Using free speech to free minds. You are listening to the David Night Show.
As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Monday, the fifteenth of April.
He're of our Lord twenty twenty four. Well, we had a close call
with war. May not be over yet in the Middle East. We'll talk
about that. But as everybody is focusing on that, DPA is coming for
local food production, meat production, using the same metrics to create rules without
any input from our congressman who just sat by dumbly and watch this happen.
They create new rules to do exactly what the World Economic Forum is doing in
polland and then Biden is working to increase the price of fuel by a fifteen
fold. That's fifteen times more expensive. Who needs a war in the Middle
East to create hyperinflation? We got bo pecky know, Bo Biden Peck.
We'll be right back. We'll make no mistake about it, folks. Our
government is at war with us. They seek to starve us of food and
fuel. On this April of fifteenth money as well. When you look at
what they're doing domestically, it's no wonder that they want to take us to
war. Right, Let's focus on other well, what can we do to
start these wars up? To get the I'm going so we're going to take
a quick look before we get into what is happening domestically, what happened in
the Middle East between Israel and Iran over the weekend, and we'll take a
look at Ukraine coming up. It's interesting how they how very simple new technology
has stalemated really expensive tanks. It's kind of interesting, you know, when
Biden says it threatens so many times of civil war, and we have the
civil war entering into Trump's speech in a really stupid way, of course,
but as Biden and Eric Swalwell and Beto O'Rourke, I want to brag about
how they've got a big military. They got tanks, and they got planes,
and they got bombs and they can take our guns. Well, if
you take a look at what's happening with cheap commercial drones in Ukraine, it
has brought both sides to a standstill. It is an no man's land.
As I was showing you last week a clip of that, I said,
you want to know what civil war is going to look like? You have
no idea how this is goingfold, how it's going to unfold. They're afraid
to use their tanks. I mean, it's happened to our most advanced tanks,
the m one abrams, as Russia said, they burn like all the
rest. They seemed to be very vulnerable from top down strikes. But let's
first talk about Iran. In Israel, Iran this weekend fired some three hundred
plus drones, missiles, etc. The cruise missiles, drones, suicide drones,
and the first ever direct attack. Now ninety nine percent of those were
down. And we may have an opportunity. If these people don't want war,
we'll see right, if they don't choose this as an opportunity to stand
down, then we'll know who the instigators of war are. We had and
of course the press is going to ignore the fact that this was precipitated by
This is not the first ever direct attack. The first ever direct attack was
Israel attacking the Iranian embassy in Damascus, Syria to assassinate two generals. When
you strike an embassy, that is the same as striking that country. That
is that country's soil. Even though it's within a foreign country, everybody treats
the embassy as a part of that country. So the Iranian embassy is Iranian
soil, and so it began there. They responded with three hundred plus drones.
The good news is is that only one seven year old girl was injured
by falling shrapnel as these drones were intercepted. So no casualties, not really
any destruction. Some of the cruise missiles or something got through and hit the
airport, but apparently from pictures that have resurfaced, Israel went to the point
of showing that planes were still landing there. I don't know if that's a
new video or an old video. See that's the thing when we talk about
war, the fog of war, the massive amount of propaganda on both sides.
That's why I don't talk about it a great deal. It's difficult to
sort through what's true and what isn't. Now they're saying that the airports are
not impaired whatsoever, but that would be the only damage, and so well
they stop at this point or Israel counter attack. We'll see who once wore
So as part of this you also had not just coming from Iran, but
of course it was also coming from their surrogates Hesba Llah in Lebanon, and
also the hoodies and Yemen also attacking at the same time, and the as
I said a seven year old girl was in serious condition, hit by falling
shrapnel. Nobody else seems to have been hurt. Now, this gave an
opportunity for Biden or somebody in his staff to say the only wise thing I've
ever heard Biden say, the only wise thing I've ever heard him say,
take the win and stop. Will they will Israel take this as a win.
Look, they sent all this stuff, over three hundred things sent in.
You intercepted virtually every single one of them, nothing really damaged, and
nobody killed. Can you declare victory? And up to this point are you
going to escalate this? That's the question? And so it appears that Iran
wants to leave it at this. They seem satisfied, even though they just
whiffed. Yah took a big lot of big swings at Israel and missed every
single time. But Tehran said the punishment of Israel is completed again. They
said their their quote from their guy Zionist regime, crossed the red line,
and that would be the bombing of an embassy for an embassy, bombing of
Iranian soil to assassinate the two generals, but in a sense maybe they will
say that the victory is how much it costs Israel, because in terms of
money, again, nobody was hurt but Israeli general. Brigadier General said the
interceptors that jet fuel and other materials expended in the shooting down of Iran's unmanned
aerial vehicles and cruise missiles cost about between one billion to one point three billion
dollars. The estimate included only Israel's direct cost, and it doesn't count considerable
weaponry used by the US and other allies to help defend against the attack.
Is it wasn't just Israel's iron dome and things like that. It was also
American warships because again there was stuff coming from Yemen. America was involved in
terms of shutting the shooting these down as they have been involved and taking out
who the attacks on shipping. The Israeli general lamented that it was far cheaper
for Iran to launch the attack than for Israel to defend itself. He said
the attack cost Iran less than ten percent of what it cost us to defend
against it. There you go, there's asymmetric warfare from a financial standpoint,
and we've seen this type of thing. This is what the US always does.
Right. He used multimillion dollar countermeasures against something that maybe cost ten thousand
dollars. He said in the future, in a year, two years,
five years, they can carry out fifty such attacks. And let's say that
if the IDF's net budget was sixty billion shekels, with less than double what,
you have no chance of reaching a situation where we can maintain the required
amounts. The Kamikazi drones are cheap. And that's what I was talking about
in Ukraine and Russia that we're seeing there as well. There is a changing
technology is very rapidly changing and making obsolete a lot of these systems. If
you remember, going back to World War II, the Japanese came in attacking
with an aircraft carrier and planes and took out what had been in the previous
war premiere weapons, with the battleships and things like that. And yet just
as their attack showed it was the aircraft carriers and the airplanes it could be
launched from them that was key in World War two, and those fortunately were
out to see at the time that they attack. Zero evidence shows several Iranian
cruise missiles. I'm sorry, is there video evidence shows that they scored direct
hits? Again, they said it was zero. But you know, Israel
is declaring a victory, the US is declaring a victory, Iran is declaring
a victory. Everybody's winning. Let's stop. Except maybe the real victory is
when they get the world at war. Is that maybe what they're after.
It certainly is what people like Lindsey Graham are after and have been after for
quite some time. The videos purport to show several missiles scoring direct hits on
two key Israeli military bases. But as I said before, Israel has put
out clips showing aircraft landing and so forth. But they've also put out some
propaganda video about the attack. And a lot of the video that they put
into the attack was old footage. So I'm not even from there. But
here is some footage of what it looked like. Very horrific scene, isn't
it. But this is war at a distance. Wait till it comes home,
And this is what people want to bring to your home. This is
what you need to understand. Lindsey Graham, Mike Johnson and Democrats across the
board want to bring that to your home. Oh, you just imagine that
happening at your home, and imagine that there is no defense. The US
is not set up to defend against any of these nuclear missiles coming in.
So they said they're not looking for significant escalation. Now this is Israel.
The G seven had condemned Iran's direct and unprecedented attack against Israel. Again,
what people are saying is what has changed with this is the fact that Iran
has been using proxies to attack. Now they're doing this directly. The question
is how long are we going to continue to use proxies like Ukraine to attack
Russia before we do it directly. We're on the cusp of doing that ourselves.
And yet Israel directly attacked Iran. And as in the past the US
and Israel have attacked, I mean, they've assassinated Iranian scientists and other things
like that. You know, regardless of what you think in terms of the
justification for it, it is still a direct attack. But they've always maintained
this positible deniability, mission impossible type stuff. Well, if your cauter capture
will deny any connection to what you're doing, now it's just we're going to
do it and openly do it. And that's a line that's been crossed.
It's been crossed by both sides, and we should all be very concerned about
that. We should also be very concerned about preampter strikes. It was an
interesting article that was put up by the Drudge Report and the reporter was saying
that she thought that we had lost the ability to fight wars since World War
Two. It's like, lady, I don't know where you've been. We've
been in a constant state of war. She said, Yeah, we don't
have the situation. We have the mass mobilization people to go out and die
and all the rest of stuff. We just don't have the tough men like
that we got. The millennials are sitting around they wouldn't know what to do,
and they're not gonna die for a country and all the rest of this
stuff. And say, well, so he needs to get set her down
and let her watch Gilbert and Sullivan's Pirate of Penzance. It's a great satire
for that. Go ye heroes, go and die, right, It's one
of the songs you know, suck And they're like looking around like what,
yeah, go and every mother's daughter, your graves will water with her tears.
Right, we have been in a constant state of war. And then
she goes on to say, and sometimes we need to be able to fend
our country, and sometimes we need to be able to attack, you know,
preemptively, like Japan did pro Harbor. Sometimes you need to be the
first one, just because you know, we look out there and we see
evil on the horizon. Oh we can smell it. We know I can't
find it for you, but you know we know it one ways. And
even though those people haven't attacked us, we've got to go attack them first.
That's the logic of Pear Harbor. And once upon a time, before
World War II, America was a country that was founded on Christian principles,
that still embraced the just war. And for somebody to do that was rightfully
labeled a day of infamy. I know that FDR stood down, he knew
about the attack, he let them attack. It doesn't excuse what they did.
It just makes him a traitor. So, as Brian shall Hovey at
a Vaccine Impact points out, he said, evangelical Christians praying for armageddon.
And I've seen that a lot myself, and it disgusts me. It really
does, he says. There was in March of twenty twenty three, several
months before you had what broke out on October seventh, with the loss.
There was a film that was produced by a Norwegian film producer. It was
a documentary film praying for Armageddon. When biblical prophecy fuels political power. Well,
we got a lot of that, don't we. Instead of a just
war, we have these people who want to push us to fight for Trump,
they want to push us to fight for Israel. They want to push
us to fight each other, you know, divide over Trump, divide over
Biden, divide over this or that. And you got these false prophets like
Julie Green telling everybody, oh, yeah, Trump is still president. He's
going to be reinstalled. You have CIA operatives like Steve pu Chennick and Alex
Jones telling everybody about the you know, go to January the sixth. Trump
didn't lose the election. We got this thing, We got all the records.
People are even being arrested here two days after the election. Lie after
lie after lie, and people follow them, follow them. No, you
know, Julie Green, people like John Hagey, the principles are clear.
What is cloudy and convoluted and muddy are their prophecy charts. And I'm sick
and tired of seeing these prophecy charts. Prophecy charts. Revelation is not about
the end of the world, is not about what's going to happen with Israel.
It's a revelation of Jesus Christ. And they make it about everything else
because they don't want to follow him as Lord. They would rather use him
as Trump is using him. Oh, Jesus endorses Donald Trump? Oh?
Yeah, that was Where is that here? Yeah? Right here? Look
at this is sent to me by Mary ellen Moore, she says, of
FreeMind Films. She said, this is being shared all over the place.
Roger Stone shared this. There's Trump, an American flag and a Bible in
the background, and that's, by the way, not his Trump Bible,
and then says endorsed by Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ doesn't do endorsements. Did
you know that? Who does Trump endorse Jesus Christ. No, And Jesus
Christ does not endorse Trump. He doesn't do endorsements. He is not on
anybody's side, any political leader's side like that. If you want to ask
a question, you ask who's on the Lord's side? Right now, it
is God on our side. Yeah, God's my copiled I'm driving. I'm
driving. He's there. He's gonna you know, maybe I'll need him.
I don't know the arrogance of these people. Well, we're going to take
a quick break and we come back. We're going to take a look at
what is happening with Iran. APS Radio delivers multiple channels of music right to
your mobile device. Get the APS Radio app today and listen wherever you go.
A you're listening to the David Knight Show. Well, I said when
we come back, we'll talk about Iron. No, we're going to talk
about Ukraine. I misspoke, and I want to talk about the drones again.
The drones, the suicide drones are a big part and are becoming a
bigger and bigger part of everything in US. Drones in Ukraine are not performing
too well. As a matter of fact, they're turning to China, they
said. The US drones rather than being a big profit center for some people
who want to join the military industrial complex, they don't seem to be very
reliable and they're very susceptible. To jamming. Wall Street Journal says in an
article, American drones failed to turn the tide in Ukraine, so the Silicon
Valley company Skydio sent hundreds of his best drones in Ukraine to help fight the
Russians. But things didn't go too well. Skydeo's drones flew off course were
lost, victims of Russia's electronic warfare. The company has since gone back to
the drawing board to build a new fleet because, as they said, they're
glitchy and they're expensive too, sounds like our drugs. Most small drones from
US startups have failed to perform in combat, dashing many companies hopes that a
badge of being battle tested would bring the startups sale and attention. It's also
bad news for the Pentagon, which needs a reliable supply of thousands of small
unmanned air craft, because that's going to be the key thing about drones.
They're going to be swarms again. We looked at that like an excellent book
looking at drones and military industrial complex. That's going to change things. Daniel
Suarez probably about a decade ago he wrote Kill Decision. Was it about a
decade? Travis is not in his head but you know, as my son
said when we were reading it, he said, nothing good ever comes and
swarms, does it. That's especially through these drones. The general reputation for
every class of US drone in Ukraine is that they don't work as well as
other systems, said the CEO of Skydio. He called his own drone quote
not very successful platform. On the front lines, the Ukrainian officials have found
US made drones to be fragile, unable to overcome Russian jamming and GPS blackout
technology. At times, they couldn't even take off, they couldn't complete missions
or return home. American drones often fail to fly at the distances advertised or
to carry substantial payloads. Ukraine has found ways to get tens of thousands of
drones as well as drone parts from China. The military is using off the
shelf Chinese drones, primarily from Dji technology. Yeah, and the US is
not very happy about that drone company. They've done a lot of things at
the federal level to try to obstruct it, just like they do with TikTok
or with you know, trying to stop the Chinese five G as well.
But you know, it's always been my experience that if you do something for
commercial market, it's a lot more it's a lot more demanding than the military.
Even when I worked at Texas Instruments, we had some things that were
commercial, but there were a lot of people who were doing things on the
defense that and I interviewed with some companies before I took that job that wanted
me to work in the defense, and it was very very crude and primitive.
They would have stuff that was very very old before the government would allow
it to be used. For example, in the Space shuttle, well into
the mid nineteen eighties, they were still using core memory for RAM for you
know, which went back to the nineteen sixties. Very unbelievably big, unbelievably
heavy, and these are the two things that you don't want to have in
a space shuttle. The only advantage that it had was that it would remember
its state if it lost power. Core memory was a grid of electrical wires.
