Well, good morning, Happy Monday, everybody. So a couple things,
a couple things before we get started. We're going to continue with duck Tails
Dan Dan McLellan on the Danny Jones Podcast, where he's not making a very
good case for biblical scholarship, and then we're going to transition over into a
couple other things. In the next couple of days. We're going to get
back into the real Hitler, the real Germany, and all the things that
people need to know, be reminded of and understand so that they stop falling
for this deception. The reason why we're going into this Abrahamic thing is because
it's tied to the same topic. This reception is great, and I know
they embedded it into us so deeply that we identify with it. We identify
with it with our salvation. Can't get much deeper than that. But what
is real and what isn't? And if that was a deception itself, wouldn't
we want to know? And that's not against God and it's not against well,
maybe the Messianic idea that you need a savior in the first place because
that disempowers you, right, because that can that is something that can happen
from within the gnosis that they talked about in the past. And that's something
that if you experience it at firsthand, you understand that exists. If you
don't, because you're constantly surrendering your power to a church or an idea or
a concept, you're always going to feel like, Hey, I'm dirt and
there's nothing magical or special about the human body or its spirit. It's all
about this, dude. It's all about this thing. And uh, that's
an awfully nice way to control people, is it not. So I'm gonna
try to bring on Brady on, so just bearrow with me for a second.
I was trying to queue up a few things so I didn't get a
chance to do this ahead of time. Let's see what happens if I just
put it up now. We want everybody to be able to play right,
wants do this real quick? Where's my there it is? And then we'll
get started here. What did I call this one? What did I call
myself? Uh? Huh, We're gonna talk about the Saturn cult today.
We're gonna get into a lot of different things today. It's gonna be lots
of fun. You'll see, You'll see all right, start right there,
let's do that. Ah undo, hold on, there we go. Don't
you hate when you hit paste instead of copy? Not a good time?
All right, We'll just make this quick substeps you and I'm pretty sure I
can just do this and we'll be a rocket and rolling. Hey, so
Speak Free Radio just so you know, Just so you know, if you
are watching anywhere, you can go to Speak Free Radio and you can find
the podcast there. You can also you can also support your favorite host there
as well, which is something that they like. They appreciate it since usually
telling the truth is a very thankless job, and a thankless job with the
family is a tough thing to try to balance. By the way, my
daughter is going to be turning eight tomorrow. Yeah, I'm super excited for
her. And let's see love it. Just put some gibberish in there at
server, but the bang save changes and we should be ready to rock and
roll on Bridion as well. Let's see. I gotta give it ten seconds
and then I can hit to save button. It would be good to go
boop. Nope, not quite yet, boop. Okay, welcome on,
Brady On. You'll have to go to Rumble to catch a couple of minutes
that you missed, but now the whole gang is here. So yeah,
she's gonna be turning eight tomorrow. That's awesome. July second, so the
real if for those of you out there who do not know this, the
real, the real deal, the real Independence Day was July second. It
took two more days for them to blah blah blah, but July second was
the actual day. July fourth they use because that's the solar appealion where the
Sun is the most furthest away from the Earth, according to people who say
shit, I don't know if it's just cabalistic bullshit or not, but there's
a perihelion where it's the closest, and the aphialion is when it's the furthest
away, which means you're more independent from it. Right, So Independence Day,
Yeah, it's all celestial thought and mite stuff in my opinion. But
we'll see, all right, So let's get into it. Doctor Peter Glidden
last week, this is what I was trying to cue up and find it.
Let me see if I can get to it. I think he's going
to now see, it's somewhere in here. So in the let's see June
thirteenth. I believe it was the June thirteenth episode with Doctor Peter Glidden.
Somewhere after the hour and six minute mark. He asked about what I thought
was going to happen in the debates, and he said, mister predictions over
here said, I think there's it's going to be a disgrace. And he
said one of two things would happen. You know, Biden would bumble,
fumble and fall basically, and you know, either metaphorically or literally, and
he would seem so ridiculous and sad that Trump would come over and put his
arm around him and be like the good guy and like just help him off
the stage, and just that'd be the end of it. And then that
they would they would announce that Gavin Newsom this is what he said, that
Gavin Newsom would be his his replacement. Now, oh boy, California,
uber allus in the house, because Gavin Newsom is a freaking carbon copy of
Governor Jerry Brown. So let me show you something. I can't put it
up that way, Gaze, everybody's gay, all right, Let's put it
up this way then, so it says up here, Gavin Newsom is ready
for the Biden emergency. This is June twenty eighth. California's governor has fundraising
chops, managing skills, and campaign infrastructure to step up. So they're already
poisoning him in the media. They're already priming the public with this bullshit.
All eyes on Gavin Newsom for a reason several actually blah blah blah. Was
this caption underneath this picture of his horrible face with this little bird nose beak
When camera's captured California Governor Gavin Newsom walking into CNN Spin Room on the spin
room. Yeah, lie, lying room, the lying room. Will Reth
flipped everything upside down and invert it on Thursday evening, flashing his Hollywood smile
before the presidential debate in Atlanta to a few political observers in his home state.
Rushed to social media with some version of the same annoying, the same
annoyed to question, why is he there? Why do you think he's there?
Diuchebags Newsom was there to cheer on President Joe Biden for his debate with
former President Donald Trump. Biden is confident, Newsome told reporters he's got a
record and he's got a vision. For the future. The guy doesn't have
a vision for breakfast. He just does what wherever they're pointing him. He's
a freaking ping pong ball or a pinball. A couple of painful hours later,
after the debate in which Biden his number this is Bloomberg, his voice
raspy and halting, looked every bit of his eighty one years. That vision
for the future seemed to cloudy. Yeah, did it. They didn't give
him his shot of adrenaline. They wanted him to look stupid. Biden's pale
and frail appearance led to immediate and widespread speculation that he would be put to
decline the Democratic nomination, and that kind of talk, in turn leads quickly
to Newsom. Well, you know, at least lead to Big Mike with
her dangly bits. Of the many prominent Democrats with aspirations for higher office,
Newsom is arguably the best equipped Marxists comeback Bolshevik piece of shit that we could
find in fundraising, chops and managing it. I obviously might have added something
there and messaging in campaign infrastructure to set up in the emergency. Not that
these people do what these things themselves. They're a face with a bunch of
little jay words with small hats on behind them ninety minutes. The ninety minutes
that Biden spent on stage with Trump live before millions of viewers ultimately served to
reinforce what polls have indicated since Biden decided to run for reelection. Most voters
believe he is tooled to be president. That's putting it mildly, the panic
among Democratic Party. And he doesn't do anything. He doesn't need to be
there, doesn't need to be a person out there. They can put a
cardboard cut out. It's not who actually runs the government. There is no
government. It's a corporation. It's run by the Federal Reserve. The FBI
is only in existence because that's the weaponized enforcers of said Reserve to protect it
and its interests. That's why you have a CIA, That's why I have
all these things because of that Federal Reserve. They're watching us. We are
the enemy because we have been taken over. Hence that's the reason why you'd
be the enemy of the state. That's why you're the domestic terrorist, because
you have been defeated without any fight. And it happened well, first happened
in nineteen thirty thirteen, but ultimately concluded with the full devastation and enslavement in
nineteen thirty three during the bankruptcy. But anyhow, that's Bloomberg, all right.
I just want to put that point that out there because that was something
that doctor Linden had said, I like almost exactly. So I found that
pretty interesting. Okay, did I get rid of Bloomberg? I don't want
that shit on my screen anymore? Not that in my life. A couple
of things I don't need. Okay, let's get into it. Oh so,
like I said before, Speak Free Radio, money Tree Publishing dot Com
listen to the words. Money Tree Publishing dot Com is where you can go
to get the books and the DVDs, Blu Ray discs. You can support
people from Speak Free Radio there. It's connected, right. You can also
go to speak Free Radio and do the same. And also if you use
code B A A L, you can get a ten percent discount on anything
that you get there. Now, I'm going to start learning ancient Greek,
by the way, and on today I'm starting my I'm hoping to go to
Thursday Fast because I just feel like it no no particular reason, Okay,
let's see what are we going to put up. First, we gotta do
our intro. We gotta have our intro for ducktails down here, so hold
on, Yeah, good times. I just lack the burricane ductor bird priests
laser's care of plane. It's a ductler, that's all a mystery for reracket
structail every days, my tails to taming, to be behind you, death
to find you, every tails of taba tennis. All right. So for
some reason my logo is not popping up on stream yard once again. Something
glitching out, So oh, there it is. It didn't pop up for
like ten minutes. But okay, it's fair enough, all right. So
now we go into where we left off, where we left off on Friday.
Make sure we get it clicked. Where you got ducktails. Dan?
There he is Bible. So here's the name of it again, for those
of you who don't recall. Bible scholar response to m and Hillman was Jesus
Christ a trafficker, Dan McLelland it's a little bit more complicated than all that.
They go through a lot of stuff in a two hour program. But
Dan is a quote unquote biblical scholar or whatever that means they only read.
Well, let's put it this way. They think that ancient Greek means something
different when it comes to the septuage it when it comes to the Bible.
That it's in context, and you owen can use the Bible to prove the
Bible. You can't go outside sources and say, well, he said outside
of the Bible. No, there's no other mention of this before that.
Well, the Bible didn't happen or occur or get written in eight hundred or
nine hundred or twelve hundred BC, So you can't say that outside the Bible,
there's no occurrence during that time of these people's names. It's circular argument.
Well, no, not outside the Bible. There reason, Well,
then it's there isn't one because it's not. That's not when the Bible is
written. So you can't say that. You can't. Oh, they referred
to something that happened back then, So therefore that's the proof, even though
nobody who would live during that time or any time after that for a thousand
years didn't say shit about it. Come on, man, come on,
we need better than that. All right, So here we go. The
context, the genre, the that is amenable to these other medical texts,
like just the genre of text is different. Hold on something. Just you
saw what happened. It jumped ahead in a minute for a new apparent reason.
