Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
As a clock strikes thirteen, it's Wednesday, the twenty first of February.
You're of our Lord, twenty twenty four. Well, today the hearings,
the final hearings, This is the second day of hearings about Juliana Siance is
going to be conducted. Absolutely amazing the media blackout that is happening with the
mainstream media, and so we're going to begin by talking about that, and
we're going to finish today by talking about that. We're going to have Marty
Gottisfeld on because if, as it looks, this whole thing has been set
up to extradite Julian Assange, they will be putting him in a communications management
unit, and there are now several of these in the United States. Think
of them as domestic gitt mos, where they can manage your communications, where
they can store dissidence so that they can't communicate with people on the outside.
And that's exactly what they did to Marty Gottisfeld. So we're going to begin
with that. We have a lot of interesting updates to political news as well.
When you look at this massive judgment of about a half a billion dollars
against Trump. It's far worse than just the corrupt legal system there. It's
all based on a very bad law. Maybe Trump should have focused on state
politics. We'll be right back well as a Julian Assan trial hits. We
have a lot of people who have shown up from all over the world for
several days. Take a look at the big crowd here. You'll see this
kind of stuff on social media right now. Right now, it is not
being censored, so you'll find it on Twitter at least, maybe not on
other social media platforms, but it is completely being censored in the press all
over the Western press, especially in America. And we'll talk about the absolute
blackout of this, which is truly amazing, because this is the most consequential
trial about freedom of the press that has happened in our lifetime, is likely
to happen in our lifetime. Noisy protest outside yesterday the Royal Courts of Justice.
You can put that in air quotes like it is here with our Department
of Justice. Protestersro around the world have gathered to demand the release of Juliana
Sange, who said in twenty eleven that almost all wars of the last fifty
years have been started by media lies. Yeah, by the way, who
needs a communications management unit prison when you got the news being controlled by the
mainstream media. And this is why it is becoming ever more essential for them
to ramp up their programs, the censorship and surveillance, to bring in anticipatory
intelligence, to bring in the CCPA, the Coalition for Content Providence and Authentication
that I've talked about so many times, to be able to stop you if
you are identified by these same people, these same mainstream media groups will be
working the coalition put together by Darpain Microsoft to have mainstream media identify you as
somebody who is not part of the narrative, and then they can and opposing
the narrative. And after your marked person, then Microsoft will work with the
CPU providers Intel arm and with Maine with a application generating software from people like
Adobe to prevent you from creating this stuff. Perhaps maybe it'll stop you from
uploading, but I think it'll be there to stop you from creating it.
And so they've already put this together. It's being funded by the same people
who created the Internet, who created social media. That is the intelligence agencies.
They want to control the information everywhere your active reports. Major media organizations,
press advocates in the Australian Parliament are among those to crying Assigned just prosecution.
Well, I haven't really seen any major media organizations opposing this. Really.
You got some of the big con some of the big conservatives. We'll
talk about it, but I only kind of tangentially because see, the problem
is their guy's part of this as well. It's just like the pandemic.
They can only go so far, you know. They say, well,
you know Julian ossingeeah, he gave us some good information about Hillary and this
is what Trump said. But then when push comes to shove, they don't
want to talk about the fact that this began under Trump and you know continued
by Biden. Just like the pandemic. They hate the pandemic, they hate
the JAB, but they don't want to draw those dots to Trump. So
you kind of tread lightly there. Assigne has been held without charge since twenty
nineteen at the maximum security Belmarsh Prison, but he's been under custody for twelve
fourteen years after spending seven years in the Ecuador and embassy in London. So
it's about twelve years. He was arrested in the embassy in April of twenty
nineteen, when Ecuador suddenly revoked his political assylum after they had a change presidents
in that country. Assange, forty seven years old, was being held on
behalf of US authorities as well as for breaching his original bail conditions, said
the UK police, Oh, really okay, being held on behalf of US
authority. So if the five eyes, if one of the five eyes,
the big eye, tells another I to hold somebody, then they can hold
them. Just forget about any due process, right, we take the dissenter
and we do the due process later. It's just not simple. It's like
the guns or anything else. Yeah, due process, Well, someday we
might get around to it. He has been held there. He's not been
charged with any other criminal offense other than he breached his original bail conditions that
put you in solitary confinement for five years, put you in an Equadorian embassy
for longer than that. So there's been no actual charges brought even on that.
They haven't had a trial, he hasn't had a conviction. Assigne was
arrested inside the Ecuador and embassy. In May of twenty nineteen, the US
indictment against him was unsealed, revealing a single charge of conspiracy. These people
are conspiracy theorists. They charge everybody with conspiracy. Isn't it interesting everybody's guilty
of conspiracy, except when you say they are conspiring to do something. No,
was this a conspiracy, Of course it was. It was a conspiracy
between the CIA and the British intelligence to come after him, and they have
all other NATO countries as well. It was a big conspiracy to commit a
crime against fundamental values of free speech and free press. The conspiracy, they
said, was to commit computer intrusion. This is the way that they escaped
the Pentagon papers issue. Remember the Pentagon Papers had Daniel Elsberg, who recently
passed away. He got some Pentagon papers about the fraud of the Vietnam War.
He released it to the Washington Post New York Times. Steven Spielberg made
a movie about what heroes the people at the Washington Post the New York Times
were when they defied the government's demands that they not published this, and they
published it anyway. And there was a court case, and the court case
decided that if you are given this information by somebody, then you can print
it. So freedom of the press is about and so the New York Times
and the Washington Post were protected under that. Daniel Ellsberg, however, could
be tried because he was the one who stole it. Now they had a
technicality that got Elsburg off. Perhaps this whole thing was a part of an
establishment move against the Vietnam War to make sure that he got off. Nevertheless,
the finding, which is consistent with free press and free speech is that
if you didn't steal it, somebody hands you something, you should be able
to speak about it. Otherwise there is no free speech. And so what
they did with Julian Assigns was they tried to pretend that he was active in
terms of obtaining these documents. And you know, they don't charge him with
actual computer intrusion. They charge him with a conspiracy to do that. Well,
I would certainly like to have information if anybody's got it about the crimes
that are being done by our government. You say that, well, you
are part of a conspiracy to get those papers. That's the nonsense that this
whole thing hinges on. Now they've subsequently added additional charges because after they extra
died him. Legally, technically they cannot add more charges, so they've added
more charges. They're looking at keeping him in jail for one hundred and seventy
five years. And we'll talk about the kind of horrific conditions that people who
are dissidents like Marty Goddisfeldt being persecuted by major corporation Harvard Harvard Medical, the
hospital there, or are somebody like Schaefer Cox who is a political dissident who's
been kept in one of these communication management units. Think about that. This
is a recent development, these CMUs, and they've now I think gone from
he was in the first one, which is an Indiana. I think they've
now gone to like three. We'll talk to Marty about it though. But
when you go back and look at the Pentagon Papers movie, like I said,
back in twenty seventeen, which was at this point in time, Julian
Osonge had been essentially under arrest in the Ecuadorian embassy, and so Steven Spielberg
does this movie to show how wonderful the mainstream press is. The mainstream press
that doesn't fight for Julian Osane's release. They had Tom Hanks, Meryl Streep
and this Steven Spielberg movie, What Heroes, What courageousness, and yet silence
about Julius Senge And of course what it was doing was it was getting you
know, you can trust the Washington Post and the New York Times because they're
so honest, you know, when you when you look at this, Caitlin
Johnstone had I think I forgot to print this out, but she had a
tweet I saw this morning. I retweeted it and she said, Okay,
so these people are saying that because this was done by two presidents, that
means that there's nothing partisan here about it. This is not political. It's
just he's a criminal and he needs to go to jail for the rest of
his life. She says, Do you really think that these people are acting
on their own? You don't understand that this is part of the American empire?
Do not understand who the real government is? A real government, the
CIA. You know, Other than Tucker Carlson's fantastic revelation last week of something
that all of us have been talking about for decades, everybody in the world
understands that unless you are completely living in that little mainstream media bubble that Tucker
Carlson thinks you're living in So why did Asannge take refuge in the Ecuadorian embassy.
Well, he did that to avoid a charge of rape in Sweden,
which is quietly dropped in twenty nineteen following a review of the evidence. They
didn't want to have a trial for that. They didn't want to have a
trial for him. You know, doing anything, do you take the person,
You do the punishment, and maybe you do the trial later. Maybe,
who knows. The British government passed a new National Security Act this last
December, very expansive and in it. When they were debating this law,
they expressly mentioned a data dumps through WikiLeaks is a major reason for criminalizing investigative
journalism pertaining to issues of national security. Under this act, journalists from quote
non accredited sources unquote. Oh, I mean I don't have a license to
speak from Nancy Pelosi or her ilk. This is something they've been looking at
for quite some time, of course, and we had during the Obama administration,
they had the FCC go around and interview people in news rooms, television,
radio and things like that. How do you put together the news?
It's like listen to your business, and this is not. First of all,
the FCC was set up to allocate radio frequency spectrums and TV spectrums and
so this is a public good. This is something that crosses state lines.
And so you know, they set up the FCC to whole lotteries and to
sell off these different frequencies, different spectrum and that's it. That's it.
But as any self respecting bureaucracy does, they're always looking at ways to expand
their mission. Mission creep and these creeps expanding their mission, decided they wanted
to get into content and they've been increasingly moving in that direction and so in
the UK, and part of that was to say, well, what's the
difference between real media and other people? Well, frankly, I don't really
care. First of all, the First Amendment protects the press and also protects
the speech of any individual. So what I don't care if you recognize me
as the press or not. Just look at me as an individual who has
equal rights to speak freely. And so non accredited sources in the UK,
Oh, you're not a licensed journalist, or maybe you're not somebody that has
been bought out either by money or by delivering access. You know, Tucker
Carlson has talked about Julian Assandra in the past, but not to the people
who matter. You had Candace Owen asked Trump about Julian Assange, the only
one, the only one who would ask him about it. She didn't press
him when he kind of wiggled around out of it. Well, I'm not
going to say who this is. And I didn't pardon Snowden, I didn't
pardon nos songe. And you know, one of them is kind of a
spy thing or something and the other one isn't. I'm not going to say
which one is and which one isn't it. But you know, I had
a bad feeling about a little bit. So why'd you have a bad feeling
about it? You know, just this wishy washy answered it was about him,
you know, but he wasn't even asked that about Tucker. Tucker,
you know, used Trump this big interview with the first debate. Thing doesn't
want to look. It's all about maintaining access. That's the way they control
these They don't have to write them a check. They do often they do,
oh well, you know this is for a special grant to study this
or that or to shore up media. That's not profitable. We'll write you
a big check. But the biggest check they can write them is to show
up. And if you ask these Republicans, if you are Fox News or
Tucker, or if you ask the Democrats, if you're seeing In or MSNBC,
if you ask them pointed questions and persist in it, well you don't
get access to these people anymore. It's safe for Tucker to do it with
some politicians that are well past their cell by date, like Pence. You
know, he followed up on Pence. He made an idiot out of Pence,
but that was for the maga crowd that he did that. It wasn't
for truth. And he doesn't have to worry about not getting access to Pence.
Nobody wants access to Pence. He's gone and he was a dead man
walking at the time in terms of politics. With an outcry from both left
and right liberals in the UK against this thing that would bar journalists from non
accredited sources. You face years of imprisoned by the way if found to be
publishing material that is contrary to the official narrative. This is the death of
the West and you see it in everything I've been seeing this type of thing
for climate deniers, pandemic deniers, you know, vaccine deniers, election deniers.
You do not question their official story on anything, or you get punished.
And now they want to take it to the next level, not just
canceling people, not just financially deplatforming people. They want to go to incarceration.
And that is what the assigned thing is truly about, taking it,
normalizing it to the next level. They can do it to assigns, so
they can do it to anybody. And that's what they said in their debates
back in December, the new National Security Act. So people were liberals,
whether they were right wing or left wing, described this verdict on Assigne as
a verdict on the future of journalism and free speech in the West. As
with the US, the European Union and its member states, the UK is
taking steps to titan state control of information. By the way, this is
many different sources talking about this is that are not mainstream, totally blocked on
the what are the accredited sources? But this is Life site News did an
excellent article on it. I think they had the best article. Tucker Carlson's
most recent broadcast revealed they said the shocking degree to which US intelligence agencies collude
with Google, Facebook and other social media platforms. Again, everybody wants to
talk about that. Everybody wants to talk about Tucker. He didn't real anything,
he didn't reveal anything. We knew all of that, but now we
can trust it because now it's been told to us by Tucker Carlson. Reporters
without Borders tried to get in to observe this trial. They were barren actually
from visiting him in prison. They can't go to the trial. They put
the trial in a very very tiny courtroom. It only has fifteen seats in
this courtroom. But this same Royal Courts of Justice in London has got a
lot of courtrooms, many of them are huge, but they put it in
the smallest one that they could find. Sorry, we don't have any more
room. Sorry sorry, Oh yes, we'd love to accommodate you, but
we can't. They also said, as Julian asign just fate hangs in the
balance. It is more crucial than ever for media organizations and journalists around the
world to speak out and support other principles at stake. And this is not
just about his speech again, this is about you. If you have anything
to say on social media or anywhere. You know, when Aaron day I
interviewed about CBDC when he had his little the introduction to the book, which
is you know, Life under CBDC, it was simply about you know this
this family and how after the father spoke out about one issue that the government
took issue with, they essentially took everything from the family. They had the
power to do it with CBDC. They have the will to do it now
that will give them the power to do it. So these reporters of that
boarders barred from visiting him in prison. They described reporting restrictions around Assange as
the worst that they have ever seen. Live Streaming of the hearing is limited,
some crucial testimony as an audible, with the extradition case being heard in
one of the tiniest rooms in the Royal courts. And you know, it
is kind of interesting when when Karen and I when we got married, we
basically just lived in London for about six weeks because and you know, we
didn't have any money, but we just just like one notch above a youth
hostel that we're staying. But we did all the free stuff, and one
of the free things you know, we'd hang out at the Speaker's corner,
watch the debates and stuff. We would go to Parliament and watch them debate
and have Thursdays was questions to the Prime Minister. I guess they still do
that. But we went one day to the Criminal Court, the Old Bailey,
and you queue up in a line, and you don't know if you're
going to get in, and if you get in, you don't know which
case you're going to go to, and so and so you said, we
just kind of dropped in on this one case. It was very interesting,
the one that we happened to get into, because it had a lot of
international intrigue and involved the CIA. It involved Malta, not the Falcon,
not the Maltese Falcon, but it was equally mysterious and we sitting there trying
to figure out, you know, what's going on. We're jumping in the
middle of this trial because you can't. The reason I mentioned this is you
can't, at least of the Old Bailey, go back to a particular the
public gallery. You can't go back and say, well, I want to
I want to go back to this trial I was listening to yesterday. You
don't know which one you're going to go to? And so it was getting
really really interesting. And then someone was mentioned about the CIA and something had
happened in Malta, and the judge or some guy that's there says, stop,
stop, stop, judge, we can't talk about this. Claire the
courtroom and we got kicked down just as it was getting good, and just
as they started to talk about the CIA. And so we go back and
requll what Julian Assine was saying back in twenty eleven about war. This is
one of the reasons they put him there, because the goal is not to
completely subjugate Afghanistan. The goal is to use Afghanistan to wash money out of
the tech spaces of the United States, out of the text basis of European
countries, through Afghanistan and back into the hands of a transfestional security of it.
That is the goal ID. The goal is to have an endless war,
no more successful war. Oh yeah, that's right. And so Hillary
Clinton said, can't we just drone this guy? Yeah. Bablin B had
their take on the Trump Golden slippers laughing about yesterday. Their take on it
was that Hillary Clinton then come up with a new line of cement shoes that
you tried them many times, never had any complaints come, none of them
were ever returned. But yeah, no return policy, not just for the
shoes, but for the person who's wearing the cemit shoes from Hillary Clinton.
So she says, can't we just drone this guy? So I said,
you know, when Juliana sign Train looked at Trump, he said, well,
we know that Hillary Clinton is a murderer, and we know that she's
hopelessly corrupt. He says, we don't know wh what Trump is. We'll
find out. Well, Trump is the guy who initiated the process, is
going to keep you in prison for the rest of your life and kill you.