You would have them in a you know, like an xy grid,
and then you would have diagonal wires running as sensors, and the intersection of
these three dimensions of wires you would have little metal doughnuts toroids that could get
magnetized, and so you could magnetize it or you could sense it with these
things, but it was huge, and they didn't want to use a semiconductor
memory which was orders of magnitude smaller and lighter and cheaper, again because it
hadn't been tested long enough, and so the military would get stuff and it
would be very crude to be big, bulky, hardened that have to test
it in the swamps, that'd have to test it into the arttic and all
the rest of this stuff. And by the time they got went through all
the different testing, everybody else had moved on in the consumer world, and
so the consumer world was really where things were happening, more so than in
the military world. And so you can kind of understand how the Chinese and
a more demanding consumer environment, they're not going to put up with the kind
of malfunctioning things that the Pentagram always puts up with. So Guidio employees went
back to Ukraine seventeen times to get feedback. He said, this new drone
is built around Ukraine's military needs and feedback from public safety agencies and other customers,
he said, rather than getting information from the US Defense Department. He
said their requirements are sometimes divorced from battlefield realities. Yeah, we noticed that,
you know, and they're marching around and red high heels and telling everybody
that climate change and gender pronouns are really their their key mission. I think
our defense department is absolutely divorced from battlefield realities. They're divorced from realities of
every kind. Anyway, this is Mike Shedlock talking about He said, I
suspect China is selling drones and drone parts to both Ukraine and to Russia.
He says, what a racket. Well, that's what the military industrial complex
in America has always done. We are on both sides, don't we.
Chinese are just following our example. So drones are crowding Ukraines skies. And
it's not just the Ukrainians, there's also the Russians who caught onto this as
well. You know. The Ukrainians started using it as an equalizer, but
the Russians quickly started doing their own as well. So many drones patrol the
skies or Ukraine's front lines that hunting for any signs of movement. The Ukrainian
and Russian troops have little ability to move on the battlefield without being spotted.
And blown up. Instead. On missions, they rush from one foxhole to
another, hoping the pilots manning the enemy drones overhead are not skilled enough to
find them inside. Expert drone operators, their abilities honed on the front,
can stalk just a single foot soldier to the death, diving after them into
hideouts and trenches. Remember I showed this about a week or so ago,
and this is the drone kill that was identified in the video as AI,
and I don't think it was AI. I think this is a drone operator.
They're not to the point they're making this stuff homegrown drones and all the
rest of the stuff. Do you really think they're hooking this in with AI.
I'm sure there's people who are working on that. But when you look
at this video of a soldier down on the ground and pretending that he is
dead and the drone comes in and flies in, I don't think this is
under AI control. I think a human is doing go past it. They
turn around and see that, and then they fly back in and kill the
guy. I showed that and I said, this is what civil war is
going to look like in the United States. And it isn't it interesting that
this is going back really to a kind of stalemate like you had in World
War One where they dug the trenches. Everybody's just dug in, and that's
what's happening now because of the drones, new technology. Nobody really knows how
to deal with it. It's neither side has an advantage, so it's just
a stalemate. The surgeons small drones in Ukraine has turned the area beyond either
side of the zero line into the death zone. Those who dare to move
day or night under the prying eyes of enemy drones are dead immediately. Cheap
drones deployed in Ukraine have transformed modern warfare, but the Russians quickly caught on
and began mass producing their own. What followed was an overabundance of disposable,
deadly drones and electronic warfare devices known as jammers that disrupt their flights. Most
common are the first person view or the FPV drones, typically controlled by a
pilot wearing a headset and holding a remote controller. I think that's what you
just saw there. That's not artificial intel by any means, absolutely not.
But again, what it's going to be concerning is when they do map it
up with artificial intelligence. What we're witnessing right now is blitzkrieg drone warfare.
So the chief of staff at Brink Drones, a Seattle based drone company,
he said, drones in Ukraine are as game changing as tanks were in World
War One. It is pretty stalemate. Now. The interesting thing I think
is this jamming stuff. I'm surprised, and again I think that it harkens
back to just how crude these things are. But I'm surprised that the Russians
haven't done something with this. When I was just working as a college intern
at a company that was working on this type of thing, they had a
phased antenna array that could frequency hop to get around jamming, and it could
also with the phased array of antennas, it could analyze jamming signals that were
coming in and friendly signals that were coming in, and it could adjust those
different antennet elements in that array to create a knull where the jamming signal was
coming from and to magnify and you know, focus in on where your friendly
signal was coming from at the same time. Now, that was forty five
years ago or more, yeah, more than forty five, almost fifty years
ago. That's that's they as fifty year old technology. But you know they
should be able to do that now, even with its quasi consumer stuff.
It's kind of surprising to me that it's not being done. I understand if
Ukraine is putting the stuff together in garages and things like that, but I'm
surprised that the Russians haven't done it. These conditions, combined with widespread mindfields
and shortage of ammunition and soldiers now makes it virtually impossible for Ukraine to retake
swaths of territory, as it did in twenty twenty two. Russia, which
has ample missile stocks and superior aviation power, capitalized on Ukraine's ammunition shortages to
seize the strategic town of Avdivka and is now pushing to take more land.
Ukraine will rely on drums to make it difficult for Russians to press forward without
putting expensive Russian fighting vehicles at risk whenever they move. So the game changer
of a century ago, the tank has now become centrally worthless because of this
game changer, the cheap drone, And so this is Washington Post talking about
it and all of this. The purpose of this article is to chide Republicans
for not giving more money and equipment to Ukraine. Of course, the war
mongering democrats. Ukrainian factories are producing a wide range of drum models, including
ones that strike inside of Russia, and civilian volunteers are building fpvs themselves following
directions on YouTube. The jamming signals, which disrupt drone frequencies and turn pilot's
screens to static, have made missions even more difficult. Sometimes, he says,
we're flying almost blind. There's a little besides jamming the signal the troops
can do to protect themselves from a drone. They often watch as Russian troops
holding assault rifles try to save their lives by shooting down his explosive laden drones
before they can crash into them. Well, you just saw it there.
A guy who runs a drone unit in eastern Ukraine, thirty five year old
Stanislav So's. The most challenging thing to figure out is if it's Ukrainian or
Russian drones. When you see ten drones in the sky, there's no way
to understand if it's our drones coming back after reconnaissance in a Russian controlled territory,
or if it's their drones coming for reconnaissance or to attack up. Yes,
although the jamming system he uses, developed by Ukrainian company, helps to
disrupt Russian flights, they also hamper his own. Again, I don't understand
why they're not taking advantage of something that military is working on fifty years ago.
Russia knows how valuable drone pilots are to Ukraine and are targeting our drone
operators with aerial guided bombs and grad systems. He said, so again,
that is the state of the art in that warfare. As we look at
autonomous killer robots and drone swarms the wave of the future. The godfather of
AI warns of battle robots. Again, it's tying this stuff in with AI,
which is going to be the killer app. I guess we could say
the world could encounter major disasters before the use of AI weapons is regulated in
a proper manner. According to Touring Award winning scientist Jeffrey Hinton, seen as
a pioneer the technology years ago, I talked to doctor Noel Sharky, who
is pioneer of the efforts to try to stop kill robots. Unfortunately, that
hasn't and that's not going to have any effect because we're in the middle of
an arms race. We got to do it before the other guys. And
it's even worse. You know, they want to turn over more and more
control to the AI because if they don't, the opponent's AI will destroy their
drones while the human is still thinking about it. And so they're going to
put these things on autopilot, and then how do you control that? How
do you turn it off once you put it on auto kill. Jeffreynton is
a former Google engineer. He quit the company last year. He compared the
use of the technology for military purposes to chemical weapons deployment, warning that quote
very nasty things unquote will occur before the global community arrives at a comprehensive agreement
comparable to the Geneva Conventions. We don't obey anyway, right, that's the
reality. We don't obey the Geneva Convention. We don't obey the just take
a look at the CIA torture which is then used to produce lies which led
us into a rock. We don't care about that. We don't enforce it
in various countries. You have to enforce it on yourself. You have to
care as a country that we follow principles and we don't care. The threat
I spoke about is the existential threat, said Professor Hinton. These things will
get much more intelligent than us and they will take over. And again,
this is not just AI fear mongering. It doesn't even have to be self
aware. It could be used as a kind of false flag and say,
well, I don't know what happened, it must be a software I'm sorry,
we just wiped out this other area. But let's not have a war
over. You know, these types of things happen, or say that to
their own people. Yeah, you know, it was supposed to kill the
enemy, but it pick out this friendly city here. But you know,
things like that happen. It's just a software area. Nobody's bad, nobody's
a fault. So one of the threats are battle bots, which makes it
so much easier for rich countries to wage war on smaller, poorer countries.
They're going to be very nasty, and I think they are inevitably coming.
Well, that's not the only place where it's going to be. Trump,
by the way, suggested in terms of Ukraine. He's got an idea here.
His big difference between him and Biden is that He's going to give Ukraine
everything they want, but we'll call it alone. Maybe someday they'll pay us
back, maybe they won't, but if we call it alone, that'll make
it all better. It just goes to show you how calculus is the love
of money the root of all evil, and not the love of people.
He's willing to let the peace die so they can have the claim that,
well, you know, we're spending all this money, but it is alone,
and maybe they will pay us back someday. That's where Trump and Mike
Johnson are. We keep handing out gifts of billions and billions of dollars,
and we'll take a look at it, said Trump. But much more importantly
to me is the fact that Europe has to step up and they have to
give more money. See same thing he was doing with NATO. Did he
stop NATO now? Did he allow NATO to keep pushing for war and expansion?
Yes? Was he whining about money and how they have to spend more
money so that he could get them to arm up so they could give the
money to Ukraine for this are surrogate soldiers there, yeah, Yeah, So
he's using this as a prod to get Europe to give more money to Ukraine.
He's going to still give the money. He's going to pretend that he's
fiscally responsible. After setting the precedent that we're going to spend three to six
trillion dollars a year, we're now going into another trillion dollars into debt every
one hundred days, about every three months. And he set that precedent.
You know, it's about four trillion a year. He did that with the
pandemic, garbage and a bit beyond. So it's another Trump precedent. Zelensky
told local broadcaster last week as government would be open to accepting USA in the
form of a loan if that's the only option left. Sure, I'll signed
the paper. Yeah, same thing Trump says when he goes to borrow money
from a bank, whereas casinos, when he goes to borrow money from the
rothschilds to bail him out when the original loan that he put in fifteen percent
goes upside down. Zelensky says, you know, a senator was here recently
asked me, would you agree to take a loan money? And I but
what are the options? He said, Well, if for example, they
tell you that the money is a loan or you don't get it. And
I said, well, what's the point of such an election if there is
no choice? Well, that's interesting. He's not actually talking about election,
but he's saying, you know, why give me a choice when there is
no choice. But of course, Zelenski also did cancel elections in his country.
He also did jail his political opponents. Why are we supporting this guy?
By the way, he so, let's be honest. We will agree
to any option. Yeah, sure, I'll sign anything. I don't care.
These people will swear to uphold the constitution to take office in America.
They don't care what they sign up to. By the way, Ukraine has
passed a new conscription law aims to drag in five hundred thousand more bodies because
you know, we've got to fight Russia to the last Ukrainian. That was
what the Indian military analysts said at the very beginning of it. He said,
this is a plan to fight Russia to the last Ukrainian. And when
you look at this, this is another good example of how there is so
much disinformation, so much lies, propaganda and fog of war, that you
can't even get the truth about the draft. The full text of the law
was not immediately available. Oh, they're operating just like the US Congress under
Mike Johnson as well as Nancy Pelosi. Right, sorry, I can't show
you that law. We've got to pass it to find out what's in it.
But among the most immediately controversial elements will include expanded powers to give Ukrainian
authorities to issue draft notices on a larger scale, including using an electronic system.
Yeah, that's right. Just get your World Economic Form ID that they're
bragging about, you know, after the war's over and Ukraine has won,
and in twenty thirty, Ukraine is going to have this wonderful digital ID system
and all the things that the government imposes on you, you can just handle
those so conveniently and comply so conveniently using your digital ID. It also reportedly
expands the age of the draft registration, including for those living abroad. But
the most controversial aspect is that a key provision got quashed which would have assured
rotation of servicemen. Oh, you don't need to do that. They were
going to give the guys a break after they had been in combat for thirty
six straight months. But now that's gone as well. Now we're not going
to take out the battle hardened troops. We're just going to add more people
in there. Demobilizing soldiers on the front lines now would deprive Ukrainian forces of
their most capable fighters. Besides the what they were talking about last week,
Oh well we're going to change the age of conscription from twenty seven to twenty
five. That looks pretty doubtful as well. Looks like that's also pure bolshevik.
Lindsey was complaining about that. You got to get those people out there
now. Yeah, I know it's meat grinder, but you got to get
these young folks out there, not him, right. This law requires all
Ukrainian men eighteen to sixty years old in Ukraine and a broad to register at
the military draft. Oh but of course they're not going to use it.
They're just registering that right. They will, they will. So all this
twenty seven to twenty five no goes down to eighteen. Probably earlier in that
I just mentioned last week, the fact they kidnapped a young athlete. They
thought he was older because he was an athlete and he was buffed up.
He had to show them his driver's license. Thing. Well, you know
this guy is under if he's that young, if he's in high school,
why would they be looking How could they mistake a high school guy for thinking
that he's twenty seven years old? Do you really think so? We need
more people in the line, says Lindsey Graham. But he's not getting in
line. Ukraine exempts men under twenty seven from being conscripted. This is what
this article says, as Zero Hedgeman. Again, do we know that?
Do we know that? Or is this? Which one is true? Ukrainians
are generally only fighting for their lives once they're shipped east to fight an American
cultivated proxy war, says David Stockman. There's been either a Russian vassal or
appendage for centuries. Ukraine has The term Ukraine actually means borderlands in Russian.
That was one of the things at the very beginning. You know, you
talk about the Ukraine. No, no, no, it's Ukraine. No.
The Ukraine was an area always has been for the Russians, and it's
been there for four hundred years. Russians have had control over that area.
It's the Russian control the Crimea and Ukraine. All the rest of this stuff
has been there as long as our country has been in existence, Britain had
the Crimean war, or he had the glorification of it by Tennyson. You
know ours is not to reason why ours is, but to do or die.
I guess that's they're not talking about the UK anymore. They're talking about
the Ukrainians. He had Lord Cardigan in his stupid charge of the light Brigade,
which is a blunder that he had anyway. On a trip to Ukraine
last May, Graham gleefully crowed that the Russians are dying and that aid to
the Lensky's government is quote the best money we've ever spent, and he is
a big advocate of giving him more and calling it a loan. That's the
way we're going to sell it, going to sugarcoat it. Trump and his
warhawk advisor Lindsey Graham on the same page with one thing after the other,
he said. Graham said, I think the loan idea is going to be
pretty popular, not just amongst Republicans but also Democrats. All of them will
have an excuse. Now, don't worry about the money. We'll get it
back. Well. Quite frankly, I'm not so worried about the money.
I'm worried about the war. You guys are trying to start the world war.