Here we go. It's is it topical or is it or is it
something you consume? Right? So this is anyways, like this is this
is his point of view. You can see where he's coming from. And
I don't I don't disagree with with the fact that that they were using whatever
they could find to get by. You know, dotera is around today because
people want to use whatever they can find to to try to cure what ails
them. So, but to use that as an interpretive lens to try to
entirely renegotiate what So, here's what he's saying, that in the Greek in
a in a medical text format somehow means something different than what it means when
they're using the same pharmacological terms, farmakia, pharmicon terms in the Bible,
the same same ancient Greek words somehow have a different meaning just because the Bible
says so, and the Bible wouldn't do that, they wouldn't talk about stuff
like that, So therefore it must mean something different that that's the whole argument,
what what Christianity was, what Jesus was within early Christian entity is like
at least be able to use evidence from those texts, because see stay in
stay within our parameters and argue from within this box. Otherwise we don't we
don't recognize the argument. Isn't that convenient? Euripides has no bearing whatsoever on
how the author of the Gospel of Mark or how Paul Uh we're using people
who are writing in the same time, are previous to that, who can
give you a basis foundation of what these words actually mean. Now they're saying,
no, that's that's no bearing. There's no bearing on that mosquito in
here, that shit the term Christ. If you go look in their text,
they're not using it in a way that's that is amenable to these other
medical texts. Like just the genre of text is different. It's not so
if you say words in a book that says medical texts, or if you
say it in a book that you decided to wrap together a bunch of stories
and letters and say it's the Bible. Somehow words have new meanings medical texts
you have kind of Greco Roman bios is part of what the Gospels are doing.
And you've got a bunch of epistolary stuff, a lot of paraanetic stuff,
a lot of word slid stuff, the context, the genre, the
way the words are being used. I don't see any support in there for
taking that understanding of the ancient world, which which I agree is a valid
one. And he knows a lot more than I do about medical texts and
classical and early Greek literature. But the notion that that just overrules everything in
the New Testament, that my understanding is that is part of the argument that
he's making that Jesus was there was some kind of purple stuff that Jesus was
rubbing on everybody and everything. Actually, that was part of in the Greek
magical but Pyrii there was one of the first words that was translated from there
was the word purple. Yeah, I think from one of the Herculaneum papriari
that they used the new technology to read, right. I think his whole
point was that the Bible completely misrepresents what the terms were, or changes what
the terms actually originally meant, which paints a false narrative of what was actually
going on. And that's where I would want to see evidence from the Bible,
because it's not like the when you talk about the original sources of the
original text. I want to see evidence from the Bible where we've already decided
that words can't possibly mean that, because the Bible certainly simply wouldn't do that.
Do you catch this? What's going on here not original to the Bible.
They're earlier than the Bible, but the Bible would have to be coming,
would have to be literarily or conceptually or in some way based on them
for them to be the original text. When we're talking about the Bible,
the Biblical texts are they're using their own traditions, they're using their own they're
using the language in their own way. And the idea of Christ as the
anointed one, this one who is to be anointed by God for this special
purpose that predates Christianity. That's in the septuagen that's in Greco Roman period literature.
So when we're talking about the original sources for what we see in the
New Testament, that's going to be Greco Roman period Jewish literature. And the
usage that is in classical and medical literature, that kind of usage that's not
in the Greco Roman period Jewish literature. And that's I even I think I
responded to Aman's live streams, and show me, show me a text from
early Judaism, early Christianity that uses the word in this way, because just
because it is used that way in other texts in the older text right in
the in the classical Greek literature, and there's and there's literature in Greek that
is being used contemporary with the New Testament that can use it in these ways
as well. Well. I guess his point is that like if, like
if you are trying to start a religion and you are trying to develop a
way of a way of life and to to somehow evolve your society right with
the religion. This goes back to like Plato's Noble lie You you don't want
to have it being based on on drugs. You want to have you want
to have some sort of a positive outlook. You want to you want it
to be positive. You don't want it to, you know, focus on
things like this. Maybe they wanted to later when they when Christianity came about,
maybe they wanted to. They didn't want you to know that it was
a saturn cult that was wrapped up in Bacchus and Dionysus and all the corrupt
parts of those types of practices that they repackaged to basically infiltrate and co opt
more minds into worshiping their God. Change it to make it fit a different
sort of narrative. Maybe, And I'm sure there were folks who thought of
of of drug use of something positive, and so there's certainly I think there
certainly would have been an audience for that kind of thing, but there's just
no evidence within the literature. The other material remains the history of early Christianity
that supports that. You know, some of the earliest references we have to
what the Christians were doing are just reports that they gather, they sing hymns,
and you know, this is a religion for women and slaves, and
they don't do anything wrong, but they're just a bunch of superstitious weirdos.
Was religion for women and slaves, Christianity, that was Pliny the younger Medea,
there was the whole this is a patriarchal society, right, they destroyed
the matriarchical society. And he's saying that Christianity is a really different women as
slaves. Yeah, maybe that's what they sell you, but that's not exactly
what it is. Oh really yeah, huh. I think that's fine of
it in the sense that it makes everybody a slave to the jealous God.
Yeah, sure, why not? Well, he has one of our earliest
accounts of Christian meetings. There was a rule that he was supposed to be
enforcing that people weren't supposed to be gathering together, and he arrested some Christians
for doing that, and he was like, we we tortured some of the
slave girls, and all we could get out of them is that they meet
together in the morning and they send him sing hymns to Jesus as to a
god. And they're just a bunch of superstitious weirdos. So I you know,
I I said, if if you'll denounce Jesus, you're free to go.
Otherwise you die. And he wrote to the emperor, said just you
do an okay, boss, And he said, you're doing a great kid.
So yeah, the there's just no evidence that this is that Christianity was
oriented toward anything like this, except for all the words in the Bible,
the ancient Greek except to agent that predates the Hebrew Bible. In any of
the literature. The only reference we have to in the Hebrew Bible with the
words they remember over one million, seven hundred thousand words in ancient Greek.
Do you think something might be lost in a translation to a language that only
has at best eight thousand words any kind of drugs in the New Testament is
there's a reference to pharmakia, which is that there's a lot more than just
a reference to pharmakia. They say things, and they contradict themselves an awful
lot. A Greek word that the pharmachia that they don't want is from the
Medean culture, could be used to refer to like potions and poisons and curses
and things like that, but also to elixirs and and things that you know,
you might rub on your forehead or might ingest. But there's there's a
negative reference to people who engage in pharmacia. And these days, you know,
you hear just asinine conspiracy theories about it. Listen to this shit.
Listen to this shit, everybody, because that's the source of the word pharmacy,
and so a lot of people think, you know, the pharmaceutical industry
is therefore the Antichrist or something. I can't believe that Danny Jones even laughs
at that. That discredits him horribly. That's that's pathetic. They're still using
snake venoms and shots right now to change your genetic profile so that you start
producing poison inside your own body through the equal in the yeast that's pumping out
this venom inside of you if you get these shots. And that's not the
first thing. O Zimpic, which I can pull up if you'd like.
That's from HeLa monster venom azt that's a shallow sea sponge toxin that murdered a
bunch of people. All of this stuff is still rooted in Pharmachia, utilizing
venoms from various animals. There's nothing that's different except for our perception of it.
They are killing you with a eugenics program called allopathy. That's amazing.
It's all interconnected. Yeah, What what is Christianity like? When when Christianity
was developed? What was? What was? What do they say about the
Illucinian mysteries? I don't know that we have much at all about about that,
I mean not really. The closest you have I think is there's an
awful lot to discuss if you actually look into the Yellos Union mysteries. There's
been a lot written about it. Uh, there are some folks who think
there there may have been some overlap between Christianity and Mithraism, just because they
were kind of both seen. And the saturn cult and Dionysus. This is
all the stuff that you get when you are reading the ancient texts in his
mystery cults. And then there's there are some who think there's some there's a
kind of a Bachic background to Christianity. There may be some influence from the
bac Eye on, like the Gospel of Mark, for instance, some of
the ways that Jesus is represented in some of the Gospels kind of mirror what
is Bakic. The bac Eyes a story associated with Dionysus and and mysteries and
and people who dance and frolic and get drunk on wine and stuff drugged wine
in the herble poison like that, and the bacaye As is this famous piece
of literature. And there have been scholars who suggest some of the imagery and
some of the gospel accounts is riffing on what's going on in in the Bakic
literature, and some people see particularly in the Johannine representation of Jesus, so
Jesus in the Gospel of John, particularly his relationship with wine kind of hints
at Dionysus a little bit. So there are some ways some of the writers
of the New Testament literature are pulling in some imagery from from the Greco Roman
world and some and from the mythology to try to represent Jesus as kind of
the true one who has all this power and is sovereign over all these different
aspects of the world, and including the beginning of the Gospel of Mark,
may be riffing on something something called the prein inscription, which is about celebrates
the good news, the gospel of the coming into the world of the God
Augustus, because it uses a lot of the same terminology what what do you
make speaking of Mark? What do you speak? What do you think?
That also brings up the question that you know, talking about Roman victories in
the Bible and calling it a gospel, why would that be good news?
Why would it be good news that they were being defeated by the Roumans of
Ahmad's interpretation of the scene in the public park where Jesus was arrested at four
I am with the kid. Yeah, that's I think that's wildly over interpreting
things. There's there's just a kid with with like a cloak or some kind
of piece of fabric. He says that he claims it was a medical bandage.
He claims the Greek word means medical bandage, like if if if you
have a text where he says, so the doctor applied a blank to his
wound, you could interpret it as medical bandage. But if you just see
the word on its own, it doesn't. Oh really Okay, So it's
the idea there is that there was a kid who just had something wrapped around
him to keep warm, and they're like that was explained in one of Vamin's
well multiple presentations that that this simply is not the case. Coma kid and
they grabbed it and he ran off and they were left with the piece of
fabric in his hand. Yeah, so you just see him scurrying away nude.
So there's that nice uh rainbow wristwatch. Again, The notion that there
was anything sexualized about that, or that it had anything to do with drugs
or antidosa drugs didn't supported by anything at all, and did it is it
true that he that Jesus said, I'm not a lay stace. I don't
know which party when that when the when the people came to arrest him,
the he Chies act like he didn't know that this was coming, Pops.
