WEBVTT

1
00:00:01.120 --> 00:00:04.639
Welcome back in Your Leadership. I'm
Chris Lorenzo and welcome to this week's Thoughtful

2
00:00:04.679 --> 00:00:07.919
Thursday. Don't forget to follow us
on YouTube at Hacking Your Leadership and leave

3
00:00:07.960 --> 00:00:10.720
us a review on iTunes. On
this Thoughtful Thursday, we're going to be

4
00:00:10.720 --> 00:00:15.679
going over some listener feedback from our
Monday episode. We're in the process of

5
00:00:15.720 --> 00:00:21.480
going over a four episode series over
four mondays on the different reasons why a

6
00:00:21.519 --> 00:00:26.399
team might not be high performing,
the kind of the dysfunctions that exist that

7
00:00:26.399 --> 00:00:30.000
it may prevent that, and if
we define high performing, is just kind

8
00:00:30.000 --> 00:00:36.640
of this sustained ability to deliver results
over a long period of time with approximately

9
00:00:36.679 --> 00:00:40.240
the same team, with mostly the
same people, that would what we consider

10
00:00:40.320 --> 00:00:44.200
a high performing team. On Monday's
episode, we talked about how one of

11
00:00:44.200 --> 00:00:49.039
the reasons that a team might not
be high performing is that there is a

12
00:00:49.039 --> 00:00:53.840
a fear or avoidance of conflict amongst
the team members and that could you know,

13
00:00:53.880 --> 00:00:58.359
be stemming from you know, people
who uh, they're they're afraid of

14
00:00:58.439 --> 00:01:02.920
challenging appear in the room, um
for you know, their own lack of

15
00:01:03.000 --> 00:01:06.280
political standing in the room, or
um they just they don't want to be

16
00:01:06.319 --> 00:01:10.760
seen as the as the one who's
always being the naysayer or or playing devil's

17
00:01:10.799 --> 00:01:15.040
advocate. UM. It's kind of
this this lack of psychological safety that says,

18
00:01:15.159 --> 00:01:19.040
I'm just going to keep my mouth
shut, And oftentimes that doesn't mean

19
00:01:19.239 --> 00:01:23.200
that those people keep their mouth shut
all the time. It means they keep

20
00:01:23.239 --> 00:01:27.319
their mouth shut when it's appropriate,
and they open their mouths when they feel

21
00:01:27.359 --> 00:01:30.799
like they're in they're in safe company. Right when we want one on one

22
00:01:30.840 --> 00:01:34.760
with another person, not the person
who needs to hear it, of course,

23
00:01:34.879 --> 00:01:37.840
but one on one with another person, and that kind of sows the

24
00:01:37.879 --> 00:01:42.599
seeds of distrust and discontent within the
team. UM. On Monday's episode,

25
00:01:42.640 --> 00:01:47.079
one of the really cool things we
talked about was that an example or an

26
00:01:47.079 --> 00:01:49.280
exercise that we can do in order
to kind of help our teams get through

27
00:01:49.319 --> 00:01:53.079
this UM and this was the the
bad ideas example. So if you haven't

28
00:01:53.079 --> 00:01:56.799
you haven't heard this, go back
and listen to Monday's episode. UM.

29
00:01:56.799 --> 00:02:00.159
But our our listeners reached out to
us after the fact and said, hey,

30
00:02:00.200 --> 00:02:01.959
that was a good example, but
we want more. We want to

31
00:02:02.000 --> 00:02:07.599
know more about what we can do
to to kind of lower the fear of

32
00:02:07.719 --> 00:02:13.319
conflict or the avoidance of conflict on
our teams because we think this does happen

33
00:02:13.360 --> 00:02:16.439
sometimes that we're in a room full
of people and everybody says yea, let's

34
00:02:16.439 --> 00:02:20.800
go do this, and then it's
clear that they didn't really mean the yea

35
00:02:21.080 --> 00:02:23.439
that they said. And I'm curious
what you think about this, len Zoe.