You're trying to start everywhere. Graham is among the most relentless and reckless
of DC warmongers. Zero Hedge says, here's a sampling of zero Hedge headlines
from just the last year. Watch. Lindsey Graham says the US should start
shooting Russian planes down. Lindsey Graham says he would support sending American troops to
Taiwan. Lindsey Graham says the only way to keep Hamas and Israel from escalating
is to attack Iran's oil. Lindsey Graham urges Biden to blow Iran off the
map over Red Sea attacks. Now. Zero Hedge says he isn't actually a
full fledged chicken hawk because you know, he is part of the US Air
Force Reserve as a lawyer. And I yeah, so somebody wrote me about
this and said, well, he's actually in the military. It's like,
come on, he was in that for thirty three years. Did he ever
go anywhere and do ever fight in any of these wars that he was creating.
No, he was there as a lawyer and quite frankly, I think
he's worse than a chicken hawk who never even signs up. This guy signed
up, got on the legal core, make sure that he's not gonna have
to go anywhere so he can then double dip with a pension as if he
needs anymore. As a senator. He has shed no blood, no sweat,
no tears in any of these wars that he has started. And I
frankly don't care if he signed up to get his pension out of the US
Air Force Reserve. That doesn't make a bit of difference. Elvis the Beetle
and the Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find them on the Oldies channel at apsradio
dot com. Making sense common again. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Well, let's talk about war. The war that really matters, the
war that's here at home, the spiritual war. I was surprised to see
over the weekend there was a Christian conference for men. They call it the
Stronger Men's Conference. And you know, I talked a few months ago.
I guess it was maybe you know, before Christmas Son, maybe last fall.
Anyway, talk to a guy who's now head of Promise Keepers. He's
very based based as a Christian. He wrote a book you talked about the
fact they don't do these big events anymore. They're doing smaller events in different
places. And I can kind of understand why. When you look at this
event they're talking about, a Stronger Men's conference, it looks like a bunch
of boys with toys. It looks pretty silly, quite frankly, and it
looks pretty dumbed down and degenerate as well. But first of all, what
do they do? Travis Eef? You can pull this article up the show
the tank driving over the cars and the pyrotechnics going off all of the US.
A promo video for this year Stronger Men's Conference opens up with a montage
of men lifting weights, revving motorcycle engines, and boxing. Then, as
the song soars with lyrics that being ready to fight, a wrestler smashes a
chair into the head of another man step as a superhero, and a monster
truck flies through pyrotechnics, A bull rider gets bucked, a cowboy snaps his
whip, and more chairs get smashed over the superheroes heads, interspersed with sermon
clips. Well, we don't wrestle with flesh and blood or with monster cars.
Strong men. There's the there's the clip. Thank you forgetting that strong
men. These are boys looking for toys. This is just pure entertainment.
And then, look, there's nothing wrong with pure entertainment. You want to
go to something like this, you know, a big truck show or something
like that. Fine, I don't care about I'm not going to criticize you
for that. But this is not about building stronger men. Let's just be
honest. This is just about boyish entertainment. It has nothing to do with
building strong men. And as an example of it, the way they open
their conference was with a male stripper on a pole. A male stripper on
a pole for a men's conference. He was billed as the finest swordsman in
all the world, slowly circled a pole on a stage. He peeled off
his red leather top, slid his tongue up to the tip of the sword,
swallowed the sword all the way down to his throat. Then later he
begins to climb the pole that was erected for the opening of this weekend's Stronger
Men's Conference in Springfield, Missouri. Now one of the speakers who was there,
Mark Driscoll, who was a megachurch pastor himself, and he's got his
own background stories. I'm not going to get into any of that, but
you know, he was somebody who really focused on maybe too much on male
issues. But again, I'm not going to get into what was going They
tried to make it about him. It wasn't about him. It was about
what happened at this conference. And this is how he pushed back on it.
And as he's pushing, if you're looking at the video feed, you
can see in an insect some pictures of what this male stripper was doing to
open this Christian men's conference. But let me do this. I've been up
since one o'clock in the morning. The reason on horse is I had been
praying for you, and my heart is very burden for you, and I
want to be very careful with this, and it's not what I want to
say, but the Jezebel's spirit has already been here. The Jezebel's spirit opened
our event. This is a rebuke and a correction of no one. This
is an observation. Before the Word of God was open, there was a
platform. It was a high place. All it was a pole, an
ashra. The same thing that's using the strip club for women who have the
Jessicel spirit to seduce him. In front of that was a man who ripped
his shirt off like a woman does in front of a pole at a strip
club. That man, then the Senate see, our God is not arrogant,
he doesn't usen or God is humble. He decent it and then he's
swallowed a sword and Jesus Christ. Okay, Pastor John, I'll received that.
Thank you wow, And that's reaction. Then everybody starts yelling, picking
up signs on this. And so you heard somebody say you're out of line,
Mark, and then he says and he keeps talking. He says Mark,
and he says, okay, Pastor John, I'll receive that. You're
done. And the guy that's yelling that is the is also a pastor of
James River Church. His name is John Lindell and he's got a large church
there. It's like you're out, get out of this conference type of thing.
And the people who sided with him said, well, Mark Driscoll,
if he had a problem with it, he should have said something to him
privately. I'm sorry you didn't bring you didn't do this privately. You did
this publicly, So a lot of people there started yelling bring him back,
bring him back, and then Lindell got up to the mike. He said,
Mark was out of line. If Mark wanted to say that, he
should have said it to me. He didn't. Matthew eighteen, if your
brother offends you, you go to him privately. He didn't do this privately.
Lindell did not do this privately. He did it publicly and need to
be rebuked publicly for what he was doing there. He said, I talked
to Mark for half an hour. There was not one word of that.
He's out of line. If he wants to say that, he can say
it to me. Well he probably knows that if he said it to you
privately, you wouldn't let him get on there to say it publicly. Anyway.
What do you think Jesus would do with this? Well, we know
what he did to the money changers, don't we I think if he had
done exactly what Jesus, he would have made a quart of whips and he
would have driven John Lindell out of that, out of the theater, or
this conference, this men's conference that he organize. Isn't that pathetic? You
see that's why we're losing the culture, because we've lost Christ, We've lost
our vision of what that is about. And again, these other people who
are trying to make excuses for this attacked Mark Driscoll. I'm not here to
defend Mark Driscoll or anything that he's not or to talk about it either.
But the bottom line is that he said the right thing, the other guy
said the wrong thing. Let's just leave it at that. In this particular
instance, pyrotechnics, explosions and guys coming down ropes and as they are selling
this to everybody. And again, there's nothing wrong with having fun like that,
but that was not good, clean fun. So when we've got people
who don't know their right hand from the left, it's no wonder that our
kids that we've turned over to the government schools to raise don't know whether they're
male or female. There's no wonder that our society is clamoring to kill babies
in the womb. As a matter of fact, this story USA Today takes
on this video that's put together by live action pro life organization called Baby Olivia.
It's a computer generated thing. It talks about the baby development from fertilization
of the AA and various ages and all this kind of stuff. And because
they begin with fertilization of the egg, you have the only line of response
that these murdering abortionists have is to say, well, they're talking about this
baby two weeks older than it really is because they don't start it at the
point of fertilization. They started at the point of another measurement. But I
think that's a good place to start it with. But that's the only criticism
that they've got. See, the real problem is they don't like people seeing
the humanity, kids seeing the humanity. And where this is coming in.
You've got several states. Tennessee is one of them where they are mandating that
this Baby Olivia video. It's like a three minute video showing the development of
a human baby. They have mandated this be shown to students. Well,
they wanted sex education, Let's tell them what happens with sex. Let's show
them what happens meet Baby Olivia, says a USA Today, a three minute
video produced by the anti abortion group Live Action, the foundation of the latest
bill that some states are considering to further dissuade people from having the procedure.
The bills would have students watch the video and health class. In Tennessee,
the legislation is a Senate vote away from landing on the governor's desk. In
Missouri, the bill would require the video be shown by the time students reached
the third grade. Is also being considered in Iowa and Kentucky. Instead of
getting information based on science, USA Today says the Baby Olivia video's purpose is
to dissuade viewers from choosing an option that is already heavily stigmatized. No,
it's not, No, it's not. They got people bragging about their abortions,
pushing it. They didn't stigmatize that, just like they don't stigmatize a
gender change. As a matter of fact, they stigmatize anything that's the opposite
of it. They stigmatize having kids, they stigmatize staying being the gender that
you are, So, well, we'll hurt students. Well, one thing
that you could do in your sex education classes to tell students not to engage
in that and wait till you're older, wait till you're married. But they
don't do that. Instead, what we have is a pattern which goes back
to this video here about the men's conference, right the Ashtroth pole or the
Shira Pole. This is something that was prevalent throughout the area where Israel is
now and through northern Africa where Carthage was, you know, in the Canaanite
area, you know what the Romans later called Palestine, the Carthaginian area in
northern Africa, it was all all of them had these pagan religions where they
would have orgies. The poles that they would set up everywhere were part of
these, you know, the festivals for Ashtroth, the goddess sex goddess.
So they have these orgies then you know, like nine months later whenever.
They would also then have ceremonies to where you'd pass your child through the fire
to Molik. You would sacrifice your child. They would eat up this alter
burning hot, and put the live babies on the lap of this god of
Mollik and burn them alive. That's almost as bad as ripping them apart limb
by limb that we do today. But they would do that, and they
would tell people, this is your prosperity, the same way that the Planned
parenthood will tell young children or single moms or whatever, you got to kill
this baby. You can't give it up for adoption or do anything else because
you know it's going to be a financial burden on you. Do you realize
how much it's going to cost a Raisis child to the age of eighteen.
You have a million dollars or whatever the number is that they come up with
it. Of course nobody does. You don't need to have it as a
lump sum up front, but that's the way they couch it. And so
you have, you know, the brave New World Sex org Society with the
poles and all the rest. You have that followed up with the child sacrifice.
History doesn't repeat itself, but it certainly does rhyme, doesn't it,
And so does pagan religion. And so that's where we are with this.
The medical expert so say, the videos timeline is about two weeks earlier than
what doctors agree upon, and so that is really quibbling. What they're concerned
about is the humanity being shown. That is why Fox fired Matt Drudge because
he showed the humanity of that baby reaching up with his tiny hand and grabbing
the pinky of the surgeon as he was operating on it before it was born.
You cannot show the humanity of a baby they weren't showing a baby being
ripped apart. They were showing a baby that was being helped, and they
showed the humanity of that. And so USA Today says, so why not
focus on sex education instead? Yeah, we know where this focus on sex
education has led, don't we It's actually led to more promiscuity. It's actually
led to the degeneracy of the trans movement and the gas lighting of kids.
We see that it has led us into the world described by Huxley and brave
New World. But it's brave New schools. And so Live Action reports to
these types of response rather to these these types of tax specifically to the USA
Today op at Peace, they said, it's not the video is inaccurate,
which they repeatedly claim. They claim it will mislead people. Will two weeks
make that much of a difference to them? They said, it's because this
video tracks the baby's development from fertilization instead of from the mother's last minstrual period
and estimated two weeks before the baby is existence. So the specific issue they
take with Meet Baby Olivia is that by sharing a realistic look at the development
of children in the womb, it might make women and teenage girls quote feel
guilty unquote or stigmatize themot do they ever try to make people feel guilty?
Do they ever try to stigmatize ostracize people. Of course they do, But
that's not what this is about. It's just simply showing people the truth.
It might stigmatize them, make them feel guilty about having an abortion, and
therefore not have an abortion when faced with an unplanned pregnancy. The problem,
by their own admission, is that USA today and these left wing media groups
are afraid that more babies will live. A poll by the pro organization Pro
Life Organization focused on the Family found that when women who are undecided about whether
to end are shown an ultrasound, seventy eight percent did not have an abortion.
Years ago, when Karen was working for pro life organizations called birth Choice
in the mid eighties, and I said, they need to take all their
money, and they need to do a massive fundraising thing, and they need
to get as much money as they can, and they need to focus on
better imagery. So right by the time, they had very crude ultrasound,
and they didn't have enough ultrasound machines to show people even I mean, I
look at those things I can't figure out anything you know now that has happened.
It took a lot longer, but I said, that's going to be
the key thing. That's what's going to change people's minds. Show them not
just even a picture of a baby developing, but show them the baby that
is in them, that is moving in them with a beating heart. And
the better you're imaging is the fewer abortions I think you're going to have.
Now, that is the ideal situation, and it is good to educate people
that this is actually a baby, that is that's actually a human that is
developing that you don't want to kill. But I think the key thing,
as I said before, it's to show what an abortion does to a baby.
Show the mutilated bodies. I know people don't want to see it.
I don't like seeing it, but it's uncomfortable truth. And it's that uncomfortable
truth. And it's going to make the people who insist that they can kill
babies anyway. It's going to make them hopping mad, and I'm fine with
that. Go ahead, get mad, get mad. God's mad about this,
and you need to understand that that wrath is going to be poured out
on us. We need to be more concerned about God's wrath than we are
about some Marxist is trying to impose some kind of censorship on us, trying
to shame us into silence. We're showing the brutal truth. And so the
brutal truth is also that nations that embrace abortion will inevitably support Euthanasian We're already
seeing this now. We're seeing it in Canada, we're singing in the UK,
as I mentioned last week, and there's a report on life site News
about this this week. I talked last week about a British member of Parliament
whose name is Matthew Paris defending euth in Asia and not only saying that it
is the socially responsible thing to do. If you don't have perfect life,
there's something wrong with you. Your quality of life just isn't good enough.
Well, it's a socially responsible thing to do. You should do it.
You would be selfish not to die. And you know you are a burden
on the country that is paying for your healthcare, your burden on your family.
You have a duty to die. That was the Wall Street Journal op
ed piece that I read to you last week, and we see that as
happening in Canada and the UK many other places. A former member of parliament
talking about killing humans because once you cross the rubicon that you can kill a
human. This is they want people to imagine. They want to deceive women,
just like they deceive children about gender. They want to deceive women that
this is not a child. Now, some people, even if they know
that as a child, they will still kill it. And you're never going
to stop that. But they don't want people to know. And that's why
you have to show that it is a child, and you have to show
that abortion is murder. Harry Lake is now coming out as pro choice,
embarrassed about the moral clarity of a law from eighteen sixty four, because you
know, she's a celebrity apprentice without any principles, one of Trump's girls,
fresh off of raising a million dollars at mar Lago, she decides that she's
going to chop up babies for her political advantage, which is exactly what she's
calling for. Yeah, let's go ahead. I don't want to stand the
way of anybody committing murder here. These Republican maga politicians are becoming harder and
harder to defend, says dissenter dot com harder and harder to defend as the
lesser of evils when it comes to moral issues. Oh, they're indefensible.
So Carrie Lake recently released a video stating that she is pro choice too.
