1
00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:04,559
So I had this love for still
the physical, especially physical science that I

2
00:00:04,599 --> 00:00:08,560
was trying to use in my studies. I was talking with you to try

3
00:00:08,599 --> 00:00:11,839
to get more into the symbolic prology. I was also talking with John Riricki

4
00:00:12,240 --> 00:00:15,359
about the cognitive science side, and
also in general. It was great on

5
00:00:15,759 --> 00:00:19,640
the physics side, and I was
always trying to bridge, mainly between you

6
00:00:19,719 --> 00:00:21,800
and John. I would say,
yeah, it took several years. I

7
00:00:21,839 --> 00:00:24,920
would often like run arguments by you
and by him, and like try to

8
00:00:24,920 --> 00:00:27,960
see if I can make something through
this. I developed, I think pretty

9
00:00:27,960 --> 00:00:34,560
carefully a path from materialism all the
way to the symbolic world and even up

10
00:00:34,640 --> 00:00:39,320
to the more let's say, esoteric
debates in symbolism, like how is it

11
00:00:39,359 --> 00:00:42,560
exactly that the world exists in Christ? And how is it that the world

12
00:00:42,600 --> 00:00:49,840
exists through human consciousness? And like
all of these more esoteric kind of questions.

13
00:00:57,960 --> 00:01:12,159
This is Jonathan Pshell come to the
Symbolic World. So hello everyone,

14
00:01:12,519 --> 00:01:18,239
I am very happy to be here
with JP Marso JP. For those who

15
00:01:18,280 --> 00:01:21,000
have followed the Channel for a very
long time, you see him on the

16
00:01:21,120 --> 00:01:23,920
channel for years. He was the
editor of the Symbolic World blog. He's

17
00:01:23,959 --> 00:01:29,480
really been a partner in kind of
developing a lot of the symbolic world ideas.

18
00:01:30,519 --> 00:01:34,200
And we're going to launch a course
where he's going to be giving a

19
00:01:34,239 --> 00:01:38,920
class called the Metaphysics of Symbolism,
where we're going to look at the relationship

20
00:01:38,959 --> 00:01:44,480
between metaphysical ideas and the symbolic world
as we kind of present it, and

21
00:01:44,519 --> 00:01:48,599
also his take on it. I'll
be part of it to some extent,

22
00:01:48,799 --> 00:01:53,159
He'll be doing part of it alone. And we're also announcing that we are

23
00:01:53,200 --> 00:01:57,439
going to publish a book on the
same subject by JP and so I'm really

24
00:01:57,480 --> 00:02:00,840
happy to see all this coming together. He's just been such a great help

25
00:02:00,920 --> 00:02:05,239
all this time to help me think
through because he has such clear thinking.

26
00:02:05,319 --> 00:02:07,799
More than I do. I get
kind of he has a very kind of

27
00:02:07,840 --> 00:02:12,520
clear thinking. We've been doing a
French podcast for years now that you can

28
00:02:12,560 --> 00:02:16,560
also find on YouTube. If you
just write Jonathan Pegel French you can find

29
00:02:16,560 --> 00:02:19,960
that you can find the podcast.
We'll put a link in the description.

30
00:02:20,039 --> 00:02:23,439
So GP, it's good to see
you, and I thought maybe we could

31
00:02:23,479 --> 00:02:27,759
start with you telling people a little
bit how you came to this. You

32
00:02:27,800 --> 00:02:30,759
know, what what your what your
story is, because it's pretty interesting.

33
00:02:30,319 --> 00:02:35,240
Yeah, for sure, thanks.
I never told it on your channel.

34
00:02:36,120 --> 00:02:43,840
Basic background was really into science during
my teenage years. I had been raised

35
00:02:44,000 --> 00:02:50,599
Catholic in in Quebec, classic practicing
family, but when I was a teenager

36
00:02:51,199 --> 00:02:57,199
drifted away from the faith mentioned science
as one of the excuses that say,

37
00:02:57,280 --> 00:03:01,800
to make my parents stop bringing me
to church. But I was still interested

38
00:03:01,800 --> 00:03:10,120
by questions of meaning. I think
these questions pop up naturally if you push

39
00:03:10,240 --> 00:03:16,400
let's say the scientifical view far enough. I was just not very impressed by

40
00:03:16,439 --> 00:03:21,719
the philosophy that I had seen when
I was younger, let's say, in

41
00:03:21,759 --> 00:03:27,439
high school or say jep that we
have here in Quebec. So I decided

42
00:03:27,479 --> 00:03:32,439
to study math in computer science in
university because I was mainly interested in mathematical

43
00:03:32,719 --> 00:03:38,479
logic and theoretical computer science. There's
all kinds of cool theorems you can prove

44
00:03:38,520 --> 00:03:44,639
about certain formal systems, what they
can and cannot prove. It gives you

45
00:03:44,639 --> 00:03:49,360
sort of an idea of how far
you can push knowledge in some areas.

46
00:03:49,360 --> 00:03:53,240
So anyway, I was really interested
by that. But I think, like

47
00:03:53,280 --> 00:03:58,360
many people with this basic scientific education, what I ended up sort of inheriting

48
00:03:58,400 --> 00:04:04,199
at the side effect was a material
stick traditionalistic worldview where I guess you spend

49
00:04:04,199 --> 00:04:12,759
so many hours like trying to do
problems where you reduce things to their constituent

50
00:04:12,800 --> 00:04:15,800
bits that at some point it sort
of became normal for me to just see

51
00:04:15,800 --> 00:04:19,879
the world as particles moving about and
even people, Like it was harn't for

52
00:04:19,920 --> 00:04:26,120
me to see people as something else
then, just complex sets of particles that

53
00:04:26,399 --> 00:04:30,399
evolved randomly through natural selection to like
have complex behaviors. But family, it's

54
00:04:30,519 --> 00:04:40,040
just reducible two particles. And yeah, I just ad this basic kind of

55
00:04:40,079 --> 00:04:44,040
worldview where it was hard to find
meaning, like in my ontology and also

56
00:04:44,120 --> 00:04:48,000
epistemologically in terms of what we can
know. I was really drawn to mathematics

57
00:04:48,040 --> 00:04:53,000
because it seemed like you can have
like sure knowledge of things in mathematics.

58
00:04:53,079 --> 00:04:58,639
That wasn't the case where that wasn't
the case for the philosophy courses I add

59
00:04:58,879 --> 00:05:01,639
before, Like mostly people were just
doubting everything in philosphy, That's what I

60
00:05:02,240 --> 00:05:04,959
saw it back then. But at
least in math I could prove stuff,

61
00:05:05,000 --> 00:05:09,720
So like, maybe it's not obvious
how I can talk about meaningful topics in

62
00:05:09,759 --> 00:05:13,360
mathematics, but at least we seem
to be going somewhere because we seem certain

63
00:05:13,399 --> 00:05:18,079
of what we're doing. But even
then, in mathematical logic, I like

64
00:05:18,199 --> 00:05:21,600
tried to take as many courses as
I could early on to see the proof

65
00:05:21,920 --> 00:05:27,959
of Girdles incompleteness theorems. And now
when I saw the proof, I saw

66
00:05:27,959 --> 00:05:30,879
that, well, I guess even
in math you can be that short of

67
00:05:30,480 --> 00:05:36,759
what you're doing. I had heard
about Girdle's famous theorem that no formal system

68
00:05:36,879 --> 00:05:41,759
that is coherent will be complete,
and I had heard about it. But

69
00:05:42,120 --> 00:05:46,240
typically when you have these really cool
sounding theorems in math or physics, like

70
00:05:46,519 --> 00:05:50,079
when you actually get to them and
you see all the postulids that are required

71
00:05:50,079 --> 00:05:53,759
for them, they're actually not that
cool. But in that case, that

72
00:05:53,839 --> 00:05:58,240
was truth, Like it was really
as devastating as it sounds. So what

73
00:05:58,439 --> 00:06:01,680
ended up happening is like, okay, like I had this world where I

74
00:06:01,720 --> 00:06:05,680
saw everyone as just bits of matter, where it was hard to find meaning

75
00:06:05,680 --> 00:06:11,519
in that, and my knowledge,
like my access to knowledge in the world

76
00:06:11,680 --> 00:06:15,639
that used to be mediated by mathematics, even that was destroyed by good Old's

77
00:06:15,680 --> 00:06:18,399
theorem. So I was a bit
a bit at rift, like like is

78
00:06:18,439 --> 00:06:21,720
anything worth doing? Really? I
wasn't doing that bad, Like it sounds

79
00:06:21,720 --> 00:06:25,279
more depressing than it was. It
just it just was great. But I

80
00:06:25,279 --> 00:06:28,600
thought, like, if everything is
meaningless anyway, I might as well think

81
00:06:28,639 --> 00:06:30,279
about it to make sure that,
like, I'm not screwing this up somehow.