When they got there and they had their weapons, and he was like in
a in a state of mania, he said, Jesus was like he was
overwhelmed and he was in the state of mania, and he said, I
am not a lay stace. That's something that can be interpreted a variety of
ways as well. It's not lay stace is a pirate specifically a child or
a human trafficker. It's not indicative of any kind of uh, you know,
enhanced or alternate state or anything like that. Doesn't mean he's well because
they use a lot think of what the Jews were involved in, like the
Phoenicians and stuff like that. They were stealing people. They were stealing the
Frisians, they were stealing the Phrygians, they were stealing children anywhere they defined
them, turning some of them into Unix because Unis had a high value to
them. So they were cutting their you know what's off conditioning them also applying
these drugs to them so that they would be little antidote factories for their rituals
for their for their rights, and rituals for their mysteries. A lot of
words to refer to Jesus being kind of overcome with with sorrow and grief and
things like that, and sometimes they're they're overinterpreted when it's I think some of
the He specifically asked what lace, what lace dace means, and he's going
off into this tangent translations. Uh should probably relax a little bit. It's
it's more like he said it in this kind of in this kind of voice,
not necessarily No, So what what what I was saying? What what
passage is it? Because I can look up the passage and we can.
I believe it's Mark one. I'm no idea like he's I don't I believe
he said it was in Mark God, if I'm like fourteen or fifteen,
I want to say he said. Anyways, he said that he says that
the word lay stace means human trafficker, and he says that human traffickers were
also everywhere in that in that time. He says there was pirates, there
was traffic I mean even he said Julius Caesar was captured by human traffickers or
chilled traffickers, and when Julius Caesar, like he says that in Julius Caesar's
account, he actually calls these guys lays Days Laystai or something like that,
and then he goes and crucifies these guys that captured him when he gets ransomed
and catches them. Yeah, I know there there was a lot of humors,
so that that was an interesting story that I didn't know about, but
I guess when he was about twenty five, Julius Caesar was captured by these
lace dye and they were holding him for ransom, and they held him for
thirty eight days, and he told them that when he was released, he
would come back and he would kill them all. And he made good on
his promise. He crucified all of them. Human trafficking going on because you
had, you know, the society was even more stratified than that it is
now. So I had a lot of people who were enslaved, and then
you had you had different types of enslaved people, and so yeah, I'm
sure there was a lot of that going on, particularly in the in the
more densely populated areas. So yeah, So his point about that was,
you know, why is this guy saying I'm not a lay stays, which
means I'm not a human trafficker when this boy is with him, and the
boy runs away and then he goes and he says the next day he's crucified
in between two other lace days. He says, the guys that were crucified
next to more human traffickers. So the I know that the terms when it's
talking about the so human trafficking wasn't a uh from what I know from first
century Rome, human trafficking wasn't one of the crimes that was punishable by crucifixion.
It was the crime punishable by crucifixion. It was the word that they
that they used to describe the criminals. I think in the later text it
calls them thieves, but they're they're brick. The later text that calls them
thieves is the one that's rewritten from the ancient Greek. And he's talking about
the Hebrew translation and what they put into modern Bibles. So that you don't
know this information, Higgins there because it was shooting again, Steve, maybe
you can find that Greek word and we can punch it in that thing again.
Yeah, there's a I'm trying to think of the English word. Danny
Jones is doing a good job. But I mean that whole laughing about pharma
pharmacy and pharmaicon and pharmacia not being Oh ha ha ha, No, No,
that's quite literally what's going on. And all the symbolism is there too,
including the colors, the color blue. That's Babylonian magic right there.
For cursing people with a disease. Oh, it was basically, Oh it's
sedition that was punishable by crucifixion. Yeah, what does that mean? So
that's trying to revolt against the state. Okay, okay, look look look,
look this is this is if you look at the body language and them
chrying like it's it's acting. He feels like he's on the spot right now.
But the so that they would have been people who were probably uh,
revolutionaries or people who were attacking the Roman rulers or things like that, I
know, thieves is not it's not right. Go back Steve to that long
list. Yeah, go down it says it says on the right kind of
like what they all mean plundering, booty, spoil taken as booty captive,
Uh, a robber. There you go. It wasn't a lay stay to
seize, to carry off as booty keep going. It was like a pirate.
I think this is it. And one of them said buccaneered, didn't
it? I think bukaroo is the right translation there. It's hard to every
pronounce every every way I can, I can in the English language, it
doesn't. But but you'll you'll notice with these with these glosses as well,
because these lexicons just use glosses which are which are basically here are So here's
what he's saying. Definitions don't apply to the Bible. Once again, he's
going to say that are equivalent words. It's not necessarily saying this means when
this happens in this context and this color and all this other stuff. It's
not a full definition, but it's pretty generic, like a robber can be
a lot of different things, and you know, you might find a if
you tell a story about a robber in a specific circumstance. And again there's
all this additional semantic freight that goes along with with the way the word is
used. But like a child he's mostly naked with a bandage on his privates
running away. At the same time, he says, I'm not a lays
day, you know, like that type of context. That doesn't mean that
that is evoked with every single use of the word. But yeah, the
I don't think I'm just watching the body language. I think I know of
any New Testament scholars who would agree that the well, the New Testament scholars
wouldn't agree. They wouldn't even consider that. Do you get like, in
this box where we holready have decided what things are, we're not going to
accept anything outside of what we've already decided. These things mean big surprise that
they wouldn't consider if they able to read the ancient Greek and it said something
that they weren't expecting that they would reject it. Of course they would.
The other two people crucified alongside Jesus were human traffickers. I mean, it
could have been included in the broader notion of a someone who committed sedition or
someone who was a brigand or something like that, but it certainly doesn't specifically
refer to human trafficking. And he says that with the word he uses that
lay stace. Word is the same word that Julius Caesar used for the guys
that captured and kidnapped him and that he crucified. There it is, that's
the word right there, says the Greek actual spelling. It's funny, it
says predator. Yeah, well lay stas, that's the predator English. Yeah,
predator pretty much sums it up, doesn't it. Let's plug it in
maybe yeah, yeah, let's plug it in, and then we should find
the actual passage. And I think it's Mark right looking at Oh, maybe
it's a Matthew. I don't know anyways, So stick there and pump that
in there. There we go. Okay, here we go. And he
carried off his booty to be won by force, a pirate or a robber,
so that can refer to an incredibly wide variety of things. Okay,
so yeah, a robber. High whim. Now, no, watch what
he does. He goes right to the this is what the words mean in
the Bible. Little app he has on his phone man bandit revolutionary insurrectionist guerrilla.
So they throw in revolutionary there so that they can make it make sense
in the in the context that they want you to see it in so I
think that second sense revolutionary insurrection is that's the kind of sense that would could
merit crucifixion. Oh that's not even here, you said, yep, yeah,
it's not even here. So the ancient Greek don't accept that as a
definition. Where did you find the revolution? So I'm looking in what what
scholars affectionately know a is b dag, which is a Greek English lexicon of
the New Testament, another early Christian literature. So it isolates the usage of
these words with it. He just so he admits that they isolate the usage
of the words based on what they say it's going to mean in the Bible,
because somehow when you magically put these things together, rapid of bidening around
it, that says Bible, it means something different in early Christian literature.
To show how they're being used in those contexts. Yeah, but wouldn't that
kind of be a biased translation if they if they don't, if they Jesus
is saying he's not a lay stay, they wouldn't want Jesus to be saying
he's not a predator. They want him to be saying he's not a revolutionary.
Well, they look at all the all very good Danny Jones, but
different places that's used to see to see how it's being used. And I'd
be interested to see the chart the usage of this word to see in what
genre of literature and what types of contact it has used to refer specifically to,
so that he can say, well, that's not biblical, that's not
a biblical text, so therefore it doesn't apply human traffickers because robber highwaymen,
band it that's pretty much anybody who's waiting along the side of the road,
the guys that captured Julius He and that's also what the Jews were doing,
and that's what they've been known for throughout history, is to be in the
bandits on the road. Right, whether they're Kazarians or anywhere else, they're
the merchants and thieves, correct, the cutthroats, the foreigners. They're always
called the foreigners no matter where they are, because they're always the outliers.
There are always non assimilators that are always there to basically arisiitically, live off
of whomever is the culture that they're you know, interacting with, these are
wouldn't that be in the same context because he was, well, the context
would indicate it see, I mean the same period of time. I'm sorry,
Oh, it would be yeah, near the same period of time.
It would be. It wouldn't be the same literary corpora. It's not the
same literature. And also one of the big differences between what's going on in
the literature written by Greek elites and the literature written by early Christians is the
Christians are using the coin a Greek, common Greek. This is street Greek.
It's the Greek that you use as a second language. It's not These
are not people who were raised reading Plato and Aristophanes and all these other people.
And so this is they're more closely related to classical Greek over and against
the New Testament Greek, which is generally referred to as coin a Greek,
which means vulgar or common, And so they use words in different ways.
And this is one of the main points, is that all the literature that
I'm honest pointing to is exclusively classical literature or literature from elite Greeks who are
are literarily trained and all that kind of stuff. Is are you familiar,
Sorry to interrupt, you go ahead, go ahead. Well, I was
just gonna say I have yet to see a single piece of evidence actually from
Christian literature to indicate that. Uh. And so once again, those who
decide that they are going to be the arbiters of the you know, retranslations
of these words, he has yet to see them admit that lace days means
predator will no shit, it's ever being used in anything approximating the way he's
describing it. There is an okay, oh you found the verse Mark fourteen
fifty one. Yeah, new international version. A young man wearing nothing but
a linen garment was following Jesus when they seized him. But what does this
say? He? When does he says his response to the cops, Oh
gosh, where did it go? What was I going to say? Oh?
Oh, are you familiar with Lucian? Not so? Also in the
story that well, the telling that Ammon gives. And I'm not supporting Ammon
in anything else that he does. I'm just explaining that this is what he's
saying is the text says that they dressed him. They dressed Jesus in purple
gown, as they say in the Bible and all this other stuff. They
dressed him up like a lay stace, and they told the crowd what he
was, what he was caught doing, and that's when the Sanhedrin, apparently
to their credit, but I don't know if I would go that far.