Let's not mince words. These politicians speak out of both sides of their mouths
all the time, and unfortunately so called conservatives are not immune to this wicked
behavior. In this clip, Blake explains how she personally chose life but doesn't
believe that abortion should be banned. This is what the Democrats used to always
say. As I've said, the Democrats of my youth, or the Republicans
have become the Democrats of my youth, and the Democrats have become the Marxists
of my youth. So it should be shouldn't believe that abortion should be banned,
Ripping babies apart live limb by limb should not be banned, but every
woman should be forced to make the same decision that she did. Uh.
The clowns need to stop calling themselves pro life as a dissenter, because the
very definition of pro choice is believing that people should be able to choose whether
or not they kill their child. But again they're not pro choice when it
comes to your medication. Oh, we've got this horrible pandemic. Yeh,
so I've heard. I haven't seen anybody say, oh, but you've got
to take this vaccine and no choices about it. Oh, and we're not
going to let you try anything else. You can't try avermectin or XQ.
Trump's not going to shut these people down who are punishing doctors and patients and
pharmacists who are giving you this stuff. He's not going to do anything about
that. You know, the politicians here in Tennessee, did they interposed?
Trump wouldn't interpose. Trump could have very cheaply have provided ivermectin and accuban.
Instead, he was providing the rigged tests, the COVID test, the PCR
test, he was providing the vaccine. Is providing the cover for everything that
they did. So the Center said, I hope you're seeing where this mainstream
pro life movement and the incrementalist ideology have led this nation's collective morality. And
again Whitmer saying abortion is on the ballot and all fifty states and the Republicans
are scared to death because they won't defend it. Bill Maher came out talking
about abortion as a matter of fact. He had a couple of people on
his show, and one of them from the Financial Times in the UK,
somebody who was actually the provost of King's College and Cambridge. Oh well,
I'm so impressed, are you? A Financial columnist? Gillian Tett said it's
odd that abortion is such a big political issue when there's so many other issues,
and so Bill Maher said the quiet part out loud. He said,
well, not if you believe it's murder. That's why I don't understand this
fifteen week thing or Trump's plan to leave it to the states. You mean,
so killing babies is okay in some states. I can respect the absolutist
position, I really can. I scoll the left and when they say,
oh, you know what, they just hate women, people who aren't pro
life, pro choice, they just he says, they don't hate women.
They just made that up. They think it's murder, and it kind of
is. He said, it kind of is murder. And then he says,
but I'm okay with that. I am. He said, he's okay
with murder. He's okay. Bill Maher says, well, let's be honest
about this, and he is, Yeah, it is murder. That's why
these people are upset. They're not upset because they hate women. They're upset
because they hate murdering little babies. And he says, but I'm okay with
that. He says, there's eight billion people in the world. I'm sorry,
we won't miss you. That's my position on that. He said,
Wow, that's a more noble position than most people take. Yeah, yeah,
Travis, so you didn't hear it. That's really sad that that's supposedly
a noble position for him to take. It's a candid position. Certainly isn't
noble, but it is sad, isn't it. Man. Yeah. Pierre's
Morgan was on the program. He said, well, I'm pro choice?
Are you were your pro choice when it came to vaccines and masks and social
distancing and I've remecked and all the rest of See you weren't pro choice.
Don't tell us that that really was our body. This is somebody else.
And then she pushed back. This provost of King's College, Cambridge pushed back
and said, well, that's quite harsh what you just said. Oh,
she sounds like Donald Trump. Let me just say one thing here. Though
I agree with him on this fifteen week thing, I do not agree with
him on the state thing. Because look, my position is, how do
we save babies. My position is the same as the people who want to
make it a federal law. We both want to try to save as many
babies as possible. I'm just saying that by refederalizing it, you're going to
wind up losing any restrictions on abortion. That's the way it's going to work.
I've watched politics all my life. I've been deeply involved in this,
and if you don't understand how this works, if you don't understand, that's
what's going to happen, it's going to wind up. Democrats is going to
get controlled. They're going to remove all restrictions up to and beyond birth.
That's what they want to do. And it'd be naive for you to take
this back into Washington. First of all, it's unconstitutional to do so.
The Supreme Court agrees with to me. Finally, I've been saying that all
my life, and I'm telling you that from a pragmatic standpoint, what it'll
do is it'll end all restrictions on children. You want to try to save
as many as you can. You're not going to stop abortion in New York
or California or not, they're too far gone. But you can stop abortions
in Tennessee and Texas and Florida and places like that. You should should work
on that. Maybe eventually you'll change the minds of people in California and New
York. But if you try to do this at the federal level, you're
going to lose everybody. You're gonna lose big time. It's beyond foolish to
do that. And so you know, when we look at people like Sean
Hannity, he's just fine with doing the politically expedient thing like Carrie Lake,
and the people on the left are so desperate attacking Trump. Now for an
Arizona Supreme Court ruling that upholds what is a Civil War era law banning abortion.
This will be fixed to the next week or two. Let not your
heart be troubled. I can pretty much assure that that will happen. Trump
opposes the law and this ruling, or you can believe Joe's make pretend Donald
Trump that doesn't exist. And you know what, Arizona's governor is a Democrat,
the state's attorney general is a Democrat. The state legislature is almost evenly
divided. If Democrats you want to get rid of the law, well you
have a chance right now to get rid of it, and I would advise
you get rid of it. They would kill the babies for Trump political tool,
kill for Trump. Remember, most politicians on the left do not actually
care about making your life better. Yeah, and Sean Hannity doesn't care about
life. How about that? The only thing that matters is Trump. Kill
for Trump. Come on, Democrats, get rid of this thing. Is
making us look bad, right, we don't like this. What a pathetic
corruption we have seen from Sean Hannity over his life. Isn't that amazing?
Did you ever think you would see something that far gone? I know he
is always about money, but still still and then one last arcle, and
this is also from Arizona. You've got an Arizona Democrat praising Satan's Satanists,
right, this is what we had to the Texas legislature when you know,
after the Gosnell trial where you had him convicted for murdering two babies that were
full term essentially and then causing the death of a woman who, by the
way, was a woman of culture and for extra bonus points, an illegal
alien, and she bled to death or I don't know what the complications were
exactly, but she died because they couldn't get a gurney through his trashy facility.
It was filthy, trashy, everything about it was a mess, and
they couldn't get her out of there quickly enough, and she died. And
so he was convicted of murder for that. And so they in Texas and
other states they started putting in some restrictions for these abortion clinics, saying,
you got to have your building so that the ambulance drivers can get gurnies through
there in case there's something that happens, and you have to have relationships,
you know, have some kind of relationship with the hospital so you can move
this stuff faster, and other restrictions that are put there. Well, that
was just too much for liberals and taxes. And so they were holding their
rallies in the state capitol, and you know when they had the pro life
people there and the abortionists there, and the abortionists started shouting, Hail Satan.
Well, here you have Arizona, and this is a democrat, this
guy is wearing a mask. Still, this just happened and he goes in
wearing a mask. Is he wearing a mask because he's that OCD about disease
and sickness or is he just ashamed? And so this is what he has
to say. Members, I would like to introduce a group of Arizonans,
some from my district, but they have membership all across the state. They
are here today to confront the arbitrary, tyrannical authority of religious persecution that's scheduled
for government committee later on today. Today, members, I want to introduce
you to member. We are graced with the presence of ministers and members of
the Stanic Temple of Arizona Police stand today. They're at the capitol today to
fight for the rights of their more than twelve thousand members of their denomination and
the rights of free speech and free exercise of all Arizonans. The temple practices
nontheistic Satanism, divorced from superstition, without any belief in gods or devils.
They practice the religious They practice the religious value of compassion, justice, bodily,
autonomy, free speech, science, humility, and noble action. As
in organized large, they actively do out their community service and participate in public
affairs where their issues might benefit, where the issues might benefit from their rational
Satanic insights. The mission of the Satanic Temple is to encourage belovedance and empathy
among all people. They embrace practical, common sense and justice. They are
guided by their conscience to undertake noble pursuits that fulfill their religious values again,
particularly compassion and free speech. Members. I welcome them to the Florida Day
and we'll hear from later on to government committee. Thank you, Yeah,
okay, says the guy who's wearing a mask because of his fear of death
or because he knows what he's doing and he's ashamed of it. Why is
the reason that he's wearing a mask here? And of course we know that
the Satanic Temple is a grifting, self promoting organization that is there not to
support free speech and free inquiry, but to shut it down. These people
are there for one purpose and one purpose only, that is to mock and
to censor the free exercise of religion by Christians. And they don't believe any
of this stuff. And they proudly tell you that they don't believe anything that
they're telling you in that regard. They are Satanic, whether they realize it
or not. Arizona Democratic State Senator you just Saard, there was one Mendez,
the guy who was saying tyrannical, tyrannical, they are tyrannical, Satanic
Temple, the Satanic Temple. That's amazing, how stupid these people are who
God has punished this nation have people like him in positions of leadership. So
he proclaimed through a large white COVID mask that he and his colleagues were graced
by the presence of ministers and members of the Satanic Temple fighting back against these
tyrannical Christians out there who have Constitution on their side in terms of free exercise.
Quite frankly, I would just suggest to him that, based on what
he's trying to accomplish here and based on his concerns, I really do think
that a ku Klux Klan mask would be better protection for you. It would
also be better optics, because that's what you're really about. Satanists were there
to testify before a Senate Government committee against the bill introduced by Senator Jake Hoffman,
and I hated when they do this. It's like the Patriot Act.
He has the Respect Act reject escalating Satanism by preserving essential core traditions. Well,
I'd be real tempted to vote against that based on the name, but
I agree with the principle. I hate those cute sa names like that.
It would ban quote Satanic memorials, statues, altars, or displays, or
any other method of representing or honoring Satan from being erected on public property.
All committee members present present that day except for Mendez, voted in favor of
the bill, but it ultimately failed when two Republicans voted with Democrats against it.
So it got out of committee, but they lost it in the House.
Well, here's the thing. I think that the bill is flawed in
that it doesn't get to the core issue. What the Satanic Temple is trying
to do is to try to destroy the aspect of the First Amendment that allows
the free exercise of religion. Their purpose is to be obnoxious and to call
their obnoxiousness a religious expression. And if they can get you to ban what
they have absolutely no belief in, then they can argue that what you truly
believe in your religion can be banned. That's the game that they're after.
And so the bill ought to address any faux religion that professes that it doesn't
believe what it's doing, and is there specifically for the mockery. That's what
ought that would be very specific about it. That is the core issue here.
And you can ban this without having any First Amendment conflicts because this is
not a religion and we're not applying some litmus tests to them. They profess
it up front. The Temple practices nontheistic Satanism, divorced from superstition, without
belief in gods or devils. He says, they practice the religious values of
compassion, justice, bodily autonomy, blah blah blah. No, those are
not religious values. It is not a religion. It is not to be
recorded respect, it is not to be accorded protection as a religion. And
that's the point. It's not a religion. They engage in stunts, They
erect statues of Baphomet on public property, They host after school Satan classes to
try to be as obnoxious as they can because they want to shut down after
school Bible classes. And so the Temple Satan says it embraces Satan's name as
a symbol of the eternal rebel in opposition to arbitrary authority. We do not
promote a belief in a personal s. Satanists should actively work to hone critical
thinking. Our beliefs must be malleable and the best current scientific understanding of the
natural of the material world. Well, okay, if you want some critical
thinking, take a look at blaze Pascal's wager. He says, what have
you got to lose? If there is a God and you obey him,
what have you got to if there is no god, what have you really
lost? You may have given up some things that you would like to do,
but if there really is a god and you rebel against him, you
have infinite loss. So Pascal the mathematician tried to explain to them what the
risk benefits are. But we have a population that doesn't understand risks and benefits
anymore. Is evidenced by this COVID thing. The group simultaneously promotes ritual abortions
and unback batism ceremonies, but their core statements say they don't believe any of
this stuff. It's just mockery. It is not a religion, it is
not beliefs. It is mockery of religion. And beliefs and of God.
The Senator promotes them as taking noble action and says that he is graced with
their presence. Well, that's where we are. That's what is happening in
America, which is why some of these other things are happening. We're going
to talk about what Joe Biden is doing to us through his EPA, as
well as another look back at the pandemic. It is amazing. Now there's
a documentary out saying that it wasn't Fauci. They've already excused Donald Trump.
These are Trump people, and now they're saying it wasn't even Fauci. No
guess who it was it was. Burks says this documentary, I'm gonna cover
that and show you some of the comments that people made with that. On
Rockfinn, thank you very much. Michelle Obaman, thank you very much.
I really do appreciate your support, and you've been there almost every day.
I appreciate that. And on Rockfinn Tornator, thank you as well, he
writes, or she writes a good morning, David. You may have already
heard about it, but there's a new documentary coming out about the fake plot
to kidnap Governor Whitmer. It's called Kidnap and Kill, and they have the
preview posted on the website kankfilm dot com. I thought you'd be interested.
The film's creator is doing interviews. I'll take a look at it, and
I'm assuming that they understand that it was a fake FBI set up. I'm
assuming from that we'll be right back here. News Now at apsradionews dot com
or get the APS radio app and never miss another story. You're listening to
the David Knight Show. Well, as we look at the Civil War,
there, we got another historical reference here. Michael Douglas is going to be
playing Benjamin Franklin on TV. Unfortunately he is no Benjamin Franklin, but he
says playing a seventy year old Benjamin Franklin on TV gives him hope about an
eighty one year old Joe Biden. Well, Michael Douglas is not eighty one.
Michael Douglas is seventy nine. But Michael Douglas, you are not Ben
Franklin, and neither is Biden. And you're also neither one of you are
seventy years old. It's a big difference between seventy and eighty one, and
of course Biden is going to be eighty six by the time he gets out
if he survives that long, because he's past life expectancy and he's not looking
anything at all like Benjamin Franklin. Neither of them. Actually Michael Douglas playing
Ben Franklin when Franklin was seventies, giving him hope that Biden is not too
old. A recent Quinnipac poll found that sixty seven percent of voters believe that
Biden is too old, because, after all, he is ten years older
than Benjamin Franklin, and Benjamin Franklin was not running for president, he was
doing some diplomacy. The reality is is that neither Michael Douglas nor especially Joe
Biden were ever nearly as smart as Franklin. They started out way below where
Franklin was in advanced age, and they have gone down downhill even further as
well. But again, these guys are decade plus older than Franklin was,
in other words, about fourteen percent older, but they were never as smart.
And Joe Biden, besides that, Benjamin Franklin always loved liberty in his
country, Joe Biden has always hated liberty, hated individual rights. The whole
concept of the Declaration of Independence was despised by Joe Biden. We saw that
in the Clarence Thomas hearings. He hated the very idea of natural rights that
were endowed by a creator with anailable right. See, he hated that.
He thought that was a disqualification for Clarence Thomas or having written about that.
And of course we now see that Joe Biden hates this country as much as
he does our constitution, our Declaration of Independence and individual liberty. So this
is on slate. Mark Joseph Stern. He says, I was skeptic of
the stormy Daniel's prosecution, but I was wrong. This is the show trial
that is going to begin today. It was interesting that we're all reminded about
the O. J. Simpson trial and what a spectacle it was. This
will not be as much of a spectacle because they've somewhat diminished it with ridiculous
charges. You know, I mean, a murder charge is pretty serious,
but these charges against Trump really aren't. Slate, however, has come around.