We found out who Trump is. I found out who Trump is.
I said the same thing about it. It's like, well, yeah,
we don't like Hillary Clinton. This guy's never held public office before. We
got a lot of big warning signs about his integrity. His integrities were flashing
like a neon sign at one of his casinos, and his integrity problems were
flashing like that. But you know, we now know who he is.
A sign she has been threatened with a drone strike by Hillary Clinton, having
laid the blame in twenty fifteen for the creation of ISIS by American destabilization of
the Middle East, including Clinton's worle in the destruction of Libya. And as
a matter of fact, some of the stuff that was leaked out there,
never forget the fact that Hillary Clinton is some of those emails that Wiki Leaks
put out there, we saw that they were coming after at Afi at that
time. I mean, the guy had literally been a terrorist. He'd blown
up airplanes and things like that. But after you know Reagan, you know,
sending cruise missiles and things like that, blowing up tents and some of
his family members, he stopped with that stuff and he started focusing on making
Africa independent. They had a large amount of gold there, have a tremendous
reservoir of water that they had. And the emails we saw from Wiki leaks,
we saw that the European central bankers are very concerned about the competition that
Kadafi with his gold standard currency was going to go into competition with these central
bankers and their fiat currency, and so that's why they wanted to take him
out. According to Hillary Clinton and some of the leaked memos, her remark
about droning Julian Assange was reported by WikiLeaks in October twenty sixteen, citing evidence
from a US State Department memo and report from True Pundit October two, twenty
sixteen, detailed the exchange. Following Clinton's alleged drone proposal, another controversial remedy
was floated in the State Department to place a reward or bounty on Assannge's capture
and extradition to the United States. Numbers were discussed in the realm of a
ten million dollar bounty, and the report also noted the bizarre atmosphere of the
US State Department under Hillary Clinton. A State Department source described that staff meetings
were bizarre. One minute, staffers were inquiring about the secretary's blue and black
checkered knit sweater, and the next minute the room was discussing the legalities of
a drone strike on Assange and of the financial bounties. That's what happens when
you get these thetalitarian girl bosses together. Should we talk about the sweater or
should we talk about our assassinations? I don't know, We'll just alternate.
An independent campaign that challenges media bias is how they describe themselves. Fair is
the name fai R found almost ten times a number of mentions for the Russian
dissident Alexei Navalney then for Julian Assange. As a matter of fact, I
looked at this morning, and I've got all over a dozen mainstream media sites
that I go to, things like CNN, BBC, NPR, USA Today,
Washington Post, New York Times, things like that. And so I
quickly pulled them up and did a word search on their website. Right on
their homepage, I should say, are there any articles about Assange? Went
through all of them? Zero? What about Navalney? Oh well, Politico
had seven articles about Navalney, CNN had four, Washington Post had five.
There was one article each at Fox, BBC, Guardian, USA Today,
New York Times, Reuters had two articles about Navalney. All together, they
had the sites that I checked twenty six articles about Navalney. Nothing about assannge
on these mainstream press organizations. Now, if you want to find out what's
going on, you really got to go to social media. Why is Navalney,
who has never been very popular with the Russian people so important? But
a Songe is not well? Because as Songe is the West's Navalny. He
is a dissident. Whether or not he is popular, he's very unpopular with
the people in power. That's what they have in common. And one of
the articles that I saw about Navalney' said, oh, yeah, they secretly
moved him to another prison. You know, he was there. They knew
who he was, and they were talking to him, and so they moved
him to this prison in the Arctic Circle and we couldn't find him. Well,
it just disappeared nobody knew where he was. And then they figured out
where he was, and shortly after that they poisoned him up there. I
thought, oh, okay, well, we have purpose built prisons for that,
don't we. They call the Communication Management units that we'll be talking about
in the third hour. So, you know, how are these things different?
I compared it the very first day I talked about this, when all
this stuff happened with Navalni and I didn't even realize that his signs court dates
were coming up this week. But I said on Monday, I said,
so how is that any different? It's the same thing. We do the
same things. You know, we imprison journalists. We know people die in
prison in America that are dissidents and so forth. Why is that different,
Well, because it's us, we're special. So New York Times was one
paper which cooperated what WikiLeaks described as a two million dollars smear campaign against Julian
Assange. Let me interject here that you know, we go back and we
look at the journalist Gary Webb who exposed a part of the you know,
the the crack cocaine up and they making how they were using that to fund
secret wars in Central and South America. At first he got journalistic awards,
and then they created a smear campaign. Not the New York Times, but
they used the La Times to smear him. And after they smeared him and
got him fired from a lot of different places, then he started to make
his comeback. And then when he started to make his comeback, just like
Navalney, he was murdered. They said it was suicide. No, he
was making his comeback. Then if you look at the how he died,
it was not suicide. Elizabeth Voss for Consortium News reported in twenty twenty three
how corporate media has repeated smears against Assange showed the legacy news media is not
simply a second rate form of journalism in comparison with wicked leaks. But it
is intentionally opposite, and so, in other words, wicked leaks tells you
the truth. They lie to you in order to start wars, as he
said. But you know, now, supposedly Tucker's figured this out after working
for these sources for the longest time. By the way, when they did
that with the La Times, they had several dozen reporters that were working on
going after Gary Webb because it was a pretty big and there were other sources
that verified what he had to say and big sources who talked about that.
As a matter of fact, the guy who was at the very center of
pushing this out so that he was put up to do it. It was
a guy's name, the rap guy anyway, had the same name as a
rapper. But he made a lot of money doing it. He went to
prison for doing it. He exposed that the CIA was a part of this
as well, validated web day Gary Webb did so anyway. In twenty seventeen,
early on the Trump administration, Trump was reportedly willing to negotiate a pardon
for a songe if he could work out if he would out the sources of
the DNC emails and if he would disprove Russiagate once and for all. In
August of twenty sixteen, as Songe made comments on Dutch television that all but
admitted that the source of the DNC emails was the murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich.
So why not admit the identity of a dead source, if indeed it
was Rich, why not disprove Russiagate? Why not do this for Trump so
that he could get what is freedom? Well? Because Wikileak's obligation, according
to Assigns, was the absolute protection of sources, no matter the cost.
It is a principle that may prove to cost the award winning journalist his life.
You see, Trump is about Trump, is about things that reflect for
Trump. He is about Trump. He's incapable of acting, as his lawyer
said, except out of his own perceived self interest or revenge. The world
is not going to be changed by Trump or people of his ilk. Self
serving narcissistic politicians will not change the world for the better. They will change
it for the worse. There's going to be people who stand on their principles,
even if it cost them their life. It will change this world.
Wiki leaks. I love Wiki eliks. During the twenty sixteen election campaign,
Donald Trump repeatedly extolled the leaker of the Democrats seeks and reveled in the damage
he believed Wiki leaks would do to Hillary Clinton's campaign. This WikiLeaks is like
a treasure Trump. It's a different story now that Julian Assange is under arrest
and facing a criminal conspiracy charge for the theft of official US secrets Wiki leaks.
I know nothing about Wiki leaks. It's not my thing, and I
know nothing really about him. I don't really have any opinion. Trump's longtime
friend and advisor Roger Stone has boasted that he kept the Trump campaign in direct
touch with a Songe he faces criminal charges for trying to cover up his contacts
with WikiLeaks. He became a willing player with the Russian Stone. Democrats are
hoping in a songs Bob Menendez means they'll get some man goldbar was going on
between Russia, WikiLeaks and the Trump campaign. I think is very good for
us to finally get him. Mention on us soil, Joe Minchin. You
can investigate, we can basically cross examine. We can find out the facts
that only he knows, and his connections and how he basically distributed his information.
Wiki Leaks believes that's the whole game. That the charge today is an
attempt to get a songe extradited to the US on one crime and then force
him to testify or be prosecuted on other things. So Keith, it seems
clear there's been an evolution in the way Trump perceives Assage. But there was
a time when Americans were really divided. I mean, you know, was
the this is Canadian Broadcasting Corporation US national security? Is that still the case?
Well, not to the extent it was, And that's because of what
we've learned with the passage of time. Massage really does seem to focus more
on exposing US secrets than those of other countries such as Russia or China.
And in the twenty sixteen election, he seemed clearly to be a Russian tool
in the stination of the Clinton campaign emails now speaking tools the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation,
and the twenty twenty election was running that are they tools? You better
believe they are tools. And you noticed in that video, yeah, Joe
Manchin, oh yeah, we got to get Julian Massage back, why was
Joe Manchin's name being floated around because folks, he's owned by the CIA,
like the rest of them. Right, if they float your name around there,
if they promote you, and of course they can promote you even by
attacking you as we see with Trump. But if they promote you, and
you know, you're allowed to compete in the pageant, the beauty pageant that
we call an election, if you're allowed to do that by the US Empire,
by the CIA, the intelligence communities, well then that's kind of a
tell. And he'd already told everybody where he stood, publicly identified himself.
Interesting that Menendez would say, well, we're going to have to have some
criminal charges against Roger Stone because he's been in contact with Julian Massage. Uh.
Yeah, Bob Menendez, who has been up for multiple indictments of allegations
of bribery. The FBI found all the goal bars and all the rest of
this stuff there. That guy, that guy, Yeah, he's going to
do the investigation for integrity. Washington is just so hopelessly corrupt, and so
is the media, all completely owned by the real government that never changes,
the CIA. So going back to some of the things that Julian Assige has
said. Nearly every war, he said that started in the last fifty years,
has been the result of media wize. The media could have stopped it
if they hadn't reprinted government propaganda. He'said populations don't like wars and they have
to be fooled into wars. If we had a good media environment, then
we would also have a peaceful environment. It's my opinion. He said that
the media are so bad that we have to question whether or not we would
be better off without them altogether. Yeah, you don't have to watch them.
The problem is we don't want to start picking and choosing who gets the
talk. You know, I would never cancel, for example, CNN or
MSNBC. They are a useful example of what the government wants to push,
so you kind of know the opposite of the truth, so as they point
out here. The former Finance Minister of Greece spoke of his recent vision a
visit to Assange. He said Singe has been suffering twenty three hours of daily
solitary confinement and the course this has been going on for him for twelve years,
twelve years. This is the same kind of treatment that our CIA government
wants to do to the January sixth people as well. If you care for
your right to know what your government is doing behind your back, then you
must support Julian Assange, because Julian Nossige is dying for your right to know
what your government is doing on your behalf. And you've got people who are
in jail life sentences dying because they have the audacity to criticize the government's elections
that have always been corrupt. It's just that they were foolishly going to bat
for the man who had locked them down with medical martial law preceding year.
So again, today is the second day of the hearings, these extradition hearings
that are going to happen, and he is indicted also now with the nineteen
seventeen Espionage Act. This is something that characterizes the Obama administration. You know,
he finished his eight years in twenty and seventeen, right, and so
Obama in his eight years as president used the Espionage Act against more people than
all the other presidents combined in that last one hundred years from nineteen seventeen to
twenty seventeen, he had more people charged of that. He went after people
like Bill Bennie, He went after people like Thomas Drake, these NSA whistleblowers.
He accused them of the violation of the Espionage Act, Sowed and all
the rest of these people. So they have come after him for that,
for the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, for publishing classified military documents and so
forth. And it is interesting that again, you know Obama with the heavy
CIA connections in his family, Bill Barr with the heavy connections in his life
with the Bush family. George H. W. Bush brought in to fix
to restore the CIA after the hearings that were not about heart attack, guns
and assassinations. The hearings of the church hearings and the Pike hearings were about
the CIA and the NSA spying and American citizens. And out of that we
got the FISA Act and the FISA Court. And then they turned around and
used that to rubber stamp their surveillance of mister and missus Rise. In other
words, they had all of these hearings and supposedly changes at the CIA,
and what came out of it was something to stop them from spying on the
American public, which they've been doing from their inception. Instead, what they'd
use, then, is that act to give them legal cover for that.
John Rizzo, who was the lawyer for the CIA, he invented this euphemism
of enhanced interrogation, and he said, I watched those hearings when I was
a young lawyer, and I looked at it and it's like they need a
good lawyer. And so he decided that he could to work for the CIA
to help them lie better. He wrote his book called it Company Man,
because the CIA always referred to himself as the company and he was a company
man. That's exactly what he did. And so Bill Barr was a company
man as well. Bill Barr worked with George HW. Bush to help rebuild
a CIA in its reputation after all of that exposure. And then when George
H. W. Bush gets appointed by the CIA as president, he brings
Bill Barr in with him as a very young attorney general. And as soon
as Trump put in this CIA shill, you don't think that the CIA controls
Trump. As soon as Trump put in this CIA shill, it's only a
couple months later that all this stuff rolled out in twenty nineteen against Julian Assange.
And Bill Barr knew how to how to get his partners in the Five
Eyes to grab him and to put him put these charges against him. So,
his wife, Stella Sossannge has warned that if a judge rules against Assigne,
he could be on a plane to US soil in a matter of days.
Here is what his wife is saying. In the United States is abusing
its legal system in order to hound and prosecute and intimidate all of you.
What's at stake is the ability to publish the truth and expose crimes when they're
committed by states. The outcome of this hearing today will make it clear the
extent of the cover up the only fair I shouldn't even talk about fairness at
this stage because the country that's trying to extradite him thought it to murder him
in the United States. Yeah, and so isn't it interesting? Weh she
talks about crimes being connected by the state. One of the key things that
really bothered them was that film called it's been named Collateral Murder where you see
the US military's gunship and the video that they obtained from it where they're watching
people. They got a journalist and a bunch of other people, civilians that
they shoot up, and then they wait until the clearly marked medical ambulance shows
up and they put the people that have already been shot up into that ambulance,
and then they let loose again and shoot up the ambulance with the dying
people inside. Collateral murder. US Army helicopter crews laughing as they gunned down
a group of Iraqi civilians, including journalists and children and even the medics that
are there. And so they published that that was a crime. That was
a crime. Now did anybody get charge of the crime for that after we
saw that? No, what happens when you've got an institution, Like I
said, any institution can have bad people in it. You know, we
talk about the police, or in this particular case, to talk about the
military. It's not an indictment of the institution to talk about the bad people
that are there. It becomes an indictment of the institution when the institution doesn't
do anything about the bad people, when it protects them. When in the
case of the FBI, and you got ln Horyucci who assassinates a Randy Weaver's
wife holding a baby in her arms, and then they give lan Horiyucci a
medal. Okay, we can forget about the FBI now as having any integrity.
And so when they embraced this as they did with the Clateral murder,
instead of coming after the people who did the murder and who laughed about it,
they come after the guy who tells you the truth about the murder.
And then when you look at Vault seven, for example, other people broke
in and got Vault seven, which was the CIA blueprint. We just had
a guy, Joshua Schulte who's been sentenced to forty years in prison for giving
Wiki leaks Vault seven, and other people got it as well, And so
Joshua Shulte is kind of like the Daniel Ellsberg of the Pentagon papers. But
they want to now come after the people who published it Wiki Leaks, unlike
you know, the New York Post of Washington, the New York Times of
Watcher Post and so vall seven, which they will talk about how this guy's
going to jail for forty years recipeonage, but they don't want you to know
the Vault seven. What Wiki Leaks published at first was the manual of how
you could use it. Then somebody else published the code and so then eventually
WikiLeaks was when ahead Him published the codes, it was already out there.
But what it showed us with a manual was that they had tools to break
in to anyone anywhere and make it look the c I can make it look
like they're Russians or Chinese or North Koreans or anyone, anyone friend or foe.
They could hack and disguise it. And they didn't really want you to
know that because they're saying, if there's a cyber hack, a cyber attack
against our infrastructure, then that's grounds for war, kinetic war, shooting war,
and how do we determine that? Well, what Vault seven showed was
that you can never be sure who did it, But we always have these
certain pronouncements in the media, don't we. Oh, they know right away
who did it, whatever happened, they know right away. You can't trust
any of this stuff. Any of it could be a false flag attack.