That's when they started getting wild up and saying, you know, he's basically
with the same thing that they that they argued Socrates was doing, which was,
you know, poisoning the youth. So I don't know what you make
of that. But I also don't think that it should be painting the hues
in a good light because what was he was Jesus one of them or not?
I don't know that people have said he isn't. So the whole point
here is is that I don't think there's a good guy in this situation,
one way or the other. And it also is kind of interesting that the
Romans say they want, you know, he washes his hands of this.
This is something that the depth of people are wanting, unless they set it
up that way to where they make it very apparent what he's guilty of,
so that they don't have to be the ones that say what to do with
them, because they are going to get the crowd riled up to say what
they want to have done. I could, I could possibly see that,
but there still seems like to be something else missing in this whole telling,
right that Well then went in the Romans, if they if you know,
they were pissed off and didn't like life stace in their in their territories,
that they wouldn't need the people or their opinions to do what they were going
to do. I don't know. Is it just like, you know,
kind of like a propaganda media to the to the people and to get them
to demand it. It's possible. Not very familiar now, it's been a
while. So he wrote us. He wrote, Lucian was another example of
a writer. I think this was like twe fifty. I could be wrong
here st you have the fact check me on this. I think it was
like one fifty. So here's where he talks about Lucian. Lucian writes in
almost the exact same time period that the New Testament is being written, and
he's talking awful lot about lay stays, and he uses it in the context
that is meaning predator, child, trafficker, abductor all this stuff. Right.
Pirate, yes, but a pirate who specifically does those things. He's
trafficking humans. And he writes extensively on it. So the name that the
word means, and it's not it's not a medical text, so you can't
use that argument. He's he's using it at the same time period that that
word would have that meaning in the culture of the Greeks, the Hellenists,
the bones that they're all being influenced by. Right the BC. Lucian was
a poet and he wrote a story about a guy named Alexander the False Prophet
who was a lay stace, and he's using the he's using the context to
how Alexander the context that Lucian uses to describe this guy Alexander the false Prophet
as this terrible, tyrannical laystace who's trafficking people and and and uses using them
as like proSP putting them into like prostitution rings and all kinds of stuff.
I think he's using that for the main historical context for that passage in Mark
where Jesus is I'm out a lay stays. Yeah, that's so that wouldn't
be relevant to what was going on on the ground and uh no, Loution
would It wouldn't be relevant because it's not part of the Bible. So even
though that's the name that's the word that's used during that time period. He
said, no, no, no, not part of the world, because
it's it's we're we're talking, uh two hundred years later, two hundred plus
years later, and a different way for it though, way for what happens
here part of the world, and a different type of literature altogether. Can
you google lution so we can actually get the real story about what his deal
was when that was a nervous laugh by the way, when he was sorry.
But yeah, you need to be able to show that that this usage
is actually going on in in the text. Your look, you're looking at
your asserting where it's occurring. But I'm I don't think there's anything in the
New Testament that can plausibly scroll down about. Yeah, they all want twenty
five Wikipedia okay, so one uh oh that is that is ce? What
is CE? What does that mean? So that's a D. That's a
D right? So this so this is a satirist yeah, yeah, So
so this is saying he was one twenty five to one eighty a D.
Right, Okay, so roughly about one hundred and something one hundred years and
change after well less than less than that for the actual composition of the Gospels,
so they're so he does actually admit that, I guess maybe to dance
credit the club. Oh, gospels are are seventy five seventy CE to maybe
one hundred and twenty five CE. Oh and that's not speculative to that seventy
CE date. Oh really, Okay, Yeah, so that's so around the
same time time. Yeah, it's it's much similar. But that's also interesting.
The Gospels are written then, and they're talking about this story of Jesus
being in a park being arrested at four am one hundred years later and Mark
the Gospel, which tells me that this whole entire story and maybe the character
himself, even if it was a real person, everything that they'd said about
him, it wasn't a first hand a count. It's they're adding attributes to
a certain person. So even if they're saying something bad about and you can't
really take it that deeply because it seems like they're just building characters to tell
their tale because it's so far removed from it and the people are so far
removed from it. And when we get into Paul, we'll understand that that's
also the case. There that it starts to make you wonder, like,
where are they coming up with this stuff that's in Mark? Wasn't even there
right? A bunch of it who were there? There was Paul, Peter
James, and John, Peter James and John. Yet so why is it
in Mark if he wasn't even there? I don't know. Well, none
of the none of the Gospels were written by people who were there. None
of them are eyewitness accounts, they're all they're all later people who are are
basically just committing the tradition to text, and probably because they're getting far enough
away from the actual life of Jesus that it's nobody really has a plausible case
to have actually heard the words of Jesus directly from him and so next so
therefore everything that they put in his mouth isn't accurate. Now it's it's time
to actually commit these words to text. Because there was an idea initially that
Jesus's words were had more authority than the scriptures, because scripture means written things,
so words on a page don't have as much authority as spoken, living
words. So the whole you know, you have read that Moses said this,
So wouldn't you want to write that down first so that you preserve it,
not wait until the hundreds of years later before you start doing that.
Well, I say, this is a way of suggesting that Jesus's words trump
scripture. But once you get far enough away that nobody can say, I,
you know, sat on my grandmother's knee and heard the words of Jesus,
Now it's you kind of need the written words to ensure that they actually
get preserved. But you still have the continuate that that that's backward logic.
If it's something that's important, you write it. Downtion of this tradition of
what they called the agrapha the unwritten things. So there were there were traditions
about Jesus that weren't written down but would continue to be communicated orally that were
considered to be of special authority because they remained unwritten. So do you think
this gives it more merit the fact that this was written Lucian was around the
same time those Gospels were written. I don't think so, because because there's
a context, that is, there's a context you see, regardless if it's
only pharmaceutical or if it's something like I don't know, telling a story about
lace days apparently that just still also means that there's no there's no binding qualities
to those definitions. That is giving that word a more specific sense. Lucian
lived in the same areas that the Gospel was taking place, and well so
they say and being written, so it's not like he was far removed from
the culture either. In the absence of a context that indicates what it means,
you've got to look at what it means most generically and then try to
reason from there what seems why it's being used the way it is being used.
Because you know, if I if I am on a street in San
Antonio and I and I say the word boot, there's an image that's going
to pop up into people's heads. It's a generic term, but they're going
to come up with a very specific image. It's going to be something like
a cowboy boot. If I'm in London and I say boot, they're going
to think either of an army boot or the trunk of a car because it's
a different context, same word. But see, this whole argument is state
is assuming that they're talking from a different First of all, it's a bad
analogy because lay states is pretty specific to what it means it's not like boot,
and it's not like gift because in German gift means poison, right,
But you know, which is kind of funny in itself, But that's not
what's going on here at all. It's the same language first of all,
that the ancient Greek. Plus it's the same area and it's the same time
period. The context is what determines the semantic content that gets evoked for the
hearer or the reader of the text. And there's just nothing in the New
Testament that points there's nothing in the New Testament that you'll accept that points to
it, because you're not reading the ancient Greek, which did predate in this
direction. So where did Lucian come from? Was he not in the same
area. He's close to the same area. I don't know where he was
living when he was writing, but I know he's Roman Roman. He was
born in Roman Syria, died in like Egypt, so it was near the
same area. But yeah, same area, the same time. Yeah,
But the the context is is what's most important there. And I got to
come up with some more off the off the cuff examples of I have to
learn how to lie better. Contextual differences and contextual uses of words. And
it seems like every in his definition, every single definition had something to do
with thievery or piracy or or robbing. But what was the one that you
looked up? Again? Yeah, predator and revolutionary are quite different. What
was the what you said you found a different definition? What was the that
that was a lexicon b dag b dag. Yeah, that's just an acronym,
a Greek English lexicon of the New Testament and other early Christian literature.
Okay, and yeah, there are a bunch of different Lexicans first that so,
okay, So that basically just references the Bible, the scriptures and and
and figures out what the words meant specifically in those scriptures. Well, it's
the New Testament, and the other Christian literature is usually the writings of the
first couple of centuries after the New Testament was written. Okay, so,
but but yeah, that's generally considered kind of a not a totally isolated,
but its own kind of linguistic corpus. Okay, the early Christian literature,
because they're talking, they're all talking to each other, and they're sharing a
lot of a lot of background, a lot of understanding, and they're talking
about the same themes, and so the you know, that's considered its own
kind of corpus for analysis. When it comes to the crucifixion of Jesus,
why what is the conventional understanding of why he died so soon? Because it's
the isn't isn't that the consensus that he died soon, like quicker than he
was supposed to. When people get crucified, it takes a long time to
come back and break their legs, so they so they drop more and they
suffocate. But for him, he died like way earlier than he was supposed
to. Yeah, that's that's what it says in one of the texts that
they went to break his legs, but he was already dead. Yeah,
And and I don't know that there's anything historical about that, however, that
that text is used to show that he was the perfect sacrifice because according to
Jewish custom this, yeah, let's never forget that this saturn cult that we're
told is, you know that's rewrapped as an Abrahamic religion is all about sacrifice,
blood eating, you know, cannibalism and sacrificing your your only begotten You're
first born to wipe away sins of other people. So basically, God's son
is less important to him than a bunch of non player characters. Basically,
like, that doesn't make any sense. If someone told me to do something
to something some of one of my children because it's gonna save a bunch of
assholes I don't even know, I would tell them to go fuck themselves and
probably kill them, because that would mean that they were a threat to my
family. If they are asking me to do something like that specific type of
sacrifice, you were not supposed to break any of the bones of the animal.
And so it was basically a way of telling the story in a way
that makes Jesus the fulfillment of prophecy. And I don't think, I don't
know that we could demonstrate one way or another that had actually happened that way.
Right, hold that thought. I'm gonna take a leap real quick,
but we'll come back in five minutes. Oh, thank you. So this
guy, he says he's a big fan of Dan. He's got a couple
questions. The first one up here, Oh, this is a good one.
