it sets out clear divisions for what

128
00:09:45.320 --> 00:09:48.399
the CFTC will handle and what would
fall under the reach of the SEC.

129
00:09:48.840 --> 00:09:54.679
It would establish consumer protections, including
rules around custody of customers assets and their

130
00:09:54.720 --> 00:10:00.279
treatment in bankruptcy, and set up
further guardrails against risky behavior. So,

131
00:10:00.320 --> 00:10:01.320
of course, this is what we've
been talking about for a long time,

132
00:10:01.360 --> 00:10:07.440
folks. We need balance regulations,
allows for innovation, protects consumers right,

133
00:10:07.720 --> 00:10:13.320
and it clearly delineates between the SEC
and CFDC duties and who has to do

134
00:10:13.519 --> 00:10:18.559
what. And I believe more power
needs to go to the CFDC because they're

135
00:10:18.559 --> 00:10:22.039
not as politically driven. Don't get
me wrong, they are politically driven to

136
00:10:22.080 --> 00:10:24.159
some degree. A lot of the
federal agencies are, but we see the

137
00:10:24.200 --> 00:10:30.039
SEC has been rotten at its core, led by scumbag regulator Gary Ganser.

138
00:10:30.480 --> 00:10:33.840
So this is a big time vote. And folks, if this makes it

139
00:10:33.879 --> 00:10:39.120
out of the House, it will
be historic, the first comprehensive crypto market

140
00:10:39.120 --> 00:10:41.559
structure bill coming out of the House. It will be historic. Now,

141
00:10:41.639 --> 00:10:45.919
I don't think it makes it to
the Senate right away. We got the

142
00:10:45.960 --> 00:10:48.480
election coming up, and I think
it needs to be merged with Senator Lummis

143
00:10:48.480 --> 00:10:52.960
and Jillibrand's bill, and I think
maybe we get something through the Senate next

144
00:10:54.039 --> 00:10:58.240
year. But getting out of the
House will be a massive loss for Elizabeth

145
00:10:58.240 --> 00:11:03.279
Warren and Gary Gantszer and could really
put them back on their heels and it

146
00:11:03.279 --> 00:11:09.480
would be very bullish for the market. Now here's what Ryan Selkis of Missuri

147
00:11:09.600 --> 00:11:13.919
had to say regarding this, because
there's so many layers to this political crypto

148
00:11:15.200 --> 00:11:18.639
mashup here, right, he said, the FT twenty one vote this week

149
00:11:18.679 --> 00:11:22.360
will be a big one in DC. We'll see if crypto remains a partisan

150
00:11:22.399 --> 00:11:26.759
football. It's a legacy defining moment
for a representative. Maxine Waters plus Waters

151
00:11:26.879 --> 00:11:31.240
vote will likely make or break hockeing
Jeffrey's chance at Speaker of the House for

152
00:11:31.320 --> 00:11:33.720
the next Congress. Why he says, there's three things you should know about

153
00:11:33.759 --> 00:11:37.919
the political dynamics of this vote.
I'll unpack them all. Number One SBF

154
00:11:37.960 --> 00:11:43.159
Sam mcmcfried embarrassed the Democrats and Waters. Number two. As Waters goes,

155
00:11:43.399 --> 00:11:46.679
so does the Democrat conference. Number
three, Liz warrens saw one to one

156
00:11:46.720 --> 00:11:52.240
rebuke opens the door for a potential
landslide fit twenty one win. We saw

157
00:11:52.279 --> 00:11:56.679
the Democrats sided with the Republicans to
repeal this both in the House and the

158
00:11:56.799 --> 00:12:03.000
Senate. Huge loss for Elizabeth Warren
and Gary Genser. Number three the SBF

159
00:12:03.039 --> 00:12:05.960
picture, the one that Maxine Waters
took with SBF. We know it's made

160
00:12:07.000 --> 00:12:09.919
the rounds. It's pretty famous.
The truth is that Waters and McHenry talking

161
00:12:09.960 --> 00:12:16.639
about Patrick McHenry have had a cordial
relationship and worked productively together for many years.

162
00:12:16.799 --> 00:12:20.440
Their approach to crypto has legitimately been
a good faith, bipartisan effort.

163
00:12:20.840 --> 00:12:26.120
Sam screwed it up. Number four. SBF was a master at the DC

164
00:12:26.279 --> 00:12:31.279
game, but his FTX fraud burned
our DC friends. It allowed adversaries like

165
00:12:31.360 --> 00:12:35.519
Liz Warren to attack and force allies
like Waters to retreat. Waters face pressure

166
00:12:35.559 --> 00:12:39.799
to step away from the FT twenty
one when FTX collapsed and the GP took

167
00:12:39.840 --> 00:12:43.440
control of the House. Number five. This has led to a dynamic of

168
00:12:43.519 --> 00:12:48.320
written about, which is one Liz
Warren shrieks about Crypto being evil to her.