And so he tells you the truth about that. So what they do They
charge him with a conspiracy to do computer hacking. Vault seven shows that that's
what they're all about, conspiracy to do computer hacking and to use a computer
hacking to start wars as well. Zarah Headsha reported that The Guardian has meanwhile
commented on US authorities attempts to bully journalists who worked with a Songe to turn
against him. At least four well known journalists have been approached by the Metropolitan
Police on behalf of the FBI. James Ball is ex Wikileak's colleague who's now
with the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, David Lay, the former Guardian and Observer
journalist, Heather Brooke, a freedom of information campaigner, and Andrew o'hagen,
who has been commissioned to ghost write Assinge's autobiography. All of them have declined
to cooperate with the FBI. In an article for Rolling Stone last year,
Ball said that he had first been approached in twenty twenty one and subjected to
pressure, including the threat of being prosecuted himself. O'hagen said that although he
had differences with Assnge, he would happily go to jail rather than assist the
FBI. I would only add he said that the attempt to punish Asinge for
exposing the truth is an attack on journalism itself. I noticed that none of
those mainstream collaborators who published his material. The New York Times published his stuff,
published some of the same stuff that Wiki leaks had The Guardian Despiegel.
None of them are being pursued, which demonstrates a generational bias against Internet based
journalism is at the heart of this case, and of course it is at
the heart of that UK legislation and what they want to do in the United
States as well. All of the five IC countries US, UK, Canada,
Australia and New Zealand, they will all be doing this type of thing.
So you know, people who understand and of course the people who are
going to stand on principle are going to be the people going to change things,
not these line grifting politicians who are controlled by the CIA and acting in
their unperceived self interest. President, do you still love WikiLeaks? I know
nothing about wiki leaks. It's not my thing. Wow, wiki leaks.
I love wiki leaks. WikiLeaks, the WikiLeaks documents show the Hillary Clinton documents
released by WikiLeaks. Today, WikiLeaks release new emails, secret speeches released by
wiki links the WikiLeaks revelations through WikiLeaks, WikiLeaks wiki leaks. Of course,
he didn't know that there was a thing called WikiLeaks, right, Do you
still love WikiLeaks. I know nothing about wiki leaks. It's not my thing.
I know nothink. Yeah, Yeah, that's exactly what Trump is.
It's a corporal Schultz or the CIA. He doesn't wear the uniform of the
CIA like Shultz wore the uniform of the Nazis. But he works for the
CIA, and he works for himself and capable of actually except out of his
own self interest. Ed Snowden said, the outrageous part of the UK ye,
the UK's years long trial to condemn Juliana Sane to die in an American
dungeon is that the victim of his crime, quote unquote crime, which is
journalism, is a state rather than a person, the definition of a political
offense which the US and UK extradition treaty explicitly forbids. His crime is against
the state against America. And they have an extradition treaty between the UK and
US which expressly forbids the extradition of somebody for a political crime. And he
says to every political leader and journalist making and writing speeches, you can't save
Navalney. You can still save Assange if you were silent here when and where
you can actually influence the outcome. You were never standing up for principles,
You were just hoping for applause and of course for money. So we will
have more to say about this coming up in the third hour. I want
to get into something some of the politics that are happening here, because there's
some very interesting things that transcend at the center of what is happening to Trump.
And again we look at these things that are happening to Trump, and
what is happening in New York is wrong. There was no victim, but
guess what, they have a law in New York that doesn't require there to
be a victim. So this is far beyond judicial prejudice, is far beyond
law fair people who are out of control in the court system. The legislature
there put that line. And then when we look in Georgia, we got
Fanny there, and take a look at this woman who focuses and is known
for doing racketeering and corruption. She's involved in a little bit of that herself.
As a matter of factured apartment is stealing money left and right from people
with civil asset forfeiture laws. And yet what does she have at home?
She brags about how she's got the stash of cash and she's paying off her
her little boyfriend and stacks of cash. See, these are the types that
nobody wants to talk about civil asset forfeiture for you and I. Nobody wants
to talk about swat team rates. They want to talk about, Oh,
look, they did a video raid of mar A Lago, but they don't
care about the swat team rates. They're done against us, and some of
the people are saying, well, look at what they did to Trump.
That means it's going to be difficult to do business in New York, WA.
We should have paid attention to what was happening in your state instead of
being focused on something that you have no control over. Forget about Washington,
especially the presidency. You don't have any control over who is running the CIA,
and it's a CIA that is running our governments. So we'll be right
back. If you're listening to the David Night Show. Interested in a curated
list of the finnest classical music, find it now at apsradio dot com.
All right, Uh, get into uh another bit of news here. I
just want to do a little bit of housekeeping and think the people who keep
this program going be very ungrateful for me to know say thank you to those
of you who kindly donate and send your support. And I'm way behind in
the list of people who have donated on zel, especially since we had somebody
asked yesterday a question, can I tip you on Zeale? And I said,
yeah, you can tip us on zal and a good place to tip
because there's no fees or commissions there if your bank has that connection. And
we got ten people who tipped us yesterday and it was amazing and very generous.
And so I've got a list of people, including some of the people
the last week of February that I've not read their names on zel. It
is so many that I don't want to do a long segment of just reading
names. I'll get back to them and then we've got a list of people
who send us support by mail. But let me just read the people who
and give a thank you to the people who contributed just yesterday. For example,
Natalie L. Mary M. Mitchell E, Noel R. Jeffrey C,
Chris T. Stacey, A. Majid Z, Kimberly M. Ramon
g. All of them contributed yesterday and I really do appreciate that one of
our regular contributors who's been around for a very long time. Gretchen See was
sent a send us an email and I said, they were like, we've
done one little thing with substack, and we want to do a lot more
with substack, but we're now posting. We finally get the show up.
It takes a while to do the outline, but we post the outline as
well as a link to the show on substack and they liked having that.
They're good place to find it. We also give that to people who are
on subscribe Star and they get a link on subscribe Star to a version of
the podcast, the audio podcast that doesn't have any commercials in it. If
they're going to support us there, that is more than we would get from
anybody watching all the commercials, more than they would pay us, far more
even if they get in at the five dollars level. So we really appreciate
that, and we send them that link for free. And then I wanted
to on subscribe Sorr. I got a tip from Mark g. He said,
thank you for your work. He says, if you read this,
say hi to Tie. Hi. Tie. He's another show supporter whom I
became friends with through this show who lives on the other side of the state
via people's rights. God bless you and your family, and like tie,
you can read my full name as long as the amount is not read,
and not for credit, but just to reject anonymity, he says. Besides,
they have my number by now. I'm not going to read your last
name. Make them work for it if they want to get your information.
I just do that unless somebody well he did ask me to read his last
name, but I'm not going to. Well, okay, Mark, go
sign. So there we go, read your last name, so you're on
the record there. Good for you for standing up. I don't try to
run from these people. Ker Karen told me a long time ago. She
said, you might as well do a show because you've written so much stuff
out there anyway, that got your numbers. So it's like, yeah,
I might as well go public with all this stuff. It is good to
stand up to these people, isn't it right? That's what all the mass
stuff was about. Don't you get a good feeling when you refuse to comply
with this stuff, when you refuse to self censor yourself. Isn't that a
good feeling? Makes me feel good? I hate Yeah. That's one of
the reasons I heard so quickly everywhere is because I'm not gonna when I talk
about the vaccine, I'm going to talk about the vaccine. I'm not going
to say, you know, the thing, that thing that's going around.
I see people do that. I understand why they're doing it, but you
know, I'm it bothers me to see people's self censor really does bother me
to see that. So let's see where was I I want to There's something
I wanted to talk about. I can't quite remember what it was here.
Let's talk a little about Okay, let's do this. Let's talk about what
is going on at Maga Lago, which I think is going to be the
new name for mar A Lago. Just call it Maga Lago. Oh,
I had this is what I was thinking of on Rock Finn. Thank you
very much, Michelle Obaman, thank you for the tip. And Travis is
reminding me that I need to remind you that I want to do and ask
me anything and you can send those as emails if you want. Of course,
you know, we can have people write us live comments. It's just
a little bit harder for us to keep track of it because Travis has got
multiple places to look for the comments and everything, so you can ask me
anything live when we do it, but if you want to send some of
the stuff in advance, you can send it to our email that is David
Knight's Show at ProtonMail dot com and you can find that at our website,
Thedavidnightshow dot com, which will also show you where you can catch the show
and both it's live and archived formats, and on the video formats, we
do have topics that are taken out of the show. Since it's a three
hour show, we give you an outline. Let's we also try to take
topics on and put those on the video thing, and it'll also show you
give you links to where you can find the audio podcast as well. Okay,
so let's talk about what is going on with the Trump administration, and
before we get into what is happening at Maga Lago, this whole thing about
the half a billion dollar judgment, and Reason really nailed this in this article
how a New York judge arrived at the staggering order that he called a disgorgement.
A disgorgement isn't that interesting? You know? When they steal your car
or your cash, or your home or something like that. Don't charge you
with a crime, let alone convict you. Right when they you know,
no charge, no conviction, but the just take it. They call it
a civil forfeiture. So now this judge is calling this a disgorgement. Isn't
that interesting how they keep coming up with these novel terms. But it is
actually not just bad politicized courts. It is also a bad law that is
the basis of this, that allows him to do this. And so it's
going to be difficult. Actually, I think as I looked at this,
it's going to be difficult for Trump to appeal this. But as Ulysses Grant
once said and again before our current presidents, he was always considered by historians
to have the most corrupt administration of any president before recent times. Ulysses Grant,
also known as a US grant, he kept the money flowing, didn't
He just like a regular US grant to all kinds of people, all kinds
of corruption. But one of the things that he said that really stuck with
me. He said, the way you get rid of a bad law is
to rigorously enforce it, and that is always sometimes that that may happen to
this. This is a bad law being rigorously enforced by this judge and this
Attorney General, Letitia James. This law does not require proof that anyone was
injured. You know, this is one of the things everybody's looking like,
what is going on? How in the world could this be fraud? The
banks were paid off. The banks said they did their own due diligence.
Trump had a disclaimer there that you know, hey, you know, do
your own due diligence. And they did, and they made the look they
moved down his you know, lowered his projected net worth. The said,
yeah, we'll make the loan anyway. Yeah, he's inflating this stuff.
But and Travis is telling me, remind people like the stream, please like
the stream about that. Travis that good? Okay, Sakes said, yes,
please like the stream. That really does help us. It does help
us to get the information out and which they don't want people to see whether
or not I'm right or wrong. I will tell you what I honestly think.
So please like the stream. And on rumble a woots thank you very
much for the tip. So Trump is a treacherous coward who belongs in d
C in hell thereafter. Thanks for offering him no quarter. I agree,
I agree, and i' and I say, you know, even though this
is I said this about Dennis Hastert, the pedophile who was groomed for Congress
and then put in as Speaker of the House. Long as serving and GOP.
He went on many times as other GOP people were outed as sexual pedophile
predators, and he went on with rush. So I know this is all
politics. All the rest is no, it was real. But they didn't
put him in jail for the pedophilia. They put him in jail for something
that was not a crime, making his own money out of the bank and
measure amounts they call that structuring, so that there would not be a report.
As long as he kept it under a certain amount, there would not
be any scrutiny of that. So he did that. They sent him to
jail for that. And so Trump, who poisoned, who sent this shot
around the world poisoning and killing people, his lockdown, all the rest of
the things that he did, the medical death protocol that he paid the hospitals
to enforce. Nobody's coming after him for that. Why well, because all
the GOP were involved in it. All the Democrats are involved in it.
Biden continued, these policies, they're not going to come after each other over
that, so they're going to come after him over a non crime. But
it is important for us to look at this because these types of things are
going to hit everybody. Jonathan Turley was right. He says, this is
something that's hanging over the head of anybody that does business in the state of
New York. Now, this bad law. Now, of course we have
selective enforcement. I will only use it against their political enemies, you see.
But the law itself is a real problem. When the interest that in
Goron also approved is considered, the total penalties are going to rise two four
hundred and fifty million dollars on its face, a penalty of nearly half a
billion dollars, says reason. It's hard to fathom given that no lender or
ensure claimed that it suffered a financial loss as a result of the transactions at
the center of the case brought by your Contentery General Letitia James. But the
law under which she sued Trump and his co defendants does not require any such
loss. The money demanded by the judge's ninety two page decision is styled not
as damages but as quote disgorgement, disgorgement like they're going to make Trump vomit
this up, and ill gotten of ill gotten gains, disgorgement of ill gotten
gains. It is aimed not at compensating people who are allegedly harmed by his
misrepresentations, but at deterring dishonesty that threatens the financial marketplace. Because we all
know that New York City is a pinnacle of honesty and integrity, and we
all know the same as true of Wall Street. We wouldn't want to damage
their reputations, would we by inflating the value of assets. Proving common law
fraud, wrote the judge in Goron requires and I'm not even sure if I
you. I've read so much about this guy who says I know him by
I know his name, I know his face. I've never I don't listen
to any news, so I don't pronounce his name. I hope I've got
it right. So if I got it wrong, you can write me and
tell me the right way to say. It requires establishing that the defendant made
a quote material statement unquote that he knew to be false, and that the
plantiff justifiably relied on that statement, and that he suffered loss as a result.
That would be common law fraud. And so everybody's looking at this and
they say, wait a minute, if you lie, somebody relies on that
and they have a damage, that's clear. None of that really, you
know, those last two things didn't happen here. Even if he made a
material misstatement, nobody was damaged by doing that. However, by contrast,
this law, section sixty three to twelve of New York's Executive While, by
contrast, authorizes the Attorney General to sue any person who engages and repeated fraudulent
or illegal acts or otherwise demonstrates persistent fraud or illegality and the carrying on or
conducting of the transaction of business. And he writes in his ninety two page
decision in Goern says, the statute casts a wide net. It defines fraud
to be any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud, and any deception,
misrepresentation, concealment, suppression, false pretense, false promise, or unconscionable
contractual provisions. See, this is a problem a law that is that broad,
just like a law that is sufficiently complex is like not having any law
at all, and it can be used by people like as Judge and like
Letitia James to come after their political enemies, which is what has happened.
There's a lesson to be learned here. Again, going back to that this
is a state problem. As I said over and over again, the state
can be worse than the federal government, as it is in New York City,
right, New York is worse than the federal laws. Yeah, they
have all that plus a lot more, just like this, and if you
don't pay attention to what's going on at the state and local level, it
can be actually worse than the federal government. If you do pay attention,
it's a possibility that it could be better. We saw this happening over and
over again in twenty twenty with people who interposed over these Trump incentives to lock
people down, people who nullified this stuff, people who refuse to be bribed
by Trump to institute medical martial law. So better pay attention to the state
level. That's the point of me talking about this. Even Trump would have
been better served to pay attention to state and local stuff instead of getting involved
in national politics. Timely and total repayment of loans does not extinguish the harm
that these false statements inflict on the marketplace. As that judge in Gharan,
that's the way he pronounce his name, he says, it's all the more
reason that we have to strive for honesty and transparency. And it is undisputed
that defendants have made all of the required payments on time. But the next
group of lenders to receive bogus statements might not be so lucky. So this
is like a pre crime thing, like a pre crime thing. So just
just think about that. You know, yeah, they all got paid,
but you know that might not happen in the future. And we don't want
somebody who is out there, you know, inflating his assets. We don't
want that to go on. It's always you know, all New York businesses
now threatened by this Trump precedent. Well, he is a precedent, and
so many times he is still precedent, isn't he. He's still establishing these
presidents. This is what Jonathan Turley says, But it's not really Yes,
it is a precedent in the sense that they've now enforced it against somebody that
have now enforced it selectively against the political enemy. But it was always a
bad law and nobody noticed it. And so what he's doing is he's enforcing,
rigorously enforcing that bad law. So the question is, are they going
to apply the US grant standard to it? Are they going to now get
rid of this rigorously enforced bad law. Jonathan Turley said many businesses are likely
wondering, but for the grace of God go I. Undervaluating or valuing property
is a common practice, particularly in real estate. That is why representations like
the one made by the Trump Corporation come with a warning that estimates are their
own and that the banks need to make their own assessments. He said,
the line between doing business and a public execution appears to be the dubious discretion
of Letitia James. We've seen this before as well. Interestingly, you go
back to the pandemic and Letitia James came against Alex Jones and against Who's Baker
James Jim Baker the tell of evangelists. Who's out of jail, But you
know he's doing other things now. Anyway, both of them had silver.