82
00:06:30,319 --> 00:06:36,720
So I decided to do a master's
in the philosophy, especially about reductionism,

83
00:06:36,800 --> 00:06:40,920
to try to see if, like
something was wrong with my worldview.

84
00:06:41,399 --> 00:06:46,680
Is reductionism wrong and can we talk
about meaning and good and evil somehow can

85
00:06:46,680 --> 00:06:48,399
we recover that. I had no
expectation at all that it would work,

86
00:06:48,439 --> 00:06:50,800
but I thought, well, if
everything is meaningless anyway, as might as

87
00:06:50,800 --> 00:06:54,319
well try. You know, well, there's literally nothing to lose. So

88
00:06:55,480 --> 00:07:00,720
during the course of my master's Joan
Peterson popped up onto this scene, and

89
00:07:00,120 --> 00:07:02,680
as soon as I hear did him
talk about the meaning and good and evil

90
00:07:02,720 --> 00:07:06,439
in terms that I hadn't heard before, I just tried to look into it,

91
00:07:08,439 --> 00:07:13,000
and through that I also stumbled upon
you. I think I started.

92
00:07:15,519 --> 00:07:19,079
I think I started contributing to your
Patreon as soon as right away. You

93
00:07:19,079 --> 00:07:24,000
were one of the first people that
supported me. Yeah, that was crazy,

94
00:07:24,279 --> 00:07:27,480
because I knew you were doing something
interesting and I wanted to talk to

95
00:07:27,519 --> 00:07:29,839
you because I didn't really understand what
you and Jordan were doing, to be

96
00:07:29,879 --> 00:07:31,920
honest, but I wanted, like
I wanted some kind of access to to

97
00:07:31,959 --> 00:07:34,079
try to dive into it. And
I had lots of time because I was

98
00:07:34,160 --> 00:07:40,839
with my masters in something related and
one of the first things we talked about

99
00:07:40,959 --> 00:07:45,199
was zombies because you were having you
it was the existential question for you.

100
00:07:45,279 --> 00:07:48,120
It wasn't just a theoretical question.
Yeah, exactly. I think I wonder

101
00:07:48,199 --> 00:07:50,800
how comment of a thing that is, Like, obviously it's present in the

102
00:07:51,240 --> 00:07:57,040
common imagination because there's lots of zombie
movies and books and so on. But

103
00:07:57,399 --> 00:08:01,720
basically, if I think back about
this period of my life, while I

104
00:08:01,839 --> 00:08:07,120
was studying abstractly nihilism and materialism during
the day in my studies, I would

105
00:08:07,120 --> 00:08:11,160
spend like all night long exploring the
same topics symbolically having zombie nightmares. So

106
00:08:11,600 --> 00:08:16,680
like, for literally like all night
every night for about a year, I

107
00:08:16,720 --> 00:08:22,000
had like zombie nightmares. It again
sounds worse than it is, Like,

108
00:08:22,079 --> 00:08:24,399
Actually, what ended up happening after
a while is I sort of figured out

109
00:08:24,759 --> 00:08:30,000
what was like going on, Like
because initially, if you just wake up

110
00:08:30,040 --> 00:08:31,600
every time you have such a nightmare, like you'll never sleep. So at

111
00:08:31,639 --> 00:08:35,840
some point I sort of understood that
it was just like just yet another zombie

112
00:08:35,879 --> 00:08:39,399
nightmare. So like even if I
would get eaten or someone, I wouldn't

113
00:08:39,440 --> 00:08:41,600
actually wake up. I would just
like I knew that I would just start

114
00:08:41,639 --> 00:08:43,679
another dream, but it never stopped, so like just this end the cycle

115
00:08:43,759 --> 00:08:50,320
of zombie nightmares. But I ended
up getting rid of my zombie problem in

116
00:08:50,399 --> 00:08:54,159
part thanks to you and John ERVEACKI. It was really a series of steps.

117
00:08:56,120 --> 00:09:05,000
First, in my studies, I
was looking at, specifically arguments against

118
00:09:05,240 --> 00:09:11,679
materialism and trying to find alternative ways
of framing the world. At that stage,

119
00:09:11,799 --> 00:09:16,039
specifically, I had seen enough arguments
against materialism in flaws Feet that I

120
00:09:16,039 --> 00:09:20,879
could drop materialism and adopt petsnychism.
At the time, I felt that was

121
00:09:20,919 --> 00:09:24,559
a nice easy bridge to make,
and then from there started to dive into

122
00:09:24,799 --> 00:09:28,960
some and yeah, what I should
say is as soon as I did that,

123
00:09:28,120 --> 00:09:31,519
there n be night mare started to
go away, like they were cut

124
00:09:31,559 --> 00:09:33,679
down I don't know, fifteen ninety
percent, and like to a good extent,

125
00:09:35,039 --> 00:09:37,440
like they started to go away.
I still ad them, but it

126
00:09:37,559 --> 00:09:41,720
was less frequent and then next step
was diving into a little bit of classical

127
00:09:41,799 --> 00:09:46,279
metaphysics, especially with regards to virtue
ethics. Okay, if there isn't just

128
00:09:46,320 --> 00:09:52,000
a matter in the world, if
people aren't just particles following blind laws,

129
00:09:52,600 --> 00:09:58,360
is there like also some kind of
good and evil that we can talk about.

130
00:09:58,440 --> 00:10:01,480
It's not immediate, like, because
you're not a materialist doesn't mean that

131
00:10:01,480 --> 00:10:05,159
you don't necessarily have antology that allows
you to speak about good and evil.

132
00:10:05,679 --> 00:10:13,480
But through classical philosophy I was able
to find good arguments for that, things

133
00:10:13,480 --> 00:10:16,960
we can find in Plato and Aristotle, but also new arguments coming from cognitive

134
00:10:16,960 --> 00:10:22,799
science, some of the things that
John Ervicki and Jordan and you talk about.

135
00:10:22,159 --> 00:10:28,360
So like a big thing for me
was realizing that in general, perception

136
00:10:28,639 --> 00:10:33,840
is something that we practice, and
it's not just our moral perceptions that we

137
00:10:33,879 --> 00:10:39,360
need to practice and improve, it's
just our perception of everything. It's something

138
00:10:39,399 --> 00:10:43,320
that we know from developing infants,
Like initially infants can't really see like it's

139
00:10:43,320 --> 00:10:48,720
something they really have to practice,
And when you sort of know that this

140
00:10:48,799 --> 00:10:52,759
happens in infants, you can start
to pick that up also in yourself.

141
00:10:52,320 --> 00:10:56,679
An example, I always come back
to is Brazilian jujitsu or like any complex

142
00:10:56,720 --> 00:11:00,919
sport really like, if you look
at it initially, you won't see anything

143
00:11:01,279 --> 00:11:03,919
like You'll just see chaos basically,
like you know, okay, at the

144
00:11:03,960 --> 00:11:05,519
beginning of the fight, two people
like are setting up and at the end

145
00:11:05,559 --> 00:11:09,720
there's one person that's obviously losing and
is tapping out. But you don't see

146
00:11:09,879 --> 00:11:13,240
really what happened in between. You
don't have the perception to make out the

147
00:11:13,279 --> 00:11:18,080
pattern from the multiplicity of moves going
on. So I just literally have that

148
00:11:18,159 --> 00:11:20,039
experience that we talked about it where
I'm watching a match and then all of

149
00:11:20,039 --> 00:11:24,039
a sudden, the people that are
there cheering and I'm like, what am

150
00:11:24,080 --> 00:11:28,559
I There's nothing happening. I can't
see what's happening, Like they know that

151
00:11:28,039 --> 00:11:31,879
now the person is in the right
position to do this or that, but

152
00:11:31,960 --> 00:11:33,919
I have no idea. I'm just
looking. And then, like you said,

153
00:11:33,919 --> 00:11:35,759
at some point, one guy loses, and I'm like, what the

154
00:11:35,799 --> 00:11:39,679
hell just happened? I don't know
what I would just watch. But if

155
00:11:39,720 --> 00:11:46,080
you practice the sport and you discuss
it with others and you also like have

156
00:11:46,159 --> 00:11:48,200
a habit of watching it, eventually
you start to pick up the patterns like

157
00:11:48,240 --> 00:11:52,759
a child who is learning to see
objects, you learn to see moves in

158
00:11:52,879 --> 00:11:56,320
jiu jitsu, And the same thing
happens with more abstract truths as well.