169
00:12:48.360 --> 00:12:54.320
Henchmen slash staffers, and the Biden
administration apply pressure from all angles Number

170
00:12:54.320 --> 00:12:58.279
three that leads to anti Crypto calls
from the White House to House leaders like

171
00:12:58.360 --> 00:13:01.919
Waters. Sand in the Gears number
six. Here, he says, I

172
00:13:01.919 --> 00:13:07.440
wrote about this dynamic in the Annual
Thesis in which I broke down this source

173
00:13:07.519 --> 00:13:13.320
of Liz Warren's power. This is
probably word for word the most precise political

174
00:13:13.360 --> 00:13:15.440
analysts, and he went through the
whole thing. I'm not going to read

175
00:13:15.440 --> 00:13:20.279
through that for you guys. So
he says, why drag Leader Representative Jeffries

176
00:13:20.279 --> 00:13:22.960
into this? I had the opportunity
to look him in the eye explicitly call

177
00:13:24.000 --> 00:13:28.440
out the Warren White House Waters dynamic
and ask a question. He said it

178
00:13:28.480 --> 00:13:31.919
would take time plus effort to bring
Representative Maxine Waters around. He says,

179
00:13:31.960 --> 00:13:37.240
I wrote about the exchange number eight. I highlight that exchange for two reasons

180
00:13:37.279 --> 00:13:41.200
one. Representative Jeffries strikes me as
a good, strong leader, even though

181
00:13:41.240 --> 00:13:46.080
I probably disagree with many of his
policies. He defers to his committee chairs.

182
00:13:46.320 --> 00:13:50.000
Number two a one line stuck with
me. He said that Waters has

183
00:13:50.440 --> 00:13:56.440
no shrinking violet to Lass number nine. There was a lot of subtext in

184
00:13:56.480 --> 00:13:58.879
the meeting, but to me,
the punchline was politics, maybe a team

185
00:14:00.000 --> 00:14:03.960
sport. But Representative Maxine Waterers answers
to no one in the Senate. That

186
00:14:05.120 --> 00:14:09.360
is why last week SAB one two
one pressure was so critical. It's opened

187
00:14:09.360 --> 00:14:13.919
the door for a bipartisan FT twenty
one vote. Number ten, Liz Warne's

188
00:14:13.960 --> 00:14:18.919
anti crypto crusade has been extremely costly
for the Democrats. They should be irate

189
00:14:18.039 --> 00:14:22.480
at her bad faith engagement with the
crypto industry. It will cost them the

190
00:14:22.559 --> 00:14:26.480
Senate, likely the White House,
but might not cost them the House if

191
00:14:26.840 --> 00:14:31.000
FIT twenty one passes by two hundred
plus votes. Now, he continues on,

192
00:14:31.080 --> 00:14:33.960
but I wanted to give you guys
some perspective there and some insights.

193
00:14:35.679 --> 00:14:39.600
This is a very big week,
folks, because this makes it out of

194
00:14:39.639 --> 00:14:43.480
the House. Democrats joined the Republicans
again and continued this momentum that they use

195
00:14:43.840 --> 00:14:46.759
to repeal SAB one two one in
the House and Senate. It's going to

196
00:14:46.799 --> 00:14:50.759
be d day for Elizabeth Warren and
Gary Genzer. They were not going to

197
00:14:50.840 --> 00:14:56.879
have a good week, So fingers
crossed. Even if Gary denies the ethereums

198
00:14:56.960 --> 00:15:01.240
body Tapps, he's losing the war. He may win that ethereomy you know

199
00:15:01.360 --> 00:15:05.080
etf battle right there, but he's
losing the war here. So big things

200
00:15:05.120 --> 00:15:07.960
in the works, folks. I'm
very bullish. I was in DC last

201
00:15:09.000 --> 00:15:13.480
week and crypto is a big topic. It can't be ignored. I've been

202
00:15:13.480 --> 00:15:16.960
telling you guys. It has become
ubiquitous. We're seeing penetration in politics,

203
00:15:18.320 --> 00:15:24.200
pop culture, the traditional financial markets, society and much more. And no

204
00:15:24.320 --> 00:15:28.240
one can ignore it anymore, even
in the political realm. Regardless of your

205
00:15:28.279 --> 00:15:31.279
party, Republican or Democrat, young, old, whatever you is, you

206
00:15:31.720 --> 00:15:35.000
got to talk about it, you
got to bring it up. It's here

207
00:15:35.080 --> 00:15:39.600
to stay and it's only going to
grow in prominence and awareness. So exciting

208
00:15:39.679 --> 00:15:41.919
times ahead. I would love to
know what you guys think. Leave your

209
00:15:41.960 --> 00:15:43.720
thoughts and comments below. Folks,
don't forget to check out my book,

210
00:15:45.039 --> 00:15:48.879
Rethinking Crypto to Crash of FTX and
a rise of savor stronger digital assets.

211
00:15:48.919 --> 00:15:52.240
You can grab a copy on Amazon, paperback and digital. Buy a copy

212
00:15:52.320 --> 00:15:54.799
to support the podcast. Also buy
some copies that give to your family and

213
00:15:54.840 --> 00:15:58.320
friends who want to learn about crypto. It touches on crypto's past, president

214
00:15:58.399 --> 00:16:03.600
and future, give some tips for
investing in crypto, talks about tokenization,

215
00:16:03.759 --> 00:16:07.120
the big quinn etf rays, why
Gary Ginz on the sec have been attacking

216
00:16:07.200 --> 00:16:11.480
the industry, why Sam mcn freed
and FTX were not the ethos of crypto,

217
00:16:11.559 --> 00:16:14.200
and much more. Check it out, guys, grab a copy.

218
00:16:14.360 --> 00:16:17.799
Thank you for watching and listening,
Thank you for your support, and I'll

219
00:16:17.840 --> 00:16:18.200
talk to you all later.