He says, I was skeptic of this prosecution, but I was wrong.
The prosecution of Trump is starting in New York today, he says,
is on firm legal ground. Well, whether or not it is, here's
a newsflash. Nobody cares, and we shouldn't care because we have seen so
much law fair, so much over charging of all this stuff, so much
political persecution, that they have completely discredited any real charges that might be there,
and they have ignored the real charges that should be brought against Trump and
Biden, their their betrayal of the Constitution, their mass murder programs, and
all the rest of it. But people made up their mind about this,
and so we're going to see the same kind of polarization that we saw with
the O. J. Simpson troup. Decades later, you know, I
still had people writing me about, you know, what they thought had happened.
And we've got people who were involved, people who are witnesses. They
disagree. Some of them think that it was Ojy's son who did it,
Others think it was the mafia who did it, and all the rest of
the stuff. Look a hit with a by O. J. Simpson using
the mob doing this. Everybody's got their own ideas. We're not going to
solve that, but everybody likes to look at that. But it also has
no impact on us, like some of these things like nine to eleven,
or like Dark Winter or the anthrax attack, or the things the oj Simpson
trial was not used to push through a radical new legal approach and to restructure
our society, like these other things that it is worth talking about in terms
of a conspiracy. But his case that he's laying out here for Trump is
that although using Cohen to pay off his bimbo hookers was a misdemeanor, he
said, because if it's used, if you commit a misdemeanor to further another
crime, then it becomes a felony, he said. So, he says
he allegedly directed his longtime fixer Michael Cohen to pay off Daniels through a shell
company for her silence. Afterwards, Trump funneled four hundred and twenty thousand dollars
to Cohen and installments, but he allegedly concealed the payments by listing them as
a legal expense for a retainer that did not exist. That is a misdemeanor,
but a misdemeanor under New York law, but it is a felony when
it's done with quote intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the
commission thereof, and in his indictment, Bragg claims that Trump lied about the
payments with the intent to violate election law, which is why elevates this crime
to a felony. I think it is still very shaky legal ground, but
he says, Brag asserts that Trump and Cohen ran a foul of the Federal
Election Campaign Act. Well, then that would be a federal issue. Why
aren't the Feds coming after him for that? By making unlawful campaign contributions in
the form of a payoff at the direction of a candidate Trump. Cohen has
already pled guilty for this very act in federal court, so it's hardly a
stretch to accuse Trump of intending to break the law by participating in the crime.
That's I think the interesting thing about it. Michael Cohen has already pled
guilty to this, and he's gone to jail for this. But the question
is can they tie this in and make that connection to turn it into a
felony. Well, Governor Sanunu from New Hampshire was the essence of establishment Republicans.
Went on ABC with Stephanopholis and they had a pretty heated back and forth.
So he was asked by stephanofflis And who knew, was if he would
continue to support Trump because now he supports Trump. He supported Nicki Haley of
course when the primary was in New Hampshire, but now he supports Trump of
course because his political opportunist who doesn't really care about anything other than that.
But anyway, he was asked if he would still support Trump if he was
convicted in this hush money case, and Sonu Nu got it exactly right on
this. I mean, he's looking at it, understands what the political calculations
are. He said, this trial is not going to have a major political
ramifications that a lot of people think it may have when it comes to these
issues. People see it more as reality TV at this point. And you
could say that about the entire election, couldn't you. I mean, do
you really think that Biden or Trump going to change anything their professional tag team
wrestling match. The people who run this country are not Trump and Biden.
It's they let these guys do whatever they want, and they're selected for that
purpose. But he says Trump will try to victimize it, and that has
worked for him, and that's been going on for over a year, and
his poll numbers never seem to go down because of that issue. Again,
it only will work out to his advantage. Dude, that the cases against
Trump are not going to sway the American public and said it should be surprising
that a Republican governor was endorsing the Republican nominee for president. Stephanopflis says,
but wait a second, your words are very very clear. On January the
eleventh, twenty twenty one, you said his rhetoric and actions contributed to the
insurrection. That's five days after January the sixth. No other president in history
has contributed to an insurrection. Please explain, given the fact that you believe
he contributed to an insurrection, how can you say we should have him back
in the oval office at Stephanopflis, Well, snoodnew was wrong, but he's
not going to say he was wrong calling it an insurrection. It was not
an insurrection. It absolutely wasn't. The GOP governor said it was about less
than Trump and more about support for the Republican administration. So instead of saying,
well, I got it wrong or it's not an insurrection, it kind
of says, well, I don't really care about the insurrection. This is
all about party politics and party loyalty, and you know, I got to
move my career forward here, which is what we see from most of these
politicians. He says. I understand it doesn't make sense to you, George,
but look at the polls, because you see, that's the only thing
that matters. Look at the polls. Speaking of the polls, I thought
it was very interesting that for the last couple of weeks I commented to Karen.
I said, you know, you go to the Drudge Report, or
you go to CNN or whatever in the different places that Drudge puts up,
and it's like, oh, yeah, Biden is ahead and blah blah blah,
and then you go to a bright bar to these other cheerleaders of Trump
and it's Trump is ahead, Trump is ahead. Well, he finally had
a reconciliation of this. Finally this week there were several articles and Drudge put
them up saying, look at this, Biden's got the momentum. He's pulled
within one point of Trump. In other words, they were lying about Biden
being ahead all the time. You can play these kinds of the games of
the polls. First of all, we are what six months away from the
election. Essentially anything can happen in six months. Polls at this stage are
meaningless even if they were honest, and they're not usually honest. They're usually
rigged in some way or the other. I know, they say they're scientific
polls. How do you explain the radical differences between these different poles if they're
also scientific, how do you explain the fact that they get it wrong so
often? Well they're not. They're not scientific, and they're not accurate,
and we're six months out. But of course they're also lying directly to you
about all of this stuff as well and putting happy spins on it. I
mean, you can play games when you do the polls and say well,
we're only going to look at swing states and who's ahead in the swing states,
And you can do things like that, and they can all play their
semantics. They can talk about momentum or whatever and say we're winning because momentum
is on our side. Well, we're still behind, but you know that
type of thing. But again, it's going to come down to Trump.
Who is are they going to have a debate? Well, who knows.
As I showed earlier, again, what is being passed around by people is
that Trump is endorsed by Jesus Christ. Well, if that were true,
that would be the only thing that really matters. He's actually endorsed by the
opposite of Jesus Christ. He's actually endorsed by the anti Christ CIA and bureaucracy
that is up there. Because they put him in office the first time,
then they put Biden in. Who knows, they might put him in again
because they need to put people to sleep again. Do you think that Hillary
Clinton could have done what Trump did in twenty twenty Not a chance, not
a chance. They needed Trump to get that done. That's why he was
present. But also, if you look at what Trump is telling people now
and every time I talk about Trump and his role in the pandemic, he
didn't do it. It was a democratic governor's Well, listen to what he
says in this speech about the mandates. I will not give one penny to
any school that has a vaccine mandate or a mask command. But weren't they
life saving? Weren't they life saving? Those vaccines? I mean, come
on, you know that's he saved millions of people's lives. We would have
had another nineteen eighteen flu epidemic if he hadn't put that vaccine out there,
and he didn't give a penny to Pfizer modernity. He gave them tens of
billions of dollars and delivered the kill shot for them. But now he's going
to focus on the mandate. That's the only thing he's got. That's what
his surrogates and conservative media were talking about. Well, he didn't mandate it.
He just created it. And he had his people telling everybody that it
was just sugar water. The new force inoculations coming next year will actually maim
and kill a lot of people. Because Bill Gates Dozy can't hide him.
That's why Trump is taking control of the process, saying he's going to have
an early vaccine a company that doesn't make one that is so dangerous or that
doesn't change our DNA. And I'm not even endorsing what Trump's doing. I
understand what he's doing, and I'm not even endorsing what Trump's doing. And
I'm not even endorsing what Trump's doing. He goes trust my vaccine, but
don't trust the CDC's vaccine. And then I went and looked up the ones
that Trump's looking at. They're very weak, attenuated, classic viruses. You're
a total liar, a very low amount of that. There's nothing anywhere that
said any of that stuff, and it's nothing that said that it was that
it was a genetic code injection quaalen or the mercury or the aluminum, which
you've always opposed. And so yeah, Trump's looking at basically sugar water for
folks. Can we take a little bit of an attenuated, microwaved or radiated
COVID deal abs a freaking legally, he knows he's lying. From Jim Jones
to Alex Jones. It's just sugar water. Drink it or injected, your
choice and nice, we have the choice. No mandates about that. Look
all these people, these maga tards out there. Oh, Trump didn't mandate
it. It was Biden who mandated it. Trump paid for it. And
Trump understands that's the way this works, because he just said I'm not going
to give a penny to any school that mandates it. Well, he was
giving lots of money away to governors to push through his emergency. That's what
the emergency order was about. It was about releasing trillions of dollars the governor's
Republican and Democrat to do exactly what Fauci and company wanted, and so he
was making those comments in Pennsylvania, I think or he was talking about Gettysburg.
I don't know if he was in Pennsylvania, but he also had some
comments about Gettysburg that was kind of interesting where our union was saved by the
immortal heroes at Gettysburg. Gettysburg. What an unbelievable battle. That was the
Battle of Gettysburg. What an unbelievable my favorite battle. So much and so
interesting and so vicious and horrible and so beautiful in so many different ways.
It represented such a big portion of the success of this country. Gettysburg.
Wow, I go to Gettysburg, Pennsylvania to look and to watch and the
statement of Roberty Lee, who's no longer in favor. Did you ever notice
that no longer in favor? Never fight uphill me boys, Never fight uphill.
They were fighting uphill. He said, Wow, that was a big
mistake. He lost his great general and they were fighting. Never fight uphill
me boys, But it was too late. He just makes that, as
one person said, he makes Roberty Lee sound like the lucky termed leprechaun.
Never fight up hilled me boys, never fight uphill. He doesn't take a
stand on anything. Right that general that died, Yeah, there were several
of them. Which one did you have in mind? You know, what's
your favorite part of the Bible? Can you tell us which other? What
a fraud he is? As one person and said, do you think he
could tell us who led pickets charge? I'm betting that he couldn't. But
you know, Biden is going to play it safe. He's going to stick
to the twentieth century. Elect me. I'm in the twenty twentieth century,
twenty first century. This is our choice. So when we come back,
we're gonna talk about why local politics is important. As the EPA has decided
that they're going to try to stop local production of meat. That's right.
Elvis the Beetle and the Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find them on the Oldies
channel at apsradio dot com. You're listening to the David Knight Show. Well,
as I've said before, we need to we need somebody who's going to
echo Cato from the Roman Senate who said, oh, after every speech,
you say, oh one more thing, Carthage must be destroyed. Well,
I think we need somebody in Congress who's going to say after every speech,
oh, one more thing. The EPA must be destroyed. I know we've
got a lot of agencies that fit that bill, but when you look at
the EPA, they are laser focused on our food, our fuel, and
so many other things. They are the bureaucracy that has been tasked with implementing
the climate. Mcguffin on us to take everything away from us. They're taking
away our transportation, they're taking away our fuel, they're taking away our energy
on the grid, as they tell everybody, well, you got to hit
everything hooked onto the grid. You know your car, your range, you're
heating your air conditioning. Oh I'm sorry. We got to shut down the
power plants now as well. And now they're coming after locally produced beef,
and folks, forget about these clowns Biden and Trump. You're going to stop
these people at the local level, if you're going to stop them, And
that's what I want to talk about here with the climate stuff. This is
an up ed piece on Brownstone by Robert Malone. He says the EPA is
threatening locally produced beef, The EPA must be destroyed, and another blow to
decentralize natural meat production. EPA rule indirectly shuts down small meat producers via overreach
of the Clean Water Act, and of course that is redundant. Clean Water
Act is the ultimate and overreach the Clean Water Act is the idea that any
water anywhere is under federal jurisdiction. It doesn't have to be a river,
it doesn't have to cross state lines. And we've seen this used against a
family that had they had eight acres and they had created a pond in Montana,
and you know, working class family, a couple of kids. They
used the pond as a swimming pool. They had one cow watered off of
that and it was completely contained. It was, you know, part of
the site plans and everything signed off by the local officials in accordance with local
and state laws. And the EPA came in and tried to run up millions
of dollars with the fees against him, and he fought them for years.
They even said at one point they tried to garnish his wages and he had
to fight them to keep them from garnishing his wages, acting as if they
were the irs or something. And so they have taken on, you know,
basically usurped all these other things that they have absolutely no authority for,
but claiming that this isolated pond fell under the Clean Waters Act the Waters of
the us On January the twenty third this year, Wright Robert Malone, under
the Biden administration guidance, the EPA proposed a new rule that will bring three
thousand, eight hundred and seventy nine meat and poultry products processing facilities under their
jurisdiction. This is a massive empire building bureaucracy. And again, this type
of thing has typically been on the jurisdiction of the USDA. You know,
the FDA is out there with food additives and other things like that. In
terms of meat processing and stuff like that's usually the USDA. So, you
know, probably the best hope that we've got of the pushback against these people
is that some of the bureaucrats that the USDA would say, wait a minute,
now, that's our little fiefdom there. You can't do that. And
so he said. They put this rule out on January the twenty third.
It was swiftly followed by an abbreviated comment period which closed on March the twenty
fifth, twenty twenty four, and then immediate implementation of the rule change.
All of this justified by waste water levels of nitrogen and phosphorus coming from animal
meat processing, mirroring the World Economic Forums agenda to minimize nitrogen runoff, the
same thing that has been the rationale for shutting down farms in the Netherlands,
for example. So you didn't think that was going to come here, Well
yeah, and it's going to come through this out of control bureaucracy. And
this is why I say these so called treaties, the Paris Climate Accord Treaty,
or the Pandemic Treaty, or the New IHR, the New Health Regulations,
International Health Regulations, all of that stuff, even though they don't follow
the procedure to ratify a treaty, you don't even have to do that.
They will use the bureaucracy to create rules for which you have no due process.
It is regulation without representation, it is taxation without representation. It's going
to be starvation without representation. That's what the EPA will bring to us.
They write whatever they want. They've been given cart block, these unelected,
unaccountable bureaucrats to do whatever they wish, and they simply put up a comment
period. That's it. That's supposed to be a check on what they do.
That is not a check at all. They can completely ignore the comments,
just as the EPA did. They can make the comment period very short,
ignore all the comments, and that's exactly what they did in this particular
cases. Robert Malone is pointing out the new rule involves a major shift in
the technology based effluent limitations, guidelines and standards for the meat and poultry industry,
threatening their livelihoods by forcing them to add water filtration systems to their facilities.