159
00:11:56,519 --> 00:12:03,240
That's basically what happens with I think
moral truths. There's even this good theory

160
00:12:03,320 --> 00:12:09,519
I Think by Jonathan It and a
few of his colleagues about moral foundations theory.

161
00:12:09,240 --> 00:12:13,960
It says that we it's kind of
like with with visual perception. Let's

162
00:12:13,960 --> 00:12:18,960
say there's all kinds of photons in
our eyes. There's like all this multiplicity,

163
00:12:18,000 --> 00:12:22,960
but it takes time for us to
turn that multiplicity into coherent patterns to

164
00:12:22,039 --> 00:12:24,440
make out the world. In the
same way, we seem to have basic

165
00:12:24,480 --> 00:12:31,320
moral intuitions that we used to make
up more complex moral judgments. Like we

166
00:12:31,399 --> 00:12:39,399
have discussed that like is a very
basic emotion that protects us from pathogens and

167
00:12:39,600 --> 00:12:43,440
dangerous substances in general, but it's
also a moral emotion that we end up

168
00:12:43,480 --> 00:12:52,919
exacting to reject certain injustices or let's
say, ideas that are also pathogens for

169
00:12:52,000 --> 00:12:56,000
our tribe and this kind of stuff. So like he has I Think this

170
00:12:56,159 --> 00:13:00,519
good theory where you can see how
there's like these basic senses that we have

171
00:13:01,320 --> 00:13:05,480
to perceive initially just chaotic multiplicity in
the moral realm, but as we grow

172
00:13:05,600 --> 00:13:11,600
up and we try to practice our
moral perceptions, we end up being able

173
00:13:11,639 --> 00:13:16,000
to perceive more and more complex patterns. Yeah, but it's important to say

174
00:13:16,159 --> 00:13:18,879
just just as you as you go
through this, that understand that what's important

175
00:13:18,919 --> 00:13:24,679
to understand in what you said is
that it makes the analogies real that when

176
00:13:24,759 --> 00:13:28,000
we use the analogy, for example, if we say you know that that

177
00:13:28,159 --> 00:13:33,080
this person is a parasite on the
system that the analogy between and even the

178
00:13:33,320 --> 00:13:37,759
mechanism by which we recognize a parasite, let's say, coming towards something dirty,

179
00:13:37,879 --> 00:13:41,320
something that that is that is dangerous
physically, is the same mechanism that

180
00:13:41,360 --> 00:13:48,000
we use to then see the moral
or societal parasite. Yeah, and also

181
00:13:48,159 --> 00:13:52,240
like it, like I think this
continuum of like when you understand that perception

182
00:13:52,360 --> 00:13:56,279
is something you need to practice not
just in morality, but also even just

183
00:13:56,279 --> 00:14:01,080
to perceive very basic objects, it
makes it really hard to reject moral realism

184
00:14:01,320 --> 00:14:07,120
on the basis of varieties between different
nations or groups or tribes, for instance,

185
00:14:07,360 --> 00:14:09,639
because if you were to look also
at developing infants, like they also

186
00:14:09,679 --> 00:14:13,559
can't really see the world, like
they're very confused, that it takes long

187
00:14:13,600 --> 00:14:16,919
time for them to be able to
perceive like faces and objects and pick things

188
00:14:16,960 --> 00:14:20,080
up, and like it's something we
need to practice. The same way that

189
00:14:20,320 --> 00:14:24,519
if like you're just starting to do
jiu jitsu, you won't perceive what's happening.

190
00:14:24,559 --> 00:14:26,200
You'll be confused, and it's going
to take longer for you to perceive

191
00:14:26,559 --> 00:14:33,279
jiu jitsu moves then to perceive like
basic objects when you're an infant. Like

192
00:14:33,320 --> 00:14:35,039
in the same way, it's going
to take like all of your life to

193
00:14:35,080 --> 00:14:39,600
improve your moral perception and still then
like you probably won't be able to see

194
00:14:39,600 --> 00:14:45,000
everything perfectly unless you become a saint. So it's not surprising that different cultures

195
00:14:45,159 --> 00:14:50,919
disagree about like how they perceive morality. It's just like, so these kinds

196
00:14:50,960 --> 00:14:58,240
of ideas were able to destroy my
moral relativism, and in like immediately when

197
00:14:58,240 --> 00:15:01,159
that happened, my zampin i mayors
were again cut down by like fifty or

198
00:15:01,159 --> 00:15:05,639
sixty or ninety percent. So at
that point I were starting to have like

199
00:15:05,879 --> 00:15:09,759
way less zombie nightmares. I still
add some, but like it was very

200
00:15:09,759 --> 00:15:13,639
manedgeible. I honestly thought it would
just stay like this forever. But because

201
00:15:13,679 --> 00:15:18,440
I was supporting you on Patreon,
we had like these regular chats and we

202
00:15:18,480 --> 00:15:20,919
became friends, and at some point
I asked you, like, what would

203
00:15:20,960 --> 00:15:24,360
you do, like if if you
were in my position, where like,

204
00:15:24,559 --> 00:15:31,120
okay, you were having a zombie
nightmare right now, like you're you're the

205
00:15:31,120 --> 00:15:33,799
main character in a zombie story.
Let's see what do you do? Like,

206
00:15:33,799 --> 00:15:35,840
what's the what's the solution? How
can I get out of this?

207
00:15:35,240 --> 00:15:39,120
And we ended up working through it
together. Do you remember what the solution

208
00:15:39,399 --> 00:15:41,919
was? You don't you remember?
Yeah, I remember what it was.

209
00:15:43,039 --> 00:15:48,240
Actually we also like further improved it, I think two three years ago on

210
00:15:48,399 --> 00:15:52,519
the French podcast. But the initial
solution was like it took us a few

211
00:15:52,519 --> 00:15:56,159
iterations to figure something out, but
the basic idea we came up with was

212
00:15:56,759 --> 00:16:04,960
to do what Jesus would do,
because like zombies are You've talked about this

213
00:16:06,000 --> 00:16:10,879
on your channel before, zombies are
a parody of the Christian resurrection. They're

214
00:16:10,879 --> 00:16:15,480
really a parody of the Christian world
view, is specifically the Christian apocalypse,

215
00:16:15,759 --> 00:16:18,360
because zombies come back to life,
but they don't have this glorious body they

216
00:16:18,399 --> 00:16:23,200
just have this decaying body. They
are all together, but rather than being

217
00:16:23,240 --> 00:16:30,000
in communion, they just like follow
their impulses in the same direction. They

218
00:16:30,039 --> 00:16:33,320
look let's say unique and special,
but it's only superficial. Really. The

219
00:16:33,360 --> 00:16:38,120
only like all want to eat it
is the same thing they like they eat

220
00:16:38,200 --> 00:16:44,440
brains because it's the least remnant of
meaning in the materialistic universe, Like they're

221
00:16:44,480 --> 00:16:48,320
trying to destroy, like the only
thing that doesn't fit quite right in the

222
00:16:48,440 --> 00:16:51,639
materialistic worldview, like even if they
try to to deny. So anyways,

223
00:16:51,639 --> 00:17:00,399
there's all these parallels between zombies and
Christianity, where zombies are trying to basically

224
00:17:00,480 --> 00:17:07,240
destroy the ancient meaning systems. And
there's also the key I think in Jesus's

225
00:17:07,319 --> 00:17:15,160
story against this again to trample down
death by death. So Jesus even today,

