And this Wednesday afternoon and Stan Carroll in for the great American Bill Cunningham,
who was in Columbus today doing God Knows One. And I get to be
here at three o'clock this afternoon, certainly looking forward to that. And between
now and then, I've got a couple of great guests. Hopefully take some
of your phone calls. Joe Biden doesn't know where Putin is waging war right
now, I could probably give I could probably pick any listener at random to
this radio station and to this show, and you could tell me where a
Putin is waging war at this moment where we're sending billions and billions of dollars.
But before we get into that, I was getting ready for the show
today, and you may have heard Scott Sloan talking about this issue just a
little while ago here on seven hundred WLW, and it's Issue one and Ohioans
are going to go to the polls on August eighth and vote on Issue one.
And so I'm looking around at the various websites as I normally do,
getting ready for getting ready for the show, and I see this line on
the WCPO website, and the headline is this answering viewer questions about Ohio's Issue
one. And when I think of WCPO, a place where I used to
work several years ago. We not several years ago, but it's been it's
been more than a few years now. When I look at WCPO, when
think of WCPO, I think of that as a legitimate news organization. Do
you not? Can you? Cam? We all join together and say w
CPO is a legitimate news outlet. I think it is. And I look
at the piece that they put on their website, cut and pasted from their
friends in Columbus, Ohio. So this is a piece answering your questions of
your questions about Ohio's Issue one. But it wasn't written locally. It was
written by a Morgan Trow who works for a news five, which I'm guessing
is a script station or a station they're affiliated within Columbus, Ohio. And
the first question is this. The first question comes from Stephen in Cleveland,
and he asked this question, why haven't I seen anything about this? And
the reply is this, Well, Steven, if you haven't seen our stories,
you're about to see a lot more about Issue one on television. The
one Person, One Vote campaign released its first statewide TV AD Tuesday morning.
A constitutional amendment this August called Issue one would permanently remove our rights from the
Ohio Constitution. The ad declares Issue one ends the majority rule in Ohio,
undermining the sacred principle of one person, one vote. So this again the
answer refers to an AD that's obviously being run by an advocate group. But
this is in the context and it doesn't go on to really explain any more
than that. And I'm not claiming that I know all the ins and outs
of Issue one, but someone who does is my first guest today, and
that is Rachel's Tach. And Rachel C. Tach is a local attorney.
Rachel C. Tach is the president of Cincinnati Right to Life. And Rachel
C. Tach Welcome again to seven hundred WLW and Rachel, great to talk
to you this afternoon. How are you great? How are you Dan?
I'm great, I'm glad you are here. So were you surprised? Like
me? As I said, you got to look at this article on the
WCPO website. And when someone asks a legitimate question, why haven't I seen
anything about this? The response that they get Is this from an advocacy group
that is saying Issue one ends majority rule, undermines the sacred principle of one
person, one vote. Were you surprised to see that as a as an
answer from a legitimate news outlet. Absolutely, And the way that the article
was framed as well was just so disappointing because they take this question and they
respond to it with a quote from that organization that distends their position. And
when they say when they go to the other side, what they quote is
an email talking about where they're canvassing. They're campusing in all eighty eight counties.
There's nothing about why or what the position is that other side. It's
not a balance overview or even a response to the question at all. So
it really it fails the test if you ask me about balance, right because
because they're giving this response as if that is a straight down the middle answer
to this question. And what I what I like about your website, Cincinnati
Right to Life, is the moment you go there, you get and you
are you are an advocate for vote yes on this issue, for vote yes
on Issue one on August eighth. I'm looking at your website right now and
h and it pops up there that preborn lives depend on. You tell me
about why why you're supporting this position. Absolutely, Um, you know,
Dan, it really is something that is it's so much broader than abortion at
stake here. We do have dangerous late term, unfettered abortion that's at stake
here. And I'm sure we'll get a chance to touch on the November Amendment,
but really this relates to absolutely everything that is at stake in the constitution
that is constitutionally protected right now in Ohio. And we wouldn't have such diverse
groups coming together on each side of this issue if it wasn't broader than a
support or an opposition to abortion. You know, on the support side,
we have gun owners, we have Second Amendment advocates, restaurant owners, business
owners, Chamber of Commerce, and pro life groups that are all in support
of Issue one. And the are groups that have ever before come together on
an issue. We don't have the same page on social issues, so it's
not an abortion issue. On the opposition side, however, we do have
quite an interesting group there as well. We have one person, one vote
that opposes Issue one. Their donations pass through Act Blue. They are registered
and paid for with the pack that has the ACOU on the steering committee.
This opposition to Issue one is also supported by Common Cause, which donates to
the DNC and Democrats with congressional campaign committees. If you go to vote no
in August dot org, you'll see their coalition members supported by Planned Parenthood,
the Ohio Democratic Party, the Council on American Islamic Relations, which is care
pro Choice, Ohio, Ohio Environmental Council, Action for Climate Feminist Leadership,
and then as we've seen from the media so far, we also have media
outlets like the Columbus Dispatch and the Cleveland Plane Dealer that have weighed in opposing
Issue one as well. When we get down to the brass tacks of what
this amendment is about, it's about elevating the standards that it takes for these
special interests from out of state to come in and change the Ohio Constitution.
This is our founding document and right now we require five percent of eligible voters
from half of the counties to sign a petition and then once it's on the
ballot, it has to pass with a fifty one fifty plus one of threshold.
What we're looking to elevate this too, is requiring voters from all eighty
eight counties five percent of those eligible voters from all eighty eight counties, not
just half, not just the rural, not just the cities, not just
the Democrats strongholds, all eighty eight counties need to have a say on what
ends up on the ballot. And once it's on the ballot, we're raising
that threshold to sixty percent so that we see that this is amendments that are
passing with wide spread support. If you look at just if you take just
maybe the past few amendments that we've had, we see that there is a
pattern of fifteen as the past twenty amendments has passed with over sixty percent of
the vote. The last three have had over seventy five percent of the vote.
You know, things like opposing Obamacare that was a sixty six percent,
Marcy's Law, eighty three percent, bail issue one which we just had seventy
six percent, So that that this is really an elevated standard which is going
to reflect what has widespread consensus in Ohio. Well, I agree with that,
and I have long been of the notion that and I feel the same
way about the federal Constitution is that in the And I think the framers of
the Constitution, the founders of this country, wanted it to be a difficult
process to amend the Constitution because it should be something that a vast majority,
the overwhelming majority that people are in favor of, I think, and going
from fifty percent plus one here in Ohio to a majority of sixty percent of
voters approving a constitutional amendment, to me, on the face of it,
does not sound like a bad idea. It should be difficult, and just
rephrasing what you said, if whatever the idea is to change constitution, it
should be so overwhelmingly positive, It should be so overwhelmingly on its face apparent
to the good citizens of Ohio that this needs to be done. It should
get well over sixty percent of support the change of constitution. And so that
notion that it should be difficult, I think, to me is the overwhelming
thing when I look at this issue. Now we've already talked about abortion,
but how is it? And I think this is where a lot of people
get confused on this issue, because issue one is changing the requirement that we
have sixty percent vote on the Constitution. And I was listening to Scott Sloan
talk to Frank Leros, a Secretary of State, about this. He said
that the Ohio Constitution is seventy thousand words and the Constitution of the United States
is only seven thousand words. And so, I mean, you talk about
things to get complicated. I don't want to sit down and leave through a
seventy thousand page document. I mean, you're a lawyer, you probably do
it all the time, but I don't want you go ahead. You know
that that is a great point, is to the point that we have so
many amendments that you almost have to hire an attorney to read it, to
understand it and to know how to pursue your constitution, all right, And
it ought not be that way. You know, we look at the United
States Constitution, as you pointed out, we have only twenty seven amendments on
the United States Constitution, twenty five twenty five of those are active because we
take away, you know, prohibition. But then we have twenty five there
that are active. And why does Ohio then have a hundred and seventy two.
I think it's the total right now, if I'm not mistaken, it's
because we're so vulnerable to these out of state interests with just a fifty plus
one majority. And you know what's also important to see is that when we
decide to make all of these changes to the law and enshrine business plans down
to the very parcel and address into our Ohio Constitution, you know, that
is a situation where it's almost it's almost impossible to repeal. We rewrite laws
all the time, but repeal of an amendment is rare. And when I
was in law school, there was a professor who said very coarsely that if
someone writes a law or is a corrupt politician, you vote the bastards out.