Now, look, I'm not aware of any representations that either of them made
that silver was going to cure the imaginary pandemic virus. But hey, if
you got an imaginary pandemic, can I have an imaginary cure? I mean,
what's wrong with that? It's kind of like the Wag the Dog scenario
where they make up this guy and now we're going to bring him home,
and then they make up another story to say, oh no, he is
his plane crashed on the way home. You know, we gotta put this
together for old shoe. Well, the bottom line is that silver is good
in terms of killing you know, pathogens and things like that has been demonstrated.
They use it to this day for burn victims. You know, they
have a sav that they put on people with burn victims keep them from getting
infected in that type of thing. But she just said, well, if
you talk about silver, I'm going to shut this hand. So Alex just
pulled all this silver product, even the toothpaste, which again, if you
get silver in your toothpaste, that's going to get rid of you know,
bacteria and nasty things in your mouth. Sad to see that go, but
that was the Tisha James. She is arbitrary, capricious, and ruthless in
what she does. Very political, as well. And so then when we
look at Trump and the an abortion I find this to be interesting because you
had people pro life people and his evangelical congress gation that follows him around saying
that Trump wants to have a sixteen week national ban on abortions. And I've
said before that I think, first of all, that's unconstitutional, and I
think from a pragmatic standpoint, it's unconstitutional for the same reason that Roe v.
Wade is unconstitutional. Always said that Dobbs, the Court agreed with what
I had been saying for many years. I'm sure that they didn't know what
I was saying it, but I always said the Tenth Amendment says that there
is no authority for the federal government of any branch to decide when life begins.
That murder, which is what we're talking about here, is something that
belongs to the states to regulate. And I've also said from a pragmatic standpoint
that if you come up with some national line, some national sixteen weeks or
whatever it is, that is well beyond what it is already in many pro
life states. And what will happen is the states where they push abortion California,
New York, people like that, they are going to ignore this law,
just like they ignore now marijuana prohibition. Marijuana is still a Schedule one
drug in the War on Drugs, but they ignore it because there's no constitutional
authority for Congress to outlaw that unless they have a constitutional amendment like they did
with alcohol. And so there is no authority for the for Congress, for
Republicans or anybody else to outlaw abortion or to enable it to you know,
to stop people from enforcing laws against abortion, which is what Roe v.
Wade did. But this is something that's being put out by the Trump campaign.
I'll just say this that as the Democrat states will ignore a lower limit,
you better believe that when the Democrats get power and they raise that limit
or get away with it altogether, that the Republican states will follow suit and
they'll say, well, that's the supreme law Bland and we have to obey
it, even though it isn't. So this was kind of interesting because this
is the way the Trump campaign works. You've got somebody inside the campaign or
people are allied with it, and they put campaign promises out there that are
not coming from the candidate. You know, it's one thing when you know
Trump promises to fix the border, and he doesn't do it right. But
now they've got surrogates who out there making his campaign promises for him, and
so as this was happening, it gives him an opportunity to pull back from
it. So he can, you know, other people can say, oh,
no, he really is going to do this. It's ford chs,
you know, just like alex is telling everybody it's not a bad vaccine.
It's really just sugar water. He's got his surrogates out there lying to you
so about what he's going to do, and then he can go out and
say, now, since he's got surrogates making these claims, he can tell
the media, no, that's not me, that's not my position. Major
pro life organizations have offered differing reactions to a recent report that Trump privately expressed
for a sixteen week national abortion ban. According to a Friday report from The
New York Times, two unnamed sources with ties to the Republican front runner alleged
that the idea of a sixteen week abortion ban with exceptions for rape, incest,
or the life of the mother. The article states that Trump said in
a private conversation that he likes sixteen weeks as a cutoff, because it's an
even four months. That sounds like something he would say. So this is
how they work again the Washington Post. Instead, according to Trump's team,
Trump has not made a decision about whether he would support a national ban,
and he's also stated that he would not be tied down to a specific number
of weeks. There you go, see he can You know, these people
put out leaks that he's really going to do this, and he denies a
publica and they say he's just playing forty chess. He's just got to get
elected. He's got to say that as president. Trump has stated he would
sit down with both sides and negotiate deal that everybody will be happy with.
That his spokesperson, you know, like the video I've shown you many times
of him setting down with the Democrats. He's got Chuck Schumer there and Diane
Feinstein. We're going to do something everybody's happy with. Can you do that?
Yeah, we can do that. We can run this thing through,
and he does it by executive order gun control. He blamed the Republican Party's
position on abortion for his losses during the twenty twenty two midterm elections. It
wasn't him. It was the babies that they saved. That's why people that
want to vote for Republicans. It was this odious albatross tied around the neck
of the party called Donald Trump. No, it was the innocent babies' lives
that were saved. That's why you didn't win your election, this good Christian
man. He also criticized DeSantis for signing a law banning abortions after the baby's
heartbeat becomes detectable, calling it too harsh. So who are you going to
believe? Well, Wine Press had an interesting story about the Maga prophets.
They're getting weirder and weirder. False prophet claims Trump possesses the Arc of the
Covenant in mar A Lago. Yeah, that's it. We all know that's
where it got sent. Right, They are walking out of mar A Lago
looking back as where it was maybe and this actually they must be taking it
in and storing it with all the documents. That's what's happened to this.
Yeah, the idolatry for Trump, and now it's all about the fact that
he's got a replica of the Arc of the Covenant. There at what I
think we should start calling Maga Lago, the Temple of Maga, the Temple
of Gloom. I guess we could say the Raiders of the Lost Document as
well as the Arc. Wine Press says, as I said, the idolatry
we see for Trump is just wild, and it fits the bill for the
cult of personality. And it's been covered here Wine Press before. The blasphemies,
either attributed to Trump or the ones that Trump himself makes are simply gross
reprehensible, his latest being endorsing an AI generated post that refers to Trump as
quote the shepherd of mankind who will neither leave nor forsake them a title of
our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. I mean, having to type that
out is so putrid it makes me want to hurl a form of disgorgement.
I guess we could say the New York good Judge laying aside all the things
that belied Trump of being this anti establishment outsider who was fighting globalist and draining
the swamp, you know, his warm angering the fact that he did what
the swamp. He left the swamp the way that it was. He didn't
change anything. He enacted the globalist COVID war against all of us. The
economic sanctions, trillions of dollars in debt, his stimulus checks that were really
an early introduction of universal basic income, and all the corruption that was accompanying
all that she said. Today, I was made aware of this false prophet
on a podcast that came out claiming that Trump possesses the arc of the Covenant
in Maga Lago. Yeah. It was presented by Pete Santilly. Pete Sentilly
and I we had go back to the Bundy Ranch standoff. That guy as
something else anyway, And it was put on at Info Wars. Here's somebody
who absolutely hated Info Wars. He would show up and bullhorn Info Wars are
in live broadcast and anything. But now he and Alex have kissed him made
up. Ain't gonna happen with me. I guarantee you it ain't gonna happen
to me. There's no way. I don't think Alex wants to kiss and
makeup. I guarantee you that I'm not going to. But here's a Pete's
intel this broadcast and he has it with Don Dona Clement. Petrushka was a
person who's talking there. Look at that thumbnail. This is obviously something that
is not a real shot. This is Donald Trump bending over with hands together
as if he were praying in front of the arc of the Covenant. That's
why he's got it there, Manerolgo. I think he just likes things that
are gold. I think I think he just can't get enough gold. And
so this is what Pete sent Tilly was selling people absolutely insane and he got
ravaged by the comments that were there. But anyway, Winepress says, after
I picked myself off of the floor from laughter, I watched a few minutes
just to humor them, and Pete Sentilly showed a picture of this lady.
She's referring to Looney Lumer, Laura Lumer. And is that that there's Laura
Lumer standing next to the Trump arc of the Covenant? That is there,
Laura Lumer, Looney Lumer standing next to a supposed replica. And Donnie Clement
Petrushka, the woman that you saw in that thumbnail, claim that she saw
it also at mar A Lago. I'm sorry, Maga Lago. Pete Senttill
he claims that Israel gave President Trump a replica of the real thing, which
they don't have because you know, it's in the government warehouse that we saw
there. Patrushka says that her father prophesied many times of a parallel blessing that
God would send on both America and Israel. Yes, God put Donald Trump
where he is. The question is is Donald Trump a blessing or a curse?
And then of course this was also put on display at mar A Lago,
and you had James O'Keefe who now refers to himself and his media organization
as o MG. So he got his h Yeah, you're supposed to be
astonished, you know, the OMG thing of everything he's got out of there,
so is his blasphemy, and him standing there a perfect replica of the
Arc of the Covenant. By the way he spells that wrong. He's got
it arc instead of ark. That's an that's a box, a box an
arc ark twenty seven hundred hours of labor and six pounds of gold. Uh
so. And then you have other people who posted up the fact that this
is the most valuable and sought after item. You know, even the Nazis
wanted it. According to Steven Spielberg, I'm going to give him special special
powers. Except sometimes these people. If you go back and read the Bible,
sometimes the people who kidnap this, certain things happen. I wonder if
we're going to find a gold statue of Donald Trump on its face, with
its head and hands broken off, like the Philistines did when they picked the
Arc of the Covenant. A close second would be a list of the subjects
and truth that authoritary minded are AI sponsors have instructed their chatties to bear false
witness about, in other words, leakers and whistleblowers. That list is the
unholy grail. The one who gets it, who gets a hold of this
arc and who spreads it, will rip down the veil that was already ripped
and accelerate the awakening above and beyond anything else imaginable. Well, back to
wine Press, she says, apparently this is purportedly created by an avid supporter
of Trump, displayed at Maga Lago during a dinner party, and that's evidently
where O'Keefe and Looney Lumer took their pictures. If true, says wine Press,
it proves once again the absolute blasphemy of Trump is sacrilege, and his
diehard proselytes are willing to commit for him. So who is this? Miss
Petrushka interviewed by Pete Sintilly. She says she's part of a ministry called House
of Destiny, founded by her dad, Kim Clement. The so called church
wants to encourage you to achieve your destiny quote unquote, according to their website.
Furthermore, on their statement of faith, the church believes, quote we
do not bring discrimination or judgment, but we inspire hope, bringing restoration to
life and often healing from the past. So, in other words, they're
just like the prosperity Gospel people with he gets us that Super Bowl ad.
You know, forget about sin, forget about removing the penalty of sin or
the power of sin. No, no, no, You're fine just the
way you are. I wonder who would be telling you that. That's not
God's message. That's It's message. We want to activate your faith so you
can fulfill God's great destiny in your life. Your destiny is to leave a
legacy, and legacy is influence. Okay, So what you're after there for
is influence? Is that? Well, we're all seeking in life. You
know, Hillary Clinton is looking for the politics for meaning. I guess they're
very much like Hillary Clinton, aren't they. Wine Press again says so Basically,
it's a spin on the American gospel of health, wealth and prosperity.
Self help name it and claim it a bunch of new age garbage, she
said. When this information was sent to my inbox today, somebody graciously linked
the ridiculous and heretical beliefs of all these people and the myriad of false prophecies
by this guy Clement Kim, for example, in twenty fifteen, one year
before his death. In twenty sixteen, he tweeted that people do not need
to be born again. Okay, there it is right there. Stick a
screenshot of that. So Jesus said you need to be born again, but
not this guy. Not this guy. He disagrees with that. And then
there was a screenshot that was sent to her screenshot taken from a YouTube video
promoting Kim Clement's alleged prophecy of Trump, even though Trump is never mentioned in
the prophecy. But they put this together after the fact. This is what
the people at QAnon do. And you see there's Trump and kind of a
quasi military uniform. You know, they've shown him dressed up like Andrew Jackson
and other things like that. She says, did you know that Kim Clement
prophesied Obama would be baptized in the Holy Spirit the summer of twenty ten,
that he would change all his presidential policies to richly blessed Americans. Did you
know that he promised that Clement prophesied that rap artist Eminem, Arthur Stephen King,
media tycoon Rupert Murdoch would all become Christian evangelists, not just Christians,
but evangelists by the end of two thousand and six. Did you know that
he prophesied two thousand and seven Bill Gates would do the work of evangelism by
giving a bunch of his money to fund churches. Was that he asking Gates
for money by doing that? Did you know that he prophesied Rudy Giuliani would
become President of the United States in two thousand and eight. After his death
in twenty sixteen, his popularity started picking up steam. I guess he's going
to become another Nostra Damis. He was being hailed by more and more people
as a true prophet based on his alleged twenty fourteen prediction that Trump had become
president, which you never said. That screenshot that just showed you there,
It's truly amazing what these people will do and how they will spend this around.
And as I said, when I looked at the Pete Sentilly thing,
it was like through pages of commercials in the description, and that's all they
had nothing there, no transcript or anything, just commercial commercial commercial. But
then there were comments like this, the Maga crowd is blinded thinking Trump is
some sort of savior. God will not share his glory with another. It
is mockery in my eyes to my Lord and Savior. He is the only
one who can save us. There have been interviews where Trump says that he
will not ask for forgiveness because he's done nothing wrong. Another one read the
Bible done, that's the female guest of Pete Sentilli. There Russia brings gifts
to the Lord and Isaiah and so forth. Therefore, the antichrist system is
just as Obama is the Antichrist, and also the Muslim Mahdi. In other
words, there's a lot of different antichrists out there. Is Trump the Antichrist,
Well, he is an Antichrist, that's for sure. Another one Alex
promoting Trump elan and Christ energy, Christ energy. The only energy Alex puts
out is from his drinking his conspiracy bourbon, and Lin listening to Metallica for
horsemen, Kim Clement was a false prophet, a one new picture of the
Ark of the Covenant would Trump would trigger? And then General Flynn in one
gave a word for word speech proclamation of that occultist Elizabeth Claire prophet. And
I've played that for you many, many times. And so why do I
talk about all this because you need to understand how this is being used Politico
And there's all these you know, articles on Drudge they'll pull, they'll drudge
this stuff up. Trump allies prepared to infuse Christian nationalism in a second administration.
And so they focus on some of these people around Trump and some of
them say they deny the label. They say, well, this is what
I believe, but they don't they want to label people as Christian nationalists.
But you said, they're also using all of this q Andon, Maga,
Lago, Arc of the Covenant and all the rest of the stuff. They're
using all of this to attack Christians. And the purpose of all of this
and the purpose of Rob Reiner's document. Rob Rein will even come out he
say, well, there's a lot of Christians and evangelists who don't support Trump
and you know, and push back against this stuff. But the people who
are actually out there that you know, that are engaged, the Christians who
are engaged in the public sphere, we need to shut them down because they're
all like Michael Flynn or Donald Trump. That's the bottom line. They want
to intimidate you because they want to make you shut up. That's what this
is about. If you're a Christian, just stay in the closet, don't
talk about any of this stuff. And we should not be We should oppose
this stuff. We should talk about Trump, we should talk about Michael Flynn
and how he's you know, plagiarizing these New Age false prophets and the rest
of this stuff. We've got to talk about that and oppose it and say
that's not us, that's not us. And what they want to do is
they want to shut us up. You know, when I look at this,
they define Christian nationalists in this Politico article that goes very very They do
very long articles. They work out you know, ten twenty thirty pages to
print these things out. Christian nationalists in America believe the country was founded as
a Christian nation and that Christian values should be prioritized throughout government and public life
as the country has become less religious and more diverse. This guy they're focusing
on, Russell Vought, has embraced the idea that Christians are under assault and
has spoken of policies that he might pursue in response. Look, the free
exercise of religion is under attack. Your belief system is under attack. People
are getting canceled, they're getting fired, they're getting sued. Some countries,
of course, they get imprisoned because of their Christian beliefs. You look at
this woman who was a high ranking government official in the past in Finland who
is now on her third prosecution because she was made a comment on social media
to her church because she disagreed with him having a pride parade. So,
yes, Christian persecution is speeding up, and it is part of the overall
rejection of free speech and the free exercise of religion. It's an overall rejection
of what is encapsulated in the First Amendment. Don't you dare go protest,
don't you dare speak out, don't you dare exercise your religion? And so
this is all about continuing the putting people in a box. They intimidated people
in the middle of the twentieth century with a couple of Supreme Court decisions saying
that if you work for the government, you've got to get Christianity out of
everything. No, you're not establishing a religion, you're exercising your faith.