226
00:17:15,279 --> 00:17:19,680
like in the Eucharist, he lets
us eat him, but doing that,

227
00:17:19,720 --> 00:17:25,799
he actually eats us the same way
that he let us kill him two

228
00:17:25,799 --> 00:17:27,359
thousand years ago, in a way
that would bring us into his story to

229
00:17:27,880 --> 00:17:33,240
make us saints. So like there's
this key inside of christ story and we

230
00:17:33,279 --> 00:17:38,160
could go deeper into many details like
what we do, especially during the Eucharistic

231
00:17:38,319 --> 00:17:45,000
lateurgy is the exact antidote to the
meaning crisis and the zombie crisis, because

232
00:17:45,319 --> 00:17:49,400
zombies, like they just grown,
they can't make sounds. But we saying

233
00:17:49,519 --> 00:17:55,319
when we're in the church, zombies
just like jumble up to eat stuff and

234
00:17:55,480 --> 00:17:59,000
destroy stuff, thinking only about themselves. But we're in church, we're praying

235
00:17:59,039 --> 00:18:02,519
for one another, being thankful towards
the same thing, rather than just consuming

236
00:18:02,559 --> 00:18:06,640
everything for ourselves. So there's all
these parallels you can make to see how

237
00:18:07,599 --> 00:18:12,319
Christianity is the specifically per spitting and
returgies in llurgy is the solution to the

238
00:18:12,440 --> 00:18:17,200
zombie problem. And what we came
up with was, okay, then what

239
00:18:17,240 --> 00:18:22,440
you would need to do is like
somehow let yourself be eaten by zombies,

240
00:18:23,440 --> 00:18:30,359
Like you would have to do something
like spiritual like like pray or like find

241
00:18:30,359 --> 00:18:33,519
some way in your zombie universe to
become a saint, and then you let

242
00:18:33,599 --> 00:18:38,720
yourself be eaten by zombies to save
even the zombies. And when we worked

243
00:18:38,799 --> 00:18:44,400
through that, then my nightmares disappeared. I never add one since then.

244
00:18:44,599 --> 00:18:48,720
The only times I add some after
where when I would explicitly be trying to

245
00:18:48,720 --> 00:18:52,119
write about my experiences for others but
I never add this again for myself.

246
00:18:52,160 --> 00:18:56,400
The dreams just run away. Yeah, And what's crazy about that is that

247
00:18:56,440 --> 00:18:59,119
we kind of we did came up
with this like a story. It was

248
00:18:59,200 --> 00:19:06,720
like a narrative about the idea of
a saint like like that get that roommate

249
00:19:06,799 --> 00:19:11,119
that lets himself be eaten and then
wakes up truly let's say, resurrects truly

250
00:19:11,200 --> 00:19:15,920
doesn't come back as a zombie,
but comes back as a as a kind

251
00:19:15,920 --> 00:19:18,960
of glorious being in the zombie story. Uh. And it's weird because it

252
00:19:19,000 --> 00:19:22,200
seems like that's a story that should
exist, like somebody should write it,

253
00:19:22,279 --> 00:19:25,960
you know that the idea, because
I don't think that exists, the idea

254
00:19:26,000 --> 00:19:29,920
of a zombie that wakes up from
his state and retrieves, you know,

255
00:19:29,960 --> 00:19:33,079
a kind of even a better level
of consciousness that they had before. So

256
00:19:33,279 --> 00:19:36,799
you know that's out there, folks. Whoever does it? You know,

257
00:19:37,119 --> 00:19:38,319
if you don't do it, at
some point, I'll write it myself,

258
00:19:38,400 --> 00:19:42,680
just because that story has to exist. Yeah. I think the closest I've

259
00:19:42,720 --> 00:19:48,480
seen is Warm Bodies. It was
meant into a movie, but there was

260
00:19:48,519 --> 00:19:52,319
also a book from futures ago,
but the zombie doesn't come back to a

261
00:19:52,440 --> 00:19:56,200
glorious body. Let's say it comes
back to the same kind of existence.

262
00:19:56,079 --> 00:20:02,720
And there's like interesting I think,
let's say facets of the Christian story you

263
00:20:02,720 --> 00:20:06,079
can see in that movie and especially
in the book. Like in the book,

264
00:20:06,079 --> 00:20:10,680
there's almost a baptism scene. At
some point, the zombie like he's

265
00:20:10,680 --> 00:20:15,359
starting to wake up basically out of
love for one girl because he ate the

266
00:20:15,359 --> 00:20:22,319
brains of his boyfriend. But like
he ends up like slowly like developing feelings

267
00:20:22,359 --> 00:20:23,759
towards that girl, and he saves
her, spends time with her, and

268
00:20:23,839 --> 00:20:27,359
like through this attraction he becomes more
and more human. But at some point

269
00:20:27,400 --> 00:20:30,519
he has to make like a kind
of confession, and there's a kind of

270
00:20:30,519 --> 00:20:34,559
baptism scene, like in front of
her church when it's raining and he's washing

271
00:20:34,559 --> 00:20:38,960
his mouth from blood because he just
ate someone but he didn't want to anyway,

272
00:20:40,000 --> 00:20:45,359
Like there's this progression and the zombie
ultimately smoiler alert shut this down if

273
00:20:45,359 --> 00:20:48,640
you don't want to read the book
or watch the film. But at the

274
00:20:48,759 --> 00:20:56,200
end, the zombie comes back to
normal human life by sacrificing himself for that

275
00:20:56,359 --> 00:21:00,839
girl, so like he has to
basically like wrap himself around her as they're

276
00:21:00,839 --> 00:21:04,000
getting shot, and yes to like
drop in like a building, I think,

277
00:21:04,319 --> 00:21:07,839
and like he's thinking he's gonna die
during that, but he eventually like

278
00:21:07,960 --> 00:21:11,640
drops in a pool, so again
there's this water baptism thing. And then

279
00:21:11,640 --> 00:21:14,640
when he comes back, like he
sees that he's bleeding, so he's become

280
00:21:15,119 --> 00:21:19,000
human again. So like you can
see glimmers I think in popular culture of

281
00:21:19,079 --> 00:21:23,000
this this solution, but as you
said, I don't think anyone has come

282
00:21:23,079 --> 00:21:27,240
up with the full narrative arc so
far. Yeah, yeah, yeah,

283
00:21:27,240 --> 00:21:30,440
well that's part of the that that
part of what's coming over the hill,

284
00:21:30,519 --> 00:21:33,000
let's say, on storytelling. You
know, it seems like it's a perfect

285
00:21:33,000 --> 00:21:37,720
story to tell. So so basically
that was the that is kind of what

286
00:21:37,960 --> 00:21:41,319
healed you. But that also kind
of that involved going back to church and

287
00:21:41,400 --> 00:21:45,279
involved getting married, like your whole
life changed, really yeah yeah, yeah

288
00:21:45,359 --> 00:21:49,400
yeah. I think as soon as
soon as it worked out the let's see

289
00:21:49,559 --> 00:21:52,960
moral layer, as soon as I
could see that, okay, I have

290
00:21:52,039 --> 00:21:56,400
a metaphysics where it's starting to be
possible to talk about good and evil,

291
00:21:56,160 --> 00:22:00,680
then I started going back to church. I was brought up Catholic. I've

292
00:22:00,759 --> 00:22:04,960
done my sacraments when I was a
child. So I just came back and

293
00:22:06,599 --> 00:22:12,880
eventually like found a really good parish
here. There's sort of this blessing in

294
00:22:12,960 --> 00:22:15,960
disguise that we have here, Like
in Quebec, the church collapse so much

295
00:22:17,039 --> 00:22:19,079
that the people who are left are
actually like really trying to do it for

296
00:22:19,119 --> 00:22:23,160
the right reasons, and like it
becomes really clear examples of what to follow.