Yeah. I appreciated his expertise in citing the sources and his responses to
people. Danny Jones, can you please ask Dan McClellan about his views on
the people like Billy Carson, whom he has made very critical response videos on
YouTube about and the rise of the simplification of the Sumerian creation stories and the
on Naki. Do you feel like Billy Carson Billy Carson's teachings are dangerous?
And why are people confusing Protestant teachings with Catholic teachings and blaming Primary Catholics and
not Judaism or Islam for the misunderstandings they have of the creation stories? Does
Dan know where the Vatican have their well, I can say one thing,
Some of the Protestant sex, like the Evangelical Christians, were created by the
converts, the baptized converts of Jacob Frank twenty six thousand in total, including
Jacob Frank infiltrated the Catholicism in Christianity. And we get these Evangelical Christians from
those people who created those brethrens, the Asiatic Brethren, the Moravian, the
Bohemian, the Plymouth, the Exclusive, and then you could get John Darby's
and school fields out there. That's that Christian Zionism comes from Sabotine Frankism,
their secret archives. I don't know where where the Vatican archives are. I
have I've had friends who've gone and done archival research at the Vatican, but
i've I was never a part of that. But the the the Aanaki,
yeah, the favorite of everyone loves talking about the Yeah, that's primarily the
result of it is primarily coming from Zacharia Sitchen's fanciful translations of the Sumerian literature,
and then also trying to and more recently Frenchman by the name of Anton
Parks, who I think uses such an s is like you know, his
foundation for validation to kind of harmonize what's going on in Sumerian and Akkadian literature
with what's going on in the Bible. There are resonances between the two,
but it's kind of trying to weave them together to make it the same historical
story. And so you get this idea about aliens coming to Earth looking for
resources, and well that's what the Kabbala basically does. It takes all of
their demons and turns them into aliens because they want to get you to get
all excited about this alien stuff, when really they're promoting their demons and stuff
like that. So you've made videos responding to Billy Carson videos. Yeah,
Billy Carson's made a lot of videos making ridiculous claims when he talks about Hebrew,
particularly when I was in graduate schooling. Ahead, there's a wonderful book
by a guy named Lambert called the I think it's called Babylonian Creation, which
is a translation of the main the main Acadian Creation myth. So if somebody
wanted a decent translation that was academically sound, that would be that would be
the place to go for that. But academically controlled translation, it's what they
mean. That's what they mean when they say academically sound or peer reviewed.
The controllers controlled it nicely. Yeah, there's I don't know who it is
these days. Okay. But another thing I wanted to talk to you about
was it seems to be a controversial idea that there are any pagan influences in
Christianity. Is this the case? Yeah, it depends on the degree to
which people argue for pagan influence, but yeah, it's it's controversial. How
much pagan influence do you believe is in Christianity? I think there was probably
a little A lot of people who came into Christianity are coming from other traditions
where they're going to keep doing some of the things that they're doing. And
like even today, you can visit different parts of the world and Christianity is
practiced in different ways because of frequently the preservation of indigenous traditions and conventions that
they just carried on. And so that's called grafting and a simulation. Right,
they have to make it more malleable to the target group. But as
long as the core is be fearful of God and be scared of death,
they've got you. Christianity is not a monolith. There are a lot of
different ways around the world and throughout time to be a Christian. And in
the earliest generations of Christianity, I think there was definitely influence from the Greco
Roman world. A lot of Greek philosophy gets into Christianity. I think there's
probably more influence from Greek philosophy than Greek mythology or paganism. But yeah,
it depends on what you're looking at, whether you're looking at ideas about divine
mediation, what the gods are like, where humans come from, morality,
all that kind of stuff. So, first of all, I don't understand
why why does why is that controversial in the first place? Why why did
so? Is the idea that that Christianity was just this new thing that developed
in its own bubble, that was completely in a vacuum from everything else is
and why is that so defended? Because most people who identify as Christian believe
that this way of life, this whole package, is something that was delivered
by God, and so they want to minimize the degree by Yeo, by
Yahweh, by very well, let's put this way. The Egyptians viewed Yahweh
as set the god of foreigners, the desert storms, storm god. Oops.
Oh, there goes ball to which social circumstances are influencing it. Most
people, most thoughtful people, will recognize there's some degree of influence from the
world around them, but there are usually a handful of non negotiable features of
their belief that they don't want to that they want to have dropped ex nihilo
from the heavens, that this is pure revelation, this is pure inspiration,
there is no borrowing or influence from paganism. So people tend to be pretty
sensitive about that. What about the idea of gods that die and resurrect.
So rsephonie Osyrus, Yeah, there's a ton of them. So the idea
that this is like a discrete category of deity, that dying and rising God
comes from Fraser from the nineteenth century, and it is it's an outdated anthropological
model that is used to try to like, if this is a discrete category,
if you can define it by these features, and then Jesus fits the
definition, then you can just say, well, Jesus is just one of
these other deities, just like these other deities. It's it's kind of an
archetype. It's just the way people create deities. And that also means that
Christianity is just kind of a product of the natural interaction of human cognition and
the environment around them, which also kind of desacralizes things. So for people
who are Christians, they tend to be pretty sensitive about that as well.
But scholars these days don't really think of the dying and Rising God motif as
something that has much analytical value, no analytical value, not a lot of
analytical value. You can point to some parallels, but when it comes to
analyzing the of Christianity, I think most scholars who study that kind of thing
would say the Jesus tradition doesn't seem to have been based on and he dying
and rising God motif. More likely, the idea of Jesus dying and rising
is just a relic of the fact that their messiah died, was executed,
and the only way for this tradition to carry on was for his followers to
develop this tradition of his return to life. And so the fact that Jesus
dies and rises is more incidentally related to the dying and Rising God motif than
it is inspired by it. So it's more of a coincidence, you think.
I think it's more likely that the whole resurrection motif is an outgrowth of
Jesus's followers trying to cope than it is with because usually when people are suggesting
Jesus as part of the dying and Rising God tradition, this is a part
of a mythicist approach, the idea that there was no historical Jesus, that
it was all made up, and that it was patterned after the dying and
Rising God motif. That's usually where that argument is going, that it's there
to support mythicism. I think most scholars agree that there was a historical person
named Jesus who was an itinerant apocalyptic preacher who was executed by the Roman state,
and then shortly afterwards stories about him having come back to life began to
circulate. So and there are the ways that the tradition doesn't fit the dying
and rising God motif, but I think most scholars would say it's more likely
incidental, right right. The dates that they picked are very incidental anyway,
So that's enough for that. If you guys want to check it out,
it's called it's called Bible scholar response to Mmin Hillman was Jesus Christ state trafficker
Dan McClellan. It's on Danny Jones podcast. Okay, we're going to switch
over now to Ammin and his response. Now again, I want to say
this and I want to repeat this, and I want to make it clear.
I see a lot of issues with Ammin. Okay, it's not this
is not a promotion. Say hey, look, Ammon's right, I'm I'm
in camp. Amen. None of that is none of that is accurate,
that's not true. Don't put don't pin that incorrectly on myself because that is
not accurate. He said one time that you know, Nemesis or justice is
the killer of Nazis. Fuck him. The other night he mentioned that while
he was in college, he was reading the Jesuit Anthony Fauci's papers and that
he wanted to give him a shout out thumbs up props for making HIV more
acceptable in society and not just a gay disease, and all the work that
he did to do that. The guy was murdering people with AZT and this
is what he comes up with. He's also the head of what was going
on during the murdering with venom shots that were going on, Yeah, and
the whole lockdown bullshit, all that, and gave him a thumbs up yesterday.
So don't think that I'm camp amin, But the things that he knows
that are of value are what we're going to pull out here. So he's
going to respond now to what we just saw with a little bit of a
I added a couple extra minutes of this retort so that he's animated. He's
interesting. No, he's not on drugs, but he does have something going
on, perhaps some kind of drama, some kind of other thing going on,
but he I don't think he does drugs. I think he just has
like a hyperactivity or something like that. Very animated. But if you saw
him in twenty eighteen or heard any of his stuff, he was very like
shy and stuttering. So something changed. So they they've they've trained him.
Well, he went to special special something training, special ops training. I
don't know what the hell it's called, some kind of school where a lot
of the people come out and become CIA agents and FEDS and stuff like that.
So there's a lot there's a lot of weirdness behind this. But you
know, and you might want to ask yourself, what are the uh,
what are the the intents the intent behind this? I just want to know
the ancient Greek and I'm going to know. Since I said that, why
don't I just show you this. I believe this is the book. If
I'm not mistaken, I believe this is the book that they're using. Sorry
for you people out there on Speak Free radio won't be able to see this.
I'll just save the name of it. It's Greek and Intensive Course second
revised edition. Second Okay, just says it twice. But it looks like
this. For those out there. It's eight hundred and forty eight pages.
The cheapest place I found it was on Amazon. Hey, I have a
birthday coming up. Anybody wants to get me the all right, I will
learn ancient Greek and I'll report back. It might take a little while for
me to start getting a handle on it, but I definitely want to do
that. All right. Now, let's get back to what we were doing
here. Every button twice. Everything's so slow with this. All right,
let's get into Amman's response, and then I have something about the cult of
Saturn and how this all plays into the Abrahamic trio. So I got to
put that up there, but I want to kind of keep this organized and
get into amin first. So here we go, put this on big screen.
We adjusted so I'm not on it because he should have just saved that
in this first place. But it doesn't. All right, there, you
go, give me the first one. What does that person say? I
want to just quick look at this comment before we get to the Dan clips.
One of the most interesting interviews I've ever listened to about all of this.
This man is dangerous to the current leaders of religions the world over.
Almen Hillman should be taken very seriously. It sounds ominous, doesn't it.
But the point here is exactly is exactly on I shouldn't be taken Uh,
you know, people shouldn't be looking at me. But these texts reveal a
completely different world than the religious world that you and I have had pulled over
our eyes. Yeah, it's a new world. Let's look at it through
that. We're the clips. Did we put the clips in there? Oh?
We need another one? She was like, shut up, gecko boy,
geko, we love geckos. He did his PhD under Stavra capulu.