36
00:02:23.520 --> 00:02:25.439
Yeah, I think it's good dialogue
to have, and like, I

37
00:02:25.719 --> 00:02:29.960
think, in full transparency, I
don't know that you ever get to a

38
00:02:30.000 --> 00:02:31.719
place where there's no conflict. And
I think that's the point of why we're

39
00:02:31.719 --> 00:02:36.840
talking about it, is like you
actually need conflict, but there is a

40
00:02:36.879 --> 00:02:39.360
way to do it that allows you
to be productive. There's a way to

41
00:02:39.400 --> 00:02:44.719
do it that allows you to challenge
one another, to discuss ideas, to

42
00:02:44.759 --> 00:02:47.080
push back, and to walk out
of the room sometimes saying you know what,

43
00:02:47.120 --> 00:02:51.960
like I don't one hundred percent agree, but this is where we've landed

44
00:02:52.360 --> 00:02:54.919
and this is the decision that we're
making. So like I'm going to support

45
00:02:55.400 --> 00:02:59.400
the vision or the strategy of what
we're talking about. So I think that

46
00:03:00.120 --> 00:03:02.680
sometimes the idea of conflict, it
gets caught up in the you know,

47
00:03:02.840 --> 00:03:07.199
conflict is bad, No conflict is
good, and I don't necessarily see it

48
00:03:07.240 --> 00:03:10.759
that way, so I'm glad that
we're talking about it. I think conflict

49
00:03:10.840 --> 00:03:15.120
can be very good and should be
a part of what you do. And

50
00:03:15.159 --> 00:03:17.680
maybe you call it a different word. Maybe it's healthy debate, right,

51
00:03:17.840 --> 00:03:22.919
maybe it's feedback. I don't like
whatever you want to put on top of

52
00:03:22.960 --> 00:03:24.960
that word. I see some of
that, not all of it, but

53
00:03:25.039 --> 00:03:31.080
some of that as conflict and healthy
conflict where you have an observation of a

54
00:03:31.120 --> 00:03:35.840
behavior that you want to correct or
a difference in of opinions. But I

55
00:03:35.879 --> 00:03:39.879
definitely think it's something that's needed.
And like I said, when done really

56
00:03:39.879 --> 00:03:46.360
well, people feel good about like
they had a chance to express their thoughts

57
00:03:46.479 --> 00:03:51.759
or their their ideas and that they
were heard and that it was valued,

58
00:03:52.199 --> 00:03:54.879
and then that whatever the outcome is
going to be is going to include that

59
00:03:55.080 --> 00:04:00.280
part of the dialogue or the conversation, and then they're okay with it because

60
00:04:00.280 --> 00:04:03.919
they know sometimes what they're what they're
you know, maybe sharing is going to

61
00:04:03.960 --> 00:04:06.800
be the thing that turns out to
be, and then maybe sometimes it's going

62
00:04:06.840 --> 00:04:10.360
to be halfway there and sometimes it's
going to be the opposite. But like

63
00:04:10.840 --> 00:04:12.960
we know, this is a part
of how we want to be able to

64
00:04:12.960 --> 00:04:16.680
make decisions. And if we walk
out of a room feeling like maybe we

65
00:04:16.720 --> 00:04:19.759
still have more questions, that we
actually ask those questions, and to your

66
00:04:19.759 --> 00:04:24.399
point earlier, we do it in
a way that is that is positive and

67
00:04:24.399 --> 00:04:27.680
that is productive. Right. I
would say that if you're on a team

68
00:04:27.839 --> 00:04:31.959
and you aren't seeing any conflict,
that's a usually a bad thing because it

69
00:04:32.000 --> 00:04:36.160
doesn't mean there's nothing to have conflict
over. It means there's a fear or

70
00:04:36.199 --> 00:04:40.360
an avoidance of conflict to be in
with, and that isn't a healthy thing.