297
00:22:23,200 --> 00:22:29,759
So found a really great parish here
pretty quickly, got involved with different

298
00:22:29,960 --> 00:22:33,359
groups that really helped me. Found
the woman that I married and now that

299
00:22:33,880 --> 00:22:41,160
I have a son with, and
yeah, like the like as you said,

300
00:22:41,359 --> 00:22:48,799
this intellectual path really followed also a
concrete, like embodied path in a

301
00:22:48,880 --> 00:22:52,240
community that I was lucky to find. So yeah, this big path of

302
00:22:52,559 --> 00:22:59,279
transformation and no more Zmi nightmares,
no more nihilism. And so that has

303
00:22:59,279 --> 00:23:00,839
helped you in some ways, because
one of the things that I've been impressed

304
00:23:00,880 --> 00:23:06,079
by you is that the fact that
you really have studied philosophy quite a bit,

305
00:23:06,200 --> 00:23:08,519
and you know, you've talked a
lot with John Raveki, with several

306
00:23:08,559 --> 00:23:15,079
people that are in this sphere,
and so you've been able to talk about

307
00:23:15,079 --> 00:23:18,960
symbolism in a more technical way using
more philosophical language, and that is what

308
00:23:19,519 --> 00:23:22,440
the book is going to be,
and that, in some ways is what

309
00:23:22,480 --> 00:23:26,599
the class is going to be,
to help people have more precise language,

310
00:23:26,119 --> 00:23:30,160
even a language that is closer to
the ones that you will hear in university

311
00:23:30,200 --> 00:23:34,440
and stuff, because both Mattyr and
I. Mattsyr developed really his own language

312
00:23:34,440 --> 00:23:40,640
which is very powerful and beautiful.
But I also recognize that some people they

313
00:23:40,680 --> 00:23:44,480
when they try to explain it to
their friends in school, they struggle to

314
00:23:44,559 --> 00:23:48,440
find the way to link it to
the to the And I have the same

315
00:23:48,640 --> 00:23:52,400
problem. People accuse me of being
imprecise, of not using the right words

316
00:23:52,400 --> 00:23:55,400
and not knowing the right words,
and so I'm really happy to see this

317
00:23:55,400 --> 00:23:57,759
this as a possibility to help kind
of bolster the case. So maybe you

318
00:23:57,799 --> 00:24:00,519
can tell us a bit about what
the thesis is and what it is you're

319
00:24:00,559 --> 00:24:07,480
hoping to accomplish with it. Yeah, So I'm trying to aid the book

320
00:24:07,519 --> 00:24:11,920
specifically for people who were sort of
in the position where I was ten years

321
00:24:11,960 --> 00:24:18,160
ago, where you're in the course
of an education focused on science and you're

322
00:24:18,200 --> 00:24:23,839
developing this sort of materialism as a
result, and you're wondering if there's another

323
00:24:25,119 --> 00:24:34,039
solution and for I think people of
this kind of character, the arguments as

324
00:24:34,079 --> 00:24:38,160
they're sometimes presented will be a bit
too fast, Like phenomology didn't work for

325
00:24:38,200 --> 00:24:42,960
me, like it like either it
wouldn't click or I would sort of understand

326
00:24:44,200 --> 00:24:45,480
what you were saying, but I
think it was going too fast, and

327
00:24:47,160 --> 00:24:52,599
it was gonna make me drop some
of the value that I saw in physics

328
00:24:52,640 --> 00:24:55,720
and math. Like there's stuff that
I just, let's say, loved too

329
00:24:55,799 --> 00:24:59,759
much still in that scientific world view
to be able to drop it too quickly

330
00:25:00,200 --> 00:25:03,319
with phenomenology. I know that ultimately, like you can recover physics from phenomenology,

331
00:25:03,319 --> 00:25:07,720
but at first it does feel like
you're abandoning something that you really love.

332
00:25:08,039 --> 00:25:11,720
So, as you said, glad
you're doing that because I don't have

333
00:25:11,839 --> 00:25:15,240
I don't have like a specific love
for physics myself, so it's good that

334
00:25:15,279 --> 00:25:21,160
you that you're doing. And as
you said, what ended up happening is

335
00:25:22,039 --> 00:25:26,599
like, okay, So I had
this love for for still the physical especially

336
00:25:26,640 --> 00:25:33,000
physical science that I was trying to
like still use in my studies. I

337
00:25:33,079 --> 00:25:36,240
was talking with you to try to
get more into the symbolic epology. I

338
00:25:36,279 --> 00:25:41,240
was also talking with John RIVICKI about
the cognitive science side, and also in

339
00:25:41,319 --> 00:25:45,079
general. It was great on the
physics side, and I was always trying

340
00:25:45,119 --> 00:25:48,720
to bridge, mainly between you and
John. I would say, yeah,

341
00:25:49,000 --> 00:25:52,319
and it took, it took several
years. I would often like run arguments

342
00:25:52,319 --> 00:25:55,440
by you and by him, and
like try to see if I can make

343
00:25:55,480 --> 00:25:59,200
something. Most of our conversations you
and I Jonathan were in private on like

344
00:25:59,200 --> 00:26:03,359
for Patreon chats with John. All
of my discussions are public on my channel

345
00:26:03,480 --> 00:26:08,559
or on its channel. But basically, as you said, like through this

346
00:26:08,599 --> 00:26:15,119
I developed I think, pretty carefully
a path from materialism all the way to

347
00:26:15,000 --> 00:26:23,000
the symbolic world and even up to
the more let's say, esoteric debates in

348
00:26:23,160 --> 00:26:26,640
similism, like how is it exactly
that the world exists in Christ? And

349
00:26:26,640 --> 00:26:30,799
how is it that the world exists
through human consciousness? And like all of

350
00:26:30,839 --> 00:26:34,680
these more esoteric kind of questions.
You can get there pretty quickly with phenomenology.

351
00:26:34,720 --> 00:26:37,599
But as I said, this was
too much for me, so I

352
00:26:37,640 --> 00:26:41,599
go I went at it very slowly, and I tried to document it in

353
00:26:41,960 --> 00:26:48,279
the book. So the main thesis
is that we're in a meaning crisis because

354
00:26:48,319 --> 00:26:52,200
of materialistic reductionism. I use the
zombie myth to talk about it, and

355
00:26:52,279 --> 00:26:57,319
then I try to the way that
I try to do it to go slowly.

356
00:26:57,359 --> 00:27:00,960
As I said, is I tried
to show like within science itself,

357
00:27:02,319 --> 00:27:07,319
there's no good way anymore to be
a reductionist. This is like in nineteenth

358
00:27:07,359 --> 00:27:11,240
century you of science, it doesn't
work. Not only can you still have

359
00:27:11,839 --> 00:27:15,680
your science, including your physics today
by going towards non reductive materialism, non

360
00:27:15,680 --> 00:27:21,079
reductive naturalism, sorry, you'll even
have like a better science and better physics

361
00:27:21,200 --> 00:27:23,960
to love. So I'm trying to
give something to materialists so they don't have

362
00:27:25,000 --> 00:27:27,240
to drop anything, they actually just
add something better. So that's the first

363
00:27:27,279 --> 00:27:30,960
part of the book where I try
to take people from materialism to non reductive

364
00:27:32,160 --> 00:27:37,519
naturalism, which is really just classical
metaphysics. Like if you read let's say,

365
00:27:37,680 --> 00:27:42,519
like what classical metaphysicians wrote using Aristotle
or Plato like in the last two

366
00:27:42,559 --> 00:27:49,839
centuries, like you'll see something that
Olmos really well modern non reductionist naturalism.

367
00:27:49,920 --> 00:27:53,960
And in the book I go through
it carefully, but there's arguments really coming

368
00:27:53,960 --> 00:27:57,079
from both like the top and the
bottom, Like there's all kinds of arguments

369
00:27:57,119 --> 00:28:02,519
that popped up in philosophy and cognitive
science about the impossibility of reducing the mind

370
00:28:03,079 --> 00:28:07,279
to matter, and even like in
general the idea that there are those emergent

371
00:28:07,319 --> 00:28:11,200
properties that you can't reduce to lower
entities. So it shows up in chemistry,

372
00:28:11,279 --> 00:28:17,160
in biology, and the most obvious
case is with consciousness. Like you

373
00:28:17,200 --> 00:28:21,279
won't find many people now in philosophy
of mind or kind oftive science who think

374
00:28:21,279 --> 00:28:26,079
that the mind is just a matter
of particles or neurons. Let's say,

375
00:28:26,160 --> 00:28:30,559
So there's this like problem coming from
the top, but there are also problems

376
00:28:30,559 --> 00:28:37,039
coming from the bottom in physics,
where like things always get if when you

377
00:28:37,079 --> 00:28:41,000
talk about quantum stuff because people like
can defend easily New Age ideas about this.