That's a difference between forcing somebody to attend a church, forcing somebody to pay
for a church, and simply freely exercising your religion, which is part and
should be protected. And so they intimidate to people that as people are waking
up to that fraud of the separation of church and state type of thing,
Oh no, no, no, get any religion out of the you know,
if you're a teacher, you can't have anything religious at work, and
that type of thing that's now been thrown out by the Supreme Court. People
are waking up to it as well, and so now they've got to find
some other way to intimidate people and enter you know, Trump and his you
know, Maga cult to help this along. But when you look at this
Christian nationalist and America believe the country was founded as a Christian nation, Well,
of course it was, of course, it was just read the decoration
of independence. If you're not completely historically illiterate, you understand that those are
Christian values, and Christian value should be prioritized through government and the public life.
We're not talking about any particular religious exercise here, We're just talking about
a worldview and understanding that you are accountable to God. You know, And
when we look at something this simple definition like this, you know, I've
been I've had problems in the past the churches that I went to that I
looked at their doctrinal statement and you know, you can put down a lot
of stuff there, and the devil is in the details. You find out
later, Well, yeah, we didn't address that because even maybe the elders
didn't agree with what was going on with that. So when you look at
their characterization of what Christian nationalism is, don't be concerned about it is simply
right now. It is a They've designed this as a pejorative label, and
even Russell Voight says, well, I don't accept that label. I don't
call myself a Christian nationalist, and I don't I don't accept what you are
saying about this. But Politico goes on to say that Trump is not a
devout man of faith. Oh that's a revelation. But Christian nationalists have been
among his most reliable campaign activists and voting blocks. Trump formed a political alliance
with evangelicals during his first run delivered them a six to three conservative majority on
the Supreme Court. Is now espousing the Christian rights long running argument that Christians
are so severely persecuted that it necessitates a federal response. Well, it doesn't.
It doesn't no matter how bad the persecution is. We need to focus
on the state level. We need to focus on interposition of state and local
officials, on nullification by them, on civil resistance, forget about the federal
government. On the Iowa caucuses, Trump promoted on his social media video that
suggested his campaign as actually a divine mission from God. America should be recognized
as a Christian nation where our rights and duties are understood to come from God,
wrote Russell Voit two years ago in Newsweek. What's hundred percent true.
That's the premise of the creation of independence. Our rights come from God,
and it's self evident that they do. He says, it's a commitment to
an institutional separation between church and state, but not to the separation of Christianity
from its influence on government and society. He got it exactly right, but
they want to label him as a Christian nationalist. He went on to accuse
the people using this label of Christian nationalism of evoking the term to try to
scare people. That's right. The term need not be subjected to such intense
scorn due to misunderstanding or slander. It's an intimidation tactic, and that's what
Rob Reiner is doing. They also go in to tie in Flynn in this
political article. Trump is talking about bringing his former national security advisor, Michael
Flynn, a vocal proponent of Christian nationalism. There's nothing Christian about Michael Flynn's
activism, and that's re awakened America. Understand that if Michael Flynn wants to
present himself as a Christian, he needs to publicly repent of what he did
pushing transgenderism on people like that Navy seal Chris Beck in twenty fourteen. He
was at the cusp of all that he and Donald Trump were leading this country
pushing transgenderism in the early teens, Trump for his beauty contest and Michael Flynn
at the Pentagon so shut up about them being Christians until they confront that and
acknowledge and repent from that they're not. And so Flynn is out there talking
about his army of God, and he is somebody who is anybody who follows
him is doing a disservice to this country and a disservice to conservatives and a
disservice to Christians because this is a setup, just like January the sixth was
a setup. So Rob Reiner has a different version of nationalism. I think
we should call it meathead nationalism. The guy who is his only acting role,
he was routinely despised. He was supposed to be the smart guy who
is going to expose Archie Bunker, the bigot, and yet everybody despised Rob
Reiner, and he wasn't acting, as you can see. Now he's made
some films, he said. Now he's made a film about Christian nationalism that
I have mentioned in the past. He says, there's very conservative Christian evangelicals,
pastors, very respected people in the Christian community that are frightened of this
Christian nationalist movement. So you should be frightened to be associated with it.
You should get back in the clause at Christians and shut up because Rob Reiner
is going to call you. He's going to associate you with Michael Flynn and
Donald Trump and these QAnon retards out there. We showed the film that this
movement was a foundation for January the sixth. They were moving elements that made
January the sixth and the insurrection happen. Now weer in the house who is
an avowed Christian nationalist. Look, it is true that QAnon and Michael Flynn
and a lot of the usual suspects that orchestrated that January the sixth trap are
doing the same thing again with Reawakened America and the rest of this stuff.
They need to be opposed with this. And of course the key part of
what Rob Reiner is doing is to play the race card white Christian nationalism.
So again he's gonna make everything about race. We've got some comments on here.
Travis is telling me that the stream is having some issues. Something is
up with our WiFi or the ISP stream is dropping in and out. I've
done everything I can short of turning everything off. I have no guarantee that
it will fix anything. If I did turn it off, our ISP could
be having issues. Our router could be freaking out. Obs could be glitching,
restream could be glitching. There's so many different possible failure points. I
can't test it while we are live, Okay, so disclaimer we will.
We will have the full program up later today, so there's both audio and
video on rumble A woots. Thank you very much for the tip. Says
Trump is a treacherous coward who belongs in DC. Oh we had this before
and Octo spook. Besides being documented mass murderer, liar, and UNI party
member, Trump is now a shoe salesman and a huckster. Well, let's
that's unfair to shoe salesman. I mean, I've known some honest shoe salesman,
and they are not all the shoe salesmen are not soulless so to speak.
They're not heels either, but stealth patriot. It's easy to know why
Trump is what he's going to do next. Just go read the World Economic
Forum website. Yep, that's what he did in the past. He's got
his freedom cities. We won't call them smart cities, we won't call them
fifteen minute cities. We'll call them freedom cities. Colton Kimberly, thank you
for the tip. I've noticed twin I have to watch later after the live
show. All the likes go back to zero after it is posted here on
Rumble. Like yesterday, I was the sixth like, oh, well that's
interesting. We don't necessarily need to repost the live show Rumble. We just
leave it up there. I guess I don't know. The only thing that
I just leave the live stream up afterwards, then upload a full version of
the show after. Oh okay, I can put captions on it. Okay,
you can't put the captions in there on the live show after it's up,
No, since it doesn't quite match up in terms of length. Oh
okay, Okay, well, well we'll work out something. It probably be
better to put them up and have people have a general guy. The problem
when I put in the time code stuff is that they inject commercials on the
audio stream and anything, so that shifts things. So those are kind of
approximate. Anyway, let me just say this before I take a break.
One person said, hey, meathead, Rob Reiner, meet John Quincy Adams,
a Christian nationalist son of John Adams and Abigail Adams. And so he
says when you look at the life of John Quincy Adams, And as a
matter of fact, I went to a junior high school that was named after
this guy, He says. Reiner's work as a pale cinematic shadow of the
career of our sixth president. If you want to talk about Christian nationalism,
he goes, Yeah, he's got a he's got a career. He's directed
a few films. He said his best film was a Few Good Men.
He said the best line out of that, out of his best film,
was you can't handle the truth? Can Rob Reiner handle the truth of how
we've had presidents who embraced openly embraced there and talked about their Christian beliefs,
and how their Christian beliefs informed their policies and their lives and their attitudes towards
things. What's the matter with that? He says. John Quincy Adams a
brilliant diplomat, a spy in chief, a master of many languages, a
friend of czars, who helped to secure his country's Florida, the Pacific Northwest,
freedom of speech, peace with Britain, liberty to the honisted passengers,
and ultimately a nation without slavery. I'm wondering if Reiner would call Adams a
Christian nationalist, he says. Reiner's own history of Christian nationalism begins in the
nineteen fifties. He says, the beginnings of this movement happened in nineteen fifty
four with Brown versus the Board of Education. See this is where he plays
the race card. Oh, the white Christian nationalists. This comment says,
Reiner's history is ugly, meathead ugly. By the way, this is David
Marshall's piece here said, two generations ago, less than one percent of white
kids attended segregated academies. That's a big swath the start of Christian nationalism quote
unquote for the whole country, which demonstrates the racism of anyone who supports Trump
today. Is that the way they We're going to look at this. But
here's the real history, he says. The scary thing is that John Quincy
Adams was a Christian nationalist. He fulfilled a promise that he made to his
mother, he said, Abigail Adams, he recited the Lord's Prayer before rising.
For the rest of his life, he read his Bible, attended church
religiously. Unlike Trump, he appealed to divine truth and public statements, including
his attacks on slavery, and with growing fervency and power as he got older,
he said, slavery is an offense against God. And so you can
lump him in there with these other infamous English Christian nationalists like William Wilberforce who
stopped the slave trade, who stopped slavery itself in England. Because of his
Christian values. He saw his work as a member of Parliament in terms of
serving those Christian values. He was going to after become a Christian, He's
going to drop out of parliament. And he talked to the guy who wrote
Amazing Grace and he said no. Newton told him, he said, stay
in. That's what God has called you to do. And so he made
it his life's work to stop the slave trade, to stop that because of
his Christian faith. John Quincy Adams is also a dedicated historian who read and
or spoke English, Greek, Latin, French, German, Hebrew, and
Russian. He was arguably America's most talented and non knowledgeable diplomat. He founded
the Smithsonian Institute. He said that if the state of Georgia didn't protect Creek
Indians from encroachment, an obligation he said that was even higher than that of
human authority. It would force him to act. And in eighteen thirty seven
address of Massachusetts, Atoms showed just how dangerous a Christian nationalists he was by
linking Christmas to Independence Day. I won't read all of that to you.
I'll just say this in summary, that we have to understand that people like
Rob Reiner is just doing propaganda. They're ignorant of history and they're trying to
intimidate people, and we don't need to fall for that. We're going to
take a quick break and when we come back, I want to start talking
a little bit about before our guest joins us, I'm gonna take a quick
break and we'll come back and we'll talk a little bit more about the Amish.
No I'm not turning Amish, but they have something to tell people about
the vaccine, about the food and the rest of this stuff. And there's
an essay by raw Egg Nationalists that really hits this on the head. We
will be right back. Whether you're feeling like the booze or Bluegrass aps radio
has you covered. Check out a wide variety of channels on our app at
apsradio dot com using free speech, two free minds. It's the David Knight
Show. Well, this essay is called the Price as from the Ray Nationalists.
They said, we pay a price when we abandoned the ways and the
wisdom of our ancestors. And he uses the Amish as an example. He
said it was and this is an article that had disappeared, so he republished
it again. It was back in twenty twenty one, I believe we first
published it. And at that time, Steve Kersh had gone before the Pennsylvania
State Senate and he talked about how the Amish were not affected by the pandemic
in spite of the fact that they didn't wear any masks, they didn't social
distance, they didn't get the vaccine, they didn't do anything they were told
to do by President Facci and his assistant Donald Trump. He said the Amish
died at a rate that was ninety times lower than the infection fatality rate of
the rest of the US during the pandemic. Because remember a lot of people
are being killed by the hospital protocols that Trump was paying the hospitals to do.
They did not lock down, masked social distance. They didn't vaccinate.
There are no mandates in the Amish community to get vaccinated. They basically ignored
every single guideline that the CDC gave us, and ignoring those guidelines meant a
death rate there was ninety times lower than the rest of America. On this
evidence, it would seem that the Amish, and not the Swedes, and
not the Floridians, should serve as the control argument against to judge the success
of these public health measures. A lot of people talked to Oh, well,
Florida followed this stuff a lot more, and even Sweden did. The
Amish did none of what we were told, what we were forced to do,
and yet they also suffered none of the disastrous consequences we were promised if
we didn't wear the mask cow or inside our home for months on end and
obediately line up to be jabbed when the time came. It turns out that
we were the ones being pushed into a disaster, a disaster whose consequences will
ramify for many years to come, whether in the destruction of so many small
businesses they were called non essential by Trump and the transfer of their hard earned
wealth the corporate leviathans like Amazon who were essential, or in the unhappy lives
of our younger generation, or in the myriad other painful and costly ways like
this the great poisoning as it gradually kills many people. It's not just in
relation to the pandemic that the Amish present a picture of unusual health. Mister
Kersh also noted that they suffered actually none of the chronic diseases that are par
for the course in modern industrial societies. Nor do they suffer from conditions like
ADHD, autism, autoimmune conditions, all of which have been subject to stunning
rises in the recent decades. Mister Kirsch believes this is because the Amish are
not vaccinated at all. They would never release a report to the findings because
the report would have a devastating effect to the US government's narrative. It would
show that CDC has been harming the public for decades. And these are more
than just inconvenient truths. They strike at the very heart of the way that
we organize our society and the way that we live our lives. And so
from this he begins to talk about a work that was done back in nineteen
thirty nine, a book Nutrition and Physical degeneration by a pioneering dentists named Weston
a price of you know him. But before I get into that and what
he found, I just want to say, how was it that the Amish
were able to do all this stuff? Well, they were able to to
not do any of this because they were not up for coercion or bribery or
blackmail. See this strikes to the very heart of the Maga denial of Trump's
involvement. There weren't people coming around door to door dragging people out and forcefully
injecting him. And so from that standpoint, Democrats, Biden and fouc you
know, oh, we didn't force anybody to do it. Well, coersion
is a kind of force, and that's what they did. But there's also
the bribery that is involved. There's not just the black mail. But they
were not susceptible to any of this because you see the way that all worked,
the way the coersion and the force and the bribery worked. They would
apply economic pressure to people. You were going to lose your job, You're
going to lose your position. That's how they have control over us. And
the Amish are not blackmailable. The Amish haven't taken the bribe for anything.
They have focused on keeping their community independent. They focused on creating a vibrant,
interdependent community that is not cannot be coerced or bribed or blackmailed from the
outside. Now, they could send troops in and they could forcefully shoot these
people, shoot them with bullets, shoot them with vaccines or something like that
by force. But that wasn't done to anybody. The rest of it was
done because we made ourselves too dependent on what the government demanded, and people
were afraid to give up this life of dependency on government money and government orders.
That's the key thing. But let's talk about what Western Price noticed back
in the nineteen thirties. He published this book in nineteen thirty nine. He
looked at the lifestyles and the subsequent health of tribal groups in many different places,
not just the Amish and Africa and North America and Oceania and Europe.
In the high Alpine Swiss herders inhabitants of the Scottish Highlands. We discovered and
documented meticulously, including a beautiful series of photographic comparisons. Is a direct refutation
of the idea that modern industrial lifestyles and medicine are making us healthier. In
fact, he showed the opposite is true. Born in the late nineteenth century,
Western Price was originally from Canada, but he set up a shop as
a dentist across the border in Cleveland, Ohio. This is a time when
the traditional diets of Americans in the Midwest, based entirely in animal and plant
whole foods, were being displaced by new industrial products, especially fine wheat and
canned products. The effects were terrible and immediate, and Price saw among his
patients, especially amongst the children, growing signs of severe physical decay, crowded
teeth, abundant cavities, malformation of the dental arch the roof of the mouth,
weakening facial structure visible in the nose, the cheeks, and the jaw.