Oh right, and that's the modern Greek that I heard in his in his
accent, of course, in ancient Greek. I'm about halfway through her book
God. Isn't that amazing? What's your book going to be called? God?
We're going to find him tonight. Are you ready? The number of
times the sixth century BCE is mentioned, but never a source. Rye right,
number of times it's mentioned but never a source. Your guy is full
of it? Yeah, thank you? What is that? There was a
very important point that I wanted to bring out for people. We do not
care about theories. We don't care about word salads, here, we care
about what the evidence is showing us, the reality. That's exactly what people
are hitting on. It's nothing to do with me. It's everything to do
with the muse. Oh right, And that's the modern Greek that I heard
in his accent, of course, in ancient Greek. I'm about halfway through
her book. God. Isn't it amazing? What's your book going to be
called? God? We're going to find him tonight. Are you ready?
The number of times the sixth century BCE is mentioned, but never a source?
Right? Right? Number of times it's mentioned, never a source.
Your guy is full of it? Yeah, thank you? What is that?
There was a very important point that I wanted to bring out for people.
We do not care about theories. We don't care about word salads.
Here, we care about what the evidence is showing us, the reality.
That's exactly what people are hitting on. It's nothing to do with me.
It's everything to do with the muse, the dragon guards that song, that's
it, it's the one job. Give it to me. What's the Oh,
let's set Dan, come here, Dan, it's time for Dan.
Let me take a couple of these clips and people, this is not personal.
This is not personal. This is professional. This is the guy that
you see Tony who went to dozens of professional conferences where people who have been
studying ancient Greek and what all their lives, they come in and they they
they wrestle and you can't mess around, man, you cannot mess around.
That's what this is about. I don't want anybody getting taken into the back
alley. Good, let's go for it. Give me a dan, I
want to suck this up. Go and then there are there are seventy forty
five words in Hebrew in the Hebrew Bible alone, so seventy nine thousand,
yeah, so I think he may have heard eighty thousand somewhere eight. Yeah,
I think he may have mistook eighty four eight because they're the Hebrew Bible
itself, which is not all of ancient Hebrew. Like there's there was a
lot of Hebrew writing and speaking outside the Hebrew Bible. But the Hebrew Bible
itself has eighty thousand different words in it, right, So who was confused
there? We all know it was ducktails Dan and he said something that was
way off. I don't know where he got seventy nine thousand, nine hundred
and ninety five. I don't know where he got those. He pulled those
out of some dark, vaporous black hole somewhere, because that's not the that
block people. What's the point of this. This is not just a game.
When you're presenting history to someone and you misrepresented, that's unsacred. That
that's something that's fouling the planet. We have to honor the muse of history.
Her name is Cleo Dan, Her name is Cleo Give us the next
one. He did correct me on something there. I said it was limited
to classical and early Greek lyrical poetry, but it's also in classical and early
Greek medical texts, and he pointed out it out. So, oh yeah,
now that has absolutely no bearing whatsoever on the claim that that's what it
means in the New Testament. Okay, but it is in medical texts.
Okay. Did you hear the voice of reasoning sneaking in there and the Renaissance
Champion coming out of Danny Jones? Did you hear that? Yeah? No,
ducktails, Danny is going to continue leading down this road of deception.
Right. It's when you take the sources and you cram them in the person's
face. That's when you know you're in the right place, You, as
a classicist, have done your job. You've just guarded the sources. We
want to hear what you think. I'm sorry, doctor p Doctor l Oxford
Yale. We don't care in the slightest what you think. We want to
know what the evidence is and we want to understand it for ourselves because we're
servants of the muse of history. Right, watch what's happening? A couple
more, Let's give a couple more. Goay, history means investigation, Isn't
that nice? I like that. What is the difference between a classical scholar
and a biblical scholar? So a person who studies classics is primarily engaging in
the Greek and the Latin literature from the middle of the first millennium BCE down
into the first few centuries CE, and I use BCE and CE, where
people use BC and A D and so classics doesn't really have a ton of
overlapping, which, by the way, that's awfully dumbed down when you start
using common era, because that's you're you're a biblical scholar who's not using and
a dominating which means you're basically rejecting your own concepts of your religion, because
before Christ, you're not you're not using that anymore. You're you're using before
common era, so you're you're eliminating the Christ from it, and yet you're
calling yourself a Mormon Christian. Right, very interesting with the Bible, but
the people who wrote and transmitted and consumed the New Testament and as well as
the septuagen we're also people engaged with classical literature, and there's a lot of
influence from classics on the Bible. That's not too bad, He's he's only
off about five hundred years. So classical philology is the study of Greek and
Latin, and our earliest sources are not in the fifth century. Right,
you've missed half the boat. Right now, what are you watching happen?
This man is an expert who makes his living off of being an expert.
Where is the responsibility to the muse? Where's the responsibility that we have?
We have an obligation to be accurate. And all you nerdy engineers and all
you nerdy computer programmers, you all understand that. The mathematicians, that's the
draw. Oh god, we love it. The musicians are even they don't
even understand, right, and they're the musicians. I love it, But
what's the He's off in the amount of time that we study. But he
also makes it sound like we don't study the Bible because we just do classical
stuff. Right in Dan's mind, in the mind that works at the university,
in the mind that works at the seminary, there is a division in
space and time between pagans and non pagans. Monus monas live in their own
universe. Right. We all know that's not true, and that's why studying
the Bible is part of studying classics, right, Okay, isn't it.
It's terrible misrepresentation of the actual science. My god, man, give me
the next one. That second sense, revolutionary insurrection is that's the kind of
sense that would could merit crucifixion. Oh that's not even here, you said.
Yeah, so I'm looking in what what scholars affectionately know as b dag,
which is a Greek English lexicon of the Testament and other early Christian literature.
So it isolates the usage of these words within early Christian literature to show
how they're being used in those contexts. Yeah, but wouldn't that kind of
be a biased translation, if they, if they, if they, Jesus
is saying he's not a lafe days, they wouldn't want Jesus to be saying
he's not a predator. Look at Danny Jones, right, he got it,
he saw right through it. What's the source that you're using, Dan
McClellan. You're using a source that was created by a specific group with specific
types of agendas, and those words you're going to be defined with their agendas.
In mind, you claim to be a translator, Dan, you should
know that. Yeah, so what do you do? What do you do?
You don't listen to those ideas. You go to this text, You
go to the sources and you look at them, you say, what do
they say? Now? The reason I wanted to harp on this is I
want everybody to see this is typical medieval Dark Age crappery classical studies. Is
the antidote to that death of the Dark Ages, to that stuff that oozes
all over your equipment and knocks it out. Your society h slows down,
stops progressing, and starts thinking things that are wild. Wild. We don't
go around the sun God created this place, right, Okay. The antidote
is that classical wisdom, and all it is is beautiful, beautiful reason expressed
by a language that I'm sorry, I'm sorry, ladies, I'm sorry,
Latin. I'm sorry. She's the most beautiful by far, by far.
Now people are wondering how many total words this creek out? Right? Last
time they checked in the TLG, the giant corpus has one point seven seven
million. They used to say. Twenty years ago, they used to say,
oh, it's probably around five hundred thousand. Right now they're saying,
well, with the TLG, it looks like it's much much higher. That
doesn't surprise anyone if you've done anything with this gorgeous, gorgeous pageant winner.
I'm sorry, I'm sorry. I hate to say that, right, I
really hate to say that, But she wins hands down. And how do
you take something that was written in such an expansive language and reduce it into
a seven into eight dozen word Hebrew, ancient Hebrew, and not lose something
in the translation. And it's confirmed to my satisfaction that it was started in
Greek. It was an Hebrew back translation after the fact, after the fact,
after the fact, after the Greek one was already created during the Hellenistic
period. Hands down. Let's just all recognize that. It's why you have
grammar. Yes, it's why you and I'm talking about the Old Testament obviously
even asked questions about your language. Yes, you know you do that in
Greek, right, You just don't realize it because you've stolen Greek. Right,
you speak this bastardized Anglo saxon garbledy goop. Listen to that. I
listen to my inability to find an Anglo Saxon word that can reach that distant
star and pull her down. Okay, it's gonna get gross. Now put
your splash bags on. We've got one more, dan healan. Last one
was, then, are you familiar with Lucian? Not very familiar now it's
been a while, so he wrote us. He wrote, Lucian was another
example of a writer. I think this was like twenty fifty I could be
wrong here, Steve, you haves a fact check me on this. I
think it was like one fifty BC. Lucian was a poet and he wrote
a story about a guy named Alexander, the false Prophet, who was a
lay stace. And he's using the he's using the context to how Alexander.
The context that Lucian uses to describe this guy Alexander the false prophet as this
terrible, tyrannical lay Stace who's trafficking people and and and uses using them as
like putting them into like prostitution rings and all kinds of stuff. I think
he's using that for the main historical context for that passage in Mark where Jesus
say I'm not a lays Stace. Yeah, that's so that wouldn't be relevant
to what was going on on the ground in that part of the world because
it's it's we're we're talking, uh, two hundred years later, two hundred
plus years later and a different part of the world and a different type of
literature altogether. Can you google lutions, we can actually get the real story
about what his deal was. So, so this is saying he was one
twenty five to one eighty a d. Right, Okay, so roughly about
one hundred and some hundred years of change after well less than less than that
for the actual composition of the gospels. So their gospels are are seventy five
seventy CE to maybe one hundred and twenty five CE. Oh really, Okay,
Yeah, So that's so around the same time. Yeah, it's it's
much similar. But so it turns out. Look, you know, there
are certain advantages of being able to open portals. We're look at how it
worked out. Originally, the thought was, first of all, he didn't
know who Lucian was, right, that's pretty you know, Okay, he
was only a minor in classical Greek. So eh, he probably didn't have
that. He probably had like one semester and it was like a survey and
they probably didn't do Lucian. Right. Right, This isn't a dude who's
been reading Greek for the last thirty five years, right, or however long
he's been out of training. I don't know. I don't know. Yeah,
but do you hear it, people of ahm and you do you hear
the grade of professional behavior? Do you hear the level of what it is
either rising to or falling to? Yeah? Do you hear that? Okay,
Lucian you don't know him. Okay, Well you think here's the question
that tell me why the lace stays and Lucian is so different from the lace
stays in Jesus's mouth in Matthew and Luke. Tell me when we talk about
the lay stas and those two that hung with him, the lay sti that
are hanging next to him in Mark, that one's in Mark. Tell me
what's the difference, Well it, Dan says, Look, that's two hundred
years difference because he's thanks because he doesn't know. Watch how quickly someone in
the trench coat is willing to embrace a fabrication, right, he doesn't know.