378
00:28:41,119 --> 00:28:45,440
So I never talk about that stuff
just because I know the problem that

379
00:28:45,480 --> 00:28:48,440
it brings. Yeah, but there's
a real problem for people who want to

380
00:28:48,480 --> 00:28:52,720
be materialist there, because like if
you're a materialist and you want to reduce

381
00:28:52,039 --> 00:28:55,799
things down to particles, like you
have to be able to talk about those

382
00:28:55,799 --> 00:29:00,440
particles. But like you're gonna enter
into like New Age territory pretty fast because

383
00:29:00,480 --> 00:29:03,920
it doesn't look like what you see
down there is stable particles. Like you

384
00:29:03,920 --> 00:29:06,880
can see like fields and you can
mathematize them, and there's interesting stuff to

385
00:29:06,880 --> 00:29:10,240
say, but it's definitely not stable
particles, Like at best, it's probability

386
00:29:10,240 --> 00:29:12,279
fields that you can quantify. But
as you do that, you're starting to

387
00:29:12,440 --> 00:29:17,240
like go towards stuff that is closer
and closer to the prime matter that the

388
00:29:17,559 --> 00:29:22,039
classical metaphysicians talked about. And another
problem coming from physics is that, and

389
00:29:22,079 --> 00:29:29,720
that's something coming from physicalists themselves,
is like there's no we don't know what

390
00:29:30,000 --> 00:29:33,400
physical entities are. Like even by
nature, physics doesn't tell you what its

391
00:29:33,559 --> 00:29:36,680
entities are. It tells you how
they behave like it only gives you equations.

392
00:29:36,880 --> 00:29:41,640
And even if physicians tell you like
the mass and charge of the electronicists

393
00:29:41,640 --> 00:29:45,200
this or that, all that means
is that if you put such and such

394
00:29:45,279 --> 00:29:48,880
values in an equation, you'll get
this in this behavior. But you actually

395
00:29:48,880 --> 00:29:52,119
never know what physical entities are in
physics. So like if you try to

396
00:29:52,160 --> 00:29:56,880
reduce things down to particles that say, and you're a materialist, like you're

397
00:29:56,880 --> 00:29:59,400
in big trouble because it doesn't look
like what you have at the bottom or

398
00:29:59,400 --> 00:30:02,559
stable particles, and you don't even
know like what is their nature? You

399
00:30:02,599 --> 00:30:04,799
know how the waves behave, let's
say, but you don't know why or

400
00:30:04,839 --> 00:30:08,880
what they are fundamentally, So there's
like these big problems if you want to

401
00:30:08,880 --> 00:30:15,079
be a modern naturalist of like there
seems to be irreducible stuff at the top,

402
00:30:15,119 --> 00:30:19,359
and there also seem to be something
like prime matter at the bottom.

403
00:30:19,839 --> 00:30:25,240
But like that's perfect if you just
consider Aristotle and Plato and like the whole

404
00:30:25,279 --> 00:30:27,279
classical metaphysical tradition, because in that
world view, what you have at the

405
00:30:27,279 --> 00:30:32,079
top or irreducible forms, and what
you have at the bottom is prime matter,

406
00:30:32,440 --> 00:30:37,119
and the world exists in a hierarchy
between them. Like the classical metaphysicians

407
00:30:37,160 --> 00:30:41,759
didn't quite use the words that John
RIVICKI use uses for that, but I

408
00:30:41,759 --> 00:30:45,440
think it's great, Like is terminology
of emanation top down and emergence bottom up.

409
00:30:45,680 --> 00:30:48,880
I think that's a great way of
explaining it. Like from potentially ty

410
00:30:49,039 --> 00:30:52,640
things emerge, but if you just
add this bottom up emergence, like it

411
00:30:52,640 --> 00:30:56,279
would be impossible to explain why things
go air. So you also need this

412
00:30:56,400 --> 00:31:02,480
top down emmanition of forms, these
patterns that allow potential to coher into actual

413
00:31:02,640 --> 00:31:06,480
entities. So that's the first part
of the book, Like how you can

414
00:31:06,960 --> 00:31:14,119
retrieve a classical wordview where you not
only have this ontology of like matter and

415
00:31:14,240 --> 00:31:17,880
form in a hierarchy, but you
also have forms that have to do with

416
00:31:18,960 --> 00:31:22,960
vices and virtues. Like you can
recover what I said earlier about perception,

417
00:31:22,079 --> 00:31:26,720
the fact that okay, you learn
to perceive objects, but also vices and

418
00:31:26,799 --> 00:31:30,119
virtues, so you recover a sense
of good and evil. You're already starting

419
00:31:30,119 --> 00:31:34,200
to leave nihilism behind. You're not
quite up to crestient yet and a full

420
00:31:34,279 --> 00:31:40,559
solution to the zombie problem, but
at least like you're not a nihilistic materialist

421
00:31:40,640 --> 00:31:45,279
anymore. And what I like about
doing it this slowly is that there's nothing

422
00:31:45,559 --> 00:31:48,559
that the scientist loses at this stage, Like it's just positive, Like you

423
00:31:48,680 --> 00:31:55,400
basically take the entire science that the
scientists add, but you take his ontology

424
00:31:55,359 --> 00:31:57,119
called hierarchy, and you just make
it a bit bigger so that what he

425
00:31:57,200 --> 00:32:02,200
has makes more sense, but it
doesn't have dropped anything. So that's the

426
00:32:02,200 --> 00:32:05,240
first part of the book. And
then the second part of the book.

427
00:32:05,279 --> 00:32:08,519
What I do is I try to
go further by saying, Okay, Christianity

428
00:32:08,559 --> 00:32:16,079
is still the full solution, Like
I can't justify Christianity fully using arguments coming

429
00:32:16,160 --> 00:32:21,559
from naturalism or materialism. I think
like if you could fully justify Christianity using

430
00:32:21,599 --> 00:32:23,920
something lower, you would actually be
reducing Christianity to something lower. I think

431
00:32:23,920 --> 00:32:28,880
the way that truth works in general
is you have to rather like try to

432
00:32:28,920 --> 00:32:34,039
seduce people into something higher. So
what I try to do is a lot

433
00:32:34,119 --> 00:32:37,759
like what Lewis did in his book
Miracles, but I do it for modern

434
00:32:37,880 --> 00:32:43,480
naturalism now. I say, if
you take the pattern of the incarnation now

435
00:32:43,599 --> 00:32:47,799
and you try to see the ontological
hierarchy, you try to see the natural

436
00:32:47,839 --> 00:32:53,400
world in the light of the incarnation, the natural world actually makes more sense.

437
00:32:53,960 --> 00:32:58,480
And it's the same way that any
new theory is against even in science,

438
00:32:58,559 --> 00:33:02,720
Like the way that new for instance, advanced his theory of relativity was

439
00:33:02,759 --> 00:33:07,720
exactly just like he came up with
new axioms that people thought were crazy.

440
00:33:07,759 --> 00:33:12,319
By the way, people thought Newton
was proposing something occult because it was proposing

441
00:33:12,359 --> 00:33:15,839
a force that acted as a distance, whereas everyone back then was a mechanist,

442
00:33:15,880 --> 00:33:21,200
like people thought that everything was just
like basically build billiard balls and like

443
00:33:21,240 --> 00:33:23,960
things pulling and pushing against one another. So people thought there was like something

444
00:33:24,480 --> 00:33:30,319
like material explaining why we're attracted to
the earth. But because Newton said it

445
00:33:30,400 --> 00:33:31,920
was just a force acting at a
distance, people thought he was insane,

446
00:33:32,279 --> 00:33:37,359
but because he was able to seduce
them, they actually ended up agreeing with

447
00:33:37,440 --> 00:33:40,440
him, because he said, okay, just I know it doesn't make sense

448
00:33:40,440 --> 00:33:45,599
from your standpoint, but if you
grant me what I'm proposing, then you're

449
00:33:45,599 --> 00:33:50,759
gonna have all that you have right
now and more. So he basically ended

450
00:33:50,799 --> 00:33:52,599
up like seducing people and now we
think nothing of it. Like of course

451
00:33:52,640 --> 00:33:57,200
gravity of course for setecting at the
distance, but I'm trying to do the

452
00:33:57,279 --> 00:34:00,000
same for the incarnation. I'm trying
to say, Okay, the incarnation seems

453
00:34:00,039 --> 00:34:05,079
crazy, like it seems to be
too much from a naturalistic standpoint, even

454
00:34:05,119 --> 00:34:09,079
a non reductive naturalist. But actually
I think that if you take the incarnation,

455
00:34:09,239 --> 00:34:13,400
you'll be able to get all of
what you had before and more.