What's more, of these physical deformities were manifesting themselves in behavioral and developmental
abnormalities that had previously been more or less unknown. He knew something was happening
on a broader level to cause these changes, so he guessed that it had
to do it diet, and so he was able to document at least a
dozen groups that he considered to display perfect health. By that he meant he
didn't just mean dental health. It meant that not only these people avoided facial
degeneration that was happening because of dental issues that was suffering by American children,
but their entire bodies condition. These people were fit, tall, had a
tremendous resistance to physical ailments of all kinds, including chronic and infectious diseases,
and they also generally lived into ripe old age. He visited the Tories Straight
Islanders, for instance, a tribe living on an island off the north coast
of Australia. He spoke to an Australian physician who had been sent to minister
to them into the small population of whites who had recently moved there too.
The doctor said that in his thirteen years with the islanders he had not seen
a single case of malignancy in other words, cancer, and they'd only seen
one that he had suspected might be a malignancy among the entire four thousand native
population. He said he had operated several dozen during the same period of time
he'd operated on several dozen malignancies for the white population that was living there.
Price could see that one of the key differences between the Islanders and the whites
was their diet. The islanders continued to eat a traditional diet based primarily around
nutrient dense animal foods and particularly the abundant seafood the bird life the island provided.
The whites were subsisting on refined and canned goods shipped in from the mainland.
Wherever Price found a group that displayed perfect health, whether that was within
the Arctic Circle or the African savannah, he found people who were eating large
quantities of food like organ meat, blood, fatty cuts of meat, eggs,
shellfish, seafood, milk, and animal fat products like butter and lard.
Price tested samples of the food these people were eating and found them to
contain massive quantities of vitamins, minerals, enzymes, and cofactors, well beyond
the quantities most people in America would have been consuming at the time, and
massively an excess of what the average person would consume today even with supplements.
So there's two things here. Number One, we have to understand how important
it is for us to have control locally. We have to understand that even
from the standpoint Trump, this bad state law again being weaponized by the people
prosecuting him, but it was a state law, a bad law, and
things can get much worse for us if we have bad local and state government,
because that's where the rubber meets the road. And even if you got
somebody in Washington, as we had with both Trump and Biden, who is
bribing bureaucrats and institutions to lock us down, to poison us, to abuse
us, to make us engage in all kinds of insane compliance rituals that can
be stopped at the local level. And the other part of this is the
understanding that so much of this has been put together by these globalist nationalists organizations,
the Rockefeller Foundation and the rest of them. And you look at what
is happening with Davos. They're very highly focused at this point in time on
making the food supply even and worse, even more poisonous, because that's how
they depopulate the world. And of course they've come up with an excuse this
nonsense about CO two. That's how they're going to roll this whole thing out.
We're gonna take a quick break right now, and we're going to establish
contact with Marty Gottisfeld, and he's going to talk to us about his experiences
with the communication management units, which is probably where most certainly where they'll put
excuse me, that has sneeze there. There's most certainly where they will put
Julian Assigne if they extradite him, to make sure that he can't talk to
people. So we're gonna take a quick break and we will be right back.
The common man they created common core and dumbed down our children, create
a common past, track and control us. Their commons project to make sure
the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man as
simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in
the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is
what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception,
intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from
us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
Please share the information and links you'll find at the Davidknightshow dot com.
Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us
financially, please keep us in your Prayersddavidknightshow dot com. If you like the
Eagles, the cars, and Huey Lewis in the news. They say the
Horrors You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio, download our app or
listen now at APS radio dot com. All right, Joining us now is
Marty gotdisfeld and uh, Marty has got a lot of different social media against
I'll just ask him where he is. He says he's trying to migrate everything
to substack martyg dot substack dot com. Uh, where you can find his
writing. But Marty, and we've had Marty on actually had his wife Dana
for many years while Marty was in a communications management unit. This is where
they put political prisoners in the US. Right now is where you will see
Juliana Songe heading And so we want to talk to him about what life is
like there. It's very, very difficult. It is there too manage and
to shut off any communication to the outside world. And so that's what they've
designed this thing for and that's why they put dissidents and political prisoners there.
We do have political prisoners, a lot of them in the United States.
So joining us now is Marty got us. Well, thank you for joining
us, Marty, thank you for having me. David tell us a little
bit about just give us an overview of the CMU. We can get to
your case in particular and why you were there, and of course it was
a great injustice and I've talked many times today and about it, and we'll
talk about that and things that are still happening with your court case. But
you're out now. But tell us, tell us what the Communication Management Unit
is like small self contained prison unit. Guys in the CNU do not get
to go out to like the prison yard, that do not get to go
out to the other places inside the prison that the average federal prisoner you know
gets to go. They keep it self contained in a very small area so
that they can cramp down on communications, make sure that like you can't pass
another prisoner a note or have another prisoner call somebody on your behalf right.
They keep even the laundry within the unit. The rest of the prison complex
sends their laundry out right like a sense for laundry place, but they're worried
that, you know, it's just an example. Prisoners will pass notes to
the guys working in the laundry and then be able to get communications out that
way. So they actually keep even the laundry right inside the unit. And
like when you buy a commissary, right for the most part, it's prisoners
who pack the commissary backs, but not for CMU prisoners. Only staff can
pack a commissary bag for CMU prisoner, which you know sometimes makes it harder
to even get your commentsary. It's like a busy week, right, Like
they might not have the staff to actually pack the bags for the CMU guys.
When I got there April first, twenty nineteen, to the CMU in
Terahoe, Indiana, and there are two run by the Bureau of Prisons,
which is a federal agency of the Justice Department. Right, so the war
is in Terahoe, Indiana. That's the original facility was opened around two thousand
and six during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The wars provided the financial
justification for the unit. The idea was that they would lock up like al
Qaeda guys, you know, JIHII guys there, and they would monitor their
communications and they would mine those communications for intel to use in the war efforts.
A few years later, they opened up a second communications management unit at
the United States Panitentiary in Marion, Illinois. I spent about a year in
that unit as well. So I've been to both CMUs. They justified the
second unit as they didn't have enough room, you know, in the first
one, and after they've been running the first one for a while, they
had guys who had like keep separate ers, right, like, they can't
put this guy with that guy or they'll attack each other on site. So
they needed someplace that they could, you know, resolve those kinds of problems.
The second unit basically doubled the CNY budget. The max capacity of either
unity given times about fifty sixty guys. When I first got there, they
were running in about half that capacity at any given time. There's probably a
little fewer than half are you know, it's hard to even call them real
terrorist cases, but there are these cases that have some nexus to something caussable
as terrorism. There tend not to be the really high profile cases though that
the really high profile cases they go to the supermax in the federal system in
Florence, Colorado. So it's important to understand that this is not These are
not the only places where they can hold actual terrorists. Right, Like El
Chapel will never see a CNU. Right he went from mcc new York,
the high security lock up in Manhattan, right straight to the supermax and Colorado.
Right, So this is not where there was no justification to keep these
UITs running for prisoners like that. This is where they play like you know,
a twenty year old kid who gets some doctorate on the Internet or gets
some trapped by the Justice Department or both, who gets caught on like a
plane to Syria or on like a cruise shift to Syria to try to fight
on the other side of a geopolitical dispute, you know, in which the
United States takes an interest. Right, those tend to be the so called
terrorism cases. There. The Bureau of Prisons gets millions and millions of dollars,
tens of millions of dollars to run these units. They take prison guards
with no intelligence training with you know who would not be able to cut the
mustard at State Department or CIA as intelligence analysts, and they laid them intelligence
analysts. They give them six figure salaries, and then their job essentially comes
to give people like me and Julie in a hard time. Yeah. Yeah,
well, it's interesting, you said, El Chappo. Will you not
find him there? I guess some would They send the Cycler family there for
their opioid. No, they're not going to go to so yeah, but
you know that. But those types of people, if they if they were
in prison, right, It's it's a very real possibility. You know,
I think I'm not trying to uh, you know, be hyperbolic, but
you know, if the fans were a lock up Trump for instance, right,
if any of these cases against Trump result in a prison term, you
know, even a prison term penning appeal. I'm not saying, you know
that he wouldn't have pellogrounds whatever, but if he does do any time in
the federal system, CMU is a likely place. The Trump bill as well,
Yeah, yeah, yeah, keep him from communicating with the outside,
they take away his cell phone, tweet with, they're worried about his followers,
they're worried about his right. He can make life very difficult on us.
If you were to say, you know, I have a problem with
this particular cl mister Smith, right, that would the Bureau of Prisons would
take very unkindly to that, and he'd likely find himself in the CMU.
And so, like so many other things, like the Patriot Act itself,
we see something that's set up to house people that are violent parists, and
instead this thing then turns against in many cases, people who are dissidents,
people who are opposing their narrative, people are political opponents. Shaeffer Cox,
for example, is one of these. He's not a terrorist, he's not
a threat of violence to anybody else, but they want to make sure that
they cut off as communications because he has influence and he can influence people against
the government narrative that they want to maintain. So Shaffer Cox was he have
to mention a one of his case was concocted. Yeah, we are a
few doors down from each other. His case it's almost laughable, I mean,
and it would be laughable if they hadn't hemmed him up for for so
long on it. You know that the appellate court largely satellized his case when
they when they reversed it and took away most of his sentence, and that
was the Ninth Circuit Us Court of Appeals. You know, it's a very
liber hole for the court that did not you know, found the government's theory
in that case, you know, kind of at the periphery of what a
jury could reasonably convict under. Yeah. Yeah, when we talk about when
we talk about Trump and lawfair and things like that. I mean, this
has been going on for a very long time to other people like Schaefer Cox,
but they do they have the ability to completely shut him down because he
doesn't have a big following. He doesn't have a billion dollars or several billion
dollars, and so what they've done to him is horrific. And they put
him into one of these communication management units that are there. Now, this
is as you were pointing out, you're not going to drive to tear Hooe,
Indiana and you see a sign out there that says Communications Management Unit.
It's a small part of the prison that is there, and a small part
of the one that is in Illinois as well, right, so this is
a subset of that. Yeah, And so the Terbote CMU is actually the
old federal death row. They built the new federal death row elsewhere in the
compound, and then they use the old death row as the CMU. So
like I've been inside, Timothy mcmay sell, and then they leave up like
some of the placarding from when it was the death row, and it's kind
of like an ominous warning, like keep doing stuff we don't like, and
we're going to move you about. We'll find a way to concoct something and
move you down the road. Like there's a lot of subtle coercion, right
you mentioned before. The coercion is a far force, and you know they
have to try to maintain the appearance that you know, there's a real public
interest in running these units. And that's why, in my opinion, you
do have the thirty to forty five percent kind of like terrorism material support cases
that are there. Those are the excuse right, and prisoners like myself,
like Julian Massange, we're a real reason. And so when you're there,
like if you're if you're me right, when you are on the phone with
the journalists, they just hang up the phone, take your phone away.
If your wife puts you to the press, which which data did with me,
Uh, you know, they throw you in solitary. I have all
the paperwork to prove this. I've spoken recently in a few places about what
mister Assange can expect to face in the CMU, and I think I was
the federal prisoner with a course of conduct most similar to mister Assanges, because
I was publishing right. Very few guys in prison. In prison do right,
and Julian also he does publish right. They hate prisoner or lawsuits out
of the CMU, so they retaliate against any kind of litigation to uphold your
First Amomic rights. You know, first they kind of they squelch the First
Amendment rights, and then if you try to go to court, they retaliate
against you further right, And I think that's something that mister Assange, unfortunately
can expect. When I was preparing file of lawsuit, they said that my
attempted lawsuit was extortion and they threw me in solitary, even though courts all
around the country have ruled that, you know, to try to say that
litigation is extortion is frivorous, as patently frivolous. It doesn't matter because no
one has prepared in the Bureau of Prisons or in the local US district courts
to be fair to you once you're placed in a CMU. Unfortunately, in
this country, most of our federal judges are former DOJ prosecutors, right,
and they get spun that you know, these are terrorists, this is the
terrorism unit. So you're done on arrival of court. You know, even
before you get there. The courts aren't going to want to hear it.
I'm out now. Before I was out, I had a federal habeas pending
in the U. S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana.
It was fully briefed. It's been fully briefed now since July, and the
court has not ruled on it. Right, and I had pro bo council
helped me with that case. It's a very well prepared case, but they
did, you know. And under the rules and the statutes in the federal
courts, federal habeus is to jump to the front of the line. It's
supposed to be the very first thing on which of court rules because it affects
somebody's literate right, and the liberty interest is one of the highest interests,
or the highest interest you can have in the law in this country. But
if you're filing a hanbeast from a CNU, the court just doesn't rule on
it until you're already out, and then they can say it's mood. You
know, you're already out. But they'd avoid having any ruling. Are they
avoid having the majority of rules that could go against the CNU on First Amendment
grounds or on due process grounds. Right, So this is something that you
filed up. This is something you filed while you were still a prisoner.
There is that, correct, And they still have not heard it anything.
You expect they're going to delay this and then say it's a mood issue.
Yeah, I mean that's part of the course unfortunately. But at the same
time, you have a federal statute and we actually put it on the docket
to the judge and asked him to rule. He said, no, Look,
under the rules, this is supposed to be the very first thing the
court here's and that will put that on the docket. And you know,
a few months ago and still nothing. Let's you know, and I want
to get to your case and let you tell what happened with your case and
because you were there under these conditions and Dana was working very hard to get
information out about this and to get the information about the way they abused your
case. How you're a political prisoner. But do you think you mentioned the
supermax prisons. Do you think that they're going to send Julian assigned to the
supermax or to the CMU And what is the difference between the two in terms
of prisoner population. Well, I think they'll send into the CMU. The
Justice Department has already made what I believe was an unqualified assurance to London that
they would not, under any circumstances send assage to the supermax. Right,
they've kind of said that they will initially put him under what are called Special
Administrative Measures or SAMs, which is kind of like the highest classification of communication
restrictions a federal prisoner can be under. But you don't need to be under
SAMs to be at the CMU. Never understands, but it's a distinction largely
without a difference, right right, Like it doesn't you don't need to be
under SAMs. The problem for them with SAMs is it would cause a diplomatic
uproar, and the Attorney General of the US Attorney General would actually personally have
to sign off on it, right, so there is some accountability there where
he could later be question as to why he signed off on this communication restriction,
whether it was constitutional, you know all that. To put you in
the CNU, they only need to sign off from the associate director of the
Bureau of Prisons. It's nowhere near as high level and official, and those
associate directors are like toilet paper. They get changed often and pretty much for
the same reasons, so you know, it's way more likely that he will
end up in a CNA. And they claim that the CMUs are general population
units, that there's nothing atypical or significant about the hardships in the CMU.
They've made these claims to the US courts. The US courts have largely credited
those claims. The reality is, of course, though it's not a general
population Theoretically, I was supposed to get two fifteen minutes phone calls each week
while I was in the CMU. I was supposed to be allowed to call
the media, you know, and I didn't even get those. But you
know, compared to that, right, the average federal prisoner, depending on
his, you know, his or her exact circumstances, and this is in
flux now with some of the prisoner form stuff going on, but they get
three hundred to five hundred telephone minutes per month, right, and cn prisoners
get most thirty a week, and a lot of the times that they don't
even get that for various reasons. They can just lock the unit down without
providing a reason and give no on their phone calls. And that goes on
for days on end. If you if you miss your calls through no fault
of your own, like if there's a technical issue with the equipment which has
happened. Uh, you know, you just don't get your call and there's
there's no makeup call. You have no in person contact business. So in
the CMU, whereas in the rest of federal prison contact business. So Dana
was unable to hug me for four years. And then after NBC dropped there
a part document series on my case and Justina Pelletier, the Bureau of Persons
simply deleted data from my contact information, would not allow me to readd her
never served me any paperwork to say that you know, I did anything wrong
or Data did anything wrong. And I was not able to speak to Data
for the last seven or eight months. Wow that I was going to see
and news. And then when I was speaking with John Kyriaku, who is
the CIA whistle blower who exposed the Bush torture program, I was discussing a
different case that we get into that effects Operation Fast and Furioce and the efforts
to investigate Operation Fast and Ferience. So I was talking with John, they
didn't They clearly didn't like that. They heard fast and furience. They cut
off my call with him, would not let me call him again. I
have a nephew who is an attorney, so he was kind of my last
resort. I thought, okay, they really ship mess with calls to a
licensed attorney. My nephew was trying to help me with my case, trying
to help me find counsel in the area. The calls were a legal nature.