71
00:04:40.519 --> 00:04:43.920
I'm sure there are some exceptions out
there, but very few, especially

72
00:04:43.959 --> 00:04:48.160
on a larger team or on a
team where you have people whom they're not

73
00:04:48.480 --> 00:04:51.560
they don't have a relationship outside of
work. If it's not like a family

74
00:04:53.040 --> 00:04:55.839
or or a group of best friends
that got together to start a business that

75
00:04:55.879 --> 00:04:58.959
kind of thing. If it's just
a team that you put together and the

76
00:04:59.120 --> 00:05:02.079
only time they see each other is
at work, if there is zero conflict

77
00:05:02.120 --> 00:05:05.199
at all, I would it'd be
hard for me to come up with a

78
00:05:05.279 --> 00:05:09.360
scenario where that was always a good
thing. I'd be very, very scared

79
00:05:09.399 --> 00:05:13.800
of a situation like that of why
that was that was lacking. But when

80
00:05:13.879 --> 00:05:17.319
we talk about, you know,
how to work through conflict, the biggest

81
00:05:17.399 --> 00:05:23.839
kind of I think roadblock or hurdle
to doing this is this either one one

82
00:05:23.959 --> 00:05:30.920
person's inability to detach their ideas or
their suggestions from their own identity, or

83
00:05:31.199 --> 00:05:38.319
another person's belief that they can't shoot
holes in an idea because it will be

84
00:05:38.360 --> 00:05:43.720
interpreted as shooting holes in that person
as opposed to the person's idea. And

85
00:05:44.199 --> 00:05:47.040
that is what leads to a lot
of people kind of avoiding that conflict.

86
00:05:47.480 --> 00:05:50.439
But when they're talking about it,
you know, one on one with other

87
00:05:50.439 --> 00:05:54.879
people later on, or they're kind
of you know, when you when you

88
00:05:54.920 --> 00:05:59.639
can tell there's discontent, it doesn't
mean that they didn't want to. It

89
00:05:59.759 --> 00:06:01.279
means that they felt like they couldn't. And so what I want to ask

90
00:06:01.279 --> 00:06:04.560
you, Lorenzo, is when have
you encounter this on a team that you've

91
00:06:04.560 --> 00:06:08.160
had where it got to the point
or it rose to the point where you

92
00:06:08.199 --> 00:06:11.600
actually to sit people down and talk
to them about, Okay, this this

93
00:06:11.800 --> 00:06:15.319
has to change because this is going
nowhere fast and it's going to get worse

94
00:06:15.360 --> 00:06:16.720
unless we kind of just really hash
it out. I want to ask you

95
00:06:16.759 --> 00:06:18.879
that, but first I want to
get it upward from one of our sponsors,

96
00:06:19.920 --> 00:06:23.800
all Lorenzo. When is it risen
to the occasion where you have to

97
00:06:23.879 --> 00:06:29.680
actually sit down with some people and
kind of pull rank a little bit and

98
00:06:29.720 --> 00:06:31.079
say, we have to we have
to talk about this out in the open,

99
00:06:31.319 --> 00:06:35.639
because this is not going anywhere positive. It's happened, and I anticipate

100
00:06:35.680 --> 00:06:41.160
that it will continue to happen because
I think when you are working with leaders

101
00:06:41.360 --> 00:06:45.639
and when you have kind of again
this delta amongst leaders that are maybe new

102
00:06:45.680 --> 00:06:48.160
to roll, new to position,
new to an element of authority, those

103
00:06:48.279 --> 00:06:53.360
that are not, those that have
different perspectives and opinions, like, you're

104
00:06:53.360 --> 00:06:59.560
going to have those moments where sometimes
two leaders maybe just cannot figure that out.