456
00:34:13,519 --> 00:34:17,000
Again, so I'm trying to saluce
people into it. And we talked I'm

457
00:34:17,039 --> 00:34:21,280
making use of much of the stuff
we discussed a few years ago related to

458
00:34:21,519 --> 00:34:28,000
miracles, especially a demiracle of the
incarnation. I think like it just makes

459
00:34:28,000 --> 00:34:30,360
so much sense of even the experience
I had doing mathematics when I was a

460
00:34:30,360 --> 00:34:36,559
student, because and it just blows
my mind and anytime I think about it.

461
00:34:37,280 --> 00:34:39,239
Let's say, if I try to
prove the theorem, let's see,

462
00:34:39,239 --> 00:34:45,519
even something basic like the pathagurrent theorem, I'm taking an abstract truth that exists

463
00:34:45,519 --> 00:34:49,760
outside of the space and time,
like even if there was no physical universe,

464
00:34:49,840 --> 00:34:53,599
the Pythagaurian theorem would still be true. And yet when I'm thinking about

465
00:34:53,599 --> 00:35:00,639
this, like somehow all of my
neurons like are assembling to host this immaterial

466
00:35:00,679 --> 00:35:06,400
truth. So there's this crazy bridge
that happens in human beings when we ponder

467
00:35:06,800 --> 00:35:14,280
eternal truths. And I think the
world makes more sense if it's made for

468
00:35:14,360 --> 00:35:17,840
this, like if at its root
like this, this bridge is just an

469
00:35:17,840 --> 00:35:23,039
image of the bridge that happens in
the incarnation, where the creator of the

470
00:35:23,159 --> 00:35:30,519
forms and matter comes and embeds himself
into that great hierarchy. So that's just

471
00:35:30,519 --> 00:35:35,239
one example, but you can find
so many, let's say, aspects of

472
00:35:35,320 --> 00:35:39,639
nature, aspect of this ontology called
hierarchy that you find in non rereactive naturalism

473
00:35:39,800 --> 00:35:45,440
that are better explained if you take
the incarnation as the key that ultimately I

474
00:35:45,480 --> 00:35:52,239
think like people should be seduced into
the story of the incarnation, and mythologically,

475
00:35:52,280 --> 00:35:55,079
also, what this does is a
solution to the zombie crisis. I

476
00:35:55,079 --> 00:35:59,880
opened the book with like a solution
to I opened the book with the zombie

477
00:36:00,079 --> 00:36:06,920
it to explain our reductionistic materialistic standpoint. But as I also said earlier,

478
00:36:07,159 --> 00:36:12,039
ultimately is the Eucharist. It's self
sacrifice that is the full solution to the

479
00:36:12,159 --> 00:36:16,440
zombie problem, and I want to
invite people into that story. I want

480
00:36:16,480 --> 00:36:21,320
to sluce people into the story of
the Incarnation. I think I provide a

481
00:36:21,360 --> 00:36:27,159
solution to the zombie problem. And
also in metaphysics, I give people something

482
00:36:27,159 --> 00:36:31,519
that makes more sense than just non
reductive naturalism. So that's the main trust

483
00:36:31,559 --> 00:36:37,800
of the book. Like I try
to take people from materialistic reductionism to classical

484
00:36:37,840 --> 00:36:43,679
metaphysics where they're not nihilists anymore,
where good and evil exist, and then

485
00:36:43,719 --> 00:36:45,400
I try to take them all the
way into the story of the incarnation,

486
00:36:45,639 --> 00:36:52,119
where like all zombies are vanquished all
the times they're very quid. I mean,

487
00:36:52,440 --> 00:36:57,519
I think it's exciting because it seems
like it's also just the right moment

488
00:36:57,599 --> 00:37:00,599
for that to come out, because
we have all these people, all these

489
00:37:00,960 --> 00:37:06,800
surprising moments like Ian HERSEYI Lee,
who's says he's a Christian. She's literally

490
00:37:06,840 --> 00:37:09,559
I've heard that she's there's gonna there's
a debate organized between her and Dawkins,

491
00:37:10,079 --> 00:37:15,119
Like they're going to actually debate that
all of a sudden. So the all

492
00:37:15,199 --> 00:37:19,360
of these things happening, you even
have people like Brett Weinstein who are also

493
00:37:19,440 --> 00:37:22,880
kind of moving in a direction saying, oh, this isn't work anymore,

494
00:37:22,880 --> 00:37:24,360
this is in some ways, this
is over, Like this world, this

495
00:37:24,519 --> 00:37:30,719
kind of nineteenth century thinking is done, and so it's a it's a wonderful

496
00:37:30,719 --> 00:37:36,320
time. Joan Peterson's next book is
called We Struggle with God, and he's

497
00:37:36,320 --> 00:37:38,360
going through the Bible and he's doing
a similar thing to what you're doing,

498
00:37:38,400 --> 00:37:42,079
which is he says, says,
by the time people finish reading this,

499
00:37:42,400 --> 00:37:45,960
there'll just be no room for atheism
anymore. So this is a perfect time

500
00:37:46,000 --> 00:37:50,360
for all this to come together.
So how do you see the course going

501
00:37:50,920 --> 00:37:52,400
going with this? Like? How
do you see the class coming together?

502
00:37:53,280 --> 00:38:00,320
Yeah? Good question. Basically,
the more the more topics I decided to

503
00:38:00,400 --> 00:38:04,880
keep for the course, I want
the book to be more general public.

504
00:38:04,960 --> 00:38:07,639
Let's say, so there's no need
to go into some of the more niche

505
00:38:07,639 --> 00:38:13,480
symbolic world topics, Like I think
it's important for people who are really interested

506
00:38:13,599 --> 00:38:21,000
to know, like what distinguishes the
symbolic quality physics from the say perennialist metaphysics

507
00:38:21,119 --> 00:38:25,400
or universalist metaphysics. I think it's
important to try to see like more precisely

508
00:38:25,639 --> 00:38:32,960
interesting stuff like how it is that
the world exists in Christ, how it

509
00:38:34,039 --> 00:38:37,199
is that the world comes to exist
through human consciousness. But I don't think

510
00:38:37,199 --> 00:38:42,159
it's necessary to go into those topics
for a general audience that is just trying

511
00:38:42,199 --> 00:38:46,960
to get out of nihilism. So
basically my approach was to take the course

512
00:38:47,000 --> 00:38:52,760
as an opportunity to dive deeper into
more advanced topics that I think will be

513
00:38:52,760 --> 00:38:58,360
interested interesting to the symbolic world audience, people who have some background in symbolism.

514
00:38:58,960 --> 00:39:01,960
But I also cover everything that is
in the book. So if someone

515
00:39:02,039 --> 00:39:06,119
just wants to work through the arguments
carefully, like in the setting, with

516
00:39:06,159 --> 00:39:07,920
other people and ask questions, I
think the course is going to be a

517
00:39:07,920 --> 00:39:13,119
great place to do so. And
for people who want more, who want

518
00:39:13,159 --> 00:39:15,079
stuff that there's not going to be
in the book, if people want to

519
00:39:15,119 --> 00:39:21,000
hear more about the more difficult aspects
of symbolic world metaphysics, the course is

520
00:39:21,000 --> 00:39:23,760
going to be a great place to
delve into those topics. So this is

521
00:39:23,840 --> 00:39:28,199
I mean, to me, it
seems like like an exciting thing. And

522
00:39:28,400 --> 00:39:30,079
I know because I can see that. I mean, I see it.