He's not from the second century, he's from BC's from the second century,
A D right and early and that for that matter. Yeah, what's
gonna happen? Then, Well, Dan's gonna discover he's gonna discover that he's
going to have to scoop up that pile of boop that he just defecated in
front of you. Yeah, okay. Do you want to get your science
from someone who is willing to engage fiction? I don't. I don't want
somebody like that testifying in court either. This is the classical standard, and
classical philologists will hold you to this. Don't bs me. I don't want
to hear your stupid ideas. What's your text? Yeah, it becomes annoying
after a while. But if you want to be an investigator, you have
a certain professional standard to uphold. Right, Okay, fantastic, fantastic.
Let's go to the first of our venture tonight. I just wanted you guys
to see this one more time, just so we can put this baby to
rest. Seven thousand words. Look, the head of the language academy at
Hebrew University, who sets the standards for modern he says, ah, isn't
it funny how modern Hebrew has approximately thirty three thousand words? That thirty three
just happened to work out that way. Ben Hebrews only got seven thousand words.
Okay. When the United Nations was getting beaten down by rape claims,
they said thirty three thousand rape claims against the United Nations, right, fine,
So the disparity between seven thousand and one millions the peacekeeping force, of
course, is what I'm talking about. And I'm sure they do plenty of
raping rate out the UN as well. Seven hundred and seventy thousand. That's
what we need to remember and focus on as we're learning. Go give me
the next one. Here's the passage we're gonna begin with tonight, people.
It's that passage from Revelation. I'm just gonna translate it out and I counsel
you to go to the marketplace and pick yourself up gold. It's been pure
fight and the fire, so you may be rich. And while you're there,
pick up a white gown, throw it upon your nakedness, and what
else you ought to buy a collierion and in Christ your eyes in order that
you may see. That's the text. That's the medicine. It's not separate.
The medicine and the religion are the same. Salvation is a medical term.
Ah now, let's go to that party. I promise you we would
go to give you the next one. Give it, okay, So hold
on, We're gonna pause here for a minute. I'm going to jump over
to the Saturn Colt stuff real quick so I can get that in and then
we'll finish off with this if we have time. It goes on for quite
a long time afterwards, so we'll see what we can fit in here today.
Let's go into post Logan's here, all right, Oh yeah, I
should buy it that way, all right, let's go on. Alright,
So the one I want to show you here is this one. It's I
don't know, maybe ten minutes long something like that. It could be a
little longer. It's I don't agree with everything that they conclude in this,
but enough to make it worth watching. Hold on a second, do you
guys even hear that? Old on? I gotta fix that. God damn
it. The cumbersome ness of this crap is ridiculous. Well I even put
that there. Of course, you want to be able to freaking hear it?
What the hell? All right, and I gotta start it over?
I do that, It's back out and go back in. I guess all
right, let's try this again. Kasha getting Saturn tattooed on her hand,
Miley the virus Cyrus getting Saturn tattooed on its body. Katie Perry has Saturn
tattooed right on her wrist. We've seen be able to say on magazine covers
right with the Saturn earrings. We've seen Adele perform at concerts not only wearing
the Saturn earrings as well, but also getting Saturn tattooed on her arm coincidentally,
of course, on her thirty third birthday. The Saturn is the lord
of the block robe judges where block robes Catholic priest I go into this extensively
in my book Priest Craft Beyond Babylon, which I'm sure all of you have
by now, and you probably all went to Amazon or Barnes and Noble and
picked it up, because uh, yeah, you're gonna want to know.
You're gonna want to know the information that's in here, because this all points
towards a lot of well things that we get we would have to accept.
Unfortunately that we don't. I wouldn't want. I don't want this to be
true about you know what We've been brought up on the religions, But the
Abrahamic Jewish deception is a reworking of a Saturn cult where block robes. Rabbis
wear black robes, kids graduating from high school, jesuits wear black robes.
I think I may have already said that part, but maybe he just said
priests when university wear black robe. Black robes are the robes of the planet
Saffron. Saffron was that's a druid facing you right there. Color was black,
God Saffron, and the ancient from the world was referred to as l
e l. This is why if you're continuing today to worship the planet Saturn,
you've become known as an elder. Obviously, this is Jordan Maxwell,
who was a freemason and a big funder of Zachariah Sichen and a total asshole
to Bill Cooper. So we'll just take the information for what it's worth,
but we can throw away the human being. Did you get to be an
elder? You got L elected with L elections because you were ELL elected.
Now you're one of the L elites. You have become l elevated something into
sting. For those of you out there who can't read the screen, it
says the cult of Saturn, and it's showing what looks like a scene from
eyes wide shut. In ancient times, Saturn was revered as a supreme deity.
It apparently ruled the kingdom of Atlantis and was worshiped by various civilizations.
This kind of goes into the whole Poseidon thing, because beside an orse,
it's whatever you want to call them, the raping of Europa, right,
that stealing away into the ocean, the bowl, right that's personified at the
EU, the European Union, because somehow that's a good thing, right,
the raping of Europa. This worship often symbolized authority and time, playing a
crucial role in shaping early religious and cultural practices. In mythology, Saturn is
often synonymous with Cronus, the Greek Titan who feared being overthrown by his offspring.
This led him to consume each child at birth. The god Saturn or
el was represented by a black que and was viewed as a supreme god and
ruler of kings, and that he ruled Atlantis and became the divine ancestor of
all earthly leaders and earthly kings, and other similar news reports like Prince now
King Charles being related to the ruler vladding Paler, whom I actually like,
by the way, and I love his tactics. When you have a bunch
of scumbags who are well means or whomever, who are a bunch of child
raping grumors that raped him when he was captured by them, he put a
few of them on a few sticks, and it scares away the other one
hundred and twenty thousand that we're good about the radiar year of kingdom. Yeah,
hey, if it works, it works, or how The late Queen
Elizabeth I was a direct descendant of the prophet Muhammad. Prince Charles, who
can trace his ancestry but to Romania's dark and distant past. The genealogy shows
that I am descended from vlad Dampalla, So I do you have a bit
of a stake in the country. As it were, It stated that Saturn
always had a negative, if not evil, significance and prominence in ancient times.
It has been called the greater malefic, which was opposed to Jupiter,
the greater benefit esoterically associated with man's limitations. There he is about to castrate
to his father Uranus with the little winged bats sights there restrictions death and decay.
Hence the relation to Chronos a representation of the god Saturn evolving into the
grim reaper with the syphe and image that we are all familiar with today.
Saturn is consequently the celestial body that is the least exposed to the Sun's divine
light. Is associated with the coldness of the principle of evil and the connection
of the one all seeing eye has persisted throughout the ages and even into today
as a form of worship to Saturn. Now, what does the worship of
the planet or the god Saturn have to do with modern day religions. Well,
this belief had apparently originated back thousands of years ago, apparently from a
group called the Cult of L. L was described as the titular head of
the Canaan Knight pantheon, and his most common epithet was the Bull, and
he was also often portrayed as an old man with a long beard. And
in the Old Testament, L is sometimes used as a synonym for Yahweh and
less commonly as the general term for deity. And it sterized that this Cult
of L later on became involved and took roles as the leaders of ancient Egypt,
then ancient Rome, and even continued up until this day. Now,
the main problem I had with researching this topic is the actual amount of information
regarding this cult and its different names it went by throughout the centuries. Same
with the Canaanite god LL. He apparently goes by many names Yahweh, I
Deny, Shaddai, Shabbat, and Sabbat, And I'd just like to say
that you get all those names in a really confused way, and when you
read morals and dogwell, and it's possible that most of the world's religions,
but mainly the Abrahamic religions, are still worshiping this god of ancient Mesopotamia,
which would kind of make sense if you look into the theory of the Ananaki
and the father of the two main gods and canon Lil, you'd see that
I pulled myself away from this part that I know a little bit about this
stuff from what I read to research my book. I think, although interesting,
where they take it is always kind of a strange place that doesn't really
have a whole lot to back it up. Anu was the supreme god,
and most of the Ananaki gods on Earth have their own cities, with their
own priests and temples and peoples who worship them. The only way to make
sense of these claims that most religions across the Earth are secretly worshiping l would
be if these religions all came from a just keep it simple and call it
Saturn and Chronos, because that's where it matters. That's where all the symbolism
comes from. Common point. It's apparently to keep our realities under control and
to keep us praying and giving our energy to this deity. And the way
they've apparently done this is with specific groups of people in their respective areas incorporating
their Babylonian beliefs into the current poperty that was in nineteen thirty three worlds Fair.
Isn't that funny that they did that? They're relations belief systems of the
ear and there's our red heifer areas they inhabit, therefore keeping everyone at war
with each other and our energies keep going to them instead of us using our
energies right to promote peace and prosperous lives. This is apparently supposed to be
a way to keep us humanity enslaved on earth and in this realm now.
According to many beliefs, when we die, our souls are supposed to be
returned to the universe to allow us to go to the next stage. But
apparently this group commonly recognized today as the Cult of Saturn, have set these
belief systems up laws banking our entire society, all for the purpose to give
our energy to Saturn, with it often being related to a symbol or symbols
that we adhere to all the time and throughout our history. Here's how.
The black cube is a mysterious symbol associated with Saturn, found in different cultures.
It represent Saturn's influence over time and mortality. This symbol is deeply rooted
in religious and esoteric traditions. You know, it's a Homeles sky lane there
next to the cube, and it's often linked to the idea of hidden knowledge.