105
00:06:59.639 --> 00:07:02.199
And I could think of a very
specific example where I had that,

106
00:07:02.199 --> 00:07:05.319
where I had two leaders that were
very passionate about the work that they do,

107
00:07:05.639 --> 00:07:09.839
They were very passionate about the team
that they led, they were passionate

108
00:07:09.879 --> 00:07:14.079
about the outcomes and the results they
that they wanted. And because they were

109
00:07:14.079 --> 00:07:17.480
both very passionate, very opinionated,
it was just continuing to be one of

110
00:07:17.519 --> 00:07:20.160
these things that would bubble up like
they would. They would, they would

111
00:07:20.160 --> 00:07:23.920
bump heads, they would bump heads, um. And then it was starting

112
00:07:23.959 --> 00:07:27.920
to kind of feel outside of just
their inability to kind of get aligned,

113
00:07:27.959 --> 00:07:30.959
it was starting to feel through the
other leaders, because each of them would

114
00:07:30.040 --> 00:07:32.439
kind of go back and be like, I like, you know, I

115
00:07:32.800 --> 00:07:35.560
can't believe they said this or they
want to do it this way. Um.

116
00:07:35.639 --> 00:07:39.600
And so I pulled the two of
them together and I sat down and

117
00:07:39.600 --> 00:07:41.600
I said, like, let me, let's let's work through this. But

118
00:07:41.639 --> 00:07:46.480
I need you to understand that that
there are things here that I think that

119
00:07:46.600 --> 00:07:50.959
maybe neither one of you can see, and that you're actually both more alike

120
00:07:51.040 --> 00:07:55.079
than you are different. And so
here's actually what I want us to do

121
00:07:55.199 --> 00:07:58.720
right now. I'd like each of
you to just write down, you know,

122
00:07:59.199 --> 00:08:01.399
not what maybe is the thing that's
annoying you, or maybe that is

123
00:08:01.439 --> 00:08:05.800
the thing that is causing you to, you know, maybe have some conflict

124
00:08:05.800 --> 00:08:09.920
with this person, but I want
you to write down what you see in

125
00:08:09.000 --> 00:08:13.160
them that you think that you really
appreciate, you know, not maybe it's

126
00:08:13.160 --> 00:08:16.160
maybe it's not the ideas or whatever, but like what you see in them

127
00:08:16.160 --> 00:08:18.959
as a leader that you really appreciate. I want you to write that down.

128
00:08:18.600 --> 00:08:20.920
Um, you know, right now
we're gonna start. We're gonna start

129
00:08:20.920 --> 00:08:24.399
there, and they both did,
and then I said, cool, now

130
00:08:24.439 --> 00:08:26.920
I want you to read it out
loud, and they did. And the

131
00:08:26.959 --> 00:08:30.279
funniest part of the whole situation was
that you would have thought that they had

132
00:08:30.360 --> 00:08:33.399
cheated with like like like wrote each
other's like words down like that they saw

133
00:08:33.440 --> 00:08:39.200
that the other person was writing down
because they were so similar and exactly what

134
00:08:39.240 --> 00:08:43.440
they saw in each other about that
they would defend the team, that they

135
00:08:43.799 --> 00:08:48.360
really really cared about people's development,
that they would stand up for ideas like

136
00:08:48.440 --> 00:08:52.279
these things. And what was happening
is that they were doing it to each

137
00:08:52.320 --> 00:08:56.759
other, not realizing that they both
had the same intent and the same reason

138
00:08:56.799 --> 00:08:58.440
as to why they were doing it. And at that point they kind of

139
00:08:58.440 --> 00:09:01.840
looked at each other and I said, yeah, exactly, Like the reason

140
00:09:01.879 --> 00:09:05.240
you two are having conflict is because
you're actually on exactly the same page.

141
00:09:05.320 --> 00:09:09.320
You see the work very similarly.
Your approach is a little bit different,

142
00:09:11.200 --> 00:09:15.080
but you're both passionately fighting, you
know, for the same things that you

143
00:09:15.120 --> 00:09:18.120
want to see within our team.
So I'm going to give you thirty minutes

144
00:09:18.159 --> 00:09:20.840
to talk through this, and I
need you both on the same page,

145
00:09:22.200 --> 00:09:24.559
and I need you to both understand
like I want. I want that level

146
00:09:24.600 --> 00:09:28.399
of passion. I want that level
of commitment from both of you towards making

147
00:09:28.399 --> 00:09:33.240
this team better. And then I
walked out of the room and they had

148
00:09:33.240 --> 00:09:35.480
their time and it wasn't thirty minutes. I think they were there for like

149
00:09:35.519 --> 00:09:39.080
another hour and a half. But
coming out of that, I think that's

150
00:09:39.080 --> 00:09:41.399
what they needed to hear, was
that they each needed to hear from each

151
00:09:41.399 --> 00:09:46.519
other that the other person actually respected
them. They saw who they were,

152
00:09:46.799 --> 00:09:50.240
they saw the work that they were
doing, and they validated that for one

153
00:09:50.240 --> 00:09:52.799
another, and they realized again that
they were more like than they were different.