That is what you do when someone from the legislative branch does something that
you don't agree with or is evolved in corruption. But when you have an
amendment that is brought into being by groups that are from out of state,
that are cutting corners and selling deceptive lives and bringing in out of state interests,
then that's when you see that our fundamental founding document to our nation is
really really at risk. Care it's very vulnerable to these deceptive interests. So
the way this is and you correct me if I'm wrong, but the way
this is connected to the abortion issue is that there are pro abortion forces we're
seeking to amend the Ohio Constitution that would enshrine abortion on demand, abortion at
any time up to and including the ninth month. Is that correct? You
know? I would say that the way it's connected to the abortion issue is
that there is opposition from pro abortion groups in Ohio that are opposed to issue
one. Which is funny because if you look at one of the supporters of
this, one of the supporters of the opposition to issue one, which is
the Ohio Democrat Party, their own party constitution requires a sixty vote like we're
asking, so hearing their messaging that's caused us a supermajority is a little bit
of a misnomer. It's less than the federal requirement of sixty six percent and
two thirds. It's ratifying. It's the same as the Democrat Party platform requirement
to amend their own constitution. We've got four other states that require that sixty
six vote Arizona, California, Nevada, and Louisiana. And then we've got
three other states that require sixty percent vote, Mississippi and Oregon and Delaware.
How that I think we look at how this is going to affect abortion in
Ohio is that when we get past this August special election, we are looking
down the road in November at a very, very scary and serious threat to
parental rights in Ohio because what's coming down the pike is just an unprecedented assault
on parental rights and unfettered abortion in Ohio through all nine months. It's a
collusion with big Pharma that is going to obliterate parential consent. It's going to
allow painful, dangerous late term abortion, life altering sex change surgeries and hormone
therapies. And when we have parents that are going to want to get involved
and are going to want to walk with their children through these kinds of decisions,
they are not going to be allowed to interfere. All right, well,
Rachel Seatach, We're gonna have to leave it right there. We're up
against the clock. Thank you for being here. If people want to find
out more about you, where can they go? I would love for them
to join me on Instagram at at Attorney Advocate, or you can go to
our website Cincinnati since you Right to Life dot org and we would love to
have you be informed and become a volunteer to make sure that voters are informed
on issue one in the November election. All right, Rachel Seatach, thank
you, and we'll talk again before August eighth. All right, thank you.
All right, there you go, Rachel Setach, attorney at law and
the president of Cincinnati Right to Life. Twelve twenty six. Got to get
to a break news coming up. Bottom of the hour, Dan Carol for
Bill Cunningham on seven hundred WULW try state fireworks. He's ready to make your
party foolw. Dan Carroll in for Bill Cunningham as we rock and roll till
three o'clock this afternoon. And one of the websites that I go to on
a regular basis is hotair dot com. And one of the great writers,
the associate editor there is my buddy David Strom. I've had him on the
program numerous times, and he joins me once again this afternoon, and David
Strom, how are you today? Well, I'm on the Dan Carroll Show.
Well I'm great. They don't get much better than that. I would
imagine you're better than president. By Let let me you know, let me
start, let me start this way. Let me just give you a little
pop quiz. Right here, A couple of couple of really tough questions.
Where is it in the world that Vladimir Putin is waging a war of aggression
right now? Well, everyone knows it's a rat. On top of that,
where has the United States been sending billions upon billions of harder and taxpayer
dollars to support which is And it's clearly a mistake because President Biden is telling
us that it's a rat. Well, yeah, I mean, for God's
sake, I mean, if you're going to fight Russia, at least send
the weapons to the right country. Wouldn't it be helpful if we had a
chief executive, a commander in chief who knew where, you know, some
some sort of large issues like this were taking place. And for those who
don't know what the heck we're talking about, David Strong, let me just
play a quick SoundBite here. Joe Biden was heading out to Marine one,
I guess a little bit earlier today. He was stopped by reporters outside the
White House and he was asked about his buddy Vladimir Putin remaining in power after
the attempted coup or whatever the heck that was that took place over the weekend
in the last few days, Dave let's hear cut number one card to tell.
But he was clearly moving to war in Iraq. He's moving to war
at home, and he is h come up with him a briar around the
world. Uh hoot, test NATO. It's not just singers in Union Japan.
It's really so David Strom. There, you have it right there.
He's clearly losing the war in Iraq. Everybody knows it. And I guess
you and I are just not not up with the program right now. Well,
I mean, it's hard to keep up with Joe Biden. I think
it was yesterday he admitted that he was selling out the United States and today
he's telling us that we're in the midst of a war in Iraq against Russia.
Uh, you know, I mean it's hard to keep up. I
mean, this guy is a genius and we're just normals. Why why isn't
there more coverage on that? When he sat there and said I've sold I've
sold top secrets, I've sold secrets, Well the media just looks at that
and yawns as if and there's zero coverage on that except that there's you know,
there's a little bit in hot air, and there's a little bit on
some of the other websites, but ABC, NBCCBS, You've got the President
of the United States sitting there with the leader of India saying that I've sold
States and and and it's it's as if as part of the course, nothing
ever happens. Well, you know, I mean, we are now in
the midst of a world driven entirely by narrative. The left truly believes that
reality is defined by words and everything has to be sort of mushed around.
I mean, this is everywhere. I mean, you know, the Canadian
government a month ago just reshuffled the alphabet for the alphabet people and now it's
two slg BT. And then the CBC just yesterday reshuffled the alphabet again and
they've dropped lesbian, gays and bisexuals completely out of it. And I think
what they're trying to do is just keep us always on our back foot because
they believe reality is defined by whatever they tell us. We're living in Orwell's
world. It is really out of control. And then we had a series
of gay Pride events over the weekend, and of course, and everyone knows
if you go to a gay Pride event, you're encouraged to bring the kids.
It's family friendly where you get to see naked men walking around waving flags
and banners, riding bicycles and all such manner of things. And then you
have in New York City where they were chanting that we're here, we're queer,
we're coming or your children, and we're just supposed to look at NBC
did us all a favor today by reporting that it's it's really you're just mistake
you really, you know, you regular you know, middle aged white guys,
straight people really have no idea what this is about. It's all perfectly
fine. Well, and I think that they believe it. I mean,
we're really moving into a world where they genuinely are coming for their children.
They even tell you that they're coming for the children. And it's not just
the chance. Uh. You know, in Montgomery County, they're you know,
they're shutting out parents out of school board meetings because they're objecting to the
fact that now you don't even get to opt out of this ideological grooming that's
going on. They're just saying, we're going to shove it down your kid's
throats, and there's nothing that you can do. About it. You know,
I mean, it's just perfectly clear that they're coming for children. And
you know, I mean in London, the police department is actually partnering up
with a pedophile activist who justifies older men having sex with kids as young as
eight and saying it's good for them, and he's one of their outreach coordinators.
It's you know, anyone who says that they're not trying to sexualize children
is just lying. I mean they are. And you know, I mean
they've they've pretty much admitted it. I mean here in Minnesota and in Connecticut
they have actually included now pedophiles under their protected class, you know, as
if it's a sexual orientation. Both states explicitly excluded pedophiles and they took that
out of the laws. Now they have not yet legalized pedophilia, but if
you're a pedophile who hasn't been caught, but you say that you like to
have sexual children, you are now a legitimate sexual orientation in those states.
Now, see a lot of people are going to hear you say stuff like
that and say, oh, this is just another one of Dan's right wing
kookie guests and who just puts out all this false information out there and they
don't. It's just that's how all this stuff gets left off. And so
you know, when we see these things and we and we people tell us
who they are and what they are doing, we should believe them. But
but then they keep but the national media keeps covering up, just like they
cover up for the Bidens and everybody else who supports the agenda. Oh yeah,
well, the AP actually set to check that and said it was false.
I mean, I could show you the law. You can actually watch
the debate at the Minnesota House of Representatives. It's online. I have an
article on it, and I can show you. I mean, they literally
struck out the language that was in the law that excluded pedophilia as a sexual
orientation. And you know, there is absolutely no debate that they did it.
Now they're claiming that they're not legalizing pedophilia, which is true. They
have yet to legalize it, but they have made it a sexual orientation that
is protected under human rights law here in the state of Minnesota. And they
call these particular pedophiles virtuous pedophiles, ones who are not which means not yet
caught having sex with children, right, I mean, the people who write
about why this is a good thing and good for children. And they're psychologists
and psychiatrists you can find online who are arguing this it's a good thing,
you know, and they will talk about tribes in Africa where it's accepted,
or the Greeks, uh, you know, practice this in the fourth century
BC, and explain how this is genuinely good for the maturation of children.
You, as a landlord can say, well, I don't want to rent
to you. You know, are just such rooms and so backwards. It
really is disgusting, it really is. We're yeah, well that is really
exactly what they argue. Uh. And uh, you know, it's pretty
hard to argue that the elite does not at least tolerate this. I mean,
you've got Jeffrey Epstein who did this for years, got convicted of pedophilic
acts and you know, had her office at Harvard after he got out of
prison, is bringing people to his island on the Lolita Express all. I
mean, you can see lists of people who were on his aircraft. Uh.