I was discussing the restrictions and when they had been applied, and you
know the facts upon which there are a reasonable inferences of retaliation, a very
similar set of circumstances to what unfort mister Assaungs can expect to experience himself.
And they just caught off that calls to my nephew would let me call him
any So for my last several months in the CMUs, I couldn't call anybody.
They just deacted me in my phone account. They never said that I
built the rule. They never gave me any kind of hearing of any kind,
right, And that's part of the course when you do things that upset
them. But DATA quoted me to a reporter of RT, and RT ran
an article with my quotes right, and they took my phone away for nine
months and added twenty seven days to my sense for being quoted by media,
right, and and so these these are just these are just some examples,
right, And this is unfortunately what Julie's going to run into. And he's
not the type to the client that it was off and I get that,
but unfortunately that means he's going to run into this retaliation over so they can
make the pledge that there's not going to he's not going to be put in
a super max. They can say that he's not going to get the special
administrative things that sam and uh. And yet you know why they don't say
we're not going to put it in a c What's that they not said they're
not going to put Yes, that's right, that nobody knows about the CMU.
Really, it's that that is not out there. And so it's like,
oh, okay, well, I guess we got all the bases covered.
No, they're not talking about the CMU. They're keeping that kind of
quiet, and that's likely to be what he's going to get there. And
so it is very just to give you an example of right, when I
was in the CNU, the SAMs guys got their phone calls, but I
did not, even though I was never on SAMs Derek this period of the
cut data and they just you know, wouldn't let me speak on the phone
all. He activated my phone account because I was talking about Fast and Curious.
But the guys on Singers all getting their phone I was not. They
actually treated me harsher the guys we're on SAMs. But there arguably, I
think a lot of you of those cases are focused too. But where there's
arguably some national security basis right where he's Attorney generalman saw As signed office and
this prisoner presents national security threat, those guys are getting their calls and I
was not getting one. And the most amazing thing about it is, in
your case, this is not it was an allegation of violence or national security
threat or any that kind of stuff. What it was was a case of
medical kidnapping that you worked to expose against Harvard's Children's Hospital. And because they're
so heavily connected with government, they use the government to punish you for that,
which which is truly amazing. And I want to get to that as
well. But you mentioned and I want to talk about this fast and Furious
thing, and what John Kyaku was talking to you about. What is going
on with the fast and furious? What is this information and how did you
come by? So there's a prisoner in the Terre Haute CNU right now named
Donald Reynolds Jr. And his case. He didn't realize that first. He's
a firearms collector. He was when he was out. He was a firearms
collector. He had several historically significant pieces. He had a browning from World
War Two. The government approached him and they asked him to be an informant,
and they had no leverage over him. He was not a criminal.
They it wasn't like they had him on something small or trying to turn him
or anything like that. So he refused, right, So the Feds show
up. They raided his house, they raided his parents' house. They find
nothing, no drugs. All the firearms are legally licensed. He's got his
Class three stamps right, he's got his vocal apartment. He's a compliance with
state law, federal law, everything. But they can cockt this drug case,
this drug trafficking case against him, even though they've they've found road drugs
and they've never found any drugs and they used that to kind of silence him.
As the years go by, they gave him life plus seventy five.
Wow, in this case is the first time non violent offender with no drugs
found give life plus seventy five in comparison, L Chapel life plus fifteen.
Right, so they actually gave Donnie a marsher's sentence. Then i'l chapa.
As the years go by, Donnie starts putting stuff together the names and dates
in his case, right, and he went to trial, forced them to
go to trial like any innocent man ordered you to assume any in this advantak
And he starts to realize that all the names and the dates overlap with fast
periods, and it took years for the information had come out right, And
so then I write about his case from inside the CMU, which was difficult
to do, but I got it done. And the American Conservative did a
month long investigation. They published a feature under the headline the Knoxville Kingpin.
Who Wasn't They go all of Donnie's case, They go over all the names
and the dates. They concluded in the end that this case is, you
know, certainly adjacent to fast and furious. The names and the dates everything
lines up, and they recommend clemency for Donnie because of the proscatorial irregularities.
And they found several witnesses and I'm sure this doesn't surprise many in your audience,
but would surprise it like the average member of the public. They found
several instances where federal prosecutors filed effidated saying this this person told us X.
Our federal agent says, this source claimed X. They then compared the trial
testimony of these witnesses, who sang a very different team to trial. So
either the prosecutor was lying or the source was never credible in the first place.
And that's kind of the story of Donnie's case. And he's been fighting
to try get out, fighting and try to expose this and that they threw
in a CMU and they retaliate against him viciously, right, And my theory
on it is, you know, the US House and representatives during the Obama
administration issued a subpoena to the White House for records on Operation Fast Experience.
Obama asserted the executive privilege to quash that subpoena, and we never got the
records from the White House about Fast Experience. Fast and feriors for those who
don't know, the Justice Department allowed high power uner penetrating firearms and ammunition to
go to walk from the United st States to the Mexican drug cartels, the
Mexican drug cartels that used those firearms to massacre people, Mexican nationals, and
also three federal agents when we're shot by these baduts. Okay, yeah,
and that was actually something interest interjector. That was something that actually a gun
walker program began under Bush, Yeah, and then Receiver. Yeah, it
became fast and furious under Obama. So it really is you know, the
atf through both of these administrations. As we see over and over again,
you know, whether it's a Republican or Democrat that is in office, these
same types of things are happening. And uh. And it was really to
carry the water for the UN Arms Trade Treaty, which wanted to make it
They wanted to make a case that you had small arms that we would you
know, typically keep pistols and rifles and things like that. Small arms are
going back and forth creating this this this crime problem in Mexico, and the
UN Arms Trade Treaty was saying we've got to stop that trafficking in arms across
the border, which means that you're going to have have to have every piece
of firearms or ammunition or whatever identified and recorded in the United States. That
was their end goal. That was the UN gun control move, the UN
Arms Trade Treaty, and that's what this was all set up to support.
And I think even the New York Times after this all blew up and they
had these federal agents get killed. I think even the New York Times said
that this was a false flag. Everybody understood it was a false flag.
Okay, yeah, So so Donnie, right, he puts this alt yet
and he's trying to get out, he's trying to get back into court.
The Obama administration had the psquashed under executive privilege, right which a president can
claim whatever the US Attorney General brief someone the matter. It's it's analogous roughly
to regular attorney client privilege, except between the president and the attorney Get The
problem for Donnie and from the Justice Department rise is because Donnie's defense was entitled
under the Fifth Amendment and under Brady v. Meat that's the discovery case where
the government's got to turn over all all this evidence to your defense council,
including evidence that speaks to your innocence, evidence that is not favorable to the
prosecution. The prosecution doesn't just get to bury that thing have to turn over
to the defense. So this information was never turned over to Donnie's defense.
Nothing about Fast and Furious was turned over to Donnie's defense. This isn't appellavis
right. If it's proven that thing with hell this information, Donnie's conviction gets
reversed. He gets to come back into court, and as long as his
liberty is on the line, they cannot use executive privilege to quash Brady because
the liberty interest trumps the executive privilege interest. Though the congressional legislative interest does
not trump executive privilege, but Donnie's liberty interest does, right, And so
if he ever gets back into court, they're either going to have to drop
the case, but the truth about Fast and Furious is going to come out,
right, and so he like myself and I feared Juliana Sanz Right.
This is a great example of the type of case that's in the CNU,
that is that there's no purpose to protect the public, there's no public safety
interest, there's no compelling interest to protect prison authorities. Donnie has never been
violent, he's not accused of violence. And you know, but they'll they'll
use the CMU in his case and in Juliet's case, and in my case,
in Shakeford Cox's case. And there's another gentleman, married Kurt Johnson.
Kurt's a great guy. He interceded to stop a murder in the CNU after
they had already been one murdered. There was going to be a second,
and mister Johnson stepped in and stopped it. He was suing big banks on
behalf of homeowners in two thousand and eight before the financial crisis. Second,
if the loans were predits praying at Dell. Yeh right, he gets sentenced,
you know a few months before the crisis. You know, everything hits
the fan, right, And if his case had been a few months later,
maybe it would would work out very differently. Right. But that's another
guy who was there in the than you. But again, it would be
very embarrassing for the system. And you know who went to jail over the
two thousand and eight financial crisis, the wisdom that's right, only the wisdom
blower went to prison. Right. So these are the types of cases that
are in the CMUs. Wow. Wow. And of course John Kiriaku,
the whistleblower about the CIA torture, did they not have the CMUs at that
point in time? I know where did they put him when he was in
so so he has written, I'm not allowed to have any direct communication with
mister Currier since I've still on supervised release, right, so I have to
preface with that, right. But I do recall that while I was on
my way to the CMU, uh, mister Carrier cup brought wrote about my
case, and he said that he was he had been placed in a modified
CMU at f c I in the red and paint. And I have not
heard that there was a modified CMU. There No one else that I know
if has heard about that. But given that he was c I A,
it's it's certainly very it's certainly possible, if not likely, that they did
something very special with him, even by standards. Oh yeah, yeah they
probably. Yeah, they probably did their own his own individualized to see him
uge just for him. That's that's probably exactly what happened. Well, let's
talk a little bit about your case, because I think it's interesting to see
the links that they will go to to put somebody in and to severely restrict
their communications to punish you. As you pointed out, if somebody does an
article about you or you have a communication you were trying to You were able
to kind of in some of your legal proceedings, were able to get some
information out that way to your wife. But they pretty much kept everything excuse
me about to sneezer, They pretty much kept everything under control. And tell
us a little bit about why you got there, because it truly is your
case is truly astounding. You were not a threat to anyone other than a
very highly politically politically connected and very powerful wealthy organization. And so we could
see this type of thing happening. For example, if somebody were to expose
and be a whistleblower about Pfizer or something like that, right, because these
people are very highly it doesn't even have to be a health issue. It
could be any kind of a whistleblower who was exposing information about a politically connected
organization or corporation. So tell us a little bit about the background of your
case. So more was at the time she was fourteen years old, a
girl named Justina Pellettier. She has mitochondrial disease, which is a congenital genetic
condition that's degenerative, progressive, and sadly often fatal. It's the same condition
that baby Charlie Guard had, or the same type of condition that baby Charlie
Guard had in the UK, and there was a more recent instance of another
child in the UK who had this condition, and they effectively just pulled the
plug on and they would not allow the parents to see the experimental therapies to
try to help these kids. Justina has a subthing, more survivable form of
it. Mitochondrial disease is like an umbrella term for a bunch of different genetic
disorders, so no tube cases are really the same. Her gastro enterologists had
moved from Tuft's University Medical Center to Harvard's Boston Children's Hospital, and Justina caught
the food and the flu causes severe complications for mitochondrial disease patients because NIDA is
metabolic disorder. Your cells and your body have a hard time converting food into
chemical energy to run the body systems. So then when the patient gets the
flood and has nausea and has a hard time eating right, you're compounding this
metabolic problem because you know, the food that was getting in already had a
hard time being converted to energy. Now you're stopping the food from getting in
in the first place. Right. So her primary mino doctor, renowned guy
named doctor person at Tufts, refers Justina to see her gastroentrologist, who you
know, the month before was working at Tufts, and this would have been
no problem. She had gone right in the toughs and seen him, but
he had moved to Boston Children's Hospital. I think it was to presume to
pursue a grant. So he refers to her to Boston Children's Hospital to see
her gastroenterologists. This is a doctor who had been with her for years.
This gastrentrologist had actually operated on her to put it in secostomy too, to
help her use the bathroom. But she gets to Boston Children's Hospital via ambulance
like three o'clock in the morning on a Sunday during the blizzard. The gas
per entrologist is not there. She gets seen by a young neurologist a few
months out of his medical training. He doesn't believe that Justina has minochondrial disease.
He refers to the parents for medical child abuse, basically munchause and syndrome
by proxy, where the his theory effectively it seemed to be that Justina's parents
were seeking attention and making her sick just to kind of bring attention on themselves.
It ignored the diagnosis. It ignored the fact that Justina's older sister also
had MITO and was successfully treated for mitom And again, this is a genetic
condition, so it tends to run in families. It tends to be passed
down the maternal line. So he either didn't know or ignored those facts,
sent Justina for a firm of psychological therapy for what they call somatophorm disorder or
like psycho semantic disorder, where like you think you're sick and your brain then
kind of makes you sick or your sentence fit your own perception of your illness.
Right, They took Justina off all her MITO treatments, right, And
that was when her parents, you know, really expressed severe Lauren, because
again this is a degenerative and awful fatal illness. You take her off of
her treatments, there's going to be severely percussions. And we've seen that there
in fact were you know, she was walking, she could at least feel
her legs when she walked into Boston Children's Hospital. She was having some trouble
ambulating because of the fluid and lack of energy. But you know she certainly
she she's ice skating six weeks earlier. Yeah, I remember seeing the pictures
of her in skits. Yeah. Now she's crippled. Now, she can't
walk right, and it's because they took her, in my view, because
they took her off of these minotherapies, and we don't know if she'll ever
walk again, unfortunately. So at the height of this case, right,
the government alleges that I launched the largest distributed denial of service attack, a
dd less attack that they had ever seen. Then I basically sent too much
away from me interject here for I'm interjected here for a second, because this
went on for quite some time, and she's degenerating throughout all of that.
A clear case of medical kidnapping. And there's been other allegations of medical kidnapping
by other people over and over again from this particular institution, and so this
has gone on for quite some time before these allegations came out. Go ahead,
what They had a word for it at Boston Children's Hospital. They called
it a parentectity. Appendectiny is removal of the appendix. A hysterectomy is removed
the uterus like a parent actomy. Removal of the parents. Right, that's
what these doctors called it. That came out in the Boston Globe And at
one point, so Boston Children's Hospital is monitoring, or between the Boston Children's
Hospital and the state, they're monitoring Justina's communications. They're clamping down on Justina's
communications. It was almost like she was in her own little CMU inside Boston
Children's Hospital. She couldn't discuss her care or treating with her parents if they
would terminate the call or terminate the visit. They limited the parents to one
twenty minute phone call a week, and I think one in person visit for
like forty minutes or an hour or something like that, and again control the
topics of conversation to prevent anything from getting out. They would not allow the
parents to photograph Justina, so they couldn't document, right, and show the
public that she was deteriorating, right, They couldn't show the public what she
looked like now versus what she looked like before. Right. So at the
kind of the height of this, Justina's parents published a handwritten note by Justina
where she talked about the kinds of things that the psych where people had done
there, right, and it was they hurt me all the time, they
don't let me sleep very much, please harmy, right, and so like
that, molde comes out like the day before, the government alleges I launched
this this huge distributed denial of service, and basically the charges against me about
to sending too much Internet traffic at somebody's networks. Right, That's that's what
we're that's what we're talking. They never claimed that I, uh, when
this happens, that a patient information that I have a repenetrated the system broke
into anything, you know, did anything. But what I did was I
took down their donation portal. That's right. That was the allegation. Yeah,
taking down their donation thing. Not that that anybody was harmed by this,
but just taking down their donation thing during a fundraiser event. They they
watched that people were harmed or could have been harmed, but the jury would
a convict on it when all the facts. But when all the facts were
aired in court. They did not obtain a conviction. Uh. They tried,
and under the federal law, the bar is so low for them.
All they had to prove was that I potentially, not even actually but potentially
impacted the medical diagnosis treating her care of one individual. And they couldn't meet
that book. They fail and meet that book and fell up order with the
pro government judge. Yeah. Right, literally everything going forward them and they
would not allow me to plead defense of another Like if I'm in a dark
gay and I see someone being attacked with a knife or with a gun,
right, and I shoot the assailant, right, and then they charged me
with murder. Right. In the United States, you're supposed to be able
to plead defense of another. Right. It's just like self defense. If
someone were to attack you and you were to take actionally defend your own life.