523
00:39:30,119 --> 00:39:35,800
I see that people have questions let's
say that I don't necessarily have, and

524
00:39:35,840 --> 00:39:39,159
so they have issues because they they're
trying to connect kind of the symbolic thinking

525
00:39:39,199 --> 00:39:45,000
with other aspects that are not the
ones that I either know or that are

526
00:39:45,119 --> 00:39:50,119
let's say, in the forefront of
my mind. And so this is really

527
00:39:50,159 --> 00:39:52,960
important for people who have those kind
of specific questions and people who are also

528
00:39:53,639 --> 00:39:59,119
you know, we all have we
all have our strength and our capacity to

529
00:39:59,159 --> 00:40:02,320
do certain things. And I'm really
grateful that you're there to also provide some

530
00:40:02,920 --> 00:40:07,639
a little more technical specificity to how
this works and trying to say, you

531
00:40:07,639 --> 00:40:12,039
know, try to work it out
in a more detailed way. It's useful

532
00:40:12,079 --> 00:40:15,920
for everybody, especially people that are
in the symbolic world kind of thinking and

533
00:40:16,000 --> 00:40:20,719
kind of roaming around that way of
seeing the world, but they also are

534
00:40:20,800 --> 00:40:23,840
in university or then in grad school
and they or they even some people like

535
00:40:23,880 --> 00:40:30,679
they even have positions in universities,
and you know they they're starting to think

536
00:40:30,719 --> 00:40:32,800
that way, but they're struggling sometimes
to justify to their peers and to be

537
00:40:32,800 --> 00:40:37,280
able to explain it to people around
them. So this is a very useful

538
00:40:37,280 --> 00:40:39,199
thing you're doing. Yeah, I
think now it's also a good time to

539
00:40:39,199 --> 00:40:44,159
do it because it's still close enough
to me, Like I can tell that

540
00:40:45,639 --> 00:40:52,440
i'd see as as Christianity in the
symbolic world, it becomes more second issue

541
00:40:52,559 --> 00:40:57,159
to me, Like it takes more
taught to put myself back into the shoes

542
00:40:57,159 --> 00:41:00,639
of a reduction stick materialist. So
I can feel that it could slip,

543
00:41:00,679 --> 00:41:02,159
Like in ten years, it would
be much harder for me to write the

544
00:41:02,159 --> 00:41:06,920
book than it was now. And
I think the same thing is going to

545
00:41:06,920 --> 00:41:08,639
happen to a lot of people.
Like ideally, if the book can save

546
00:41:08,760 --> 00:41:13,000
time for people who are at the
point where I was ten years ago,

547
00:41:13,239 --> 00:41:15,039
that's great, and then they can
forget about it and move on to just

548
00:41:15,119 --> 00:41:21,360
like sing the world symbolically. But
yeah, as you said, I think

549
00:41:21,400 --> 00:41:22,840
now is a good time to do
it. If there's lots of people going

550
00:41:23,159 --> 00:41:25,719
through this transition if I can save
them a lot of time. I think

551
00:41:25,840 --> 00:41:30,079
this is great and it would be
order to do. Like at some point,

552
00:41:30,199 --> 00:41:32,840
as more and more people see the
world this way, like it's going

553
00:41:32,880 --> 00:41:37,400
to be ordered to document the transition
exactly how it works. Yeah, because

554
00:41:37,440 --> 00:41:39,880
I mean our prediction, both my
brother and I his prediction, and I

555
00:41:39,880 --> 00:41:44,400
think Georg Peterson' told we had a
similar insight when he wrote Maths, meaning

556
00:41:45,079 --> 00:41:47,079
he said, you know, in
twenty five years, everybody's going to think

557
00:41:47,079 --> 00:41:51,480
this way and no one will know
that they've changed the way they think.

558
00:41:51,800 --> 00:41:54,079
And so I think that for those
of us that are at the outset of

559
00:41:54,119 --> 00:41:58,760
this and that are kind of helping
to instigate the change, it's useful for

560
00:41:58,800 --> 00:42:00,679
us to be clear on what's going
on on as we notice it kind of

561
00:42:00,679 --> 00:42:07,039
infuse the backgrounds of people's minds and
change the world view slowly. So wonderful

562
00:42:07,039 --> 00:42:08,519
stuff. I'm I will be there
in the class, folks. I'll be

563
00:42:08,559 --> 00:42:12,800
there not in every single episode,
but I'll be there at the beginning,

564
00:42:12,840 --> 00:42:15,480
maybe a few times during it,
and I'll definitely be there at the at

565
00:42:15,480 --> 00:42:19,119
the last class to kind of to
wrap it all up. So I'm looking

566
00:42:19,159 --> 00:42:22,840
forward to seeing people there and to
and to follow along and you know,

567
00:42:23,880 --> 00:42:30,000
this year like how can I say
this? Like everything now COVID after COVID

568
00:42:30,079 --> 00:42:31,760
ended, things are kind of starting
to consolidate. I feel, you know,

569
00:42:31,760 --> 00:42:35,440
we have the Symbolic World Press.
Now we're going to start to publish

570
00:42:35,760 --> 00:42:38,599
not just my works, but also
works of people like John Fidipp that are

571
00:42:38,599 --> 00:42:43,360
in the Symbolic World and that are
thinking about this and that have really worked

572
00:42:43,360 --> 00:42:46,800
out some aspects, so both fiction
and nonfiction. So it's a it's a

573
00:42:46,800 --> 00:42:51,079
great time to to to jump in
and to get involved. We did the

574
00:42:51,079 --> 00:42:54,320
Baywolf class. It was massively successful, and I think we'll see something similar

575
00:42:54,360 --> 00:42:59,320
with this class as well. So
people sign up the class is what do

576
00:42:59,440 --> 00:43:01,360
we say the first day? Was
it going to be? We just had

577
00:43:01,599 --> 00:43:07,639
the twenty fourth Yeah, twenty fourth
January twenty fourth January twenty fourth is the

578
00:43:07,679 --> 00:43:10,440
first class. Sign up. We'll
put a link in the descriptions of course

579
00:43:10,719 --> 00:43:15,840
you can. You can sign up
and we'll have questions there. It is

580
00:43:15,880 --> 00:43:20,400
a mix of lecture and interaction and
we're looking forward to seeing you guys there.

581
00:43:20,920 --> 00:43:22,800
Thanks. The book is going to
be ready for the summit. Basically

582
00:43:22,880 --> 00:43:25,679
that is the plan. The plan
is to have a pre launch at the

583
00:43:25,679 --> 00:43:28,679
summit, so if you come to
the summit, you'll be able to get

584
00:43:28,719 --> 00:43:32,880
early copies of the book, and
then after that we'll have a more official

585
00:43:34,519 --> 00:43:38,519
or official launch. So good stuff. Perfect, Thanks Nathan, Yeah,

586
00:43:38,599 --> 00:43:43,440
thanks, thanks you. I want
to invite you all to the very first

587
00:43:43,440 --> 00:43:46,840
Symbolic World Summit. Over three days, we will finally meet in real time,

588
00:43:47,079 --> 00:43:51,880
in real space, and everyone from
this little corner of the Internet will

589
00:43:51,880 --> 00:43:54,920
be there to explore the theme of
reclaiming the cosmic image. Of course I

590
00:43:54,960 --> 00:43:59,400
will be speaking. There will also
be Martin Shaw, who is an amazing

591
00:43:59,440 --> 00:44:04,119
mythographer, her father Stephen de Young
of Lord of Spirit fame. There will

592
00:44:04,119 --> 00:44:08,400
be Richard Rowland from the Universal History
series, Vesper Stamper, Nicholas Kotar,

593
00:44:08,480 --> 00:44:13,440
and Neil de Gray that you've all
seen on my channel here and there for

594
00:44:13,599 --> 00:44:17,559
entertainment, we have everyone's favorite apocalyptic
band, the One and Only Dirt Poor

595
00:44:17,679 --> 00:44:22,280
Robbins. This event will be the
chance of a lifetime to capture and embrace

596
00:44:22,400 --> 00:44:27,559
our current moment, So join us
from February twenty ninth to March second,

597
00:44:27,639 --> 00:44:32,599
twenty twenty four in Tarbinspins Florida.
Visit the Symbolic World dot com slash summit

598
00:44:32,760 --> 00:44:36,239
for more information, and I will
see you there