What does this mean to small meat processing facilities. It's been reported that
the initial cost to install a water filtration system bringing it into compliance would be
between three hundred thousand and four hundred thousand dollars, with a minimum of one
hundred thousand dollars annual maintenance. This would force many small meat processing facilities to
shutter their doors. It is also a direct attack on the buy local foods
movement. If local meat producers no longer have a nearby facility to process meat,
they will no longer be able to provide their product direct to the customer
at food markets or online. And again, as we've seen the moves by
the USDA or by state Departments of Agriculture against Amos Miller and some other Amish
farmers. They want to shut down local meat production. This is the way
to do it in compliance with the global agenda being done by Washington bureaucracy.
And how do we fight it. We have to fight it at the local
level. And it can be fought at the local level, because the EPA
has no bill to enforce this, and they have no authority to create this
rule in the first place. As a matter of fact, there is no
authority in the Constitution for the EPA to even exist. It was an abomination
created by Richard Nixon, and it has to be destroyed. It must be
destroyed. You've had a weak counter effort by a couple of people in Congress
that has absolutely no chance of passing. There isn't any support for people in
Washington to ban the EPA. But we can effectively nullify it at the state
and or local level, and we must do that. If you've got people
who are on the ball at state level, they can nullify rules from the
ATF, they can nullify rules from the EPA. And we're not going to
be able to ban these organizations, but we can keep them from doing any
of this stuff. If we have good people at the local level. Trump
and Biden are a distraction. Neither one of them is going to do anything
to check the EPA. They're not even going to talk about this if they've
got there, if they've got their debates, I can guarantee you up front,
I know exactly what they're going to be talking about. It's the same
thing they always are asked at these debates, and it'll they'll just be recycling
the same issues that they've been talking about for thirty or forty years. They've
got a couple of wedge issues that they'll talk about. They won't give you
any hardcore statements of what they're going to do, and if they do,
you can guarantee you can be guaranteed that they're not going to follow them once
they get into office. The Kansas Natural Resource Coalition filed comments opposing the proposed
rule and was joined by other county coalitions and by American Stewards of Liberty KNRC,
an organization of thirty Kansas counties states. These proposed rules will regulate indirect
discharge facilities that departs from constitutional and statutory authority. Well again, the EPA
a departure from constitutional statutory authority, and it will significantly alter the balance between
state and federal powers. They also state the proposal quote gives priority to environmental
justice goals. They're continuing to make this law fair, They're continuing to focus
on the climate stuff as a human rights type of issue. We're seeing that
type of legislation. We saw it in Switzerland, for example. That's the
strategy. It's always global in it's or you know, the strategy that they
come up with and use in Switzerland, which worked in Switzerland. You can
be certain that they're going to try that here and that it will work in
places like California and New York and places like that. And that was the
We had the group of seventy year old women who said that, you know,
pollution was affecting their quality or longevity of life or some kind of nonsense
like that. And so they'll use the courts in any way that they can,
they'll use any tactic that they can to try to impose this on people.
So they also state that the proposal gives priority to environmental justice. The
EPA jurisdiction and the Clean Water Act is not based on ecological importance. Or
on environmental justice. So your Clean Water Act is not about that at all.
And of course they're the same people who polluted several rivers with their accidents
trying to clean of mind, they said, demonstrating that the comment period was
mere window dressing to meet formal federal comment requirements. Immediately on March the twenty
fifth, the EPA jammed through a finalized version of its devastating act that addition
to the Clean Water Act. They called it Effluent Limitations, Guidelines and Standards
for the Meat and Poultry Products point source category. Well, it is effluence,
isn't it. It's pure Bolshevik. Clearly, this is another case of
aggressive, arbitrary, and capricious EPA regulatory overreach, writes Robert Malone. It
is directly analogous to the recent Supreme Court case West Virginia versus the EPA,
a landmark decision of the Supreme Court relating to the Clean Air Act and the
extent to which the EPA can regulate carbon dioxide emissions related to climate change.
According to the EPA, after months of study and testing to look for bacteria,
viruses, etc. What they actually found in the waste water of processing
facilities was nitrogen and phosphorus, two of the fundamental elements which all living things
are composed of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, phosphorus. When you
talk, as these people have been talking about most of my life, about
banning carbon in this kind of it is absolute absurdity. And if you accept
what they're doing, a lot of people will accept it and argue it,
well, this process generates less carbon dioxide than you really think or whatever.
If you go down that path, you are playing their game. And they're
trying to ban natural it's like saying, we've got to ban water, and
now I have a cart blanc to do anything necessary to ban water or water
vapor, because you know, water vapor is far more of a greenhouse gas
than carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide is only zero point zero four percent, and
if you look at the man made carbon dioxide, oh, it's much smaller.
And if you look at man made carbon dioxide based on transportation, that
comes to two point five times one ten thousandth of a percent, two point
five ten thousands of a percent. The EPA has decided that the entire meat
industry, from watering beef to poultry, marinas to packaging, must now retrofit
current facilities and lagoons and biomass dissipates to turn nutrients into CO two and methane
in order to prevent these pollutants from entering local water supplies. So now they
want CO two and methane. Now CO two and methane are not as dangerous
as nitrogen because they got to starve us. The EPA anticipates these new rules
will at least result in the closure of sixteen processing facilities across the country at
a time when our countries meat producers are already struggling. However, on the
high side, the EPA itself estimates that this might have an impact range of
closing up to eight hundred and forty five processing facilities. So is a sixteen
or is at eight hundred and forty five? Do they care? Yeah?
They do. Actually, I think they want the eight hundred and forty five
to shut down. These people are at war with us. They have been
imposing sanctions, which is an act of war since Trump and his orders in
twenty twenty, and it's only getting worse. And we've got all kinds of
sanctions on everything about our life, our energy use, our transportation, our
food. Everything is being sanctioned by these people, and at some point we've
got to push back against our enemies domestic peacefully. That would be nullification.
It would be done at the local and the state level, and we need
to try to do that before we do anything else. For sure, we
don't want to have a war, but these people are at war with us.
They want to destroy everything we have, they want to starve us,
they want to kill us. That's what the injections are about. They're not
sugar water. It's suicidal injections. It's national suicide what these people are all
doing. They're all on the same page, and they're all trying to kill
their own people democracy. It's demicide, far reaching impacts up and down the
supply chain, from the consumer prices to producer losses and again, it all
began with Richard Nixon creating the EPA unconstitutionally. It truly is amazing. On
rock fan Assyrian Girl, she says, the magos refused to see the destruction
that Trump hasn't mind or has perpetrated through the scamdemic. Yeah, I agree,
rock Fan Wes robertson Trump and everything around him is just one big distraction,
misdirection, gas lighting, etcetera center one huge sigh oup and they're going
to be reveling in that. We're going to have another oj Trump. Maybe
he could pull up in a white Ford Bronco get A vintage nineteen ninety seven.
Jason Barker, good to see, Jason. This is all about consolidating
all the food supply so they can inject mRNA into it. They're testing poultry
and beef mRNAs and already have the pork ones. I agree. And you
know, we just had this law that was passed here and you had the
left. Oh, look at these crazy conspiracy theorists in Tennessee saying that if
you put if you genetically modify fruits and vegetables to have mRNA in them,
we're going to consider that to be a pharmaceutical and regulate it accordingly. And
they'll go, oh, are you talking about And it's like, well,
here's the studies where these people say they are you doing it? They want
to put it on everything again. It is mass coling of the population.
Yeah, they want to make us, they want to impoverish us, they
want to enslave us. But more than anything, they want to kill us.
There's no doubt about it on Rock Fan Dougalug Thank you very much for
the tip. Thank you David and the crew. Excellent program today. Well
thank you on Rumble Junk Silver. THEPA is Richard Nixon's enduring f you to
all of us. Yeah, I would agree, I would agree. Yeah,
it's it's always bothered me about Rogerstone. He's got Mixon tattoo in his
back. But I never said it to Roger, but I said, well,
of course he was a backstabbing politician. That is appropriate moral toon.
But I can think of many backstabbing politicians besides Richard Nixon. So I guess
we should get all of their tattoos, tattoos on their faces, all over
our backs, just to remember how these guys have stabbed us repeatedly. Facilities
can bypass these new regulations by drastically reducing their weekly annual pounds process. See
you there, you go, there's your out. Just start scaling it down.
We can make meat rare ya. How do you like your beef?
I like it as an never available and expensive that's the key. Right,
you do it? How do you do it? You do it from the
inside. You do it with disruption, and you do it iteratively, right,
that's what they would like to do. They would like to Okay,
should we shut you down right away? If they shut down everything, people
might start to wake up. So here's what we'll do right now. Just
reduce the amount of processing that you're doing. And all of a sudden,
people say, why is meat getting so expensive? And chicken and pork and
everything that weak? Why is it getting so expensive? They don't know that
these people are having to cut down their production to even stay in little stay
in business a little bit, and then they'll keep ratcheting that down until they
just they disappear. It'll be done iteratively from the inside, with disrupture.
The rule change fails to provide clarity of funding to local water treatment facilities.
Here's the other thing, too, such a phony thing. VPA fighting to
cover up what the scientists, what some scientists within the EPA know about fluoride,
fighting to cover that up, keep that hidden. They're dumping poison and
have been dumping poison into the water supply, calling it medication if it was
helpful. It's not helpful. If you dump it into the water, you
have no way to control the dosage. So you're going to have some people
getting too much overdosing, and you're going to have other people getting too little,
assuming that it is really a medication. None of it makes any sense.
So while they're fighting to continue to dump industrial waste into our water,
they're trying to use the Clean Water Act as a means to shut down our
meat. The federal government is our enemy. The rules fail to account for
foreign inputs. The rules specify seventeen species of endangered animals that may be affected
by salt residue as the assaults flow downstream from processing facilities. This is bogus
language to attempt to establish jurisdictional standing. Like I said, they even came
after this family that had a small pond on eight acres of land and it
wasn't connected to anything else. They even tried to impose it on that.
So the rules do not differentiate between facilities that are near navigable waters or facilities
that have private water rights. So in Congress, what are they doing.
Well, two Congressmen SD's and Burlison have proposed the Beef Act, And I'm
sure that that stands for some silly you know phrase or something. Oh yeah,
here it is beef banning. EPA's encroachment on facilities. Yeah, I've
got a beef with what they do. I've got a beef with their very
existence. But look, just get rid of that encroachment on facilities. Just
make it the banning the EPA Act. Let's make this a little bit more
direct. Whereas to the Tenth Amendment, no powers are delegated to the federal
government to protect our environment, and whereas any environmental protection is best done by
the people who live there. We therefore hold that the EPA is unconstitutional and
terminate it immediately, especially considering that it has experimented violated the Nuremberg things back
in twenty twelve. It was trying to I was looking for people had respiratory
issues, putting them on diesel fine particulate matter. There was seventy two times
more dense than what they said would harm people. Anyway, this legislation currently
has a one percent chance of being enacted and only a four percent chance of
passing out of the House Committee on Transportation. Why is that in the House
Committee on Transportation? Why isn't it on food? So anyway, this is
and by the way, this is the House where the GEO has a majority.
Meanwhile, you have Biden punishing drillers and consumers. Let's just talk about
it that way, because that's where it's ultimately going to go. Zerohedge article
points out it will be a fifteen fold increase in permitting costs and plans to
block Arctic oil extraction. So you know, depending on which way the wind
is blowing and who's doing the reporting, this week, Biden has four oil
extraction out of the Arctic or he is against it. One week after the
Biden administration slapped new regulations on key power grid components, the Washington Post reports
that US oil and gas companies will face a fifteen fold increase in costs to
drill on federal land under a new rule released on Friday. Under it,
the Interior Department's Bureau of Land Management's the BLM, same people, they're the
Monday Ranch. And I just saw an I saw an article, a Drudge
report saying, you know, it was a decade ago and the bundies are
still grazing their cattle there. Yeah. See, you can stand together and
you can fight the system. Think about that, you know, Look at
they've really come after the bundies, especially Ammon. They've tried to lock them
up they have locked him up, they tortured him when he was in jail.
But if you stand firm, you can fight these people. And they
had a lot of people who stood with them. And ten years later they're
still grazing their cattle. And boy, you talk about grazing, I don't
know how these cattle find anything to eat out there in that desert. It
truly is amazing. But as they were saying, they were like, oh,
well, we got to shut all this down to protect the desert tortoise.
Uh, the desert tortoise studies showed actually thrived with cattle there. The
cattle cattle droppings you know, the bolshevik that they're dropping as they feed there,
that had enough moisture and the tortoise could actually feed off of that stuff
and gave them another moisture reservoir. Not to mention the fact that the ranchers
that were there, the bundies, had put up watering troughs and things like
that for the cattle, which helped to get that moisture out there. But
they had more desert tortoise with the cattle than they did before there were cattle
there. Anyway, the BLM will now require drillers to pay one hundred and
fifty thousand dollars per lease on federal lands, up from ten thousand dollars from
hundred and fifty thousand in the first comprehensive update to the federal oil and gas
leasing program in over three decades. Fossil fuel companies will also be required to
pay higher royalties to the government on oil and gas extracted from federal lands.
And so again it's it's Biden essentially throttling things down. Now one more example
of how we stop things at the local level. Two bills equal double trouble
for autonomous trucking. This is from Freight Waves. Now we talked about autonomous
trucking. What we're talking about is taking really big vehicles, you know,
like eighteen wheelers weigh eighty pounds and taking the driver away from the behind the
steering wheel. What could possibly go wrong with that? We've got this mastered,
don't we. I mean, it's great to see all these crews and
Tesla cars that can navigate their way around traffic in the city and clog everything
up and become such a pariah to the people that they're putting cones on the
cars to keep them frozen in place because they're getting in the way, creating
gridlock and all the rest of it. They don't even they're not even close
to having this salt. And for all the people who say, well,
yeah, but navigating inside of it city, that's a lot harder than navigating
out on the highway, is it? What are the consequences when this thing
is out of control with an eighty thousand pound semi trailer. How easy is
it to recover one of those things? How easy is it to stop them?
Right? The brakes don't work as well as they do on cars.
They got a lot more mass, a lot more inertia there. You remember
one of these that was in a test and they had human drivers in there,
and then they had flipped the switch and turn it over to the autonomous
driver. In one of these incidents, they had switched off the autonomous driver
when they were got off the interstate and they're getting ready to park it,
and then they get back on the interstate and it's like, all right,
let's put the autonomous thing back on because it's simpler now, you know,
we're just we're going seventy miles an hour with an eighty thousand pounds load.
But you know, let's just calculate the mass and the inertia. But anyway,
they flip it back on and it immediately did a hard left turn.
Why well, because the point where they were flipping it off, they turn
it off, it was about to do a hard left turn, and when
it came back on, it remembered the state of where it was and it
immediately starts to execute that turn and takes it across the media and fortunately nobody
was killed. But yeah, if you want to put these things on the
highway, run them up to seventy miles an hour, any error is going
to be catastrophic, truly is anyway, So how do you stop this stuff?
Well, in California, there is some pushback from the Democrats about this.