You had Roman Polanski who got an oscar after he was convicted of raping
a thirteen year old girl, and pretty much every celebrity out there signed a
partial to let him come to the United States to get his oscar, despite
the fact that he was still a convicted pedophile who had not served his sentence
in the United States. So they clearly think it's no big deal. So
David, look up the case of Romanians. I mean, it's right there.
Yeah, So David strama in other news, isn't an interesting that we
have all these whistleblowers coming out now from the IRS talking about the interference that
they got from the Department of Justice into the Hunter Biden investigation. Just some
of the most damning evidence that we've ever seen that outlays and identifies the corruption
within this family and within this administration. And then at the same time,
we get this leak from I don't know where it came from, but if
the prosecution against Donald Trump, and we have this audio tape come out,
this audio recording that has Trump talking about some documents and said he wanted to
go to Warreth the Rock and all this and CBS News in what Russia Limbaugh
used to call a random act of journalism actually looked into this and you had
if you watched MSNBC and CNN earlier this week, they were besides themselves because
finally they had an audio. This was the smoking gun that was going to
do him in. But CBS came out and said, you know what,
this wasn't even in the documents that he was indicted for. So yeah,
well, you know, where are the journalistic standards and the ethics, because
how many times have we heard, you know, there's a piece of audio
that comes out they couldn't verify the Hunter Biden laptop, and they just aren't
going to disclose that information until they can go ahead and verify it. But
yet the moment, the instant that something comes out and looks like it might
be bad for Trump, well that goes on the air right away. So
yeah, So the journalistic ethics that all these different organizations have, it seems
that they are They're quite pliable when it suits their needs. Hey, I've
got another example for you yesterday, buried in paragraph twenty one of a story
on the Irs whistleblowers, the New York Times drops the tidbit, which is
they have independently verified some of the claims, so and somehow, I mean,
it just sort of drops in their paragraph twenty one and then they move
on to other things. And it's like Hey, wait a second, You've
independently verified that Merrick Garland lied to Congress and that is not the headline.
There's a phrase we use in the business called burying the lead, and that's,
yes, exactly what that is. Yeah, that is about it.
Mary, did you get I mean paragraph twenty one? And uh, you
know I wrote about it this morning, and you know it's nowhere in the
mainstream media. It's like, well, wait a second, I mean,
we now have absolute proof, according to the New York Times, that Merrick
Garland lied, that they interfered with the investigation. And everybody's shrugging, you
know, no big deal, And it goes how do you live in a
world where you know, everybody in charge of everything is just corrupt? It
is, and the thoroughness of the corruption just goes on and on and on,
and before we go, why is it the bud light is just getting
around us saying now that they've finally fired the top two advertising executives the marketing
you got Daniel Blake, the marketing VP, and Melissa heinrich side that they
are no longer with the company and they were put on a leave of absence.
I guess months ago when this thing first happened, But now they I
guess they've lost so much money. There's no way they're coming back. And
to my way of thinking, David Strom, all these advertising campaigns, the
CEO said he was going to go out and do a listening campaign and all
the rest of this, they have yet to actually own what happened. And
I don't know how they're going to get better unless they do that. We
got about twenty seconds left. Well, Budbart is dead, and I think
that they didn't say that they were fired for so long because they're afraid of
lawsu. I mean, it's the rule of HR. You know, human
resources actually run companies. All right, Well, David Strom, with that,
we got to let it go. Great talking to you again. If
people want to find out more about you, where can they go bair dot
com and I am an accept writer and a guest on radio. David Strom,
Great talking to you, buddy. Thanks for the thanks for chiming in,
and we'll do it again soon. All right, it's a blast.
All right. There you go David stromhotair dot com and you can check out
his work there. The guy is just a terrific writer. Twelve fifty five
got to get to a break news coming up top of the hour as we
roll on till three This afternoon, Dan Carol for Bill Cunningham on seven hundred
www dot com. Four hour twenty twenty three. I heard radio Music Festival
coming back to Las Vegan clock this afternoon. Joe Biden is out talking about
what he calls biden Omics, the great economic record of Joseph Robin at Biden,
and I guess that's going to be one of his the main planks and
his campaign platform as he rolls on to twenty twenty four. Here to talk
about that and much much more is my buddy from Power the Future, one
of the great websites that I look at all the time, My buddy,
Dan Turner and Daniel Turner welcome again to seven hundred WLW. How's it going,
Oh, it's great to be on your program. Thanks for having me.
Do you find it interesting that Joe Biden is going to campaign on his
powerful economic record. It's remarkable when you listen to whoever this this deputy Press
secretary is. I guess they're rolling her out. I've never seen her face
and don't know the name, but she just blatantly said, well, this
is you know, a record that we're proud of, because if you ask
any Americans, they'll tell you how happy they are with the state of the
economy. All the White House Press Corps, Yeah, they almost have scratched
their head and said, well, every piece of pulling says the exact opposite.
The overwhelming majority of Americans are very concerned about their personal finances in the
overall state of the economy. So I guess you can run on the record
of Biden umics if you're Joe Biden, if you just lie about what it
is. Well, you know, when we have a commander in chief who
goes out there in a couple of days ago, talked about how he stole,
he sold a lot of state secrets, and then today he said,
it's it's clear as a bell Daniel Turner that Putin is obviously losing the war
in Iraq. You can't help but really want to go to the polls and
vote for that guy again. Yeah, I mean, I think he's absolutely
right that when I look at the war in Iraq stands a chance. So
we're sending all those billions and billions of dollars, we've been sending it to
the wrong country. We got to start. We gotta, you know,
I wonder if I wonder if Ukraine will give us a rebate now so we
can send all that stuff to Iraq where you know where they're just they need
all that that weaponry and money. It's just insanity on a regular basis.
And it's frustrating because if you do ask the average American and you ask about
their state of finances, and they know what it costs to fill up their
gas tank and how much food costs. And yes, prices have come down,
I'm not ignoring that, and that's great. They have come down,
but they are still considerably higher than where they were two years ago. If
you ask average America those questions, they're so frustrated and just disappointed with things,
things being expensive when they don't have to be. And that's why this
administration has really struggled to explain inflation. They've been blamed inflation on everything from
corporate greed, to the COVID pandemic, to supply chain issues, to Putin's
invasion of Ukraine. They will not admit that inflation is driven by their own
disastrous monetary policies and their war on fossil fuels. Yeah, and I think
that's an important thing that you just said, that things are the way they
are and they don't have to be this way, and there's just so many
reasons why we can't have nice things. And you know, I don't know
about you. I don't I've never asked you where you're from. Are you
from the New York somewhere? In that I do detect a little bit of
an accent there. Oh. Yes, born and raised in New York City,
and my family is still all here. But I haven't lived in New
York since I graduated high school in nineteen ninety two, so I am now
a proud Virginia country boy. Have you ever felt threatened though, by wood
fired pizza stoves in New York City? Have you ever felt felt that somehow
that was endangering your your life or your ability to breathe? Cleaning? Why
do you think I left? I mean, it was absolutely horrifying to know
that in the city of eight and a half million people, there are one
hundred and forty Yeah, there are one hundred and forty wood fired pizza oven
And I'm actually in New York right now visiting my parents, and it's remarkable
to see the overwhelming state of decline of this city. It does make me
very sad, and even though I don't live here anymore, I will always
consider myself in New Yorker. But you look at the comfort level of lawlessness
that this city has embraced, that you can walk into a store and just
steal anything you want and walk out. The carjacking, the pushing people in
front of the subway. You look at the overwhelming send the just defecating on
the on the street, and the homelessness and shooting up heroin on the street.
All of that is fine. But this is where the mayor is focusing
his attention on pizzeria ovens. And it's that level of disdain for what your
citizens feel. It's that level of aloofness that you can clutch your pearls and
say, I'm so worried about climate change. We need to go after the
pizza ovens where the irregular New Yorkers are afraid to walk down the street.
But the mayor doesn't have to worry about walking down the street. He has
drivers so he can he can afford the luxury of the climate change. And
climate change is a luxury cause. It is the cause of rich elite predominantly
white. Um, but it is the greatest first world cause going. Most
people have other issues by their mind. Well, how does someone get to
that point where thinking that, uh, Mom and pop pizzerias that use that
burn wood to cook their pizza with are somehow going to be able to afford
at a minimum twenty grand to install an air filtration system. And when you
talk about the maintenance and the upkeep, and that bill is going to go
even higher. How many of these these small shops will be driven out of
business by this notion. So it's perfectly fine for him to go around with
as big a carbon footprint as he wants. But yet his administration, his
EPA there the New York City Department of Environmental Production is getting ready to hammer
these small businesses and saying you have to comply or you can't sell pizza and
sorry about your luck. Yeah, And I hate to sound like such a
cynic, because we all know that big government would never collude with big business
for pernicious reasons. Right, but if you go back and look at the
COVID nonsense, big businesses did get exemptions what's from the government to stay open?