154
00:09:54.159 --> 00:09:56.360
And the cool part of that is
that they are very close now,

155
00:09:56.679 --> 00:10:01.399
and you know they now they defend
each other when it comes to certain things

156
00:10:01.399 --> 00:10:03.240
that are going on, which I
think is the right thing to do,

157
00:10:03.320 --> 00:10:05.960
but but that those are those moments
sometimes that you definitely have to step in.

158
00:10:07.039 --> 00:10:09.639
You know, I've always heard that
that when you are arguing with somebody

159
00:10:09.639 --> 00:10:16.759
about something, it's important to look
at them as a teammate and that both

160
00:10:16.759 --> 00:10:20.559
of you are on the same team, and the opponent is whatever. The

161
00:10:20.600 --> 00:10:26.320
wrong idea is not your opponent is
the person that you're talking with. And

162
00:10:26.840 --> 00:10:28.759
if you can do that, if
you can take two people who are already

163
00:10:28.759 --> 00:10:33.000
on the same team and instead of
getting them to look at each other like

164
00:10:33.120 --> 00:10:37.240
they're they're on opposing teams, each
of whom is, you know, pushing

165
00:10:37.279 --> 00:10:41.720
forward their own set of ideas or
strategies or agendas, and instead the idea

166
00:10:41.799 --> 00:10:46.919
and the and the goal is to
there is there, whatever the results are.

167
00:10:46.960 --> 00:10:48.320
You want these results, You want
to be on a high performing team.

168
00:10:48.799 --> 00:10:54.559
And if you and that other person
can look at yourselves as teammates and

169
00:10:54.000 --> 00:11:00.320
the opponent is whatever wrong, the
wrong way forward is. It's amazing how

170
00:11:00.399 --> 00:11:05.679
much differently people treat each other when
they start the conversation from that standpoint of

171
00:11:05.879 --> 00:11:11.279
viewing each other as teammates looking towards
a common goal and just having different ideas

172
00:11:11.320 --> 00:11:15.799
of how to get there. When
you start from a standpoint of looking at

173
00:11:15.840 --> 00:11:20.639
a teammate as an opponent who has
a different goal than you have, it's

174
00:11:20.759 --> 00:11:22.840
really easy to get caught up in
this and have it become, you know,

175
00:11:24.120 --> 00:11:28.120
an unhealthy level of conflict, which
turns into an avoidance or a fear

176
00:11:28.159 --> 00:11:31.279
of conflict because you just don't want
to deal with it. And so,

177
00:11:31.559 --> 00:11:33.879
yeah, these exercises are really important. There's no such thing as a team

178
00:11:35.080 --> 00:11:39.279
that doesn't go through this. So
if you as a leader, one of

179
00:11:39.279 --> 00:11:43.879
your responsibilities is to facilitate these kind
of moments where they can happen in a

180
00:11:43.879 --> 00:11:46.879
healthy and a productive way, because
when the time comes where it needs to

181
00:11:46.919 --> 00:11:50.559
happen anyway where there's there's no avoidance
of it, it needs to be able

182
00:11:50.600 --> 00:11:54.679
to be done in a way that
that kind of raises the cohesion of the

183
00:11:54.679 --> 00:11:58.720
team as opposed to degrades it absolutely, and with that it brings us to

184
00:11:58.759 --> 00:12:01.080
the end of this episode. This
is hacking leadership. I'm Lorenzo and I'm

185
00:12:01.159 --> 00:12:03.399
Chris, and have a great day.