They have kind of shied back from giving autonomous control to these massive trucks,
and so California Senate bill would require community by community okay for the driver
lost trucks advocates call this a de facto ban. Let me just say this,
you don't need to have the state legislature help you with us. As
we've seen over and over again, whether you're talking about some of the negative
aspects of some corrupt areas that might have a you know, speed trap or
something, you know, a little area where they hire a bunch of cops
and everybody comes by and gets a ticket type of thing. We've seen that
happen pop up in Texas over and over again. But you can do essentially
the same thing to shut down these autonomous trucks, and it should be done
for safety. If they care anything at all about safety, got to shut
this thing down. Don't talk to me about all the petty regulations that they
write tickets for with automobiles if they're going to allow these trucks to be under
computer control and drive at that. So this is something another one of these
things that could be shut down and nullified at the local level, and it
doesn't even have to have the permission of the state legislature. But the state
legislature is lining up to try to do that in California. So again,
when we look at the tactics that they're using, they're constantly using the bureaucracy
to push this stuff through without any accountability. What the EPA is doing,
it should be as concerned about that. It's what is happening with the WHO
because it's essentially the World Economic Forum's agenda, and they found their strategy for
how they're going to try to impose the World Economic Form agenda that we see
in action in the Netherlands, to shut down farmers, to shut down meat
and pork and poultry and all the rest of it. That is now what
they're doing in the Biden administration with EPA. So in Germany we get to
the cars. Germany electric car sales are plummeting, thirty down. And the
response now is that Germany decides that maybe what they need to do is to
ban driving on the weekend. So you use this little shiny metal boxes as
contestants and a suicidal race, as the police said, and that's all.
That's all you use it for. You just use it for your commuting,
but no fun allowed. And so we're going to just shut it down.
If you don't like the electric cars, we're not going to let you drive
except on weekends. Well, we're going to take a quick break and when
we come back, we're going to talk about the pandemic. Stay with us.
Elvis the Beetle and the Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find them on the
Oldies Channel at apsradio dot com. If you're listening to the David Night Show.
Well, in another article that shows how we can take action at the
local level, how an an individual can take on the World Health Organization.
This is in Finland. The World Health Organization's doctor Hannah nank I guess is
the way pronounce it a testifying in court that she advised her government the vaccine
passports are not needed, but she was ignored despite explaining that the COVID vaccines
did not stop virus transmission and that the passports gave a false sense of security.
Now what is happening here is that one citizen, a Finnish citizen,
Mika Volcalla, is suing after he was denied entry to a cafe for not
having a vaccine passport. Now it turns out that this woman, doctor Hannah
whatever her last name, is his chief physician at the Finnish Institute for Health
and Welfare. But she serves as the who's chair of Strategic Group of Experts
on immunization. So that's the connection. She is a Finnish public health bureaucrat,
but she also has a high position at the WHO. And this one
guy who was kicked out of a restaurant is suing her and as part of
the deposition, the truth of the fraud of the pandemic comes out. That
is key, So again stunning revelations in a Helsinki courtroom. Never give up
on the idea that one of us can bring these people to account and can
expose this stuff when you get discovery in a lawsuit. She testified and said
she stated that the Finnish Institute for Health knew by the summer of twenty twenty
one that the COVID nineteen vaccines did not stop virus transmission. During that same
twenty twenty one time period, the wa JOE said it was working to create
an international trusted framework for safe travel. Well, EU members states began rolling
out COVID passports. Now, where did all this stuff come from? You've
heard of the commercial that I've done about the common Man, right, The
World Economic Forum came up with the Common Pass and it was their template that
we saw being enacted everywhere. You know, it's nothing complicated, and everybody
reproduced it and they created their own. EU created their own, some countries
did their own. I don't know if they used anybody use the World Economic
Forums Common Pass, but the whole idea was that they would have their tentacles
down to the local level. They would have somebody that they trusted at the
local level that you would have to go to and they would give you the
shot and then they would report it, and this trusted vaccinator would then put
it into the system and it'd percolates its way back up to a globally centralized
database that all nations could access to control all global transportation. And that is
essentially what all these different people have done with the EU and all the rest
of them. And so this is the so called international trusted framework, but
it begins with somebody that they trust at the local level. Right. So
this Finnish doctor who's the public health bureaucracit there in Finland as well as a
WHO flunky, testified that her institute advised the Finnish government in late twenty twenty
one the COVID passport's no longer made any sense, yet the certificates continue to
be required, so they knew by summer that it wasn't doing anything in terms
of immunity, and then continued to advise them instill by late twenty twenty one.
So it doesn't make any sense, but they can to do so.
Her admission that the government ignored scientific advice to terminate the vaccine passports proved shocking,
as she is widely embraced in global medical circles. Besides chairing the who's
Strategic Advisory Group on Immunizations, she is also one of Finland's top vaccine advisors
and serves on the boards of Vaccines Together and the International Vaccine Institute. The
used digital COVID certification helped to establish the who's Global Digital Health Certification Network in
July of twenty twenty three, one, EU officials said, by using European
best practices, we contribute to digital health standards and interoperability globally to the benefit
of those most in need. So that's the key thing. That's the key
phrase interoperability, which is the same thing that they're doing with CBDC, because
again both CBDC and the vaccine passport our form of global digital ID and it
is this interoperability where they connect everybody, all the different nations, which will
continue to exist to as a means of deception so that you don't really understand
that we're under global governance. It'll continue to exist, it'll give people a
sense of continuity. You can still wave your flag and sing your national anthem
and feel good about your country, but it'll be global governance, says we've
already got now, and this interoperability will allow them to interchange the information as
essentially create a network of global control. So the person who pushed back against
is the Finnish citizen create a website discussing his case against Finland's government, where
he writes that he launched his lawsuit quote to defend basic rights unquote after he
was breakfast in December of twenty twenty one at a Helsinki cafe because he did
not have a COVID passport even though he was healthy. He said the Constitution
of Finland guarantees that any citizen should not be discriminated against based on health conditions,
among other things. He says on his site, and of course that
was what Western civilization was about. We got great documents out there. It's
just that now we're ruled by people who absolutely hate the foundations of Western civilization.
They hate our constitutions, and they went to rule as tyrants. On
Rumble Junk, Silver says the only way self driving vehicles can be safe is
if they're the only thing on the road, and I believe that's the plan.
I agree as well. Yeah, and to completely control everything about it,
and as we've talked about this year's past with Eric Peters, to make
sure not only the only thing on the road, but just like with a
plane or something, you're going to space them out and make sure there's nothing
else close to them. You're going to have to have kind of air traffic
control or something to keep them far away from each other as well. So
this lawsuit continue today at Helsinki District Court were British cardiologists Assim Malhotra will testify
that during the COVID pandemic, some authorities and medical professionals supported unethical, coercive
and misinformed policies such as vaccine mandates and vaccine passports. He said it undermined
and formed patient consent and evidence based practical medical practice. And of course we
have seen this from the very beginning. Now, one of the things that
is new about this was is the effort by the MAGA people to try to
explain away the pandemic, and it truly is amazing. I saw this documentary
push to me, this is this is good kid productions, and it is
very elementary and juvenile in its understanding. It truly is. But it is
out there to preach to the choir, the Trump choir. It wasn't Fauci.
How the deep state really played Trump? Oh, so he was played.
I thought he was playing. I thought he was doing the four dy
chess. I thought he was the master chess player. Now he got played.
But of course he's also going to be the guy he's going to save
us. Right, So who was the chief engineer of the lockdowns? He
says, it's not who you think. But of course it's not going to
be Trump, and it's not going to be Fauci according to him, right,
And so who is it? Well, I didn't watch the whole thing,
but you can see from the comments here that it is Burks. He
wants to selve the idea. Again. We've got other conservatives. Now we're
pushing this novel new way to cover for both Trump and Fauci. Ran Paul
is covering for Fauci by saying it was the wu Han, or covering for
the vaccine industry and covering for Trump by saying it was Wuhan. And he's
blaming Fauci. Now other people, other conservatives are saying, well, I
think it was doctor Scarf. It should be noted that her work on AIDS
in Africa was just as useless and as damaging doctor Burkes, and they misspell
it. But and then there's b U rks instead of b I r X.
Assume that COVID nineteen was like AIDS a prompted school closings was disastrous.
But the backing of the CDC, the legacy media, the WHO, and
government schools businesses folding anything in there about Trump? Did he put them in
charge? Did he keep them in charge? Oh no, it's not Trump
at all. Another one, Jared Kushner. He's the one, the great
unsung villain of Trump's administration, says one person. Very good info, but
I think it deflects too much from Fauci. Both he and Burks seemed to
be at fault here, But not Trump, not Trump at all. Not
this guy who had he was king of the swamp, could have drained it.
But no, he put these people in charge, left him in charge.
Trump didn't produce any ivermectin or hand that out to anybody. Thanks for
this. Sounds like everyone below Trump was on a power trip. Not Trump.
Trump was not on a power trip. Trump wasn't following the instructions of
Klaus Schwab and the World Health Organization. Trump didn't run this through in a
way that Hillary Clinton even couldn't do it. It goes on to say,
I didn't think it was possible to despise Pence more than I already do.
See, it was everybody, everybody but Trump, and maybe he wasn't even
Fauci. Maybe it was Pence and Burks. Sounds like a big problem was
Trump and Pence's lack of sufficient oversight of what the administration was doing. Oh
wow, that's a minority position. There. Cares Act that paid People to
Stay home was introduced by Democrat leader in January twenty nineteen, and so then
Trump put it in and bragged about it. Is that what you want us
to believe? As soon as I saw that there was a new video,
I clicked so fast my mouse almost broke. Awesome video as usual, well
done. Yeah, this is childlike production, truly amazing. So one person
said, I wish this was available sooner. Yeah, it took a long
time for somebody to be this stupid, this naive about both politics and the
pandemic. Didn't it. It's just amazing. Trump was angry at Florida and
Georgia for opening early. One person puts in, well, okay, finally
got the truth into some of these people. But only one person replied to
that, and sure, you're just a shill for Biden. I'm sure that's
what they said. And they people just loved this documentary. It truly is
amazing, brilliant work. Because yeah, it was Deborah Burks who did this.
It wasn't even Fauci. Isn't that amazing? Mystery is more Faucy emails
surface and raise questions about his links to the COVID lab leak after he was
accused of secretly conspiring with the CIA. Anything, But don't blame Trump.
The good news is that Trump, even though he was totally owned and deceived
by everybody, his administration, is now going to fix everything. Colleges are
backtracking as a COVID vaccine mandate lawsuits proceed at the Supreme Court. And as
I played for you earlier, you know, Trump said not a penny for
these colleges, right, I give one. Yeah. He knows that has
a vaccine mandate or a maskand he knows how to control people. He knows
how to get him to do what he wants. Right. It is always
about the care or the stick. It is always about the bribe or the
blackmail. Whether you're talking about a president or you're talking about a governor.
That's how they get the people underneath them to do whatever they want. They
don't have to worry about the Tenth Amendment or whether they have the legal authority.
They just bribe people. Here's some Fiat cash. It's orders and money,
right, Fiat cash, Federal reserve. I've got unlimited amounts of Fiat
paper, and so the Fiat is an order, and here's your cash money.
That's the way this works. So a lawsuit by an independent presidential candidate
RFK Junior and his children's health defense seems destined for the Supreme Court to determine
whether Rutgers suspending the mandate as an April first system wide email announced is enough
to end this litigation. So Rutgers is being sued. They have backed off.
RFK Junior is a part of that suit. Trump sees it, so
now he starts talking about that's what I'm going to do. But of course
it always was about the money. That's how he controlled all the people underneath
him. The vaccine expert from the Children's Health organization importedly undermining its posture and
laws. Suit against Finland's one time COVID passes happening at the same time as
I reported it earlier. It's not just this, but it's also what is
being exposed in Finland on rumble mark M two two eight during April twenty twenty,
Trump stood there like a pathetic weakling. He looked like a cartoon dog
that said which way did he go? Which way to you go, George?
Which way to go? Absolutely right? And then he threw out the
ACQ and Ivermacton and then fout you, Oh, that's the guy doesn't know
anything, and he sheepishly back down. He just did that so that he
could discredit it, because if he was serious about it, he could have
put in some orders to protect people. It's like I said, that's what
they did here in Tennessee. If somebody has got an ivermacton prescription, he
was supposed to fill it and not be punished. They put that in all.
Why couldn't Trump do that? Well, he could. They could have
done that, and he could have manufactured vast quantities of these cheap drugs and
put them out there. Instead, what he did was he sheepishly and comically
discredited them. He was the comedian to Fauci's straight man on Rock fan Wes
Robertson. Trump surrounded himself with a so called deep state, everyone from Rothschild
and Goldman Sachs bankers to government mules to military industrial complex psychos. Absolutely right.
I mean you look at his administration. It was pathetic. Well,
I thought was interesting. This is from Michael Brown, who writes on WorldNet
Daily and several other sites. He has a regular column, and he is
a pastor, and I thought it was interesting when he said five reasons that
Donald Trump is so hated. Well, you know, I can think of
a few which are not in here, and I'll show you the ones that
I think are really key. I went back and I found some things I'd
taken screenshots of back in the summer of twenty twenty. This one, for
example, the pandemic swimming pool. And you got a mom there and she's
fawning over this little girl who is on the side, and that little girl
was labeled as massive corporations, and the fawning mother is labeled as the US
government or Donald Trump really and then you've got small business, which is a
little kid in the foreground who is struggling to keep his head above water,
drowning. And then down at the bottom is a skeleton setting underwater in a
chair underwater, a skeleton labeled the working class by that pretty much is the
pandemic swimming pool. Massive corporations pampered by the government, small businesses struggling to
stay above water, and the working class dead underwater. And quite frankly,
folks, that's exactly what we saw from Trump's income tax changes that he put
in before the pandemic. It was consistent. What was done during the pandemic
was consistent with his tax reforms quote unquote, same type of thing. And
then this also during the summer, this from the Australian paying for a and
this was also i think from August of twenty twenty, paying for an epidemic
of stupidity. We have handed control of our lives to a clown car packed
with idiots who have wasted billions or in our case in America, trillions,
trying to defeat this virus. And they will never admit that it was all
for nothing. And again the Conservatives won't either. They'll cover for Trump,
they'll even cover for Fauci. They'll come after Burks, they'll come after Pencer,
whoever it is that they don't like. They'll make a case that it
was all that person. Folks, it was all of them. It was
Trump, and it was Biden. It was Trump and it was Pence.
It was Trump and the Republicans, and the Republicans and the Democrats. It
was all of them. And that's why they're not doing any accountability of the
no investigations, no inquiries, no accountability for anything, because it was all
of them. As I've said before, it's like an Agatha Christie novel,
Murder on the Orient Express, except this is Murderer on the Warp Speed Express.