And so if you owned a private hardware store, you were shut down
because of the pandemic, But if you were home depot, you're lobbyists ensure
that you were allowed to stay open. And everyone skis in their head and
said, well, what's the difference and the differences? We're big and powerful
and we have lobbyists, and you don't. I hate to think that big
Pizza would do this with big government and say, how can we put these
guys? Who's our number one competition? If we're a major industrial pizzeria in
New York City? The mom and pop shops which New York has hundreds of
thousands of them, because that's where you get your good pa thousands of them,
but that's where you get good pizza. How do I get rid of
all of those stores? Maybe I've tried to get regulations passed under the guise
of COVID or under the guise of climate change that will put them all out
of business. Isn't it terrible that that's where my mind is going? But
this is not about climate change. Nothing about climate change is about climate change.
It's always about money, and it's all is about power. So why
would you target pizzeria's There's got to be a reason why, and that's where
my money is going, that this is a plan to get rid of competition.
Well, and I'm reading I'm reading an article right here, and the
headline it's from Popular Mechanics, is that giant wind turbines keep mysteriously falling over
And then they talk about how this shouldn't be happening. And you've got wind
turbines from Oklahoma to Sweden to Colorado, in Germany and all over the place.
And I'm looking at a video right now where a big chunk of wind
turbine blade goes flying into the air. These things are the very definition of
unreliability. Yet we're supposed to look at these things and talk about this is
the future. Wind and sun is going to power us into a glorious future.
Yeah, And the green cultists will tell you that the wind and the
sun are free, and therefore this technology is free, and the wind and
the sun are forever, and therefore these are renewable technologies. And that's just
that's insulting your intelligence, and that's just playing fast and loose with the truth.
The fact of the matter is that these products don't work, and they
don't work with the reliability and the affordability that we need to maintain our current
lifestyle, and that's the problem that we're having. There was an article that
just came out yesterday from the National Energy at whatever that said that sixty six
percent of American households or at risk the summer for experiencing a blackout because of
the unreliability of the grid. Why. Because we're taking reliable, fossil fault
fuels out of the equation and we're replacing them with the wind and solar,
which takes years to build, which take years to come online, and even
when they are online, they're really offline because they only work about fifteen percent
of the time. So if you are comfortable with being one of those sixty
six percent of the households that will have a blockout, that's what it means
to go green. This is not free. This is the actual trade off.
Sixty six percent, and that numbers up from I think last year.
I remember reading about that and I think it was fifty four or fifty five
percent. So we really aren't making progress in that area. And I'm looking
at an article that's on Power of the Future right now, and Ford is
laying off thirty eight hundred people and workforce. They expect to lose three billion
dollars this year. Looking at electric vehicle companies that are going bankrupt right and
left, there has been at least a dozen or more electric vehicle companies that
have had us. Imagine that they get all this money from the United States
government and all these subsidies from the government to do their business. And even
with that, you've got electric vehicle companies that are going belly up all over
the place. Yeah, you can't force markets faster than the markets will allow.
You can force products online, and you can try to bribe customers and
you can mandate that they take it, but that does not mean the product
itself is going to survive. And that's the problem with what's happening in the
EV market and with wind and solar as well. Government is deciding that this
is what we're doing and you have to do it whether you like it or
not. When it comes to evs, they're giving you huge tax credits.
When it comes to evs, they're giving the company's enormous subsidies to push this
type of manufacturing. But you can't force markets no matter how hard you try.
Ask the Soviet Union and and so we're going to experience the hardware.
There's gonna be a lot of hardships when this catches up to reality, because
it will catch up, right, we can't float this industry in perpetuity.
Eventually the siphon will get turned off and this industry will absolutely go belly up
because we've seen it before. Yeah, And I was on the radio yesterday
and the day before I had heard a story about a brand new start up
here in Ohio company that's going to recycle batteries from cars, the electric car
batteries, going to recycle those, and I thought to myself, I wonder
if they're getting a government subsidy, And sure enough, I looked it up,
and about half of the startup costs for building that factory is coming from
the taxpayers of the United States. And so the subsidies. You get a
subsidy to buy the car, you get a subsidy to make the car,
you get a subsidy for this that, for plugging it in, you get
a subsidy for everything else. And in the end it doesn't work. And
to me, that is just par for the course when it comes to government
deciding to pick the winners and the losers. Absolutely. And that's why when
people say this administration and these policies will be the end of America, it
won't be the end of America. Will continue as a country, but we're
going to look a lot more like France. And I don't want to be
France, right, I don't want that sort of European quasi socialist big government
where you pay seventy percent of your income in taxes. And and sure they
brag about how healthcare is free, and this is free, but any entrepreneur
in France tries to get the heck out of France and they come to America.
And if they don't come to America, where else are they going to
go. They used to go to Hong Kong, but we gave that back
to the communists. So there aren't a lot of places left in the world
for those class of people to live. There's a reason why Elon musk who
is South African, he didn't stay in South Africa. And it's not because
South Africans are not as smart. It's not because they're not as creative.
They're not as free, and he had to go to a place that was
free to make all of these things that we talk about Tesla, SpaceX,
the Loop, all of these genius ideas he has. If America is no
longer that country, then then I don't know what will happen next. Let's
start a plot of land. We can go and start our own country,
because I know I'd be there soon as possible. Who's gonna win that glue?
Who's gonna win that cagemac between Elon Musk and I guess Zuckerberg. Apparently
they're going to tee it up and I guess have an FCC match against each
other. Who's gonna wind up winning that? I saw some video today where
they're both apparently in training now to go ahead and have at each other.
Are you gonna put your money behind on that one? I gotta put my
money behind weight because neither of them are really trained fighters. But Elon seems
to be bigger and heavier, and I'm pretty sure Mark Zugerberg looked like he's
about five six and a buck fifty, So I'm gonna go with Elon just
because I think Elon's around six two and probably two twenty five, So I'm
gonna go Elon. It's all, well, we didn't neither want of us
have a dog in that fight. But it'll be interesting that now, that
would be must CTV. If if those guys tee it up in the cage,
that'll be that'll be terrific, Daniel Turner. If people want to find
out more about you, where can they go how or the feature dot com.
It is always as great to be on your program. Thanks Daniel Turner,
thanks for being on and we we'll talk again soon, my friend.
I really appreciate it, all right, all right, Daniel Turner, A
power of the future, one of the great websites that I look at all
the time. Check it out for yourself. Coming up on news here at
the bottom of the hour. I'll tell you what. Between twelve thirty and
one, I'm sorry, make that one thirty and two, we don't have
any guests, so you want to pick up the phone. Five one three,
seven four nine, seven thousand, one eight hundred the Big One,
Dan Carroll for Bill Cunningham on seven hundred WLW Liberals Sham phone lines are open
right now. Five one three, seven four nine, seven thousand and one,
eight hundred the Big One. Earlier today, the Commander in Chief,
Joe Biden, said that Putin was clearly losing the war in Iraq. The
other day he said something that I wonder why hasn't gotten more coverage? And
you know, we all know that Joe Biden tries to be the funny man.
Joe Biden's always making jokes. Tom, Did you all think I'm joking?
Don't you? How many times have we heard Joe Biden say that?
Well, here's what he said at a meeting with the Prime Minister of India
just a couple of days ago. Hit that cut number two? Do we
have cut number two? I was just thinking, anyway, I started off
without you, and I sold a lot of state secrets and a lot of
very important things that we shared. I sold a lot of state secrets and
a lot of very important things that we shared. I sold a lot of
state secret Is that the kind of joke at a guy who is under suspicion
of having sold out American foreign policy should be making? And to my way
of thinking, this suspicion has been around since we've known about the Hunter Biden
laptop. The official White House transcript of this event reads, I was just
thinking the anyway, I started off without you. I sold a lot of
state secrets and a lot of very important things that we shared laughter in commas,
and then he says, all kidding aside, and he goes on to
talk about whatever they were talking about. So is that the kind of joke
that that Joe Biden should be making right now when you have all this stuff
that's going on with him and his son and another What's App a text message
has come out related to Joe Biden, and the New York Post has a
story. First son Hunter Hunter Biden was at Joe's Wilmington, Delaware home the
same day he used the future president as leverage in a text message into a
Chinese business associate to close the deal. Photos found on his abandoned laptop show
and other evidence suggests the elder Biden was around as well. They talk about
the picture of Hunter Biden there in the in the corvette. Hours earlier,
Hunterson a threatening What'sapp message to translator Raymond Zal of the CEFC whatever that is
some Chinese company. He says, tell the director, I would like to
resolve this now before it gets out of hand, and now means tonight,
and Zee, if I get a call or a text from anyone involved in
us other than you, Zang or the chairman, I will make certain that
between the man sitting next to me and every person he knows, and my
ability to forever hold a grudge, that you will regret not following my direction.