So this cube is the link to the Saturn worship that's hidden within the
Abrahamic religions. And it's theorized that the Saturn occult has been behind every great
empire throughout history, and this black Cube was one of the representations of Saturn
and it's worship throughout history. And there are apparently cubes like this or similar
in relations to Saturn scattered throughout the planet. So let's not forget black Cube
is also that what I talk about my book is the quote unquote law firm
that defended or had as a client Weinstein. Einstein, Right, it's not
the only thing they do. They bump people off. They're all IDF and
u XIDF and Macad and you know Israel intelligence people that make up the Black
Cube. They're a his squad more likely cube on the north pole of Saturn
known as the Hexagon storm, right in the eye of this massive storm.
Now that cannot be a coincidence. How can ancient civilizations have known of the
Black Queue of Saturn. Maybe if the cube was on another planet or hell,
even if the cube or hexagonal shaped object didn't exist at all of Saturn.
Maybe if this were the case, I wouldn't be looking so deeply into
a conspiracy of Saturn worship. Well here's the other thing too. We also
have to accept that NASA is telling us the truth and that these images are
real before we can even say, but a cube on it's on its point.
When you look at it from and a two dim fashion looking down on
it, you're going to see it more of a hexagon shape because it's on
its point, so you're seeing you see what I mean. Yeah, so
that's why it's a hexagonal. But it's still the black cube. But once
again I have to ask, And there's the Kaba or Kaba which you see
in Mecca. This is also something that's in my book detailed in here beast
Craft Beyond Babylon. How would ancient civilizations have known to associate this shape,
the cube or the hexagon with Saturn. This symbol is everywhere. Muslims take
a pilgrimage to the Kaba in Mecca, a building shaped like a black cube,
and they do seven. I believe circumambulations around it, and then they
try to get close to the stone, the Blackstone and Mecca and try to
kiss it. But those those rotations are representative of the rings, some say,
which they run around the outside of it in concentric circles, strangely enough,
representing the rings of Saturn and could even be seen as representing the hexagon
storm on Saturn. But the Kaba a black cue that housed many deedy altars
but belong to the chief god Habu or otherwise known as by All or by
All. It's another connection to the worship of Saturn. Jewish people wear the
leather boxes called tefhlin on their foreheads as and I've discussed this in extent to
the religious observance. Tephln are a reminder of God's intervention during the exodus from
Egypt that never happened, and are worn during weekday morning prayers. They consist
of small black leather boxes with straps containing parchment scrolls inscribed with verses from the
Torah. This practice is based on the biblical commandment to bind God's word as
a sign on your hand. Yeah that's a listen, He's gonna finish this.
But This is what happens when you do literal translations of something that's written
cryptically and then let them serve as a frontlet between your eyes. Found in
Deuteronomy six, verse five through eight, the tefling worn on the head,
known as the schel roche, are placed just above the forehead on the midline
of the head, in accordance with this commandment. So it seems like both
the Muslim and Jewish faith are partaken in Saturn worship. Well, what about
Christians? What could possibly be the representation of Saturn in Christianity. I don't
remember seeing anything in Christian history that resembles the worship of a cube, but
apparently there is, and I've discussed this too. I think it's awesome in
my book. It's the cross. The cross is what is revealed when the
cube has been opened and unfolded. Man, I feel that the god of
the Bible is none other than l set Chronos' father, Time himself, the
Grim Reaper, and many others. Both Satan and Santa are also derived from
Saturn. In fact, Christmas is actually the pagan holiday Satanalia. But according
to some researchers, Saturn symbolism is everywhere throughout society. They claim that it's
damn near inescapable, the lord of the rings of reference to Saturn as well
as the symbolism behind wedding rings. The halo that is often depicted over the
heads of religious figures and art is also a reference to Saturn's rings. There
are several corporate logos paying tribute to Saturn as well, from Nike all the
way to Nissan. All of this is to give our energy towards these symbols
and images, because according to the occult, it doesn't matter what people believe
a symbol is to them personally. What matters is the true meaning of it
its origin. So it doesn't matter if good people with good intentions pour their
energy into these celebrities, companies, or religious symbols. If they view the
cross or the cube as a positive image of their respective god or belief,
their energy and prayers are sent straight to l or the god Saturn. The
cults of Saturn may have deceived this all. This cult's made up of many
famous individuals in Hollywood, politics, sports, music, and religion, is
apparently hoarding aesotoric knowledge for themselves and also practicing black magic. So what I've
gotten from this belief in Saturn, from these occults is that a group of
people that worship the god el who was the God of Saturn. These members
of this society held the keys to power within each of their areas. And
you know what, this also indicates the same thing I've been saying before.
The quote unquote you Israelite whatever are in fact the Canadonites, not those who
conquered it. That's just a re telling of the history so they can sweep
away their past. Some spread to Egypt, Rome and then the Vatican Church
to the Middle East as well. It stated that they're here to keep our
energies and souls trapped here, our negative energies from stress, pandemics, wars,
famine. It's all food or source of energy for these beings or deities
that feed off of us. And that includes l and that every major religion
on Earth, every major corporation logo, and even members of Hollywood uses symbolism
in everything. Every major war, the forced poverty, famine, the suppression
of technology, even these are all things done or planned by these elite members
of the Cult of Saturn or the many secret societies that has taken its roots
in this occult belief of Saturn's last Satan, and the only way to not
be recycled, according to the research, is to reach a personal ascension similar
to the ancient teachings of the Mystery Schools or the Kundumini with all of its
chakra points. I think that might be it. Yeah, okay, cool,
we have like three minutes left. M. That worked out pretty well.
I'm gonna share the screen with you. Did it all right, guys?
So Patreon is getting bigger, Thank you. I'll be putting more stuff
on today. I uh in it. I put a link to that Greek
book if anyone else is interested in learning it. I am interested because I
don't want to take AMA's word for it either. I mean, and that's
I think that would be wise to just learn it, maybe use some he
does, M and you so, I mean, maybe he could use that
as a free way to get through the you know, get through the book
of course, each study type of thing, and they. But I mean
as far as eventually wanting to know what it says yourself would be probably the
most intelligent approach, right. So yeah, there's pre Patreon is patreon dot
com. Disguise d I S G. U I s E. The limits
And also there's Gibson good dot com backslash ball the A A L Busters.
We definitely did that today, didn't we. You guys are the uh the
investigators to the end of the historians, those who are on the trail.
Give yourself a pat in the back for tuning in and giving us crap about
this stuff, because it's some heavy topic stuff and it's not always easy for
us to have to uh, you know, digest because who hell wants to
believe that this is all true? Who the hell wants to even consider it?
Right? And there was a couple other things that Supreme Court allows white
house press social media companies to censor speech. Yeah, blah blah blah.
We know that are there vaccines in our food supply? According to this article,
USDA drug manufacturers aren't required to release any information on veteritary drugs and evidence
is hard to find. So where do you think they're going to put the
crap that they want you to have? And then this one says quiet backroom
deal just approved forty million homes to be seized this month. The Federal Housing
Finance Agent FHFA, the Freddie Mack and Freddie Mack will be offering second leans
on homes. Don't take the bait. It will start small. Blah blah
blah blah blah. The oomans are caps, but if you miss a payment,
they take everything that you own. You will own nothing and be happy.
It's basically where the summary of that is in the quickest form I could
put it in there. You have it, okay, but yeah, help
out the show, get the book. You'll see the description in the video
here, and thank you over on Speak Free Radio. I know you're signing
off now. Enjoy. I believe ju Seppi is coming up next. And
then if you look in here in the description, you get signed copies my
book. The Amazon link is there, the Barnes and Noble, the Cobo,
and then there's the link for a Patreon link for the creatine. I'm
gonna be putting together a oh by the way, I'm putting together a prototype.
Hopefully I can make at least ten h excuse me, pre workout stimulant
free keto. Probably gonna have monk fruit for a sweetener in it, but
it's gonnas gonna be a straight free workout that if you're gonna want stimulant you're
gonna get a grab a sugar free energy drink or something like a Ghost or
something like that like I do, and it's not gonna have a caffeine and
hydros in it. You have to buy it in bulk that I've seen so
far, and I don't I don't know if I actually even want it in
there. Because other people take their own daily regiment of things if they're on
like a federa or fan around, you know, taking energy drinks. You
don't want to have additional stimulants in your pre workout. I might make one
that does have it in there eventually, but people dry scoop, and I
don't want that liability of people doing dumb things to hurt themselves. This won't
be something that you want to drive scoop. You want to put it in
water and mix it or some kind of drink and mix it all right,
And so then there's uh the Peter Glidden. Oh, by the way,
here's here's the biggest announcement. Doctor Peter Glidden is raising his prices July fourth.
If you get in now, you lock it in for life. Okay,
look at this link, leave big farmer behind. Okay, this is
the link to get to the membership. You can lock it in for year
and annually get builled. I think it's like two sixteen and that's the cheapest
way to do it. But it's twenty four dollars a month right now.
After the fourth if you guys are thinking about being a member, it's gonna
go up to forty four dollars. It's gonna get twenty. It's gonna be
twenty dollars more. If you lock in now, you're good for life.
You don't have to worry about it. Okay. The cheapest it's ever been
is what it is right now, and he's changing that. So just know
that so that you don't lose out. Okay, there you go. And
isn't it funny that Square is also another black cube? I just noticed.
I don't like Square, but I have they bought out Weekly, which is
what I used to use. But uh yeah, doctor Peter Glidden's on looks
like a square website because he's got the cube there anyhow, Uh right,
or maybe it's no, maybe it's square space that he's using. I think
square space is what he's using. Anyway, So now you know all this
stuff is in here. There's a creative link. There's all the doctor Manzo
links for his stuff and the Azurewel standard brand stuff. There's the gifts and
go in here at the bottom or towards the bottom, and also the all
the good stuff. Okay, you'll see it in the links in the description.
Appreciate it, Have a wonderful day, see tomorrow. Did you like
the uh? Did you like how I dressed up today? I bet you
the people on radio really cared. Bye? Oh yes, and I'm going
to remind me I'm going to be fastening until the least hopefully hopefully Thursday. Bye.