So Michael Brown five reasons that Donald Trump is so hated. I hate
him because of the stupidity. I hate him because of the evil. I
hate him because of the murder that he did. You know, what he
did to our society or rule of law and everything else, and the massive
number of people that were murdered with what Alex Jones calls sugar water. But
he says, why is he so hated him? By that he means hated
personally. Well, he says the first and most obvious reason that Trump is
reaping what he has sown. He has sown hatred, and he is reaping
hatred. He has been nasty and cruel and crude and vicious, and his
detractors are responding in kind, giving him some of his own medicine. That's
right, that's good. Yeah, he is reaping what he has sown.
He has sown hatred and division, and that's exactly what he's getting back.
He said. This should occasion no surprise, even to his most dedicated followers.
He punches his opponents in the face metaphorically speaking, and they punch back.
Would a more fitting metaphor be that he hits below the belt? Well,
yeah, there is no fair play. The gloves are off. As
a matter of fact, when you look at this, for the people that
he praises and then hires, you know, he would go out and hire
these people. He would effusively praise them. I've played the clips. You
know, here's Trump when he hires person X, and here's what Trump says
about that personally fires. That's such a loser. It's this person that this
guy or this woman such losers, and he just hectors them as he's firing
them. You know, it's the hatred, the viciousness with which he attacks
anybody. He can't just say, well, you know, give that.
The reason that people offer their resignations is you know there, know that they're
being fired, but you give them the grace to say, well, you
here, I voluntarily resigning. Give me your letter of resignation so that I'm
not publicly humiliating you. A little way to pull this back and give you
some plausible deniability that you wanted to go. This is mutual decision or something
like that. But he didn't do that. We've never seen anybody act that
way publicly a CEO or certainly not a president. And so he's reaping what
he sewed. Second, he said, Trump is hardly seen as a model
of Christian virtue and humility. In his pre presidential days, instead, he
was known as a proud woman. Well, I would say that's putting it
mildly. As well, he was known as a Jeffrey Epstein pal. You
know, the two of them in the nineties were inseparable doing the same stuff.
Bill Clinton as well, you know, the three amigo's or whatever.
He was a man who made money on strip club casinos, not mentioned being
thrice married himself. Narcissist was his middle name. That's why his critics have
wondered aloud at the widespread support that he's received from Christian conservatives, in particularly
evangelicals. Those of us who did vote for him, he said, should
have a ready response to our knowledge his immoral days were in his past.
You have no reason to say that, none whatsoever. I mean, as
we'll see with his trial that begins today, in his past. I don't
think so. Anyway. He says Trump was and is a better choice than
Biden or Hillary Clinton. No, I say that, and I said this
in twenty twenty. I said Hillary could never have gotten away with what she
did. And I said, and it's going to be harder for Biden to
get away with forcing the vaccine on people than it would be for Trump,
because you're going to have these conservative suckerfish like Alex Jones telling you it's all
for your good. He's doing it to tuppy, he's playing forty chess.
He really understands what all these people in the deep state are doing, and
he's out smarting them. So I said, It's better to have somebody coming
at you wearing a uniform saying they're going to kill you, or take your
meat away from you, your car away from you, your energy, away
from all this stuff. It's better to have them coming at than to have
somebody pretend to be behind you so they can stab you in the back.
And that's what Trump is. I've said. The difference between Trump and Biden
is the fact that Biden makes it very clear that he's an enemy combatant.
He wears the uniform, he flies the flag, whereas Trump is the fifth
column. Trump is a person who pretends to be the anti globalist, who
who actually is enacting the globist agenda with the help of the conservative press and
GOP politicians who are so afraid to criticize him that they cover for him.
Question if Donald Trump were a far left Democrat running against a god fearing,
highly moral Republican, how would we feel about Trump? Yeah, how would
you feel if he was in the other party? Because he is in the
other party? Put another way of Trump or the enemy rather than the ally.
Would we excuse the sordid nature of his past and overlook the unsavory aspects
of his character? Today, wouldn't we say we don't want a man like
that in the White House? Well, of course we already did. This
is not a hypothetical. That's what happened with Bill Clinton. And I still
remember in the nineties and even a decade later, having conversations with people friends
who were left as Democrats, who were so angry that Republicans wanted Bill Clinton
impeached. They would make any kind of an excuse for his sexual assault,
his rape, his corruption. And of course Ken Star did as well,
and ken Starr was one of the council legal defenders of Jeffrey Epstein, and
ken Starr also defended credible sexual assault allegations against the football team at Baylor when
he was president of Baylor. Three strikes, you're out, Ken, Actually
you're out with the first strike. But you look at this, and I
remember in the nineties and early two thousands, how in the world can the
left defend Bill Clinton over this stuff? That's pathetic? And yet we've seen
exactly the same thing from the conservatives. Now it's the partisan Democrats and the
partisan Republicans who will defend any kind of behavior of their guy because their party
is their religion. They don't have any principles. They simply are playing forty
chess to win. It is situational ethics. If they have any ethics at
all, the means justifies the end, and the end means that I get
to where the crown is set on the Game of Thrones seat. Third.
Trump is deeply hated because his opponents believe the very worst things about him.
Uh so, yeah, it is pretty believable. Fourth, Trump is a
threat to the establishment and to the political and social status quo. That's no
different from any other politician. And you see these people come after each other
pretty hard. It's just that he gives them more ammunition and he's reaping what
he has sown. Fifth Trump has identified publicly with Christian conservatives, and this
is one of the reasons why I truly despise him because of that. You
know, I'm endorsed by Jesus attitude that's being sold by people like Roger Stone.
If you are a pro abortion, he is the enemy. If you
sympathize a transitioning children, he is the enemy. No he's not. No,
he's not. He was pushing the transgender stuff before, and so is
Flynn before. Anybody who was even on the radar most normal people. If
you don't like the Bible, which Trump freely waives and endorses, he is
the enemy. It's too bad that he doesn't oppose abortion. It's too bad
that he doesn't oppose the stuff. It's too bad that he exploits Jesus and
is a reproach to Christ. And it's too bad that these Christians love politics
and Trump so much that they themselves become a reproach to Christ. But he
finishes up with this, He says, that's why it's so important that if
we do choose to vote for Trump, as I have said time and again,
then we make that a secondary matter lest we tarnish the name of the
savior we love. In other words, to the extent that we preach Trump
rather than just vote for Trump, we defile our witness. Well, that
is absolutely true, and that's one of the reasons why I wanted to read
this. These people have made a idol out of Trump, and it is
It's absolutely disgusting what is happening in this country. So let's preach Jesus and
model our lives after him, and let's be sure to vote. He said,
Let's be sure to vote for a murdering trader who did everything that the
globalist wanted, from the lockdowns to the depopulation. And don't forget inject your
sugar water. If you like the Eagles on the cars and Heuey Lewis and
the news, they say the You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio,
download our app or listen now at apsradio dot com. You're listening to
the David Knight Show on Rumble Junk. Silver says, very few of the
Trump supporters who say he was deceived took the JAB. I often asked them
why they weren't deceived too, And I have seen a lot of them,
you know, like Tim Poole. I am so sick and tired of hearing
you people talk about the you know, the jab before that was four years
ago. Okay, so four years ago Trump did a thing, said Tim
Poole, and he goes and you know what, you took the jab as
your fault. And I've seen the same thing from oh what is that guy
that writes on WND. I can't remember his name now, but the commentator
that is there said the same thing, Well, you took the jabs your
faults on you. That's the same kind of ethic that I've talked about.
In that movie that you had a actress who put poison in some milk and
put it in front of a bass at hound and she said, well,
that's poison. If I were you, I wouldn't drink that. But it's
completely up to you. You want to drink it, you know, And
you're sitting there watching this beautiful bassett hound and it's like, oh no,
I can't believe it. That's the kind of pathological thing. And it was
a movie called Montenegro. I do not recommend it, but that scene has
always stuck with me, and every time somebody says, well, it's your
fault. I didn't take it. I was smart enough to see through that
stuff and support Trump, who was telling everybody to take it. Who's telling
everybody it was the elixir of life. This is your magic live forever pill
or injection. Come on, take it. Look at all the people I've
saved. You talk about something that is satanic. That was one of the
most satanic things I've ever seen anybody do. And he's still doing it,
and they still excuse it, And it's your fault if you took it.
Shame on you. Ah, you're stupid. I'm smart. I support Trump.
Yeah. On rumble, Christian constitutional conservatives says millions of Americans will never
recover financially from what Trump did, followed up by Biden. Salaries will never
rise at the same pace as this inflation, which will never end. That's
right, as David Stocklin said, guy who is omb director for Reagan,
Trump's war on capitalism beginning with the tax cuts, the way that he structured
them, you know, leave the dead middle class down at the bottom of
the thing. You know, some of the businesses might be able to keep
their head above water. But yeah, that legacy, that financial disruption.
And it's not only the financial disruption and the main street businesses that he killed
to support the Wall Street businesses that were essential. And that's another one.
I mean I told that story before we had the video stores we had.
We never closed our video stores, not for any snowstorm anything else. So
I I mean, I would we call people, can you make it to
work? I can't make it snow I'll be right where do you live.
I'll come get you had a four wheel drive jeep, I would go pick
them up and deliver them. And we had a snowstorm. I did nothing
but drive back and forth and jeep delivering people to work because the people in
the neighborhood could somehow find a way to get to the video story. You
better believe it. But one time we had a hurricane that came through and
it took out power everywhere and carry and so our stores closed because noe,
the customers didn't have power. We didn't have power. Taking them out.
Power to our stores wouldn't have stopped us. But if our customers didn't have
power, we could stay up. And so one store got power back,
and so we opened that store up and we were open up for about eight
hours. And right across the street was Walmart. We're open for eight hours,
and the cops came in and told us we had to close and said
why, well, you're enticing people to get out and I think it's still
kind of dangerous for people driving and say, well, yeah, it's your
judgment. But I said, what about Walmart. They are They've got a
lot more people than we do, unfortunately, but oh no, that's Walmart.
They can stay open. So I can't stay open because I'm a small
mom and pop store, but Walmart can stay open. Are you kidding me.
Yeah, that's that's when I saw what Trump was doing to people.
Just amazing. Well, let's talk about what we can do to try to
make the best of a bad situation. A bad situation quantitative easing, lowering
the interest rates, the massive trillion dollar debts, the repo trillions of dollars
into the repo market in twenty nineteen, all the rest of this nonsense is
going on. All these chickens are coming home to roost, folks, And
you can see it now over the last few days. What is happening not
only the financial chickens that are coming home to roost and the expectations that because
of the election Biden has going to lower interest rates even with inflation high,
but also because of the war issues. Gold over the weekend broke twenty four
hundred dollars. I don't know where it is today. But the interesting thing
about it to me is the fact that in just six weeks it's gone up
by three hundred dollars, the fastest climb that gold has had in decades.
That's the thing about gold. It has not been a roller coaster. It's
slowly and surely changing, but it is really picked up in the last few
weeks, last couple of weeks especially, and as they say, on zero
hedge. Fast forward to tonight, when most other assets were quiet, gold
suddenly surged higher, and after closing at an all time high, gold spiked
by another fifteen dollars in a matter of seconds a moon, which for the
otherwise hyper lethargic asset is the equivalent of a turbo boost and a dismal outlook,
proposed last week by none other than the Bank of America CIO Michael Hartnett,
who in his latest flow show reports noted that investors are looking beyond the
here and now, realizing that there is no way that markets or the economy
can sustain five percent nomenal and two percent real rate real rates of growth,
and are hedging two different things. Number one, the risk that the Fed
cuts as CPI accelerates, and number two, and more ominously, the endgame
of Fed interest cost control, yield curves and quantitative easing to backstop US government
spending. In short, something big is about to break. And if the
surge in gold leads to a spike in yields, if the bond market sniffs
out the endgame that gold is currently smelling it will be up to Powell to
once again prevent a catastrophic financial collapse. For those wondering how far gold can
rise, we expect from the latest note from Bank of America commodities strategist Michael
Widmer, he says gold and silver are among our most preferred commodities, with
the yellow metal pushed up by the central banks, China, investors, and
increasingly Western buyers on a confluence of macro factors, including an end to the
rate hiking cycles. Accordingly, we see gold rally to US three thousand dollars
an ounce by twenty twenty five. Silver benefits from that too, with prices
also boosted by strong industrial demand. This could take prices above thirty dollars an
ounce for silver for the next twelve months. And even as gold is hitting
these highs, these record highs, central banks are still buying. As one
person said, well, it's actually a Peter shift, he said, the
buy low, sell high thing he goes. Even though it's at a record
high, central banks are still buying, especially China, so he said.
Last month mark the seventeenth in a row that China's Central Bank continued to stack
gold. Russia is also doubling its reserves of gold and foreign currencies on its
de dollarization path, further detaching Russia from the petro dollar empire as it reacts
to wartime sanctions from the US and EU. There are other blips on the
d dollarization map as well, though much smaller than Russia and China. Zimbabwe
has a new gold back currency that lets them dump the US dollar for trade
with China and other countries. Chinese citizens are trying to divest as well,
but from their economy. They're not trying to get out of the petro dog.
They're worried about the Chinese economy. Chinese buying has become so blistering that
gold ETFs have gone haywire, with China repeatedly hating or rather halting trading and
as ETF's rocket upward at a gobsmackingly high premium against physical billion. It has
become increasingly difficult for the Chinese to invest outside of China due to attempts by
the regime to keep investments within the country, so citizens are trying to make
moves to protect themselves. They turn to gold. Meanwhile, expectations that the
FED and other Western central banks will be cutting rates this year amidst continuing wars
in Ukraine and the Middle East provide further rocket fuel for the gold price,
with central bank buying helping its hold, helping it hold its new levels despite
whatever else seems to be going on in global markets, we have a much
bigger problem than they acknowledge, and that's why the price of gold is at
a record high, and that's why it's going to continue to go up.
He said. Well, UBS, the Swiss Bank is expecting that gold could
double from here. They're predicting that it could go to more than four thousand
dollars an ounce in the next two to three year and they're at four thousand.
That's UBS at four thousand. Goldman Sachs is at twenty seven hundred.
Bank of America sees gold at three thousand dollars announce. And as all this
is happening again, as you're getting record highs, and as it's moving very
quickly, and at these record highs, you have the central banks buying into
it more. What is also interesting is that when you throw in things like
the war, you see that bitcoin and stocks plunged, or as zero Hedge
put it, they purge as gold surges and they also said Bitcoin in this
particular situation with war and concerns about that doesn't look like a refuge but a
roller coaster. But Gold is starting to go crazy as well. David Knight
dot gold to take you to Tony Ardburn. That's one of the key things
they said. Make sure you deal with somebody who is reputable, because there's
a lot of people out there who are trying to exploit this as people turn
to gold for the first time. David Night dot gold will take you to
Tony Rdoban's Wisewolf Die Gold. Thank you for joining us. Have a good
day. The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader. If you've
been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your
part and try not to spread it. Financial support, or simply tell the
others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread. Father people have to
trust me, I mean, trust the science, wear your mask, take
your vaccine, don't ask questions using free speech to free minds. It's The
David Knight Show.