So that's the original one that came out, and now there's another one
that came out just yesterday. House Republicans released another what'sapp message on Tuesday written
by Hunter Biden on a business deal with the Chinese energy company, and the
message is this. The message was Guan to Guanan Dong of CEFC China Energy
associate, who used the nickname Kevin, which I guess is a lot easier
to say than gone when Dong and Hunter Biden writes this, I'm tired of
this, Kevin. I can make five million dollars salary from any law firm
in America. And if you run a law firm, would you, Hunter,
would you hire Hunter Biden as an associate at a salary of five million
dollars? Just curious. I know there's a lot of lawyers who listen to
this show, but Hunter Bien, he can make five million dollars, a
five million dollars salary from any law firm in America. And then he goes
on to write this. If you think it's about money, it's not.
The Bidens are the best at doing exactly what the chairman wants from this partnership.
Please let's not quibble over peanuts. The next day, one of Hunter
Shell companies was given a ten million I'm sorry, a ten thousand dollars.
This says ten thousand, but I think it's a ten million dollar payment that
went to one of the Biden Shell companies. And I was thinking to myself,
you know, I haven't really I haven't done a lot of international business.
I haven't done a lot of business, you know, with overseas partners.
In fact, I haven't really done any I haven't done any business at
all out of the United States. So maybe I'm stupid, maybe I'm naive,
Maybe I don't know the way that regular business has done, because that's
what we're told that this is just Look, it's just he was just Hunter
Biden, just doing his own business, didn't have anything to do with Joe
Biden, just just regular everyday business dealings between Hunter Biden the business man and
his associates and China. And maybe you've done some international business, and if
you have, maybe you can tell me Is this the normal way of doing
business if there's a question about payment or moneies that need to change hands.
Is this the typical language that you use when, Hey, I can get
five million dollars from any any law firm in America. When you talk about
how the ten million dollars needs to be invested annually into the joint venture,
I'm tired of this. The bidens are the best at doing exactly what the
chairman wants from this partnership. Is that the kind of language you use when
you're dealing with an international business partner? Is it to talk about how don't
overlook my ability to hold a grudge or what the man sitting next to me
right now is capable of doing. Is if there's a dispute over an issue,
whether it's payment or anything else. I'm just curious if that's the typical
way that individuals talk to each other when they're doing international business at this level.
Five one, three, seven, four, nine, seven thousand hundred.
The bigger one, John is on seventy five north heading somewhere, and
John wants to chime in. John seven hundred WLW what's going on? So
I've long wondered if the national media is going to make Joe Biden campaign and
if he does, will they cover it? Because if they do both of
those, you're gonna not eat any more material for your show, because well,
I am, I've got Fox News on to the left of me right
now, and Joe Biden just made a campaign speech where apparently I didn't I'm
the sound is down, so I didn't get to hear exactly what he said.
But apparently he's out there campaigning right now talking about the great Biden economy,
and so I guess we're going to hear how wonderful things are under the
Biden economy, and that's one of the main reasons why you should re elect
him to four more years in office. And then my second question is will
he debate or will he especially if Trump gets the nomination on the GOP side,
Well, he's come up with a reason as to why he cannot debate.
Well, they've already made it clear that he's not going to debate during
the primary, although there is some talk now about how did you see those
pictures over the weekend of JFK Jr. Bumping around with no shirt on and
he's doing some pushups and working out with his personal trainer and all that.
I mean, the guys sixty nine years old and he's in terrific shape.
And so there's some there was some talk that there may be a matchup between
those two, although I sort of doubt it. My understanding is is that
income at presidents typically don't get involved in primary debates, and and look if
that, if that's the standard, that I'm fine with that. But when
it comes to debating on a stage with Trump, Trump can take no prisoners
and he's got it. He's got a hammer. Biden with a series of
a very quick questions, it's going to be tough. So will they Will
they take that risk and put him on a stage? I have no idea,
but it'll be interesting to see it if it does happen. If you
were on team Biden and you were the campaign manager, would you put him
out on the trail and would you put him in front of a debate?
You know what? You know what his last team didn't. His last team
knew that he was incapable of doing something like that, and that's why they
kept him in debate. You know. Oh yeah, well we have the
Wuhan going on. Okay, Well, that's fine. But everything come up
to this time around too. Yeah, and it's gonna be well, Trump
can't win presidency because he's indicted. There's gonna be an excuse as to why
he cannot get out there and fulfill a campaign, uh you know, you
know, or campaign or debate of it or anything like that. There's there's
gonna have to be well, we'll see what. We'll see what happens.
We haven't crossed that bridge yet, but if they do, I just hope
there's some legitimate reporting that happens on it. And look, Biden said today
the Putin was clearly losing the war in Iraq. If that doesn't show you
that he's slipping, I don't. I don't know what does. But John,
thank you very much for the call. You'd be careful out there.
Let's go to Mason and talk to Jim. Jim seven hundred ww yeah,
Danna, thanks for taking my call. Um you cutting him, Hannity,
Um, all the talk show guys. You guys do a great job of
bringing all this stuff out and the truth to the American people. And now
we're here, we're starting to hear some investigations that are going somewhere with the
Congress. But when are they ever going to close the deal? When are
they gonna do what the Democrats do? Why doesn't the Republican Party find a
Republican attorney general that will issue a special prosecutor thing on some of these things
where where Biden did these deals at and go after him. I just don't
understand why it never closes a deal. The Republicans need a victory badly.
Oh, Jim, you make a good point. And this is something I've
talked about time and time again, is you've got these Republicans in office who
It reminds me when John Bayner was the Speaker. I mean, he talked
a good game, but never did anything to hold anyone accountable, probably because
he was guilty of some of the things that he accused his Democrat colleagues of
being guilty of him. I think there's there's a lot of blame to go
around, whether you're Republican or Democrat when you talk about what's going on in
Washington, DC, and for too long now, the Republicans in Congress,
Republicans, even when they have the power, they are too afraid of their
own shadow, and they tuck tail and run at the first sign of pushback
or criticism from the media or something that that may they think may harm them
in terms of getting votes. And on that score, I think that's where
Trump really put the template out there for doing, for going with your gut,
not being afraid to say what's on the top of your mind, not
being afraid to point out what's wrong and what's right, and what's good and
what's not good. And we have too many Republicans. Look, Jim Jordan
is great. All these hearings are terrific. And I'm reminded of the Durham
when Durham testified on Capitol Hill last week and you had Matt Gates of Florida
saying, why didn't you windict? How come there's no charges related to this.
We had one mid level FBI guy who got a slap on the wrist,
and he's he's already been welcome back to he was disbarred, he's already
welcome back to the bar association. And Matt Gates said, you're part of
the problem. And so it's great to have all these hearings, but at
some point, I'm with you, we need to see some action on this,
and until that happens, I don't think any of us are going to
be satisfied. We got time to get one more in here. Let's go
to a Randy in Cincinnati. Randy seven hundred wlw Ahi, Dan, how
you doing. I'm good, Randy, thanks for calling in. Hey,
thank you for accepting that call off. Yeah. I think both parties of
both presidential candidates Trump find who are there are? They stay stupid and they
scared people. And as a Democrat, I'm scared to Donald Trump is Yeah,
he thinks he can temporarily suspend the constitution. Now see, you're wrong
about that. You're reading from the Democrat talking points and the way that that
story was spun on national media and what Trump was talking we got to get
to a break, Randy. But I'll thank you for calling him. But
what what Trump was talking about was the way that things unfolded was a reflection
of the notion that you can suspend the Constitution and you can go after a
president, you can spy on a president, you can do all this stuff.
You can fiddle around with with a with an election and not be held
accountable. That's what he was talking about. And if you did more than
just read the DNC talking points, and listen to what you hear on MSNBC
or CNN, then you might know that and understand it. It's one fifty
four. We got to get to a break news coming up top of the
hour, but I'm gonna be talking with an expert from the Heritage Foundation and
E. J. N. Toni has written an excellent piece on Joe Biden's
economic falsehoods. And the timing couldn't be better because Joe Biden is can't as
we speak, talking about the greatness of the Biden economy. And we'll get
the complete breakdown on that as we march on till three o'clock this afternoon.
Dan Carol for Bill Cunningham on seven hundred WLW number twenty nine. J.