If someone were to attack your wife and you took action to defend your
your wife's life. Where someone were to attack your child, you were to
take action to defend your child's life. Right. So they just would't let
the argument. They took it away, they took it out of the jury's
purview. They told the jury instead that my good motive was no excuse for
the crimes. Charm wow. And then we find out that the federal judge
who sits on my case is a clerk shareholder director of a for profit family
seafood business called Slade Burdening Co Bank, that Slave Borglan Codeinc. Donates to
Boston Children's Hospital, that Boston Children's Hospital publicly thanks Slave Burden and Kobank on
the very same website the government alleges I brought down. We find out that
the Harvard hospitals that were all eventually affected by the didas do industry research for
Slave Mordling, Code Bank and an industry trade group called the Seafood Nutrition Partnership
to market the company's products to the public as part healthy We find out that
the judge was a board member and a member of the corporation of an organization
called the Licoln Home for Little Wanderers, that his brother was also a board
member of this organization, and that this organization, since two thousand and three,
is partnered with Boston Children's Hospital to divert juvenile psychiatric inpatients to outpatients stay,
which is what they were trying to do with Justina. As soon as
she became hot potato. Right. And then we find out that one of
my jurors in this case, Majory, that was supposedly drawn randomly, was
an accountant for the Home for Little Wanders. And she steps followed on the
first day of trial and says, hey, I was an accountant for the
Mainland Home for the Little Wanders. I'm worried this might cause of this truck.
And we moved to dismiss this juror, and the judge refuses, and
the judge never discloses, Yeah, and he never discloses that he was a
board member at the England Home for the Little Wanders. Then we find out
that the first witness in the case, the government's first witness, was a
contractor with an agency that actually did the it work for the Midlin Home for
Little Wanderers. And the judge never discloses this and never recuses from the case.
Right, And the number the connections, I mean, this is just
scratching the surface in my case. And I have all the documents to prove
it. And you mentioned that there's a new filing room my case. I've
moved to vacate the conviction. You get one chance after your appeals and then
you get one further chance in the federal law, uh to attack the conviction
that I've moved to do that. And the filing is pending in the U.
S. District Court in Boston right now, but unfortunately it's pending before
the very same district judge, the same the same person with all these all
these confidence and interest gets to decide, you know, whether the conviction should
be overturned. Wow. And when we look at Julian Designs. I didn't
get into this earlier in the program, but the judge where there's two judges
that are residing over this saying, one of these two judges has a very
very long history with British Intelligence, the Ministry of Defense. He has even
been involved in enhanced interrogation cases and things like that. Just like yeah,
and so, I mean he's got a very very long history with the very
people who are coming after Julian Assigne, just like this judge in your case,
and as songs will be tried in the Eastern District of Virginia over here
in the United States, that's the the jurisdiction where they indicted him, that's
known as the Intelligence School. Right to people like John Carrierkou, Edward Snowden,
and Julian Nissan's right, that's where they bring all these intelligence cases.
And basically your jury pool is Alexandria, Virginia. Your jury pool is pulling
from these very same federal agencies and the US judges, unfortunately, they don't
disclose largely. The Wall Street Journal a couple of years ago published a front
page xpose. They found that one hundred and thirty one US federal judges had
sat over six hundred and fifty presided over six hundred and fifty cases in which
the judge owned an equity interest in one of the parties. So that's like
Microsoft sues Amazon. The judge owned stock in Microsoft, and the judge does
not disclose, right and does not recuse himself right. And to put that
into perspective because the Wall Street Journal, I don't know why they didn't,
they never did. The US doesn't have that many federal judges. One hundred
and thirty one federal judges is about one six it's about one six title judges.
So with a very uh, you know, I mean less than comprehensive,
I mean, it was it was good work that the Wall Street Journal
did I'm not trying to impute it. But their search was just like surface,
right, and with a comprehensive and that they went over and they judges
disclosures, but they didn't look too deeply into you know, each particular judge
situation. They found that one in six US judges broke the law when it
comes to recusal. Right. Now, imagine what a deeper analysis would do.
And imagine Julian's judges in the Eastern District of Virginia. Right, we
likely have serious ties to these contractors likely own uh stop right in companies like
Norfolk Bumman, right, and the other defense contractors. Right, the people
who sold sold the tanks, right, the people who sell the weapons you
know to the military. Uh. And you know, Julian arguably cost him
a lot of business because he made it a lot harder to continue to prosecute
before sat I Rack in Afghanistan. They lost a lot of money because of
his reporting. Well, it truly is amazing. And of course you're talking
about a surface looking at conflict of interest. They wouldn't have probably discovered the
kind of connections that you discovered with this judge if they just did a service
analysis exactly. It was a couple of different levels deeper than just the surface.
Yeah, and that's exactly my point. And you know, they discourage
attorneys from looking into these issues, and most attorneys, like my attorneys,
would not find to recuse my district us. They feared him so much they
feared retaliation from him. At least. That's the only logical explanation that I
was ever able to conjure, was that they fear this guy so much they
will not brief the issue. And so I was I was about to do
it from say, and then you know, if you if you brief something
like this, I represented they you know, they try to act like here's
some crack pop, right, like the lawyer who has himself for a client
as a fool, right, But like at the same time they make sure
that they're at the court point. Attorneys are ever going to brief this very
elected that even a project retained attorney whatever brief this. And then you trying
to brief it yourself, even if you have all the documents, all the
evidence, right, they say you're supporting that because you will present yourself well,
you really are a fighter. And it is truly I'm sorry for what
happened to you, But how long were you? And you went into the
supermax in twenty nineteen, so you were there a little bit less than five
years. How long were you in that? Not the Supermax, the CMU,
Yeah, how long were you? I was never in the Superman.
How long were you incarcerated? For sure? So I was in the CMUs
one way or another from April first, twenty nineteen to June ninth of twenty
twenty three, so a little more than four years. I was split between
the two facilities. I did time in bolth if I've seen both. There
are some meaningful differences, but nothing really that you would affect Julian or or
nothing that would affect his extradition case, right, Like the bottom line is
that they're going to play in all of these units. They're going to do
so for unconstitutional reasons. They're going to violate his constitutional rights. There's really
no reason that Britain should extradite him, and there is no representation from the
US government that is credible right in terms of preserving his rights. And if
we're just a real here, he's only being prosecuted because he told the truth.
That's right, right. Uh, people found that embarrassing and it went
against you know, powered moneyed interests. And there used to be a time,
I feel in this country where that wouldn't be an issue. They wouldn't
be able to go after you like this, and with Assage in particular.
Right, they agonized work to Britain this case because you know, the verifications
of it. The above administration they called it the New York Times problem,
Like how are they going to justify prosecuting Massage but not prosecuting the New York
Times. And the thing is now they're just very selective. Federal laws are
written in such a such a way that they can they can pick on anyone
that's right, Right, It's like why it's starting to see what we're starting
to see is in the UK they said, well, if you're a credited
organization, you know, you get a different standard. So we have a
dual standard for so called non accredited non establishment media than there is for other
people and for anybody who is exercising their free speech. And as Ed Snowden
pointed out, he said, what he's being accused of a crimes against a
state, and the extradition treaty between the US and the UK specifically excludes somebody
from being extradited for crimes against the state. Most extradition treaties have carbots for
political offenses or that kind of thing. That's something that you expect to see
in an extradition treat Yeah, and yet what we have now is all of
the Western governments are rapidly moving towards criminalizing descent. And that is what's so
concerning about this. They're moving against the press, the independent press, They're
moving against individuals exercising their free speech. But it is all about criminalizing dissent
and criminalizing information. It's not enough for them to ban people, it's not
enough for them to financially deprogram people. They have to now move to criminal
penalty. We see this happening throughout Europe. Uh, there's the movement towards
this in the US as well. It's a very uh foreboding harbinger of what
is on its way when they can do this to Julian Assigne and you pointed
out the New York Times problem. Going back to the New York Times and
the Washington Post and Pentagon papers, they didn't come after the press people.
It's one of the reasons why they're alleging that he had incentivized somebody to get
these these these papers, and that's is so tenuous what they're coming after for
it's pretty transparent that this is political persecution. Yeah, I mean, what
journalists would not encourage a source to come forward? And how how explicit does
that encouragement have to become a forts aproblem, you know, And the conspiracy
laws of the United States, even a tacit agreement, they call it an
unspoken tacit agreement is enough to find a conspiracy. So under this theory,
really any journal US who runs a secure drop box right could be be said
to be tacitly encouraging people to violate the classification the espionage right. And so
you know, it's just it's a very simpler stuff. I agree to wholeheartedly
with your comment about the way the scent is being criminalized, and I think
it really on the other side of it, right, it shows that for
the most part, these government narratives are so weak, so flawed, that
they know they cannot stand the scrutiny. But when you feel truly confident about
your perspective about what you're doing, your actions, right, you don't mind
the scrutiny. I've it never bothers me to get a tough interview question about
Justina, about like what if this had done? Like whatever. I'll answer
those questions. I don't mind being in the hot seat and answering a difficult
question because I truly belave you what I did. I think it passes must
right. But when you know your argument is weak, that's when you can't
have people question that's right. And we've seen this with the so called science
behind climate change, the so called science behind the pandemic and everything. Oh,
you can't see my data, I'm not going to you dare not question
me about this. And so immediately when somebody shuts this thing down and they
don't want to show you their data, if they're talking about science, or
they want to shut down anything that is about dis scent and claim national security
of some sort, we know exactly what is happening with it. And as
you point out, they're very they're very fearful about this. They understand now
how weak they are in this, but it is also something that makes them
a lot more dangerous because they're going to start lashing out in new ways against
people in terms of punishments and even imprisonment for this and it is really sad
to see how every aspect of the First Amendment is actually being just trashed and
shreaded with these actions. Yeah. And if they succeed in expediting the saws,
right, Yeah, the message really is that they can get any whistle
war anywhere. Yes, right, this is this is a test case,
right, right. If they succeed in getting him, right, that means
that they didn't get you in the UK and all the common donations, they
can get you anywhere in asient they can get anywhere where they have influence,
anywhere they're able to hold aid or cooperation or any of these kind of uniladvel
of bilateral diplomatic arrangements. Right. And the US does by influence all over
the world. You know, all that aid we give, we don't do
whatever the business of our hearts. And you know we do that to buy
influence. And you know, at the same time you have a Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act, like I can't bribe a customs agent. You know, if
I've got on vacation of the Bahamas and I'm going to get some some liquor
or something I'm not supposed to bring in, if I still think I had
twenty. Right, I've committed a felony I vio the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
But if the US government gives some country a billion dollars worth of day,
say the fire and prosecutor looking into you know, sun on some that's
perfectly leading. That's perfectly leading. So I'm twenty. I'm going to the
person. He doesn't with the billing twenty to my animal, which I paid
taxes. I'm going to the prison he doesn't with a billion dollars by don't
you bear asks? Oh? Yeah, yeah. It's amazing that the double
standards and just the corruption, the corruption, the ruthlessness as we turn more
and more authoritarian in terms of what is happening with your case. Now you
got this this action that is pending. There is that. I know that
Kiriaku served his time and was released. He wanted to get a pardon because
if you've got a criminal record that limits you during certain things, certain activities.
In his particular case, it was keeping him from getting his pension.
Of course, the interesting story that he had about Rudy Giuliani wanting a couple
of million dollars to do that for him with Donald Trump. But apart from
that, I mean, is that in play with the filings that you have,
there is that part of it. So clemency comes later or usually can
be granted at any time. But one of the arguments they try to use
again to you when you when you go for a pardon, right, is
that you have to exhaust everything in the courts. Right. They don't.
They're not trying to preempt the courts jenially right. The president has the progative
to do whatever he wants. But the kind of accepted practice going back many
decades is first you exhaust everything in the courts. You give the courts the
opportunity, uh to do what's right. Right. So I'm still kind of
at that stage. And but if this fan is then yes, the next
thing, next thing up would be would be a pardon. I feel I'm
a good candidate for that, especially given what happened to Justina, what Loston
Children's Hospital has been seen doing after Justina. They really have kind of committed
themselves as a partisan political organ That comes with benefits the institution, but it
also comes also that's other verifications, right, which which means that you know,
my case might be viewed to the in parts of light because of the
partisanship of this of of the other actor. So yeah, I mean,
my effort, my faelt foremost has to be the litigation at least for now,
and then we'll see what happens after that. Well, I certainly I
wish you the best with that, and again I appreciate your tireless efforts to
help other people and the CMU that are unjustly convicted, that are political prisoners,
to expose this kind of incarceration that is directed towards political prisoners enemies of
the state for whatever reason. And we've seen this net continue to get wider
and wider, going after parents who speak out at a school board meeting,
for example. It is absolutely insane to see the way they are extending these
borders of people that they alleged to be threats to them, extremists, terrorists
and all the rest of this stuff. It will have no other way to
support their posts. They that's right, Yeah, yeah, they are desperate,
and so people can find you again at substack martyg dot substack dot com.
And of course, while you were still incarcerated, your wife ran a
lot of social media platforms on Facebook and other places that were under free Marty
G. And those are still available as well. People can find you also
on Twitter at Marty goddessfel G O T T E S F E l D.
But again, Mardig dot substack dot com is really probably the best place
for people to find you, isn't it because subs Yes. Good. Thank
you so much, Marty. Thank you for the work that you do.
It is very important people need to understand what is happening with us. We'll
be right back, Folks, stay with us. You're listening to the David
Knight Show. If you like the Eagles on the Cars and Huey Lewis and
the news, they say the you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio,
download our app or listen now at APS radio dot com. Well,
we just have a couple of minutes left, and this time I want to
talk about another aspect. We talked earlier about the situation in New York.
You know, half a billion dollars that they're coming after Trump and that type
of thing and disgorgement, and it's due to a law, a bad law
there that doesn't require that anybody be harmed. It's just well, we think
that you were doing business and you were engaged in misleading statements. So we're
going to take everything from you. A bad law that is combined with some
political persecution. And when we look at what is happening in Georgia, Fanny
Willis has had amazing back and forth. I didn't get into all this because
I don't want to get into all the soap opera aspects of her life and
of Donald Trump's trials, because again they're doing this to push him to the
forefront. They want to run against Trump. But when you look at what
was revealed in her particular case, she hired a she was sugar daddy.
I guess sugar mama to some kind that she hired. She's paying him off
in cash, massive amounts of cash, no receipts. And again it's Reason
magazine, which most of the press does not talk about civil asset for for
sure, to their credit, they do. And so I said, well,
what about this cash thing. You know that is evidence immediately of a
crime for anybody else, and yet for her, no issue at all,
even when there are connected allegations of illegal activity. The fact that she has
this cash, nobody's going to go to her house to confiscate it. Nobody's
going to confiscate her house either as they do, and in her office being
involved in rico stuff, she's also involved in civil asset forfeiture. A significant
amount of the budget of her office is funded by theft, which they call
civil forfeiture. Reasons that it's quite a turn when a prosecutor defends the use
of cash for financial transactions, after years of authorities treating mere possession of physical
cash as being sketchy and grounds for seizure theft. This week a law enforcement
official claimed there's nothing to see in her alleged cash reimbursements for her boyfriend for
an aviable lifestyle that is arguably funded by the taxpayers. Either Fanny Willis and
company were right in the past and she should be subject to scrutiny for anonymous
cash transactions, or she's right today and she and her colleagues, oh the
rest of us have pass on our taste for financial anonymity. And so he
was paid more than his colleagues about six hundred and fifty four thousand dollars in
all, well, this is money which Willis seemingly benefited in the form of
expensive vacations and other pleasures of life. Did I ever make him produce receipts
to me. Whatever he told me it was, I gave him back the
money in cash. You gave him cash before you ever went on a trip?
Oh, yes, she said. My Grandpapy told me I need to
keep about fifteen thousand dollars around in cash. That hasn't stopped the police from
stealing money from people left and right. You got cash, Well, you're
obviously doing drugs or something else illegal, so we're going to charge the cash,
not you. Thanks for listening. Let me tell you the David Night
Show you can listen to with your ears. You can even watch it by
using your eyes. In fact, if you can hear me, that means
you're listening to the David Night Show right now. Yeah, good job.
And you want to know something else. You can find all the links to
everywhere to watch or listen to the show at Thedavidnightshow dot com. That's a website.