Hello to the heart attack was the muddled one this week, but I'
m not saying that because it was wonderful, much less, but because the
Minister of Finance who is adding up and remaining desperate in these weeks for trying
to adjust the fiscal deficit, for the stoppage of the economy and for the
collapse of the tax revenue. If you read a balcony of our printed edition
this week that brought information about an approval in the Congress of the Republic,
it will already be difficult to finance the approval. In the last debate of
the fourteen month for the pensioners of the security forces, which are estimated to
be about a billion pesos, but that we have added an additional premium to
the fifteen month, as we said in a headline and in the text of
that balcony, because it would already be too much. I don' t
understand how we got to the fifteen table for that small record in the form,
if from early on, in the digital one, from the day before,
we always spoke as was right, of table fourteen, which was what
was approved, and so lost we were the highlight of that balcony if we
put up an appointment that correctly referred to the fourteen table. I think the
minister didn' t really have time to read that balcony. Fortunately, because
if you had also read that fifteen table that we invented, you would be
paid, moreover, according to our clear version, not only to veterans,
but also to active members, because that heart of the Minister would have exploded
into a thousand quiet pieces Minister, on this side, you only have to
find funding for the fourteen table, which is already enough and only for the
pensioners of the security forces. The benefit that will be for the assets and
that was also approved this week in concrete, is the payment of the minimum
wage and extra bonuses for the young people who perform the military service. But
here, on the other hand, if our headline was read by the Minister,
because he might have taken it for granted and avoided the concern for its
funding, because we ate a letter and talked about military service, not military
service. It sounds more like a digestive function or something like that. But
if in that headline we ate a letter, in another we ate a whole
word, which we were leaving at the meeting of President Petro on his journey
through Europe with his Ukrainian counterpart Bolodinir Excellent. Petro will meet for the first
time with select, if that headline of ours was to say for the first
time, but we failed to say it, with which the headline was more
like Daniel Quintero' s manoeuvring commercial in elections or something for him. This
ended with a pull of ears, a little more conceptual of Mario Roberto p
who found it curious to say at least the use of quotation marks in two
headlines about President Petro' s reaction to the election in Mexico of Claudia Shain.
I feel like he was going over his spades where Mario Roberto doesn'
t always look for quotation marks to ironize what someone has said. As I
seem to understand, what is it that complains many times and more in these
times when every statement is misinterpreted with double intentions, because quotation marks are the
best or the best way to say exactly what the person said, and I
think that is the case in these two headlines. In one, the word
in quotation marks was triumph that spoken by the President of one country about the
elections of another, since it is not so natural and can rather be seen
as an intervention in the internal affairs of another gymnastics. It was then necessary
to put it in quotation marks to make it clear that that was precisely the
word used by the President, and not that it was a free interpretation.
There, for example, he is ill- fated with his words. In
the other, the word in between was helped that again it was necessary to
put it in quotation marks exactly with the word used the discussion that generated the
statement of the President Pepe on the type of relationship of the now President-
elect of Mexico with that of medi nineteen, when it was still a guerrilla
group in the clandestine, so in these cases I believe that the quotation marks
fulfill the role totally opposite to that which I think was insinuating in that jar
of ears. They avoid misinterpretation rather than feeding it. Yes, the quotes
sometimes only play the main role of some stretchers, which is to quote faithfully
what is called good. It' s no more. He sees us a lot.