Greetle swings and lines at right center field in the gap. Nobody's gonna get
it. Umber thirty seven Tyler Stephen over Bee pill out one by the rind
number sixteen dixends that home run nixons LL number six shot. He comes into
the round third and the red fucking all the six Nati Reds play I'm the
home of the Red. The Reds are coming and they are coming like wild
five. Seven hundred w l W Landmark Church that I was bad of the
bowl, bad of the bowls the pole. You know, I've been watching
with great interest the spin that comes out of this White House when they talk
about Joe Biden and his economic policies, and he's hitting the campaign trail in
Chicago today talking about the greatness of the Biden economy. The White House spokesperson
who was up there yesterday, who was a new one, and her name
is Dalton, and she was talking about she's the Deputy Press Secretary, Olivia
Dalton, and she was talking about how Joe Biden's economic policies are incredibly popular.
As we Americans here here in fly Over Country begin to feel the impact
of the Biden agenda, Well, isn't that just dandy here to talk about?
That is a guy who writes about the economy all the time. Ej
Antoni is a research fellow with the Heritage Foundation and he is my guest this
afternoon. And ej Antoni, welcome to seven hundred. Ww's great to talk
to you, sir. How are you today, Oh, it's great to
be here. Thank you for having me. Well, thanks for being here.
You know you you wrote a piece a few days ago entitled The President
of Economic Falsehoods. And now we hey are here from the White House that
Joe Biden is going to be extolling the virtues of biden Omics. And I
ask myself, under under what criteria is this guy saying that he has an
economy that's good enough to run run a campaign on for reelection the president of
the United States? Can you lay out some of that for me? Uh
no, No, I really can't. I don't know what economic record this
president possibly has to run on that would justify his reelection. You know,
people are demonstrably poorer today than when he took office. Just look at the
average American family for a second. Here. Prices have risen so much faster
than wages that the average American family has essentially lost fifty six hundred dollars in
annual pay. That's how much less they can buy today than when Biden took
office, because inflation has risen so much faster than wages. But on top
of that, interest rates have had to rise to try to combat that inflation.
And now that is increasing borrowing costs on everything from student loans to mortgages,
from auto loans to credit cards, and that adds another sixteen hundred dollars
on top of that. So the average family in America essentially feels like they're
about seventy two hundred dollars poorer today then when Biden took office. I mean,
that's just devastating. You have heard a lot of American families that's the
equivalent of like a month's pay. So the idea that somehow Biden's policies are
popular, as I think it was the Deputy Press Secretary was saying, I
would love to know among whom these policies are popular, besides maybe the political
donor class and those different organizations through which Biden has been laundering money for years.
Well, the one thing that Joe Biden loves to claim whenever he goes
out and speaks is talking about the millions and millions of jobs, more than
any other president in history, that his administration has created. And I have
always been of the opinion that people were already starting to return to work during
the last months of the Trump administration after being shut down for the Wuhan virus,
and more people started going back to work, and I really I still
don't think that we're fully recovered from that yet as far as people going back
to work. But for him to sit there and take credit for all these
people that were going to go back to work yesterday or not yesterday, but
going to go back to work after the pandemic was over, and sit there
and take credit for that is one of the biggest falsehoods that I can think
of, because these people were going to go back to work anyway, and
I think that was even slowed because of all the mail box money that was
coming Americans who essentially got paid for doing nothing and got lawed into that false
sense of security that that government money was us going to keep rolling in with
no end in sight. Well absolutely, and you know, the mental gymnastics
here are just appalling. Quite frankly, none of this stuff actually helps the
American people when you're just espousing this kind of rhetoric. At the end of
the day, it makes no sense to count as job creation. When you
allow people to go back to work after you forcibly shut down their businesses and
made it illegal for them to go out and earn a living. That's literally
what we did. You can't call that job creation. I mean, if
you really want to go down that rabbit hole, and this shows you how
little Biden's handlers have thought this issue through. If you really want to go
down that rabbit hole, then Trump actually looks even better than Biden does,
because in the recovery under Trump, the economy averaged one point for million new
jobs a month. Again, this is according to Biden's logic here, but
that compares to an average of only about five hundred thousand jobs in other words,
about a third under Biden. And so the job growth, again using
growth loosely, has slowed under Biden, not increase. And furthermore, if
you want to look at where the labor market was before the pandemic, we
still haven't recovered to that pre pandemic trend. In fact, if we had
a labor force participation rate, if we had an employment to population ratio that
was similar to what we had before the pandemic, if we had that today,
we'd have an additional more than two million jobs. So this idea that
somehow biden nomics has been a success, that it has somehow boosted the labor
market, I mean, these things they may sound good, but they just
don't stand up for the facts. And the government spending I think that we
have seen has been at levels that I've never seen before, and we just
keep dolling out billions and billions of dollars, and we pay a little lip
service to the to the debt. They cut this deal to keep the United
States paying its bills and to not default, which I guess in the as
you look at it can be spun as a good thing. But to say
that we're on you know that as we look at it, we're on our
way to thirty five trillion dollars in debt right now, rocketing towards forty trillion,
and who knows how far it's going to go. Do you ever see
a time when this is going to be dealt with in a serious manner?
Oh goodness, I don't think there's any chance that the people currently in charge
have any intention of ever dealing with this in a serious manner, which is,
unfortunately, unfortunately, because we are, we are hurdling fast to a
point of no returning. I know that sounds hyperbolic, but oftentimes schederal finance
is overly complicated, and it helps to think of this in terms of a
family budget instead of the federal budget. Imagine you are constantly spending more than
you take in, and you are having to put that spending on a credit
card. What happens over time as your credit card balance keeps growing, and
not only that, but as you're not even able to afford the finance charges
every month. That's what we're getting to with the federal budget. By the
end of the year, it's very likely that interest on the national debt is
going to exceed medicare spending. We are eclipsing major categories here, We've already
exceeded defense. This is a path to insolvency. As you look at this,
are you able to find any positives at all from this Biden from this
Joe Biden economy and the things that he's done. No, No, I'm
not, I'm really not. Unfortunately, I can't think of a single policy
that Biden has put into place that has in any way really helped things along.
Now, he has done a tremendous amount to hurt, to damage the
economy. He has put a lot of weights around the necks of the American
people in the American economy, but he just hasn't done anything that has helped.
And it's such a shame because he had the benefit of hindsight, right,
he was able to look back at Donald Trump and see everything Trump did
that was good and everything Trump did that was bad. And trust me,
there was plenty of both. This is not a partisan point here, right,
This is about policymatics, and the fact is that Biden was able to
see the things that Trump did that worked, the things that Trump did that
didn't work, and Biden, for some reason has chosen to double down on
the failures and ignore the successes. And that's how we've wound up in the
situation which we are in today. It stands in stark contrast to what Bill
Clinton, another Democrat, did in the nineteen nineties, where he decided to
rebuff a lot of these failed policies that Biden is currently implementing and instead shifted
towards policies that included balancing the budget and having a surplus not a deficit.
Earlier this year, the Biden administration kept ducking and dodging and refused to acknowledge
what had been the longtime definition of a recession. And you could and I
remember I went and I looked it up and it was what was it at
three quarters in a row of economic zero growth or negative growth? And now
you've got a piece out that the Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, by her own
definition, we are back in a recession. How do you manage to spend
that one? Oh dear goodness, Well, don't forget. These are the
same people who have basically made it a habit, if you will, of
redefining words. They look at what they do with redefining what a woman is.
I mean, it shouldn't come as a surprise to us that they want
to redefine what a recession is. And it's amazing how now that their redefinition
has come back to bite them, they've suddenly abandoned it. It's so shockingly
like George Orwell's nineteen eighty four where the giant government Oceania, right, it's
at war with East Asia, and then it's at war with Eurasia. And
every time it switches, they tell the people, no, no, no,
you're remembering, right, it has always been this way. We're at
war with East Asia. We've always been at war with East Asia. And
that's essentially what we're doing here today. And once again I go back to
the fact that playing these Orwellian word games doesn't actually help the American people in
this very difficult time, and instead, what it does is it belittles their
plight by essentially implying, if not outright stating, that your concerns mean less
to us than scoring political points. It's two nineteen and we're talking with EJ.
Antony of the Heritage Foundation talking about the economy. Joe Biden is out,
he's out campaigning on the great biden Omics that we're all experiencing, and
the White House is saying that the American people are starting to feel the impact
of the Biden economy. Out of my way of thinking, I've been feeling
this impact for a long time. And when I go every time I go
to the grocery store, every time I fill up one of my vehicles,
every time I look at my utility bills, every time, you know,
I write a check and pay for my telephone or pay for my internet service
or whatever else it may be. Is that the kind of impact that they're
talking about, that we're supposed to be feeling that is so popular with the
American people, you know, I quite frankly, I have no idea what
they're talking about at this point anymore, because everything they're saying just slides in
the face of the data and it's not even a SI. These are my
numbers. This is the administration's own data. We're talking about here, real
weekly earnings in other words, what your weekly earnings, your weekly pay can
actually buy you. That has dropped five point one percent under Joe Biden.
Find me someone who's happy about working more and being able to afford less.
I just can't. So maybe they have some magic focus group that we just
don't know about. Quite frankly, and I don't need to sound flippant here,
because these are very serious issues, right. The fact that we have
had anemic economic growth of only one percent over the last five quarters, I
mean that's really devastating because it is economic growth that drives higher standards of living,
that drives innovation, that drives life saving technologies and things that genuinely make
people's lives better. And these things are essentially all stagnating under this president.
So again, I don't need to sound flippant. I know these are serious
issues, but the ridiculousness of the statement out of this White House a beggar
belief and frankly, just deserve mockery. So on the other hand, you're
gonna we're gonna have Trump out there and Trump is out. He's campaigning hard
as well, and he talks about the economic policies that he had that he
claims were so good for this country. And when you talk about the kind
of things that Trump is talking about, having a bringing back energy not just
independence, but energy dominance, when you talk about reinvigorating the manufacturing sector,
when you talk about all these things he wants to do, making real cuts
and government spending. Can that get this ship turned around eventually? If we
ad here, not just talk about doing stuff like that, but actually implement
stuff like that and adhere to those kind of policies, That's exactly the direction
that we need to go. Now. The problem is that heading in the
opposite direction today. The other problem is that you do get to a point
as a nation state where your momentum is just going to take you over the
falls, and no matter how hard you turn, you try to turn that
big old battleship around, it's going over the falls. Right now, we
don't know where exactly that point of no return is. It has proven different
for different countries around the world at different periods of time, so it should
be particularly scary for us that we don't know where that again, that point
of no return is so we need to as quick as we can again turn
things around and start moving away from it. Again, looking at it in
terms of family finance, you can't perpetually spend more than you take in and
expect that that is going to end. Well, when we reach that point
of no return? Will we know it when we get there? You know?
If you again, if you go back to history, there's no indication
that nations ever realized when they have hit that point of no return. In
fact, very often, as they're going over the falls, if you will,
they seem to think that things are improving, right because initially as that
final descent, if you will, as that begins, the government is very
often able to paper over things and make things seem as if they're actually improving,
and then it very very quickly spirals out of control. That's precisely what
we saw in Greece, for example, during the global financial crisis. That's
also what we've seen with in numerous South American countries at different times in the
last one hundred and fifty years. It's what we saw in the Weimar Republic
in Germany in the nineteen thirties. All right, Well, e j Antony,
We're gonna have to leave it there. Our time has gone, but
I want to thank you for your time this afternoon. I always love having
people on from the Heritage Foundation, and I can't thank you enough for being
here this afternoon, and I certainly hope we get a chance to do it
on down the road. Well, thank you for having me. I really
appreciate it and be pleasure to join you again, all right. D j
an Tony from the Heritage Foundation talking about Biden nomics where we have decades high
inflation, gas prices that are totally out of reach, lower paychecks, less
money for you to spend, and just uncertainty that we have not experienced in
America in a long, long time. Time for a break news coming up
bottom of the hour, Dan Carroll for Bill Cunningham, seven hundred WLW,
Zeroes Carpet and Erduck Cleaning's Hottest Summer Sale is now going on fifty back on
the Big one seven hundred w LW Dan Carroll for Bill Cunningham and phone lines
are open five one three, seven, four nine seven. Thought we actually
took a couple of callers earlier in the show. Five one three, seven,
four nine seven, eight hundred, the big one. Those are the
numbers the call. An increasing number of registered voters are anxious about President Joe
Biden's mental and physical fitness to be president. Results of a new NBC survey
reveal two thirds sixty eight percent sixty eight percent of US registered voters are concerned
that Biden doesn't have the necessary mental and physical health to run the country.
That's according to a national poll that was conducted to June sixteenth to twentieth.
That represents a seventeen seventeen point increase from three years earlier. In October twenty
twenty, a poll conducted just a month before the election, fifty one percent
of registered voters were at least moderately concerned about Biden's capability to run the country,
including thirty eight percent who said it was a major concern. Biden would
be eighty six at the end of his second term if re elected. He
has regularly spurred concerns in the media about his state of health after he fell
over on the bicycle. Their course was that video that went viral when that
happened. But beyond the physical fitness, there's also been concerns about his mental
health. While delivering a speech to introduce Supreme Court Justice Katangi Brown Jackson,
Biden attempted to define the America, or to find America in one word.
In fact, I think, Dave, do we have that cut? Let's
hear, let's all remember this together. When Joe Biden said America is a
nation that can be defined in a single word, I was, and we
And just today we heard Joe Biden say that Vladimir Putin was clearly losing the
war in I Rock. So this is starting to become an issue as they
talk about how great the economy is under Joseph Robin and Biden. The American
people, according to the White House, just starting to feel the impact of
the Biden economy. And I want to thank e j Antony from the Heritage
Foundation for being on with me to talk about that. You know, I
was a little upset yesterday when I saw this story about the city council here
in Cincinnati decided to vote unanimously to make Cincinnati a sanctuary for gender affirming care.
So that means that the city of Cincinnati wants to welcome kids who want
to have hormone blockers, who want to have cross gender therapies. We don't
do the surgeries here in the state of Ohio, but I imagine if we
were able to do that, we would do that as well. And that
comes right on the heels of universal income, as Cincinnati approved universal income,
giving monthly payments to some who are to some people who are low income.
And this is a notion that this universal income notion has been around for quite
some time. There have been another of other cities and states that have adopted
something similar. So I was getting ready for the show today and I came
across the headline that read this defying the state, Kansas City would be a
sanctuary for people seeking gender affirming healthcare. And I thought to myself, I
wonder if there's other cities across the country that are doing the same thing,
just like we did here in Cincinnati. And so I looked it up,
and here's just some of what I found when it comes to cities and this
notion about gender affirming care. Let's see, of course we had the city
of we had Kansas City, Missouri. Here's another one. Wisconsin County considers
sanctuary status for transgender kids. West Hollywood City Council adopts resolution declaring the city
of West Hollywood a sanctuary city for transgenders. Rally to make Tallahassee a LGBTQ
sanctuary city. Defendini. I guess that's a council member in Ithaca, New
York, wants the city to become a sanctuary. Washington, Minnesota becomes transgender
and abortion sanctuaries. Maybe we can add abortion to it here in Cincinnati before
too long, New Jersey governor declares state a safe haven for gender affirming care.
California becomes first sanctuary state for transgender youth seeking medical care. And the
problem is, at least to my way of thinking, that this just shows
how utterly uninformed the members of council are when it comes to this issue.
This isn't doing anything wonderful or good or uplifting. It is virtue signaling at
its worst, the worst kind. If you ask me, virtue signaling,
it's flavor of the month. It's not leadership. It's pandering for votes.
It's not leadership. This is not leadership. And when you vote for members
of city council or members of any government body, these are the kind of
things that you should look for. Is this something that is in the best
interest of the City of Cincinnati to pass a resolution like this that may or
may not pass muster if the if the state winds up banning these types of
procedures and medical experimentation on kids. It's not really what's doing what's best for
the city. It's promoting an agenda, a personal agenda or a group agenda
that I don't recall them running on. And maybe I'm wrong about that,
but I don't care. This is the kind of stuff again, it's not
leadership, it's virtue signaling. It's pandering, and it's the worst kind there
is. Let's go to Mason and talk to Ken. Ken seven hundred ww
what's up, Hey, Danna, how are you today? Good? Thanks
for calling in. Well. I hope your listeners are beginning to understand whenever
their lips are moving their line. We have clear examples today. Abiden is
trying to tell what the economy is doing, how good it is, and
your guests dispelled every single thing they said. Mary Garland claimed that the US
attorney wife hit complete autonomy on the hundred Biden case. We now that's a
complete lie. We've been listening to a head of Homeland Security. Myocis for
a year and a half lie about the state of the border. People need
to understand it's one hundred percent propaganda. They're doing it on purpose. They
know exactly what they're saying. Dans. Today you talked about the economy.
They know the state of the economy, and they continue to lie about it
no matter what. It's like this on everything they do. Everything they're saying
is a lot ken. The White House says that the American people that the
Biden omics is exceedingly popular, and that now that you and I are just
beginning to feel the impacts of the Biden economy, that we are going to
be full steam ahead with seeing to it that this man gets another four years
in office. Well, Dan, every time I go to the grocery store,
it's cost to me about forty percent more for items i'd buy I've been
buying for twenty years, just since your guest talked about the average loss of
incomes around fifty eight hundred dollars for most American families. You know, I'm
seeing that. I mean, that's the truth. See, you don't see,
you don't understand. Your wages have gone up though under Joe Biden,
you are bringing more money now than you've ever brought home before because of these
wonderful economic policies. Come on, Ken, you don't understand that you're better,
You're better than that. That's exactly what they want us to believe,
you know. And unfortunately, Dan, millions of people are buying this craft
book glynd and Sinker. I was talking to an elderly man who's a Democrat,
and it was so obvious he really didn't understand what was going on.
I said, sir, with all respect, these are not Democrats that you
were fifty years ago. They don't believe in the Democratic party that you grew
up in. This is not a democratic party. These the Marxist Party.
Mark Levin has been calling it to Mark this party for five years now,
you know, and it's all coming to fruition. If people need to understand
this. You know, he talked about the buymar comedy economy in Germany,
how Greece collapsed, you know, in that potential can happen in America if
it's not stopped soon. Well he at least he did say that that when
we get there, we'll recognize it. So I guess that's something. But
if this thing doesn't, you got to start at least to slow it down.
At least slow it down. But the foot's been on the accelerator for
the last two plus years and I don't see anything good coming up. I
don't see anything changing either, you know, as long as what we have
you know, Dan, right now, we need to make sure that we're
we're checking the voting process as as close as we can, and we've got
to get involved in do exactly what the Democrats have been doing with voting.
That's the most important thing. We don't need to worry about campaigns and anything
else. We just need to know that the vote is securious we can get
it becase problems will be staring us right in the face, Dan, if
we don't change something there. Well, Ken, I like to think that
the vote here in Ohio is pretty secure, but in other places around the
country, I'm not so sure about that. Ken, always great talking to
you. Thanks for the call. All right, Dan, have a great
one. All right, there you go, Ken and Mason, And just
to follow up if you missed any of that conversation, here's what my guest
ej Antony wrote about Joe Biden. The job's numbers that mister Biden has been
breaking about show strong evidence of double counting, such as when a person has
to get a second or a third job just to make ends meet. Raise
your hand, how many listening to this show right now have that second or
third job. Not because you're buying a lake house, not because you need
to get some work done on the boat, not because that you're planning that
bucket list vacation to Scotland. No, because you need to make ends meet,
and that has goosed up the job numbers, but it doesn't mean that
more people are employed. The second big fabrication is mister Biden's oft repeated line
about reducing the deficit. After massive government spending in the name of COVID nineteen
relief I call it Wuhan relief. In twenty twenty, the deficit balloon to
three point three trillion dollars. But with that expiration of trillions in one time
spending, the deficit in twenty twenty one was set to fall dramatically. In
fact, if mister Biden lets spending fall back to pre pandemic levels, there
would have been a surplus. Instead, Biden pushed for trillions in new spending
and the deficits that came in at two point six trillion for twenty twenty one
and to fight and despite federal tax receipts a four point seven trillion in twenty
twenty two, thirty nine percent higher than pre pandemic levels, Biden added spending
to help fuel a one point four trillion dollar deficit last year. So all
he had to do was just let it go back to pre pandemic levels,
and he could have claimed an even better economy than he's claiming. Now,
let's go ahead and get to a break, and we'll do that, and
we'll come back to wrap things up as we get ready for Eddie and Rocky
at three o'clock on the Home of the Rents seven hundred WLW. He's there
on the air on the stream on the podcast. I'm talking g O O
D Baby with Breen's charm and a voice bestown to him during a sacred service
on Mount Olympus. It's true. Come on, would I lie to you?
Mike McConnell fights morning mediocrity with his credit fists and light in the move
with my Mike McConnell funds, supplying you with the latest news, weather,
traffic, sports. It is cutting wit and endless charm. Mike McConnell makes
your Mornings super Morrow Morning at five Get your tickets now dot com four Hour
twenty twenty three. I heard radiot just about three minutes away from three o'clock.
Eddie and Rocky will be in take you all the way up to six,
So we're looking forward to that. Of course, the dj came out
with the report talking about the death of Jeffrey Epstein, and I don't know
how many years after the fact is this. This has been around. His
death has been around for a long time, and now that the Inspector General
at the DOJ is just coming out with a report on this, and my
buddy Daniel Greenfield rights in Front Page magazine. How did Jeffrey Epstein, who'd
already tried to commit suicide and was supposed to be on suicide watch, manage
to kill himself in one of the most secured attention facilities in the country,
much like how he was he able to evade sex offender registration in three states.
It's a mystery wrapped in an enigma and locked up in a black box.
The DOJ report on Epstein's death blames an inexplicable series of airs. No
one at the facility did what they were supposed to do. It's the bottom
line. Not only did they not monitor Epstein, but they gave him plenty
of bed linens with which to hang himself. For some mysterious reason, Epstein
was inappropriately taken off suicide watch. The guards lied about conducting rounds they didn't
conduct for some reason, he wasn't housed with a cell mate. And then
there was the malfunction of the video recording system. Recorded evidence recorded video evidence
for August ninth and tenth in the area where Epstein was housed was only available
from one prison security camera due to a malfunction of the digital video recorder system
that occurred on July twenty nineteen. Nothing suspicious here. The combination of these
and other failures led to Epstein being unmonitored and alone in his cell, which
contained an excessive amount of bed linens, for approximately ten forty pm on August
nine, until he was discovered hanged in his locked cell the following day.
Maybe we need linen control. So nothing suspicious there in the death of Jeffrey
Epstein. Thanks to a report from the dj and according to Trent Rosecrans,
He's reporting that the Reds may have lost one hundred Green until August now,
and he's got that hit problem. Cincinnati's unlike to put unlikely to put an
official timeline on Green's return, so we'll see what happens with that and so
much more. But it's time for me to get out of here. I
get to come back tomorrow night nine to midnight for what I like to call
the Midweek Races, and that'll be the Thursday night edition, So I hope
you can join me then from nine to midnight. Until then, thanks for
listening. Have a great day. Eddie and Rocky are up next on the
home of those Reds News Radio seven hundred WLW News Traffic and Weather News Radio
seven hundred WLW Cincinnati, and arrest now in one of the more disturbing shootings
lately in the city of Cincinnati. This is the three o'clock report. I'm
Matt Reese breaking now an update on a brash, reckless attack and over the
Rhine about a month ago, a teenager now under arrest for a leisurely opening
fire from a car during the late afternoon, injuring several people, including children.
We had shots fired down here on mcmickin Street. It was broad daylight,
broad daylight. Cincinnati Police Chief Teresa feetg almost one month ago, after
three children and an adult man were injured by gunfire from a car driving along
Mcmcinavenue near the Grant Park playground. Responding officers had dozens of evidence markers in
the street with lots of promises to find those responsible. A sixteen year old
has now been arrested for that shooting. The arrest happened a week ago.
That team is right now charged with eight counts of felonious assault. It seems
unlikely that teen was the only suspect, but we are waiting on more from
police. I'm Jack Crumley, News Radio seven hundred WLW. Time to check
the roads on this hazy Wednesday afternoon. The latest traffic and weather together from
the UC Health Traffic Center. You're pain, shouldn't wait. UC Health Orthopedics
and Sports Medicine offers same day appointments. Call five one, three, four,
seven, eight eight sixty nine zero to schedule. There's a disabled vehicle
on seventy one North from three thirty eight. That's in Kentucky. I'm John
Crawford on NewsRadio seven hundred W WELLW. Now the latest forecast from the Advanced
Industry Weather Center, Advanced Dentistry. It's true, a no Fear dentist experience
is possible. Learn more at no fearist dot com. The quality issues will
continue through the remainder of your afternoon today, temperatures into the low to mid
eighties with some sunshine peering through that smoke and haze. We're looking at eighty
three air quality indexes inside an unhealthy category, so if you are outside,
you may be dealing with some respiratory issues. As we head into the evening
that will We're dealing with mostly clear skies overnight, then a chance at strong
storms on Thursday, with a high near eighty nine from your severe Weather station
of nine First Wanting Meteorologists Brandon Spinner News Radio seven hundred WLW Hayes in smoke
eighty three degrees in Cincinnati. Boulair is going to stick with us yet another
day as a Southwest Ohio Air Quality Agency is extending the air quality alert to
tomorrow until midnight for the tri state. The agency expects to see levels of
both ozone and pollution from the Canadian wildfires and the unhealthy range of the air
quality index because there are two air pollutants with high concentrations. People encouraged to
limit outdoor activities, especially kids with respiratory illnesses. The same goes for adults.
Cincinnati Police with an update on a day